O R D E R     S H E E T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH CIRCUIT COURT LARKANA

C.P. No.S- 330  of 2011

Date	Order with signature of the Judge

1. For orders on office objection flag ‘A’
2. For Katcha Peshi.                                        

25.02.2011.

Mr. Naimatullah Bhurgri, advocate for petitioner alongwith petitioner.

Mr. Amir Ahmed Narejo, State counsel .

                                    ---------

            Pursuant to court notices, the official respondents have filed their statements which are taken on record. It has transpired that there seems matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the proposed accused namely Mumtaz and Khalid Mehmood which might have resulted in the alleged incident as mentioned in the instant petition. The police officials present in Court state that the petitioner may approach them, they will record her statement and if a cognizable offence is made out shall proceed in accordance with law against the proposed accused.

            To this submission, learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied. 

            Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with the direction to approach the concerned SHO who has shall record statement of petitioner and if a cognizable offence is made out shall proceed in accordance with law.

                                                                                                            Judge