ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 356 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

-.-.-.-.

None present. Through instant petition relief is sought for police protection against the purported harassment arisen out of business transaction as also acknowledged in para No.6 of the petition. Adequate and efficacious remedy is available under the Statute, which may be invoked by the petitioner. Instant petition with such disputed facts is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1557 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Syed Sardar Ali Shah Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Shehriyar Imdad Awan Assistant A.G a/w SIP Imtiaz Ali of P.S. ‘A’ Section Sukkur.

-.-.-.-.

Through this petition, petitioner is seeking relief that respondents should not victimize the petitioner and his family members on any ground including the political. He has pointed out that the petitioner’s son Abdul Salam did approach the Justice of Peace by instituting Cr. Misc. Application No. 14/2007 and recently in year 2016 petitioner filed Cr.Misc. Application No. 390 of 2016. Both proceedings were disposed of by orders which are already on record.

As per learned Assistant A.G, F.I.R No. 15/2016 under section 9-C CNS Act,1997 was lodged by Police Station ‘A’ Section Sukkur. Per learned A.A.G the male members of petitioner’s family are involved in criminal activities. In rebuttal learned counsel for petitioner has referred to the judgment available at page 19 in which son of the petitioner was acquitted.

Arguments heard. Record perused. At present no criminal case is pending against the petitioner or his family members. Facts of this case are quite peculiar, interalia, as the petitioner on different occasions have approached the Courts for protection of life and civil liberties. This petition is disposed of with direction that no victimization of the petitioner should be done by the respondents on any ground whatsoever. Moreso if the petitioner feels aggrieve, she may complain to D.I.G Police Range Sukkur about the police officials. The complaint, if filed, will be thoroughly probed by the D.I.G.P who should pass speaking order thereon. However, it is clarified that police officials are not restrained from taking any action but strictly within the parameters of law against any one including the petitioner or her sons, if the circumstances for such an action are there. Copy of this order be communicated to learned Assistant Advocate General and D.I.G, Sukkur Range for compliance.

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1417 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Kamran Hyder Advocate holds brief for Mr. Ghulam Asghar Abbassi Advocate for petitioners.

Mr. Shehriyar Imdad Awan Assistant A.G a/w Ziadullah Leghari Divisional Forest Officer Khairpur/Respondent No.1 and Altaf Hussain Mahesar Forester and ASI Kifayatullah of P.S. Tando Masti Khan.

-.-.-.-.

Comprehensive parawise comments has been filed by Ziadullah Leghari Divisional Forest Officer Khairpur wherefrom it appears that forest department has taken action against the petitioners for purportedly encroaching uponthe forest land. Copy of the criminal case No. 281/2009 is also appended with their parawise comments in which present petitioner has been mentioned as accused and as per learned A.A.G these petitioners have been convicted in trial pertaining to F.I.R No. 96/2009 of Police Station Tando Masti Khan. All these facts have not been mentioned in present petition which shows that the present petition has been filed by concealing the material facts which further shows that petitioners have come to the Court with unclean hands, therefore petitioners disentitle themselves from any relief. Consequently this petition is dismissed with cost of Rs.10,000/- which should be paid by the petitioners within one week in the account of dispensary funds of this Court and receipt of which shall be deposited by the petitioners with the Accountant of this Court.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

R.A No. S- 57 of 2000

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

1. For orders on CMA 983/2017

2. For orders on CMA 664/2017

3. For orders on CMA 720/2016

4. For orders on CMA 489/2011

5. For orders on CMA 04/2013

6. For orders on CMA 375/2010

7. For orders on CMA 33/2010

8. For regular hearing.

15-12-2017.

Mr. David Lawrence Advocate for respondents.

-.-.-.-.

1,2 and 3. Notice subject to maintainability of these CMAs.

4,5 to 7. Deferred. On next date of hearing all pending applications will be listed for hearing which shall be heard along with main case. Today matter is adjourned with note of caution that if on next date of hearing learned counsel for the applicants fails to appear and proceed with the matter this matter shall be heard and decided in accordance with law.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

Civil Appeal No. S- 37 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

9. For orders on office objection at Flag ‘A’.

10. For orders on CMA 1176/2017 (U/A)

11. For katcha Peshi.

12. For orders on CMA 1177/2017 (Stay)

15-12-2017.

