ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI
 
Crl. Bail Application No.319 of 2012

----------------------------------------------------

Date              Order with signature of Judge

----------------------------------------------------

 

 

For hearing

 

 

Date of hearing 14.05.2012

 

Mr. Syed Shahid Mushtaq Advocate for the Applicant.

 

Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Awan learned AAG.

 

-------@@@@-------

 

 

Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi J;     By this order I would decide the bail application filed by the Applicant Barkat Ali.

 

       Brief facts of the case as incorporated in the FIR are that the present Applicant committed the murder of son of the complainant in the Bara of co-accused Imam Bux. 

 

Learned Counsel for the Applicant contended that the Applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case of due to enmity. Neither specific overt role has been attributed to the Applicant nor the Applicant has been nominated in the FIR. There is inordinate delay of 41 hour in registration of the FIR. According to the learned Counsel for the Applicant possibility of manipulation and deliberation cannot be ruled out as the present Applicant has been implicated subsequently due to personal enmity of the complainant with the Applicant. It is urged by the learned Counsel that Khadim Hussain the brother of deceased left the deceased in serious condition when he was unconscious in the hands of the Applicant, who informed his father/complainant, who is also father of the deceased. According to learned Counsel matter is fixed for prosecution evidence since December, 2011 but the prosecution has failed to produce any single witness before the Trial Court. He further submitted that according to the prosecution crime was committed with 30 bore pistol as shells of 30 bore pistol were recovered from the place of incident whereas recovery of 32 bore pistol has been shown from the Applicant/accused, which creates doubt. He further contended that alleged recoveries of SIMs of mobile phones belong to absconding accused Illahi Bux. He has relied upon PLD 2005 Karachi 621, 2008 SCMR 6, PLD 2004 Karachi 8, 2005 P.Cr.L.J. 1135 and NLR 2011 AC 39.

 

On the other hand learned APG Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Awan has vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the Applicant and submitted that Applicant is fully involved in commission of murder of the deceased, his name is mentioned in the FIR with specific role. Applicant/accused was lastly seen with the deceased, deceased had pointed out in injured condition towards the Applicant and call his name also.

 

I have heard Mr. Syed Shahid Mushtaq Advocate for the Applicant, Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Awan Learned APG and perused the relevant material available on record with their assistance.

 

On tentative assessment of the material available on record, it is admitted position that the Applicant has been nominated in the FIR with specific role. Deceased in injured in presence of the Complainant and Khadim Hussain father and brother of the deceased had pointed his hand towards Barkat Ali the present Applicant and call his name, then became unconscious. After funeral of his son the complainant lodged the FIR therefore, delay in registration of the FIR was fully explained. Pistol of 32 boare was recovered from the possession of the Applicnat/accused, the same was sent to Ballistic Experts for test and according to opinion/report of Fire Arms Examiner, Forensic Division, Sindh, Karachi the presence of gun powder residue in the barrel of the above mentioned 32 bore Revolver No.36090 in question, it revealed that fire has been made through it.

 

Prosecution witnesses in their 161 Cr.P.C. statements have fully implicated the Applicant. Material available on record prima facie connects the Applicant in the commission of offence. Learned Counsel for the Applicant has failed to make out the case of grant of bail and case law cited by the learned Counsel for the Applicant in my humble opinion are distinguishable from the facts and circumstances of the present case.

 

For the reasons discussed above, the instant Bail Application was dismissed with the direction to the Trial Court to conclude the trial within a period of three months and at-least examine the complainant and PW Khadim Hussain within one month from the date of order. Thereafter, the Applicant can move fresh Bail Application, if so desire.  

 

Observations made hereinabove are of tentative nature and the trial Court shall not be influenced by any such observation.

 

           

                                                                                                J U D G E