ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-1337 of 2012
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
For Katcha Peshi
18-05-2016
Mr.
Liaqat Ali Shar, Additional Advocate General a/w Shahariyar Awan, A.A.G.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. On
19.01.2014 following order was passed by this court.
" Learned Additional Advocate General
submits that a division bench of this Court took notice of an incident reported
in news papers, whereupon, pursuant to court’s directions, D.I.G Crime Branch,
Karachi Bashir Ahmed Memon submitted report dated 15.08.2012, wherein it has
been stated that Inspector Inayatullah Soomro, S.H.O P.S Airport Sukkur has
recorded his statement about the incident, wherein it has been stated that he
does not want to pursue the matter or the enquiry any further. It is further
stated that though such incident took place according to which Syed Khursheed
Ahmad Shah get hold of him from Collar and clapped him, however, he has
forgiven him and therefore, he does not want to proceed further with this
matter.
Record shows that on 16.05.2012 when this matter was
taken up for hearing in Court, Inspector Inayatullah Soomro appeared in person
and stated that such incident did occur, occur, however, he stated that matter
has been settled and he does not want to pursue the matter. It was observed by
the Division Bench of this Court in its order that Inspector Inayatullah Soomro
appeared to be in tremendous pressure, therefore, he has made such statement,
therefore, inquiry was directed to be conducted by the I.G.P Sindh.
It is surprising to note that instant matter has been
fixed in court after lapse of considerable time, whereas, no rebuttal or
comments have been filed on behalf of Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah, on whose
behalf vakalatnama was filed by Mr. Madad Ali Shah Masoomi, advocate.
Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to call Inspector Inayatullah Soomro, who
shall appear in person on the next date of hearing. He may be served through
concerned S.S.P. To come up on 23.02.2016. Intimation notice may also be issued
to Mr. Madad Ali Shah Masoomi, advocate for the next date."
2. Today the learned Additional Advocate General submits
that pursuant to court’s order dated 19.04.2016, a statement duly signed by
Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah has already been filed on 17.5.2016, wherein, the
alleged incident of 12th May 2012, as reported in the Newspapers has
been categorically denied. Mr.Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Advocate has filed vakalatnama
on behalf of Syed Khursheeed Ahmed Shah and argued that Syed Khursheed Ahmed
Shah categorically denied the alleged incidence, and has submitted that there
is no truth in the allegations regarding abuse of authority, whereas, on
account of irresponsible and improper reporting Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah has
been falsely implicated with the alleged incidence which never occurred as
reported and the Media created hype to the story of alleged incident.
3. Per
learned counsel, his client being responsible citizen, an elected Member of
Parliament and leader of opposition, cannot even imagine to slap a public
functionary or to create any hindrance in performance of their duties. It has
been further contended that despite repeated notice and opportunities having
been given to the said S.H.O to state his version, has not come forward either
to state such facts on oath or to assist this court to determine the real facts
regarding occurrence of alleged incident as reported in the Newspapers. Today also he is not in attendance, inspite of
notice nor has filed his statement regarding alleged incidence.
4. In
view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of the case, particularly when the
alleged victim has not come forward to support or verify the alleged incident as
reported in Newspapers inspite of repeated notices and opportunities provided
for such purpose, we are not inclined to keep instant matter pending for
indefinite period, whereas, Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah against whom the
allegations appeared in the Newspapers, has filed a detailed statement, wherein
the occurrence of alleged incident has been denied categorically. We have no
reasons to disbelieve such statement filed by a Public Representative, who is
also leader of opposition in the National Assembly of Pakistan.
5. Accordingly,
instant petition is disposed of in view of the statement filed by Syed
Khursheed Ahmed Shah.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/PA
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2199 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
For non-prosecution
18-05-2016
Mr.
Shabbir Ali Bozdar Advocate for petitioner
Mr.
Liaqat Ali Shah Addl.A.G
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Learned
counsel for the petitioner submits that notices have been issued to the
respondents, however, no one has shown appearance. Learned Additional Advocate
General claims copy of petition along with annexures. Learned counsel for the
petitioner undertakes to supply copy of petition along with annexures to
learned AAG during course of the day. Let notice be repeated upon respondents
by first three modes of service as well as through fax for 20.5.2016.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/PA
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-3649 of 2015
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
For hearing of CMA
No.1515/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Talib Hussain Memon Advocate for respondent No.5
Mr.
