ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

Const. Petition No.D-4675 of 2016

Date

               Order with signature of Judge

           

                           1.   For hearing of CMA No.14202/2016

                           2.   For hearing of CMA No.13233/2016

                           3.   For hearing of main case

17-04-2018

                      Mr. Mehboob Ali Sahito, Advocate for petitioners

                           Mr. Mehboob Ali Wasan, Assistant  Advocate General        

                           12-09-2014

                                                 .-.-.-. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

 

               The learned counsel for the petitioners has made his submissions at length. His main contention is that petitioners are entitled to get the requisite appointment letters for the post of Police Constable in the Police Department. On the other hand learned AAG has invited our attention to the parawise comments of respondents No.2 and 4. As per these comments the minimum criteria fixed for qualification of test was to secure 40 marks. As per these parawise comments 12 petitioners out of 31 since secured requisite marks therefore appointment letters were issued to them. The names of 12 petitioners are also mentioned in the parawise comments.

               Though the learned counsel disputes the above contentions of respondents by further arguing that the remaining petitioners have also secured reasonable marks and that is the reason they were called for interview and went under medical examination.

               We are not impressed by the submissions of learned counsel representing the petitioners as parawise comments are quite comprehensive and specific, besides the written test was taken by Institute of Business Administration (IBA), which is a very credible institution. More so 12 petitioners have already been appointed against the vacancies of Police Constables and no plausible reason is there in the defence of other petitioners, that they were discriminated against. Consequently this petition, in this view of the latter development has no merit and is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. However it is clarified that those petitioners who are at present unsuccessful and could not get appointment letters may apply afresh in accordance with prevalent rules and regulations, as and when new vacancies are announced.              

                                                                                                JUDGE

                                                                                    JUDGE

Suleman Khan/PA