C.P.No.D-105 of2010
For KatchaPeshi
Along with C.P No.D-1147/2009, 2261
of 2010,323, 893, 907, 1802, 1866, 2494, 2629 of 2011,
338, 1305, 2161, 2166, 2722, 2893, 2930, 2954, 3064, 3121, 3309, 3467, 3655,
3670 of 2012 29, 120, 142,
298, 346, 495, 496, 616, 774, 837, 870, 874, 961, 1082, 1148, 1185, 1197, 1385,
1490, 1774, 1850, 1881, 2104, 2140, 2233, 2359, 2455, 2479, 2596,2597, 2611,
2627, 2645, 2726, 2790, 2826, 2829, 2927, 2961, 3063, 3165, 3230, 3231, 3237,
3382, 3414, 3439, 3503, 3761, 3774, 3811 of 2013 , 186, 280, 282,
309, 382, 429, 463, 464, 536, 550, 594,
673, 769, 994, 1098, 1126, 1136, 1151, 1290, 1329, 1518, 1759, 1891, 1908,
1946, 2005, 2042, 2064, 2080, 2099, 2226, 2306, 2335, 2355, 2592, 2594, 2713, 2734,
2843, 2946, 2987, 3021,3083, 3099, 3114, 3135, 3142, 3201, 3214, 3273, 3330,
3380, 3382, 3457, 3531, 3547, 3611,
3635, 3652, 3791,3804, 3816, 3819, of 2014, 49, 51, 79,116, 126, 142, 224, 283,
291, 312, 349, 350, 377, 386, 451, 467, 468, 518, 624, 814, 820, 854, 875, 876,
914, 928, 933, 952, 979, 1018, 1066, 1208, 1349, 1473, 1554, 1571, 1674, 1794,
1841, 2033, 2071, 2106, 2187, 2247, 2379, 2495, 2678, 2798, 2821, 3104, 3140,
3158, 3688, 3734, 3739, 3824, 3944, 3948, 3983, 4083, 4181,4236, 4261, 4263,
4299, 4416, 4477, 4808of 2015,04, 42,114, 197of 2016.
For
Hearing of Contempt Application
CP No.D-542 of 2009,
570, 677, 1884of 2010, 338, 796, 3123, 3402of 2011,
614, 2906of 2012 and 2034 of 2013.
27.01.2016
M/sQurban Ali Malano, ShaikhAmanullah,
GhulamShabirShar, Zulfiqar Ali Naich, David Lawrence, Suhail Ahmed Khoso,
Sardar Akbar F. Ujjan, Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Khan Muhammad Sangi, Abdul
SattarSoomro,GhulamMurtazaKorai, Manoj Kumar Tejwani, Haji ShamsuddinRajper,
Muhammad HamzoBuriro, Abdul Baqi Jan Kakar, HadiBux Bhatt, Bakhshan Khan Mahar,
Shakeel Ahmed Kalwar, Mahfooz Ahmed Awan, Gul Muhammad Mahar, Muhammad Imran
Shamsi, Achar Khan Gabol, Mushtaq Ahmed Abbasi, Shabir Ali Bozdar,
AlamSherBozdar, Shafiq Ahmed Leghari, J. K. Jarwar, MujeeburRahmanSoomro, Syed
Bahadur Ali Shah, Muhammad Ali Napar, M. A. Hakeem, Iftikhar Ali Arain, Syed
Sardar Ali Shah Jillani, Ghulam Akbar Jamro, ShahnawazWaseer, Miss
RizwanaJabeenSiddiqui, Abdul NaeemPirzada, Shahid Ali Memon, Abdul Sami Maitlo,
MansoorHussainMaitlo, Muhammad Ali Ansari, Abdullah Brohi, IqbalHussain Joyo,
Nadir Ali Chachar, Mir Hassan Seelro, ShahidHussainLeghari, MunawarAlam Khan,
Bashir Ahmed Shar, NusratHussainMemon, NadimShahbazShar, ImdadHyderSolangiAdvocates
for the petitioners.
Abdul MaroofShaikhpetitioner present in
person.
Mr. Liaqat Ali Shar, Additional Advocate
General.
Mr. Noor Hassan Malik, Assistant Advocate
General
................
The aforesaid petitions along with
contempt applications filed therein are being disposed of by consent of all parties,
in the following terms:
1. That
the petitioners in the aforesaid petitions and the applicants in the contempt
applications filed in the aforesaid petitions shall apply to the relevant
Departments for their appointment on deceased quota basis, within 15 days from
the order of this Court, along with requisite documents showing their
eligibility, as per relevant rules, policy and Notification No.SORI(SGA/CD)2-3/2002(P-II)dated
06.09.2014, issued by the Chief Secretary, Services and General Administration,
Government of Sindh, whereby amendments have been introduced under rule 10 (a)
and rule 11 (a) of Sindh Civil Servants (appointment, promotion and transfer)
Rules, 1974, and according to learned counsel for petitioners and learned state
counsel, the clog of cutoff date has been done away.
2. The respondents in the
above petitions i.e the respective Departments of Government of Sindh, shall
consider the applications of the petitioners for their appointments on Deceased
quota, strictly in accordance with law, rules and the aforesaid Notification,
which shall be decided within a period of three months from the date of receipt
of such applications along with requisite documents, however as per spirit of
the aforesaid Notification, whereafter, compliance report may be furnished to
this Court through Additional Registrar of this Court.
3. Above disposal of the cases
is however, subject to any decision/judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court or
High Court on the subject controversy, wherein, the effect or implementations
of the above Notification would have been examined and decided otherwise.
All the above petitions
and contempt applications stand disposed of in the above
terms.
JUDGE
JUDGE
N.M.