C.P.No.S-468 of 2016

For Katcha Peshi

16.05.2016

Mr. Aijaz Ali Jarwar advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Noor Hassan Malik, Assistant Advocate General.

..................

Pursuant to Court notice, Mr. Alam Sher Bozdar has filed vakalatnama as well as statement on behalf of respondent No.5, whereas, statements have been filed on behalf of respondents Nos.3 and 4, which are taken on record. Learned counsel for the respondent No.5 submits that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, whereas, the petitioner has already filed direct complaint against the respondents, which is pending before Special Prosecutor Anti-Corruption, Sukkur, whereas, no such allegation has been levelled by the petitioner, who has filed instant petition to pressurize the respondents. Such fact is disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that since the petitioner has filed direct complaint against the police officials, therefore, they are causing harassment and there is likelihood that petitioner will be involved in false criminal cases.

In view of statement filed on behalf of respondents, instant petition is disposed of with directions to the concerned police to ensure that no harassment whatsoever shall be caused to the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is being harassed by the police, appropriate action shall be taken against them, independent of the proceedings, which are pending before the learned trial Court in view of direct complaint filed under Section 200 Cr.P.C.

JUDGE

N.M.