ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA

C.P.    No.93  of 2011.                                                                                                                                        

DATE OF HEARING

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF HON’BLE JUDGE

FOR KATCHA PESHI.

28.1.2011.

                        Mr. Kashif Noor Khan Pathan advocate for petitioner.

                        Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed Shahani  advocate for respondent No.7.

Mr. Abdul Hamid Bhurgari, Addl. A.G along with PSI Raza Muhammad Sohoo on behalf of DPO Kamber Shahdadkot, PSI Muhammad Hanif on behalf of DPO Larkana, SIP Muhammad Aslam Abro on behalf of SP Investigation, SIP Manthar Ali Umrani, PS Dari and Inspector Aijaz Ali Massan, SHO PS Kamber.

                                                                        -.-.-.-.-.-

                        Pursuant to Court notice, Mr. Irshad Ahmed Shahani advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.7, who is also present in Court. At the very out set learned counsel for respondent No.7 states that the instant petition is misconceived as there is civil transaction between the patrties in respect of the said land. He further states that the respondent has never harassed the petitioner, on the other hand an amount of Rs.50,000/- cash and cheque of Rs.12,00,000/- (Twelve lacs only) is still in the custody of the petitioner for which the respondent will seek his remedy in the proper Court of law. Official respondents have also filed comments wherein the allegation contained in the petition have been specifically denied. It appears that there is dispute between private parties in respect of some transaction over the subject land.

                        Since the respondents have categorically denied the allegations of causing any harassment or interference in the civil transactions between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press instant petition provided that no harassment will be caused and the parties may be left to settle their dispute before the appropriate Court of law.

                        Accordingly, the instant petition in view of hereinabove facts is disposed of . However, parties are at liberty to seek redress of their grievance before the proper Court of law.

Judge