Mr. Safdar Ali Jogi Advocate for appellant

-.-.-.-.

Counsel for the appellant undertakes to comply with office objection within three days from today. In the meantime his urgent application is taken up today as the money decree is in the field against the said appellant. Accordingly, urgent application is allowed. Office is directed to fix this matter on 22.12.2017.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

Civil Appeal No. S- 37 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

13. For orders on office objection at Flag ‘A’.

14. For orders on CMA 1176/2017 (U/A)

15. For katcha Peshi.

16. For orders on CMA 1177/2017 (Stay)

15-12-2017.

Mr. Safdar Ali Jogi Advocate for appellant

-.-.-.-.

Counsel for the appellant undertakes to comply with office objection within three days from today. In the meantime his urgent application is taken up today as the money decree is in the field against the said appellant. Accordingly, urgent application is allowed. Office is directed to fix this matter on 22.12.2017.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 3978 of 2016

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Petitioner No.2 Ahmed Khan is present.

-.-.-.-.

Inquiry Report has been furnished by learned Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate Nara and a copy will be obtained by petitioner No.2 Ahmed Khan who is present today in Court.

Adjournedto 15.01.2018.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 2283 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Ferozeuddin Shaikh Advocate for petitioner.

-.-.-.-.

Office has not filed the report of service on respondents. Learned counsel for petitioner states that respondents will attempt to execute the Judgment and Decree against the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel is directed to file execution application under his statement whereafter his stay application will be considered if the respondents side fails to appear in the matter.

To come upon 22.12.2017 .

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 2379 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Sundar Khan Chachar Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Shehriyrar Imdad Awan A.A.G

-.-.-.-.

Private respondents are present in person along with Mr. Pervez Ahmed Junejo Advocate and have stated that no harassment is caused to petitioner though this is disputed by petitioner counsel but from pleadings as well as from arguments it appears that matter is purely of civil nature. It would not be decided in instant proceedings which is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable hence office objections are sustained howeverpetitioner is at liberty to seek his remedy before the appropriate forum including the complaint to senior police officer which will be decided accordingly.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 2329 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Farooque Ali Jatoi Advocate for petitioner.

-.-.-.-.

Office is directed to file report of service on respondents. Amended tile filed by learned counsel for petitioner is also taken on record.

Adjourned to 15.01.2018. If the private respondent No.1 remains unserved then office will effect service by all modes except publication.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 2028 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Asadullah Khand Advocate for petitioner.

-.-.-.-.

Petitioner’s counsel when put on notice to address office objection he states that he will seek remedy before the appropriate forum. Accordingly office objection is sustained, present petition is dismissed leaving the petitioner at liberty to approach appropriate forum including the police officials to whom he may approach for redreesal of his complaint.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1844 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Riaz Ali Shaikh Advocate for respondents.

Mr. Shehriyar Imdad Awan Assistant A.G

-.-.-.-.

No one is present on behalf of petitioner. On last date of hearing petitioner’s counsel was put on notice to argue the maintainability of this petition in view of the office objection. Since the petitioner or his counsel are not in attendance to argue the maintainability hence in view of the last order, the office objection is sustained and present petition is dismissed being meritless with no order as to costs.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1598 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Shabbir Ali Bozdar Advocate for respondents.

Mr. Shehriyar Imdad Awan Assistant A.G

-.-.-.-.

From bare perusal of the petition it appears that primarily dispute relates to distribution of agricultural land amongst the petitionerand other legal heirs but respondent No.6 allegedly, fraudulently mutated the land in his name.

Ex facie, the dispute is of civil nature and adequate remedies are provided under different statutes viz. Land Revenue Act as well as C.P.C. In view of the matter, this petition being frivolous and meritless is dismissed with cost of Rs. 10,000/- which should be paid by the petitioner within one week in the account of dispensary funds of this Court and receipt of which shall be deposited with the Accountant of this Court.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1564 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Shehriyar Imdad Awan Assistant A.G a/w SIP Mouledino of P.S. Site Area Sukkur.

