ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH
AT SUKKUR
C. P. No. D – 245 of 2017
along
with C. Ps. No. D – 1019 of 2017, 162 and 351 of
2018
|
Date
of hearing |
Order with signature
of Judge |
11.10.2018
Mr. Shafique Ahmed Khan, Advocate for
petitioner in CPD-1019/2017.
Petitioner Hussain
Ahmed, present in person in CPD-162/2018.
Petitioner Ahmed
Ali, present in person in CPD-351/2018.
Mr. Liaquat Ali Shar, Additional Advocate
General Sindh.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
These are petitions filed by the
sons of the deceased employees in District Judiciary. They seek their
appointment in terms of the policy in vogue. It has been observed that only
from Grade-1 to 5, such posts could be filled on the basis of the policy, as framed
as 20% quota is fixed for children of the employees having been further
categorized in four (04) categories which are as under:
a)
First preference be given to
children of those employees of the High Court who expired during service.
b)
Second preference would be given
to children of those employees who expired after retirement.
c)
Third
preference to be given to children of retired employees.
d)
Last preference would be given to
children of serving employees.
All these petitioners, however,
claim that father of each of them was the employee of the District Judiciary,
died during service. Without ascertaining as to whether they died during
service or otherwise, we dispose of these petitions that their applications be
considered in the light of the recommendations and policy of the Hon’ble Chief
Justice in relation to Grade-1 to 5 on the basis of the restricted quota for
the employees of District Judiciary.
Accordingly, the District &
Sessions Judges may consider their applications in the light of the above recommendations
and policy in the next recruitment.
All the petitions stand disposed
of
in the above terms along with pending applications, if any. The compliance
reports be filed in three (03) months.
J U D G E
J U D G E
Abdul Basit