C.P.No.D-2460 of 2014
For hearing of CMA-7275/2015
Present:
Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi &
Mr. Justice Syed Saeeduddin Nasir.
15.09.2015
Mr. Jamshed Ahmed Faiz Advocate along with petitioners.
Mr. Ubedullah Malano Advocate for alleged
contemnors along with alleged contemnors Nos.2 and 3.
Mr. Iftikhar Ali Arain for respondent No.4.
Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Assistant Advocate
General.
O R D E R
AQEEL AHMED ABBASI, J. Above
petition was finally disposed of through consent order dated 14.10.2014 in the
following terms:
“After
hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties at some length, by
consent the instant petition is disposed of in the following terms:
i.
That
the respondent No.3 will send the case of the petitioners to the Review Board
for reappraisal and reconsideration specially by critically examining,
Migration Certificates and the Matric Certificates (issued by Board of
Intermediate and Secondary Education, Bhawalpur) of the petitioners.
ii.
That
the petitioners are directed to appear before the Review Board. The said Board
will pass order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.
iii.
That
the Review Board is directed to decide the matter of the petitioners within one
month of the forwarding of the matter to them by the respondent No.3.
iv.
That
the respondent No.3 would be at liberty to take appropriate action deems fit
against the respondent No.4 as required.”
2. After disposal of the above petition,
the petitioners filed Contempt application being CMA-1093/2015 on which notices
were issued, whereafter the said Contempt Application was also disposed of vide
order dated 20.05.2015 in the following terms:
“This matter was heard at length on
14.10.2014 and thereafter with the consent of the parties the matter was
disposed of. It was categorically mentioned in the order dated 14.10.2014, vide
paragraph No. II, as under:-
II. That the
petitioners are directed to appear before the Review Board. The said Board will
pass order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.
As per the petitioners, the respondents
did not comply with the order of the court and thereafter a contempt
application was moved. Notice was issued to the alleged contemnors, in response
to which, the alleged contemnor/ respondent No.3 appeared and stated that
though the order has been passed in compliance of the order passed by this
court dated 14.10.2014, but he is ready to decide the case of the petitioners a
fresh. Thereafter the respondent No.3 decided the matter of the petitioners
afresh vide order dated 19.05.2015. It is noted that the said order has been
passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. When the
said violation was pointed out to the respondent No.3, he admitted his fault
and stated that he is ready to withdraw the said notification dated 19.05.2015
and to pass a fresh order after providing opportunity to the petitioners.
In view of the above, we, dispose of
this contempt application by directing the petitioners to appear before the
respondent No.3 on 25.05.2015 at 12:00 noon, along with all the relevant
documents and material and the respondent No.3 is directed to decide the matter
of the petitioners after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioners in
accordance with law and in letter and spirit of the order dated 14.10.2014.
Matter stands disposed of.”
3. Above
petitioners being still dissatisfied with the conduct of the respondents filed
another Contempt Application i.e.
CMA-7275/2015 alleging therein that in spite of specific directions of this Court
in para 1 of the order dated 14.10.2014, the alleged contemnors have passed an
order dated 23.07.2015 in violation of such directions, by raising flimsy
grounds with an attempt to destroy the academic career of the petitioners and to
deprive them their fundamental right to acquire education. Notices were issued
to the respondents i.e. alleged contemnors, in response to which they have
filed their reply, whereas, the learned counsel for the alleged contemnors has
supported the impugned order dated 23.07.2015 passed by the Controller of
Examinations in respect of both the petitioners and submits that since the
petitioners obtained admission in the college without submitting relevant required
documents, therefore, their provisional admission in the college and subsequent
registration and examination was illegal. It has been further argued that after
scrutiny it has been found that petitioners had obtained admission on the basis
of forged marks sheets issued from Hyderabad and Karachi Board, whereas, they
appeared in SSC examinations from Bhawalpur Board. Per learned counsel, it has
been resolved that result of both the petitioners be quashed under rule 22 of
the relevant rules.
4. Such
contention of the learned counsel for alleged contemnors is vehemently denied
by learned counsel for the petitioners who submits that petitioners have sought
admission on the basis of their Matric (SSC) Certificates and Migration
Certificates from Bhawalpur Board, which fact has duly been verified by
respondent No.4, therefore, such contention of alleged contemnors is false and
contrary to record.
5. We have heard the learned counsel for
the parties and perused the record as well as the earlier orders passed by a Division
Bench of this Court in the instant case.
