ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH
AT SUKKUR
C. P. No. D – 642 of 2017
along
with C. Ps. No. D – 677, 1951 of 2017 and 748 of
2018
|
Date
of hearing |
Order with signature
of Judge |
10.10.2018
M/s Shabbir Ali Bozdar and Achar Khan Gabol, Advocates for
the petitioners.
Mr. Ahmed Ali Shahani, Assisant Advocate
General Sindh.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioners are aggrieved for not
deciding their applications regarding their appointment under deceased quota,
which are claimed to have been pending since long and are not being decided for
one reason or the other. Petitioners’ counsel submission is that such
applications are to be decided in view of the policy in vogue and in terms of
the latest amendment in Rules 10-A and 11-A of the Sindh Civil Servants
(Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974.
Learned AAG,
conceding the consideration of the petitioners’ applications who claim to be
the children of the deceased employees, submits that each and every application
has its own merit and to be dealt with in accordance with law and shall be
considered in the light of latest pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the case of Province of Sindh v. Waheed Ali and others in C. Ps. Nos. 482-503-K of 2016. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed
of with direction that the petitioners’ applications for their appointment under
deceased quota be considered as conceded by learned AAG,
and an speaking order shall be passed within three
(03) months.
All the petitions stand disposed
of
in the above terms along with pending applications, if any.
J U D G E
J U D G E
Abdul Basit