ORDER
SHEET
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKUR.
C.P.No.D- 951, 965, 1250, 2980,
3241, 3363, 3373, 3438, of 2012
C.P.No.D- 1107, 1461, 2229 of2013
C.P.No.D- 206, 226, 1321, 1700, 3394 of 2014
C.P.No.D- 21, 169, 1042, 2628, 2726, 2755, 2845, 2846,
2874, 2925, 3058, 3077, 3100,
3113, 3124, 3128, 3130, 3151, 3152, 3160, 3173, 3178, 3182, 3183, 3188, 3195,
3253, 3254, 3256, 3268, 3269, 3270, 3284, 3295, 3652, 3966, 3974, 4013, 4028,
4031, 4032, 4064, 4080. 4085, 4086, 4087, 4090, 4091, 4095, 4097, 4099, 4108,
4188, 4253, 4270, 4348, 4427, 4428, 4457, 4463, 4542, 4543, 4701, 4714 of 2015
C.P.No.D- 37, 305, 324, 519, 521, 571, 591, 773, 1032,
1033, 1039, 1040, 1044, 1048, 1050, 1059, 1060, 1068, 1069, 1071, 1072, 1083,
1084, 1087, 1088, 1089, 1111, 1117, 1118, 1120, 1129, 1137, 1138, 1157, 1158,
1164, 1174, 1197, 1207, 1208, 1302 of 2016
For KatchaPeshi.
C.P.No.D- 2448, 2496 of 2010
C.P.No.D- 615 of 2011
C.P.No.D- 2362, 2975, 3389, 3600, of2013
C.P.No.D-
322, 3939, of2014
C.P.No.D- 411, 449, 647, 670, 719, 894, 1075, 1213,
1356, 1369, 1376, 1413, 1459,
1866,
2067, 2207 & 2311 of 2015
For hearing of contempt applications.
06th. April, 2016.
M/s Dareshani Ali Hyder ‘Ada’, NusratHussainMemon,
Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Mehfooz Ahmed Awan, Aijaz Ali Jarwar, AtherHussainAbro,
Shakeel Ahmed Kalwar, MansoorHussainMaitlo, Abdul NaeemPirzada, Farhan Ali
Shaikh, AjeebullahJunejo&NusratHussainMemon, Advocates for petitioners.
Mr. Shafique Ahmed Leghari, State Counsel.
After
hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioners and in view of objection as to
maintainability of instant petition by consent, instant matters are being
disposed of in the following terms:-
(i)
All the above petitions, in which, the petitioners
have sought directions of this Court to the affect that the respondents i.e
concerned procuring agency may be directed to issue blank tender forms, if they
are found to be eligible in accordance with law and as per SPPRA Rules,2010, in
which blank tender forms have already been issued to the petitioners, are
hereby disposed of, for having become infructuous.
(ii)
The contempt applications filed by the applicants
are disposed of as not pressed however, the applicants may be at liberty to
agitate their grievance for alleged violation or non-compliance of SPPRA Rules,
2010, by filing appropriate proceedings before the relevant forum/ authority in
terms of SPPRA Rules, 2010. Whereas, it is expected that all public tenders, NITs
shall be processed in a fair and transparent manner to avoid any dispute and
unnecessary litigation on this account.
(iii)
The procuring agency shall ensure the constitution
of “Complaint Redressal Committee” in
terms of Rule 31 of SPPRA Rules, 2010 so that in case of any grievance, an
efficacious and adequate remedy for the
aggrieved party shall be readily available as envisaged in the above Rules, so
that litigation of the nature on such trivial issues can be avoided and
government functionaries in this regard are saddled with an obligation to
follow the above Rules. Respondentsshall dispose of such complaint after
providing an opportunity of being heard to the concerned parties within a
reasonable period of time strictly in accordance with law and relevant rules.
All
the aforesaid constitution petitions and contempt applications are disposed of
in the above terms along with listed applications.
JUDGE
JUDGE
A.R.BROHI