ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA

C.  P.   No.S-954     of  2013.

DATE OF HEARING

 

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF HON’BLE JUDGE.

07.4.2014.

1. For orders on office objection.

2. For Katcha Peshi.

 

Mr. Fida Hussain Shah, advocate for the petitioner.

 

Mr. Ameer Ahmed Narejo, State Counsel.

 

Mr. Imdad Ali Mashori, advocate for respondents No.7, 8 & 9.

 

                             ------------------

                   Through the instant Constitutional Petition, Petitioner Muhammad Murad has prayed for the following reliefs :-

a)           direct the respondents No.1 to 10 not to harass, humiliate, disgrace, threaten and pressurize the petitioner, his brother Ghulam Mustafa and his family members themselves or through their agents, at the instance of respondents No.7 to 10, with a view to pressurize the petitioner to vacate his house handover the possession of the above property.

 

b)           Further direct the respondents No.1 to 6 not to harass the petitioner and his brother Ghulam Mustafa at the instance of respondents No.7 to 10 and not to entertain any false and frivolous application of the respondents No.7 to 10 and they should not conduct illegal enquiry into the baseless allegations and not to call the petitioner and his brother Ghulam Mustafa in those false applications made by the respondents No.7 to 10.

 

c)            Direct the respondents No.1 to 6 to ensure that the petitioner, his brother Ghulam Mustafa and family members are provided due legal protection against the ill-wishes and illegal activities of respondents No.7 to 10, strictly in accordance with the law.

 

 

                   Notices were issued to the respondents as well as Addl. A. G.  Comments are filed on behalf of respondents No.1, 3, 4 5 & 6.

                   In the comments, it is stated that neither petitioner has been harassed nor he will be harassed in future and he will be provided protection as provided in the law.  Learned advocate for the petitioner is satisfied with the statements, which are available on record, and does not press the instant petition more, which is disposed of accordingly.

 

                                                                                                JUDGE