ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA

1^st Cr. Bail Appln. No.S-395 of 2022

1^st Cr. Bail Appln. No.S-401 of 2022

Date of

Hearing

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

29.09.2022.

1. For orders on office objection.

2. For hearing of Bail Application.

Mr. Akbar Ali S. Bhangwar, advocate for applicant Waris Ali Solangi in Cr. B.A. No.S-395/2022.

Mr. Abdul Rehman A. Bhutto, advocate for applicant Muhammad Zaman Solangi in Cr. B.A. No.S-401/2022

Mr. Ali Anwar Kandhro, Addl. P.G.

---------------------

Applicant Waris Ali Solangi seeks pre-arrest bail in Crime No.101/2022, registered at P.S Kashmore, for offence u/s 337-A(i), 337-F(i), 337-A(ii), 337-F(ii), 427, 452, 506/2, 114, 504, 147, 148, 149, PPC. Previously, applicant applied for the same relief before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kashmore. The same was rejected vide order dated 06.08.2022. In Cr. Bail Appln. No.S-401/2022 applicant Mohammad Zaman Solangi seeks pre-arrest bail in Crime No.99/2022, registered at P.S Kashmore, for offence u/s 337-F(vi), 337-A(i), 337-F(i), 337-L(ii), 504, 114, 147, 148, 149, PPC. Previously, applicant Muhammad Zaman applied for pre-arrest bail before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kashmore. Same was rejected vide order dated 06.08.2022.

Admittedly, these are counter-cases. Yet it is to be determined which party is aggressor. Moreover, alleged offences do not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. In such cases grant of bail is a rule and refusal is an exception, but no exception is attracted in these cases. No objection to the confirmation of interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicants/accused has also recorded by the complainant of each case. In the view of above, interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicants/accused Waris Ali Solangi and Mohammad Zaman Solangi is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions.

In the view of above, both bail applications are accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE