ORDER   SHEET

IN  THE  HIGH  COURT  OF  SINDH, CIRCUIT  COURT,  LARKANA

Crl.Bail Appln.No.S-569 of 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

DATE                                       ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF HON’BLE JUDGE

_______________________________________________________________________

For hearing of bail application.

28.02.2022

                        Mr. Insaf Ali Mirani, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Ali Anwar Kandhro, Addl.P.G for the State.

                        =  *  = * = * = * = * =

IRSHAD ALI SHAH - J;- It is alleged that the applicant with rest of the culprits, after having formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of their common object, fired and injured PWs Mst.Aneela and Mst.Reema with intention to commit their murder, for that the present case was registered.

2.         The applicant on having been refused post arrest bail by learned             6^th Additional Sessions Judge, Larkana, has sought for the same from this Court by way of instant application u/s.497 Cr.PC.

3.         It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant being innocent has been involved in this case falsely by the police; the FIR of the incident has been lodged with delay of about one day and complainant Noushad Ali and PW Mst.Reema by filing their affidavits have recorded no objection to grant of bail to the applicant. By contending so, he sought for release of the applicant on bail.

4.         Learned Addl.P.G for the State who is assisted by PW Ghulam Ali who happened to be father of the injured, has recorded no objection to release of the applicant on bail.

5.         I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.

6.         The FIR of the incident has been lodged with delay of about one day. The applicant is attributed role of causing fire shot injury to PW Mst.Reema. Complainant Noushad Ali and PW Mst.Reema now by filing their affidavits have recorded no objection to grant of bail to the applicant by contending that they have compounded the offence with the applicant. In these circumstances, the guilt of the applicant is calling for further inquiry.

7.         In view of above, the applicant is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum Rs.50,000/- and PR bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

8.         The instant criminal bail application is disposed of accordingly.

                                                                             JUDGE