Mian Mumtaz Rabbani DAG
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
No
one has shown appearance on behalf of SEPCO. Learned DAG claims copy of listed
application. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 undertakes to supply copy of
listed application to DAG during course of the day. Let notice be issued to
SDO, SEPCO Sukkur. To come up in the first week of June 2016.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/PA
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-1303 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on office objection
2. For katcha peshi
3. For hearing of CMA No.5645/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Jaffar Ali Shah Advocate for respondent No.6
Mr.
Mian Mumtaz Rabbani DAG
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Mr.
Nazeer Ahmed holding brief on behalf of Mr. Muhammad Aqil submits that counsel
for petitioner is unwell hence could not reach before the court. Mr. Qurban Ali
Malano also called absent. Objections/counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent No.6,
taken on record copy supplied to learned counsel who is holding brief on behalf
of counsel for petitioner, whereas statement along with parawise comments has
been filed by DAG on behalf of respondents No.2 and 5, taken on record, copy
supplied to learned counsel who is holding brief on behalf of counsel for
petitioner as well as counsel for respondent No.6. Counsel for respondent No.6
seeks urgency in the matter and submits that since respondent No.6 is returned
candidate and further process is under way, therefore, some short date may be
given to avoid delay in this regard. Adjourned to 25.5.2016, to be taken up at
11.00 a.m. Interim order passed earlier to continue.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/PA
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-4265 of 2015
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For hearing of CMA No.4013/2016
2. For hearing of CMA No.4014/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
David Lawrence advocate for applicants
Mr.
Zulfiqar Ali Sangi for petitioners
Mr.
Mian Mumtaz Rabbani DAG
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
After arguing the matter at some length, when the learned
counsel for applicants was confronted to point out any error or the fraud and
mis-representation resulting in erroneous disposal of the instant petition,
could not satisfactorily respond to such query of the Court and has candidly
submitted that petitioner would not press listed applications, however,
requests that District Returning Officer Sukkur may be directed to comply with
the directions of Election Commission of Pakistan as contained in its letter dated
6.11.2015, and to decide the application of applicant regarding recounting of
votes in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that
there are certain facts which were required to be brought to the notice of
Election Commission of Pakistan, however, since petitioner was not made party
therefore order has been passed without taking into consideration the
registration of FIR No.144/2015 registered at PS A-Section Sukkur, which shows
that ballot papers were snatched and destroyed by the mob on the day of election.
It has been prayed that District Returning Officer may be directed to hear all
the concerned parties while disposing of the application of the applicant for
recounting of votes in accordance with law.
Accordingly,
listed application is dismissed as not pressed, however, District Returning
Officer Sukkur is directed and to decide the fate of application of recounting
of votes strictly in accordance with law after hearing all concerned parties, without
being influenced with the order of this court dated 17.11.2015.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/PA
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2261 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6137/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.6138/2016
3. For katcha peshi
4. For orders on CMA No.6139/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Nisar Ahmed G.Abro Advocate for petitioners
a/w
petitioners
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. Urgency
application is granted.
2. Exemption
application is granted subject to all just exception.
3 & 4. It
is inter alia contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the
petitioners are innocent having no nexus whatsoever with the alleged corruption
or misappropriation of funds by Qamer Raza Balouch, Ex-EDO (Revenue)
Qamber-Shahdadkot against whom some enquiry/investigation is pending before NAB authorities relating to
NHA scheme of Additional Carriageway project-2009. However, NAB authorities are
causing harassment and raiding house of petitioners and there is apprehension
that petitioners will be arrested by the NAB authorities and implicate in some
false case. Per learned counsel in the aforesaid enquiry one Khadim Hussain the
then Mukhtiar has been granted protection from arrest by NAB authorities vide
order dated 01.3.2016 in CP No.820/2016 and requests that similar protection
may also be provided to the petitioners who are willing to cooperate with the
NAB authorities in the enquiry/investigation.
