C.P.No.S-3306 of 2015

For Katcha Peshi

28.09.2015

Haji Abdullah Memon Advocate along with petitioner.

Mr. Noor Hassan Malik, Assistant Advocate General.

...............

Respondent No.2 SHO, PS, Jhangro has filed statement which is taken on record.

Pursuant to Court notice respondents Nos.3 and 4 shown appearance along with Mr. Muhammad Asim Malik Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on their behalf. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no harassment has been caused by the respondents to the petitioner, whereas, in fact the respondents Nos.3 and 4 given their land for construction of masjid and madersa to the petitioner from S.No.16 deh Mari, taluka Rohri District Sukkur, however, according to learned counsel for the respondents, the petitioner is trying to occupy further surrounding area which belongs to the respondents Nos.3 and 4. Such contention of learned counsel for the respondents is opposed by learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner has filed relevant title document of the masjid and madersa, whereas, the respondents have no claim whatsoever over such madersa. It is further stated that if respondents have any claim, they may seek their remedy by filing appropriate proceedings instead of causing harassment to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no harassment whatsoever shall be caused to the petitioner, whereas, remedy, if any, shall be availed by filing appropriate proceedings before competent Court of jurisdiction.

In view of such undertaking given by the respondents Nos.3 and 4 instant petition is disposed of.

JUDGE

N.M.