ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR
Cr.B.A.No.763 of 2009
For hearing
ORDER
28.10.2009
Mr.Ubedullah Ghoto Adv: for
applicants.
Mr.Sardar Ali Shah A.P.G.
for the state.
--------
On 03.08.2008 at about
During investigation the present applicants
were arrested on 14.08.2008 but according to learned counsel for the applicants
nothing was recovered from their possession and final report was filed on
29.08.2008, presently the applicants are facing trial in the court of learned
IIIrd Addl.Sessions Judge M.Mathelo. Bail application of the present applicants
was filed before the learned trial court but the same was dismissed vide order
dated 18.8.2009 and this order is impugned in the present bail application
before this court.
Heard arguments of learned counsel for the
applicants and learned A.P.G. for the state. Bail application was opposed by
learned A.P.G. for the state.
Learned counsel for the applicants contended
that though the applicants were allegedly armed with kilashnikoves but
according to the case of prosecution there is no role against them. He further
contended that though both the applicants were arrested during investigation
but neither crime property nor case property was recovered and these two points
have not been controverted by the learned A.P.G. learned counsel for the
applicants state that the applicants are behind the bar since 14.08.2008 and
the case has not been proceeded. He further prayed that in the similar
circumstances bail has been granted by the Honourable Supreme Court as well as
High Court. He relied upon the case of Sher Khan and another vs. The state and
another 1980 SCMR 193, Case of Mumtaz Hussain and 5 others vs. The state 1996
SCMR 1125, Case of Yaroo Vs. The state 2004 SCMR 864. While learned A.P.G. for
the state relied upon the case of Munawar vs. The state 1991 SCMR 1092 in which
that there were no role but bail was dismissed. This order will be presumed as
over ruled by the order of applicant Yaroo vs. The state 2004 SCMR 864, as
earlier bail application was decided by two Honourable Judges while latest
observation this bail application has been decided by the three Honourable
Judges of the Supreme Court.
Accordingly, I allow this bail application. The
applicants shall be released on bail subject to furnish solvent surety in the
sum of Rs.200,000/- (Two lacs)each and
P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.
JUDGE