ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR.

C.P No. D- 1342  of 2016

_____________________________________________________________________          DATE                                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

           

1.    For orders on CMA 3661/2016 (U/A)

2.    For orders on CMA 3662/2016 (Ex)

3.    For katcha Peshi

 

 

10.05.2016

 

Mr.Shaiwak Ram Valecha  Advocate for petitioner.

 

 

                                    …….

 

 

                        Through instant petition, the petitioner intends to get the inquiry dated 02.08.2012 set aside, which was conducted by respondent No.2 in respect of crime No. 78 of 2012 registered at Police Station Setharja district Khairpur, on the grounds that while such inquiry was being conducted the petitioner, who is the complainant in the aforesaid crime, was not associated. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that similar petition No.S-2241/2012 was filed before the learned Single Judge of this Court, however, the same has been dismissed for the reason that during pendency of such petition, the inquiry was concluded and challan was submitted before the trial Court.

 

                        From perusal of record it appears that such enquiry was conducted in the year 2012, which according to learned counsel for petitioner, was placed on record before learned trial Court, however, the petitioner did not press the earlier petition, for the reasons best known to the petitioner. Admittedly, the challan has already been submitted before the competent Court of jurisdiction, whereas, petitioner has not filed any application before learned trial Court challenging such inquiry.

 

                        It appears that learned trial Court has not taken cognizance of such inquiry, nor any supplementary challan has been submitted before the learned trial Court pursuant to such inquiry as nothing has been placed on record in this regard. In view of above facts and circumstances, we do not find any substance in the instant petition which suffers from latches. Moreover, the petitioner is at liberty to approach learned trial Court and to dispute such inquiry report if the learned trial Court has taken cognizance on such report.

 

                        Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications.

 

                                                           

                                                                        J U D G E

`               

 

Irfan/PA                                                            J U D G E