ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH
AT SUKKUR
C. P. No. D – 2733 of 2016
along
with C. P. Nos. D – 3682,
4504, 4663 of 2016, 2206, 2207 of 2017, 146, 229 of
2018.
|
Date
of hearing |
Order with signature
of Judge |
12.09.2018
M/s Achar Khan Gabol and Saeed Jamal
Lund,
Advocates for the petitioners.
Mr. Liaquat Ali Shar, Additional
Advocate General Sindh.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
This bunch of petitions involves the
applications of the petitioners to be appointed on deceased quota. Their
applications claimed to have been pending but are not being decided for one
reason or the other. It is claimed by learned counsel for the petitioners that
there is a policy to be followed and in terms of the latest amendment in Rules
10-A and 11-A, such applications are to be decided.
Learned Additional Advocate General
Sindh has conceded insofar as the consideration of the applications is
concerned, however, he submits that each and every application has its own
merit and to be dealt with in accordance with law. He concedes that all the
applications of the petitioners who claim to be the children of the deceased
employees shall be considered in the light of latest pronouncement of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in C. Ps. Nos. 482-503-K of 2016.
Accordingly, these petitions are disposed
of with the direction that their applications for appointment be considered
in terms of the rules and regulations and the principle as laid down in the
aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. It is expected that all such
applications be considered and disposed them of with the speaking order within
three (03) months.
All the petitions stand disposed
of
in the above terms along with pending applications, if any.
J U D G E
J U D G E
Abdul Basit