IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

Constitution Petition No.D–399 of 2019.

 

DATE OF

HEARING

 

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE.

                                  

 

1.    For orders on office objection at flag-A.

2.    For orders on CMA No.1472/2019.

3.    For hearing of main case.

 

 

                             

21.11.2019

 

Mr. Mohammad Qayyum Arain Advocate for petitioner.

                                 ********   

           

                   The petitioner Rasool Bux Shambani through instant petition has prayed as under;

 

a)    That this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.2 to 7 to maintain the record of village of petitioner in revenue record.

 

b)   That this Honourable Court may be pleased to cancel the order dated 29.01.2018 and the respondent No.3 and orders may be directed to maintain the record village of petitioner as per order dated 14.12.2017.

 

 

                   The petitioner’s case is that he is residing in village Qadir dad Shambani from U.A. No11 area (08-00) acres) situated in deh Ibupoa Taluka Rhri district Sukkur. It is further averred that respondent No.3 passed order dated 29.01.2018 that S.Nos. 85/4 (2-27), 85/5 (02-08), 92/5 (01-08), 92/6 (0-14), 125/1 (01-08) and 126/1 (0-15) total area (08-00) acres situated in deh Ibupota Taluuka Rohri district Sukkur regarding cancellation was withdrawn all the number overlapping and private respondents wants to oust the petitioner party.

                  

                   Heard Counsel for petitioner.

 

                   We have considered the arguments of learned Counsel for petitioner and have perused the record. The main grievance of the petitioner is to cancel the order passed by respondent No.3 Director of Settlements Survey and Land Record Sindh, Hyderabad. Perusal of file reflects that petitioner has approached directly before this Court for redressal of his grievance against the order of respondent No.3 though he has alternate remedy to approach before proper form first therefore, instant petition is dismissed being not maintainable. However petitioner is at liberty to approach before proper forum provided under the law.

 

 

                                                                                            J U D G E

 

                                                                      J U D G E

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                       

                  

                                                       

 

 

 

 

Ihsan.