ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA

C.P.    No.123  of 2011.                                                                                                                                        

DATE OF HEARING

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE                            OF HON’BLE JUDGE

FOR KATCHA PESHI.

31.1.2011.

Mr. Muhammad Ashique Dhamrah advocate for petitioners.

Mr. Khalid Iqbal Memon advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.4.

                        Respondent No.4 is also present.

Mr. Altaf Hussain Surahiyo, State Counsel along with SIO Gul Munir, SIO PS Rehmatpur, Inspector Toufiq Ahmed Sadhayo, SHO PS Rehmatpur and SIP Ghulam Mustafa Abro, SHO PS Baqapur.

                                                            -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

Through instant petition, the petitioner claimed harassment by respondent No.4 with he connivance of the official respondents. It has been stated in the petition that the respondent No.4 is causing continuous harassment to the daughter of the petitioner and issuing threats and even attempted to kidnap to petitioner No.3, where-after an FIR No.4/2011 was registered at Police Station Rehmatpur. It has been further stated that in spite of FIR, police officials have not arrested respondent No.4 in the instant crime.

                        Notices were directed to be issued to respondents as well as learned Addl. A. G. Pursuant to which respondents No.1 to 3 have filed their statements wherein it has been denied that the official respondents are conniving with the respondent No.4. It has been further intimated that the matter has been resolved between the parties outside the Court and report under section 173, Cr.P.C for disposal of the case under “C” class has been submitted before the concerned Magistrate.

                        From the perusal of the documents attached with compromise between the parties, it appears that same is not signed by the respondent/alleged accused. Under the circumstances, this Court directed the appearance of respondent No.4 in person who has appeared in Court in person along with his counsel Mr. Khalid Iqbal Memon, who states that the respondent No.4 has undertaken not to cause any harassment to the petitioner, whereas the matter has been settled between the parties. The petitioner present in Court though reiterate the compromise. However they have shown their apprehension that since respondent No.4 is influential person, he might repeat the same in future.

                        Keeping in view hereinabove facts and on the assurance of respondent No.4 present in Court in person as well as his counsel, the instant petition is being disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.4 to execute P.R bond in the sum of Rs.200,000/- (Rupees. Two lacs) before the Additional Registrar of this Court for his good conduct and behaviour and not to cause any harassment whatsoever to the petitioner or his family in future.

                        Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

Judge