Note: The Sorting of following cases is based on the search by public, Litigant.It does not reflect Ranking of Hon'ble Judges.
1) 208/2015 Suit Mirza Shakir Baig (Plaintiff) V/S Miss. Iffat Chughtai & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
2) 77/2012 Const. P. Haji Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) V/S Head Master Govt Primary School Bhutta Road Suk (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:ence, it could be safely observed that the pleadings of the plaint do support the proposed amendment sought by the petitioner. In the same way, will not change the nature and complexion of the suit. Had the proposed amendment be not supported by the pleadings in terms of Para 6 as well as in terms of prayer clause A, it could be a possibility that nature and complexion of the suit may have been altered by introduction of these impugned, proposed amendments, but that is not the case here.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 02-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
3) 4/2011 H.C.A Salehbhoy through LRs (In person) (Appellant) V/S M/s. Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt.) Limited and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 22-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.41-K/2013 Salehbhoy v. M/s Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt.) Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Not Reached
4) 252/2021 Cr.Bail Ahmed Ali @ Ali Bhutto and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 911
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
5) 615/2014 Const. P. Mst. Zarina Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
6) 830/2013 Suit S. Abdul Mannan Muttaqi (Plaintiff) V/S Defense House Authority & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
7) 262/2010 Civil Revision Mst. Farasa Aijaz (Applicant) V/S M/s. Qamran Construcation (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-APR-12
Approved for Reporting
8) 903/2007 Suit Allah Dino Khaskheli (Plaintiff) V/S HBL (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Damages employement HBL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 08-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
9) 1316/2011 Suit KHAIR MUHAMMAD KHATIAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S LIAQUAT ALI G. KAZI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 13-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
10) 59/2016 Civil Revision Dr. Bhagwandas & Others (Applicant) V/S Mashooq Ali Jatoi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVII Rule 3 CPC)
Citation:2019 CLC Note 58
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
11) 240/2014 Const. P. Sikandar Ali Lashari (Petitioner) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shaukat Ali Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-JUN-15
Approved for Reporting
12) 1630/1998 Suit NOTHERN POLYTHENE LTD (NPL) (Plaintiff) V/S NAT BANK OF PAK & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 MLD 782
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 27-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
13) 3309/2011 Const. P. M/S Ibrahim Fibres Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Infrastructure fee / cess levied vide Sindh Finance Act, 2017 applicable retrospectively w.e.f. 01.07.1994 is intra vires; all petitions stand dismissed to that effect; however, Insofar as the first four versions of law introduced through Sindh Finance Act, 1994, amended through Sindh Finance Act, 1996, the Sindh Finance (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001, and the Sindh Finance (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2001 are concerned, their applicability on the petitioners who had litigated earlier and were Appellants in Sanofi Aventis(PLD 2009 Karachi 65), has attained finality and is a past and closed transaction, notwithstanding promulgation of its fifth version vide Sindh Finance (Amendment) Ordinance, 2006, further amended by The Sindh Finance (Amendment) Act, 2007 (Sindh Act No: II of 2007, and The Sindh Finance (Amendment) Act, 2009 (Sindh Act No: III of 2009);
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 55
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.869/2021,C.P.L.A.1434-K/2021,C.A.953/2021,C.P.L.A.4321/2021,C.P.L.A.4493/2021,C.P.L.A.1564-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1544-K/2021,C.A.1628/2021,C.A.1637/2021,C.A.1586/2021,C.A.1619/2021,C.P.L.A.6039/2021,C.A.1635/2021,C.A.2049/2022 SCP Status:Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relied,Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Allowed, Leave Granted and Impugned Judgment suspended.,Disposed Allowed, Leave Granted and Impugned Judgment suspended.,Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relied,Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relied,Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed ,Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)
14) 1022/2011 Suit MST. AZRA PERVEZ & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S SHEIKH ASHFAQ HUSSAIN & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 09-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
15) 71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 04-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting
16) 167/2012 Suit Naseem-ul-Haq (Plaintiff) V/S Raees Aftab Ali Lashari & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 YLR 550
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
17) 1682/2009 Suit MAZHAR SAYEED (Plaintiff) V/S ATIF MAZHAR & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 23-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
18) 161/2014 Cr.Rev SIP Ahmed Saeed Shaikh and others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Bakhsh and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
19) 191/2021 Cr.Bail Mujeeb Rehman @ Mujahid (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 584
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
20) 1761/2020 Const. P. Abu Hashim & another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment in NADRA case passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan whereby the show cause notices issued under Section 18 of NADRA Ordinance, 2000 are quashed. The blocking of CNICs of the petitioners was declared illegal.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 387
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
21) 1019/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Ayaz Khan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, has pronounced the judgment on 24.07.2020 in the case of Muhammad Ayaz Khan and others v. Federation of Pakistan & others (along with C.P.No.D-1046/2019), whereby, Members of the Establishment of Sindh High Court and Members of Establishment of the Establishment of sub-ordinate judiciary of Province of Sindh, expressed their grievance against withholding of income tax by the Accountant General Sindh on the amounts paid towards Judicial Allowance and Special Judicial Allowance by treating the same as part of their salary income chargeable to tax under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. The Hon'ble bench of Sindh High Court has been pleased to allow both these petitions in the following terms:-
"In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered opinion that amount of judicial allowance and special judicial allowance paid to the Members of establishment of Sindh High Court as well as to the Members of the establishment of sub-ordinate judiciary of Province of Sindh falls within the exclusion in terms of clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, therefore, not part of their taxable salary income, hence, not chargeable to Tax or deduction under Section 149 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Accordingly, withholding of income tax on the aforesaid amounts is hereby declared to be illegal and without lawful authority. Consequently, both the constitutional petitions are allowed along with listed applications. Respondents are directed not to withhold any amount of income tax from judicial allowance and special judicial allowance of the Members of establishment of Sindh High Court as well as the Members of establishment of sub-ordinate judiciary in Province of Sindh. The amounts already deducted from the salary of the Members of establishment of Sindh High Court as well as to the sub-ordinate judiciary, shall be refunded by the FBR, on their filing refund applications in accordance with law, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of such claims."
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 969
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 24-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.484-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Muhammad Ayaz Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
22) 46/2006 II.A. Muhammad Aqil (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Amir & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Section 27 - Relief against subsequent buyer )
Tag Line: The newly developed question in these proceedings while the instant appeal was pending adjudication is the alienation of the property by respondents No.1 and 2 to respondent No.3. It is claimed to have changed hands and respondent No.3 claimed to have acquired rights in the property and very ably represented by the same counsel who represents the respondents No.1 and 2. Its alienation was effected while the interim order was operating. Additionally Mr. Abrar argued issue of lis pendens. Admittedly the notice under section 18 of the Registration Act in terms of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act was not issued. The question of lis pendens would take its effect when proceedings would be initiated in terms of section 18 of the Registration Act, 1908 for its effectiveness and cure as required in terms of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.975/2018 Syed Muhammad Sami-ud-Din v. Muhammad Aqil & others,C.A.976/2018 Muhammad Amir & another v. Muhammad Aqil & another,C.A.32-K/2018 Muhammad Aqil v. Muhammad Amir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending ,Disposed Dismissed
23) 174/2010 Civil Revision Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (Applicant) V/S M/s. Seaward Surveyors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 MLD 24
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 06-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting
24) 1542/2008 Suit MUHAMMAD BACHAL (Plaintiff) V/S PROV OF SINDH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
25) 227/2013 Cr.Bail Waheed Ali & Ors (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Murder Bail (Ocular evidence is corroborated by medical evidence), Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Bail Dismissed)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 26-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
26) 128/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector Model Customs Hyderabad (Applicant) V/S M/s Khuda Raheem & anothe (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 16-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting
27) 308/2011 Cr.Misc. Yasmin Gul Khanani and another (Applicant) V/S Tariq Mehmood (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 18-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting
28) 30/2009 Cr.Rev Haji Muhammad Usman. (Applicant) V/S Abdul Sattar and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 03-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
29) 135/2012 Suit Independent Media Corporation Private Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Mr. Ali Azmat & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Defamation Ordinance, 2002. (Application filed by defendant is allowed)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 15-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
30) 69/2004 Execution Allied Bank of Pakistan (Decree Holder) V/S Fateh textile Mills ltd & othes (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed
Order Date: 22-DEC-06
Approved for Reporting
31) 1699/2010 Suit ABBAS ALI (Plaintiff) V/S ASIF ABBAS & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 01-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
32) 1413/2014 Cr.Bail SHAH JAHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 SBLR Sindh 796
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
33) 378/2016 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD BABAR S/O MUHAMMAD SALEEM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 02-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
34) 13/2004 Const. P. Pakistan Lawyers Forum (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Supreme Court of Pakistan, Islamabad
Head-Note to be written, Keywords: Constitution of Pakistan, Legal Framework Order, 2002 LFO.
Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal, Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Mr. Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, Mr. Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Faqir Muhammad Khokhar
Order Date: 28-FEB-08
Approved for Reporting
35) 365/2010 Cr.Acq.A. Nabi Bux S/o Vikio Machhi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
36) 2149/2015 Const. P. Abdul Hameed and another (Petitioner) V/S Provicne of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Jurisdiction: Remedy before proper forum)
Tag Line:In our humble opinion, one of the reasons for introducing the doctrine of alternate remedy was to avoid and reduce the number of cases that used to be filed directly before this Court, and at the same time to allow the prescribed lower forum to exercise its jurisdiction freely under the law. Moreover, if a person moves this Court without exhausting the remedy available to him under the law at lower forum, not only would the purpose of establishing that forum be completely defeated, but such person will also lose the remedy and the right of appeal available to him under the law.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
37) 223/2008 H.C.A Abdul Rasheed & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Abdul Ghani & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.764-K/2011 Abdul Ghani (decd) thr. his L.Rs. & others v. Abdul Rashid (decd) his L.Rs. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
38) 444/2019 Const. P. Aam Loeg Ittehad & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Election Matters
Tag Line:A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, has pronounced the judgment on 12.06.2020 filed by Aam Log Ittehad, through its Secretary General Azhar Jamil and Mr. Wajihuddin Ahmed (former Judge of Hon?ble Supreme Court of Pakistan) in his capacity as Human Rights and Political Activist, challenging the appointment of respondents No.2 to 5, Justice (Retired) Shakeel Ahmed Baloch, former Judge, Balochistan High Court; (ii) Justice (Retired) Irshad Qaiser, former Judge, Peshawar High Court; (iii) Justice (Retired) Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi, former Judge Lahore High Court; & (iv) Abdul Ghaffar, a former bureaucrat, who according to petitioners, have been appointed in violation of Article 207 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, which provides that "a person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court shall not hold any office of profit in the service of Pakistan, not being a judicial or quasi-judicial office or the office of Chief Election Commissioner or of Chairman or member of a law commission or of Chairman or member of the Council of Islamic Ideology, before the expiration of two years after he has ceased to hold that office". This being a case of first impression on the subject constitutional and legal points has been decided through this detailed judgment by Hon?ble Bench in the following terms:
"22. We would, therefore, sum up our findings on various constitutional and legal grounds agitated by the petitioners and the objections as to maintainability of instant petition raised by the respondents, in the following terms:
(i) Petitioners have the locus standi to file instant constitutional petition in the nature of quo-warranto under Article 199(i)(b)(ii) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 for the reason that any person, who may not be an aggrieved party, can invoke the constitutional jurisdiction of a High Court for issuance of a writ of quo-warranto so that a High Court may examine the validity of an appointment to a public office, on constitutional and legal grounds. In view of our detailed finding as recorded in Para: 9 to 12 hereinabove, the objections raised by the respondents with regard to maintainability of instant petition on various grounds, including: (i) locus standi of petitioners to file instant petition; (ii) mala fide on the part of the petitioners; (iii) latches; and (iv) lack of territorial jurisdiction of this Court, are hereby declared to be without any substance, hence over-ruled.
ii) Office of Election Commission of Pakistan is a "quasi-judicial office", therefore, bar of expiration of two years in terms of Article 207(2) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, would not be attracted in the case of appointment of retired judges of Supreme Court and High Court(s). Therefore, a writ of quo-warranto cannot be issued against respondents Nos. 2 to 4 being the retired Judges of different High Courts on the grounds that their appointments have been made before expiration of two years from the date when they ceased to hold office as Judges of High Courts. Accordingly, writ against respondents Nos.2 to 4 is misconceived and not maintainable.
iii) As regards issuance of writ of quo-warranto against respondent No.5, a retired bureaucrat, no substantial constitutional or legal ground has been agitated, nor any sufficient material or evidence has been produced in support of the allegations of corruption, therefore, we are not inclined to conduct any inquiry or to make a probe into the allegations levelled against respondent No.5 while exercising constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199(i)(b)(ii) of the Constitution in the instant case. Accordingly, writ against respondent No.5 is not maintainable.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2018
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 12-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.479-K/2020 Aam Loeg Itehad & others v. The Election Commission of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
39) 160/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. RAO NADEEM @ GOGA S/O HASSAN ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
40) 79/2014 Cr.Misc. M/s.Abid S. Zuberi & others (Applicant) V/S M/s.Kh.Shamsul Islam and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 26-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
41) 641/2020 Suit Mr. Shakeel Qadir (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Shumaila Umair (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 514
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
42) 1285/2010 Const. P. Safdar Ali Sahito (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-OCT-10
Approved for Reporting
43) 1511/2005 Const. P. K.E.S.C Labour Union and others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973
1. A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan has pronounced the judgment today i.e. on 21st January 2021 in the case of K.E.S.C. Labour Union and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the privatization process adopted by the Respondents Nos.2 and 3 i.e. Privatization Commission through its Secretary and Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. through its Managing Director in respect of sale/transfer of the shares of KESC for being illegal, irrational and without lawful authority. Whereas, further declaration has been sought to the effect that purported sale and transfer of shareholding and management control in KESC to M/s.Hassan Associates consortium, is void, malafide and opposed to law and public policy. Various other Constitutional and legal grounds were agitated during the course of hearing of above Petitions and after hearing all the learned counsel for the parties, in detail, learned Divisional Bench of this Court through an exhaustive judgment pronounced today has been pleased to dismiss the above Petitions in the following terms: -
"62. In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of the case, the aforesaid petitions are disposed of in the following terms:-
a) The privatization process adopted by the respondents No.2 & 3 in respect of sale/transfer of the share of KESC does not violate the constitutional mandate, whereas, substantial compliance of the provisions of Privatization Commission Ordinance, 2000 read with Privatization Commission (Modes and Procedures) Rules, 2001, has also been made, therefore, no interference is required by this Court. Accordingly, aforesaid Constitutional Petitions being devoid of any merit, are hereby dismissed along with listed applications.
b) That without prejudice to above finding, we hereby declare that the petitioners have failed to establish the malafide on the part of respondents in respect of sale/transfer of the share to KESC through negotiated sale to a private company, which is otherwise permissible in law and as per rules referred to hereinabove, therefore, the allegation of malafide by the petitioners on the part of the respondents stands rebutted, hence petitions are dismissed on this ground also.
c) Nothing has been produced by the learned counsel for the petitioners in support of their submission that electricity being an essential service cannot be privatized, therefore, such plea of the petitioners also stands rebutted and the petitions are hereby dismissed on this account also."
2. Before parting with the aforesaid judgment, learned Divisional Bench of this Court has been further pleased to observe that plea of the learned counsel for the petitioners requiring the Court to take cognizance of subsequent events of privatization, issue directions to the Auditor General of Pakistan for conducting scrutiny and audit of the accounts of the K-Electric (KESC), cannot be acceded in these Petitions, as it would amount to granting a relief to the petitioners beyond the pleadings, while changing the complexion of the proceedings, to the disadvantage of the respondents, which is not permissible in law. However, it has been observed that this aspect of the matter can be agitated as a separate cause before the relevant forum/authority/Court of law, by filing appropriate proceedings, however, subject to all just exceptions and in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 427
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 21-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.482-K/2021 KESC Labour Union through its Chairman & another v. Federation of Pakistan Through the Cabinet Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
44) 447/2008 Const. P. Ali Asghar Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S M/s. Tyms Education Limited & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 12-APR-12
Approved for Reporting
45) 84/2011 Execution M/s. NIB Bank Ltd (Decree Holder) V/S Apollo Textile Mills Ltd & others (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 430
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
46) 299/2021 H.C.A Asif Siddik Adam (Appellant) V/S Siddiki Fun Trust & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 549
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Mehreen(ADVO-10600-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Qasim Iqbal(ADVO-19002-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Yaseen Khan Azad(ADVO-2367-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 10-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.936-K/2023 Asif Siddik Adam v. Siddiki Fund Trust through its Trustees & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (-) Salahuddin Panhwar,J
47) 2389/2014 Suit Al-Tamash Medical Society (Plaintiff) V/S Dr. Anwar Ye Bin Je & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Amenity Plot , Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:With all humility, the aforesaid dictums are distinguishable as on the face of it in the present case there is no change or conversion of amenity plot to commercial or residential use but throughout the pleadings, nothing has been surfaced that the defendant Nos.1 and 2 or the defendant Nos.8 to 10 are endeavoring to convert the use of land from amenity to commercial or residential use.
Citation:2017 MLD 785
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
48) 3757/2013 Const. P. Yaqoob Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, has pronounced the judgment on 02.07.2020, filed by large number of petitioners, whereby, imposition of Income Support Levy at the rate of 0.5% on the value of Net Moveable Assets, through Income Support Levy Act, 2013, has been challenged for being ultravires to Constitution, as according to petitioners, subject levy did not possess the characteristic of a tax, therefore, could not be introduced through Finance Act 2013, along with Money Bill in terms of Article 73 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The subject levy was also challenged for being violative of the provisions of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, as according to petitioners, Income Support Levy is discriminatory in nature, as it creates unreasonable classification between the same class of persons having Net Moveable Assets exceeding Rs.1.00 Million. The Hon?ble Divisional Bench of this Court, after having examined in detail all the constitutional and legal points involved in these petitions, has been pleased to allow the petitions in the following terms:-
(i) The levy imposed through Income Support Levy Act, 2013 alongwith Money Bill, does not possess the characteristics of a tax, as it is not a common burden for raising revenue to be utilized for general public purpose, on the contrary, it is a levy in the nature of fund to be charged and utilized for a specific purpose i.e. ?to provide for financial resources for raising an income support fund for the economically distressed persons and their families?. Accordingly, the Income Support Levy Act, 2013, could not be introduced through Finance Act, 2013, in terms of Article 73 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, the same is hereby declared to be ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.
(ii) The levy imposed through Income Support Levy Act, 2013, is hereby declared to be ultravires to the Constitution for being discriminatory, as it creates unreasonable classification within the same class of person i.e. persons having Net Moveable Wealth exceeding Rs.1.00 M (One Million), whereas, its incidence and charge of levy falls un-equally upon the existing taxpayers only, who file or required to file Wealth Statement under Section 116 along with their Income Tax Return under Section 115 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, , however, non-existing taxpayers, who are not required under law, or do not file their Wealth Statement along with Income Tax Return, inspite of having much higher Net Moveable Wealth, exceeding Rs.1.00 M (One Million), have been excluded from the incidence and charge of such levy, which is in clear violation of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic of Pakistan, 1973.
(iii) All the Notices and the proceedings, including assessment order(s) passed under Section 5 of the Income Support Levy Act, 2013 after repeal of the Income Support Levy Act, 2013, under clause 10 of the Finance Act, 2014, in the absence of any saving or validation clause to protect or validate the Income Support Levy Act, 2013 are hereby declared to be without jurisdiction and lawful authority.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1013
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1396/2013 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-I, Karachi v. Yaqoob Ahmed & others,C.P.1796/2013 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-I, Karachi v. Yaqoob Ahmed & others,C.P.L.A.1237-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Yaqoob Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
49) 309/2019 Const. P. Rashid Ali Noonari (Petitioner) V/S Mst Zoya & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Family matter (Family Court dismissed Conditional dower amount ,DJ allowed .High Court Restored Family Court Order and Sat aside Appellate Court Order .)
Tag Line:1. A supreme court judgment, though later in time, is not binding if it has not considered an earlier view of a bench of co-equal strength; nor has referred the matter for constitution of a larger bench. The earlier view will be the binding precedent till such time it is in the field.
2. Family court has no jurisdiction under clause 9 of Schedule to Section 5 of the Family Court Acts, 1964 in cases of enforcement of clause 18 and 19 of the Nikahnama which are dependent on the happening of or related to KHULA or DIVORCE. It vests in the ordinary courts as settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Mukhtar Hussaid Shah (PLD 2011 SC 260)
A supreme court judgment, though later in time, is not binding if it has not considered an earlier view of a bench of co-equal strength; nor has referred the matter for constitution of a larger bench. The earlier view will be the binding precedent till such time it is in the field.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 162
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
50) 88/2002 Civil Revision Syed Shahan Shah @ Syed Nasrullah Shah (Applicant) V/S Syed Amanullah Shah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 10
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
51) 575/2009 Const. P. Dr.Jalil Qadir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 27-APR-10
Approved for Reporting
52) 8551/2017 Const. P. Danish Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1326
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.466-K/2020 M/s. Danish Iqbal v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary of Law & others,C.A.1324/2020 Danish Iqbal v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary of Law & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Pending
53) 815/2010 Suit MUHAMMAD SHAHNAWAZ & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VI Rule 17)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
54) 416/2011 Suit GHULAM NABI SHAH (Plaintiff) V/S PIAC & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 PLC CS 768
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
55) 69/2011 Cr.Rev Akhtar Pervaiz Qrueshi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 14-APR-12
Approved for Reporting
56) 628/2009 Suit ILYAS AHMED (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD MUNIR & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 17-NOV-11
Approved for Reporting
57) 1724/2009 Suit MST.ZAIBUNISA & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S IQBAL AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Cancellation Sale Deed)
Tag Line:Section 39 of Specific Relief Act. Cancellation of Document. An instrument inherently void not required a formal cancellation under Section 39 of Specif Relief Act. Object of Law is to advance justice and remedy the wrong forthwith, instead of putting a law abiding person through the mill. to enforce orderly behaviour in a society. General Damages awarded for sufferings of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs awarded general damages due to protracted litigation and on account of fraudulent act of Defendants.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
58) 1761/2008 Suit Mst. Shagufta Noor (Plaintiff) V/S Defendant (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Appointment of commissioner to record evidence)
Citation:2012 CLC 1902
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 06-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
59) 3/2018 Judicial Companies Misc. Dr. Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Others (Applicant) V/S Mohammad Asif & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Forensic Audit of Company / Respondent No. 5 ordered in terms of Section 286 of the Companies Act ordered.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
60) 1623/2023 Cr.Bail SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 652
Advocates:Shaikh Muhammad Raza(ADVO-19262-SBC-KHE),Mohammad Ali Waris(ADVO-4491-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
61) 3415/2017 Const. P. Dr. Uzma Shaheen Pirzada (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1100
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.614-K/2017 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.9-K/2019 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ Early date ],Disposed Disposed of
62) 1092/2015 Const. P. Sarha Rasheed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anwar Hussain, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 14-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
63) 3693/2011 Adm. Suit Mohammad Khan Jalbani (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
64) 6383/2015 Const. P. Tehseen Muzammil and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:School Fees, Schools who have increased their
tuition fees over 5% per annum for the last three years
from the date of their respective registration/reregistration, no further enhancement be permitted until
their re-registration whereupon enhancement be
regulated in strict compliance of Sub-rule 7 (3) of the
Rules 2002
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 07-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.869-K/2016 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.11-K/2017 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
65) 166/2019 H.C.A Najmul Hassan & ors (Appellant) V/S Romana Qamar & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 516
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1357-K/2020 Najmul Hassan & others v. Romana Qamar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
66) 102/2012 Civil Revision Chaudhry Manzoor Ahmed & another (Plaintiff) V/S Faisal Manzoor & other (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 30-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
67) 1134/2011 Suit M/S. SADAT BUSINESS GROUP LTD (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 )
Citation:2013 CLD 1451
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
68) 1009/2015 Suit M/s. Century Paper & Board Mills Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 1269
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
69) 1637/2013 Const. P. Dawood Singhar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 28-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
70) 277/2014 Const. P. Pharmatee Pakistan PVT LTD (Petitioner) V/S Bakht Rehman and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
71) 43/2013 Cr.Rev Shahrukh Jatoi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 15-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
72) 84/2023 Const. P. Parvez Ali Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article 25-A Right to education)
Tag Line:In a comprehensive judgment, the court issued multiple directives aimed at overhauling the education sector in Sindh to ensure alignment with national and global standards. Key directives issued in the judgment to the concerned quarters include:-
??? Launch awareness programs for education importance.
??? Reopen closed schools with updated codes and staff.
??? Quickly hire merit-based teachers and staff.
??? Form a committee to adjust teacher-student ratios.
??? Swiftly hire non-teaching alongside teaching staff.
??? Recognize and meet the needs of upgraded schools.
??? Promote physical activities in schools.
??? Use budgets efficiently for education projects.
??? Allocate unused funds to school maintenance.
??? Start urgent school repairs and provide necessary facilities.
??? Extend all degrees to four years to meet global standards.
??? Restore Technical Education up to the Metric level.
??? Chief Secretary to monitor progress of these directives.
??? Recruit staff urgently to operationalize closed schools.
??? Make closed schools functional with necessary resources.
??? Ensure school renovations and create accessible paths.
??? Ensure compliance and accountability for these directives.
??? Upgrade schools with digital resources and IT curriculum.
??? Update libraries with internet and digital access.
??? Make education accessible to all and ensure regular attendance.
??? Install solar panels and basic facilities in schools.
??? Prioritize high-quality education for student development
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 49, 2025 SHC SUK 2053
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 25-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
73) 31/2011 Cr.J.A Dhani Bux s/o Bagh Lakhiar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting
74) 159/2022 Const. P. Sadam Hussain and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether the private respondents have the requisite length of service to claim promotion to the post of Executive Engineer (BS-18) in the PHED; and, whether the DPC considered the case of the petitioners along with private respondents for promotion under law and policy of the Government of Sindh as introduced in the year 1984 or otherwise
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 287
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1709/2022 Fazal uddin Soomro and others v. Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi ad others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
75) 62/2010 H.C.A Muhammad Naved Aslam & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Mst.Aisha Siddiqui & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.166-K/2011 Muhammad Naveed Aslam and others v. Mst. Aisha Siddiqui and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
76) 22/2003 Suit.B M/S.AZMAT TRADING CO. (Plaintiff) V/S NDLC IFIC BANK (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
77) 81/2011 Cr.J.A Mujahid @ Ghulam Shabir Gahejo (Applicant) V/S he State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 04-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
78) 230/2016 S.M.A In the matter of Letter of Administration of deceased Tahir Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Nil (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: International Law, Civil Procedure Law (UAE), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 13.), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 44.)
Tag Line:It would be an inconvenience, rather a hardship for the present Petitioner and her siblings to file the proceeding in respect of properties of her deceased father in three different Countries; Pakistan for moveable property, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates for the immoveable properties, particularly, when instant Proceeding is a noncontentious in nature. Proprietary rights are mentioned in Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and hence they can neither be ignored nor their significance can be lessened.
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 130, 2017 SBLR Sindh 2034
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 02-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
79) 618/2012 Const. P. Nasrullah Domki (Petitioner) V/S SHO PS Saddar Jacobabad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Nasrullah Const.p: Petitions No. S- 618 of 2012.S-65, 74, 79, 134, 164, 226, 284, 337, 697, 814,834, 845, 932 and 1079 of 2015.
Citation:2016 PLD 238
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 14-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
80) 5158/2014 Const. P. Zeeshan Mustafa Lashari and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.69-K/2015 Mir Salman Abro and another v. Zeeshan Mustafa Lashari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
81) 3/2013 I. A Soofi Rice Mills & Others (Appellant) V/S N.B.P & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2019 CLD 395
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4495/2018 Sofi Rice Mills, Larkana & others v. National Bank of Pakstan thr. its Manager Branch at Rato Dero, Larkana,C.A.318/2020 Sofi Rice Mills, Larkana & others v. National Bank of Pakstan thr. its Manager Branch at Rato Dero, Larkana Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned
82) 1254/2015 Suit Mrs Naveen Irfan (Plaintiff) V/S Mst Shama Parveen (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
83) 1141/2009 Const. P. M/S EFU General Insurance Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 08-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
84) 1154/2022 Cr.Bail ARSHAD ALI S/O ASGHAR ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 897
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-9955-SBC-KHI),M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),S. Abdul Rawoof(ADVO-9110-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
85) 3337/2013 Const. P. Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Director General of Intelligence and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 11-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
86) 1076/2013 Suit Digri Sugar Mills Limited and others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mian Kamran Elahi and others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In a Suit for Declaration, Injunction, Cancellation, Rendition of Accounts and Recovery, Plaintiffs had sought a restraining order against Defendants from presenting postdated cheques given as security pursuant to written agreements between the parties; or to use the same for any criminal proceedings or otherwise. Defendants opposed this application on the ground that section 56 (e) of the Specific Relief Act bars grant of any such permanent injunction; hence, no temporary injunction can be granted. The Court repelled this argument and allowed the injunction application by passing a temporary injunction and restrained the Defendants from using such cheques in any manner pending trial of the Suit.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 83
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
87) 75/2012 H.C.A Shaikh Muhammad Sabir (Appellant) V/S M/s. K.K Builders (Pvt) Ltd., and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 115
Advocates:Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-3719-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI),Munir Uddin(ADVO-10835-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
88) 2694/2019 Const. P. Human Resources Solution (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1308
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
89) 1899/2021 Cr.Bail FARAZ TASNEEM S/O TASNEEM UR RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Primarily, in bail matters, it is the discretion of every Court to grant the bail, but such discretion should not be arbitrary, fanciful, or perverse, as the case in hand begs a question as to what constitutes an offense under section 489-F, P.P.C. Every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation, and lastly that the cheque in question is dishonored.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 95
Advocates:Chaudry Rizwan ur Rasheed(ADVO-13051-SBC-MLR),Aurangzeb(ADVO-3048-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
90) 272/2020 Cr.Bail ABDULLAH S/O MEHMOOD RAZA & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail dismissed U/S 9 C After arrest. )
Citation:2021 MLD 267
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
91) 819/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) V/S Mst Khursheed Lubna & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 YLR 2003
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
92) 411/2022 Const. P. Gul Mina Afridi D/o Khan Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Rana Abdul Kareem and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 930
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Tamar Victor Lawrence(ADVO-18974-SBC-KHE),Imran Sami(ADVO-19341-SBC-KHS),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS),Fozia Muneer(ADVO-5018-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
93) 1458/2011 Suit NAJMUDDIN ZIA & ANOTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S MST. ASMA QAMAR & 3 OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 SBLR Sindh 666
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
94) 1231/2006 Suit Muhammad Ibrahim Hajano (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
95) 636/2012 Suit Mari Gas Company Ltd (Plaintiff) V/S Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 314
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
96) 940/2016 Const. P. M/s Al-Zarina Glass (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 14-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.920/2018 The Chief Commissioner (IR) Region, Hyderabad v. M/s Al-Zarina Glass Industries and others,C.P.L.A.472-K/2017 The Chief Commissioner (IR) Region, Hyderabad v. M/s Al-Zarina Glass Industries and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed
97) 1136/2014 Const. P. Sarfraz (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Maher, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 17-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
98) 526/2014 Const. P. data not available, hyd case (Petitioner) V/S data not available (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
99) 196/2010 Const. P. M/S Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd and another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 290
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Moin Azhar Siddiqui(ADVO-3955-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1218/2022 Competition Commission of Pakistan Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad v. M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd Karachi and others,C.A.1402/2024 Competition Commission of Pakistan Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad v. M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, will be heard a/w appeals out of C.P.3562/22 etc.,
100) 315/2019 Cr.J.A ROSHAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 1157
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 11-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
101) 855/2021 Suit ISHRAT SWALEH (Plaintiff) V/S MST. FARZANA SHAIKH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section of 151 CPC Defendant No. 2, seeks rejection of the Plaint.
suit for Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction.
Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, an agreement between two or more persons which creates an obligation to do or not to do a particular thing. The Contract Act, 1872 [the Act] defines the term Contract under its section 2 (h) as An agreement enforceable by law.
it cannot be revoked/terminated, yet it may be observed that merely the use of the word irrevocable in a power of attorney will not make it so, unless it is clear from the terms that it is an agency coupled with interest of the agent without which it will be only an independent authority lacking the interest as envisaged in Section 202 of the Contract Act, 1872.
Insofar as the question of limitation is concerned, Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908, provides period of limitation of three years for filing of a suit for specific performance of contract.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 213
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
102) 470/2006 H.C.A Mst. Halima Tahir & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Naheed Ejaz &Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 18-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
103) 217/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) V/S Amanullah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: LIMITATION (CP dismissed, Execution application is time barred, in rent case, section 48 CPC is applicable . )
Citation:2020 YLR Note 979
Advocates:Eijaz Ali Hakro Associates(Firm-390-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 10-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.657-K/2019 Muhammad Usman v. Amanullah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
104) 15/2018 I. A Pak Leather Crafts Limited & others (Appellant) V/S Al-Barak Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1422-K/2018 Pak Leather Crafts Limited and others v. Al-Baraka Bank Limited,C.A.24-K/2019 Pak Leather Crafts Limited and others v. Al-Baraka Bank Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
105) 42/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Rehmatullah & others (Applicant) V/S Inayatullah Khoso & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2024 CLC 311
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
106) 158/2010 I.T.R.A Commissioner (Legal) V/S M/S EFU General Insurance Ltd (Applicant) V/S Commissioner (Legal) V/S M/S EFU General Insurance Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 06-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
107) 22/2010 Cr.Appeal Syed Naveed Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
108) 323/2009 Cr.Misc. Haji Muhammad Zakria Seth (Applicant) V/S The State & 2 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 25-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
109) 25/2014 Execution Saleem Ahmed Mirza (Decree Holder) V/S (Ret) Major Syed Iftikhar Hussain Zaidi & others (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 23-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
110) 1914/2020 Const. P. Amir Akbar Khan (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Applicability of the regime of sections 204 and 91 Cr.P.C. to a Reference under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 16
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 26-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5188/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Amir Akbar Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
111) 878/2014 Const. P. Jaffar Ali (Petitioner) V/S SHO Airport PS Latifabad Hyd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 25-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting
112) 279/2007 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Collector of Sales Tax and Fderal Excise (Applicant) V/S M/s. Abbott Laboratorie (Pakitan) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 09-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
113) 2/2021 Const. P. Salman Bari S/o Abdul Bari (Petitioner) V/S Samia Khan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Under Article 199 of Constitution,
Petitioner seeks recall of order dated 01.12.2020, whereby non-bailable warrants (NBWs) was issued against the petitioner-- Section 51, CPC-- In the present case, the petitioner has specifically, pleaded that he had already paid a partial payment of Rs.2,71,000/- (Rupees Two Lac and Seventy-One Thousand) to the private respondent vide statement dated 10.11.2020 (available at page 73 of memo of petition) and undertake to pay the remaining amount within a reasonable time as per his financial position-- In the light of the aforesaid legal position of the case and an undertaking of the petitioner, the operation of NBWs issued against him by the learned trial Court is converted into BWs, enabling him to furnish security / appropriate bond equivalent to the remaining amount before the learned trial Court. However, the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on the next date of hearing and in case of failure, the order passed by the learned trial Court on 01.12.2020 shall be operative.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 775
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.216-K/2024 Salman Bari v. Samia Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Dismissed as Not Pressed
114) 288/2013 Const. P. Syed Sajid Abbas Rizivi (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Naureen and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter (Petitioner used delay tactus . CP dismissed with Cost .)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 25-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
115) 264/2010 H.C.A Asadullah Mirbahar & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Mrs.Ayesha Muzahir & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 08-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting
116) 242/2009 Cr.Acctt.A State / Anti Narcotics Force (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Adeel Hussain & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 27-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
117) 6241/2016 Const. P. Anjum Badar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Contract appointments)
Tag Line:petitioners have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments / services be regularized in BPS-17 under Section 3 of The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013---Whether temporary employees appointed on contract in BS 16 and above can be deemed to have been validly appointed on regular basis, without going through the competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, merely in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the mandatory requirement of competitive process of selection only through the Sindh Public Service Commission for appointments in BS 16 and above, which is the command of the Constitution and specific direction to the Government of Sindh by the Honble Supreme Court, can be waived, relaxed, done away with, exempted and or bypassed in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the petitioners have any vested right for regular appointment, or to claim regularization, or to approach this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction to seek redressal of their grievance relating to regularization ; and, is there any corresponding legal duty cast on the Government of Sindh to appoint them on regular basis ? If no, then can a writ of mandamus to this effect be issued against the Government of Sindh ? --Whether Section 3 of the Act of 2013, to the extent of regularization / appointment in BS 16, 17 and 18 without the mandatory competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, is ultra vires the Constitution and against the law laid down and the direction given by the Honble Supreme Court to the Government of Sindh in Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and others V/S Province of Sindh and others, 2015 SCMR 456.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 351
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Rana Khalid Hussain(ADVO-15716-SBC-KHI),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.735-K/2021,C.A.28-K/2021,C.A.27-K/2021,C.M.A.589-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1727-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1728-K/2021 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed [ C.P. be numbered & leave granted & C.A. be fixed after three months ],Disposed ,Disposed
118) 1497/2020 Const. P. Nasir Kamal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:PNSC is hereby directed to pay all the post-retirement benefits to the petitioner strictly in accordance with law without fail within fifteen (15) days and to submit compliance report to this Court through MIT-II within seven (07) days thereafter. For future as well as for cases pending for calculation and/or payment of post-retirement benefits, PNSC is further directed to ensure compliance of the directions given by the Honble Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Advocate (supra) and Province of Punjab, through Conservator of Forest, Faisalabad (supra) in letter and spirit The petition is allowed in the above terms with costs.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1417
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI),Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI),Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-4097-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1089-K/2021 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation through its Chairman v. Nasir Kamal & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
119) 1011/2013 Const. P. REHAN AHMED BIAG (Petitioner) V/S MST. SABEEN NAZ & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 06-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
120) 189/2022 Cr.Rev MUHAMMAD ASIF SOOMRO & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE PRESIDING OFFICER VITH ADJ KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 760
Advocates:Riaz Akhtar(ADVO-17792-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
121) 191/2018 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner I-R Zone-IV (Applicant) V/S Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Default surcharge and penalty, in relation to the circular debt.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 705
Advocates:Faheem Ali(ADVO-16513-SBC-KHS),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1221-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
122) 905/2017 Const. P. M/s MCB (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2612/2019 MCB Bank Ltd, Lahore v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Zulfiqar Hussain Awan, Director (Legal-II), Office of Consultant Legal Affairs to the President of Pakistan, Islamabad & others,C.A.533/2020 MCB Bank Ltd, Lahore v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Zulfiqar Hussain Awan, Director (Legal-II), Office of Consultant Legal Affairs to the President of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 4 weeks a/w C.As.1386/2018 etc,Pending Adjourned
123) 1072/2015 Suit Delhi Mercantile Muslim Co-operative Housing Society (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting
124) 9/2020 Const. P. Mst. Shabana (Petitioner) V/S Nadir Ali Magsi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 650
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.522-K/2022 Mst. Shabana v. Nadir Ali Magsi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
125) 708/2011 Adm. Suit Mohammad Ibrahim Tunio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
126) 14/2013 Cr.Bail SYED OBAID AHMED THE STATE (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 27-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
127) 1757/2017 Const. P. Ava Ardeshir Cowasjee and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1930
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1899/2019 Anzar Ali Shah & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary School Education & Litreacy Department, Karachi & others,C.P.L.A.719-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Ms.AVA Ardeshir Cowasjee Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
128) 89/2015 Cr.Acq.A. SYED MUHAMMAD AHSAN (Appellant) V/S MUNAWAR ALI NAQVI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 (Section 8), Criminal Procedure Code (Sub-section 4 of Section 403)
Tag Line:(a) Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005)-
----Ss. 3, 5 & 7---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 265-H & 417(2A)---Appeal against acquittal--- Appreciation of evidence--- Illegal dispossession---Declaration to title---Proof---Appellant was complainant and was aggrieved of dispossession from subject property by accused persons---Trial Court under S. 265-H(i), Cr.P.C. acquitted accused persons---Validity---Law of land and even Shia Personal Law did not authorize Momineen of any locality to request anyone amongst themselves to unlawfully control or occupy immovable property of an orphanage owned by some registered private institution with intention to dispossess, grab, control or occupy said property and dispossess otherwise lawful occupiers of such property---Accused persons, despite backing of so-called religious scholars and their goodwill in community were conscious of fact that they had no moral authority or legal defense to justify taking over possession of subject property and grab and control of resources of private institution---Accused persons never filed any civil suit to seek declaration of their title in respect of subject property as they knew that their so-called working committee was not even fraudulently registered---High Court set aside judgment of acquittal passed by Trial Court and convicted accused persons under S. 3(2) of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 along with fine---Appeal was allowed accordingly.
2010 YLR 2139; Muhammad Akram and 9 others v. Muhammad Yousuf and another 2009 SCMR 1066; PLD 1989 SC 283; PLD 1971 SC 550; 2012 CLC 793; Shahabuddin v. The State PLD 2010 SC 725; Mumtaz Hussain v. Dr. Nasir Khan and others 2010 SCMR 1254; Shaikh Muhammad Naseem v. Mst. Farida Gul 2016 SCMR 1931 and Mst. Gulshan Bibi and others v. Muhammad Sadiq and others PLD 2016 SC 769 ref.
(b) Illegal Dispossession Act (X1 of 2005)---
----S. 3---Illegal dispossession---Abandoned property---Principle---Even abandoned property is supposed to be in constructive possession of its lawful owner---If at all there is any defect in status of owner to hold, occupy and control subject property of private institution, accused are not supposed to contravene S. 3(1) of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005. (c) Illegal Dispossession Act (X1 of 2005)---
----Ss. 3 & 5---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 92---Illegal dispossession---Criminal and civil liabilities---Determination---Accused persons cannot contend that complainant has no lawful authority to file legal proceedings in view of S. 92, C.P.C. when raised before a court seized of a criminal case---Proceedings under Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 cannot be regulated by Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
Zafar Ahmad and 5 others v. The State and 3 others PLD 2007 Lah. 231 and Bashir Ahmed v. Additional Sessions Judge PLD 2010 SC 661 ref
Citation:2020 YLR Sindh 1
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.161-K/2019,Crl.P.166-K/2019,Crl.P.158-K/2019,Crl.P.L.A.913/2019,Crl.P.L.A.987/2019,Crl.A.403/2019,Crl.A.404/2019,Crl.A.405/2019,Crl.A.406/2019,Crl.A.407/2019 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted( Notice in Crl.MAs for suspension of sentence in all cases for 29.10.2019),Disposed Leave Granted( Notice in Crl.MAs for suspension of sentence in all cases for 29.10.2019),Disposed Leave Granted( Notice in Crl.MAs for suspension of sentence in all cases for 29.10.2019),Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.
129) 544/2025 Const. P. Mst Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 359
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
130) 181/2016 H.C.A Adam A. Muchhadda (Appellant) V/S Captain (R) H.A.Rahim (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 10-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.301-K/2017 Adam A. Muchhadda v. Capt. (R) H.A. Rahim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
131) 5220/2017 Const. P. Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Tag line
Dispute regarding value of supply of services of labor and manpower under heading 9829.0000;
Held, that under Sindh Sales Tax Act 2011 read with Rule 42(E) of Sindh Sales Tax Rules 2011 such value does not include the amount of salary and wages reimbursed by the recipient of the service and tax is payable only on the service charges component.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1041
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1188/2021 Sindh Revnue Board through its Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi v. M/s Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Limited Karachi and another,C.P.L.A.317-K/2021 The Provice of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. M/s. Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
132) 1211/1996 Suit LT. COL (R) MUHAMMAD WALI KHAN. (Plaintiff) V/S UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
133) 4469/2013 Const. P. Prof. Dr. Masood Hameed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Governor of Sind and Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLC CS 1014
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
134) 1/2024 I. A Saturgun (Appellant) V/S Engeer Kumar & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1043
Advocates:Qamar Iqbal(ADVO-9999-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
135) 601/2017 Const. P. Kashif Hussain Gaad (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
136) 466/2021 Const. P. Ajaz-ul-Haque (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Urooj & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 141
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
137) 424/2020 Cr.Bail Wajid Pahore (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters (Post arrest bail Rejected.U/S 377 PPC, as direct evidence available.)
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1284
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
138) 415/2018 Const. P. Ghulam Mehdi & others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:he subsequent judgment of the Member Board of Revenue dated 20.04.2017 not only ignored the order of his predecessor, but also ignored the fact that the suit, challenging the order of his predecessor, was also dismissed. These orders i.e. order of the Senior Civil Judge and more importantly the order of the Member Board of Revenue is implied res judicata as the subject matter of the appeal is nothing but the land which is defined as UA No.437 and 438. Here, it could safely be added that legally the litigation (s) are meant to decide controversies (issues). Where, the controversy / issue is that of general application and not limited to a party only then any decision thereon by a competent forum shall be binding upon all, including those who even were not before the legal forum / authority. A mere change of name of parties would never be sufficient to open a new round of litigation for the thing which otherwise stood decided by a lawful forum / authority. If this is ignored, there shall be no end to litigations and interested shall keep things hanging merely by substituting parties. An aggrieved however may get such decision reversed by appeal or reviewed, subject to law, but cannot seek another order from same forum / authority on plea of his being not a party to earlier lis. Any departure to such concept, shall result in frustrating the object of res judicata which otherwise has application in all matters, including Revenue jurisdiction.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 27-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
139) 215/2015 Suit Muhammad Rafiq (Plaintiff) V/S Habib Bank Limited. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1215
Advocates:Faraz Faheem Siddiqui(ADVO-12257-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Jamshid Malik(ADVO-16711-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
140) 232/2007 H.C.A Muhammad Saad &others (Appellant) V/S Amna & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 29-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
141) 1928/2016 Suit Mr. Mehtab Tahir Niazi (Plaintiff) V/S M/s Al-Qasmia Properties & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 685
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shafi(ADVO-2185-SBC-KHC),Farman Ullah(ADVO-11315-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.445/2023 Khawaja Muhammad Awan v. Government of Sindh through its Secretary Home, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
142) 1109/2014 Adm. Suit SIKANDER ALI LASHARI S/O ALI MUHAMMAD LASHARI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 12-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
143) 500/2006 Suit DELHI MERCANTILE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD (Plaintiff) V/S REGISTRRA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES SINDH & (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
144) 1109/2013 Cr.Bail ALI BUX QADRI S/O NATHU KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 28-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
145) 909/2024 Cr.Bail SYED FURQAN ALI S/O SYED ASHFAQ ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:To prove the charge against an accused under Section 489-F. P.P.C. all the ingredients of section 489-F, P.P.C. must be proved through cogent evidence and beyond any shadow of a doubt, however, in this case, the complainant claims that he made a Marketing business transaction with the applicant and the applicant issued a cheque for an amount of Rs.15000,000/- and in this regard, and the applicant has pleaded that the subject cheques were issued as a security amount in a business transaction which was not for the encashment as such he made an attempt to stop the payment but the Bank refused to entertain his request due to insufficient funds which are wrong notion on the part of Bank, however this aspect of the case is to be determined by the trial Court under what circumstances, the cheque (s) was/were issued and what was the intention of the person, issuing it.
7. Prima facie, the mere issuance of a cheque(s) and its being dishonored by itself is not an offense, unless and until dishonesty on the part of a payer is proved.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1046
Advocates:Shaneel(ADVO-21109-SBC-KHS),Lubna Ashfaq Abbasi(ADVO-10807-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
146) 699/2019 Const. P. Abdul Jabbar Mahar & Other (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 727
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
147) 1590/2023 Const. P. Attock Cement Pakistan Ltd and another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: The Constitution (26th Amendment) Act, 2024 (Article 199 & 202A - Constitutional High Court Powers & Constitutional Benches Roster)
Tag Line:High Court Roster Assignments in terms of Article 175 and 202A
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 763
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 02-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.594/2025 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Energy (Power Division), Islamabad v. Attock Cement Pakistan Limited Karachi and others,C.P.L.A.587/2025 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Energy (Power Division), Islamabad v. M/s MIDAS Clothing Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending
148) 2252/2019 Const. P. Amara Gohar & Others (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Sindh Public Service Commission Act 1989 (Sindh Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules, 1990)
Tag Line:Having come to the irresistible conclusion that, when (a) the framers of the Constitution consciously chose to abstain from making provisions for mandatory creation of Public Service Commission; (b) the Chief Minister of Sindh having no powers to appoint Chairman and Members of the Commission under Rule 5(ii)/Schedule-III/Entry(3) of the Sindh Government Rules of Business 1986; (c) the appointments of Chairman and Members of the Commission made under Rule 5(2) and (3) of Sindh Public Service Commission (Appointment of Chairman and Member) Rules 2017 being violative of the Rules of Business and made with utter disregard to the maintenance of political neutrality of the Commission; (d) No right to appeal having been provided to an aggrieved person; (e) Chairman and Members having taken no oath of office; (f) function of Examination of
candidates restricted to Testing and then narrowed down to Interviewing under the Sindh
Civil Servants (Functions) Rules, 1990 being ulta vires to the provisions of 1989 Act; (g) no
Annual Reports as required by Section 9(1) of the Act, 1989 having been made available to
the Public; (h) no data having been made available with regards advice refusal of the Commission under Section 8 of the Act, 1989 then how could one expect that any legit and
useful fruit could be borne by this skewed and merit-throttling recruiting process; thats
why Courts are kept engaged by Commissions Members and operatives constantly on a
permanent basis since inception of the Commission in the year 1989 when the said Act was enacted for no Constitutionally compelling reasons in the presence of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974; the Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation and Seniority) Rules, 1975; the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and half a dozen alike laws/rules; and whereas, the Province (to a great extent) had been well served by honest, qualified and motivated civil servants before 1989 when this institution in its present form was born - according to one view, to serve as one window facility to foster
whole-sale corruption, has lost every shred of legitimacy and ought to be brought to a nullity in its present form
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 414
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.816-K/2021,C.P.L.A.822-K/2021,C.A.1502/2021,C.A.1508/2021,C.P.L.A.5751/2021,C.P.L.A.5765/2021 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed in 1st week of Dec.2021,Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed in 1st week of Dec.2021,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
149) 9/2010 I. A M/s.Shaz Packages & Ors. (Appellant) V/S M/s.Bank Alfalah Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
150) 518/2013 Const. P. Amir Aslam Shaikh & ohters (Petitioner) V/S COurt of IV th Rent Controller & ohters (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the jurisdiction vested in it was not exercised fairly justly and in fact the findings of the learned Rent Controller has completely shut down the plea raised by the petitioners/tenants wherein it is alleged by tenants that in terms of section 18 the default claimed is to be regulated by section 15 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 and despite the fact that 30 days period was provided under section 18 to tender the rent, the tenants/petitioners can still avail the rights guaranteed to them in terms of proviso to section 15 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, provided that they have fulfilled the conditions laid down therein. The judgments relied upon by learned counsel for respondent No.3 are not relevant to the present case. They relate to the issue of interlocutory orders regarding which no appeal lies, however, in the instant case issue is totally different wherein the learned Rent Controller has not performed and exercised the jurisdiction, as required.
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 495
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 11-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.200-K/2013 Muhammad Nadeem v. Aamir Aslam Shaikh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
151) 7077/2016 Const. P. Shahbaz Garment (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2873/2018,C.M.A.8722/2018,C.M.A.8723/2018,C.M.A.8724/2018,C.M.A.8725/2018,C.P.L.A.461-K/2019,C.P.L.A.462-K/2019,C.P.L.A.463-K/2019,C.P.L.A.464-K/2019,C.P.L.A.465-K/2019,C.P.L.A.466-K/2019,C.P.L.A.467-K/2019,C.P.L.A.468-K/2019,C.A.98-K/2019,C.A.99-K/2019,C.A.100-K/2019,C.A.101-K/2019,C.A.65-K/2019,C.A.102-K/2019,C.A.103-K/2019,C.A.104-K/2019,C.A.105-K/2019,C.A.106-K/2019,C.A.107-K/2019,C.A.108-K/2019,C.A.109-K/2019,C.A.110-K/2019,C.A.111-K/2019,C.A.112-K/2019,C.A.113-K/2019,C.A.114-K/2019,C.A.115-K/2019,C.A.117-K/2019,C.A.116-K/2019,C.P.L.A.469-K/2019,C.P.L.A.470-K/2019,C.P.L.A.471-K/2019,C.P.L.A.472-K/2019,C.P.L.A.473-K/2019,C.P.L.A.474-K/2019,C.P.L.A.475-K/2019,C.P.L.A.476-K/2019,C.P.L.A.477-K/2019,C.P.L.A.478-K/2019,C.P.L.A.479-K/2019,C.P.L.A.480-K/2019 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
152) 4614/2022 Const. P. Hakimsons (Impex) (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Levy of tax on deemed income from capital assets in terms of Section 7E of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, is valid; within the competence of the Federal Legislature and is not ultra vires to the Constitution.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 53, 2024 PLD Sindh 132
Advocates:Imtiaz Ali Solangi(ADVO-15225-SBC-KHS),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Additional Attorney General khi(),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 28-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.51-K/2023 Zulfiqar Ali Hakim & others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Revenue Division Government of Pakistan Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 04-Jun-24)
153) 5842/2022 Const. P. Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Super Tax - Section 4C of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001.
Citation:2023 PTD 607
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan(),Muhammad Ahmed Hussain(ADVO-15940-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.220-K/2023,C.P.L.A.221-K/2023,C.P.L.A.222-K/2023,C.P.L.A.223-K/2023,C.P.L.A.224-K/2023,C.P.L.A.227-K/2023,C.P.L.A.228-K/2023,C.P.L.A.230-K/2023,C.P.L.A.126-K/2023,C.P.L.A.229-K/2023,C.P.L.A.226-K/2023,C.P.L.A.225-K/2023,C.P.L.A.3825/2022 SCP Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Disposed
154) 470/2010 Cr.Acq.A. THE STATE (Appellant) V/S MUSHTAQ AHMED SOLANGI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Abdul Baqi Mahar(ADVO-13425-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ashraf Samoo(ADVO-8176-SBC-KHI),Haseeb-Ur-Rehman(ADVO-4032-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Ashiq Ali(ADVO-15549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
155) 354/2010 Cr.Appeal Heman and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 13-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
156) 2899/2013 Const. P. UMER FAROOQ (Petitioner) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 894
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 27-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
157) 302/2017 Suit FatimaFert Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC)
Tag Line:Thus, it is unanimous view that an order of suspension of the operation of the judgment and decree or leave granting order would not operate to have a binding effect on other parties; it could operate inter parties since the operation of the judgment and decree was suspended in a particular suit/appeal with reference to particular party.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
158) 1250/2016 Const. P. Dawood Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Saleem & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 23-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
159) 132/2019 Const. P. M/s Millennium Mall Management Co (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Entry No.50 of the Fourth Schedule ), CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property including tax on annual rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment), Cantonments Act 1924 (Section-60 to 64)
Tag Line: the power to levy, charge, impose and recover any
or all tax(es) separately on immovable property is concerned it is an
alien object under cantonment laws in the present frame of the
Constitution. The tax on the annual rental value of immovable property
is a tax and not a fee or any other genre of levy. The Cantonment Boards
have no power to levy tax on immovable property including tax on
annual rental value of immovable property. The Presidential Order 13 of
1979 has no effect on the subject after the revival of the Constitution
and the 18th Amendment, and the subject law to the extent of provision
of section 3 as applied, is no longer protected.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1059
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 06-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.102/2024 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defense, Govt of Pakistan Rawalpindi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company through its Managing Partner, Karachi and others,C.P.L.A.230/2024 Faisal Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Karachi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company, through its authorized managing partner and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 05-Aug-24),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 05-Aug-24)
160) 33/2016 II.A. Muhammad Tariq (Appellant) V/S Afzal Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 03-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
161) 37/2014 H.C.A Syed Mumtaz Ali & others (Appellant) V/S Mst.Khatoon Begum (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 07-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
162) 28/2019 Const. P. Arsalan Aijaz (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sanober & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 YLR 450
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
163) 85/2020 Suit Touqeer Ahmed (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Younus Lakhani & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 235
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
164) 1352/2014 Const. P. Tahir Ayub Khan (Petitioner) V/S Ms. Aalia Anwar and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 27-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.232-K/2015 Tahir Ayub Khan v. Ms. Alya Anwar and another,C.M.A.986-K/2016 Tahir Ayub Khan v. Ms. Alya Anwar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Allowed
165) 43/2013 Cr.Appeal Jabbar Gopang (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 13-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
166) 941/2013 Suit Ms. Rehana Ahson & Another (Plaintiff) V/S Mr. Zulfiqar Mohammad (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1605
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
167) 1139/2007 Suit Muhammad Imran (Plaintiff) V/S President KASB Bank Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 07-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
168) 31/2009 Cr.Misc. P.C Zulfiqar Ali Jakhrani (Applicant) V/S Shah Muhammad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
169) 8/2019 Execution First Appeal HABIB BANK LIMITED (Appellant) V/S AMIN SOAP AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Compromise and Consent Decree)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 264
Advocates:Ammar Hussain Quazi(ADVO-16149-SBC-KHE),Mohammad Jamshid Malik(ADVO-16711-SBC-KHS),Rehman Aziz Malik(ADVO-8586-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
170) 669/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Hassan Zaman S/o Muhammad Zaman (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Bilquees and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Petition of Father dismissed, as well as G&W court and Appellate Court. Minors remain with Grand mother (nani )after death of wife.)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 802
Advocates:Syed Saeed Hasan Zaidi(ADVO-1549HLC-SBC-KHI),Asif Ali(ADVO-4531-SBC-KHI),Kabir Ahmed(ADVO-4213HLC-SBC-KHI),Farhan Ul Hassan(ADVO-15556-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.3051/2022 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Aziz ur Rehman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
171) 49/2012 Civil Revision Mumtaz Ali Hulio (Applicant) V/S Azhar Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Pre-emption
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
172) 127/2011 Adm. Suit Mulo Ahmed (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 06-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
173) 451/2016 Const. P. Ghulam Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Sindh Tenancy Act 1950 (Peasants Rights (Sindh Tenancy Act 1950)), Sindh Tenancy Act, 1950
Tag Line:Sindh Tenancy Act, 1950
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.652-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Senior Member Board of Revenue and others v. Ghulam Ali Leghari,C.A.7-K/2022 Province of Sindh thr. Senior Member Board of Revenue and others v. Ghulam Ali Leghari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
174) 510/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD ABID S/O MUHAMMAD AFZAL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 132
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
175) 3015/2017 Const. P. Ghulam Haider (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 521
Advocates:M/S. ADNAN & CO(FIRM-247-SBC-KHI),Additional Attorney General khi(),Adnan Ahmed(ADVO-3134-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 25-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
176) 121/2010 I. A Asif Kudia (Appellant) V/S M/s. KASB Bank Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 10-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
177) 111/2005 H.C.A Muhammad Sabir Awan (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Author (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XLI Rule 27 -Additional Evidence), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Dismissed)
Advocates:Nazar Hussain Dhoon(ADVO-2640-SBC-KHI),H. A. Rahmani(ADVO-1408-SBC-KHI),M/S. MUNEER A. MALIK & CO(FIRM-197-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
178) 1513/2009 Suit M/S.RABBIYA ASSOICATES (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.ZONG CHINA MOBILE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 15-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting
179) 813/2020 Const. P. Usman Hamid Thr. Attorney Muhammad Adnan Hamid (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sundus Wahid and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Jurisdiction is Challenged in G&W Case. Marriage is Solemnized In Karachi ,and Minor born in Karachi, Hence Jurisdiction is Karachi.)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1927
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
180) 15/2018 E.P Tahir Hussain Khoso (Petitioner) V/S Sohrab Khan Sarki & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Election Matters
Tag Line: If a history is traced of the judicial pronouncement relating to the question in hand that concerns with the deficiencies in the election petition and deciding its fate, the first judgment that I came across is of S. M. Ayub v. Syed Yusaf Shah and others reported in PLD 1967 Supreme Court 486. It deals with the National and Provincial Assemblies (Elections) Act (VII of 1964). Section 59 of the aforesaid law is somehow peri materia to Sections 142, 143 and 144 of the present enactment of 2017. The Hon'ble Supreme Court maintained that Section 67 does not, in terms, say that the petition shall be dismissed even if there be a partial failure to comply with the provisions of Section 59, ex facie Section 67 of the Act would seem to be designed to cover a case where the petition as a whole made allegations of a vague and indefinite character, without being supported by full particulars of the corrupt or illegal practice alleged. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that unless, therefore, the language of the law is intractable and clearly provides for dismissal of a petition for a technical defect, the Courts should not be astute to ascribe to the legislature a desire to be hypertechnical, so as to smother genuine litigation.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
181) 84/2014 II.A. Pervaiz Iqbal (Appellant) V/S Faisal Akram (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
Tag Line:Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 30.08.2017 whereby this appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, the impugned judgments and decrees were set aside and Suit No.563/2010 for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction filed by the respondent against the appellant was dismissed.
Advocates:S. M. Mustafa(ADVO-3851-SBC-KHI),Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(ADVO-6819-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.61-K/2018 Faisal Akram v. Pervaiz Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
182) 2057/2017 Const. P. Jahan Ara D/o Bahadur Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Hussain Bux(ADVO-13264-SBC-KHE),Qadir Hussain(ADVO-6245-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Wajid Ali(ADVO-171-SBC-JMS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
183) 32/2016 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Nawaz and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 137
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.64-K/2022 Rajabuddin v. Muhammad Nawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
184) 6085/2024 Const. P. Zubair Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:To elaborate further on the subject point of law, Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, guarantees equal treatment to all persons similarly placed. In terms of Article 27 of the Constitution, no citizen in the service of Pakistan or other persons shall be discriminated against in any manner. Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is in the clear negation of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 228
Advocates:Israr Ahmed(ADVO-19321-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
185) 12/2025 Judicial Companies Misc. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti (Applicant) V/S TRG Pakistan Limited and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Scope of section 286 of Companies Act, powers of Court, applicability of Limitation Act and implication of Securities Act.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1734
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.871-K/2025 The Resource Group International Limited v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti and others,C.P.L.A.872-K/2025 TRG Pakistan Limited v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti & others,C.P.L.A.2543/2025 Greentree Holdings Limited, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti thr. attorney and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 01-Dec-25). Part Heard Matter,Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 01-Dec-25). Part Heard Matter,Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 01-Dec-25). Part Heard Matter
186) 65/2018 Const. P. Ghulam Shabir (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:The comments filed by respondents No.3 and 4 accompanied with the recommendation of the Government of Sindh, Finance Department with reference to Rule 171 of the Sindh Civil Services Rules that there shall be no change in the date of birth which shall lead to the advantage to the Government servant concerned and unless an application in that behalf is made by the Government servant concerned within two (02) years of the date on which his service book was opened under Rule 167 of the Sindh Civil Services Rules. His service book apparently was opened in the year 1988 by Superintendent District Jail, Dadu, and an attempt has been made to alter it in the year 2017 and that too on the basis of irrelevant factor on account of medical certificate which otherwise, never permit such correction. It may well be added that things, if are done, in deviation to specific law and procedure, shall always be considered as nullity hence no benefit could be claimed in consequence thereof.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 11-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
187) 5807/2021 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khursheed Jehan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 441
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Mansoor Akhtar(ADVO-16880-SBC-KHC),Zahid Hussain(ADVO-14979-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 28-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
188) 30/2020 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Fatima Fertilizer Company Limited (Applicant) V/S Commissioner-II SRB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Person liable to tax.
Citation:2021 PTD 484, 2021 TAX 122
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.705/2021 Commissioner-II, Sindh Revenue Board, Karachi v. Fatima Fertilizer Company Limited, Lahore Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
189) 21/2020 Criminal Appeal Sanaullah & Another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (Control of Narcotic 9(C) Appeal allowed On Ground contradictions in the evidence of complainant and mashir, )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 314
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
190) 136/2019 Civil Revision Zia-Ul-Haque Mugheri. (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Murad Mugheri and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVII Rule 3 CPC)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 943
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
191) 1068/2003 Suit ASLAM PERVAIZ. (Plaintiff) V/S MST. NASEEM FATIMA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
192) 1268/2014 Suit Hamdard Laboratories (Waqf) Pakistan (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Fahim (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 25-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
193) 6712/2020 Const. P. M/s Telenor Microfinance Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Employees Social Security Act, 2016
Tag Line:Social Security for workers
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1358, 2025 SHC KHI 2028
Advocates:Waheed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-18218-SBC-KHS),Regan(ADVO-18058-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
194) 774/2011 Suit Trading Corporation of Pakistan. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s.Abdullah Sugar Mills Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 254
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 18-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
195) 677/2015 Suit The Kathiawar Co-operative Housing Society & another (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 08-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
196) 315/2010 Cr.Appeal Adil Sher (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 05-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
197) 323/2020 Suit Shabbir Ahmed Arif & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Rizwan Riaz & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 334
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
198) 5113/2021 Const. P. OBS Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 239 ), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 221), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (S.170), Workers" Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971 (section 4(1))
Tag Line:The impugned Circular has only restored the process of Section
170 of Ordinance 2001 for claiming refund only however actions which
have already been taken thereunder are not open for a scrutiny at least
under Section 221 of Ordinance 2001. For convenience however we may
say that impugned Circular has prospective effect only. The adjustments
made and allowed on the basis of Circular 4 cannot be subjected to
provisions of Section 221 of Ordinance 2001. Applications made under
section 170 of Ordinance 2001 for refund has the limitation of three
years in terms of Section 170(2) i.e. deemed assessment or when tax was
paid whereas deemed assessment itself could be subjected to
amendment within five years of such deemed assessment hence the
purpose which cannot be achieved under Section 170 is available under
other provisions of Ordinance 2001.
Citation:2022 PTD 290
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 17-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.139-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Sanofi-Aventis Pakistan Limited,C.P.L.A.70-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. OBS Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
199) 421/2020 Cr.Bail SALEEM KHALID S/O KHALID ABDUL AZIZ (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ 119
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 09-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
200) 1208/2011 Const. P. M/s.International Business Management (Petitioner) V/S Aziz Ahmed (Late) & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Judgment of Rent Controller &Appellate Court order is Set-aside . One day delay not default being Sunday Last day )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 04-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
201) 2322/2014 Suit Dr. Arifa Farid and others (Plaintiff) V/S Mitha Khan and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Judgment in rem / personam, Exception to right of hearing
Tag Line:Exception to right of hearing; where the results can and would not have been any different. Dispute between the government departments should not affect bona fide purchasers. Judgment in rem / personam.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
202) 4725/2015 Const. P. Mansoor Ashraf (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Eviction of tenant during pendency of Rent Case and Civil Suit)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.662-K/2016 Mst. Fareeda Zafar and others v. Mansoor Ashraf and others,Crl.A.399/2025 Mansoor Ashraf v. Riaz Hussain Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Pending
203) 583/2021 Suit SICPA SA (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1115
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 20-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
204) 4053/2016 Const. P. Syed Maqbool Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Reinstatement into service)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 14
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
205) 359/2006 Suit GHULAM MUJTABA PARACHA (Plaintiff) V/S MOHAMMAD SALEEM (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 11-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
206) 2650/2019 Const. P. Ms. Saba (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:ADJ appointment/retest case
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.429-K/2019 Ms. Saba v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
207) 519/2019 Cr.Bail Ali Sher (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
208) 1574/2020 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD FAISAL @ CHITTA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Bail rejected)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1308
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 08-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
209) 766/2018 Cr.Misc. Khalid Hussain & others (Applicant) V/S Asif Iqbal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ 242
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
210) 12/2012 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Rashid Aslam & Arshad Nabi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 25-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
211) 101/2009 Cr.Appeal Khadim Khoso & another (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 04-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
212) 263/2016 H.C.A The Collector Model Customs Collectorate & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. Naveena Industries Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 03-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1204/2017,C.A.1200/2017,C.A.1206/2017,C.A.1205/2017,C.A.1201/2017,C.A.1198/2017,C.A.1202/2017,C.A.1242/2017,C.A.1199/2017,C.A.1505/2017,C.A.1255/2017,C.A.1504/2017,C.A.1508/2017,C.A.1512/2017,C.A.1211/2017,C.A.1232/2017,C.A.1236/2017,C.A.1506/2017,C.A.1510/2017,C.A.1514/2017,C.A.1209/2017,C.A.1213/2017,C.A.1233/2017,C.A.1507/2017,C.A.1511/2017,C.A.1515/2017,C.A.1210/2017,C.A.1214/2017,C.A.1231/2017,C.A.1509/2017,C.A.1513/2017,C.A.1503/2017,C.A.1502/2017,C.A.1230/2017,C.A.1234/2017,C.A.1179/2017,C.A.1218/2017,C.A.1216/2017,C.A.1217/2017,C.A.1215/2017,C.A.1208/2017,C.A.1212/2017,C.A.1203/2017,C.A.1207/2017 SCP Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed
213) 83/2023 Const. P. Umar Jamshed S/o Jamshed Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Mishal Jawaid and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Basis for calculating the maintenance to be paid to a Minor.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 53
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh),Zahrah Sehr Vayani(ADVO-15100-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
214) 2121/2019 Suit Mst. Sanobar Rizwan (Plaintiff) V/S Naseera Begum (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Status of an email as Primary Evidence of Secondary Evidence under Article 73 and Article 74 of the Qanun e Shahdat Order, 1984 read with the Electronic Transactions Odinance 2002
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 495
Advocates:SURRIDGE & BEECHENO(FIRM-101-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Junaid Khatri(ADVO-15252-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
215) 789/2018 Suit Mst. Nadia Shakeel & another (Plaintiff) V/S Shagufta Baqar & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:There is no concept of amendment in the disposed of memo of petition for Letter of Administration in respect of ONE identified deceased on subsequent death of another person who was legal heir of the deceased whose petition has been disposed of prior to the death of the other person
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 109
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
216) 780/2001 Suit Zafar Mahmood Khan (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Ali Khan and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 13-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
217) 34/2005 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Pali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting
218) 878/2020 Suit Mst. Bushra Hamid & others (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Farzana Nizam & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Benami Transactions status as a resulting trust under Section 102 of the Sindh Trusts Act, 2020 and whether a claim can be maintained by legal heirs of a person who is contended to be the real owner of a property but who didn't claim the property to being held benami in his lifetime in terms of Article 120 of the Limitation Act,1908 and Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 267
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Tasawar Hussain(ADVO-3243-SBC-KHS),Abdul Qadir(ADVO-20685-SBC-KHS),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
219) 838/2012 Suit GLOBAL QUALITY FOODS (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S HARDEE'S FOOD SYSTEMS, INC. Dis (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Citation:2016 PLD Sindh 169
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 18-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
220) 1708/2023 Const. P. Zahid Hussain & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 18
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1433/2024 Ghulam Murtaza Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.267-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Zahid Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned + Before 3JJs, Adjourned + Before 3JJs
221) 2680/2020 Const. P. Pakistan Broadcaster Association (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P.No.D-2680 of 2020 whereby the Court declare that the powers of the PEMRA vested in Section 30 of the PEMRA Ordinance 2002 could not be delegated to the Chairman or any other official of PEMRA by dint of Section 13 of PEMRA Ordinance, 2002 for suspension of Broadcast Media Licenses without framing of Rules. The decision of the Authority conveyed vide minutes of meeting dated 24.04.2020 is also declared null and void. All actions taken by the Chairman pursuant to the delegated powers for suspension of Broadcast Media Licenses are strike down.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 633
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.11/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad v. Pakistan Broadcasters Association Karachi and another,C.P.5303/2021 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad v. Pakistan Broadcasters Association Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
222) 4942/2022 Const. P. Irfan Hussain Halai & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Levy of CVT on foreign assets through Section 8 of Finance Act, 2022; Held; is not ultra vires and is within the competence of the Parliament under Entry 50 of the Federal Legislative List in 4th Schedule to the Constitution.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 54, 2024 PLD Sindh 453
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan()
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.M.A.1108/2023,C.P.L.A.245-K/2023,C.P.L.A.247-K/2023,C.P.L.A.249-K/2023,C.P.L.A.57/2023,C.P.L.A.5176/2023 SCP Status:Disposed Allowed. stay. Early date,Pending ,Pending ,Pending ,Pending ,Pending
223) 1872/2016 Suit Saleem Butt.. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Challenge to the vires of section 230(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on the ground of delegation of excessive legislative power not successful. While making such challenge, the Plaintiff had also to demonstrate infringement of a Fundamental Right. SRO 115(I)/2015 re the conferring of powers and functions on the DG I&I, was within the jurisdiction of the FBR. Effect of striking-down of same SRO by another High Court discussed. The invoking of section 176 does not militate against the concept of deemed assessment under section 122 of the Ordinance. Malafides had to be pleaded with particulars.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 676
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
224) 59/2007 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Digri Sugar Mills Ltd (Applicant) V/S The Additional Collector of Customs & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 PTD 825
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Danish Zuberi(ADVO-6720-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Imran Ali Mithani(ADVO-15070-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
225) 184/2020 R.A (Civil Revision) Ahmed & Others (Applicant) V/S Shahmeer & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 430
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
226) 4930/2015 Const. P. Musheer Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1278
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.263-K/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Musheer Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
227) 304/2016 Cr.Appeal JAHANZEB S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 07-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
228) 1461/2016 Suit Mohsin Abbas. (Plaintiff) V/S Air Waves Media (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
229) 7407/2021 Const. P. Noorullah Abro (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 893
Advocates:Agha Haris Ahmed Khan(ADVO-17298-SBC-KHS),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 14-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
230) 38/2020 I. A Mumtaz Hussain Siddiqui (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Tahir (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1092
Advocates:Tasdeeque Ahmed(ADVO-4526-SBC-KHI),Hyder Raza(ADVO-14554-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
231) 730/2012 Const. P. M/s. Muhammadi Builders (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
232) 20/2009 Civil Revision Mst Rabia Khatoon (Applicant) V/S Abbas Ali and an other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 12-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
233) 2458/2018 Suit Khawaja Ahad Rahman & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1249
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
234) 98/2001 Cr.Rev Roshan Ali Dero S/o Ghulam Haider Dero (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
235) 4164/2021 Const. P. Haleem Adil Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 552
Advocates:Muhammad Asif Qureshi(ADVO-10738-SBC-KHI),Faran Sardar(ADVO-19278-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 28-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
236) 173/2009 S.M.A Muhammad Javed .... Petitioner (Petitioner) V/S aaa (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 1
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
237) 263/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous ABDUL GHAFFAR S/O MUHAMMAD SHARIF (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (The court cannot interfere during investigation.)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 374
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
238) 29/2021 Cr.Rev MS.RUBINA MIR D/O LATE MIR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 640
Advocates:Spl.Prosecutor Customs(SpPCus),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Firdous Farride(ADVO-3796-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
239) 248/2014 H.C.A Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S M/s Friends Corporation Stevedores (Pvt.) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 31-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
240) 6572/2016 Const. P. Sultan Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S M/s Sui Southerm Gas Co. & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Promotion case
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
241) 2460/2014 Suit M/s. Amreli Steel (Pvt) Ltd., & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Saeed Ahmed Kazmi & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Abbadul Hussnain(ADVO-6779-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
242) 2275/2017 Suit M/s. Inbox Business Technologies Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 244
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
243) 53/2023 M.A. Muhammad Naeem Ikram S/o Ch. Muhammad Ikram (Appellant) V/S Sh. Tahir Rauf and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 766
Advocates:Syed Abid Ali Qadri(ADVO-9235-SBC-KHI),Iftekhar Ahmed(ADVO-4310-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
244) 178/2017 Criminal Appeal BILAWAL S/O RAMZAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Syed Shabeer Hassan Shah(ADVO-11693-SBC-KHI),Mubashir Ahmed Mirza(ADVO-5495-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
245) 111/2023 Const. P. Lashkar Ali Maitlo (Petitioner) V/S Mst Azizan Khatoon Maitlo (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 19
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
246) 2025/2008 Const. P. Syed Jarrar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh &Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Citation:1990 PLD 504, 2000 SCMR 506, 2001 SCMR 683, 2006 SCMR 178, 2007 SCMR 287, 2008 SCMR 105, 2010 SCMR 1925, 2011 SCMR 279, 2015 SCMR 456, 1994 CLC 2214, 2006 CLC 342, 2008 CLC 573, 2014 CLC 965, 2015 PLC 719, 2005 YLR 2423, 1917 OTHER 56, 1957 OTHER 97, 1957 OTHER 311, 2010 OTHER 373
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4266/2018 City Schools (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Province of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Cooperation Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
247) 2415/2016 Suit Saleem Butt (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan and Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Given the mechanism in-built in section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, which includes the providing of reasons in writing to the taxpayer, the power conferred on the Commissioner to call for record under section 177(1) of the Ordinance, does not by itself offend Article 25 of the Constitution. The question then, whether such power has been used unlawfully, is different, and one that may vary with the circumstances of each case. While making such challenge, the Plaintiff had also to demonstrate infringement of a Fundamental Right. The invoking of section 177(1) does not militate against the concept of deemed assessment under section 122 of the Ordinance. Malafides had to be pleaded with particulars.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 276
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
248) 3962/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Naved Aslam & Others (Petitioner) V/S EDO Revenue & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLC 132
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 13-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.413-K/2014 Mst. Aisha Siddiqi v. Muhammad Naveed Aslam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
249) 247/2023 Const. P. Dua Tauseef Korai (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1208
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
250) 1569/2000 Suit Ali Muhammad & another (Plaintiff) V/S Faizullah & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 16-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
251) 203/2002 Suit ADVOCATE GENERAL SINDH (Plaintiff) V/S ISLAMIC EDUCATION TRUST & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 07-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
252) 74/1991 Suit Mohammad Sarwar (Plaintiff) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Suit for recovery of compensation amount--Deceased died in the custody of police officials---Contention of the police was that deceased died due to cardiac arrest---Validity---None of the police officials entered the witness box to defend the claim against them---Written statement filed by the police officials had lost its evidentiary value as contents whereof were never proved in the evidence---Deceased died while he was in the custody of police officials---Plaintiff was to prove the factum of incident only---Burden would shift on the police officials to disprove the causation if they wanted to succeed in the claim against the plaintiff---Present case did fall within the purview of Fatal Accidents Act, 1855---Prosecution in a criminal case was to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of accused but in civil proceedings the matter had to be decided on the basis of preponderance of probabilities---Acquittal of (private) defendants in the criminal case did not have any adverse bearing on the present lis---Police official were liable to compensate the plaintiff by applying the rule of vicarious liability--- Claim of plaintiff with regard to quantum of damages was also unchallenged---Life expectancy of seventy five years in plaintiff's family had been proved---Deceased might also have lived for another fifty years approximately---Claim of awarding damages of Rs.50,00,000/- was justified---Master/employer in the claims with regard to tortuous liabilities would be liable for the wrongful acts of his employees/servants---Provincial Government and Inspector General of Police were liable to compensate the plaintiff besides other defendants---Defendants (Police officials) were liable to pay the damages/compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- together with 10% markup from the date of institution of suit till realization of the amount to the plaintiff and his wife i.e. parent of the deceased jointly and severally. Suit decreed.
Topic: Fatal Accident (Recovery of Damages)
Tag Line:Custodial death, suit for recovery of compensation amount decreed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 23-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
253) 89/2009 Cr.J.A Abdul Hayee (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 10-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
254) 1533/2013 Cr.Bail ABDUL KABEER KAZI S/O MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 30-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
255) 147/2009 H.C.A M/S Tee Jays Exclusive (Pvt.) Limited & another (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Naveed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PLD 88
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 26-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.138-K/2016 M/s Tee Jays Exclusive (Pvt) Ltd and another v. Muhammad Naveed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed (After compliance of the Court Order on
26-06-2024) -- Allowed.
256) 654/2010 I.T.R.A Commissioner (legal) (Applicant) V/S M/s Habib Metropolitan Bank (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 02-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting
257) 41/2016 Election Appeal Tariq Hussain (Appellant) V/S Subhan Ali (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 17-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
258) 4674/2018 Const. P. Pakistan Services Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(i) Whether Petitioner-PSL has locus standi to approach this Court as an aggrieved party under Article 199 of the Constitution against the decisions of NIRC?
(ii) Whether petitioner-PSL is a Trans-Provincial Organization and falls within the ambit of National Industrial Relations Act, 2012?
(iii) Whether or not the registration of industry-wise trade unions by the Registrar, Trade Union NIRC, Islamabad is violative of the mandatory requirement of Section 8 of Act, 2012, based on strength of workforce; and, liable to be canceled, in view of mandate of Section 11 of the IRA-2012?
(iv) Whether the registrar of trade unions and/or NIRC is competent to determine the registration of the respondent unions?
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 957
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3497/2021 Pakistan Services Limitd, Islamabad through Director v. Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission, comprising three embers at Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
259) 2666/2020 Const. P. Saeed Habib (Petitioner) V/S National Bank of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:NBP--We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-bank. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 599
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.305/2021 Saeed Habib v. National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
260) 599/2009 I.T.R.A M/s. Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. (Applicant) V/S The Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 14-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting
261) 261/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SIKANDAR ALI LASHARI S/O ALI MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Decision/Judgment in the appeals filed by Sikandar Ali Lashari (District Judge) against the conviction of death penalty decided by A.T.C. on the charge of murder of Aqib Hussain son of District & Sessions Judge.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 28
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 20-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.294/2020 Muhammad Irfan Khan @ Faheem v. The State,Crl.P.L.A.592/2020 Sikandar Ali Lashari v. The State thr. PG Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted
262) 1010/2020 Cr.Bail HASSAN RABBANI S/O TARIQ RABBANI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 602
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
263) 3969/2011 Const. P. Mst. Rukhsana (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 20-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting
264) 1764/2014 Suit Muhammad Hussain & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:Faced with the presumptive taxation of imports, supplies, contract, exports etc. under section 80-C and 80-CC of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, where tax payers challenged the constitutionality of presumptive taxation, the Supreme Court of Pakistan in its landmark judgment of Ellahi Cotton Mills (Supra) held that section 80C and 80CC (Section 148 and 153 and 154 in Ordinance 2001) provides for presumptive taxation of income within the category of presumptive tax as under the same the persons covered by them pay a pre-determined amount of presumptive tax in full and final discharge of their tax liability in respect of the transactions on which above tax is levied. If Entry 47 is read in isolation without reference to Entry No.52 one can urge that Entry 47 does not admit the imposition of presumptive tax as the expression tax on income employed therein should be understood as to the working out of the same on the basis of computation as provided in the various provisions of Ordinance. Thus, it can be held that presumptive tax is in fact akin to capacity tax i.e. capacity to earn.
Citation:2016 PTD 622, 2016 SBLR Sindh 1484
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
265) 968/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD YAMEEN S/O MUHAMMAD AMIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Tag Line:The question involved in the present proceedings is whether the alleged amount could be recovered by detaining the applicant for an indefinite period. Section 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1184
Advocates:Muhammad Iqrar(ADVO-8782-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Daud(ADVO-10638-SBC-KHE),Mohammad Aslam(ADVO-7603-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
266) 9/2016 Civil Revision Ashfaque Hussain Lahori (Appellant) V/S Lal Bux Soomro and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 21-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
267) 308/2021 Suit M/S. FOREL INTERNATIONAL TRADING & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S WAQAS AHMED JAT & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Suit barred for staying freezing order passed under section 5(5) of the FIA Act, 1974.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 681
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
268) 405/2012 Const. P. Ali Gohar and another (Petitioner) V/S SSP Kamber Shahdadkot and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 30-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
269) 479/2023 Const. P. Syed Mustafa Ali S/o Syed Abid Ali (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Afsheen Fatima and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family Courts Act, 1964 (Limitation Act, 1908)
Tag Line:Application of Section 29 (2) of the Limitation Act,1908 to the Family Courts Act, 1964 and Family Court Rules 1965.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 81
Advocates:Irum(ADVO-16757-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
270) 1808/2016 Suit Mst. Bilqis Bano & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Defence Housing Authority & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
271) 1386/2012 Suit MS ROHEELA YASMIN (Plaintiff) V/S MS. NEELOFAR HASSAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter
Tag Line:"(a) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)---
----S. 7---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XX, R. 13-Administration suit- Talaq-e-Bain- Effect--- Contention of plaintiff was that she being wife of deceased was entitled for deferred dower as well as share from his property whereas defendants contended that plaintiff had been divorced by the deceased and she was not legal heir to claim inheritance-Validity-Plaintiff was given Talaq-e-Bain and no question of reconciliation would arise---Such Talaq would become effective the moment same was pronounced-Plaintiff was not entitled for any inheritance however claim of dower amount was debt on the property of deceased which was to be paid first.
(b) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)-
--S. 7---Divorce--- Effectiveness of--- Scope---Marriage could abe dissolved by husband at his will without intervention of the court-Man who wished to divorce his wife should as soon as might be after pronouncement of Talaq give the Chairman Union Council a notice in writing of his having done so and should supply a copy thereof to the wife---Talaq would not be effective until the expiry of 90 days unless same was revoked earlier expressly or otherwise.
(c) Islamic Law---
---Talaq, Mubarat and Khula-Meaning-- -""Talaq"" was divorce which was pronounced by the husband whereas ""Mubarat"" was Talaq effected by mutual consent of parties and ""Khula"" was dissolution of marriage through court.
(d) Islamic Law--
----Talaq, kinds of-Scope-Talaq would be of three kinds i.e. Talaq-e-Ahsan, Talaq-e-Hassan and Talaq-e-Bain-Talaq-e-Ahsan could be pronounced by single pronouncement during ""Tuhrs"" followed by abstinence from going to wife to establish marital relationship till Iddat period-Talaq-e-Hassan was pronounce-ment of divorce through successive three ""Tuhrs"" without establishing physical relationship with wife in any of the three ""Tuhrs""---Talaq-e-Bain was the divorce by husband through pronouncement made through single ""Tuhr"" either in one sentence or in separate sentences---Talaq-e-Bain was irrevocable divorce whereas Talaq-e-Ahsan would become irrevocable on expiry of Iddat period and Talaq-e-Hassan on third pronouncement irrespective of Iddat period-Talaq-e-Bain would become irrevocable immediately on pronouncement of the same either uttered orally or written down on a piece of paper irrespective of Iddat period-Talaq-e-Bain did not provide any room for any reconciliation-Communication was not material ingredients or prerequisite for validity of Talaq."
Citation:2014 YLR 2315
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
272) 4864/2020 Const. P. Hasan Khursheed Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 329
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3927/2021 Mst. Hira Imam and others v. Hasan Khurshid Hashmi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
273) 143/2016 I.T.R.A ALLIED ENGINEERING & SERVICE LTD (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1415
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.582-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Allied Engineering & Services Ltd Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
274) 164/2007 Suit Raees Ghulam Sarwar (Plaintiff) V/S Mansoor Sadiq Zaidi & 4 others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Defamation Ordinance, 2002., Defamation Ordinance, 2002. (Application Dismiss)
Mr. Justice Khalid Ali Z. Qazi
Order Date: 29-MAY-08
Approved for Reporting
275) 2019/2015 Suit A&Z Agro Industries (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others.. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Search of premises under section 38 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and section 175 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
276) 109/2017 Civil Revision Shafi Muhammad Khan (Applicant) V/S Abdul Rehman & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 1374
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
277) 628/2024 Cr.Bail SANIYAL ALI S/O MUHAMMAD ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Coming to the proposition bail in an offense punishable up to seven years, broadly speaking a person accused of a bailable offense has a right of admission to bail and an arrested person can be refused bail if it appears to the Court concerned that "reasonable grounds" exist for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. Allegations against him are that he cheated the complainant and deprived him of his legitimate amount on the pretext that he would return the plot. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act V of 1898) {Code} for bail the offenses are divided into two categories termed ???Bailable offence??? and ???Non-bailable offence???. These are defined under Section 4(b) as under: -
(b) "Bail able offense, "non-bail able offence": "Bailable offence" means an offence shown as bail able in the Second Schedule or which is made bail able by any other law for the time being in force; and "non-bailable offence means any other offence???
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 41
Advocates:Muhammad Aleem(ADVO-2374-SBC-HYD),Badar Hussain(ADVO-11544-SBC-KHI),Syed Jamil Ahmed Shah Bukhari(ADVO-161-SBC-HYD),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
278) 2798/2014 Const. P. Arham Aziz Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 121
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
279) 2157/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem Shaikh. (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment passed by Honble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi in the petitions filed to challenge the Combined Competitive Examination 2003 (CCE-2003) conducted by Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC). The Honble Judges constituted a High Powered Inquiry Commission to probe and submit the report to the competent authority.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 987
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.413-K/2020,C.P.406-K/2020,C.P.407-K/2020,C.P.408-K/2020,C.P.409-K/2020,C.P.410-K/2020,C.P.411-K/2020,C.P.412-K/2020,C.P.L.A.777-K/2022 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
280) 117/2011 Suit.B I.G.I. Investment Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S M/S Admore Gas (Pvt) Ltd & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 30-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
281) 13/2009 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Waseem Ahmed and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 10-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.80-K/2017 Muhammad Ali v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
282) 1731/2009 Suit JEHANGIR SIDDIQUI (Plaintiff) V/S NOMAN ABID INVESTMENT MANAGMENT & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
283) 1040/2009 Suit NASIR ALI (Plaintiff) V/S SYED QAMAR HUSSAIN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Agreement )
Tag Line:Plaintiff Buyer, within the time prescribed in the contract, made part payment of the Sale Price, whereafter Defendant Seller handed over the first floor of the bungalow on the suit property to Plaintiff. Plaintiff Buyer did not pay the outstanding balance sale price when he found out the suit property was mortgaged. Blamed Defendant Buyer for not executing the sale deed, expressed willingness and readiness to pay and filed suit for specific performance under the Specific Relief Act as well as claimed part performance under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act. Interpretation of where time is of the essence, proving readiness and willingness, criterion for curating discretionary relief where the cause of action accrued in 2005 and the case decided in 2023. Suit dismissed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 115
Advocates:Javed Anwar(ADVO-8093-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Safdar(ADVO-4807-SBC-KHI),Munawar Ali(ADVO-10937-SBC-KHE),Ali Asghar(ADVO-2854-SBC-KHI),Sanjeeda Sultana Zaidi.(ADVO-5092-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
284) 164/2024 Cr.Bail Zeeshan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Tag Line:The law on bail is now well settled. In cases where the offense falls outside the non-prohibitory clause of section 497(1) of Cr.P.C., bail is to be granted as a matter of course, and rejection of the same is an exception. Where, however, an offense falls within the prohibitory clause, bail can only be granted if the court concludes that there is no reasonable ground for believing that the accused has committed a non-bailable offense or where an accused makes out a case of further inquiry into the guilt of the accused or in case the accused is under the age of 16 years or is sick or infirm.
Citation:2024 SHC MPK 1422
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
285) 13/2018 Civil Revision Manzar Alam (Applicant) V/S Malik Muhammad Yamin & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2019 YLR 598
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 01-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
286) 2847/2017 Const. P. Sajjad Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:Declare that naming, renaming any street, road, government
institute, town, or city after the name of any individual having no
positive social, role, courage or exceptional dedication to service
in ways that bring special credit to an area, city town is illegal,
unlawful against the basic rights of citizens of particular areas,
towns, cities and public at large.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
287) 182/2009 Cr.Misc. Khuda Bux (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
288) 210/2017 Cr.Misc. muhammad anwar qureshi (Applicant) V/S muhammad ayoob & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2019 YLR 839
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 20-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
289) 538/2002 Suit Imdad Ali & other (Plaintiff) V/S Professional Builders & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed
Order Date: 07-NOV-08
Approved for Reporting
290) 220/2023 Const. P. Faqir Muhammad & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 843
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
291) 19/2013 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Nawab Siraj Ali S/o Imdad Ali Talpur (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment in murder case of Shahzaib
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 13-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.2-K/2018,Crl.A.3-K/2018,Crl.P.724/2019,Crl.A.400/2019 SCP Status:Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of+ directions,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
292) 1119/2016 Const. P. M/s Qasim International Container Terminal Pak Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
293) 1710/2012 Const. P. Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd., (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
294) 43/2017 II.A. Mst. Saba and others (Appellant) V/S Mst. Fatima and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: II Appeal (Appeal allowed . Judgment of Appellate Court and Trial Court is Sat aside.)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
295) 4497/2018 Const. P. Muntazir Mehdi & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The petitioners who are serving as Deputy Prosecutor Generals in the prosecution department Government of Sindh contend that they are holding the LLM Degree and have claimed LLM degree allowance through this petition based on equality.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 744
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Samiullah Soomro(ADVO-960-SBC-SUK),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 02-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.501-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Muntazir Mehdi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
296) 5162/2020 Const. P. Burshen LPG (Pakistan) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 899
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Amer Raza Naqvi(ADVO-3585-SBC-KHI),Afaq Ahmed(ADVO-4782-SBC-KHI),Mushtaque Hussain(ADVO-14825-SBC-KHS),Ghazala Rafiq(ADVO-10618-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 20-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
297) 1916/2016 Const. P. M/s Continental Biscuit (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Input Tax adjustment denied pursuant to section 8(1)(h) & (i). Held-yes-Petition dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 136
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
298) 4/2012 H.C.A Mirza Afzal Baig (Appellant) V/S Mudabbir Ali Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 CLC 261
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 11-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
299) 916/2015 Const. P. Khawaja Muhammad Salman (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Saeed-ud-Din Nasir, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 04-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
300) 1995/2016 Const. P. M/s Dairy Land (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976
Tag Line:It is also, prima facie, evident that vires of the Act 2016 has not been challenged, but the notification, so issued under such Act, impugned. A challenge to application of notification only
without assailing the vires of the Act under which the notification has been issued, legally, cant be made, particularly where things notified are with reference to the Act itself. On this count, too, the instant petition (s) are not tenable in law. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed with no order as to cost.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 620
Advocates:M/S. "ARAIN LAW ASSOCIATES"(FIRM-280-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
301) 4769/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Kausar Noor (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 649
Advocates:Mansoorul Haque Solangi(ADVO-6746-SBC-KHI),Zubair Ahmed Rajput(ADVO-7308-SBC-KHI),Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-1474-SBC-KHP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.748-K/2025 Shabbir Ali Babar & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary , Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned
302) 7241/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem Baloch and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the foregoing, we find that a five-member Bench of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Gul Taiz Khan Marwat (supra) has decided the question of maintainability of a Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution against the administrative orders passed by an Administrative Committee or the Honorable Chief Justice of High Court. Besides that, all the legal grounds raised by the learned Counsel for the petitioners in the present petition have already been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid decisions as such this Court cannot further dilate upon the issue more.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 656
Advocates:Riaz Ahmed Phulphoto(ADVO-16022-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 31-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
303) 100/2013 Cr.J.A Abdul Aziz Bhatti (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
304) 38/2020 Cr.Rev Pir Bux Brohi & another (Applicant) V/S The State & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 857
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
305) 2500/2015 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-IV (Applicant) V/S M/s. Hamdam Paper Products (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 632
Advocates:Kafil Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-7764-SBC-KHI),Aqeel Ahmed Khan(ADVO-12466-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 22-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1091-K/2022 Commissioner-IR Zone-IV v. M/s. Hamdam Paper Products (Private) Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
306) 2069/2011 Const. P. Ayaz Ali and others (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Service matters (Deceased quota)
Tag Line:since the delay in appointment cannot be attributed to the petitioner No.1, as such the notification dated 17-07-2009 being adversely affecting the petitioner No.1 cannot be applied retrospectively, as prior to issuance of such Notification; the petitioner No.1 had already acquired a vested right and was entitled to be governed by the Notifications dated 02-09-2002 and 11-03-2008 read with letter dated 13.12.2008 issued by S&GAD. On the basis of these observations, the petitioner No.1 is entitled to be appointed under the deceased quota, after fulfillment of requisite codal formalities as otherwise required under the said policy
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
307) 120/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) Shabbir Ahmed Memon and others (Applicant) V/S Shahnawaz and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 473
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.548-K/2021 Shabbir Ahmed & others v. Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
308) 398/2020 S.M.A Batul Husain Dharamsey d/o Hussain Dharamsey (Petitioner) V/S Nil (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: S.M.A ( power of attorney is not a title document , does not render any ownership its holder in any manner, dismissed .)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 306
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
309) 85/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous MST. ROZEENA RAZZAQ D/O ABDUL RAZZAQ (Applicant) V/S MIRZA MOHSIN ALI JAH & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 821
Advocates:Shujjat Abbas(ADVO-16049-SBC-KHC),Riasat Ali(ADVO-4003-SBC-KHW),Muhammad Hanif Samma(ADVO-4046-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Nasrullah Malik(ADVO-11854-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
310) 52/2011 Cr.Rev Abdul Hameed (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 14-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting
311) 5608/2014 Const. P. Mansoor ul Haq Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.859-K/2016 Pakistan Automobile Corporation Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: M/o Industries and Production and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
312) 3511/2011 Const. P. Nazir Oad (Petitioner) V/S Registrar High Court of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 27-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
313) 2847/2012 Const. P. Mst. Zaria Begum (Petitioner) V/S Zafar Iqbal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 510
Advocates:Naeem Akhtar(ADVO-4730HLC-SBC-KHI),Imran(ADVO-11259-SBC-KHI),Asadullah(ADVO-4145-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
314) 8/2016 H.C.A Haroon (Appellant) V/S Abdul Aziz (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 07-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.390-K/2017 Haroon v. Abdul Aziz and another,C.A.67-K/2017 Haroon v. Abdul Aziz and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed
315) 3548/2019 Const. P. M/s Younus Textile Mills (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 602
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Mushtaque Hussain(ADVO-14825-SBC-KHS),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 28-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
316) 232/2004 Civil Revision Zeal Pak Cement Factory (Applicant) V/S Kazi Nisar Ahmed and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 567
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
317) 15/2013 Cr.Acq.A. Mukhtiar Ahmed Siyal (Appellant) V/S Piyaro Siyal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Murder Trial (Discrepancies in evidence of prosecution case)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 01-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.77-K/2019 Noor Uddin v. The State and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
318) 114/2011 I. A Muhammad Ismail (Appellant) V/S Dubai Islamic Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLD 5
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
319) 804/1996 Suit ABDUL KARIM K. KHAN. (Plaintiff) V/S ABDUL MALIK K. LOKHA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The plaintiff cannot succeed for the restoration of his suit on the weaknesses of defendant Counsel. He had to show why he was prevented from appearing which was to be measured on the touch stone of the sufficient cause independently and not viz-a-viz defendants Counsel appearance or non-appearance.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 04-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
320) 2/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. IMS Health Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Commissioner-II SRB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 , Finance Act, 2014
Tag Line:It is the consideration in money including federal and provincial
duties and taxes which constitute value of taxable services which the
person provides against the consideration but it excludes the amount of
sales tax under the ibid Act. The Tribunal was of the view that the
invoices generated on the amount includes the expenses/expenditures
plus 10-% service charges and is to be taken as one revenue component
for services rendered. The Tribunal is also of the view that in certain
cases there is specific rule in Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
providing for valuation of a particular service and providing a certain
minimum threshold and also any exemption and exception. However,
Tribunal considered that since no rule is available for the category of Business Support Services full value of generated invoices shall be
taken as the value of services rendered or provided in terms of
provisions of Section 5 ibid.
--Primarily value of service charges for the purposes of Act 2011 is
governed by the value of service agreed upon between the provider and
the recipient as the market itself is so competitive that nothing could
defeat the actual amount being declared to be taxed. However, in case
such understanding of value of service is doubtful as it does not disclose
correct value of service, it was open for the department to have
considered the open market price of such service as required to be
determined under section 6 of Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
which is not the case here. Two provisos to Section 5 deals the situation
of value of service. In a situation where the consideration of value of service is in kind or is partly in kind and partly in money, value of service
shall mean open market price2
excluding the amount of sales tax under
Act 2011. Similarly in case where service is provided by provider to a
recipient who is an associated person and the value is not the actual
value of service, then the value of service which is being provided by a
provider to a non-associated person shall be counted and in case no
consideration is claimed or value is lower than it is being provided by
other persons, the value of service shall be of open market. In principle
the department has not disputed the value of services rather the
department is of the view that reimbursed amount or the amount of
maintenance/expenses incurred should be made part of the value of the
service.
Citation:2022 PTD 576
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 29-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
321) 99/2011 J.M M/S. BESROCK (PVT) LTD. (Petitioner) V/S PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORP (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 14 of Arbitration Act, 1940)
Citation:2013 CLD 719
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
322) 39/2007 R.A (Civil Revision) Nasim Hayat (Applicant) V/S Mrs.Naseem Akhtar and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
323) 80/2015 I.T.R.A The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appellant) V/S Tianshi International Pakistan Co (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 07-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
324) 723/2011 Const. P. Asghar Khan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 CLC 1534
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon
Order Date: 12-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
325) 195/2010 H.C.A Light Metal & Rubber Industries Pvt.,Ltd., & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Sarfraz Quadri (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 841
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.765-K/2011 Light Metal & Rubber Industries (Pvt.)Limited and others v. Sarfaraz Quadri Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
326) 3271/2020 Const. P. Bilqees (Petitioner) V/S The Sect: Wafaqi Mohtasib and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether Wafaqi Mohtasib is competent to absorb any deputationist by appointing her/him by transfer in the Establishment of the Wafaqi Mohtasib, Islamabad?
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 235
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1164/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others,C.A.1349/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed after 3 months,
327) 1325/1999 Suit CHINA INT. WATER & ELECTRIC CORP. (Plaintiff) V/S PAK. WATER & POWER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLC 188
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
328) 843/2015 Suit Aroma Travel Services (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Faisal Al Abdullah Al Faisal Al Saud & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act 2011)
Citation:2017 YLR 1579
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 03-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
329) 1589/2013 Const. P. Kaleemullah (Petitioner) V/S C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: WAPDA CASES
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 365
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
330) 0/2020 Suit Damen Shipyards Gorinchem B.V. (Plaintiff) V/S The Ministry of Maritime Affairs and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Application for conditional withdrawal of Suit Order 23 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as plaintiff wanted permission to allow prosecution of Constitution Petition filed on the same cause of action after urgency was declined due to current pandemic in this Suit. Plaintiff had filed petition without first withdrawing the Suit, and had instead sought permission post-facto. such conduct cannot be permitted as it amounts to Bench-hunting.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2367
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
331) 3100/2016 Const. P. Ms. Surriya Kanwal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 399
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 29-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3922/2021 Managing Director Pakistan Bait ul Mal, Islamabad v. Surriya Kanwal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
332) 4506/2018 Const. P. Mst. Shabana Noor (Petitioner) V/S D.G Immigration & Passport & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
333) 3548/2017 Const. P. Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) V/S Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
334) 5066/2024 Const. P. Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject to the approval of the competent authority. The regularization of the petitioners shall be considered from the date of their regularization. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Deputy Director Food Faisalabad Division, Faisalabad, etc. vs Muhammad Tauqir Shah and others vide order dated 10.03.2021passed in C.P.43-L/2021 to C.P.58-L/2021.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 234
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Saulat Rizvi(ADVO-1835-SBC-HYD),Akhtiar Hussain Soomro(ADVO-12331-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.403-K/2025 Ali Raza Larik & another v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
335) 111/2013 Cr.Misc. Mst.Saeeda Shaikh (Applicant) V/S The SSP Larkana and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 03-JUN-13
Approved for Reporting
336) 109/1985 Civil Revision Ali Bux through his legal heirs & others (Applicant) V/S Mst. Bhagbhari through her legal heirs & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
337) 3976/2021 Const. P. Faisal Masroor Siddiqi (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 769
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Abdul Hafeez(ADVO-13095-SBC-KHI),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
338) 275/2020 Const. P. Har Lal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: National Database and Registration Authority Regulations, 2002 (Redesignation of declaration of faith form)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1013
Advocates:Abdullah Nizamani(ADVO-14295-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
339) 162/2019 Criminal Appeal SHAHID WAHAB SIDDIQUI S/O ABDUL WAHAB (Appellant) V/S SYED FARHAJ AHMED & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2108
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1250/2021 Muhammad Qasim v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh,Crl.A.324/2023 Muhammad Qasim and others v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
340) 763/2021 Const. P. Ayub Khan (Petitioner) V/S The Dist & Session Judge West and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the appointment of sons of deceased/retired and serving employees of the District and subordinate Courts--whether the Petitioners son is entitled to be appointed on the son quota basis in view of policy decision /directives of the Honble Chief Justice of this Court vide letters dated 03.03.2010, 23.7.2012 & 4.3.2013--In the light of the above rule position, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution on the premise that petitioner failed to point out any administrative decision of the member of the subordinate judiciary; and, merely agitating the claim that his son was not accommodated in the Judicial District was/is no ground to direct the respondent No.1 to appoint his son. However, the petitioner is at liberty to apply for the post on merit as and when the vacancy occurs in the office of District & Sessions, Judge Karachi West.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 76
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.544-K/2021 Ayub Khan v. The District & Sessions Judge Karachi (West) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
341) 153/2020 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Jabbar and others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Rasool (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 697
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
342) 275/2023 Const. P. Maria Ramesh (aka Mala) (Petitioner) V/S Learned IXth ADJ, Karachi (East) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Difference between Judicial Separation and Divorce and the criteria for obtaining Judicial Separation and Divorce under the Sindh Hindu Marriages Act, 2018 and the obligation of maintenance of a wife in Hinduism
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 869
Advocates:Dr. Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-9924-SBC-KHI),Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
343) 2533/2019 Const. P. Asif Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Deceased Son Quota, Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion andTransfer) Rules,1974 (Rule 11-A)
Tag Line:Sindh Government /Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of ASI on the basis of Son/Shaheedquota by issuing Standing Ordersor by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion andTransfer) Rules,1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014by relaxing the requisite qualification for appointment in the disciplinary force. The appointment of ASI can only be made through competitive process on merit.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.392-K/2019 Asif Ali v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deprtt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
344) 193/2020 Const. P. SHAFQAT ALI (Petitioner) V/S MST. IMTAIZ & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Applicability of Sub-Sections 6 and 7 of Section 9 of the Family Courts Act, 1964
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 613
Advocates:Hannan Iqbal(ADVO-17006-SBC-KHS),Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Iqbal(ADVO-3445-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
345) 5913/2018 Const. P. Ghulam Asghar Pathan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1070
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
346) 5482/2017 Const. P. Nestle Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S The F.B.R & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Role of Customs in recovery of income tax and sales tax post clearance of imports.
Citation:2023 PTD 527, 2023 SBLR Sindh 211
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General(),Tasawar Ali Hashmi(ADVO-2778-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.70-K/2023 The Directorate of Post Clearance Audit through its Director General Federal Board of Revenue Islamabad v. Nestle Pakistan Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed by majority of 2 jjs.with dissenting note
347) 99/2015 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. NADEEM NASIR S/O NASIR MEHMOOD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Discrepancies and contradictions)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
348) 1622/2023 Cr.Bail SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 137
Advocates:Shaikh Muhammad Raza(ADVO-19262-SBC-KHE),Mohammad Ali Waris(ADVO-4491-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
349) 7329/2015 Const. P. Freeway Heights (Petitioner) V/S P.C.A.A and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 515
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 05-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
350) 1272/2020 Const. P. Mst. Salma @ Ume-Salma (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh, through Secretary Home Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 366
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 05-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
351) 7678/2015 Const. P. HBL (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:HBL--back benefits--Through this petition, the petitioner-Habib Bank Limited (HBL) is praying for setting aside the order dated 28.10.2015 passed by the Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad (NIRC-FB) in Appeal No.12(18)/2015-K, whereby order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Commission, at Karachi (NIRC-SB), in Grievance Petition No.4B (187)/2012-K, filed by the private respondent, was allowed with the compensatory cost of Rs.100,000/- while granting salary and all admissible back benefits to him by treating him to be in service from the date of his dismissal from service i.e. 09.09.2003, till reaching the age of superannuation i.e. 12.12.2012; and, he was also declared to be entitled to have pensionary benefits with effect from 12.12.2012 in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by this Court in C.P. No.D-886 of 2011.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 10
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3062/2021 Habib Bank Limited, Karachi v. Full Bench, National Industrial Relations Commission and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
352) 212/2019 Suit M/s. Shan Associates (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt.) Limited & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
353) 491/2011 Cr.Appeal Abdul Ghaffar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 31-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
354) 30/2011 Cr.Rev Feroz Khan Baloch (Applicant) V/S First Women Bank & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 24-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.38-K/2011 First Women Bank Ltd. v. Feroze Khan Balouch and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
355) 108/2007 Cr.Rev Ali Raza (Applicant) V/S Haji Mir Muhammad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
356) 1803/2020 Suit KARAM CERAMICS LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Challenge to the gas tariff issued under the OGRA Ordinance, the definition of Captive Power Plants and the Moratorium on the supply of gas to Captive Power Plants.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 989
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
357) 1014/2016 Const. P. Faraz Alamgir (Petitioner) V/S ADJ-VIII Karachi South & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 7, 8 and 25)
Tag Line:The petitioner through the instant constitutional petition has challenged the order passed by the learned Additional District and Session Judge Karachi (South) while dismissing the family Appeal filed by petitioner upheld the order passed by learned Family Judge Karachi (South) in G & W Application; returned the application under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1980, under order VII Rule 10, CPC.
Order VII Rule 10 CPC & Provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 and The West Pakistan Family Court Rules, 1965, in the light of guide lines set by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Anne Zahra vs. Tahir Ali Khilji and 2 others(2001 SCMR 2000). And Major Muhammad Khalid Karim Vs. Mst. Saadia Yaqub and others (PLD 2012 SC 66) were discussed.
This Constitutional Petition was disposed of directing the learned Family Judge Karachi (South) to rehear the case of the petitioner and decide the question of territorial jurisdiction afresh, inter alia, in the light of Rules framed under the Family Courts Act, 1964.
Citation:2017 YLR 994
Advocates:Mohsin Kadir Shahwani(ADVO-12570-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
358) 858/2016 Const. P. Irshad Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
359) 5463/2013 Const. P. Zamir Iqbal Khan (Petitioner) V/S Provice of Sindh and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 942
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
360) 79/2011 Cr.Tran Bakshoo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 10-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
361) 34/2020 Criminal Appeal Zubair Jakhrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Against Order of Trial Court(A.T.C Upto 7 years)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 470
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 10-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
362) 286/2003 Suit SYED WAQAR HAIDER ZAIDI (Plaintiff) V/S MST.ALAM ARA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 CLC 535
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
363) 47/2015 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Amjad Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 05-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
364) 5107/2021 Const. P. Atlas Honda Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 177), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 214C )
Tag Line:Sectoral benchmark ratios are therefore figures for various business metrics that must be used by the Commissioner to determine taxable income for a taxpayer where a taxpayer has been lawfully selected for audit but is unable to provide the relevant information, sufficient explanation for the record. Sectoral benchmark ratio does not concern with sectoral audit selection. It only empowers the Commissioner on an event when a taxpayer has failed to furnish record or documents including books of accounts or has furnished incomplete record or books of accounts or is unable to provide sufficient explanation regarding defect in relation to the documents or books of accounts on the basis of an independent procedure of Section 177 of Ordinance 2001. It is at this stage when the guidelines of sectoral benchmark ratios, as prescribed by the Board, could be adhered to.
Citation:2022 PTD 866, 2024 SBLR Sindh 409, 2022 PTCL 253
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 18-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.680-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Atlas Honda Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
365) 159/2020 Cr.Rev SYED ALI ZAIDI & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1240
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
366) 571/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Mateen Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 1
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 28-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.653-K/2018 Muhammad Mateen Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
367) 152/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SYED MEHROZ MEHDI ZAIDI S/O SYED HASSAN MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 287
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 19-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
368) 754/2024 Suit Muhammad Faisal & others (Plaintiff) V/S SBCA & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:History and current status of the regulation of Town Planning and Building Control in the Province of Sindh. Whether flats can be constructed on commercial plots? Whether SBCA can by amendment in regulations increase the FAR of an area without a proportionate change in the infrastructure of an area.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2005
Advocates:Muhammad Abdullah(ADVO-8894-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ilyas Warriach(ADVO-6766-SBC-KHI),Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Azher Mehmood(ADVO-9556-SBC-KHI),Rehman Aziz Malik(ADVO-8586-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
369) 247/2010 Suit Maula Bux Khatian (Plaintiff) V/S The Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
370) 875/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Arif and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Three thousand three hundred and fifty nine petitioners collectively filed these forty eight petitions, requiring this court, in its writ jurisdiction, to judge their individual claims for regularization in Suit Southern Gas Company Limited; premised upon their averment of having rendered contingent / contractual services thereto, though third party companies or otherwise. Petitions dismissed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 463
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 22-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.352/2025,C.A.1376/2021,C.P.L.A.5119/2021,C.P.L.A.1092-K/2022,C.P.L.A.3914/2022,C.A.3991/2022,C.A.4009/2022,C.P.L.A.3556/2024,C.P.L.A.3890/2024 SCP Status:Pending Adjourned. Be fixed before a Larger Bench,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed ,Pending Adjourned/Referred to Larger Bench to be fixed within a month.,Pending Adjourned/Referred to Larger Bench to be fixed within a month.
371) 1170/2021 Const. P. Haroon Sohail (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 1061
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
372) 20/2020 Execution First Appeal M/S. METROPOLITAN STEEL CORP. LTD (Decree Holder) V/S MEPCO & AN ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 605
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
373) 6306/2021 Const. P. Iqbal Hussain Channa (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (Issuance of notice to Special Prosecutor NAB without passing interim order)
Tag Line:Issuance of notice to the Special Prosecutor NAB, by learned Administrative Judge, in such a way and fixing the hearing of the pre-arrest bail on 26.10.2021, without passing interim orders, ex facie amounts to dismissal of the bail before arrest application.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 897
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 21-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
374) 4235/2012 Const. P. Mehar Ali Dayo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 01-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.694-K/2013 Mehr Ali Dayo v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
375) 154/2012 Cr.Appeal Noman & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 13-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
376) 6211/2016 Const. P. M/s Liberty Mills Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PTD 347
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.423-K/2021 M/s. Liberty Mills Limited & others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finanace & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
377) 205/2013 Cr.Bail Abdul Sattar Jalbani and another (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 07-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.65-K/2015 Abdul Sattar and another v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
378) 6550/2020 Const. P. Abdul Raheem @ Manghar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Encroachment on irrigation land.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1274
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
379) 180/2019 Cr.Bail Waheed Dehpal Chandio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Bail Matters (Post arrest bail dismissed, section 20, 21, 24, PECA,FIA Cyber Crime. Accused used Neked Photos )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
380) 13/2020 R.A (Civil Revision) Sohail Ahmed Ansari (Applicant) V/S Irfan Ahmed Ansari and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1287
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
381) 646/2024 Cr.Bail TALHA SAMOO S/O GHULAM NABI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In such circumstances, when the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497(1) Cr. P.C and punishment of the offense is less than 10 years, the Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799 has given loud and clear directions to all courts in the country that granting bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be an exception, then, the subordinate Courts should follow this principle in its letter and spirit because principles of law enunciated by this Court under Article 203 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is binding on all subordinate Courts. My view is supported by the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of The State v. Syed Qaim Ali Shah (1992 SCMR 2192) and the famous case of Khan Asfandyar Wali and others v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2001 SC 607).