-.-.-.-.

None present for the petitioner. Today police officials /S.H.O of Police Station Site Area Sukkur has submitted statement in which he has stated that the door of Darbar/Mandir was unlocked for worshippers as per order passed on 12.10.2017 in C.P No.D- 785/2017.

Today no one is in attendance on behalf of the petitioner to apprise the Court of latest position. There is no reason to not believe the statement of police officials, but regretfully it is duty of the petitioner and his counsel to be present in Court for assistance. Taking the lenient view this petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1506 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Shehriyar Imdad Awan Assistant Advocate General.

-.-.-.-.

Petitioner present in person and states that on account of contractual dispute with Asif Ali (respondent No.9), the police officials are causing harassment to petitioner. Police officials have denied the allegations while undertaking that they are discharging their duties in accordance with law. If the petitioner is still aggrieves he is at liberty to approach appropriate forum in accordance with law but the present petition with such disputed facts is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1414 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Shehriyar Imdad Awan Assistant Advocate General.

-.-.-.-.

None present for the petitioner. Parawise comments have been filed by different police officials wherein allegations of petitioner have been deniedwith an undertaking that police officials will act accordingly if petitioner approach them.

The petition is devoid of any merit being not maintainable leaving the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1360 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Ali Akber Shar Advocate for petitioners.

Mr. Shehriyrar Imdad Awan Asst.A.G.

-.-.-.-.

Petitioner No.2 Zulifqar Ali is present. Petitioner’s counsel does not press this petition but seeks protection of police officials.

Today HC Arbab Ali Sargani of P.S. Bhirya city is present and states that if the petitioners approach police station, such complaint will be dealt with in accordance with law.

Petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1346 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Shehriyrar Imdad Awan Asst.A.G.

-.-.-.-.

Mr. Athar Hussain Abro Advocate holds brief for Mr. Imdad Ali Malik Advocate for petitioner.

On the other hand learned Assistant A.G states that primarily the dispute pertains to mutual obligation between customer and a bank about ATM machine, as petitioner allegedly claimed that he has suffered certain monetary loss on account of faulty ATM machine. Such dispute relates to the concerned bank and the petitioner is the customer of Allied Bank Limited.

Since the petitioner’s counsel is not present, therefore, taking lenient view this petition is dismissed being meritless, otherwise such frivolous petition should have been dismissed with exemplary cost.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1140 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Athar Hussain Abro for petitioner.

Mr. Shehriyrar Imdad Awan Asst.A.G.

-.-.-.-.

This petition is not pressed by learned counsel with statement that he will seek his remedy at the appropriate forum. Statement filed by the police officials reveals that no illegal gratification was demanded by police from petitioner.

In view of the above, petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 1082 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Raham Ali Jatoi Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Shehriyrar Imdad Awan Asst.A.G.

-.-.-.-.

Petitioner’s counsel confronted with the parawise comments of police officials has stated that he will seek his remedy at the proper forum. It also appears that a Cr.Misc. Application No.1013/2017 was also filed against the police officials.

In view of the above, instant petition being not maintainable is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to seek his remedy at appropriate forum if he still aggrieves after the statement of police officials in which they have categorically stated that they have not caused any harassment to the petitioner.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 826 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

Mr. Ferozeuddin Shaikh Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Zulifqar Ali Naich Asst.A.G.

-.-.-.-.

Today ASI Jalaluddin of Police Station Mirwah is present and states that if the petitioner approaches at Mirwah Police Station, his complaint will be dealt with accordingly. If the petitioner is still feels aggrieved he is at liberty to approach the appropriate jurisdiction in accordance with law.

Instant petition is disposed of.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.

ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____

C.P No. S- 356 of 2017

________________________________________________________________

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

15-12-2017.

-.-.-.-.

None present. Through instant petition relief is sought for police protection against the purported harassment arisen out of business transaction as also acknowledged in para No.6 of the petition. Adequate and efficacious remedy is available under the Statute, which may be invoked by the petitioner. Instant petition with such disputed facts is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed.

JUDGE

Irfan/PA.