Order Sheet.

 HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIRT COURT HYDERABAD.

C.P.NO.S-70 OF 2010.

Date              Order with signature of Judge

 

31.05.2010.

 

1.       FOR KATCHA PESHI.

2.       FOR HEARING OF MA NO.688 OF 2010.

 

None present for the petitioner nor any intimation is received inspite of the fact that intimation notice was issued to Mr. Fayyaz Ahmed Sammor, counsel for the petitioner.

 

Mr. Muhammad Ali Shaikh, DAG. alongwith I.B. Tunio, Assistant Director FIA.

 

Mr. Mukhtar Ahmed Khanzada, Advocate for A.A.G.

 

Mr. Razia Ali Zaman, Advocate for respondent No.3.

. . . .

 

      It appears that for the last three dates of hearing nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner in this case. The learned DAG as well as counsel for the respondent state that since notices have been issued to the respondents for the purpose of conducting inquiry and no harassment whatsoever is being caused the instant petition otherwise is not maintainable.

      Be that as it may, since nobody is in attendance on behalf of the petitioner, this Court has no option but to conclude that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the instant petition, which is dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith the listed application.

 

                                                        JUDGE

 

S