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 152
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Sajjad Gul(ADVO-8403-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
382) 510/2020 Cr.Bail Syed Zaman Ali Shah (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 622
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
383) 262/2018 Suit Deedar Ali Isran (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Wahid & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:Under Order 07 Rule 2 CPC read with Section 151 of CPC, issues involved and discussed in order are; 1) Specific Performance, 2) Time Bar and 3) Doctrine of res judicata
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 105
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
384) 436/2001 Suit MST.YASMIN PAYAR ALI. (Plaintiff) V/S TRUSTEES OF PORT KARACHI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 591
Advocates:Samsam Ali Khan(ADVO-7110-SBC-KHI),S. Izhar Haider Rizvi(ADVO-1379-SBC-KHI),Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
385) 73/2015 Const. P. Rafiq Haji Usmani (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
386) 6847/2019 Const. P. Wazeer Ali Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1347
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
387) 2304/2018 Const. P. Meezan Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Textilers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
388) 236/2017 Const. P. Tarique Hussain Umrani (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 456
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.928-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Dept. and others v. Tarique Hussain Umrani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
389) 85/2019 Cr.J.A Ahsan Marfani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Narcotics 9(c) Case Appeal allowed on ground Material Contradiction between witness and delay sending Parcel .)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 30
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 27-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
390) 83/1995 Adm. Suit Mst. Parveen Shoukat (Petitioner) V/S none (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 07-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
391) 422/2012 Const. P. Hafizullah & ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed: of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4655/2018,C.P.L.A.574/2019,C.A.1125/2019,C.A.1127/2019 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.
392) 7470/2017 Const. P. Mst Almas Ismail (Petitioner) V/S Fayyaz Hussain & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 199, 2018 SBLR 1606
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 01-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
393) 2728/2014 Const. P. Advance Telecom (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 462
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 22-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
394) 6382/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Jibran Nasir & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Police case
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) Note 179
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 29-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3871/2023 Province of Sindh, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Jibran Nasir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
395) 6/2006 Adm. Suit Muhammad Hashim and another (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Mujtaba Shah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
396) 8/2021 J.M M/S. GETZ PHARMA (PVT.) LIMITED (Applicant) V/S NOVARTIS AG & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Patents Ordinance, 2000.
Section 27 of the Patents Ordinance, 2000, has two parts. One is relating to grant of Sealing Order about the main invention and the second part relates to Patent of Addition. There is no concept of automatic stay order, if a proceeding including that of Appeal is pending regarding the grant of patent in respect of the main invention.
The Sealing Order under the Patents Ordinance, 2000, was issued after complying of fundamental requirements, coupled with the fact that there is a presumption under Article 129 Clause (e) of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, that official acts are regularly performed, then, unless such official act is declared illegal in the main case, the basic ingredients for grant of injunction are not present in favour of Petitioner/Applicant. Injunction refused.
Interpretation of statute:
expressio unis est exclusio alterius and casus omissus explained.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 458
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5311/2021 M/s Getz Pharma Pvt Limited, Karachi v. Novartis A.G. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned, after Summer Vacation. order dictated to Mr. M. Asif, PS
397) 8830/2018 Const. P. Wahid Khursheed Kunwar (Petitioner) V/S EOBI and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 430
Advocates:Zafar Imam(ADVO-7019-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 13-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
398) 19/2011 Suit.B The Bank of Punjab (Plaintiff) V/S Dewan Salman Fibre Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 25-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
399) 622/2024 Cr.Misc. Mst Muskan & Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 595
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
400) 318/2002 Cr.Misc. Ali Zahir Jafari (Applicant) V/S The State (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 04-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting
401) 508/2025 Const. P. Syed Momin Hussain Shah (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 2163
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
402) 47/2009 II.A. Ghazi Naseem & Ors (Appellant) V/S Moulana Muhammad Bilal Somayri & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 15-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
403) 4596/2021 Const. P. Employers Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Minimum Wages Act 2015 (Section 4), Sindh Minimum Wages Act 2015
Tag Line:Title Minimum Wages under the Sindh Minimum Wages Act 2015
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1055
Advocates:M/S. RASHID RAZVI & ASSOCIATES.(FIRM-104-SBC-KHI),Rasheed A. Rizvi(ADVO-2131-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5863/2021,C.P.L.A.5800/2021,C.P.L.A.64/2022,C.P.L.A.1370/2022,C.P.L.A.6605/2021,C.P.L.A.6606/2021 SCP Status: ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
404) 89/2023 I. A M/s. Farooqui Fisheries & Others (Appellant) V/S Faysal Bank Limited & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance XLVI of 2001 (Section-22- Appeal)
Tag Line:whether the appeal must be filed against the judgment alone without waiting for the decree to be drawn?
--OR--
Whether Section-22(1) of the FIO, 2001 provides an independent right of appeal against the judgment in a suit or such right is against a decree in a suit filed under the FIO, 2001?
**In view of the above analysis, the judgment rendered in the case of First Pakistan Security (Supra), surfaced as a blend of both
per incuriam and sub-silentio; the most appropriate interpretation of
Section 22 of 2001 Ordinance is that in the civil jurisdiction an
appeal can be filed after passing of a judgment but the process is
completed only after filing of decree within limitation and "only"
(emphasis applied) on the basis of a judgment a Civil Appeal cannot
be maintained under Ordinance 2001. If an appeal is preferred
against the judgment only for any urgent cause (as at time it might
take some time for Court to draw decree), it must be followed by a
decree to be placed and time consumed to obtain decree be excluded
as limitation would run from the date of drawing decree.
Citation:2024 CLD 1199, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1599
Advocates:Adil Khan(ADVO-11831-SBC-KHI),Wahaj Ali Khan(ADVO-20055-SBC-KHC),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Abdul Rashid Rajar(ADVO-10878-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 26-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
405) 1522/2016 Suit Nirmal Das (Plaintiff) V/S Tekchand (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 YLR 336
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 16-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
406) 27/2012 II.A. Mst. Tabasum Muneer & another (Appellant) V/S Asghar Hameed & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The impugned judgments and decrees are set aside and the present appeal is allowed with costs throughout. Accordingly, the Suit filed by the appellants is decreed as prayed.
Advocates:Muahmamd Javed(ADVO-8539-SBC-KHI),Ainuddin Khan(ADVO-2221-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
407) 14/2018 Cr.Rev Khalid Mehmood (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
408) 19/2017 Judicial Companies Misc. Total Parco Pakistan Limited & another. (Petitioner) V/S Vs (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
409) 3465/2022 Const. P. Tahir Hussain (Petitioner) V/S DG SBCA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Under Section 16 of the SBC Ordinance, 1979, an adequate remedy through an appeal is available, offering two forums for aggrieved parties. Therefore, without exhausting the remedy of filing an appeal against any illegality or irregularity, filing a constitutional petition directly under Article 199 of the Constitution is neither competent nor maintainable.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 573
Advocates:Muhammad Abu Bakar Khalil(ADVO-17482-SBC-KHI),Shaikh Muhammad Suleman(ADVO-3950-SBC-KHC),Irfan Aziz(ADVO-6448-SBC-KHI),Nancy Dean(ADVO-11449-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 30-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
410) 733/2003 Suit COL. (RETD) MUHAMMAD SHARIF (Plaintiff) V/S SQ. LDR. NOW LT. COL. (RETD) GHULAM FARI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1971
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 29-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
411) 346/2019 Suit Syed Khaliluddin (Plaintiff) V/S Rafiq Ahmed Qandhari & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
412) 49/2013 Cr.Rev Ahsan Mian (Applicant) V/S The Statte (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 23-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
413) 6359/2023 Const. P. Abdul Hameed Tunio (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:This case pertains to the regularization and allotment of 10 acres of land in Deh Mowach, Karachi. The petitioner claims the respondents have failed to issue an NOC despite the required payment and alleges that Respondent No. 11 is unlawfully claiming part of the land. The court emphasizes the need for transparency in land allotments and compliance with the Land Grant Policy 2024, particularly the requirement for open auctions in the disposal of public land.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 871
Advocates:Farhan Ahmed Mangi(ADVO-14154-SBC-KHE),Abdul Jabbar Korai(ADVO-7310-SBC-KHI),Irfan Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8266-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mehmood Khan Kayani(ADVO-11156-SBC-KHI),Khalid Ahmed(ADVO-13659-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
414) 3044/2020 Const. P. M/s Textiles Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 889
Advocates:Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.449-K/2022 The Province of Sindh & others v. M/s. Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
415) 6107/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Rizwan Dalia and Ors (Petitioner) V/S The Ombudsman and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, 2010
Tag Line:We, in view of the foregoing, are of the opinion that it would be premature to pass such orders as evidence in the matter is yet to be recorded and soon after issuance of the impugned show cause notice the Petitioners/accused have approached this Court and since then no progress has been made in the proceedings pending before the Respondent No.2. The Petitioners are directed to file their reply to the show cause notice, which will be considered on its own merits.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 624
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 07-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.295/2022 Muhammad Rizwan Dalia and others v. Ombudsman (The Protection against harassment of women at the workplace) Sindh, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
416) 981/2023 Const. P. Irfan Bashir S/o Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Learned XXIIth ADJ, Karachi South and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1480
Advocates:Farhan Ul Hassan(ADVO-15556-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Aurangzeb(ADVO-15419-SBC-KHE),Mashooque Ali(ADVO-12414-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2353/2024 Irfan Bashir v. Mst. Shumaila Yaqoob and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
417) 384/2022 H.C.A Mst. Nusrat Fareed (Appellant) V/S Haji Ahmed Mujahid (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Succession Act, 1925 (Tarka and Estate of Deceased)
Tag Line:Estate of a deceased and requirement of Succession Certificate.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 601
Advocates:Sajid Hussain(ADVO-14343-SBC-KHI),S. Abid Hussain Shah(ADVO-3430-SBC-KHS),Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ishaq(ADVO-9362-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
418) 6768/2020 Const. P. Mohsin Ali Nathani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1201
Advocates:Ammar Ather Saeed(ADVO-13697-SBC-KHC),Naveed Amjad Andrabi(ADVO-1773-PBC-LHR),Anwar Kashif Mumtaz(ADVO-11772-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 04-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
419) 1595/2006 Const. P. Zaeem Aziz Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A.C. & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Nil...
Citation:2016 PLC CS 272
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 02-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.145-K/2016,C.A.144-K/2016,C.P.L.A.137/2016,C.P.L.A.163-K/2016 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed [ Announced today by Mr.Justice Mushir Alam ],Disposed Allowed [ Announced today by Mr.Justice Mushir Alam ],Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted
420) 165/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) Ali Mardan Shah & Others (Applicant) V/S Mushtaque & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 280
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
421) 32/2021 Conf.Case Muhammad Kashif (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 958
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
422) 12/2010 Cr.Acctt.A Peer Deedar Ahmed Sarhandi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Death of appellant during pendency of appeal, proceedings are abated against him. However, appeal was dismissed on merits and fine was ordered to be recovered as land revenue from assets devolving upon the legal heirs of deceased appellant in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1077
Advocates:Ghulam Sarwar Chandio(ADVO-1145-SBC-HYD),Abdul Mujeeb Pirzada(ADVO-80-SBC-SUK),Ch. Munir Ahmed(ADVO-3697-SBC-KHI),Qurban Ali(ADVO-631-SBC-SUK),Syed Khalid Shah(ADVO-3930-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
423) 64/2011 Const. P. Syed Akbar Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Mst Mehar-U-Nisa and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 29-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
424) 89/2023 Cr.Rev ARY Communication Limited & ors (Applicant) V/S INDEPENDENCE Newspapers Corporation Pvt Ltd & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 346
Advocates:Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Zeeshan Hazoor Bux Kalwar(ADVO-19762-SBC-KHS),Barrister Atta Hussain(ADVO-17486-SBC-KHS),Waqar Hussain(ADVO-17203-SBC-KHS),Omrazia Nadeem(ADVO-20500-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.513/2025 ARY Communication Limited, Karachi and others v. Independent Newspapers Corporation Private Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
425) 4747/2016 Const. P. Rukhsana Yahya (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
426) 51/2005 Cr.Appeal Abdullah Bhutto (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 12-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
427) 5577/2023 Const. P. SICPA Inks Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Estimate of Advance Tax under Section 147 of Income Tax Ord 2001; such estimate cannot be disputed or challenged by the Commissioner
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 478
Advocates:Ovais Ali(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHS),Jahanzeb Balouch(ADVO-18867-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 23-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
428) 191/2015 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Pirzada @ Peer (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 27-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
429) 6/2008 Suit.B Transmission Engineering Industries Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVII Rule 3 CPC)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 03-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
430) 2324/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD TANVEER KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF KHAN (Applicant) V/S XTH ADJ KHI SOUTH & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The only question involved in the present bail matter is whether the bail can be refused in section 471 PPC., which is a bailable offense, whereas Sections 406 & 468 are punishable by up to seven years. In such circumstances, when the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497(1) Cr. P.C and punishment of the offense is less than 10 years, the Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799 has given loud and clear directions to all courts in the country that granting of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be an exception.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 737
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
431) 613/2019 Cr.Bail ABDUL MAJEED S/O ALLAH DITTA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail Granted In Theft of Sui Southern Gas .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 30-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
432) 5128/2020 Const. P. Farkhunda Muslim (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad has pronounced the judgment on 22nd December 2020 in the case of Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla v. Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue and others (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the issuance of notice under Section 182(2) read with Section 116A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, enforcing penalty for not submitting returns regarding Foreign Income and Assets Statement. The plea of the petitioners was that the petitioners have already declared Foreign Income and Assets from all the sources in their wealth statement filed under Section 116 alongwith their return of total income for the Tax Year 2019 under Section 114 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, within the prescribed time limit, by availing e-filing facility via IRIS, whereas, such return was duly accepted, as no notice was issued to the petitioners by the Department in terms of Section 120(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, requiring the petitioners to furnish any short documents in this regard. It was further argued on behalf of the petitioners that omission in filing returns was neither deliberate nor it has any financial implications or involvement of payment of any taxes, etc. therefore, the penalty provisions of Section 182 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be invoked. Learned Divisional Bench of this Court by examining all the relevant provisions of law and case-laws has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: -
13. In view of the foregoing discussions, we are of considered opinion that in the absence of prescribed format notified under Section 116A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, whereas, nothing has been concealed by petitioners, nor there is any consequence either on income or tax liability of petitioners for non-filing of Foreign Income & Assets Statement along with return of income for Tax Year 2019, the penal provisions of Section 182 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be invoked. Particularly, when respondents have failed to establish willful default or mens rea on the part of petitioners. We derive analogical guidance from the Non delegation Doctrine which is well established in jurisprudence and is attracted in the instant circumstances. Issuance of notices under section 182(2) cannot be validated, therefore, impugned notices having no support of lawful authority are hereby declared as illegal, hence, of no legal consequence. For these reasons, the petitions were allowed vide short order announced on 22.12.2020.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1686
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.745/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue AEOI, Karachi and others v. Farkhunda Muslim,C.A.380/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue AEOI, Karachi and others v. Farkhunda Muslim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,impugned judgment suspended,Disposed Disposed of
433) 18/2014 I.T.R.A COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S. UNIVERSAL LEATHER (PRIVATE) LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:S. Asif Ali(ADVO-3123-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.21-K/2018 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Univeral Leather (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.61-K/2019 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Univeral Leather (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed
434) 4201/2020 Const. P. Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The pivotal question involved in the present proceedings is whether a Civil / Government Servant who is found guilty of misconduct under The Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, and a minor penalty was imposed upon him could be considered for promotion? ---In our view, the promotion to a post depends upon several circumstances. To qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. An employee found guilty of misconduct cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion committee takes the penalties imposed upon the employee into consideration and denies him the promotion, such denial cannot be termed as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal or unjustified. In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee should not be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the DPC, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess every proposal for promotion, on case to case basis. In cases where disciplinary case / criminal prosecution against the Civil / Government servant is not concluded even after the expiry of two years from the date of the meeting of the first DPC which kept its findings in respect of the Government servant the appointing authority may consider the desirability of giving him an ad-hoc promotion--Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 38
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.405-K/2021 Shamsuddin Dal v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
435) 39/2011 Const. P. Darakshan Jahan (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 23-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting
436) 71/2010 Execution ARK GARMENT INDUSTRY (Decree Holder) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Execution. )
Tag Line:the Applicant/ Decree Holder under Order IX Rules 9 of C.P.C read with Section of 151 C.P.C
the applicant has clearly demonstrated sufficient cause for non-appearance on 27.10.2015 and 18.11.2015. Accordingly, present application is allowed and the order dated 18.11.2015 passed by this Court is recalled and Execution Application is restored to its original position.
Citation:2018 CLC 155
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
437) 145/2009 Cr.Rev Mrs. Ghazala Parveen (Applicant) V/S Sadiq Daniel & 18 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 08-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting
438) 76/2015 Civil Revision Fozia Rahat (Applicant) V/S Masood Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 1 Rule 10 CPC)
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. I, R. 10 & O. XLI, R. 20 & S. 96---Suit for declaration---Appeal---Impleadment of party as co-appellant---Amendment of appeal---Effect---Applicants filed application for impleadment in the appeal which application was accepted and they were impleaded as co-appellants---Validity---Party could be impleaded at any stage even in appeal as appeal was continuation of suit---Applicants could be impleaded in appeal if they had bona fide interest in the result of appeal---Applicants were to be allowed to join as respondents in the appeal and not as appellants---If applicants were aggrieved by the order impugned in appeal then they could file an appeal even if they were not party to the suit subject to law of limitation---Applicants, in the present case, were not necessary party in whose absence an effective judgment in appeal could not be delivered by the Appellate Court---Neither there was any order to amend the appeal by the newly added co-appellants nor an appeal could be amended suo motu or at the will of appellants---Amended appeal was to be considered from the date of its presentation---Decree impugned in the appeal was not even binding on the applicants as they were not party to the suit---High Court observed that purpose for filing of application for impleadment was to delay the decision of appeal on merits---Impugned order passed by the Appellate Court was set aside---Appellate Court was directed to decide the appeal on merits within one month---Revision was allowed, in circumstances.
Citation:2019 CLC 1323
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
439) 836/2012 Suit KHURRAM NASEEMUDDIN (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Permanent Injunction)
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----Ss.42, 54, 56 (d) & (e)---Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974 (VIII of 1975), S.5---Suit for declaration and injunction---Criminal investigation---Refusal of injunction---Plaintiff assailed notices issued by Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to Habib Bank Limited in furtherance of inquiry that certain immovable properties of someone had been fraudulently offered by two persons to various banks for obtaining loans against said properties in favour of plaintiffs company---Validity---Defendants were officers of FIA established under Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974 and were fully competent to inquire into fraud committed by different persons in obtaining loans from banking institutions---One of the defendants was posted in commercial banks circle and it was within the purview of his duty to inquire into and investigate complaint registered, numbered and marked to him in terms of S.5 of Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974---Remedy was quashment, if made out and not simple declaration and decree prohibiting public functionaries from performing their duties within the four corners of law---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Mian Hamza Shahbaz Sharif v. Federation of Pakistan and others 1999 PCr.LJ 1584; Messrs K.G. Traders and others v. Deputy Collector of Customs and 4 others PLD 1997 Kar. 541; Assistant Director Intelligence and Investigation, Karachi v. Messrs B.R. Herman and others PLD 1992 SC 485; Shahzad Ahmed Corporation v. Federation of Pakistan and others 2005 PTD 23 and 2005 PTD (Trib) 135 distinguished.
Citation:2014 PLD 264
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 21-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
440) 51/2001 Cr.Acctt.A Saeedullah Soomro (Appellant) V/S TheState (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 02-SEP-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.22-K/2011 Saeedullah Soomro v. The State through NAB Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Judgment Reserved Judgment Reserved
441) 168/2011 Civil Revision Asad Khan & another (Applicant) V/S The Taluka Nazim Qasimabad & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 23-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
442) 42/2020 Suit Syed Zain Ul Abideen (Plaintiff) V/S Federal Board of Revenue & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Ouster of jurisdiction to try a civil suit in respect of matters arising under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 2017 and exceptions to such ouster.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 681
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
443) 579/2023 Const. P. Faheemuddin Memon & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 223
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.524-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Faheemuddin & others,C.P.L.A.2033/2023 Noor Ahmed Khuharo and others v. Faheemuddin Memon and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,
444) 4800/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 193
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 29-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.8-K/2023 Muhammad Akram v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finance Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
445) 149/2008 H.C.A Mst.Ishrat Jehan & Ors. . (Appellant) V/S Syed Anisur Rehman & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 12-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
446) 362/2015 Suit Wakeel Akhtar (Plaintiff) V/S Shahzad Alam (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:While Article 84 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order provides a mode for proving execution of a document by comparison of signature or hand-writing, that is an additional mode and not a substitute of or an alternate to the mandatory provision of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order. The mode of proof by way of Article 84 is not the most desirable of modes in that, the signature and hand-writing of a person may vary with time and age; or a person called upon under sub-Article (2) of Article 84 to give a specimen of his signature or hand-writing may feign the same to defeat the comparison.
Citation:2021 CLC 54
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
447) 2939/2011 Const. P. Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio & others (Petitioner) V/S Federal Investigation Agency & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 1
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
448) 4843/2013 Const. P. Maj. Rtd. Tariq Lodhi (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khalida Jilajni and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 21-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.528-K/2017 Maj.(Retd) Tariq Lodhi v. Mst: Khalida Jilani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
449) 1179/2017 Const. P. Mohammad Anwar (Petitioner) V/S Fed:of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
450) 480/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous FAIZAN BASIQ S/O AGHA NAIER HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S NOORUL ARFEEN QURESHI & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1707
Advocates:Muhammad Daud(ADVO-10638-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
451) 124/2021 Cr.Bail Talib Hussain Chachar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 678
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
452) 1399/2018 Cr.Bail FAHAD PAREKH S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
453) 639/2010 Const. P. Abrar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S VIIth A.D.J. South at Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters)
Tag Line:Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act (XXXV of 1973)---
----Ss. 41(2)(4) Proviso, 42 & 55---Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976, Chap. XII---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss.151 & 153---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Canon of professional conduct and etiquette of advocates---Misconduct---Dispute as to property---Constitutional petition filed for recalling an earlier order of dismissal of petition being not pressed, was not supported by affidavit---Application under Ss.151 & 153, C.P.C. was not filed on behalf of the petitioner by the advocate who also submitted his own affidavit---Validity---Lawyer earns a reputation worthy of some value by demonstrating his sincerity and honest conduct both towards his client and court in administration of justice---Upright lawyer is supposed to be an officer of court fairly assisting court in dispensing justice and not slave of his client nor greedy to serve him against law and facts---Lawyer has to contest cases on merit and merit alone, he was to adhere to standards of duties of lawyer explained in Chapt.XII (Canon of Professional Conduct and Etiquette of Advocates) of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976---Counsel for petitioner, in the present case, filed application in question on his own without any authority from anyone---High Court directed Pakistan Bar Council to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the counsel for professional misconduct by treating contents of order as complaint under S.41(2) of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973---High Court further directed the Tribunal for decision in terms of proviso to S. 41(4) of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973---Court official was directed to seal the property in question and locate respondents to hand over its possession to them after proper verification---Application was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2018 CLC 664
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 24-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
454) 5256/2023 Const. P. Saleh Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, along with its accompanying Rules, 2020, provides the framework for appeals to the Government of Sindh. Specifically, Section 18(3) stipulates the right to appeal against the Registrar???s orders concerning amendments to the society???s bylaws
The Superior Courts??? jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights, as enshrined in Article 199(1)(c), of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, transcends the confines of federal, provincial, or local administrative bodies
The jurisdiction of the Special Court for Cooperative Societies is circumscribed by the provisions of Sections 73 and 117, of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, and Rule 53 of the 2020 Rules.
It is the prerogative and duty of the Special Court, endowed with the appropriate jurisdiction, to meticulously dissect and evaluate the disputed facts, thereby resolving and delineating the rights of the parties predicated on the evidence tendered.
it is settled law that superior courts could not engage in factual controversies as the matters pertaining to factual controversy can only be resolved after thorough inquiry and recording of evidence in a civil court.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 06-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
455) 795/2020 Suit Mahnaz Mirza Malik (Plaintiff) V/S Bilal Embroidery & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1469
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
456) 43/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Shaikh Nasir Ali (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 10-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
457) 5842/2022 Const. P. Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 393
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan(),Muhammad Ahmed Hussain(ADVO-15940-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.220-K/2023,C.P.L.A.221-K/2023,C.P.L.A.222-K/2023,C.P.L.A.223-K/2023,C.P.L.A.224-K/2023,C.P.L.A.227-K/2023,C.P.L.A.228-K/2023,C.P.L.A.230-K/2023,C.P.L.A.126-K/2023,C.P.L.A.229-K/2023,C.P.L.A.226-K/2023,C.P.L.A.225-K/2023,C.P.L.A.3825/2022 SCP Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Disposed
458) 4/2017 Const. P. Scherazade Jamali (Petitioner) V/S Hasim Gillani & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family Courts Act, 1964 (section 14(1)(b)), Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, 1997 (sections 105), Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 25), Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (47), Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, 1997 (Section 102 subsection 15 ), Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 9), West Pakistan Family Court Rules, 1965 (Rule 6), Citizenship Act, 1951
Tag Line:The primary object of the Guardian & Ward Court or for that matter appellate Court was to discover as to where the welfare of the ward lies and how such welfare can be effectively achieved and maintained and should not have concerned with the visitation rights of father.
--Jurisdiction Issue-
The child may be an American national by birth and he may have been permanently residing in Kuwait with parents but he is a dual national. When the respondent/ father surrendered to the jurisdiction of the trial Court by moving an application under section 25 of the Guardian & Wards Act, it was promptly responded and replied by filing written statement and jurisdiction conceded by petitioner.
--Once petitioner acquiesced to the jurisdiction, she cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time. The question of jurisdiction even if made dependent on ordinary residence of ward, it may not be a pure question of law that can be assailed at any forum or at any time. For that it has to be specifically pleaded so that the facts in this regard be brought to the notice of the Court. It is, thus, not a simple question of law rather a mixed question of law and facts which requires determination through evidence.
--Movement or Restriction in Movement of ward-The ward belongs to a family which can afford a better upbringing, education and environment either in Pakistan or anywhere in the world which was restricted and curtailed by restriction in his movement.
The Courts below should not have seen welfare only from the angle that the father/respondent must not miss his opportunity to see his child but it must also be seen from the angle as to whether a ward who is capable of studying abroad, in case the opportunities are available to him, should he be deprived of on account of the fact that father must not miss a visiting opportunity?
--In any other case it would have been the welfare considering the situation of the ward while being at Karachi and only Pakistani national but the situation here is different as the child is privileged to have access to any educational institution around the world including Pakistan. An educational institute or an environment for which most of the children could only dream for. Every child has its own peculiar circumstances and the welfare demands may vary. The restriction in the movement in the present case appeared to be a tool to settle score with mother/petitioner but it will not serve as the welfare of the child. The father/respondent who had raised serious allegations against the mother/petitioner as he claimed that she is not fit to take care of ward yet is not serious in having the custody of the ward, although none of them stands proved in evidence. There are ways and mechanism to regulate the movement which is not achieved by of restricting the movement.
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 377
Advocates:Kazim Hassan(ADVO-2630-SBC-KHI),Sameer Ghazanfar(ADVO-11222-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Shahan Karimi(ADVO-15097-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1034/2018 Hashim Gillani v. Scherazade Jamali & others,C.A.1355/2018 Hashim Gillani v. Scherazade Jamali & others,C.P.L.A.1715/2025 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division), Islamabad and another v. V.T.R. Gases Private Limited, Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed ,Pending
459) 571/2009 Cr.Bail Muhammad Hanif S. Kalia and two others (Applicant) V/S State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 06-JUL-09
Approved for Reporting
460) 1657/2020 Suit TCB AVIATION (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S SRI LANKAN AIRLINES LTD THR. COUNTRY MANAGER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 )
Tag Line:The Court can take further proceeding, inter alia, as provided under Section 3 of the above Act, 2011, that is, invoking Civil Procedure Code. It must be clarified that grant of interim relief is not prohibited under the scheme of Arbitration Act, 2011, inter alia, in view of Section 3 thereof,
but, in exceptional circumstances.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 444
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
461) 4729/2021 Const. P. Wazir Ali Ind Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Federal Excise Duty (Section 46), Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 25)
Tag Line:Since 2010, Commissioner entrusted with the mandate of calling the record as and when required. Now one thing is for sure that this "as and when required" is not meaningless as being consistently followed and maintained throughout. We now need to understand what could be the event or stage when this phrase may come into play and be given some meaning. Eventually when a Commissioner examines the return of a tax payer, he may have some queries which might be tempting to call record as he may not be able to reconcile and/or resolve them through return statement. Those queries must be understood and settled to the satisfaction of the commissioner before he could make up his mind further. Now the audit is nowhere in the scheme when such questions came for consideration after going through the returns while the Commissioner acts under 25(1) of Sales Tax Act, 1990. Surely the record may satisfy the curious mind but queries must be genuine at the time of calling the record which could not have been answered without going through the record required. Therefore, record calling could not be a roving exercise and cannot be a courtesy call either. The phrase "as and when required" had remained part of Section 25 throughout ever since it was introduced.
It is not "as and when desired" but "as and when required". Therefore, the reasons in the shape of "mindful queries" must be in existence and disclosed before calling record for the fulfillment of requirement "as and when required". The requirements of 25(1) are neither unfettered nor are so liberal that a hunting expedition would commence. It is the periodical transfiguration of the provisions of Section 25 that led us believe that there has to be an event or occasion when the Commissioner required the record and documents maintained under this Act or any other Act. Even requiring the documents/record for satisfaction of queries must be revealed so that notice may not transform into a hunting time.
However, if the mindful queries were not met, he may authorize an officer of the Inland Revenue, on the basis of record obtained under subsection (1) by him, to conduct audit. Now, if the officer of the Inland Revenue subordinate to the Commissioner is under the obligatory command of Commissioner to conduct audit then the Commissioner must disclose the discrepancies he found while forwarding record already obtained by him, for audit be conducted in pursuance of the queries of the Commissioner, which queries must see the daylight so that the officer of the Inland Revenue proceed accordingly. The officer of the Inland Revenue on his own without having knowledge of discrepancies, queries of the Commissioner, cannot start the proceedings of audit which has to be under the authorization. It would only be general audit but not as contemplated under section 25(1) which compelled the commissioner to call record. The authorization thus should contain the reasons and mindful queries required to be processed through the audit which he has passed on to designated officer.
Thus, insofar as Section 25 is concerned, we would conclude that for purposes of Section 25(1) Commissioner must frame legitimate mindful queries to the knowledge of a taxpayer after going through the returns which must be either be satisfied after calling the record or otherwise.
Citation:2023 PTD 576
Advocates:Abdul Rahim Lakhani(ADVO-4061-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Atta Mohammad Qureshi(ADVO-584-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.315-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Wazir Ali Industries Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
462) 750/2016 Suit Syed Farukh Mazhar (Plaintiff) V/S SGS Headquarters and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:Injunction dismissed.
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 327
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
463) 87/2024 Criminal Appeal Ghulam Mustafa @ Lanti Jakhrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Section 311 P.P.C. Honour Killing Conviction.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1122
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.238/2025 Ghulam Mustafa alias Lanti v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
464) 6359/2018 Const. P. Syed Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Naheed Hussain & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 880
Advocates:Khawaja Saif ul Islam.(ADVO-7383-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
465) 2/2018 Cr.J.A Bilawal Dasti (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain M. Sheikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
466) 5/2017 Spl.H.C.A Syed Wajahat Hussain Zaidi & another (Appellant) V/S United Bank Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLD 91
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
467) 82/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Nek Mohammad Khan Sohriyani (Applicant) V/S Mukhtiar Ahmed Sohriyani & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 522
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
468) 1957/2018 Const. P. Mst Afsheen (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Protection to Women, children, vulnerable persons in cases of domestic violence.
Tag Line:Protection, Women, children, vulnerable persons, destitute, domestic violence, welfare of minors, mechanism, safe houses, Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013,
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.387-K/2019 Makhdoom Mehmood Rehman v. Province of Sindh thr. Home Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
469) 24/2020 M.A. MUHAMMAD SHAH KAKAR THR ATTORNEY AHMED SHAH (Appellant) V/S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TRIBUNAL AT SINDH & BALOCHIS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: TRADE MARK (Section 5(2) of Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 ), TRADE MARK (Section 40 of Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001), Custom Act, 1969, Itellectual Property Law (Trade Mark Cases)
Tag Line:SRO 170(I)/2017 dated 17.03.2017 is for "imported goods only" and was not applied to parallel or grey market imports and de-minimis imports.
Powers to take action, detention, seizure, confiscation of goods imported into or taken out of Pakistan were/are always available with the customs officials and it is not that SRO 170(i)/2017 that has empowered them, it only set the process to be initiated by custom officials in relation to goods being imported. What was amended by virtue of SRO 768(I)/2014 is also very material. In Section 3CC and 3E of Customs Act, 1969 formation of the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement was redesigned along with its functions, jurisdiction and powers.
In the present case Tribunal could only pass order to the extent of trade mark being an infringed one or otherwise and to restrain it from being violated. The Procedural action of custom officials was not questioned independently by respondent. Once the effect of infringement was determined by tribunal the customs officials would definitely have followed it.
Color and color scheme also at time claimed to be an inventive one but that is not the case here as no one has claimed livery or color scheme or get up to be a mark of distinction under any intellectual property rights. Both parties are contesting over one mark i.e Tabiat and no one has claimed any exclusive right over livery or dress up of mark. So everything is a disclaimer except "Tabiat". If there are deceptive liveries of common product like rice, with one trade mark "Tabiat" in the absence of a right claimed under the liveries, the buyer would definitely get confuse and jump to some other brand as a natural course.
In terms of Section 5(2) of Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 goods even if not meant for a local consumption but only to enter the port for onwards journey, would mean the use of mark within jurisdiction.
Unless goods in transit are defined otherwise, only aforesaid meaning is deducible. Construction of our Trade Mark Ordinance, 2001 is also based on same scheme and there is no inconsistency as far as framing of relevant provision trade mark is concerned.
The word import or export (exclusively or inclusively) not defined under the law in hand differently that is dealing with goods in transit. The case of the appellant is on better footing since the attempt is made to export the goods from the territory where the mark is registered
The word "use" as explained above is also applicable to goods "for export only" and hence Section 5(2) read with section 40 of Trade Mark ordinance 2001 would be interpreted accordingly as use within territory of Pakistan.
Citation:2021 CLD 48
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
470) 4106/2019 Const. P. M/s Elite Screener (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 524
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
471) 8/2008 H.C.A Shafi Muhammad & another (Appellant) V/S Waseem Ahmed Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
472) 66/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) Gul Muhammad and others (Applicant) V/S Sardar Khan, thr:his L.Rs.&Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:1. Dismissal of suit in Non-prosecution under Order 9 CPC, upheld till High Court operates as a Bar to a 2nd Suit by the same plaintiff in respect of the same cause of action; notwithstanding, any subsequent Judgment in the Suit of Defendant, either way. No fresh cause of action can accrue.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 613
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.888-K/2022 Sardar Khan deceased through his L.Rs. & others v. Gul Muhammad through his legal heirs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
473) 200/2003 I.T.C The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) V/S M/S. Dewan Khalid Textile Mills Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 09-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.457/2010 M/s. Dewan Khalid Textile Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed.also short order
474) 368/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) V/S Silk Bank Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.278-K/2019 Muhammad Siddique v. Silk Bank Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
475) 68/2012 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue (Applicant) V/S Hyderabad Electronic Supply Co. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 04-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1105/2014 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Hyderabad v. M/s Hyderabad Electric Supply Co. Hyderabad,C.P.46-K/2014 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Hyderabad v. M/s Hyderabad Electric Supply Co. Hyderabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Disposed Leave Granted
476) 129/2017 Suit Premium Textile Mills Ltd., & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Gas price notification struck down
Citation:2025 CLC 332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
477) 538/2020 Suit Pakistan Airline Pilots (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Tag Line:The issue involved was that whether the Notification dated 28.4.2020 under the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 has been validly issued and applied on the employees of PIA and whether the Notice dated 30.04.2020 terminating the Working Agreement has been issued validly and whether the proceedings in the Suit should be stayed under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act as there is an arbitration clause. The injunction application has been dismissed; and application under Section 34 has been allowed by staying the proceedings of Suit, as provisions of Section 41 of the Arbitration Act cannot be invoked by a Plaintiff for an interim relief who has filed a Suit for Declaration instead of invoking the provision of the Arbitration Act, and further that the notification for placing the employment of PIA under Essential Services has been validly issued.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2007
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
478) 2268/2017 Const. P. Attaullah Khan Chandio (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion), Service matters (Seniority)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1157
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
479) 421/2020 Const. P. Sohail Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khusboo & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 35
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
480) 1406/2022 Const. P. Moula Bux Sahito & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 224
Advocates:Mohsin Kadir Shahwani(ADVO-12570-SBC-KHS),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Shahzeb Akhtar Khan(ADVO-13473-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1932/2022 Azeem Qadir and others v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4046/2022 Farzana Perveen v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4047/2022 Humaira Qayum v. Maula Bux Sahito and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed
481) 1331/2008 Const. P. Sardar Nisar (Petitioner) V/S Registrar Coop. Societies & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 04-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.156-K/2011 Sardar Nisar v. Registrar Cooperative Societies and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
482) 45/2014 S.M.A Mst. Mehrunnissa (Petitioner) V/S N.A (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: S.M.A (Nephew of Petition and Nazir of this Court appointed as Guardian.)
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 19-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
483) 31/2012 Const. P. Mst. Rehana Hafeez (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Ali alias Ehsan (through legal heirs) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 22-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting
484) 678/2022 Const. P. Mohammad Faraaz Shaikh Thr. Syed Muhammad Shariq (Petitioner) V/S Javeria Shahani and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1125
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
485) 2741/2025 Const. P. Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: placing the name on Passport Control List declared illegal
directions issued to remove the name
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1992
Advocates:Amanullah(ADVO-18436-SBC-KHS),Ahsanullah Khan(ADVO-3067-SBC-KHP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
486) 1899/2009 Const. P. Haji Muhammad Iqbal and others (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Saeed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
487) 4850/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Shabbir Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Discrepancies in MDCAT Test)
Tag Line:In response to substantiated allegations of paper leakage in the MDCAT 2024, the High Court of Sindh ordered a retake of the exam, emphasizing the necessity of strict security measures to ensure fairness and transparency in educational testing, thereby upholding constitutional rights and maintaining educational integrity.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 667
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 26-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5655/2024 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC), through its President, Islamabad v. Muhammad Shabbir Ahmad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
488) 8592/2018 Const. P. Al-Noor Sugar Mills Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 232
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
489) 2970/2021 Suit SHUJABAD AGRO INDUSTRIES (PT.) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Policy-making by the CCI under Article 154(1) is in a different sphere than policy-making by the Federal Government in the exercise of its executive authority under Article 97. The Natural Gas Allocation & Management Policy, 2005 was within the legal competence of the Federal Government and not the CCI. Under the GSAs between the Plaintiffs and the SSGC, the Plaintiffs cannot assert a right to receive gas for industrial use during the months of December, January and February. Article 158 of the Constitution exists as a prerogative of a Provincial Government, and therefore it does not give actionable cause to a person other than the concerned Provincial Government to invoke the same.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 264
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
490) 468/2019 Const. P. Abdul Hussain Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Deceased Quota
Citation:2025 PLC CS 916
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
491) 66/2018 Cr.Bail Ameer Khan Awan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
492) 5865/2024 Const. P. Mst. Mehwish & Another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, arising out of the underage issue if any, pending before the competent court of law.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1101
Advocates:Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-669-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Yousif Korai(ADVO-23186-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
493) 655/2010 Suit LUCKY CEMENT LTD (Petitioner) V/S HMS BERGBAU AG & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting
494) 41/2019 M.A. Roshan Ara and others Thr. Yasir Ali Palijo (Appellant) V/S Abdul Karim and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925) ---
----Ss. 372, 373 & 295---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 85 & 128---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42---Succession certificate, issuance of---Public document---Presumption of truth---Legitimacy of a child---Proof---DNA test, conducting of---Respondents being sisters of deceased filed application for conducting DNA test of minor son of deceased with the contention that he was adopted son and was not entitled for inheritance---Petition for conducting DNA test and objections were dismissed and succession certificate was issued in favour of petitioners---Validity---Documents produced on behalf of petitioners were official which had not been disputed by the respondents---Respondents should have sought declaration and cancellation of said documents before raising objections to the legal status of minor after death of his mother---Legitimacy of a child or his status as son of deceased could not be disproved by any oral evidence as against documentary evidence from official record which was a public document---Civil Court in presence of documentary evidence could not hold that the child was not born from the marriage of the parties---Father, in the present case, had not challenged that deceased was not mother of the minor son---Respondents had failed to challenge or rebut the evidence of official record of National Database and Registration Authority and other evidence before the Trial Court---DNA test could not be a sole proof of paternity of a child---Trial Court had rightly refused request of respondents for conducting DNA test, in circumstances---Respondents had made a frivolous challenge to the paternity of a child to deprive him from inheritances---Appeal was dismissed in, circumstances.
2012 YLR 1752 distinguished.
Mst. Laila Qayyum v. Fawad Qayum and others PLD 2019 SC 449; Salman Akram Raja v. Government of Punjab 2013 SCMR 203 and Ghazala Tehsin Zohra v. Ghulam Dastagir Khan PLD 2015 SC 327 rel.
Citation:2020 CLC 1670
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
495) 6/2007 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. THE STATE (Appellant) V/S AHSAN BASEER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB, NAB (forfeiture/ confiscation of Properities after abatement )
Tag Line:The properties left by
deceased can be inherited by the legal heirs however, it
shall be subject to any proceedings as may competently be
brought/undertaken by the State for forfeiture/
confiscation within the framework of the relevant law (as
discussed) as abatement alone will not restrict such
actions.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 923
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 29-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
496) 488/2006 Const. P. Raza Fecto Tractors (Private) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 438
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 06-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
497) 4623/2018 Const. P. United Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 929
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Azher Mehmood(ADVO-9556-SBC-KHI),Abdullah Nizamani(ADVO-14295-SBC-KHI),Abdul Haleem Siddiqui(ADVO-3062-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.995/2022 M/s United Bank Limited Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Labour and Human Resources Development, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
498) 231/2005 I.T.R Major General (R) M. Jalaluddin V/S Asstt:Commissioner of Income Tax (Applicant) V/S Major General (R) M. Jalaluddin V/S Asstt:Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 04-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
499) 3852/2018 Const. P. Total Parco Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1394
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4589/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-III, LTU, Lahore v. M/s Total PARCO Pakistan Limited, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
500) 22/2018 I. A Mashooq Ali Rajpar (Appellant) V/S Raja Abdul Hameed & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2168
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 04-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1277-K/2020 Mashooq Ali Rajpar v. Raja Abdul Hameed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
501) 3153/2021 Const. P. Yasir Ali Baloch and Others (Petitioner) V/S Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 482
Advocates:Rajesh Kumar Khagaija(ADVO-51467-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.931-K/2022 The Managing Director, Sindh Technical Education & Vocational Training Authority (STEVTA) v. Yasir Ali Baloch & another,C.P.L.A.1281-K/2022 Yasir Ali Baloch & another v. The Administrative Secretary STEVTA & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Pending Adjourned (Notice) to Respondent & DAG
502) 4694/2016 Const. P. Dr. Syed Abbas Haider (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2783/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
503) 1324/2015 Const. P. SSGC-LPG (PVT) LTD (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 28-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.525-K/2017 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Sui Southern Gas Company and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
504) 1364/2020 Const. P. Yasmeen & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 781
Advocates:Pir Riaz Muhammad Shah(ADVO-4269-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Abdul Nabi(ADVO-13636-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
505) 145/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Liaquat Ali Khoso & another (Applicant) V/S Haq Nawaz Khoso & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 26
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
506) 4662/2017 Const. P. M/s Quality Steel Re-Rolling (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:SRO 583(I)/2017 struck down.
Citation:2022 PTD 39
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
507) 1085/2013 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Abbas Rizvi & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 SBLR Sindh 145
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 30-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.336-K/2014 Muhammad Abbas Rizvi and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.1343/2014 Muhammad Abbas Rizvi and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. (C.A. be fixed on 06.11.14),Disposed Dismissed
508) 2271/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD TAHIR S/O GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Sindh Prohibition, Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale and use of Gutka and Manpuri Act, 2019), Criminal After Arrest Bail (Dismissed)
Tag Line:post-arrest bail in FIR No.451/2021 for offences punishable under sections 269, 270 PPC & 8(i) of Sindh Prohibition of Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale & Use of Gutka and Manpuri, Act 2019
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 75
Advocates:Muhammad Hanif(ADVO-13389-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Fareed(ADVO-18678-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
509) 758/2020 Suit Danish Elahi & others (Plaintiff) V/S Mariam Kamran & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:This court sees acts of the plaintiffs aimed to throttle livelihood of the deceaseds legal heirs and put them to the caprice of the Plaintiffs, an act offensive to dignity of human thus the Family Agreement sought to upkeep familys honour in fact is nothing but a sophisticated form of honor killing, tossing the widow (alongside her children) to the dust of injustice. For what has been reduced in the foregoing, I do not see any prima facie case of plaintiffs, neither balance of convenience in their favour, nor they would suffer any irreparable losses as their claim is only for money. The application is hence dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1099
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE),Hamza Hussain Hidayatallah(ADVO-16940-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
510) 17/2012 I. A First Dawood Investment Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S BankIslami Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 31-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.686-K/2013 First Dawood Investment Bank Ltd. v. Bank Islami Pakistan Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
511) 8233/2019 Const. P. Sapphire Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Tax credit - A challenge to the vires of section 65B of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, post amendment vide the Finance Act 2019.
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 1007
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
512) 47/2013 H.C.A Haroon Zia Malik (Appellant) V/S Mst. Fariha Razzak and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Plaintiff was owner of suit property who voluntarily gifted the same to the donee-wife---Trial Court had correctly appraised the evidence while recording his findings---Impugned gift deed was not a forged and fabricated document but same had been signed by the donor---Suit property had been gifted in favour of defendant who was wife of donor at the relevant time---Ingredients of gift were offer, acceptance and delivery of possession which were present in the case---Possession of suit property was already with the donee which till date continued to be with her---If husband had made a gift of anything to his wife or vice-versa then it could not be retracted---Transaction in question was not a financial one but it was gift of which a reciprocal financial obligation was not a consideration---Provisions of Arts. 17 & 79 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 were not applicable in the matter of gift---Gift did not require a compulsory registration---Donor did not suffer any mental distress at the hand of donee---Impugned judgment did not suffer from any infirmity or illegality---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
Topic: H.C.A (Revocation of Gift)
Tag Line:Plaintiff was owner of suit property who voluntarily gifted the same to the donee-wife---Trial Court had correctly appraised the evidence while recording his findings---Impugned gift deed was not a forged and fabricated document but same had been signed by the donor---Suit property had been gifted in favour of defendant who was wife of donor at the relevant time---Ingredients of gift were offer, acceptance and delivery of possession which were present in the case---Possession of suit property was already with the donee which till date continued to be with her---If husband had made a gift of anything to his wife or vice-versa then it could not be retracted---Transaction in question was not a financial one but it was gift of which a reciprocal financial obligation was not a consideration---Provisions of Arts. 17 & 79 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 were not applicable in the matter of gift---Gift did not require a compulsory registration---Donor did not suffer any mental distress at the hand of donee---Impugned judgment did not suffer from any infirmity or illegality---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2018 YLR 1557
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 21-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.96/2018 Haroon Zia Malik v. Mst. Fariha Razzak and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
513) 515/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous MST. GUL E RANA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 554
Advocates:Amer Raza Naqvi(ADVO-3585-SBC-KHI),Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.159-K/2023 Mst. Gull-e-Rana v. The State through P.G. Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
514) 1965/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD UMER S/O SAINDAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Sindh Prohibition, Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale and use of Gutka and Manpuri Act, 2019)
Tag Line:In view of the above, the applicant / accused Muhammad Umar son of Saindan is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The instant bail application is allowed in the above terms.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1319
Advocates:Muhammad Akbar(ADVO-6812-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 03-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
515) 76/2018 I. A Muhammad Ahmed Siddiqui & another (Appellant) V/S Abdul Abid Advocate & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLD Pesh. Note 1, 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 77
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 30-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
516) 5396/2014 Const. P. Naeem Akhtar Chang (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Deputy Attorney General(),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
517) 1096/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Mumtaz (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 20-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
518) 22/2010 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A The State (Appellant) V/S Kamran @ Kami & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 29-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
519) 1519/2011 Const. P. Abdul Ghafar (Applicant) V/S Govt of Sindh & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Group Insurance being not part of inheritance (Tarka) and the same is payable to the nominee mentioned therein. Since, it is an admitted position as also supported by all documentary evidence, the present petitioner has been mentioned as nominee in the Nomination Form of State life Insurance Corporation, therefore, petitioner is entitled to amount of group insurance.---Rules 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 of the West Pakistan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1963 are interpreted and pensionary benefits were allowed to the petitioner being a nominee.
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:Group Insurance being not part of inheritance (Tarka) and the same is payable to the nominee mentioned therein. Since, it is an admitted position as also supported by all documentary evidence, the present petitioner has been mentioned as nominee in the Nomination Form of State life Insurance Corporation, therefore, petitioner is entitled to amount of group insurance.---Rules 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 of the West Pakistan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1963 are interpreted and pensionary benefits were allowed to the petitioner being a nominee.
Citation:2017 PLC CS 625
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 13-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
520) 1000/2020 Cr.Bail Nabi Bux (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 108
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
521) 239/2009 H.C.A Muhammad Hanif & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Hameed A.Haroon & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 507
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.895/2020 Muhammad Haneef & another v. Hameed A. Haroon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 09-Dec-25)
522) 83/2011 Civil Revision Manzoor Meeraci & otheres (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Umar Mangsi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 24-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
523) 461/2011 Cr.Bail Rashid (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 13-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
524) 85/2022 Suit M/S TAHIR FOODS PRODUCTS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Power of DG I&I Customs re phytosanitory action under the Pakistan Plant Protection Rules, 2019.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 185
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI),Shamail Sikander(ADVO-18733-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
525) 69/2022 M.A. M/s. Meerut Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (Appellant) V/S Shahid Akhtar Qureshi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Court interpreted the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, and its 2020 amendment, observing that the Act primarily supports broad economic activities in agriculture, not for housing schemes of affluent and influent persons. The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its original purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 159, 2025 SHC KHI 2052
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
526) 551/2017 Suit Muhammad Saeed (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PLD 622
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
527) 3508/2011 Const. P. SHAHID NABI MALIK (Petitioner) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 CLC 1792
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 07-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1683/2014 Sindh Building Control Authority through the DG Karachi v. Shahid Nabi Malik & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
528) 64/1992 Civil Revision Province of Sindh and others (Applicant) V/S Rahim Buc,through his L.Rs.and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Limitation. Revisional jurisdiction is corrective and supervisory in nature; hence, Court seized of a revision petition can exercise its suo motu jurisdiction to correct the errors of jurisdiction committed by the courts below and can condone delay
Public document within the meaning of Article 85(1) & (4) of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, was admissible in evidence in terms of Article 76(f) ibid; hence, even if the same was not produced in original, they can be relied upon as secondary evidence.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 46
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.555/2022 Rahim Bux Khan (deceased) through LRs and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Irrigation and Power Department, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
529) 849/2017 Const. P. Nofil Nawaz Mulkana (Petitioner) V/S Sana Maqbool & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter
Tag Line:The proceeding in the nature of summary trial does not mean that process of effecting service will only be a formality. It is but the initial pillar in the procedure to achieve disposal on merit after effecting service. The trial Court Judge should have made efforts and that should be seen to have been done by trial Court in effecting service though nothing is available on record as far as Bailiffs report of refusal is concerned. There is nothing as far as reasoning is concerned as to why service was not effected at the address of Copenhagen and why address of the attorney Umer Al-Hamidi was considered as lawful. What convinced the trial Court to conclude that summons of the instant suit were to be served upon alleged attorney is mystery.
The process of substituted service is not to be taken lightly by the trial Court. It is to be exercised only in case when it is required i.e. where the Court is satisfied with the reasons to believe that the defendant is keeping out of way for the purpose of avoiding service or that for any other reason summons cannot be served in the ordinary way the Court shall order for service of summons by:
(a) affixing a copy of the summons at some conspicuous part of the house, if any, in which the defendant is known to have last resided or carried on business or personally worked for gain; or
(b) any electronic device of communication which may include telegram, telephone, photogram, telex, fax, radio and television or
(c) urgent mail service or public courier services or
(d) beat of drum in the locality where the defendant reside; or
(e) publication in press; or
(f) any other manner or mode as it may think fit;
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
530) 357/2025 Cr.Bail Muhammad Yousif (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1623
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
531) 635/2000 Suit Muhammad Aqil (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Khaliq (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 24-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
532) 2632/2025 Const. P. Iftikhar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S The State & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1754
Advocates:Muhammad Azeem(ADVO-8715-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
533) 220/2022 II.A. Muhammad Siddique S/o Abdul Salam Shaikh Siddiqui (Appellant) V/S Mst. Feroza Begum (Advocate) and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1012
Advocates:Kalim -ul- Hassan Siddiqui(ADVO-6817-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
534) 1463/2016 Cr.Bail Siraj Muhammad (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 YLR 99, 2016 OTHER 1559, 2017 SBLR 1433
Advocates:Babur Ishaq(ADVO-11008-SBC-KHE),Inamullah(ADVO-11910-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 14-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
535) 460/2018 Criminal Appeal THE STATE / ANF (Appellant) V/S NADEEM BAHADUR (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: LIMITATION (Article 157)
Tag Line:Her reference to Article 157 of the Limitation Act is erroneous as the appellant has not filed an appeal against an order of acquittal. This Revision Application is against conviction in which, according to the appellant, Respondents No.2 and 3 have been awarded lesser punishment. In our humble view, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mst. Fazeelat Bibi (PLD 2013 SC 361) has authoritatively held that ANF can only invoke the jurisdiction of appeal under Section 48(i) of CNS Act, 1997 for challenging the order of Special Court under CNS Act
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2051
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 23-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.199-K/2020 The State/Anti Narcoties Forec v. Nadeem Bahadur,Crl.A.11-K/2021 The State/Anti Narcoties Forec v. Nadeem Bahadur Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
536) 2477/2019 Const. P. Hajj Organizers Association of Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
537) 272/2013 Cr.J.A Muh (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 30-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.485/2016 Muhammad Ishaq v. The State,Crl.A.489/2020 Muhammad Ishaq v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
538) 194/2024 H.C.A Land Mark Associates (Appellant) V/S Abdul Malik & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 92
Advocates:Ishfaq Ahmed(ADVO-18300-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
539) 88/2011 Cr.Appeal Mitho alias Muhammad Mithal Lakhan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 22-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting
540) 966/2022 Const. P. Aijaz Ali Abro (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Pension Benefits Qualifying length of service.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 668
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
541) 7622/2018 Const. P. Zulfiqar Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1167
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5242/2023,C.P.L.A.5244/2023,C.P.L.A.5304/2021,C.P.L.A.1671-K/2021,C.P.L.A.6600/2021,C.A.352/2022,C.A.349/2022,C.A.347/2022,C.A.355/2022,C.P.L.A.6603/2021,C.P.L.A.2799/2023,C.P.L.A.5222/2023,C.M.A.8564/2023,C.P.L.A.3323/2023,C.P.L.A.5224/2023 SCP Status: Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed ,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed , Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Allowed, Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)
542) 27/2010 Const. P. Nooruddin and 05 others (Petitioner) V/S Federal Land Commissioner and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:The pivotal questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the subject land surrendered under Martial Law Regulation (MLR) 64 of 1959, which was resumed by Deputy Land Commissioner (DLC) Hyderabad vide order dated 17.6.1959, and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners became Qabuli Land? And, whether Civil Suit No.40/1972 filed by respondent No.7 was rightly decreed vide judgment and decree dated 23.10.1974, and its viries, could be called in question in Constitution Petition, in the terms paragraph 19 and 26 of Martial Law Regulation-1972? And, whether the Chief Land Commissioner, Sindh could pass the order after the judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Qazalbash Waqf, to re-determine of holding declaration under MLR/115/72 and LR-II/77 after the surrender of the excess land by the declarant, its resumption by the government; and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners in the year 1959 and 1960?
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 76
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1137/2022 Akhund Ghulam Muhammad through L.Rs and others v. Federal Land Commission, Islamabad through its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice)
543) 1704/2018 Const. P. Al-Razzaq Fibres & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 3)
Tag Line:WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973
A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan has pronounced the judgment on 18th January 2021 in the case of Al-Razzaq Fibres Pvt. Ltd. and others v. The Federation of Pakistan and another (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the vires of the amendment in in subsection (2)(b) of Section 3 and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge" as well as SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(I)/2011 for being ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Divisional Bench of this Court has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: -
"11.Accordingly, for the above reasons, instant petitions are allowed in the following terms:-
(i) Amendment in Section 3(2)(b) read with Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words " Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge", is ultravires to Constitution, and contrary to law, hence of no legal effect.
(ii) SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 issued in terms of and in purported exercise of powers conferred by, the amendment in Section 3(2)(b) and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(1)/2011, is declared to be ultra vires the Constitution, and is of no legal effect.
(iii) The respondents are restrained from demanding any duty in terms of SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 from the petitioners.
(iv) Provisions of Section 74A, suffice to say, have no relevance to the controversy in hand because it seeks validation of the acts of "Federal Government, and not that of the Board, with the approval of the Federal Minister-in-Charge"."
Citation:2021 PTCL 270
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.610-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-I v. Al Razzaq Fibres (Pvt) Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
544) 49/2013 II.A. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF (Appellant) V/S ASLAM PARVAIZ & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Appeal allowed with costs throughout.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.26-K/2019 Aslam Pervaiz and others v. Muhammad Ashraf Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
545) 194/2010 Cr.Bail Muhammad Shoaib (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-APR-10
Approved for Reporting
546) 33/2019 Judicial Companies Misc. MUHAMMAD YOUSUF AHMED & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S ARTISTIC DENIM MILLS LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Petitioners hold 14.45% shares in respondent Company and are aggrieved by the notice as well as the proceedings of the impugned Meeting dated 19.10.2019 and the resolutions passed thereon, whereby, related party transactions were approved in respect of 2 Companies, which have certain common Directorship. It is their case that they hold more than 10% of the shareholding and are, therefore, qualified to institute present proceedings, under s.136 of the Companies Act, 2017 which according to them has seriously prejudiced their interests. According to them statement of material facts under Section 134(3) of the Act, annexed with the impugned notice of meeting, failed to include the minimum information required under Regulation-5 of the Company (Related Parties Transactions and Maintenance of Related Records) Regulations, 2018, whereas, the meeting was also conducted without following proper procedure and has deprived the Petitioners from exercising their rights. However, the Petitioners have failed to make out a case for indulgence; hence, this petition fails and is accordingly dismissed with pending applications.
Citation:2021 CLD 134
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
547) 2442/2015 Suit M/s. ICI Pakistan Limited. (ISSUES) (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Al-Abid Silk Mills Limited. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 621
Advocates:Mirza Mahmood Ahmed(ADVO-9818-PBC-LHR),Abdallah Azzaam Naqvi(ADVO-15005-SBC-KHI),Manzoor ul Haq(ADVO-11805-SBC-KHI),Faiz Mehmood Khan Durani(ADVO-4955-SBC-KHI),Samia Alam Durrani(ADVO-4007HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
548) 6221/2021 Const. P. Asif Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 PLC CS 228
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
549) 642/2023 Const. P. Fatima Noor (Petitioner) V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Coming to the main case, it is also a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence. This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it appropriate to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757).
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 523
Advocates:Muzamil Hussain Jalbani(ADVO-18676-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Wasiq Mirza(ADVO-13772-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
550) 66/2010 Civil Revision Sikandar Ali Bhangwar and another (Applicant) V/S Badaruddin Awan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 14-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1425-K/2018 Sikandar Ali and another v. Badaruddin and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
551) 67/2016 Suit Fashion Knit Industries (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern as Co. Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973, Pakistan Economic Survey of 2014-15
Tag Line:Impugned Sunday Closure Notices are illegal, unlawful and ultra vires the Constitution
Citation:2017 CLC Note 141
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
552) 669/2009 Suit Premier Financial Services (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S The Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 1852
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 08-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting
553) 879/2000 Const. P. Shell Emplolyees Union (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 27-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
554) 2188/2012 Const. P. Adam Sugar Mills (Petitioner) V/S Respondent (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tender (tender process)
Tag Line:Petitioner on payment of outstanding dues in terms of the Award cannot be termed as a defaulter and hence cannot be ousted to participate in the subject tender process.
Citation:2012 CLC 1780, 2012 CLD 1734, 2013 SBLR Sindh 806, 2013 SBLR Sindh 1244
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.236-K/2012 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Adam Sugar Mills Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
555) 3468/2021 Const. P. M/s Kiran Food Products (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Import of betel nuts under Serial No.5 of Part-I and Serial No.155 of Part-III of Appendix B of Import Policy Order, 2020; has to be regulated by Plant Protection Department under the Quarantine Act and the Rules framed thereunder and not by the Customs department.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 198
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Mamoon Nawaz Chaudhry(ADVO-11348-SBC-KHE),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 23-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
556) 4026/2012 Const. P. Rashid Latif (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 27-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
557) 5061/2023 Const. P. Arshad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Furqan uddin Usmani and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Civil Revision )
Tag Line:Scope of Writ Jurisdiction in hearing revisions arising from interlocutory orders passed during trial about civil procedure matters. Petition challenging trial court's order relating to Petitioner/Defendant application to examine witnesses under Order 16 Rule 1 CPC., Exercise of writ jurisdiction against revisional order has to be exercised in rare and exceptional circumstances only when it could be said that the order passed by the revisional Court has been passed without lawful authority, beyond jurisdiction and vested rights were curtailed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 254
Advocates:Syed Mudasser Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-11456-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
558) 174/2020 Cr.Bail SAMIULLAH S/O MAHBOOB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2466
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
559) 68/2014 Cr.Acq.A. Zulfiqar Ali Baloch (Appellant) V/S Parkash & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 08-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
560) -819/2021 Suit SYED GHULAM SARWAR SHAH (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: As a result of the above discussion, it is hereby held that the instant Suit is barred by limitation, and also under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, and Order VI Rule 4 CPC, and is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. Accordingly, the Suit is liable to be dismissed with costs.
Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 08.04.2021 whereby this Suit and the listed applications were dismissed with costs of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only). The amount of costs shall be deposited by the plaintiff with the Nazir of this Court within thirty (30) days, which amount shall be transferred / deposited forthwith by the Nazir in the bank account of Edhi Foundation.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1230
Advocates:Muhammad Ali Shaikh(ADVO-2056-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
561) 2070/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Miscellaneous Application . (Father filed for Custody In his fever .Dismissed with direction Settled In Guardian Court.)
Citation:2019 YLR 1507
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
562) 82/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Arthur Lawerance Private Limited (Applicant) V/S M/S Actlaw (The Legal Consortium) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----Ss. 115, 6 & 15 & O. VII, R. 10---Revision before High Court---Procedure---Revision, in the present case, was filed before High Court without availing remedy before District Judge---Validity---Power of High Court with regard to the cases decided by any Court subordinate to High Court in which no appeal lay was not subject to any limitation---Revisional power of District Court was dependent on its pecuniary jurisdiction---Revisional power of Court was unfettered when it was exercised by the High Court and/ or District Court suo motu---When such jurisdiction had been invoked then copies of all the proceedings should have been furnished and revision should have been filed within ninety days from the date of order in which no appeal lay---Revisional powers of High Court and District Court were concurrent only when it was exercised by said courts at their own---Pecuniary value of claim of petitioner, in the present case, did not exceed the limits of appellate jurisdiction of District Court---If suit had been dismissed or decreed by the Trial Court on merit then first appeal would lie before District Judge on account of pecuniary value of the decretal amount---When revisional jurisdiction had been invoked against a particular order then it would not be a case of concurrent jurisdiction and mandatory provisions of S.6 read with Ss.15 to 20 of C.P.C. were also be considered---Aggrieved party had no option in the matter of jurisdiction of Court and it should respect each and every word of statute with regard to the jurisdiction---Every suit was to be instituted in the Court of lowest grade---Provisions of Ss.6 & 15 of C.P.C. were to be complied with while filing revision/appeal---Revision/appeal could not be filed in the High Court unless pecuniary value of the subject matter did exceed the appellate jurisdiction of District Court---When case had been filed in a Court which had no jurisdiction on pecuniary ground then plaint/revision should be returned to the party to file it in the Court having both territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction within limitation prescribed for filing the same---Petitioner had consumed more than ninety days time to overcome objection raised by the office---Revision petition could not be presented in the Court of District Judge after expiry of ninety days which was dismissed, in circumstances.
Muhammad Din v. Muhammad Amin PLD 1995 Lah. 15 and Mst. Safia Mushtaq v. Wali Muhammad and 18 others 2010 CLC 120 distinguished.
Khalid Ahmed and another v. Syed Hassan Shah Bukhari and others 1994 MLD 903; HOECHST Pakistan Limited and others v. Maqbool Ahmed and another 1998 CLC 134 and Shafi-ur-Rehman and 2 others v. Fateh Muhammad PLD 2002 Kar. 511 rel.
(b) Appeal---
----Appeal/revision was a continuation of original suit.
(c) Interpretation of statutes---
----Court could not interpret one section of an Act which might render the other mandatory provision of the said Act meaningless.
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 129
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.2380/2019 Arthur Lawrence (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. M/s Actlaw, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
563) 644/1986 Const. P. Karachi Bulk Storage & Terminals (pvt) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Collector Of Courts & Excise & Lands & C (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 28-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
564) 525/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Hassan Sultan Thr Attorney Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Union Council Cantonment Board & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 449
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
565) 401/2022 Const. P. Rehmatullah Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Ghulam Sarwar Sadhayo & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Order VII Rule 11 CPC)
Tag Line:Application under Order VII, Rule 10, CPC in rent matter.
Citation:2024 CLC 1158, 2024 SBLR Sindh 263
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
566) 5773/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Irfan Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SCMR 98
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1444-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others,C.A.86-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
567) 4677/2013 Const. P. Dr. Naeem Memon (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Whether supersession is punishment---in promotion matters to such post could not be made in a mechanical manner and a variety of factors, such as examination of service records, evaluation reports of training institutions, record of disciplinary proceedings, reputation of integrity and efficiency, suitability for handling particular assignment, etc. had to be taken into consideration--- NCA Employees Service Rules 2011, on the aforesaid proposition, the matter has been set at rest by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafique Ahmed Khan and others v. NESCOM through Chairman Islamabad and others (PLD 2016 SC 377)] therefore, question of declaring the Chapter II of the NCA Employees Service Rules 2011 as ultra vires of Section 9, 11 of the National Command Authority Act 2010 and Articles 4,9,10-A of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 are not apropos at this stage for the reason discussed in the preceding paragraphs.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
568) 589/2011 Cr.Bail Badshah alias Muhammad Saleh (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting
569) 47/2021 Cr.Bail Muhammad Siddique & others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 875
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
570) 62/2015 Suit M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PLD Sindh 479, 2018 SBLR Sindh 2022
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
571) 190/2018 Civil Revision Muhammad Bachal (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
572) 69/2019 Cr.Acctt.A Mehboob Ali Zardari (Appellant) V/S NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2096
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
573) 2465/2017 Const. P. Abdul Majeed Sohail (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Mahboob-uz-Zaman Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Judgment of Rent Controller& Order Appellate Court is maintained . C P dismissed .)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 25-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
574) 4668/2015 Const. P. Lucky Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976 (Payment of contribution under EOBI Act 1976)
Tag Line:Petitioner employers sought declaration that demand of contributions by the Federal EOBI under EOBI Act 1976 is illegal as EOBI became federal subject after 18th Amendment and subsequent Sindh EOBI Act 2014; Sindh Province did enact the Act 2014 but could not establish the Institution; CCI resolved EOBI shall remain with Federal Government. Held petitioners cant take benefit of dispute between the Federation and Province; priority must be given to the employees as the Old Age Benefit law is a beneficial law, aimed for the benefit of the employees therefore in case contribution amount is not received by the EOBI ultimately it is the employees who will suffer. Hence these petitions are disposed of in terms that petitioners shall deposit the contributions and other dues according to EOBI Act 1976; all amount deposited with the Nazir shall be returned in favour of the EOBI established under the EOBI Act 1976.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1239
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
575) 1010/2007 Const. P. Muhammas Aslam (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A.C. & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 736
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
576) 4045/2012 Const. P. Taj Rani (Petitioner) V/S National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Deceased Son Quota
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.70-K/2018 Mst: Taj Rani v. The President National Bank of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
577) 607/2012 Suit Dr. Dilnawaz Rafi Shaikh and others (Plaintiff) V/S Riyazur-Rahim and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 08-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
578) 717/2024 Suit M/S CENTURY ROLLER & STONE FLOUR MILLS PVT LTD&ORS (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD ASIF & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Suit Barred under section 69(2) of the Partnership Act.)
Tag Line:Suit barred by section 69(2) of the Partnership Act.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 784
Advocates:Mian Raza Rabbani(ADVO-3376-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI),Saalim Salam Ansari(ADVO-3307-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
579) 318/2016 Suit Gul Bano. (Plaintiff) V/S Shahnaz Bano & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Mesne Profit)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 439
Advocates:Muhammad Imran Khan(ADVO-8714-SBC-KHI),Uzma Rafiq(ADVO-9637-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
580) 3601/2018 Const. P. Pakistan Stock Exchange (Petitioner) V/S Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 (Section 23), Securities Act, 2015 (Section 6), Securities Act, 2015 (Section 7), Stock Exchanges (Corporatization, Demutualization & Integration) Act, 2012 (???Act 2012???), CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article- 137)
Tag Line:Stock Exchange is a commercial organization and is engaged in a
business of providing services for the trading of securities. As per
definition of the term Stock Exchange it is a market place where
facilities for trading of securities are provided. The surplus (receipts
over expenses) is distributed regularly as dividend amongst the
shareholders. Its shareholders taking part in trading activities as brokers
derive profit. Even before demutualization the members of stock
exchange were entitled to trading on stock exchange and were also
provided services as brokers; they have established their offices and
solicit business and use their membership for earning income therefore
economic and commercial activities were the core activities of the
erstwhile members and also the present TRE holders (trading right
entitlement). Stock exchanges entertain applications from individuals
and corporate entities to issue them such trading certificates for their
economic/business activity. The stock exchange lacks the important
attribute of lack of commerciality of a members club for application
of the doctrine of mutuality
Citation:2024 CLD 580
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR),Ghulam Murtaza Korai(ADVO-14432-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Tariq(ADVO-19123-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.775/2022 Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited, Karachi v. Sindh through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
581) 85/2019 II.A. Mst. Naz Bibi (since died) through her LRs (Appellant) V/S Wahid Bux (since died) through his LRs and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:The impugned judgment and decree of the learned appellate Court are maintained to the extent of entitlement of respondent No.1 in respect of the amount of the National Savings Certificates left by the deceased along with profit thereon, however, according to his share as per Shariah ; and, the impugned judgment and decree are set aside to the extent of grant of 50% share to respondent No.1 in the severance grant, gratuity and benevolent fund of the deceased, which shall be paid expeditiously to the legal heirs of the appellant / widow as per the service rules and regulations of the respondent No.2-bank. Needless to say the above payments shall be in addition to the donation by the respondent No.2-bank and the death compensation of the deceased granted to the appellant / widow by the learned appellate Court which, having not been challenged by respondent No.1, has attained finality. This appeal is partly allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs.
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1418
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1520-K/2021 Wahid Bux & others v. Mst.Naz Bibi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
582) 356/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Ramzan & Others (Petitioner) V/S Chuttal Bughio & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:12 (2) of CPC
Fraud and misrepresentation
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1503
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
583) 36/2018 I. A Ashraf Ali Qureshi (Appellant) V/S Qamaruddin Shaikh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 534
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3954/2022 Qamaruddin Sheikh v. Ashraf Ali Qureshi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
584) 20/2018 Cr.Appeal Nadir Moosani & others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 25-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
585) 575/2008 Const. P. Naseeruddin & another (Petitioner) V/S Syed Daulat Ali & ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 10-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
586) 1518/2007 Suit ANSAR ALI (Plaintiff) V/S ALTAF AHMED MEMON & ANOTHER. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
587) 68/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst. Naseem Kausar and others Thr. Junaid Safdar (Applicant) V/S Sardar Abdul Rehman (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, LIMITATION (Limitation Act 1908)
Tag Line:Reader and even for that matter court had no jurisdiction to extend time for filing leave application against statutory period and that too without any justified reason. By that time the service has already been effected at least by publication on 06.12.2020. In terms of Order XXXVII Rule 3, CPC, the leave to defend application is supposed to have been filed within the period prescribed therein.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 280
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.812-K/2021 Mst.Naseem Kausar & others v. Sardar Abdul Rehman & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
588) 1112/2016 Cr.Bail Roshan Ali Solangi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 04-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
589) 2316/2021 Suit MUHAMMAD FARHAN WAZIR & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Plaint can be rejected if it is bad for multifariousness.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 782
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
590) 6863/2019 Const. P. Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases.
Topic: Service matters (Pension)
Tag Line:the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases.
Citation:2023 PLC Lab. Note 78
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
591) 3662/2011 Const. P. Ali Raza (Petitioner) V/S M. Shoaib and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 21-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
592) 1736/2013 Const. P. Akhlaque Hussain Memon and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether the post of Additional/Assistant Advocate General could be filled amongst District Attorneys as per the Sindh Law Officers (Conditions of Service Rules), 1940 as amended up to date; and, whether between the notification dated 10.5.2016 bearing S.REG:1(22)2015/117 and notification dated 9.4.2018 bearing S.REG.4(07)/2018 which one is to prevail; and, whether the service structure for Deputy District Attorney and District Attorney in Solicitor Department, Government of Sindh needs to be streamlined ?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1271
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1633-K/2021 Amir Ahmed Kehar v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
593) 5/2022 I. A Prof. Dr. Kheo Ram (Appellant) V/S M/s. Changan Mehran Motors & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:(1) The Consumer Court improperly used its powers under the Code of Civil Procedure, given the matter was a complaint and not a plaint.(2)Consumer Court's Authority under Section 36 of the 2014 Act overlooks proper use of Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C.(3)Meticulous analysis of Section 29 of the Consumer Protection Act of 2014 confirms timeliness of the Appellant's Complaint. (4) The key requirement of establishing consumer status is to invoke the jurisdiction of the Consumer Court.
Citation:2025 CLC 393
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
594) 3184/2021 Const. P. Tahira Haneef (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In the light of the above discussion, in our view, a deputationist could not be treated as an aggrieved person, because she has no vested right to remain on a post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period and can be repatriated at any time to her parent department more particularly in the light of aforesaid decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court. Reference is also made to the case of Dr. Shafi-ur-Rehman Afridi V/s CDA, Islamabad through Chairman and others (2010 SCMR 378). Even otherwise she cannot continue to serve on deputation in Sindh Government after her removal from service by the parent department, as discussed supra.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 19
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
595) 5176/2013 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Shoaib (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 SBLR Sindh 443
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.121-K/2017 M/s Hadeed Welfare Trust thr. CEO Bin Qasim, Karachi and another v. Syed Muhammad Sohaib and others,C.P.L.A.599-K/2018 Syed Muhammad Shoaib and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
596) 8023/2018 Const. P. M/s Abdullah (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
597) 7111/2018 Const. P. Ahmed Habib ul Islam (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters ( Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973), Service matters (Merger of services in other caders )
Tag Line:It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 454
Advocates:Shazib Masud(ADVO-44528-PBC-LHR),Ali Ashfaq(ADVO-46574-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
598) 2941/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ayub Fazlani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 11-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
599) 6912/2022 Const. P. UBL (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bank account of customer debited with the forged cheque. Bank held liable to reimburse customer.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 918
Advocates:Khalil Ahmed(ADVO-6793-SBC-KHI),Jahanzeb Awan(ADVO-11549-SBC-KHI),Shahan Karimi(ADVO-15097-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1333-K/2023 United Bank Limited v. Federation Of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
600) 65/2005 Civil Revision Liaquat Ali alias Khabar and others (Applicant) V/S Habibullah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Concurrent finding of two courts below can be interfered with if the court lacked jurisdiction or a case of misreading and non reading of evidence is made out;
a registered sale deed as against a mutation entry will have precedence over it.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 50
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
601) 51/2021 Suit MUHAMMAD FARAZ KASBATI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. SOUTH CITY HOSPITAL (PVT) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 644
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
602) 1449/2008 Cr.Bail AIJAZUL HAQ (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI),Syed Mohammad Iqbal(ADVO-3496-SBC-KHI),Shamshad Ali(ADVO-19351-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Shamim Jawed(ADVO-12497-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
603) 49/2021 I.T.R.A CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (Applicant) V/S THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 236A)
Tag Line:Section 236A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 requires a person,
making sale by public auction or auction by a tender of any property or
goods (including property or goods confiscated or attached, either
belonging to or not belonging to the Government, local Government, any
authority, a company, a foreign association declared to be a company
under sub-clause (vi) of clause (b) of subsection (2) of section 80, or a
foreign contractor or a consultant or a consortium or Collector of
Customs or Commissioner Inland Revenue or any other authority, shall
collect advance tax, computed on the basis of sale price of such
property and at the rate specified in First Schedule, from the person to
whom such property or goods are being sold. This provision is as clear as
crystal however it is followed by an explanation inserted by Finance Act 2020 for the removal of doubt that the expression of sale of public
auction or auction by tender include renewal of license previously sold
by public auction or auction by a tender and where payment is received
in installments, advance tax is to be collected with each installment. As
we observe that there is no necessity of any explanation or any
clarification as section 236A is clear in its entirety.
Notwithstanding the above, even the explanation of clarificatory
nature operates retrospectively as it only provides an assistance in
interpreting the provisions correctly in terms of intention of the
legislature, subject to however if a contradictory situation is reached by
the Court interpreting the basic provisions as against explanation. We
are, therefore, of the view that the applicant described as an agent
collecting advance tax from the bidders/occupants/lessees/ licensees
etc. to whom the premises/property was given either by way of public
auction or tender or by any other mode and includes renewal of such
document.
Citation:2021 PTD 1867, 2021 PTCL 804
Advocates:Abdul Rahim Lakhani(ADVO-4061-SBC-KHI),Abdul Jabbar(ADVO-13242-SBC-KHS),Atta Mohammad Qureshi(ADVO-584-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 07-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
604) 202/2017 Cr.Rev N. J. AUTOS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & 02 OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
605) 360/2016 Cr.Appeal SAIFULLAH S/O BABAR ALI SHAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 21-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
606) 5297/2021 Const. P. Mst. Shah Bano and Others (Petitioner) V/S The D.G SBCA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 391
Advocates:Faiz Mehmood Khan Durani(ADVO-4955-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
607) 433/2000 Suit MRS. SHABINA AZIZ (Plaintiff) V/S STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF PAKISTAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XIII Rule 4 CPC)
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. XVI, R. 1(2)---Limitation Act (IX of 1908) S.3---Summoning and attendance of witnesses---Object, scope and nature of O.XVI R.1, C.P.C.---List of witnesses, non-filing of---Provisions of O.XVI, R.1, C.P.C. were mandatory---Use of the word "shall" in O.XVI, R.1(1), C.P.C. was re-emphasized with a prohibition that the party "shall not" be permitted to call witnesses other than those in the said list except with the permission of the court on showing "good cause" for the omission of said witnesses from the list---Time limit was an essential requirement of O.XVI, R.1, C.P.C. for seeking any relief with respect to summoning and attendance of court witnesses---Limitation of seven days was imposed so that the other side should be well aware of possible evidence expected in the case to meet it in rebuttal---Such limitation, if was allowed to be flouted with impunity, then the parties would keep on surprising each other by introducing witnesses and documents in evidence---After seven days from the time of framing of issues, upon failure to file list of witnesses, a statutory right was accrued in favour of opposite party which was; that even if evidence was available with a party such evidence shall not be used by the party having such evidence in their possession---Said right was analogized to the right of parties under S.3 of the Limitation Act, 1908---Rights survived but the remedy was extinguished---Evidence may be available but its effect was barred seven days after framing of issues by the court---Not only the "good cause" had to be shown by the delinquent party for calling a witness through the court but at the same time the applicant was required to explain the delay in disclosing the name of the witness---Failure of party to explain such delay would disentitle such party from getting relief and it would be against the spirit of the law to causally condone the time limit given in O.XVI, R.1, C.P.C. in the name of doing justice on merit.
Muhammad Umar Mirza v. Waris Iqbal and others 1990 SCMR 964; 2008 YLR 1871 and 2008 CLC 1334 rel.
(b) Administration of Justice---
----Submission of irrelevant case-law by counsel appearing in court---Complaint of overwork in the judiciary was one of the basic obstacles in the administration of justice and it was not for the courts alone to administer justice and ensure that justice was not denied on account of inordinate delay in the disposal of cases---Each and every lawyer appearing in court had an equal responsibility to ensure that they should not consume the time of the court out of proportion to the issue in hand on the date of hearing---Very valuable time of the court can be consumed in the reading of case-law submitted by counsel and if such case-law was not relevant, it was one of the major contributing factor in the delay of administration of justice----Counsel were expected to be brief and to the point to help save time of the courts which in turn would utilized by the courts in disposal of other cases particularly the old cases.
Citation:2014 CLC 420
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
608) 6544/2020 Const. P. M/s Drive Line Motor Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Othes (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (section 138 of Customs Act, 1969 read with Customs Rules 86 to 89 laid down in SRO 450(I)/2001)
Tag Line:Since section 138 deals with the frustrated cargo and Rule 86 has
defined what frustrated cargo would be. It is thus one which will brought
into customs station by reason of inadvertence or misdirection or where
consignee is untraceable or has dishonoured his commitments and the
consignor wishes to have it re-shipped to him. Since the consignee has
refused or dishonored his commitments, the consignor immediately
acted upon by moving an application for re-export on 17.04.2018 and
that is exercised under Rule 88 of the ibid Rules. There was no occasion
for the Collector of Customs to have avoided or discarded the
application of the consigner for the re-export of the vehicle as it was
and is within the definition of frustrated cargo and permission ought to
have been followed in terms of Rule 89 on Collector being satisfied
which he should under the relevant circumstances of the case as in our
view the vehicle came out as a frustrated cargo.
Citation:2022 PTD 363
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 05-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
609) 7/2022 M.A. Samaa TV and others (Appellant) V/S Learned XIth ADJ, Khi (South) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Whether a Suit instituted under the provisions of the Defamation Ordinance, 2002 can be instituted before the High Court in its original jurisdiction and as to whether the lis in respect of Defamation is justicable under the Common Law
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 450
Advocates:Tahmasp Rasheed A. Razvi(ADVO-11140-SBC-KHI),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 21-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
610) 1015/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem Jehangir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for becoming entitled to be considered for promotion to a higher grade, of course, is not without logic as the officer who is initially inducted to a particular post needs to serve on the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to serve the public in a befitting manner. It is also important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual length of service virtually violates the entire service structure as a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention of the law nor of the equity.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 452
Advocates:Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khan(ADVO-2324-SBC-HYD),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.555-K/2025 Muhammad Saleem Jehangir v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned for a short date.to be fixed before any other bench
611) 12/2013 J.M Karachi Development Company (Applicant) V/S IM Technologies Pakistan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLC Note 157
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
612) 190/2011 Const. P. Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd.,(MOBILINK) (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Stamp duty.
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh 859
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.125-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Pakistan Mobile Communication Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
613) 1171/2012 Cr.Bail ALI ASGHAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 25-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
614) 149/2010 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs (Appellant) V/S Water & Power Development Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 535
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.70-K/2014 Collector of Customs Karachi v. M/s Water & Power Development Authority, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
615) 86/2019 I. A Sheikh Kashif Imtiaz (Appellant) V/S Faysal Bank Limited & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2209
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1909/2020 Sheikh Kashif Imtiaz v. Faysal Bank Limited, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
616) 938/2017 Suit Farrukh Afzal Munif (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Afzal Munif & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 31
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
617) 200/2019 Suit Agha Steel Industries Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Directorate of Intelligence & Investigation & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tax matters (Conduct of raid u section 175 of I Tax Ord and u/s 38 of Sales Tax Act 1990)
Tag Line:Sales Tax Act & Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 - Power to search premises of a taxpayer under S. 38 of Sales Tax Act and Section 175 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 can only by permitted when "some proceedings" are already pending before the officer.
Citation:2019 PTD 2119
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
618) 269/2014 H.C.A Hamdard Laboratories (Waqf) Pakistan (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Fahim (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 03-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1440/2016 Muhammad Faheem v. Hamdard Laboratories (Waqf) Pakistan, Karachi,C.M.A.5165/2016 Muhammad Faheem v. Hamdard Laboratories (Waqf) Pakistan, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Allowed and Parent Case Restored but subject to payment of cost of Rs.50000.
619) 4391/2018 Const. P. Zaheer uddin Mujahid (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.277/2019 Zaheeruddin Mujahid v. Province of Sindh thr. Cooperative Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
620) 319/2021 Cr.Bail Majid Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:For the above reasons, the applicant Majid Ali has made out a case for post-arrest bail in FIR No.42 of 2021, registered with Police Station Darri, District Larkana, for offenses punishable under sections 452, 376, and 511 P.P.C. Accordingly, the applicant is admited to post arrest bail; he shall be released in the aforesaid crime subject to furnishing his bail bond in the sum of Rs.50, 000/- (Fifty Thousand Ruprees) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 247
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
621) 348/2014 Suit Syed Shafaat Ali & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Farhat Ali & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Malicious prosecution
Tag Line:Plaintiff filed suit for recovery of damages for Malicious Civil Proceedings and Malicious Prosecution against Defendants. Whereas the Supreme Court of Pakistan had recognised malicious civil proceedings by the 1990s, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has only recently held that a claim in malicious prosecution could also be brought in relation to civil proceedings in Willers v. Joyce, [2016] UK SC44 (reported in 2016 SCMR 1841). Plaintiff was unable to establish through evidence the five (5) elements that form the basis for accepting or rejecting a suit for recovery of damages for malicious prosecution/malicious civil proceedings as laid down in the case of Niaz and Others v. Abdul Sattar and Others, PLD 2006 SC 432. In the circumstances, proving the six (6) principles for granting and/or refusing damages with regards to malicious prosecution/malicious civil proceedings as laid down in Muhammad Akram v. Mst Farman Bi, 1990 SC 28 is irrelevant. Suit dismissed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 894
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 19-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
622) 327/1966 Suit Raza Hussain and others (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Khan and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Compromise on behalf of defendants---Scope---Transferee of property could not confer upon a transferor a better title than he himself possessed---Defendants had no lawful authority, right or interest at the relevant time in the subject property when they entered into a compromise with the plaintiffs---Neither any appeal was preferred against the partition order nor authenticity or validity of the same was challenged by any of the parties---Possession of suit property was wrongly handed over to the plaintiffs by the Nazir of the Court---Nazir of the Court was directed to take appropriate measures to hand over the possession of suit land to its claimants.
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Transfer of Property)
Tag Line:Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell. Directions to the Nazir to handover the possession of suit land to its claimants.
Citation:2018 YLR 1053
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 15-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
623) 379/2024 Cr.Bail Muhammad Bilal (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 142
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
624) 12/2010 Const. P. Safdar Ali Sahito (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 01-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
625) 3913/2020 Const. P. Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:i) Whether the petitioner possesses the required qualifications for the post of police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police as per recruitment Rules-2016 ? And
ii) Whether police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police can be recruited on a contract basis and subsequently be regularized in service under the law?
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 102
Advocates:Muhammad Ashraf Samoo(ADVO-8176-SBC-KHI),Qaim Ali(ADVO-11490-SBC-KHI),JAM SHAHID IQBAL(ADVO-53967-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1725-K/2021 PC.77 Jan Muahmmad & others v. Province of Sindh thorugh Secretary, Home Department Govt, of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.5160/2021 Abdul Ghafar and others v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
626) 1472/2016 Const. P. M/s Tufail Chemical (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Sales tax on toll manufacturing is to be paid to FBR/ Federation and not to Province of Sindh
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 145
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.919/2024,C.P.L.A.1854/2023,C.P.L.A.1685/2023,C.A.918/2024 SCP Status:Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
627) 887/2018 Const. P. Hassan Zada & Ors (Petitioner) V/S FOP & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1216
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4119/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others,C.A.1564/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.impugned is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Disposed of
628) 22/1999 Civil Revision Ghulam Hyder Mahar (Applicant) V/S Ellahi Bux and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:A Suit for declaration without any title or legal right is not maintainable under section 42 of the Specific Relief Act..
similarly a declaration of lawful possession cannot be maintained under section 42 of the Specific Relief Act.
a mere application for allotment of land creates no title
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 531
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
629) 1779/1999 Const. P. Abdul Cadir Adam Seedat (Petitioner) V/S Wealth Tax Officer & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Attorney General(),Jawaid Farooqi(ADVO-3964-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
630) 3982/2013 Const. P. Syed Qadeer Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan And Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 39
Advocates:Munir Ahmed Malik(ADVO-14377-SBC-KHS),Sami Ahsan(ADVO-6815-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1328/2022 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited through its President, Islamabad and others v. Syed Qadeer Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
631) 95/2020 Cr.Rev GHOUS BUX S/O SUFAR KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1606
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
632) 3310/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Asad ul Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the petitioners are seeking regularization of their services against the quota reserved for deceased civil servants as provided under the Prime Ministers Assistance Package for the Families of Government Employees, on the premise that their parents were serving in the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on different posts, who passed away during their service.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 287
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
633) 71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 30-NOV-10
Approved for Reporting
634) 13/2022 H.C.A Muhammmad Sadiq (Appellant) V/S Dawood Jan Muhammad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 845
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Jahangir(ADVO-13481-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Shariq A. Razzak(ADVO-15492-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.525-K/2022 Muhammad Sadiq v. Dawood Jan Muhammad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
635) 53/2017 J.M Province of Sindh & others (Applicant) V/S M/s. Pakrock Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
636) 2543/2011 Const. P. Mansur-ul-Haque (Petitioner) V/S Government of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Citation:2017 PLC (CS) 1255
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.313-K/2017 Mansoor-ul-Haque v. Govt. of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Defence and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
637) 4461/2017 Const. P. Imtiaz Bibi (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceased???s first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Hon???ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance.
Topic: Service matters (Pension)
Tag Line:Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceaseds first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Honble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 679
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
638) 51/2019 Execution First Appeal MENA ENERGY DMCC (Decree Holder) V/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Execution of Foreign Decree. Judgment when conclusive under section 13 CPC.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1212
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Hashmatullah Alim(ADVO-11063-SBC-KHE),Arshad Mohsin Tayebaly(ADVO-3740-SBC-KHI),Waqar Ahmed Ch:(ADVO-11376-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
639) 133/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) Shaikh Muhammad Sajid & Another (Applicant) V/S Roohullah & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Civil Revision Application was dismissed with costs of Rs.10,000.00 ; the applicants were directed to deposit the said amount with the Nazir of this Court within thirty (30) days ; and, the Nazir was directed to utilize the same towards the benevolent fund of the employees of this Court.
Advocates:Sameer Ghazanfar(ADVO-11222-SBC-KHI),Abdul Karim Khan Faheem(ADVO-3829-SBC-KHI),M/S. TABASUM GHAZANFAR & COMPANY (LAW FIRM).(FIRM-147-SBC-KHI),Tabasum Ghazanfar(ADVO-2492-SBC-KHI),Javed Haleem(ADVO-9588-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
640) 5229/2015 Const. P. Karachi Tax Bar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether a probationer has the capability and potential to make a satisfactory career in the organization, and whether or not the organization/employer will have any benefit of his services. We are of the view that the period of probation provides equal opportunity to the employer and employee to decide whether they would like to continue with the engagement or not.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 593
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
641) 699/2008 Suit MST. AZKA ASIF W/O SYED ASIF ALI (Plaintiff) V/S CITY DISTRICT GOVT KARACHI CDGK @ OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 695
Advocates:Irfan Hassan(ADVO-9405-SBC-KHI),Touqeer Ahmed(ADVO-52245-SBC-KHS),Thawur Ali Khan(ADVO-2306-SBC-KHI),Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),Abdul Khalil(ADVO-2205-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
642) 205/2023 I.T.R.A M/S ELAHEE BUKSH & COMPANY PVT. LTD (Applicant) V/S ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Interpreting Section 18(1)(d) r/w Anti-avoidance Sections 108 & 109)
Tag Line:Profit accrued on loan advanced by Associate Company is liable to tax under Section 18(1)(d) read in the light of Chapter VIII of the ITO, 2001, dealing with Anti-avoidance with specific provisions on transactions between Associates and recharacterization. ITRA Dismissed. Division Bench Judgments of this Court and Lahore High Court dealing with loans advanced by the Director of the Taxpayer Company to the company based on fiduciary duty are distinguished.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1460
Advocates:Emad-ul-Hasan(ADVO-5822-SBC-KHI),Irfan Mir Halepota(ADVO-9555-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 05-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1061-K/2024 M/s Elahee Buksh & Company Pvt. Ltd. v. The Additional Commissioner (Audit-III) Inland Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice)
643) 6344/2019 Const. P. Dr. Jagdesh & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Civil Servant Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 (Group Insurance)
Tag Line:Group insurance to employees of Government of Sindh, the Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 and Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Rules, 1980, Boards for administration of the Funds, State life insurance corporation: Khyber Pukhtunkhwa Civil Servant Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation Act 2014, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Civil Servants Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation (amendment) Act No.V of 2016, judgment of the Peshawar High Court in case of Fida Muhammad Durrani and judgment of Islamabad High Court in case of Muhammad Rehan Khan; advice by Advocate General Sindh to the Government of Sindh with regard to amendment in existing law/rules.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1366
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
644) 10/2008 II.A. Tahir Raza Qadari (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Tanweer Amna (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Whether a Power of Attorney attested by a Magistrate is required to still be proved as to its execution. What is the scope of hearsay evidence. What is the application of the Parol Evidence Rule. The application of Section 215 of the Contract Act, 1872 as between a principal and an agent.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 323
Advocates:Syed Ali Shabbar Rizvi(ADVO-2858-SBC-KHI),Basil Nabi Malik(ADVO-13956-SBC-KHI),Choudhary Atif Rafiq(ADVO-11896-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
645) 518/2020 Const. P. Abdul Haleem Chachar & others. (Petitioner) V/S P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:For the reasons noted above, the impugned action of converting the Amenity Plot reserved for playground situated at Sindh Cooperative Housing Society, Sukkur into residential plots by the present as well as previous Management of Sindh Cooperative Housing Society, Sukkur is
declared to be against the rights of petitioners of Constitution Petition No.D-518 of 2021 and others and a result of an arbitrary exercise of power, therefore, is set aside. Accordingly,
the respondents are directed to restore the amenity Plot reserved for Playground situated at Sindh Cooperative Housing Society, Sukkur to its original position in accordance with the sanctioned plan of this area.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 927
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
646) 1461/1998 Suit A. QUBUBUDDIN KHAN (Plaintiff) V/S CHEC MILLWALA DREDGING CO. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 15)
Tag Line:if illegallity is separable from the main award, the same can be modified / corrected by invocking section 15 of the Arbiration Act, 1940.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 24-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
647) 166/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) Jacob (Applicant) V/S English Biscuits Manufactures (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLC 1357
Advocates:M/S. MANSOOR AHMED KHAN & CO.(FIRM-106-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shaiq Usmani(ADVO-2667-SBC-KHI),Abdullah Munshi(ADVO-17280-SBC-KHS),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Aziz A. Munshi(ADVO-1214-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
648) 486/2018 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD KASHIF S/O SHER MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The test for weighing the evidence of identification proceedings is to first assess the system variables, i.e. the precautions taken at the test identification parade, and then to assess the estimator variables i.e. the capacity and ability of the eye-witness to identify the accused in the circumstance of the case. Rel. Mian Sohail Ahmed v. The State (2019 SCMR 956) and The matter of Kanwar Anwaar Ali (PLD 2019 SC 488).
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 318
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.496/2020 Muhammad Kashif and Muhammad Hanif @ Kalia @ Mamoo v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
649) 2719/2011 Const. P. Dilip Kumar & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting
650) 63/2000 Civil Revision Sachedino Kalwar (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Order VII, Rule 11. (Section 161(B) of Land Revenue Act)
Tag Line:Applicant first chose to contest the matter before the Revenue authority by filing its objections and attending hearings, and then once the order was passed, filed a Suit challenging the same. When an order is an appealable order in terms of s.161 ibid, which has not been availed, then the very maintainability of the Suit under section 9 CPC is big question mark; and impliedly bars jurisdiction of the Civil Court in such matters where the jurisdiction to adjudicate exclusively vested with the revenue Courts.
.
Admittedly, the Applicant failed to avail the statutory remedied of appeal and
revision before the Commissioner and the Board of Revenue respectively
against the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 39
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
651) 4151/2020 Const. P. M/s Popular Juice Ind Pv Ltd and Othes (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1277
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.124-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan thorugh Chairman Federal Board of Revenue & others v. M/s. Popular Juice Industries & others,C.A.3934/2022 Federation of Pakistan thorugh Chairman Federal Board of Revenue & others v. M/s. Popular Juice Industries & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
652) 185/2021 Const. P. Syeda Asia Rizvi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Entitlement of Pension to divorced daughter)
Tag Line:Whether a divorced daughter of a civil servant can claim pensionary benefitsd
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 258
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
653) 4669/2022 Const. P. Salman Zafar Siddiqui & Others (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Pension funds and like trusts are entitled for exemption from Tax under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, without registration under the Sindh Trusts Act, 2020
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 2063
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Tajammul Hussain Lodhi(ADVO-10103-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
654) 1476/2013 Cr.Bail ABBASS ALI S/O ABDUL KHALIQ (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PCr.LJ 1791
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
655) 448/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Imtiaz Hussain Jatoi (Applicant) V/S The State and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 162
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
656) 797/2019 Cr.Acq.A. Askari Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Tara Chand S/o Jasso Mal (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 592
Advocates:Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHI),Tariq Hussain(ADVO-5937-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.55-K/2022 Tara Chand v. M/s. Askari Bank Ltd, through its Chief Executive Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next hearing: After 3 weeks)
657) 61/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Rehman Dashti (Applicant) V/S Niaz Ahmed Soomro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Allotment of amenity plot. Jurisdiction of Civil Court. Locus Standi of individual from public.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1512
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
658) 200/2020 Suit M/s Sadiq & Suharwardy (Plaintiff) V/S Ismail Industries Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Intellectual Propoerty Organization of Pakistan Act 2012 (Rejection of Plaint or transfer to IP tribunal or Continuing hearing by High Court)
Tag Line:These ten trademark suits currently pending in the High Court are disposed of in three different manner following the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Muhammad Multazam Raza v. Muhammad Ayub Khan, 2022 SCMR 979 in paragraph 12 and the enactment of the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2023, on 11.08.2023. The three actions on the part of the High Court depend on the category of trademark dispute: Category A - Suits for infringement currently pending in the High Court and filed prior to 29.12.2015 may be transferred to the IP Tribunal forthwith (Category ???A???). Category B - trademarks suits filed after 29.12.2015, currently pending in the High Court, the Plaint in such suits must be returned (Category ???B???) as High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the same. Finally, in cases involving a Suit connected with a J. Misc. Application involving either Section 73(4) [an application for revocation], Section 80(4) [an application for declaration of invalidity], Section 96(2) [an application for rectification], etc, the High Court may retain jurisdiction and proceed with deciding both Suit and J. Misc.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 433
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 10-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
659) 125/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Nusrat Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 963
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP),Syed Jamil Ahmed Shah Bukhari(ADVO-161-SBC-HYD),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3874/2024 The Province of Sindh, through its Secretary, Finance Department, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others v. Muhammad Nusrat Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
660) 4778/2021 Const. P. Pakistan Mobile Communication (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Federal Excise Duty, CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973, Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Tag Line:The impugned enactment is for area which formed part of
province i.e. Sindh hence for all intent and purposes Article 142(c) is
significant. It emphasized Provincial Assembly to legislate with respect
to any matters not enumerated in the Federal Legislative List. The
impugned Act whereby Serial No.6A was introduced to the First Schedule
forming part of Table-II is introduced through a Money Bill in terms of
Article 73 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. No other
Entry of Part I of the Federal Legislative List could then be taken into
account as this was a money bill which is primarily covered from Entry
No.43 to 53 as routed through Article 73 of the Constitution of Islamic
Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The federation has already conceded and we
are not required to deliberate on the point that for a tax to fall under
the said Federal Legislative List it must be covered by Entries No.43 to
53. This, as claimed to be a sales tax/Federal Excise Duty, is apparently
covered in terms of Entry 49 to the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution
of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Thus, the 18th Amendment
excludes the Federation by virtue of the Entry 49 from the competence
to legislate on the subject of services rendered in their province on
account of SSTA, 2011 w.e.f. 01.07.2011.
--It is neither in the competence of the federation to legislate after
18th Amendment nor it relates to federation to invoke Entry No.58 of the
Fourth Schedule to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan,
1973. Similarly, Entry No.59, as relied upon by the respondents counsel,
that these matters are incidental or ancillary to any matters enumerated
in this part, is also inconsequential as this cannot be invoked
independently unless a reciprocal entry is found within the competence
of federation. One may argue this Entry 59 may have a bridged with
Article 151 but we have already discussed non-application of Article 151.
Citation:2022 PTD 266
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 18-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.6171/2021 Federal Board of Revenue through the Secretary Revenue, Ex-officio Chairman FBR, Islamabad and others v. Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd, Karachi and another,C.A.3109/2022 Federal Board of Revenue through the Secretary Revenue, Ex- officio Chairman FBR, Islamabad and others v. Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
661) 74/2022 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 428
Advocates:Farzana(ADVO-9037-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
662) 288/2019 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD SALEEM SHAHZAD S/O PARO (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2210
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
663) 2489/2023 Const. P. Tanveer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:KBTPR prohibits regularization of additional floors.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 631
Advocates:Syed Salim Ahmed(ADVO-2360-SBC-KHI),Fahim Ahmed(ADVO-523-SBC-JCB),Usman Farooq(ADVO-16057-SBC-KHE),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 07-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1089-K/2023 Muhammad Mohsin Waheed v. Tanveer Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
664) 303/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Aftab Pervaiz (Applicant) V/S Mst. Naghma Sultan Burney & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 920
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
665) 2386/2011 Const. P. Karachi Property Investment (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and ros (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.578-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Culture Deptt: v. Karachi Property Investment Company (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
666) 3954/2015 Const. P. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.887-K/2018 Syed Ishitiaque Ahmed Hashmi v. Province of Sindh thr. its Director General and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
667) 859/2023 Const. P. Junaid Ahmed Khan S/o Kamal Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sassi Hizbullah and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter
Tag Line:Family matter; applicability of Rule of exception in exercising Constitutional jurisdiction; held YES; when Appellate Court fails to properly appreciate the case and its responsibility in family matters;
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 599
Advocates:Siddiqa Nausheen(ADVO-17638-SBC-KHE),Fouzia Waheed(ADVO-17118-SBC-KHE),Syed Mukhtar Hussain(ADVO-7962-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh),Marium Badar(ADVO-17333-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 25-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
668) 985/2013 Const. P. Mst. Roshan Ara Begum (Petitioner) V/S Executive Officer & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
669) 205/2019 II.A. Ms. Qaiser Jehan Begum Thr. Salman Hussain Memon (Appellant) V/S Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:the provisions of Section 42 were misconstrued by Courts below. A plaint could only be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC if it is barred by law. None of the provisions of law was cited by respondents counsel and/or find mention in the orders/judgment of two Courts below whereby a plaint of the suit of the appellant could be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC. The appellant had a cause of action on account of a threat to her property in view of alleged unlawful and illegal construction beingraised on the adjacent plot.
Citation:2022 MLD 308
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.815-K/2021 Amir Nisar v. Qaiser Jehan Begum & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
670) 109/2018 I. A Muhammad Jawed (Appellant) V/S First Women Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLD 254
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
671) 295/2018 Const. P. Pir Bux & another (Petitioner) V/S Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
672) 269/2012 Criminal Appeal Asad Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Appellant Asad Khan dissatisfied with the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi whereby the appellant Asad Khan was convicted for committing Qatl-e-Amd of his wife Mst. Aneela an offence under section 302 PPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.50,000/- Complainant stating therein that about two years back, his daughter Aneela married with Asad . Since the beginning of the marriage, the attitude of in-laws of his daughter was not good Aneela informed him on the telephone that she is coming to him at Qasim Town but till 08:30 P.M, she did not come at Qasim Town and her father made a telephonic call to her maternal Aunt Mst. Bano, who is residing in the neighbor of Aneela and informed her about the arrival of Aneela at Qasim Town .Complainant came to know that his daughter Aneela has been killed by causing her knife and dagger injuries at her house. the strong circumstantial evidence is available to connect the appellant with the commission of offence; that the appellant has admitted his guilt before the Cameraman, which was recorded in CD/USB flashed on TV. e. The admission of the appellant came in media and newspaper. In order to support his contention, the prosecution examined Mst. Aqeela Bano, who has also supported the version of the complainant and further deposed that she went to the house of Anila but was locked. Resultantly, she died in his house and after committing the murder, the appellant locked the door of the house from outside and ran away . All the circumstances, consisting on unnatural death of deceased inside the house with dagger; finding the house locked from outside as well leaving away the house are also making a chain of circumstances against the appellant and in such like eventuality the defence was required to prove otherwise. instant appeal filed by the appellant merits no consideration, which is dismissed
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.432/2019 Asad Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
673) 558/2020 Const. P. Meer Hazar Khan Chandio & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 829
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 28-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
674) 201/2019 Cr.Rev MST. NAGHMA IMJRAN WD/O IMRAN KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Revision (Revision application is dismissed. The Applicant may move the same before the Sessions Court.)
Tag Line:The Explanation clause of section 435 Cr.P.C. entails that while the High Court can call for and examine the record of proceeding before a Magistrate, either suo moto or in Revision arising from an order of a Sessions Judge, a Revision application against the order of a Magistrate is to filed by the litigant to the Sessions Judge to whom the Magistrate is a Court inferior within the meaning of the Explanation clause of section 435 Cr.P.C.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
675) 182/2017 Cr.Misc. Ch. Azeem Ahmed (Applicant) V/S S.H.O P.S Sanjar Chang District Tando Allahyar & 17 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
676) 369/2021 Const. P. Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Petition allowed)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1140
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Yusuf Moulvi(ADVO-4051-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5177/2021 Saadat Ali Yasin v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
677) 5009/2019 Const. P. Sheikh Muhammad Ashgar (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB (426, Cr.P.C. Application is dismissed, crimes are heinous as they are crimes of corruption and cannot be condoned .)
Citation:2021 YLR 188
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
678) 29/2020 Criminal Appeal Parvez Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 340
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.51/2024 Parvez Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
679) 249/2018 H.C.A Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, Arbitration Law
Tag Line:principal of awarding demurrage charges and analysis of Force Majeure clause of COA
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 25
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.76-K/2020 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation v. Pakistan State Oil Company, Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
680) 1892/2018 Const. P. Faheem Ali Gambheer (Petitioner) V/S P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line: Mst. Faryal Talpur and Giyanoo Mal seek review/recall order of this Court c whereby their Membership was ordered to be suspended on account of their failure to curb the dog bite cases in their Constituencies. The Chief Secretary Sindh and Secretary Local Govt. Department Government of Sindh are directed to pay compensation in the shape of Diyat, Arsh or Daman amount (as the case may be) in terms of amount specified through latest Notification issued by Government of Pakistan to the bereaved families of the deceased of dog bite cases so also to the seriously injured victims and victims of the Dog bite cases within 15 days time after claim of the legal heirs of deceased and injured persons. It is made clear that the deceased and seriously injured of Rato Dero and Jamshoro shall also be compensated at the first instance. petitions stand disposed of.
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 420
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.3707/2020 Noor Hassan and others v. Fahim Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
681) 85/2010 Civil Revision Saffdar Hussain and others (Applicant) V/S Zaffar Ali Arain and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 1877
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
682) 71/1994 Const. P. Gul Ahmed Textile Mills (Petitioner) V/S Collector of Customs & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan, Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:Constitutional petition is maintainable even if Federation or Province not impleaded as respondent.
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 144
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
683) 994/2020 Const. P. M/s. Guidance Schooling System Thr. M. Ashraf (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Seema Mohsin and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Rent matter-- In view of the above, no illegality is found to have been committed by both courts below. Writ of certiorari against the order passed in rent jurisdiction can be exercised only if the order is beyond the jurisdiction or patently illegal, which is not the present case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications with no order as to costs.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 93
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
684) 163/2013 Adm. Suit Muhammad Hussain (Applicant) V/S The State (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 18-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
685) 1862/2016 Const. P. M/S Dewan Sugar Mills Limited (Petitioner) V/S M/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) ltd & (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Ousting the petitioner from availing their remedy which they could have before the executing Court amounts to a denial of fair trial. I am in agreement that such a compromise ought to have been recognized by executing Court, however whether tenant can still make an attempt to have it recognized or otherwise, the jurisdiction vest with the executing Court to be exercised first and I refrain from passing on my observation as it may prejudice the case of parties
Citation:2018 YLR 2337
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 04-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.69-K/2018 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Dewan Sugar Mills Ltd. and others,C.P.60-K/2018 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Dewan Sugar Mills Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
686) 62/2006 Const. P. General Tyre & Rubber Co. Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Shah Zareen & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 11-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
687) 3/2019 Criminal Appeal Dost Muhammad Thebo & Another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (Control of Narcotic 9(C) Appeal allowed On Ground contradictions in the evidence of complainant and mashir, )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 503
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
688) 17/2012 H.C.A Syed Jaffar Abbas (Appellant) V/S Habib Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLD 209
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 10-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.137-K/2014 Syed Jaffar Abbas v. Habib Bank Limited,C.A.4-K/2015 Syed Jaffar Abbas v. Habib Bank Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of
689) 472/2021 Cr.Bail Allah Ditto Bhutto (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 1295
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
690) 7596/2017 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali Domki, Advocate (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
691) 411/2012 Const. P. Najaf Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1259
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
692) 358/2025 Cr.Bail AZHAR ALI S/O ABDUL RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 527
Advocates:Khalid Rahim(ADVO-9042-SBC-KHE),Daniyal Muhammad Hussain(ADVO-22224-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Kamran Mirza(ADVO-11996-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
693) 7114/2016 Const. P. Asifa Jawed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 326
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
694) 136/2014 Cr.Appeal Basar & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 13-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
695) 7180/2021 Const. P. Nadeem ur Rehman Baig (Petitioner) V/S The Learned Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 664
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Mirza Arshad Baig(ADVO-12760-SBC-KHE),Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Latif(ADVO-3023-SBC-KHI),Mirza Moazzam Baig(ADVO-2750-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
696) 2/2017 Cr.Rev Party-1 (Applicant) V/S Party-2 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
697) 191/2024 Const. P. Arshad Ali Gorar (Petitioner) V/S Mst Uzma & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Custody of a minor on re-marriage of mother.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 460
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
698) 1544/2013 Suit Kamran Ali Khan and another (Plaintiff) V/S Vaneeza Umeran and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 19-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting
699) 68/2015 Const. P. Sherbaz Khan Rind And ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.881-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Sherbaz Khan Rind and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
700) 394/1997 Suit MUHAMMAD KHAN (Plaintiff) V/S PAK. STEEL MILLS CORP. LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Non-production of Departmental Inquiry Report in the evidence by Defendants has raised adverse presumption against them, as envisaged in Article 129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Loss of consortium; that is, deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries or death caused by a tortfeasor. Well known rules about "foreseeability",causation and but for explained; if any reasonable person by applying his ordinary prudence can foresee a loss that can arise from his act(s), then he owes a duty of care to others [claimant] and is liable for the negligent act that has caused damaged to the other person (claimant). Similarly, causation is the linkage between the negligent act [breach of duty of Care] that has resulted in causing injury and the "but for" test if simply put, means, that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant's negligence. Legislative amendments are proposed.
Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Tag Line:Non-production of Departmental Inquiry Report in the evidence by Defendants has raised adverse presumption against them, as envisaged in Article 129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Loss of consortium; that is, deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries or death caused by a tortfeasor. Well known rules about foreseeability,causation and but for explained; if any reasonable person by applying his ordinary prudence can foresee a loss that can arise from his act(s), then he owes a duty of care to others [claimant] and is liable for the negligent act that has caused damaged to the other person (claimant). Similarly, causation is the linkage between the negligent act [breach of duty of Care] that has resulted in causing injury and the "but for" test if simply put, means, that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant's negligence. Legislative amendments are proposed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1429
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
701) 1641/2012 Suit SUI SOUTHERN GAS CO. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Attachment before Judgment
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
702) 151/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Abdul Haq @ Mulla and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 12-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
703) 2323/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Sultan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
704) 35/2021 Criminal Appeal Karimdad Brohi & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Narcotics Appeal.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1214
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
705) 2112/2015 Const. P. China Harbour Engineering Company Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2475/2016 Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue and another v. China Harbour Engineering and others,C.P.604-K/2015 Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue and another v. China Harbour Engineering and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
706) 29/2011 Civil Revision Haji Abdul Rasool Tunio (Applicant) V/S S.D.O Hesco Wapda and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 18-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
707) 1358/2017 Const. P. Ismail Ibrahim S/o Ibrahim Jamal (Petitioner) V/S Kashif Muhammad Baig & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.80-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Ismail Ibrahim and others,C.P.1097-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Ismail Ibrahim and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
708) 151/2017 Const. P. Sahoo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2428
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
709) 2054/2019 Const. P. Natho (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 266
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
710) 6546/2016 Const. P. Bheru Lal (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
711) 27/2023 Const. P. Mst Sahja & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 838
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
712) 1929/2018 Suit Akbar Adamjee. (Plaintiff) V/S Performance Automotive (Pvt) L:td., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Mandatory Injunction granted)
Tag Line:Mandatory Injunction - Order 39 CPC - Specific Performance of an agreement- no settled formula to grant or refuse the same- dependent on facts of the case- mandatory injunction granted.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
713) 57/2021 Cr.Rev Muhammad Murad Bhutto (Applicant) V/S Lal Bux Kosh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Offence falling under two different enactments)
Tag Line:The offences committed by the accused persons fall under two different enactments i.e. one under the Pakistan Penal Code and other under the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, therefore, there seems to be no bar in taking cognizance under the provisions of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 626
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
714) 455/1990 I.T.R Sindh Club Karachi (Applicant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.293-K/2016 Commissioner Inland Tax v. M/s Sindh Club Karachi,C.A.2504/2016 Commissioner Income Tax/Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Sindh Club Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of
715) 493/1993 Suit Shahimah Sayeed (Plaintiff) V/S Base Commander and three others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 342
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
716) 32/2020 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S MAHVASH & JAHANGIR SIDDIQUE FOUNDATION (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Section 177(6A) of the Income Tax Ordinance
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1203
Advocates:Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 25-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
717) 750/2009 Const. P. M/S Dewan Cement Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan thr Sec Ministry of Finance and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-JUN-10
Approved for Reporting
718) 201/2017 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Yaseen (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 372
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
719) 217/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Saleem (Applicant) V/S Haresh Kumar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVII Rule 3 CPC)
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2307
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
720) 13/2010 I. A Muhammad Ameen (Appellant) V/S Wali Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting
721) 79/2017 Const. P. Qadir Bux @ Ghulam Shabir (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2019 YLR 1844
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
722) 4371/2020 Const. P. Syed Ghulam Mohiuddin and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P. No.D-4371 of 2020 filed by Syed Ghulam Mohiuddin against Government of Sindh (vehicle number plats petition). The petition has been dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 821
Advocates:Sarosh Jameel(ADVO-18157-SBC-KHS),Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(ADVO-11058-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 29-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1464-K/2021 Syed Ghulam Mohiuddin & another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
723) 3902/2014 Const. P. Mst. Rukhsana Bano and Ors (Petitioner) V/S KMC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 140
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.55-K/2022 Haji Jaffer Khan v. KMC (Karachi Muncipal Coorporation) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
724) 297/2021 Spl.Cr.Rev. HANIF MOOSA S/O MOOSA & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Trial (Power to summon material witness under section 540 Cr.P.C )
Tag Line:Intent of section 540 CrPC is to ensure a just decision. If that leads to filling of lacuna in evidence, such consequence does not come in the way of exercising the power.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 99
Advocates:Fazal Mahmood Sherwani(ADVO-4347-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Ashiq Ali Anwar(ADVO-2754-SBC-KHI),Iftikhar Hussain(ADVO-14665-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
725) 1000/2014 Suit Mst. Ghazala Ishrat (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Sarwat Hussain & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 03-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
726) 174/2015 Civil Revision Azizullah and others (Applicant) V/S Zulifqar Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2027
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
727) 1447/2006 Suit Syed Amjad Mahboob (Plaintiff) V/S Raja Mumtaz Hussain Arif & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 15-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
728) 214/2023 Const. P. Mst Mehwish Janvri (Petitioner) V/S 3rd Additional District Jduge Larkana (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Maintenance of minors and child justice approach.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1456
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
729) 47/2012 Judicial Companies Misc. Muhammad Younus & another (Applicant) V/S Venu Gurdas Advani & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 16-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
730) 3482/2011 Const. P. M/s.Blessed Textile (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
731) 3172/2016 Const. P. Cyrus Cowasjee and Ors (Plaintiff) V/S V/S KMC and Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 183
Advocates:M/S. IQBAL KHURRAM LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-231-SBC-KHI),Ch: Arif Majeed(ADVO-6948-SBC-KHI),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.444-K/2022 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation through its Administrator v. Mr. Cyrus Cowasjee & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice to Next Session)
732) 1089/2016 Const. P. MAL Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S PAKISTAN through secretary revnue Division (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Extra tax levied in terms of Section 3(5) of the Sales Tax Act 1990 read with SRO 896(I)/2013 dated 4.10.2013 read with Sales Tax General Order No.27 of 2014 dated 18.3.2014 is valid, lawful and not ultra vires
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 608
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 15-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
733) 1535/2019 Const. P. Khaliq-ur-Rehman & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 550
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.222/2022 Imam Bux, Honorary Secretary of Madrass Cooperative Housing Society Ltd Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Cooperative Department, Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
734) 256/2012 Criminal Miscelleneous Muhammad Aslam Khan @ Niazi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
735) 658/2023 Const. P. Mst. Bushra (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Maintainibility
Tag Line:Additional Registrar OR office staff cannot be directed not to accept any petitions / cases as they are not authorized to decide its maintainability under the applicable Appellate Side Rules of the Court.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 135
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 30-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
736) 2951/2018 Const. P. Abdul Latif Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3658/2018 Abdul Latif Barohi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
737) 869/2019 Cr.J.A KHALID AHMED S/O ABDUL REHMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Father killed his daughter on the suspicion of being unchaste. No mitigating circumstance in favour of appellant was found for awarding lesser punishment. Death sentence confirmed
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1442
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.312/2021 Khalid Ahmed v. The State,Crl.A.230/2023 Khalid Ahmed v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
738) 192/2023 Const. P. K.M.C (Petitioner) V/S IXth ADJ (East) and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:KMC is a part of the third tier of Government. Several Judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan have already made affirmative observations in support of the proposition in the case of local government and municipal authorities. In such cases, as per CPC and Sindh Civil Court Rules, KMC, as a 'third-tier of Government", may appoint counsels by way of filing a Memo of Appearance instead of Vakalatnama subject to conditions specified under the Sindh Local Government Act, 2013. KMC???s Counsel???s submission, based on a judgment of the Indian Court that the government, at its discretion, may appoint as many government pleaders as it likes, is contrary to Pakistan law based on Judgment of Supreme Court of Pakistan in Rasheed Ahmad v. Federal of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage, Government of Pakistan Islamabad, and Other, PLD 2017 SC 121.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 372
Advocates:Muhammad Mohsin(ADVO-15408-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Azra Muqeem(ADVO-4332-SBC-KHI),Syed Hassan Mujtaba Abidi(ADVO-15596-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
739) 144/2009 Cr.Rev Mrs. Ghazala Parveen (Applicant) V/S Sadiq Daniel & 18 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 08-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting
740) 270/2012 Cr.Appeal Lalio & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 11-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
741) 6274/2017 Const. P. Bushra Jabeen and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 03-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.3854/2018,C.P.4573/2018,C.A.1486/2018,C.A.1487/2018,C.P.4475/2018,C.P.4476/2018 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
742) 100/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Mohammad Zaheer (Applicant) V/S District Judge, Tando Allahyar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 485
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.428-K/2021 Muhammad Zaheer v. Shoukat Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
743) 128/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Ghulam Murtaza. (Applicant) V/S Mst. Asma & Another. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Coversion of Civil Revision into Appeal)
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 72
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
744) 722/2018 Cr.Bail Jumoon S/o Muhammad ALi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
745) 105/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Imtiaz Ahmed & Others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Raheem thr: LRs and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 70
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
746) 920/2015 Suit Party-1 (Plaintiff) V/S Party-2 (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
747) 30/2018 Cr.Acctt.A HAROON PUNJWANI S/O SULEMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB (Conviction Set aside, Land which sold by accused, not decided to be used any purpose, no loss Government. )
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 996
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1337/2020 Chairman National Acountability Bureau through Prosector General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Haroon Punjwani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
748) 1479/2020 Const. P. Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 420
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.450-K/2022 The Province of Sindh & others v. M/s. Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
749) 4967/2018 Const. P. Orix Leasing Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 353
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
750) 2013/2015 Suit M/s. A.F Ferguson & Co., & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: In all these Suits the claim of the Plaintiffs was to the effect that in terms of Section 92 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 there is no compulsion or restriction that it is only the firm which can file its return and pay taxes on the income, as at the same time, the partners of the firm are also qualified to file their return and pay the tax accordingly and in that situation the firm would not be liable to pay any tax on the income on which the partners have already paid the tax. According to the Plaintiffs, Section 92 does not prohibit the partners from paying tax on their income as against the same by the firm. Their further case was that the inverse of what is provided in Section 92 is permitted as not being prohibited or restricted; however, the contention of the Plaintiffs is held to be misconceived as this would defeat the intention of the legislature and would rather amount to do legislation in favour of the Plaintiffs. The law as it stands today provides a clear mechanism and the principle of taxation which has to be applied on the firm, whereas, nothing could be read into the said provision . It is settled law that the function of the Courts is only to expound and not to the legislate. In view of such position, all Suits have been dismissed by holding that the firm i.e. the Plaintiff No. 1 in all these Suits was required to file its return and pay the tax accordingly; and not the partners individually in respect of the income received from the association of persons or the firm; and once the tax is paid by the firm, then the partners are not required to pay any tax on such income.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
751) 173/2015 Const. P. Imran Ali & another (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 10-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4088/2019 Imran Ali Talpur & another v. Government of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
752) 31/2021 Const. P. Irfan Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench of N.I.R.C & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 612
Advocates:Javed Asghar(ADVO-4324-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Nadeem Ahmed Farooqi(ADVO-6272-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 02-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.721-K/2022 Irfan Ali Khan v. M/s. Habib Bank Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
753) 114/2013 Suit.B AL-BARAKA BANK (PAKISTAN) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S ENSHAA HOLDING LTD. & AN OTHER. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
754) 2955/2017 Const. P. Syed Faisaluddin (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.556-K/2019 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.44-K/2020 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o. Interior and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,
755) 37/2019 II.A. Muhammad Saleem Ghanchi & Another (Appellant) V/S Mst. Hajiani Khatija (since deceased) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 944
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.87-K/2023 Mst. Hajiani Khatija since deceased through her legal heirs: & others v. Muhammad Saleem Ghanchi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
756) 154/2008 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S China National Water Resourcess Hydropower Eng. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 03-NOV-09
Approved for Reporting
757) 836/2019 Const. P. Sardar Muhammad Bux Mahar Thr. Tasawar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Saman Muhammad Mahar and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 7, 8 and 25)
Tag Line:The natural guardians/mother and father of minors are not required to seek declaration of their guardianship through the Court. The Court under Section 7 of the Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 is not empowered to decide title of guardian about custody of the ward.
Citation:2020 PCr.LJ 1079
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
758) 667/2020 Const. P. Prof. Dr. Jan Muhammad Memon & another (Petitioner) V/S P. O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Service Matter; Quo Warranto
1. Appointment of an ad hoc appointee / Professor as Principal of a Medical College challenged; Held No
2. Exercise of Discretion in such matter; guidelines
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 621
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 08-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
759) 92/2023 H.C.A A & Z Agro Industries Pvt Ltd & Others (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 661
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Ghazi Khan Khalil(ADVO-18768-SBC-KHE),Ameer Nausherwan Adil Memon(ADVO-15705-SBC-KHS),Abid S. Zuberi & Ayan M. Memon Law Associates(FIRM-425-SBC-KHI),Abdul Hakeem Junejo(ADVO-21088-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 28-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1592/2024 A & Z Agro Industries Pvt Ltd thr. its duly Authorized officer, Karachi and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad and others,C.A.845/2024 A & Z Agro Industries Pvt Ltd thr. its duly authorized officer, Karachi and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Pending
760) 1218/2017 Cr.Misc. Mst. Zuriat W/o Sheeral Khan (Applicant) V/S Kouro Khan @ Kouro and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Re-investigation of Case (Magistrate Joined the Let of accused U/S 302 PPC and Granted Bail .In Petition Sataside about Bail . )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
761) 876/2007 Suit Mustafa H. Jivanjee (Plaintiff) V/S The Director General Karachi Development Authority (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 06-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
762) 3073/2012 Const. P. Saleem Khokhar (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1574
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.190-K/2020 Peter Qadir v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Social Welfare & Women Development Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
763) 4292/2021 Const. P. M/s Outdoorsman (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Import Policy Order 2020, Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950
Tag Line:We do not find any necessity of an independent license from the federal
government in presence of Import Policy Order, 2016 w.e.f. 14.6.2018 followed
by Import Policy Order, 2020. The Import Policy Order, 2016 in terms of the
subject in hand was amended by virtue of SRO No.772(1)/2018 on 14.6.2018
which provides that the individual license holders or arms dealership license
holders [as issued by Home Department, Province of Sindh] are allowed to
import arms and ammunition. It was clarified by Federal Government, Ministry
of Commerce & Textile vide letter dated 06.09.2019 that the import of arms and
ammunition does not require any import authorization from the Commerce
Division Islamabad after issuance of SRO No.772(I)/2018 dated 14-06-2018.
For convenience and ready reference, text of [i]. Letter dated 06.09.2019, [ii].
Section 6(1) and [iii]. Entry No.62 Part I of Appendix B of IPO, 2020
---Section 4 of ibid Act 2013 is related to the license for the manufacture/sale of arms and
ammunition which is not the case here. Section 5 deals with the import, export
and transportation which for all intent and purposes means import and export
within the province of Sindh and we, while read it down, do not find it to be ultra
vires to the Constitution. It primarily concerns with the person who is brining
into and taking out of Sindh or any of its districts, arms, ammunition or military
stores of a firearm or convert an imitation firearm into a firearm unless a license
has been issued in accordance with the provisions and rules thereunder.
Similarly, in section 9&10 the words import and export are in relation to brining
into and taking out of the province of Sindh and any of its districts and it does
not mean import of any arms and ammunition from outside the country which is
an independent subject of the federal government hence, we read down these
provisions to be within frame of Sindh Arms Act, 2013 and are not ultra vires
the Constitution.
Citation:2022 PTD 539
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 06-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.245-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Home Department Government of Sindh & others v. M/s. Outdoorsman & others,C.P.L.A.246-K/2022 Federal Board of Revenue & others v. M/s. Outdoorsman & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned [ Next Session ],Pending Adjourned [ Next Session ]
764) 31/2016 F.R.A Dr.Muhammad Hassan (Appellant) V/S Additional Controller of Rents & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963 (entire trial in the name 18 of Section 19(8) of the CRRA, 1963 was a malafide attempt to deprive to applicant .FRA allowed.)
Tag Line:(a) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)---
----S.3---Rent Controller---Jurisdiction---Government building---Neither any other Court nor parties can confer jurisdiction on a Court / Tribunal when it is expressly barred by Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963.
(b) Jurisdiction---
----Question of---Principle---Whenever question of jurisdiction of a Court is raised by any party it has to be decided first by the Court as preliminary issue.
A.M Qureshi v. Government of Sindh and others 1991 SCMR 1103 rel.
(c) Jurisdiction---
----Interim order, passing of--- Principle--- Court having no jurisdiction to adjudicate on dispute between parties on merit, cannot even pass interim order and then penalize parties for its non-compliance.
(d) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)---
----Ss.3, 17, 19(8) & 24--- Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 10-A & 23---Eviction of tenant---Property rights---Rent Controller, jurisdiction of---Petitioners were having lease agreements in their favour executed by Federal Government and the Government sought their eviction from Rent Controller on the plea of raising commercial buildings---Validity---Tenants had perpetual right in demised shops under the agreements with Federal Government and whenever the government decided to launch any commercial project by demolishing the property in question, the rights of tenants under existing agreement were to be protected and no effort should be made to wriggle out of the contractual obligations except in accordance with law---Tenants were to be properly informed with relevant material details of any proposed action---Landlord had filed cases in the Court of Additional Rent Controller despite the fact that he had no jurisdiction and then tried to subvert entire trial in the name of S. 19(8) of Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, 1963 which was a mala fide attempt to deprive tenants from their Constitutionally guaranteed lawful right in demised shops---High Court in exercise of appellate jurisdiction set aside eviction orders passed by Rent Controller---Appeal was allowed in circumstances.
Suo moto Case No.04 of 2010 PLD 2012 SC 553; Inaam-ul-Haq v. Muhammad Ali Shaheen and another 2013 CLC 904; Sh. Riaz-ul-Haq and another v. Federation of Pakistan through Minisry of Law and others PLD 2013 SC 501; Zulfiqar Ahmed khan v. Station Commander, Station Headquarters, Karachi and another 2010 CLC 354 and Ghulam Mustafa Bughio v. Additional Controller of Rents, Clifton and others" 2006 SCMR 145 ref.
M.H Mussadaq v. Muhammad Zafar Iqbal 2004 SCMR 1453; Khawaja Muhammad Mughees v. Mrs. Sughra Dadi 2001 SCMR 2020; Asif Najma Ansaizi v. Mrs. Mariam Mirza and another 2014 MLD 1304; Arif Lakhani v. Irfan Nazar and another 2014 CLC 1756; Uzma Construction Co. v. Navid H. Malik 2015 SCMR 642; Muhammad Saqib v. S.M Mushtaq 2015 YLR 723; Mian Muhammad Lateef v. Mst. Nasima Warsi through L.R 2009 CLC 279; Najma Aziz Sethi v. Muhammad Azeem Butt 2008 MLD 42; Dawood Khan through Attorney v. Sheraz Ahmed 2009 YLR 1238; Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan v. Station Commander, Station Headquarters, Karachi an another 2010 CLC 354; M.K. Muhammad and another v. Muhammad Abu Bakar 1993 SCMR 200; Mrs. Ghazala Iftikhar v. Controller/Additional Controller of Rents and another 2012 YLR 74 and Abdul Latif and another v. Messrs Parmacie Plus 2019 SCMR 627 distinguished.
Citation:2020 CLC 1720
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
765) 233/2007 Suit TRUSTEES OF PORT OF KARACHI. (Plaintiff) V/S M/S FATIMA SUGAR MILLS LTD. & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
766) 631/2010 Const. P. Tahir Ashraf Durrani & Ors. (Petitioner) V/S FIA and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 728
Advocates:Nayyar Ziauddin(ADVO-4179-SBC-KHI),Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Kaukab S. Ahmed(ADVO-10589-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Ilyas Khan(ADVO-1410-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
767) 3568/2024 Const. P. Yawar Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:On the subject proposition, primarily, the disciplinary proceedings and criminal proceedings are altogether different and independent of each other and cannot be termed synonymous and interchangeable. The departmental inquiries for misconduct use a lower standard of proof ('balance of probabilities') compared to criminal trials ('proof beyond reasonable doubt'). The forums for adjudication, principles of evidence, and procedure are also separate and distinct. The decision of one forum cannot have a bearing on the decision of the other forum. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the cases of Dr. Sohail Hassan Khan v. Director General (Research), Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Punjab, Lahore and others (2020 SCMR 1708), (2021 SCMR 420), The District Police Officer, Mianwali and others v. Amir Abdul Majid, Province of Punjab v. Khadim Hussain Abbasi (2021 SCMR 1419) and Usman Ghani v. The Chief Post Master, GPO Karachi, and others (2022 SCMR 745). The respondent department's reliance on clause 27.1 (2) (i) of Estacode 2021 to defer proceedings against the petitioner is incorrect based on Supreme Court rulings.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 285
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Mustafa Mamdani(ADVO-16160-SBC-KHE),Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Jazib Aftab(ADVO-17490-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
768) 241/2017 S.M.A Barbara Helena Philomina through attorney Debbie (Petitioner) V/S Marina Caroline Bond - Deceased (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
769) 1074/2018 Const. P. Mst. Parveen Ara (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Hanif & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 15 )
Tag Line:Evidence available does not fulfill the requirement of Section 15-A of the SRPO as it has to be proved independently that the premises was re-let. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to prove its contention through evidence that it was a misuse of section 15 of the SRPO whereby the eviction of the petitioner was acquired through a mala fide attempt.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1159
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.580-K/2021 Mst.Parveen Ara v. Muhammad Hanif & others,C.P.L.A.1475-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Amir Asim Steel Re-Rolling Mills (Pvt) Ltd. & others,C.A.47-K/2021 Mst.Parveen Ara v. Muhammad Hanif & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Allowed
770) 1753/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Iqbal (Applicant) V/S Mst.Zahida and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 15-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
771) 2703/2016 Const. P. Nadar Shah & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 31-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
772) 4/2017 Suit Habib Metropolitan Bank (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Dagra Textile (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLD 1256
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 11-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
773) 665/2003 Suit Umar Islam Khan (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Basit and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Cancellation)
Tag Line:Suit for Declaration and Cancellation decreed. Held that the impugned transaction/transfer in favour of Defendant No. 1 is to be struck down on three grounds. (i) Admittedly no sale price was paid by the Defendant no. 1 to plaintiffs. (ii) Even the mother could not have entered into such type of transaction, if at all it even assumed that deceased mother of plaintiffs did sign the affidavit, though no convincing evidence has been led by Defendant No. 1 with regard to this fact, and (iii) Under section 11 of Contract Act, Plaintiffs No. 2 and 3, being minors at that relevant time, could not have entered into sale transaction with Defendant No. 1, again, even if it assumed that these plaintiffs had signed the documents under challenge; such kind of transaction is held void ab initio.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 23-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
774) 3998/2021 Const. P. Lal Muhammad Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: National Accountability (Second Amendment) Ordinance XXIII, 2021 (Bail under section 7)
Tag Line:In the view of above legal position, it is observed that superior Court can entertain application for pre-arrest bail and grant relief to the accused in appropriate cases where accused could inter alia establish that he was prevented from approaching the lower Court concerned in the first instance. An accused normally can approach in the first instance the Court of Sessions/NAB Courts (now in view of the National Accountability (Second Amendment) Ordinance XXIII, 2021) for bail before arrest as propriety so demands but depending on the compelling circumstances, an accused can approach the High Court directly by invoking its concurrent jurisdiction. In the present case, no compelling circumstances have been pointed out
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 491
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Muhammad Shafi(ADVO-2185-SBC-KHC),Abbas Rasheed Razvi(ADVO-14822-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 27-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
775) 64/2024 II.A. Pirshotam (Appellant) V/S Sht. Seeta & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 1215
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
776) 1567/2005 Suit NAUMAN AHMED (Appellant) V/S COL (R) SALMAN AHMED & ORS (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Safdar(ADVO-4807-SBC-KHI),Khalid Pervez(ADVO-5994-SBC-KHI),Seema Wasim(ADVO-3037HLC-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Tariq(ADVO-2510-SBC-KHC),Mirza Sarfraz Ahmed(ADVO-4467-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
777) 920/2017 Suit Mst. Hajani Sherbano (Plaintiff) V/S Qazi Muhammad Fareed & Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 24-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
778) 101/2015 Adm. Suit Muhammad Saeed (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Baqir Bukhari (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 24-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
779) 2551/2014 Suit M. Najeeb Usman. (Plaintiff) V/S Sharik Affandi. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PLAINT RETURNED U O 7 RULE 10
Tag Line:In view of what has been discussed above, leave me with no option but to conclude that instant suit is not maintainable before this Court and is liable to be returned for its presentation before the Court within whose local territorial jurisdiction the property is situated. Accordingly, the plaint of the plaintiff be returned; plaintiff is at liberty to file plaint in the Court having jurisdiction. CMA No.8009/2013 is allowed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1026
Advocates:Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Raja Qasit Nawaz Khan(ADVO-3457-SBC-KHI),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Basil Nabi Malik(ADVO-13956-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Munir Khan(ADVO-13065-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 08-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
780) 179/2015 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Arsalan alias Sohrab (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 25-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
781) 72/2010 Cr.Appeal Bacha Mir and Karamat Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 20-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
782) 4035/2019 Const. P. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Declare the supersession of the petitioner made by the Respondent No.02 / CSB and the competent authority through impugned order dated 06.06.2018 as illegal--Direct the respondents to consider the case of promotion of petitioner in BPS-20, in terms of original reference of December, 2016--when a civil/public servant is recommended for supersession by the Central Selection Board (CSB) and the recommendation of the CSB is approved by the competent authority, what is its effect, and whether supersession is punishment?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 258
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 31-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3921/2021 The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Govt of Pakistan, Islamabad and another v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar and another,C.P.L.A.757-K/2021 The Chairman (FBR) v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
783) 96/2017 Cr.Appeal Ghulam Muhammad Mazari and Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 01-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
784) 84/2012 Cr.Appeal Abdul Qadir (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 09-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.37-K/2014 The State (ANF) v. Abdul Qadir,Crl.P.L.A.90-K/2014 The State (ANF) v. Abdul Qadir Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
785) 201/2005 I.T.R M/s State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan (Applicant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tax matters
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1549
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 24-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
786) 62/2010 H.C.A Muhammad Naved Aslam & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Mst.Aisha Siddiqui & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.166-K/2011 Muhammad Naveed Aslam and others v. Mst. Aisha Siddiqui and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
787) 8/2006 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Dr. Muhammad Saleem (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 16-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
788) 725/2025 Const. P. Peer Bux (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Constitutional Petition: Bail granted to the petitioner in a ???narcotic drug??? case under the Sindh Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 2024
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1699
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
789) 206/2008 Const. P. Hussain Developers (Petitioner) V/S Ist Senior Civil Judghe Karachi South (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.89-K/2018 Hussain Developers v. Yousuf Moulvi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
790) 491/2023 Const. P. Nadeem Masih S/o Boota Masih (Petitioner) V/S DJ/Civil Appellate Court, Malir Khi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Disputed question of title in undeclared Katchi Abadi leading to a dispute of title before the Rent Controller
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1066
Advocates:Ghulam Rasool Shaikh(ADVO-1824-SBC-KHP),Amanullah(ADVO-6388-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
791) 4287/2020 Const. P. Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin)
Tag Line:Petitioner, who is serving at present as Assistant Commissioner in BPS-17, is aggrieved by the purported decision of the Provincial Selection Board-II (`PSB-II`) dated 09.3.2020 and 11.3.2020, whereby his promotion to the post of Deputy Secretary (Equivalent BPS-18) was deferred on the ground that his Annual Confidential Reports (`ACRs`)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 852
Advocates:G.N Qureshi(ADVO-7228-SBC-KHS),Asif Ali(ADVO-20048-SBC-KHS),Waheed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-18218-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 20-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
792) 252/2009 Const. P. Filters Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Board of Revenue & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 26-JUL-10
Approved for Reporting
793) 176/2008 Civil Revision Jai Kumar (Applicant) V/S Partab Rai & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
794) 6779/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Salman (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 82
Advocates:Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
795) 426/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. United Refrigeration Industires Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Director D I&I-FBR (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 874
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.830-K/2021 Director, Directorate General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) v. United Refrigeration Industries Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
796) 39/2016 Election Appeal Mohib Ali (Appellant) V/S Returning Officer and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 28-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
797) 787/2019 Criminal Appeal Akhtar Meen S/o Khayal Jan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1221
Advocates:Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-4091-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.90-K/2021 Sheeraz Gul Thebo v. Akhtar Meen Afridi,Crl.P.91-K/2021 The State through Prosecutor General Sindh v. Akhtar Meen Afridi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned,Pending Adjourned
798) 508/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Siddiq Majid and Others (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Constitutional vs. Regular bench; distribution of jurisdiction.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 634
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Syed Muhammad Nehal Hashmi(ADVO-3490-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
799) 22/2017 F.R.A M/s. Pharmacie Plus (Appellant) V/S Abdul Latif & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 966
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 07-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.711-K/2018 Abdul Latif and another v. M/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd.,C.M.A.881-K/2018 Abdul Latif and another v. M/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.25-K/2018 Abdul Latif and another v. M/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, Notice in CMA.,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed
800) 1238/2008 Suit ZAFAR HUSSAIN FARIDI (Plaintiff) V/S MRS. SYEDA FARHATUAL AIN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Syed Ashiq Raza(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aslam Khan(ADVO-8086-SBC-KHI),Mirza Saeed Baig(ADVO-1960-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Dhoon(ADVO-3342-SBC-KHI),Abdul Jabbar Lakho(ADVO-4299HLC-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
801) 1995/2020 Suit XIAMEN GOLDEN DRAGON BUS COMPANY LTD & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S SINDH INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMP. LTD & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1037
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
802) 1617/2025 Const. P. Mansoorul Haque Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pak.& ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is a settled principle that merit-based reinstatement entitles employees to full "back benefits" (retroactive pay), as established by the Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Sharif v. Inspector General of Police (supra). Exceptions arise if reinstatement is due to procedural defects (pending fault determination) or reduced penalties. FR 54 treats periods of full paid absence as duty. The petitioner's counsel argues the 'gainful employment' exception does not apply, as the Respondent failed to prove it, and his pro bono legal work is not "gainful employment." However, given the Supreme Court's previous ruling disallowing the petitioner's back benefits due to insufficient evidence of non-gainful employment, this court cannot contradict that decision. The onus is on the petitioner to present new evidence in the proper forum to substantiate his non-employment during the intervening period.
11. For the reasons stated above, this petition is dismissed with pending application(s), if any.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1785
Advocates:In Person(INP),Javed Asghar(ADVO-4324-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.967-K/2025 Mansoorul Haque Solangi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
803) 5458/2020 Const. P. Haji Adam Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: National Accountability (Second Amendment) Ordinance XXIII, 2021 (Bail under section 7)
Tag Line: In the view of above legal position, it is observed that superior Court can entertain application for pre-arrest bail and grant relief to the accused in appropriate cases where accused could inter alia establish that he was prevented from approaching the lower Court concerned in the first instance. An accused normally can approach in the first instance the Court of Sessions/NAB Courts (now in view of the National Accountability (Second Amendment) Ordinance XXIII, 2021) for bail before arrest as propriety so demands but depending on the compelling circumstances, an accused can approach the High Court directly by invoking its concurrent jurisdiction. In the present case, no compelling circumstances have been pointed out.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 525
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Shoaib Ali Khatian(ADVO-17922-SBC-KHS),Rasheed A. Rizvi(ADVO-2131-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shafi(ADVO-2185-SBC-KHC),Abbas Rasheed Razvi(ADVO-14822-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
804) 5/2015 II.A. Ali Bux (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Advocates:Eijaz Ali Hakro Associates(Firm-390-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.729-K/2019 Ali Bux v. Mst: Asghari and others,C.A.88-K/2022 Ali Bux v. Mst: Asghari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
805) 550/2022 Const. P. Mst. Kiran Yazdani D/o Syed Ather Yazdani (Petitioner) V/S The XXth Civil Judge/JM, Khi South and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:When an appeal lies against an order on temporary custody passed under section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 875
Advocates:Shazia Aziz(ADVO-10080-SBC-KHE),Nazia Siddiqui(ADVO-10687-SBC-KHI),Hassaan Sabir(ADVO-6909-SBC-KHI),Shafqat Zaman(ADVO-11-3116-KBC-HAZ),Sana Abid(ADVO-20018-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
806) 169/2020 Const. P. Fajjar Din (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:This Constitutional Petition has been filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorari/ mandamus to call for the records relating to the Compulsory Retirement Order dated 01.11.2012 and Appellate Order dated 30.10.2017 passed by the respondent-Airport Security Force (hereinafter referred to as `ASF'), and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to reinstate services of the petitioner as an Inspector (ASF).
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1005
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.760-K/2021 Mr. Fajjar Din v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Refer to Const. Bench)
807) 2308/2020 Const. P. Zubair Javed (Petitioner) V/S Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Sindh Provincial Assembly Secretariat (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1975)
Tag Line:A person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except the employees whose terms and conditions of service are protected under the constitutional protection.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 262
Advocates:Ghulam Sarwar Chandio(ADVO-1145-SBC-HYD),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
808) 3055/2016 Const. P. Maqsood Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Since respondent No 3 has crossed the age of 60 years and left his position from KPT, no further action is required. However, it is made clear that he is not entitled to a second pension from KPT due to his illegal deputation and subsequent absorption in KPT in the intervening period without the approval of the competent authority as discussed in the preceding paragraphs---Before parting with this order, it may be observed that even on moral ground, the illegalities committed by the management of KPT and respondent No.3, being a retired naval forces personnel and a patriot, was expected to act honestly in the best interest of the country. However, he chose not only to get himself illegally absorbed in KPT, but also claimed and received pension from their different services causing heavy loss to the national exchequer.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 761
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1325/2021 CDR (R) Khalid Munir v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
809) 6249/2022 Const. P. Ayaz Ali and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:NBP, being a statutory corporation, is amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 199 of the Constitution. (ii). Reserving employment for the progeny and widows of deceased employees without subjecting them to open competition is inherently exclusionary and prejudices the rights of other qualified citizens. Moreover, Article 18 of the Constitution reinforces the emphasis on merit-based appointments by guaranteeing every citizen the right to enter any lawful profession.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1376
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Ghulam Muhammad Dars(ADVO-16974-SBC-KHS),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1242-K/2024 Ayaz Ali v. Federation of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to President NBP
810) 1952/2014 Const. P. Syed Ali Ammar Jafry and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.424-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited and another v. Syed Ali Ammaar Jafrey and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
811) 510/2010 Cr.J.A Rehmatullah & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
812) 16/2021 Cr.J.A Mehar Ali Solangi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Appellant expired. Appeal allowed, on the ground FIR lodged delay after 3 Years.)
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 345
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
813) 94/2021 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner inland revenue legal (Applicant) V/S M/s filters pakistan pvt. ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 11(2))
Tag Line:Section 6 is pari materia to provisions for recovery of sale tax in
respect of goods imported into Pakistan and time and manner shall be
similar to that of recovery made under Customs Act, 1969. For the
instant matter, for determining tax liability for the period 2011-12
limitation would perish by 30 June, 2017. Show cause notice was issued
on 21.08.2017, after requisite period. Hence, any notice that was issued
belatedly i.e. beyond the statutory requirement would have no bearing.
--The consequential point that arises is whether a timeframe
prescribed under Section 11(5) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 for issuance of
show-cause notice and after the expiry of timeframe prescribed, could
be extended and/or resurrected a time barred cause under SRO
394(I)/2001 dated 21.05.2009 read with Section 74 of the Act, 1990.
Citation:2022 PTD 345, 2022 PTCL 415
Advocates:Imtiaz Ali Solangi(ADVO-15225-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 18-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
814) 192/2017 Cr.Rev MOHSIN ABBASS S/O ABDUL REHMAN S (Applicant) V/S QADIR KHAN MANDOKHAIL & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---
----Ss. 200, 203, 435 & 439---Private complaint, dismissal of---Revision against order of Judicial Magistrate---Maintainability---Procedure---Held, order having been passed under S.203, Cr.P.C., whereby direct complaint had been dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate without framing a charge and trial, it could not be treated as acquittal of the accused/respondents---Order under S.203 Cr.P.C, being an order passed by a court inferior to the Court of Session, the propriety demanded that the same should first be examined by the Sessions Judge for the purpose of satisfying itself to the correctness, legality or propriety of the said order passed by the Magistrate who was covered by the explanation given at the bottom of S.435, Cr.P.C.---Revision before the High Court being without exhausting the remedy available to the applicant was not maintainable---Matter was sent to the Sessions Judge for a just and fair decision on the grievance of the applicant---Revision application was thus disposed of accordingly.
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 94
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
815) 160/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. New Era Fabric, Karachi (Applicant) V/S Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-I, CTO, Kar.& Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line: imposition of penalty under section 33 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990; element of mensrea still a requirement unlike section 34 of the Act.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 58
Advocates:S. Ahsan Ali Shah(ADVO-16440-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Taimoor Ahmed(ADVO-15452-SBC-KHI),Yasir Ali(ADVO-21973-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 16-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
816) 568/2009 Cr.Bail Anwar Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 09-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting
817) 104/2019 Criminal Miscelleneous SHOUKAT ALI KHATIAN & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S THE IST ADJ, KARACHI SOUTH & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---
----Ss. 22-A, 22-B & 154---Order of ex-officio Justice of Peace to register FIR---Scope---Application under S.22-A, Cr.P.C. was allowed by the Justice of Peace and SHO was directed to register the case in accordance with law---Validity---Station House Officer had no authority to refuse to record the statement of complainant in the relevant register irrespective of its authenticity/ correctness or falsity of such statement---High Court was not supposed to comment on the possible outcome of the inquiry and investigation which was to be conducted by SHO after recording statement of respondent---Whatever was the stance of the applicants, it should first be brought to the notice of SHO to falsify the statement of respondent, if any, incorporated in the FIR---If the statement of respondent after inquiry and investigation found to be false, the SHO could prosecute respondent under S. 182, P.P.C.---Criminal miscellaneous application was dismissed accordingly.
Brig. (Retd.) Imtiaz Ahmad v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Interior Division, Islamabad and 2 others 1994 SCMR 2142 ref.
Muhammad Bashir v. Station House Officer, Okara Cantt. and others PLD 2007 SC 539 and Younas Abbas and others v. Additional Sessions Judge Chakwal and others PLD 2016 SC 581 rel.
Citation:2020 YLR Note 21
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
818) 2/2018 II.A. Muhammad Umar & another (Appellant) V/S Sikandar Ali & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 764
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1077-K/2021 Muhammad Umar & another v. Sikandar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
819) 694/2019 Cr.Bail Atta Muhammad Janwari (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Granted, 22 days delay in Lodging FIR, Recovered article not identified before Magistrate, Already enmity exists. )
Citation:2020 PCr.LJ 1221
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
820) 3026/2016 Const. P. Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Petition dismiss)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
821) 76/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Azizullah Soomro & another (Applicant) V/S Muzafar Hussain Soomro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Recording of additional evidence during the Appellate proceeding.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 273
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
822) 28/2006 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A The State (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Saleem (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 31-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
823) 297/2015 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Muhammad Owais (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 23-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
824) 191/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Umaid Ali & Another. (Applicant) V/S P.O.Sindh & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Jurisdiction of civil Courts is barred in specified cases, excluding questions of title. Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it requires legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be produced and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
825) 4965/2023 Const. P. Saleem Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is well-settled that while considering the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the merit of all the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates who are found to be most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored by the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department.
14. In the light of the position explained above, it is concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be considered for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 292
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.421-K/2025 Province of Sindh & others v. Saleem Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
826) 1/2011 II.A. Mst.Hanifa (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:The appellant has attempted to challenge, by filing Civil Appeal No.44/2007, both the preliminary decree dated 10.10.2000 and final decree dated 28.03.2007. The appellate Court, on consideration of the accounts and the reports of the Mukhtiarkar, did not find any illegality or irregularity committed by the Senior Civil Judge while passing final decree. It is also a matter of fact that in her own examination-in-chief, she has stated that at the time of marriage, the age of his father-in-law was about 80 years and that two of her sons Abdul Majeed and Abdul Rahman were jobless. In the pleadings, respondents No.3 and 4 i.e. Mst. Hanifa and her husband Nazeerullah s/o Haji Sultan Muhammad, whose property is under dispute, admitted that his father-in-law / father was an old man and needed care and help in feeding and lodging, which was done by defendant No.3 (appellant), hence when enquired from the counsel Mr. Lawrence that he was on death bed, Mr. Lawrence honestly and categorically conceded. He, however, was of the view that he was in full senses.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.28-K/2019 Mst: Hanifa v. Province of Sindh thr. Revenue Department Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
827) 389/2012 Const. P. Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.673-K/2018 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others,C.A.49-K/2019 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
828) 852/2019 Const. P. Naeem Sadiq and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:CBC janitorial staff-- minimum wage
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 384
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
829) 700/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S Aurangzaib & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Release of tampered / smuggled vehicle carrying smuggled items.
Citation:2021 PTD 1026
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1658-K/2021 Aurangzaib v. Director General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
830) 52/2009 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Hakeem (Applicant) V/S Ameenuddin Since Deceased Through his Legal Heirs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C
Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----S. 115 & O. VII, R. 11---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.9---Suit for possession of immovable property---Revision---Competency---Phrase "no appeal lies" in S.115, C.P.C."---Scope---Plaint was rejected by Trial Court but Appellate Court converted the suit for declaration and permanent injunction into a suit for recovery of possession---Validity---Law had specifically barred an appeal against the dismissal of suit under S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Revision against the impugned appellate order was not maintainable as appeal had been barred by law---Revisional Court could not find any jurisdictional defect in the order passed by the appellate court when appeal was barred by law---Revision would lie when no appeal lay---Phrase "no appeal lies" in S.115, C. P. C could not be equated with the phrase "no appeal shall lie" used in S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Right and entitlement of the parties could not be determined in the suit under S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Lawful claimant could file a civil suit for his title and recovery of possession thereof---Revision was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2017 CLC 1406
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 03-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
831) 425/2016 H.C.A Asif Seemab Sindhu (Appellant) V/S Administrator, DHA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 MLD 1295
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
832) 3532/2020 Const. P. China Power Hub Generation Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 885
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.546-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue Z-III v. China Power Hub Generation Copmpany (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
833) 6948/2019 Const. P. Anis Haroon and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:i) Whether the post of Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations is to be filled amongst the career foreign service officers or eminent personalities from business, media, law, and other areas on a contract basis ;
ii) Whether the Prime Minister of Pakistan is the competent authority under Rule 15(1)(g)(h) of the Rules of Business, 1973 or the Federal Cabinet under Article 90 of the Constitution of Pakistan to make such appointment ; and,
iii) Whether appointments on a contract basis are prohibited under or contrary to Section 14 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, and the Policy unless the conditions specified therein are satisfied?
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 307
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
834) 235/2010 Cr.J.A Muhammad Iqbal Makrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 23-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.315/2013 Muhammad Iqbal v. The State,J.P.220/2013 Muhammad Iqbal v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Leave Granted
835) 1497/2020 Suit TOTAL PARCO PAKISTAN LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Doctrine of indoor management.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 117
Advocates:Ayasha Warsi(ADVO-23473-PBC-LHR),Amna Warsi(ADVO-22352-PBC-LHR),Abraiz Ali Khan(ADVO-15124-SBC-KHS),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui(ADVO-2269-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
836) 37/2021 F.R.A Fazal Mehmood Thr. Attorney Mansoor Malik (Appellant) V/S Faisal Imran (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 401
Advocates:Muhammad Zahid Kabeer(ADVO-10594-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
837) 333/2024 H.C.A Shamim Ahmed Siddiqui (Appellant) V/S Karachi Metropolitan Corporation and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 537
Advocates:Muhammad Mohsin(ADVO-15408-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Muhammad Bilal(ADVO-19679-SBC-KHE),Shahzeb Akhtar Khan(ADVO-13473-SBC-KHI),Syed Hassan Mujtaba Abidi(ADVO-15596-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.605-K/2025 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation through Director Safari Park v. Shamim Ahmed Siddiqui & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. Minus Mr. M. J. Salahuddin Panhwar sb.
838) 43/2025 Cr.Bail Abdul Hakeem (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 132
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
839) 431/2011 Suit PSO (Plaintiff) V/S PROV.OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Property Tax on property of KPT is payable and is not exempt, whereas, the Plaintiff / Tenant pursuant to lease Agreement is liable to pay the same.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 869
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
840) 49/2011 II.A. Zaka Uddin (Appellant) V/S M/s. S. Ashrafi Abbasi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 MLD 1408
Advocates:Abdul Qadir Khan(ADVO-3399-SBC-KHS),Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Khurshid Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-2251-SBC-KHE),Fiaz Ahmed Abro(ADVO-7997-SBC-MLR),Abdul Aziz Khan(ADVO-9-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
841) 410/2017 Cr.Appeal SHABBIR AHMED S/O SHER MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
842) 1779/2020 Const. P. Pakistan Re-Insurance Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Reasons
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 381
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 16-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
843) 1150/2011 Adm. Suit A.KHALID ANSARI (Plaintiff) V/S INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER CORPORATION & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 15-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
844) 4965/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Hassan Nadeem & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Model Custom Collectorate and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Search and seizure.
Citation:2021 PTD 764
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3606/2020 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Revenue, FBR, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Hassan Nadeem and others,C.A.4123/2022 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Revenue, FBR, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Hassan Nadeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
845) 2455/2023 Cr.Bail IMRAN ALI JATOI S/O ADAM KHAN JATOI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 837
Advocates:Allah Ditta(ADVO-14195-SBC-KHI),Jamila Kausar(ADVO-10826-SBC-KHI),Kher Muhammad(ADVO-9957-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
846) 3408/2013 Const. P. Zafar Iqbal Zahid and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Reinstatement into service)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 882
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 05-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.554-K/2018,C.P.L.A.555-K/2018,C.P.L.A.559-K/2018,C.P.L.A.562-K/2018,C.P.L.A.560-K/2018,C.P.L.A.553-K/2018,C.P.L.A.557-K/2018,C.P.L.A.558-K/2018,C.P.L.A.556-K/2018,C.P.L.A.561-K/2018 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
847) 4849/2016 Const. P. Rafique Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S The NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 28-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2129/2017 Rafique Ahmed v. The NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad,C.P.L.A.4706/2017 Rafique Ahmed v. The NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
848) 656/2019 Const. P. Rao Abdur Razik & Others (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1349
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
849) 566/2013 Suit Tariq Rafi. (Plaintiff) V/S Topgen Health Care/T.G. Pharma & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLC Note 39
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 27-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
850) 142/2022 Cr.Rev FAISAL SARDAR S/O SARDAR ALI KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 207
Advocates:Zahoor Ahmed Khan(ADVO-10377-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Nizar(ADVO-10921-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Israr Ahmed(ADVO-19321-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
851) 4329/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Tahir Khan Chandio & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 605
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.240-K/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Muhammad Tahir Khan Chandio and others,C.A.928/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Muhammad Tahir Khan Chandio and others,C.P.877-K/2021 Muhammad Faisal & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
852) 108/2018 Cr.Acctt.A Riaz Hussain Kalhoro (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
853) 185/2015 H.C.A Dr. Obaid ur Rehman & Others (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Neelofer Khalid & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.31-K/2019 Mrs. Neelofer Khalid and others v. Dr.Obaid-ur-Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. Relist it before a 3 members bench
854) 19/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous Ghulam Nabi (Applicant) V/S Senior Superintendent of Police (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 70
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 14-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
855) 71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-SEP-11
Approved for Reporting
856) 644/2005 Suit MUHAMMAD KASHIF (Plaintiff) V/S FURQAN KARIM & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 83
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
857) 49/2021 Const. P. Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Ganj Bibi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1235
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
858) 286/2003 Suit SYED WAQAR HAIDER ZAIDI (Plaintiff) V/S MST.ALAM ARA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 406
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
859) 2502/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector, Model Customs Collectorate (Applicant) V/S The Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench-I & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Mazhar Ali Khan(ADVO-12976-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Rafique(ADVO-9220-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
860) 20/2017 Const. P. Mrs. Humaira Imran. (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 467
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
861) 20/2010 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. The State (Appellant) V/S Wakeeluddin (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
862) 8/2016 M.A. M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Jahangir Moghul (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line: As per Section 118 of the Insurance Ordinance, 2000, a claim is to be settled within ninety days, subject to certain conditions contained in the above provision. Consequently, finding of learned Tribunal, even on this issue, does not justify any interference.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 684
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 09-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.445-K/2021 M/s. EFU General Insurace Ltd. v. Jahangir Moghul Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
863) 3026/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Waris (Petitioner) V/S E.O.B.I (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976 (Pensionary Benefits )
Tag Line:VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt
gain.
Citation:2023 PLC Lab. 41
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
864) 8261/2019 Const. P. Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Repatriation from the post of Additional Deputy Commissioner-I, Hyderabad to his parent department i.e. Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. vide Notification dated 12.2.2016 issued by Chief Secretary--whether the petitioner was qualified to be inducted from Sui Southern Gas Company in Sindh Government on deputation for three years' And, whether the Chief Minister, Sindh was competent to nominate the petitioner as Assistant Commissioner in Ex-PCS cadre under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964? and, whether his repatriation to his parent department is in accord with the direction given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court?--It is well-settled law that a deputationist does not have any vested right to remain on the post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period. He can be repatriated to his parent department at any time. The Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafiur Rehman Afridi v. CDA, 2010 SCMR 378, has settled the issue on the aforesaid proposition. Therefore, no further deliberation is required by us--In our view, since the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters is still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1466
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
865) 60/2017 Cr.Acq.A. THE STATE THROUGH DAG PAKISTAN (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD YOUNUS & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Hassaan Sabir(ADVO-6909-SBC-KHI),Salman Sabir(ADVO-9793-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
866) 136/2010 Civil Revision Jan Muhammad and others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Nabi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 06-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
867) 56/2015 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Wahid (Applicant) V/S Punhoon (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2330
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
868) 1172/1997 Suit HAJI MAQBOOL AHMED (Plaintiff) V/S MST. SIKANDAR (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 325
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
869) 689/2021 Cr.Misc. Pir Shoaib Ahmed Qureshi and others (Applicant) V/S SHO PS Khadhar SBA and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1170
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
870) 173/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Irfan S/o Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Saima and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 808
Advocates:Farooq Rasheed(ADVO-365-BBC-QTA-QTA),Muhammad Sakhi @ Ghazali(ADVO-6788-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
871) 6382/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Jibran Nasir & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 165
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3871/2023 Province of Sindh, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Jibran Nasir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
872) 261/2007 Suit SM SHOAIB BAGHPATI (Plaintiff) V/S UMER GUL AND OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 01-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
873) 49/2012 H.C.A Port Services (Pvt) Limited (Appellant) V/S Port Qasim Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 MLD 506
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 13-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1665/2014 Port Qasim Authority, Karachi v. M/s. Port Services (Pvt) Ltd. Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time a/w application for condonation of delay and stay
874) 5381/2021 Const. P. Power Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 406
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
875) 37/2013 Criminal Appeal Zakir Ali Gondal (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 11
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
876) 5466/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Hujjan Ujjan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 343
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
877) 4729/2018 Const. P. Advance Telecom (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 914
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.851-K/2020 Federation of Pakistan & others v. M/s.Advance Telecom,C.A.31/2025 Federation of Pakistan & others v. M/s.Advance Telecom Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. (Orders dated 13.01.2025 and 16.01.2025 have been declared non est and Crl.O.P.1/2025 was order to be fixed along with the appeals arising out of CPLA No.836-K/2020 etc),Pending
878) 436/1993 Suit SHAHIMAH SAYEED (Plaintiff) V/S BASE CDR PAF BASE MASROOR (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 378
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
879) 26/2021 I. A Mst. Bibi Saira and others (Appellant) V/S P.O.Sindh and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 MLD 1729
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
880) 1704/2019 Cr.Bail RAHIM S/O SHOUKAT (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 02-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
881) 5503/2019 Const. P. Abdul Ahad Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 403
Advocates:M.S. Bukhari(ADVO-17093-SBC-KHI),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.793-K/2022 Abdul Ahad Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC
882) 43/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous ADELL REHMAN MEMON (Applicant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH FIA & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 938
Advocates:Rana Daniyal Akram(ADVO-22478-SBC-KHS),Daniyal Muhammad Hussain(ADVO-22224-SBC-KHC),Mohammad Jibran Nasir(ADVO-13974-SBC-KHE),Barrister Zain-ul-Abidin(ADVO-22640-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.128-K/2025 Syeda Ghanwa Hussaini v. Adeel Rahman Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
883) 937/2025 Const. P. Syed Sahir Hasan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Resolution to give effect to Article 202-A )
Tag Line: bail in cases of Sindh Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 2024 is to be heard by a Constitutional Bench formed under Article 202A(3) of the Constitution and not a Regular Bench
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 507
Advocates:Allah Dino(ADVO-23693-SBC-KHS),Habibullah(ADVO-18059-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Manzar Bashir(ADVO-13572-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 22-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
884) 2820/2014 Const. P. Syed Mansoor Ali (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PLD Sindh 41
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
885) 99/2018 I. A Ayub Raza (Appellant) V/S M/S. Bank Al-Falah Limited & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 06-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
886) 28/2018 I. A MCR (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Appellant) V/S Soneri Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 08-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.5-K/2019 Soneri Bank Limited v. MCR (Pvt) Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
887) 116/2020 H.C.A Shahzad Noor Muhammad (Appellant) V/S Karachi Gymkhana & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, H.C.A
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 343
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
888) 123/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Shahid Khan & another (Applicant) V/S Mst. Sofia Bano & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 999
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
889) 82/2018 I. A Mrs. Asma Hassan & another (Appellant) V/S Askari Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Tag Line:As a consequence hereof the Limitation Application has become infructous and is disposed-of.
Citation:2020 CLC 1068, 2019 SBLR Sindh 2030
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.436-K/2019 Mrs Asma Hassan and another v. Askari Bank Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
890) 1502/2008 Adm. Suit Mr. Nazar Akbar, Advocate for the Plaintiff. (Plaintiff) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 01-OCT-10
Approved for Reporting
891) 788/2012 Suit MRS.RIFFAT SIRAJ MUNIR (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.MOOMAL PRODUCTIONS PVT LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 662
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
892) 6142/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Ahmed Manna (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1388
Advocates:Jawaid Farooqi(ADVO-3964-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
893) 8/2016 Election Appeal Haji Arz Mohammad Brohi (Appellant) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2019 YLR 2098
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
894) 1991/2011 Const. P. Sui Southern Gas Company (Petitioner) V/S Darya khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 11-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1094/2021 M/s Al - Hamd Edible Oil Industries Pvt Ltd Thatha v. The Province of Sindh through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)
895) 38/2022 Cr.Rev Muzaffar Ali Soomro (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1373
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
896) 11/2016 II.A. Abdul Aziz (Appellant) V/S Abdul Kareem & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Section 27 - Relief against subsequent buyer )
Tag Line:Sale deed of appellant as being enjoyed by appellant cannot be set-aside automatically as the defence of the appellant is
protected being buyer without notice of any dispute. As stated above it has to
be proved independently through impartial evidence failing whereof the
aforesaid provisions of law would protect the title of appellant. Section 27(b) is
for enforcing performance against those who acquired title with knowledge of
previous agreement/contracts, whereas section 41 of Transfer of Property Act
protect title for those who acquired title without knowledge of previous litigation.
Since it is a case of cancellation of sale deed I am of the view that section 41 of
Transfer of Property Act is more appropriate for its application
Citation:2023 YLR 104
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
897) 7319/2018 Const. P. Mst. Shamim Naqvi (Petitioner) V/S P.D.O.H.A and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.401-K/2019 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others,C.A.21-K/2020 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of
898) 7176/2022 Const. P. Imran Qadeer (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tax matters
Tag Line:(FTO)Federal Tax Ombudsman; jurisdiction to initiate disciplinary proceedings against FBR's employees without any notice; HELD No;
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 445
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 12-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
899) 1016/2013 Const. P. Nadeem Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
900) 115/2012 Suit MEDIA MAX (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S MEDIA MAX (PVT) LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 555
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-JUN-13
Approved for Reporting
901) 4970/2017 Const. P. Sapphire Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Section 5A ITO 2001 struck down.
Citation:2021 PTD 971
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.926-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Saphire Textile Mills Ltd.,C.A.3387/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Saphire Textile Mills Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, transfered to Islamabad.,Pending
902) 5895/2017 Const. P. Uzma Naz and Ors (Petitioner) V/S The D.G Rangers & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 300
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.860-K/2022 The Director General Rangers Sindh through Ashraf Hussain Shah Deputy Superintendent Rangers v. The Province of Sindh through Senior Member Board of Revenue Government of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.859-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh & another v. Uzma Naz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned after summer vacation,Pending Adjourned after summer vacation
903) 186/2016 Spl.Cr.Misc MUMTAZUDDIN S/O MOINUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
904) 1492/2011 Suit MAHMOODA TAPAL & ANOTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (PAKISTAN) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh Note 28
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
905) 132/2020 Cr.Acq.A. Abdul Qayoom (Appellant) V/S Raja Khoso (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1392
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
906) 20/2015 H.C.A Syed Arif Ali & another (Appellant) V/S Zeenat Hanif Siddiqui & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 SBLR Sindh 1227
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 26-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.366-K/2017 Mrs. Zeenat Hanif Siddiqui v. Syed Arif Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
907) 1311/2004 Suit Shaikh Abdul Jabbar through his Legal Heirs (Plaintiff) V/S Irfan Jami Rafique and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 08-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
908) 5663/2021 Const. P. Mir Karam Ali Magsi and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether a person is legally qualified for appointment or promotion to a particular post and grade is relatable to the factum whether he possesses the requisite qualifications for consideration, whereas the question of fitness pertains to the competency of the person concerned, which is to be decided by the competent authority.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 279
Advocates:Ghulam Shabbir Babar(ADVO-10219-SBC-KHI),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Sikandar Ali(ADVO-14953-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
909) 6431/2019 Const. P. Irshad Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance.
Tag Line:Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to submit before this Court on the next date hearing a list of all such employees of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh who were absorbed / appointed at any post and are still holding such post, and also the notification of repatriation of respondent No.7 to his parent department.
Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 131
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.279-K/2020 Ghulam Ali v. Irshad Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
910) 162/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Rafiq. (Petitioner) V/S Officer Incharge National Database & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
911) 38/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) Junaid Ahmed Siddiqui (Applicant) V/S M.Yaqoob Khan Niazi & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O.XX, R.5, O.XIV, Rr.1, 2 & O.XLI, R.31---Suit for cancellation of lease and possession---Recording evidence of the parties after framing of issues---Dismissal of suit while deciding issue of maintainability without touching any other issues---Scope---Plaintiff filed suit for cancellation of lease and possession wherein issues were framed and evidence was recorded---Trial Court dismissed the suit while giving findings on issue of maintainability while treating it preliminary issue without deciding issues of facts which was upheld by the Appellate Court---Validity---Purpose of conferring power on the Court to first decide the case or any part thereof only on the issue of law was to save the time of Courts and litigants---Court for deciding a case on the issue of law should form a conscious opinion in the light of pleadings of the parties and give notice to the parties that in its opinion the case mighty be disposed of on the issues of law and it should try those issues first---Trial Court, in the present case, had neither consciously framed issue of law nor expressed its intent to dispose of the case on the issue of law---Even settlement of issues of facts had not been postponed and evidence of both the parties had been recorded---Once Court had consumed time in recording evidence then efforts were to be made to decide the case both on law points as well as on merit---Trial Court after completing trial should have passed judgment on all the issues, in circumstances---Courts below had failed to appreciate the pleadings of the parties in correct perspective---Plaintiff had prayed for recovery of possession of suit property on the basis of registered title document and his suit was simple suit for recovery of possession under S.8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Plaintiff had not sought any declaration as to his entitlement to any legal character---Even defendant had not raised any legal objection with regard to bar to the present suit in terms of S.42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Dispute between the parties was with regard to entitlement to possession specific suit plot on the basis of title documents---Question of title of the plaintiff and/or defendant could have automatically been determined had the Court decided the issues of facts with regard to entitlement of possession of suit land---Provisions of Ss.42 & 8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 were not complementing each other and were independent provisions of law and dealt with different kinds of grievances---Any person who had been deprived of his immovable property by any unscrupulous person could sue the said illegal occupant and recover its possession without seeking a declaration of his entitlement to his legal character---Findings recorded by the Courts below treating issue of maintainability as preliminary and dismissing the suit were not sustainable, in circumstances---Impugned judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below were set aside---Matter was remanded to the Trial Court for decision afresh while giving findings on each and every issue---Revision was allowed, in circumstances.
Syed Iftikar-ud-Din Haider Gardezi and 9 others v. Central Bank of India Ltd., Lahore 1996 SCMR 669; Sh. Abdul Kabeer v. Mian Abdul Wahid and others 1968 SCMR 464; Sultan Mehmood Shah through L.Rs. v. Muhammad Din and 2 others 2005 SCMR 1872; Muhammad Aslam v. Mst. Ferozi and others PLD 2001 SC 213 and Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Cantt. Board, Rawalpindi v. Ikhlaq Ahmed and others 2014 SCMR 161 distinguished.
Hafiz Muhammad Siddique Anwar v. Faisalabad Development Authority and others 2007 SCMR 1126 and Taj Wali Shah v. Bakhti Zaman 2019 SCMR 84 rel.
(b) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----Ss.42 & 8---Provisions of Ss.42 & 8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 were independent provisions of law and dealt with different kinds of grievances---Principles.
Citation:2020 MLD 1693
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 18-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
912) 654/2024 Criminal Appeal Umar Farooq S/o Khan Bahadur (Appellant) V/S The State & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1543
Advocates:Sajjad Hussain(ADVO-2122-SBC-KHP),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Babar Hussain Shah(ADVO-17287-SBC-KHS),Basam Ali Dahri(ADVO-17400-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
913) 5472/2017 Const. P. Shahid Iqbal Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.573-K/2018 Shahid Iqbal Shaikh v. The Govt. of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
914) 33/2007 Judicial Companies Misc. Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. (Applicant) V/S Beema Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Winding up petition
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.2486/2019 Beema Pakistan Company Ltd, Karachi v. The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
915) 913/2020 Const. P. Ali Muhammad and another (Petitioner) V/S Mukaram Khan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Petition allowed, female minor custody handed over to mother and father has right to meet minors and approach G&W Court . )
Tag Line:Habeas Corpus--custody of minors--In view of the statement of the parties, the petitioners are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs. 200,000/- before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose and in the meanwhile petitioners shall not take away the custody of minors out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights in the intervening period subject to tentative payment of maintenance of the minors @ Rs.3000/- per month for each minor and maintenance at the rate of Rs.5000/- per month for petitioner-mother till final adjudication by the learned trial Court. On the aforesaid proposition, I am fortified by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Humayun Hassan v. Arslan Humayun and another, PLD 2013 SC 557.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 637
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
916) 1499/2017 Suit Faisal Mehmood (Plaintiff) V/S PIA Corporation Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 08-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
917) 234/2007 Suit BASIRAT DAD KHAN LODHI & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S FARHAT DAD KHAN LODHI & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Defendant is bonafide Purchaser for Value whose interest is to be protected. Suit dismissed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 140
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
918) 438/2020 Const. P. Dheraj @ Wanio (Petitioner) V/S Sht. Surma & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1440
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
919) 184/2018 Const. P. Ghulam Qadir Thebo (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (petitioner has been superseded HPSB in its meeting held , discussed supra on account of a bad reputation. CP dismissed.)
Tag Line:In our view, to qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. This is the minimum expectation to ensure a clean and efficient administration and to protect the public interest. An employee found not fit for promotion cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his / her case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his / her entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion denies him / her promotion, such denial would not be illegal or unjustified under the service jurisprudence.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 596
Advocates:S. Mahmood Alam Rizvi(ADVO-3351-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Obaid -ur- Rehman Khan(ADVO-12008-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.550-K/2022 Ghulam Qadir Thebo v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan through Secretary, Establisment Division, Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
920) 850/2020 Suit Dewan Sugar Mills Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Selection for audit under section 25 of the Sales Tax Act and section 46 of the Federal Excise Act requires the giving of reasons.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 213
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Faheem Bhayo(ADVO-2534-SBC-HYD),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
921) 756/2017 Const. P. S.M Kaleem Makki (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service
Tag Line:It is the general principle of jurisprudence that the law takes its effect from the date of promulgation and interpretation of the said law cannot be subjected to the doctrine of retrospective effects unless expressed specifically in the judgment, therefore, Mustafa Impexs case is to be applied prospectively, in general. It is the existence of law at the relevant time that counts, which may have been interpreted at a later date. Since the deficiency in the appointment notification as far as Provincial Cabinet is concerned, is not questioned no challenge could be thrown.
The principle we derive from the conclusion of the aforesaid three judgments is that Mustafa Impex only invalidates those actions retrospectively which were impugned in that lis and not all others, so by virtue of aforesaid principle the notification for the appointment of the petitioner is saved whereas it set a mechanism for future course i.e. issuance of impugned notification.
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) Note 11
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 28-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.724-K/2019 Province of Sindh and others v. S.M Kaleem Makki,C.P.L.A.41-K/2020 S.M Kaleem Makki v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
922) 94/2024 Cr.Rev Muhammad Ishaque (Applicant) V/S The State and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1633
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
923) 319/2022 Cr.Bail NADEEM S/O SHER MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1187
Advocates:Aamir Jamil(ADVO-12902-SBC-KHE),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
924) 755/2020 Const. P. Karim Bux Tanwri & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Group Insurance Policy matures only on death; petitioners who are alive; retired and have crossed the age of 65 years are not entitled for refund or return of contribution made by them during service.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 594
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
925) 12/2020 M.A. Awais Aziz (Appellant) V/S Learned Presiding Officer Hyderabad & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 168
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 01-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
926) 104/2015 H.C.A M/s. Nina Industries Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. E.F.U. Genral Insurance Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1133
Advocates:Mujahid Bhatti(ADVO-7589-SBC-KHI),Naved Ahmed(ADVO-8552-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
927) 2608/2021 Const. P. Abdullah Soomro (Petitioner) V/S UBL & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 710
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Mughal(ADVO-2678-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Mahmood Abdul Ghani(ADVO-4801-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.330/2023 United Bank Limited through its President, Karachi and others v. Abdullah Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
928) 2/2022 M.A. Mckinsey & Company Pakistan (Private) Limited (Appellant) V/S Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters
Tag Line:It is nobody's case that holding company has
discharged such obligations, if at all it is under such duty. It is not stated
that the holding company has disclosed such data in the consolidated
financial statements of the group and presented as those of single
enterprise and that such would be within domain of SECP, so that the
purpose of non-disclosure of the remuneration of CEO or director of the
relevant company whose shares are being held, would be
inconsequential.
Citation:2023 CLD 530
Advocates:Shahbakht Pirzada(ADVO-14752-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.577-K/2023 McKinsey & Company Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
929) 555/2012 Cr.Bail Hazoor Bux Brohi and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
930) 4546/2012 Const. P. Ayaz Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Railways & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PLC CS 226
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 18-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.7-K/2017 Pakistan Railways thr. Chairman and others v. Ayaz Ahmed Memon and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
931) 2110/2009 Const. P. Muhammad Tariq Qasmi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:EJECTMENT AND RECOVERY OF POSSESSION
Citation:2019 PLC CS 594
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
932) 48/2018 Cr.Rev Nasrullah Khoso (Applicant) V/S Sessions Judge Kandhkot & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 558
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
933) 390/2017 Criminal Appeal REHMATULLAH REHAN S/O LATE ABDUL REHMAN (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD ZIAUDDIN & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---
----Ss. 500 & 501---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss.200 & 201---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Defamation---Private complaint---Accused-appellant was convicted and sentenced to fine on the basis of moving false complaints and publishing pamphlets with defamatory words against the respondents---Complainant produced two witnesses including his brother in support of his claim---Record showed that Trial Court, after recording statement of accused under S. 342, Cr.P.C. and hearing final arguments, without assigning any reason, instead announcing order on merit, restarted the trial and issued process for evidence to the Additional Collector as court witness---Trial Court, after recording statement of court witness, recorded statement of accused under Ss.342 & 340(2), Cr.P.C. second time---Accused, after second statement under S.342, Cr.P.C. had examined himself on oath and had produced documents showing character of the complainant---Record showed that Trial Court failed to appreciate that even complainant's own brother had not supported him---Trial Court misinterpreted the evidence with reference to the burden of proof in criminal cases---Record did not show that the complainant had by way of rejoinder affidavit denied the contents of counter affidavit of officials containing the allegation of blackmailing and harassment by the complainant and, therefore, it ought to have been accepted as admitted document about a truth---Trial court failed to appreciate that the complainant was not aggrieved by derogatory remarks on oath against him---If such remarks did not cause any defamation to the complainant then how a letter written to any government functionary, which had not been conveyed to the complainant, would have caused any injury to the complainant---Trial Court clearly favoured the complainant when he convicted the accused and sentenced him to pay fine of Rs. 100,000/- as punishment and further ordered that fine be paid to the complainant---Trial Court had no authority to handover the amount of fine to the complainant---Amount of fine imposed as punishment had to be deposited by court through its ministerial office in the government treasury---Circumstances established that complainant failed to prove his claim---Appeal was allowed and accused was acquitted by setting aside the conviction and sentence recorded by the Trial Court.
(b) Criminal trial---
----Burden of proof---Scope---Burden is never shifted on accused unless the prosecution evidence is found to have proved the commission of offence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Citation:2020 MLD 905
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.14-K/2019 Muhammad Zia-ud-Din v. Rehmatullah Rehan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
934) 3560/2016 Const. P. Rasool Bux Soho (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 10-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.768/2018 Rasool Bux Soho v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
935) 2651/2016 Suit Zohaib Shakoor (Plaintiff) V/S Mahwish Pirzada & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Injunction Granted. )
Tag Line:With these observations, the third basic ingredient of suffering irreparable loss is not difficult to decide. The forecasting done by Plaintiff while entering into the subject agreement and making investment in relation to that is bound to be frustrated and jeopardized if the injunctive relief is
refused. Hence, Plaintiff cannot be compensated in monetary terms; whereas, the Defendants will not suffer any loss as they will be getting their agreed payments, rather now the enhanced payments as per Plaintiff Statement dated 30.01.2017
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 06-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
936) 755/2020 Const. P. Ashfaque Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1714
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
937) 1141/2019 Cr.Bail Kashif Dars S/o Muhammad Usman Dars (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters ( under Section 498 Cr.P.C r/w Section 561-A Cr.P.C), Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:a) S.498, 561-A Cr.P.C--- Scope: Application of proper procedure;
S.498, 561-A Cr.P.C--- Order under S.497(5) Cr.P.C passed by the District & Sessions Judge cancelling the bail of accused charged under Cyber Crime was assailed before High Court---The Court observed that the proceedings filed were half criminal bail application and half criminal Miscellaneous Application. It was further observed that surprisingly the Counsel who was protecting the liberty of his client was unaware of the law and nature of proceedings. As the proceeding under both the provision are distinguished in nature, in fact Deputy Registrar Judicial had to check that whether the instant application under Section 498 Cr.P.C was in the prescribed format for such an application or not. And if it was not the Deputy Registrar should have raised objection to bring it in the proper form.
b) Supreme Court.16, 20, 21, PECA 2016 r/w 49, 420, 109 PPC (Prevention of Electric Crimes Act) ---
S.497(5) Cr.P.COrder:
In fact in Cyber Crime the accused cannot allege malafide in associating/ connecting him in the crime. The complainant was not aware of the applicant. He had only noticed certain fake pages on internet and Facebook carrying objectionable. FIA by using scientific technics reached to the accused through cell phone number which has been used to the Facebook carrying offensive material. Held--- Since the complainant party was never aware of the person behind this misuse of internet, it cannot be said that complainant had malafidely named the accused and arrested or associated with the offence. The Cell phone was in use of Accused and sufficient documentary evidence appeared against him connecting him with commission of offence. Application dismissed.
Citation:2020 PCr.LJ 259
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 16-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.171-K/2019 Kashif Dars v. The State and others,Crl.A.397/2019 Kashif Dars v. The State and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
938) 5842/2022 Const. P. Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Section 4C Income Tax Ordinance 2001
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 667
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan(),Muhammad Ahmed Hussain(ADVO-15940-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.220-K/2023,C.P.L.A.221-K/2023,C.P.L.A.222-K/2023,C.P.L.A.223-K/2023,C.P.L.A.224-K/2023,C.P.L.A.227-K/2023,C.P.L.A.228-K/2023,C.P.L.A.230-K/2023,C.P.L.A.126-K/2023,C.P.L.A.229-K/2023,C.P.L.A.226-K/2023,C.P.L.A.225-K/2023,C.P.L.A.3825/2022 SCP Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Disposed
939) 2116/2019 Const. P. Mst. Nighat Naeem (Petitioner) V/S K.D.A and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 56
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
940) 4/2021 Cr.Acctt.A SULTAN QAMAR SIDDIQUI S/O QAMAR UL HASSAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:NAB Matter - Appeal against conviction
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1120
Advocates:Munwar Ali(ADVO-2050-SBC-KHP),Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),S. Mahmood Alam Rizvi(ADVO-3351-SBC-KHI),Asst Attorney Gen(AsstAG),Obaid -ur- Rehman Khan(ADVO-12008-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1339/2021 Sultan Qamar Siddiqui v. The State through Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
941) 1375/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 1493
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.410-K/2019 Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy/Irrigation Deptt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
942) 102/2013 Cr.Appeal Abdul Qadir alilas Fauji (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 17-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
943) 77/2013 II.A. ABDUL RASHID (Appellant) V/S MAQBOOL AHMED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.65-K/2018 Abdul Rasheed v. Maqbool Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
944) 594/2019 Cr.J.A ALI SHAH S/O ZAREEN KHAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 268
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Sara Malkani(ADVO-15404-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
945) 415/2022 H.C.A Muhammad Hussain (Appellant) V/S Imtiaz Ahmed & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 673
Advocates:Mehmood Anwar Hussain Baloch(ADVO-2976-SBC-KHS),Feroze(ADVO-6910-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
946) 100/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Taj Muhammad Detho (Applicant) V/S Senior Civil Judge Ratodero and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Rejection of Plaint
Principle of Res judicata
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1499
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
947) 67/2025 Cr.Bail Shakil Ahmed Shaikh (Applicant) V/S The State (NAB) & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1823
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
948) 431/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector Customs Model (Applicant) V/S M/s Ahsan & Company (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Jurisdiction; Customs Tribunal; cannot set aside or modify a Valuation Ruling while hearing Appeals against order of Collector Appeals;
different jurisdictions of the Tribunal under Section 194A of the Customs Act explained
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 346
Advocates:Ghulam Hyder Shaikh(ADVO-10758-SBC-KHI),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI),Pervez Iqbal Kasi(ADVO-4320-BBC-OTH),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 10-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
949) 91/2023 Criminal Appeal UMAIR QADEER S/O QADEER AHMED (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD NASIR & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Trial (Quantum of punishment)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1139
Advocates:Shahid Nawaz(ADVO-9974-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
950) 100/2015 I. A Farhat Fareed Sheikh (Appellant) V/S NIB Bank Limited and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 07-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.26-K/2020 Muslim Commercial Bank (MCB) Limited v. Mst: Farhat Fareed Shaikh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
951) 421/1991 Suit Rahim Ali Palari & ors. (Plaintiff) V/S Govt. of Sindh & ors.. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Tag Line:Suit under Fatal Accident Act is independent of proceeding under Motor Vehicle Ordinance, 1965 and Criminal Proceeding (If any). Res Ipsa Loquitor applies to fatal accident cases. If accident / incident disputed then onus on Defendant to disprove negligence. Defendant to disprove causation of death. Criteria for awarding damages. Deprivation of the association of a family member (loss of consortium). Tort Law as a Tool for enforcing good governance. Computing income of deceased when no evidence of employment.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
952) 141/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996, Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Act, 1991, Civil Servants Act, 1973, Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:Subsection 2 of Section 36 of Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organization) Act, 1996 enabled an employer, with the consent of the transferred employee, to award appropriate compensation in lieu of whatever benefits they could have gained at the end of their tenure. These employees were given service benefits, which were not even matured at the time the employees opted VSS, hence it cannot be said that any guarantee or secured right was arbitrarily snatched by the employer. These employees could have continued to serve without opting VSS.
VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract (for any prompt gain) in bargain with their post retirement or pensionary benefits.
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 895
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 19-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
953) 3478/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Akbar and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 381
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
954) 457/2021 Const. P. M/S Rafique Ahmed & Co (Petitioner) V/S The Registrar of Trade Union Govt Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Sind Industrial Relations Act, 2013. Maintainability of petition by Employer against order of Registrar Trade Union passed under section 9(10). Held Yes.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 442
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 23-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5602/2021 Fauji Fertilzer Company Mazdoor Union through its President / General Secretary, Ghotki and others v. M/s Rafique Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
955) 29/2020 Judicial Companies Misc. Amir Bux Channa & Another through Attorney (Applicant) V/S Isra Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) Limited. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Isra University Act, 1997
Tag Line:1. A post to which a person is nominated is
not a tenured post. His nomination can be withdrawn at any time by the
nominating authority, although it has to be seen whether nominating
authority is constituted legally.
2. This principle of reading down is
applied when a provision is capable of more than one interpretation and
one or more of those interpretations would render the other provisions
either redundant or illusory or in conflict with main frame of the
Statute. In such cases, Courts will read down the provision in a manner
that saves the provision .
3.since the
induction of the council members has been successfully disputed by
petitioners; hence I am of the view that the audit of the foundation is
also inevitable.
4. Claim of rent by foundation is neither
illegal nor illogical, however one may argue on the quantum and an
arbitrary way of fixing the rent. This should have been done without any
influence and coercion from either side.
Citation:2023 CLD 691
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
956) 1006/2010 Const. P. Mst. Shahnaz Parveen (Petitioner) V/S 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 28-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
957) 1018/2021 Const. P. Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin)
Tag Line:the decision of PSB-II for promoting the private respondent No.8 in BPS-19 against future vacancy in absence of ACRs is/was an erroneous decision--ACRs--it is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if the promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, the competent authority, and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1270
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
958) 33/2004 I. A Fed.of Pak.thr:Secretary Communication & another (Appellant) V/S Haji Abdul Latif Bughio and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:1. Maintainability of appeal under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 against an order passed on an application under section 12(2) CPC; Held No
2. Election of Forum for seeking remedy. Once a party has selected a legal forum for seeking any relief, then it cannot abate such proceedings in between and seek any other remedy for the same relief. Once that remedy was elected, then, by implication of the doctrine of election, the other remedy by was barred.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 216
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1817/2022 Chairman National Highway Authority, Islamabad through Project Director, Moro v. Haji Abdul Latif through its L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
959) 3/2007 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst:Fatima Parveen and another (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Younis and other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:The provisions of Articles 17 and 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO), 1984, concerning the competence and number of witnesses and the procedure for proving attested documents, are procedural in nature and possess retrospective effect. These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even if the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 255
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
960) 6115/2023 Const. P. Saad Aqil (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The rights of tenants in Buildings declared as Dangerous by the SBCA under Section 14 of the SBCO, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 682
Advocates:M/S. K. A. WAHAB & CO.(FIRM-119-SBC-KHI),Iftikhar Jawed Qazi(ADVO-2356-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
961) 119/2006 Suit MRS. SHABEENA FARHAT (Appellant) V/S V/S M/S HIGHWAY HOUSING PROJECT & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Defendant has neither provided basic amenities in the Housing Scheme nor has produced any document, rules / bye-laws or Agreement between the parties hereto, to substantiate its evidence, that it is not the responsibility of Defendant to provide these basic amenities. the subject Housing Project launched by Defendant was not complete at least till the time of giving evidence till September, 2014; thus, the grievance of Plaintiff is of continuing nature, inter alia, in terms of Section 23 of the Limitation Law. This is a further ground in addition to the above, for determining that the present lis is maintainable. Hence, suit partly decreed.
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Transfer of Property)
Tag Line:Defendant has neither provided basic amenities in the Housing Scheme nor has produced any document, rules / bye-laws or Agreement between the parties hereto, to substantiate its evidence, that it is not the responsibility of Defendant to provide these basic amenities. the subject Housing Project launched by Defendant was not complete at least till the time of giving evidence till September, 2014; thus, the grievance of Plaintiff is of continuing nature, inter alia, in terms of Section 23 of the Limitation Law. This is a further ground in addition to the above, for determining that the present lis is maintainable. Hence, suit partly decreed.
Citation:2014 CLC 322
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 02-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
962) 203/2024 Const. P. Zafar Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 14, 2025 MLD 14
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
963) 100/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s.P & G International Lahore (Appellant) V/S Assistant Collector of Customs & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 14-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
964) 4980/2015 Const. P. Ameen Steel (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 107
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
965) 219/2021 Cr.Rev NIAZ AHMED S/O SHER JANG & ORS (Applicant) V/S MUHAMMAD AIJAZ & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 817
Advocates:Shamshad Ali(ADVO-19351-SBC-KHS),Amjad Hussain(ADVO-14302-SBC-KHE),Bahadur Khan Khattak(ADVO-4351HLC-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.66-K/2024 Niaz Ahmed and another v. Mohammad Aijaz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
966) 38/2021 Const. P. Hamid Baig (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Saba Khan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 360
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
967) 183/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Silver Surgical Complex (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Commissioner I-R Zone-IV (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Rules, 2006 (Rule 25), Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 10), Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 8(2))
Tag Line:Supplies involving exempt and taxable purchase cannot be treated in a generalized way. Applicant while having input tax adjustment of the above period forgot to apply rule 25(3) of the ibid rules 2006 which does not permit the adjustment of input tax in its entirety when they deal with both taxable and exempt supplies.
--Learned counsel for the applicant has argued to the extent of claiming refund in terms of section 10 of the Sales Tax Act. The scheme of Section 10 caters for an event other than applicants case. In terms of the facts and circumstances of the case where input adjustment is claimed on both exempt and taxable supplies as is the case of applicant before lower forums, we have to apply an unambiguous provision that deals the event and i.e. 8(2) of the ibid Act which directly deals with the input tax in respect of the supplies involving both exempt and taxable supplies.
Citation:2021 PTD 2020
Advocates:Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Aminuddin Ansari(ADVO-3574-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
968) 1357/2017 Const. P. Shrimati Aashi (Petitioner) V/S Bhesham Lal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Family matter
Tag Line:This Proviso is primarily is in consideration of the fact that Muslim
women who file their respective suits for dissolution of marriages and
dower amount shall also be in a position to avail the jurisdiction of local
limits where the (wife) ordinarily resides but that doesnt exclude the
jurisdiction of the above two situations i.e. (a) and (b).
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
969) 2377/2012 Const. P. Bank Alfalah Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Banking Law, Criminal Procedure Code, General Clauses Act, 1897 (Section 24A)
Tag Line:petitioner is precluded from raising such contention
in the generalized form, more importantly as we have already observed it
is not the kind of investigation that would be governed by any of the
above enactment since it involves a question of granting auto loan on
the basis of bogus document such as Auto loan agreement, ID Card of
individuals who never applied for such loan. It is mainly related to their
officers concerned and it is to be seen whether any public exchequer,
cess was involved and/or misappropriated including but not limited to
the offence that has already been registered.
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Zaheeruddin Mujahid(ADVO-4421-SBC-KHI),Sami ur Rehman(ADVO-11815-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
970) 201/2012 Const. P. Mr. Abdul Rashid. (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Autority & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
971) 5330/2019 Const. P. Mujahid Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
i) Whether the petitioner was non-suited by this Court vide judgment dated 30.3.2018 in earlier round of litigation and the same view was affirmed by the Honorable Supreme Court in Civil Petition No457-k of 2018, vide order dated 19.4.2018, therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings?
ii) Whether Rule 12 of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1974 was amended vide Notification dated 14.9.2018 issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh, whereby relaxation up to maximum of fifteen (15) Years in the upper age limit to all the applicants applying for the vacancies in all the Departments of Government of Sindh were done away against the posts to be filled through Combined Competitive Examination by the Sindh Public Service Commission?
Topic: Service matters (age relaxation)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
972) 2067/2016 Suit M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Through this Suit all Plaintiffs had sought exemption on the packing material imported by them for the manufacture of pharmaceutical products in terms of entry No. 105 of the 6th Schedule to the Sales Tax Act, 1990; however, the said entry only caters for raw material and not for packing material therefore, the Suits of the Plaintiffs have been dismissed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
973) 133/1998 Suit MRS. PARVEEN MEHMOOD. (Plaintiff) V/S THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC CO. LT (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Recovery of amount/damages)
Tag Line:The delay in filing the claim in not of few days but it is of eleven months regarding which the Plaintiff had not led any positive evidence to justify that why the above delay beyond prescribed period should be condoned, or, the said delay in filing this Lis, is not hit by Rule 29.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 799
Advocates:SURRIDGE & BEECHENO(FIRM-101-SBC-KHI),Khalid Rehman(),Malik Muhammad Riaz(ADVO-6493-SBC-KHI),Sohail Mazaffar(ADVO-2086-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
974) 3251/2024 Const. P. Mst Sarwat Ghazi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Pension Rights of Divorced Daughter
Citation:2025 SBLR Sindh 1198
Advocates:Ghulam Hasnain(ADVO-12328-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.718-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Sindh secretariat, Karachi & others v. Mst. Sarwat Ghazi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice to Respondent)
975) 48/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Faisal and Others (Applicant) V/S Jan Muhammad Pathan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 71
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
976) 924/2009 Const. P. Baber Qayyum Raja (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 06-NOV-09
Approved for Reporting
977) 23/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. AMIR RAHMEEM S/O MUHAMMAD RAHEEM BONERI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeal, Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeal (uphold sentences In Section 397 PPC , though witness not Identified accused, but arrested just incident with property .)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 477
Advocates:Shamim Alam(ADVO-17880-SBC-KHE),Samiullah(ADVO-13723-SBC-KHW),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Raqab Ali(ADVO-18289-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
978) 871/2024 Cr.Bail SHAHZAD JUNAID S/O ROSHAN ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Coming to the proposition bail in an offense punishable up to seven years , broadly speaking a person accused of a bailable offense has a right of admission to bail and an arrested person can be refused bail if it appears to the Court concerned that "reasonable grounds" exist for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. Allegations against him are that he cheated the complainant and deprived him of his legitimate amount on the pretext that he would return the plot. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act V of 1898) {Code} for bail the offenses are divided into two categories termed ???Bailable offence??? and ???Non-bailable offence???. These are defined under Section 4(b) as under: -
(b) "Bail able offense, "non-bail able offence": "Bailable offence" means an offence shown as bail able in the Second Schedule or which is made bail able by any other law for the time being in force; and "non-bailable offence means any other offence???
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 889
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
979) 8125/2018 Const. P. Pakistan Minerals Developement Corporation (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Mines and Minerals, CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:Petitioner, Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources. In respect of an area of 3818.81 acres at
Lakhra, District Jamshoro, for which a mining-lease was granted to the Petitioner for mining coal for a period of thirty[30] years. These renewal applications remained pending with the Respondent No.2, and though in the meantime both the mining-leases of the Petitioner expired in April 2015, the date of such expiry stood extended .Respondent No.2 had granted mining-permits to SLCMC without waiting for a decision on the Petitioners appeals pending under Rule 71 of the SMC Rules. Mr. Jawad Dero, the learned AAG Sindh, and Mr. Jaffar Raza, learned counsel for SLCMC had objected to the maintainability of these fresh petitions on the ground that the Hyderabad Petitions for the same relief were still pending. we agree with Barrister Zameer Ghumro that these petitions cannot be held to be not-maintainable merely on the ground that the Hyderabad Petitions are also pending. Appellate Authority manifests that the refusal to renew the Petitioner mining-leases was only for the reason that the Petitioner was Federal Government entity and the Government of Sindh had already made up its mind to award a mining concession in the same area to the SLCMC, a company wholly owned by the Government of Sindh. Having found no reason to interfere in the discretion exercised by the Respondent No.2 The petitions succeed for prayer clause 3 in terms that the impugned Notifications dated 09-07-2018 granting mining permits to SLCMC (Respondent No.3) having been granted in contravention of Rule 68 of the SMC Rules, the same are without lawful authority and are therefore set-aside judgment shall be dispatched by the office to o be placed in C.P. No. D-7643/2018 pending before this Court at Karachi The petitions stand disposed off.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2795/2019 M/s Sindh Lakhra Coal Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation thr. its Project Director & others,C.P.L.A.443-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Energy Department, Govt. of Sindh and another v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation and another,C.A.1539/2019 M/s Sindh Lakhra Coal Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation thr. its Project Director & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
980) 30/1994 R.A (Civil Revision) Faiz Muhammad and others (Applicant) V/S Army Welfare Turst and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:1. A simple suit for declaration under section 42 of the Specific Relief Act regarding possession without claiming title to property is incompetent
2. Khasra Girdawari is not a title document nor can be relied upon to claim title or possession.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 830
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
981) 379/2019 Suit Muhammad Ayub Khan Sanjrani (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Contract employee)
Tag Line:Service Matter - Non Renewal of Contract of Employment - held - No vested right to get it renewed even against the Government - Injunction refused.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
982) 1169/2021 Const. P. Mazher Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 233
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),M/S. BADAR ALAM & COMPANY(FIRM-261-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.423-K/2022 Mazhar Ahmed & another v. Province of Sindh Ministry of Law and Parliamentary Affairs through Law Ssecretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
983) 3679/2014 Const. P. Province Of Sindh and ors (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PLC CS 179
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.482-K/2015 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Dr. Bashir Ahmed and others,C.A.33-K/2016 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Dr. Bashir Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
984) 4268/2013 Const. P. Bilal International (Petitioner) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 465
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
985) 883/2022 Const. P. Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui and Others (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Election Matters
Tag Line:Article 140A of the Constitution. Local Government Elections cannot be delayed for want of any amendment in the Sindh Local Government Act 2013
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 642
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE),Farkhanda Jabeen(ADVO-4122-SBC-KHI),Pooja Kalpana(ADVO-8787-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.841-K/2022 Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui & others v. Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
986) 1073/2009 Const. P. Aziz ur Rehman Chaudhry. (Petitioner) V/S PIAC (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 10-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.276-K/2013 Pakistan International Airline Corporation (PIAC) v. Aziz-ur-Rehman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed
987) 1961/2018 Const. P. Fahmeed Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S Ist. Addl:D.J Sanghar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:The Appellate Court is burdened with more responsibility if a judgment is
being set-aside then in case where the judgment is being upheld by him, as he
could agree with the reasons assigned by the trial court. But when the judgment
and decree is being set-aside then the strong reasons are required to be
provided by the Appellate Court.
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 377
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
988) 462/2022 Criminal Miscelleneous JAMAL SHAIKH S/O BILAL SHAIKH (Applicant) V/S IIIRD ADJ KHI CENTRAL & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 312
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-20773-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
989) 6554/2019 Const. P. Ms. Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) V/S PM & DC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was by virtue of Article 89(2)(a)(ii) of the Constitution, i.e., by a resolution of the Senate disapproving the same and not by way of any repealing enactment. Therefore, the effect of repeal contained in sections 6, 6-A and section 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which otherwise apply only when a repeal is by way of a repealing enactment, were neither triggered nor would those serve as an aid in construing the effect of repeal under a Constitutional provision such as Article 89. In other words, on the repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, nothing contained in the General Clauses Act, 1897 would come to save the Amending Admission Regulations that had been made under the repealed Ordinance. In view of Pakistan Medical and Dental Council v. Muhammad Fahad Malik (supra), Article 264 of the Constitution also did not have the effect of saving or giving permanency to the Amended Admission Regulations when the effect of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was only temporary as it was never accorded approval by the Parliament. Therefore, on 29-08-2019, when the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was repealed by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, the Amended Admission Regulations also stood repealed and the Original Admission Regulations were revived.
(b) It will be seen that while the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 repeals all previous Regulations, but that is subject to sub-section (7) which provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process. The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 1962 by the PMC Ordinance, 2019, the former being a permanent statute under the 1973 Constitution, is not a repeal by virtue of Article 89 of the Constitution, but a repeal by a repealing statute, albeit a temporary one, and one which has been expressly made subject to section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which in turn provides that the repeal shall not revive anything not in force or existing at the time at which the repeal takes effect. We have already discussed above that on 29-08-2019 the Amended Admission Regulations had ceased and the Original Admission Regulations had revived. Therefore, when sub-section (7) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process, those can only be the Original Admission Regulations.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4221/2019 Pakistan Medical & Dental Council thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Ms. Urooj Fatima & others,C.A.610/2020 Pakistan Medical & Dental Council now Pakistan Medical Commission thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Ms. Urooj Fatima & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
990) 10/2012 M.A. M/s. Recorder Television Newwork (Pvt Ltd) (Applicant) V/S The Pakistan Electronis Media Regulatory Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 23-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1594/2013 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad v. M/s Recorder Television Netwrok (Pvt) Ltd,C.A.1413/2013 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, (PEMRA) Islamabad v. M/s Recorder Television Netwrok (Pvt) Ltd. Thr. Chief Secy. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
991) 4598/2021 Const. P. NBP Officers Welfare Association and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 373
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.790/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President Karachi and another v. NBP Officers Welfare Association, Karachi through Senior Vice President others,C.P.L.A.1177/2023 NBP Officers Welfare Association, Karachi through its Vice President and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Finance Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending
992) 557/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S M/s. Umer Zahid Malik & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Tampered motor vehicles.
Citation:2022 PTD 1112
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
993) 4193/2022 Const. P. Mst. Farzana (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 900
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Qadir Hussain(ADVO-6245-SBC-KHE),Faiz Ahmed(ADVO-15410-SBC-KHI),Moiz Ahmed(ADVO-13395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
994) 3400/2012 Const. P. Sarfraz Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Son Quota (Dismissed))
Tag Line:In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of Son/Shaheed quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
995) 6183/2015 Const. P. Mazhar Ali Magsi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 16-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.803-K/2023 Samira Mahamadi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
996) 7072/2018 Const. P. Badar ul Haq Kandhro (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Council for Work & Housing Research & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 502
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Irfan Ali(ADVO-14257-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aslam(ADVO-4546-SBC-KHI),Inayatullah Morio(ADVO-376-SBC-LAR),Kamran Khan(ADVO-13655-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
997) 211/2018 Cr.Appeal MUHAMMAD NASIR KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD MUKHTIAR (Appellant) V/S TH STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
998) 1084/2015 Suit Engro Elengy Terminal (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 26-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
999) 18/2015 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Yousif Mahar (Applicant) V/S Nizamuddin Dahar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1222
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 02-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
1000) 195/2018 Criminal Appeal SHIRMATI JAAMI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 191
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
1001) 1725/2023 Const. P. M/s Al- Abbas Fabrics & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1018
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 09-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1103-K/2023 M/s. Al Abbas Fabrics (Pvt.) Ltd. & others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Energy, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
1002) 197/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. TAIMOOR @ TANVEER S/O MUHAMMAD IRSHAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1204
Advocates:Muhammad Imran Meo(ADVO-13761-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1003) 1376/2024 Cr.Bail IMTIAZ S/O MEHBOOB ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Tag Line:Primarily, to constitute an offense under the aforesaid Section, the prosecution is not only required to prove the possession but also to establish the knowledge about the property to be stolen. In the present case, the prosecution has presented the case to the extent that the subject vehicles were stolen and involved in the subject FIRs under Section 381-A PPC and came into possession of the applicants, which were later on recovered from their possession, be that as it may, if the aforesaid section is supposed to be applied, the maximum punishment provided under the statute for the offense is seven years however under Section 411 PPC is three years, which provides dishonestly receiving stolen property and the same does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C. It is settled law that grant of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory clause is a rule and refusal is an exception. The liberty of a person is a precious right which cannot be taken away without exceptional foundations. So far as the applicability of sections 381-A PPC and 411 PPC, the trial Court has to determine, if the prosecution brings any cogent material to connect the applicant with the alleged crime, as the issue of confession before police and subsequent recovery has already been discussed in the preceding paragraph.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1015
Advocates:Rameez Raja(ADVO-20204-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
1004) 209/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Alman and others (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Revenue & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1005) 16/2020 II.A. Khadim Hussain & others (Appellant) V/S Fida Hussain Dero (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 871, 2025 SBLR Sindh 731
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.95-K/2023 Fida Hussain Dero v. Khadim Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
1006) 427/2013 Const. P. Shahid Ansari & others (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 06-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
1007) 155/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. NAZEER AHMED S/O SARDAR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Non-identification of accusd at the time of evidence)
Tag Line:PW Muhammad Akeel at the time of recording his evidence has not identified the present appellant to be a same person who was identified by him at the time of identification parade as such in our view such identification of the accused has no such legal value to maintain conviction of accused in a case of capital punishment without any other corroboration.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 205
Advocates:Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Asadullah Shah(ADVO-9203-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
1008) 513/2019 Const. P. Muhammasd Rashid Bhatti (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.440-K/2019 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Interior and others,C.A.3044/2022 National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Syed Arshad Wahab and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
1009) 2805/2022 Const. P. Ansar Ahmed Gorar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Contempt ), Service matters (Employees' Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976)
Tag Line:whether the impugned notification is, in conformity with the judgments passed by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Crl. Org. Petition No.89/2011, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and Gul Hassan Jatoi; and, whether IGP Sindh is competent to issue the impugned notification under Section 12 of the Police Act, 1861, or it is for the Government of Sindh to order the repatriation of the petitioners to the ICT Police, Baluchistan Police and Pakistan Railways Police; and, whether police establishment is indivisible one force; and inter se transfer and subsequent absorption from the Federal Capital Police, Railways Police or Baluchistan Police to Sindh Police is permissible under Rule 1.5 of Police Rules, 1934; and, whether the repatriation of the petitioners to ICT Police, Baluchistan Police, and Pakistan Railways after rendering service for a considerable period in Sindh Police, attracts the principle of locus poenitentia and the same are within the principles laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 426
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2266/2022 Ansar Ahmed Gorar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1010) 2150/2020 Const. P. M/s Heal The World (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 189
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1804/2022 M/s Heal the World through its Chief Executive, Karachi v. The Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of Food Security, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
1011) 83/2015 Suit Nawab Brothers Steel Mills Ltd., & another. . (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Customs Act 1969)
Tag Line:Customs Act (IV of 1969)---
----Ss.18(3), 30, 79, 104 & 131---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss.42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2---Notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015---Suit for declaration and injunction---Interim injunction, grant of---Rate of duty---Determination---Principle---Plaintiffs imported goods from foreign supplier under contract executed prior to issuance of Notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015---Plea raised by plaintiffs was that authorities be restrained from applying/deducting regulatory duty in terms of notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015---Validity---Manner and method of date of determination of rate of duty on goods imported into Pakistan were subject to Ss.79 & 104 of Customs Act, 1969, and date of determination of rate of duty on goods exported was subject to provisions of S.131 of Customs Act, 1969---Imposition and collection of regulatory duty on "import" and "export" was different and distinct and no analogy could be drawn for interpreting the provision of one section of the statute with the other section in the same statute by referring to case-law dealing with one particular levy---Provisions of notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015, were applicable on shipments of plaintiffs in terms of S.30 of Customs Act, 1969, irrespective of the fact that plaintiffs had entered into contract for purchase of consignments with foreign suppliers and opened letter of credits prior to 14-1-2015---High Court declined to grant interim injunction against applicability of notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2015 PTD 1308
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 27-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
1012) 3387/2023 Const. P. Mst. Sumera Amir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Preventive detention under the MPO Ordinance, 1960.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 976
Advocates:Jowhar Abid(ADVO-7364-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 01-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1013) 46/2015 Cr.J.A Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz Kalhoro & anothe (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Murder Appeal dismissed, Conviction Maintained, witnesses are relatives no ground to discard evidence. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(A.T.C Death)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1011
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.94/2021 Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz v. The State,Crl.A.178/2023 Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Partly Allowed , Death to Life Imprisionment and conviction under ATA set aside
1014) 2819/2016 Const. P. Faysal Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Banking Mohtasib of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 822, 2020 CLD 548, 2019 SBLR Sindh 1966
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.538/2020 M/s Faysal Bank Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.489-K/2019 M/s Faysal Bank Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned,Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 4 weeks a/w C.As.1386/2018 etc
1015) 4058/2022 Const. P. Al-Ghazi Tractors Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Petition dismissed as not maintainable. No cause of action accrued; a mere challenge to vires of Rules will not confer jurisdiction
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 314
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI),Munawar Ali(ADVO-10937-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 12-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2034/2024 Al Ghazi Tractor Limited, Karachi v. Pakistan, through the Secretary Revenue, and Ex-Officio Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, FBR House, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 19-Jun-25)
1016) 73/2021 Const. P. Sher Ali (Petitioner) V/S Syed Hamid Ali and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 942
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1017) 729/2009 Suit ABDUL WADOOD (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD IQBAL & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Malicious prosecution
Tag Line:(a) Malicious prosecution---
----Suit for malicious prosecution, recovery of damages and compensation---F.I.R. was registered by defendants against the plaintiffs---Trial Court acquitted the plaintiffs in connection with the F.I.R. under S. 245(1), Cr.P.C on the basis that prosecution had failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt---Plaintiffs instituted present suit with the contention that they had been maliciously prosecuted by the defendants by registration of an F.I.R.---Validity---Plaintiffs were acquitted by the Trial Court on account of the fact that prosecution had failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt---Judgment of Trial Court was silent with regard to the "malice" of the defendants and also with regard to the "falsehood" of the F.I.R.---Plaintiffs had failed to establish that there was "no reasonable and probable cause" for their prosecution---Plaintiffs had also not proved claimed special or general damages----Simple affidavit in evidence had been filed by plaintiffs without support of any documentary evidence claiming professional fee, travelling charges, business loss, mental torture/discomfort, damages on account of loss of reputation and defamation in public---Suit for malicious prosecution was dismissed accordingly.
Citation:2013 MLD 584
Advocates:Zulfiqar Ali Solangi(ADVO-9977-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ikram Siddiqui(ADVO-2713-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
1018) 2342/2013 Const. P. Imran Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 25-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1515/2013 Federal Board of Revenue thr. Chairman, Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Law, Islamabad & others,C.P.L.A.1848/2013 Federal Board of Revenue thr. Chairman, Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Law, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted
1019) 107/1987 Suit Allwin Engineering Industries Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Karachi Electric Supply Corporation (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi
Order Date: 14-MAR-06
Approved for Reporting
1020) 6261/2020 Const. P. SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Enforcement of Guideline passed by Supreme Court )
Tag Line:M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited ("SSGC"), has sought enforcement of the guidelines provided by the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in its order dated 11.03.2020 passed in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.4450/2019 (M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. Karachi v. The Registrar Trade Unions, C/o National Industrial Relations Commission, Islamabad, and others), to the Registrar, National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), for conducting the referendum with respect of determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC as provided under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012--we direct the Deputy Registrar NIRC to announce the result of the referendum for determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC. However, it is made clear that, if any of the parties in the proceedings is aggrieved by the outcome of the result of the referendum, they are at liberty to avail and exhaust their respective remedies in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1135
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
1021) 4496/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) V/S Chairman EOBI and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976 (Pensionary Benefits )
Tag Line:With regard to length of service, counsel for the EOBI contends that the petitioner remained employee of the respondent for a period of four years, therefore, he is not entitled for any benefit. Needless to mention that decision/termination was challenged by the petitioner in referred grievance application which was allowed, hence, it cannot be said that length of service of the petitioner was only four years. That service would be treated as upto the age of superannuation.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 725
Advocates:Syed Jaffar Ali Rizvi(ADVO-15659-SBC-KHS),S. Ashfaq Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-3111-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
1022) 7/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Regus Executive Center Karachi.(Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Assistant Commissioner (Unit-04) Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Tag Line:Sales tax on renting of property and Business support services; Defined
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 61
Advocates:Muhammad Rashid Khan Mahar(ADVO-15076-SBC-KHS),Shamshad Ahmed Narejo(ADVO-2185-SBC-HYD),Daniyal Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-19877-SBC-KHS),Jahanzeb Awan(ADVO-11549-SBC-KHI),Shahan Karimi(ADVO-15097-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 17-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
1023) 727/2008 Suit BAYER AG and Bayer Health Care AG (Plaintiff) V/S Bayhealth Care (Private) Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 27-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
1024) 10/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Arslan Habib Buriro (Applicant) V/S Rustam Ali Tunio (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Revision
Tag Line:After the recording of evidence, the trial court was operating in the second stage of the summary suit and had to dig deeper into the evidence to decide the suit. The evidence brought on record required greater scrutiny, and the threshold of the burden of proof was on a higher pedestal based on the general principles of the law of evidence. Yet the trial court decided against the applicant/defendant on the assumption that the production of the cheque was sufficient and/or no further proof was required as the cheque was a negotiable instrument. This may be one of the considerations in deciding an application for leave to defend, but it was not proper for the trial court to overlook the circumstantial evidence produced by the applicant-defendant-Arslan Buriro and available in the suit file surrounding the alleged loan and the cheque issuance. Revision against the Execution allowed.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 969
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
1025) 319/2023 Suit MAXCO (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters
Tag Line:Justice demands that rights in the physical world and the digital/virtual world should be the same and at par with each other. Yet currently, SECP appears to be maintaining two different sets of standards for qualifications/remarks. It is clear that the Registrar of Companies, SECP is not empowered to publish qualifications/remarks on its dashboard and/or its digital platform for banks relating to the Plaintiff Company that ???Currently Company is under DISPUTE CASES??? as the same is contrary to law and SECP???s regulations framed under the Companies Act, 2017. Consequently, SECP is directed to immediately remove the said remarks from its dashboard/digital portal accessed by banks or other entities and replace such qualifications/remarks with any of the qualifications/remarks that may be assigned to the Plaintiff Company under Regulation 20 of the Companies (Registration Offices) Regulations, 2018.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 593
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 23-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1026) 431/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Majid (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Bano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1283
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
1027) 19/2000 Civil Revision Abdul Baqi & others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Salam & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VI Rule 17)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1028) 17/2025 Const. P. Sadaf Gul & Others (Petitioner) V/S Sain Bux & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Right of Fair Trial
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 168
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
1029) 6796/2021 Const. P. Advans Pakistan Microfinance Bank Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 910
Advocates:Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2797/2022 Advans Pakistan Microfinance Bank Limited Karachi and another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Interior, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1030) 3698/2021 Const. P. Nadeemuddin Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The short question is whether compulsory retirement of the petitioner on the aforesaid grounds would be a valid exercise of the powers; and, whether such a purpose could be termed to be in the public interest?
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 927
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Nasima Mangrio(ADVO-10697-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
1031) 47/2021 Spl. Cr. A. THE STATE / ANF (Applicant) V/S AGHA MEHMOOD UL HASSAN HARAVI & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, overrides Prevention of Smuggling Act, 1977.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 761
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.198-K/2022 The State / Director General Anti-Narcotics Force Sindh v. Agha Mehmood Ul Hassan Haravi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1032) 3/2018 Insolvency Abdul Ahad Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Lubna Qaiser (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Insolvency petition dismissed
Citation:2021 CLC 297
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
1033) 108/2014 Cr.J.A Riaz Khan and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 27-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
1034) 14/2021 I.T.R.A TRI-PACK FILMS LTD. (Applicant) V/S COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:s. 221 ITO; ambit of rectification.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 562
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Hashmatullah Alim(ADVO-11063-SBC-KHE),Waqar Ahmed Ch:(ADVO-11376-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1649-K/2021 Tri-Pack Films Limited v. Commissioner Inland Revenue & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1035) 4048/2012 Const. P. M/s. Dalda Foods(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (Labour Law)
Tag Line:We find that the private respondents were deprived of their due process rights. They were not confronted with the material based on which their services were verbally terminated. Even otherwise, the process followed by the petitioners was sketchy, one-sided, non-transparent, and not supported even by the law. We, therefore, find that both the Learned SLC and SLAT were justified in passing the impugned orders and recorded valid and cogent reasons for doing so, therefore, no ground existed for re-evaluation of the evidence, thus, we maintain the consolidated order dated 22.10.2011 passed by the Sindh Labour Court (SLC) in grievance Applications of the private respondents and common order dated 31.10.2012 passed by the learned Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal (SLAT) in Appeal No. KAR-273/2011, Appeal Nos. KAR-445/2011 to KAR 496/2011 and KAR-498/2011 to KAR-603/2011.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1065
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.6488/2021 M/s Dalda Foods (Pvt) Limited v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi & others,C.P.L.A.5640/2021 M/s Haq Engineering & Packing Service (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: ,
1036) 3183/2018 Const. P. Dr. Fateh Muhammad Burfat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2151
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
1037) 1575/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Akram Thr. M Anwer Khan (Petitioner) V/S Shri Mahant Baboo Lalgir Mahraj & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters), Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (FRA Remanding Order Set aside and declared null & void. )
Tag Line:Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----Ss. 15, 18, 20 & 21---Ejectment of tenant---Change of ownership on the basis of decree of the Court---Denial of relationship of landlord and tenant by the tenant---Default in payment of rent---Expression "or by such other mode" in S. 18 of the Ordinance---Scope---Dispute of title or ownership---Determination of---Procedure---Landlord became owner of demised premises through decree of the Court and tenant was intimated with regard to change of ownership and was requested for payment of rent to the new landlord---Tenant denied the relationship of landlord and tenant---Eviction petition was allowed by the Rent Controller on the ground of default in payment of rent---Appellate Court remanded the matter to the Rent Controller with the direction to decide the same afresh after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties and directed the civil Court to amend the decree passed in the civil suit---Contention of tenant was that decree of the Court did not create any title---Validity---Tenants were in possession on the demised premises as tenants and they were not claiming ownership---Notice for change of ownership of demised premises had been received by the tenants---Tenants were bound to tender rent to the new owner of the demised premises within 30 days from the moment they had received the intimation of transfer of ownership by sale, gift, inheritance "or by such other mode"---Notice from new owner to the tenant for change of ownership was enough---Tenants on receiving the said notice refused to tender rent to the new owner on the ground that the decree of Court did not create any title---Decree of Court could also be one of the "such other mode" for transfer of ownership of demised premises---Decree of Court was against previous landlord/owners who were party to the suit in which same was passed---Tenant had no right to question the title of landlord---Tenants on receiving notice of change of ownership were supposed to protect their right as tenant in the demised premises in their possession by tendering rent to the person who had sent them the notice---Tenants had failed to tender rent to the new owner of demised premises---Courts while exercising authority under the law had no jurisdiction to decide or even comment on the title/ownership of the property in possession of tenant---If issue of relationship of landlord and tenant was complex then it should be left for the Civil Court to decide the same---Appellate authority in the present case had remanded the matter to the Rent Controller with the direction to decide the issue of relationship between the tenant and new landlord by re-examining the issue of ownership/title of demised premises already decided by the Civil Court---Judgment of Civil Court could not be examined by the Rent Controller---Appellate Court had exercised powers not vested in it and order for modification/preparation of fresh decree and remand of the case was perverse and void---Impugned order passed by the Appellate Court was set aide and order for preparation of fresh decree and remand of rent case were declared null and void---Tenants were directed by the High Court to vacate the demised premises within thirty days---Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.
Messrs Habib Bank Limited v. Sultan Ahmed and another 2001 SCMR 679 and Allahditta and others v. Member (Federal) Board of Revenue 2018 SCMR 1177 rel.
Citation:2019 CLC Note 25
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 20-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.95-K/2019 Evacuee Trust Property Board (ETPB) thr. Administrator v. Shri Mahant Baboo Lalgir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1038) 704/2019 Suit Pakistan Airline Pilots Association (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airlines & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Rejection of Plaint
Topic: Merger
Tag Line:Order VII rule 11 CPC - Rejection of Plaint sought - Suit barred in law under Order 2 Rule 2 - Application dismissed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
1039) 6198/2014 Const. P. K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
1040) 13/2013 First Appeal Against Order Hassan Abbass (Appellant) V/S Ist Additional District & Session Judge (Central) at Karachi. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. VII, R. 11---West Pakistan (Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Karachi) Ordinance (III of 1962), Ss.27 & 29---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.42---Suit for declaration---Correction of father's name was sought by plaintiff---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Name of maternal grandfather was mistakenly mentioned in the school record as name of father of plaintiff and same had been disclosed by him which was also supported by affidavit of his mother---Record maintained by the Education Board was incorrect and father of plaintiff and that of his mother could not be one and the same---Trial Court was bound to reconcile the record of Education Board with that of the correct name of father of plaintiff in view of available record---Education Board had not applied mind to the request made by the plaintiff through a proper application wherein ingredients of plaint and circumstances mentioned in the same had been brought to the notice of Education Board but same had been declined without assigning a cogent reason---Education Board had not mentioned the rules before the Trial Court which restrained them from making correction in the record---Section 27 of Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Ordinance, 1962 did not mean that Education Board was a final authority and order passed by the same was not subject to review by the courts---Section 29 of Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Ordinance, 1962 stipulated that no suit for damages or other legal proceedings should be instituted against Government and any member of Education Board or Committee---No decision or order of Education Board was under challenge nor plaintiff had claimed any damages against controlling authority or member of Education Board in the present suit---Present was a suit for correction in the relevant record of Education Board---Education Board was bound to make necessary correction once there was a satisfactory proof of mistake on the record---Refusal of Education Board to rectify the mistake in the certificate issued by Board was without any lawful jurisdiction---Impugned order passed by the Education Board was without reasoning and same was not a speaking order---Trial Court had rejected the plaint without proper trial which was contrary to the requirement of law---Orders passed by the Trial Court and Appellate Court were set aside and case was remanded for decision on merits after recording of evidence in accordance with law.
(b) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)---
----S. 5---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42---Suit for declaration---Appeal---Non-disclosure of dismissal of appeal by the counsel to the appellant---Professional misconduct of counsel---Condonation of delay---Scope---Application was supported with a complaint against the counsel who had been representing the appellant before the Trial Court and first Appellate Court---Details of professional misconduct of counsel had been given in the affidavit with regard to the fact that he (counsel) did not disclose about the dismissal of appeal---Circumstances were not within the control of appellant to file present appeal in time who had accounted for the delay---Application for condonation of delay was accepted in circumstances.
Citation:2014 YLR 2042
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
1041) 89/2022 Const. P. Sikandar Ali & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Service matters. No vested right concept in promotion policy. Government can amend the same, if deemed appropriate.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 775
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 14-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1700/2022 Sikandar Ali and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and Literacy Department Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1042) 2272/2021 Suit PAKISTAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction), Competition Act, 2010 (section 24(1), (5) & (6) read with section 28(1))
Tag Line:Chairman's right to cast second vote Challenged by plaintiffs. **There should not have been a situation of even number of member
of commission in a quasi-judicial proceeding, however, in the current
situation the event of an equality of votes reached and hence the
Chairman/Chairperson and/or any other member already rendered
opinion, cannot be saddled with additional responsibility to cast a vote
to untie knot as it would destroy the balance of each independent
judicial mind being applied to a triable question under adjudication.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 66, 2023 CLD 265
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
1043) 213/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Hyd. (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Sabir S/o Muhammad Yousaf & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Clause 89(i) of section 156(1))
Tag Line:Burden of proof under section 187 Customs Act.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 914
Advocates:Zulifiqar Ali Arain(ADVO-1899-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 05-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
1044) 2507/2019 Const. P. M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Ghafoor Shaikhson (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:the Sindh Consumer Protection Act, 2014
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1138
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
1045) 951/2012 Cr.Bail Ghulam Nabi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Murder Bail (Ocular evidence is corroborated by medical evidence), Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Bail Confirmed)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 26-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
1046) 1650/2020 Const. P. Gas & Oil PakistanLtd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PTD 104
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1347-K/2020 Gas & Oil Pakistan Limited v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1047) 1007/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Mehboob (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Ehtram-e-Ramazan Ordinance, 1981
Tag Line:The prohibitions contained in Sections 3 and 4 and the punishments provided therein for their contravention clearly show that the persons who do not fall within the exemptions provided in Section 5 or who knowingly and willfully show disrespect for the persons fasting and/or for the holy month of Ramazan, are to be dealt with strictly and punished under Sections 3 and 4, as the case may be. Another important aspect is that no person should be allowed to take advantage of the exemptions provided in Section 5 or to exploit the same if he is not entitled to the same.Since the hotels and restaurants of the petitioners are admittedly not situated within the premises of any of the places enumerated in Section 5 of the Ordinance, they are not certainly entitled to seek exemption under the said Section, and as such all these petitions are liable to be dismissed.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 28-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1048) 5850/2018 Const. P. Zeeshan Usman (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of.
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Tag Line:The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 187
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1754/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others,C.A.936/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained.,Disposed Allowed
1049) 1414/2014 Const. P. Ahemd Kaleem Usmani and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 565
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
1050) 45/2022 Suit.B THE BANK OF PUNJAB (Plaintiff) V/S M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (section 9(2))
Tag Line:Condonation Application to allow Defendant Customer to file leave to defend application in Banking Suit allowed. Summons were defective, as Plaintiff Bank did not include the registered address of the Defendant Company in the title of the Plaint. Plaintiff relied on Musharaka Agreement which mentioned the previously registered address. Subsequently, Defendant Company notified the change of registered address to PSX, SECP and updated its website page. Defendant Customer did not notify Plaintiff Bank. Order 29 CPC mandatory. Registered Post Acknowledgment and Delivery Report of summons were not available. Bailiff, on his own volition, reached the registered address of Defendant Company. Publication of Summons alleged by Defendant was not in its knowledge. In the circumstances and based on case law, Defendant Condonation Application allowed and Leave to Defend taken on record with the same to be decided in accordance with law, including Plaintiff's right to file replication, if so desired.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1042
Advocates:Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Bin Maaz(ADVO-13125-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Mahmood Ali(ADVO-17058-SBC-KHS),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 21-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1051) 4658/2018 Const. P. Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, has pronounced the judgment on 06.08.2020 in the case of Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd. and others v. Federation of Pakistan & others (along with connected petitions), wherein, the Hon'ble bench of Sindh High Court has been pleased to dispose of all the petitions in the following terms:-
" (i) The impugned sub-section (2) of Section 221-A of the Customs Act, 1969, as added vide Finance Act, 2018, is ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as through impugned amendment the legislature has attempted to validate constitutional defect while making amendment in sub-section (3) of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1969, and issuance of SRO 1035(I)/2017 dated 16.10.2017, through Finance Act, 2017, however, without making the required constitutional amendment.
