ORDER
SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR
C.P
No.D-383 of 2015
______________________________________________________________________ DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE
OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________
For katcha Peshi.
22.01.2016
Mr.Mehfooz Ahmed Awan,
Advocate for petitioner.
Mr.
Noor Hassan Malik A.A.G for the State.
-------------
While confronted as to maintainability of
instant petition, through which petitioner has leveled allegations regarding
appointment made by the respondent No.4 on menial posts such as Beldars and Chowkidars etc from the year 2008 till 2015, without having placed any
material on record to support such allegation, learned counsel for the
petitioner could not satisfactorily submit response to such objection. In a
constitutional petition in the nature of quo-warranto,
petitioner is required to establish the violation of any specific provision of
law, rules or policy at the end of appointing authority in respect of a
particular employee and his employment, whereas mere allegations regarding
entire appointments made during the years 2008 to 2015, do not give any cause
of action to the petitioner, and rather amounts to creating harassment to the
respondents who in the instant case are working on menial post.
Learned counsel for
petitioner submits that the petitioner will seek remedy
by collecting material to support such allegations before relevant forums, and
does not press instant petition which is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
J U D G
E
J U D G E
Irfan/PA