ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH CIRCUIT COURT LARKANA

Crl. Misc. Application No.S-227 of 2012

DATE	ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

1. For orders on office objection flag ‘A’
2. For Katcha peshi.                                

01.3.2013

Mr. Mubashir Ali Solangi, advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Abdul Rasheed Soomro, State counsel.

                        ----------

            Learned counsel for the applicant contended that  on account of the contradictions in the FIR and statements under section 161, Cr.P.C the learned Magistrate reached to such conclusion in terms of the impugned order dated 02.11.2012. It is a fact that apparently there is contradiction as far as the contents of the FIR and the contents of the statements under section  161, Cr.P.C are concerned.

            The learned State counsel has fully supported the impugned order and submitted that on such score alone the impugned order is neither illegal nor perverse.

            I have enquired from the counsel as to whether there is such contraction as far as contents of FIR and the statements under section 161, Cr.P.C are concerned, he affirmed that although these contradictions are there but the fact of robbery is also there. Be that as it may, basis on which the impugned order was passed seems to be logical and does not suffer from illegality and infirmity. Consequently, application is dismissed.

                                                                                                            Judge