(ii) The Regulatory Duty charged and collected pursuant to amendment in sub-section (3) of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1969, and issuance of SRO 1035(I)/2017, through Finance Act, 2017, has already been declared by the Divisional Bench of this Court in the case of Premier Systems (Pvt) Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others (2018 PTD 861), as illegal and unconstitutional in the light of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mustafa Impex, Karachi & others vs. The Government of Pakistan & others, (PLD 2016 SC 808), therefore, in the absence of any constitutional amendment, cannot be validated through subsequent amendment in law, while giving it retrospective effect in respect of past and closed transaction, therefore, no Regulatory Duty can be charged, collected or recovered for the period starting from the date of commencement of Finance Act, 2017 till the date of commencement of Finance Act, 2018. .
Citation:2021 PTD 232, 2021 PTCL 178
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 06-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.836-K/2020 Federation of Pakistan through Revenue Division & others v. Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.16/2025 Federation of Pakistan through Revenue Division & others v. Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. (Orders dated 13.01.2025 and 16.01.2025 have been declared non est and Crl.O.P.1/2025 was order to be fixed along with the appeals arising out of CPLA No.836-K/2020 etc),Pending
1052) 193/2022 II.A. Zulfiqar Ahmed S/o Muhammad Yaqoob (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Nadeem and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Scope of the second appeal is narrow, allowing exercise only on specific grounds. In a claim for damages for malicious prosecution, the burden of proof lies on the claimant; claimant must establish that the prosecution was without reasonable and probable cause and motivated by malice. The court held that acquittal through the benefit of doubt constitutes an honorable acquittal; the importance of curbing false accusations and frivolous litigation by means of civil suits for malicious prosecution; the rejection of the plaint should not have been done summarily without providing an opportunity to prove the allegations through evidence. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded back to the trial court for a fresh decision after recording evidence.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 293
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
1053) 703/2007 Suit MRS. BILQUIS MOHSIN BUTT & OTHERS. (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD MAHMOOD BUTT & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. XX, R. 13---Administration suit---Limitation---Scope---Suit for administration was only a formality to determine the mode of distribution of the estate of the deceased amongst the legal heirs according to the Shariah---Court would act only as an administrator in such suit for a limited purpose---Plaintiff was required to satisfy the court in a suit for administration and partition, his status as legal heir of the deceased and proprietary rights of the deceased in the estate at the time of opening of succession---Question of limitation in case of joint family properties did not arise---In the present case, none of the properties mentioned in the schedule were part of the estate of the deceased---Plaintiff could not seek administration and partition of the disputed properties---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Pattoki Sugar Mills Limited through Chief Executive v. WAPDA through Chairman and 4 others 2007 CLD 659 and Anjum Rashid and others v. Shahzad and others 2007 CLC 1414 and Ghulam Ali and 2 others v. Mst. Ghulam Sarwar Naqvi PLD 1990 SC 1 rel.
(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. XX, R. 13---Administration suit---Limitation---Question of limitation in case of joint family properties did not arise.
(c) Company---
----Limited company was a juristic person and a legal entity separate from its share-holder and any change in the shareholding of a company did not mean change in the title of assets of the company or premises occupied thereby---Properties of a company could not be inherited by the legal heirs of one of its Directors or even ordinary shareholders of the company---Legal heirs of a deceased director or shareholder of a company could claim inheritance only to the extent of shareholding of the deceased Director or shareholder in the company and not in the assets of the company as estate of the deceased.
(d) Islamic law---
----Succession---Classes of legal heirs---Classes of legal heirs of deceased (in Sunni Hanfi Law of Succession) were sharer, residuaries and uterine (distant kindred).
(e) Islamic Law---
----Distribution of the estate of deceased---Procedure.
Muhammadan Law paras 61 and 63 quoted.
(f) Islamic law---
----Succession---Succession to the estate of a Muslim would open immediately, he had passed away and title would pass to the legal heirs automatically to the extent of their respective shares ordained by Shariah without any interference by the State functionaries.
(g) Islamic law---
---- Inheritance---Grand-children whose father or mother had survived their grand-father had no locus standi to claim inheritance in the estate of the deceased grand-father---Once father/mother of grand-children had died (true legal heirs of grand-father) they could file a suit for administration of the estate left by their deceased parents and if there was any undistributed property from the estate of their grand-father, continued to be in existence, they could include "share" of their deceased parents in the said estate of their own deceased father or mother but they could not reopen the issue of inheritance from the entire estate of their grand-parents---Grand-children could not claim as matter of their own right any share in the estate of their grand-father.
Citation:2015 CLC 1333
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 30-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
1054) 234/2023 Cr.Bail Ghulam Sarwar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 334
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
1055) 1021/2014 Suit Muhammad Ali Zubair. (Plaintiff) V/S Sabira Khatoon & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Transfer of Property -Suit Dismissed )
Tag Line:(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----S. 12---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXIII, R. 3 & O. VII, R. 11---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Compromise---Cause of action---Power-of-attorney---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Executant of power of attorney died prior to the execution of agreement to sell---Effect---Agreement was not validly entered into by and between the parties after the death of principal---Said agreement to sell was not enforceable at law even if contesting parties were ready and willing to abide by its terms---Sub-attorney who claimed to have entered into an agreement of sell with the attorney had not invited objections on entering into agreement of sale of suit property---Even (present) plaintiff after entering into agreement of sale with the sub-attorney had not issued any public notice in newspapers for inviting any objection from public-at-large for transfer of title of suit property---Had such effort been made, legal heirs of the deceased executant of power-of-attorney could have warned the plaintiff before making any further payment of suit property---Search certificate of suit property was not obtained from the office of Sub-Registrar of the properties concerned---Defendant had already breached promise with the plaintiff---Broken promise by the compromising parties could not be endorsed by the court---Application for compromise of suit was liable to be dismissed---No cause of action existed for filing of suit against the defendant---Cause of action shown in the plaint was a false and collusive statement of plaintiff and defendant---Plaintiff had attempted to obtain a compromise decree from the court---Defendant had never refused to perform her part of contract---When cause of action had ceased to exist, provisions of O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C. would attract and plaint was liable to be rejected---Suit for specific performance was liable to be rejected once defendant had conceded that he was ready and willing to perform his part of contract---Nazir of the court could not be allowed to perform part of contract under circumstances---Suit had become infructuous and plaint was liable to be rejected---Both the suit and compromise application were dismissed with cost of Rs. 100,000/- to be jointly and severally borne by the plaintiff and defendant---Said cost should be paid within specified period and if the same was not paid, Nazir of the court should take step for recovery of cost including attachment of movable and immovable properties of plaintiff and defendant---Member Inspection Team of High Court was directed to examine the record and if any criminal case was made out, he should initiate or cause to initiate criminal proceedings against plaintiff and defendant in accordance with law.
Diamond Rubber Mills v. Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd. and 2 others 1989 CLC 1989 rel.
(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. VII, R. 11---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Jurisdiction of civil court to exercise its authority to adjudicate between the parties would co-exist with the "cause of action" to settle the grievance of plaintiff against the defendant on his/her denial to accept/acknowledge certain rights of plaintiff---No suit could be filed without a "cause of action" and if at all such suit was filed, plaint should be rejected for want of cause of action---If cause of action had ceased to continue after filing of suit, nothing was left for the court to exercise its authority.
Citation:2017 YLR 138
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 12-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
1056) 850/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Preventive) (Applicant) V/S Falak Jan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (SRO 577(I)/2006)
Tag Line:Exemption is a privilege being enjoyed by diplomats and other
dignitaries. If we trace history of last 50 years (though there were
earlier SROs also), we come across initial SRO 53(I)/70 issued in exercise
of powers available under Section 19 of Customs Act for all articles of
household and personal effects including motor vehicles for the personal
use by the ruler of any of the Gulf Sheikhdoms including vehicles
imported by the UAE dignitaries which includes use and donations to
welfare projects in Pakistan with conditions, such as articles will not be
sold without prior consent of Central Board of Revenue, as it then was.
It was persons specified SRO as it contained list of all such dignitaries
with a table attached.
Vehicle was imported in 2002 when SRO 506(I)/88 was active. It
restricted the sale without prior permission of Federal Government,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to be routed through a formal application. In
other event, no such vehicle could have been sold within two years of its
importation to anyone other than Department of Investment Promotion
or diplomatic representatives or mission of foreign government, except
when the diplomatic representative by whom it was imported is
transferred within two years of its importation and it has been used by
him for not less than one year. So nothing beneficial could be achieved
by respondent through said SRO
Citation:2022 PTD 512
Advocates:Zakir Hussain Khaskhali(ADVO-419-SBC-KHP),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 06-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.273/2022 Falak Jan v. The Collector of Customs Model Collectorate of Customs (Preventive) Custom House Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1057) 638/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Junaid Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1344
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
1058) 614/2003 Suit ZAFAR AHMED. (Plaintiff) V/S ASSOCIATES PRESS OF PAK & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Recovery of amount/damages)
Tag Line:The Defendants have illegally deprived the Plaintiff from the benefits of enhanced pension since 01.07.2000. Defendants should have considered the service rendered by Plaintiff to the Organization; he has given his prime years of life to Defendants No.1 and in all fairness deserves
a fair treatment from Defendant No1.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 29
Advocates:Sardar Sultan Jahangir Khan(ADVO-2028-SBC-KHI),S. Ashfaq Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-3111-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
1059) 8/2009 H.C.A Al-Ahmed Pvt.,Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Anjuman Falah-o-Behbood Hazara Mughal Goth & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 12 (2) CPC.
It further appears that the same counsel who had filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent moved the application under Section 12(2) CPC on behalf of the respondent through a stranger, claiming himself to be the President of respondent No.1 without producing any evidence regarding his authorization in this regard. From perusal of the application under Section 12(2) it further appears that no new facts or the instance of alleged fraud and misrepresentation by the appellant/plaintiff has been pointed out. Similarly, perusal of the impugned order shows that the learned Single Judge in chamber appears to have re-examined the entire judgment and decree and on the same set of facts appears to have given a different opinion from the one already given in the impugned judgment and decree dated 14.03.2006 and 20.04.2006 respectively.
Scope and the application of Section 12(2) CPC is very limited and could only be attracted in cases where the judgment and decree has been obtained by misrepresentation or by playing fraud on the Court by a party. Though an application under Section 12(2) CPC can be filed by a stranger to the proceeding but such applicant has to show that he is an aggrieved party and the impugned order/judgment has been obtained by misrepresentation and fraud. In the instant case, it was found that the respondent/applicant has miserably failed to discharge such burden.
Accordingly the appeal was allowed and the order passed by the Single Judge was set aside.
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 19-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
1060) 587/2022 Cr.Acq.A. ASIF IBRAHIM KHAN S/O MIR IBRAHIM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 729
Advocates:Barrister Musavir Gajani(ADVO-17167-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ayoub Chaniho(ADVO-15383-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1061) 3319/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Ayub (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 27-APR-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1685/2012 N.A.D.R.A. thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Muhammad Ayub & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1062) 1102/2017 Const. P. Vicky Kumar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4380/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1609/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1063) 792/2013 Const. P. Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:contract employees
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1406
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
1064) 391/2011 Cr.Misc. Syed Jawaid Haider Qazmi (Applicant) V/S S.I. Muhammad Zaffaran and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 12-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
1065) 60/2012 H.C.A Karachi Electric Supply Co (Appellant) V/S Karachi Water & Sewerage Board & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 14-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
1066) 1126/2013 Suit Hamza Haneef Awan and others. (Plaintiff) V/S Sher Ali Mangal and others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 292
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 22-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1067) 5539/2017 Const. P. Mst Aysha Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bonafide purchaser for value without notice Rule will apply where purchasers are not equally at fault with their predecessors. Property purchased on the basis of official record and transactions spreading over many years and did not change hands in quick succession showing undue haste, hence 5th owner cannot be penalized.
Responsible officials of KDA to be dealt with strictly, DG KDA directed to hold enquiry and fix responsibility on officials involved in committing illegality and fraud, whether in service or retired, alive or dead, should be mentioned in the Inquiry Report.
An alternate plot of same value and utility be allotted to the petitioner. Cost of Rs.100,000/- is imposed on respondent KDA payable to the petitioner.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 371
Advocates:Syeda Raffat Bano(ADVO-3570-SBC-KHI),Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Aziza Parveen(ADVO-7065-SBC-KHI),M/S. BADAR ALAM & COMPANY(FIRM-261-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 17-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.286-K/2022 Mst.Aysha Begum v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Housing & Town Planning & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1068) 327/2012 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Younus (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Zafar Ali Khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:The trial Court appears to have passed the order summarily without touching the legal aspect as enshrined in aforesaid two cited cases and as described u/s 179 Cr.P.C.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting
1069) 378/2022 H.C.A Mrs. Seema Tariq Khan & Another (Appellant) V/S Najamul Sehr Soomro & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A
Tag Line:High Court Appeal not maintainable under Section 3 of Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, against an order dismissing a Review Application. Order 47 Rule 7 CPC is applicable
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 929
Advocates:Mansoor-ul-Arfin(ADVO-157-SBC-KHI),Anwar Muhammad(ADVO-3569-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zubair Hashmi(ADVO-12273-SBC-KHS),Syed Adeel Mahmood Shah(ADVO-19981-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 08-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.186-K/2024 Mrs. Seema Tariq Khan and another v. Najmul Sehar Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Notice + Stay.
1070) 858/2008 Suit MST.BASHIRA BIBI (Plaintiff) V/S FED.OF PAK & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 554
Advocates:Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),Amir Maqsood(ADVO-6412-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
1071) 277/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Ahmed Ramzani (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 06-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
1072) 2421/2014 Suit Hameeda Iqbal & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Majeed & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 655
Advocates:Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-12115-SBC-KHI),Zahid Hussain(ADVO-4065-SBC-KHI),Hameed Siddiqui(ADVO-3991-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
1073) 2396/2012 Const. P. Mir Muhammad Raza Talpur (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar
Order Date: 17-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1374/2017,C.A.1380/2017,C.P.L.A.108-K/2017,C.P.L.A.290/2017 SCP Status:Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1074) 5143/2020 Const. P. Dr. Tariq Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 1304
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.639-K/2022 Dr.Tariq Ahmed Shaikh v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1075) 1264/2007 Suit MUHAMMAD AYUB GABOL (Plaintiff) V/S THE PROV OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
1076) 971/2022 Suit M/S INSAF & BROTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Rules 31, 32 SPPRA, 2010. Section 10 CPC.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 115
Advocates:Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Asad Ashfaq Tola(ADVO-17101-SBC-KHS),M/S. BADAR ALAM & COMPANY(FIRM-261-SBC-KHI),Bilal Ahmed Khan(ADVO-19578-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1077) 612/2013 Cr.Bail Muhammad Aslam (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (dishonor of cheque section 489F)
Tag Line:The contents under Section 489-F for the perusal as reproduced as also the contents of the FIR clearly manifest the dishonesty. For reaching the conclusion as to whether offence under Section 489-F is bail out or not the applicants attitude towards the cheques need not to be further established as he has failed to inform the concerned Manager of the Bank regarding the alleged misappropriation of cheque which was allegedly stolen. The applicant has not been able to this fact satisfactorily as to why this information was not given to the Manager. It also creates an impression that before issuing cheque to the complainant he might have managed to lodge this non-cognizance report to save his skin from future dispute. With these reasons I am clear in my mind that the applicant is not entitled for concession of bail and this bail application is dismissed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting
1078) 85/2011 II.A. Gul-e Nasreen (Applicant) V/S Maj. Lala Rukh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Administration of justice---
----Courts to act in accordance with law and decide the cases on the basis of legally admissible evidence on record---Decisions had to be in consonance with entire evidence---Evidence led by the parties should be discussed in support of reasoning in arriving at a particular findings---Judgments passed by the courts below being not in accordance with law and evidence on record by High Court were set aside. [Paras. 14 & 15 of the judgment]
[Case-law referred]
(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----S. 100---Second appeal---Scope---Second appeal would be competent if findings on facts were result of mis-reading, non-reading of evidence or same were perverse. [Para. 13 of the judgment]
Citation:2017 CLC Note 211
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 29-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2084/2016 Hafiz Muhammad Iqbal v. Gul-e-Nasreen & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Partly Allowed
1079) 13/2018 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S MSC SWITZERLAND GENEVA (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Implication of double taxation treaties upon super tax.
Citation:2021 PTD 885
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.672-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Legal v. M/s. MSC Switzerland Geneva Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1080) 89/2013 Suit.B Bank Al-Falah Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Gulistan Spinning Mills Limited and others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
1081) 1026/2017 Const. P. Aurangzeb and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Upgradation)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
1082) 6954/2019 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa Mahesar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 415
Advocates:Irfan Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-1741-SBC-HYD),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5458/2021 Ghulam Mustafa Mahesar and another v. Province of Sindh through Law Secretary, Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1083) 240/2017 Const. P. Mazhar Ali Langah (Petitioner) V/S Asad Ali Khoso & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Territorial jurisdiction of Family Court is governed by Rule 6 of the Family Court Rules 1965, not by provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act 1890.
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 1113
Advocates:Ali Azhar Tunio(ADVO-3234-SBC-KHI),Abdul Ghani Bijarani(ADVO-282-SBC-LAR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
1084) 101/2012 Spl.Cr.Bail Muhammad Saleem Khan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting
1085) 2358/2015 Const. P. ORI-TECH, OILS PRIVATE LIMITED (Petitioner) V/S The Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue, Regional Tax Office-I, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Excise, Sale Tax Rules, 2006, Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:The petitioner through the present constitutional petition sought declaration that the petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing process through Toll Manufacturer and thus eligible to be registered as Manufacturer with the Tax Authorities.
It was considered that the petitioner being manufacturer of its products owns the proprietary rights over its brand name and fixes the retail price and sell the finished product, hence the petitioner is engaged in the taxable supply being manufacturer.
Provisions and definition clauses of the Sales Tax Act 1990, Federal Excise Act 2005 & Sales Tax Registration Rules 2006 were examined.
Section 2 (17) was examined and it was considered that manufacturer is a person who engages, whether exclusively or not, in the production or manufacture of goods whether or not the raw material of which the goods are produced or manufactured are owned by him and shall include a person any person, firm or company which owns, holds, claims or uses any patent, proprietary, or other right to goods being manufactured, whether in his or its name, or on his or its behalf, as the case may be, whether or not such person, firm or company sells, distributes, consigns or otherwise disposes of the goods.
It was also observed that there appears no provision in sales tax act, which could exclude a person who does not possess its own facility of manufacturing and get his products manufactured from toll manufacturing from claiming himself as manufacturer. The Federal Excise General Order No.2 of 2008 dated 06.10.2008, was taken into consideration and it was observed that both vendor and the principal fall in purview of the definition of manufacturer.
Hence, it was decided that the petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing of its products through Toll manufacturing arrangement and thus eligible to be registered as Manufacturer with Tax authority. The Petition was allowed.
Citation:2017 PLD Sindh 1497
Advocates:Emad-ul-Hasan(ADVO-5822-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.407-K/2017 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s ORI Tech Oil (Pvt) Ltd.,C.P.572-K/2015 Muhammad Mashooque v. Faiz Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1086) 6966/2016 Const. P. Forte Pakistan (Private) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Azam Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 13-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
1087) 2259/2020 Const. P. Nisar Ahmed Tarar & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 973
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
1088) 1661/2015 Suit Dewan Steel Mills and others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti Dumping Law
Tag Line:Ant- Dumping Case: Concept of dumping explained. Section 31 Anti Dumping Act, 2015, explained. NTC not required to first give an independent decision or determination before delivering its preliminary determination. Concession of parties cannot confer jurisdiction on a Court. Suit barred in view of Section 70 of the Anti Dumping Act, 2015. Confidentiality issue to be considered by Appellate Forum. Information and database about prices of a product obtained from Customs Department, not confidential, unless otherwise barred by any statute or rule. Decisions of National Tariff Commission should not be resulting in creating directly or indirectly any monopoly or cartel of any business. Claim of confidentiality should be decided on the touchstone of Article 19A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and Freedom of Information Ordinance, 2002. Role of National Tariff Commission is very significant vis-a-vis CPEC. NTC to ensure that local industry is not destroyed. Time enlarged for filing Appeal before the Appellate Authority. Case referred to National Tariff Commission.
Citation:2018 PTD 668
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 02-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
1089) 6793/2021 Const. P. Pakistan Post Office C.H.S (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Jurisdiction: Remedy before Civil Court )
Tag Line:The court ruled that land title and possession disputes fall under civil court jurisdiction, not writ jurisdiction per Article 199 of the Constitution, referencing the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 and the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act 2010. The petition was dismissed due to unresolved factual disputes and blocked revenue entries.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1417
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 31-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.625-K/2024 Pakistan Post Office Employees Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
1090) 324/2024 H.C.A M/s. ARY Communication Limited (Appellant) V/S Federal Board of Revenue and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line: Section 227 of the ITO 2001; plaint rejected; Suit barred in law; Appeal dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 344
Advocates:Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Abid S. Zuberi & Ayan M. Memon Law Associates(FIRM-425-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 13-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
1091) 1261/2020 Const. P. Shamshad Ali and another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Amenity Plot
Tag Line:It is well-settled that conversion of an amenity plot into any other purpose is illegal and encroachment thereon cannot be allowed under any circumstances. This view is fortified by the following authorities of Honble Supreme Court and cases decided by learned Division Benches of this Court, laying down the principles regarding illegal conversion and use of amenity plots/public properties for other purposes, rights of public in respect of amenity plots/public properties and duties of authorities concerned for maintaining the status of amenity plots/public properties
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1408
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 14-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1092) 2549/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Luqman Khoso and another (Petitioner) V/S Syed Nazar Hussain Shah (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Inherent Powers of the Civil Court.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 69
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.884-K/2025 Hafiz Ahmed Din v. Sayed Nazar Hussain Shah (deceased) through his LRs Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
1093) 5812/2015 Const. P. Shahrukh Shakeel Khan and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.7-K/2017,C.P.950-K/2016,C.P.865-K/2016,C.A.13-K/2017 SCP Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
1094) 199/2015 S.M.A Sheikh Haroon Buksh S/o Shaikh Buksh Elahi (Plaintiff) V/S Shaikh Tahir Buksh & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Succession Act
Tag Line:Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)---
----Ss. 295 & 278---Chief Court (Sindh) Rules (OS), Chap. XXII, R.413---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XX, R.13 & S.114---Succession---Procedure in contentious cases---Decree in administration suit---Nature of order under S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925---Conversion of proceedings under Succession Act, 1925 to a suit of administration under O. XX, R.13, C.P.C.---Petitioner sought review of order passed by High Court under S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925, whereby in view of contentious nature of succession proceedings, application seeking issuance of letters of administration were converted into a civil suit--- Contention of applicant inter alia was that impugned order, which converted proceedings into suit for administration and stated that the preliminary decree be passed was contrary to law; and the suit should be regular suit and not a suit for administration---Validity---Impugned order identified the parties and identified as to who should be the plaintiff and defendant and mentioned that the suit would be in the form of a suit for administration of the properties of the deceased and therefore all ingredients of S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925 and O.XX, C.P.C. were fully adhered to---When parties were legal heirs of the deceased and were contesting with regard to share in property left by the deceased, in such situation any one of the legal heirs could file a suit for administration of properties or file an application under S.278 of the Succession Act, 1925 for grant of "letter of administration" and in terms of S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925 in the case where there was contention, then proceedings were supposed to be converted as nearly as they could be, into a "regular suit" according to provisions of the C.P.C.---Court in the impugned order exercised powers of a court of original civil jurisdiction and once an order was passed, the court also had power to take further steps to minimize delay in disposal of dispute and the court was under a statutory obligation to pass an order for preliminary decree---Use of the word "shall" in O.XX, R.13, C.P.C. was of mandatory nature, and the C.P.C. did not envisage any other form a suit except for a suit for administration of properties under O.XX, C.P.C.---No error on the face of record was found in the impugned order---Review application was rejected, in circumstances.
Citation:2017 PLD 563
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
1095) 1809/2024 Cr.Bail HASSAN ALAM S/O NOOR LAM & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1115
Advocates:Muhammad Umar(ADVO-23239-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
1096) 31/2019 M.A. Muhammad Yameen Qureshi (Appellant) V/S Arshad (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:In the light of decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee vs. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) and order passed by the learned Tribunal in the matter, I am of the considered view that the official respondents are under legal obligation to comply the directives of the Honourable Supreme Court passed in the cases of removal of illegal encroachment of amenity plots / public properties from its occupants
Citation:2021 CLC 19
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4146/2019 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi v. The Judge Anti Encroachment Tribunal, Hyderabad & others,C.A.228/2023 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi v. The Judge Anti Encroachment Tribunal, Hyderabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1097) 14/2007 II.A. Major Inayatullah (Appellant) V/S Major (rtd.) Muhammad Nazir (Respondent No.1) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Order XX, Rule 5, CPC and Order 41, Rule 31, CPC. Article 17(2) of Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 Failure of trial court to give findings on each issue separately ??A?A|.. non appreciation of fact by trial court that financial documents must be attested by the two witnesses ??A?A|Held: the sale agreement is not a financial document Appeal dismissed on the point of limitation as well as on merits. (Ashraf Yar Khan)
Mr. Justice Khawaja Naveed Ahmed
Order Date: 01-APR-08
Approved for Reporting
1098) 2076/2010 Const. P. Abdul Hameed Pathan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 29-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.38-K/2018 Abdul Hameed Pathan v. Fedeation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1099) 77/2008 M.A. Smithkline Beecham P.L.C. (Appellant) V/S The Registrar of Trade Marks and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 02-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
1100) 654/2011 Const. P. Sultanul Uloom (Petitioner) V/S Anis-ur-Rehman & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Point of reconstruction coupled with personal need. The petition is allowed, the impugned judgment of the learned appellate Court is set aside and the eviction order passed by the learned Rent Controller is restored.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 26-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
1101) 642/2003 Suit M/S.SILVER FLOUR MIOLLS. (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 YLR Note 258
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
1102) 697/2019 Cr.Bail Mumtaz Ali Mirani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 MLD 1841
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
1103) 3830/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Measum (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 702
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1475/2015 Collector of Customs and others v. Muhammad Measum,C.P.L.A.361-K/2014 Collector of Customs and others v. Muhammad Measum Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted & Notice to Respondents for 30.12.2015
1104) 172/2019 Suit Furqan & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Roshan Ara & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1566
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
1105) 4538/2016 Const. P. Riaz Ahmed Bhutto and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.428-K/2017 Riaz Ahmed and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1106) 817/2023 Const. P. Mrs. Naheed (Petitioner) V/S NBP and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2436
Advocates:Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-18219-SBC-KHE),Fahad Akbar(ADVO-23800-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Farhan(ADVO-14016-SBC-KHC),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4913/2025 National Bank of Pakistan, through President, Karachi and another v. Naheed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1107) 185/2017 Civil Revision Muhammad Yousuf (Applicant) V/S Masood Ahmed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1205
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
1108) 1224/2023 Const. P. Allah Dino & Others through Their Attorney (Petitioner) V/S Mst Qamar-u-Nisa & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 637
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
1109) 107/2011 Criminal Appeal Lal Bux @ Laloo Bangulani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Appeal (Accused acquitted under Section 345(6) Cr.P.C by Way of Compromise, In Murder Case. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 602
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1110) 2/2018 Adm. Suit HAYS TRADING & SHIPPING (Plaintiff) V/S M.V. MISKI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Admiralty
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
1111) 1357/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD HUMAYUN QADRI S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Applicant Muhammad Humayun Qadri has earlier been admitted to ad-interim pre-arrest bail by this Court vide order dated 14.7.2021. Now the matter is fixed for confirmation of pre-arrest bail or otherwise
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1297
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1112) 219/2017 H.C.A Karachi Metropolitan Corporationi & another (Appellant) V/S M/s. Zafar Memorial Education Society (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
1113) 7042/2018 Const. P. M/s Karachi Golf Club (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Doctrine of Mutuality.
Citation:2021 PTD Sindh 558, 2021 SBLR Sindh 2102, 2022 TAX 203
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.538-K/2021 The Province of Sindh & others v. M/s. Karachi Golf Club (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.4076/2022 The Province of Sindh & others v. M/s. Karachi Golf Club (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
1114) 304/2015 Cr.Appeal MUHAMMAD ASIM S/O MUHAMMAD RIAZ (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 06-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
1115) 1216/2016 Suit Jamshoro Joint Venture Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern Gas Co., Limited. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
1116) 183/2009 Suit Syed Ali Athar (Plaintiff) V/S City District Government Karachi & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
1117) 584/2021 Suit DEEPAK KUMAR & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 500
Advocates:Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
1118) 7/2016 Election Appeal Muhammad Ameen and another (Appellant) V/S Jawaid Ali and 5 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
1119) 23/2011 Adm. Suit Abdul Wahid (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 405
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
1120) 2925/2011 Const. P. Sardar Amin Farooqi and ors (Petitioner) V/S Director I & I FBR and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 08-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting
1121) 916/2018 Const. P. Sub-Engineer / Staff Welfare Association (Petitioner) V/S GOS & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
1122) 715/1996 Const. P. MST ANILA ABRAR (Petitioner) V/S GOVT. OF SINDH AND OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Citizenship Act, 1951
Tag Line:i-Section 10(2) of the Citizen Act gives a preferential treatment to
the spouse of Pakistani man vis-??-vis a Pakistani woman and thus
infringes constitutional guarantees
ii-The object is foreign spouses and not just foreign wives and thus
making of 10(2) and reading it now may vary with constitutional
demands. The intent of the said provision is not to encourage or facilitate women to marry Pakistani men. The concept which now
emerged through international jurisprudence is to enable Pakistanis
married to foreigners to be able to live together and acquire nationality
for their spouses and live a family life in Pakistan and the Act of 1951
should now be read and tamed accordingly. Restricting the benefit of
Section 10(2) to Pakistani men only is a clear discrimination to Pakistani
women.
45. The doctrine of reading in is used by Courts to extend the scope
to avoid and limit the discriminatory language having head-on conflict
with a constitutional provision. The doctrine of ???reading in??? involves
adding words to a statutory provision to bring it in conformity with
constitutional provisions.
iii- The application of "reading in" is required to cater section
10(2) of the Citizenship Act to save it from offending Article 25 of the
Constitution that is wherever reference is made to ???woman??? and ???she???
therein; the words "or man" and "or he" be read. This adjustment shall
not have any effect on the operability of the statute.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1135
Advocates:Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 05-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
1123) 40/2014 Spl.Cr.Bail THE STATE (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 10-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
1124) 3/2012 Civil Revision Adnan Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Capital Development Authority (Respondent)
Islamabad High Court, Islamabad
Accommodation Allocation Rules, 2002
Section 2 (b) (g) (e) and Section 15 (b) (1) (2) read with Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 Civil Procedure Code, 1908.--- Petitioner claiming entitlement of residence being successor in interest after retirement of his father.--- Validity.--- Post filled on daily wages work-charge basis or hired from contingencies or ad-hoc basis are excluded for allotment of the accommodation.--- After expiry of six months period of his fathers death, the petitioner becomes trespasser as per rule 2 (p).--- Civil revision application having no merits to succeed, as such dismissed.
(Paras 12, 13, 14, 15 & 17) A, B, C, D & E
Mr. Justice Noor-Ul-Haq N. Qureshi
Order Date: 31-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
1125) 707/2023 Const. P. Raja Rafique Ahmed Gilal (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Service matters (Repatriation)
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 481
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 19-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
1126) 424/2006 Suit MRS. SHAMIM BARLAS (Plaintiff) V/S AL HABIB CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY & ANOTHE (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Jurisdiction of Special Court for Cooperative Societies under the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020 and the application of Section 115 of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 917
Advocates:M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),Abdul Rauf Khan(ADVO-3788-SBC-KHI),Abdul Qadir Anwer(ADVO-5510-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ishaque @ Sathi M. Ishaq(ADVO-3650-SBC-KHW),Nadir Khan Burdi(ADVO-13227-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
1127) 2327/2021 Cr.Bail RIAZ AHMED DAHIRI S/O HAJI NOOR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:From the above discourse, primarily, the pre-arrest bail is extraordinary relief and can be granted only in exceptional circumstances, if there is mala fide of the complainant and police in lodging the FIR. Prima facie, there is no mala fide of the complainant to lodge the FIR of the incident against the applicant. Previous conviction of the applicant in a criminal case as discussed supra, disentitle him for extraordinary relief as provided under Section 498 Cr.P.C. Also, there is nothing placed on record by the applicant, which could show that the applicant has been acquitted from the aforesaid case by the learned appellate Court.
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 1826
Advocates:Siraj Ahmed Mangi(ADVO-21906-SBC-KHS),Nadeem Ahmed Mangi(ADVO-11894-SBC-KHI),Hazoor Bux(ADVO-1899-SBC-SUK),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.6-K/2022 Riaz Ahmed Dahri v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1128) 993/2016 Cr.Bail DR. ASIM HUSSAIN S/O TAJAMUL HUSSAIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PCr.LJ 631
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 11-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
1129) 752/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Akhtar Khan (Petitioner) V/S Registrar High Court of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 894
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
1130) 60/2014 First Appeal Against Order Arif Oasman (Appellant) V/S Habib Bnk Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
1131) 197/2020 Cr.Rev NOMAN S/O MUHAMMAD AKRAM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 175
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Ghulam Mustafa(ADVO-16267-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Shahid(ADVO-14140-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 15-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
1132) 1211/2023 Cr.Bail ALLAH DITTA S/O MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 667
Advocates:Farzana(ADVO-1221-SBC-LRK),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Raham Ali(ADVO-12316-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
1133) 7097/2018 Const. P. Sindh Petroleum & CNG Dealer Assoication and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 851
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
1134) 81/2011 I. A Province of Sindh and Others (Appellant) V/S Khairuddin and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 194
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.13-K/2023 Khairuddin& another v. Government of Sindh through Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1135) 3257/2010 Const. P. Hafiz Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) V/S Fed.of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Progressing further on the subject issue, we have noticed that the (Amendment) Act, 2016, and the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Shafique Ahmed Khan and others supra came on 21st January 2016, which clarified the status of NCAES Rules, 2011 of National Command Authority. Therefore, there is no further discussion on the aforesaid proposition required on our part. It is well settled that the Government and control organization fall within the ambit of "person" within the meaning of Article 199(1)(a)(ii) read with Article 199 (5) of the Constitution and if their actions or orders are violative of the statute creating those bodies or of rules/regulations framed under a statute, the same could be interfered with by the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. It is also well settled that when the service issues of the employees of such organizations/authorities are non-statutory then its enforcement has been restricted by the Supreme Court in the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company v Syed Salahuddin (2022 SCMR 991).
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 608
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.59-K/2011 Hafiz Muhammad Tariq v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.489-K/2025 Hafiz Muhammad Tariq v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed, Adjourned
1136) 1567/2022 Const. P. M/s Aziz Tabba Foundation (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:Contribution under the Employees Old Age Benefit Act 1976 (EOBI Act)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 564
Advocates:Faiz Mehmood Khan Durani(ADVO-4955-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Samia Alam Durrani(ADVO-4007HLC-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Muhammad(ADVO-15728-SBC-KHE),Ubedullah(ADVO-10657-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
1137) 239/2016 H.C.A Allah Dino Khaskheli (Appellant) V/S Zakir Mehmood & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A (reinstatement in service)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 999
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.14-K/2019 Allah Dino Khaskheli v. Zakir Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1138) 1217/2020 Const. P. D.G Khan Cement Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7))
Tag Line:In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 464
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
1139) 2695/2017 Const. P. Syed Muhammad S/o Muhammad Anwar (Petitioner) V/S Noorullah & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:-The petitioner while making such statement of alleged purchase has not realized the burden he took over. There is a marked difference in the probative value of entering into possession for the first time as tenant, and continuing in possession with claim of change in its nomenclature. Where occupant claiming his continuous possession as other than original character, it is expected that some trustworthy evidence in furtherance of his subsequently claimed character would be shown, failing whereof his admitted character would concur (Reliance2).
-This PT-1 was then followed by another PT-1, which is claimed by the respondent No.1. This PT-1 then followed by notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. While recovering taxes in terms of the gross annual rental value, as assessed by authority under ibid Act, constructive possession of the respondent No.1 had been identified and regulated. It may not constitute the ownership but it does authorize the one who was found in constructive possession, to regulate his possession as required under the law. This was thus a jura possession recognized by Sindh Urban Immovable Property Tax Act and rules framed thereunder of 1958. Thus having constructive jura possession with reference to property in question, an authoritative recognition in the shape of PT-1 was issued.
-This PT-1 would enable the respondent No.1 to deal with his possession as deem fit and proper under the law. It is not in dispute that respondent No.1 was and is responsible for payment of annual gross rental value and it is not in dispute that in terms of Section 14 of Sindh Urban Immovable Property Tax Act, 1958, the tax recoverable from any person on account of any building or land, if found in arrears, it shall be lawful for the proscribed authority to serve upon any person paying rent in respect of that building or land or any part thereof to the person from whom the arrears are due, a notice for the recovery of such taxes may be issued to the tenants or one from whom such taxes are required in terms of PT-1. It also enables the authority that if a person willfully fails or neglects to comply with the notice, the authority may after giving him an opportunity of being heard proceed against him as it could have proceeded under the provisions of this act against the defaulter of the tax.
-Thus, in my view this PT-1 authorizes respondent No.1 to deal with this property as deem fit and proper and a lawful notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was issued to the petitioner to apprise him about the current situation as to the change of PT-1 and authority of new landlord.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 460
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.573-K/2021 Syed Muhammad v. Noorullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of [ Four months time granted ]
1140) 173/2018 H.C.A Mst. Suriya Iqbal Chishti & others (Appellant) V/S Mst. Rubina Majidullah & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 211
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
1141) 3531/2020 Const. P. Faisal Manzoor Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 640
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
1142) 8152/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Shahzad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1143) 316/2019 I.T.R.A DR. IMDADULLAH MEMON (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
1144) 1244/2006 Const. P. Mustafa F. Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 04-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
1145) 2/2012 Cr.Ref Ali AKbar & 2 Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 16-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
1146) 1482/1998 Suit Abdul Wahid (Plaintiff) V/S Deedar Ali Issran (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Cancellation of Sale Deed)
Tag Line:Sale Deed registered in favour of defendants are valid documents and have been entered by the authorized Attorney (having registered sub-irrevocable general power of attorney which is in pursuance of earlier registered irrevocable general power of attorney given by the legal heirs to one of legal heirs) of the plaintiffs. Suit dismissed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 29-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
1147) 6377/2014 Const. P. Continental Biscuit Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Cantonments Act 1924
Tag Line:The case of the petitioner precisely is that respondent No.2 (Cantonment Board Hyderabad) under the Cantonment Act, 1924, does not have the authority or power to charge any advertisement fee.
Provisions of Cantonment Act 1924, Constitution of Pakistan 1973 were discussed.
Sections 60 to 63 of the Cantonment Act 1924, were examined and it was observed that Cantonment may levy tax but such a power has a precondition, however in the said provisions the word fee is not appearing. It was remarked that when a parent statue [the Governing Law] does not empower the levy of fee, then levy of such a fee through a delegated legislation in the shape of Bye laws is not permissible. Moreover, Section 282(23) of the Cantonment Act, 1924 only empowers the Board to frame bye-laws to regulate the items mentioned in the relevant statutory provision/enabling enactment and does not empower them to levy a fee.
It was further observed that the terms 'fee' and 'tax' are two distinct terms. Tax is a compulsory exaction of money by public authority for public purposes enforceable by law and is not payment for services rendered whereas fee may be generally defined to be a charge for a special service rendered to individuals by some governmental agency or a Local Council under the principle of quid pro quo.
It was opined that the imposition of advertisement fee by the respondents without adhering to the preconditions and without providing any corresponding service or facility and issuance of the recovery notices by the contractors were illegal and without jurisdiction. And the proceeding pending before the learned Cantonment Magistrate was quashed. The petition was accepted.
Citation:2017 PTD 1803, 2017 YLR 2155
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.279-K/2017 Cantonment Board Hyderabad, Sindh v. Continental Biscuits Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1148) 3150/2016 Const. P. M/s Jubilee Life Insurance (Petitioner) V/S V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 22-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.37-K/2018 M/s Jubilee Life Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
1149) 2337/2007 Const. P. Zahid Saeed (Petitioner) V/S CDGK & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 10-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
1150) 998/2019 Cr.Bail SARDAR SAMEER HUSSAIN S/O SARDAR AFSAR HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 17-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
1151) 303/2016 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Manzoor Elahi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 06-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
1152) 63/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. Hafeezullah alias Hafiz Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 04-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
1153) 163/2018 H.C.A Federation of Pakistan & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. Mehran Associates (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 124
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Fahmida Khanam(ADVO-7414-SBC-KHC),Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Ahmed Khan(ADVO-6852-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
1154) 1886/2006 Const. P. Iftikhar Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S C.D.G.K. &Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 27-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.166-K/2010 City District Govt. & others v. Iftikhar A.Soomro & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
1155) 1767/2014 Suit Abdul Sattar Shaikh. (Plaintiff) V/S Adeel Zahoor Malik & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Violation of proprietary right being a fundamental right should be remedied forthwith. Failure to examine both attesting witnesses of a Sale Agreement, which is a disputed document, is fatal to the case of Defendant, who is basing his claim on the Sale Agreement. Sufficient evidence is brought on record justifying grant of mesne profits. No Village / Goth can exist in a developed Scheme-36. The Passport entries and presumption of genuineness as envisaged in Articles-90, 92 and 129 (e) of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, is attracted. Hence, Plaintiff is entitled to mesne profits. The conclusive evidence about the wrongful / illegal possession of Defendants No.1 and 2 of the suit plot does not require an inquiry as mentioned in Order XX, Rule 12, Sub Rule 1 (b). Suit Decreed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1156) 276/2018 I.T.R.A DR. ZAFAR SAJJAD (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 959
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1281-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1487-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1095-K/2021,C.A.3928/2022,C.A.3789/2022,C.A.3622/2022 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted, Fix in Islamabad.,Disposed Leave Granted, Fix in Islamabad.,Disposed Leave Granted, Fix in Islamabad.,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1157) 204/2019 Cr.Rev ADEEL BAQAI S/O AJMAL HUSSAIN & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S HASSAN ASAD & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 827
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.110-K/2024 Adeel Baqai and another v. Hassan Asad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1158) 3/2016 II.A. Mian Hassanullah,thr: LRs. (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Sadiq and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 655
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1338-K/2023 Mian Hassanullah since deceased through his L.Rs. and another v. Abdul Razzak & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1159) 6218/2020 Const. P. Dr. Faraz Ahmed Wajidi (Petitioner) V/S Chancellor DOW University (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: The DOW University of Health Sciences Act, 2004 (Dow Employees (Service) Statute, 2007)
Tag Line:The caption petition has raised substantial questions of law involving interpretation of the certain provisions of
The DOW University of Health Sciences Act, 2004 (`Act-2004`) and the Dow Employees (Service) Statute, 2007, and the principles governing the Writ of Quo Warranto as well as the power of the syndicate/competent authority of respondent-University to make a contractual appointment under the Act-2004 as amended up-to-date and Service Statute 2007--In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee of respondent-university ought not to be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the competent authority, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess the candidature of a candidate for regular appointment or on contract basis, on case to case basis. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri v. Federation of Pakistan and others (2014 SCMR 157). In the instant case, prima-facie, the competent authority has assessed the candidature of the private respondents and appointed them in the respondent-university, which does not require interference at our end.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 716
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Fareeda Mangrio(ADVO-11275-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
1160) 5613/2021 Const. P. Aftab Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 833
Advocates:Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
1161) 90/2007 Const. P. Nizar Noor Ali & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Ameer Ali & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Order of eviction passed by the learned Rent Controller is restored.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 08-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
1162) 2305/2020 Const. P. Aisha Steel Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1616
Advocates:Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.2694/2020 K-Electric Limited thr. its Chief Executive Officer, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Energy & thr. Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others,C.A.1022/2020 K-Electric Limited thr. its Chief Executive Officer, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Energy & thr. Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted and be fixed on 4.12.2020 (Friday),Disposed Allowed
1163) 63/2018 First Appeal Against Order Asif Munawwar S/o Munawwar Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Bank Islami Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 885
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
1164) 183/2020 Const. P. Ali Bux Chohan & Another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line: Petitions seek execution and/or implementation of orders passed by the Anti-Encroachment
Tribunal, Sukkur. we have noticed with concern that the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal is passing orders and is disposing of the complaints apparently in a slipshod manner inasmuch as on the one hand, certain directions are given to carry out demarcation and survey of the property, only then an order for removal of the encroachment has to be passed. Both directions at the same time and final disposal of a complaint are unwarranted as it creates further complications. The above provision clearly provides that the Tribunal is the final authority to determine all disputes, whereas, it has to conclusively determine the rights of the parties to a dispute. In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of this case, both these Petitions are dismissed as not maintainable.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 1350
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 04-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
1165) 5333/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Umair & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Tag Line:It is a general principle of law that in the absence of statutory rules of service a writ petition, in service matters, ought not to be entertained
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 2250
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1166) 8633/2017 Const. P. Ghulam Ali Bhatia (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973. A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, has pronounced the judgment on 09.10.2020 in the case of Ghulam Ali Bhatia & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others (along with connected petitions), whereby, the petitioners have expressed their grievance against impugned amendment in SRO 583/2017 dated 01.07.2017, for being discriminatory, as according to petitioners, the concession and reduction in payment of duty and taxes to the Ship Breaking Industry in respect of re-rollable and re-meltable scrap is violative of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, whereas, a declaration has been sought to the effect that petitioners, who are the importers and manufacturers of re-rollable and re-meltable scrap, may be given the similar concession/reduction in tax liability as according to the petitioners, they fall within the same class of persons. The aforesaid petitions have been dismissed by the Divisional Bench of this Court while holding that petitioners, who are importers of re-rollable and re-meltable scrap are covered under PCT Heading 7204.4910, whereas, ship (vessel) imported by the Ship Breaking Industry are covered under PCT Heading 8909.0000, hence cannot be treated at par. It has been further held that through impugned amendment, reduction of tax liability has been granted as an incentive for the revival of ship breaking industry pursuant to policy decision, whereas, there seems no legal impropriety in the impugned amendment. No additional liability or burden has been created through impugned amendment, in violation of constitutional provisions or the law, therefore, the allegation of discrimination amongst the same class of person is otherwise misconceived. Reliance has been placed in the case of Messrs Elahi Cotton Mills Ltd. and others vs. Federation of Pakistan and others (PLD 1997 SC 582), wherein, it has been held as under:-
"(vi) That the tests of the vice of discrimination in a taxing law are less rigorous. If there is equality and uniformity within each group founded on intelligible differentia having a rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved by the law, the Constitutional mandate that a law should not be discriminatory is fulfilled."
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 309
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1482-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Ghulam Ali Bhatia Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1167) 138/2012 Cr.Appeal Mst Tabish (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
1168) 104/2001 Cr.Rev Muhammad Akram S/o Muhammad Salim (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 15-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
1169) 147/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Ahmed and another (Applicant) V/S Rehmat Ali deceased through his L.Rs. and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 305
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
1170) 2890/2020 Const. P. M/s Micro Innovations & Technologies Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 276
Advocates:M/S. AWAN LAW CHAMBERS(FIRM-299-SBC-KHI),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 12-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
1171) 692/2022 Const. P. Nawal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 420
Advocates:Muhammad Adnan Abdullah(ADVO-15915-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Wasiq Mirza(ADVO-13772-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Aaquib Rajpar(ADVO-7212-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
1172) 1928/2020 Const. P. Shahzad Sher Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Maintainability of Petition)
Tag Line:Where employment rules are non-statutory, the relationship of an employee and his employer is to be governed by the principle of master and servant.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 368
Advocates:Syed Khurram Nizam(ADVO-6426-SBC-KHI),Hasan Khurshid Hashmi(ADVO-11313-SBC-KHI),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
1173) 1465/2024 Const. P. National Accountability Bureau (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Request of the National Accountability Bureau for 25 % share amount of misappropriation recovered by NAB is denied.
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1166
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 18-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2022/2025 National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman, Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Communication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1174) 5/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Shahzad & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Confiscation of vehicle under Section 157(2) of the Customs Act, 1969.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 183
Advocates:Zia -ul- Hasan(ADVO-9389-SBC-KHI),Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Iqbal Masih Khurram (Iqbal M. Khurram)(ADVO-4370-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.690-K/2022 Shahzad v. The Collector of Customs & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1175) 1914/2015 Const. P. Wali Muhammad Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 205
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
1176) 84/2016 Const. P. Mst. Samina Pathan (Petitioner) V/S National Database and Registration Authority [NADRA] (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Dismissal from service in undue haste and in violation of statutory service rules, can be assailed in a writ jurisdiction.
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:Dismissal from service in undue haste and in violation of statutory service rules, can be assailed in a writ jurisdiction.
Citation:2018 PLC Lab. 36
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 17-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2857/2016 National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others v. Samina Pathan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted
1177) 5430/2020 Const. P. Imad Samad (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PTD 2063
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
1178) 4000/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Javed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (service general )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1179) 1150/2011 Suit Mr. Khalid Ansari (Plaintiff) V/S Independent Newspapers Corporation (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 11), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 2 R.2)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 15-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
1180) 341/2009 Suit SHIAKH KHALID SAFDAR (Plaintiff) V/S ALI HUSSAIN & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 441
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1181) 2249/2016 Suit Indus Motor Co., Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Audit of Taxpayers under Section 25 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 and Section 45 and 46 of the Federal Excise Act 2005.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
1182) 770/2021 Cr.Bail Mashooque Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Bail Matters (Pre arrest bail dismissed In Section 324, 506/2, 337-A (i), 337-F (ii), 3374- H (ii), 504 & 35 PPC.)
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1324
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
1183) 1501/2011 Const. P. Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed Govt. & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 13-JAN-16
Approved for Reporting
1184) 22/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Enforcement) (Applicant) V/S M/s. Ara Detergents & Chemicals FZE & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Scope of Tribunals power under section 194A Customs Act, 1969.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 464
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 26-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2051/2022 The Collector of Customs (Enforcement), Karachi v. M/s Ara Detergents & Chemicals FZE, Sharjah, UAE Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1185) 6131/2017 Const. P. Dr. Moomal and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Chairman SPSC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
1186) 18/2021 Judicial Companies Misc. N.P waterproof Industries Pvt ltd & others (Applicant) V/S N.P spinning Mills limited & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters
Tag Line:Though this is not in dispute but the arguments put forward by
learned counsel for petitioners is that by virtue of being a Muslim, shares
automatically devolve upon the legal heirs of deceased shareholder. This perhaps may be a case under Muhammaden Law where rights are being
acquired in respect of movable and immovable assets under general law,
but in case where an entity is created by a special law, it is to be dealt
with within that frame of special law. No provision of this special Act
would take away any of their right under the general law but it laid
down a procedure of its own because the entity is the creation of
company law. The successor who intends to take advantage of any of its
shareholding left by deceased has to go through a process prescribed by
company law and that is Section 78 of the Companies Act, 2017
Citation:2023 CLD 33
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),M/S. RIAA BARKER GILLETTE(FIRM-174-SBC-KHI),M/S. ISMAT LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-257-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
1187) 594/2010 Cr.Misc. M/s. Pirbhulal Goklani and Azizullah Shaikh, Advocates for the Applicant. (Applicant) V/S Syed Meeral Shah, D.P.G for the State. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
1188) 2865/2013 Const. P. Rashid Latif (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 27-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
1189) 88/2017 I. A Mohammad Shahid Murtaza (Appellant) V/S Warid Telcom Pvt Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 433
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
1190) 578/2025 Const. P. Fahad Junaid s/o Junaid Jalal (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:police cannot be bound to record FIR after obtaining permission from
the Court
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1965
Advocates:Ahsan Ali(ADVO-51450-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
1191) 184/2013 Civil Revision Syed Murshad Ali (Applicant) V/S Syed Amjad Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 31-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.174-K/2014 Syed Amjad Ali and another v. Syed Murshad Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1192) 293/2020 Cr.Bail Muhammad Yaseen (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 353
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 17-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
1193) 1409/2009 Const. P. Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) V/S The Collector of Customs (Preventive) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 25-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
1194) 908/2019 Const. P. Zahid Khan S/o Muhammad Matloob Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Razia Khatoon and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 05-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
1195) 234/2009 Cr.Misc. Kamran Ellahi (Applicant) V/S The State & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 18-AUG-10
Approved for Reporting
1196) 326/2017 Const. P. Azizullah Khan Afridi (Petitioner) V/S The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 170
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 29-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
1197) 1316/2000 Suit DR. ABDUL RASHID PARACHA (Plaintiff) V/S THE DEF. HOUSING AUTHORITY (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2153
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
1198) 5025/2020 Const. P. Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla (Petitioner) V/S Deputy Commissioner I.R and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973
A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad has pronounced the judgment on 22nd December 2020 in the case of Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla v. Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue and others (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the issuance of notice under Section 182(2) read with Section 116A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, enforcing penalty for not submitting returns regarding Foreign Income and Assets Statement. The plea of the petitioners was that the petitioners have already declared Foreign Income and Assets from all the sources in their wealth statement filed under Section 116 alongwith their return of total income for the Tax Year 2019 under Section 114 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, within the prescribed time limit, by availing e-filing facility via IRIS, whereas, such return was duly accepted, as no notice was issued to the petitioners by the Department in terms of Section 120(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, requiring the petitioners to furnish any short documents in this regard. It was further argued on behalf of the petitioners that omission in filing returns was neither deliberate nor it has any financial implications or involvement of payment of any taxes, etc. therefore, the penalty provisions of Section 182 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be invoked. Learned Divisional Bench of this Court by examining all the relevant provisions of law and case-laws has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: -
"13. In view of the foregoing discussions, we are of considered opinion that in the absence of prescribed format notified under Section 116A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, whereas, nothing has been concealed by petitioners, nor there is any consequence either on income or tax liability of petitioners for non-filing of Foreign Income & Assets Statement along with return of income for Tax Year 2019, the penal provisions of Section 182 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be invoked. Particularly, when respondents have failed to establish willful default or mens rea on the part of petitioners. We derive analogical guidance from the Non delegation Doctrine which is well established in jurisprudence and is attracted in the instant circumstances. Issuance of notices under section 182(2) cannot be validated, therefore, impugned notices having no support of lawful authority are hereby declared as illegal, hence, of no legal consequence. For these reasons, the petitions were allowed vide short order announced on 22.12.2020.
Citation:2021 PTD 335
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.742/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue AEOI, Karachi and others v. Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla,C.A.377/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue AEOI, Karachi and others v. Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,impugned judgment suspended,Disposed Disposed of
1199) 173/2020 Cr.Bail SAMIULLAH S/O MAHBOOB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 438
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
1200) 116/1998 Civil Revision Yousuf (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Anwar (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 203
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1201) 8679/2018 Const. P. Nawab Brothers Steel Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Payment of fixed sales tax under Rule 58H of Special Procedure Rules does not entitles a taxpayer to claim exemption of sales tax at import stage
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 397
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-20773-SBC-KHE),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
1202) 416/2019 Const. P. Majid Hussain Khokhar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:PCSIR
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 907
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.801-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Majid Hussain Khokhar,C.P.L.A.810-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Tariq Mateen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1203) 236/2009 H.C.A Member(LU) Board Revenue & Ors. (Appellant) V/S K.P.T. Officer Coop.Housing Socy & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (Article 172), Colonization of Government Land (Sindh) Act, 1912, Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:The compromise entered into between the parties is one
which is beyond mechanism and mandate which enabled the Government
of Sindh to have transferred the land in question and the learned single
Judge ought to have considered aforesaid aspects before allowing the
compromise application as prayed. I
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.2191/2013 The Trustees of Port of Karachi v. The Member (Land Utilization) BOR, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1204) 270/2012 Cr.Bail Mumtaz Ali Lashari (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail before arrest Granted In Section under Sections 379, 462-B, 462-C, 427, PPC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 16-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
1205) 6629/2018 Const. P. Imran Khan Sahito (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2008/2019 Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani v. Imran Khan Sahito & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
1206) 952/2018 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali Rajpar & Brothers (Petitioner) V/S POS & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 936
Advocates:Farhan Ul Hassan(ADVO-15556-SBC-KHI),Asst Attorney Gen(AsstAG),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan()
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 25-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3667/2019 Ghulam Ali v. Federation of Pakistan to be served thr. Secretary Interior Ministry, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1207) 440/2020 S.M.A Shamsuddin s/o Aboobakar (Petitioner) V/S Yasin Hasan (Deceased) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 704
Advocates:Saleem uz Zaman(ADVO-6427-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 12-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
1208) 1107/2014 Suit Work Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 01-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
1209) 1592/2010 Suit MST.SHAMIM AKHTER & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S MST.NAZAR BARI & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Territorial Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, not applicable retrospectively. Legal Heirs of pre-deceased son will not inherit. Suit not maintainable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1015
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
1210) 354/2016 H.C.A Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. Punjab Trading Agency (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Trading Corporation of Pakistan Matter
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 623
Advocates:M/S. KHALID DAWOOD POTA & CO.(FIRM-112-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Khalid Daudpota(ADVO-356-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS),Junaid Khalid Daudpota(ADVO-13056-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1211) 1675/2016 Suit Naved Alam Zubairi.. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 30-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
1212) 273/2019 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD USMAN S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 98
Advocates:Mujahid Ali Thebo(ADVO-14980-SBC-KHI),Dilber Ijaz(ADVO-10718-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Muhammad Naeem(ADVO-11341-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
1213) 46/2020 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD ANWER JOKHIO & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1755
Advocates:Ashiq Muhammad(ADVO-3498-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
1214) 862/2011 Suit PERVAIZ HUSSAIN & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S MIAN KHURRAM RASOOL (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The Defendant issues / has issued the cheques in favour of Plaintiffs, but the same upon presentation could not be encashed because of closure of account, then this conduct on the part of Defendant is a mala fide one and is done with a dishonest intention to defraud the Plaintiffs. Hence, suit is decreed.
Tag Line:The Defendant issues / has issued the cheques in favour of Plaintiffs, but the same upon presentation could not be encashed because of closure of account, then this conduct on the part of Defendant is a mala fide one and is done with a dishonest intention to defraud the Plaintiffs. Hence, suit is decreed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 19-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
1215) 1472/1998 Suit Abdul Qadir (Plaintiff) V/S Mr.Ameer Zadi& Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 16-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
1216) 1377/2024 Cr.Bail Ali Nawaz (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 19
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
1217) 123/2008 Spl.H.C.A Kalb-e-Haider & Co Pvt Limited (Appellant) V/S National Bank of Pakistan & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLD 183
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 10-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.191-K/2015 National Bank of Pakistan and another v. M/s Kalb-e-Haider & Company Pvt. Ltd.,C.A.39-K/2016 Kalb-e-Haider Company (Pvt) Ltd. v. National Bank of Pakistan and another,C.M.A.735-K/2018 Kalb-e-Haider Company (Pvt) Ltd. v. National Bank of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Allowed - Relist Civil Appeal after Eid-ul-Adha 2018.
1218) 7382/2019 Const. P. Akhtar Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:issuance of offer/appointment orders to the post of Gavi Vaccinators (BPS-6) in the Health Department on the plea that they have already been declared successful candidates based on marks they obtained in the competitive process --i) Whether the recruitment process for the post of vaccinator (BPS-6) was flawed under the law?
ii) Whether the Selection Committee was lawfully constituted; and, the Provincial Minister was competent to reduce the passing marks and facilitate private respondents/beneficiaries for appointment to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)?
iii) Whether some of the private respondents/beneficiaries on the recommendation of the two-member Selection Committee were lawfully appointed as vaccinators in BPS-6?
iv) Whether the petitioners can claim a right to be appointed through the two-member Selection Committee to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)?--
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 177
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3111/2021 Ghayasuddin Shahani and others v. Akhtar Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1219) 198/2011 I.T.R.A Pakistan Mercantile Exchange (Applicant) V/S Comm, Inland Revenue Zon-1 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PTD 1463, 2020 TAX 436
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1220) 735/2001 Suit KPT Officers Cooperative Housing Society Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Government of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1221) 3804/2020 Const. P. Dr. Abdul Karim Channa (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:7. The question involved in the present proceedings is whether Temporary and officiating service rendered by the petitioner on retenairship as Medical Officer with effect from 1992 till his purported regularization firstly in 2008 and secondly in 2012 shall count for pension.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 729
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 31-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1006/2022 Civil Aviation Authority, through Director General CAA, Karachi and another v. Dr. Abdul Karim Channa and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
1222) 304/2010 I.T.R.A Commissioner (Legal) (Applicant) V/S M/s E.N, I Pakistan (M) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 20-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
1223) 210/2019 Const. P. Atam Mal (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1224) 533/2016 Suit Zain Khan. (Plaintiff) V/S Taj Roshan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
1225) 30/2019 Cr.J.A Duro @ Dur Muhammad Tart Jatoi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 462
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.508/2020 Duro @ Dur Mohammad v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1226) 4377/2012 Const. P. Dr. Itrat Malik (Petitioner) V/S State Life Insurance Co-opration & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Dismissal-Termination)
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 1861
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2849/2018 State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Dr. Itrat Malik Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1227) 1498/2015 Suit Feroze Sajan & others (Plaintiff) V/S Farzana Sajan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh Note 88
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
1228) 461/2011 Cr.Bail Muhammad Arshad (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 18-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
1229) 176/2017 Civil Revision Raja Khan (Applicant) V/S Shah Nawaz & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1230) 1/2019 I. A M/s. Moin and Sons Electronics (Appellant) V/S M/s. SME Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1418
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3495/2020 M/s Moin & Sons Electronics, Karachi v. SME Bank Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1231) 2652/2017 Suit Al-Hassan Tech E Eng SVC (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act 1940 - Award)
Citation:2021 CLC Note 666
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
1232) 1/2018 E.P Nida Khuhro (Petitioner) V/S Moazam Ali Khan Abbasi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Election Matters
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.188/2019 Nida Khuhro v. Moazzam Ali Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed
1233) 4900/2014 Const. P. M/s Ahsan and Co. (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
1234) 1878/2018 Suit Abdul Qudus Alvi. (Plaintiff) V/S The Ned University of Eng. & Tec. & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1235) 1192/2022 Suit ZIAUDDIN AHMED & CO. (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S KARACHI SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING WORKS LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bank guarantee. Rule of non-interference and the rule of strict compliance.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 537
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1236) 3491/2013 Const. P. Lal Badshah And Ors (Petitioner) V/S Chairman K.P.T And Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Cost of Living Allowance (CLA) )
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1231
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.211-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.P.L.A.212-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.A.46-K/2022 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of
1237) 28/2010 Cr.Bail Adeel (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail Granted In Police Encounter , In Effective firing U/S 324,353 PPC.)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
1238) 95/2023 Criminal Appeal FAHEEM S/O RAHEEM BUX (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 672
Advocates:Abdul Qudoos(ADVO-1878-SBC-LRK),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Wazeer Hussain Khoso(ADVO-7864-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
1239) 328/2018 H.C.A Farrukh Afzal Munif (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Afzal Munif & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 97
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
1240) 4425/2021 Const. P. M/s Medisure Laboratories Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 563
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Mamoon Nawaz Chaudhry(ADVO-11348-SBC-KHE),Muhabbat Hussain Awan(ADVO-13542-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
1241) 233/2019 II.A. Muhammad Asghar S/o Allah Ditta (Appellant) V/S Mst. Tahira Parveen and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Forged document (Partnership deed)
Tag Line:I would not hesitate that preparation of forged document itself is an offence but production thereof in Court proceedings with a view to prejudice the right and entitlement of a rightful person makes the act rather grave hence the Courts must take appropriate actions whenever such act surfaces because such actions not only result in delaying the object of timely justice but also encouraging such ill actions.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1423
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.741/2021 Muhammad Asghar v. Mst. Tahira Parveen and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
1242) 972/2005 Suit DR. HASAN FATIMA JAFERY & ORS (Appellant) V/S ROYAL SAUDI CONSULATE KARACHI & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
With the passage of time, the principle governing immunity has undergone a change. National Courts in different jurisdictions, specially where there exists constitutional dispensation, have generally narrowed down the scope of immunity, whether constitutional, diplomatic or any other type of immunity. One of the reasons for adopting such view, while interpreting the law or clauses relating to immunity is that the concept of immunity is to be balanced with the accountability and those rights guaranteed as fundamental and human rights.
Topic: The State Immunity Ordinance, 1981, Diplomatic and Consular Privileges Act, 1972
Tag Line:With the passage of time, the principle governing immunity has undergone a change. National Courts in different jurisdictions, specially where there exists constitutional dispensation, have generally narrowed down the scope of immunity, whether constitutional, diplomatic or any other type of immunity. One of the reasons for adopting such view, while interpreting the law or clauses relating to immunity is that the concept of immunity is to be balanced with the accountability and those rights guaranteed as fundamental and human rights.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
1243) 558/2018 Suit Abdul Majid & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mrs. Nida Irfan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 05-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
1244) 47/1997 Civil Revision Shabbir Khan & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Haji Abdul Latif Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Civil Revision, Case remanded. )
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----Ss. 151, 96, 10 & 11 & O. XLI, R. 27---Appeal---Inherent powers under S.151, C.P.C. exercised by the Appellate Court---Scope---Respondent moved an application under S.151, C.P.C. claiming res judicata against the suit---Appellate Court remanded the case while exercising powers under S.151, C.P.C.---Validity---Respondent raised a factual issue before the Appellate Court through application under S.151, C.P.C. which was not raised before the Trial Court---Powers of civil court under S.151, C.P.C. had certain restrictions in application of the same could not be equated with the powers of a court of original civil jurisdiction---Provisions of Civil Procedure Code which empowered courts of original civil jurisdiction while dealing with civil suits like provisions of Ss.10 & 11, C.P.C. were not available to the appellate court while exercising authority in terms of S.96, C.P.C.---Appellate Court had not given reference to the findings of the Trial Court while deciding the appeal and had exercised the powers of a court of original civil jurisdiction which were not vested in it---Exercise of power under S.151, C.P.C. by the Appellate Court was improper and uncalled for---Trial Court had not discussed the issue of res judicata in its judgment---Issue which was not taken up and decided by the Trial Court was not supposed to be examined by the Appellate Court---Issue of res judicata ought to have been raised first before the Trial Court for its decision and not at the appellate stage for the first time--Question of res judicata was a question of fact and parties had to first allege it and then prove it through evidence---Appellate Court was not supposed to examine a new/fresh defence (plea of res judicata) at appellate stage---If appeal was time barred then Appellate Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the same and remand the suit---Appellate Court had exercised the jurisdiction not vested in it---Impugned judgment and decree were set aside and appeal was remanded for decision afresh---Appellate Court was directed to first examine the question of limitation for filing the appeal before proceeding further in the matter---Revision was disposed of in circumstances.
(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----S. 11---Res judicata---Power of appellate Court---Scope---Question of res judicata was a question of fact and parties had to first allege it and then prove it through evidence---Appellate Court was not supposed to examine a new/fresh defence (plea of res judicata) at appellate stage.
(c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----S. 151---Inherent power---Scope---Civil court was not supposed to resort to the inherent powers in presence of a specific provision available in C.P.C. to deal with a particular situation.
(d) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----S. 115---Revisional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---High Court had suo motu power to examine the correctness, legality and propriety of an order passed by the subordinate court at any time and if subordinate court had improperly exercised its jurisdiction and/ or exercised jurisdiction not vested in it then High Court could set aside the said order.
Citation:2016 CLC 1790
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 29-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
1245) 1171/2011 Suit ZULFIQAR SHAKOOR (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. QUETTA TOWN CO-OPY (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 31-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
1246) 1372/2018 Const. P. Indus Motors Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 25D)
Tag Line:Transactional value of Goods; addition of Royalty in such Value under Section 25(2) (d) & (e) of the Customs Act 1969 ; HELD; No
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1074
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1255-K/2023 The Chief Collector of Customs, (South) and another v. M/s Indus Motor Company Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1247) 6084/2017 Const. P. Reliance Petrochem Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 1
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 30-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1248) 1222/2013 Suit Forte Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:-The contract in question contains specific terms in relation to any
default of the plaintiff including but not limited to late delivery of the
goods. It is also an admitted fact that on account of late deliveries of
certain goods, in pursuance of such clauses relating to late deliveries the
defendant No.1 had already deducted liquidated damages from the
subject bills/invoice. Hence, once such late delivery charges have been
recovered/deducted, the encashment of subject guarantee in relation to
same issue is a debatable issue. It amounts to collecting liquidated
damages twice over the same alleged default and can be termed as
vexing the plaintiff twice which is also hit by Section 74 of the Contract
Act. Therefore, any attempt to collect further amount on the basis of
same default would tantamount to be in violation of Section 74 of the
Contract Act which prima facie prohibits compensation/penalty in excess
of any amount stipulated in the contract itself.
--Insofar as second contention, which relates to complying with the
terms and conditions of new obligations of the documents dated
09.10.2012 and performance guarantee dated 21.12.2010 is concerned,
it only covers the obligation as contained in the purchase order dated
08.12.2010 and 13.12.2010 and any other subsequent amendment,
novation, additional obligation, that may arise in relation to the project
shall not be covered by the terms thereof. The ultimate paragraph of
this performance guarantee is in support of above observation. Such
recourse is deducible out of section 128 of the Contract Act, which
allows the guarantee obligation to be limited by way of contract.
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 1735
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
1249) 259/2019 H.C.A M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Entry 105 to the 6th Schedule to the Sales Tax Act 1990), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XLI Rule 31 )
Tag Line:Interpretation of fiscal exemptions.
--Entry 105 extends a benefit in respect of raw materials for the basic
manufacture of pharmaceutical active ingredients and for manufacture of
pharmaceutical products. The claim of the appellants / petitioners admittedly does not
fall into the prior category and no case has been set forth before us to interfere in the
findings of the learned Single Judge, whereby it has been determined that the said
claim did not fall within the latter category either. It is observed that while there appears
to be no cavil to consider packaging / packing material chargeable to tax per the Act,
no case has been made out to consider exemption for the same within the parlance
of Entry 105.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 407
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.550/2022 M/s Getz Pharma (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1250) 204/2015 Criminal Appeal AIJAZ NAWAZ @ BABA S/O SARFRAZ NAWAZ (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 25-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.301/2019 Aijaz Nawaz @ Baba v. The State,Crl.A.65/2023 Aijaz Nawaz @ Baba v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1251) 459/2006 I.T.R.A First Women Bank Ltd (Applicant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 10-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
1252) 3930/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Service Regulations
Tag Line:The pivotal question involved in the listed application is whether Civil / Government / public servant is entitled to have the protection of the previous service rendered as Adhoc temporary/contingent basis in the organization for fixation and counting of the previous service for pension.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 772
Advocates:Moula Bux Khatian(ADVO-13552-SBC-KHI),Bashir Ahmed(ADVO-14353-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Tanveer Aftab(ADVO-17883-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.77/2022 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another,C.P.L.A.5919/2021 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1253) 183/2019 Const. P. Sindh Petroleum & CNG Dealers Association & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Unadjudicated recovery of default surcharge via a third party.
Citation:2021 PTD 713
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.521-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Sindh Petroleum & CNG Dealers Association & others,C.A.742/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Karachi v. Sindh Petroleum & CNG Dealers Association & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1254) 4954/2022 Const. P. Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaaf (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 577
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
1255) 73/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Ghulam Safdar Brohi (Applicant) V/S Mukhtiar Ali Chandio & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Suit for malicious prosecution where acquittal on benefit of doubt.
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 1192
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
1256) 402/2007 Suit Yousuf Dada (Plaintiff) V/S M.C.B.Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Shahid Anwar Bajwa(ADVO-3644-SBC-KHI),Umar Hayat Sandhu(ADVO-2841-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
1257) 74/2024 Const. P. Tarique Mubeen Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 487
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1258) 171/2018 H.C.A Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4612/2018 Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islamabad & others,C.P.518-K/2019 Mst: Sajida Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.883/2020 Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islambad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1259) 275/2019 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S SIEMENS PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 755
Advocates:Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.23-K/2021 Commissiner Inland Revenue Legal v. M/s. Siemens Pakistan Engineering Company Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1260) 1353/2012 Const. P. Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Mst.Zeenat Ismail & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
1261) 67/2010 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s United Exports Company V/S Regional Tx office through CommissionerEnforcement (Applicant) V/S M/s United Exports Company V/S Regional Tx office through CommissionerEnforcement (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 15-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
1262) 10/2023 Cr.J.A Muhammad Irfan Saeed Rajput (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 304
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
1263) 866/2017 Suit Hajj Organizaers Association of Pakistan & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 MLD 1616
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
1264) 43/2016 M.A. M/s. Idara-e-Noor-e-Haq through Sec. (Appellant) V/S Public at Large (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)---
----Ss. 272, 269, 299, 300 & 384---Appeal---Probate, grant of---Ownerless property---Application for grant of probate under S.272 Succession Act, 1925, was filed by appellant but Trial Court dismissed the application---Validity---Once it was found that none was available to claim ownership of immovable property in question in his own right or by way of inheritance, such property should be treated as an ownerless property---Once Court was satisfied that the property was rendered ownerless, it was the duty of Court to protect it from being misappropriated or wasted or damaged---Court could appoint Curator under S.195 of Succession Act, 1925, to takeover possession of the property pending final determination of fate of proceedings---Court could have also taken prompt action under S.269 of Succession Act, 1925, for protection of such property---Jurisdiction of High Court under S.300 of Succession Act, 1925, was concurrent with District Judge in exercise of power under Succession Act, 1925---High Court appointed its official as a Curator to protect the property in question and directed him to take over the possession immediately---High Court declined to interfere in the order passed by Trial Court---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
1993 CLC 1552 ref.
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh Note 563
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
1265) 5812/2015 Const. P. Shahrukh Shakeel Khan and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:School Fees Judgement
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 07-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.7-K/2017,C.P.950-K/2016,C.P.865-K/2016,C.A.13-K/2017 SCP Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
1266) 139/2017 Const. P. Nadeem Zuberi (Petitioner) V/S C.A.A (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service
Citation:2023 PLC (CS) 1133
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1156/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi,C.A.445/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Dismissed
1267) 5635/2022 Const. P. Habib ur Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Article 474 (b) of Civil Service Regulations)
Tag Line:The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1008
Advocates:Bashir Ahmed(ADVO-14353-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2126/2023 Trustees of the Karachi Port, through its Board of Trustees, KPT, Karachi v. Mazhar Ali Jatoi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned.to be fixed before 3 member bench
1268) 1054/2018 Const. P. Ishrat Ali Lohar (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD 47, 2018 SBLR 1367
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 23-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
1269) 4485/2020 Const. P. Ashfaq Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the major penalty of removal from service--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 465
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
1270) 102/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Muhammad Sharif (Prop. of M/s.MSN Enterprises,Kar) (Applicant) V/S The Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-III, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Discrepancy in Income Tax and Sales Tax Return; must be reconciled by taxpayer
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 233
Advocates:Furqan Mohiuddin Ansari(ADVO-17092-SBC-KHE),Shams Mohiuddin Ansari(ADVO-9489-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 06-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.905-K/2024 Muhammad Sharif v. The Commissioner Inland Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1271) 618/2025 Cr.Bail Asad Ali S/o Yousuf Hussain (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 708, 2025 SHC KHI 709
Advocates:Syed Qaim Ali Shah(ADVO-18879-SBC-KHS),Aijaz Hyder(ADVO-22207-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
1272) 8569/2018 Const. P. International Brands Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Inter-corporate dividends
Citation:2024 PTD 49
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2087/2023 International Brands Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Revenue Ex Officio Chairman FBR Constitutional Avenue, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
1273) 1512/2009 Suit MOBIN RAFIQUE & OTHER (Plaintiff) V/S RASHID AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The reasons that I have highlighted the occasions and circumstances ibid where a Receiver could be appointed is because I have gone through the entire affidavit filed in support of the application for appointment of Receiver and in none of the paragraphs the apprehension that the property would be wasted or it is in danger of being wasted was shown. The affidavit discloses that both the business concerns were in control, custody and possession of the defendants No.1 to 3 since the death of father i.e. 2005. It is also mentioned that the profits and income received from these business concerns were being collected and consumed and retained by defendants No.1 to 3 without sharing the same with the plaintiffs or other legal heirs. It has also been disclosed that the defendants are trying to sell the property in question, of course they mean the movable property (as immovable property is on rent) and they urged that they are entitled for their share out of the business income. However, they have not disclosed a single ground whereby this Court could exercise and invoke powers to appoint Receiver. Admittedly the business was being run by defendants No.1, 2 and 3 since 2005 and for reasons mentioned above it is sufficient to hold that the solvent grounds which could attract the provisions of Order XL rule 1 CPC are not available though apparently it seems that the plaintiffs rights and interests as far as their share in the business is concerned is being denied but certainly this alone is not sufficient to invoke the powers under Order XL rule 1 CPC which is a very harsh remedy which is to be used sparingly. The plaintiffs here alleges only exclusion and not waste or malversation. Even apprehension of mismanagement or misappropriation alone would not be sufficient to call for appointment of a Receiver, which is not the case of the plaintiffs
Citation:2012 PLD Sindh 449, 2012 SBLR 1411
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting
1274) 1315/2006 Suit MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 23-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
1275) 304/2020 Suit Husein Industries Ltd (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. A bank guarantee is an independent contract between the surety (bank) and the creditor (beneficiary of the guarantee), and as such the bank guarantee is to be construed on its own terms independent of the underlying contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, and irrespective of claims pending interse the creditor and principal debtor. Rel: National Construction Ltd. v. Aiwan-e-Iqbal Authority (PLD 1994 SC 311); and Shipyard K. Damen International v. Karachi Shipyard & Engineering Works Ltd. (PLD 2003 SC 191).
2. Mobilization Guarantees are generally not subject to a restraining order even if there is a dispute between the parties to the underlying contract. However, in cases of guarantees other than Mobilization Guarantees, the Court have granted or refused injunction to restrain encashment depending upon the literal words used in the guarantee. Rel: National Grid Company v. Government of Pakistan (1999 SCMR 2367); and Shipyard K. Damen International ibid.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1285
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
1276) 2431/2017 Suit M/s. Deluxe Interiors (Plaintiff) V/S The Sindh Industrial Estates (SITE) and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 YLR 2091, 2018 SBLR 1310
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 19-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1277) 144/2014 Civil Revision Mst. Parveen Raza Jadun through her legal heirs (Applicant) V/S Bashir Ahmed Chandio and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
(i). In direct benami claim requires a higher standard of proof; (ii) every transaction between family members cannot be recognized as benami; (iii). Claimant not challenged the purchase of property by father in favour of his son, during the life time of the father, then claim of Plaintiff (sister) is meritless.
Tag Line:(i). In direct benami claim requires a higher standard of proof; (ii) every transaction between family members cannot be recognized as benami; (iii). Claimant not challenged the purchase of property by father in favour of his son, during the life time of the father, then claim of Plaintiff (sister) is meritless.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 12-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
1278) 1126/2013 Cr.Bail ASIM RIZWAN S/O YOUNUS RIZWAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 SBLR Sindh 785
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 10-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
1279) 91/2017 Cr.J.A Sikander Ali Lashari (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 11-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1280) 26/2024 M.A. Shreemati Sarswati Devi Wd/o Khemchand (Late) (Appellant) V/S Public at Large and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 374
Advocates:Javed Ahmed Qazi(ADVO-13711-SBC-KHI),Anand Kumar(ADVO-8271-SBC-KHI),Sadaf Gul Memon(ADVO-16750-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
1281) 648/2020 Suit Muhammad Idrees Abbasi (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Akbar Khan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12(2))
Tag Line:Section 12(2) CPC provides a bar where plaintiff is precluded by
rule from instituting a further suit in respect of any particular cause
of action and shall not be entitled to institute a suit in respect of
such cause of action in any court to which this code applies.
Citation:2022 CLC 1322
Advocates:Sher Ali Rizvi(ADVO-2829-SBC-KHI),Gul Muhammad Khaskheli(ADVO-75-SBC-MTY)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
1282) 34/2012 Cr.Rev Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) V/S Sageer Ahmed and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Revision (acquitted the appellants from all the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 08-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
1283) 479/2023 Const. P. Akifowa and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Electricity Act, 1910
Tag Line:Petition against determination of NEPRA in respect of Electricity dues and other charges not maintainable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 688
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 11-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1284) 888/2021 Const. P. Prof: Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Government of Sindh is directed to expedite the process by ensuring reconstituting of Search Committee within two months from the receipt of this order and shall also complete the process of interview of all the candidates afresh for the appointment for the post of Vice-Chancellor, University of Karachi, at the earliest. Meanwhile, the Search Committee (after reconstitution) shall send the copies of the original academic certificates/degrees/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents to the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for verification. The Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is directed to look into the academic qualification certificates/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents and after ascertaining genuineness or otherwise submit the report to the Search Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh in a sealed envelope within one month for further proceedings.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 445
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.392-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Universities & Boards Department Government of Sindh & another v. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1285) 284/2018 H.C.A Famous Brands (Private) Limited (Appellant) V/S Samsonite IP Holdings S.A.R.L & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), TRADE MARK
Tag Line:By moving an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant does not surrender to the jurisdiction of the Court. The jurisdiction is conferred by law based on facts. A litigant may be right or wrong in asserting that the Court had no jurisdiction or that the suit is barred by law. But, this act of litigant would neither confer and/or bestow nor take away any jurisdiction which in fact is conferred by law. Actions of parties prior to litigation leads to constitution of a cause to initiate proceedings in Court of competent jurisdiction.
- If the two applications were not moved simultaneously and would have been filed one after the other, will a litigant still be debarred from filing the other application such as Order VII Rule 10 CPC.A simple answer to this proposition is No as rejection of plaint has its own reasons whereas return of plaint has its own. In an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant has only to show that it does not disclose a cause of action; the relief claimed is undervalued or is not properly valued and that the suit appears to be barred by law. None of these rational is available while entertaining an application under order VII rule 10 CPC, which is for return of plaint on numerous counts including but not limited to pecuniary jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction. Courts when plaint is presented are required to see whether they are bestowed with pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction whereas under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Courts are required to see whether it is barred by law. The Court had to apply law to decide the issue of jurisdiction; it is the law that confers or takes away the jurisdiction of the Court and not based on moving of application under the aforesaid provision of law. Another proposition is that while entertaining and hearing application under order VII rule 11 CPC Court is empowered to return the plaint if the circumstances so warrants as required under the law.
-Section 86(3) of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001 provides that owner of the trademark which is entitled to protection under the Paris Convention as a well-known trademark shall be entitled to restrain by injunction the use in Pakistan of a trademark which, or the essential part of which, is identical or deceptively similar to the well-known trademark in relation to identical or similar goods or services, where the use is likely to cause confusion or where such use cause dilution of the distinctive quality of the well-known trademark.
- At the very outset there is nothing in the instant case which could attract Section 81 of Trademark Ordinance, 2001. The proprietor of the mark never gave up their right or it has not been demonstrated that for continuous period of five years from the date of alleged registration (in favour of user) in the use of registered mark in Pakistan, the proprietor was aware of it and that the proprietor ceased to be entitled on the basis of that earlier trademark or other rights. The engagement of the appellant with the respondent itself is enough to understand that there was no case of acquiescence at all. In fact the appellant conceded when they assumed the role of a distributor.
-The appellate Court normally avoid interfering in the orders of the interlocutory nature involving exercise of discretion as the appellate Court cannot substitute its own discretion unless when the discretion has been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, perversely or where the Court has ignored certain principles regulating grant or refusal of injunction. The appellate Court is not required to reassess the material to reach a conclusion different from the one reached by the trial Court/learned Single Judge on the consideration that another view is possible.
Citation:2021 CLD 1008
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 19-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4034/2021 Famous Brands (Private) Limited, Lahore v. Samsonite IP Holdings S.a.r.l., Luxembourg through its Attorney Abdul Rasheed, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1286) 5282/2021 Const. P. Maqsood Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The Sect: College Education Dept: and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 375
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
1287) 385/2016 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S MEHMOOD TRADERS KHI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 548
Advocates:Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
1288) 1317/2014 Const. P. Farida Azam Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Section 64-A of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925.
The proceedings of Arbitration and that of the Appellate forum, under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, are to be executed as a decree of Civil Court, hence, the same cannot be overturned or interfered with by exercising administrative revisional jurisdiction, under Section 64-A of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, by the Provincial Government.
Proceeding declared coram non judice and impugned Order quashed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 229
Advocates:Khalid Rahim(ADVO-9042-SBC-KHE),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Rajendar Kumar(ADVO-9912-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
1289) 279/2015 Const. P. Kamran Bhutto (Petitioner) V/S Mst Farsa Manzoor & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Family matter (Khulla Granted, Dower articles is right of wife to back . Judgment upheld . CP dismissed. )
Citation:2018 CLC 84
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 20-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1290) 240/1971 Suit AMIR ALI (Plaintiff) V/S GUL SHAKER & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Administration Suits (Property left by Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Fatima Jinnah and Shireen Jinnah)
Tag Line:Report has been furnished by the Nazir today which shows that a total sum of Rs. 73,32,51,903/- is available with the Nazir. A proposal is made that these sums be used as seed funds by the new Trust for building Girls Medical College/Hospital at the said premises. Learned AAG states that the Government of Sindh would like to participate in such a noble initiative and he has no objection if the property be used solely for the purpose of construction of building and operation of Medical College/Hospital exclusively for girls with residential facilities therein, with regard to the sums deposited by the Provincial Government, learned AAG seeks time to get a nod from the concerned authority as if this fund could be used as token of good gesture or whether Sindh Government wishes these sums to be returned.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
1291) 1083/2019 Cr.Bail ARIF BALOCH S/O YAR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Plea of alibi can be considered at the stage of bail. Rel: Zaigham Ashraf v. The State (2016 SCMR 18).
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
1292) 51/2007 I. A S.Muhammad Ali Jafri (Appellant) V/S Habib Bank Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khilji Arif Hussain
Order Date: 15-APR-09
Approved for Reporting
1293) 2/2015 J.M Province of Sindh & Others (Applicant) V/S Bilqees & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 1920
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 09-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
1294) 14/2021 Conf.Case REF. MADE BY SPL. COURT II CNS KARACHI (Appellant) V/S NAEEM AKHTAR @ ALI HAIDER & 2 ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 ((No legal bar or restriction has been imposed to consider statement of official witnesses))
Tag Line:No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained unshattered during the cross-examination. Even otherwise, the provision of Section 25 of the CNS Act has provided the exclusion of Section 103 Cr.P.C. during recovery proceedings.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 387
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1295) 53/2013 I. A Meezan Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Mrs Parveen Sabir & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 1806
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 13-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.595-K/2015 M/s Meezan Bank Ltd. v. Mrs. Parveen Sabir and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1296) 15/2012 H.C.A Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S Adnan Faisal & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 235, 2019 CLD 242
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
1297) 586/2024 Cr.Bail Jongal Khan @ Babal Korejo and Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Case calling for further inquiry, pre-arrest bail granted
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 525
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
1298) 39/2007 Civil Revision Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 22-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
1299) 974/2014 Const. P. Haji Gul Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 07-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
1300) 51/2012 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue (Applicant) V/S MCR (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 13-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
1301) 1642/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf and another (Petitioner) V/S Faisal Cantonment Board and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 08-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
1302) 363/2016 Const. P. Orangzeb Samo (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
1303) 449/2007 Const. P. Mst. Dadli (Petitioner) V/S The Federation of Pakistan and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 27-OCT-10
Approved for Reporting
1304) 3/2018 E.P Saifullah Abro (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:ection 55(3) of the RoPA, 1976 to the extent of verification and signing of the schedule or annexure is peri materia to Section 144(4) of the Elections Act, 2017, however, this relevant provision is to be adjudged and tested along with the rules framed under the Elections Act, 2017. Previously, there were no such rules except (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1977 which catered the process of election (pre-election process). Rule 140 offers that every petition shall be processed by the Tribunal and in case the petition is found deficient of laid down procedure, the petitioner shall be informed accordingly, indicating the deficiency/ies in the petition, directing him to fulfill the same within seven (07) days of the receipt of communication from the Tribunal, failing which the petition is liable to be dismissed by the Tribunal. The moot question thus is whether Rule 140 has any application to Sections 142, 143 and 144 of the Elections Act, 2017.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
1305) -758/2021 Suit MIAN NASSER HYATT MAGGO (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 424
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
1306) 1724/2024 Const. P. Mir Mazhar Talpur (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 575, 2026 CLC 40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
1307) 303/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous GHULAM SHABBIR KUBBAR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Cognizance on police report)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 556
Advocates:Imtiaz Ali Shah(ADVO-16001-SBC-KHS),Nasrullah Korai(ADVO-11200-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.106-K/2023 Ghulam Shabbir Kubar v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1308) 10/2012 J.M Mrs.Syma Mahnaz Vayani & others (Petitioner) V/S Molasses Export Company Pvt. Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: J.Ms/12(2) C.P.C (winding up petition is dismissed, unless the shares are transferred no assets of the respondent???s company shall be disposed of)
Citation:2013 SBLR Sindh 1276
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
1309) 562/2014 Suit Abdul Razzak Khamosh (Plaintiff) V/S The Province of Sindh and others, (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
1310) 1347/2006 Suit ASADULLAH KHAWAJA (Appellant) V/S INVESTMENT CORP. OF PAKISTAN (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 146
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
1311) 1089/2016 Const. P. MAL Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S PAKISTAN through secretary revnue Division (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
1312) 86/2014 II.A. Mst. Nargis Ehsan Malik & Others (Appellant) V/S Arshad Mehmood Mir & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 29-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1-K/2019 Mst: Nargis Ehsan Malik thr. her L.Rs and others v. Arshad Mehmood Mir,C.P.L.A.425-K/2019 Mst: Nargis Ehsan Malik thr. her L.Rs and others v. Arshad Mehmood Mir Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Adjourned [ Appeal converted into Civil Petition),Disposed Disposed of
1313) 437/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Waqas Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Vth. Rent Cotrollar Hyd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 281
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1314) 33/2022 II.A. Ghulam Akhtar & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 490
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
1315) 6008/2017 Const. P. M/s Hascol Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 873
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.88-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Hascol Petroleum Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1316) 1344/2021 Cr.Bail AZIZ UR REHMAN @ BABUL S/O ALI AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Consequently, the pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant on 14.07.2021 is hereby recalled and this bail application is dismissed with direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously within two (02) months strictly in accordance with law. Let this order be communicated to the trial Court for compliance.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 44
Advocates:Dr. Raana Khan(ADVO-4571-SBC-KHI),Abdul Rauf Malik(ADVO-15553-SBC-KHI),Amna Usman(ADVO-17283-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
1317) 144/2019 Cr.J.A ABDUL REHMAN S/O DEEN MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1920
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 02-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.176/2021 The State v. Abdul Rehman,J.P.600/2022 1. Basheer @ Bashoo 2. Wazir v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned s (-) Mr. Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, J,Pending
1318) 6135/2023 Const. P. Abdullah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service
Tag Line:Nomination in FIR; quashment or compromise; disentitled for fresh appointment in Police Department
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1467
Advocates:Muhammad Azeem(ADVO-8715-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
1319) 345/2018 H.C.A M/s. Adamjee Insurance Co. Limited (Appellant) V/S M/s. Trustees of the Karachi Port & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 756
Advocates:ORR. DIGNAM & CO.(FIRM-109-SBC-KHI),Sajid Zahid(ADVO-2109-SBC-KHI),M. Sarfaraz Sulehry(ADVO-1929-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.500-K/2022 M/s. Adamjee Insurance Co.Ltd. v. M/s. Trustees of the Karachi Port & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
1320) 295/2020 Cr.Misc. Mst. Fouzia @ Waziran (Applicant) V/S SSP District Jamshoro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Miscellaneous Application . (Mother filed Petition for Custody of her Sons aged 10, 8, years .Petition dismissed with direction to approach G&W Court . )
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2017
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
1321) 2011/2019 Const. P. Mst. Anwar and another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
1322) 786/2011 Suit MUHAMMAD MANSOOR (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD RASHID (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 20-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1323) 5575/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Naeem (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950
Tag Line:Afghan Transit goods for which Bills of Lading have been issued are also protected under Para 4 of Import Policy Order 2022.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 372
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 31-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
1324) 4940/2021 Const. P. Zeba Ilyas (Petitioner) V/S Nazim e Ala and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Doctrine of merger )
Tag Line:Where a matter is not decided on merits, but is disposed of in some other manner, such as for non-prosecution, the doctrine of merger would not apply.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 245
Advocates:Muhammad Mohsin(ADVO-15408-SBC-KHS),Abdul Wajid Wyne(ADVO-2246-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
1325) 102/2019 Criminal Appeal Abdul Rehman @ Suleman @ Siloo Magsi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Appeal (Conviction sentenced in Section 365-B P.P.C, on the ground Contradiction in evidence, delay in lodging FIR, and Material witnesses not examined. )
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 700
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
1326) 1077/2020 Suit Akhlaq Hashmi (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Bakht Bibi & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Suit and listed applications were dismissed with costs of Rs.50,000.00 (Rupees fifty thousand only) to be paid by the plaintiff to defendants 1 to 31 within thirty (30) days. The amount of Rs.7,000,000.00 (Rupees seven million only) received by the said defendants from the plaintiff shall be returned by them to him within thirty (30) days.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 226
Advocates:M. Umer Farooq Khokhar(ADVO-38951-PBC-LHR),Farooq Hashmat Abbasi(ADVO-4616-SBC-KHC),Qamar Iqbal(ADVO-9999-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aijaz Khan(ADVO-3564-SBC-KHI),Nasrullah Malik(ADVO-11854-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
1327) 4284/2015 Const. P. K-Electric and Ors (Petitioner) V/S M/s Naveena Export and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: LIMITATION (Conversion of revision into Appeal)
Tag Line:It is imperative for the proper working of any system of justice that in a context such as the one at hand a party aggrieved by an order passed by a judicial forum be required to assail that order in a timely manner through appropriate proceedings, as prescribed. As such, a party cannot be allowed to escape the consequence of its own indolence and failure to avail a prescribed remedy so as to adopt a course of action other than that envisaged under the law, and then retrace its steps while seeking to circumvent limitation through recourse to the plea that the order sought to be questioned is void.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 315
Advocates:Khalil Ahmed(ADVO-6793-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
1328) 5920/2015 Const. P. Kainat Soomro and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1627
Advocates:Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
1329) 764/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Pariyal (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Zahida Parveen & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Family Matter
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 976
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1330) 6280/2024 Const. P. M/s Fazlee Sons (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:Exemption from audit under Clause 105A of part-4 of 2nd Schedule.
Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit
but from the tax year involved.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1
Advocates:Muhammad Taimoor Ahmed(ADVO-15452-SBC-KHI),Yasir Ali(ADVO-21973-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 20-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
1331) 25/2012 II.A. Sikandar Ali (Appellant) V/S Abdullah & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Delay in payment of Court Fee)
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
---O. XXIII, R. 1(3) & 0. II, R.2---Withdrawal of suit---Fresh suit, institution of---Scope---Suit was decreed by the Trial Court but same was dismissed by the Appellate Court being barred under O.II, R.2, C.P.C.---Validity---Plaintiff was precluded from filing another suit after withdrawl of earlier suit on same "cause of action", on same "subject matter" and against the same defendant without permission to institute a fresh one-Provisions of O.XXIII, R.1(3) and O.II, R.2, C.P.C. were complementary to each other to control the litigation after litigation between the same parties on the same subject matter.
Ghulam Nabi and others v. Seth Muhammad Yakoob and others PLD 1983 SC 344; Muhammad Suleman v. Ehsan Ali PLD 1983 Kar. 537; State Life Insurance of Pakistan v. Mst. Zainab Khatoon and others PLD 1987 SC AJ&K 5; Manzoor Hussain v. Rasool Bukhsh 1991 CLC 640; Qazi Shamas-ur-Rehman and another v. Mst. Chaman Dasta and others 2004 SCMR 1798 and Siddique Khan and 2 others v. Abdul Shakur Khan and another PLD 1984 SC 289 ref.
Muhammad Suleman v. Ehsan Ali PLD 1983 Kar. 537; State Life Insurance of Pakistan v. Mst. Zainab Khatoon and others PLD 1987 SC AJ&K 5; Manzoor Hussain v. Rasool Bukhsh 1991 CLC 640; Qazi Shamas-ur-Rehman and another v. Mst. Chaman Dasta and others 2004 SCMR 1798 and Siddique Khan and 2 others v. Abdul Shakur Khan and another PLD 1984 SC 289 rel.
(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----S. 99---Appeal---Court fee, non-payment of---Effect---Ministerial staff of court was bound to point out non-payment of court fee and if such had been done then appellant could pay the same to avoid dismissal of appeal on account of non-payment of court fee---If such objection had been raised by the Appellate Court only then appellant could have been penalized---Jurisdiction of Appellate Court was not disputed to entertain the appeal, therefore order passed thereon was not affected adversely on account of non-payment of court fee---Impugned judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Court were protected by the provision of S.99, C.P.C. despite the fact that no court fee on the appeal was paid---Appellate Court had no power to set aside the judgment and decree on the ground of error or irregularity which had not affected the merits of the case or jurisdiction of the court---Non??payment of court fee was mere irregularity which could be corrected at any time and such irregularity had not rendered the impugned order void or without jurisdiction---Appellant (respondent) had not refused to pay the court fee and High Court could not non-suit him on the ground of filing first appeal without court fee---No punitive action could be taken against the appellant (respondent) without recourse to the provision of O. VII, R.11, C.P.C.---High Court could call upon the appellant (respondent) to pay the court fee---Appellant (respondent) was directed to deposit/pay the requisite court fee in the High Court within a specified period to rectify the irregularity occurred on account of non-payment of court fee before the first Appellate Court.
Citation:2015 PLD 155
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 09-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
1332) 219/2019 Criminal Appeal ANANTKUMAR PARSHOTAM (Appellant) V/S MEM. OF MANAGING COMT. NARAYAN TEMPLE TRUST & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. Under section 8-A of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, an order that is appealable to the High Court does not include an order dismissing the complaint. However, the appeal can be converted to a criminal revision.
2. In order to constitute an offence under the Illegal Dispossession Act, the complaint must disclose actus reas and mens rea, and if the facts that constitute an offence under section 3 of the Illegal Dispossession Act are not disclosed through the complaint or documents with it, then the Court can dismiss the complaint straight away. Rel: Waqar Ali v. The State (PLD 2011 SC 181).
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ Note 38
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
1333) 7029/2021 Const. P. Salman Talibuddin (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 514
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
1334) 1653/2019 Const. P. Irshad Ahmed Gopang (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: NAB (Bail before arrest dismissed, committed crime, made bogus voucher of material and at site physical existence. )
Citation:2020 YLR 2001
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
1335) 7142/2017 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali Magsi (Petitioner) V/S I.G Police and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
1336) 239/2017 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. KASHIF SOHAIL S/O GRIFFIN ALMAS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 18-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
1337) 6549/2020 Const. P. Dr. Habibur Rehman Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 348
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.484-K/2022 The Director General Military Land & Cantonment & another v. Habib Rehman Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1338) 335/2023 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Masood (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 193
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
1339) 1660/2015 Suit Askari Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Hafiz Ghulam Murtaza (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:???Factory??? let without machinery, eviction lies before Rent Controller. Suit entertained for recovery of arrears of rent.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 751
Advocates:Muhammad Ilyas Warriach(ADVO-6766-SBC-KHI),Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-15164-SBC-KHI),Amanullah Khan(ADVO-1997-SBC-KHI),Irfanullah Khan(ADVO-4688-SBC-KHI),Lubna Aman(ADVO-6915-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
1340) 61/2021 Cr.Tran HAJI MIR HASSAN KHAN BHURGARI (Appellant) V/S MUKHTIAR AHMED @ GUDO & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1090
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.155-K/2021 Haji Mir Massan Khan Bhurgari v. Mukhtiar Ahmed @ Gudo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
1341) 230/1993 Const. P. Faiz Mohammad Palari (Petitioner) V/S Member (L.U.) B.O.R. & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 19-SEP-11
Approved for Reporting
1342) 2108/2016 Suit The City Schools (Private) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLC 4
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 05-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
1343) 217/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Ramada Industries (Pvt) Ltd., Karachi (Applicant) V/S The Commissioner I. R. Zone-VI, CTO, Kar. &another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line: input tax claim cannot be denied if subsequently the supplier has been suspended or blacklisted
Section 21(3) and Section 8(1)(ca) interpreted
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 466
Advocates:Muhammad Din Qazi(ADVO-17782-SBC-KHS),Ghazi Khan Khalil(ADVO-18768-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Faheem Bhayo(ADVO-2534-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
1344) 399/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Pacific Oil Mills (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:No Reference Application is maintainable under section 196 of the customs act against an order dismissing a Rectification Application
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 260
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(ADVO-11058-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
1345) 730/2019 Const. P. Mst. Shakeela (Petitioner) V/S Mohammad Arif Abbasi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2482
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
1346) 6221/2015 Const. P. Rab Nawaz (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 5
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.675-K/2017 Rab Nawaz v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1347) 2438/2017 Const. P. Syed Ali Abbas Rizvi Thr. Nisar Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S The Addl. Controller of Rents Clifton & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (an interlocutory order and it does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect or error, Petition dismissed.)
Tag Line:The petition is dismissed with costs as the impugned order is an interlocutory order and it does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect or error, this petition, being misconceived and malafide, is not maintainable. The learned Rent Controller is directed to decide the subject rent case within forty five (45) days from receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law and in view of consent order dated 24.08.2010 passed by this Court in C.P. No.S-597/2010 and the judgment delivered by this Court on 10.04.2009 in FRA No.38/2008, and to report compliance within seven (07) days thereafter to this Court through MIT-II.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 11-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
1348) 2717/2024 Cr.Bail SYED SARIM AHMED BURNEY (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 489
Advocates:Mamoon Ahmed Khan Shirwany(ADVO-11042-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
1349) 2135/2021 Const. P. Noman Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Sindh Education Foundation --we conclude that there is no illegality, infirmity, or material irregularity in the impugned letters dated 06.02.2020 & 30.11.2020 issued by the respondent-SEF. Besides, the issue of continue in service, since he is facing the NAB reference based on moral turpitude, thus we cannot order the competent authority to continue his service.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 847
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
1350) 1926/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The D. G. Customs Valuation, Karachi & another (Applicant) V/S M/s. A.A. Tyre , Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Jurisdiction of Customs Tribunal explained; Appeal against an order of Revision under Section 25D of the Customs Act, 1969; acceptance of declared values as true transactional value, by whom, guidelines
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 368
Advocates:Amjad Hayat(ADVO-53613-SBC-KHS),Zafar Hussain(ADVO-15545-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 04-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
1351) 1048/2017 Cr.Misc. Majid @ Dado Mirani & other (Applicant) V/S The State & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1352) 33/2014 Spl.Cr.Bail MUMTZUDDIN S/O MOINUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
1353) 5666/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Farooq Legharii (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 139
Advocates:Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
1354) 357/2012 Cr.Bail Khuda Bukhsh and 4 others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting
1355) 1513/2024 Const. P. M/s C.A.A (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Alternate Dispute Resolution in Tax matters; Section 134A of the Income Tax Ordinance mandatory for State Owned Enterprise after Tax amendment Laws Act, 2024
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 226
Advocates:Ammar Ather Saeed(ADVO-13697-SBC-KHC),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Anwar Kashif Mumtaz(ADVO-11772-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.555-K/2024 M/s Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority Karachi. v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary of Finance and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned + Status Quo + for early date
1356) 100/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Moosa (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 687
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
1357) 419/2021 Const. P. Basheer Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 632
Advocates:Soofia Saeed(ADVO-3712-SBC-KHI),Abdul Samad(ADVO-9460-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5397/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar,C.A.2856/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
1358) 843/2015 Suit Aroma Travel Services (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Faisal Al Abdullah Al Faisal Al Saud & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 414
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 30-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
1359) 3893/2016 Const. P. Shabana Haider (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:The right of withdrawal of the resignation was available as long as
the resignation was not accepted. This gained strength when sub-clause
(v) is read along with this proposition. It provides that in case an
employee withdraws the resignation before its acceptance, the
resignation shall be deemed to have been withdrawn. This is not the
case here. The resignation was accepted on 08.02.2016 whereas the
request for withdrawal of the resignation was made on 26.02.2016, on
the imaginary ground that 30 days' notice period was yet to expire. In
this context we may observe that notice period has nothing to do with
the acceptance of resignation. On acceptance of resignation all that is
essential for an employee is to complete the notice period i.e. to serve
the Commission in case the employee had opted to give one month
notice. The employee could have opted to pay salary in lieu thereof but
that is not the case here.
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 69
Advocates:Raja Qasit Nawaz Khan(ADVO-3457-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 21-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
1360) 2933/2014 Const. P. M/s Lucky Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Doctrine of Election
Citation:2021 PTD 835
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3231/2020 Lucky Cement Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1361) 20/2011 M.A. Pakistan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers? Association (Appellant) V/S The Controller of Patents and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 30-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
1362) 1094/2020 Const. P. Suresh Kumar Hindu (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:Precise facts are that Petitioners have challenged the Wheat Release Policy 2020-21 dated 14th October 2020 (said Policy), on the ground that Clause (xii) whereof is violative of the Food Stuffs (Control) Act, 1958, and the Food-grains (Licensing Control) Order, 1957, and consequently, be set aside and Flour Mills of Petitioners be given wheat as per the uniform Policy. The legal team of Respondents has stated that it is purely an executive matter regarding which no petition of the nature is maintainable. Crux of the rule laid down in these decisions is that ordinarily under Article 199 of the Constitution, High Court cannot interfere in the policy matters of the Executive, except if it is violative of law or is product of mala fide; whereas, the mala fide is also explained, inter alia, that unless an un rebuttable material is on record with regard to a specific plea of mala fide and not a vague one, the decision or action complained of, cannot be annulled or declared illegal This principle has been evolved through judicial pronouncements and opinions of jurists, the crux of which is that punishment must fit the crime. When on the record there is no evidence that Petitioners / Flour Mills have entered into plea bargain with NAB, then Clause (xii) cannot be stretched to include Petitioners / Flour Mills, and such an action of Respondents is hit by this doctrine of proportionality also and is unreasonable and discriminatory. Petitions are accepted only to the extent, that the Clause (xii) of the Wheat Policy is not applicable to the present Petitioners / Flour Mills and they are entitled to get their respective share / quota of wheat in accordance with the present Wheat Policy 202021 like other Flour Mills established and operating in the Province of Sindh.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 481
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1363) 3/2012 Conf.Case The State (Appellant) V/S Danial alias Dani (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 17-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
1364) 162/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S Ms. Nausheen Leghari & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1387
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Rukhsana Ahmad(ADVO-4278-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1081-K/2021 M/s. The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Ms Nausheen Leghari & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned to Next Session before 3HJJ
1365) 871/2014 Suit Muhammad Irfan Gazi. (Plaintiff) V/S IZO SPA & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Zaheeruddin Mujahid(ADVO-4421-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Nouman Jamali(ADVO-10431-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
1366) 3657/2017 Const. P. Ehsan Ali Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
1367) 725/2015 Suit Mazhar Ali. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Pak Avenue Owners/Occup. Welf. Ass. & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident , Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Tag Line:The undisputed record and the evidence adduced by the parties, concludes that Defendants and particularly Defendant No.1 was responsible for causing the death of the deceased Mazhar Ali, because despite collecting enormous amounts towards maintenance charges each month from different offices/Units in the said Building, the elevators / lifts were not maintained properly. Negligence rather callousness of Defendant No.1 in particular, is also proved from the undisputed fact that no remedial measures were taken even after another incident preceding the one of the present lis, in which a person was injured due to fault in one of the lifts (in the said Building).
Citation:2020 MLD 257
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 08-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
1368) 1546/2021 Const. P. Mst. Bilquees Khalid (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (S.68)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 845
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
1369) 12/2020 Cr.Acctt.A ANWAR AI S/O RAJAB ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAIN NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:NAB matter - Appeal against conviction
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 240
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 07-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1296/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Anwar Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1370) 1327/2017 Const. P. Irfan Victor (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khalida (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
1371) 22/2015 Cr.Bail Mst Moona (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 19-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
1372) 3/2017 Election Appeal Jam Javed Ahmed Khan Dehar (Appellant) V/S Haji Muhammad Akbar and 14 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 13-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1373) 466/2023 Suit CYNERGYICO PK LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S TRAFIGURA PTE LIMITED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Recognition & Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements & Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011 (Section 7 and Article V(2) New York Convention)
Tag Line:Plaintiff (Award-Debtor) filed suit against Defendant (Award-Creditor) for declaration and mandatory injunction. pleading grounds of public policy under Article V(2) of the New York Convention read with Sections 6 and 7 of the REA, 2011. The pro-enforcement bias of the NY Convention discussed in the CNAN Group SpA case reported in PLD 2014 Sindh 349 in respect of Article V(1) is equally applicable to the Foreign Arbitral Award under challenge in this lis by Plaintiff. There has to be an action initiated by the Award-Creditor, first, in whose favor the Award has been made before the Award-Debtor raises a challenge in the domestic court. The suit is dismissed as not maintainable under Article V (2) of the New York Convention. Office is directed to draw up a decree in terms of the Judgment.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 374
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
1374) 3075/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Tufail (Petitioner) V/S Chief Naval Staff and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution?
ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice?
iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect?
Topic: Service matters (Bar of Jurisdiction )
Tag Line:Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution?
ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice?
iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect?
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1274
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
1375) 333/2016 H.C.A Delhi Mercantile Muslim Cooperative Housing Society Limited Karachi (Appellant) V/S Alamgir Welfare Trust International and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 1167
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 10-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
1376) 2314/2021 Const. P. Danish Azhar (Petitioner) V/S The Consumer Protection Court & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 252
Advocates:Zulfiqar Ali Qureshi(ADVO-16008-SBC-KHS),Ishrat Zahid Alvi(ADVO-6918-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 03-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.702-K/2022 Waheed Anwar Abro v. Danish Azhar & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
1377) 1039/2018 Suit Pakistan National Shipping Corporation & others (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Coniston Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Dismissed)
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act. Section 42 and 56. Anti-Injunction Suit concept - can only be granted in rare exceptional cases- grant of such an Injunction amounts to transgressing norms of Judicial restraint.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 56, 2020 CLC 454
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 25-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1378) 1111/2017 Suit Dr. Sulleman and another (Plaintiff) V/S Higher Education of Commission of Pakistan and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 14-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
1379) 1826/2019 Const. P. Syed Muzaffar Ali Jaffro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (transfer and posting)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
1380) 793/2023 Const. P. Mst. Shamsa Kanwal and Another (Petitioner) V/S Amjad Hussain and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Dowry articles are personal belongings of wife that is to be returned to her.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 6
Advocates:Mahmood Baig(ADVO-4572-SBC-KHC),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1381) 3993/2011 Const. P. M/S Akhter Textile Industries Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal at Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLC Lab. 319
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon
Order Date: 13-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
1382) 6222/2023 Const. P. Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:firstly section 10 of the Civil Servant Act 1973 provides that every civil servant shall be liable to serve within and outside Pakistan under the Federal Government or any Provincial Government, whereas Rule 20-A of the Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1973 provides appointment of deputation
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1070
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Sajad Ali Solangi(ADVO-18123-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.552-K/2024 Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Establishment Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1383) 74/2008 M.A. Smith Kline Beecham PLC (Appellant) V/S Registrar of Trade Mark (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 40
Advocates:IRFAN & IRFAN ADVOCATES.(FIRM-125-SBC-KHI),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 01-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
1384) 41/2019 Suit Shahid & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Zainab & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:no Inheritable Property. Plaint Rejected.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1193
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
1385) 12/2020 I. A Abdul Ghaffar (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Aalam & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:The encroachment of amenity plot cannot be allowed to sustain under the law, which aspect, the official respondents have to look into and restore its position in accordance with law. The encroachment of an amenity plot to another use is treated as an abuse of discretion and therefore is unlawful for the simple reason that the paramount object of modern city planning is to ensure maximum comforts for the residents of the city by providing maximum facilities and that a public functionary entrusted with the work to achieve the above object cannot act in a manner, which may defeat the above objective and deviation from the planned scheme will naturally result in discomfort and inconvenience to others.
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1766
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
1386) 32/2012 Cr.Acq.A. Nisar Ahmed Shaikh (Appellant) V/S PC Umed Ali Jakhrani & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Scope of Referee Judge in Cr. Appeals. Death in police custody. Appraisal of evidence should not be unrealistic. Applicability of section 302(c) PPC.
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 581
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.131-K/2023 PC Umeed Ali & others v. Nisar Ahmed & another,Crl.M.Appeal.1-K/2023 Umed Ali & others v. The Deputy Registrar Supreme Court Pakistan Karachi. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Disposed of
1387) 20/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. MUHAMMAD ALI S/O ASHIQ ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Trial ( Discrepancies and contradictions )
Tag Line:It seems that most of the grounds which persuaded learned Division Bench to acquit the said accused, are common in nature and they are also applicable to the case of present appellant. For instance, (i) violation of the provisions of Section 103 Cr. P.C., as discussed in paras 20, 21 and 22 of the judgment; (ii) non-production of arrival and departure entries by police officials, as discussed in para 23 of the judgment; (iii) extension of benefit of doubt to the accused as discussed in paras 24, 25, 26 and 30 of the judgment and (iv) although there being cross-firing during alleged police encounter, no injury/scratch was caused to the police officials or the complainant party.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1301
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Mir Wali(ADVO-15230-SBC-KHI),Samiullah Soomro(ADVO-960-SBC-SUK),Zakir Hussain Bughio(ADVO-11959-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
1388) 100/2013 Const. P. Nafees Fatima (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.357-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. and another v. Nafees Fatima and others,C.P.L.A.365-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust and another v. Nafees Fatima and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1389) 7450/2018 Const. P. Imran Ahmed Khanzada & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:I. Whether respondent No.4 can hold the charge for the post of Director I.T. in BPS-18 under the law?
II. Whether respondent No.4s case falls within the ambit of Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013?
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1943
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.594-K/2021 Mst.Tabassum Abbasi v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1390) 927/2024 Cr.Bail ALI RAZA S/O MUHAMMAD CHAND (Applicant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: In the instant case, prima facie the abductee has given two versions of the incident, one before the Police after her recovery and secondly before the Magistrate on 13.01.2024 voluntarily after 8 days from the date of registration of F.I.R, though the alleged offense took place on 16.12.2023 alleging therein that her brother in law Faizan had abducted her and committed the alleged crime but she failed to disclose the name of the present applicant though the applicant was already arrested in the FIR on 07.01.2024 and her statement was recorded on 13.01.2024, however, the statement does not transpire the name of the applicant, which makes the case of the applicant that of further inquiry. On the aforesaid proposition, I seek guidance from the decision of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ehsan Ullah vs. The State (2012 SCMR 1137) wherein it has been held by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:-
???This shows that in the present case the prosecution itself has two versions vis-??-vis the petitioner, first of the complainant party according to which the petitioner was present at the spot and had resorted to firing and second of the investigating agency according to which the petitioner was not present at the spot and he was abetting his co-accused from behind the scene. All these considerations surely render the case against the petitioner one of further inquiry into his guilt.???
