ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

 Cr. Revision Application No.S-15 of 2022

 

Date

               Order with signature of Judge

           

                    

1.    For orders on MA No.619/2022

2.    For orders on office objection at flag `A`

3.    For orders on MA No.620/2022

4.    For hearing of main case

5.    For orders on MA No.621/2022                                                 

 

21-02-2022

                

                  Applicant Shoukat Ali Dahar present in person

                                                   .-.-.-. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

1.                  Granted.

2 to 5.          Heard applicant in person. Perusal of impugned order dated 06.01.2022, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge Daharki, reflects that the learned trial court in paragraph No.11  has observed as under:-           

                     “11.         From the perusal of record it reveals that the complainant Anwar Ali has lodged FIR alleging therein that applicants/accused have caused injuries to them and police paper further shows the injuries on the person of complainant and P.Ws were verified by the medical officer and as per medical certificates the nature of injuries were declared as Ghayr-Jaifah-Munqillah, Ghayr-Jaifah-Badiah. Record further shows after framing of charge examination of chief of the complainant as well as P.W Gulzar Ahmed was recorded and they have also supported the prosecution case and evidence of remaining P.Ws yet to be recorded. Record further shows the applicants/accused filed this application and prayed for their acquittal on the basis of procedural defects during investigation of the case and it will be determined after recording of evidence of investigation officer, whether such procedural defects in investigation will affect the trial or not. Moreover, the learned counsel for the applicants/accused during his course of arguments has pointed out the contradictions in the evidence of complainant and prosecution witness about the date, time of their receipt of their medical certificates and duration of treatment and that will also be considered after recording the evidence of medical officer. Therefore, at this stage I do not find merits in the application, hence same stands dismissed.”

                     No illegality or infirmity has been found in the impugned order which requires any interference by this court, therefore this application is dismissed in limine along with listed applications.

 

                                                                                             JUDGE

 

Suleman Khan/PA