ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKUR.

 

Constt: Petition No.D-         3122   of 2013

 

 

DATE                                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF HON’BLE JUDGE

 

 

FOR KATCHA PESHI

 

19th. August, 2015.

 

 

Mr. Muhammad Aslam Gadani, Advocate along with petitioner.

 

                        Mr. Shahryar Imdad Awan, Asstt: A.G.

 

                        Through instant petition, the petitioner has impugned the decision of District Recruitment Committee, (Education) Department, Sukkur dated 08.6.2011 available at Page No.39 at Annexure ‘E-1’ whereby the name of the petitioner namely Fateh Muhammad Jatoi has not been considered for appointment to the post of PST in UC-38 on the ground that all his testimonials including CNIC, PRC and Domicile pertain to UC-13.

 

                        Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is resident of UC-38 whereas he was shifted in UC-13 for a short period on temporary basis on account of threats to his life. He further stated that he has produced the Residence Certificate of UC-38 as well as CNIC of his mother and brother pertaining to UC-38 which has not been taken into consideration by the District Recruitment Committee. It is further stated that under similar circumstances one Imran Ali S/o Shahdad Mangi has been given appointment on the basis of CNIC of his mother and brother.

 

                        Conversely, learned Asstt: A.G submits that earlier a petition was filed by the petitioner bearing C.P.No.D- 2452 of 2011 which was disposed of vide order dated 05.12.2012 with direction to the respondents to submit compliance report within 45 days, whereafter vide order dated 22.1.2013 the compliance report was submitted by the respondent was taken on record and thereafter this petition has been filed. Expressing the similar grievance, it is stated by the learned Asstt: A.G that since the petitioner could not produce relevant document showing that he was resident of UC-38, therefore, the request of the petitioner has rightly been declined by the respondents.

 

                        We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. It appears that the order passed by this Court in earlier round of proceedings in C.P.No.S- 2452 of 2011 filed by the petitioner has duly been complied-with and such report has been furnished wherein it has been stated that all the documents produced by the petitioner including his CNIC, PRC and Domicile  pertain to UC-13 and not UC-38. Accordingly, we do not find any merit in the contentions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeking appointment on the post of Primary School Teacher on the Seat of UC-38. However, we have observed that while considering the case of Imran Ali S/o Shahdad Mangi who had also applied for PST for UC-25 on the basis of CNIC of his mother and brother has been taken into consideration. The electoral roll in respect of said Imran Ali Mangi was also taken into consideration. While dismissing the instant petition, we may observe that the petitioner may agitate his grievances before the concerned authority with the request to treat him at par with Imran Ali Mangi. Provided he may submit the requisite documents in support of his claim.

 

JUDGE

JUDGE                     

A.R.BROHI