ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

C. P. No. D – 748 of 2017

along with C. P. Nos. D – 2272, 2413, 2624, 2625, 2709, 2760, 3178, 3626, 3824, 3895, 4042, 4484, 4488, 4529, 4671, 4697, 4735, 4825, 4921, 5050, 5070, 5199, 5200, 5243 of 2016,

39, 148, 158, 352, 451, 598, 670, 700, 704, 708, 797, 825, 965, 979, 1007, 1067, 1075, 1079, 1123, 1137, 1168, 1171, 1180, 1346, 1504, 1635, 1636, 1643, 1675, 1676, 1725, 1805, 1826, 1896, 1941, 1982, 1983, 2041, 2101, 2156, 2364, 2432 of 2017,

200, 221, 224, 340, 479, 658, 1054, 1055, 1062, 1121 of 2018

Date of hearing

Order with signature of Judge

11.09.2018

M/s Hadi Bux Bhatt, Sohail Ahmed Khoso, Achar Khan Gabol, Mansoor Hussain Maitlo, Muhammad Ali Ansari, Muhammad Asim Malik, Ghulam Nabi Chadhar, Abdul Naeem Pirzada, Shabbir Ali Bozdar, Ali Gul Abbasi, Fayyaz Ahmed Soomro, Abdul Waheed Bhanbhro, Muhammad Azam Abro, Riaz Ali Shaikh, Gul Mir Jatoi, Arif Raza Khoso and Badaruddin Memon.

Mr. Liaquat Ali Shar, Additional Advocate General Sindh along with Abdul Majid Bullo, District Education Officer (Primary) Sukkur, Lal Muhammad Tunio, Deputy District Education Officer (Primary) Sukkur and Manthar Ali, Head Master Government Primary School Bagh-e-Hayat Ali Shah Sukkur.

.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

This bunch of petitions pertains to employment under deceased quota. In some of the cases, the counsel have raised grievances that the department is not identifying the applications, and in fact, showing their ignorance as far as the availability of the applications are concerned. In view of such facts and grievances, learned AAG Sindh has conceded that in terms of the latest pronouncement, those petitioners whose applications are not available or they have not preferred, they are entitled to move fresh applications, which shall be considered in terms of the law, policy in vogue and the latest pronouncement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in C. Ps. Nos. 482-503-K of 2016. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of that the cases of the petitioners in the light of the pending applications or in case they so desire, on the basis of fresh applications, be considered within a period of three (03) months, as there are approximately more than seventy (70) cases, which are being disposed of by this order. It is, however, expected that the official respondents shall submit their compliance report periodically before this Court in the relevant petitions.

All petitions stand disposed of along with pending applications, if any.

J U D G E

Abdul Basit