ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA

C.P. No.913  of 2012. 

DATE OF HEARING

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF HON’BLE JUDGE

1. For orders on office objection as Flag ‘A’.

2. For Katcha Peshi.

11.12.2012.

Mr. Abdul Sattar Janvri, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Ameer Ahmed Narejo, State Counsel along with PSI Akhtar Hussain Burdi on behalf of SSP, Larkana, SIP Saifullah on behalf of SSP Hyderabad, SIP Munwar Ali Brohi, In-charge SHO PS Rehmatpur, SIP Hafeezullah Shaikh, In-charge SHO PS Waleed, HC Ghulam Nabi, CIA Hyderabad & PC Aijaz.

                                      -.-.-.-.-.-.-

                   Through this Constitutional Petition, petitioner Niaz Hussain Tunio,  has  prayed for the following relief(s):

a) That this Honourable Court may kindly be pleased to call respondents No.2 to 6 and direct them not to violate fundamental rights and legal privileges of petitioner and his family and further be pleased to direct them not to pressurize the petitioner for divorce to his wife and to avoid from arresting, harassing, pressurizing or confining, recovering any amount from the petitioner, except due course of law.

b) That this Honourable Court may also be pleased to direct the respondents No.5 & 6 not to harass and not to put pressure upon the petitioner for divorce and recovery of any amount from the petitioner illegally and forcibly without due course of law and further be pleased to direct respondents No.2 to 4 not to arrest and involve the petitioner in any false criminal case without prior permission of this Honourable Court.

c) That this Honourable Court may also be pleased to direct the respondents No.1, 7 & 8 to ensure legal protection to petitioner and his family against apprehended life and property loss at the hands of respondents No.2 to 6 named above and undue harassment and disgracement as well as arbitrary arrest.

d) To pass any other order as deemed fit and proper to secure legal privileges of petitioner and his family under the prevailing circumstances according to law.

          Notices were issued to the respondents as well as Addl. A. G. Comments/statements have been filed by respondents No.1 to 4, 7 & 8. Copies supplied to the advocate for the petitioner. In the comments, it is stated that petitioner has never been harassed and official respondents have stated that they are bound to provide legal protection to the petitioner. Learned advocate for the petitioner stated that petitioner was illegally detained for three days by the respondents No.2 to 4. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the proper forum regarding high handedness of the police officials . So far other relief(s) are concerned, learned advocate for the petitioner is satisfied with the statements/comments which are placed on record by the official respondents in which it is stated that no harassment whatsoever shall be caused to the petitioner and legal protection shall be provided to the petitioner. In these circumstances, learned advocate for the petitioner does not press this petition more and it is disposed of accordingly.

Judge