ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA.

Cr. Misc. Appln. No.S-25 of 2015.

 

 

Date                     Order with signature of judge.

1.For orders on office objection as flag A.

2.For Katcha Peshi.                                  

 

20.03.2015.

Mr.Athar Abbas Solangi, advocate for the applicant. 

Mr. Khadim Hussain Khoonharo, D.P.G a/w ASI Ahmed Ali Odho, I/C SHO P.S Nabi Shah Wagan.

 

Alleged detainee  Mst.Sadori is produced alongwith her father.

 

========

                   Mr.Anwar Ali Shaikh files power on behalf of respondents No.3 to 7 which is taken on record.   Respondents No.1 and 2 have also filed statements  which are taken on record.

 

                   Through  the instant application, the applicant Jani Khan  has prayed for following relief (s):

 

a)            That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue Rule Nisi   through respondent No.01 and 02 for production of the detainees from wrongful confinement of private respondents  before this Court for recording statement of detainee Mst.Sadori.

b)           That this Hon’ble Court in  the light of statement of detainee Mst.Sadori may be pleased to set  at liberty with her minors kids to lead her life with her husband as her wishes and will.

c)    Costs of this application.

d)           Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper.

 

          Notices were issued against the respondents as well as A.A.G and D.P.G. I/C SHO P.S Nabi Shah Wagan has produced  Mst.Sadori D/O Lal Mohammad, baby Hina and baby Mandum aged about 2 and 3 years respectively.

 

          Mst.Sadori   present in court submits  that she  is wife of applicant Jani Khan but applicant Jani Khan  has driven her out from his house by maltreating  therefore, she is not prepared to join applicant Jani Khan.  She states  that  she want to go with her father namely Lal Mohammad who is present in Court.  Mst. Sadori  is major and sui juris.  She is at liberty to go with her father  where she feels secure alongwith her minor children. 

 

          In these circumstances, learned counsel for the applicant  does not press the instant petition  which is accordingly disposed of.

 

                                                                             JUDGE