Let
pre-admission notice be issued to respondents, learned DAG as well as
Prosecutor NAB Sukkur for 30.5.2016, to be taken up along with aforesaid
petition. Petitioners shall cooperate with the NAB authorities in the
enquiry/investigation, however, they shall not be arrested till next date of
hearing. The petitioners shall furnish solvent surety in the sum of
Rs.100,000/- (Rupees one lac) each with
P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Incharge Additional
Registrar of this court.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2264 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6140/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.6141/2016
3. For katcha peshi
4. For orders on CMA No.6142/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Ghulam Shabbir Shar Advocate for petitioner
a/w
petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. Urgency
application is granted.
2. Exemption
application is granted subject to all just exception.
3 & 4. It
is, inter alia, contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner
is being continuously harassed by NAB authorities by issuing call up notice, in
the subject enquiry regarding misappropriation of government wheat stocks in
district khairpur, Crop 2012-2013 and subsequently 10971 bags of wheat Crop year
2012-2013 by M/S Kaleem Enterprises Transport Contractor. Counsel for the
petitioner submits that from perusal of the enquiry report available at page 27
of the instant petition, it is clear that the petitioner has no role whatsoever
with the alleged offence, however, there is apprehension that the NAB
authorities will arrest the petitioner, which will cause serious humiliation
and injury to the reputation of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits
that under similar circumstances other accused namely Kaisar Khan has been granted protection from arrest by
NAB authorities vide order dated 27.4.2016 in CP No.1819/2016 and requests that
similar protection may also be provided to the petitioner.
Let
pre-admission notice be issued to respondents, learned DAG as well as
Prosecutor NAB Sukkur for 19.5.2016, to be taken up along with aforesaid
petition. In the mean while, the petitioner shall cooperate with the NAB
authorities in respect of any enquiry/investigation pending against him,
however, the respondents shall not arrest the petitioner till next date of
hearing.
Petitioner
is directed to furnish solvent surety in the sum of Rs.200,000/- (Rupees two
lacs) with PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Incharge
Additional Registrar of this court.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2177 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.5933/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.5934/2016
3. For katcha peshi
4. For orders on CMA No.5935/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Qurban Ali Malano Advocate for petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. Urgency
application is granted.
2. Exemption
application is granted subject to all just exception.
3 & 4. Let
notice be issued to respondents by first three modes of service as well as learned
D.A.G for 02.08.2016. In the meanwhile petitioner may not be dispossessed from
the subject quarter except in due course of law.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2226 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6112/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.6113/2016
3. For katcha peshi
4. For orders on CMA No.6114/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Zafar Ali Shah Advocate for petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. Urgency
application is granted.
2. Exemption
application is granted subject to all just exception.
3 & 4. Let
pre-admission notice be issued to respondents by first three modes of service
as well as learned Addl.A.G for 10.8.2016. In the meanwhile respondents are
directed to ensure that if the land of petitioner is required for construction
of road, same may not be acquired without due course of law.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2237 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6063/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.6064/2016
3. For katcha peshi
4. For orders on CMA No.6065/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Aijaz Ali Jarwar Advocate for petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. Urgency
application is granted.
2. Exemption
application is granted subject to all just exception.
3 & 4. It
is, inter alia, contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the
petitioner who has been illegally dispossessed from his house by respondent
No.2 who is applicant in Cr.Misc. application No.857/2016 u/s 22-A and 22-B Cr.P.C filed before learned
Ex-Officio Justice of Peace Naushahro Feroze who has passed the impugned order
and there is apprehension that petitioner shall be implicated in false case.
Per learned counsel for the petitioner, wife of the petitioner has filed Cr. Misc.
application No.1842/2015 u/s 22-A and
22-B Cr.P.C before the learned Ex-officio Justice of Peace Naushahro Feroze
regarding robbery and assault made by respondent No.2 who was making an attempt
to dispossess the petitioner from subject house, however, such application was
dismissed in view of the facts that the matter relates to some civil dispute
between the parties over landed property.
Let
pre-admission notice be issued to respondents by first three modes of service
as well as learned Addl.A.G for 26.5.2016. In the meanwhile respondent No.1, SHO
PS Bhiria may record statement of respondent 2, however, shall not arrest any
person implicated in the statement, till next date of hearing.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2248 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6123/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.6124/2016
3. For katcha peshi
18-05-2016
Mr.