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 572
Advocates:Sakhiullah(ADVO-4762-SBC-KHI),Shah Muhammad Maitlo(ADVO-15724-SBC-KH1-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Muhammad Bilal Rashid (ADVO-16235-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
1391) 4634/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Idrees and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. Extraneous considerations keep officials of SBCA away from illegal construction being raised by the persons.
2. If exemplary punishments are awarded to these officials, issue of illegal construction can be controlled.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 883
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
1392) 191/2023 Cr.Acq.A. AZIZ DAMJI S/O NAZAR ALI (Appellant) V/S RANA SHAHID JAMIL & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1987, 2025 SHC KHI 2043
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Aziz(ADVO-14070-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
1393) 2/2011 Cr.Ref The State (Appellant) V/S Arz Muhammad and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 28-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
1394) 469/2024 Const. P. Aijaz Ali Chandio & Others (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Shamul Chandio & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Laws regulating "Adoption of Children"
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 778, 2025 SHC LAR 1796, 2025 SHC LAR 1798
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3120/2025 Aijaz Ali and others v. Mst. Shamul and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1395) 4504/2023 Const. P. Zia uddin Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2217
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
1396) 1975/2022 Const. P. Taj Munawar & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1017
Advocates:Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 08-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
1397) 1080/2020 Const. P. M/s U & I Garments Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 13
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 03-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
1398) 6309/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Naeem Akhtar Khan (Petitioner) V/S NIRC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:we queried from the learned counsel for the Petitioner as to how this Petition is maintainable in its form against the National Command Authority (NCA) under the National Command Authority (Amendment) Act, 2016; besides that SUPARCO, comes under the definition of NCA as provided under clause (A) of Section 2 of the NCA Act, 2010.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1438
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
1399) 264/2011 Cr.Misc. Hussain Bux Dal and others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Khan Ghumro and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:the sufficient material was not available before the Judicial Magistrate as well as before the revisional Court to handover the custody of the buffaloes to the respondents only on the basis of the enquiry report by disregarding the fact that these respondents did not bother to make hue and cry for about one and a half year and all of a sudden when these buffaloes were recovered or discovered, they lodged F.I.R to take advantage. It is yet to be determined as to how they got such information and who gave them such information of these buffaloes being seized. This needs further expert enquiry and investigation.
Citation:2015 PCr.LJ 813
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 29-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
1400) 5798/2014 Const. P. Anwery Begum (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 572
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
1401) 82/2007 H.C.A The Trustees of the Port of Karachi & Ors (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Zahir Shah & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 CLC 1862, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1625
Advocates:Mushtaq Ahmed A. Memon(ADVO-1988-SBC-KHS),Nasima Mangrio(ADVO-10697-SBC-KHI),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),QAMAR ABBAS & CO.(FIRM-124-SBC-KHI),Faheem Shah(ADVO-14407-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 30-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4473/2024 Trustees of the Post of Karachi through its Chairperson, Karachi v. Muhammad Zahir Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1402) 214/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) V/S Sazzuddin & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 12-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.364-K/2019 Muhammad Ishaque v. Sazzuddin and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1403) 111/2004 H.C.A Muhammad Aslam V/S M/s.Colony Sarhad Textile Mills Ltd (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Aslam V/S M/s.Colony Sarhad Textile Mills Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 24-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.158-K/2011 Muhammad Aslam v. M/s Colony Sarhad Textile Mills limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1404) 8/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Additional Collectof of Customs (Applicant) V/S K. S. Sulemanji Esmailji & Sons (Private) Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 1276
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 22-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.799/2015 Additional Collector of Customs v. M/s K.S. Sulemanji Esmailji & Sons (Pvt) Ltd.,C.P.182-K/2015 Additional Collector of Customs v. M/s K.S. Sulemanji Esmailji & Sons (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted
1405) 646/2014 Const. P. Engro Foods Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:"Industrial Relations. Challenge to registration of trade union re trans-provincial establishment".
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 767
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
1406) 1/2009 M.A. Nishat Raffiq & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Securities & Exchange Commission (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Shaikh Jawaid Mir(ADVO-5446-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 28-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1407) 68/2016 Execution First Appeal JAWAID SARWAR (Decree Holder) V/S RANA MUNIR & ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Decree for specific performance entails possession. Privity of contract. Compromise decree when executable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 424
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
1408) 7528/2018 Const. P. Shahnawaz and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 PLC CS 447
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Hameedullah Dahri(ADVO-2292-SBC-HYD),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.517-K/2023 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1409) 5048/2016 Const. P. Azher Jawaid (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 229
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 13-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.6-K/2017 Azhar Jawaid v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.19-K/2017 Azhar Jawaid v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted with Notice to Respondents.
1410) 4387/2014 Const. P. Pakistan Tibbi Pharmaceuticals Manufacturers (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: DRAP ACT, Sindh Food Authority Act, 2016, CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:The petitions arise under and in relation to the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012 (DRAP Act). petitioners contend, the DRAP Act cannot, does not and should not apply to various products as manufactured, sold, used or imported by them, including Unani medicines, prescriptions and preparations, We start with the first set of questions, which relate to the constitutionality of the DRAP Act as enacted under Article 144. This Article originally had two clauses, of which the second was omitted by the 8th Amendment in 1985. two changes made by the 18th Amendment, one was necessitated by the omission of the Concurrent List, and need not detain us. The other, which will require some comment, was that originally Article 144 applied only if two or more Provincial Assemblies passed the necessary resolutions. The present Constitution of course had two Legislative Lists on its commencement. The competences listed in the Federal List were exclusive to the Federation, those on the Concurrent List were common, and those which were not enumerated were exclusive to the Provinces. VThat ability of course is one of the defining characteristics of federal legislative power, since in respect of matters that lie in the Federal domain by right Parliament can make laws for the whole of Pakistan or any part thereof. It would be unduly restrictive of the purpose and intent behind Article 144 if Parliament, while making the law for which it has been given power cannot include therein provisions that relate to matters in the Federal domain as of right. Secondly, a provincial law made subsequent to the law made by the Federation under Article 144 may override or impliedly repeal the latter. This follows directly from the express provision that the Provincial Assemblies may amend or repeal the law made by Parliament. The 1976 Act, in like manner, fractured and receded. It became provincial legislation and hence territorially bound. It now so operates in this and all other Provinces. It must be kept in mind that this position has remained unaltered, and is unaffected by the enactment of the DRAP Act under Article 144. Whatever may be the relationship of, and interaction between, the two laws, the 1976 Act does not now transcend or cross provincial boundaries in the manner of the DRAP Act. It is therefore our conclusion that in the present case, the scope of the legislative competence entrusted to Parliament in terms of Article 144 is governed by the terms of the resolution passed by the Punjab Assembly. Within 30 days of announcement of judgment the Authority under the DRAP Act shall issue proper guidelines, Simultaneously with posting the guidelines on its website, the Authority shall issue notice to each petitioner in the petitions to which this para applies. Interim orders made in any petition to which this para applies shall continue but will lapse 30 days from the date on which the guidelines are posted as above or the date on which the determination is made, whichever is later. following petitions are dismissed: CP D-4387/2014 and CP D-1684/2017. e following petitions are disposed off in terms of para 50
herein above: CP Nos. D- 6532/2014, 2623/2016, 6262/2016, 6263/2016, 6264/2016, 6265/2016, 6310/2016, 6820/2016, 7134/2016, 7135/2016, 1135/2017, 1921/2017, 2329/2017, 424/2017,
4421/2017, 5237/2017 and 5892/2017.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1411) 1579/2020 Const. P. Indus Motor Co. (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Primacy of charging section.
Citation:2021 PTD 460
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.410-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Indus Motors Company Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1412) 151/2016 Cr.Rev Muhammad Javed (Applicant) V/S VIIIth Addl Session Judge Hyd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 PCr.LJ 1522
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 14-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1413) 494/2019 Const. P. Custom Public School Thr. Akbar Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Aftab Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Section 21 of SRPO 1979
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 06-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1414) 778/2021 Suit FAUJI OIL TERMINAL & DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S PORT QASIM AUTHORITY & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Injunction application dismissed
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 656
Advocates:Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-13137-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
1415) 954/2016 Const. P. Ms. Rehana Parveen (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 1794, 2018 PLC (CS) Note 123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.354-K/2017 Ms. Rehana Parveen v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1416) 2531/2019 Const. P. M/s GUINAULT SA PA ORLEAN SOLOGNE (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 YLR 692
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.85-K/2020 M/s Guinault SA.PA Orleans Sologne v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1417) 74/2015 S.M.A Mr Afia Baig w/o. Mirza Fawad Baig V/S (Petitioner) V/S Party-2 (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Succession Act
Tag Line:(a) Counsel and client---
----Affidavit by advocate---Scope---Lawyer is not supposed to take place of his client when seeking any substantial relief which the client wanted from the Court---Lawyer cannot swear affidavit of facts relating to circumstances of his client in which need for an order from Court of law was felt for the client even on the advice of lawyer---Such facts and circumstances can only be in the personal knowledge of the client when neither application nor affidavit in support of application is signed by client.
(b) Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)---
----Ss. 273 & 372---Chief Court Rules (O.S.), Rr. 340, 376, 377 & 399---Letters of Administration and succession certificate---Amended petition---Seeking of surety---Object---Necessary ingredients---Widow of deceased owner of property in question died during pendency of petition and applicant did not file proper amended petition---Validity---On the death of widow of deceased owner, in amended petition for the share inherited by her, amended petition must disclose her legal heirs---Once all codel formalities were honestly completed and petition of letter of administration was granted, it would be duty of petitioner to administer properties of both deceased parents as per law which could include first mutation in the name of respective legal heirs and then it would be the choice of new owners by way of inheritance to deal with their respective individual shares in joint properties the way they could wish to, but in accordance with law---Grant of letter of Administration was always subject to the Rules---Purpose of obtaining sureties by Court in terms of Rr. 399 & 340 of Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.) was to ensure that petitioner would administer properties of deceased in accordance with law and honestly.
Citation:2017 MLD 460
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 14-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
1418) 847/2020 Const. P. Khalid Ali Dars & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 20
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
1419) 438/2012 Suit Farid Virani & another (Plaintiff) V/S Feroz Virani (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 386
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 20-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
1420) 2406/2014 Const. P. Nazeer Ahmed & other (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 CLC 2044
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
1421) 731/2021 Const. P. MCB Bank Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Zahid Ali and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Whether the Payment of Wages in respect of trans provincial entities would fall with the legislative competence of the federation or of a province
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 127
Advocates:Shoukat Ali(ADVO-10357-SBC-KHI),Javed Asghar(ADVO-4324-SBC-KHS),Imdad Ali Saheto(ADVO-16074-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 29-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1422) 273/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous MST. SEEMA D/O LATE NOOR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S WAJID ALI SHAH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Applicant filed this Crl, Msic. Application, impugned the order dated 06.04.2021 passed by learned 6th A.D.J Karachi South whereby her Cr. Rev. Application No.23/2021 filed against order dated 09.02.2021 of 7th Judicial Magistrate Karachi South in Cr. Case No.1794/2017, was dismissed.
The respondent lodged FIR against her ex-wife on the ground of committing fraud and cheating in obtaining Pakistani passport for her personal gain by showing her wrong date of birth.
It has been held that the present petitioner was/is not said to be a civil servant or employed in some institution where the date of birth was/is material for some advantage or gains. I am conscious that for such a civil servant/employee the alteration/change in the date of birth has been discouraged but for ordinary person the same was/is not strictly prohibited because an ordinary person normally was/is not likely to take any advantage/benefit with change of such date of birth unless otherwise, so is proved/established. Cr. MA was allowed.
Cr.Misc. Appln. No.319/2020; Cr.Rev. No.135/2020 and CP No.S-445/2020 was referred in support of above as well PLD 1959 Lahore 566 and 2020 SCMR 316.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1173
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Syed Nadeem Haider(ADVO-13415-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 29-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1003/2021 Wajid Ali Shah v. Mst. Seema and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1423) 918/2023 Cr.Bail Anwar Ali Chakrani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 MLD 1848
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
1424) 52/2017 II.A. Ali Asghar (Appellant) V/S Additional District Judge, Sehwan & 07 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
1425) 6/2000 Civil Revision Executive Engineer Highways and others (Applicant) V/S Nazir Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 896
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
1426) 322/2023 Const. P. Nida Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Hameed & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Articles 49 & 104 of Limitation Act.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 694
Advocates:Irfan Bashir Bhutta(ADVO-14755-SBC-KHI),Arjumand Saeed(ADVO-6780-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.285-K/2024 Abdul Hameed v. Nida Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
1427) 882/2003 Const. P. Tanveer Hidayatullah Hashmi and another (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Fozia Naheed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 15-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
1428) 989/2018 Suit Reliance Petrochemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S F.B.R., & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:After repeal of proviso to section 40B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the posting order passed thereunder by the Commissioner is not saved under section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 394
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
1429) 318/2017 H.C.A Raja Saqib Khan (Appellant) V/S Raja Sabri Khan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Benami Filing Appeal without Decree Administration Inheritance Property
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1790, 2025 SHC KHI 1792
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.626/2025 Raja Sabri Khan v. Raja Saqib Khan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1430) 966/2008 I.T.R.A M/s. Dewan Farooque Motors (Ltd.) (Applicant) V/S Comm. of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 28-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
1431) 291/2014 Const. P. Syed Mujahid Rasool & 2 others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & 4 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 26-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.123-K/2014 Syed Mujahid Rasool and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1432) 762/1995 Suit SHAHZAB GOTH RESIDENTS (Plaintiff) V/S GOVT. OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1433) 1481/2022 Suit All Pakistan Restaurant Association (APRA) & ors (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 670
Advocates:Rajesh Kumar Khagaija(ADVO-51467-SBC-KHS),Sandeep Kumar(ADVO-18347-SBC-KHS),M.S. Bukhari(ADVO-17093-SBC-KHI),Imran Ahmed Khan Abro(ADVO-12720-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
1434) 370/2005 Suit MANZOOR AHMED SHAHZAD (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD SHAKIR SHAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
1435) 4529/2015 Const. P. Institute of Chartered Accountants and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 74
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),ORR. DIGNAM & CO.(FIRM-109-SBC-KHI),Sajid Zahid(ADVO-2109-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.42-K/2023 The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan v. Federation of Pakistan Ministry of Finance Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
1436) 2839/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1437) 27/2025 Cr.Bail Mst, Zahida (Applicant) V/S The State & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 200
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
1438) 121/2013 II.A. MAULANA SHABBIR AHMED (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD SHARIF MUGHAL & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1453/2018 Mualana Shabbir Ahmed Usmani v. Muhammad Sharif Mughal and another,C.P.L.A.981-K/2018 Mualana Shabbir Ahmed Usmani v. Muhammad Sharif Mughal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Leave Granted
1439) 100/2024 Spl. Cr. A. Waqar @ Vicky Gadegi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 573
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
1440) 3083/2015 Const. P. Pir Bux Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 343
Advocates:Aziz Ur Rehman Akhund(ADVO-11615-SBC-KHI),Munawar Ali Issani(ADVO-2125-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 25-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
1441) 5674/2020 Const. P. M/s Spectrum Enterprises (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (section 81)
Tag Line:Sub-section 2 of Section 81 caters for a situation when the goods are
allowed to be cleared or delivered on the basis of provisional
determination, the amount of duty, taxes and charges correctly payable
to those goods shall be determined within six months from the date of
provisional determination. The time is further extendable provided the
officer concerned may in the circumstances of exceptional nature and
after recording such situation extends period of final determination,
which shall in no case exceeds ninety days.2 Proviso to sub-section 2
provides the calculating mechanism of the period prescribed in subsection 2 of Section 81. Sub-section 3 of Section 81 provides the
mechanism on completion of final determination. The amount already
paid or guaranteed shall be adjusted against the amount payable on the
basis of final determination and difference between the two amounts
shall be paid forthwith to or by the importer as the case may be.
--Indeed the Explanation in a statute/enactment does form an
integral part to the extent of explaining and elaborating meaning of the
word in the section3 and the purpose is to explain, clarify, add or subtract
something by clarification 4, however, the word provisional assessment is
neither used in sub-section 1 nor in sub-section 2. It is sub-section 1
which secured differential amount on provisional determination and not
provisional assessment 5.
If the interpretation of respondent is accepted then customs would
never bother to determine it finally and would enjoy benefit of not doing
anything after provisional release. We may observe that the respondent
conceded that the cause of delay in final determination is not attributable
to the importer.
Citation:2022 PTD 732, 2021 SBLR Sindh 2391
Advocates:Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Syed Asif Ali (ADVO-10999-SBC-MLR),Muhabbat Hussain Awan(ADVO-13542-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 02-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1606-K/2021 Federal of Pakistan & others v. M/s Spectrum Enterprises Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1442) 13/2012 Cr.Acctt.A Muhammad Akbar Zardari & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 396
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1443) 165/2016 H.C.A Dr. Farzana (Appellant) V/S Syed Shahrukh Abbas (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 10-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
1444) 1396/2010 Suit AURANGZAIB QURESHI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S THE CHAIRMAN P.I.A & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
1445) 1768/2016 Suit H. Nizam Diin & Sons (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers HOusing Authority & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:CMA filed by defendant No.1 under Order VII, Rule 11, C.P.C. for rejection of the plaint
Sections 42 and 56 of the Specific Relief Act , the Easement Act, 1882 and Transfer of Property Act are discussed.
Plain is rejected.
Citation:2018 MLD 802
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
1446) 441/2016 Const. P. Sohail (Petitioner) V/S Kamran Siddiqui (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 12-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
1447) 5/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Sher Khan Jakhrani (Applicant) V/S Deputy Assistant Manager NADRA, Kashmore & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:If the date mentioned on the Primary School Certificate was to be believed by the Applicant/Plaintiff when he applied for CNIC and furnished his information on Form A submitted to NADRA, he would be underage at the time of issuance of his CNIC (less than 18 years). Further, the Applicant/Plaintiff filed the same claim twice, first in 2015 and then again in 2020. Each application to NADRA does not constitute a fresh cause of action. Revision dismissed.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 583
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
1448) 613/2013 Const. P. Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLC CS 797
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3796/2021 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited through its M.D., Karachi and others v. Salma Memon and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1449) 1817/2014 Cr.Bail Sikandar Ali Lashari S/o Ali Muhammad (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.9-K/2015 Hunain Tarique v. The State and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1450) 432/2015 Suit Muhammad Arif. (Plaintiff) V/S Mrs. Uzma Jawaid & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Transfer of Property)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
1451) 21/2012 Judicial Companies Misc. King?s Food (Pvt.) Ltd. and Hilal Confectionery (Pvt.) Ltd.a (Applicant) V/S Nonw (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 07-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
1452) 288/2018 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s. Al-Meezan Poultry Feeds (Applicant) V/S The Collector of Customs (Adj-I) & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1334
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.638-K/2021 The Collector of Customs Model Customs Collectorate v. M/s. Al-Meezan Poultry Feeds Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1453) 868/2019 Const. P. Muzammil Mumtaz Meo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Legislation on manufacture sale and use of gutka, mainpuri and mawa etc
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 03-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4922/2019 Raja Haider Ali and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Home Secretary, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.M.A.4542/2020 Raja Haider Ali and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Home Secretary, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed
1454) 3707/2021 Const. P. Mst. Shereen Javed (Petitioner) V/S The State Thru Governor and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 669
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Mahmood -ul- Hasan(ADVO-8162-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
1455) 6145/2018 Const. P. M/s Korea Marine Transport Co. Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 14A)
Tag Line:Custom Act (Section 14A). Vires challenged - Matter already decided by a DB Judgment in the case of Qasim International Container Terminal V/s. Fed. of Pakistan (CP No.D-4867/2013).
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 962
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.563-K/2021 M/s. Korea Marine Transport Co. Ltd. & another v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1456) 125/2016 Cr.Appeal Naeem @ Gunda Dahar (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 23-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
1457) 15/2020 I. A Anwar Ahmed Ansari (Appellant) V/S Pak Libya Holding Co. (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 332
Advocates:Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS),Rozina(ADVO-13373-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Saleem Mangrio(ADVO-4620-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
1458) 1079/2022 Const. P. M/s Zam Zam LPG (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 546
Advocates:Ellahi Bukhsh(ADVO-17033-SBC-KHS),Mushtaque Hussain(ADVO-14825-SBC-KHS),Ghazala Rafiq(ADVO-10618-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 04-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1097-K/2023 Saulat Sikandar v. Muhammad Tariq & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1459) 10/2017 M.A. Aurora Broadcasting Services (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) V/S PEMRA (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 574, 2019 SBLR Sindh 856
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
1460) 769/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous NOMAN MARWAT S/O KAISAF KHAN (Applicant) V/S IVTH ADJ KHI MALIR & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In principle, the offense under section 489-F PPC is punishable with imprisonment of three years, thus, does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr. P.C; and, the grounds for cancellation of bail are altogether different from the grant of bail; and once pre-arrest bail is confirmed, the exceptional and extraordinary grounds, as well as strong reasons, are required to recall the bail order granted earlier to the accused. The principles enunciated, governing for grant of bail and cancellation whereof has been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme court in the case of Sharif Khan V/S The State and another, 2021 SCMR 87
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 952
Advocates:Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1461) 1584/2019 Const. P. Mst, Saabi (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 98
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1462) 2659/2018 Const. P. Khalid Hameed Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
1463) 1193/2009 Cr.Bail Salman Quershi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S. 497(2); Pakistan Penal Code 1860, S.365-A/34. Abduction for ransom; Bail, grant of; Case of further inquiry;
Accused was neither nominated in the F.I.R. nor direct role of alleged offence had been assigned in the challan; Neither complainant, alleged abductee or the prosecution witnesses had identified accused in connection with the alleged crime nor any active role had been assigned, excepting that the car alleged to be used for the crime----Prosecution had not produced any incriminating evidence against accused connecting him with the crime and he appeared to have been involved on the basis of suspicion---Prosecution case which was not free from doubt, required further inquiry into the guilt of the accused---Accused was admitted to bail, in circumA?stances.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 04-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
1464) 340/2022 Criminal Appeal ABDUL MAJEED S/O AHMED & 12 OTHERS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 983
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
1465) 415/2024 Const. P. Asim Farooq S/o Muhammad Farooq (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Shaista Choudhry (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Issue of Jurisdiction in G&W matters.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 617
Advocates:Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
1466) 2352/2012 Const. P. Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) V/S Special Judge Customs & Taxation & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 42
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
1467) 81/2016 Cr.J.A Juma Khan Brohi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1468) 2/2021 Adm. Suit Tenedos Denizcilik ve Tie Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S M.T MAKHAMBET & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Resjudicata , Admiralty
Tag Line:--Section 11 CPC is universal doctrine so it does not matter if the judgment is of a foreign Court or of a Court beyond the territorial limits of this Court. The subject claim is a tried and adjudicated issue (within competent jurisdiction) and hence it is being applied for enforcing res- judicata. There is no legislation enacted contrary to the acceptance of
such rule except as provided in Section 11 CPC.
--The explanation provides that a former suit is one which has been
decided prior, irrespective of its filing date. Explanation II provides that
for the purpose of Section 11 competence of Court shall be determined
irrespective of any provision as to right of appeal from the decision of
such Court5
. Explanation III provides that matter referred to must in the
former suit have been alleged by one party and either denied or
admitted expressly or impliedly by the other. Explanation IV provides
that any matter which might or ought to have been made ground of
defence or attack in such former suit shall be deemed to have been a
matter directly or substantially in issue in such suit and under
Explanation V any relief claimed in the plaint, which is not expressly
granted by the decree, shall for the purposes of this section be deemed
to have been refused. The remaining explanation VI is not relevant for
the purposes of issue in hand.
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 378
Advocates:Ishrat Zahid Alvi(ADVO-6918-SBC-KHI),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
1469) 424/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Sindh Revenue Board (Applicant) V/S M/s Meesam Construction Company (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 20-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
1470) 127/2009 H.C.A Federation of Pakistan & another (Appellant) V/S Naya Daur Motors (Pvt) Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLD 312
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.121-K/2014 Collector of Customs v. M/s Naya Daur Motor Pvt. Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1471) 1176/1997 Suit S.M. YOUSUF (Plaintiff) V/S THE SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),S. Irtaza Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-2043-SBC-KHI),S. Faiq Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-2514-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 23-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
1472) 2628/2022 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali Panhwar & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:No regularisation of project employees can be ordered by the Court in absence of any law, rules or policy to that effect
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1354
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 04-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3909/2024 Mumtaz Ali Panhwar and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
1473) 137/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Alam and Others. (Applicant) V/S District officer community and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Order XXI Rule 103 CPC
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 713
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
1474) 1578/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
1475) 3328/2012 Const. P. National Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Auditor GEneral of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 211
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Mansoor-ul-Arfin(ADVO-157-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
1476) 1672/2014 Cr.Bail Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 07-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
1477) 44/2024 Criminal Appeal Shafi Muhammad Sarki (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Use of modern devices in the investigation of Narcotics Cases.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1475
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
1478) 1569/2000 Suit Ali Muhammad & another (Plaintiff) V/S Faizullah & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 32
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
1479) 2/2010 I. A Khadim Hussain & others (Appellant) V/S Gul Hassan Tiwano & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
1480) 18/2021 II.A. Asif Baig S/o Siddique Baig (Appellant) V/S Mst. Salma Begum and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Right to file Second Appeal under section 100 CPC
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1061
Advocates:Khalid Mumtaz(ADVO-4861-SBC-KHI),Khalid Pervez(ADVO-5994-SBC-KHI),Roomi Iqbal(ADVO-9621-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
1481) 17/2016 Cr.Rev SANA-UR-REHMAN S/O ZAKA-UR-REHMAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 454
Advocates:Jamshed Iqbal(ADVO-10830-SBC-KHI),Mahmood -ul- Hasan(ADVO-8162-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Akhtar Qureshi(ADVO-3582-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
1482) 4/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SARDAR S/O MIR HASSAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Minor Contradictions can be ignored)
Tag Line:Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 780
Advocates:S. Ahsan Ali Shah(ADVO-16440-SBC-KHS),Imran(ADVO-12874-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
1483) 2/2009 Conf.Case Ref. made by 3rd ADJ-South (Appellant) V/S None (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 21-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
1484) 3130/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Adnan (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Finance (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 27-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.12-K/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Finance Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and another v. Muhammad Adnan Qureshi,C.A.1192/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Finance Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and another v. Muhammad Adnan Qureshi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after Summer vacation,Disposed
1485) 2863/2014 Const. P. Pir Kaleemullah and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 11-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.643-K/2018 Pir Kalimullah and another v. Province of Sindh thr. Cheif Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1486) 2395/2011 Const. P. M/S State Life Ins. Corp. (Petitioner) V/S Shahid Khan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 25-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1027-K/2016 M/s State Life Insurance v. Shahid Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1487) 506/2021 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD SHAFI S/O FAIZULLAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997
Tag Line:It is observed that mere heinousness of the charge and recovery of huge quantity of the alleged contraband is no ground to convict accused. The prosecution is under a bounden responsibility to drive home the charge by proving each limb of its case that essentially
included production of the witness, tasked with the responsibility of transmitting the samples to the office of Chemical Examiner.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 304
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Rashid Khan(ADVO-4194-SBC-KHI),Shaikh Ikram Aziz(ADVO-4129-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1488) 317/2010 Civil Revision Esso (Applicant) V/S Zahid Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 249
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1489) 8/2023 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. AMJAD ALI @ ZAKIR @ SAJID (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 783
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Iftikhar Ahmed Shah(ADVO-17182-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.504/2023 Amjad Ali @ Zakir @ Sajid v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1490) 5430/2020 Const. P. Imad Samad (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (SRO 833(I)/2018 Section 19), Import Policy , Rules of Business, 1973 (Schedule-II), Custom Act, 1969 (Section 19), Import Policy Order 2020, Rules of Business, 1973, Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950
Tag Line:- Import of vintage cars on the strength of SRO No.833(I)/2018 dated 03.07.2018
followed by a decision in the case of Moin Jamal Abbasi in CP No.D-4124
of 2019 reported as 2020 PTD 660.
--Full Bench was constituted to consider the question arising out of
litigation:-
Whether the subject SRO No.833(I)/2018 issued in terms of
Section 19 of Customs Act, 1969 can also be treated as SRO issued
by the Ministry of Commerce in terms of Section 3 of the Import
& Export Control Act, 1950, permitting import of vintage cars
which are otherwise not importable as being old and used in
terms of the Import Policy Order of both 2016 and 2020.
Citation:2021 PTD 2063
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 10-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
1491) 1009/2023 Suit M/S. PAKISTAN NATIONAL BUILDING MATERIAL D.C.F. (Plaintiff) V/S AQSA SULEMAN BAWANY & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The rights of a Sub-Lessee to seek an injunction to prevent construction being raised by the Lessee
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1007
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
1492) 216/2020 H.C.A Riffat Humayun (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 768
Advocates:Muhammad Asghar(ADVO-14586-SBC-KHI),Syed Shahid Hussain(ADVO-6814-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
1493) 452/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Naeemuddin & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:The overlap between the jurisdiction of this Court on its Original Civil Side and under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 and the manner in which a Court should act in terms of the judicial propriety as clarified by the Supreme Court of Pakistan where both jurisdictions are invoked.
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1349
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1494) 666/2019 Cr.Acq.A. SHAHID S/O NASEEMUDDIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1307
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
1495) 151/2021 Const. P. Munawar Ali Narejo (Petitioner) V/S Judge Anti-Terrorism Shikarpur and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1153
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
1496) 2999/2021 Suit CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OFFICERS ASSOC. & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:it is inconceivable that under the ibid repealed
Ordinances, which were never in fact acted upon, plaintiffs could exert
for the transfer of the employees/officers of the two divisions to their
respective authorities. The law that stood prior to the repeal of the
ordinances under consideration revived and the two authorities are now
deemed to be working under the common umbrella of Ordinance 1982 as
were earlier.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 232
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
1497) 32/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Rasheed & Ors. (Applicant) V/S Mst. Khato & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 53
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
1498) 971/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD IMRAN S/O NAWABUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence falling under prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C )
Tag Line:To invoke the provisions of section 364-A, it is incumbent upon the court to first see whether there was kidnapping within the meaning of section 361 PPC which envisages the co-existence of three elements contained therein namely (i) The minor was taken or enticed away by the kidnapper. (ii) The minor was out of the keeping of the lawful guardian (iii) The keeping of the minor was without the consent of the guardian. Once kidnapping is established, the question under section 364-A would be as to whether the appellant intended to murder the victim or subject her to grievous hurt or lust.
9. The words 'take' and 'entices away' used in section 361 PPC are key words to the offense of kidnapping implying some action on the part of the kidnapper to take or entice away the kidnapee followed by keeping the kidnapee out of the lawful guardianship of the guardian without his consent. The expression "taking" and "enticing" call for some positive steps taken by the accused to remove the girl from the custody of her guardian. Neither Section 361 PPC nor Section 363 PPC would have any application if the girl of her own accord the word 'kidnapping' connotes stealing away a child without the permission of a person under whose custody or care the child is'.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 995
Advocates:Muhammad Hanif(ADVO-10943-SBC-KHC),Imran Khan(ADVO-12660-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
1499) 110/2009 Cr.J.A Inayatullah Mugheri (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 09-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.449/2015 Inayatullah Mugheri v. The State,Crl.A.154/2018 Inayatullah Mugheri v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1500) 1360/2015 Const. P. Adil Rashid (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.393-K/2019 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others,C.A.20-K/2020 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,
1501) 746/2022 Const. P. Umeed Ali (Petitioner) V/S Deputy Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Service matters (Deceased quota)
Tag Line:It is crystal clear that the respondentrevenue department/Government of Sindh has to make recruitment to every post applied by the candidates under the law as discussed supra as well as based on invalidated or incapacitated/minority/differently-abled and deceased quota
reserved for those employees by issuing appointment order by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974.
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 71
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 02-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
1502) 79/2002 Cr.S.M.Rev State (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Ayub (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Mr. Justice Khalid Ali Z. Qazi
Order Date: 23-JUN-08
Approved for Reporting
1503) 13/2023 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. IFTIKHAR ALI S/O MUHAMMAD DIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 247
Advocates:Mohammad Akbar Khan(ADVO-2642-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
1504) 184/2023 Cr.Bail MST. DANIA BIBI D/O MALIK MUKHTIAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1231
Advocates:Liaquat Ali(ADVO-14595-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
1505) 629/2025 Const. P. Mst. Sumaira Bibi & another (Petitioner) V/S SHO PS Dokri , Dist. Larkana & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 2063
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
1506) 41/2020 Criminal Appeal Zaheer s/o Haji Qasim Lakho (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (Control of Narcotic 9(C) Appeal allowed On Ground contradictions in the evidence of complainant and mashir, )
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1141
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1082/2020 Zaffarullah v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor A.N.F. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1507) 490/1998 Cr.Bail Muhammad Umar @Umro (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Cancellation (Bail granted by High Court ,Accused Jumped From trial Court . Sessions Court Competent to Cancel bail. ial Court ,)
Mr. Mohammad Sadiq Laghari
Order Date: 01-JAN-98
Approved for Reporting
1508) 184/2013 R.A (Civil Revision) SYED MURSHAD ALI (Applicant) V/S SYED AMJAD ALI & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 06.03.2014, whereby the impugned judgment was set aside, and this Civil Revision Application was allowed with costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) payable by respondents 1 and 2 each to the applicant.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.520-K/2018 Syed Sarfaraz Ali v. Syed Murshid Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1509) 1346/2012 Const. P. M/s M.R Industires (Petitioner) V/S The Sindh Employees & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PLC Lab. 72
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon
Order Date: 12-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.234-K/2014 M/s M.R. Industries through its Managing Partner v. The Sindh Employees Social Security Institution and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1510) 817/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam Tunio (Petitioner) V/S XEN SCARP Larkana (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:No judge of a High Court or the Supreme Court is robed, crowned and sceptered as a King to do whatever suits his whim and caprice.
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 442
Advocates:Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(ADVO-545-SBC-LRK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1511) 1817/2019 Const. P. Marie Stopes Society (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Signing of MoU by NGO
Tag Line:The application of an organization for signing MoU cannot be rejected merely on the account of dubious activities.
Every Citizen / person has an inalienable right to enjoy the protection of law and be treated as such.
The acquiescence is specie of estoppel but there can be no estoppel against the law. Every decision / order / judgment passed by any forum, department or Court should be passed after application of mind with reasoning.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 573
Advocates:Dr. Atif ud Din(ADVO-12716-SBC-KHE),Deputy Attorney General(),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 28-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1001/2022 Federation of Pakistan through the Federal Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Revenue Economic Affairs, Statistics & Privatization, Islamabad v. Marie Stopes Society through its authorized officer, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1512) 40/2021 Const. P. Munawar Ali Sagar & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:A) The site "Karoonjhar Hills" is not available for excavation of any nature whatsoever except excavation for discovering historical monuments and that too after following international guidelines and archeological department
B) Mines & Mineral Department do not enjoy the jurisdiction over
it since it is protected heritage and not available as a site for
mining/excavation;
C) Entire range Karoonjhar Hills in ???one monument??? under the
law and cannot be divided into pieces and portions and to
make some part of it (range) available for any prohibited
excavation. Its importance lies in preserving the entire range
and not permitting mineral excavation in between as it would
not only destroy the beauty but at the conclusion of mining
process would destroy the existing topography
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 428
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 16-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3964/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh Secretariat, Karachi v. Munawar Ali Sagar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Notice
1513) 1494/2008 Suit M/S.CENTURY INSURANCE CO.LTD (Plaintiff) V/S THE ASSITANT COLELCTOR (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005.
Tag Line:Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 197
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
1514) 4646/2017 Const. P. Z.A Quraishi and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same.
Topic: Service matters (restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension)
Tag Line:Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 70
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
1515) 122/2010 Civil Revision Muhammad Naeem & Others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Muhammad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Tag Line: it is a case of material irregularities and illegalities, as the evidence is totally contrary and against the claim of respondent whose suit was decreed. Hence the suit of the plaintiff/respondent No.1 stands dismissed. However, this would not give a license to the applicants as far as their claim is concerned and the revenue authorities are at liberty to act in accordance with law.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1179-K/2018 Ghulam Muhammad v. Muhammad Naeem and others,C.A.15-K/2020 Ghulam Muhammad v. Muhammad Naeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed and Remanded
1516) 72/2014 II.A. Amanullah (Appellant) V/S Inamullah and Shahid Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui
Order Date: 20-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
1517) 37/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Mithal (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
1518) 764/2024 Cr.Bail SUBASH S/O JAYRAM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Accused specifically nominated in the FIR with specific role)
Tag Line:Before deciding the post-arrest bail on merit, which is based on two versions one forwarded by the complainant present in court and the second by the investigating officer who challaned the case, who challaned the present applicant along with others, these two versions require thorough probe by the trial Court. However, I am cognizant of the fact that, while deciding a Bail Application, only allegations made in the FIR, statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. nature and gravity of the charge, other incriminating material against the accused, legal pleas raised by the accused and relevant law have to be considered. However, in the present case, the record reveals that the offense with which the accused/applicant has been charged is non-compoundable. However, in view of the statement of the complainant as recorded above, as well as his affidavit of no objection, the case of the applicant/accused calls for further inquiry under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr.P.C. The record also shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict nor a hardened criminal. Moreover, he has been behind bars since his arrest and is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance, that could justify keeping him behind bars for an indefinite period pending the determination of his guilt. Consequently, while taking into consideration the statement of the complainant before the Court and his affidavit, the applicant is admitted to post-arrest bail in crime No. 145 of 2024 of PS Steel Town subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 86
Advocates:Liaquat Ali(ADVO-14595-SBC-KHI),Shafique Ahmed(ADVO-52507-SBC-KHS),Javed Ahmed(ADVO-4482-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
1519) 1847/2016 Suit M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Emirates Airline / Emirates Sky Cargo & other (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Term an act of war or armed conflict as mentioned in Rule 18(2)(c) of the Fourth Schedule of Carriage by Air Act, 2012, also means non-international armed conflict (NIAC). Armed attack at Jinnah International Airport on 08.06.2014 falls within non-international armed conflict (NIAC) or at least it may be categorised as a hybrid phenomena; where repeated acts of terrorism in furtherance of defined objectives translated into a non-international armed conflict.
Topic: International Law
Tag Line:Term an act of war or armed conflict as mentioned in Rule 18(2)(c) of the Fourth Schedule of Carriage by Air Act, 2012, also means non-international armed conflict (NIAC). Armed attack at Jinnah International Airport on 08.06.2014 falls within non-international armed conflict (NIAC) or at least it may be categorised as a hybrid phenomena; where repeated acts of terrorism in furtherance of defined objectives translated into a non-international armed conflict.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1835
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
1520) 5262/2013 Const. P. M/s Inland Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Mehdi Khan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Salary)
Citation:2019 PLC Lab. 182
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1521) 733/2017 Const. P. Faqirullah (Petitioner) V/S D.G Pakistan Public and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 720
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.947-K/2018 Faqirullah v. The Director General Pakistan Public Works Department, Ibd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1522) 102/2011 Suit Muhammad Akram Solangi and others (Petitioner) V/S D.C.O, Khairpur and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
1523) 207/2019 Criminal Appeal Riazullah and another (Appellant) V/S VS The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Criminal Appeal (Death Sentenced Converted to life Imprisonment , Evidence in Shape of Medical and Confessional Statement before Judicial Magistrate, )
Citation:2020 YLR 115
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.613/2020 Riazullah S/o Rafiullah Khan and another v. The State through Deputy Prosecutor General, Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
1524) 378/2024 Const. P. Syed Raheel Ahmed S/o Syed Tanzeem Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Syeda Zona Naqvi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bridal gifts given by a husband are the absolute property of a wife and cannot be taken away from her. A bride can always recover the articles of bridal gifts, ???WARI??? and presents given to her by a bridegroom or his family at the time of the marriage.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 803
Advocates:Quaiser Jamil Ahmed Malik(ADVO-3103-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.473-K/2024 Syed Raheel Ahmed v. Mst. Syeda Zona Naqvi and others,C.P.L.A.1713/2025 Chairman, Union Council No.18 Malguzar Taluka Kandhkot, District Kashmore and another v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government, Sindh Local Government Board Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Pending Adjourned
1525) 4363/2022 Const. P. Shahab Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Validity of Regulation No. 3-2.14.3 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 in the context Section 6 and 7D of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 975
Advocates:Muhammad Riaz(ADVO-11621-SBC-KHI),Tarik Ali(ADVO-4931-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Akram Tariq(ADVO-14630-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
1526) 37/2003 I. A Mst: Kanwal (Appellant) V/S Dr.Muhammad Suhail (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 589
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
1527) 213/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Muhammad Hasan Nadeem & others (Applicant) V/S Collector of Custom (Adjudication-I) & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 478
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Saad Fayaz(ADVO-15882-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
1528) 19/2016 Judicial Companies Misc. Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Dadabhoy Insurance Co. Ltd (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLD 993
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1529) 277/2012 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Khas Trading Co (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 22
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 05-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
1530) 2829/2010 Const. P. M/s.Iqbal & Sons (Petitioner) V/S CDGK through DCO & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
No rule is prescribed under Sindh Public Procurement Rules, 2010, whereby on rejection of a tender to the lowest bidder, the second lowest bidder can be considered as the successful bidder on the same terms but the same states that negotiations with the bidder are not permissible in terms of Rule 52 and 83 of the Sindh Public Procurement Rules 2010. It is trite principle of law that a public functionary while performing function under the law, rule and regulation, is required to adhere to such law, rule and regulation in its letter and spirit. The discretion vested in a public functionary is to be exercised strictly in accordance with law in a reasonable and transparent manner and not under a colorful exercise of authority.
Though, while exercising constitutional jurisdiction, there is no absolute bar in entertaining the grievances of the aggrieved person against the orders or actions of public functionaries, however, such discretion is to be exercised rarely in cases where there is some jurisdictional error or gross violation of law and the alternate remedy is not considered to be efficacious under the facts and circumstances of the case.
Detailed principle as per rules explained.
In such circumstances, the case is remanded back to the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law and the relevant rules and dispose of the same within a period of seven days after providing proper opportunity to the petitioner and if the petitioner still fails to justify his claim he may avail the alternate remedy before the forum provided in terms of Rule 31 of Sindh Public Procurement Rules, 2010, whereafter the petitioner may avail any other remedy as available to him under the facts and circumstances of the case.
The instant petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed applications.
Tag Line:Sindh Public Procurement Rules, 2010.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 16-NOV-10
Approved for Reporting
1531) 40/2009 I. A Karim Dad Khushk (Appellant) V/S United Bank Ltd., (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
1532) 1602/2002 Suit Adnan Abid (Plaintiff) V/S Munaf Attara and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 28-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
1533) 1505/2000 Suit MST. SAFIA BEGUM. (Plaintiff) V/S D.M.C. KARACHI (SOUTH) & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Advocates:Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),Amir Maqsood(ADVO-6412-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin(ADVO-3032-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
1534) 265/2006 Const. P. Evacuee Trust Property Board. (Petitioner) V/S Wahabiddomn and Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 412
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.712-K/2022 Evacuee Trust Property Board Government of Pakistan v. Wahabuddin & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1535) 1409/2001 Suit TRADING CORP. OF PAK. PVT. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. COX & KING AGENTS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
1536) 76/2007 Civil Revision Allah Bux and others (Applicant) V/S Govt.of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:There is no cavil to the proposition that the entries were neither substantiated before trial Court nor before appellate Court and there was no reason to have relied upon those entries which have no basis as far as title is concerned and the appeal was rightly allowed and consequently the suit was dismissed. Similarly, taking into consideration the contentions of the learned State counsel regarding maintainability of suit, such being a question which is apparent on the face of it such as defect which is not curable and since it is legal, can be raised at any stage including revisional and appellate stage. There is no cavil to the proposition that Government functionaries / authorities are to be sued as required in terms of Article 174 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 as well as Section 79 CPC. In these proceedings, the Provincial of Sindh was sued through Deputy Commissioner which is not in consonance with the judgment of (1) Haji Abdul Aziz and (2) Government of Balochistan (supra) which provides a mechanism of suing the Government through Province of Sindh and through concerned Secretary to the Government. Commissioner under the hierarchy does not represent the Province in the manner as highlighted in the plaint and as such the objection raised by the learned State Counsel also goes on to prove that the suit at the very inception should have been buried as the legal mandatory formalities in terms of Section 79 CPC and Article 174 of the Constitution have not been complied.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1463-K/2018 Allah Bux & others v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1537) 142/2012 Suit DOLLAR INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD. & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S KAMRAN AKHLAQ (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 405
Advocates:Muhammad Azeem(ADVO-8715-SBC-KHI),Kazim Raza Abbasi(ADVO-12253-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1538) 2231/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Dawood Wagan (Petitioner) V/S The province of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Amenity Plot (Allowed), Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:In the light of foregoing, we have reached the conclusion that the amenity plots cannot be converted into either commercial or residential purposes and no encroachment can be allowed on the amenity plot as discussed supra. The report of learned Commissioner is very clear in its terms that no any amenity plot was found in existence in the housing scheme during the inspection, except one open plot of about 1200 sq.ft and a mosque about 2400 sq. ft. in Kehkashan Housing Scheme and Midland Bungalow adjacent with plot No.38 and 39, therefore, the objections raised by the learned counsel for the Respondents 8 & 9 on the site inspection report are of no consequence in view of the orders passed by this Court and Honble Supreme Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
1539) 599/2022 Const. P. Miss Seema Sanam (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:The petitioner was appointed on daily wage basis and is seeking regularisation. However, in the absence of any statutory backing, regularisation can not be granted. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1352, 2025 SHC SUK 1356, 2025 SHC SUK 1358
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
1540) 5890/2018 Const. P. Ashiq Hussain Chaudhary & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (section 117), Cantonments Act 1924, Cantonments Act 1924 (section 179), Cantonments Act 1924 (section 181), Cantonments Act 1924 (section 108), Cantonments Act 1924 (section 116)
Tag Line:If at all any alteration is inevitable or the open spaces that vests with the Cantonment Board now
is required, the powers and jurisdictions vests with the Board with whose consultation the desired object could be materialized and not otherwise.
Citation:2021 CLC 1437
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 02-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1026/2021 The Officer In-Charge Army Housing Directorate, Karachi v. The Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of Defense, Rawalpindi Cantt and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
1541) 1227/2009 Const. P. Evacuee Trust Property Larkana/Sukkur (Petitioner) V/S Mohib Ahmed Khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 1119
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 10-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1422/2024 Evacuee Trust Property Board through Assistant Administrator Larkana / Sukkur v. Mohib Ahmed Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1542) 771/2024 Const. P. Teerath (Petitioner) V/S Beena D/o Somji (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Tag Line:The learned trial Court was duly empowered to appreciate the evidence and no case has been set forth to apprehend that the same was not done. Just because the view of one party did not prevail does not vitiate the process. The entire matter was open to the appellate Court, but not approached at the first instance for deliberation whether to differ with the judgment rendered by the learned trial Court or otherwise. The counsel remained unable to demonstrate any apparent infirmity about the appreciation of evidence that does not merit any consideration by this Court. Even otherwise such an exercise is not amenable for adjudication in writ jurisdiction. On the aforesaid proposition we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court reported as 2011 SCMR 1990; 2001 SCMR 574 and PLD 2001 Supreme Court 415.
Citation:2024 SHC MPK 341
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
1543) 1662/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Uris and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
1544) 212/2019 Criminal Appeal Parvaiz (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
1200 grams of charas appeal allowed
Tag Line:1200 grams of charas appeal allowed
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1966
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
1545) 740/2018 Const. P. DR. Mazhar Ali Hisbani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sind & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (Deferred on ground not finalized earlier, the disciplinary/departmental proceedings . )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
1546) 5196/2017 Const. P. SESSI United Staff Union sindh (CBA) & ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Sindh Employees Social Security Institution--vacant posts in SESSI were required to be filled through the competitive process--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the appointment in the public office can only be made through the competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise as discussed supra. It is well-settled law that appointments in public office are to be made strictly under applicable rules and regulations without any discrimination and in a transparent manner. Thus, all appointments in the public institution must be based on a process that is substantially and tangibly fair and within the parameters of its applicable rules, regulations, and bylaws. However, if the candidate has applied based on such admissible quota under the law he can be accommodated subject to his qualification for the post under the dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan on the subject issue--
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1091
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1547) 24/2019 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Attari Traders (Applicant) V/S Appellate Tribunal SRB Karachi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 (doctrine of the exhaustion of rights after first sale)
Tag Line:The foregoing position of law makes it clear in our minds that the nature of transaction of sale/purchase of goods between the manufacturer and the applicant established through the agreement/appointment letter aims to propel a service performed by the applicant which could rightly fall under the head of supply chain management/ distribution (including delivery) service, hence attracts the provisions of the 2011 Act, and the Tribunal did not misinterpreted or misapplied the relevant tariff heading 9845.0000 to the case of the applicant. Resultantly Question Nos. I and II are answered in Affirmative and the Question No. III is answered in Negative.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1425
Advocates:Shahid Iqbal Rana(ADVO-27398-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
1548) 162/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Alim Shar (Petitioner) V/S Shah Nawaz & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Order XXIII CPC conditional withdrawal of suit.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 783
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
1549) 6555/2016 Const. P. Maj (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Contract employee)
Citation:2019 SCMR 984
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 12-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.514-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.A.26-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ Relist after summer vacation before a 3 Member Bench at Islamabad ],Disposed Dismissed
1550) 2603/2015 Suit Novartis Pharma Pakistan Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: DRAP ACT
Tag Line: The drugs are being considered as essential commodities. These are always subject to regulations and unbridled ways of dealing with the prices and allowing market forces to set the prices cannot be granted. This could not be taken as violative of Article 18 or 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan. These are reasonable restrictions and are being protected under the Constitution as often it happens the cartels are formed to manipulate the situation of these essential commodities and hence are always subjected to reasonable restrictions. However, in Suit No.1217 of 2016 in which Mr. Anwar Mansoor Khan learned advocate is appearing wherein Policy itself has been challenged I would dispose of the injunction application in the following terms and keep the lis pending as an issue in relation to the vires of subject policy had not been framed. Any finding here would not influence the trial of this suit.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 19-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
1551) 1826/2017 Suit The Stillman (Plaintiff) V/S S. M. Anees (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 815
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
1552) 5058/2019 Const. P. M/s Liberty Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 16-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
1553) 1904/2014 Const. P. Fotile Kitchen & Home Appliances (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 1580
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 13-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
1554) 852/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Osaka Electronic & Industries Co. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1105
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1555) 19/2018 E.P Jam Saifullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
1556) 127/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf Khan (Petitioner) V/S Ministry of Interior & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 361
Advocates:Syed Kawish Hussain Naqvi(ADVO-19083-SBC-KHS),Junaid Ahmed(ADVO-15448-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
1557) 17/2013 Cr.Appeal Sadam Hussain (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 30-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.312/2018 Sadam Hussain v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted
1558) 92/2011 I. A Anwar Mehmood (Appellant) V/S Askari Bank Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 CLD 912
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 11-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
1559) 860/2014 Const. P. PTCL (Petitioner) V/S Prov of sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 PLC 13
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 15-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1560) 2171/2018 Suit M/s. Ahsan Engineering Works. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Petroleum Ltd., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tender (Tender issue until bid accepted, no vested right )
Tag Line:Public Procurement Rules 2004 - Claim of lowest and /one successful bidder - No vested Right - Recourse to fresh bidding is the only option left - Injunction refused.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1561) 6683/2018 Const. P. P.T.C.L (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 733
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
1562) 4037/2023 Const. P. Mrs. Viqar Unisa Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 584
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1043-K/2025 Viqar Unisa Begum v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary, Local Government & HTP Department, Government of Sindh , Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
1563) 1918/2015 Suit Mrs. Gulnar & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S K.M.C., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
1564) 1700/2014 Cr.Bail MIRZA KARIM BAIG S/O MIRZA MUHMMAD MAHBOOB BAIG (Petitioner) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
1565) 7558/2021 Const. P. M/s Abid Nisar International (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 615
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Abbas(ADVO-13908-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.769-K/2022 M/s. Abida Nisar International v. Collector of Customs & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1566) 123/2019 Cr.Acq.A. Moula Bux Chachar (Appellant) V/S Khan Mohammad alias Khoso (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 427
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 05-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
1567) 189/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. ARREY MASIH @ ERIC S/O BABU MASIH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1242
Advocates:Iftikhar Ahmed Shah(ADVO-17182-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Muhammad Tariq(ADVO-8862-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
1568) 149/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Adam Sugar Mills Limited, Karachi (Applicant) V/S The Appellate Tribunal I.R. of Pak. and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Section 8(1)(h) of Sales Tax Act, 1990. input tax adjustment not admissible on material used for construction by a registered person
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1258
Advocates:Ajazuddin Qureshi(ADVO-9652-SBC-KHE),Arif Ali(ADVO-18846-SBC-KHS),Imran Iqbal Khan(ADVO-9206-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 02-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1063-K/2024 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Limited v. Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1569) 1003/1997 Suit MST. FATIMA BAI & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S K.B.C.A. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
1570) 982/2008 Suit Muhammad Ali Shaikh (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 YLR 444
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 21-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
1571) 329/2020 Suit Danish Akhtar & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Directorate of Estate Projects & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 YLR 64
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
1572) 8/2008 I.T.R.A M/S. Raja Weavig Mills Ltd (Applicant) V/S The Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 09-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
1573) 62/2023 H.C.A Ghulam Ali P. Allana (Appellant) V/S LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES SUISSE SA & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Concept of Till Further Order), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XXXVIII Rule 5)
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 242
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Salman Hamid(ADVO-3747-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 05-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
1574) 485/2012 Suit SOORTY ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C. LTD & ANOTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Electricity Act, 1910 (section 20 )
Tag Line:when the parties are not at issue the question of its determination does not arise. The plaintiffs was already put on notice by notices dated 17.2.2012 and the controversy came to an end on account of such admission with regard to keeping the load as standby. The distinguishing features as far as this suit and the Suit No. 329/2012 are concerned is of course the admitted position with regard to the status of the sanctioned load when the initial notices dated 17.02.2012 were replied. Since there was no question of determination and even after the issuance of notices it was consistent stand of the plaintiff that it was keeping the sanctioned load as standby, the defendant No.1 was well within their right to disconnect the electricity as the determination is not required.
Citation:2012 CLC 1508
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting
1575) 207/2017 I.T.R.A Citi Bank NA Karachi (Applicant) V/S The Commission Inland Revenue (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 07-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
1576) 101/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs Model (Applicant) V/S M/s.Kapron Overseas Supplies Co,Ltd.,, (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
1577) 955/2021 Const. P. Mst. Shawana Hussain D/o Iftikhar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Shahzaib and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1311
Advocates:Muhammad Aqil(ADVO-3154-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Hafiz(ADVO-8755-SBC-KHI),Rahat Fazal(ADVO-5355-SBC-KHE),Arif Dawood(ADVO-8711-SBC-KHI),Muzammil Iqbal(ADVO-9075-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.179-K/2024 Shahzaib v. Mst. Shawana Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to Appellate Court.
1578) 3974/2021 Const. P. Syed Atif Salman Hashmi and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 682
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 09-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
1579) 210/2024 I.T.R.A LIBERTY POWER TECH LIMITED (Applicant) V/S COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Rectification; section 221 of the Income Tax Ordinance,2001, guidelines as to error apparent on record;
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 492
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Barrister Dr. Huma Sodher(ADVO-8700-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 29-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
1580) 265/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Salman Khan Baloch (Adv) (Petitioner) V/S Syed Mustafa Kamal & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P. No.D-265 of 2020 (writ of quo warranto) filed by Mohammad Salman Khan Baloch against Syed Mustafa Kamal, Ex City Nazim (Mayor) of Karachi for his disqualification. The petition has been dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 528
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
1581) 49/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Khalique Rind (Applicant) V/S Raees Ali Akbar Shabrani and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 616
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
1582) 5839/2015 Const. P. Arshad Noor Khan (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 360
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
1583) 2785/2013 Const. P. Ghulam Mohammad Khoso (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 YLR 1028
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 21-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.433/2024 Chairman National Highway Authority thr. its Authorized officer, Karachi v. Ghulam Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1584) 1614/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD ZAFEER SIDDIQUI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 563
Advocates:Abdul Qayyum Khan Abbasi(ADVO-7342-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1585) 222/1993 R.A (Civil Revision) Delhi Mercantile Muslim Co.Operative Hou (Applicant) V/S M.Jawaid & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Conversion of plot void ab initio ??? MLO 34.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 332
Advocates:Mohammad Zia Qureshi(ADVO-4028-SBC-KHI),Mansoor Ali Ghanghro(ADVO-12030-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zubair Qureshi(ADVO-2946-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Ali Ghanghro(ADVO-20942-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1586) 6339/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Habeen Fatani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:ECL Matter.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 652
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
1587) 1477/2024 Cr.Bail Mst. Yasmeen W/o Zulfiqar Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:According to the case of the prosecution, 560 grams of Heroin was recovered from the applicant, not only because the quantity of 60 grams exceeds the upper limit of 500 grams to bring the case within the prohibition contained in section 497(1) Cr. P.C. The Supreme Court in such circumstances granted post-arrest bail to the lady accused, keeping in view the (II) Proviso of Section 497 Cr. P.C. in the case of Mst. Kainat Bibi v. The State (2022 SCMR 609). The Supreme Court also in the case of Ateebur Rehman v. The State (2016 SCMR 1424), which involved the recovery of 1014 grams of heroin, and Ayaz Khan and another v. The State (2020 SCMR 350), which involved the recovery of 1100 grams of heroin, granted bail in both cases. In the present case, the guilt or innocence of the applicants is yet to be determined by the trial Court. The prosecution has not placed any material to establish that the applicant is a previous convict, mere involved in the same and similar offenses in the past cannot be a ground to refuse bail as this case can be decided on merit, therefore past record cannot be cited as precedent to refuse bail on this point.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1047
Advocates:Ahmed Hussain(ADVO-207-SBC-THT),Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-18376-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
1588) 120/2019 Cr.Bail Shahid Ahmed Shaikh (Applicant) V/S PO SIndh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
1589) 426/2022 H.C.A Prof. Dr. Amir Bux Channa & Another (Appellant) V/S Isra Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) Ltd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters
Tag Line:No High Court Appeal is maintainable under Section 6(14) of the Companies Act, 2017 against a final order of a Company Judge
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 926
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
1590) 1177/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Murtaza (Petitioner) V/S Gul Sher & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 106
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
1591) 104/2018 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S PAKISTAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1016
Advocates:S. Mohsin Imam Wasti(ADVO-4357-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1592) 2165/2012 Const. P. M/s. Naushero Feroz-I CNG Station (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 2198, 2019 SBLR 346
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1119-K/2018 M/s Naushehro Feroze-1, CNG Station v. Federation of Pakistan thr Secy: M/o Petroleum and Natural Resoures and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1593) 323/1998 H.C.A Muhammad Amin & another (Appellant) V/S Mst. Abida (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Farrukh Usman(ADVO-12432-SBC-KHI),Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI),Amir Maqsood(ADVO-6412-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
1594) 28/2020 I.T.R.A M/S. TELENOR MICRO FINANCE BANK LTD. (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 473
Advocates:Furqan Mohiuddin Ansari(ADVO-17092-SBC-KHE),Aminuddin Ansari(ADVO-3574-SBC-KHI),Shams Mohiuddin Ansari(ADVO-9489-SBC-KHC),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
1595) 754/2016 Cr.Bail SHERAZ S/O ALI BHAI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 02-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
1596) 600/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd (Applicant) V/S Additional Collector of Customs & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 02-APR-12
Approved for Reporting
1597) 25/2015 Execution First Appeal M/s. S.K. Enterprises (Decree Holder) V/S Dadabhoy Multi-purpose Coperative Housing Soceity (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 15-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
1598) 147/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Shafi Nagori (died thr LRs) Thr Waqar (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ayoub and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Proprietary rights.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 245
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Waseem Iqbal(ADVO-15948-SBC-MLR),Syed Ehsan Raza(ADVO-4790-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
1599) 2365/2021 Cr.Bail BASHEER AHMED S/O ABDUL WADOOD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:seeking post-arrest bail in FIR No.665/2021 of PS Ittehad Town, Karachi registered under Section 23(i) A of the Sindh Arms Act, 2013
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1098
Advocates:Aamir Haroon(ADVO-19016-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1600) 362/2012 Suit M/S. DALDA FOODS (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 04-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
1601) 509/2014 Const. P. Arif Khan and 31 others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.412-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Arif Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1602) 32/2023 Const. P. Mst. Kishwar Aijaz Thr. Attorney Aijaz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Family Judge/J,M. XXVII, Karachi (East) and Anothe (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 634
Advocates:Nisar Ahmed Khan(ADVO-17724-SBC-KHE),Chand Bibi(ADVO-18900-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
1603) 4666/2013 Const. P. Afaq A. Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Chief Secretary and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
1604) 1382/2025 Const. P. Dost Ali Solangi (Petitioner) V/S DIG Shaheed Benazir Abad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2223
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date: 08-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
1605) 50/2025 Const. P. Mst. Hayat Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Pension of widowed daughter
recurring cause of action, laches not involved
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 2123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
1606) 1469/2010 Suit MST.AFSHAN (Plaintiff) V/S SYED KAMRAN ALI SHAH & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
1607) 2681/2025 Const. P. Rayan Technology (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Freezing of Bank Accounts by the FIA is set-aside.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1968, 2025 SHC KHI 1982, 2025 SHC KHI 1983
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
1608) 5144/2015 Const. P. Dr. Altaf Hussain and Others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:they have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments/services be regularized in respondent-Water and Power Development Authority (`WAPDA`) without discrimination, with a further assertion that they have already served in WAPDA for a considerable period and they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis rather than joining fresh process with other candidates--
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 732
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1519-K/2021 WAPDA through its Director Legal & others v. Dr.Haresh Kumar & others,C.P.L.A.1580/2022 Water and Power Development Authority thr. its Chairman, Lahore & others v. Dr. Altaf Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed/No Intereference
1609) 49/2018 H.C.A Syed Hamid Mir & another (Appellant) V/S Board of Revenue Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1229
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 04-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
1610) 3190/2011 Const. P. mran Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 474
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 11-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
1611) 2918/2023 Const. P. Naeem ur Rehman Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Local Government Act, 2013 (Section 18, 21, 79 to 81, ), CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 ( Article 90, 91, 130, 130(9) and 140A)
Tag Line:*The Federal and Provincial Governments are
constitutional constructs whereby they are governed by the provisions
set out under the Constitution whereas the Local Government is a
statutory construct which operates under the Provincial Government
hence since the Local Government system is a statutory construct and
operates on the basis of enactments by the Provincial Government, the
same can be statutorily amended, which is well within the legislative
competence of the Provincial Government.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 480
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 11-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
1612) 3550/2013 Const. P. Akhter Billoo (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 11-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
1613) 47/2011 Cr.J.A Ghulam Sarwar Maitlo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.634/2018 Ghulam Sarwar Maitlo v. The State,Crl.A.331/2022 Ghulam Sarwar Maitlo v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Partly Allowed
1614) 464/2003 Const. P. Samiur Rehman and another (Petitioner) V/S IInd ADJ South Karachi and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 03-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.145-K/2017 M/s State Life Insurance Corporation Pakistan v. Sami-ur-Rehman and others,C.A.78-K/2017 M/s State Life Insurance Corporation Pakistan v. Sami-ur-Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
1615) 579/2014 Suit Mr. Asif Mannan & others (Plaintiff) V/S Mr. Suleman Lallani & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Plaintiffs being minority shareholders in Defendant No.9 (Company in question) are primarily aggrieved with payment of Rs.430.944 Million to Defendant No.8 as advisory fee and its post facto approval from shareholders, and since admittedly the quantum of Plaintiffs shareholding is less than what is required to maintain a Company petition under the then Companies Ordinance 1984, and even under the Companies Act, 2017, instant Suit has been filed under the Ordinary Civil jurisdiction of this Court by relying upon the exception to the rule settled in the case of [Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189]. Their case is that the alleged transaction has caused a tremendous loss to the Company in question and as a consequence thereof, the shareholders have lost substantial amount of their money, and therefore, the present Suit in the form of a derivative action is competent. However, Plaintiffs have not been able to convince this Court that their case as set-up for the purposes of interim relief, (at least), would fall within the exception to rule laid down in Foss v Harbottle; rather, on facts it is covered by the said judgment; hence, the applications filed on behalf of the Plaintiffs at Serial No. 1, 3 & 4 (CMA Nos.4651/2014, 588/2015 and 13510/2015) are hereby dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1563
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
1616) 877/2007 Suit M/S. NISAR AHMED JAPANWALA (Plaintiff) V/S THE C.D.G.K. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 06-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
1617) 192/2006 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Collector of Sales Tax & Federal Excise (Applicant) V/S M/s. Hilton Pharma (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Admissibility of input tax under Section 7 on supplies which were taxable at the relevant time; held; Yes.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 183
Advocates:Abdul Rahim Lakhani(ADVO-4061-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 21-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
1618) 670/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam Kalhoro (Petitioner) V/S District & Sessions Judge Larkana & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 54
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 10-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
1619) 1202/2021 Const. P. Aftab Alam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:SESSI
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 609
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.586-K/2021 Sindh Employees Social Security Institution v. Aftab Alam & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1620) 47/2017 M.A. M/s. Labbaik Pvt Ltd (Appellant) V/S PEMRA & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002
Tag Line:hese folds, as unfolded, could only reveal contravention on the part of the Ministry of Interior and not on the part of appellant. Security clearance no doubt is inevitable but under the present set of facts Council of Complaints would not come in picture. Rule 7(d) of Rules 2009 without any ambiguity provides a right to PEMRA to ascertain the credibility and track record of the management and the majority shareholding and management control and so also in terms of Rule 7(e) read with Rule 9(5) of 2009 Rules at inception, whereas 30(d) caters for subsequent change. It however does not include the scope of Council of Complaints in terms of Section 30(d) of the Ordinance 2002 as prima facie it relates to issues between Ministry of Interior and PEMRA.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1506/2017 PEMRA thr. Secretary to Authority, Islamabad v. M/s Labbaik (Pvt.) Ltd. and others,C.A.1568/2017 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) thr. Secretary to Authority v. M/s Labbaik (Pvt.) Ltd and others,C.P.1689/2017 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) thr. Secretary to Authority v. M/s Labbaik (Pvt.) Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of as having been Fructified,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
1621) 6/2005 I. A Asad Ali Khan (Appellant) V/S The Conservator Forest and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:1. In a Reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act it is the obligation of the person claiming compensation to prove his ownership beyond any doubt.
2. A Reference under section 18 of the Act is different from a Reference under Section 30 ibid and cannot be converted from one to the other by the Referee Court;
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 110
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 11-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
1622) 504/1985 Suit TEWFIQ FIKREE & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S V/S USMANI FIKREE & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
1623) 1317/2021 Cr.Bail INTEKHAB ALAM QURESHI S/O MUHAMMAD YOUNUS QURESHI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:seeking pre-arrest bail in F.I.R No. 432 of 2021, for an offense under section 489-F P.P.C at Liaquatabad Police Station, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 504
Advocates:Barrister Zulfiqar Ali Khan Jalbani(ADVO-17147-SBC-KHS),Mohammad Sharif Buriro(ADVO-17608-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1624) 307/2019 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Hassan Narejo & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 2163
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 28-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
1625) 203/2017 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S MAPAK EDIBLE OIL (PVT) LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
1626) 3606/2010 Const. P. Khayabane Saddi Rizwan Abbasi Resident Trust & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
1627) 237/2018 Cr.Acq.A. GHULAM MUJTABA S/O LATE ABDUL AZIZ (Appellant) V/S SYED HASSAN & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---
----S. 182---False information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person---Appeal against acquittal---"Aggrieved person"---Scope---Station House Officer (SHO) requested the trial court for prosecution of respondent under S. 182, P.P.C. on the ground that he had furnished false information for lodgment of first information report (FIR) under Ss. 506 and 34, P.P.C. read with S. 25 of Telegraph Act, 1885---Trial court acquitted the respondent of the charge---Validity---Appellant, nominated accused in earlier FIR, could not be aggrieved by the decision of the Magistrate on the complaint under S. 182, P.P.C. filed by public servant---Section 182, P.P.C. did not refer to any private person and it related "to cause public servant to use his power" and in case such information was found false then such public servant could initiate proceedings---Appellant was not a public servant nor the alleged false information was given to him---Right of appeal on the orders passed by Magistrate did not lie with the nominated accused for the reason that an appeal was continuity of original proceedings and admittedly the proceedings were not initiated by the appellant---Appeal against acquittal was dismissed.
Khuwaja Muhammad Waseem v. Syed Jalees Anjum and others 2018 PCr.LJ 1230 rel.
(b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---
---S. 182---False information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person---Scope--- Proceedings under S. 182, P.P.C. are not a remedy of any humiliation or insult suffered by the accused nominated in the false information given by the complainant to the Incharge Police Station.
Citation:2019 MLD 1994
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1628) 145/2023 Suit JDW Sugar Mills Limited & others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Injunction Granted. ), Sugar Factories Control Act, 1950
Tag Line:Now this debate is not concluding here to benefit any party to
whom quota was allocated or would be allocated following above
understanding of policy, but the end beneficiary is the federal
government as the policy ensured prompt foreign exchange in about 45
days of opening of Letter of Credit. We need to understand that the
subject matter is of such a magnitude that it requires immediate and
conclusive attention of Court. Cane commissioner misunderstood when
he applied his wisdom without following the limitations that they are
under. Federal government is also equally responsible in not assisting
this Court and clarifying the intent of policy to the cane commissioner as
adjudged above. Politics should not invade policy matter meant for
public interest in a way that fundamental and secured legal rights of
citizen would get prejudiced. This case seems to be one of those,
unfortunately. Thus, not being an ordinary situation I not only inclined
to grant injunction restraining cane commissioner to act in such manner
and distribute quota arbitrarily, but would expect prompt makeup for
the losses by adhering to the above conclusion drawn by this Court, as
far as sugar mills quota is concerned i.e. distribution on performance
based i.e. sugar crushed and/or sugar produced which is the only
justified formula provided by federal government when policy was made
and applied. Since it is time bound issue and since sugar has its best use
if consumed in two years' time, it is expected that cane commissioner
would respond and submit reallocation within two weeks from date of
this order
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 348, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1355
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
1629) 106/2017 Criminal Miscelleneous Arshad Mehmood and other (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
1630) 206/2010 Const. P. Mst.Jameela and others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Iqbal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
1631) 787/2020 Const. P. Dr. Mubeenuddin & others (Petitioner) V/S Khurram Shahzad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1435
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
1632) 3299/2016 Const. P. Bacho Leghari (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 24-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
1633) 32/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) SHAMIM AKHTER & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S THE CHAIRMAN EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 14 of Evacuee Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975)
Tag Line:Through this Civil Revision Application the applicants have challenged the order passed by Vth Additional District and Session Judge Karachi (South) in Civil Appeal, upholding the Judgment and Decree passed by VIIIth Senior Civil Judge Karachi (South) in Civil Suit; dismissing the suit of the Applicants.
Provisions of Pakistan Administration of Evacuee Property Act 1957, Evacuee Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975 in the light of the judgments pronounced by the Honble Supreme Court in the cases of Evacuee Trust Property Board v Mst. Zakia Begum and others (1992 SCMR 1313), Evacuee Trust Property Board v. Mst. Sakina Bibi and others (2007 SCMR 262) and Evacuee Trust Property Board, through Deputy/Assistant Administrator, Evacuee Trust Property, Peshawar v. Ali Bahadur (2011 PSC 22), were discussed.
No infirmity or material irregularity was found in the impugned judgments of the courts below, which could warrant interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court, Revision Application was dismissed.
Citation:2017 YLR 851
Advocates:Shab Alam(ADVO-12148-SBC-KHI),Shahid Iqbal Rana(ADVO-7703-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
1634) 63/2007 Suit.B NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN (Plaintiff) V/S RAJA TRADERS & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:Under the parameters of Financial Institutions (Recovery of
Finances) Ordinance, 2001 the defendant is entitled for a relief if
question of law and fact is being established. Article 10-A of the
constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan no doubt provides an
opportunity of fair trial but it does not amount to a trial of a suit where
neither any question of law nor a fact was established. Article 10-A of
the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan also provides for the
determination of a civil right and the obligation. Once the due process
as required in terms of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances)
Ordinance, 2001 is adopted and the defendant is before the Court for
redressal of his grievance, all he has to do is to establish the question of
fact and law for determination of civil right and obligation, which is to
be determined by the Court. In terms of Section 10(3) of the Financial
Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 the application for
leave to defend is supposed to be in the form of written statement
which shall be containing summary of substantial question of law as well
as fact in respect of which in the opinion of defendant, evidence needs
to be recorded..
Citation:2016 CLD 1938
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
1635) 2954/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 23
Advocates:Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 28-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.715-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Usman Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1636) 54/2010 II.A. Zafar Aziz Osmani (Appellant) V/S Lt. Col.(R) M. Yousuf Satti & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 896
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.4212/2018 Muhammad Gulistan Khan v. Zafar Aziz Osmani & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
1637) 213/2018 Cr.Rev BASHIR AHMED BADAL S/O ABDUL MAJEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Azeem(ADVO-8715-SBC-KHI),Syed Imtiaz Ali Shah(ADVO-12898-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.878-K/2022 Roshanuddin thr. his L.Rs. v. Manzoor Illahi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1638) 4612/2018 Const. P. M/S Saiban International (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 07-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
1639) 2707/2019 Const. P. Shah Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to award him incentive of timescale i.e. BPS-17 to BPS-19, from the date of his entitlement; and, other ancillary benefits, to bring him at par with the employees of other departments of Government of Sindh--whether the petitioner is entitled to the incentive of the timescale from BPS-17 to BPS-19 under the law or otherwise.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 992
Advocates:Soofia Saeed(ADVO-3712-SBC-KHI),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
1640) 727/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Zahid Ali Company (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 337
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1641) 69/2004 Execution Allied Bank of Pakistan (Decree Holder) V/S Fateh textile Mills ltd & othes (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
1642) 8477/2019 Const. P. Stafford Miller (Ireland) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S M/s ZNS Auto Corp & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 386
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI),Mumtaz Khan(ADVO-6377-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
1643) 405/2017 Cr.Bail Ashraf Barach & Another (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 21-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1644) 255/2019 Const. P. Mst Iffat & another (Petitioner) V/S Umar Farooque & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Family matter (CP dismissed with Cost . Maintenance of minor and her mother till iddat Period is Maintained. )
Tag Line:Family Matter. Filing of a Constitutional petition under Article 199 against concurrent findings of family court and Appellate Court. Not a matter of right and cannot be heard and decided as an appeal as in that case it would make such jurisdiction indistinguishable from the Appellate Court's jurisdiction which is not the intention of the Constitution makers.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 422
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
1645) 2991/2013 Const. P. Ali Asghar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 682
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.441-K/2017 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others,C.A.62-K/2018 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1646) 56/1987 Civil Revision Lt Col.(RTD) Nasim Ahmed & Others (Applicant) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 CLC 88, 2018 SBLR 2168
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
1647) 1913/2017 Const. P. Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Environment Law (Cutting of Trees), Sindh Local Government Act
Tag Line:Cutting of Trees (Environment): Green Belt with trees is a 'Public Trust' resource. Environmental Human Rights are in fact fundamental human rights. Plea of National Security is also justiciable. "Rational Basis Test" explained. Balance is to be struck between the policies relating to security and civil liberties. State Institutions are subject to the accountability. Judiciary in a Muslim Polity is clothed with greater obligation. Only concern council can direct the cutting of dangerous trees under paragraph 55 of Part II-Schedule II of SLGA 2013.
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 697
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1648) 183/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous GHULAM MUSTAFA S/O ABDUL KARIM & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 99
Advocates:Aamir Jamil(ADVO-12902-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
1649) 1673/2006 Suit Mrs. Shamshad Begum and another (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Iftikhar Hussain Jaffary and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 19-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
1650) 4789/2020 Const. P. Khizar Hayat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether the petitioner can challenge the show cause notice issued against him and his suspension order in a Constitution Petition?--We are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, a final decision against the petitioner has yet to be taken by the respondent- Police Department and he has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the said proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 364
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
1651) 1660/2023 Const. P. Ashique Ali Chijjan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 353
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1652) 3502/2021 Const. P. Syed Babar Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We do not agree with the statement of the learned counsel for the Petitioner on the aforesaid assertions for the simple reason that compulsory retirement from service is a major penalty under service jurisprudence and falls within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of the civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456]
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1111
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
1653) 151/2006 H.C.A Karachi Pipe Mills Ltd. & others (Appellant) V/S Habib Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 03-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
1654) 2220/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Nadeem Akber (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether the recruitment rules have been notified or gazetted--whether the competent authority is empowered under the Rules, 1974, to appoint civil servants from different departments of Government of Sindh to the Inspection and Registration of Private Institutions, School Education, and Literacy Department Cadre
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 404
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2287/2022 Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo v. Muhammad Nadeem Akber and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1655) 3478/2018 Const. P. Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment.
Topic: Service matters (Counting of previous service for pension)
Tag Line:the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1172
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1661/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Bashir Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
1656) 171/2010 Civil Revision Abdul Haleem and an other (Applicant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer and an other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 17-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
1657) 280/2022 Const. P. Yasir Kalwar S/o Abdul Wahab Kalwar (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Farzeen and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1025
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Shahzad Mahmood(ADVO-12500-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
1658) 1830/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Ikhlaq and another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 3401, 2025 SHC HYD 3402, 2025 SHC HYD 3403
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 28-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
1659) 10/2023 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUZAMIL S/O ZAKIR HUSSAIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 904
Advocates:Muhammad Nooruddin(ADVO-1341-SBC-SUK),Muhammad Khan(ADVO-10244-SBC-KHC),Naimatullah Shah(ADVO-13664-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
Order Date: 09-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
1660) 1480/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Saleh & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
1661) 39/2010 II.A. M/s. Habib Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. State Life Insurance Corporation (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Limitation)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 10-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
1662) 372/2020 Criminal Miscelleneous NOMAN AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1352
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Haris Rashid(ADVO-13980-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Bilal Rashid (ADVO-16235-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
1663) 3216/2021 Const. P. Badar Expro Solution (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1106
Advocates:Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Zayna Nazir Khan(ADVO-18780-SBC-KHS),Javeed Akhtar Rind(ADVO-9495-SBC-KHI),Syed Abrar Ahmed Bukhari(ADVO-3063-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
1664) 6/2019 Cr.Acctt.A Faisal (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 19-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
1665) 1/2017 M.A. (HESCO) Hyderabad (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Tanveer & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 189
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
1666) 1299/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Rafique Memon (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to reconsider the case of promotion of the petitioner in BPS-20, within three months, in the light of dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Federation of Pakistan v. Dr. Muhammad Arif, 2017 SCMR 969; and, his earlier supersession as recorded hereinabove will not come in his way, while considering his case for promotion in next rank with his batchmates, provided he is still in NAB service.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1562
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Addl. Deputy Prosecutor General NAB khi(AddlDyProsNAB),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
1667) 45/2012 Cr.Appeal Saeed Ahmed Solangi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 28-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
1668) 3/2021 M.A. M/s. Jiangsu Dajin Heavy Industry Co. Limited (Appellant) V/S Port Qasim Authority (PQA) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: General Clauses Act, 1897 (Section 24A), PPRA Rules, 2004 (Rule 36), PPRA Rules, 2004 ( Rule 25, 29, 30 and 31)
Tag Line:- Indeed, it appears that it was more than a month after opening of the bid that the appellant made an attempt to rectify its material inability by furnishing a separate/counter bank guarantee from Bank AlHabib for both the tenders. This deficiency could not have been resurrected as by then the ship sailed. These belated attempts would have amounted to a modification of the tender documents, which is not permissible under Rule 31 of Rules 2004. Eventually only those whose technical bids were found to be in consonance with the terms of the invitation, were liable to be considered for further steps and were considered accordingly.
-Petitioner being aware of the said tender conditions participated and having participated in the tender cannot challenge or dislike prerequisites meant for technical qualification. He could only expect judicious treatment within the playing rules however, it was too late for appellant when it realized that playing conditions were not palatable to it. The situation faced by appellant based on the aforesaid facts is not res integra as a number of judgments are in the filed covering the issue as settled law.
- Even if I have to measure bidding terms on the touchstone of malice and mala fide, I would come out with understanding that these terms are for every one and not to exclude anyone. These are commercial transactions and decisions in this regard should base on strict compliance of terms of tenders whereas equity and fair play based on financial offer is not primary concern. Even if someone intends to impress by showing better financial offer, he has to qualify first on technical grounds. It is the overall impact till completion of job that needs serious consideration by procuring agency. Whether a bidder has the ability to deliver as per terms of tenders and having capacity to ensure projects completion should be the primary concern of procuring agency. There is thus nothing which could lead to conclude that the process ended up in a decision of rejecting technical bid of appellant was flawed.
- Any term within frame of law is also not open for a judicial review even under the hierarchy of procurement laws as Rule 25 enables the procuring agency to require bid security not exceeding five per cent of the bid price to be furnished by every bidder and procuring agency may save its effectiveness for a period as they required in terms of Rule 26.
Citation:2021 CLC 1931
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
1669) 1042/2017 Suit Khalid Mehmood and others (Plaintiff) V/S M/s Multi Plus Corporation Private Limited and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLD 1737
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 21-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
1670) 3/2010 Cr.J.A Roshan Buriro & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 30-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.437/2018 Roshan & Sikandar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1671) 348/2011 Cr.Bail Kashif Raza (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-NOV-11
Approved for Reporting
1672) 5062/2020 Const. P. Engr: Muharram Khan and Othes (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether the private respondents are undertaking the work of professional engineers in terms of the Pakistan Engineering Council Act, 1975, being Diploma Holders. And whether their case falls within the ambit of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maula Bux Shaikh supra or otherwise.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 283
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Jhamat(ADVO-14-SBC-HYD),Deputy Attorney General(),Abdul Aziz(ADVO-20687-SBC-KHS),Asif Ali Jokhio(ADVO-14779-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
1673) 7286/2019 Const. P. Abdul Rauf (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 2063, 2020 SBLR Sindh 1633
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.226-K/2020 Abdul Rauf Nizamani v. Election Commission of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1674) 26/2012 J.M MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Petitioner) V/S MUHAMMAD AKBER BHATTI & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 1446
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
1675) 1585/2013 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD QAISER S/O MUHAMMAD SHARIF (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 25-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
1676) 829/1999 I.T.A. M/s.N.D.F.C. (Appellant) V/S Comm Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 374
Advocates:Mazahr Elahi Jafari(ADVO-1920-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Jamil(ADVO-2525-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zubair Hashmi(ADVO-12273-SBC-KHS),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
1677) 198/2011 Civil Revision Abdul Majeed Kalhoro (Applicant) V/S Amjad Ali Arain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 775
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
1678) 10/1994 I.T.C M/S.Cotton Export Coproation of Pakistan (Applicant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance 1979
Tag Line:Subsidy paid by the Government for offsetting losses incurred by Cotton Export Corporation is income; hence, taxable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1078
Advocates:Faheem Ali(ADVO-16513-SBC-KHS),Iqbal Salman Pasha(ADVO-3176-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Altaf(ADVO-7751-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Iqbal Naim Pasha(ADVO-594-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Taseer Khan(ADVO-6931-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 28-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4865/2024 M/s Cotton Export Corporation of Pakistan Pvt Ltd, Karachi v. The Commissioner of Income Tax Companies III, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of. Referred to ADR
1679) 1432/2022 Suit SYED ABBAS RAZA (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 910
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
1680) 1955/2014 Suit Mst. Humaira Aslam. (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Rahim Rafi & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Yaseen Khan Azad(ADVO-2367-SBC-KHI),Syed Iftikhar ul Hasan(ADVO-5840-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Younis Khan(ADVO-6864-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting
1681) 190/2017 Const. P. A-One Laboratories and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1682) 2157/2019 Const. P. Kashmir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1916
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
1683) 78/2017 I. A Mohammad Moazam Khan (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Iqbal & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1684) 1444/2019 Cr.Bail SYED MUHAMMAD WAQAR HAIDER NAQVI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 08-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
1685) 4291/2015 Const. P. Syeda Sakina Riaz (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Citation:2018 SCMR 1272
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 13-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1189/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.P.L.A.343-K/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted. Relist after 3 months
1686) 291/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Orient Electronics (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Govt. of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 23-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1687) 217/2024 Const. P. Mehboob Ali Channa (Petitioner) V/S District & Sessions Judge, Larkana & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Inheritable right to employment in the judicial establishment; Per-incuriam?; Contempt of Court notice to Registrar High Court."
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 5, 2025 SHC LAR 1705
Advocates:Abdul Rehman Bhutto(ADVO-430-SBC-LAR),Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(ADVO-545-SBC-LRK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1688) 341/2006 Cr.Appeal Meharban and 2 others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 23-AUG-10
Approved for Reporting
1689) 512/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S Abdul Razzaq and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Smuggled goods are liable to outright confiscation and cannot be released on payment of redemption fine under Section 181 of the Customs Act, 1969
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 440
Advocates:Asim Muneer Bajwa(ADVO-3939-SBC-KHI),Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Azad Khan(ADVO-6962-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.439-K/2023 Abdul Razzak v. The Collector of Custom & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1690) 235/2017 H.C.A Saeeduddin Qureshi & others (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Bushra Qureshi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.867-K/2018 Saeeduddin Qureshi and others v. Mrs. Bushra Qureshi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1691) 117/2023 H.C.A Uzair Saboor (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: DRUG REGULATORY AUTHORITY ACT, 2012
Tag Line:To regulate the products described in the DRAP Act, 2012, the
respondent No.2 only wants that they may be enlisted with it so that
they may regulate it as being an alternative medicine/therapeutic
goods. While appellants would make an application for enlistment, it
would certainly be without prejudice to above understanding and
notwithstanding their stance, a proper scrutiny would still be
undertaken by DRAP to adjudge it as a product/drug etc, to be
enlisted within frame of law (act and rules), which order will then be
conclusive, subject to a challenge within DRAP Act, 2012.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 497
Advocates:Shah Nawaz Sahito(ADVO-8545-SBC-KHI),Hafeez Ullah(ADVO-18295-SBC-KHE),Touqeer Ahmed(ADVO-52245-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 29-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3662/2024 Uzair Saboor v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy M/o. National Regulation & Service, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1692) 394/2020 S.M.A Saleem Islam s/o late SYed Zafar ul Islam (Petitioner) V/S Wing Cdr Syed Feroze Ali Rizvi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Succession Act
Tag Line:Section 15 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that every suit
shall be instituted in a Court of lowest grade competent to try it. The
primary reason, amongst many, is that a right of appeal may be
available before appellate jurisdiction which jurisdiction is asked to
exercise concurrent jurisdiction. Concurrent jurisdiction could only
be exercised in exceptional cases and circumstances which do not
exist here. It could also be exercised when appeal is being heard and
orders are required to be passed as being from original court/forum,
for exercise of concurrent jurisdiction as in the case of Idara-e-Noore-Haq.
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 278
Advocates:Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Abdullah Abid(ADVO-17679-SBC-KHE),Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI),Zara Saba Tariq(ADVO-15089-SBC-KHS),Syed Ali Bin Maaz(ADVO-13125-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
1693) 7684/2019 Const. P. H.D.A (Petitioner) V/S Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Labour
Tag Line:1. writ petition, ordinarily, not maintainable against concurrent findings of two forums below.
2. Work charged employees of Hyderabad Development Authority can approach Labor Court for regularisation and back benefits
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 10
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Syed Jamal Uddin Bukhari(ADVO-14803-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1107-K/2022 Hyderabad Development Authority v. Moiz Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1694) 4/2018 Adm. Suit SELAT MARINE SERVICES CO. LLC (Plaintiff) V/S M.V. BOFORS & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Admiralty (Attachment before Judgment in Admiralty law)
Tag Line:Admiralty Jurisdiction - Mode of action in Rem and in personam - Arrrest of Ship and Sister ship - what is an "offending ship" - Arrest of Vessel under Rule 731 of Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S) read with Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC.
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 533
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
1695) 2591/2016 Const. P. Dr. Zubeda Altaf (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 24-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
1696) 135/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Sami Kehar (Applicant) V/S Amanullah Dasti & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Suit for Specific Performance of Contract: Oral Agreements: Detailed Proof Required in Legal ClaimsDiscussion: Proving an oral agreement to sell requires the plaintiff to specify the date, time, place, and witnesses, outline all terms, and explain the lack of written documentation. Inconsistent witness testimonies and missing details can undermine the claim's credibility, emphasizing the need for thorough evidence and precise articulation.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 842, 2025 CLC 1083
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
1697) 555/2019 Criminal Appeal MUSHTAQUE AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 134
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
1698) 23/2008 Execution Bankers Equity Limited & others (Decree Holder) V/S M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd. (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Banking Court while executing a decree passed under Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 is entitled to adopt any procedure deemed appropriate by it to effect sale of mortgaged properties in execution of a decree. Judicial sanctity in disposing of the mortgaged property through Court auction is required to be reaffirmed. Such sanctity could only be disturbed if there is a material irregularity which leads to fraud to cause loss to any one which is not the attribution. Mere allegation that the property worth more than it was evaluated is not sufficient. Every judgment debtor, if allowed to plead the value of his property there can hardly be any auction which could be conducted. There was nothing to prevent the judgment debtor during these ten years since decree was passed in 2006 to bring a buyer of its choice who could offer a price as it (judgment debtor) desires. The Court while considering the objections of the judgment debtor has also to weigh and consider the miseries and pain undertaken by the decree holder. It is within the domain and propagative of the banking Court to adopt any of the procedure it deems fit and proper and hence this question is not of any material importance that the bid is substantially low as compared to the reserved price or forced sale price.
Citation:2017 CLD 1148
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
1699) 1757/2009 Const. P. Qaiser Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
1700) 3981/2018 Const. P. Saeed Babar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Tag Line:Seniority in service, cadre, or post to which an official is promoted is to take effect
from the date of regular promotion to that service, cadre, or post and not from the
date of any ad-hoc induction
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 28
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
1701) 58/2014 Suit Aamir Haider Butt. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Engage Human Resources & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 521
Advocates:Umar Farooq Khan(ADVO-1914-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
1702) 34/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst. Ruqiya Qureshi and Others (Applicant) V/S Akhtiar Ali Sangi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Section 44 Transfer of Property Act. (Joint Possession of Dwelling House)
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 448
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
1703) 92/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. WAQAS AZAM S/O MUHAMMAD AZAM (Appellant) V/S THE TATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Conviction under Section 21-L of the Anti Terrorism Act, 1997. Set-aside. Cannot be maintained on the basis of a mere statement recorded before framing of the Charge.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 251
Advocates:Anjli(ADVO-17350-SBC-KHS),Mohamamd Riaz Abbasi(ADVO-4521-SBC-KHI),Zahoor Ahmed Khan(ADVO-10377-SBC-KHI),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting
1704) 46/2007 Cr.Rev Muhammad Haroon.. (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---
----Ss. 497(5) & 561-A---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 489-F & 420---Bail, cancellation of---Condonation as to appearance of accused during pendency of application for cancellation of bail---Inherent powers of High Court---Scope---Pre-arrest bail granted to accused was conditionally confirmed by Court of Session on basis of compromise between the parties, subject to payment of the amount mentioned in the dishonoured cheque in monthly instalments---Accused failed to make payments, on which the complainant filed application for cancellation of bail---Accused, instead of appearing before the court, filed application for condonation of his appearance for an indefinite period on medical grounds, which was dismissed by the court---In the garb of impugned order the accused had challenged the maintainability of the cancellation application---Question of jurisdiction had to be first raised before the Court, which had granted the bail---Grounds which had not been taken by the accused before the trial court, could not be examined by the High Court in exercise of inherent powers under S. 561-A, Cr.P.C. to interfere with the proceedings of the court below, as the same would amount to usurpation of power of the lower court---Accused, in such circumstances, before violating the bail order, should have filed application before the same court for modification of said order or breach of any undertaking by the complainant---Accused was guilty of violating the undertaking given by him before the court below for obtaining order of confirmation of bail---Accused was, thus, playing with the courts by unilaterally claiming that the complainant had not withdrawn the case--- Accused without exhausting said remedy had directly invoked the inherent jurisdiction of High Court, to obtain relief which had not been prayed before the Court of first instance---Accused had avoided to explain his position before the court below by abusing the process of the High Court under the cover of present proceedings for about eleven months---High Court, holding that the accused was to be put on notice as to why bail before arrest granted by the court below should not be cancelled on ground of violating the terms thereof, directed the accused, pending cancellation application, to comply with initial order for payment of monthly instalments by depositing the arrears of instalments with the Nazir of the High Court---Application under S. 561-A, Cr.P.C. was disposed of accordingly.
Citation:2016 PCr.LJ 700
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 11-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.4-K/2016 The State v. Muhammad Haroon Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1705) 17/2013 Cr.J.A Farooque Mahar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.614/2018 Farooq v. The State,Crl.A.364/2022 Farooq v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1706) 8756/2018 Const. P. Jawed Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the petitioner has assailed the vires of the office order No.42/2018 issued by respondent-Employees Old-age Benefits Institution (`EOBI`), whereby he was declared as Dead wood, consequently, he was forcibly sent on Early Retirement from the service of EOBI on the ground that his further retention in service would be of no benefit for the institution.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 672
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4249/2021 The Chairman Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), Karachi v. Jawed Qureshi and another,C.A.49/2024 The Chairman Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), Karachi v. Jawed Qureshi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed
1707) 428/2012 Suit MANZAR MASOOD (Plaintiff) V/S BANK ISLMI PAKISTAN LTD (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Murtaza Wahab(ADVO-13085-SBC-KHI),M/S. AHMED NIAZI & CO(FIRM-298-SBC-KHI),Mehar Khan(ADVO-14209-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Niazi(ADVO-10916-SBC-KHI),Fida Muhammad(ADVO-3004-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 03-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
1708) 45/2019 J.M Al-Habib Coop: Housing Society Ltd (Applicant) V/S Mrs. Shamim Barlas & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Where the plaintiff/applicant establishes fraud, the defendant benefitting from the fraud and opposing the application of section 18, Limitation Act, must show that the plaintiff had clear and definite prior knowledge of the facts constituting the particular fraud and not merely clues or hints of the fraud, failing which limitation will run only from the date of actual knowledge of the fraud.
Citation:2021 YLR 141
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
1709) 4335/2018 Const. P. Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Doctrine of Constructive Res-judicata)
Tag Line:we are of the view that this Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot interfere in the findings recorded by the competent authority of respondent-PTCL vide decision dated 25.07.2017 as we do not see any illegality, infirmity or material irregularity in its decision warranting interference of this Court.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 638
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Syed Ansar Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-12809-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.839-K/2018 Masood Ahmed Bhutti v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.6501/2021 Masood Ahmad Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, M/o Information Technology and Telecommunication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
1710) 1634/2009 Suit Mst. Humera Jabeen & Ors (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Arshad & Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Principles of recusals of a Judge.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 907
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
1711) 628/2010 Suit Mst. Shahida Begum (Plaintiff) V/S Ume-Aiman and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Fasih-uz-Zaman Abbasi(ADVO-7446-SBC-KHI),Sana Akram Minhas(ADVO-4195-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Y. Mandviwala(ADVO-3668-SBC-KHI),Agha Zafar Ahmed(ADVO-9944-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
1712) 256/2012 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Siddiq Traders. (Applicant) V/S Deputy Collector & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 03-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
1713) 7988/2018 Const. P. Nadeem Mumtaz Baig (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Food Authority and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 478
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
1714) 317/2018 H.C.A Mussawar Ali (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A (Maintainability of the Suit)
Citation:2019 CLC 1670
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
1715) 11/2023 Cr.Rev AYESHA MIRZA D/O SALIM MIRZA (Applicant) V/S FIA THROUGH DIR GEN. & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 161
Advocates:Wahaj Ali Khan(ADVO-20055-SBC-KHC),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Abdul Rashid Rajar(ADVO-10878-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.718/2023 Ayesha Mirza v. Federal Investigation Agency through its Director General Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1716) 223/2014 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Nawaz Jhatiyal (Applicant) V/S SHO PS Nasirabad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 30-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
1717) 1407/2013 Const. P. Dr. Moiinuddin Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Federal Secretary, Water and Power, Govt. of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 23-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
1718) 113/2017 I. A Province of Sindh & another (Appellant) V/S Abdul Raheem Khan (Late) & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 YLR 1799
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
1719) 1836/2018 Const. P. Shoukat Hayat Awan (Petitioner) V/S A.I.G and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1720) 226/2005 H.C.A State Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Naeem and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 11-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.146-K/2019 State Bank of Pakistan v. Muhammad Naeem & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1721) 2924/2011 Const. P. Clarissa James and another (Petitioner) V/S M/S SIS Builders and Developers and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 20-OCT-11
Approved for Reporting
1722) 1702/2020 Const. P. Hameedullah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Enquiries and Anti-corruption Establishment Sindh (`E&ACE`) for issuance of his retirement notification and releasing his salaries up to 21.7.2013, wherein he has served for 10 years--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of respondents/Home Secretary, Government of Sindh is directed to issue his retirement notification within two weeks and release his pensionary benefits under the law within a month from the date of receipt of this order and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this court
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1201
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1723) 7084/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ateeq and others (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Shafiq and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 16-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
1724) 1292/2022 Suit ARY COMMUNICATIONS LTD (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002
Tag Line:Reasonable restriction imposed by law, by no stretch of
imagination means to condemn a person/entity without any
justification and without hearing3. According to (RSF) Reporters
without borders Pakistan press, since beginning is oscillated
between civil societys demand for greater press freedom and the
political and executive/establishment elites constant reassertion of
extensive control over the media. This has to be streamlined within
frame of law not by dictations
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 50
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Abid S. Zuberi & Ayan M. Memon Law Associates(FIRM-425-SBC-KHI),Shahzeb Akhtar Khan(ADVO-13473-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
1725) 91/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Sukhio Khan Gadehi (Applicant) V/S Ali Nawaz Dahar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2024 MLD 656
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1726) 102/2006 Suit MST.ISHRAT PARVEEN (Plaintiff) V/S SYED AZHAR ALI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 726
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
1727) 10/2009 I. A Syed Itrat Hussain Rizvi (Appellant) V/S M/s. Tameer Micro Finance & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
Tag Line:The appellant through present first appeal has challenged the Judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Karachi (Central), in a summary chapter suit filed by respondent No.1 for recovery its amount against the appellant.
In this case Section 3(2) of Microfinance Institution Ordinance 2001 and Order XXXVII of CPC were discussed.
It was considered that in a summary suit under Order XXXVII of CPC, in which summons have been issued in Form No.4 Appendix B, the defendant is not entitled to appear or defend the suit as a matter of course unless he obtains leave from the Court so to appear and defend. In default of his obtaining such leave for his appearance and defence in pursuance thereof the allegations in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted and the plaintiff shall be entitled to a decree.
Section 3(2) of Microfinance Institution Ordinance 2001, was examined and it was observed that the Banking Companies Ordinance and any law for the time being in force relating to banking companies or financial institutions shall not apply to microfinance institutions licensed under the Ordinance. And microfinance institutions shall not be deemed to be a banking company for the purposes of the said ordinance
Citation:2018 CLD 116
Advocates:Agha Muhammad Saleem Raza(ADVO-7105-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Mohammad Ali Waris(ADVO-4491-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
1728) 282/2017 Criminal Miscelleneous Mst. Nazi (Applicant) V/S The State & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
1729) 1233/2020 Const. P. Inayat Ali (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 862
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 03-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1730) 92/2012 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue. (Applicant) V/S Wali Oil Mills Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 30-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.340-K/2014 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Wali Oil Mills Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1731) 3147/2025 Const. P. Sindh Public Service Commission & Another (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:NAB, Inquiry Quashed Matter falling outside the ambit of NAO, 1999
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2047
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
1732) 272/2022 Const. P. Mir Muhammad Raza (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sehar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1152
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
1733) 1243/2018 Const. P. Patient Welfare Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 83
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.925-K/2021 Patient Welfare Society v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Health Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned [ Notice to Respondents & A.G.Sindh ]
1734) 2418/2014 Suit Muhammad Raza & others (Plaintiff) V/S Nasir Khan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1735) 456/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S M/s. S.M. Traders (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Import into Export Processing Zones; Section 79 & 32 read with Section 156(1) of the Customs Act, 1969 are applicable
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 232
Advocates:Salman Aziz(ADVO-14423-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Younus Rao(ADVO-16208-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
1736) 309/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S Learnd Family Judge Tando Adam & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Family matter (Decree of dissolution Marriage In Section 10(2) Up held . CP dismissed.)
Citation:2022 CLC 1447
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
1737) 747/2020 Const. P. Syed Sibt-e-Hussain Shah (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Promotion matters; fitness of employee; petition is maintainable;
Once major penalty has been set-aside, then promotion cannot be denied on the same charges.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 876
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 27-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
1738) 1797/2022 Suit THE HUB POWER COMPANY LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S CHINA POWER HUB GENERATION COMPANY (PVT) LTD & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:I- Despite different designations there are in fact `legal similarities` attached to both the documents i.e. standard letter of credit and standby letter of credit, if compared. There may be some differences in the banking practice but are functionally similar and makes no material difference when it comes to execution and implementation. The SBLC thus has evolved as one of the kind of letter of credit and forms on independent guarantee such as performance bond/surety ship guarantee.
II- While in every instance where there is a fraud there would have been a lack of bonafides as well, however, to its contrast it does not mean that in every instance where beneficiary of credit lacks bonafides there is necessarily a fraud behind it. One may be compelled to or had no choice, despite having knowledge.
III- The concept of unconscionability runs the same way i.e. the concept of unconscionability involves unfairness as distinct from dishonesty or fraud or conduct of a kind so reprehensible or lacking in good faith that the court of conscience either restrain the party or refuse to assist the party. Mere breaches of contract by a party would not by themselves be unconscionable. Thus unfairness is also excluded for the concept of unconscionability to prevail.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 421, 2023 CLD 1220
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Choudhary Atif Rafiq(ADVO-11896-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
1739) 4867/2013 Const. P. Qasim International Container Terminal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 14A), Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:The main object of the Customs Act, 1969 is to make it expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to levy and collection of customs duties, fee and service charges and to provide for other allied matters. So it does not matter that the amending provisions do not itself qualify as one imposing duties and taxes etc. All other ancillary and allied provisions in the Customs Act are meant to facilitate the officials to carry out their main objective and mandate and that is the collection of duties and taxes by applying law.
Customs Act is nothing but a fiscal Statute meant to extract customs duties and other taxes. A simple reading of Article 73(2) (a to g), may distract the ideal conclusion but it is to be seen that these very amendments are inserted in a fiscal statute, the main object of which is to extract duties, taxes etc. These amendments are thus nothing but to toe and facilitate the main object of the statute and hence it is ancillary and incidental to main object of imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax which they would ultimately perform while performing their duties within the premises of these private port/terminal operators to whom licenses were issued.
Each statute carry different mechanics to assign a varying meaning of the "same word". The meaning of same word may vary from one legislation to another and it is the Statute and the very provision itself that would determine as to which varying definition would come into play to carry the object of such legislation. In order to find intent of word in any provision of statute, it is always wise or logical to discover individual meaning of a solitary word first, however at times it is to be read in connection with entire provisions to find logical meaning closer to the functioning of the Statute and provisions. A word may have potential to be explained differently. Meaning of a word discovered judicially to understand a provision of statute does not necessarily be applied to provision of another Statute as it may dis-balance the scheme of that Statute. It may tend to carry same meaning in a similar Statute, if used in different provisions/Sections etc. but may not necessarily carry same intent in another Statute.
Entertaining an application by an adjudicating authority is altogether different in the present contest as they (port operator) do not enjoy such authority and authorization as far as adjudication is concerned. Certificate itself is adjudication by someone having authority in this regard which require no more deliberation by private port operators.
Citation:2020 PTD 1952
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 06-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.426/2020 Qasim International Container Terminal Pakistan Ltd, Karachi & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary, Revenue Division, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others,C.A.194/2020 Qasim International Container Terminal Pakistan Ltd, Karachi & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary, Revenue Division, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted/Stay,Pending
1740) 9/2008 II.A. Malik Muhammad Yaseen (Appellant) V/S Syed Raza Hyder and ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 17-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.432/2014 Syed Raza Haider v. Malik Muhammad Yaseen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
1741) 171/2023 Const. P. M/S Shahbaz Flour & Rice Mills (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Sindh Food stuffs (Control) Act, 1958 (Additional Punishment by Authority)
Tag Line:Punishment in addition to what has been prescribed by law is unconstitutional
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1202
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3001/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others v. M/s Shahbaz Flour & Rice Mills through its Lessee Mr. Ghulam Ali Kamboh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1742) 549/2008 Suit MOBEEN RAZA and another (Appellant) V/S M/S. ALLOO & MINOCHER DINSHAW (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----S. 42---Suit for negative declaration seeking only the disentitlement of defendants in suit property---Maintainability---Interpretation of S.42, Specific Relief Act, 1877---Plaintiff sought declaration to the effect that the defendants had no interest in the suit property and were not entitled to sell or dispose of, the same---Question before the High Court was whether plaintiffs could seek such negative declaration in relation to the disentitlement of the defendants without claiming in ownership , interest or legal character for themselves in relation to the suit property ---Held, that plaintiffs had not sought relief in respect of property in question for themselves, nor any legal character had been attributed to suit property, hence no entitlement in terms of S.42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 was available to the plaintiffs---Plaintiffs had sought declaration to the effect that defendants had no locus standi or right in relation to the suit property; however such prayer would not entitle the plaintiffs to file suit for declaration when they were not claiming any interest, title or legal character in the property, and especially when defendants had established their interest in the property by placing a registered sale deed---Suit for negative declaration was only maintainable in certain exceptional cases---When a plaintiff demonstrated some interest in the property to which some legal sanctity could be attached only then plaintiffs could seek some legal character in terms of S.42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877---Suit for declaration, in the present case, sought declaration to the disentitlement of the defendants, and was not maintainable---Suit was dismissed, accordingly.
Citation:2016 CLC Note 10
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
1743) 922/2019 Const. P. Omer Bin Mehmood S/o Mehmood Bin Kafil (Petitioner) V/S Court of IIIrd ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Criteria for determining a father unfit to be a Guardian of a minor
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 324
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI),Arshad Mohsin Tayebaly(ADVO-3740-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1744) 938/2018 Suit Shan Foods (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Sales Tax Act 1990 - Schedule VI - Exemption of Sales Tax on -Iodised Salt - held - Yes: Injunction granted - Suit decreed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
1745) 3022/2022 Const. P. Eric Ghori & another (Petitioner) V/S Learned Consumer Judge Hyd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Sindh Consumer Protection Act 2014 (Order VII Rule 11 CPC)
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 637
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
1746) 3977/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Azhar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 288
Advocates:Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.280-K/2022 Muhammad Azhar v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Law & Justice & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1747) 2018/2016 Const. P. Mohammad Sadiq (Petitioner) V/S Market Committee and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1426-K/2018 Market Committee Karachi and another v. Muhammad Saddiq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1748) 980/2022 Const. P. Faraz Arif Thr. Attorney Muhammad Rizwan Arif (Petitioner) V/S The Honble Court of 7th ADJ, Khi South & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 416
Advocates:Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Altaf(ADVO-12600-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
1749) 1/2013 J.M United Banik Limited (Applicant) V/S Gulistan Textile Mills Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 20-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
1750) 842/2020 Const. P. Adeela Saeed Sheikh D/o Hafiz Muhammad Saeed Sheik (Petitioner) V/S Saad Mahmood Sherani and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Mother filed 491 CRPC dismissed By ADJ ,High Court Sat aside and Ordered to hand over custody to mother .)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1363
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
1751) 3580/2014 Const. P. Humair Altaf (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 06-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.221-K/2017 Humair Altaf v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1752) 1847/2017 Const. P. Yasin Ali Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) V/S The Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
1753) 170/2010 Civil Revision Raja Abdul Hameed,thr:L.Rs. (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ahsan Nawaz & anor (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 815
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
1754) 1608/2015 Const. P. Nizamuddin Kolachi V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Petitioner) V/S V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
whether the Petitioner can challenge his show cause notice, non- inclusion of his name in Upper School Course in a Constitution Petition
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
1755) 3876/2011 Const. P. Junaid & M/s Al-Raziq PVT (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2012 CLC 1962
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 05-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting
1756) 1189/2021 Suit Captain Adnan Andalib Siddiqui & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mrs. Shahnaz Hyder & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Dismissed), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:The other undisputed but crucial fact is that since decades both Plaintiffs and their families are residing in the Suit Property, although the lease is in the name of Claimant. It is to be determined through a proper trial that whether the Suit Property was given to the Claimant as her exclusive Property or the same was the compensation given to the Family of Deceased
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 306
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 24-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
1757) 7/2017 I. A United Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Rafiq (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Citation:2020 CLD 129
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
1758) 2217/2021 Const. P. Zeeshan Anjum and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The main grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been declined without announcing the final merit list i.e. written test and interview--Prima-facie, this petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that no offer of appointment order had been issued in their favor, thus no vested right had/has accrued in favor of the petitioners.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1318
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
1759) 3049/2023 Const. P. Popular International Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 70
Advocates:Abdul Ghaffar Khan(ADVO-4250-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhabbat Hussain Awan(ADVO-13542-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 06-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
1760) 4610/2018 Const. P. Inamuddin Marwat (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
1761) 4535/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Jamil Khan (Petitioner) V/S SESSI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Employees??? Social Security Institution Service Regulations, 1976
Tag Line:Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article
199 of the Constitution.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 141
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2745/2022 Muhammad Jamil Khan v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1762) 4446/2022 Const. P. Hascol Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Like Letter of Credits, which essentially establishes the intent and
commercial transaction the presence of vessel at high seas has to be
seen within the same frame i.e. it is there for petitioners and such has
not been established via vessels Bill of Lading or private contracts as
they are easily getable
Citation:2023 PTD 1415
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 14-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.680-K/2023 HASCOL Petroleum Limited & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary (Revenue Division) Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Re-List
1763) 229/2022 Cr.Misc. DR. SHEHZAD NASIM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 729
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
1764) 743/2018 Const. P. Ali Sher Shanbani (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
1765) 451/2019 Cr.Acq.A. GHULAM ALI S/O DAD MUHAMMAD MAGSI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code (Acquittal Appeal )
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 436
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
1766) 4452/2013 Const. P. Mir Hassan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Son Quota (Dismissed))
Tag Line:Son Quota
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 82
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
1767) 122/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Mst. Rizwana Hakro (Appellant) V/S The State & 7 others (Opponent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 564
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
1768) 111/1999 Civil Revision Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) V/S Mian Sajjad Ahmed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
1769) 292/2016 Criminal Appeal BILAL HUSSAIN S/O MUHAMMAD HANAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 10-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
1770) 22/2014 I.T.R.A M/S AP MOllar Marersk (Applicant) V/S Commissioner Inland Revenue (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PTD 1614, 2021 PTCL 285
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.560-K/2019 Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-IV, Karachi v. M/s A.P. Moller Maersk Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1771) 2578/2014 Suit Muhammad Ali Barry. (Plaintiff) V/S Kaybee Snacks & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Jurisdiction (Plaint Retuned U/Order 7 rule 11 CPC. definition of ???Intellectual Property Act, 2012??? is barred)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1029
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1772) 65/2018 Cr.J.A Himat Gul Pathan & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned Judgment, appeal dismissed . Narcotics case. )
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 225
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 20-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.820/2022 Himat Gul S/o Muhammad Anwar Khan and another v. The State through P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1773) 595/2025 Const. P. Gul Sher Jalbani (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Transfer and posting of employees constitutes internal administrative management. It is well established in service jurisprudence that no employee can claim transfer or posting as a matter of right. Petition dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1210
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
1774) 2987/2018 Const. P. TCS (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Post & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD SC 69
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 03-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4990/2018 Skynet Worldwide Express, Karachi & others v. Pakistan Post having their place of business at Director General, Pakistan Post Office, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
1775) 8033/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Ayoub Panhwar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 482
Advocates:Altafur-Rehman(ADVO-193-SBC-SUK),Mushtaque Hussain(ADVO-14825-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1439-K/2020 Muhammad Ayub Panhwar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1776) 966/2009 Const. P. Wali Muhammad Khoso & another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973.
Article 19 --- freedom of expression --- Article 19 does not give constitutional protection to a defamatory utterance nor the right to exercise freedom of speech and expression is exempted from the liability of libel and slander --- legal relief against such an abuse --- appropriate remedy under the ordinary law is always available to person aggrieved --- petitioners have failed to refer to any specific statement that has been aired and published by Respondents No.4 to 8 in their respective programmes --- petition dismissed in limine.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 31-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
1777) 692/2013 Const. P. M/s. Memon Motors (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 21-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.267-K/2014 National Accountability Bureau v. M/s Memon Motors and others,C.A.70-K/2014 National Accountability Bureau v. M/s Memon Motors and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted & Refixed on 29.12.2014,Disposed Disposed of
1778) 1713/2008 Suit MUHAMMAD AYAZ S/O MUHAMMAD HANEEF (Plaintiff) V/S MILITARY ESTATE OFFICE (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
1779) 88/2021 M.A. Iqbal Javed & Others (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1162
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
1780) 2262/2016 Const. P. Syed Athar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Bail admitted)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
1781) 180/2022 Const. P. Rana Muddasir Ali Rajput Through Attorney (Petitioner) V/S Additional District Judge Moro & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:It is settled principle of law that articles given in the dowry by the parents of the bride are not gift for a husband or his family but are entrusted of the bride to her personal use and benefit. Petition is disposed of.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1584
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
1782) 126/2021 Criminal Appeal ISLAM SHAH S/O SYED KAMAL SHAH & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
Tag Line:It is observed that the mere heinousness of the charge and recovery of a huge quantity of the alleged contraband is no ground to convict the accused. The prosecution is under a bounden
responsibility to drive home the charge by proving each limb of its case that essentially included the production of the witness tasked with the responsibility of keeping the narcotic in safe custody and safely transmitting the samples to the office of the Chemical Examiner. Failure to do so is fatal to the prosecution case.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 805
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor Coastguard(ADVO-SpPCostG-KHI),Mir Hidayatullah Khan(ADVO-535-SBC-SGR),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE),Raheel Uddin(ADVO-9576-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 03-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
1783) 24/2012 J.M KANDAWALLA TRUST (Petitioner) V/S PUBLIC AT LARGE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 26
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
1784) 145/2017 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. AQAL NAWAB S/O AMEER NAWAB (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 07-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
1785) 5791/2016 Const. P. Zona Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 2), Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Tag Line:There is no space of
interpretation provided by petitioners in relation of Foreign Exchange
Manual read with Section 154 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Similarly,
there is no applicability of extra territorial operation for giving effect to
Article 141 of the Constitution. Hence we conclude accordingly. The
doctrine of occupied field would also not come into play as we are of the
view that Entry 49 of Federal Legislative List, as structured after 18th
Amendment, empowers the province to legislate on the subject under
consideration. The legislative powers defined under Articles141, 142 and
143 of the Constitution have not been violated while encompassing
services rendered by indenters to be within the frame of SSTA 2011 and
find its place within exclusion defined in Entry 49 of Federal Legislative
List of Fourth Schedule of Constitution.
