C.P.No.D-1651 of 2016

For Katcha Peshi

16.05.2016

Mr. Mujeebur Rahman Soomro advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Shahzad Gul Kalwar advocate for respondents 3 to 6.

Mr. Noor Hassan Malik, Assistant Advocate General.

..................

Pursuant to Court notice learned counsel for the respondent No.3 to 6 has filed statement along with annexures, whereas respondent No.2 has also filed statement, which are taken on record and copy supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 to 6 submits that the allegations as contained in the instant petition are totally false and frivolous, whereas, the respondents are lawful owners of the subject-land and are also in possession and the petitioner has no locus standi whatsoever to file instant petition.

While confronted with such position, learned counsel for the petitioner could not satisfactorily respond to the contention of learned counsel for the respondents and submits that petitioner will seek remedy in accordance with law by approaching the appropriate Court of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed, however, if the petitioner claims any right or title over the subject-property, he will be at liberty to file proceedings in accordance with law.

JUDGE

N.M.