Ajeebullah Junejo Advocate for petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. Urgency
application is granted.
2. Exemption
application is granted subject to all just exception.
3. Let
notice be issued to respondents as well as learned Addl. A.G for 02.6.2016 when
the respondents shall file comments.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2257 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6095/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.6096/2016
3. For katcha peshi
18-05-2016
Mr.
Illahi Bux Maitlo Advocate for petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. Urgency
application is granted.
2. Exemption
application is granted subject to all just exception.
3. Let
notice be issued to respondents as well as learned Addl. A.G for 02.6.2016,
when the respondents shall file comments.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2265 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6146/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.6147/2016
3. For katcha peshi
18-05-2016
Mr.
Ali Dad Narejo Advocate for petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. Urgency
application is granted.
2. Exemption
application is granted subject to all just exception.
3. It
is, inter alia, contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the son of
petitioner namely Asif Ali has been illegally arrested by respondent No.3
without registration of FIR against him on 12.5.2016, whereas his whereabouts
has not been disclosed and there is apprehension that son of petitioner may be
implicated in some false criminal cases.
Let
pre-admission notice be issued to the respondents as well as learned Addl.A.G
for 25.5.2016. SSP Khairpur shall examine the contents of instant petition and
shall ensure that if son of petitioner is found in illegal confinement he shall
get him released and produce before this court on the next date.
Copy
of this order be communicated to SSP Khairpur through fax for compliance.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2267 of 2016
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6147/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.6148/2016
3. For katcha peshi
4. For orders on CMA No.6149/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Gulzar Ahmed Malano Advocate for petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
1. Urgency
application is granted.
2. Exemption
application is granted subject to all just exception.
3 & 4. It
is, inter alia, contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has entered into contract of rent
of licence with Pakistan Railways in respect of subject land at Railway Station
Pano Akil vide agreement dated 27.3.2015 for a period of three years at the
rate of Rs.82500/- per annum and paid an advance amount of Rs.82500/- for one year, however, respondents are making
an attempt to dispossess the petitioner from the said land without due course
of law.
Let
pre-admission notice be issued to the respondents as well as learned Addl.A.G
for 10.8.2016. In the meanwhile respondents are directed to ensure that if
petitioner is found in lawful possession of subject land as stated by learned
counsel, he may not be dispossessed through force without adopting legal
course, in accordance with law.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-875 of 2015
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6160/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.5671/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Abdul Sattar N. Soomro Advocate for petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Learned
counsel for petitioner requests for short adjournment to place on record copy
of order passed by this court in the instant petition on 27.1.2016. To come up
on 24.5.2016.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2379 of 2015
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on CMA No.6158/2016
2. For orders on CMA No.6159/2016
18-05-2016
Mr.
Abdul Sattar N. Soomro Advocate for petitioner
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Learned
counsel for petitioner requests for short adjournment to place on record copy
of order passed by this court in the instant petition on 27.1.2016. To come up
on 24.5.2016.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-1711 of 2012
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For Katcha peshi
2. For hearing of CMA No.8743/2012
18-05-2016
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioner
and his counsel called absent. No intimation received. Instant petition was
filed on 08.6.2012 whereby petitioner has prayed that irrigation authorities
may be directed to ensure that the petitioner may be supplied irrigation water
from watercourse No.15R of Garkino Wah as per their share. However, record
shows that after having filed instant petition the petitioner and his counsel
has not remained vigilant to proceed with the matter, which is pending since
2012 without any useful progress. Whereas, it appears that such claim can also
be raised by petitioner by approaching concerned irrigation authorities in
accordance with law.
Accordingly,
instant petitioner is dismissed for non-prosecution along with listed
application, however, respondents shall ensure that grievance of the petitioner
may be redressed in accordance with law after hearing the parties.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2961of 2012
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For Katcha peshi
2. For hearing of CMA No.936/2012
18-05-2016
Mr.
