ORDER
SHEET
IN THE
HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR
C.P. No. S – 1037 of 2011
Date of hearing |
Order with signature
of Judge |
For
regular hearing of main case
03.09.2018
Mr.
Iftikhar Ali Arain advocate for petitioners.
Mr.
Noor Hassan Malik Assistant Advocate General Sindh.
.................
This
petition impugns an order passed on an application under section 12(2) CPC.
Brief facts are that an ex parte judgment and decree
was obtained by the respondents excluding the petitioner / applicant. It is
claimed by the petitioner / applicant that this property was enjoyed by two
real brothers and after their sad demise the property should have been devolved
amongst legal heirs of two brothers i.e. Mst. Pathani and Mst. Husna. It is claimed that Mst. Pathani filed a suit against a stranger and obtained an ex parte decree collusively. On acquiring knowledge, the
petitioner filed application under Section 12(2) CPC that the decree was void
ab initio and that no limitation would run against the void judgment and
decree. No title documents claimed to have been filed at the time of obtaining
decree that concerns title of property. This Court vide order dated 18.09.2012
admitted this petition for regular hearing. In terms of para 16 of the order
that an appropriate case should have been remanded after converting it into a
revision application to a District and Sessions Judge after condoning the
delay.
I have
gone through the facts of the case. Despite service by way of publication no
one has appeared on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner / applicant has
been ousted summarily in terms of an order passed on 12(2) CPC and that he was
remedy-less. Though no appeal would lie against an order dismissing the
application under Section 12(2) CPC, a revision would always be competent. I,
therefore, convert this Constitution Petition into a civil revision application
and send the record to District & Sessions Judge concerned to hear this
Revision Application in the light of the facts disclosed in the order dated 18.09.2012
and record of Suit No.09/2006 expeditiously. As an indulgence, notices may be
issued once the transferee Court receives the record and proceedings of this
Constitution Petition as being converted into a Revision Application. The
Revision Application be decided in accordance with law preferably within two
months with compliance report to this Court.
__________________
J U D G E
N.M.