C.P.No.D-919 of 2012

For Katcha Peshi

29.04.2016

Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Sangi holds brief for Mr.Nusrat Hussain Memon advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Aijaz Ali Jarwar advocate for respondents Nos.6 to 9.

Mr. Shaharyar Awan, Assistant Advocate General.

................

Petitioner present in person submits that private respondents are causing harassment to him in respect of share in the property, whereas, the Mukhtiarkar (Revenue) Taluka Bhiria, District Naushahro Feroze, is not resolving the dispute between the parties. Learned counsel for the respondents Nos.6 to 9 denies the allegations as contained in the instant petition and submits that no harassment has been caused by the private respondents, whereas, petitioner may be directed to approach the concerned Revenue authorities for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law. Learned AAG submits that instant petition may be disposed of by directing the parties to get their dispute relating to entitlement resolved by approaching the Revenue authorities.

Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with directions to the concerned Mukhtiarkar to look into the matter and decide the dispute between the parties regarding their respective share in the property, after providing opportunity of being heard and pass order strictly in accordance with law. In the meanwhile, the private respondents are directed to ensure that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner in respect of civil dispute as referred hereinabove.

JUDGE

JUDGE

N.M.