ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

Cr. Bail Application No.S-407 of 2021

 

Date

               Order with signature of Judge

           

 

Applicants:                                 Farhat Ali and another, through

                                                  Mr. Sikandar Ali Junejo, Advocate

 

 

Complainant:                             Nemo

 

State:                                         Through Syed Sardar Ali Shah Rizvi,

                                                   DPG

 

Date of hearing:                         01.10.2021

Dated of order:                           01.10.2021

                                                 

O R D E R

 

Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, J:  Through captioned bail application, Applicants/accused Farhat Ali s/o Phullan Khan and Mushtaque Ali son of Rehmat Ali Samejo, are seeking pre-arrest bail in FIR No.17/2021, registered at Police Station Raza Goth, District Sukkur under sections 489-F, 420, 506/2, 504 and 34 PPC. Their earlier   pre-arrest bail plea was declined by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pano Aqil, vide order dated 25.06.2021. Hench they approached this court for the same relief by filing present bail application.

2.              Learned counsel for the applicants has contended that the bail application was dismissed  by the Additional Sessions Judge Pano Aqil only on the ground that the applicants have not joined the investigation/trial though was directed at the time of interim           pre-arrest bail. He next contended that the applicants had approached the I.O but his statement was not recorded by him. He prayed for confirmation of interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicants.

 3.             Learned DPG has opposed the confirmation of bail and has contended that applicants have misused the concession of pre-arrest bail granted by the trial court as they were directed to join investigation but they failed to do so which comes in the definition of misusing of concession of interim pre-arrest bail, therefore they are not entitled for concession of pre-arrest bail.

4.              I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant, Learned DPG and perused the material available on record with their able assistance.

5.              Perusal of order dated 25.06.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge Pano Aqil reflects that interim pre-arrest bail was granted on 17.06.2021 and applicants were directed to join investigation/trial, however no proof in respect of joining of investigation/trial has been produced by applicants before the trial court or before this court though chance was given to them to submit any proof in respect of joining of investigation/trial and learned counsel submits that he has no such proof that the applicants have joined the investigation/trial, which reflects that applicants deliberately did not want to join the investigation and misused the extra ordinary relief of interim pre-arrest bail. In the similar circumstances the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of  Deedar Ali v. The State (SBLR 2010 SC 464) has also refused to grant concession of pre-arrest bail.

6.              In these circumstances, I am of the view that the applicants have misused the concession of extra-ordinary relief of pre-arrest bail and are not entitled for the confirmation of interim pre-arrest bail. Resultantly, this application is dismissed and the interim pre-arrest bail granted to them vide order dated 30.06.2021, is hereby recalled.

7.              Observations made herein above are tentative in nature and will not cause any prejudice to either party at the trial.

 

                                                                                 JUDGE

 

Suleman Khan/PA