,    ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

 

Cons. Petition No.D-686 of 2014

______________________________________________________________________        DATE                                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

           

1. For order on objection at Flag.

2. For katcha Peshi.

 

21-12-2015.

 

 

Mr.Shahzado Dreho Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Liaquat Ali Shar Additional A.G.

 

 

-------------

 

                                    Learned Additional A.G at the very outset submits that under the similar circumstances this Court has already passed detailed order in CP-No.D-3134 of 2013 whereby the petition has been dismissed, he has placed on record copy of the said petition passed by this bench on the aforesaid petition. While confronting the same, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition in terms of para No.6 and  6 of the aforesaid order. Accordingly this petition is disposed of against the respondents for the following terms.

                                    In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of the case, and the aforesaid Order passed by a Division Bench of this Court on the subject controversy, wherein, reliance has been placed on the Judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court i.e Nizamuddin and others vs. Civil Aviation Authoirty (1999 SCMR 467) and Pak Com Limited and others Vs. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2011 SC 44),

                                    However, before parting with the above order, we may observe that Government departments are required to be fair and responsive to all contractual obligations, whereas it is expected that the respondents may consider the claims of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law and shall ensure that the admitted outstanding amount against the respondents, shall be paid to the petitioner within a reasonable period of time, whereas, efforts shall be made to get all the subject public works completed within stipulated period as per original schmee and the costs so determined, to avoid any revision of scheme i.e enhancement of cost, so that there shall be no loss to the public revenue on this account.

                                                                                    J U D G E

 

 

                                 J U D G E

Irfan/PA