ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Criminal Bail Application No.1628 of 2013

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE                 ORDER WITH SIGNATURE(S) OF JUDGE(S) 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          For hearing

          --------------

 

05.03.2014

 

            Mr. Muhammad Akhtar Shad, Advocate for Applicant

            Mr. Khadim Hussain Khuharo, D.P.G. along with IO Mohsin of P.S. Gulberg.

          ---------------------------------------------------------

 

          Applicants/accused A amir Shaikh son of Hussain Ahmed Shaikh and Muhammad Umair son of Ansar Ahmed, seek bail after arrest in Crime No.233/2013, registered against the accused on 11.09.2013 at P.S. Bilal Colony, Karachi, under Sections 147, 148, 435, 427 and 34 PPC.

 

          After usual investigation, challan was submitted against the applicants/accused under the above referred Sections in the Anti-Terrorism Court-II, Karachi.

 

          Bail applications were moved on behalf of the applicants/accused, separately, the same were rejected by the learned Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court-II, Karachi, vide order dated 14.12.2013. Thereafter, the applicants/accused approached this Court for seeking the same relief.

 

          Mr. Muhammad Akhtar Shad, learned advocate for the applicants/accused after arguing the bail application at some length stated that he would not press the bail application in case, directions are issued to the trial Court for recording evidence of complainant within a short possible period.

 

          Mr. Khadim Hussain, learned D.P.G. recorded no objection and stated that Investigation Officer says that complainant would be produced before the trial Court for his evidence within one month.

          In the above stated circumstances, bail application is dismissed as not pressed, with direction to the trial Court to record the evidence of complainant within one month and decide the case expeditiously. In case, prosecution failed to produce complainant before the trial Court within one month, the applicants/accused would be at liberty to repeat the bail application before the trial Court, the same shall be decided by the trial Court in accordance with law.

 

                                                                                      JUDGE

 

                                                                   JUDGE

Gulsher/PA