Citation:2022 PTD 984, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1536
Advocates:Kazim Hassan(ADVO-2630-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Murtaza Korai(ADVO-14432-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 10-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.917/2022 Zona Pakistan (Private) Limited Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Secretary, Karachi and others,C.A.4024/2022 Zona Pakistan (Private) Limited Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of
1786) 110/2017 Cr.Rev SYED NASEEM AHMED S/O SYED AMEER MIAN (Applicant) V/S MST. REHANA TAJ WD/O ZAHEER UDDIN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
1787) 3/2019 Suit Amsons Textile Mills (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:res judicata in suit after decision in constitution petition.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 388
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
1788) 88/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Gul Hassan (Applicant) V/S Wazeer Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 539
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1789) 4929/2013 Const. P. Nadeem Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 SBLR Sindh 263
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
1790) 145/2018 H.C.A Cantonment Board Clifton (Appellant) V/S Nadim Ahmed Ansari (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (Section 273-Notice of Suits)
Tag Line:Section 273 of the Cantonments Act requiring a notice to be given to CBC before filing a suit against CBC is not unfettered and unqualified. A suit for either declaration or injunctions, etc., are well-regulated under the said provision so long as the civil action is in pursuance of the Act. NAA Consulting Engineers had filed a suit against CBC for compensation for services rendered to CBC which was not in pursuance to the Act. Those civil actions beyond the Act's parameters could not be eclipsed by the bar on suits under Section 273. In the circumstances, Section 273 was not applicable. The In-house Counsel of CBC stepped into the witness box. kept responding to questions put to him in the cross-examination, claiming a lack of awareness of NAA's documents exhibited, including his own documents. In the circumstances, he accepted NAA Consulting Engineers claim against CBC. Appeal allowed and Judgment and Decree confirmed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1000
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Rehmat -un- Nissa(ADVO-9852-SBC-KHI),Aman Aftab(ADVO-18333-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.6-K/2024 Cantonment Board Clifton through CEO v. Nadeem Ahmad Ansari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1791) 860/2024 Const. P. Arfeen International (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Indenters are liable to be registered under the Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 219
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 13-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
1792) 3387/2018 Const. P. Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 50
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1793) 289/2024 H.C.A Perwaiz Ahmed Shaikh and Others (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Tahir and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Intellectual Propoerty Organization of Pakistan Act 2012 (Sec.18 and TMO, 2021, S.80(4) - High Court Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:In a J. Misc. filed in High Court under Section 84(3) and 14(4) read with Section 116 of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001, which was instituted prior to the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2023, enacted on 16.08.2023, which forum should hear the lis: the High Court or under Section 18 of IPOP, 2012, the IP Tribunal, alone?
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 604
Advocates:Syed Zaeem Hyder Musavi(ADVO-15365-SBC-KHS),Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
1794) 5/2022 Spl. Cr. A. THE DIR. GEN I& IR KHI & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Money laundering and predicate offences.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 114
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.64-K/2025 The Director DG I&I- Sales Tax House Karachi & another v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned/ repeat notice
1795) 3463/2010 Suit Dr Raheela Magsi (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
1796) 404/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Euro Tiles & Granites (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 390
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
1797) 5/2022 J.M SHAHID IQBAL DAR & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S PUBLIC AT LARGE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Rectification of a trust deed; per section 31 of the Specific Relief Act 1877.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1016
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Nida Faisal Ghani(ADVO-17766-SBC-KHS),Mahmood Abdul Ghani(ADVO-4801-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
1798) 84/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Pir Syed Mashooque Mohiuddin & others (Applicant) V/S Ali Raza Chandio & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Article 30 of Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Admission of facts.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1350
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
1799) 32/2020 Const. P. Bashir Ahmed Phulpoto & others (Petitioner) V/S P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 1609
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 23-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
1800) 211/2017 Cr.Bail SALMAN ABRO S/O GHULAM SARWAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ilyas Khan(ADVO-1410-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 18-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.829/2017 Salman Abro v. The State thr. P.G, Sindh,Crl.A.267/2017 Dhani Bux v. The State thr. P.G, Sindh,Crl.P.L.A.684/2017 Dhani Bux v. The State thr. P.G, Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1801) 167/2020 H.C.A Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Sadan General Trading LLC & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(i). Discussion on Section 74 of Contract Act. (ii). maxim "ubi jus ibi remedium" Meaning `where there is right, there is a remedy.
Citation:2025 CLC 525
Advocates:Muhammad Aamir Khosa(ADVO-15884-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ghulam Muhammad Dars(ADVO-16974-SBC-KHS),Muneer Iqbal(ADVO-17705-SBC-KHE),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.66/2025 Trading Corporation of Pakistan Pvt Limited Karachi v. Sadan General Trading LLC through its Local Agent KZK Industrial & Commercial Co. Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1802) 68/2024 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Saleem (Appellant) V/S Meraj ud Din and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2024 SHC MPK 1118
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
1803) 28/2009 Cr.J.A Muhammad Azeem Almani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.511/2020 Muhammad Azeem Almani v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1804) 3803/2020 Const. P. Suhaila Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of her previous service rendered with effect from 1971 till her reinstatement/re-employment in the year 1990 or not?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 490
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4282/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another,C.A.1423/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed
1805) 232/2014 Cr.Misc. Azhar Ahmed Batla (Applicant) V/S M/s. I.G.I. Finex Securities Limited and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 28-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
1806) 4245/2018 Const. P. M/s Saba International (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Courts refrain from deciding constitutional questions if a case can be resolved on other, narrow grounds
Citation:2025 SBLR Sindh 555
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI),Sohail Mazaffar(ADVO-2086-SBC-KHI),Iftikhar Hussain(ADVO-14665-SBC-KHI),Muhabbat Hussain Awan(ADVO-13542-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
1807) 6540/2019 Const. P. SICPA SA (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 MLD 2049
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.361-K/2020 SICPA SA v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1808) 126/2018 Civil Revision Mst. Tahira Bano thr: L.Rs (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Bilal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
1809) 1027/2015 Suit Shapes (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Cantonment Board Clifton and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 12-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
1810) 323/2007 Suit M/S.FRIENDS ASSOCIATES BUILDERS (Plaintiff) V/S TOWN MUNICIPAL ADMINSTRATION (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
1811) 977/2014 Suit Asim Jofa. (Plaintiff) V/S K.M.C. & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 207
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
1812) 608/2015 Const. P. Mst Yasmeen Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Ayaz Pathan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 08-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
1813) 35/2020 Cr.Bail Manzoor Thebo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail After Arrest---497- Under S. 302 PPC)
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 774
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 17-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
1814) 7380/2018 Const. P. Karamuddin Panhyar (Petitioner) V/S The NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
We have decided the main appeal of the appellant therefore the Constitution Petition No: 7380 of 2018 filed by the appellant for suspension of his sentence during the pendency of the appeal has become infructuous and is also dismissed.
Topic: NAB (misused his authority and with malafide intention made illegal fifteen (15) entries in Record . appeal dismissed.)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 685
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 01-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
1815) 274/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous Sher Bahadur Khan Khattak S/o Amir Azam Khan (Applicant) V/S SSP South & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1797, 2025 SHC KHI 1799
Advocates:Sannia Khalique(ADVO-21260-SBC-KHS),Abdul Baqi(ADVO-11889-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP),Abdul Rauf(ADVO-16009-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
1816) 21/2021 First Appeal Against Order Muhammad Irfan son of Abdul Ghani (Appellant) V/S The Province of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 483
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1817) 45/1996 I.T.R Commissioner of Income Tax (Applicant) V/S M/S. B.R.R Investment (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
1818) 103/2021 Cr.Tran Akhtiar Ali Solangi (Appellant) V/S Qamar-uridin Solangi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Transfer Application is allowed. Counter case issue
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 506
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 01-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
1819) 443/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S Nasir ul Haq & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 PTD 1193
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4070/2021 Nasir-ul-Haq v. Director, Directorate of Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1820) 265/2024 Const. P. Suraj Cotton Mills Ltd and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 414
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Hashmatullah Alim(ADVO-11063-SBC-KHE),Laiq Ahmed(ADVO-15955-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 27-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3410/2024 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited, Karachi v. Suraj Cotton Mills Ltd, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1821) 163/2021 Criminal Appeal LOUNG & OTHERS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1839
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
1822) 68/2018 S.M.A Dr.Mohammad Sharif (Petitioner) V/S Party-2 (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: S.M.A (Until Petitioner not Submitted FRC , Case not fixed for hearing.)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 23-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1823) 1/2014 Cr.Appeal Mushtaq Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 08-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.220/2019 Rafiullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1824) 133/2018 Suit Mrs. Wieb Rosemarie Dakhan & another (Plaintiff) V/S Shahnawaz Dakhan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1792
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
1825) 2562/2015 Const. P. Tasawar Abbas Tanveer (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:S. Ashfaq Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-3111-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.64-K/2017 Tasawar Abbas Tanveer v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1826) 131/1986 Civil Revision Khanzada Siddi Yakoob and others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Ghafoor and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1842
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
1827) 562/2012 Const. P. Nabeela Ashfaq (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 24
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
1828) 846/2015 Const. P. CDR (R) Mansoob Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Bar of Jurisdiction )
Citation:2019 CLC 1444
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.336-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.25-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Cancelled Dismissed.Leave granting order is recalled.C.P is Dismissed.
1829) 4430/2014 Const. P. High Court Bar Association Hyderabad (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti
Order Date: 03-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
1830) 218/2009 Const. P. Muhammad Idrees Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Kashif Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 02-JUN-09
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.728-K/2009 Muhammad Idrees Qureshi v. Muhammad Kashif Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
1831) 3228/2020 Const. P. Misri Ladhani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (Proforma Promotion after Retirement)
Tag Line:prima-facie the claim of the Petitioner for proforma promotion is tenable under the law for the simple reason that CSB recommended his promotion in BS-21 during his tenure of service, in the meanwhile, he reached the age of superannuation, just after the recommendation made by SCB in his favour, as a consequence, the pay of the petitioner is required to be re-fixed and his post-retirement benefits will be re- calculated by allowing his proforma promotion in BS-21 and arrears shall be paid to him with 6% simple interest per annum--The competent authority of respondents is directed to notify the proforma promotion of the petitioner in BS-21 with effect from 13.02.2014 i.e. the date on which the CSB recommended his case for promotion in BS-21 and other ancillary benefits under the law, without discrimination, within 02 weeks
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 413
Advocates:Sagar Ladhani(ADVO-17211-SBC-KHS),Additional Attorney General khi()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5548/2021,C.A.21/2022,C.A.22/2022,C.P.L.A.5779/2021 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months
1832) 1057/2018 Const. P. Board of Secondary Education (Petitioner) V/S Provincial Ombudsman Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 1531
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
1833) 2393/2019 Const. P. Manzar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.430-K/2019 Federal Board of Revenue thr. its Chairman v. Manzar Hussain & others,C.P.L.A.484-K/2019 Amer Rashid Shaikh v. Manzar Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1834) 322/2021 Cr.Bail Ashfaq Ahmed (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 997
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
1835) 443/2007 Suit HUMAIR ASSOCIATES BUILDERS PVT. LTD (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. CHAPPAL BUILDERS & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C (Dismissed.)
Tag Line:Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.)---
----R.14---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 151---Inherent powers of High Court---Miscellaneous applications---Maintainability---High Court directed the office to be cautious while receiving applications under 5.151, C.P.C., in pending cases; it was also imperative for court to be vigilant and very careful in exercising inherent jurisdiction under S.151., lest it should not be "advancing" instead of "preventing" abuse of process of court---Office while referring miscellaneous applications to Judges in terms of second proviso to R.14 of Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.) was directed to ensure scrutiny of each and every application under S.151, C.P.C. filed in any civil suit before placing the same in court for order/hearing---High Court directed the office to examine/scrutinize such applications bearing in mind amongst. other at the queries to the effect that as to whether applicant who had involved provision of S.151, C. P. C. was already a party in proceedings or not; that whether prayer in application was relevant to issues between parties and was directed against adverse party in the lis or not and that whether inherent powers sought to be invoked were with respect to the procedural matters or it would affected substantive rights of either party.
Citation:2014 PLD 327
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 06-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
1836) 61/2007 H.C.A National Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S M/s. White Gold Exporters (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 30-NOV-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.224-K/2011 Mst. Abida Parveen v. National Bank of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1837) 16/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) Shahnawaz and another (Applicant) V/S Shabbir Ahmed Memon and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 311
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
1838) 865/2025 Cr.Bail FAQIR ZAINUL ABDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1836
Advocates:Mudassir Hussain(ADVO-20327-SBC-KHE),Govinda(ADVO-20050-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author)
Order Date: 25-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
1839) 20/2019 I. A M/S Mohammad Bux Abro & Ors (Appellant) V/S M/S Askri Bank Ltd & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 947
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
1840) 1511/2019 Const. P. Jam Mitha Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner is seeking direction to the Respondents to issue notification of his post-retirement benefits, on the premise that he was appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) BPS-17 in Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) ---the petitioner???s Counsel was directed to assist this Court more particularly regarding Article 187(2) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 that whether this Court can examine and or modify the Judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court or only to enforce it in accordance with the law--We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Sindh Government to pay all his perks and privileges to which he was entitled to on issuance of notification of his repatriation, inclusive of his entire pensionary benefits within [02] months and report compliance through MIT-II of this court.
Topic: Service matters (post retirement benefits)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
1841) 838/2014 Const. P. Imran Ahmed Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. Since the Petitioners service was terminated under Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules, which rule has since been declared un-constitutional by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Itrat Sajjad (2017 SCMR 2010), the only point left for our consideration is whether the effect of the declaration in Itrat Sajjad on the case of the Petitioner can be addressed by us in writ jurisdiction.
2. It had been settled by a 5 member Bench of the Supreme Court in DHA v. Jawaid Ahmed (2013 SCMR 1707) that applying the function test, the DHA is a person to whom a writ can issue under Article 199(1)(a)(ii) of the Constitution of Pakistan. But then, moving to a question distinct, viz. whether the employee of a statutory authority can invoke the writ jurisdiction of the High Court to enforce service rules of the statutory authority, it was held that where service rules were non-statutory, those cannot normally be enforced in writ jurisdiction for such rules attract the principle of master and servant; but at the same time it was also held that where action of a statutory authority in a service matter is in violation of principles of natural justice, such action can be interfered with in writ jurisdiction. Itrat Sajjad reiterates the same principles, and while it was concluded that the DHA Service Rules are non-statutory and thus not enforceable ordinarily by way of a writ petition, the judgment went on to hold that since Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules violated the principle of natural justice, the case fell within the recognized exception that a writ can issue where the action of a statutory authority in a service matter is violative of the principle of natural justice. For the same reason, this petition, to the extent it assails termination issued under the same Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules, is also maintainable.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 962
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
1842) 747/2019 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD RAMZAN S/O KARIM BUX (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---
---Ss. 320, 107 & 114---Provincial Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965), Ss. 3 & 5---Qatl-i-khata by rash or negligent driving--- Abetment--- Scope--- Abettor present when offence is committed---Prohibition on driving without licence---Scope---Accused, while driving a water tanker, hit an unknown lady who received injuries and expired on the spot---Driving licence of accused was found to be fake and bogus---Investigating Officer of the case was required to have included the owner of the vehicle in investigation as co-accused for allowing the vehicle to be driven by a person who was not holding a valid driving licence or whose licence was not genuine---Owner of the vehicle was an abettor in terms of S.107, P.P.C. and his case fell under S.114, P.P.C.---Investigating Officer was directed to take action against owner of the vehicle and the prosecution was directed to expeditiously complete the trial against the owner as co-accused---Appeal was adjourned pending action against the owner of the vehicle.
Atta Muhammad v. The State 2005 PCr.LJ 1648 rel.
Citation:2021 YLR 409
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
1843) 20/2013 Cr.Acq.A. Syed Abdul Wahab Mehdi (Appellant) V/S Bachal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 21-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
1844) 5220/2016 Const. P. Works Cooperative Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.707-K/2018 Works Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1845) 1367/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD NAVEED ZAMEER S/O ZAMEERUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Tag Line:The questions involved in the present proceedings is whether the cheques in question given for surety purpose could be dishonoured, entailing the punishment under Section 489-F P.P.C. and whether the alleged amount could be recovered by detaining the applicant for an indefinite period. Section 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 906
Advocates:Muhammad Ishtiaque(ADVO-1512-SBC-HYD),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
1846) 6026/2018 Const. P. Shoukat Hussain Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S The Stae thr Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Lastly, we may observe that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but the only tentative assessment is required, and a cursory glance of the record show that all the petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail in connivance with each other have caused huge loss to the Government exchequer, therefore, the pre-arrest bail of petitioners Sabah-ul-Islam, Muhammad Waseem, Roshan Ali Shaikh, Fazal-ur-Rehman, Ahmed Ali, Farrukh Jamal Siddiqui, Nadeem Qadir Khokhar and Sohail Yar Khan is recalled with imidiate effect, their petitions are dismissed.
Topic: NAB (Post arrest bail granted , on the ground, hardship and 56 witnesses have examined , accused are in Custody since 2 years )
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ 24
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.486-K/2020 Sabah-ul-Islam Khan & another v. The Chairman NAB Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1847) 269/2017 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S PACIFIC DISTRIBUTION (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1031/2018 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Pacific Distributors,C.P.18-K/2018 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Pacific Distributors Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted [ Before (3)HJJs ]
1848) 4972/2023 Const. P. Shamim Ahmed & Another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 25-A)
Tag Line: No interim relief or provisional release can be granted by this Court when assessment has been made on Valuation Ruling under Section 25A of the Customs Act
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1134
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 31-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1407/2024 Shamim Ahmed and another v. The Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary (Revenue)/Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR House, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. Early date
1849) 7615/2022 Const. P. Jamia Masjid Al Siddiq (Regd) Trust & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 845
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
1850) 1151/2020 Const. P. Shamal Media Service Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Actions without ratification or validation of law will be of
no legal consequences and those with validation and ratification of laws
may be sustained and deemed validly enacted.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 371
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan(),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
1851) 5/2005 Execution Mrs. Meher Rohinton Minwalla (Decree Holder) V/S S Darayus Cyrus Minwalla & Ors. (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.)---
----R. 50---Withdrawal of power of attorney by advocate of party---Effect---Applicant sought restoration of her execution petition which was dismissed after withdrawal of power of attorney by her advocate---Validity---Grievance of applicant was that intimation notice was issued to previous attorney after withdrawal of Vakalatnama---Issuance of notice to the attorney of applicant was not even required after compliance of notice under R.50 of Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.)---Court had shown grace by issuing notice, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, the Court could not ignore deliberate and wilful negligence of applicant herself in pursuing the case---Applicant failed to show bona fide in prosecuting her case with due diligence---High Court declined to restore execution petition---Application was dismissed in circumstances.
Messrs United Bank Limited v. Messrs. Plastic Pack (Pvt.) Limited 2012 CLD 239; United Bank Limited v. The Chairman, Banking Tribunal-I, Lahore 1999 MLD 3267; Alamgir v. The State 1988 SCMR 642 distinguished.
Bashir Ahmed v. Settlement of Rehabilitation Commissioner 1982 SCMR 188; Rafiq Ahmed v. Abdul Haleem 1982 SCMR 1229; Muhammad Rahim v. Mst. Begum Kaniz Fatima Hayat 1986 CLC 178 and Zulfiqar Ali v. Lal Din and others 1974 SCMR162 ref.
(b) Constitution of Pakistan---
----Art. 10-A---Right to fair trial---Scope---Provisions of Art.10-A of the Constitution are not for prosecutor to claim "fair trial and due process"---Protection of Art.10-A of the Constitution is available only to defendant and / or accused facing civil or criminal trial, as the case may be so that they may not be condemned unheard or treated unfairly in the process of adjudication.
Citation:2014 CLC 1312, 2014 SBLR 1021
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 29-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
1852) 395/2016 H.C.A Jamshoro Joint Venture Limited (Appellant) V/S Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
1853) 5661/2024 Const. P. Sindh Club (Petitioner) V/S Syed Muhammad Taqi Naqvi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:Estoppel.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 202
Advocates:Muhammad Ali(ADVO-7350-SBC-KHI),Manzoor Hussain Khan(ADVO-16596-SBC-KHI),Shuja Uddin(ADVO-11034-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date: 17-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
1854) 11/2024 M.A. Unitied Bank Limted (Appellant) V/S Dr. Farooque Adil Abbasi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Jurisdiction of consumer protection court in ATM card service disputes and appropriate compensation for delays.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 376
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
1855) 1202/2005 Suit MRS.TARANUM SABIH (Plaintiff) V/S KBCA & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 673
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1856) 2109/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.63-K/2017 Muhammad Ramazan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1857) 527/2018 Const. P. Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1421-K/2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and others v. The Province of Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.140-K/2021 Agha Shohaib Abbas & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1858) 336/2024 H.C.A Federation of Pakistan & Another (Appellant) V/S Premium Textile Mills Ltd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: OGRA Ordinance 2002 (Sec.8 - Notification - Mustafa Impex)
Tag Line:What are the exceptional situations when the principles of Mustafa Impex disapply - Discussed in the context of OGRA Ordinance, 2002
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 4
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1017/2025 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division), Islamabad and another v. Premium Textile Mills Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1859) 0/2018 Execution Tariq Gul (Decree Holder) V/S Zarar-ul-Yamin Khan (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. XXXVII, Rr. 1 & 2---Suit for recovery of money disposed of on compromise---Execution petition---Competence---Compromise between the parties was to be treated as a fresh agreement---Aggrieved party in case of any breach of compromise was required to file a fresh suit---Execution petition for enforcement of compromise was not competent---Parties might avail remedy under the law for implementation of compromise agreement---Execution petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2019 CLC 566
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
1860) 1347/2001 Suit RANA MUHAMMAD SAFDAR (Appellant) V/S V/S MST AHMED BANO BEGUM & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 17-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
1861) 6095/2021 Const. P. Capt: Muhammad Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Port Qasim Authority and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Belated challenge to seniority, rested upon pre contractual employment antecedents of a regularized employee.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 900
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1202-K/2022 Capt. Muhammad Ali Khan v. Port Qasim Authority through its Chairman Port Qasim & others,C.A.112-K/2024 Capt. Muhammad Ali Khan v. Port Qasim Authority through its Chairman Port Qasim & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ For Next Session -- Before 3-HJJ ],Pending
1862) 949/2022 Const. P. Pakistan Medical Commission (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 57
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.719-K/2022 Jinnah Sindh Medical University & another v. Pakistan Medical Commission & others,C.P.L.A.718-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. M/s. Pakistan Medical Commission & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
1863) 471/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S Zeeshan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 239
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Syed Asif Ali (ADVO-10999-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.532-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Zeeshan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1864) 64/2013 Execution NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Decree Holder) V/S SULTAN ALI AKHANI (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:"Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) ---
----S. 47 & O. XXI, R. 23-A---Arbitration Act (X of 1940), S. 14---Application for making award as rule of court---Consent decree---Execution petition---Objections---Contention of decree holders was that objections to execution petition could not be considered unless judgment debtor had deposited the decretal amount or furnished security in lieu thereof---Validity---Validity of decree could only be challenged before the Executing Court if the same was void or had been passed by the court having no jurisdiction---Provisions of O.XXI, R.23-A, C.P.C. were mandatory and objections to the execution by a judgment debtor could not be considered unless judgment debtor had deposited the decretal amount or furnished security in lieu thereof---Executing Court could not go beyond the decree---Judgment debtor could not escape from his obligation under the decree---Requirement of notice and hearing were duly complied with at the time of trial---Executing Court could not be burdened with re-trial---Compromise decree was in fact a contract, breach of which might give rise to fresh cause of action to decree holder---Decree was neither void nor it had been passed by a Court having no jurisdiction---Objections to execution application taken by the judgment debtor were over-ruled, in circumstances."
Citation:2015 CLC 1278
Advocates:S. Afsar Ali Abidi(ADVO-1715-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Khalid Anwar(ADVO-1477-SBC-KHI),Farhatullah(ADVO-4356HLC-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
1865) 4445/2013 Const. P. Aftab Ali (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Reinstatement into service)
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 64
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 13-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1906/2017 Aftab Ali v. Federation of Pakistan, thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1866) 1228/2023 Const. P. Bisman Noreen (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 557
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.790-K/2023 Bisma Noreen v. MInistry of Interior Government of Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
1867) 690/2022 Const. P. Nazar Muhammad Jamali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 827
Advocates:Muhammad Faizan(ADVO-16322-SBC-KHE),Deputy Attorney General(),Muddasir Iqbal(ADVO-12980-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Arif(ADVO-4057-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
1868) 13/2011 II.A. Mst. Sughra Begum & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Akbari Begum & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Partition)
Tag Line:Islamic Law---
----Inheritance---Nephew being son of pre-deceased brother could not claim inheritance even as vested inheritance as his father was not alive at the time of opening of succession---Daughter being sole legal heirs was entitled to half of the estate of the deceased as sharer and the remaining half which was to be treated as residue would also devolve on her---Both the courts below had passed judgments and decrees in violation of law of inheritance---Impugned judgments and decrees being contrary to law were set aside and suit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed---Second appeal was allowed in circumstances.
Citation:2016 PLD 232
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 07-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.41-K/2016 Mst. Akbari Begum and others v. Mst. Sughra Begum and others,C.P.585-K/2015 Mst. Akbari Begum and others v. Mst. Sughra Begum and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted (Refixed after two months)
1869) -1049/2024 Suit Muhammad Nasser Janjua & others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Services Tribunals Act 1974), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:Civil Courts, including a Judge (in Chambers) of High Court of Sindh, exercising jurisdiction on the original side as a civil court under C.P.C. cannot entertain a civil suit of a civil servant relating to the terms and conditions of his service.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 326
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Uzair Qadir Shoro(ADVO-207-SBC-JMS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
1870) 5907/2020 Const. P. Overseas Pakistanis Foundation (Petitioner) V/S NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 616
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.228/2021 Overseas Pakistanis Foundation thr. its authorized Office, Karachi v. National Industrial Relations Commission(Full Bench) , Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1871) 71/2011 Cr.Rev Shabir Khoso and others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 64
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
1872) 1572/2010 Suit Zahid Hussain (Plaintiff) V/S United Bank Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 16-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1873) 8149/2018 Const. P. M/s Fabrica (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 3)
Tag Line: A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan has pronounced the judgment on 18th January 2021 in the case of Al-Razzaq Fibres Pvt. Ltd. and others v. The Federation of Pakistan and another (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the vires of the amendment in in subsection (2)(b) of Section 3 and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge as well as SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(I)/2011 for being ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Divisional Bench of this Court has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: -
11. Accordingly, for the above reasons, instant petitions are allowed in the following terms:-
(i) Amendment in Section 3(2)(b) read with Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge, is ultravires to Constitution, and contrary to law, hence of no legal effect.
(ii) SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 issued in terms of and in purported exercise of powers conferred by, the amendment in Section 3(2)(b) and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(1)/2011, is declared to be ultra vires the Constitution, and is of no legal effect.
(iii) The respondents are restrained from demanding any duty in terms of SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 from the petitioners.
(iv) Provisions of Section 74A, suffice to say, have no relevance to the controversy in hand because it seeks validation of the acts of Federal Government, and not that of the Board, with the approval of the Federal Minister-in-Charge.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1080
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.518-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Fabrica Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
1874) 398/2021 Const. P. M/S J.S Bamk Limted (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 500
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
1875) 1426/2018 Const. P. Zia-ul-Hassan Lanjar (Applicant) V/S Election Commissioner of Pakistan & othrs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 09-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
1876) 992/2014 Const. P. Majid Ali Memon, (Petitioner) V/S Senior Superintendent of Police Shikarpur and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Service matters (Applicant acquitted in Criminal Case. Hence is entitled to Job. )
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 467
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1009-K/2021 The Senior Superintendent of Police Shikarpur & others v. Majid Ali Memon Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1877) 3759/2017 Const. P. Kamran Ahmed Mallah (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 41
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 19-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.67-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1878) 3189/2019 Const. P. Captain (R) Javed Afzal & Ors (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A.C.L & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.442-K/2019 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd.,C.A.22-K/2020 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, Adjourned
1879) 471/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Victory Pipe Industries (Pvt) Ltd, Islamabad. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 85
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.782-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Victory Pipe Industries (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.3289/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Victory Pipe Industries (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed in the light of earlier judgement
1880) 243/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous AZHAR ALI (Applicant) V/S MUHAMMAD ACHAR & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 32
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
1881) 646/2021 Const. P. M/s Al-Kousar Drinking Water (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:to direct the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board (KW&SB) to grant him license to continue his business for supplying Brackish water via Pipe Line from Subsoil/boring to National Refinery and other industries in Karachi--we are not inclined to subscribe to the request of the petitioner because no right of the petitioner to extract minerals/brackish water has been established and prima-facie under the garb of this petition he has attempted to continue such an activity illegally
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1067
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
1882) 771/2004 Const. P. Capt. S. M . Asllam (Petitioner) V/S Karachi Building Control Authority & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:When the application was made in the year 2003, the Resolution No.383 dated 06.01.2004 was in the field. Commercialization charges /fees as applicable in the year 2004 should be charged.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 316
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Manzoor Ahmed(ADVO-2423-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP),Syed Jamil Ahmed.(ADVO-3431-B-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 12-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1657-K/2021 Captain S.M.Aslam v. Sindh Master Plan Authority Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Session)
1883) 4769/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Kausar Noor (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Drawing an analogy from the present situation and, more importantly, guided by the principles established by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Dr. Naveeda Tufail and 72 others v. Government of Punjab and others (2003 SCMR 291) and Shahzad Shahmir and others v Government of Sindh & others (2021 SCMR 824). The Dr. Naveeda Tufail case shows that the Federal Government regularized ad hoc employees through the Public Service Commission. While the Petitioners, as provincial contract employees, cannot automatically claim this, Article 25 of the Constitution calls for equal treatment. In Naveeda Tufail, the Supreme Court recognized a legitimate expectation of regularization for Punjab's ad hoc lecturers due to continuous ad hoc appointments. The Supreme Court directed the Punjab government to regularize them via the Punjab Public Service Commission, following the Federal model with some concessions, ensuring separate consideration from direct recruits and non-retention of unsuitable candidates. This case highlights the need for fairness and the Public Service Commission's role in regularization.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 637
Advocates:Mansoorul Haque Solangi(ADVO-6746-SBC-KHI),Zubair Ahmed Rajput(ADVO-7308-SBC-KHI),Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-1474-SBC-KHP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.748-K/2025 Shabbir Ali Babar & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary , Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned
1884) 514/2018 Const. P. Mohammad Ali Hakro (Petitioner) V/S Returing Officer and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2871/2018 Muhammad Ali v. Returning Officer P.S. 16-Kamber Shahdakot-III & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1885) 4389/2016 Const. P. Lutfullah Kalhoro and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
1886) 66/2013 Cr.J.A Rafique @ Peeko (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1356
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.285/2020 Rafiq @ Peeko v. The State,Crl.A.161/2023 Rafiq @ Peeko v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Partly Allowed
1887) 3292/2012 Const. P. Asif Abbasi V/S NED University & Ors. (Petitioner) V/S Asif Abbasi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.632-K/2018 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi,C.A.135-K/2019 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed
1888) 1410/2013 Suit Toyoshima & Co. limited (Plaintiff) V/S Shadman Cotton mills limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Territorial jurisdiction of Sindh High Court was questioned by Defendant, primarily on the ground that Defendant-Company has been shifted from Karachi to Lahore, therefore, a foreign company / Plaintiff cannot enforce an International Arbitral Award by filing a suit in Sindh High Court. The crucial documentary evidence shows that when the suit proceeding was filed for enforcement of the Award under Section 6 of the Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011, the Defendant had its registered office in Karachi and even Annual Report of the Company also shows that the Management notice for convening the Annual General Meeting was also to be held at Karachi. Consequently, it has been held, that Sindh High Court has jurisdiction in the matter.
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Territorial Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:Territorial jurisdiction of Sindh High Court was questioned by Defendant, primarily on the ground that Defendant-Company has been shifted from Karachi to Lahore, therefore, a foreign company / Plaintiff cannot enforce an International Arbitral Award by filing a suit in Sindh High Court. The crucial documentary evidence shows that when the suit proceeding was filed for enforcement of the Award under Section 6 of the Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011, the Defendant had its registered office in Karachi and even Annual Report of the Company also shows that the Management notice for convening the Annual General Meeting was also to be held at Karachi. Consequently, it has been held, that Sindh High Court has jurisdiction in the matter.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
1889) 6599/2014 Const. P. M/s Lucky Cement (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 963
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 20-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.21/2022 Lucky Cement Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Division, Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Ministry of Finance and Revenue, Islamabad and another,C.A.318/2022 Lucky Cement Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Division, Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Ministry of Finance and Revenue, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1890) 5058/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Rashid Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 PLC CS 1216
Advocates:Muhammad Taha Ali Khan(ADVO-16320-SBC-KHC),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ashfaq Rafiq Janjua(ADVO-4858-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
1891) 720/2023 Cr.Bail SHAHID MEHMOOD S/O SHAIKH SALAHUDDIDN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 338
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Khan(ADVO-8525-SBC-KHI),Allah Wadhayo(ADVO-18409-SBC-KHE),Imdad Ali Saheto(ADVO-16074-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
1892) 4976/2020 Const. P. Naseer Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Petitioner has called in question the rejection of his candidature for the post of District Public Prosecutor (BS-19) in Law Department, Government of Sindh vide letter dated 18.10.2019 issued by Sindh Public Service Commission Hyderabad (SPSC) on the analogy that he did not possess ten (10) years' experience as an Advocate of High Court ---In our view, the submission of respondents will be counterproductive and would prevent good Advocates from accepting appointments in civil service if this analogy persists. The second limb of the argument of the respondents is that once an Advocate is appointed as a Law Officer in any department of the Government of Sindh, he cannot be appointed to the post of District Public Prosecutor has to be ruled out for the understanding that it does not appeal to logic--We, therefore, hold that ten (10) years' service experience includes a period of serving as a law officer, which counts active practice at the bar which petitioner possesses and therefore is qualified to appear for the subject test for the position of District Public Prosecutor--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of SPSC is directed to allow the petitioner to appear in the subject interview and after conducting his interview announce the result accordingly within two (02) weeks from today.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 535
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
1893) 370/2014 Const. P. Mst Bibi Naz Bibi (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1067
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
1894) 138/2013 Cr.Rev Nawab Liaquat Ali and others (Applicant) V/S the State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 25-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
1895) 940/2010 Cr.Bail Ghulam Nabi alias Papu, (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting
1896) 1711/2020 Suit Fazal Mehmood (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:stay application
Application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2
Application under Section 39 Rule 4 R/w section 151 CPC filed by Defendant No. 9 and 10
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 186
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1897) 69/2011 Const. P. Ashfaq Ghori (Petitioner) V/S IV-Addl: District Judge Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 09-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting
1898) 949/2022 Const. P. Pakistan Medical Commission (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:"MDCAT" ADDITIONAL NOTE
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 552
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.719-K/2022 Jinnah Sindh Medical University & another v. Pakistan Medical Commission & others,C.P.L.A.718-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. M/s. Pakistan Medical Commission & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
1899) 5147/2017 Const. P. Mst. Yasmeen Akhtar and ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
1900) 409/2016 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD SULEMAN S/O JAHANZAIB KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 17-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
1901) 41/1999 J.M MOULANA IBADUR REHMAN (Applicant) V/S JEHANGIR ADAM & ORS. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 410
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 07-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
1902) 2325/2009 Const. P. Sultan Ahmed Siddiqui & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 17-JAN-11
Approved for Reporting
1903) 2520/2014 Const. P. Syed Faisal Ali and ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 751
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1904) 43/2016 Cr.J.A Sadique Ali Sabzoi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Murder Appeal allowed, on Contradiction ,Delay in Shifting dead body & Injured in Hospital, tracking foot print via dogs not disclose in FIR.)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 410
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1905) 1885/2015 Const. P. M/s CIM Shipping Inc (Petitioner) V/S Tousif Ahmed and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Compensation)
Citation:2019 PLC Lab. 121
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
1906) 212/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Mian Azam Waheed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 744
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3215/2021 Mian Azam Waheed v. The Collector of Customs thr. Addl. Collector of Customs, Model Customs Collectorate of Appraisement (East), Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1907) 854/2023 Const. P. Mst. Lily Nadeem and Others (Petitioner) V/S IXth ADJ, Karachi West and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Christian marriage Judicial Separation
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1048
Advocates:Mirza Saleem Akhtar(ADVO-7001-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ayaz Kandhro(ADVO-20686-SBC-KHS),Saddam Bhutto(ADVO-19398-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
1908) 940/2016 Const. P. Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) V/S Dr. Nizamuddin Ghori and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1909) 253/2018 Const. P. Arshad Rasool (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Saniya & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2019 YLR 700
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1910) 1258/2010 Suit DR. ISHAQUE MUHAMMAD SHAH (Plaintiff) V/S NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 522
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1580/2021 Dr. Ishaque Muhammad Shah (deceased) through L.Rs v. National Bank of Pakistan through its President Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1911) 181/2012 Cr.Appeal Ashraf (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
1912) 55/2013 I. A Homepack Freight International & another (Appellant) V/S Saudi Pak Leasing Company Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLD 82
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
1913) 2598/2016 Const. P. Rashid Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Section 3 of Sindh Regularization Act, )
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1245
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1914) 4920/2016 Const. P. Maqsood Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
regularization issue of employees of PSQCA
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3673/2020 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others,C.A.522/2021 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed and Remanded
1915) 805/2021 Const. P. Project Implementation Managers Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 517
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Sara Malkani(ADVO-15404-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2412/2023 Tehreem Muneeba v. Governor of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1916) 569/2017 Const. P. Ghulam Rasoom Bhagat (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
1917) 830/1999 Const. P. Haroon Rashild. (Petitioner) V/S Fed.of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 696
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Federal Counsel()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
1918) 20/2011 II.A. Muhammad Azam (Appellant) V/S Honourary General Secretary, Jamiat Dehli Punjabi Saudagran (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Abdul Malik(ADVO-6378-SBC-KHI),Mahmooda Suleman(ADVO-10749-SBC-KHI),Younis Inayat(),Shamdas Chhangani(ADVO-137-SBC-KHI),Mukesh Kumar(ADVO-11446-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 23-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
1919) 3573/2014 Const. P. M/s Wyeth Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Nasimul Hassan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLC Lab. 171
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
1920) 793/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous ABDUL GHANI S/O SOOBAL KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the learned judge directed the police to register a case against the applicant-son under the Protection of Parents Ordinance 2021
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 606
Advocates:Nusrat Ali Shar(ADVO-881-SBC-KHP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.688/2022 Ahmad Jahanzaib & others v. Mian Arshad Ali Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1921) 97/2010 I. A M/s.United Bank Ltd (Appellant) V/S M.Mubeen Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 30-APR-12
Approved for Reporting
1922) 17/2018 E.P Mir Abdullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 415
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
1923) 5312/2016 Const. P. Abdullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.516-K/2018 Abdullah Khan v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1924) 2136/2012 Const. P. Hassan Jameel Ansari (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting
1925) 2353/2014 Const. P. Pakistan Airlines Pilots Association and others (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Internatinal Airline Corporation and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 23-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.839-K/2016 Pakistan Airline Pilots and others v. P.I.A. and another,C.A.585/2018 Pakistan Airline Pilots and others v. P.I.A. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1926) 201/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Pakistan State Oil Company Limited (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PTD 397
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 04-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting
1927) 508/2022 Cr.Bail Hakeem Khan & Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 335
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
1928) 214/2022 Cr.Rev SALMAN IQBAL THROUGH ATTORNEY ZAINUL ABIDEEN (Applicant) V/S INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER PVT LTD & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 332
Advocates:Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Barrister Atta Hussain(ADVO-17486-SBC-KHS),Omrazia Nadeem(ADVO-20500-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.498/2025 Salman Iqbal v. Independent Newspapers Corporation Private Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1929) 40/2001 Civil Revision Shamsuddin and others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Jabbar & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Islamic law---
----Pre-emption suit--- Talbs, performance of--- Requirements---Plaintiffs had failed to produce two witnesses of the occasion/event when they came to know that defendants had sold or they were about to sell their property and plaintiffs raised their right of pre-emption against the defendants---Plaintiffs were required to produce two witnesses of Talb-i-Ishhad but they had not produced the second witness nor had mentioned second witness in their claim of pre-emption---Plaintiffs had failed to prove their right of pre-emption, in circumstances---Revision was dismissed accordingly. [Paras. 7, 8, 9 & 10 of the judgment]
Citation:2020 CLC Note 25
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
1930) 699/2019 Const. P. Abdul Jabbar Mahar & Other (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Utilization of Social Welfare Funds)
Tag Line:Royalty of Oil, Gas and Coal
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 344
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
1931) 816/2008 Suit Mrs.Nuzhat Irfan (Plaintiff) V/S City District Government Karachi & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 810
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 05-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
1932) 44/2010 H.C.A Saeed Qureshi V/S Mrs.Surriya Afzal & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Saeed Qureshi V/S Mrs.Surriya Afzal & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 28-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting
1933) 2/2014 Judicial Companies Misc. Industrias Cannon de Colombia S.A (Applicant) V/S Olympia Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters, LIMITATION
Tag Line:The claim of the petitioner itself is yet to be
ascertained on the touchstone of Article 51 and Section 19 of the
Limitation Act which summarily cannot be decided here. Even in the
case of Halla Spinning Mills the observation of the Honble Supreme
Court was that efforts should be made by the judicial forums to adopt
such device so that the project may continue running commercially and
its financial liabilities starts reducing gradually.
--The statutory notice of demand under clause (a) of subsection (1)
of Section 306 of the Companies ordinance is in relation to a debt
claimed by the petitioner which as observed is to be ascertained and is
also subjected to a limitation clause and hence such statutory notice
would also loses its strength when not only the claim is bonafidely
disputed but is also subjected to the Limitation Act, which in this
particular case appears to be a mixed question of law and facts.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
1934) 4/2015 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Ali Bux (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 11-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
1935) 169/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. HASHIM RAZA @ TAARO S/O NAWAB HAIDER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
1936) 61/2024 H.C.A Furqan Ahmed Shaikh (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Contempt Proceeding
Tag Line:The judgments are not immune from criticism but the institutions
and personalities of those who authored judgments/orders cannot be
subjected to such scandalous, abusive, contemptuous intent and
offensive language to settle score against judicial pronouncements and
specially to make it part of pleadings/grounds in support of their appeal
in an attempt to assail judgments/orders
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 822
Advocates:Saad Fayaz(ADVO-15882-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Asif Malik(ADVO-8425-SBC-KHI),Rehan Kayani(ADVO-12724-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 17-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.144-K/2025 Nasir Javed & another v. Furqan Ahmed Sheikh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1937) 672/2015 Const. P. Abdul Karim (Petitioner) V/S IIIrd Additional Session Judge SBA and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 YLR 261
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
1938) 1106/2014 Suit Habib University Foundation (Plaintiff) V/S Mecatch (Pvt.) Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
1939) 157/2016 Cr.Rev MOHAMMAD MESUM ABBASS S/O ANWAR HAIDER (Applicant) V/S THE IST ADJ KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
1940) 1265/2005 Suit ANWAR KHAN & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S FOUZIA KHAN & ORSll (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 83
Advocates:M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),Mirza Saeed Baig(ADVO-1960-SBC-KHI),Mian Ashfaq Ahmed(ADVO-6296-SBC-KHI),Kamran Shahzad Siddiqui(ADVO-8203-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
1941) 340/2018 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S M/s. Tariq Chobdar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1960
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Fouzia Rasheed(ADVO-6865-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1456-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. Tariq Chobdar & others,C.A.1432/2021 The Collector of Customs, Karachi v. Tariq Chobdar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Judgment Reserved Judgment Reserved
1942) 81/2020 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. MUHAMMAD JAVED S/O MUHAMMAD ESSA @ ESSAL KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 750
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 04-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1486/2020 The State through Prosectutor General Sindh v. Muhammad Javed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1943) 1636/2024 Const. P. Ali Ahmed Turabi Advocate (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:10. In the instant matter, petitioner is not an aggrieved person. No action of Government was either proposed for him or against him. None of his legal right, whatsoever, has been violated. The amendment to Section 2(c) of the Decoration Act, 1975, appears constitutionally valid. The broadened definition of "gallantry" aligns with constitutional provisions and established legal principles, supported by definitions from renowned dictionaries. Judicial precedents emphasize the presumption of constitutionality, the burden of proof on petitioners, and the judiciary's role in enforcing existing rights rather than creating new ones. Additionally, the petitioner lacks locus standi and hasn't demonstrated a violation of legal rights. Therefore, the petition challenging the constitutionality of the amendment is not found maintainable.
11. In view of the above facts and observations made by the Honorable Supreme Court as well as High Court in various cases, instant petition is bereft of any merit stands dismissed in limine. Above are the reasons of our short order dated 02.04.2024.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1321
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
1944) 465/2018 H.C.A Murtaza Baig & others (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Tag Line:The impugned order is only an interlocutory order and the main
application under section 12(2) CPC is pending. The elections of the
society pending since last more than six years i.e. ever since this appeal
is filed and pending. It is therefore in the interest of the Society itself
that the elections be held at the earliest with the inclusion of these
applicants of application under section 12(2) CPC, identified as
respondents in the instant appeal.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 793
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 26-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.302-K/2024 P.I.D.C Employees Multipurpose & another v. Province of Sindh &Y others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1945) 1631/2008 Const. P. Allauddin Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 18-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
1946) 7/2017 M.A. Southern Networks Limited (Appellant) V/S PEMRA Thr. Its Chairman & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules, 2009, PEMRA Ordinance, 2002
Tag Line:-Definition of a person is provided under Ordinance, 2002, which
includes an individual, partnership, association, company, trust or
corporation. Invariably in the show-cause/decision impugned, PEMRA
presumed to have issued licenses to individual directors hence referred
that licenses to them should not have been transferred by them. It is
misconceived impression.
--The issuance of licence is subject to Section 19 of Ordinance
2002. The authority enjoys exclusive right to issue licence for the
establishment and operation of broadcasting media and distribution
services and that these licences shall be in conformity with the
principles of fairness and equity and the eligibility of such applicant to
whom the licence is likely to be granted is based on prescribed criteria
notified in advance.
---With this understanding of law perhaps the intensity of violation
and penalty imposed on appellant should be viewed in term of their
proportionality. Wednesburys principle while defining proportionality
has discussed role of public officers entrusted with the discretionary
powers. However, it is often seen that officers entrusted with such
powers exercising their discretion goes unattended. Discretion at times
goes unmeasured. Subjective analysis of a discretion exercised by public
officers is a difficult proposition but proportionality is a tool which can
play its role to serve the subject. The principle requires that measures
adopted by the authority should not exceed the limits of what is proper
and necessary in order to attain the objectives, legitimately. It is
generally expected that where there is choice between several
appropriate remedies and measures, the recourse that must be the least
onerous and least cumbersome be adopted.
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 6
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.5469/2021 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) through its Chiarman, Islamabad and another v. Southern Networks Limited, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
1947) 157/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Nihal Khan & Others (Applicant) V/S Province Of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 241
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
1948) 858/2019 Cr.J.A DIL AHMED S/O QASIM ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 619
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Sara Malkani(ADVO-15404-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
1949) 163/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN S/O GHULAM SARWAR & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Discrepancies and contradictions)
Tag Line:No ransom demand has been proved by the prosecution through any tangible evidence. For instance, there is no CDR to link the appellants to the offence. No one saw the appellants throw the body of the deceased in the canal and the last seen evidence without proper identification of the appellants cannot be relied upon which in any event is only circumstantial evidence and is to be viewed with extreme caution. No toxicology report was produced to show that the child had even been drugged.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 474
Advocates:Insaf Ahmed(ADVO-4455-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 24-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
1950) 20/2004 Execution Union Bank Limited (Decree Holder) V/S Iqbal Ahmed Malik (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 1524
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 20-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
1951) 108/2012 H.C.A P.T.C.L & another (Appellant) V/S Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLC CS 510
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.313/2018 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others,C.A.416/2022 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
1952) 5862/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam Awan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 67
Advocates:Abdul Qadir Leghari(ADVO-4868-SBC-KHI),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.492/2022 Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (KW&SB), Karachi through its Chairman v. Muhammad Aslam Awan and others,C.P.L.A.285-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Aslam Awan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed
1953) 4597/2019 Const. P. Rizwan Tahir & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 571
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.765-K/2022 The University of Karachi through its Registrar v. Province of Sindh through the Education Secretary, & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
1954) 1789/2022 Suit ARIF HASSAN ALI HASHWANI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S SADRUDDIN HASHWANI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:If a litigant is entitled to more than one relief in respect of same
cause of action, as indeed, in the instant case, he has to sue for all or he
may sue for any of the relief he may opt but the leftover would count as
an omission to sue. Since provisions of Order II rule 2 CPC are penal in
nature it would preclude a litigant to sue for a portion of claim or
remedy so ignored or omitted. The plaintiffs have ignored and omitted
to sue for all the claims and reliefs to which they were entitled with
regard to a cause of action that is "breach of trust" and hence are
precluded to have a next round of litigation on the original cause of
action. Plaintiff can only ignore any of the matured relief at the risk of
treating them as relinquished or ignored one
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 75
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
1955) 270/2023 Const. P. Farooque Alias Ayaz Ali Jamali (Petitioner) V/S Mst: Asma Jamali & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:A.F.R
Recovery of Dowry Article
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 409
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.882-K/2025 Mst. Asma v. Farooque alias Ayaz Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Notice
1956) 825/2010 Const. P. Hassan Ali Gopang (Petitioner) V/S E.D.O Revenue Kamber Shahdadkot and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line: We have prima facie observed that the impugned order was passed in haste without dilating upon the earlier order passed 21 days before by the same Executive District Officer in respect of the same land and it clearly smacks mala fide. Once an order was passed on the basis of certain facts based on reports of two Mukhtiarkars referred above, he practically becomes functus officio and cannot exercise such jurisdiction as exercised in the impugned order. The objection relating to the maintainability of this petition is, therefore, not sustainable and we hold that in view of the present facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is maintainable; particularly in the manner in which the impugned order was passed, when we see that there is no deliberation regarding earlier order and that too passed by same officer in the span of 21 days without notice to petitioner. The impugned order is not a speaking order particularly when earlier he has decided the entitlement of land in favour of the petitioner twenty one days before. The case law cited by learned counsel for respondent are distinguishable.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 23-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
1957) 2802/2024 Const. P. Pakistan Federal Union of Journalist (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002 (Code of Conduct - 2015 - Court Reporters)
Tag Line:PEMRA's impugned directive was declared illegal and out of sync with PEMRA laws. Exercise of judicial restraint. Where two options are available to the Constitutional Court one on constitutional ground and the other ground of statutory construction, Court may opt for the latter option. Petition allowed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1004
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.472/2025 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) through its representative, PEMRA, Islamabad v. Pakistan Federal, Union of Journalists (PFUJ), through its Secretary General, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1958) 223/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/S. A. R. Industries, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Valuation of goods; section 25 of the Customs Act; determination in a sequential order; fall back method under section 25(9); how to be applied guidelines
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 243
Advocates:Imran Taj(ADVO-9526-SBC-KHC),Aamir Raza(ADVO-15010-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.737-K/2023 M/s. A.R. Industries Karachi v. The Collectors of Customs Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1959) 977/2019 Const. P. Public Interest Law Association of Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bomb Detector Khoji case
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
1960) 1754/2023 Const. P. Gulab Sahito (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1302
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.201-K/2025 Province of Sindh & others v. Gulab Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
1961) 267/2012 Const. P. All Pakistan Security Agencies (Petitioner) V/S Fedration of pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 24-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
1962) 5300/2020 Const. P. Rasheed Alam (Petitioner) V/S Dr. Qadeer Muhammad Ali & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We are also cognizant of the fact that the invocation of the writ of Mandamus under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been restricted to enforce the terms and conditions of non-statutory rules of service of government-owned and controlled organizations. However, the petitioner's case involves the enforcement of the university's service rules. The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders keeping in view that one of the respondents has retired from service as pointed out by the counsel for the respondent university.
12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 146
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Muhammad Yousuf Chohan(ADVO-3371-SBC-KHI),Dr. Tahir Rasheed(ADVO-4392-SBC-KHI),Shoaib Mohiuddin Ashraf(ADVO-4396-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
1963) 2933/2021 Suit PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMIANL LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Plaintiff is in no position to succeed on the strength of
investment made by him as it was on Build Operate and Transfer
(BOT) basis. Plaintiff build and operated it for 21 years and now it
stands transferred at the conclusion of Agreement.
Citation:2023 CLC 2119
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
1964) 80/2017 Civil Revision Abdul Qadir Memon (Applicant) V/S Shahid Umar Rajput (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
1965) 635/2018 Const. P. M/S Gerry (Petitioner) V/S Learned Member NIRC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (transfer and posting)
Citation:2019 PLC Lab. 63
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.86-K/2018,C.P.L.A.84-K/2018,C.P.L.A.88-K/2018,C.P.L.A.83-K/2018,C.P.L.A.87-K/2018,C.P.L.A.85-K/2018 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1966) 1312/2022 Const. P. Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 792
Advocates:Muhammad Saeeduz-Zaman.(ADVO-4476-SBC-KHI),Dildar Ahmad(ADVO-19038-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
1967) 31/2020 Cr.J.A Abdul Majeed Gaincho (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal ( convicted and sentenced under Section 9 (c), CNS Act, is Sat aside, on delay sanding Parcel and not in Safe Custody. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 419
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
1968) 38/2020 Const. P. Administrator Evacuee Trust property & Others (Petitioner) V/S Pardeep Kumar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 895
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 24-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
1969) 3337/2011 Const. P. Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
1970) 2301/2023 Const. P. Abid Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Quashment of FIR (Remedy under section 265-K and 249-A Cr.P.C)
Tag Line:Once Challan / Report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been filed before the trial Court, High Court must not interfere in its Constitutional jurisdiction and an accused must avail alternate remedy under the Law.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 402
Advocates:Umar Farooq Khan(ADVO-1914-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 08-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
1971) 579/2015 Cr.Bail HAMOODUR REHMAN KHAN NIAZI & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 19-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
1972) 283/2021 Cr.Bail Dado Adam son of Muhammad Qasim Abbasi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 762
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
1973) 1762/2018 Suit Mrs. Zarina Iqbal (Plaintiff) V/S Haji Jaffar & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
1974) 463/2021 Criminal Appeal HAJI KHAN S/O SHAH WALI KHAN & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 380
Advocates:Raja Babar Hamid(ADVO-40313-PBC-LHR),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
1975) 6200/2022 Const. P. Zakir Hussain Samo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Proforma Promotion)
Tag Line:Entitlement for Proforma Promotion. If a person reaches superannuation and is not considered for promotion or no meeting is held by the Departmental Promotion Committee, then he is entitled for consideration for proforma promotion as per rules.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 263
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.207-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretarty and others v. Zakir Hussain Samo Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Not Reached
1976) 1798/2016 Suit Syed Ali Haider & others (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airline (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Suit decreed. Independent promotion orders cannot be recalled through Admin Order No. 17/2016 without proper Notice and confronting the Plaintiffs.
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) 221
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
1977) 13/2012 II.A. Mohammad Ashfaq & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Haroon (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-6927-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ramzan Tabassum(ADVO-7688-SBC-KHI),Abdul Ghaffar Kalwar(ADVO-10009-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
1978) 198/2025 Const. P. Mst Shahida Parveen Jumani (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Family Pension Right of the widowed daughter.
.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2106
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
1979) 208/2013 Cr.Misc. Abdul Malik Brohi and others (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 24-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting
1980) 2432/2008 Const. P. Works Coop. Housing Society Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 16-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
1981) 504/2020 Const. P. Syed Noor Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S The Learned Election Tribunal Ps 52 Umarkot (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Petition allowed)
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
1982) 2201/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Asif Ansari and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Televison Corp. and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the foremost questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the re-designation / induction of the private respondents as Producer Programs (G-5) was/is suffering from inherent disqualification under the PTVC rules, and whether the private respondents are holders of the public office, therefore, fall within the purview of sub-clause 1(b) (ii) of Article 199 of the Constitution and this Court has jurisdiction to entertain this petition?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 793
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1075-K/2021 Muhammad Asif Ansari & another v. Pakistan Television Corporation through its Managing Director & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned
1983) 998/2023 Const. P. Mst. Shaheen Gul (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1084
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 19-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
1984) 88/2014 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Eastern Construction Co., Khi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 22-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.159-K/2015 Collector of Customs v. M/s Eastern Construction Company Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
1985) 83/2011 Civil Revision Ghulam Rasool through L.Rs & Ors (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 5
Advocates:Muhammad Ismail Bhutto(ADVO-261-SBC-LAR),Abdul Ghaffar Kalwar(ADVO-10009-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
1986) 875/2024 Cr.Bail FAHAD ALTAF S/O ALTAF HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters
Tag Line:**There is no doubt a departure from normal process is enshrined under Section-5(6) of the Ordinance, 1984 that is offences in respect of Bank (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984 and Section-497 Cr.P.C but that alone will not subside the constitutional mandate.
**Section-5 Sub-section-6 of the Ordinance, 1984 does not
restrict the court absolutely from not extending the accused
person/applicant on bail. It restricts the court from not extending
the accused/ applicant on bail if it appears to the court that there
are reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of
scheduled offence. Such does not seems to be a case here.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1356
Advocates:Irtafa Ur Rehman(ADVO-19686-SBC-KHS),Khuda Dino Sangi(ADVO-1679-SBC-SUK),Deputy Attorney General(),Barrister Gazain Magsi(ADVO-67-BBC-QTA-QTA),Syed Ghulam Shabbir Shah(ADVO-13398-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 23-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
1987) 8/2023 Suit Syed Tahir Imam Rizvi (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 734
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Sarmad Hani(ADVO-14089-SBC-KHI),Zarar Qadir(ADVO-282-SBC-JMS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
1988) 1971/2011 Const. P. Khursheed Ali Junejo (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Province Through Chief Secretary and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 12-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
1989) 1845/2013 Const. P. Wajid Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Civil Judge and JM-1 Tando Muhammad Khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
1990) 4187/2023 Const. P. Aurangzaib Khan Bangash (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Abida & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1491
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Shah Jehan(ADVO-4580-SBC-KHI),Farman Ullah(ADVO-11315-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 19-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
1991) 3429/2021 Const. P. Akhtar Hussain Abro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (respondents are hereby directed to consider the petitioner???s case for promotion in DPC. CP Allowed.)
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 906
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
1992) 103/2019 Cr.J.A Momin & others (Appellant) V/S State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 YLR 1160
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 07-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
1993) 52/2006 Suit.B National Bank of Pakistan (Plaintiff) V/S M/S ARK Garments Industry (Pvt.) Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 15-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
1994) 210/2022 H.C.A Haji Ibrahim & Others (Appellant) V/S Abdul Qadir Lakhani & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1). Before granting a mandatory interlocutory injunction the Court had to feel a high degree of assurance that at the trial it would appear that the injunction had been rightly granted.
2).Similarly, a mandatory injunction ought not to be granted on an interlocutory application in the absence of special circumstances and then only in clear cases either where the court thought that the matter ought to be decided at once or where the injunction was directed at a simple and summary act which could be easily remedied or where the defendant had attempted to steal a march on the plaintiff. Moreover, before granting a mandatory interlocutory injunction the Court had to feel a high degree of assurance that at the trial it would appear that the injunction had been rightly granted.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 11
Advocates:Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI),Rehan Kayani(ADVO-12724-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 18-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting
1995) 1114/2011 Suit Imtiaz Ali Effendi (Plaintiff) V/S Ali MUhammad Effendi and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 26-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
1996) 489/2010 Cr.Appeal Mst. Shehnaz (Appellant) V/S State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 21-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
1997) 1233/2017 Const. P. Major (Rtd) Raja Mohammad Basharat Ahmed & others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Re-grant of land under Colonization Act.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 277
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 04-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
1998) 687/2010 I.T.R.A Cargill Pakistan Holding(Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 21-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
1999) 2187/2015 Const. P. Dr. Asha Bai (Petitioner) V/S Chairman KPT and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
2000) 7493/2021 Const. P. AUS Food (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Extra Sales Tax under Section 3(5) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 on consumers of Electric Power and Gas under SRO 1221(I)/2021; held; valid
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1106
Advocates:Zulfiqar Ali Mirjat(ADVO-11639-SBC-KHI),Syed Hamza Ahmed Hashmi(ADVO-16626-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 24-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
2001) 135/2020 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD SOHAIL S/O JAHAN SHAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Section 353/324/34 PPC
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2020
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.48-K/2021 The State through Prosecutor General Sindh v. Muhammad Sohail Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2002) 1253/2011 Suit ABDUL AZIZ (Plaintiff) V/S ABDUL WAHAB & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2003) 906/2011 Suit Pakistan Water & Power Development Authority (WAPDA) (Plaintiff) V/S M/S CCI - AG, AN IMI Company and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 MLD 82
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
2004) 2108/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Asim Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (age relaxation)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
2005) 7357/2017 Const. P. M/s. Marosh & 24 others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & 3 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PTD 1787, 2018 PTCL 603
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 23-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.841-K/2018 The Collector of Customs Appraisement (West) and others v. M/s Marosh and others,C.P.L.A.4483/2017 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman FBR, Islamabad & others v. M/s Marosh, Lahore & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Judgment Reserved ,Disposed Disposed of
2006) 560/2000 Suit Nasreen Yousuf (Plaintiff) V/S Aijaz Safdar Kiyani and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 24-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
2007) 2288/2016 Const. P. Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) V/S KMC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 2
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.322-K/2018 Khursheed Mukaram v. Ms. Azra Muqeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2008) 20/2018 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Sharif and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 24-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1013/2019 Muhammad Sharif S/o Khuda Nazar Pathan & another v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh,Crl.A.183/2022 Muhammad Sharif S/o Khuda Nazar Pathan & another v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
2009) 253/2015 Const. P. Faraz Sherwani and ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1084
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.70-K/2019 Ali Muhammad Joyo v. Asif and another,C.A.1000/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others,C.P.L.A.2215/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be heard a/w C.A.816/2020 out of C.P.1771/20 after 3 months.
2010) 21/2018 H.C.A Government of Sindh (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Hailey Vincent D Abreo & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 246
Advocates:Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1895/2023 Mrs. Hailey Vincent D'Abreo and others v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2011) 42/2019 Const. P. Pir Bux Chandio (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 07-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
2012) 2194/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Anwer and others (Petitioner) V/S Fouji Foundation Model School & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2085
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
2013) 5370/2024 Const. P. Abid Khan and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Khalid v. National Accountability Bureau (2017 SCMR 1340) has provided certain guidelines which need to be adhered to by the F.I.A. while probing the cases against the Housing Societies.
6. This Court, while exercising discretionary power under Article 199, of the Constitution is not an appellate court. Especially when alternative remedies exist under specific statutes and rules, and when the Court???s discretionary powers remain unaffected. However, in the present case question is whether F.I.A. has jurisdiction in Provincial employee cases in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of F.I.A. Vs Syed Hamid Ali Shah
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1100
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5367/2024 Abid Khan and others v. The Federation of Pakistan through its Interior Secretary, Ministry of Interior Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
2014) 5016/2019 Const. P. AKD Investments Management & Ors (Petitioner) V/S JS Investment & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLD 596
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2015) 5920/2015 Const. P. Kainat Soomro and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Directions given by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito in C.P.No.D-5920 of 2015 to the I.G. Sindh for implementation of SOP for sampling and preservation of DNA samples in rape, sodomy and sexual violence cases.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 984
Advocates:Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
2016) 829/2018 Const. P. Rasheed Ahmed @ Abdul Rasheed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line: In pursuance of the report submitted by Mukhtiarkar (Revenue) Ghotki, one Muhammad Umar was found to have occupied the subject piece of 00-09 ghuntas to which these petitioners do not claim. They only claim that this piece of land, which is claimed by respondent No.4, is part and parcel of the village and as such the villagers have right over the land. This is not a public interest litigation as the petitioners were defendants in the suit and contested on their own right as being in occupation. The petitioners have not been able to show any right or title over the land in question. The orders, which they have impugned, may have been passed beyond jurisdiction but the approach of the petitioners is mala fide and the hands are tainted. They have not approached the Court with clean hands. Muhammad Umar, who was found to be in possession, was claimed to be the brother of the petitioners and this fact was not denied, and he has not been made party in these proceedings purposely. This is not difficult to ascertain as to why he has not been arrayed as one of the petitioners.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 17-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.714-K/2018 M/s Sessi United Staff Union Sindh (CBA) and another v. The Registrar Trade Unions and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2017) 90/2004 Suit MRS.ANJUM ARA (Plaintiff) V/S SHABBIR A.HALAI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2050
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2018) 1978/2015 Suit Pakistan Beverage (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:here is a need of carving out a distinction between a determined/prescribed price for the consumer and sale price for the consumer. OGRA only determines the prescribed price on the basis of estimated revenue requirements and that is the only determination that they forwarded to the federal government i.e. Rs.469.04 per MMBTU. It cannot be considered as a sale price for each category of consumer since this could only be culminated and matured into a sale price once the federal government sends it back to the authority/OGRA for issuing a notification considering it to be a sale price in the notification. Determined prescribed price of OGRA cannot prematurely be considered to be sale price under the given circumstances. The impugned notification further lacks its sanctity as the same was much higher i.e. Rs.600 MMBTU than the prescribed/recommended price of Rs.469.04 per MMBTU by OGRA itself.
Citation:2016 SBLR Sindh 1268
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
2019) 3411/2017 Const. P. Civil Aviation Authority (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
2020) 115/2016 Cr.Appeal Ali Dino alias Pehlwan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 31-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
2021) 127/2021 Cr.Bail Sabir Ali Khoso (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:For the aforesaid reasons, the instant bail application merits no consideration is dismissed. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the case; dispose of the same preferably within two months from the date of this Order; and, it is made clear that the direction given by this Court in bail matters may not be taken lightly and valid reasons are to be assigned if the same direction is not complied with as now it is well-settled law that to have a speedy trial is the fundamental right of the accused being universally acknowledged. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, a smooth methodology and Scheme for a speedy trial are provided whether it is held by the Sessions Court or Magistrate, in recognition of the said right of an accused person. This principle shall apply more vigorously to the trials before Special Courts, constituted under the CNS Act, or any other special law so that unnecessary delay, a much less shocking one in its conclusion is avoided in all circumstances. Any unreasonable or shocking delay in the conclusion of the trial, before Special Courts, would amount to the denial of justice, or to say, denial of fundamental rights to the accused, of speedy trial. On the aforesaid proposition. In this context, I am fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Imtiaz Ahmed vs. The State (2017 SCMR 1194).
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 603
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
2022) 8265/2017 Const. P. Majid Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Seniority)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 771
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.135/2018 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others,C.A.636/2019 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2023) 3519/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Faizan Amjad (Petitioner) V/S The Secretary, Board of Secondary Education Karachi, & 03 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 YLR 397
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 28-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
2024) 1557/2021 Suit SALEEM BUTT (Plaintiff) V/S DR. AFNAN ULLAH KHAN & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:Parliamentary privilege cannot be vitiated by civil suits.
Citation:2025 PLD Sindh 28, 2023 SBLR Sindh 28
Advocates:Umair Usman Ghani(ADVO-17297-SBC-KHE),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Syed Kawish Hussain Naqvi(ADVO-19083-SBC-KHS),Junaid Ahmed(ADVO-15448-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
2025) 123/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S Haji Abdul Sattar Koshka & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 983
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2026) 921/2009 Cr.Bail Palyo Shar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 06-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
2027) 1064/2022 Const. P. Sartaj Hyder Shar (Petitioner) V/S P.o Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: National Disaster Managment Act 2010 (Constitution of committee for preparation of Master Plan )
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1176
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 02-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1348/2023 Ghulam Asghar Kansaro v. Chairman Planning and Development Board, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others,C.P.L.A.943-K/2022 Province of Sindh through Chief Minister & others v. Sartaj Hyder Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Disposed of
2028) 68/2015 Cr.Rev SULEMAN LALANI & 02 OTHERS (Applicant) V/S AQEEL KARIM DEDHI S/O HAJI KARIM DEDHI & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Test for issuing process under section 204 CrPC.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 701
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.77-K/2024 Jahangir Siddiqui v. The State and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2029) 140/2012 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue. (Applicant) V/S Independent Newspaper Corp(Pvt)Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 06-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
2030) 3727/2024 Const. P. Javed Ali Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1218
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.976-K/2025 Javed Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through Petroleum Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
2031) 118/2013 II.A. M/S INTERFLEW COMMUNICATION PVT (Appellant) V/S AAMIR ALI S/O BAKHSH ALI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Delay in payment of Court Fee)
Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. VII, R. 2 & S. 100---Money suit---Second appeal---Limitation---Court fee fixed after period of limitation---Effect---Defendant did not appear for cross-examination and his affidavit-in-evidence was discarded and suit was decreed---Validity---Defendant had not produced any witness to discharge his burden---Courts below had decreed the suit on the basis of unimpeachable evidence of plaintiff---No mis-reading or non-reading of evidence had been pointed out in the impugned judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below---Defendant had paid court fee after one year and nine months of filing of present appeal, which was time barred---Defendant was guilty of contumacy and had no respect to the authority of law---Valuable right of limitation having accrued in favour of plaintiff, second appeal was dismissed.
Hassan Bakhsh and others v. Syed Afzal Shah and others 1974 SCMR 364; Allah Yar v. Muhammad Riaz and others PLD 1981 SC 489 and Assistant Commissioner and Land Acquisition Collector, Badin v. Haji Abdul Shakoor and others 1997 SCMR 919 rel.
Citation:2020 CLC Note 33
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
2032) 23/2016 Spl.H.C.A M/s. Muslim Cotton Mills (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Appellant) V/S Allied Bank Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 110
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.588/2021 Liberty Mills Limited, Karachi v. Muslim Cotton Mills (Pvt) Limited, Karachi and others,C.A.1740/2021 Liberty Mills Limited, Karachi v. Muslim Cotton Mills (Pvt) Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of. CMA 1983/21 is allowed,Pending
2033) 567/2019 Const. P. Nasir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 346
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Additional Attorney General khi(),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2990/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Ahsan Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2034) 263/2025 Cr.Bail Muhammad Zaman (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1885
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
2035) 256/2005 H.C.A Karachi Electric Supply Corporation (Appellant) V/S Mst. Batool Fatima (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 279
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2-K/2024 Mst. Batool Fatima deceased through legal heirs & others v. Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Limited (KESC) Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2036) 113/2011 I. A Al Baraka Bank Pvt Ltd (Appellant) V/S Raja Ashfaq Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:We may observe that the aforesaid provision of Section 9 of the Financial
Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance 2001 is not comprehensive and
exhaustive in deriving conclusion regarding the jurisdiction of the Court as the
recourse in terms of Section 15 have to be made to discover as to what is the precise
jurisdiction vested on the Banking Court under the Ordinance in terms of Section 15.
No doubt that the preamble/title of the Ordinance provides that it has been primarily
for the purpose of recovery of finance. The other recourse that is available under
section 15 of the Ordinance, 2001 is off-course is the mechanism which provides for
the recovery of the loan by way of sale of the mortgaged property with or without
intervention of the Court and the jurisdiction in terms of Section 15 of the Ordinance,
2001 is also open and extended as far as the disputes of the sale of the mortgaged
property is concerned. Such disputes if at all, raised are to be dealt with in terms of
Section 15 of the Ordinance, 2001. There is no cavil to this proposition and perhaps
to this extent the jurisdiction of the Banking Court extends so far as it relates to a
dispute for the sale of the mortgaged property, which is not the case here.
Citation:2013 CLD 511, 2013 SBLR Sindh 318
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
2037) 97/2018 II.A. Zulfiqar Ali Sheera Through His Attorney (Appellant) V/S Shaukat Ali & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. XXIII, R. 3---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42 & 54---Suit for declaration and permanent injunction---Appeal--- Compromise--- Suit was dismissed concurrently against which appeal had been preferred---Defendants had filed compromise application with the request to decree the suit against them on their admission of claim of the plaintiff--- Validity--- Compromise application with the clause of two months' time to be given to defendants to vacate suit property from the date of order on the said application had been filed---Two months' time to vacate suit property by the defendants had already expired prior to filing of present application---Terms and conditions of compromise should have already been complied with by the parties during the period of pendency of proceedings---Condition of order of the Court on such compromise was absurd---Decree for disposal of suit/appeal on compromise would not serve the purpose---Appeal on such compromise had become infructuous, in circumstances---Alleged compromise was one sided and contrary to the record and conduct of appellant---Compromise application was dismissed, in circumstances and counsel for the appellant was directed to address the court on merit of the case on the fixed date.
Peer Dil and others v. Dad Muhammad 2009 SCMR 1268 rel.
Citation:2020 YLR 2418
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2038) 8542/2018 Const. P. Sukkur Beverages (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLD 110
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
2039) 1656/2016 Const. P. Arham Khan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S M.D KW & SB and Oters (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
2040) 902/1997 Suit MRS SARDAR BEGUM FARROQUI (Plaintiff) V/S MR AZHAR MASOOD AHMED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 307
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2041) 1547/2016 Const. P. Aamir Jamil (Petitioner) V/S University of Karachi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (statutory or non statutory rules of service)
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 524
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.663-K/2017 Aamir Jamil v. University of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2042) 420/2023 Const. P. Junaid Iqbal S/o Jawaid Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Hanfia Alamgir Jama Masjid Trust and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 916
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Khan(ADVO-8525-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 29-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
2043) 4326/2012 Const. P. P.T.C.L (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
2044) 519/2024 H.C.A Frequency Allocation Board (Appellant) V/S Southern Networks Limited and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 533
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2045) 3984/2014 Const. P. Mr. Shumail Sikandar (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB And ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PCr.LJ 1517
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
2046) 2227/2015 Suit Allied Bank Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Qamar Hussain Naqvi & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Plaint rejected by invoking legal maxim ???actio personalis moritur cum persona??? and Article 36 of the Limitation Act, 1908.
Legal maxim ???actio personalis moritur cum persona??? (a personal right of action dies with the person) ??? death extinguishes liability in Tort, is enforceable in Pakistan subject to certain exceptions. First, where a tortfeasor???s estate is benefited by the wrong done, then an action would lie against his representatives, secondly, when already a decree is passed, inter alia, for damages, the legal representatives / heirs of a deceased can continue the litigation, thirdly, if in a service case, the Trial Court has reinstated a petitioner in service, which is overturned by an appellate court and in the intervening period, person dies, his legal heirs can continue the litigation, because if a Higher Forum restores the Order of Trial Court, then the legal heirs would at least be entitled for the service benefits. However, no suit can be filed after the death of a person for his individual acts, against his legal heirs.
Topic: Order VII, Rule 11., LIMITATION
Tag Line:Plaint rejected by invoking legal maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona and Article 36 of the Limitation Act, 1908.
Legal maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona (a personal right of action dies with the person) death extinguishes liability in Tort, is enforceable in Pakistan subject to certain exceptions. First, where a tortfeasors estate is benefited by the wrong done, then an action would lie against his representatives, secondly, when already a decree is passed, inter alia, for damages, the legal representatives / heirs of a deceased can continue the litigation, thirdly, if in a service case, the Trial Court has reinstated a petitioner in service, which is overturned by an appellate court and in the intervening period, person dies, his legal heirs can continue the litigation, because if a Higher Forum restores the Order of Trial Court, then the legal heirs would at least be entitled for the service benefits. However, no suit can be filed after the death of a person for his individual acts, against his legal heirs.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
2047) 3062/2020 Const. P. Sabre Travel Network Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article 260), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 74, 112, 114, 120 and 122)
Tag Line:No order could be
passed even if the show-cause notice is issued on the last day when limitation
ends, as essentially the "order" could not be passed after expiry of five years.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 140
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 21-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.56-K/2025 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Karachi v. M/s. Sabre Travel Network Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd & others.,C.P.L.A.719-K/2025 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Karachi v. International Air Transport Association, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending
2048) 1299/2022 Const. P. Mujahid Ali Lund (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Perusal of the substituted Rule 10-A reflects that with widening its scope, certain conditions were also imposed. Earlier the benefit of such rule was provided only to the children of the deceased civil servant who died during service whereas the substituted rule included the children of the civil servant who were declared invalidated or incapacitated for further service and the post against which such category of persons could be appointed, was curtailed to BS-16-17 only instead of BS 11-20.
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 503
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
2049) 2546/2020 Const. P. Aftab Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) V/S The Speaker Provincial Assembly and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today.
Topic: Service matters (Repatriation)
Tag Line:Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1306
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1879/2020 Aftab Ahmed Mahar v. Speaker Provincial Assembly of Sindh, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2050) 97/2007 Cr.J.A Kouro Shar and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.365/2012 Kouro & others v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2051) 473/2021 Criminal Appeal SANA RIZWAN W/O RIZWAN AHMED & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1172
Advocates:Nawabuddin Shar(ADVO-17728-SBC-KHE),Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Mirza Sarfraz Ahmed(ADVO-4467-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
2052) 3617/2013 Const. P. M/s Chevron Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 818
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.151-K/2021 Commissiner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Chevron Pakistan Ltd & another,C.A.96-K/2022 Commissiner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Chevron Pakistan Ltd & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2053) 100/2004 Civil Revision Bahadur and Others (Applicant) V/S Government of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 19-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
2054) 30/2022 Cr.J.A Muhammad Rafique @ Laloo Chandio (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 500
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 19-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
2055) 8408/2018 Const. P. Nazir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.133-K/2019 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.71-K/2020 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2056) 4859/2018 Const. P. Naeem Adil Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S R.O & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Election Matters
Tag Line:Instant petition challenging the orders, passed by Returning Officer and learned Election Appellate Tribunal, whereby the nomination papers of the petitioner for contesting the forthcoming general election-2018 was rejected.
sub-section (9) and (10) of Section 62 of the Election Act 2017 are discussed.
So far as the exercise of the discretionary powers in upsetting the order passed by the forum below is concerned, this court has to comprehend what illegality or irregularity and or violation of law has been committed by the courts below which caused miscarriage of justice. Reference may be placed to the case of Muslim Commercial Bank Ltd. through Attorney v. Abdul Waheed Abro and 2 others (2015 PLC 259).
The instant petition is devoid of merit, thus, constrained to dismiss the petition with no order as to costs.
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI),Asst Attorney Gen(AsstAG),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
2057) 789/2024 Const. P. Dalan Khan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:HESCO Matter
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 625
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2058) 1066/2010 Suit MUHAMMAD KHALIL (Plaintiff) V/S PTCL & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PTCL Service Regulations, 1996
Tag Line:Disciplinary proceedings against employee of PTCL were initiated and proceeded
under Government Servant (E&D) Rules, 1973, and not under the PTCL Service Regulations, 1996. Furthermore, it is a well settled principle of law that where the law required an act to be done in a particular manner, it had to be done in that manner alone and such dictate of law cannot be termed as a technicality or mere formality, and where things have not been done in the manner, as required by the law and procedure, the same cannot be given legal sanctity particularly when the same are resulting in penal consequences or causing irreparable injury to an individual
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 69
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Abdul Ghani(ADVO-4801-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting
2059) 412/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director, D. G., Int.& Inv (Custom) Hyderabad. (Applicant) V/S Liaquat Ali and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line: 2nd Proviso to Section 157(2) of the Customs Act, is not applicable retrospectively. Vehicles used in smuggling with false cavities and extra tanks cannot be released on payment of redemption fine.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 378
Advocates:Asim Muneer Bajwa(ADVO-3939-SBC-KHI),Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 06-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.214-K/2024 Liaquat Ali v. Director, Directorate General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2060) 638/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Bilal Metals (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Frustrated cargo; section 138 of the Customs Act; Customs Tribunal has no jurisdiction in such cases.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 227
Advocates:Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Khalilullah Jakhro(ADVO-19697-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 13-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
2061) 5887/2024 Const. P. Sajjad Ahmed Sunny and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We do not agree with the findings of the IGP Sindh and other members of the Committee for the simple reason that transferring the investigation wing to the Executive branch is not justified by the Police Act or the Police Rules 1934, citing para 56 of the Gul Hassan Jatoi judgment. The transfer of investigation officers to the Executive branch contradicts the Supreme Court's judgment as their appointment letters as Inspector Investigations limit their transfer and posting to the Executive Branch, is a matter of their terms and conditions of service and is outside the jurisdiction of the court under Article 212 of the Constitution. Therefore, the petitioners cannot be allowed to be transferred from the Investigation wing to perform their service in the Executive Branch of the Police Department. The petition is dismissed as it lacks merit as well.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1465
Advocates:G. M. Bhutto(ADVO-8053-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2062) 3872/2020 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 116
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Durdana Tanweer(ADVO-10812-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2063) 6378/2016 Const. P. Mst. Fatima Begum (Petitioner) V/S Bashir Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 09-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
2064) 45/2020 Criminal Appeal Allahdad Waswano (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 43
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
2065) 891/2017 Suit Karim Sayani (Plaintiff) V/S Almina Pardhan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter ( Marriage dissolved in the settlement and indenture of Mubarat. compromise application is allowed. )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
2066) 126/2025 Cr.Bail Ali Dost Jhangwani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Case calling for further inquiry, pre-arrest bail granted
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 582
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
2067) 26/2021 II.A. M/S Arif Builders & another (Appellant) V/S Allah Bux Unar Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 170
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2068) 1649/2010 Const. P. Miss. Javaria D/O Muhammad Qasim Lashari. (Petitioner) V/S Mehran University of Engineering and Technology Jamshoro. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 05-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.468-K/2011 Mst. Javaria D/o Muhammad Qasim Lashari v. Mehran University of Engoneering & Technology Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2069) 991/2021 Const. P. Mst. Fatima Zehra D/o Zahid Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Sheroz and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 12 G&W Interim Custody Modified. )
Tag Line:The learned Civil & Family Judge shall fix any two days in a month for the meeting of father-respondent No.1 with the minor baby Dua, and in the meanwhile, petitioner-mother shall not take away the custody of minor out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights i.e. Birthdays, Eid occasions, and summer and winter vacations and arrangements shall be made by the learned Family Court upon filing appropriate application by the respondent-father and the learned Family Court would be at liberty to pass appropriate order on such application concerning the date, time and place of meeting of minor with respondent-father, however, that arrangement is subject to the observation made by this Court as discussed in the preceding paragraph and also subject to payment of maintenance of the minor, which has already been done by the learned Family Court.
Citation:2022 MLD 1506
Advocates:M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),Raheel(ADVO-15925-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Ishaque @ Sathi M. Ishaq(ADVO-3650-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2070) 240/2005 Const. P. M/S Fahad Construction Co (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
2071) 877/2024 Const. P. Darwais Hameed (Petitioner) V/S M/s South Asia Pakistan Terminal Pvt Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is well settled that certiorari is available to quash a decision for an error of law. It will also be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction when an inferior Court or a tribunal acts without jurisdiction or over its jurisdiction or fails to exercise its jurisdiction or where the Court or a tribunal acts illegally in the exercise of its undoubted jurisdiction and it decides a matter in violation of the principle of natural justice.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1030
Advocates:Inayat Hussain Shah(ADVO-10288-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
2072) 152/2023 Criminal Appeal Asadullah & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Murder Trial (Value of further statement in the eyes of law )
Tag Line:Life Imprisonment
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 747
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.42-K/2024 Mehboob Ali v. Ashique Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2073) 1477/2023 Cr.Bail HYDER ABBAS S/O GUL HASSAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 216
Advocates:Arifa Raham Ali(ADVO-10439-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Raham Ali(ADVO-12316-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
2074) 34/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. AMMAR ASSAD S/O SYED HAFEEZ UR REHMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Murder Trial (Unseen incident)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 145
Advocates:Moula Bux Bhutto(ADVO-15386-SBC-KHI),Shama Parveen(ADVO-6390-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
2075) 11/2010 Suit MST.ZARINA (Plaintiff) V/S ZAKAULLAH KHAN & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 216
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-21540-SBC-KHS),Deedam Gul Pathani(ADVO-21643-SBC-KHS),Amir Maqsood(ADVO-6412-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Janan(ADVO-3463-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2076) 1/2019 I. A Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Saleem Ahmed Memon (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 324
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
2077) 811/2018 Const. P. Ehsan ur Rehman (Petitioner) V/S FOP & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.982-K/2018 Ehsan-ur-Rehman Mazari v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.492/2021 Ehsan-ur-Rehman Mazari v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. Early date,Disposed Disposed of and remanded
2078) 77/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Khan Bahadur Lund (Applicant) V/S Federal of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 304
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2079) 1155/2023 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Contract Employees claiming regularization.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 548
Advocates:Muhammad Saleem Khaskheli(ADVO-481-SBC-MPR),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
2080) 620/2014 Const. P. The Fauji Foundation Charitable Trust (Petitioner) V/S Federal Land Commission & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: MLR 115 of1972 , Land Revenue Act, 1967 , Law of laches , Act II of 1977 , law of acquiescence , Estoppel , Doctrine of Election
Tag Line:Subject: Resumption of land under MRL 115
Fauji Foundation a "Charitable Trust" operating under endowment Act 1980 was functioning through a committee formed vide notification of 08.03.1972 of federal Government. Committee after deliberation resolved that secretary to act as authorized person. Unless otherwise explained, it does not deemed to have empowered /authorized secretary to further delegate the powers by a simple authority letter signed by Secretary alone, when it's not borne out of resolution.
In the earlier petition when resumption of land was questioned, the parties withdrew their lis in view of negotiation which ended as 30 years leases of subject land and the cause of resumption deemed to have exhausted by way of doctrine of election, Petitioner opted for a long term lease instead to continue litigation against resumption of land .Such right (if any) was bartered with long term lease. Such right to challenge the resumption of land thus was not available when present petition was filed.
Process of execution for long term lease should have followed requirement of MLR 115 and section 17 of Act II of 1977 and since it was not transparent, the two leases were executed in an unlawful manner and which period (30 years) has already been exhausted.
Scheme of recovery of land revenue includes a process of attachment of holding against arrears which are due. Unless a remedy is exhausted, immediate jump to arrest and detention would not be justified.
The question of declaring MLR 115 being repugnant to injunctions of Islamic law has already been decided but with its prospective effect as highlighted in the judgment of Qazalbash Waqf v. Chief Land Commissioner and the effective date was set as 23rd March, 1990 before which the process of resumption had already been completed yet long term leases were executed surrendering rights over the land. (if any)
Citation:2020 YLR 2188
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 09-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1751/2020 The Fauji Foundation, Charitable Organization under the Committee of Administration thr. Brig. (R) Sabir Ali, Fauji Foundation, Fauji Towers, Rawalpindi v. The Federal Land Commission thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2081) 1/2020 Judicial Companies Misc. JOHNSON CONTROL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED (Applicant) V/S SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (Company winding up )
Tag Line:Company wound up
Citation:2023 CLD 162
Advocates:Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Basil Nabi Malik(ADVO-13956-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
2082) 10/2012 H.C.A Pangrio Sugar Mills Limited (Appellant) V/S Bankers Equity Limited & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 637
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 04-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.368-K/2014 M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Bankers Equity Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2083) 1/2025 Cr.Rev Jeendal Shah (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 412
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2084) 1107/2011 Suit M/S. CRESENT STEEL & ALLIED PRODUCTS LTD (Plaintiff) V/S SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LTD & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 10-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
2085) 60/2022 II.A. Rais Muhammad Mithal. (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Hassan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1062
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
2086) 384/2021 Criminal Appeal SHAHNAWAZ S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Non-association of private witness)
Tag Line:No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellant against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during the cross-examination.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 815
Advocates:Liaquat Ali(ADVO-14595-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.583/2022 Shahnawaz v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2087) 147/2016 Cr.Rev MUHAMMAD KHALID S/O MUHAMMAD RASHEED ASLAM & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
2088) 85/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD AMEER S/O MOMIN KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 146
Advocates:Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
2089) 1/2018 Election Appeal Allah Bux Khan (Appellant) V/S Mukhtiar Ahmed Sahto (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 05-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2090) 872/2019 Cr.Bail Mirza Ali Adil Baig (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail Dismissed In Gas theft Sections 15, 17 and 24 of Gas (Theft Control & Recovery))
Citation:2020 PCr.LJ 780
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
2091) 32/2019 II.A. Bundoo Khan & another (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Younus (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2092) 2/2013 Adm.A AGILITY LOGISTICS PVT LIMITED (Appellant) V/S B K SHIPPING & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
2093) 1842/2015 Const. P. Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Port Qasim Authority and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 557
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
2094) -52/2016 Suit Allahdino & Others.. (Plaintiff) V/S H.H Shaikh Zaid Bin ultan Al-Nahyan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
2095) 46/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) ZAFAR IQBAL (Applicant) V/S MST. QAISER JEHAN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Inverse bona fide purchaser.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 472
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2096) 272/2021 Cr.Bail Bakhshal Abro (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 259
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
2097) 637/2016 Cr.Misc. Riaz Ahmed Bhutto & othr (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & othr (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui
Order Date: 02-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
2098) 4934/2024 Const. P. Samina Alvi & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 509
Advocates:Anwar Mansoor Khan(ADVO-2746-SBC-KHI),Asim Mansoor Khan(ADVO-4784-SBC-KHI),Zeeshan Bashir(ADVO-12488-SBC-KHI),Umaimah Anwar Khan(ADVO-11287-SBC-KHI),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
2099) 712/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Uzair Ahmed Maniya (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Quashment of FIR in Constitutional jurisdiction; Held No:
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 364
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),S. Ahsan Ali Shah(ADVO-16440-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Bilal(ADVO-716-SBC-NSF),Aqeel Ahmed Khan(ADVO-12466-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 22-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
2100) 1342/2007 Suit MUHAMMAD SHAFI (Appellant) V/S SYED CHAN PIR SHAH & ORS (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Liaquat Hussain Khan(ADVO-8341-SBC-KHI),Mahboob Aftab Khan(ADVO-7393-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aslam Khan(ADVO-8086-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Arif Khan(ADVO-2437-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 31-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
2101) 1679/2017 Const. P. Mazhar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 150
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
2102) 4/2024 Cr.J.A Sher Muhammad (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1413
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.108-K/2025 The State through Prosecutor General Sindh, Karachi v. Sher Muhammad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2103) 7/2018 E.P Muzaffar Ali Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Meer Nadir Ali Magsi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:The question now which remains for resolution is whether the omission on part of the Oath Commissioner in mentioning, in the attestation of verification or the affidavit, if the oath had been administered to the appellant/deponent, shall have the effect of invalidating the election petition. As regards the above, suffice it to say that according to the provisions of Article 129, illustration (e) of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, there is presumption of correctness attached to an official act and it could not be controverted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the oath commissioner who is appointed by the respective High Courts under the law shall be performing the official acts for which he was appointed. However, he has stressed that the administration of oath before attestation by the Oath Commissioner should not be presumed in this case rather should reflect from the contents of attestation.
We have applied our mind to this aspect of the matter and hold that in order to meet the real object and the spirit of the election laws which require verification on oath, in an ideal situation, the Oath Commissioner at the time of verification of the petition etc. and also the affidavit, must record and endorse verification/attestation that the oath has been actually, physically and duly administered to the election petitioner/deponent. But as the law has not been very clear till now, we should resort to the principle of presumption stipulated by Article 129(e) ibid in this case for avoiding the knock out of the petition for an omission and lapse on part of the Oath Commissioner. But for the future we hold that where the election petition or the affidavit is sought to be attested by the Oath Commissioner, the election petitioner shall insist and shall ensure that the requisite endorsement about the administration of oath is made, otherwise the election petition/affidavit shall not be considered to have been attested on oath and thus the election petition shall be liable to be, inter alia, dismissed on the above score. We consciously and deliberately neither apply this rule to the instant case nor any other matter pending at any forum (election tribunal or in appeals).
Citation:2020 CLC 92
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
2104) 39/2008 I. A Habib Bank Ltd., (Appellant) V/S Rafiq Ahmed & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-OCT-11
Approved for Reporting
2105) 6920/2019 Const. P. Aache Garments (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:s.37 STA summons/notice sans underlying inquiry.
Citation:2021 PTD 1576
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2106) 2322/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Umair (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969, Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules 2019 , Pakistan Plant Quarantine Act, 1976
Tag Line:The customs officials have only held the goods and
have not passed an order as required under section 17 of Customs Act,
1969 that whether on account of such deviation and in the light of
Methyl Bromide test/fumigation having been performed and certificate
of physical inspection having been issued by the Department of Plant
Protection whether the subject consignment could be subjected to the
detention, seizure, confiscation or could be subjected to the fine/
penalty only or otherwise.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1843
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ishaque Pirzada(ADVO-4443-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 05-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
2107) 253/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous TAHIR IQBAL KHAN & ANTOHER (Applicant) V/S XITH CJ/JM KARACHI EAST & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 496
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Aftab Ahmed Shar(ADVO-16408-SBC-KHE),Nawabuddin Shar(ADVO-17728-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2108) 192/2022 H.C.A Muhammad Aqeel & Others (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A (Discretionery Powers of Single Judge to pass interlocutory order)
Tag Line:-----Learned Division Bench on the
apprehension of the appellants and the counsel representing Board of
Revenue, Government of Sindh that the private respondents will create
third party interest as the construction was being raised regularly,
granted an interim order that no further third party interest shall be
created, however, nowhere the order suggests that the powers of learned
Single Judge to pass any other injunctive order that may require in the
interest of justice before or at the time of disposal of the injunction
application, were also curtailed. This aspect of the argument of
appellants cannot be termed as ratio of judgment.
------If the learned Single Judge was empowered to
pass an order while deciding the injunction application finally, then the
said judge equally enjoys the powers to pass interim or ad interim orders
of the restraining nature, on the tentative assessment of claims, keeping
the interest of the parties and to save interest of the litigants involved.
Discretionary powers of the court are wide enough to foster the interest
of justice and equity, as it demands.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 400, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1938
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Ali Nawaz Khuhawar(ADVO-16396-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General(),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
2109) 92/2014 Suit M/s. Haidri Beverages (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The precise controversy involved is that whether the Plaintiffs industry (beverage industry) is an agro-based industry, being entitled for exemption and benefits allowed vide SRO No.575(I)/2006 dated 05.06.2006 (SRO 575); and whether, can the Plaintiffs seek protection under the doctrine of departmental practice whereby in the past their industry has been recognized as an agro based industry. It has been held by the Court that the Plaintiffs have not been able to make out a case in their favor, in that the beverage industry cannot be called or classified as an agro-based industry for the purposes of exemption claimed under SRO 575; nor they are protected under the doctrine of past practice, once it is held that such practice was a wrong practice.
Citation:2021 PTD 362
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
2110) 437/2012 Const. P. M/S Saro Textiles (Petitioner) V/S IIIrd ADJ & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Tag Line:Where the jurisdiction in refusing the adjournment by the Court was exercised
properly and judiciously, the order passed by the Court in rejecting the application
was also justified and the order cannot be said to have been without lawful authority
as the authority or without jurisdiction. The dismissal of the suit under Order 17 Rule
3 CPC was a decree which was only appealable.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 31-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.82-K/2013 M/s Saro Textile v. Regent Textile Industries and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2111) 8570/2019 Const. P. Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:There is not an iota of evidence available to disagree with the
observation of the Tribunal which ordered its (vehicles) release
unconditionally however subject to verification of ownership. This being
situation no question has arisen to deviate from the findings of the
Tribunal and proposed question No.1 is answered in affirmative as the
seizing agency has failed to comply with the provisions as required under
section 26 of Customs Act, 1969 whereas the proposed questions No.2 is
irrelevant for the purpose of declaring the subject vehicle as an
smuggled vehicle.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1196
Advocates:Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Bilal Bhatti(ADVO-15212-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 16-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2112) 207/2016 H.C.A M/s. Karachi Water & Sewerage Board & another (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Ali Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 718
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
2113) 378/2017 Const. P. Syed Mubarik Ali Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S The Finance Director HESCO (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
2114) 491/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Urooj Autos (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 237
Advocates:Munawar Ali(ADVO-10937-SBC-KHE),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.530-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Urooj Autos & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2115) 761/2011 Cr.Bail Asghar Ali alias Ghoro (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 23-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
2116) 166/2020 Const. P. Fayaz Ali Mastoi (Petitioner) V/S Assistant XEN Irrigation Shahdadkot & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Irrigation Water
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 131
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
2117) 6939/2021 Const. P. Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 899
Advocates:Muhammad Haroon(ADVO-13231-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
2118) 1260/2012 Const. P. Attique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2119) 233/2010 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Mustafa Ali Ladiwala (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 18-OCT-11
Approved for Reporting
2120) 745/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Hussain Iqbalani and ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2121) 4047/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Ali Javed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The general principles of up-gradation that to our mind emerge from the enunciations of the Supreme Court can be elucidated as follows:
(i) Up-gradation is not the same as promotion, the latter being a term specifically defined in civil service statutes;
(ii) Up-gradation is essentially an upgrade of the post to a higher pay-scale and not a promotion to a higher grade. Thus, the incumbent of the upgraded post retains his substantive grade;
(iii) Up-gradation is meant for isolated posts, where the service structure does not provide avenues for promotion to a higher pay-scale thus putting the incumbent at a disadvantage as compared to other employees, its purpose being to address the stagnation and frustration of the employee of such post so that he/she remains productive;
(iv) To justify up-gradation, the Government will have to demonstrate that it is required for restructuring or reforming the department or to meet exigencies of service in the public interest. In other words, up-gradation should be pursuant to a scheme or a policy;
(v) Up-gradation should not be to the prejudice of other employees and should not be used to by-pass prescribed rules of promotion.
Rel. Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456); Regional Commissioner Income Tax v. Munawar Ali (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030); and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890).
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
2122) 404/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Ali and another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) 295
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.181-K/2019 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. and another v. Muhammad Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2123) 536/2018 Const. P. Jangi Mahar & another (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 22-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
2124) 923/2023 Cr.Bail Bilal Ghori (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 646
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2125) 562/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs (West), Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Seminar (Pvt) Ltd., Sialkot (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Invoice retrieved from consignment; assessment on such higher invoice; held YES; Section 25A(2) of the Customs Act, 1969
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 107
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 23-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
2126) 5205/2020 Const. P. Prof: Dr. Muhammad Zahid (Petitioner) V/S Chancellor of Fed: Urdu University & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P. No.D-5205 of 2020 challenging the appointment of Search Committee and its members for the appointment of Vice Chancellor of Federal Urdu University of Arts, Sciences and Technology (FUUAST).
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 73
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 28-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2127) 558/2020 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O JAN MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Effect of the prohibition in section 51(1) of the CNS Act, 1997.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1484
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
2128) 5391/2021 Const. P. Sajid Akbar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We, therefore, in absence of the exceptions as enunciated in the case-law cited above, cannot travel beyond and dilate upon the merits of the instant case and interfere with any Order passed under the hierarchy of Pakistan Armed Forces in service-related matters according to their applicable laws.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 427
Advocates:Shahid Mushtaq(ADVO-12762-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2129) 799/2018 Suit Ms. Ambreen Bashir & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Injunction; restraining operation of a private school on residential property.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1290
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shuaban(ADVO-9969-SBC-KHI),Touqeer Ahmed(ADVO-52245-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
2130) 67/2007 H.C.A Muhammad Hussain Qureshi (Appellant) V/S Mrs Mumtaz Muzakkir & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.352-K/2019 Muhammad Faisal and another v. Mrs. Mumtaz Muzakkir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2131) 245/2009 Suit SAEEDUDDIN QURESHI (Plaintiff) V/S WAQAR SAEED & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2132) 5079/2013 Const. P. Syed Farhat Iqbal and 11 others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.411-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Syed Farhat Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2133) 344/2015 Const. P. M/s. Haider Industries and others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Regulatory Duty
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Saeed-ud-Din Nasir, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah
Order Date: 28-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
2134) 1490/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Dua International & Co., Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Classification of Goods; a specialized job;
to be decided by the Classification Centre established by the Collector of Customs Appraisement.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1415
Advocates:Tania Alam(ADVO-8924-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Nabi(ADVO-15504-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 26-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
2135) 1622/2014 Cr.Bail Sabir Hussain (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail Rejected U/S 302 PPC With Direction .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 19-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
2136) 135/2005 Cr.J.A Amir Bux (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 438
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
2137) 59/2009 Cr.Appeal Asghar Hussain (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 19-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.783/2018 Asghar Hussain v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2138) 66/2009 Suit MOIN US SAMAD KHAN (Plaintiff) V/S MRS.TANVEER QAZI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 135
Advocates:S. Abid Hussain Shah(ADVO-3430-SBC-KHS),Abdallah Azzaam Naqvi(ADVO-15005-SBC-KHI),Nasir Jahangir Rifat(ADVO-4555-SBC-KHS),Salman Pirzada(ADVO-12966-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
2139) 2/2012 Adm.A S.S Eagle Cape & another (Appellant) V/S Hussain Can Company (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 15-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.254-K/2014 S. S. Eagle Cape and another v. Hussain Cane Company (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2140) 3473/2025 Const. P. Saifuddin & others (Petitioner) V/S KMC & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Authority of the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation to deal with amenity plots and in particular plots that are parks, the application of Regulation 18-4.1 of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002 and Article 52 A of the Karachi Development Authority Order, 1957
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2181
Advocates:Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1152-K/2025,C.P.L.A.4842/2025,C.P.L.A.1172-K/2025,C.P.L.A.4843/2025 SCP Status:Pending ,Pending ,Pending ,Pending
2141) 444/2024 Cr.Bail Khair Muhammad Abro (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.273/2025 Khair Muhammad v. The State through P.G. Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2142) 2413/2019 Const. P. Shaheena Nasreen (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Proforma Promotion)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
2143) 1/2013 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Asif Traders (Applicant) V/S The Collector of Customs & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 1057
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 24-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
2144) 38/2023 Spl.Cr.Bail MUSTAFA SIKANDAR S/O MUHAMMAD SIKANDAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 756
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Qureshi(ADVO-3530-SBC-KHI),Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
2145) 290/2019 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/s Agha Steel Industries (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1225
Advocates:Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
2146) 1706/2012 Suit Dr. Samrina Hashmi (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Medial Association (Centre) & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Other.
Tag Line:Certainly and undoubtly the cause of association is much higher than the cause of an individual. In this matter, it is to be seen whether injuries or irreparable loss that may be caused to the association is important than the personal injuries of the plaintiff. I have no confusion in my mind that the cause of the association is at higher pedestal. In priority the interest and reputation of the association has to be safe guarded. At the same time this does not mean that the cause of an individual is to be ignored. What is meant by this observation, is that in priority cause of the association is to be kept at higher forum.
Citation:2014 PLD Sindh 268
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
2147) 28/2023 Suit.B FIRST WOMEN BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1429
Advocates:Salman Talibuddin(ADVO-4367-SBC-KHI),Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Jam Asif Mehmood Lar(ADVO-10595-SBC-KHI),Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
2148) 195/2017 H.C.A Abdul Tauheed Khan (Appellant) V/S The Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
2149) 5578/2023 Const. P. Nutrico Morinaga Pvt Ltd &Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Child Nutrition Act,2023
Tag Line: Article 116 of the Constitution' Governor cannot retain a Bill beyond 10 days; either has to return it with objections, and if not, there shall be "deemed assent" and will become an ACT of the Provincial Assembly.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 57
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 21-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.370/2025 Nutrico Morinaga (Private) Limited, Karachi and others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2150) 82/2021 II.A. Sohail Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Ghulam ali Murtaza & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 18
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.650-K/2025 Sohail Ahmed v. Ghulam Ali Murtaza Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:In Transit
2151) 612/2023 Spl.Cr.Misc USMAN BAJWA S/O JAWED A. BAJWA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE &ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Separate trials of special offences by Special Courts does not attract bar of double jeopardy.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 778
Advocates:Spl.Prosecutor Customs(SpPCus),Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Ashiq Ali Anwar(ADVO-2754-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1364/2024 Usman Bajwa v. The State through D.A.G. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2152) 830/2014 Const. P. Sohail and ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 50
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1112-K/2021 Muhammad Junaid v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Ports & Shipping & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned
2153) 8518/2017 Const. P. Munner Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3793/2018 Muneer Ahmed & another v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2154) 1033/2017 Const. P. Nazeer Ahmed Baqai and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Service matters ( annual increment awarded after move-over)
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 678
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 18-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.885-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Secretary, Education & Literacy Department Government of Sindh & others v. Nazeer Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2155) 122/2011 Cr.Appeal Bhawal Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 07-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
2156) 493/2009 I.T.R.A Commissioner (Legal Division) (Applicant) V/S Pakistan Services Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:no penalty can be imposed or sustained under Section 111(2)(b) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, without proving mensrea and deliberate intention to claim expenses not incurred actually.
Citation:2023 PTD 773
Advocates:Jawaid Farooqi(ADVO-3964-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2157) 2748/2009 Const. P. Malir Development Authority (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 21-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
2158) 1652/2021 Suit MUHAMMAD AMIN (Plaintiff) V/S ASIF YOUNUS & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:Undisputedly, IPO is subsequent in time and following the rule laid down in the aforementioned Decisions, the present Lis and issues agitated therein is triable by the Tribunal [in accordance with law], established and functioning under the IPO. Consequently, this Application is treated as the one for return of plaint rather rejecting it. Accordingly accepted. Plaint is returned.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 590
Advocates:Sultan Ahmed Sheikh(ADVO-274-SBC-KHI),K. A. Wahab(ADVO-71-SBC-KHI),Salman Ahmed Shaikh(ADVO-10256-SBC-KHS),Saleem(ADVO-2477-SBC-KHS),Moiz Ahmed(ADVO-13395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 08-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
2159) 166/2013 Cr.J.A Rehman Burfat and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 384
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2160) 165/2017 H.C.A Imran Modi (Appellant) V/S Mizhar Uddin (Farooqui) & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 874
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
2161) 216/2021 Cr.Bail Asghar Gahejo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 60
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
2162) 3518/2015 Const. P. Asad Abdullah and others (Petitioner) V/S The State and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 02-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting
2163) 1372/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Rehan (Petitioner) V/S NBP & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1005
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.941/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rehan and another,C.A.13/2024 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rehan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2164) 129/2017 H.C.A Nooruddin & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. S.I.T.E. Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Question of Local/territorial jurisdiction under section 21 ), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
Tag Line:So Section 21 CPC has its own comprehensive jurisprudence which could
overview the original court`s proceedings. The ibid section is primarily for
appellate/revisional court where an appeal is preferred apparently by the
appellant defending the suit but one must not be misled by such language.
The language is couched in such a way that for appellant, who defended the
suit, some restrictions were imposed, before enabling the appellate court to
take cognizance. It has, however, provided a legal frame for the trial court
considering the nature of jurisdiction being objected.
**Lack of territorial or pecuniary
jurisdiction becomes a mere irregularity at a later stage, if not taken at the
earliest which does not make a decree nullity and in fact if taken belatedly
and successfully may lead to a failure of justice.
***The two jurisdictions of the appellate court have been established to
have acted lawfully i.e. (i). In the first instance where on account of
procedural illegality or irregularity, identified above for [a] & [b] kinds of
jurisdiction not by way of inherent lack of jurisdiction, a litigant plaintiff is
ousted and (ii). In a case of lack of inherent jurisdiction, the court continue to
proceed with the matter which may have resulted in the failure of justice.
For both these limbs, the appellate jurisdiction is available
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1416
Advocates:Shahid Ali(ADVO-9536-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Zamir Khan(ADVO-3889-SBC-KHI),Mushtaq Ahmed A. Memon(ADVO-1988-SBC-KHS),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 11-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
2165) 4479/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 129
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.536-K/2017 Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2166) 6194/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Anwar & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the August court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the August Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 794
Advocates:Musharraf Azhar(ADVO-15411-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2167) 32/2008 Civil Revision Mst.Zareedah Begum & 2 others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Rasheed & Shehzad Yousif (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 30-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
2168) 238/2024 Civil Revision Ali Asghar Shah & Jumman Shah (Applicant) V/S Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 2461, 2025 SHC HYD 2546
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
2169) 146/2022 Const. P. Syed Zafar Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 270
Advocates:Syed Farhan Ali Shah(ADVO-16966-SBC-KHS),Nisar Ahmed(ADVO-628-SBC-KHP),Saif Sohail Yunus(ADVO-16965-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2170) 228/2003 I.T.C M/s.Habib Insurance Co.Ltd., (Appellant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 23-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.58-K/2018 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Habib Insurance Company Ltd.,C.A.632/2019 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Habib Insurance Company Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Allowed
2171) 44/2021 M.A. Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Ltd (Appellant) V/S The Court of District Judge, Khi (East) & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Succession Act, Carriage By Air Act, 2012 (Rule 6 of 6th Schedule)
Tag Line:Precisely the gist of law and the succession application provides
that the litigation commenced for issuance of a certificate in terms of
Rule 1, 2 and 6 of Sixth Schedule of the ibid Act 2012. It enabled one of
the legal heirs of the deceased to pursue the proceedings on behalf of
all legal heirs who sustained damages to claim compensation from the
airline.
-Respondent No.2 approached District Judge/ respondent No.1 for
issuance of requisite succession certificate. The District Judge/
Respondent No.1 however in terms of order impugned in these
proceedings treated such compensation as an asset left by the
deceased/victim and by considering it as part of succession application
and has taken action in terms of the impugned order, which action is
being challenged by the appellant/PIA in these proceedings. I disapprove
the observation of the District Judge to the extent whereby recovery
process was initiated.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1166
Advocates:Farrukh Usman(ADVO-12432-SBC-KHI),Hasan Mehmood Mandviwalla(ADVO-15443-SBC-KHS),Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Y. Mandviwala(ADVO-3668-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.813-K/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Limited v. The Court of District & Sessions Judge East at Karachi. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
2172) 10/2023 Criminal Appeal Sikandar Ali Kolachi and others (Appellant) V/S The State and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2023 SHC MPK 390
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
2173) 125/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Manzoor Hussain Arain (Applicant) V/S Ali Murad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 35
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
2174) 1683/2017 Suit OPI Gas (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S United Energy Pakistan Limited & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (International Arbitration Law Act 2011)
Tag Line:(a) Constitution of Pakistan---
----Art. 18---Sale purchase agreements---Creation of vested rights---"Freedom of trade"---Scope---Plaintiff sought to establish a vested right to be the sole supplier of LPG manufactured by defendants and sought to restrain the defendants from allowing any third-party to make such supply---Contention of plaintiff, inter alia, was that it had made a huge investment to enable such supply which had created a vested right in its favour---Validity----Investment of plaintiff had not created any vested right in its favour as the LPG itself belonged to the defendants prior to sale purchase contract between the parties and also upon termination of said contract---Huge investment in the business by a trader could not be considered as an investment to acquire any rights whatsoever in the product/property which was owned by the other contracting party beyond the limited extent incorporated in the written sale / purchase agreement---Plaintiff could also not interfere in the defendants' freedom of trade guaranteed by Article 18 of the Constitution---Suit was dismissed, in circumstances.
1994 CLC 728; Chitty on Contract (13th edition) page 56-57 from Volume.1 General Principles; AIR 1978 SC 798; AIR 2006 SC 40; Bank Alfalah Ltd. v. NEU Multiplex and Entertainment Square Company (Pvt.) Ltd. 2015 YLR 2141; Royal Foreign Company v. The Civil Aviation Authority and another 1998 CLC 374; Messrs World Wide Trading Co. v. Sanyo Electric Trading Co. Ltd. and another PLD 1986 Kar. 234 and Messrs Universal Business Equipment (Pvt.) Ltd., v. Messrs Kokusai Commerce Inc. and others 1995 MLD 384 ref.
(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. VI, Rr. 2 & 4---Pleadings generally---Practice of counsel/lawyers placing on record several documents which such counsel/lawyer did not even refer to during course of arguments or otherwise and such documents were not part of their own record needed in support of their pleadings---High Court observed that such practice was due to the reason that counsel/lawyer/ wanted to give an impression to the court that the case filed by them was an important one requiring immediate attention; which practice was against the basic principles of pleadings to be filed in court under O.VI, C.P.C. wherein emphasis of law makers/legislature was on "material facts" and "effect of material documents" in pleadings.
Citation:2018 CLC 279
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
2175) 98/2018 Cr.Bail Muhammad Moosa Pathan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
2176) 14/2014 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Zahid alias Liaquat and Muhammad Ibrahim (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 11-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
2177) 3525/2013 Const. P. Ghulam Rasool Saand (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
2178) 1198/2012 Cr.Bail IRFAN AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 03-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
2179) 2427/2010 Const. P. Iftikhar Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S CDGK and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2090
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 21-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
2180) 395/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Shamim Ali S/o Abdul Karim (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Asma Begum and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bridal gifts given by a husband are the absolute property of a wife and cannot be taken away from her. A bride can always recover the articles of bridal gifts, ???WARI??? and presents given to her by a bridegroom or his family at the time of the marriage
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1019
Advocates:Mohammad Kashif Ayaz(ADVO-9096-SBC-KHE),Jamshed A. Shaikh(ADVO-8896-SBC-KHE),Dr. Raana Khan(ADVO-4571-SBC-KHI),Gulnaz Kausar(ADVO-9422-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.263-K/2024 Muhammad Shamim v. Mst. Asma Begum and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2181) 6286/2016 Const. P. Abdul Majeed & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 09-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
2182) 63/2022 M.A. M/s. Getz Pharma International FZ LLC (Appellant) V/S The Registrar of Trade Marks and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Deceptive Trademark
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 411
Advocates:Zain Sheikh(ADVO-3193-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Kashan Anwar(ADVO-15087-SBC-KHE),Saleem(ADVO-2477-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Sarmad Khan(ADVO-17309-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1726/2024 GLITZ PHARMA thr. Attorney v. GETZ PHARMA INTERNATIONAL FZ LLC and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)
2183) 5507/2020 Const. P. Dr. Arif Dawood Harekar (Petitioner) V/S M/s Sea Breeze (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 955
Advocates:Syed Ali Ahmed Tariq(ADVO-2510-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 21-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1601-K/2021 Dr. Arif Dawood Harekar v. M/s Sea Breeze Private Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2184) 5577/2016 Const. P. Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3440/2017 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1592/2017 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2185) 197/2020 Cr.Bail SHEERAZ S/O IMAM BUX (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Post arrest bail Granted u/s 353/324/302/34 PPC. How Complainant Knew the name of accused . )
Citation:2021 MLD 292
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
2186) 2566/2024 Const. P. Masjid-e-Saheem and Others (Petitioner) V/S PDOHA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 266
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.485-K/2025 Masjid-e-Saheem & others v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority through its Administrator DHA Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned on application
2187) 123/2019 Criminal Appeal SYED JUNAID ALI SHAH S/O FIDA HUSSAIN SHAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal
Tag Line:Appellant Syed Junaid Ali Shah filed Appeal against the judgment whereby the appellants were convicted u/s. 420 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for six (6) years and fine of Rs.26 lacs ,also convicted for an offence u/s.468 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for six (6) years and fine ofRs.50,000/- accused Syed Junaid Ali Shah in active connivance of his other accomplices obtained the credential/secret information and full particulars of A/c No.22877100245003. He arranged fake cheque book requisition slip on which he made forged signature of Imran Afzal Khokhar. Accused Syed Junaid Ali Shah received the cheque book request process, After receiving the million fresh cheque book accused Syed Junaid Ali Shah got transferred an amount of Rs.2.600 million through cheque . t Junaid Ali Shah, as he has taken plea of alibi that from June 2008 up to October 2012, he remained out of country, e allegation against the appellant Syed Junaid Ali was that on 26.07.2012 and 27.07.2012 he along with co-accused Syed Nizam Mohiuddin Rafai deposited two cheques amounting of Rs.13 lacs in the bank and appellant Syed Junaid Ali Shah posed himself as Afzal Khokhar. trial Court while convicting the appellant Syed Junaid Ali Shah has made the observation that FIA itself is not confident the genuineness of travel of the passenger, The above observations made by trial Court having no force, as the procedure provided at all airports that if, any person traveled abroad on presentation of his/her passport before FIA officials, they will made entry in the data/computer and in the last they affixed stamp on the passport Exit along with date, and on his arrival the FIA made entry in the data/computer and affixed stamp of Arrival. On the basis of the travel history of the appellant. Convictions and sentences awarded to appellant Syed Junaid Ali Shah are set aside. Appellant Syed Junaid Ali Shah is acquitted from the charge.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2188) 310/2021 Const. P. Habib Bank Limited (Petitioner) V/S IXth Rent Controller, Khi (Central) & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:-Since statute does not provide remedy of appeal, this petition has been filed to invoke jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. By dismissal of an application under order VII rule 11 CPC, none of the fundamental right of the petitioner was violated to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.