Noor Hassan Malik AAG
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioner
and his counsel called absent. No intimation received. Instant petition was
filed on 13.1.2012 whereby petitioner has sought direction of this court for
quashment of FIR No.273/2012 registered at Police Station Mirwah. According to
learned AAG challan in the instant matter has already been submitted before
trial court, therefore, instant petitioner, otherwise has become infructuous.
Since
petitioner and his counsel are not in attendance, therefore, we are not
inclined to keep pending instant petition further. Accordingly, instant
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with listed application.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-3353 of 2012
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For orders on office objection
2. For orders on CMA No.10542/2012
3. For orders on CMA No.10543/2012
4. For katcha peshi
18-05-2016
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioner
and his counsel called absent. No intimation received. Instant petition was
filed in office on 27.11.2012. However, thereafter petitioner and his counsel
has never shown appearance before this court, whereas instant petition has been
fixed in court today first time for hearing, which reflects that the petitioner
has lost interest to proceed with the matter.
Accordingly,
instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with listed
applications.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-3535 of 2012
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
For katcha peshi
18-05-2016
Mr.
Noor Hassan Malik AAG
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioners
and their counsel called absent. No intimation received. Instant petition was
filed on 12.12.2012 whereby petitioners have prayed that respondents may be
directed to release their salaries. Learned AAG submits that after having filed
instant petition the petitioners have not remained vigilant to proceed with the
matter, whereas, an ad-interim order has already been passed.
Since
the petitioners and their counsel have not remained vigilant to proceed with
the matter, whereas ad-interim order is operating in the matter since
12.12.2012, therefore this court has left no option but to dismiss the instant
petition. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-3569 of 2012
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For katcha peshi
2. For hearing of CMA No.11251/2012
18-05-2016
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioner
and his counsel called absent. No intimation received. Instant petition was
filed on 17.12.2012. However, record shows that after having filed instant
petition the petitioner and his counsel has not remained vigilant to proceed
with the matter, which is pending since 2012 without any useful progress, which
shows that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with the matter.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution along with listed application.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-3651 of 2012
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For katcha peshi
2. For hearing of CMA No.11520/2012
18-05-2016
Mr.
Noor Hassan Malik AAG
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioner
and his counsel called absent. No intimation received. Instant petition was
filed on 26.12.2012, whereby petitioner has impugned the his transfer posting
order by respondents. However, record shows that after having filed instant
petition the petitioner and his counsel has not remained vigilant to proceed
with the matter, which is pending since 2012 without any useful progress,
therefore, this court has left no option but to dismiss the instant petition
for non-prosecution.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution along with listed application.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-706 of 2013
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
For katcha peshi
18-05-2016
Mr.
Noor Hassan Malik AAG
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioner
and his counsel called absent. No intimation received. Instant petition was
filed on 27.02.2013. However, record shows that after having filed instant
petition the petitioner and his counsel has not remained vigilant to proceed
with the matter, which is pending since 2013 without any useful progress, which
shows that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with the matter.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-1939 of 2013
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For katcha peshi
2. For hearing of CMA No.5923/2013
18-05-2016
Mr.
Muhammad Imran Khan for respondents
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioner
and his counsel called absent. No intimation received. Instant petition was
filed on 25.06.2013 whereby petitioner has prayed that respondents may be
directed to allot subject quarter to the petitioner on commercial rent basis.
Learned counsel for Railways submits that such property of Railways can only be
allotted to the employees of Pakistan Railways and not to others. In view of
such position, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with
the matter which is pending since 2013 without any progress.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution along with listed application. However, request of the
petitioner if made within prescribed time for allotment of quarter of Pakistan
Railways, may be considered, strictly in accordance with law.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT
SUKKUR
Constt. Petition No.D-2022 of 2013
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
1. For katcha peshi
2. For hearing of CMA No.6192/2013
18-05-2016
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Petitioner
and his counsel called absent. No intimation received. Instant petition was
filed on 03.07.2013. However, record shows that after having filed instant
petition, the petitioner and his counsel has not remained vigilant to proceed
with the matter, which is pending since 2013 without any useful progress.
Therefore, we are not inclined to keep instant petition pending unnecessarily.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution along with listed application.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Suleman
Khan/