IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

Constt: Petition No.D–1486 of 2018.

DATE OF HEARING

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE.

1. For orders on O/objection at flag-A.

2. For hearing of main case.

02.04.2019

Mr. Achar Khan Gabole Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Manzoor Hussain Balouch Advocate for respondent No.6.

Mr. Agha Athar Hussain AAG.

********

The petitioner Talib Hussain Siyal through instant petition has prayed as under;

a) That this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct respondent No.2 to 4 to initiate departmental action against the respondent No.6 and take strict action against him regarding his act of misconduct and misusing of official powers as recommended in inquiry reports conducted by the high rank officials of police department.

b) To direct the respondent No.3 and 4 to suspend the service of respondent No.6 in immediate effect till the completion of departmental inquiry pending against him.

It is, inter alia, contended by learned Counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.6 while serving in Police Department misused his official powers and created nuisance for local people including petitioner. He further contended that the petitioner moved application to respondents No.2 to 4 and an inquiry in this regard was conducted by respondent No.4 against respondent No.6 in which he was found guilty such report was sent to respondent No.3 but he did not pay any heed, hence the petitioner has filed instant petition.

Conversely, learned Counsel for respondent No.6 submitted that petitioner is real nephew of respondent No.6 and they are on disputed terms over property matter, hence the petitioner has filed instant petition just to pressurize respondent No.6. By contending so, he prayed for dismissal of instant petition.

We have considered the arguments of learned Counsel for parties and have perused the record. It is observed that the matter is pending before respondent No.3 which is within his domain and petitioner is at liberty to participate or approach respondent No.3 for redressal of his grievance but he instead of approaching respondent No.3 has filed instant petition before this Court which being not maintainable is dismissed with no order as to costs.

J U D G E

J U D G E

Ihsan.