Since
instant petition has already been disposed of by consent of the parties vide
order dated 14.10.2014, we would not re-examine the controversy involved in the
instant petition, and would only examine as to whether the consent order passed
by this Court in the instant petition has been complied with in letter and
spirit by the alleged contemnors or not. From perusal of order dated 14.10.2014,
it is clear that respondent No.3 Controller of Examinations, Board of
Intermediate and Secondary Education (BISE), Sukkur, was directed to send the
case of the petitioners to Review Board for re-consideration by critically
examining Migration Certificates and Matric certificates (issued by BISE,
Bhawalpur) in respect of the petitioners, whereas, petitioners were
directed to appear before the Review Board, and the Board was directed to pass
appropriate orders after providing an opportunity of being heard to the
petitioners. Further directions were issued to the Review Board to decide the
matter of the petitioners within one week from the date of the consent order.
However, record shows that instead of complying with the specific directions of
this Court, the respondents/alleged contemnors issued a notification dated 19.05.2015
wherein it was held that since the petitioners have managed bogus Marks
Certificate by BISE, Mirpur Khas and BISE, Karachi, therefore, they were not
entitled to seek admission in Government Jam Mumtaz Hussain Dahar Degree
College, Ubauro. Since the petitioners were not provided opportunity of being
heard while issuing above notification, in spite of specific directions of this
Court, the petitioners filed Contempt Application being CMA-1093/2015 which Contempt
Application was disposed of vide order dated 20.5.2015 with the direction to
petitioners to appear before respondent No.3 Controller of Examinations on
25.05.2015 at 12-00 noon along with all the relevant documents and material and
the respondent No.3 was directed to decide the matter of the petitioners after
providing an opportunity of being heard, in accordance with law and in
letter and spirit of order dated 14.10.2014. The respondent No.3 instead of
passing an order by keeping in view the specific directions by this Court as
referred to hereinabove, has passed yet another order dated 23.07.2015,
wherein, by referring to irrelevant facts and purported rules relating to
admission and enrolment of students in HSC-I, it has been held that since the
petitioners already took admission in HSC-I in Sadiqabad and Bhawalpur
respectively, whereas, the Migration Certificates of BISE, Bhawalpur were
applicable for getting admission at HSC-II for Annual Examination of 2013 or
thereafter, therefore, the admission of the petitioners in HSC-I for the year
2012 was illegal. Such conclusion by the respondents besides being misconceived
is also contrary to facts and record. It is regretted to observe that in spite
of a consent order having been passed by this Court on 14.10.2014 with specific
directions to the respondents i.e. alleged contemnors to verify the Marks Sheets
of SSC and Migration Certificates of both the petitioners issued by BISE,
Bhawalpur, how the alleged contemnors have travelled beyond the mandate of the
consent order passed by this Court on 14.10.2014, with an attempt to create
confusion with regard to eligibility of the petitioners to take admission in
HSC-I on the basis of Matric Certificate/Marks Sheet and the Migration
Certificate issued by BISE, Bhawalpur. From perusal of documents submitted by
the respondents themselves, it has come on record that verification of the
aforesaid documents in respect of the petitioners was sought by the respondents
from the BISE, Bhawalpur regarding correctness of the aforesaid documents in
response, the BISE, Bhawalpur vide their letter No.5919/Record dated 28.10.2014
and letter No.6213/Record dated 13.11.2014 have verified both the subject
documents in respect of both the petitioner to be correct and genuine and have also
supplied the duly verified copies of such documents to the respondents. There
remains no ambiguity with regard to genuineness of Matric certificate and
Migration certificates as well as the claim of the petitioners in compliance of
the directions of this Court as contained in order dated 14.10.2014, therefore,
still withholding the result of the petitioners of HSC-II by the respondents on
the basis of frivolous allegations appears to be based on mala fides, and an attempt to frustrate and defy the
specific directions of this Court as referred to hereinabove.
6. In view of hereinabove facts and
circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that no adverse inference can
be drawn, at this stage, on the claim of petitioners in respect of their
admission in Government Jam Mumtaz Hussain Dahar Degree College, Ubauro,
particularly, after their enrolment for examination by the respondents and their
appearance in the Annual Examinations of HSC-I, and HSC-II, especially when their
educational documents i.e. SSC certificate/ Marks Sheet and Migration Certificate
issued by the BISE, Bhawalpur have duly been verified and found to be correct
and genuine. Accordingly while taking lenient view, and without initiating
contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors who have issued the
impugned notification dated 23.07.2015, with an attempt to destroy the academic
career of the petitioners one of whom has reportedly taken admission in Baqai
Medical College after making payment of huge money on self-finance basis, we
would direct the respondents to announce the result of the petitioners of HSC-I
and HSC-II, which was illegally withheld, within a period of seven days from
the date of receipt of this order and shall submit compliance report to this
Court through Additional Registrar of this Court, within 15 days from this
order.
Contempt
Application CMA-7275/2015 stands disposed of in the above terms.
JUDGE
JUDGE
N.M.