ORDER
SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR
C.P
No.D-2376 of 2012
______________________________________________________________________ DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE
OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________
1. For katcha Peshi.
2. For hearing of CMA 7825/2012
12th February 2016.
Mr. Sarfraz Akhund Advocate for petitioner.
Mr.Sajjad
Mohammkad Zangejo Advocate for respondent No.3.
Mr. Shehiryar Ali Awan
Asstt:A.G
-------------
Learned counsel for petitioner
submits that a civil dispute is pending between the parties in respect of
residential property, however, at the instance of private persons, Wafaqi
Mohtasib (Ombudsman) issued the impugned letter dated 26.07.2012 whereafter the
Deputy Inspector General of Police Sukkur was directed to dispossess the
petitioner from suit property.
Mr. Sajjad Mohammad Zangejo has
shown appearance and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.3, and submits
that instant petition has become infructuous, as no action has been taken
pursuant to impugned letter dated 11.6.2012 as another letter dated 26.07.2012
was also issued from the office of Director General (Incharge) Wafaqi Mohtasib
(Ombudsman)’s Secretariat Regional Office, Karachi, directing respondent No.3
not to proceed further. Such fact is not disputed by learned counsel for
petitioner, who submits that purpose of filing the instant petitioner has been
achieved as no adverse action has been taken pursuant to impugned letter as
referred to hereinabove.
Be that as it may, instant petition
is disposed of as infructuous, however, without prejudice to any legal right of
entitlement of any party in respect of subject property.
J U D G E
`
Irfan/PA J U D G E