ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

 

C.P No. D- 1389 of 2015

 

______________________________________________________________________        DATE                                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

           

1.    For orders on Office objection at Flag ‘A’.

2.    For orders on CMA 4082/2015(Ex.A)

3.    For orders on CMA 1900/2016(Contempt)

4.    For orders on CMA 1901/2016(Stay)

5.    For katcha Peshi.

 

 

24-02-2016.

 

            Mr.Alam Sher Bozdar, advocate for Interveners.

            Mr.Shafique Ahmed Leghari, State Counsel

a/w Inspector Fida Hussain Solangi, DSP (Legal)

on behalf of DIGP Sukkur, Manzoor Panhwar

DSP, on behalf of S.S.P Dadu  and SIP Khalil Ahmed.

 

-------------

 

            Petitioner Ajeeb Ali Lakho called absent, no intimation received.

 

            Learned State counsel submits that pursuant to Court directions, the necessary postings and transfers have been made to ensure that rule 14.47 of Police Rules,1934 as well as order passed by division bench of this Court in

CP No.D-2314/2011 re: Ajeeb Ali Versus Province of Sindh and others shall not be violated.

 

            Mr. Alam Sher Bozdar, learned counsel for interveners submits that he has filed an application on behalf of proposed interveners, who according to learned counsel, have been transferred from district Ghotki to district Khairpur Mir’s pursuant to pendency of instant petition, whereas according to learned counsel,  the transfer of proposed interveners is not governed under rule 14.47 of Police Rules,1934.

 

            We are not inclined to entertain the request of learned counsel for interveners in the instant petition, as it relates to compliance of rule 14.47 of Police Rules,1934, according to which, no Inspector or Sub-Inspector can be posted in home district, whereas, such order has already passed by division bench of this Court in CP No.D-2314 of 2011 re: Ajeeb Ali versus P.O Sindh and others .

            Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of along with listed applications , however, with directions to the respondents to ensure that compliance of aforesaid rule as well as the order already passed by division bench of this Court,  as referred to hereinabove  shall be made. However, the proposed interveners are at liberty to seek remedy against their transfer order in accordance with law before the appropriate forum or Court of proper jurisdiction.

 

 

                                                           

                                                                        J U D G E

`               

 

Irfan/PA                                                            J U D G E