IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR
Constitution
Petition No.D–399 of 2019.
|
DATE
OF HEARING |
ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF
JUDGE. |
1.
For orders on office objection
at flag-A.
2.
For orders on CMA No.1472/2019.
3.
For hearing of main case.
21.11.2019
Mr. Mohammad Qayyum Arain
Advocate for petitioner.
********
The
petitioner Rasool Bux Shambani through instant petition has prayed as under;
a) That
this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.2 to 7 to
maintain the record of village of petitioner in revenue record.
b) That
this Honourable Court may be pleased to cancel the order dated 29.01.2018 and
the respondent No.3 and orders may be directed to maintain the record village
of petitioner as per order dated 14.12.2017.
The petitioner’s case is that he is residing in
village Qadir dad Shambani from U.A. No11 area (08-00) acres) situated in deh
Ibupoa Taluka Rhri district Sukkur. It is further averred that respondent No.3
passed order dated 29.01.2018 that S.Nos. 85/4 (2-27), 85/5 (02-08), 92/5
(01-08), 92/6 (0-14), 125/1 (01-08) and 126/1 (0-15) total area (08-00) acres
situated in deh Ibupota Taluuka Rohri district Sukkur regarding cancellation
was withdrawn all the number overlapping and private respondents wants to oust
the petitioner party.
Heard Counsel for petitioner.
We have considered the arguments
of learned Counsel for petitioner and have perused the record. The main
grievance of the petitioner is to cancel the order passed by respondent No.3
Director of Settlements Survey and Land Record Sindh, Hyderabad. Perusal of
file reflects that petitioner has approached directly before this Court for
redressal of his grievance against the order of respondent No.3 though he has
alternate remedy to approach before proper form first therefore, instant petition
is dismissed being not maintainable. However petitioner is at liberty to approach
before proper forum provided under the law.
J U D G E
J U D G E
Ihsan.