ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR.

C.P No.D-1469 of 2016.

______________________________________________________________________ DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

1. For orders on CMA 4061/2016(U/A)

2. For orders on CMA 4062/2016(Ex)

3. For katcha Peshi.

12.04.2016

Mr. Zulifqar Ali Naich, Advocate for the petitioner.

-----

. From perusal of the contents of instant petition and to submission of learned counsel for petitioner, it appears that petitioner Rao Muhammad Shakir through his attorney Abdul Qadir has expressed his grievance regarding petitioner’s involvement in false cases by the police, whereas, it has been further alleged that the complaint filed by the petitioner against police officers is not being considered and decided by the respondent No.4. It has been prayed that directions may be issued to respondent No.4 to register F.I.R against respondents No.6 and 7 and also prayed that respondent No.2 may be directed to conduct enquiry against the respondents No.3 and 4.

It appears that some F.I.Rs have been registered against the petitioner and his employees, in which petitioner has statedly obtained bail from the trial Court of competent jurisdiction, Challans have been furnished and matters are pending disposal by trial Courts. Petitioner instead of disputing such F.I.Rs or acceptance of challans by trial Court, in accordance with law, has filed instant petition with generalized allegations and by agitating certain disputed facts. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to satisfy this Court as to maintainability of instant petition, which does not prima facie disclose any cause of action, which may require this Court to intervene and to grant any relief to petitioner under article 199 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Petitioner may seek departmental or the judicial remedy as may be available under the facts and circumstances of the instant case strictly in accordance with law by approaching the relevant authority/forum/Court for redressal of his grievance, which may be decided in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of being heard to the parties concerned. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the instant petition, which is hereby dismissed in limine along with listed applications.

J U D G E

JUDGE

Irfan/PA