-The whole gummit of the lis is yet to be decided and hence if an appeal against such order could not be maintained, how this alternate recourse be made available, when no fundamental right of the petitioner seems to have been violated.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 811
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2189) 1644/2013 Suit Sheikh Muhammad Javaid (Plaintiff) V/S Sartaj Saqlain and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 1 Rule 10 CPC)
Tag Line:(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----S. 12---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 17 & 79---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 113 & S. 22---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. I, R. 10---Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), Ss. 290 & 309---Suit for specific performance of contract---Impleadment of party during pendency of suit---Limitation, commencement of---Agreement to sell by the Directors of a private limited company---Effect---Document---Proof---Procedure---Private limited company was impleaded as one of the defendants during pendency of suit on 07-09-2015---Suit against the said defendant was to be deemed to have been instituted from the date when company was impleaded as defendant---Plaintiff had stated in the plaint that cause of action had accrued on 26-08-2011---Present suit was time barred against newly impleaded defendant private limited company---Remaining defendants were not owners of the suit property---Suit to compel the said defendants to execute sale in favour of plaintiff was not maintainable---Plaintiff was bound to prove execution of agreement to sell with the lawful owner of suit property---Alleged agreement to sell was not executed by the company or any duly authorized person by the company in accordance with law---Managing Directors of a company had to act on the basis of authorization by the Board of Directors of company or on the basis of its Articles of Association---Even plaint/suit on behalf of a company could not be filed by the Director of a company for its benefit without proper authorization---Nothing was on record with regard to any meeting of the company to propose sale of its property---Even sale consideration was not paid to the company---Immovable property owned by a private limited company could not be sold by its Director---Suit property remained to be the property of company in the record of Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan---Documents including alleged agreement to sell appeared to be forged and fabricated---Even legal heirs of Director of company could not step into the shoes of Director on his/her death to deal with the assets of a private limited company---Suit property belonged to a private limited company and possession of plaintiff on the suit property was result of fraud and mismanagement of the assets of private limited company---Plaintiff had not produced any of the marginal witnesses of agreement to sell and payment receipts---Photocopy of document was inadmissible in evidence---Business of registered company was to be transacted through Bank account held by the said company---Any transaction by or between the third party with any person who was even Director of company could not be treated as transaction binding on the company itself---Plaintiff had failed to establish contract with the lawful owner of suit property---Plaintiff had made attempt to misuse the process of court on the basis of forged documents---Court was bound to protect such immovable property owned by the company---Company had abandoned its business and its property should be dealt with in accordance with law---Suit property could only be protected or disposed of by winding-up of the company for the benefits of its affectees, if any---Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan was directed to initiate proceedings against the company and wind-up the same---Nazir of the High Court was directed to inspect the suit property and take over possession of entire suit property till final order by the Court---Member Inspection Team was directed to examine affidavit filed by the plaintiff in his examination-in-chief on oath and file a complaint against him if any case was made out---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Bashir Dawood v. Haji Suleman Goawala and Sons Ltd. and others 2010 CLC 191 rel.
Citation:2018 CLC 1676, 2018 CLD 1237
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 17-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
2190) 1920/2016 Const. P. Ishtiaq Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2191) 410/2025 Const. P. Anwer Zaib (Petitioner) V/S M/s Rasheed Fabrics (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973, Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984
Tag Line:The Article 162 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984
Citation:2025 SBLR Sindh 897
Advocates:Inayat Hussain Shah(ADVO-10288-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2192) 618/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Kamran (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Aslam & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1284
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1292-K/2020 Muhammad Aslam v. Muhammad Kamran & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2193) 1168/2024 Const. P. Mst. Wajiha Fatima and another (Petitioner) V/S Syed Badar Abbas Jafri and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1382
Advocates:Ahmed Dawood(ADVO-9332-SBC-KHI),Syed Rashid Rizvi(ADVO-20800-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1026-K/2025 Syed Badar Abbas Jafri v. Mst. Wajiha Fatima & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2194) 69/2018 Cr.J.A Niaz Hussain Soomro (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Murder Appeal dismissed. appellant remained absconder for considerable time, then a negative inference can be made .)
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 760
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
2195) 4657/2023 Const. P. Ubaidullah Qazi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Absorption contrary to section 11A Civil Servants Act. Writ issued.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 545
Advocates:Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-19967-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 04-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
2196) 562/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Munawar & others (Petitioner) V/S Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 349
Advocates:Dr. Raana Khan(ADVO-4571-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General()
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
2197) 5868/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Salman & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: In view of the above discussion, we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore, and others Vs. Ch. ABDUL SATTAR HANS and 29 others and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, NORTHERN REGION, ISLAMABAD, and another Vs. Syed MUNAWAR ALI and others (2017 P L C (C.S.) 1030). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts as Inland Revenue Audit Officer (BPS-18) with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 171
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3520/2021 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others,C.A.1919/2023 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 3 months, Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)
2198) 6291/2021 Const. P. Capt: Muhammad Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Port Qasim Authority and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 398
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
2199) 7/2017 F.R.A Engineers & Professionals Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (Appellant) V/S The Institute of Engineering Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
2200) 2350/2021 Cr.Bail SYED MUHAMMAD FARHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:seeks bail after arrest in Crime No.473/2021, registered under Section 6/9-C of the CNS Act, 1997 ---The guilt or innocence of the applicant is yet to be established as it would depend on the strength and quality of the evidence produced / to be produced by the prosecution and the defense before the trial Court. Therefore, it is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative which shall not prejudice the case of either party or shall influence the trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits under law.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 488
Advocates:Khatija Kulsoom(ADVO-9274-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2201) 196/2011 H.C.A Madad Ali Madan (Appellant) V/S Faysal Bank Limited and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 10-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.177-K/2014 Madad Ali Madan and another v. Faysal Bank Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2202) 168/2006 Civil Revision Niaz Ali & another (Applicant) V/S Mst. Aisha & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2203) 207/2010 Civil Revision Muhammad Mian @ Raja & another (Applicant) V/S Mst. Noor Fatima & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:No Pre-emption right can be claimed in respect of gift of property; and
Plaint can be rejected even without a formal application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 326
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2204) 1470/2020 Const. P. Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1335
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2205) 55/2013 H.C.A Muhammad Athar Hafeed Khan (Appellant) V/S Sangyong & Usmani JV (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLC 135
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 28-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
2206) 791/2023 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Farhan S/o Absar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Safia Fatima and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1255
Advocates:Muhammad Rais(ADVO-13802-SBC-KHE),Shahid Iqbal(ADVO-8278-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
2207) 401/2011 Cr.Bail Muhammad Arshad & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 04-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
2208) 5833/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1333
Advocates:Syed Ashiq Raza(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHI),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Syed Muhammad Mujtaba Raza(ADVO-15118-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2209) 2901/2022 Const. P. Qazi Khalid Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1109
Advocates:M/S. MANSOOR AHMED KHAN & CO.(FIRM-106-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Irfan Siddiqui(ADVO-9254-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.147-K/2023 Qazi Khalid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan & others,C.A.40-K/2025 Qazi Khalid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed
2210) 224/2019 Cr.Bail MST. FOZIA D/O ABDUL GHAFFAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 480
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
2211) 3818/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Maqsood (Petitioner) V/S Tauheed Sultan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (locus standi)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 245
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2212) 43/2015 Cr.Bail Ismail (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 26-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.M.A.12-K/2017 Ismail v. The State through P. G. Sindh,Crl.P.76-K/2015 Ismail v. The State through P. G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed
2213) 128/2020 Const. P. Asad Ali Laghari & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 161
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2214) 1607/2020 Const. P. Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani (Petitioner) V/S President N.B.P & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Double Jeopardy )
Tag Line:The legal position of the case is that dispensing with the regular inquiry and awarding two
punishments i.e. downgrading and major penalty of dismissal from service, ought not to
have been imposed upon the Petitioner at the same time when the charges were denied
by the Petitioner. The principle of natural justice demands that the petitioner ought to
have been heard on the allegations leveled against him; however, the respondent had
chosen not to conduct the regular inquiry and simply relied upon the purported admission
of the petitioner which was not called for in the above circumstances.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 351
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Zain Mustafa Soomro(ADVO-17295-SBC-KHS),Afaq Ahmed Saeed(ADVO-5783-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1926/2022 The President, National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi and others v. Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2215) 156/2023 II.A. Amjad S/o Akbar Ai (Appellant) V/S Khuda Bano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 131
Advocates:Mohammad Ashraf Baig(ADVO-4642-SBC-KHI),Nasir Ahmed(ADVO-9370-SBC-KHI),Saadat Hassan(ADVO-9057-SBC-KHI),Imran Aziz(ADVO-17771-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2216) 77/2007 Civil Revision Farida Gul Agha & others (Appellant) V/S Saeeda Bano Ahmed & Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Islamic law---
----Gift---Revocation of---Death of donor and donee---Effect---Suit was filed for cancellation of gift deed after the death of donee/beneficiary---Trial Court dismissed the suit but Appellate Court decreed the same---Validity---Donor being mother of donee was related to the donee within the prohibited degree---Donor could not revoke the gift after the death of donee even through court---Appellate Court had failed to appreciate that first burden of proof was on the plaintiff and unless it was discharged by evidence consistent with the pleadings the defendant could not be required to prove anything from his pleadings---Evidence of the parties had not been discussed by the Appellate Court and suit had been decreed---Findings recorded by the Appellate Court were contrary to evidence---Donor had already transferred suit property by way of gift by handing over possession and original title document to the donee---Requirements of Islamic Law had been complied with in the present case---No further act/action was required on the part of donor and donee---Actual physical dispossession of the donor from the suit property was not required in the present case---Cause of action had died/buried with the death of donor as gift might be revoked by donor but not by his legal heirs after his/her death---Suit filed by the donor had abated by her death---Proceedings after the death of donee were coram non judice---Impugned judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Court were set aside and those of Trial Court were restored---Revision was allowed in circumstances.
Mulla's Muhammadan Law para. 167 ref.
(b) Islamic law---
----Revocation of gift after death of donee---Scope---Donor could not revoke the gift after the death of donee even through court.
(c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----S. 96---Appellate Court---Duty of---Appellate court was not supposed to write a fresh judgment of its own without commenting and explaining the circumstances for forming an opinion contrary to the opinion/reasoning of the Trial Court---Appellate court unless found the judgment of Trial Court suffering from improper treatment of evidence such as wrongly placing the burden of proof on the parties in deciding the issues between them or finding it in conflict with some law on the subject could not reverse finding of Trial Court---Appellate court had to meet the reasoning of the Trial Court in the first instance and thereafter reappraise the evidence on record while reversing the findings of Trial Court.
Ch. Muhammad Shafi v. Shamim Khanum 2007 SCMR 838 rel.
(d) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)---
----Art. 117---Burden of proof---Whoever approaches the Court of law to give judgment as to his legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts which he asserts in the plaint, must prove that those facts exist.
Citation:2016 YLR 2087
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1412/2016 Tariq Ahmed (decd.) thr: L.Rs & others v. Farida Gul Agha (decd.) thr. L.Rs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2217) 1725/2000 Suit PAK. STATE OIL CO. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. GILLANI PVT. LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Tag Line:Arbitration Act (X of 1940)---
----Ss. 8, 20, 25, 32 & 34---Suit for recovery of money---Arbitration clause---Referring matter to Arbitrator---After filing of suit, proceedings were stayed and matter was referred to Arbitrator---Subsequently plaintiff filed application for restoration of suit and sought appointment of Arbitrator under Ss. 8 & 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940---Validity---Once parties were referred to Arbitrator, the purpose / object of Arbitration Act, 1940, was effectively achieved and parties were prevented to obtain a decree from Court contrary to their own agreement that their disputes were to be adjudicated by a private party as provided in arbitration agreement---Order on application under S. 34 of Arbitration Act, 1940, and / or on application under S. 20 of the Act, was one and the same---Purpose of both the provisions was to seek enforcement of an 'arbitration clause/agreement' against the party guilty of avoiding / refusing arbitration for resolution of their dispute---High Court declined exercise of discretion under S. 25 of Arbitration Act, 1940---Plaintiff had repeatedly approached the High Court by suppressing arbitration agreement and attempted to obtain a decree from a civil Court despite the fact that the suit was barred under S. 32 of Arbitration Act, 1940---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2018 MLD 1770
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
2218) 4962/2019 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Abro and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:discrimination in service safeguarded under article 27 of the
Constitution
discrimination in service safeguarded under article 27 of the
Constitution
Petitioners be given equal treatment as given to readers of Federal
Service Tribuna
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1703
Advocates:Syed Jamal Uddin Bukhari(ADVO-14803-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Syed Haider Imam(ADVO-8703-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4025/2025 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Islamabad v. Altaf Hussain Abro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2219) 38/2021 Judicial Companies Misc. MFG Insurance Company Limited (Applicant) V/S Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (reduction of share capital)
Tag Line:In case for confirmation of resolution of reduced share capital the
question for consideration are, should the Court refuse its sanction to
the reduction out of regard to the interest of those members of the
public who may be induced to take shares in the company; is the
reduction fair and equitable between different classes of shareholders;
whether the reduction is shared by all; and is it designed to work justly
and equitably and whether it does not involve diminution of the liability
in respect of unpaid capital or payment of any shareholder of any paid
up capital; and there is evidence regarding loss of capital and nonrepresentation of available assets. None of these impediments exist in
the case of the petitioners company and consequently in view of above
proposed reduction in the share capital, as resolved by the company
itself, apparently seems to be just, fair and reasonable and not likely to
adversely affect the interests of shareholders who have themselves
resolved to the approval of this scheme of reduction. The proposal for
reduction of share capital is therefore confirmed in terms of the
requirements of Companies Act, 2017.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 486
Advocates:Aman Aftab(ADVO-18333-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2220) 882/2020 Const. P. Arif Pasha (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Direction Matter
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1712
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
2221) 164/2010 Const. P. M/S Al Abbas Sugar Mills Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S ederation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 22
Advocates:Attorney General(),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shaiq Usmani(ADVO-2667-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.319/2022,C.P.L.A.998/2022,C.P.L.A.1217/2022,C.A.1401/2024 SCP Status: , ,Disposed Leave Granted, will be heard a/w appeals out of C.P.3562/22 etc.,
2222) 2753/2009 Const. P. M/S Shahbaz Garments Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and others (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab
Order Date: 01-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
2223) 17/2020 M.A. DR. FAROOQ AHMED (Appellant) V/S THE SECRETARY FPSC & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 841
Advocates:Imran Ahmed(ADVO-2097-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1716-K/2021 Dr. Farooq Ahmed v. The Secretary Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2224) 288/2020 Const. P. M/S Sui Southran Gas Co Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Nasir Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Sindh Consumer Protection Act 2014 (Order VII Rule 11 CPC)
Tag Line:Consumer Court has no jurisdiction in matters of alleged excessive billing by a Gas Utility Company, it lies with the GAS Utility Court under the 2016 ACT.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 778
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
2225) 274/2024 I.T.R.A MUKESH KUMAR (Applicant) V/S APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:No Reference Application is maintainable against dismissal of Rectification Application.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1334
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-20870-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 03-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2226) 182/2024 M.A. CSM Pakistan (Guarantee) Limited (Appellant) V/S Kresta Corp (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:For the foregoing reasons the instant appeal is allowed. The Impugned Order dated 31.08.2024 is set aside with no order as to cost. The learned Tribunal shall decide the case without being influenced by the findings in the Impugned Order, after recording of evidence of both parties.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 455
Advocates:Ali & Associates(FIRM-379-SBC-KHI),Kazim Raza Abbasi(ADVO-12253-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
2227) 67/2021 M.A. Zubair Ahmed S/o Muhammad Yousif Abro (Appellant) V/S Sindh Thr. Chief Secretary and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 641
Advocates:In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2228) 445/2020 Const. P. Mst. Seema D/o. Noor Muhammad (Late) (Petitioner) V/S Wajid Ali Shah & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter (Remarrying after Khulla )
Tag Line:I would, respectfully, add that bona fide be attached with her act of second marriage as same is,
undeniably, after resort to her available course i.e approaching honourable Court for khula and obtaining thereof; technical remand order as well dismissal of her suit (challenged by her) should
not be allowed to undo a legal and rightful act i.e remarrying afterkhula because such act (remarriage) can be nothing but a seal on door of her first-marriage and that she is happy with decision of khula. Any technical defect, in such peculiar circumstances, needs to be ignored because law favours the rights over procedure.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1053
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.406-K/2021 Wajid Ali Shah v. Mst.Seema Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2229) 4679/2016 Const. P. Sohail Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PLC CS 510
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 01-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.846-K/2016 Additional Member Inspection Team-1 (M.I.T) High Court of Sindh, Karachi v. Sohail Ahmed and others,C.A.633/2018 Additional Member Inspection Team-1 (M.I.T) High Court of Sindh, Karachi v. Sohail Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.TO BE FIXEDIN 3 MONTHS,Pending Adjourned(-) Mr Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
2230) 450/2014 Const. P. Aqeel Karim Dhedhi (Petitioner) V/S National Accountability Bureau (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 14-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
2231) 821/2021 Const. P. Noor Muhammad Chandio (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Petition of Employees of SEPCO (Sukkur Electric Power Company) in respect of service matters is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 860
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 10-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2232) 85/2012 Const. P. Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 407
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.738-K/2022 Aziz Khan & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2233) 34/2003 R.A (Civil Revision) Nandomal and others (Applicant) V/S The P.O. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 1309
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2234) 26/2024 I. A Syed Ayaz Haider (Appellant) V/S National Bank of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Discussion on Order 21 Rule 89 CPC.
Citation:2024 CLD 1373, 2024 YLR 2773
Advocates:Muhammad Salim Thepdawal(ADVO-3099-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Taimoor Ahmed(ADVO-15452-SBC-KHI),Suleman Hudda(ADVO-8799-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 08-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.908-K/2024 Syed Ayaz Haider v. National Bank of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2235) 1644/2013 Const. P. Peer Tariq Ahmed Advocate (Petitioner) V/S Election Tribunal and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 09-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
2236) 1670/2018 Suit Liaquat Ali Bhatti & others (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The issue involved in this Suit was in respect of promotions of private Defendants as Chief Engineers from Deputy Chief Engineers in PIA and leaving out the Plaintiffs though they were admittedly senior. It was claimed by PIA that neither seniority nor promotion is a vested right; hence, no case is made out by the Plaintiffs; however, there being no cavil to this legal proposition; such contention has been repelled by the Court and the impugned order of promotion of private defendants has been suspended, for the reason that firstly the Plaintiffs have not been provided with any reason or justification as to why they have been left out; and secondly, even the Court was not assisted as to the entire material and record for promoting private defendants, and therefore, the Plaintiffs cannot be left without any remedy. They being seniors at least ought to have been communicated with a proper response for not being considered so that they could have availed any further remedy as per law; and this has been found a valid ground for suspending the impugned order, whereas, if the management of PIA feels that due to exigency, fresh proceedings are necessary for carrying out promotion(s); then they are at liberty to do so but in accordance with the Agreement and the revised policy, if any, and so also keeping in mind the discussion made hereinabove, including consultation with Defendant No.2 as per the Agreement.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
2237) 213/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD UMER S/O MUHAMMAD SULEMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.30/2020 Muhammad Umar & Muhammad Fazil @ Rana v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2238) -9/2018 Suit Muhammad Afzal (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 02-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
2239) 73/2005 H.C.A Saadat Hayat Khan V/S Zaheeruddin & Ors (Appellant) V/S Saadat Hayat Khan V/S Zaheeruddin & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 29-APR-11
Approved for Reporting
2240) 104/2016 Cr.Appeal Syed Waris (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 20-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
2241) 1421/2022 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Encrochment over Public Property)
Tag Line:The court dismissed the petition on illegal encroachments and ordered an inquiry into the actions of Revenue and Anti-Encroachment authorities. The inquiry, led by the Chairman of the Provincial Anti-Corruption Establishment, will verify the legality of their actions and report within 90 days, with strict penalties for any interference.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1394
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 31-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2242) 305/2010 Const. P. Syed Ayaz Haider (Petitioner) V/S M/s. Noble House (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 15-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
2243) 1327/2021 Cr.Bail FAHAD NAWAZ S/O GUL NAWAZ (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1025
Advocates:Siraj Ahmed(ADVO-17944-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Allah Bakhsh(ADVO-15166-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2244) 342/2013 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. National Feed Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 631
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.634-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. National Feeds Limited & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2245) 58/2020 Cr.Rev Faraz Memon (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 251
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
2246) 2/2019 F.R.A Ahmed Khan (Appellant) V/S Javed Ali (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2247) 46/2023 Cr.Appeal Kareem Bux (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 886
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2248) 154/2019 Criminal Miscelleneous MRS. FARHEEN W/O AURANGZEB MUHAMMAD KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. The ratio of the said judgments of the Supreme Court is that where the remedy under section 249-A Cr.P.C. is available before the trial Court, the High Court should not exercise inherent jurisdiction under section 561-A Cr.P.C except in extraordinary circumstances which warrant such an action. In other words, the question is not to the jurisdiction of the High Court, but the manner in which such jurisdiction is to be regulated by the High Court. Ref. Muhammad Farooq v. Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani (PLD 2016 SC 55); Maqbool Rehman v. State (2002 SCMR 1076); Bashir Ahmed v. Zafar-ul-Islam (PLD 2004 SC 298); Mian Munir Ahmad v. State (1985 SCMR 257).
2. It is a misconception to state that in all cases where it is being contended that a civil dispute has been converted into a criminal case, an applicant need not approach the trial Court under section 249-A Cr.P.C. or 265-K Cr.P.C.
3. The argument that section 249-A Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked until a formal charge is framed under section 242 Cr.P.C., is misconceived. Section 249-A Cr.P.C. categorically states that the power thereunder can be exercised at any stage of the case. Rel. State v. Ashiq Ali Bhutto, 1993 SCMR 523.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2249) 100/2022 Cr.Rev ASKARI BANK LIMITED (Applicant) V/S MUHAMMAD FAROOQ & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is settled law that when the criminal charges depend on the outcome of the civil cases, proceeding with the criminal case before the civil cases are resolved could potentially harm the accused. Additionally, the amount owed, which is a crucial element in the criminal case, can only be determined in the civil court, and the criminal court is divested from such determination.
19. To establish criminal liability under these sections, it would be necessary to demonstrate that the accused has defaulted on a financial obligation to the bank and has failed to repay the amount due. The specific nature of the breached obligations and representations would need to be examined to determine whether they directly relate to the accused's financial obligations to the bank and whether they constitute a criminal offense under the FIO. Mere breach of a contract or civil obligation, without more, may not necessarily constitute a criminal offense. The prosecution would need to prove that the accused's actions were intentional, dishonest, or fraudulent and that caused significant financial loss to the bank. Additionally, the bank cannot unilaterally determine the amount owed and initiate criminal proceedings as such a proper judicial process is necessary to establish liability and debt amount before criminal charges can be pursued.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1066
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHS),Furqan Ahmed Siddiqui(ADVO-19117-SBC-KHS),Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui(ADVO-2269-SBC-KHI),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.16-K/2025 Askari Bank Limited v. Muhammad Farooq Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
2250) 2307/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:commutation--recalculation--subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law, if the parties are so aggrieved against the calculation of the Nazir, they may take resort of the Court of plenary jurisdiction.
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 833
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2251) 3141/2015 Adm. Suit Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 15-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting
2252) 273/2013 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD ALI S/O YAMEEN KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Conviction Set aside, Delay in Identification, JM not examined, Recovered article not produced, at the time of Statement, No hulia given in FIR )
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ Note 13
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
2253) 3/2020 Judicial Companies Misc. Ali Husain Rajabali Limited (Applicant) V/S Security & Exchange Commissioner of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (Companies Ordinance, 1984)
Tag Line:The company claimed to have been authorized under Article 6.4 of its Articles of Association to pass special resolution in this regard which it did subject to confirmation of this Court, as required under section 89 of Companies Act, 2017. The Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) was carried out on 30.01.2020 after issuance of notices dated January 8, 2020 and on the recommendation of the Board of Directors the resolution was passed on 08.01.2020. The Board unanimously through a special resolution passed on 30.06.2020 in terms of Section 89 of the Companies Act, 2017 resolved that the paid up share capital of the company be reduced in terms of the above.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 322
Advocates:Sikandar Khan(ADVO-3828-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2254) 35/2021 J.M MST GUL NASREEN (Applicant) V/S MRS TASNEEM & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 288
Advocates:Zahid Hussain(ADVO-4065-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
2255) 92/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Azhar Ali Khan and Others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ali and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 789
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
2256) 16/2012 I. A Province of Sindh & others (Appellant) V/S Deputy District Officer (Rev) & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Land Acquisition Act,1894 (Limitation)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
2257) 1000/2021 Const. P. M/s. Shabbir Tiles & Ceramics Limited (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Unions Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Trans-Provincial status.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1489
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-10142-SBC-KHI),Farhan Ul Hassan(ADVO-15556-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Khalid Imran(ADVO-8140-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2258) 840/2019 Suit M/s. Zafa Pharmaceuticals Labs (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Drug Appellate Board has no jurisdiction of revision of its own orders under Rule 5 of the Drugs (Appellate Board) Rules 1976; however, the Drug Registration Board can exercise powers under Section 7(11) of The Drugs Act 1976. Injunction allowed and impugned order passed by Drug Appellate Board suspended.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2338
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2259) 34/2017 R.A (Civil Revision) Wikiyo (Applicant) V/S Mst. Aami and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: S.M.A (Section 4 of Muslim Fanily Law Ordinance, 1961 )
Tag Line:The succession to the estate of a Muslim under Muhammadan Law
is open only at the time of his/her death and legal heirs alive at such time could
be entitled to inherit his/her estate. It is only Section 4 of the Muslim Family Laws
Ordinance, 1961 which intervened with prospective effect. Thus the legal heirs of
a predeceased son in the instant case were never devolved of any share or could
not draw title by inheriting estate of his grandfather/ great grandfather under
Muhammadan Law
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 361
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
2260) 3751/2021 Const. P. Naz Parveen (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 373
Advocates:Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-13627-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2261) 326/2022 Const. P. M/s. SINDHLAB (PRIVATE) LIMITED (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the forgoing reasons the instant petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. However, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to file an appeal under the above-mentioned Section at the appropriate forum and the time spent by the Petitioner in the instant petition shall be excluded for the purposes of computing limitation.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 182
Advocates:Mohammad Humayun(ADVO-3047-SBC-KHS),Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHI),Syed Shayan Ahmed(ADVO-16453-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Jawad Akbar Sarwana(ADVO-7174-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 14-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
2262) 30/2003 Suit.B MIRZA SUGAR MILLS LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S P.I.C.I.C (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Restructuring Agreement )
Tag Line:Banking suit. Effect of Restructuring Agreement.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 41
Advocates:Abubakar I. Chundrigar(ADVO-155-SBC-KHI),Ainuddin Khan(ADVO-2221-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
2263) 553/2014 Suit Khalil Mughal. (Plaintiff) V/S P.I.A. Corporation. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Masood Ahmed Noorani(ADVO-97-SBC-HYD),Fiaz Ahmed(ADVO-19358-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Abdul Haleem Siddiqui(ADVO-3062-SBC-KHI),M/S. HALEEM & KHAN(FIRM-248-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-16
Approved for Reporting
2264) 114/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Ali Gohar through his LRs . (Applicant) V/S Mumtaz Ali though LRs and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 518
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
2265) 1398/2018 Const. P. Ayaz ul Islam (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is well-settled law that once a promotion order is acted upon and the employee has benefited from it, the order cannot be rescinded or withdrawn, especially if it has created vested rights for the employee. This principle, often referred to as animus revertendi or locus poenitentiae, protects individuals from having their accrued benefits taken away after an order has been implemented. Reference can also be made to the cases of Pakistan through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance v. Muhammad Himayatullah Farukhi (PLD 1969 SC 407), Capital Development Authority Through Chairman, Islamabad And Others v. Shabir Hussain And Others (2022 SCMR 627) and Mrs. Zeenat Parveen Jaffery versus Secretary to Government of Sind, Education Department and 4 others [1983 P L C (C.S.) 1260].
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1067
Advocates:Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-8216-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),S. M. Shuja Abbas(ADVO-3695-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.901-K/2025 The Director General, Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation and another v. Ayaz UL Islam Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
2266) 40/2009 Const. P. Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Article, 177, 193, 199 of Constitution of Pakistan
In Article 193, the word a?Safter consultationa?y has been comprehensively considered and is held that the object of providing consultation, inter alia, in Article 177 and 193 for the appointment of Judges in the Supreme Court and in the High Courts was to accord constitutional recognition to the practice/ convention of consulting the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned and the Chief Justice of the Federal Court which was obtaining prior to independence of India and post-independence period, in order to ensure that competent and capable people of known integrity should be inducted in the superior judiciary; The Chief Justice of a High Court and Chief Justice of Pakistan are well equipped to asses as to the knowledge and suitability of a candidate of judgeship in the superior Courts whereas the Governor of a Province and the Federal Government are better equipped to find out about the antecedents of a candidate and to acquire other information as to his character/conduct. The consistent view as developed by Superior Courts is that that the Executive Authority is bound to accept the views of Chief Justice of High Court concerned and Chief Justice of Pakistan in the matter of appointment of judges in superior judiciary and such view cannot be rejected arbitrarily for extraneous consideration and if the Executive wishes to disagree with their views, it has to record strong reasons which will be justiciable and that if a person is found to be unfit by the Chief Justice of a High Court concerned and Chief Justice of Pakistan for appointment as a judge of a High Court, he cannot be appointed as it will not be a proper exercise of power to appoint under Articles of the Constitution.
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab
Order Date: 25-JUN-09
Approved for Reporting
2267) 159/2010 Suit.B Deutsche Bank AG (Plaintiff) V/S Fateh Textile Mills Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 26-JUL-16
Approved for Reporting
2268) 433/2022 Const. P. Mir Muhammad Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Grievance Notice can be sent in form of appeal, representation or review.
Company can initiate disciplinary proceedings against employee within
one month, wrong entry of date of birth in a proforma does not amount to misconduct.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1594
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2660/2025 Managing Director, Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGCL), Karachi and others v. Mir Muhammad Brohi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice) to contesting Respondent. Early date
2269) 3472/2012 Const. P. M. Afzal Kausar (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1258
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.544-K/2018 Muhammad Afzal Kausar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2270) 13/2025 Criminal Appeal Aftab Ahmed Rashid & Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1838
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
2271) 1028/2011 Cr.Bail Muhammad Haseeb Khan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 03-NOV-11
Approved for Reporting
2272) 2068/2016 Const. P. Gulistan Textiles Mills Limited (Petitioner) V/S VIIIth ADJ Karachi South & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 8 (Fair Rent))
Tag Line:- Similarly, a presumptive view in respect of overall inflation and rate of taxes cannot be applied. The maintenance claimed to have been made/done by the landlord/respondent and in support thereof they have filed some accounts and debit vouchers but it pertains to a period w.e.f. March 2007onward. How these debit vouchers and maintenance bills are being applied to entire building and on what calculation and basis its ratio in terms of facilities provided to the premises is being applied, is inconceivable on the strength of the evidence available on record. Floor-wise true calculation is not provided. The presumptive analysis thus is beyond the domain and jurisdiction of the Rent Controller. The statistics in terms of inflation and maintenance charges should have been provided in statement recorded on oath and only then it could have been taken into consideration by the appellate Court. Filing plethora of documents disclosing them as debit vouchers in respect of maintaining the entire building is inconceivable. Statistics showing percentage of taxation over the building in question as well as maintenance as to be applied to entire building and has to be established statistically and not generally. Such data was not provided to Rent Controller. Taxation and maintenance are differently applied on ground floor and upper floors.
- Similarly in presence of lease deeds of the same building between same landlord and tenant or between same landlord and other tenants, the reliance/applicability of rent or fair rent of other buildings in the adjoining locality should not have been applied as a priority, wherein respect of which direct evidence is available. When a building is operated by lifts there is not a serious degree of difference between second and third floor of the same building where premises are situated.
- Though the Rent Controller while determining fair rent of the premises in question has taken a very conservative view by fixing fair rent at Rs.10/-per sq. foot, yet I am of the view that fair rent fixed by the appellate Court is on higher side. The Rent Controller and appellate Court were required to provide a cumulative effect of all those factors available under section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 subject to availability of evidence though the quantum of inflation and the enhancement of taxation has not been statistically provided in terms of applicability of such claim/charges per sq. foot yet the other factors may contribute for the determination of fair rent.
- The rise in cost of construction has also not been demonstrated statistically. It is only presumptive analysis that cost of construction rises with the passage of time, however, the witness is required to provide data of such rise in cost of construction through his affidavit or any expert witness. It is a difficult assignment but the requirement of law. This burden could be relieved had appropriate lease deeds of same building or of adjoining building having similar facilities could be cited in evidence.
- Section 8(2) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 enables the Rent Controller to revise such fair rent on account of changes/ additions brought or improving the premises in question which is not the case here. Similarly, there cannot be an automatic enhancement at the rate of 10% per annum on the fair rent in terms of Section 9 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. It provides a maximum cap of 10% per annum on the existing fair rent and not an automatic enhancement to its maximum. Such enhancement at any particular rate, which in any case should not be 10% per annum, is dependent on certain factors which were not decided in the application under section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. Besides, there was no prayer for such enhancement under section 9 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979.
Citation:2024 YLR 16
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1490-K/2021 Gulistan Textile Mills Limited v. The Learned VIIIth Addl.District Judge, South at Karachi. & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2273) 564/2020 Cr.Misc. Allah Bachayo (Applicant) V/S SHO P.S Matli (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Miscellaneous Application . (SHO is directed to record statement u/s 154 Cr.P.C and Register FIR against Proposed accused. )
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 677
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2274) 5924/2021 Const. P. Mahnoor Foods Ind (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 503
Advocates:Khalid Hidayat Khan(ADVO-16304-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2275) 46/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) EDO Roads Kashmore @ Kandhkot & others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Hafeez Chachar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Moulding of relief )
Tag Line:The courts can mould the relief within the scope of the provisions of Order VII, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 ("C.P.C."), and are empowered to grant such relief as the justice may demand in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 852
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
2276) 315/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Sharif Polani (Applicant) V/S Sindh Industrial Trading Estate Ltd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1512
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.236-K/2024 Sharif Polani v. Sindh Industrial Trading Estate Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2277) 1893/2021 Const. P. Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 591
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Badar Hussain(ADVO-11544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 26-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
2278) 42/2016 H.C.A Mst. Rani (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Internationial Airline Corporation & anor (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
2279) 652/2021 Cr.Bail Aijaz Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 522
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2280) 37/2001 Adm. Suit Hashim Ali Rizvi (Plaintiff) V/S M.V.Eco Ekram & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 114
Advocates:Ramchand Alias Manoharlal.(ADVO-2049-SBC-KHI),Aga Faquir Mohammad(ADVO-2855-SBC-KHI),QAMAR ABBAS & CO.(FIRM-124-SBC-KHI),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
2281) 6190/2023 Const. P. Abdullah Yaqoob (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Obligation on the SBCA to demolish a building under Section 14 of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1179
Advocates:Khursheed Javed(ADVO-8182-SBC-KHI),Ishrat Zahid Alvi(ADVO-6918-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
2282) 331/2012 Cr.Appeal Syed Abbas Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 21-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.22-K/2016 Syed Abbas Ali v. The State,Crl.P.44-K/2016 Syed Abbas Ali v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Partly Allowed [Crl.M.A.131-K/2016 Dismissed],Disposed Leave Granted
2283) 411/2016 Criminal Appeal ABDUL QADIR SOOMRO S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR (Appellant) V/S THE SPL COURT OFFENCES IN BANKS SINDH KHI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal
Tag Line:Appellants filed Appeal against the judgment passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Special Court (Offences in Banks) for the offence under sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 477-A PPC, whereby both the appellants were convicted u/s. 409 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for ten (10) years each and fine of Rs.2 Million on each count .Branch Manager Abdul Qadir Soomro of Bhriya misappropriated the money through RTC of different persons and had received different amounts through deposit slips duly stamped/signed from eleven customers name of whom are mentioned in the FIR and instead of crediting the said amount in their account fraudulently pocketed the same as such they have committed embezzlement of Rs.82,44,300/- . s (PW-4) Farooq Ali in his evidence deposed that in the month of November 2012 he has deposited cash of Rs.335,000/- in his account which was received by accused Abdul Qadir, Branch Manager but the said cash amount was not credited in his account The accused had misappropriated an amount of Rs.985,300/-, Rs.13,30,000/- and Rs.300,000/- by using his ID. He further deposed that he cannot say that the accused has transferred money from the account of Shahnawaz, Ghulam Rasool and Abdul Baqi .appellant Abdul Qadir Soomro that he is not a dangerous, desperate and hardened criminal as well as he is not a previous convict, it is a matter of record that the appellant is in jail for a period of six (6) years, two (2) months and fourteen (14) days .instant appeal is dismissed on merits.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
2284) 3354/2018 Const. P. Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) V/S Akhtar Hussain Chairman (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
2285) 185/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst.Manzooran and Others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Irfan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1428
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 22-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
2286) 14/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Haider Abbas (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 16-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
2287) 6/2022 M.A. Muhammad Hassan (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Yousif & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 18
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
2288) 1463/2016 Cr.Bail Siraj Muhammad (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code Cr.P.C Bail After Arrest---497 (Offences under Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997)
Tag Line:The applicant/accused through the above bail application has sought post arrest bail in a case registered under Section 6/9-C C.N.S Act 1997, at Police Station Shah Faisal Colony, Karachi.
The matter was considered in the light of Zafar Iqbal v. Muhammad Anwar and others (2009 SCMR 1488), a larger Bench of the Honourable Supreme Court has elucidated the principles for considering the grant of bail, where offences fall within the non-prohibitory clause.
The issue of violation of Sections 21 and 22 of the Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997, was considered in the light of Muhammad Younas and others Vs. Mst. Parveen alias Mano and others (2007 SCMR 393).
It was discussed that the guilt or innocence of an accused does not depend on the question of competent or otherwise of a Police Officer to investigate the offence. A trial of an accused is not vitiated merely on the ground that the case has been investigated by an officer who is not authorized to do so unless a contrary intention appears from the language of a statute. And the Court has to determine the guilt or innocence of an accused on the basis of the evidence produced before it irrespective of the manner in which he is brought before it.
Citation:2017 YLR Note 99, 2017 SBLR Sindh 1433, 2016 SLJ 1559
Advocates:Babur Ishaq(ADVO-11008-SBC-KHE),Inamullah(ADVO-11910-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
2289) 1231/2024 Const. P. Nizar Ali Fazwani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Coming to the case in hand, it appears that the Ayyan Ali case supra establishes that mere criminal involvement does not justify ECL placement, which confirms that citizens have a fundamental right to liberty under Article 9, which, combined with Articles 4 and 15, includes the right to travel, unless restricted by a law enacted in the public interest. Numerous judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name on the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with established legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 220
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2290) 634/2020 Const. P. Abdul Wahid & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 659
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 28-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
2291) 2/2015 M.A. Hashoo Holdings (Pvt.) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan & Ano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (Penalty u s 224)
Tag Line:Companies Ordinance 1984- Section 224- Limitation to issue show cause and in passing of an order is not fatal - Trading by Directors and shareholders in violation of S. 224 ibid- liable to penalty.
Citation:2019 CLD 675
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.377-K/2019 Hashoo Holdings (Pvt) Ltd. v. Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan and another,C.A.24-K/2020 Hashoo Holdings (Pvt) Ltd. v. Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned for next Session.
2292) 2270/2018 Suit Mir Muhammad Raza (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Injunction refused in fake degree case
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 10-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
2293) 27/2016 F.R.A Nazimuddin (Applicant) V/S Mrs.Shahida and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 07-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting
2294) 80/2015 Const. P. Abdul Jalil & anothers (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1424
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
2295) 676/2009 Const. P. Abdul Salam and others (Petitioner) V/S Jan Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Advocates:Eijaz Ali Hakro Associates(Firm-390-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
2296) 974/2017 Const. P. Nasrullah (Petitioner) V/S Raza Muhammad s/o Allah Dino (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 26-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
2297) 114/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD ADEEL AKHTAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Disposal of FIR under B Class)
Tag Line:A bare perusal of the afore-quoted provision of law makes it clear that whenever an overt act is materialized and ended into an overt act, the provision of Section 506(ii) PPC would not be applicable and the only provision that will remain in the field is the overt act, which is committed in consequence of criminal intimidation. On the aforesaid proposition, I am guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Rana Muhammad Imran Nasarullah Vs. The State 2022 SCMR 1946. However, in the present case, the complainant simply stated that the accused came to his house and on the pointation of a pistol extended threats of dire consequences, intimidated him to sign a divorce deed and other documents, and left such house after intimidation However the subject act was no materialized and ended into an overt act for the investigating officer opined that no such incident ever took place and the complainant had falsely roped the accused in the case.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 118
Advocates:Sajid(ADVO-14482-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
2298) 395/2006 Const. P. Israr Ul Haq & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Zohra Jabeen & Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters)
Tag Line:The petitioners through instant constitutional petition has challenged the concurrent finding of facts by the learned courts below, whereby the Rent Controller allowed the fair rent case of the respondent, which order was subsequently upheld by the Rent Appellate Court.
Section 8 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was discussed. It was taken into consideration that law requires that while deciding such application the Rent Controller shall take into consideration the four factors as stated in clause (a) to (d) of subsection (1) of Section 8 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, including the rent of similar premises situated in the similar circumstances, in the same adjoining locality, the rise in cost of construction and repair charges, the imposition of new taxes, if any, after commencement of the tenancy and the annual value of the premises, if any, on which property tax is levied. If a party succeeds in establishing through evidence the aforesaid factors, the Rent Controller is required to examine cumulative effect of all four factors as enumerated in section 8(1) for fixation of fair rent.
It was discussed that where there are concurrent findings of facts recorded by the Courts below, this Court under its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot reappraise the entire evidence in the matter, as such jurisdiction besides being discretionary in nature is very limited and not plenary in nature.
Citation:2017 YLR 1769, 2018 SBLR Sindh 104
Advocates:Abdullah Chandio(ADVO-1763-SBC-KHI),Qaiser Hassan Khan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
2299) 7663/2019 Const. P. Shafqat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 294
Advocates:Muhammad Hanif(ADVO-10943-SBC-KHC),Mahtab Alam(ADVO-12521-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2300) 133/2011 Cr.Appeal Ghulam Nabi Narejo & Ors (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
2301) 162/2021 Const. P. Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi (Petitioner) V/S The Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the respondent-university as well suggestion of Secretary Universities and Board to the competent authority for the appointment of Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University as discussed supra was without lawful authority; and, we do not appreciate the conduct of the respondents in the manner they have dealt with the matter of appointment of the Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University, in bypassing the senior professor working in grade 22 and got recommended the private respondents for the said position in violation of the principle of natural justice and seniority, which is a universal principle. It is well-settled law that if a civil/public servant is appointed in violation of any provision of law, the competent authority can look into the matter---Coming to the next point that interest of the petitioner is also being agitated in the petition, suffice it to say when we have found that every action of the respondents dubious to propose the competent authority, the names of the shortlisted candidates, in a cursory manner, thus prima facie the competent authority was not properly appraised on the subject issue, therefore, the matter needs to be looked into by the competent authority afresh, keeping in view the seniority-cum merit principle as law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court on the subject and take a fresh decision to appoint Dean of Faculty of Science of respondent-university.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 998
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1547-K/2021 Dr.Nasira Khatoon v. Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
2302) 64/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S Samiullah Sheikh & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 439
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2303) 22/2022 Criminal Miscelleneous Javed Ali Shaikh (Applicant) V/S Amjad Bajkani & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:No second bail application can be entertained and allowed on the grounds which were already available at the time of filing the first bail application, even if the same have not been attended to in the order of dismissal and they are deemed to have been considered.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 491
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
2304) 104/2018 H.C.A Port Qasim Authority (Appellant) V/S Industrial Management & Investment Co. Ltd. & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.577/2019 Aromatic Foods Limited v. Port Qasim Authority & others,C.A.578/2019 Industrial Management & investment Company Ltd. v. Port Qasim Authority & others,C.A.579/2019 Project Development Corporation LTD v. Port Qasim Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending ,Pending
2305) 156/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. S. Najmuddin Ahmed & Co. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1421
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2306) 684/2003 Adm. Suit Engro Fertilizers Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S The Federation of Pakistan. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 21-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
2307) 1020/2019 Const. P. M/s Shaheen Freight Services (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 CLC 323
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.703-K/2019 M/s National Logistic Cell (NLC) v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.46-K/2020 M/s National Logistic Cell (NLC) v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2308) 721/2009 Const. P. Fazal Ahmed Samtio (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Mr. Justice Bin Yamin
Order Date: 11-JUN-09
Approved for Reporting
2309) 1344/2009 Suit Amin Jan Mohammad (Plaintiff) V/S Innovative Investment Bank Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Recovery and Damages
Tag Line:the changes so made are not proved to be structural as the averments of the plaintiffs witnesses are neither corroborated nor supported by any cogent material except that of verbal assertion. So also the plaintiff has failed to bring on record and/or exhibited any receipts to show payment as maintenance charges to the Association. It is a settled practice that whenever maintenance is paid receipts are being issued towards the same and in the absence of such receipts it cannot be established that the plaintiff has paid the maintenance charges and that too at the rate claimed. Since I have observed that the plaintiff has failed to prove any structural changes in the premises, the question of damages or cost towards restoring the premises back to its original position does not arise and the plaintiff is not entitled to claim such relief. As regards the claim of notice amount i.e. 12 months rent is concerned, the defendant in his letter dated 09.05.2008 (Ex.PS-1/9) asserted that since the premises was vacated by the defendant on special circumstances, therefore it was not binding on them to give notice of 12 months. This is an admission on the part of the defendant that they have not given 12 months notice. As regards the claim of the defendant as to the special circumstances, such thing is nowhere in the agreement which may absolve the defendant to perform his part of the agreement.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
2310) 33/2018 Cr.J.A Gulzar Sanghro (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (prosecution has proved in Murder Case. prosecution who were the natural witnesses, and the evidence of witnesses is fully supported.)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 128
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2311) 854/2015 Suit M/s. Axact (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Federal Investigation Agency & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:M/S. MANSOOR AHMED KHAN & CO.(FIRM-106-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer(ADVO-10014-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
2312) 2507/2022 Const. P. Standard Chartered Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 849
Advocates:Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR),Khwaja Aizaz Ahsan(ADVO-62607-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3840/2022 Standard Chartered Bank Pakistan Limited v. Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of Finance and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25)
2313) 1331/2017 Suit Mst. Sufia Nasim & others (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Hasan Khan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:specific performance
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 104
Advocates:Abdul Qadir Khan(ADVO-3399-SBC-KHS),Hifzur Rahman(ADVO-4819-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Iqbal Aqeel(ADVO-3233-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2314) 883/2015 Suit Dr. Abdul Malik. (Plaintiff) V/S K.M.C., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 846
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2315) 112/2011 Suit SAFDAR HUSSAIN BIRLAS & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S MOHSIN ALI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 29-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
2316) 69/2013 Cr.Appeal Shahnawaz alias Shahid Ali Soomro (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 29-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
2317) 500/2024 Cr.Acq.A. MUHAMMAD QAISER MIRZA (Appellant) V/S NAZIM ALI PANHWAR & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 569
Advocates:Muhammad Yousif(ADVO-18584-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Daud(ADVO-10638-SBC-KHE),Haad Abid(ADVO-15656-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo
Order Date: 15-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.84-K/2025 Nazim Ali Panhwar v. Muhammad Qaiser Mirza & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2318) 4925/2021 Const. P. Nazir Ahmed Palijo (Petitioner) V/S Chief Minister Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In the light of the above discussion, it is demonstrably clear that the petitioner has not been denied or deprived of a legal right. He has not sustained an injury to any legally protected interest. The impugned working paper does not operate as a decision against him, much less does it wrongfully affect his title to something. He has not been subjected to a legal wrong. He has suffered no legal grievance. He has no legal peg for a justifiable claim to hang on. However the petitioner has only sustainable cause to be considered for promotion in BS-20 subject to qualification, experience, and availably of the post, however, the petitioner is not precluded to ask for consideration of his case for promotion as per Rule 13 of Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation, and Seniority) Rules, 1975 by PSB-I which is going to take place in the ensuing month.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 657
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2319) 575/2009 Const. P. Mrs. Samina Zaheer Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Mr. Hassan S. Akhtar & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sind Rented Premises Act - Eviction---15
Tag Line:Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----Ss. 16, 21 & 15---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.199 & 4---Constitutional petition---Scope---Ejectment of tenant---Tentative rent order, non-compliance of---Effect---Landlords filed an ejectment petition wherein they moved an application under S. 16(1) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979---Application for payment of arrears of rent was accepted and tenant was directed to deposit the same who failed and her defence was struck off---Eviction petition was accepted concurrently---Validity---Tenant had failed to comply with the tentative rent order and she was guilty of non-compliance of the direction to deposit monthly rent---Said findings were findings of facts and no evidence was required to come to such conclusion---Order passed by the Appellate Authority was final and same could not be challenged through constitutional petition on the ground that "no other adequate remedy" had been provided by law or said finality attached to the order had violated the constitutional guarantees provided under Art. 4 of the Constitution to the tenant---Constitutional petition was dismissed and tenant was directed to vacate the premises within specified period.
Citation:2014 YLR 2331
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 04-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.265-K/2014 Samina Zaheer Abbas v. Hasan S. Akhtar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2320) 8784/2017 Const. P. Shahnaz Parveen (Petitioner) V/S The Additional District Judge-III, Karachi East & 3 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 MLD 1008
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
2321) 2899/2010 Const. P. Syed Nusrat Nasir (Petitioner) V/S Federal Tax Ombudsman & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 28-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
2322) 688/2009 Cr.Bail Akbar and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
2323) 677/2010 I.T.R.A The Comm, InlandRevenue (Applicant) V/S M/s Karachi Port Trust (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 144
Advocates:Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Imran Ali Mithani(ADVO-15070-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2324) 3603/2016 Const. P. Shanaz Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 78
Advocates:Zafar Imam(ADVO-7019-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-3297-SBC-KHI),Arsalan Wahid(ADVO-14854-SBC-KHI),Irfan Mir Halepota(ADVO-9555-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
2325) 2817/2023 Const. P. Humanitas Education Services (Pvt) Ltd & Another (Petitioner) V/S SBCA (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Illegal commercial activity on residential property. Complete ban on change of use of land.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 396
Advocates:Khursheed Javed(ADVO-8182-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2326) 2186/2021 Const. P. Zabardast Khan Mehar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:NAB Petition for Reduction of Surety Amount
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 215
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 05-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4267/2021 Zabardast Khan Mahar v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB,Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2327) 1528/2020 Const. P. Aijaz Hussain Jakhrani (Petitioner) V/S National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:National Accountability Ordinance, 1999
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 16-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3022/2022 Aijaz Hussain Jakhrani v. National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman NAB, HQ, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
2328) 2911/2012 Const. P. Mohammad Essa (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Siddique & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 05-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
2329) 1287/2006 Suit S.M. Khalid (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
2330) 1869/2022 Suit SYEDA RUBINA SHAHID (Plaintiff) V/S SYED SHAHRUKH ABBAS ZAIDI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Appointment of Receiver under Order XL Rule 1)
Tag Line:Illegal use of residential property for commercial purposes as a motel / guest house. Receiver appointed; property to be sealed.
Citation:2025 MLD 544
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
2331) 8297/2019 Const. P. Louis Dreyfus Co. Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S F.B.R & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:the goods which have already been subjected to sales tax under the previous regime and were in stock by 30.6.2019 and to be supplied after the effected date of the standard regime would be subjected to input tax adjustment under standard regime to save the goods from double / increased incidence of tax. Several sectors have been accommodated by the FBR such as steel sector, oil and ghee sector etc., but specifically the bulk importers of edible oil were not given this fair opportunity to maintain equality. Thus STGO No.105/2019 in its true spirit be applied in the case of the petitioner in relation to a stock for which stock report has been filed in terms of FBRs letter dated 09.7.2019. The manual returns thus filed in terms of the orders of this Court shall be taken into consideration in view of the above, wherein adjustment of the stock, as mentioned above is claimed.
Citation:2022 PTD 205, 2022 PTCL 400
Advocates:ORR. DIGNAM & CO.(FIRM-109-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Barrister Zulfiqar Ali Khan Jalbani(ADVO-17147-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
2332) 7731/2019 Const. P. Javed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (it appears that the policy of the respondent is uniform and without any discrimination .CP dismissed.)
Tag Line:promotion in PSO
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2403
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
2333) 6360/2019 Const. P. Kamran Shamshad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 709
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI),Asad Ali(ADVO-666-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Ahmed Pirzada(ADVO-3502-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.558-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & another v. Kamran Shamshad,C.P.L.A.500-K/2023 Kamran Shamshad v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & another,C.P.L.A.1367-K/2023 Muhammad Aslam Khoso & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed,Pending Adjourned afte a fortnight
2334) 1123/2023 Cr.Bail HAIDER ALI S/O SHER ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 861
Advocates:Zahid Iqbal(ADVO-8996-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
2335) 135/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Zakir S/o Abdul Malik (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Faisal and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In principle, the applicant has lost his case; and, at the revision stage, he has agitated the grounds already exhausted by him and properly adjudicated by the competent forum including the plea that the suit filed by the respondent was time-barred on the premise that he made last payment to the applicant on 12.8.2015 whereas, he filed his suit No.497/2017 for declaration, specific performance of sale agreement, permanent injunction and consequential relief on 24.4.2017 means 01 year, 08 months and 12 days
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 89
Advocates:Syed Khurram Kamal(ADVO-16504-SBC-KHI),Syed Ehsan Raza(ADVO-4790-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2336) 138/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Waqar Rahim & another (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Revenue Court cannot cancel the entries incorporated in record of rights
pursuant to a registered document.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1592
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
2337) 44/2018 Civil Revision Govt of sindh & Ors (Applicant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVIII Rule 18)
Citation:2018 YLR 2420
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
2338) 3500/2013 Const. P. Hijab Qazi (Petitioner) V/S Chairman/CEO PIAC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2339) 372/2023 H.C.A M/s National Refinery Limited (Appellant) V/S Syed Mansoor Ali and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Law Reforms Ordinance,1972
Tag Line:Sub-section-2 of Section-3 provides an appeal to a Bench of two or more Judges of High Court from an order made by a single Judge of that Court under clause-1 of Article-199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, not being an order made under subparagraph (i) of paragraph (b) of that clause. To our understanding, it excludes an appeal in relation to a subject summarized in Article199(1)(b)(i), whereas, rest of the "subjects" of Article-199(1) have been
subjected to appeal. Subject of dismissal of a claim made under Section-15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is already subjected to appeal under Section-17, but this is not the ???subject??? which could be impugned in any of the lower fora and hence neither appeal nor petition is a remedy. For the purpose of appeal under Law Reforms Ordinance or this appeal in particular wherefrom the impugned order has arisen, out of proceeding under Article-199 from a single Bench,
we may sum-up by referring to Appellate side of Sindh Chief Court Rules. Rule-8 confers jurisdiction ordinarily exercised by two Judges of this Court, except otherwise provided by law in particular.
Similarly Rule-9 discussed matter to be decided by single Judge of appellate side, not necessarily under Article-199 as there may be some miscellaneous lis etc. Such work (subject) assigned under Rule9 ibid is not the one impugned by the appellant before learned single Judge, hence jurisdiction was not vested and incorrectly exercised.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1347
Advocates:Shoukat Ali(ADVO-10357-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 14-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4312/2023 National Refinery Limited, Karachi v. Syed Mansoor Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2340) 796/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC Appraisement (West) (Applicant) V/S M/s. SG Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 881
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
2341) 1377/2014 Const. P. Akmal Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Establishment Government of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 128
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi
Order Date: 23-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.14-K/2018 Akmal Hussain v. The Secy: Estabishment Div. Govt. of Pakistan, Islambad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2342) 1322/2013 Cr.Bail MIRZA KARIM BAIG S/O MIRZA MUHAMMAD MEHBOOB BAIG (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PCr.LJ 112
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 23-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
2343) 8/2013 M.A. Muhammad Ameen (Appellant) V/S Wali Khan and an Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting
2344) 491/2017 Suit SINOTEC Co. Limited (Plaintiff) V/S The Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 303
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 15-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
2345) 166/2018 Const. P. Sajid Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Change of date of examination)
Tag Line:Reverting to the plea taken by the Petitioner that other seven candidates were allowed to appear in the interview and he was left out. The aforesaid plea of the Petitioner cannot be considered as a valid ground to appear in the interview; therefore we do not see any discrimination on their part as discussed supra. The Petitioner has failed to make out a case on the basis of discrimination
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.390-K/2019 Sajid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Finance and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2346) 33/2022 Const. P. Parvez Ahmed Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the petitioner has called in question the vires of his posting order dated 01.01.2022 of respondent No.4 as Chairman Sindh Text Book Board (STBB), issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 27
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.527-K/2022 Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan v. Pervez Ahmed Baloch & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2347) 12/2001 R.A (Civil Revision) Shaikh Imran Ahmed (Applicant) V/S K.D.A & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act (V of 1975)---
----Ss.3 & 4---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42, 54 & 55---Suit for declaration, perpetual and mandatory injunction---Contention of plaintiff was that he was in occupation of suit plot for the last 20 years and had raised Pacca construction of a residential house on one portion and on the other he was doing business---Notice under S. 3 Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1975 to the plaintiff who apprehended that either, he would be forcibly evicted or the plot would be auctioned and filed suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction against the authorities---Authorities had denied all the averments in the plaint and stated that the plaintiff had illegally encroached upon the suit plot and raised construction thereon unauthorizedly---Trial Court decreed suit filed by the plaintiff, and appellate court in appeal set aside judgment passed by the Trial Court---Validity---Plaintiff had failed to prove any assertion from the plaint about his lawful right under any statute for regularization of the suit plot by Karachi Development Authority---Plaintiff had sought regularization of the suit plot in his illegal possession---Plaintiff could not prove that he was in possession of suit plot for 20 years---Even if proved, it was not sufficient to claim legal cover for such occupation; nor it created legal obligation on Karachi Development Authority for conferring title of the suit plot on him---Plaintiff had not produced any of the Rules or Regulations of the Authority to show that the possession on land for 20 years was enough to confer on him legal status for occupation of suit plot---Show-cause notice, impugned through suit by the plaintiff, was supposed to be replied by the plaintiff within three days by way of review application in terms of S.4 of the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1975 which he neither complied nor removed encroachment and straightway filed suit in response to show-cause notice within 10 days---Plaintiff filed suit without showing his own entitlement to any legal character to the plot---Suit filed by the plaintiff was not maintainable and the plaintiff was guilty of abusing the process of court---Courts of law, were not supposed to help the illegal occupants to perpetuate their possession on the Government land, which possession was even protected by the inaction of the officials of the Authority---Rules, Regulations and the law relevant for the disposal of the State property should have been followed in letter and spirit by the Authority---Appellate court below had rightly reversed the findings of the Trial Court declaring that notice issued under S.3 of the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1975 by Karachi Development Authority (KDA) against encroachment by the plaintiff, was not illegal and unlawful and held to have been issued lawfully---Revision application was dismissed and cost of Rs.200,000 was imposed on the plaintiff for illegal occupying Government land for 35-40 years including 26 years in courts---Authority was also directed to deposit cost of Rs.100,000 on account of their willful inaction for 16 years, which had resulted in damaging the image of judiciary---Order accordingly. [Paras. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 12 of the judgment]
Citation:2017 CLC 224
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 19-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
2348) 18/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst. Shan Khatoon and others (Applicant) V/S Haji Ghulam Hussain and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1146
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
2349) 5688/2019 Const. P. ASG Metal Ltd (Petitioner) V/S S.E.C.P (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2350) 47/2003 Civil Revision Khalid Hussain thr:LRs (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh and other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----S. 42---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XLI, R. 31---Suit for declaration without seeking possession---Main-tainability---Gift---Proof of---Contention of defendants was that no valid and legal gift was made in favour of plaintiff---Suit was dismissed concurrently---Validity---No attesting witness of gift was produced by the donee---Nothing was on record with regard to possession of plaintiff on the suit property---Plaintiff had failed to prove the execution of gift in her favour---Suit for declaration without seeking possession was not maintainable---Both the courts below had decided the matter by referring evidence on record---Case should not be remanded when there was sufficient material available to examine the issues to settle the dispute between the parties---Sufficient compliance had been made of the requirements of O. XLI, R. 31, C.P.C.---No effort was made to claim possession pending the appeal before the Appellate Court---Revision could be dismissed on account of failure of plaintiff to seek possession along with declaration of ownership in circumstances---Revision was dismissed in circumstances.
National Bank of Pakistan v. Mst. Hajra Bai and 2 others PLD 1985 Kar. 431; Muhammad Subhan and another v. Mst. Bilquis Begum through Legal Heirs PLD 1994 Kar. 106; Messrs National Bottlers (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Additional Secretary, Federation of Pakistan and 2 others 1995 CLC 631; Auqaf Department v. Javed Shuja and others 1995 CLC 1173; Rashid Ahmed and others v. Sardar Bibi and others 1994 MLD 467; Nasrullah Khan v. Rasul Bibi 2001 SCMR 1156; Kanwal Nain and 3 others v. Fateh Khan and others PLD 1983 SC 53; Jam Pari v. Muhammad Abdullah 1992 SCMR 786; Haji Muhammad Din v. Malik Muhammad Abdullah PLD 1994 SC 291; Abdul Hakeem v. Habibullah and 11 others 1997 SCMR 1139 and Anwar Zaman and 5 others v. Bahadur Sher and others 2000 SCMR 431 ref.
Nasir Abbas v. Mansoor Haider Shah PLD 1989 SC 568; Syed Iftikhar-ud-Din Haider Gardezi and 9 others v. Central Bank of India, Ltd., and 2 others 1996 SCMR 669; Abdur Razzaq v. Sabar Khan 2004 CLC 950; Sultan Muhammad and another v. Muhammad Qasim and others 2010 SCMR 1630; Sarfraz Khan v. Federation of Pakistan 1986 SCMR 1950; Niaz Ahmed Khan v. Kishwar Begum and 19 others PLD 2003 Lah. 48; Haji Ghulam Rasool and others v. The Chief Administrator of Auqaf, West Pakistan PLD 1971 SC 376; Amanat Ali v. Abdul Haque and 27 others 1999 MLD 1148; Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Mst. Zubeda Begum and another 1993 MLD 2138; Mir Zaman v. Mst. Begum Jan and 11 others PLD 1983 Pesh. 100; Mian Tahir Shah and another v. Additional District Judge, Swabi and others 1998 SCMR 858; Muhammad Yousaf v. Abdul Majid PLD 1993 Lah. 245; Haji Jan Muhammad v. Provincial Water Board, Balochistan, Quetta PLD 1994 SC 242 and Allah Bakhsh and another v. Ghulam Janat and 6 others PLD 1993 Lah. 254 distinguished.
Citation:2016 YLR 1370
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 11-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.3-K/2016 Khalid Hussain through his L.Rs. v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2351) 300/2015 Const. P. Mian Trust (Petitioner) V/S Lyari Expressway And ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Amenity Plot
Tag Line:It may be noted that in view of the express statutory Bar, inter alia, as provided in Regulation 18-4.1 of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002, a land reserved for amenity purpose cannot be converted and utilized for any other purpose. In this regard, a reported Judgment in the case of Mansoor Sharif Hamid vs. Shafique Rehman-2015 SCMR 1172 handed down by Honble Supreme Court, cited by the learned counsel for Petitioner is relevant.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 425
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 18-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2352) 1298/2024 Const. P. Jan Muhamad (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 406
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
Order Date: 03-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5196/2024 Abdul Sattar Jatoi v. Jaan Muhammad Lakho and others,C.P.L.A.4843/2024 Abdul Sattar Jatoi v. Jaan Muhammad Lakho and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending Adjourned
(a/w CPs.5194 & 5196/24)
2353) 6046/2017 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa Daudpota (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The disciplinary matters fall within the expression ???terms and conditions of service??? which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984.
Tag Line: The disciplinary matters fall within the expression terms and conditions of service which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 452
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3452/2020 Ghulam Murtaza Daudpoto v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2354) 2442/2018 Const. P. Faique Ali Jagirani & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh 139
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.290-K/2020 Faique Ali Jagirani v. The Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2355) 6498/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Shafi Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Qayyum Solangi and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
2356) 6708/2014 Const. P. Dr. Mumtaz Ali Shar & 3 others (Petitioner) V/S The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 30-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1782/2017 Dr. Mumtaz Ali Shar and others v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2357) 555/2020 Suit M/s Taj Medicos (Plaintiff) V/S Public Procurement Regulatory Authority & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Auction
Citation:2021 CLC 472
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
2358) 2526/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Nadeem Rana (Petitioner) V/S D.G Rangers and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PCr.LJ 213
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
2359) 2161/2016 Suit Roche Pakistan Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD 222
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
2360) 2/2018 Civil Ref. Assistant Chief Inspector of Stamps (Appellant) V/S .. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Stamps Act, 1899 (Sections 27), Stamps Act, 1899 (Sections 57), Stamps Act, 1899 (Sections 56)
Tag Line:The Court had itself observed that
the valuation done by the family Court was for a particular purpose and
since it was not a decree of a Court the valuation so carried out was not
binding. And then the Court went on to observe that even if there is a
decree of the Court, the stamp duty would be payable as per Valuation
Table. Though on facts the said judgment is not relevant; nonetheless,
since it has been cited before this Full Bench, therefore, we are
compelled to hold that we do not approve such observations made by
the Division Bench in the aforesaid paragraph. Had it been in
performance of decree, an instrument is being registered, it ought to be
on the basis of value determined in the decree and/or agreement
entered into for which performance is to be made in terms of Court
decree. In such situation there was no occasion for altering/undervaluing
the property to avoid stamp duty as the value is already determined by
Court of law or decree. It is only in case when the property has changed
its status lawfully i.e. from a built-up property to an open plot or from a
semi-constructed property to a fully constructed property, the value of
the property may be altered in instrument sought to be registered. Thus,
when the property sold out on the basis of a decree, which decree has
valued the property in question, then the right of valuing the property
does not rest with the vendor and vendee and/or the concerned
authority. H
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 47
Advocates:Muhammad Aqil(ADVO-3154-SBC-KHE),Abdul Wajid Wyne(ADVO-2246-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 16-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
2361) 132/2002 I.T.C Comm Income Tax V/S M/s.Badruddin (Applicant) V/S Comm Income Tax V/S M/s.Badruddin (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 28-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.648-K/2011 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Badruddin Ibrahim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2362) 128/2024 M.A. Asim Iqbal S/o Iqbal Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Mateen Sadiq and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In light of what has been held above, the instant appeal is allowed within no order as to costs. The matter is remanded back to the learned trial Court who is further directed to conclude the proceedings in the above-mentioned suit within a period of six (06) months from today.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 60
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
2363) 2712/2021 Const. P. Mst. Almas Bano (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 538
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
2364) 3779/2012 Const. P. Irfan Iqbal Puri (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman, NAB and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 06-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
2365) 13/2010 II.A. Muhammad Shafiq (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Suleman Jameel & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sind Rented Premises Act - Eviction---15
Tag Line:(a) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----S. 21---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), 0.1, R. 10--- Ejectment proceedings against tenant---Remedies for a stranger against the order of Rent Controller---Principles---Plaintiff filed suit for declaration to the effect that order of Rent Controller declining his request in the case to become a party was wrong---Validity---Plaintiff preferred an application under 0.1, R. 10, C.P.C. before Rent Controller which was dismissed and no appeal or revision against the said order was filed--- Order passed by the court during civil litigation in exercise of original or appellate jurisdiction could be attacked alongwith final order in appeal---Plaintiff should have filed appeal after final ejectment order and impugned both the orders viz; order of dismissal of application under 0.1, R.10, C.P.C. and final ejectment order---Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was special law and plaintiff had no option except to find remedy under said law---Plaintiff should have instantly filed an appeal or revision or even constitutional petition to press his grievance against the dismissal of his application under 0. 1, R. 10, C.P.C. by Rent Controller---Stranger to the proceedings or third party against the order of Rent Controller might have two remedies open to him i.e. an application under S. 12(2), C.P.C. for recalling or review of the order based on fraud or filing a separate suit but he could only pursue one remedy he had initiated first or. earlier in point of time and having done so the other remedy should stand forfeited---Plaintiff had already entered into jurisdiction of Rent Controller and his right to avail other remedy of a separate suit was forfeited---Plaintiff had chosen wrong forum for filing a civil suit after final ejectment order---Plaintiff should have not abandoned the proceedings before the Rent Controller on dismissal of his application under 0.1, R.10, C.P.C.---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2014 YLR 1960
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 30-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
2366) 3895/2020 Const. P. M. Saeed Shahzad and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Othes (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1215
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1368-K/2023 Muhammad Ali (Haider) v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Govt. of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.1369-K/2023 Zulfiqar Ali & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed
2367) 65/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf Baloch S/o Lal Muhammad Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Shazia Naz Baloch and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 848
Advocates:Adnan Ahmed(ADVO-3134-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.143/2025 M/s. Boulevard Ltd Formerly M/s. Hero Construcdtio Ltd. thr. its Authorized, Hyderabad v. Sohail Ladhani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2368) 527/2021 Criminal Appeal ZARDULLAH KHAN S/O SHUJA ALAM KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 235
Advocates:Muhammad Haris(ADVO-17401-SBC-KHS),Ajab Khan Khattak(ADVO-8138-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Syed Nadeem-ul Haq(ADVO-6993-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
2369) 220/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Raz Textile, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Valuation of goods; section 25 of the Customs Act; determination in a sequential order; 25(7); deductive value method how to be applied guidelines
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 261
Advocates:Imran Taj(ADVO-9526-SBC-KHC),Aamir Raza(ADVO-15010-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.736-K/2023 M/s. Raz Textile Karachi v. The Collectors of Customs Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2370) 700/2009 Cr.Bail Insaf Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Bail Confirmed)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed
Order Date: 26-OCT-09
Approved for Reporting
2371) 4300/2017 Const. P. KMC (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
2372) 36/2001 Execution M/S. HABIB BANK LIMITED (Decree Holder) V/S M/S. NATIONAL FIBRES LIMITED (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2373) 61/2023 Cr.Rev Ameer Ali Shahani (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Sarwar Shahani & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1171
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
2374) 220/2011 H.C.A Muhammad Farooque vs Aman Elahi (Appellant) V/S Aman elahi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 14-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
2375) 317/2015 Criminal Appeal MUMTAZUL HAQ S/O LATE ZAHOORUL HAQ (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal (Appeal)
Tag Line: Appellant Mumtaz ul Haq has assailed judgment Anti-Corruption(Provincial), under Sections 5-B and 5-C read with section 5(2)of Prevention of Corruption Act (Act II of 1947), whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years (5)and to pay fine of Rs.5 Lacs to the Government. He purchased a bungalow measuring 600 sq, During his posting at Park and Recreation Department, K.D.A., he got allotted KDA land for Nursery and now he is running Nursery thereon. accused has neither applied for permission to purchase the above property, nor the declaration of assets has been furnished. During the course of enquiry, he failed to prove justification regarding his source of income for the purchase of the above properties. Accused in his statement on oath had given sufficient details regarding the properties and the source from which the same came into his possession. Another serious lacuna on the part of Investigating Officer is that it took almost eight (8) years in submitting challan before the competent Court of law, as admittedly the F.I.R. was lodged on05.7.1997. Apart from above, none of the prosecution witnesses has specifically involved the accused in amassing the properties beyond known sources of his income by misusing his official position /authority and / or indulging in corruption or corrupt practices. Criminal appeal is allowed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1391
Advocates:Mirza Sarfraz Ahmed(ADVO-4467-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Asif Ali Jokhio(ADVO-14779-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2376) 629/2021 Const. P. Javed Ali Balouch (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:7. For the reasons given in the aforesaid judgments, in my view, there can hardly be any doubt that Respondent-Company is also a ???person??? within the meaning of Article 199(1) (a) (ii) read with clause (5) thereof. The learned five Member Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Pakistan Defence Officers' Housing Authority and others v. Lt. Col. Syed Jawaid Ahmed and other connected appeals supra has answered the question about the maintainability of the petition against the government-owned and controlled companies.
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 4
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2377) 39/2021 Suit.B THE BANK OF PUNJAB (Plaintiff) V/S M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Banking Law, Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891
Tag Line:----With regard to candid admission on the part of the defendant, the
execution of documents referred above including a request letter for
grant of loan, sanction letters, finance agreements and creation of
charge documents are of much significance.
----Defendants have neither denied execution of agreement nor
challenged the authority of Mr. Jawed Khan to execute the agreement
with it on behalf of the bank. It is thus not a question of law that could
form substantial question out of the pleadings in consideration of law of
Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 and
execution of documents in particular
Citation:2023 CLD 920
Advocates:Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI),Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHS),Syed Ali Bin Maaz(ADVO-13125-SBC-KHI),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2378) 703/2010 Const. P. Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial), Amenity Plot (Allowed)
Tag Line:The action of Respondent No.3 in changing amenity nature and use of reserved plots is void ab initio. Consequently, very allotment in favour of private Respondents has no sanctity in the eyes of law and it is also settled principle that transferor cannot transfer a better title then what he himself possesses, therefore, if the title of the private Respondents being purported allottees of the above subject Plots is defective then further transfers of these plots do not improve the legal status of these allottees / private Respondents vis-??-vis the respective newly created purported Plots No.261 to 265 or any other Plot(s) created / allocated in a land exclusively earmarked / reserved for amenity purpose(s).
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 26-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.550-K/2024 Abdul Hameed and others v. Abdul Qadir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2379) 107/2000 Civil Revision Misri @ Shamsuddin (Applicant) V/S Tharparkar Dist Devolopment (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Civil Revision section 92 CPC not applicable to waqf
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 563
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
2380) 1945/2013 Const. P. Ehsanullah Khan, Addl. Director FIA (Retired) (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Ahsanullah(ADVO-11208-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Naila Tabassum(ADVO-8444-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.680/2017 Secretary Establishment Division and others v. Ehsanullah Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2381) 8/2024 Judicial Companies Misc. EFG HERMES PAKISTAN LTD AND ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S Court Notice - PSX & SECP (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Sanction of scheme of merger.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 536
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
2382) 98/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Habib Sugar Mills Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 582
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2383) 1046/2019 Const. P. Ashfaq Muhammad Awan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, has pronounced the judgment on 24.07.2020 in the case of Muhammad Ayaz Khan and others v. Federation of Pakistan & others (along with C.P.No.D-1046/2019), whereby, Members of the Establishment of Sindh High Court and Members of Establishment of the Establishment of sub-ordinate judiciary of Province of Sindh, expressed their grievance against withholding of income tax by the Accountant General Sindh on the amounts paid towards Judicial Allowance and Special Judicial Allowance by treating the same as part of their salary income chargeable to tax under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. The Hon'ble bench of Sindh High Court has been pleased to allow both these petitions in the following terms:-
"In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered opinion that amount of judicial allowance and special judicial allowance paid to the Members of establishment of Sindh High Court as well as to the Members of the establishment of sub-ordinate judiciary of Province of Sindh falls within the exclusion in terms of clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, therefore, not part of their taxable salary income, hence, not chargeable to Tax or deduction under Section 149 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Accordingly, withholding of income tax on the aforesaid amounts is hereby declared to be illegal and without lawful authority. Consequently, both the constitutional petitions are allowed along with listed applications. Respondents are directed not to withhold any amount of income tax from judicial allowance and special judicial allowance of the Members of establishment of Sindh High Court as well as the Members of establishment of sub-ordinate judiciary in Province of Sindh. The amounts already deducted from the salary of the Members of establishment of Sindh High Court as well as to the sub-ordinate judiciary, shall be refunded by the FBR, on their filing refund applications in accordance with law, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of such claims."
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1396
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 24-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.485-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Ashfaq Muhammad Awan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2384) 503/2017 Const. P. Vishandas (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 192
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 08-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2385) 79/2022 Criminal Appeal Abdul Rasheed (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Conviction (Police officials are good witnesses and recovery proved) )
Tag Line:The sole evidence of a material witness i.e. an eyewitness is always sufficient
to establish the guilt of the accused if the same is confidenceinspiring and trustworthy and supported by another independent source of evidence because the law considers the quality of evidence and not its quantity to prove the charge.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 321
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
2386) 405/2007 I.T.R.A The Commissioner of Income Tax (Applicant) V/S M/s Shaista Estate (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 08-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
2387) 1395/2005 Suit HINA GHORI & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S NATIONAL LOGESTIC CELL & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Advocates:Abdul Hameed(ADVO-13458-SBC-KHI),Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),M. Sarfaraz Sulehry(ADVO-1929-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
2388) 4449/2021 Const. P. Pakistan Stock Brokers Association (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Stock Exchange Ltd and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Securities Act, 2015 (PSX Regulations Futures Eligibity Criteria)
Tag Line:When SECP introduced an amendment to the Futures Eligibility Criteria (FEC) of the PSX Regulations proposed by PSX, it could not have directed PSX to proceed straightaway to publish the amended Regulations in the Official Gazette without subjecting SECP's amendments to the process mandated by the Legislature, i.e. to have such amended Regulations placed before the public. Hence, the amended Regulations pertaining to the Futures Market (both DFC & CSF) are declared illegal. Even otherwise, SECP's proposed Criteria 4(i) of the FEC providing that even if a company obtains a stay order against an inquiry/investigation of the Commission, such stay order will not make the securities of such company on the Futures Market eligible to trade inspite of the Court's stay order is held to be unconstitutional. Petition allowed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 499
Advocates:Jam Asif Mehmood Lar(ADVO-10595-SBC-KHI),Raja Qasit Nawaz Khan(ADVO-3457-SBC-KHI),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Gohar Mehmood(ADVO-15953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
2389) 474/2022 Suit All Pakistan Solvent Extractors Association & ors (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Quarantine pests. Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 2019.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 680
Advocates:Aamir Raza(ADVO-15010-SBC-KHS),Abid S. Zuberi & Ayan M. Memon Law Associates(FIRM-425-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
2390) 5888/2015 Const. P. Abdul Basit Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Hence, in our view, the decision taken by the Cantonment Executive Officer Clifton Cantonment to impose the major penalty of compulsory retirement upon the petitioner is violative of the principles of natural justice and law on the subject issue, so as the length of service of the petitioner is concerned, which is not sustainable under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Jan Muhammad v. General Manager, Karachi Telecommunication Region and another, 1993 SCMR 1440, is clear in its terms.
15. Foregoing the reasons, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Cantonment Executive Officer Clifton Cantonment to take a fresh decision by hearing the petitioner within two months.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 624
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
2391) 3/2025 Cr.Acctt.A ZAKARIA MOTIWALA S/O MOOSA MOTIWALA (Appellant) V/S THE NAB THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN (Hq) Islamabad (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3387
Advocates:Ghulam Farooq(ADVO-23096-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Nouman Jamali(ADVO-10431-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
2392) 1534/2012 Suit MS. GULNAR (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD YOUSUF BARAKZAI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 20
Advocates:Ejaz Mubarak(ADVO-3235-SBC-KHI),Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting
2393) 2552/2014 Suit Jubilee General Ins. Co. Ltd., & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Assistant Director, Directorate of Intelligence & Investigation, Islamabad has no jurisdiction to issue any notice to a tax payer, who is not registered either with LTU or RTO Islamabad in terms of SRO 350(I)/2014 dated 7.5.2014.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1705
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2394) 15/2022 Criminal Appeal Zubair Ahmed (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
Tag Line:On scanning the entire evidence produced by the prosecution in respect of the recovery, safe custody and its safe transmission for chemical analysis of the charas we are of the view that the prosecution failed to prove the safe custody and its transmission for chemical examination
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 610
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
2395) 2180/2017 Const. P. Masood Ahmed Wassan & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Colonization of Government Land (Sindh) Act, 1912, Sindh Land Utilization Department
Tag Line:For roads, bridges, gas/oil line etc. most precious lands were/are being acquired or intercepted in between to have a shortest distance to minimize the cost of that project, but we do not realize that while doing so we are not only destroying fertile/ agriculture land but so also risking our future. This acquisition is normally based on feasibility report of that particular project but there is no realization that for providing some convenience or low cost project, precious land is being destroyed, which is far more important for our future than the convenience and low cost project. The project may cost less but consequences would be detrimental.
We are living in a world where natural resources such as fertile land is being vacuumed up by development of concrete structure and this would count a lot in future and no one would come for our rescue when we have to yield our own food for our own consumption.
In this case land was attached with the research based agriculture department of Sindh which caters for not only fruit crop but other agri products as well. The authorities responsible for identifying this land have not applied their mind at all and in an attempt to please, the most fertile land of the province had been provided for an object which could conveniently be achieved on non-agriculture land, subject to law.
Blanket recommendation was forwarded by the Committee constituted for the aforesaid purpose and without identifying the reasons of disassociating the land with the agriculture based research department, they have made this land available for a scheme called Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Town. The recommendation of the Committee and the action of the authority is neither transparent nor lawful but in fact a mala fide attempt to usurp the most precious and fertile land of district Mirpurkhas where research is being conducted.
The provincial government should have emphasized to uplift the research system of the agriculture department and steered the progress by maintaining it rather than to ignore the research based system. They could always find the land anywhere else and provide resources and amenities for dwellers where the land could be developed by land developers.
The performance of Ministry of Agriculture to save the land was half-hearted and they only presented themselves as marionette since they have not taken action against usurpation of their land. If we really want to protect the agricultural lands and to promote sustainable agrarian growth for the future, large scale basic reforms and legislation are needed.
Citation:2020 YLR 2597
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 29-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
2396) 831/2012 Suit MS. SHEHAR BANO ALI (Plaintiff) V/S SYED MEHDI RAZA ALI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 20-JUL-16
Approved for Reporting
2397) 344/2021 Const. P. Abbas Ali (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1209
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
2398) 23/2011 Adm. Suit Abdul Wahid (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 267
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
2399) 330/2018 Criminal Appeal AYAZ AHMED SIDDIQUI S/O ANSAR AHMED (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ 325
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2400) 40/2006 R.A (Civil Revision) Khadim Hussain and an others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ibrahim and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Sale of property covered by Section 19 of the Colonization Act, 1910. Parties can enter into such sale and there is no legal bar however, the same can only be a deferred sale, specific performance of which was postponed to a date when the grantees had acquired the proprietary rights
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 578
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
2401) 208/2015 Cr.Bail Ghulam Shabir Chandio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 30-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.69-K/2015 Ghulam Shabbir v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2402) 664/2008 Suit MRS. SAKINA SULEMAN (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD ARIF JANJUA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1311
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
2403) 68/2014 Cr.Appeal ZULIFQAR ALI KACHELO @ ALI & 03 ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 28-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
2404) 713/2021 Cr.Bail JAHANZAIB QAZI S/O JAWED AKHTAR QAZI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the above, the interim bail granted to the applicant / accused vide order dated 26.04.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. However, if the concession of bail is misused by the applicant in any manner whatsoever or he violates his undertaking to attend the case before the trial Court on every date of hearing, the learned trial Court will be at liberty to take action against him in accordance with law, including cancellation of bail.
This bail application stands disposed of in the above terms.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 405
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Khan(ADVO-8525-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Saqib Ali(ADVO-13757-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2405) 4576/2012 Const. P. Sheikh Shafi-uddin Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Saalim Sheedi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 12-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
2406) 4079/2021 Const. P. Shakeel Ahmed Kanasa (Petitioner) V/S Federal Tax Ombudsman and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tax matters
Tag Line:Petitioners have neither been served any notice intimating them
with regard to the complaints against which the investigations were to
be conducted nor have been given fair opportunity to respond to the
accusations of alleged maladministration and corrupt practices.
Furthermore, the Federal Tax Ombudsman is authorized to summon
record under section 10(9) of Ordinance 2000 and no reasons have been
provided as to why the powers conferred therein have not been
exercised and resort has been made directly to inspection of the
petitioners offices. Indeed there must be some refusal by the petitioners
to comply with Section 10(9) of the ibid ordinance before measures such
as inspections are resorted to and/or a case has to be made out to
jump/short-circuit the mechanics.
Citation:2024 PTD 1, 2024 SBLR Sindh 569
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Ameer Nausherwan Adil Memon(ADVO-15705-SBC-KHS),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 28-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
2407) 1129/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. National Foods Limited (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs, Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Exemption of duties and taxes on prefabricated buildings as Capital Goods under SRO 41 of 2009 read with Chapter 9917(2) of the Customs Tariff; HELD: YES
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1117
Advocates:Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR),Faheem Raza(ADVO-3408-IBC-ISD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 12-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
2408) 1343/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 429
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2409) 1279/2017 Suit Muhammad Nazir Awan. (Plaintiff) V/S Imtiaz Fatima Rizvi & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 174
Advocates:Arshad Iqbal(ADVO-2647-SBC-KHI),Dara Shaikh(ADVO-1915-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
2410) 1058/2020 Const. P. Mukhtiar Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:No writ of quo warranto against promotions on project posts, if otherwise they are qualified for promotion
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 939
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 17-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2653/2022 Mukhtar Ahmed v. Province of Sindh through Secretary to Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2411) 4/2020 Suit.B Nisar Mustafa Shaikh & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Sajid Ahmed Kalhoro (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Suit for Recovery (Appeal against Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C, is Allowed, Plaint was rejected on t he ground Affidavit of minor not attached.)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 1508
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
2412) 24/2009 I. A Sajjad Gondal (Appellant) V/S Orix Leasing Pakistan Ltd., & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Financial Institution (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, Section 9, 10, 16
No substantial ground, justifying filing of leave to defend application was raised by the appellant; hence the same was rightly dismissed by the learned Banking Court.
Section 10 of subsection (6) of the Ordinance, 2001 provides that an application for the grant of leave which does not comply with the requirements of subsections (3), (4) and (5) of section 10 of Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), the same shall be rejected unless the defendants are able to show sufficient cause for their inability to comply with any such requirements. In the instant case neither appellant complied with the requirements of section 10 nor has any plausible explanation or sufficient cause been shown.
Held that compliance of the provisions of subsection (3), (4) and (5) of Section 10 is mandatory and the non-compliance whereof would follow the penal consequences as provided in terms of Section 10(6).
In the circumstances, no substance was found in filing the appeal, which was dismissed alongwith listed applications with cost against the respondent No.1 and with special cost against the respondents No.2 and 3 by a short order dated 05.11.2010.
While dismissing the appeal by a short order, the counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3 was directed to file certificate of professional fee and the cost who appears to have filed the certificate dated 15.11.2010, wherein it has been stated that an amount of Rs.50,000/- from each of the respondents has been charged as professional fee. Accordingly, in addition to cost of the petition against the respondent No.1, an amount of Rs.25,000/- as special cost to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents No.2 and 3 was imposed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 05-NOV-10
Approved for Reporting
2413) 118/2012 Suit AZHAR MUKHTAR (Plaintiff) V/S MST. TAZEEN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
2414) 500/2021 Criminal Appeal SHAKEEL AHMED S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE/ ANF (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 ((No legal bar or restriction to consider statement of official witnesses))
Tag Line:No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 130
Advocates:Muhammad Farooq(ADVO-6839-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.653/2022 Shakeel Ahmed & 3 others v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2415) 3764/2022 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:Applicability of Section 10 of Civil Servant Act, 1973, appointment of a junior officer when no suitable person is available for promotion; held No; appointment set-aside
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1168
Advocates:Sarmad Hani(ADVO-14089-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
2416) 56/2017 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD KHAN S/O ABDUL SATTAR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
2417) 6666/2016 Const. P. Majid Anwar Seehar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Out of turn promotion)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
2418) 526/2022 Const. P. Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 YLR 2537
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.282-K/2024 Allah Wadhayo through L.Rs. v. Sher Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2419) 6162/2020 Const. P. Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:reinstatement in service as Staff SDO (B&R)--immoral activities--Article 199(3) of the Constitution--Dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 184
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2420) 1130/2011 Cr.Bail Arshad (Applicant) V/S The (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 04-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting
2421) 133/2022 Const. P. Nauman Qasim Paracha and Others (Petitioner) V/S SBCA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Illegal commercial / school activity on residential plot.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 336
Advocates:Soofia Saeed(ADVO-3712-SBC-KHI),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS),Asad Anwer Alavi(ADVO-16067-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 15-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.200/2025 Head Start School System, Owner/Occupant Karachi v. Sindh Building Control Authority, through its Director, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2422) 3463/2017 Const. P. Karam Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Refusal to issue appointment orders due to criminal cases against petitioners. Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants act, 1973: appointment criteria and moral turpitude. Impact of acquittal on eligibility for civil service appointment. Malicious implication and false accusations not ground for disqualification. Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as a legally recognized conviction.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 133, 2025 SBLR Sindh 2469
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.517-K/2025 Province of Sindh though Secretary Police Department Sindh & others v. Karam Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2423) 1117/2024 Cr.Bail JAWAD KHAN S/O ABDUL LATEEF (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Failure to record video or or photograph at the time of arrest and seizure )
Tag Line:The essential prerequisite for the grant of bail by sub-Section (2) of Section 497, Cr.P.C. is that the Court must be satisfied based on the material placed on record that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life. The condition of this Clause is that sufficient grounds exist for further inquiry into the guilt of the accused, which would mean that the question should be such, that has nexus with the result of the case and can show or tend to show that the accused was not guilty of the offense with which he is charged.
8. Primarily, grant or rejection of bail is a discretionary relief but such discretion should be exercised fairly and judicially. The word discretion when applied to Court means sound discretion judiciously guided by law and to lessen the hardship of the people. For what has been discussed above, prima facie the applicant has made out a case for further inquiry into their guilt within the meaning of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
9. For the foregoing reasons, the applicant Jawad Khan is admitted to post-arrest bail in Crime No. 04 of 2024 under Section 6/9-2 S. No. 3 and 6/9-2 S No. 6 of CNS amended Act 2022 of PS Excise
West subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 100,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand Only) and P.R Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 9
Advocates:Prosecutor General ANF(PGANF),Waqas Ali(ADVO-18259-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
2424) 934/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous Lal Khan Shar (Appellant) V/S Baroch son of Ghulam Mahar & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 570
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2425) 1701/2015 Suit Muhammad Ayaz Khan. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Feroz 18888 Mills Limited. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 652
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2426) 138/2012 H.C.A Cummis Sales And Service (Pakistan) Limited (Appellant) V/S Cummins Middle East FZE & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 1655
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 29-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
2427) 3035/2014 Const. P. Telenor LDI Communication (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
2428) 43/2014 Cr.Misc. Nizamuddin alias Nizam Brohi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 05-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
2429) 322/2022 Const. P. Sher Nawaz (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 934
Advocates:Muhammad Saeeduz-Zaman.(ADVO-4476-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2430) 249/2025 Cr.Bail Muhammad Kashif (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 275
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2431) 76/2013 Const. P. Naveed Khan Domki (Petitioner) V/S Director Health Hyderababad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Service matters (Section 3 of Sindh Regularization Act, ), Constitution of Pakistan (Labour Law)
Tag Line: Petitioner was appointed as Laboratory Technician (BPS-09) in Health Department as Medical Technician for 90 days w.e.f. 18.2.1997. The period of his contract was repeatedly extended on expiry of 90 days time and since 1997 he has been working in same capacity without being regularized despite the fact that he was entitled for regularization in terms of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013. The petitioner is declared to be regularized in service with effect from 1997.Petition is allowed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 24-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
2432) 1929/2014 Const. P. Sikandar Ali Shah and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 962
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1151-K/2018 Sikandar Ali Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others,C.A.120-K/2019 Sikandar Ali Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,
2433) 2197/2019 Const. P. M/s Javedan Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Compensation instead of reinstatment
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 892
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Sanaullah Noor Ghauri(ADVO-4123-SBC-KHI),Rafiullah(ADVO-4519-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1210-K/2023 Ghulam Murtaza v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice)
2434) 343/2000 I.T.A. M/s.Al-Hashmi Brothers (Appellant) V/S Dy.Comm Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 551
Advocates:Saiyed Rehan Hassan Naqvi(ADVO-1709-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Taseer Khan(ADVO-6931-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 03-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2435) 545/2020 Cr.Bail SHAHID AHMED S/O ROSHAN UDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1295
Advocates:Shamsuddin Bhayo(ADVO-19492-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Muhammad Asim Iqbal(ADVO-17584-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
2436) 82/2023 I. A Muhammad Ifrahim & Another (Appellant) V/S M/S. JS Bank Limited and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Execution , Banking Law (Recovery )
Tag Line:The value and/or forced sale value is provided in the sale
proclamation only as equity and to have an idea about the possible
price.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 804
Advocates:Muhammad Mobeen Khan(ADVO-16336-SBC-KHE),Mukesh Kumar G. Karara(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK),Suleman Hudda(ADVO-8799-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 29-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.166-K/2024 Muhammad Ifrahim and another v. M/s J.S. Bank Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2437) 87/2023 Const. P. Sajjad Ahmed Thr. Muhammad Arif (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Nosheen Khan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 111
Advocates:Makhdoom Javed Husnain(ADVO-16983-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2438) 7004/2015 Const. P. Syed Umer Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
2439) 2333/2022 Cr.Bail FAISAL MAQBOOL SHAIKH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 232
Advocates:Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Munir A. Malik(ADVO-1969-SBC-KHI),Ali Ashfaq(ADVO-46574-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
2440) 470/2021 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O BASHIR AHMED & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
Tag Line:There is no evidence to ascertain as to whether the property was kept in safe custody from
its recovery till its arrival at the office of the chemical examiner. Therefore, by failing to prove the safe custody of the recovered contraband, the same could not be used against the appellants in this regard and the chemical report is of no legal value.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 536
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Zakir Hussain Bughio(ADVO-11959-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
2441) 89/2008 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s.Pak.Arab Refinery (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 15-OCT-09
Approved for Reporting
2442) 578/2023 Cr.Appeal ASHIR @ WASEEM S/O BOOTA MASIH (Appellant) V/S LEARNED XTH ADJ KHI WEST (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 614
Advocates:Waseem Abbas(ADVO-16925-SBC-KHE),Abdul Naeem(ADVO-20803-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
2443) 243/2009 Cr.Acctt.A State / Anti Narcotics Force (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Adeel Hussain & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 27-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
2444) 282/2015 Spl.H.C.A Bank Alfalah Limited (Appellant) V/S Interglobe Commerce Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLD 1428
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Saalim Salam Ansari(ADVO-3307-SBC-KHI),Arshad Mohsin Tayebaly(ADVO-3740-SBC-KHI),Rabbani & Ansari()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 07-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.406-K/2017 Bank Al-Falah Ltd. v. Integlobe Commerce Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2445) 5178/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Imran Mehmood and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 525
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
2446) 6611/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Ismail & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.498/2019 Muhammad Ismail Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2447) 6803/2018 Const. P. Mian Dad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1102-K/2018 Mian Dad v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2448) 803/2011 Const. P. Zuhaib Hussain Qazi (Applicant) V/S P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 13-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.258-K/2013 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Zuhaib Hassan Qazi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2449) 141/2016 S.M.A Muhammad Iqbal S/o Abdul Wahab (Petitioner) V/S Noor Muhammad Chutani - Deceased (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
2450) 5101/2015 Const. P. Lt. Col. Syed Jawaid Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 459
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1013/2019 Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. its Secretary, Karachi & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Defence, Islamabad & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2451) 328/2022 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) V/S The ECP & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Election Matters
Tag Line:The Delimitation is to be carried out in terms of the mandatory provisions of Section 8 to 10 of the Local Government Act, 2013, Read with Section 20(3) & (4) read with section 221 to 223 of the Election Act, 2017 keeping uniformity in population of Union Councils.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 946
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 26-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
2452) 4752/2013 Const. P. Ghulam Sarwat Thaheem (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.94-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Board & University Deptt: Govt. of Sindh v. Ghulam Sarwar Thaheem Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2453) 28/2011 I. A Nadir Sajid Syed & Ors. (Appellant) V/S M/sU.B.L (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 16-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
2454) 903/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Nasir Siddiqui & others (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Qasim Ansari & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 20-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.945-K/2018 Muhammad Qasim Ansari v. Muhammad Nasir Siddiqui and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2455) 57/2012 Cr.Rev Paltoo Khan Rajput (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Pakistan Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
2456) 823/2008 Suit Abdul Karim (Plaintiff) V/S Bilal Atiq & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Permanent Injunction)
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. VII, R. 2---Money suit---Plaintiff filed suit claiming his charge on the suit property---All the transactions with regard to the suit property by and on behalf of defendant were dubious, mala fide, illegal and contrary to law---Buyer could not have better title than the seller---Plaintiff was entitled of decree to the tune of amount as equivalent to market value of the property on the date of filing of suit---Suit was decreed with specific directions.
(b) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)---
----S. 54---"Sale"---Scope---Mere sale agreement was not enough for transfer of title of immovable property---Transfer of title of immovable property must be through "registered instrument" and not merely by registered power of attorney to act on behalf of owner---"Sale" had to be proved independently by payment of full and final sale consideration---Sale would be incomplete until and unless a full and final sale consideration was paid and receipt thereof was issued separately by the seller.
Sarfraz Ahmed and 36 others v. Mst. Sakina Ahmed and 36 others PLD 1985 Journal 121 and Mst. Hussain and 5 others v. Mst. Channo Bi 1990 CLC 1591 rel.
(c) Stamp Act (II of 1899)---
----S. 3---Registration Act (XVI of 1908), S.17(b)---Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S.54---Sale of immovable property through power of attorney---Requirements---Power of attorney was liable to be "duly stamped" with stamp duty to confer power to "sell" on attorney with whom seller had also entered into an agreement of sale---Amount of stamp duty on such power of attorney should be equal to the stamp duty required for registration of "conveyance deed".
(d) Stamp Act (II of 1899)---
----Preamble---Scope---Stamp Act, 1899 was purely fiscal statute and violation of the provisions of Stamp Act, 1899 would entail penal consequence---Compliance of the Act was must for protection of revenue.
Citation:2015 CLC 1451
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 15-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
2457) 865/2019 Const. P. Atta Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Nazia & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 718
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
2458) 1940/2014 Const. P. Prof: Jan Muhammad Memon (Petitioner) V/S Governor of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2715/2018 Professor Jan Muhammad Memon v. The Governor of Sindh/Chancellor thr. the Principal Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2459) 4485/2018 Const. P. Prof. Javed Ahmed Badvi & another (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Appointment of Vice Chancellor )
Tag Line:Petitioner No.2 has impugned the recruitment process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the position of Vice-Chancellor, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana, (SMBBMU)---We are of the view the ground of awarding marks to the shortlisted candidates by the Search Committee was not their mandate under reference set forth by the competent authority. On the subject, unreported order dated 21.12.2017 passed by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Civil Petition No.655-K of 2017 (Re-Prof. Abdul Razak Shaikh v. Province of Sindh and others) and Professor Dr. Razia Sultana supra is clear in its terms
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 755
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2460) 25/2021 F.R.A M/s. Nixor College (Pvt) Ltd and another (Appellant) V/S Dr. Suleiman Muhammad Al Suleiman (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:MRC.
Where a landlord refused to accept rent, it was mandatory for the tenant first to remit the rent through postal money order and if that was not done, deposit of rent in Court would not absolve the tenant from being a defaulter for the relevant period.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 927
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Saif ul Islam.(ADVO-7383-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.3609/2023 M/s Nixor College Pvt Limited, Karachi and another v. Dr. Suleiman Muhammad Ali Suleiman Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2461) 4465/2016 Const. P. Dr. Shafiq Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2782/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
2462) 5506/2020 Const. P. M. Asif Hashim Mughal (Petitioner) V/S Dawood University of Engr: and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 PLC (CS) 711
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Blosch Ahmed Junejo(ADVO-12921-SBC-KHS),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Kamaluddin(ADVO-296-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.58-K/2022 Dawood University of Engineering & Technology through its Vice Chancellor & another v. Muhammad Asif Hashim Mughal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2463) 4216/2022 Const. P. Habib Nasir Siddiqui and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Touching to the last proposition, it is well-settled law that a legislative act to nullify a judgment, without taking away its basis, is an impermissible exercise. Whereas in the present case, this Court in the case of Syed Mansoob Ahmed Bukhari and 28 others as discussed supra, directed the Competent Authority for inclusion of Orderly Allowance in pensionable; emoluments of the petitioners under law and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan, in the above-referred matter, as well as the observation made in the preceding paragraphs, however the respondent CAA without taking away the basis of the order omitted sub-regulation 10 of Regulation 46, which exercise amounts to nullify the effect of the order, which is not permissible under the law.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 939
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Amir Saleem(ADVO-4522-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2143/2024 Civil Aviation Authority, through its authorized officer, Islamabad v. Habib Nasir Siddique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2464) 94/2018 I. A Saeed Akhtar & others (Appellant) V/S M. C. B. Pakistan Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 902
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 22-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1105-K/2022 Saeed Akhtar & others v. M/s. Muslim Commercial Bank Pakistan Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2465) 55/2021 II.A. Abdul Samad through L.rs (Appellant) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 19
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.135-K/2022 Fayyaz Ahmed & another v. Abdul Samad deceased through his legal heirs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2466) 6/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Asif & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:"Shifting of SABZI MANDI - MARKET COMMITTEE"
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1381
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2467) 4188/2020 Const. P. M/s Panjgour Goods Transport and Co. (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (SRO 499(I)/2009 issued under section 181 )
Tag Line:The proposition whether the events, as disclosed in the respective seizure reports of all three references followed by show cause notices and passing of Order-in-Originals, could be distinguished from the frame of SRO 499(I)/2009 as far as owners plea is concerned.
Preamble (b) of the aforesaid SRO provides that the option shall not be given to pay fine in lieu of confiscation in respect of a vehicle which is defined as good/goods in terms of sub-clause (b) of the said preamble. Thus, a lawfully registered vehicle/conveyance, having packages and
containers inside, found carrying smuggled goods, in false cavities or were being used exclusively or wholly for transportation of offended goods under clause (s) of Section 2 of Customs Act, 1969 becomes a subject matter of such offence. This clause (b) has emphasized that a vehicle or conveyance used exclusively or wholly for transportation of offended goods cannot be distinguished from the one having packages and containers inside as such conveyance having packages and containers are inclusive of such definition of vehicle/conveyance.
Citation:2022 PTD 59
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 11-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2468) 205/2018 Criminal Appeal AASHIQUE ALI CHANDIO S/O G. MUHAMMAD CHANDIO & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Ajab Khan Khattak(ADVO-8138-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
2469) 1443/2016 Const. P. Najeeb ur Rehman Jakhrani. (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 06-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.81-K/2018 Mir Najeeb-ur-Rehman Jakhrani v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2470) 493/2018 Const. P. Umaid Ali (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 344
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2236/2019 Umaid Ali v. The Election Commission of Pakistan thr. Secretary Election Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad & others,C.A.1400/2019 Umaid Ali v. The Election Commission of Pakistan thr. Secretary Election Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. Impugned judgment suspended. Notict to AG Sindh xxvii-A CPC. Relist after vacations,Disposed Allowed
2471) 1168/2019 Const. P. Syed Iftikhar Haider Rizvi S/o Syed Mumtaz Hussain (Petitioner) V/S VIth ADJ, Karachi Central and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 700
Advocates:Saira Erum Khan(ADVO-6446-SBC-KHI),Sami Ahsan(ADVO-6815-SBC-KHI),Irfan Ahmed Usmani(ADVO-3616-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
2472) 169/2015 Civil Revision Province of Sindh and others (Applicant) V/S Mst. Tasleem Begum and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 163
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
2473) 6244/2019 Const. P. Azizullah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Whether the Petitioner is qualified for the post of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 in Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh?
ii) Whether the post of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 in Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh is to be filled by 80% by initial appointment through Sindh Public Service Commission (except contract employees) and 20% by promotion amongst the various categories of teachers having 7 years service in BPS-16?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1432
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4278/2021 Aziz ullah v. The Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2474) 3167/2020 Const. P. Syed Sad Ali and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 827
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.407-K/2021 Syed Saad Ali & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC
2475) 33/2016 J.M Mrs. Samar Rais. (Applicant) V/S Askari Bank Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 583
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 13-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
2476) 3016/2019 Const. P. Khawaja Izhar ul Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 932
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 22-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1073-K/2023 Khawaja Izhar ul Hassan v. Chief Minister, Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2477) 7/2007 M.A. Searle Pakistant Ltd. & anor (Appellant) V/S The Monopoly Control Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices (Control & Prevention) Ordinance, 1970 (Section 59), Competition Act, 2010 (Sections 61), Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices (Control & Prevention) Ordinance, 1970 (Sections 3, 4, 11 and 12)
Tag Line:**Maintainability of appeal
on the count of ???Aggrieved person???:- Aggrieved person not necessarily be one facing financial losses; a
person/entity feels and considers a process as an intervention to
business decisions and actions are being an intervention to business
decisions, it can qualify as basis of being an aggrieved person. To be an
aggrieved, you do not have to show yourself in a frame of financial loss
alone. An attempt to justify that intervention to the business
understanding is unnecessary by regulator, notwithstanding financial
gains, the intervention can be objected by objector as being aggrieved
person.
**Public interest:- Laws are made to protect public interest and the enforcement of such
laws is in eminent public interest. The distribution arrangement between
Searle and IBL has unfairly benefitted IBL and its shareholders to the
prejudice of Searle and its shareholders which include minority
shareholders from the general public. The general public minority
shareholders have no other appropriate remedy through which they
could have corrected such arrangement or recovered their losses. It is
therefore a matter of public interest that action should have been taken
by the Authority to redress the situation
Citation:2024 CLD 1314
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 07-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3933/2024 The Searle Company Limited Formerly Known as Searle Pakistan Limited Karachi and another v. The Competition Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2478) 1256/2019 Suit Eaton Phonenixtec MMPL Co., LTD (Plaintiff) V/S Messrs. New Rabia Enterprises (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Plea of equitable set-off in defense to Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 181
Advocates:Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI),Syed Daanish Ghazi(ADVO-13558-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zahid Khan(ADVO-3162-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
2479) 61/2016 Cr.J.A Saeedo @ Saindad (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (Accused is Acquitted In Murder Case on the Ground Material Contradiction In Evidence .)
Tag Line: Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 162
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
2480) 70/2021 II.A. Mehfooz Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Mst. Rehmat Begum & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 401
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.49-K/2022 Mst.Rehmat Begum v. Mehfooz Ahmed & othersmanhg Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2481) 868/2019 Cr.Misc. Notan Lal (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 2233
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
2482) 2844/2021 Const. P. Muneer Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Health Department (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The petitioners have called in question, their suspension from the service order dated 01.04.2020 and subsequent order dated 18.08.2020, whereby their reinstatement in service order dated 22.7.2020 was cancelled/withdrawn by the respondent-Secretary, Health Department, Government of Sindh.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 815
Advocates:Syed Mustafa Mahdi(ADVO-17494-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2483) 710/2016 Suit Mrs. Sanam Irshad Shah & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan & Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 12-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2484) 2003/2022 Suit TIME PRESS (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) V/S SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Gas (Theft, Control and Recoverey) Act, 2016 (Order VII Rule XI CPC)
Tag Line:Gas (Theft Control and Recovery) Act 2016 designates the fora for pertinent prosecution, adjudication and matters ancillary and related thereto; plaint rejected.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 112, 2025 SBLR Sindh 1861
Advocates:Ghazi Khan Khalil(ADVO-18768-SBC-KHE),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Ameer Nausherwan Adil Memon(ADVO-15705-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
2485) 4082/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Haneef (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 286
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),In Person(INP),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1715/2022 Pakistan Atomic Energy Commissoin (PAEC) through its Secretary (PAEC), Islamabad v. Muhammad Haneef and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned. Be fixed a/w CPLA.3433/21 etc
2486) 1351/2011 Suit MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM THAHIM (Plaintiff) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
2487) 1100/2023 Suit M/S AA QUALITY BUILDERS (Plaintiff) V/S CHINA HEBEI RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CHGL) & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Amendment of Pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 to amend plaint to make it maintainable.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 520
Advocates:Sufiyan Zaman(ADVO-15548-SBC-KHS),Atir Aqeel Ansari(ADVO-21844-SBC-KHS),Aman Aftab(ADVO-18333-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ajmal Khan(ADVO-10273-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2488) 2647/2020 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:relieving him from the post of Director Anti-Quackery Sindh Health Care Commission (`SHCC`)--In view of the above discussion, the petition is not maintainable either on facts or in law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated in the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government. A person coming to Court must be fully aware of his right i.e. whether he is entitled to such right or not. We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of the plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent- SHCC. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs.
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 949
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.104-K/2021 Dr.Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2489) 37/2020 Suit.B UNITED BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD ISMAIL DOSSA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Having obtained Foreign Judgment, the Bank has to options for its enforcement in Pakistan.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1033
Advocates:Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Saalim Salam Ansari(ADVO-3307-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
2490) 9/2007 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Asadullah (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 12-MAY-07
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.233/2020 Asadullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2491) 1153/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD ASLAM S/O SARDAR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the above, the interim bail granted to the applicant / accused vide order dated 18.06.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. However, if the concession of bail is misused by the applicant in any manner whatsoever, the learned trial Court will be at liberty to take action against him in accordance with law, including cancellation of bail.
This bail application stands disposed of in the above terms.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 218
Advocates:Maqbool Ur Rehman(ADVO-17531-SBC-KHE),Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-20773-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2492) 1585/2023 Const. P. Hamid Mehmood & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Interpretation of Regulation No.18-4.1 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 in respect of the conversion of amenity plots.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 439
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
2493) 2944/2020 Const. P. M/s Outdoorsman (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 622
Advocates:Mohsin Kadir Shahwani(ADVO-12570-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
2494) 5025/2016 Const. P. Imdad Ali Abro & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the petitioners are seeking the up-gradation of the post of Computer Operator/Assistant Computer Programmer BS-16 to 17--we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts in BPS-17 with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 948
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 28-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2495) 1233/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Ms. Shazia Aman (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 25D)
Tag Line:the Valuation Ruling such as one dated
10.07.2008 is not applicable as the valuation is to be issued on the basis
of data of 90 days, either before or after, import in terms of Rule 107(A)
of Customs Rules 2001. It has not been disclosed as to what the exact
dates of the clearance of the goods are however subsequent valuation
rulings, as reviewed, are of 15.07.2009 and 27.04.2010 respectively. In
the absence of a clear date of clearance of the goods, the applicability
of Valuation Ruling of 15.07.2009 and 27.04.2010 would be farfetched.
Subsection 4 to Section 25A of Customs Act, 1969 was amended by
Finance Act 2010 and assented on 30.06.2010 which was subsequent to
the last ruling relied upon, hence by the time goods were cleared the
regime of availability of 90% data, pre or post, was applicable as the
applicability of last issued Valuation Ruling was introduced after
30.06.2010. Even the show-cause notice is silent as to the date of
clearance of the goods.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1204
Advocates:Iqbal Masih Khurram (Iqbal M. Khurram)(ADVO-4370-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 07-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2496) 5/2014 Adm.A SAJID PLASTIC FACTORY (Petitioner) V/S MSC BAHAMAS & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The learned single Judge stayed the admiralty suit keeping in view the clause of Bills of Lading with regard to gist of form provided therein, however, the appellate court set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge at O.S. and decided that the suit may be heard and decided in view of Admiralty Jurisdiction of the High Court Ordinance, 1980.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 561
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2497) 48/2018 I. A Mian Ejaz Ahmed & another (Appellant) V/S M/s. Meezan Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 CLD 113
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.204-K/2019 Mian Ejaz Ahmed and another v. M/s Meezan Bank Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2498) 1179/2014 Cr.Bail Muhammad Nizam alias Waja (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 22-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting
2499) 306/2011 Const. P. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2500) 4780/2018 Const. P. M/s M. Iqbal & Sons & ORs (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 707
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.643-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan & others v. M/s. Iqbal & Sons & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2501) 262/2017 H.C.A Gulshan Weaving Mills Limited (Appellant) V/S Al Baraka Bank (Pakistan) Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1008/2018 Bank of Punjab, Karachi v. Gulshan Weaving Mills Ltd, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
2502) 849/2021 Const. P. Mustafa Saeed and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:whether relaxation up to fifteen years in upper age limit, under sub-rule (2) of Rule 12 of the Sind Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974, applies to the appointments against the posts in BPS-16 and 17 to be filled through SPSC Competitive Examination-2021.
