C.P.No.D-2128  of  2011

 

 

For Katcha Peshi

 

 

Along with C.P No.D-1147/2009, 2261 of 2010,323, 893, 907, 1802, 1866, 2494, 2629 of 2011, 338, 1305, 2161, 2166, 2722, 2893, 2930, 2954, 3064, 3121, 3309, 3467, 3655, 3670 of 2012  29, 120, 142, 298, 346, 495, 496, 616, 774, 837, 870, 874, 961, 1082, 1148, 1185, 1197, 1385, 1490, 1774, 1850, 1881, 2104, 2140, 2233, 2359, 2455, 2479, 2596,2597, 2611, 2627, 2645, 2726, 2790, 2826, 2829, 2927, 2961, 3063, 3165, 3230, 3231, 3237, 3382, 3414, 3439, 3503, 3761, 3774, 3811 of 2013 , 186, 280, 282, 309, 382, 429, 463, 464, 536, 550,  594, 673, 769, 994, 1098, 1126, 1136, 1151, 1290, 1329, 1518, 1759, 1891, 1908, 1946, 2005, 2042, 2064, 2080, 2099, 2226, 2306, 2335, 2355, 2592, 2594, 2713, 2734, 2843, 2946, 2987, 3021,3083, 3099, 3114, 3135, 3142, 3201, 3214, 3273, 3330, 3380, 3382, 3457, 3531, 3547, 3611,  3635, 3652, 3791,3804, 3816, 3819, of 2014,  49, 51, 79,116, 126, 142, 224, 283, 291, 312, 349, 350, 377, 386, 451, 467, 468, 518, 624, 814, 820, 854, 875, 876, 914, 928, 933, 952, 979, 1018, 1066, 1208, 1349, 1473, 1554, 1571, 1674, 1794, 1841, 2033, 2071, 2106, 2187, 2247, 2379, 2495, 2678, 2798, 2821, 3104, 3140, 3158, 3688, 3734, 3739, 3824, 3944, 3948, 3983, 4083, 4181,4236, 4261, 4263, 4299, 4416, 4477, 4808of 2015,04, 42,114, 197of 2016.

                       

 

For Hearing of Contempt Application

 

CP No.D-542 of 2009, 570, 677, 1884of 2010, 338, 796, 3123, 3402of 2011, 614, 2906of 2012 and 2034 of 2013.

 

 

29.03.2016

 

M/sQurban Ali Malano, Shaikh Amanullah, Ghulam Shabir Shar, Zulfiqar Ali Naich, Suhail Ahmed Khoso, Sardar Akbar F. Ujjan, Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Khan Muhammad Sangi, Ghulam Murtaza Korai, Manoj Kumar Tejwani, Haji Shamsuddin Rajper, Muhammad Hamzo Buriro, Hadi Bux Bhatt, Bakhshan Khan Mahar, Shakeel Ahmed Kalwar, Achar Khan Gabol, Shabir Ali Bozdar, Alam Sher Bozdar, Shafiq Ahmed Leghari, Iftikhar Ali Arain, Ghulam Akbar Jamro, Shahnawaz Waseer, Abdul Naeem Pirzada, Abdul Sami Maitlo, Mansoor Hussain Maitlo, Muhammad Ali Ansari, Abdullah Brohi, Iqbal Hussain Joyo, Nadir Ali Chachar, Mir Hassan Seelro, Shahid Hussain Leghari, Munawar Alam Khan, Nusrat Hussain Memon, Nadim Shahbaz Shar, Imdad Hyder SolangiAdvocates for the petitioners.

Abdul Maroof Shaikh petitioner present in person.

 

Mr. Liaqat Ali Shar, Additional Advocate General.

Mr. Shafique Ahmed Leghari, State Counsel.

                                    ................

 

            The aforesaid petitions along with contempt applications filed therein are being disposed of by consent of all parties, in the following terms:

 

1.                     That the petitioners in the aforesaid petitions and the applicants in the contempt applications filed in the aforesaid petitions shall apply to the relevant Departments for their appointment on deceased quota basis, within 15 days from the order of this Court, along with requisite documents showing their eligibility, as per relevant rules, policy and Notification No.SORI(SGA/CD)2-3/2002(P-II)dated 06.09.2014, issued by the Chief Secretary, Services and General Administration, Government of Sindh, whereby amendments have been introduced under rule 10 (a) and rule 11 (a) of Sindh Civil Servants (appointment, promotion and transfer) Rules, 1974, and according to learned counsel for petitioners and learned state counsel, the clog of cutoff date has been done away.

 

2.                     The respondents in the above petitions i.e. the respective Departments of Government of Sindh, shall consider the applications of the petitioners for their appointments on Deceased quota, strictly in accordance with law, rules and the aforesaid Notification, which shall be decided within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such applications along with requisite documents, however as per spirit of the aforesaid Notification, whereafter, compliance report may be furnished to this Court through Additional Registrar of this Court.

 

3.                     Above disposal of the cases is however, subject to any decision/judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court or High Court on the subject controversy, wherein, the effect or implementations of the above Notification would have been examined and decided otherwise.

                        All the above petitions and contempt applicationsstand disposed of in the above terms.

 

 

                                                                    JUDGE

 

 

                                                JUDGE

 

 

N.M.