ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKUR.

Constt: Petition No.D-        712     of 2014.

DATE                                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF HON’BLE JUDGE

 

FOR KATCHA PESHI

 

18th. March, 2016.

 

                        Mr. Ghulam Mujtaba Sahito, Avocate for petitioner.

Mr. Shahryar Imdad Awan, Asstt: A.G.

 

                        At the very outset, learned Asstt: A.G raised objection as to maintainability of instant petition and place on record copy of order dated 24.11.2015, passed by this Court in C.P.No.D-3134 of 2015 (Re: Pervaiz Ali Shah and others v. Government of Sindh and others) and submits that the instant petition may be dismissed. Copy of such order has been provided to learned Counsel for the petitioner, who submits that instead of dismissing instant petition, instant petition may be disposed of in terms of Para No.5 & 6 of the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid case.

                        Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of in the following terms.

“5.       In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of the case, and the aforesaid order passed by a Division Bench of this Court on the subject controversy, wherein, reliance has been placed on Judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court  i.e Nizamuddin and others vs. Civil Aviation Authority (1999 SCMR 467) and Pak Com Limited and others vs. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2011 SC 44). We are not inclined to entertain the disputed claims of petitioner which otherwise relate to some contractual obligation, therefore, instant petition is hereby dismissed for being not maintainable.

6.         However, before parting with the above order, we may observe that Government Departments are required to be fair and responsive to all contractual obligations, whereas, it is expected that the respondents may consider the claims of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law and shall ensure that the admitted outstanding amount against the respondents, shall be paid to the petitioner within a reasonable period of time, whereas, efforts shall be made to get all the subject public works completed within stipulated period as per original scheme and the costs so determined, to avoid any revision of scheme i.e enhancement of cost, so that there shall be no loss to the public revenue on this account.”

 

                        Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

JUDGE

JUDGE

A.R.BROHI