C.P.No.D-2127 of 2013

For further orders

18.08.2015

Mian Mumtaz Rabbani for the petitioner.

Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Assistant Advocate General.

..............

Learned Assistant Advocate General has drawn the attention of this Court to the concise statement dated 22.06.2015 filed by Additional Secretary (Schools), Focal Person on Litigation cases, Education & Literacy Department and its annexures, which, according to learned AAG, has been submitted pursuant to orders passed by this Court on 06.05.2015 whereby, instant petition was finally disposed of. Per learned Assistant Advocate General, after detailed scrutiny in the matter pursuant to directions of this Court it has been found that the testimonials of the petitioner are bogus and forged, therefore, he could not be considered for appointment in the Education Department.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of such concise statement along with its annexures has not been supplied to the petitioner for examination and the petitioner may file objections thereon. He claims copy of such statement. Learned Assistant Advocate General undertakes to supply the same during course of the day.

From perusal of record, it appears that instant matter was finally disposed of vide order dated 06.05.2015. Thereafter, concise report has been furnished by the respondents accordingly in the above terms and no further orders are required as the matter is already disposed of with direction which have been complied by respondents. Such statement/report is taken on record. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by such report or any subsequent development, he may seek remedy by filing appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

JUDGE

JUDGE

N.M.