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1101
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.183-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary Forest & Wildlife Department, Government of Sindh & others v. Mustafa Saeed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2503) 116/2019 Criminal Appeal SYED NIZAM MOHIUDDIN RAFAI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH DAG (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Appellants Challenged the Judgment whereby the appellants were convicted u/s. 420 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for six (6) years and fine of Rs.26 lacs, also convicted for an offence u/s.468 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for six (6) years .Manager Operation HBL stating therein that accused Syed Junaid Ali Shah in active connivance of his other accomplices obtained the credential/secret information and full particulars of A/c No.22877100245003 of HBL, WAPDA Town Branch Gujranwala titled Imran Afzal Khokhar. Thereafter, he arranged fake cheque book requisition slip on which he made forged signature of Imran Afzal Khokhar and with active connivance of accused Sajid Ali, a banker holding duties of clearing, collection of bills posting and cheque deposit and posting of cheque book requisition at HBL, WAPDA Town Branch Gujranwala processed the same for issuance of a fresh cheque book. Later on, with the connivance of his another accomplice Ghulam Ghous also a banker holding duties of cheque book to the account holder. Accused Syed Junaid Ali Shah received the cheque book request process, HBL WAPDA Town Branch Gujranwala whose duty was to deliver the he cheque book to the account holder. Appellant Syed Nizam Mohiuddin Rafai that he is not dangerous, desperate and hardened criminal as well as he is not a previous convicted, Page 9 of 10 therefore, the sentence awarded to him may be reduced into the period already undergone, is concerned, . Instant appeal is dismissed on merits
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2504) 427/2021 Const. P. Ghulam Farooq (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In our view, no candidate shall be appointed to a post unless after such medical examination as Government may prescribe such candidate is found medically fit to discharge the duties of the post. In the present case, the petitioner was relieved from the duties on medical grounds and his appeal was rejected on the same analogy. Besides above, the assertion of the petitioner is misconceived on the premise that he obtained a medical examination fitness test certificate on 02.12.2019 after the rejection of his appeal, on 14.5.2019, thus this document could not be taken into consideration, besides the respondents have relied upon the documents which prima facie show adverse inference against him. Thus, at this stage, we cannot declare him medically fit or otherwise for the subject post, which was a contractual position and by efflux of time expired.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1249
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 15-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2505) 1408/2021 Const. P. Saifullah Abro (Petitioner) V/S Senate Appellate Tribunal & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 341
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.702/2021 Shahid Ali Rind v. Saifullah Abro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2506) 3314/2019 Const. P. Zeba Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Regularization of Appointment against deceased quota under Prime Minister???s Assistance Package
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 502
Advocates:Zafar Imam(ADVO-7019-SBC-KHI),Tauqeer Ahmed(ADVO-16763-SBC-MLR),S. Mohsin Imam Wasti(ADVO-4357-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Bilal Bhatti(ADVO-15212-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2507) 769/2014 Const. P. M/S Maritime Agencies Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Assistant Commission -II and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 24-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
2508) 7339/2017 Const. P. Independent Media Corp (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Raja Tariq Mehmood and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Contract employee)
Citation:2018 PLC Lab. Note 29
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.66-K/2018 M/s Independent Media Corporation (Pvt) Ltd and another v. Raja Tariq Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2509) 4031/2013 Const. P. Pak Afghan Cargo Services (Private) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Deputy Collector of Customs & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 661
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 09-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
2510) 137/2023 Spl.H.C.A National Tiles and Ceramics Ltd & Another (Appellant) V/S Sindh Bank Limited & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XXI Rule 89& 26 CPC), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 21 Rule 86)
Tag Line:Judgment-Debtor did not take any action under Order 21 Rules 89 or 90 CPC during the hearing of the appeal against the impugned Order passed by the learned Single Judge on Order 21 Rule 86 CPC, Division Bench passed. ad-interim Order beyond the scope of Order 21 Rule 89. Such an interim Order was a provisional measure subject to hearing the Auction-Purchaser; it was not final, did not meet the procedural requirements of CPC, and was barred by limitation. No grounds were agitated by the Judgment-Dector under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC. The period of 30 days under the Limitation Act of 1908 commenced from the date of sale (i.e. when the Court approved the sale pursuant to Order 21 Rule 86 CPC. Valuable rights had accrued to the Auction-Purchaser which could not be taken lightly. Appeal dismissed.
Citation:2024 CLD 264
Advocates:Abdul Wahab Baloch(ADVO-5874-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Iqbal Haider(ADVO-12894-SBC-KHI),Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHI),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
2511) 519/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Adnan (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Group Insurance Entitlement
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 369
Advocates:Saud Ahmed Khan(ADVO-13763-SBC-KHI),Additional Attorney General khi(),Syed Ansar Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-12809-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Asad Ashfaq Tola(ADVO-17101-SBC-KHS),Haq Nawaz Talpur(ADVO-11466-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.665-K/2025 Muhammad Adnan v. Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Notice
2512) 2414/2021 Cr.Bail IMRAN NASEER S/O NASEER AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 706
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Muhammad Jameel(ADVO-4255-SBC-KHI),Inayatullah Bugti(ADVO-11026-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2513) 459/2012 Cr.Misc. Allah Wadhayo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 07-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.99-K/2012 Nek Muhammad Jakhar v. Allah Wadhayo Jakhar & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2514) 1753/2013 Const. P. Crystal Enterprises and Others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 2073
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 07-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting
2515) 6752/2016 Const. P. Mukhtar Ahmed Mangia (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (award the Page 5 of 5 petitioner proforma promotion as EVP by way of Circulation within one week, )
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 715
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Sanaullah Noor Ghauri(ADVO-4123-SBC-KHI),Suleman Hudda(ADVO-8799-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2516) 518/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD TAHIR JATOI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Dismissed), Criminal After Arrest Bail (Bail in Abduction and Rape)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 109
Advocates:Muhammad Moosa(ADVO-16214-SBC-MLR),Imdad Ali Malik(ADVO-1469-SBC-SUK),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
2517) 234/2023 H.C.A Cedar Pvt. Ltd (Appellant) V/S Soneri Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (section 12), Law Reforms Ordinance (Appeal Against modification in Interim Order)
Tag Line:*The subject matter of the suit is not just simply a negotiable
instrument but it is the rent of the subject period which was not
paid, therefore, there is no logic in saying that since the Rent
Controller could not pass any order on ???negotiable instrument???.
**Section-12 of the SRPO, 1979 does not empower the civil court to adjudge necessary
repairs to be carried out by the landlord; neither an application was filed by the tenant in this regard.
***once the rent is deposited pursuant to the orders of the Court, which the
appellant had not deposited till date, the tenant/appellant will
???not??? be under the obligation to deposit the arrears of rent in
compliance of Section-16(1) of the SRPO, 1979, as the tenant
cannot be waxed twice. Security would not come in the way unless
the tenant vacates the premises.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 947
Advocates:Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Uzma Farooq(ADVO-14781-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 23-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.293-K/2024 Cedar (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Marina Construction (Pvt.) Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2518) 39/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. NASEER AHMED @ MULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Delay in Identification Parade)
Tag Line:For an identification parade to be properly held, it is essential that it must be conducted soon after the arrest of the accused and that accused is not shown to the witnesses before the identification parade. However, the said guidelines were not followed.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 820
Advocates:Zahoor Ahmed Khan(ADVO-10377-SBC-KHI),Moula Bux Bhutto(ADVO-15386-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
2519) 6629/2016 Const. P. Touseef Nazeer (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.19-K/2019 Touseef Nazeer v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2520) 2253/2020 Const. P. M/s Majeed & Sons Steel (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1029
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.3155/2020,C.P.2652/2020,C.A.1119/2020,C.A.1011/2020 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted/ be fixed on 4.12.2020 (Friday),Disposed Leave Granted and be fixed on 4.12.2020 (Friday),Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed
2521) 2816/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Saqib Rizwan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Goods confiscated outrightly without any option to pay fine in lieu of confiscation vests in the Federal Government under Section 182 of the Customs Act 1969
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1214
Advocates:Amjad Hayat(ADVO-53613-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 27-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
2522) 363/2012 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Haneef Gabole (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 31-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
2523) 111/2004 H.C.A Muhammad Aslam V/S M/s.Colony Sarhad Textile Mills Ltd (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Aslam V/S M/s.Colony Sarhad Textile Mills Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 18-APR-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.158-K/2011 Muhammad Aslam v. M/s Colony Sarhad Textile Mills limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2524) 4685/2020 Const. P. Azhar Hussain Solangi and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1229
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
2525) 1134/2022 Const. P. M/s Trio Ind (Petitioner) V/S Babo Sher and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 610
Advocates:Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Fazal Mannan(ADVO-7300-SBC-KHW),Ashraf Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-2463-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.451-K/2023 M/s Trio Industries (Pvt) Limited v. Babu Sher & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2526) 3/2021 M.A. Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Shamim Bano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 108
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2527) 1/2017 M.A. Show Time Cable & Datacom Pvt Limited (Appellant) V/S PEMRA & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Television Broadcast Station Operations) Regulations, 2012, Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules, 2009 (Rule 5), PEMRA Ordinance, 2002 (section 13), PEMRA Ordinance, 2002
Tag Line:Two propositions/counts are as under:
(i) That for the impugned decision an opinion was sought from the Regional Council of Complaints which had no jurisdiction under the ibid Ordinance to comment and/or recommend any opinion ,as far as dispute is concerned;
(ii) That even if such recommendations are ignored to have been forwarded by the Council of Complaints and the impugned order be seen as an independent decision of PEMRA then again, the details of the outstanding dues does not seems to generate from PEMRA Ordinance 2002, Regulations 2011-12 and PEMRA Rules 2009, and hence are/were illegal and unlawful, and could be struck down by this Court on merit.
-So far as the first question as raised by the appellant is concerned, is answered in affirmative that the Council of Complaints had no jurisdiction for rendering opinion/recommendation to PEMRA under the Ordinance and its role in this regard and the advice sought is of no avail and merits no consideration; it should have been an independent order of PEMRA in view of provisions of PEMRA Ordinance.
- Schedule-B attached to these rules enables PEMRA to recover in-house channel fee for cable TV. Table VI provides licence fee of Rs.175,000/-upto10,000 subscribers as B-5 category which category appellant is enjoying followed by annual renewal of Rs.87,500/-. This amount is being paid by the appellant in terms of said rules as reflected in the outstanding dues chart hereinabove. It also enable the licensor PEMRA to recover Rs.24/-per subscriber per year which is a subscriber fee(Table VI), disclosed in horizontal column 2 in the subject chart incorporated in the impugned order. Table IX deals with in-house channel licence fee and is chargeable to all categories from B-1 to B-10.
-Thus, in view of aforesaid rules and regulations, the claim is legitimate and I do not see any transgression of the PEMRA authority in claiming the amount mentioned in the impugned decision.
-.It is pertinent to point out that rationale and vires of such levy and charge were argued by appellants counsel as the fee and other claims are claimed to be disproportionate. Perhaps these arguments could have served better had it been a case of challenging the vires of regulations and rules.
Citation:2022 CLC 254
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.3385/2021 Show Time Cable & Datacom (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad through Chairman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2528) 2625/2018 Const. P. Faizan Shabbir S/o Shabbir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Shaikh Abdul Wahab thorugh Afsarullah Khan & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 06-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2529) 753/2024 Suit Muhammad Faisal & others (Plaintiff) V/S SBCA & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Historical original and Current regulation of Town Planning and Building Control in Karachi. Whether Flats can be constructed on commercial plots? Whether SBCA can unilaterally alter an FAR of designated area without a proportionate change in the infrastructure.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2004
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2530) 1136/2015 Const. P. M/s Lucky Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S The Chief Minister and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 755
Advocates:Sajeel Shehriyar(ADVO-29442-PBC-LHR),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI),Syed Muhammad Ishaq Shah(ADVO-13528-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3781/2022 Lucky Cement Limited Karachi v. The Chief Minister Sindh through Chief Secretary Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2531) 713/2024 Const. P. NBP (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Windfall Tax
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 205, 2025 SBLR Sindh 1154
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 20-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2532) 7039/2021 Const. P. Mis Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pak Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Mohammad Javaid and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 858
Advocates:Muhammad Rashid Khan Mahar(ADVO-15076-SBC-KHS),Inayat Hussain Shah(ADVO-10288-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Jahanzeb Awan(ADVO-11549-SBC-KHI),Shahan Karimi(ADVO-15097-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1644/2022 Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pakistan (Pvt) Limited Karachi v. Muhammad Javaid and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
2533) 78/2022 Const. P. Mazhar ALi Rajper (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:1. The Court directs the Sindh Government to fully implement the Sindh Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2018, by creating a PWD Fund and launching a Special Employment Exchange and Portal in every district.
2. All public and private bodies must identify and register eligible PWDs, report their total workforce and PWD representation within two months, and fill the five-percent quota.3. Where qualified PWD candidates cannot be placed, establishments must remit the equivalent salary into the PWD Fund.
4. Merit-based standards for competitive positions remain unchanged, ensuring fairness alongside affirmative action.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2032, 2025 SHC SUK 2034, 2025 SHC SUK 2035, 2025 SHC SUK 2036, 2025 SHC SUK 2037
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
2534) 1159/2019 Const. P. Allah Dino (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2535) 678/2021 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD IRSHAD S/O AMANAT KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 917
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Zakir Hussain Bughio(ADVO-11959-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 09-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.651/2022 Muhammad Irshad Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2536) 1550/2022 Suit M/S CROWN HOLDINGS LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S PORT QASIM AUTHORITY & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 249
Advocates:Muhammad Saad Siddiqui(ADVO-12321-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),M/S. NAZIM H. SIDDIQUI & CO.(FIRM-466-SBC-KHI),Shahzad Mahmood(ADVO-12500-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2537) 42/2018 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Faisal Associates (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1186
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.706-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s.Faisal Associates Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2538) 211/2015 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Usman (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 19-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
2539) 215/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Syed Munawar Ali Shah. (Applicant) V/S DFO, Sanghar @ Khipro & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 324
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
2540) 361/2014 Const. P. Belal Mostafa Sadeqi Limited (Petitioner) V/S Deputy Collector of Customs & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 761
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 12-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
2541) 1004/2025 Cr.Bail Javaid S/o Mehmood (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1228
Advocates:Khadim Hussain Soomro(ADVO-20661-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
2542) 5102/2021 Const. P. Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Given the petitioner's retirement in 2021, this court find it unnecessary to refer the case back to the Selection Board (SB) in 2025. Besides the current legal framework does not recognize pro forma promotion for retired public servants. Without a legal basis, this court cannot compel the CAA to take an action impermissible by law. Guidance on this matter can be found in the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Secretary Ministry of Finance, Finance Division, Government of Pakistan Versus Muhammad Anwer (2025 SCMR 153), National Bank of Pakistan through its President Versus Sajjad Ali Khaskhelli and another (2024 PLC (CS) 276), and Inspector General of Police Punjab versus Waris Ali (2024 SCMR 1109).
10. Based on the aforementioned discussion and keeping in view the legal position of the case, we find no merit in this petition that justifies intervention by this Court. Consequently, the Constitution Petition and any pending applications are dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1735
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-13137-SBC-KHS),Noor Nabi(ADVO-19386-SBC-KHC),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
2543) 8591/2018 Const. P. Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 232
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
2544) 2782/2024 Const. P. Aamir Ali (Petitioner) V/S Dist. & Session Judge Larkana & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 436
Advocates:Ahsan Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-605-SBC-LRK),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 20-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
2545) 191/2012 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Dastagir Engineering (Applicant) V/S Collector Customs (Appeal )& another. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 454
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
2546) 1278/2014 Cr.Bail Azhar Ali Khwaja & Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Bail admitted)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 01-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
2547) 4329/2021 Const. P. Ullab Ali and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 686
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2548) 569/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Shahzad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Syed Abid Ali & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979, Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (FRA Remanding Order Set aside and declared null & void. )
Tag Line:Hence the only presumption, deducible in absence of any contrary
evidence is that it was executed and authenticated in presence of Notary Public who is one of the authority to authenticate the subject
document i.e. Power of Attorney.
--
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 239
Advocates:Muhammad Touqeer Randhawa(ADVO-14636-SBC-KHI),M/S. ADNAN & CO(FIRM-247-SBC-KHI),Afaq Ahmed(ADVO-4782-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
2549) 4953/2020 Const. P. Peoples University of Medical & Health Sci (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Reasons assigned to the short order dated 11.11.2020 passed in the MDCAT petitions viz. C.P. Nos.D-4953, 5036, 5158, 5237 of 2020 (challenging the vires of Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020) by Division Bench of Sindh High Court comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry.
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 522
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 11-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1301-K/2020 Peoples University of Medical & Health Seiences for Womon & others v. Pakistan Ministry of Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2550) 580/2020 Const. P. Syed Mansoob Ahmed Khatri and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Orderly Allowance)
Tag Line:principally the petitioners are seeking inclusion of `Orderly Allowance` in their pensionable emoluments in the light of Amendment No.19 in clause/regulation 46 of Chapter IV (Emoluments) of Civil Aviation Service Regulation-2014 (CSR-2014) and the decision of 179th meeting held on 1.8.2019 by Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (PCAA) Board Secretariat---Accordingly, while following the principle of law enunciated in I.A. Sherwani's case (ibid), and in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case while invoking the jurisdiction conferred upon this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, we hereby declare the impugned decision /action/order of the Respondent-CAA is in negation to the strict and prohibitory command contained in Article 25 of the Constitution, because the Petitioners have been treated with sheer discrimination, which cannot be approved on any premises whatsoever.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1087
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2285/2022 Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority through Director General, Karachi v. Syed Mansoob Ahmed Bukhari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2551) 1911/2010 Suit MUHAMMAD ZULFIQAR (Plaintiff) V/S PAKISTAN RAILWAY EMPLOYEES & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (Section 185)
Tag Line:In the circumstances, this being pure a question of law, where perusal of section 185 read with section 2(iv) of the Cantonment Act, 1924 leave no doubt in my mind that raising of boundary wall of less than eight 8 feet in height as long as it does not abutt a street, does not require approval by the defendant No.2. Resultantly Issue Nos.1 and 2 are answered in affirmative.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1114
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
2552) 1292/2015 Const. P. Ghazna Rafiq & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 YLR 1864
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 12-JUN-15
Approved for Reporting
2553) 4/2021 Criminal Appeal Nakeef Nindwani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1139
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.514/2023 Rahamtullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2554) 67/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Haris Trading Co. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 343
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2555) 693/2010 Const. P. Mohammad Shahban Mugheri (Petitioner) V/S 4th Additional District Judge Shikarpur & orsV/S 4th Additional District Judge Shikarpur & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 10-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
2556) 1288/2022 Const. P. Abdul Shakoor Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 462
Advocates:Munawar Alam Khan(ADVO-26041-SBC-KHS),Sajjad Ahmed(ADVO-16879-SBC-KHS),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
2557) 717/2010 Suit AGAH ASAD ABBAS (Plaintiff) V/S MST.NASEEM IRFAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Limitation for an application for restoration of a suit dismissed for non-prosecution, is governed by Article 163 of the Limitation Act, not by Article 181.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 829
Advocates:Muhammad Aqil(ADVO-3154-SBC-KHE),Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
2558) 314/2020 Const. P. Muhamamd Hanif Gohar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2127
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
2559) 787/2024 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Anwar (Applicant) V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 12
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2560) 649/2013 Const. P. Mst. Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Service matters (Contempt )
Tag Line:Petitioner being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the non -action by the alleged Contemnors, filed an Application (CMA 14152/2015)under Article 204 of the Constitution, praying therein to initiate the Contempt Proceedings against the alleged Contemnors. The alleged Contemnors have filed statements showing compliance of the order dated 10.9.2015, passed by this Court with the assertion that they offered the post of Balder in BS-1 to the son of the Petitioner, Contempt Proceedings is always between the Court and the alleged Contemnor, thus its scope cannot be enlarged. the post of Field Assistant under Rule-10-A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant , for the simple reason that the aforesaid post can only be filled as per recruitment Rules. The explanation offered by the Respondents vide (CMA 14152/2015),prima facie, is tenable under the law as the Petitioners son was offered the post of Beldar in BS-1 by the Respondents in compliance of order dated 10.9.2015 passed by this Court; but the same was refused by the Petitioners son. we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged Contemnors that substantial compliance of the order dated10.9.2015 passed by this
Court has been made in its letter and spirit, therefore at this juncture, no case for initiating Contempt Proceedings is made out against the alleged Contemnors. Thus, we are not minded to proceed with any further on the listed application searing , having no merits, are accordingly dismissed.
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1408
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
2561) 1497/2023 Const. P. M/S pakistan Chemical & Energy Sector Skills (Petitioner) V/S Rabnawaz & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 16, 2025 PLC Lab. 14
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2562) 2652/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD JAVED MEMON (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 902
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Zahid Farooq(ADVO-9494-SBC-KHI),Qadir Raza(ADVO-8786-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
2563) 39/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. MUHAMMAD MAQSOOD & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 919
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Barrister Muhammad Awais Shaikh(ADVO-18935-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
2564) 2782/2021 Const. P. Abdul Sajjad Khan and Others (Petitioner) V/S SBCA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the petitioners have assailed the suspension from service order, inquiry proceedings initiated by respondent No. 8, and subsequent issuance of show-cause notices to them by the Director-General (DG) SBCA without hearing them is illegal, unlawful, malafide, without jurisdiction and ultra-vires to the Articles 4,5,6,9,14,10-A of the Constitution and the provisions of Sindh Building Control Authority (Recruitment) Regulations 2017 read with Rule 5,6,7,8,9 and 12 of the Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 469
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Dhani Bakhsh(ADVO-14857-SBC-KHI),Shahzad Mahmood(ADVO-12500-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
2565) 4941/2020 Const. P. Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
PTCL-Voluntarily Separation Scheme (VSS)--we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in October 2020 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in June 2008, i.e. approximately 12 years before filing of the instant petition--Dismissed in limine.
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Petition hit by laches )
Tag Line:we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in November 2011 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to her in June 2008 when her late husband availed the benefits of VSS, i.e. approximately 04 years before the filing of the instant petition.
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 481
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
2566) 811/2020 Const. P. Hanif Lalani (Petitioner) V/S The State Through DG NAB, Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2269
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
2567) 198/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Ramesh Lal (Applicant) V/S Gul Hassan Through Legal heir (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 272
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
2568) 4667/2023 Const. P. Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Primarily, the police force is a disciplined force; it shoulders the great responsibility of maintaining law and order and public order in the society; that people repose great faith and confidence in it; that it must be worthy of that confidence; that in recent times, the image of the police force is tarnished and instances of police personnel behaving in a wayward manner by misusing power are in Public domain and are a matter of concern. This factual position is also a cause of great concern these days in our Country as well. On numerous occasions, we come across the involvement of Police personnel in routine as well as heinous crimes, and even if they are apprehended, are let off by the Courts due to faulty and supportive investigation by their brethren by extending the benefit of the doubt. Taking guidance from these observations, it is observed that this must stop and Courts are also required to play their part and let this issue be decided by the Executive / Appointing Authority which in all fairness is in a much better position to ascertain facts and the relevant ground realities.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1064
Advocates:Zaheer Ahmed Ujjan(ADVO-13500-SBC-KHS),Vishal(ADVO-409-SBC-KSH),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.200-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others v. Atta Muhammad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
2569) 361/2018 Criminal Appeal FARAZ AHMED BALOCH & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal (Appeal)
Tag Line: Appellants Challenged the Conviction and sentenced for the offence under sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 109 PPC, whereby both the appellants were convicted u/s.409 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for seven (07) years each and fine of Rs.15 lacs. complainant Nadeem Hamid, Branch Manager Askari Bank made a complaint alleging therein that , an entry of Rs.1.500 million was posted in transfer mode by debiting head office account. The transaction was posted with advice On scrutiny, the voucher has not been found in the branch record and was missing. On 29.06.2011 cash amounting of Rs.1.480 million was withdrawn through cheque from account of Gul Wali and Ahmed Khan, the said cheque was posted by Shafiq Abro through his ID and was supervised with the ID of Nasir Mehmood, e. The said cheque was bearing forged signature of the customer. The customer Gul Wali Khan and Ahmed Khan also denied withdrawal of amount through cheque and informed that cheque had been misplaced . The transactions of every cheque are reconciled on every 15 days and the said entry of Rs.14,80,000/- was not reconciled/made and verified through the Page 9 of 13 record. The inquiry was continued for about six (6) months but the said inquiry proved about it through Head Office referred the matter to FIA. The handwriting of whole staff was obtained by the Head office and sent to the Handwriting Expert and the office received a report from the Handwriting Expert whereby the Handwriting of the accused Faraz being matched with the handwriting mentioned on the disputed cheque. Pervez Ahmed, SI FIA ,it is correct to say that incident took place due to sharing of password and ID. It is correct to say according to the regulation, SBP Bank officials are not expected to share their IDs and Passwords. He further admitted that PW Sohail Noor in his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. shown doubt that Raheel Rauf CD Incharge might have used his ID. The overall discussions involved a conclusion that the prosecution has failed to bring the guilt against the appellants beyond any reasonable doubt. The convictions and sentences awarded to the present appellants are set-aside and they
are acquitted of the charge .
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2570) 264/2021 H.C.A Mahle Engine Components Japan Co. (Appellant) V/S Azam Autos & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Intellectual Propoerty Organization of Pakistan Act 2012 (Rejection of Plaint or transfer to IP tribunal or Continuing hearing by High Court)
Tag Line:What are the criteria for Suits and/or J. Misc. Applications instituted under the Trade Marks Ordinance in the first instance Jurisdiction of the High Court to be either transferred and/or the plaint returned or rejected following the coming into force of the IPOP 2012 - key date 29.12.2015
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 479
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.458-K/2025 Azam Autos & another v. MAHLE Engine Components Japan Corporation Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (-) Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
2571) 591/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMAMD JAVED S/O IMAMUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Parameters for pre-arrest bail.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 22
Advocates:Amna Salman Ahmed(ADVO-15517-PBC-LHR),Syed Shahid Ali Rizvi(ADVO-20700-SBC-KHE),Nazir Ahmed(ADVO-7463-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.474/2024 Muhammad Javed v. The State PG Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2572) 4789/2023 Const. P. Saqib bin Rauf (Petitioner) V/S SBCA & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Jurisdiction of SBCA to institute criminal proceedings under Section 19 of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 616
Advocates:Salman Hamid(ADVO-3747-SBC-KHS),Syed Asamul Haq(ADVO-5612-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
2573) 325/2016 H.C.A Pakistan Defence Officers (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Akram Qureshi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 728
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1358/2024 Muhammad Akram Qureshi (decd.) thr. L.Rs & another v. Pakistan Defence Officer's Housing Authority, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2574) 318/2023 Suit MUHAMMAD AYUB TAREEN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S JS BANK LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O. XXXIX, Rule 1 & 2 Dismissed.), Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962 (Section 23)
Tag Line:-A subsidiary as defined in Section 2(68) of the Companies Act,
2017, which can only exist in relation to a holding company in which the
holding company either (i) controls the composition of the Board of the
subsidiary or (ii) exercises or controls more than one half of its voting
securities. Viewed in this context and in particular read with Section 23
of BCO, it is clear that the word ???form??? used in this section clearly
envisages the forming of a subsidiary by acquisition either by control of
composition of its Board or control of more than half of its shareholding
by way of acquisition under the Regulations, 2017. This is further
strengthened by the fact that Section 23(1) uses the term ???formed??? in
past tense in respect of the subsidiary being taken over by Banking
Company. So it envisages a subsidiary which is being formed or was
already formed.
--The objective behind and mischief
sought to be avoided by Section 23(1) is to bar more than one
commercial banking license within a group save where a subsidiary is
engaged in Islamic banking. Whether the subsidiary is a newly formed
company or formed by way of acquisition of its majority shareholding, is
immaterial to that objective.
Citation:2024 CLD 290
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
2575) 1913/2019 Const. P. Sindh High Court Employees C.Operative (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1403
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2576) 276/2017 Civil Revision Shah Nawaz (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Azam & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 312
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.6-K/2021 Muhammad Azam & others v. Dr.Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2577) 595/2010 Const. P. Muneer Ahmed Baluch and others (Petitioner) V/S Khuda Bux Lashari and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Rent Applications Section 15(2) of SRPO, 1979 before the Rent Controller, are allowed.)
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 419
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 15-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
2578) 2436/2010 Const. P. Kali Khan (Appellant) V/S Bodlo & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 29-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
2579) 316/2019 Cr.Bail Ghulam Mujtaba son of Imam Din by caste Lakho (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
2580) 1682/2014 Suit Pakistan Petroleum Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Ouster clause in Section 227(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Suit against show cause notice Plaint rejected.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 207
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2581) 4422/2017 Const. P. Syed Irtaza Raza Naqvi (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.68-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.2976/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Petroleum & Natural Resources Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2582) 928/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC Appraisement East (Applicant) V/S M/s Hi Tech Impex & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1409
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2583) 86/2021 Cr.J.A Farooq Ahmed Korai (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 360
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
2584) 390/2014 Cr.Misc. SHEIKH MUHAMMAD SABIR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---
----Ss. 497(5) & 561-A---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 489-F & 420---Bail, cancellation of---Condonation as to appearance of accused during pendency of application for cancellation of bail---Inherent powers of High Court---Scope---Pre-arrest bail granted to accused was conditionally confirmed by Court of Session on basis of compromise between the parties, subject to payment of the amount mentioned in the dishonoured cheque in monthly instalments---Accused failed to make payments, on which the complainant filed application for cancellation of bail---Accused, instead of appearing before the court, filed application for condonation of his appearance for an indefinite period on medical grounds, which was dismissed by the court---In the garb of impugned order the accused had challenged the maintainability of the cancellation application---Question of jurisdiction had to be first raised before the Court, which had granted the bail---Grounds which had not been taken by the accused before the trial court, could not be examined by the High Court in exercise of inherent powers under S. 561-A, Cr.P.C. to interfere with the proceedings of the court below, as the same would amount to usurpation of power of the lower court---Accused, in such circumstances, before violating the bail order, should have filed application before the same court for modification of said order or breach of any undertaking by the complainant---Accused was guilty of violating the undertaking given by him before the court below for obtaining order of confirmation of bail---Accused was, thus, playing with the courts by unilaterally claiming that the complainant had not withdrawn the case--- Accused without exhausting said remedy had directly invoked the inherent jurisdiction of High Court, to obtain relief which had not been prayed before the Court of first instance---Accused had avoided to explain his position before the court below by abusing the process of the High Court under the cover of present proceedings for about eleven months---High Court, holding that the accused was to be put on notice as to why bail before arrest granted by the court below should not be cancelled on ground of violating the terms thereof, directed the accused, pending cancellation application, to comply with initial order for payment of monthly instalments by depositing the arrears of instalments with the Nazir of the High Court---Application under S. 561-A, Cr.P.C. was disposed of accordingly.
Citation:2016 PCr.LJ 717
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
2585) 291/2016 Cr.Appeal Mangat Hussain Butt (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 06-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
2586) 244/2019 Const. P. Syed Zahid Hassan Rizvi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed.
Tag Line:DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed.
Citation:2023 PLC Lab. Note 66
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2587) 348/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Ali Gohar Kanasro & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 470
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2588) 145/2014 Cr.Rev JAVAID IQBAL @ KHALID MAHMOOD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & 06 OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 (Sections 3, 4, 7 & 8)
Tag Line:Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005)---
----Ss. 3, 4, 5, 7 & 8---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 10A---Illegal dispossession---"Offender" as defined in S.3, Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005---Scope--- Dismissal of complaint---Petitioner, who was tenant in shop in question, was forcibly and unlawfully dispossessed by the landlords on the pretext that petitioner had not paid utility bills of the shop in question---Respondents after dispossessing the petitioner, locked the shop---Trial Court dismissed the complaint filed by the petitioner against his illegal and unlawful dispossession, without even going for the trial simply on the ground that petitioner did not fall within the definition of offender as given in S.3 of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005---Trial Court while passing impugned order failed to assign any reason---If respondents were of the view that, the petitioner was guilty of non-payment of utility bills of the shop, they were not supposed to take law in their hands---Respondents could file case for ejectment of the petitioner/tenant in terms of S.15 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, but, instead they chose to apply force to dispossess the petitioner---Petitioner, was deprived of fundamental rights guaranteed to him under Arts.4 & 10-A of the Constitution---Order passed by Trial Court, was set aside and case was remitted, with directions that complaint filed by the petitioner, be disposed of after framing charge, and recording evidence of all the parties, mentioned in the Police report or any other witness, that parties could choose to bring in support of their case---Pending proceedings, possession of shop in question should be handed over to the petitioner, in circumstances.
Citation:2015 YLR 1609
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 29-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.36-K/2015 Muhammad Ismail Nizami and others v. Javed Iqbal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2589) 1469/2003 Const. P. Allied Bank of Pak: and others (Petitioner) V/S National Ind. Relation Commissio and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 246
Advocates:Muhammad Azam Khan Azmati(ADVO-3826-SBC-KHI),Javed Asghar(ADVO-4324-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2590) 277/2024 H.C.A Roque Martin D (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 (Section 19(1))
Tag Line:This appeal is filed under section 19(1) of Contempt of Court
Ordinance 2003 read with Section 15 of the Ordinance X of 1980 and
Section 3 of the Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, presumably on the
understanding that the impugned order was passed under special law,
hence invoked Section 19(1) of Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003. Mr.
Makhdoom???s question that the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003
cannot be invoked, is a premature question when the defence is yet to
be taken by the Appellants and considered by the learned Single Judge.
We are also not satisfied that the issuance of a show-cause notice under
the ibid law would cause prejudice to the rights likely to be determined
by the learned Single Judge. The alleged contemnors have been given
the opportunity to file their respective replies against the accusation
and allegations raised in the contempt application and jurisdiction could
never be an exclusion
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1837
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 23-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
2591) 4296/2024 Const. P. Nazeer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Exhumation of dead body under section 176(2) Cr.P.C
Tag Line:To apply for exhumation of the dead body under Section 176(2) of the Code a Magistrate's satisfaction that exhumation is necessary to determine the cause of death. This discretion should be exercised cautiously, even if the request comes from a stranger, as long as reasonable circumstances or suspicion exists. The purpose is to initiate criminal proceedings if necessary. Close relatives may be involved in homicides, so their objections alone should not be a barrier to disinterment if other circumstances warrant it. The case of Muhammad Ramzan and others v. The State and another (1987 SCMR 272) supports disinterment even after a year to determine the cause of death.
8. Primarily, the father has the right to know his loved one's true cause of death. As the Supreme Court upheld in Ameer Afzal Baig v. Ahsan Ullah Baig, disinterment orders based on suspicion are valid. Even after burial, the right to investigate the cause of death exists. The law allows such requests, even from strangers to ensure proper investigation and to satisfy concerns about potential foul play.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 897
Advocates:Abbadul Hussnain(ADVO-6779-SBC-KHI),Safir Uddin Khan Gandapur(ADVO-16031-SBC-KHS),Sana Kheshgi(ADVO-21300-SBC-KHS),Salah-ud-Din Khan Gandapur(ADVO-2969-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Bilal Rashid (ADVO-16235-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
2592) 74/2015 J.M Maula Bakhsh. (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Abrar Ahmed & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Tag Line:1. Substituted service by way of publication is only presumed to be personal service by virtue of Rule 20(2) of Order V CPC. Such presumption is rebuttable. Therefore, where service by publication is challenged, the first test is to see whether the conditions of Order V Rule 20 CPC had been met, viz., that the publication was resorted to after the Court was satisfied that the defendant was avoiding service, or there was some other reason to believe that summons could not be served in the ordinary manner; in other words, whether the ordinary modes of service available had been exhausted. Rel: Muhammad Anwar v. Abdul Haq (1985 SCMR 1228); Haji Akbar v. Gul Baran (1996 SCMR 1703); and Nargis Latif v. Feroz Afaq Ahmed Khan (2001 SCMR 99).
2. While a couriers receipt was filed to show that summons had been dispatched, there was no report of delivery by the courier to show that summons so dispatched were delivered or tendered within the meaning of Order V Rule 10 CPC. So far there is no statute that attaches a presumption of service to summons sent by a private courier service (as opposed to a public courier service). Rel: Inayatullah v. Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah (2014 SCMR 1477). Thus, it can be safely said that prior to publication neither the available modes of service were exhausted nor was there a verification that the modes of service so used had failed. In any case, the publication made was at best publication of the notice of the pending CMAs and there was no publication made of the summons of the suit.
3. Had it not been a case attracting section 12(2) CPC, the exparte judgment and decree could nonetheless be set-aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1190
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2593) 2515/2024 Cr.Bail ARSALAN KHAN S/O GHOUS KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 461
Advocates:Syed Waseem Raza(ADVO-16754-SBC-KHW),Rashid Hussain(ADVO-21192-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2594) 131/2000 H.C.A Civil Aviation Authority & others (Appellant) V/S Providence Aviation Services (Pvt.) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 26-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting
2595) 1017/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Rashid and 93 others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Petitioners have impugned the Notification whereby they have been relieved / repatriated to their parent department that is Karachi Development Authority. The reason assigned by the competent authority in the said impugned Notification is that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan passed directives vide order dated 01.08.2016 on CMA No. 243/2016 in C.P No.108-K of 2014 to repatriate the officers/officials absorbed in Malir Development Authority to their parent department .In our view, once the Honble Supreme Court has passed order the terms that any official working on deputation or otherwise absorbed in the MDA shall immediately report back to his parent department this Court has no justification to take contrary view of the same. We are of the view that the only remedy available to the Petitioners is to approach the Honble Apex Court in Review and not this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Consequently ,both the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.402-K/2017 Shahid Ali Khan v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.560-K/2017 Muhammad Zahid Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
2596) 58/2017 Civil Revision Attique Rehman Soomro (Applicant) V/S Khadim Hussain Soomro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2597) 813/2014 Cr.Bail Mitho and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 04-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
2598) 50/2025 R.A (Civil Revision) Ali Sher Oghai & others (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Rejection of plaint. Adjudication of fishing rights of fishermen in public waters.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1290
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
2599) 1139/2014 Cr.Bail Akhtar Ali Khaskheli & Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 21-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
2600) 33/2014 Judicial Companies Misc. M/s. Symmetry Digital (Pvt.) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLD 1493, 2019 SBLR Sindh 504
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 14-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
2601) 6238/2015 Const. P. Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In line with the opinion of the Advocate General Sindh, as detailed in the preceding paragraph, the petitioner's resignation from the Board, submitted as a consequence of his absorption, is considered invalid. In a landmark judgment as discussed supra, the Supreme Court of Pakistan declared all absorptions in different cadres as illegal, ordering employees to revert to their parent departments, while ensuring their seniority is retained.
12. This petition is hereby disposed of with the direction that the respondent, BISE Sukkur, must fully implement the Supreme Court's judgments (2013 SCMR 1752 and 2015 SCMR 456) by ordering the petitioner's return to his parent department while protecting his seniority, if he has not superannuated yet. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within three months.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 307
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
2602) 1998/2021 Cr.Bail SYED MUHAMMAD ABBASS S/O SYED SHAMSUL HASSAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 40
Advocates:Khawaja Naveed Ahmed(ADVO-2102-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Muhammad Faisal Khan(ADVO-14117-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
2603) 438/2016 Const. P. Imran Badar (Petitioner) V/S PO Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 21-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.142-K/2016 Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others v. Imran Badar,C.P.582-K/2016 Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others v. Imran Badar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
2604) 14/2015 I. A Nazli Hilal Rizvi (Appellant) V/S Bank Al-Falah Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLD 808
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.381-K/2019 Nazli Hilal Rizvi v. Bank Al-Falah Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2605) 91/2021 I. A Mansoor Ahmed Mughal (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Naureen Mughal & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 779
Advocates:Khawaja Naveed Ahmed(ADVO-2102-SBC-KHI),Shahzeb Akhtar Khan(ADVO-13473-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 02-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3413/2023 Manzoor Ahmed Mughal v. Naureen Mughal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2606) 75/2017 Suit M/s. Rashid Silk Mills. (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern Gas Co., Limited. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 617
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2607) 5043/2017 Const. P. Allah Bux Soomro (Petitioner) V/S NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1046
Advocates:Syed Amir Shah(ADVO-12175-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Yaqoob.(ADVO-8956-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1229/2023 General Manager, MCB Bank Ltd Sukkur v. Allah Bux Soomro dec. thr. LRs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2608) 591/2018 Const. P. Okash Khalid Memon & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (???DRTA???) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (Appointment by transfer)
Tag Line:Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (DRTA) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1201
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.433-K/2020 Okash Khalid Memon v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2609) 69/2011 Civil Revision Muhammad Sharif, thr:L.Rs: (Applicant) V/S Abdul Razak, thr:L.Rs.and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:The applicant claimed to be in possession of the subject property, however, he was unable to demonstrate as to how he came in possession. The agreement is absolutely silent as far as delivery of possession is concerned. His brother was a lessee of the land in question, however, the lease expired in the year 1997 and the possession of his brother is neither in pursuance of the sale agreement nor could he be deemed to be in possession as a lessee after the sad demise of his brother. His only defence was that he was given possession of the suit land in part performance of the agreement which has not come out of the evidence and the agreement. His own witnesses denied his version as there was no decision being taken as far as possession is concerned at the time of alleged agreement. In fact, the record and proceedings were called and original agreement was perused. It reflects a contrary view about possession which is to be delivered at the time of the registration of sale deed, hence, the evidence of the applicants is not confidence inspiring.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.175-K/2019 Muhammafd Sharif thr. his L.Rs & others v. Abdul Razak thr. his L.Rs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2610) 315/2000 Suit S.M.INAMUL HAQ. (Plaintiff) V/S MIRZA AMJAD BAIG & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 28-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
2611) 552/2011 Cr.Bail Abdul Rasool Khoso & ors (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters, Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Bail Dismissed)
Tag Line: In the entire application it has not been convincingly stated as to what malafide was involved in nominating the applicants after 04 months and 12 days. Statement of the applicants that since they have been involved after 04 months and 12 days is sufficient to establish the malafides, I am afraid, is not convincing statement. The complainant and the eyewitnesses have categorically nominated the applicants in their statements and as observed by the Honourable Supreme Court that no court would have any power to grant pre-arrest bail unless all the conditions specified for allowing bail before arrest specially the condition regarding malafides were proved. Perusal of the record shows that no such ground was available or were made out as far as bail application is concerned. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances and in view of medical post-mortem report and the statements of the eyewitnesses I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail in favour of the applicants and being so the instant application stands dismissed and the interim pre-arrest bail already allowed to them is hereby recalled. Accordingly, bail application is dismissed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
2612) 204/2017 Cr.Misc. DR. EHSAN BARI S/O SHEIKH MUHAMMAD DIN & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S WASEEM MAQSOOD & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
2613) 58/2015 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Muhammad Jawad and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 04-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
2614) 4989/2021 Const. P. Syed Imdad Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (disciplinary proceedings)
Tag Line:Needless to mention that mere allegation that respondent No.2 is biased is not sufficient to avoid least delay of conclusion of the inquiry. Needless to add that inquiry officer is bound to conduct to impartial inquiry and submit report to the competent authority; hence at this premature stage we are not inclined to interfere with the inquiry proceedings merely on uttering of word biasness when there has been placed nothing on record to substantiate such allegation. Accordingly, petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications. However, with directions to respondent No.2 that he shall conduct inquiry by providing all rights of hearing and
complete the same preferably within one monthbeing SSP, is enjoying his position as SSP Sujawal and inquiry is pending since 2018, yet same has not been completed which is shocking, particularly when it relates to irregular appointment under directives of Honourable Apex Court. The competent officer(s), surprisingly, yet failed to conduct inquiry within stipulated period---Without prejudice to this denovo inquiry has been notified, hence, petitioner cannot chose a particular officer and manner of inquiry other than provided under the law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1022
Advocates:Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
2615) 475/2020 Cr.Bail MUJAHID KHAN S/O AMEER KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh 1281, 2021 MLD 1683
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
2616) 1663/2009 Suit Clariant Pakistan Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Deputy Commssioner Inland Revenue Service (AEC) and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 19-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
2617) 797/2025 Const. P. Syed Amjad Shah and another (Petitioner) V/S The State and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1648
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
2618) 58/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s.Real Trading Co. (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 08-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
2619) 1723/2024 Const. P. Sirbuland Khan (Petitioner) V/S R.O PS-112 & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Elections Act, 2017 (Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:*There is no cavil that the point of jurisdiction of this Court is to
be addressed first and at no point in time the merits of case should be
discussed however the arguments of the petitioner???s counsel are of such
nature which compelled us to go into brief history of the case, which
should, in any case, may not be counted as exercise of jurisdiction under
Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.
**Now since our jurisdiction is contoured in terms of vely couched
Article 225, having essence of mandatory application, read with
numerous judgments of Supreme Court providing a limited scope to
thrive, we could also draw an inference that both acceptance and denial
to a recount of votes on any ground could fetch and attract the
jurisdiction of the Tribunal followed by orders of Returning Officer/
Commission
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 388
Advocates:Mian Raza Rabbani(ADVO-3376-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 12-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4736/2024 Sirbuland Khan v. The Returning Officer, Provincial Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. Be fixed a/w CPLA.5327/24
2620) 6121/2021 Const. P. Waheed Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 914
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Mujtaba(ADVO-20757-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ali Ashfaq(ADVO-46574-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3165/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned afte a fortnight
2621) 3375/2023 Const. P. Saeed Rabi Arain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Right of a person having acquired title to a unit in a building without an approved plan to be made a party in a proceeding.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1027
Advocates:Faheem Shah(ADVO-14407-SBC-KHE),In Person(INP),Amna Usman(ADVO-17283-SBC-KHC),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
2622) 8590/2017 Const. P. M/s Akhtar Hussain & Co. and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
2623) 949/2012 Const. P. Zainal Abden Sarki (Petitioner) V/S SHO PS Civil Line Jacobabad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Pakistan Penal Code, Pakistan Penal Code (registration of second FIR would only complicate the issue rather than resolving the same. CP dismissed.)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
2624) 132/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Pervaiz Ahmed Soomro (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Umar @ Amir Ali Soomro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1605
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
2625) 1693/2022 Const. P. Amanullah Lakheer (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 169
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
2626) 366/2023 Const. P. Samiullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Be that as it may, it is admitted position that the petitioner is not enrolled as an advocate under the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1973, and/ or a practicing lawyer and has no standing at the bar at all.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 459
Advocates:In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
2627) 2662/2023 Cr.Bail SUMAIRA BIBI W/O MUHAMMAD IMRAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1269
Advocates:Javaid Ahmed Chhatari(ADVO-4333-SBC-KHI),Muahmamd Javed(ADVO-8539-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Saima(ADVO-16387-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
2628) 2067/2022 Const. P. Mahfooz Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S OGRA & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1160
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
2629) 1376/2015 Cr.Bail SYED IMRAN ALI @ IMRANI S/O SYED SATTAR ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 17-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting
2630) 462/2013 Suit Sajid Ali Qureshi (Plaintiff) V/S V/S Saleem Dawood. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 705
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
2631) 1721/2022 Suit Shehzad Arshad (Plaintiff) V/S Pervez Arshad & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 227
Advocates:Waqar Ahmed(ADVO-15702-SBC-KHS),Abdallah Azzaam Naqvi(ADVO-15005-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Hanif Faisal Alam(ADVO-17587-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
2632) 237/2010 H.C.A Karachi Fish Harbour Authority (Appellant) V/S Hussain Private Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 CLC 1519
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 11-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.294/2014 Manager Director, Karachi Fish Harbour Authority, Fish Harbour Wharf Karachi v. M/s Hussain (Pvt) Ltd Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2633) 1290/2010 Suit SYED HABIB HAIDER ZAIDI (Plaintiff) V/S SYED HUSSAIN KHURSHEED BILGRAMI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Proof of possession of gifted property. Elements of Benami.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 690
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
2634) 1489/2024 Const. P. Ms. Aisha Qazi (Petitioner) V/S Irshad Ali Shah (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 660
Advocates:Zakir Laghari(ADVO-12695-SBC-KHI),Saadat Yar Khan(ADVO-8217-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2635) 4153/2023 Const. P. M/s Pakistan Beverages Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Afzal and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Section 12 of the Ordinance 1968 provides that no temporary workmen whether monthly rated, weekly rated daily rated or piece rated and no probational or badali shall be entitled to any notice if his services were terminated by the employer, nor shall any such workman be required to give any notice or pay wages in lieu thereof to the employer if he leaves the employment of his own accord. However, the situation is quite different than the permanent workman under Section 12(3) of the Ordinance 1968.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 806
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Fazal Mannan(ADVO-7300-SBC-KHW),Shuja Uddin(ADVO-11034-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shakeel(ADVO-19385-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.461-K/2024 Muhammad Afzal and others v. M/s Pakistan Beverages Limited through its Executive Director and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned
2636) 114/2012 Civil Revision Mst.Sher Bano (Applicant) V/S Nazir Ahmed & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
2637) 211/2018 H.C.A Pakistan State Oil Company Limited (Appellant) V/S M/s. Gillani (Pvt) Ltd & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 251
Advocates:Abdur Razzaq(ADVO-11476-SBC-KHI),QAMAR ABBAS & CO.(FIRM-124-SBC-KHI),Faheem Shah(ADVO-14407-SBC-KHE),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2638) 223/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Imran Ansari (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ali & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 3284
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
2639) 18/2011 Civil Revision Mehboob (Applicant) V/S Nadir Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Revision Application and pending stay application were dismissed with no order as to costs.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 16-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2640) 154/2010 Const. P. Sanaullah Rajar (Petitioner) V/S Govt.of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
2641) 160/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Tahir (Petitioner) V/S Gulab & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 701
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
2642) 50/2012 I. A Mst. Noor Khatoon & Ors (Appellant) V/S M/S Habib Bank ltd &anothe (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 CLC 702, 2013 CLD 463
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 21-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
2643) 20/2013 Adm. Suit MUHAMMAD YAQOOB S/O MUHAMMAD TAHIR (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. A.P MOLLER MAERK A.S. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In light of the above it is held that the Plaintiff has not been able to establish his claim under tort. For the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order as to cost.
Office to prepare decree in the above terms.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 632
Advocates:M/S. LARI & CO.(FIRM-272-SBC-KHI),Aga Faquir Mohammad(ADVO-2855-SBC-KHI),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2644) 2813/2022 Const. P. Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 168
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
2645) 891/2021 Suit MST. FEHMIDA BEGUM (Plaintiff) V/S MATI-UR-RAHMAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 32 and 33)
Tag Line:Stranger to an arbitration award cannot file objections.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 684
Advocates:Umar Farooq Khan(ADVO-1914-SBC-KHI),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
2646) 4226/2018 Const. P. Mir Punhal Khan Talpur (Petitioner) V/S Manzaoor Hussain Wasan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 49
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1851/2020 Mir Punhal Khan Talpur v. Manzoor Hussain Wassan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2647) 1608/2020 Suit Seamax Marine Services (Plaintiff) V/S The Ministry of Maritime Affairs & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Rule 48 of Public Procurement Rules, 2004.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1290
Advocates:Munawar Ali Issani(ADVO-2125-SBC-KHI),M. Omair Nisar Khan(ADVO-10502-SBC-KHI),M/S. BADAR ALAM & COMPANY(FIRM-261-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
2648) 446/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Ayoub Afridi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.221-K/2019 Muhammad Ayoub Afridi v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: Water & Power and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2649) 45/1998 Suit MUHAMMAD AKRAM QURESHI & ORS. V/S (Plaintiff) V/S l PAK DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Section 42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877)
Tag Line:Declaration of ownership, injunction and compensation
sanctity of Registered Documents
The Sindh Government Land Ordinance 2000, Order 1 Rule 9 of CPC and section 42 of Specific Relief Act 1877
Citation:2017 CLC 495, 2017 SBLR Sindh 725
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
2650) 6550/2020 Const. P. Abdul Raheem @ Manghar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Removal of encroachments from irrigation land.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1014
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2651) 862/2023 Const. P. Mst. Atiya Abdul Karim Thr. Abdul Karim (Petitioner) V/S The Learned VIth ADJ, Karachi East and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter
Tag Line:Petition against interlocutory order(s) of the family court: dismissed as not maintainable
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 893
Advocates:Mohammad Jibran Nasir(ADVO-13974-SBC-KHE),Barrister Rafique Ahmed(ADVO-20194-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 23-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
2652) 2695/2019 Const. P. Tarruf Ali (Petitioner) V/S I.G of Police Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Police Department--Petitioner has been reverted / demoted from the rank of Police Inspector to his substantive rank of Police Head Constable on account of earning out of turn promotion during his tenure of service---In view of the foregoing discussion, this petition is allowed whereby the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue retirement order of the petitioner to the rank of Police Inspector and is entitled to be paid his full pensionary benefits as admissible to Police Inspector under the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this judgment. Pending application stands disposed of accordingly.
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Citation:2022 PLC CS Note 26
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.193-K/2020 Province of Sindh thr. I.G.Police and others v. Taaruf Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2653) 342/2024 I.T.R.A M/S AL MASOOM PRODUCTS (Applicant) V/S COMMISSIONER (APPEAL-VI) INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:Section 24A of General Clauses Act, 1897; Orders without assigning reasons; liable to be set aside;
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1458
Advocates:Syed Irshad ur Rehman(ADVO-8599-SBC-KHI),Zia Ahmed(ADVO-20491-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 10-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2654) 51/2003 Cr.Appeal Rehmatullah Narejo and others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 14-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
2655) 172/2020 Const. P. Malik Faraz Ahmed & others (Petitioner) V/S Agha Khursheed Ahmed & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1931
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3356/2020 Malik Faraz Ahmed and others v. Agha Khursheed Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2656) 3315/2020 Const. P. Mst. Zarina Anwar (Petitioner) V/S The Secretary M/o Education & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Secretary Education, Government of Sindh and Secretary Education Department Government of Punjab, jointly and severally, to pay all her perks and privileges to which she was entitled to by issuance of notification of her retirement, inclusive of her entire pensionary benefits within two (02) months and report compliance through MIT-II of this Court.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1207
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
2657) 1507/2019 Cr.Bail FAHEEMUDDIN S/O ALEEMUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In section 395 PPC, while the alternative to life imprisonment is rigorous punishment which shall not be less than four years nor more than ten years, that alternative punishment still provides for a maximum of 10 years, keeping the offence within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C. Thus, at the stage of bail when the Court looks at the alternate punishment provided under section 395 PPC, that is for the purposes of considering whether the case is one of further inquiry within the ambit of sub-section (2) of section 497 Cr.P.C., and it is not to say that the case does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
2658) 4010/2012 Const. P. Lt. Cdr. (R) Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) V/S Karachi Port Trust & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PLC 699
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 29-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting
2659) 5541/2016 Const. P. Tanveer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S PTCL & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.705-K/2018 Tanveer Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2660) 622/2022 Const. P. Saeed Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Chief Election Commission Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Election Matters
Tag Line:Declaration of assets in Local Government Elections
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 109
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 22-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
2661) 3682/2011 Const. P. Syed Sohail Hassan (Petitioner) V/S The State - NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 03-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.160-K/2013 Syed Sohail Hassan v. The State through Chairman NAB & another. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2662) 983/2017 Suit Mrs. Hina Mumtaz Somroo (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Sami Soomro (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
2663) 5612/2019 Const. P. Health (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.843/2020 Healthek (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary M/o Health Services, Regulation and Coordination, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2664) 2102/2017 Const. P. M/s Textilers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Meezan Bank Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
2665) 2692/2020 Const. P. Shahnawaz and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Seniority matter--SRP--Police Constables--Adverting to the point raised by learned counsel for the petitioners that they were appointed in SRP Karachi and posted in RRF Karachi since 2009, thus their seniority is liable to be maintained in Karachi range, suffice it to say that prima-facie, the RRF was / is not part of the Karachi range, but is a combination of different regions/units of the Sindh police, merely their appointment in SRP Karachi and posting in RRF Karachi does not support their case to the effect that they belonged to Karachi Range Police, for the reason that they never remained posted in the Karachi range police, therefore, their seniority cannot be ordered to be mixed with Karachi range police. The record further reflects that their recommendations for initial appointments by their regional head were made based on their respective place of domicile. Petitioners have failed to point out that their appointment was / is based on Karachi domicile, therefore they are precluded to claim vested right for seniority and promotion at Karachi Range on the aforesaid analogy--Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2205
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1438-K/2020 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others,C.A.57-K/2021 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, Adjourned
2666) 4348/2017 Const. P. Dr. Dileep Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S S.P.S.C and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 234
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.73-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others,C.P.L.A.426-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
2667) 1215/2020 Const. P. Bansi Lal Malhi & Another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Police Service of Pakistan (Composition Cadre and Seniority) Rules 1985 (Rule 10)
Tag Line:the common grievance of the Petitioners is against the issuance of notifications dated 09.12.2019 and 26.2.2021 by the respondent-Establishment Division, whereby the direction was given to the Police Service of Pakistan Officers (PSPO), who were not pleaded as parties to the Petition bearing No D-1555 of 2021, serving in the Province of Sindh to report to the Establishment Division, basically they were also posted outside the Sindh Province----We may hold that Section 10 of the Civil Servants Act 1973, and Rule 10 of the Police Service of Pakistan (Composition Cadre and Seniority) Rules 1985, provide transfer and posting of the civil servants/PSP officers to different Provinces and the competent authority can withdraw any such officer of Federal government before the expiry of their tenure limitation, additionally, Rotation Policy cannot restrict the process of the competent authority from withdrawing any civil servant/PSP officer from the Provincial governments at any time on administrative grounds/ valid reasons.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 431
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Choudhary Atif Rafiq(ADVO-11896-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1674-K/2021 Bansi Lal Malhi & another v. The Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2668) 47/2020 H.C.A Wahid Hussain (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1262
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Syed Zaeem Hyder Musavi(ADVO-15365-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Bilal Bhatti(ADVO-15212-PBC-LHR),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI),Farman Ullah(ADVO-11315-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2669) 2378/2017 Const. P. Shahzad Qamer Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 29-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
2670) 1121/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB & ANR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1185
Advocates:Noor Nabi(ADVO-4506-SBC-HYD),Sanaullah(ADVO-16730-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
2671) 3373/2016 Const. P. Abrar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:proforma promotion
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 148
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2672) 310/2019 Const. P. M/s Al Tariq Construction (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 PTD 1444
Advocates:Jawaid Farooqi(ADVO-3964-SBC-KHI),Shamshad Ahmed Narejo(ADVO-2185-SBC-HYD),Dr. Ahsan Laliwala(ADVO-15149-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2673) 5326/2016 Const. P. Nazeer Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
2674) 108/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Shoukat Ali Solangi & others (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:The jurisdiction of a Civil Court cannot be completely ousted against the officials on account of any colourful exercise of powers. The mandatory test is to be seen by consequential provisions. The jurisdiction to be exercised by these officials should strictly be within the four corners of the statue and not otherwise. In case it is so pleaded, it needs probe and unless such questions are dealt with accordingly after an enquiry and probe, plaint cannot be summarily rejected as has been done in this case. I am not commenting about the merit of the case which may go either way, but it is the manner in which a plaint was dealt with.
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 1212
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
2675) 706/2019 Const. P. Tahir Khan (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2676) 1047/2005 Const. P. Hakeemuddin and anor. (Petitioner) V/S D.G. of Customs Intelligence and ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
2677) 21/2002 Cr.Appeal Habeebullah Dharpali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 16-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
2678) 184/2023 Cr.Rev MST. IRAJ JAWAID W/O JAWAID (Applicant) V/S RAM LAL & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1451
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ayoub Chaniho(ADVO-15383-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2679) 233/2015 H.C.A Zahid Younus (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 05-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
2680) 3066/2024 Const. P. M/s Pak Terry Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 288
Advocates:Muhammad Kamran Iqbal Bhutta(ADVO-16183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 21-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
2681) 2358/2015 Const. P. ORI-TECH, OILS PRIVATE LIMITED (Petitioner) V/S The Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue, Regional Tax Office-I, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Emad-ul-Hasan(ADVO-5822-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 08-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.407-K/2017 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s ORI Tech Oil (Pvt) Ltd.,C.P.572-K/2015 Muhammad Mashooque v. Faiz Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2682) 1874/2019 Const. P. Dr. Arfana Mallah (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2339
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2683) 6572/2018 Const. P. Sumair Saeed (Petitioner) V/S The Sect: Aviation & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
whether the transfer and posting of private Respondents is the domain of the Competent Authority of CAA, if they found the private Respondents to be worthy of posting at the particular post on acting/additional charge basis, in our view, this Court cannot interfere in the service affair of the Respondent-Authority until and unless it is shown that the said posting and transfer orders negate basic provision of law and Constitution, which is lacking in the present case
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
2684) 492/2018 Const. P. Dildar Ali Khoso (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2685) 68/2015 II.A. M/S K-Electric Supply Company and others (Appellant) V/S Fayyaz Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
2686) 1641/2022 Const. P. Mohsin Raza (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 340
Advocates:M/S. ISMAT LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-257-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
2687) 25/1998 Cr.Acq.A. Fateh Muhammad Kobhar (Appellant) V/S Sabzal and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 09-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
2688) 1351/2012 Const. P. Daleel Khan & others (Petitioner) V/S Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Service matters
Citation:2017 PLC CS Note 34
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 08-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
2689) 199/2010 Civil Revision Muhammad Soof and others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Yakoob and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Order of dismissal of Suit under Order XVII Rule 3 CPC is an appealable order and is not a dismissal for non-prosecution in terms of Order 9 CPC. No 2nd Suit can be filed in such a situation, and the only remedy is by way of appeal or review of dismissal of suit.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 543
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2690) 7383/2015 Const. P. Pakistan Medical Association (Centre) (Petitioner) V/S Chancellor Dow University of Health Sciences & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Additional Charge), Contempt Proceeding
Tag Line:Professor Dr. Masood Hameed Khan/Respondent No.3 filed listed application for initiation of
contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors on account of their willful, and deliberate act of disobeying order passed by this Court. The learned law officer after consultation with the official present in Court, Additional Secretary (HE),Governor House informed that the Summary on the issue of 8appointment of Vice Chancellor is in process before the Governor Sindh/Chancellor and an order will be passed on the said summary within a week. This undertaking has also been given by the above named official . we are of the view that the same is pending in Suit No.893/2017, as such we would refrain to pass any order in this regard, because the same may prejudice the case of either party in the said Suit. assignment of the Additional Charge of Vice Chancellor of DUHS to Professor Dr. Khawar Saeed Jamali is concerned the same has already been taken care of in order dated19.04.2017 passed in Suit No.893/2017 .In view of the above discussion, at this juncture, we are of the view that no contempt of this Court's order dated 26.04.2016 is made out. Therefore, the listed applications accordingly dismissed in the above terms.
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 71
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
2691) 190/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Yousaf and another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Re-investigation of Case (Supplementary Challan Submitted. Cognizance taken . Petition Dismissed as case already on trial .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon
Order Date: 18-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
2692) 2053/2024 Cr.Bail SAQLAIN ABBASS @ AYAN S/O NAWAB HUSSAIN SHAH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:This Court is not oblivious to the fact that unfortunately, one young lady has lost her life in the alleged accident of the present case, however, the fate of the bail application is also to be decided within the framework of Section 497 Cr.P.C. and under the guidelines on the subject laid down by the Supreme Court. Besides the above, the liability of the present applicant or charges leveled against him could only be determined by the trial Court after recording and evaluating the evidence. It is also a settled principle of law that at the bail stage deeper appreciation of the merit of the case cannot be undertaken and only a tentative assessment of the material available is to be made. The record shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict or hardened criminal. Moreover, he is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1013
Advocates:Hussain Bux(ADVO-13264-SBC-KHE),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-17921-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
2693) 52/2019 Cr.Acq.A. The State / A.N.F (Appellant) V/S Subhan Ali (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2372
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.45-K/2020 The State (ANF) v. Subhan Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2694) 31/2007 II.A. Bhoja Airlines (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) V/S P>I.A. Corporation (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
Tag Line:The case of respondent is based on a contract, breach of which is
claimed by the respondent and hence they preferred a claim for
recovery. Article 120 will only be made applicable when no Article
prescribes the limitation to file a suit for recovery as claimed by the
respondent. Perusal of Article 115 shows that it is for the
recovery/compensation for breach of any contract either express or
implied. Respondent has claimed nothing but a breach of contract in
respect of service which was allegedly rendered by it as it is claimed
that they have failed, refused and neglected to make payment which is
breach of a contract.
Advocates:Amir Malik(ADVO-2673-SBC-KHS),Sana Akram Minhas(ADVO-4195-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
2695) 7215/2017 Const. P. Engro Foods Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2071
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.38/2021 Engro Foods Limited, Karachi v. Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others,C.P.L.A.145-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Engro Foods Limited,C.A.4066/2022 Engro Foods Limited, Karachi v. Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
2696) 1713/2012 Suit Sharif Ahmed Qureshi (Plaintiff) V/S Wing Cdr.(R) Mazhar Mirza and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PROPERTY (Housing Scheme)
Tag Line:Housing Scheme_
If a Housing Scheme is announced by Defendant No.3, primarily, for Military Personnel, then either there should be a complete embargo on transferring of land to the civilians, or, if the same embargo is not in place and civilians / citizens can purchase in a housing scheme launched by Defendant No.3, then the policy and formalities of Defendant No.3 should be equitable and fair and no one should be discriminated against. It is understandable that there are security issues, for which NOC and other formalities are to be completed, but the security concern cannot be allowed to be misused, or, under the garb of security issue, rights of citizens cannot be compromised. Proprietary rights are guaranteed under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973; inter alia, in terms of Article 24.
Pleadings_
Admission made in Written Statement (on oath) does not need further proof.
Executive Action_
Executive actions based on the premise of national security are justiciable on the basis of Rationale Basis Test.
Sale NOC_
Non issuance of sale NOC by the Army Housing Directorate, violates Section 24A of the General Clauses Act, 1897. Thus, requirement of NOC cannot be given that degree of importance or significance, that it can be allowed to impinge upon a statutory and fundamental right of ownership of a citizen, who is a lawful and bona fide transferee of a property, situated in a Housing Scheme of Official Defendants.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2697) 1456/2017 Const. P. Syed Zia Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Mst.Mahiya and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Interim Custody 10 days allowed In Section 12 G&W by Civil Judge ,Maintained by ADJ and High Court . Petition dismissed .)
Citation:2018 CLC 50
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
2698) 1049/2010 Const. P. M/s Shell Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S NIRC and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 25-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
2699) 20/2013 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Muhammad Ayoub (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shaukat Ali Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 20-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.286/2015 Muhammad Ayoub v. The State,Crl.A.34/2020 Muhammad Ayoub v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
2700) 1784/2010 Suit SHARAFAT ALI (Plaintiff) V/S MST. SHAHJAHAN BEGUM & ANOTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: The Suit was liable to be dismissed in any event in view of the above-cited law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court due to the plaintiffs admitted failure in depositing the balance sale consideration in Court despite this Courts order. Thus, the order dated 21.05.2018 of the dismissal of the Suit on both the grounds was fully justified, and the same is not liable to be recalled.
Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 01.06.2021 whereby the listed application was dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1144
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
2701) 156/2024 Const. P. Islam Khalti & Others (Petitioner) V/S Manik Khan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Fraud and Misrepresentation
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 628
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
2702) 24/2016 Judicial Companies Misc. International Complex Project Ltd & another (Petitioner) V/S V/S (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLD 1468
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
2703) 1098/2023 Suit NEW METALLURGY HI-TECH GROUP CO. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S SIDDIQSONS TIN PLATE LIMITED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC)
Tag Line: The application for an ad-interim injunction filed by the plaintiff allowed as prayed.
The decision on the enforcement of the Award is adjourned sine die.
The adjournment is in place until the final hearing, following the decision of Case No. HC/OA 809/2022, which is pending before the High Court of Singapore.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 199
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umer Akram Chaudhry(ADVO-44417-PBC-LHR),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
2704) 5558/2016 Const. P. ARY Communications Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Council of Complaints Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 604
Advocates:Ali Shah Gillani(ADVO-39478-PBC-LHR),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Manzar Bashir(ADVO-13572-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1365/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad and others v. ARY Communication Limited, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2705) 1697/2009 Const. P. Mubarak Maseh (Petitioner) V/S V/S Muhammad Yaqoob & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 25-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.889-K/2018 Mubarak Masih v. Muhammad Yaqoob and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2706) 633/2009 Suit SYED QAMAR SULTAN (Plaintiff) V/S JAVED IQBAL GOHR & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Raja Hassan Nawaz(ADVO-10701-SBC-KHI),Hifzur Rahman(ADVO-4819-SBC-KHE),Mushtaq Ahmed(ADVO-4412-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Asghar(ADVO-8770-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
2707) 1357/2020 Suit ABDUL REHMAN (Plaintiff) V/S NOMAN ABID (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:The circular in this regard is for the litigants who have crossed
age of 65, widow who have not re-married and orphan whose both
parents have expired. The litigant, for the purpose of defining above
circular, does not include the attorney who is contesting on behalf of
person litigating under such status, on a private arrangement. The
attorney may have crossed the age of 65 but the litigant has not.
Citation:2023 CLC 1098
Advocates:Abdul Qadir Khan(ADVO-3399-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Saleem Ibrahim(ADVO-7445-SBC-KHI),Saleem ul Haq(ADVO-11690-SBC-KHI),Hafiz Danish Iqbal Memon(ADVO-17688-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
2708) 5/2019 Cr.Rev Chatto Khan Suhandro (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Nabi Suhandro and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 484
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.52-K/2020 Muhammad Panjal v. Munir Ahmed and others,Crl.P.L.A.653/2021 Chatto Khan v. Ghulam Nabi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Pending Adjourned
2709) 41/2025 Cr.Bail Ali Ahmed & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 212
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
2710) 43/2009 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Mohammad Saleem (Appellant) V/S the State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 19-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
2711) 993/2020 Const. P. Kamla (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1688
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3635/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Kamla & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2712) 886/2023 Const. P. Khair Nawaz Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Regularization of contractual employees requires a clear legal basis, a well-defined policy, and a fair assessment of the employee's performance and qualifications. Without these, employees cannot claim regularization of service. Reference in this regard may be made to the cases of Vice Chancellor Agriculture University, Peshawar v Muhammad Shafiq 2024 SCMR 527, Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Islamabad and another v. Fazal-e-Subhan and others (PLD 2024 SC 515); Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Forest, Peshawar and others v. Sher Aman and others (2022 SCMR 406); and Messrs. State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181).
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1337
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Sanaullah Noor Ghauri(ADVO-4123-SBC-KHI),Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2713) 2609/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Asim (Petitioner) V/S The Sindh Wildlife Dept: & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
2714) 2934/2023 Cr.Bail Arshad Ali S/o Moj Khan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 19
Advocates:Muhammad Ilyas Khan Tanoli(ADVO-3262-SBC-KHS),Syed Nadeem-ul Haq(ADVO-6993-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Hashim(ADVO-11604-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
2715) 176/2024 Const. P. Abdul Majeed Talani (Petitioner) V/S PO Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Right to seek bail in criminal proceedings before trial court suspended by orders in a writ petition
Citation:2025 PLD Sindh 19
Advocates:Muhammad Ibrahim Lashari(ADVO-584-SBC-JCB),Aitbar Ali Bullo(ADVO-14368-SBC-KHI),Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(ADVO-545-SBC-LRK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.913-K/2024 Abdul Majeed Talani v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2716) 8/2016 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Mithan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 776
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.161-K/2018 Ghulam Shabbir v. Porho @ Haji Khan Jiskani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2717) 921/2014 Suit Ansar Hussain Siddiqui & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Abrar Hussain Siddiqui & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Whether territorial jurisdiction of a court in a suit for administration would be determined on the basis of the location of the property or on the basis of the place where the deceased was domiciled at the time of his demise.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1293
Advocates:M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mumtaz(ADVO-4861-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Saleem Khan(ADVO-2583HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2718) 443/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Sami @ Shabrati S/o Allah Noor (Petitioner) V/S MCAC/ DJ Malir, Karachi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 803
Advocates:Ch: Muhammad Iqbal(ADVO-2247-SBC-KHS),Abdul Ghaffar Kalwar(ADVO-10009-SBC-KHS),Irshad Ahmed Shaikh(ADVO-9976-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
2719) 180/2019 Criminal Appeal ARSHAD HUSSAIN S/O SANARAS KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 336
Advocates:Umair Akram Khan Noon(ADVO-17396-SBC-KHC),Tarique Mehmood(ADVO-4864-SBC-KHI),Iftikhar Ahmed Shah(ADVO-17182-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
2720) 2/2017 Conf.Case REFERENCE MADE BY THE VTH ADDL.S.JUDGE KHI EAST (Appellant) V/S FARMAN ALI S/O SAIF-U-REHMAN & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2721) 10/2021 F.R.A Aamir Rafat Siddiqui Thr. Attorney Mrs. Sadia Aami (Appellant) V/S The VIIIth Senior Civil Judge, Khi South & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 77
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2722) 4397/2024 Const. P. Shamsher Khan & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2632
Advocates:Yawer Farooqui(ADVO-3590-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhabat Ali(ADVO-20630-SBC-KHS),Asad Ali(ADVO-15949-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 06-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
2723) 52/2015 Spl.Cr.Bail GUL WALI S/O KHAN WALI & 05 ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 05-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
2724) 91/2021 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. sindh revenue board (Applicant) V/S appellate tibunal of SRB and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Tag Line:Limitation as to deciding an Appeal by Commissioner is directory and not mandatory; Interpretation of Section 59 of the Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011;
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 300
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Shahida Nasreen(ADVO-8068-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Ch. Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-2175-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 23-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
2725) 1486/2014 Const. P. Messrs Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Petitioner) V/S Arif Aziz & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Citation:2017 PLC Lab. 122
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
2726) 1664/2023 Cr.Bail Syed Ovais Hussain & Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Pre arrest bail - dismissed in limine.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 83
Advocates:Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 31-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1008/2023 Syed Ovais Hussain v. The State through P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2727) 3236/2022 Const. P. Mehrun Nisa Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 633
Advocates:Imtiaz Ali Solangi(ADVO-15225-SBC-KHS),Mansoorul Haque Solangi(ADVO-6746-SBC-KHI),Tariq Hussain(ADVO-5937-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2728) 119/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Kar. (Applicant) V/S M/s. Chase Up, Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Time barred Order in Original. Collector cannot extend the time period under Section 179(3) of the Customs Act, 1969. In section 2(s) cases,
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1137
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
2729) 3000/2012 Const. P. Landi Renzo Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 PTD 658, 2013 MLD 601
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 12-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.83-K/2013 M/s Landi Renzo Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2730) 1696/2000 Suit BEECHAM PAKISTAN PVT. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:The imposition of impugned ten percent loading (charges) was in
effect a levy, which could not have been imposed or recovered except
through a valid legislation or other permissible statutory method. This
impugned loading of 10% was/is illegal per se and cannot be sustained.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1301
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
2731) 73/2019 Const. P. Anwar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Tariq Mehmood Khan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 CLC 145
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.37-K/2020 Anwar Ali v. Tariq Mehmood Khoso and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2732) 424/2018 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S Syed Javed Ahmed & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Baggage Rules, 2006 (Rule 17), Custom Act, 1969 (Section 89), Custom Act, 1969 (Section 139), Custom Act, 1969 (Section 156), Custom Act, 1969 (Section 8)
Tag Line:The Tribunal has also laid reliance on Rule 17 of the Baggage Rules, 2006
which provides that the goods brought in commercial quantity shall
be allowed release only on payment of duty and taxes at the statutory
rates and redemption fine equal to thirty per cent of the value of the
goods in terms of the Notification No.SRO 547(1)/2005 dated 06th
June, 2005 wherein fine was subsequently reduced by a following
SRO in 2009. Thus in view of the definition of Section 2(s) of the
Customs Act, 1969 the commercial quantity of silver jewelry does not
fall in any prohibition or restriction clause unless proved otherwise.
The SRO 499(1)/2009 also allow commercial quantity baggage to be
released on taxes or redemption fine.
In view of Section 139 of the Customs Act, 1969 we are of the
view that the passenger was at liberty to declare such contents of his
baggage orally which he did as disclosed in the impugned order and
such facts cannot be re-appreciated while hearing reference
Citation:2022 PTD 8
Advocates:Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2733) 633/2018 Const. P. Israr ul Haq (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Educational Foundation & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.533-K/2019 Israr-ul-Haq v. Ms Naheed Shah Durrani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2734) 133/2015 Const. P. Mrs. Seema Sheerazi (Petitioner) V/S NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 17-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting
2735) 210/2011 Spl.H.C.A Nadeem Athar and another (Appellant) V/S M/s. Dubai Islamic Bank (Pakistan) Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 27-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
2736) 8836/2018 Const. P. M/s Digicom Trading (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 946
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2737) 1142/2014 Cr.Bail Ghulam Mustafa Soomro (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Murder Bail (Ocular evidence is corroborated by medical evidence), Murder Bail (Dismissed)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 13-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
2738) 31/2017 M.A. Independent Media Corp. Pvt (Appellant) V/S PEMRA & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002
Citation:2018 CLC Note 82
Advocates:Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
2739) 25/2012 Execution Askari Bank Ltd. (Decree Holder) V/S A.H. International (Pvt) Ltd. & OTHERS (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:??? BLOCKING OF CNIC. ORDER BY COURT AGAINST DEFENDANT OR JUDGMENT DEBTOR. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CITIZENS. RIGHT TO LIFE. CIVIL RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS. NADRA.
??? Suspension or blocking of CNIC of a citizen carries severe implications. It virtually brings life of the affected citizen to a halt; his right of employment and access to bank accounts is affected; his right to engage in trade, business or profession is affected. His access to education, health, etc. is also denied. His family members are also affected. Ultimately, his Right to Life, as guaranteed under Article 9 of the Constitution, is virtually taken away, and the citizen is denied the exercise of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of Pakistan.
??? No provision exists in CPC. or the Financial Institutions Ordinance 2001 for blocking of CNIC of a Judgment Debtor.
??? Even a warrant of arrest under section 51 CPC. cannot be issued routinely, without fulfilling certain mandatory pre-requisites.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2590, 2026 SHC KHI 723
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
2740) 5104/2017 Const. P. Zeeshan Javed & 6 others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 MLD 368
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.698-K/2018 The Vice Chancellor NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Zeeshan Javed and others,C.A.6-K/2020 The Vice Chancellor NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Zeeshan Javed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2741) 143/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Arif Hussain S/o (Late) Ghulam Hussain (Applicant) V/S Mst. Rukhsana Bano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 335
Advocates:Muhammad Aamir Khosa(ADVO-15884-SBC-KHS),Ahrar Jawaid(ADVO-20791-SBC-KHE),Muneer Iqbal(ADVO-17705-SBC-KHE),Sikandar Khan(ADVO-3828-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2742) 3482/2012 Const. P. Sher Muhammad Zafar & Others (Petitioner) V/S PIAC & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 06-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
2743) 4146/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Rizwan Memon (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 718
Advocates:Jaffar Hussain(ADVO-8923-SBC-KHE),Deputy Attorney General(),Khalilullah Jakhro(ADVO-19697-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
2744) 253/2019 H.C.A K-Electric Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Syed Anwar Ali & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:KESC--Whether suit is maintainable by the retired employee of the KESC in the present form?
2. Whether through the KESC Officers Policy 2010, certain benefits to the Plaintiff under the previous policy, can be withdrawn by the Defendant ?
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 537
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.507/2021 K-Electric Ltd, Karachi v. Syed Anwar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2745) 25/2014 Civil Revision Muhammad Rafique & anor (Applicant) V/S Syed Warand Ali Shah & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:Mutation itself does not create a title and a person driving title thereunder had to prove that the same was lawfully entered and attested, thus, no presumption of correctness was attached to the mutation entries till they are proved satisfactorily and independently through cogent evidence. Any subsequent entry or title on the basis of such entry of 1971 thus would also fall along with original sin.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
2746) 2347/2021 Cr.Bail MST. ZULEEKHAN ABDULLAH & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:, through the captioned bail application, has called in question, the rejection of their post-arrest Bail Application by the learned 1st Additional District Judge/Model Criminal Trial Court Malir, Karachi, vide order dated 21.10.2021, with the observations that quantity of 1400 and 1300 grams of charas is above the borderline, as settled by the Honble Supreme Court.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 476
Advocates:Gul Hassan(ADVO-10552-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2747) 578/2014 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Qasim International Container Terminal (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 217
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
2748) 676/2024 Const. P. M/s Karachi Shipyard & Engineering (Petitioner) V/S SLAT & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In principle cases in Courts are decided on the preponderance of evidence led in the case by the parties, and to reach a just and proper conclusion, the oral as well as the documentary evidence needs to be taken into consideration. But at the same time, when the matter comes to this Court in Constitutional Jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, it is not the domain of this Court to re-weigh or interpret the evidence and /or material produced before the forums below as this Court is not Appellate Court and under the Constitutional jurisdiction, this Court has limited jurisdiction until and unless the findings are shown to be perverse with jurisdictional defect.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 787
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
2749) 2857/2013 Const. P. Farnaz Riaz (Petitioner) V/S Through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 11-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
2750) 127/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. REHMATULLAH S/O AJAB KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 747
Advocates:Habib Ur Rehman(ADVO-13625-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Sahib(ADVO-9797-SBC-KHW),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 14-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
2751) 13/2020 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. IMRAN HUSSAIN @ MAMA S/O NAZEER HUSSAIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1675
Advocates:Muhammad Imran Meo(ADVO-13761-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
2752) 4335/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) V/S Department of Plant Protection & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Pakistan Plant Quarantine Act, 1976 (Pakistan Quarantine Rules, 2019), Pakistan Plant Quarantine Act, 1976
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 793
Advocates:Muhammad Rashid(ADVO-8654-SBC-KHI),Farhat Hussain(ADVO-19009-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General(),Pervez Iqbal Kasi(ADVO-4320-BBC-OTH)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
2753) 85/2018 H.C.A SAGA Shipping & Trading Corporation Ltd. & others (Appellant) V/S WALIA Steel Industries PLC & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2407/2019 SAGA Shipping & Trading Corporation Ltd & others v. WALIA Steel Industries & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2754) 3585/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Rasheed & another (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 03-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
2755) 2217/2019 Const. P. Dilbar Khan Nizamani (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Chairman UC Nazim case
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2756) 60/2012 H.C.A Karachi Electric Supply Co (Appellant) V/S Karachi Water & Sewerage Board & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 14-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
2757) 6357/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Taqui Nayani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 491
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.906-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Mohammad Taqui Nayani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2758) 1373/2012 Suit Amir Karim (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Asif & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 26-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
2759) 599/2021 Const. P. Zahid Iqbal Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sadia Paras & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 670
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2760) 5876/2023 Const. P. Rameez Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Overlap between Regulation 25-2 and 25.9 of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations 2002 explained
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 168
Advocates:Muhammad Siddiq(ADVO-7192-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-18527-SBC-KHS),Mirza Shouja Baig(ADVO-19091-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
2761) 2920/2012 Const. P. Mrs. Fozia Sultana (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 19-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting
2762) 395/2006 Const. P. Israr Ul Haq & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Zohra Jabeen & Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Abdullah Chandio(ADVO-1763-SBC-KHI),Qaiser Hassan Khan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
2763) 2/2011 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. Sher Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 24-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.265/2015 Sher Khan v. The State,J.P.3/2015 Sher Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted
2764) 448/2017 H.C.A Ahsanuddin (Appellant) V/S Shahid Hussain Malik & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
2765) 560/2025 Const. P. Reva Chand & others (Petitioner) V/S Bheem Raj & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 2354
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
2766) 131/1993 Const. P. Muhammad Khan and others (Petitioner) V/S Commissioner Hyderabad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
2767) 6025/2024 Const. P. Dr. Pritam Das (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set by the government. In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of the parent department of the petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 372
Advocates:Jahangeer(ADVO-17692-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
2768) 3169/2019 Const. P. Fouzia Khan (Petitioner) V/S Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2769) 540/2005 Suit MANSOOR AHMED & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S MST. SAEEDA BEGUM & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:1965 PLD Sindh 3746, 1983 PLD SC 693, 1985 PLD Sindh 274, 2008 PLD SC 42, 1995 SCMR 1431, 2004 SCMR Sindh 834, 1990 CLC 1649, 2001 CLC 1686, 2007 CLC 1814, 2005 YLR 1905, 2007 YLR 2333, 2016 YLR 2528, 1999 MLD 3345
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
2770) 177/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Yousuf Memon (Applicant) V/S Syed Mujeeb Alam Shah (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1419
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
2771) 283/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHOSO S/O MUHAMMAD HASHIM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Re-investigation of Case (Report B Class Submitted .Cognizance taken .Petition dismissed For Re Investigation .)
Tag Line:Obviously, criminal cases are decided based on the material so collected by the prosecution during the investigation, and the evidence recorded in the trial Court, and that too, after appraisal of evidence by it under the law applicable thereto. This Court cannot assume the role of an investigation agency or of a trial Court to deliberate upon the factual controversies involved in the present case in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 561-A Cr.P.C. This view has been consistently enunciated by the Honorable Supreme Court that High Court ought to refrain from exercising inherent jurisdiction, during the investigation of a criminal case.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1206
Advocates:Raghib Ibrahim Junejo(ADVO-13637-SBC-MLR),Nazirullah Mehsood(ADVO-13809-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Rehman Ghous(ADVO-14269-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Zahooruddin(ADVO-8212-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2772) 2264/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD TARIQ S/O HABIBULLAH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:seeks bail after arrest in Crime No.646/2021, registered under Sections 420/468/471/470/489-F/34 PPC---Coming to the allegations of three cheques, which were later on dishonored, a question as to what constitutes an offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. primarily, every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation; and, lastly the cheque in question is dishonored on presentation. Prima-facie, in the present case allegations are almost same, therefore, tentative assessment of record explicitly shows that the complainant has been defrauded by the applicant for the reasons discussed supra.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 694
Advocates:Khalid Mumtaz(ADVO-4861-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Sadia Mumtaz(ADVO-12363-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2773) 1362/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Sultan (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Yousuf (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Zafaruddin(ADVO-3268-SBC-KHI),Syed Abdul Waheed(ADVO-3255-SBC-KHI),Saify Ali Khan(ADVO-6773-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 28-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
2774) 324/2025 Const. P. Sanam Soomro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Wedlock Policy - Spouses be stationed at the same place
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2083
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date: 19-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
2775) 46/1998 S.M.A Mst. Jamila Naheed...........(Petitioner (Petitioner) V/S Mrs. SaminaQasim (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
2776) 1346/2019 Suit Muhammad Yameen (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Shakeel & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 680
Advocates:Muhammad Shahid Habib(ADVO-10820-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2777) 26/2020 Civil Revision Muhammad Iyas & others (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1494
Advocates:Eijaz Ali Hakro Associates(Firm-390-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2778) 503/2024 Const. P. SIP (Retd) AIjaz Ali Kandhro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 433
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 03-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
2779) 1564/2021 Const. P. Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 204
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 15-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2780) 6581/2020 Const. P. Qamar ul Arafeen (Petitioner) V/S The Vice Chancellor Karachi University and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 443
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Shoaib Mohiuddin Ashraf(ADVO-4396-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2781) 412/2021 Const. P. United Carpets Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Audit notice under section 214D of the Income Tax Ordinance; petitions dismissed; held, validly issued as the petitioners had defaulted during the period of subsistence of the provision from 1.7.2015 to 30.6.2018
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 3
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Mushtaq(ADVO-11332-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Taseer Khan(ADVO-6931-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5392/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Shahnawaz Soomro,C.A.2851/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Shahnawaz Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
2782) 150/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S The Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench-III & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Customs:- Amnesty Scheme once granted; no further demand of 1% flood Relief Surcharge can be raised.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 23
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
2783) 1405/1998 Suit RAFAT MALIK JAMAL (Appellant) V/S MUNAWAR MALIK JAMAL & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----Ss. 114, 151, O. XLVII, R. 1 & O. XXVI----Review---Scope---Provisions of review of order under S. 114 or O. XLVII, R. 1, C.P.C. and provisions of S. 151, C.P.C., for correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes in the order, could be invoked simultaneously---Appointment of Commission by Court to examine witnesses---High Court accepted application of interveners; whereas, Division Bench of High Court modified the said order of acceptance, remanded the case to decide issue as to legal status of the interveners within six months, for which Commission had been appointed---Applicant filed application for review of said order of appointment of Commission---Validity---Applicant was not sure as to whether the order sought to be reviewed contained typographical errors, or the same was result of overlooking certain facts on record, nor had he showed as to what prejudice had been caused to him, for which review was necessitated---Failure of applicant to record evidence on pretext of pendency of review application was calculated move to delay decision on merit---Application was dismissed with cost in circumstances.
(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. XIV, R. 5----Settlement of issues---Power to amend, and strike out, issues---Scope and object---Issues can be resettled even after recording of evidence and just before final order, either suo moto by court in terms of O. XIV, R. 5, C.P.C. or on request of parties---Purpose of said provision is to ensure that recording of evidence of parties should not be postponed.
Citation:2016 MLD 931
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 23-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
2784) 508/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Shoaib Palijo & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Petition challenging vires of a law while seeking enforcement of fundamental rights can only be heard by a Constitutional Bench
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 665
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 22-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
2785) 2869/2014 Const. P. Munir ul Haque (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Mushtaque Hussain(ADVO-14825-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.56-K/2020 The Director General FIA and others v. Munir-ul-Haque and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2786) 145/2011 Cr.Rev Dr. Khalid Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Mst. Roshan Ara and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 04-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
2787) 1707/2019 Const. P. Rawal Khan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:7. To elaborate further on the subject point of law, Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, guarantees equal treatment to all persons similarly placed. In terms of Article 27 of the Constitution, no citizen in the service of Pakistan or other persons shall be discriminated against in any manner. Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is in the clear negation of law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in its various pronouncements.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 855
Advocates:Munwar Ali(ADVO-2050-SBC-KHP),S. Mahmood Alam Rizvi(ADVO-3351-SBC-KHI),Sabih Ahmed Zubairi (ADVO-15778-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Obaid -ur- Rehman Khan(ADVO-12008-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2788) 206/2013 Cr.Misc. ASAD ASGHAR S/O LATE GHULAM ASGHAR WAGAN (Applicant) V/S RIZWAN IKRAM KHANZADA & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 13-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
2789) 108/2011 H.C.A Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Pvt.,Ltd., (Appellant) V/S Jan Muhammad & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Tag Line:Appeal allowed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1694
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
2790) 543/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director, D.G of post Clearance Audit Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s Bin Saeed Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 756
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2791) 254/2024 Const. P. Zeeshan Razzak Thr. Attorney Muhammad Zaid (Petitioner) V/S Cantonment Board Clifton and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1853
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
2792) 171/2017 Cr.Rev Nazeer Ahmed Chandio (Applicant) V/S The State & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
2793) 1276/2017 Const. P. Mohammad Farooq (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Naseem & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 10-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
2794) 456/1988 Suit MUHAMMAD WAJID KHAN. (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. ATTOCK CEMENT FAC. PAK. LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
A remedy available to a person under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, cannot operate as an absolute bar for seeking a remedy under an ordinary civil jurisdiction by filing a suit.
Article 22 and 24 of the Limitation Act, 1908, where under an action to seek compensation for an injury should be instituted within one year, is not applicable in the instant case, for the reason that Plaintiff was made to run from pillar to post for redressal of his grievance but without any success. Plaintiff was lastly operated upon on 15.10.1987 and the suit was filed on 17.11.1987, hence the cause of action and so is the grievance is of continuous nature. Well entrenched principle that if a person has a right to claim compensation for a wrong done to him, he should also have a remedy, has been attracted in the instant case.
The Defendants, who are Employer [Client], Contractor and sub-contractors, respectively, were jointly and severally held liable to pay damages for the negligent acts, which caused the Plaintiff serious injury and partial disability of permanent nature. Damages have been awarded by invoking the principle of composite negligence.
Topic: Tort Law, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Damages)
Tag Line:A remedy available to a person under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, cannot operate as an absolute bar for seeking a remedy under an ordinary civil jurisdiction by filing a suit.The Defendants, who are Employer [Client], Contractor and sub-contractors, respectively, were jointly and severally held liable to pay damages for the negligent acts, which caused the Plaintiff serious injury and partial disability of permanent nature. Damages have been awarded by invoking the principle of composite negligence.
Citation:2016 CLC 1063
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 11-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
2795) 4279/2020 Const. P. Muzaffar Ali Talpur and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 922
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.640-K/2022 The Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Climate Change. v. Muzaffar Ali Talpur & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2796) 28/2021 H.C.A SPEC Energy DMCC (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Petroleum Ltd & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Works contract running into minute details, not specifically enforceable, hence temporary injunction cannot be granted.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 860
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
2797) 88/2016 I. A House Building Finance Company Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Major Muhammad Abdul Aziz & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Section 3 (Cost of funds))
Tag Line:The learned Judge has correctly granted HBFC cost of funds from 2010 onwards in the Judgment, which, according to Respondent No.1-Customer???s admission, was the date of default, yet there is no explanation why the learned Judge proceeded to apply a varying rate of cost of funds as already discussed. Therefore, HBFC???s claim that the learned Judge of the Banking Court has not granted the cost of funds from the date of default is incorrect. In fact, the Banking Court granted costs of funds but did not grant HBFC the cost of funds as certified by the State Bank of Pakistan from time to time from 2010 till the date of Judgment in May 2016. The case is remanded to the Banking Court to determine the cost of funds amount payable to HBFC in terms of section 3(2) of the FIO, 2001. There shall be no change in the already decreed principal outstanding amount of Rs.1,771,340 and the costs of the suit of Rs.31,425, which will remain the same. The Respondent No.1-Customer has already paid HBFC through the Banking Court a total sum of Rs.3,057,486, which comprised of the old decretal (i) principal outstanding amount, (ii) the disputed cost of funds amount, and (iii) the costs of the suit. The Banking Court shall adjust the payment already made by Respondent No.1-Customer to HBFC of Rs.3,057,486 against the fresh cost of funds to be determined by it and pass an amended Decree, accordingly. All the other terms and conditions of the Decree dated 05.05.2016 shall remain intact.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 473
Advocates:Muhammad Aslam(ADVO-5915-SBC-KHE),S. Muhammad Salam Kazmi(ADVO-3937-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
2798) 311/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Super Star Company (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Retrospective effect of beneficial notification.
Citation:2021 PTD 1094
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2799) 1504/2023 Const. P. Ahsanuddin & Another (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Failure to obtain alternate remedy under Sub-Section (5) of Section 9 of the Election Act, 2017
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 472
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Syed Amir Shah(ADVO-12175-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Huzaifa Khan(ADVO-14330-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3990/2023 Ahsan Uddin and another v. The Election Commission of Pakistan through its Secretary, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2800) 1161/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD WALEED S/O ABDUL WAHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the above, the applicant / accused has made out a case for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him vide order dated 08.07.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 933
Advocates:Liaquat Ali(ADVO-4166HLC-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 12-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
2801) 297/2013 Const. P. Dr.Pervaiz Mehmood Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S S.B.C.A & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 26
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Akbar(ADVO-9244-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Tariq(ADVO-8862-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 03-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
2802) 1168/2020 Const. P. Dr. Itrat Malik (Petitioner) V/S State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Major penalties aim to not only punish the offender but also deter others. Minor punishment may be preferred when the offense is less severe, and circumstances suggest no bad faith or willfulness. This view is supported by the Supreme Court of Pakistan's observations in Secretary, Government of Punjab, and others versus Khalid Hussain Hamdani and 2 others 2013 SCMR 817.
18. As a result of the above discussion, this Petition is allowed. The impugned orders dated 09.05.2019 and 19.11.2019, and the directions issued by the SLIC for withholding the service benefits of the petitioner and appellate order are set aside, and she is entitled to be paid for the period mentioned in the impugned orders, accordingly within two (02) months from the date of receipt of this order.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1739
Advocates:Muhammad Asadullah Shaikh(ADVO-13708-SBC-KHI),Syed Awn Abbas Rizvi(ADVO-12153-SBC-MLR),Ameer Uddin(ADVO-10948-SBC-KHI),Shoaib Mohiuddin Ashraf(ADVO-4396-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 04-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1563/2025 State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan and others v. Dr. Itrat malik and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Notice). Early date. Relist it before a 3 members bench
2803) 120/2004 Cr.Acq.A. Muhammad Sarwar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
2804) 295/2012 Cr.Bail Imran Bhatti (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters (bail granted)
Tag Line:here is a considerable delay in lodging the F.I.R i.e., 3 days despite the fact that victim's brother went to police station to obtain the letter. In addition, perusal of the F.I.R shows that there is hardly any role prescribed to the applicant and entire accusation was made for Bashir Bhatti who caused straight fire from his Kalashnikov which hit the deceased on his back and went through. However, nothing was attributed to the applicant and no role was assigned to him. As far as the case of vicarious liability is concerned, no doubt Section 460, P.P.C is quite different and distinct from Section 302, P.P.C, however, it is yet to be determined that the applicant was involved as it has become a case of further enquiry on account of delay in lodging the F.I.R. These views are also fortified by one of the judgments referred above i.e., case of Faraz Akram, in terms whereof it was observed that the vicarious liability could be determined at the trial and not at this stage, where there is inordinate delay in lodging the F.I.R.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
2805) 6583/2018 Const. P. Azhar Ali Farooqui (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 349
Advocates:Ahsanullah(ADVO-11208-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Naila Tabassum(ADVO-8444-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2368/2022 The Secretary, Establishment/Cabinet Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad v. Azhar Ali Farooqi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2806) 31/2017 Cr.Misc. MEHMOOD RANGOONWALA & 02 ORS (Applicant) V/S FURQAN ALI MUSTAFA & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
2807) 1434/2023 Const. P. Gazain Zafar Magsi Adv and Another (Petitioner) V/S Karachi Bar Association and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 173
Advocates:Amir Saleem(ADVO-4522-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP),Muhammad Abdul Rehman(ADVO-15571-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
2808) 260/2019 H.C.A Mrs. Zarina Iqbal (Appellant) V/S Haji Jaffar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2352
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
2809) 45/2024 Criminal Appeal Munawar @ Munni & others (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2024 SHC MPK 911
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
2810) 273/2023 Const. P. Inspector Rukhsana Leghari and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 308
Advocates:Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Irfan Mir Halepota(ADVO-9555-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2811) 6/2011 F.R.A M/s. Khazan Tech (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) V/S Syed Fayyaz Ahmed Shah (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 17-OCT-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.9-K/2012 M/s.Khazam Tech (Pvt) Ltd. v. Syed Fayyaz Ahmed Shah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2812) 127/2011 I. A Mst Khursheed Begum & Ors (Appellant) V/S NIB Bank Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Banking Law (limitation of liability to the extent of a cap provided by the registered mortgage deed)
Tag Line:limitation of liability to the extent of a cap provided by the registered mortgage deed
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 276, 2024 CLD 765, 2024 CLD 888
Advocates:Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS),Syed Daanish Ghazi(ADVO-13558-SBC-KHI),S. Riaz Haider(ADVO-4452-SBC-KHI),Barrister Gazain Magsi(ADVO-67-BBC-QTA-QTA)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 14-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.284-K/2024 Mst. khursheed begum through L.Rs. and others v. M.C.B. Bank Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2813) 113/2012 Cr.Misc. Amanullah Kaleri (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 21-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
2814) 50/2021 Criminal Appeal NADIR ALI @ BABAR S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB & OTHERS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Murder Trial (Mitigating Circumstances)
Tag Line:Turning to the quantum of sentence awarded to the appellants by the trial court we have considered the evidence produced by the prosecution and found that there were general allegations against the appellants of causing hatchet and knife injuries to the deceased
resulting in his death and all the witnesses have deposed that the appellants actively participated in the commission of offence.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 492
Advocates:Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Wazeer Hussain Khoso(ADVO-7864-SBC-KHI),Nadir Khan Burdi(ADVO-13227-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
2815) 4811/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Nasir (Petitioner) V/S Ministry of Petroleum & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 MLD 1830
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 22-JAN-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1040/2016 M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Muhammad Nasir & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2816) 5623/2023 Const. P. Fatima Quaid (Petitioner) V/S Principal S.M. Govt. Law College & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 309
Advocates:Khurram Lakhani(ADVO-12563-SBC-KHI),Raafia Rizwana(ADVO-6950-SBC-KHI),Yusuf Moulvi(ADVO-4051-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
2817) 4/2022 Judicial Companies Misc. THE CHANCELLOR MASTERS & SCHOLARS AND ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S N/A (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (Amalgamation ), Merger
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 382
Advocates:VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
2818) 1214/2013 Suit Muhammad Nasir (Plaintiff) V/S Zeehsan Parvez (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Specific Performance of Contract )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 07-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
2819) 388/2014 Spl.Cr.Misc LAJPAT S/O PAROMAL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH D.A.G (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Application under section 561-A CrPC for quashing investigation of FIR, not maintainable.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 758
Advocates:Darvesh Mandhan(ADVO-10700-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
2820) 224/2013 Suit ABDUL QAYUM KHAN (Plaintiff) V/S ABDUL AZIZ KHAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Mistake of Court. Court-Sale set-aside under inherit powers.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 177
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
2821) 5732/2024 Const. P. Trade Smart Securities Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S SECP and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Judicial review not maintainable)
Tag Line:No judicial review is made out against the Pakistan Stock Exchange under Article 199(1)(a)(ii) of the 1973 Constitution when an arbitration is ongoing and PSX has not done any act or proceeding in connection with the functions and affairs of the Federal Government
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 276
Advocates:Muhammad Asad Ashfaq Tola(ADVO-17101-SBC-KHS),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE),Zoha Sirhindi(ADVO-13544-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2822) 315/2007 Suit SYED MAZHAIR HUSSAIN NAQVI (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.RUFI BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 394
Advocates:Nayyar Ziauddin(ADVO-4179-SBC-KHI),S. Nasir Hussain Jaffari(ADVO-3413-SBC-KHI),Mehmood Hussain(ADVO-9083-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2823) 101/2013 Const. P. Syed Hasnain Raza (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.426-K/2019 Syed Hasnain Raza v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: I.T & Telecom M/o Information Technology and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2824) 1151/2019 Const. P. Dr Fozia Akmal (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
whether the services of the petitioner as Consultant Gynecologist in SESSI can be regularized
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
2825) 66/1999 J.M MST. ZULEKHA BIBI & ORS (Applicant) V/S MST. HAFIZA AHMED & ORS. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:No relief can be granted to the non-existent person.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1477
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
2826) 658/2011 Const. P. Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Younus Ali & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 07-JUL-11
Approved for Reporting
2827) 1083/2020 Const. P. Syed Jawad Arshad (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Quashing / bail, in fiscal offences, in writ jurisdiction
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh 2384
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Bilal(ADVO-716-SBC-NSF),Aqeel Ahmed Khan(ADVO-12466-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2828) 1227/2022 Const. P. Imran Hussain and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 539
Advocates:Ghulam Akbar Lashari(ADVO-13888-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2829) 27/2006 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Yousuf and others (Applicant) V/S Mst/Salma and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
Tag Line: Limitation. Time barred Suit. if from the contents of the Plaint if it is discernible that the Suit is time barred then the plaint ought to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC even without evidence.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 23
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
2830) 6192/2020 Const. P. Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:quo warranto
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 1117
Advocates:Munawar Alam Khan(ADVO-26041-SBC-KHS),Zafar Ali Talpur(ADVO-18868-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Kamran Khan(ADVO-13655-SBC-KHI),Inayat Ali Mirza(ADVO-18253-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 22-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.562-K/2021 Roshan Ali Kanasro v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2831) 749/2024 Const. P. Ali Murtaza (Petitioner) V/S Govt: of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Salary of Probationer Employee
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 190
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
2832) 1673/2017 Const. P. Mst. Rabia Gul W/o Arshad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khatoon Begum & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
2833) 2206/2017 Suit M/s. Chhipa Corporation (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Explanation clause to Order II Rule 2 CPC
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1240
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2834) 4077/2016 Const. P. Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Repatriation, from the appointment as Assistant Commissioner (BPS-17) in Ex-PCS Cadre by way of nomination, to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue, Sindh---we are not impressed with the grounds urged by the petitioner in his petition for the simple reason that the appointment of the petitioner in Ex-PCS cadre (BS-17) had already been declared as illegal by the Honorable Supreme Court and ordered his repatriation to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue--In our view, since the directions of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters are still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed.
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 1289
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
2835) 638/2011 Cr.Bail Major (R) Zubair Qayyum Butt (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 07-JUL-11
Approved for Reporting
2836) 2/2008 Cr.Org.Misc. Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Applicant) V/S Adnan Faisal & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 231
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
2837) 176/2013 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Deputy Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Pakistan Office Product (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 106
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 01-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2838) 24/2021 Cr.Bail Ali Hassan Jeho (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters (Granted Bail U/S 302, 324, 114, 337-H(ii), 147, 148 PPC, after arrest)
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 114
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
2839) 6071/2019 Const. P. M/s Sawera Ind C.G.P.F & Oil Mills (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Effect of a contrary notification upon a statutory exemption.
Citation:2021 PTD 318
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 23-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.107-K/2021 The Chief Commissiner (IR) & another v. M/s. Sawera Industries Cotton Ginning Pressing Factory and Oil Mills & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2840) 7153/2021 Const. P. M/s Manaco International (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 144
Advocates:Muhammad Rashid(ADVO-8654-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Naimatullah(ADVO-19350-SBC-KHS),Aqil Ahmed(ADVO-11506-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2841) 4177/2016 Const. P. Parveen Shoukat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Citation:2019 PLD SC 710, 2018 PLC (CS) Note 118
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.664-K/2017 Parveen Shoukat v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.130-K/2019 Parveen Shoukat v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2842) 817/2018 Const. P. Muhammad DIn (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Kausar Jehan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
2843) 311/2011 Criminal Appeal Abu Bakar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
2844) 70/2016 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Raheem (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 21-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.590/2019 Muhammad Raheem v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2845) 3/2016 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Muhammad Javed and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 07-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
2846) 197/2016 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Saeed Ahmed & Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 24-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
2847) 212/2010 Cr.Acq.A. Jalal Hassan (Appellant) V/S Ammer Hamza Awan & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain M. Sheikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 13-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
2848) 1954/2010 Suit RAZAK LATIF & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S ACE SECURITIES (PVT) LTD (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 959
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 20-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
2849) 94/2020 Suit Jazaa Foods (Pvt.) Limited & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Junaid Jamshed (Pvt.) Limited & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. Effect of disclaimer made under section 21 of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 from exclusive use of a name.
2. The principle that registration of a trade mark gives rise to a prima facie case, balance of convenience and likelihood of irreparable loss, that principle would be applicable where the trade mark was registered without a disclaimer.
3. In view of section 42(3) of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001, the use of the disclaimed feature of the mark in question would not constitute trade mark infringement.
4. An action for passing-off is essentially to protect property in goods based on the reputation of those goods, as distinct from an action to protect a trade mark which is a property in itself.
Citation:2021 CLD 362
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
2850) 2920/2017 Const. P. Mst. Asma Shakeel (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Jurisdiction: Remedy before proper forum)
Tag Line:Ownership disputes over industrial plots and unsubstantiated KDA claims invoke "Nemo dat qui non habet," invalidating KDA allotments. Article 199 enforces pre-existing rights; factual disputes for civil courts. Declarations under section 42 of Specific Relief Act confirm rights. Only 9 of 21 village acres regularized, encroachment defined under Act 2010. Petitions dismissed; D-4305 of 2016 advised BOR regularization.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1472
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2851) 244/2023 Suit BASHAM BALOCH & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Rejection of plaint.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1027, 2025 CLC 625
Advocates:Rizwana Ismail(ADVO-4484-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
2852) 843/2022 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD NAWAZ (Applicant) V/S SADAM HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 1039
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.166-K/2023 Muhammad Nawaz v. Sadam Hussain and others,Crl.A.146/2024 Muhammad Nawaz v. Sadam Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Partly Allowed,Disposed
2853) 2187/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Yamaha Motors Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PTD 207
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.33-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Yamaha Motors Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2854) 7761/2018 Const. P. Roshan Ali Kanasiro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
We may observe here that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but only a tentative assessment is permissible and a cursory glance of the record shows that all the petitioners in connivance with each other have misappropriated a huge amount of money from the Government from which some amount was recovered through plea bargains. Under these circumstances the interim pre-arrest bail granted to all the petitioners earlier by this court is recalled with immediate effect. We also find that with regard to petitioner Shahenshah Hussain who is seeking his post-arrest bail there is sufficient evidence against him in the shape of documentary evidence which connects him to the commission of offence to which he has been charged and therefore his petition for post-arrest bail is also dismissed.
Topic: NAB (Bail Application is dismissed ,as accused have misappropriated a huge amount from the Government, )
Tag Line:We may observe here that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but only a tentative assessment is permissible and a cursory glance of the record shows that all the petitioners in connivance with each other have misappropriated a huge amount of money from the Government from which some amount was recovered through plea bargains. Under these circumstances the interim pre-arrest bail granted to all the petitioners earlier by this court is recalled with immediate effect. We also find that with regard to petitioner Shahenshah Hussain who is seeking his post-arrest bail there is sufficient evidence against him in the shape of documentary evidence which connects him to the commission of offence to which he has been charged and therefore his petition for post-arrest bail is also dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2469
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2603/2020 Roshan Ali Kanasro v. Federation of Pakistan through Federal Secretary, Interior Department, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2855) 95/2022 Criminal Miscelleneous Saeed Ahmed Bhayo Ors (Applicant) V/S Ali Sher Bahrani & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 941
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
2856) 767/2023 Suit HASCOL LUBRICANTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAK (SECP) & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Once costs are paid to SECP for obtaining certified copies of statutory forms, SECP cannot deny such requests made by the company. Under Regulation 20 of the Companies (Registration Offices) Regulations, 2018, SECP may insert certain qualifications/remark on such statutory forms.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 394
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
2857) 182/2011 Suit PAKISTAN STATE OIL CO. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S ABDUL ALI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Defence (Special Powers) Rules, 1951
Tag Line:that the defendants are
not precluded from using their land in pursuance of Rule 10 of ibid Rules
1951 however the reasonable restriction for the security and safety of
the occupants be adhered to, which restriction shall not be arbitrary and
fanciful and that such restriction would not be of such magnitude as
would materially render and disentitle neighboring land owners from
utilizing their land in accordance with law as it would then be in
violation of Article, 4, 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Plaintiff has prayed in the suit that no structure/ construction shall be permitted and that defendants are not entitled to raise any construction within a distance of 200 sq. yards from the
plaintiff key point installation i.e. category 1-A, Zulfiqarabad Oil Terminal, is thus misconceived and would amount to acquiring the property without its market value under acquisition laws.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 174
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Shafique Ahmed(ADVO-12780-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
2858) 3032/2013 Const. P. Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 21-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.437-K/2015 Ali Ahmed v. National Accountability Bureau Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2859) 7679/2019 Const. P. Dar ul Sukun and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Senior Citizens matter
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 12-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
2860) 500/2019 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD IMRAN S/O MUHAMMAD @ PATEL (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 449
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 19-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
2861) 276/2019 H.C.A Province of Sindh (Appellant) V/S Rahim Ali Palari & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 749
Advocates:Farrukh Usman(ADVO-12432-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 07-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.728-K/2023 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary Transport Department Govt. of Sindh v. Rahim Ali Palari & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
2862) 74/2014 I. A Abu Bakar (Appellant) V/S First Women Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1120-K/2018 Abu Bakar v. First Women Bank Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
2863) 136/2021 Suit MIR MUHAMMAD TAHIR ZEHRI (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 908
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 24-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
2864) 1741/2016 Const. P. Ali Murad Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Zarai Tarqiati Bank and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.126-K/2019 Ali Murad Brohi v. Zarai Taraqiati Bank Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2865) 5270/2023 Const. P. Ejaz Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The perusal of Article 199 (b)(ii) of the Constitution shows that a person performing duties in connection with affairs of the Province could be required to show under what authority he is holding a particular public office and for that purpose, the petitioner therein may not be required to be an aggrieved person, however, in the instant matter the directions sought by the petitioner were not merely confined to the afore-referred aspect of the matter rather the same include the issuance of directions like the Writ of Mandamus and prohibition against the respondent No.5 requiring him to show his fitness to hold the promotion post in BS-21 without fulfilling the criteria as outlined in the recruitment rules as the matter of appointment of the post of Inspector General of Prison Sindh (BPS-21) is governed under the Recruitment Rules
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 374
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Asad Ashfaq Tola(ADVO-17101-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
2866) 5307/2015 Const. P. Mst. Nazima Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Deceased quota)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 817
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
2867) 5509/2023 Const. P. M. Ashraf Raja (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Noureen Naz & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 66
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.709-K/2024 Muhammad Ashraf Raja v. Mst. Noureen Naz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice to Respondents)
2868) 6608/2020 Const. P. Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue (Petitioner) V/S Fed: Sect: / Revisional Authority and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1548
Advocates:Manzoor Ahmed(ADVO-17465-SBC-KHS),Shahid Iqbal Rana(ADVO-7703-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Akram Tariq(ADVO-14630-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1012-K/2025 Evacuee Trust Property Board v. Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2869) 1/2017 Service Appeal Mian Fayyaz Rabbani (Appellant) V/S The Chief Jutice H.S.C through Registrar (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
2870) 1662/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Nawaz Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:disposed of in the terms of paragraph 35(iii) of the judgment dated 18.03.2016 passed by learned Sindh Service Tribunal maintained by the Honorable Supreme Court vide order dated 26.03.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.266-K and 1074 of 2016, resultantly the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA is directed to comply with the ratio of the aforesaid judgments in its letter and spirit and allow them joining from the date of their repatriation by the Sindh Government vide notification dated 5.7.2018 and the issue of their salary, for the intervening period, shall be decided by the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA accordingly within one month
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 234
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.542-K/2021 Muhammad Nawaz Soomro v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.558-K/2021 The Wapda through its Director (Legal) v. Muhammad Nawaz Soomro & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2871) 1/2015 M.A. M/s. Alpha Insurance Company Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. Poly Foils (Pvt.) Ltd and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 28-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.36-K/2018 M/s Poly Foils (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Alpha Insurance Co. Ltd.,C.P.113-K/2017 M/s Poly Foils (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Alpha Insurance Co. Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
for Next Session,Disposed Leave Granted
2872) 15/2017 Suit.B National Bank of Pakistan (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Textile City Limited & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. Notwithstanding the failure of the defendant to comply with conditions of a leave application, the Court is still required to apply its mind to the case of the plaintiff before passing any order/judgment. Leave granted where statement of account incomplete.
2. Notwithstanding the creation of a mortgage, the mortgagor remains liable to the lessor for any breach or non-performance of the conditions of lease; and that if the lessor forfeits the lease, the remedy of the mortgagee is against the mortgagor for indemnification, and not against the lessor. The security of the mortgagee in the mortgaged property can be no better than the interest given to the mortgagor by the lease.
Citation:2021 CLD 194
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
2873) 5159/2023 Const. P. Amir Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Information Commission & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 73
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.611-K/2024 Amir Baloch v. Sindh Information Commission through its Chief Information Commissioner and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
2874) 1307/2020 Const. P. Sindh Agriculture University Tando Jam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:We have examined the layout plan, drawings and Google map of the project available on record, wherein the actual path of the project and the bigger curve proposed by the University have been distinctly shown. It is clear from the above that if the impugned alignment is altered by including the bigger curve proposed by the University, the overall length of the project will be increased by several kilometers, and a portion of the said proposed bigger curve will pass through the oil and gas fields of OGDC. In such an event, the cost of the project and the time required for its completion will be increased substantially, and the said oil and gas fields will be exposed to the public / commuters and heavy construction machinery which may result into a disaster. Therefore, in addition to the legal position discussed above, prima facie, the proposal made by the University does not appear to be practical and safe for the commuters, public at large and the people working at the said oil and gas fields. In view of the object, purpose and urgent need of the project, it shall be in the public interest that the same is completed expeditiously.
As a result of the above discussion, C.P. No.1307/2020 and all the applications pending therein are dismissed ; and C.P. No.05/2021 is disposed of by directing the Government and the acquiring agency to complete the project and the land acquisition proceedings in respect thereof expeditiously and strictly in terms of the Act. There will be no order as to costs in any of the subject petitions.
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 321
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 07-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
2875) 441/2005 Cr.Appeal Haji Javed Ahmed Jatoi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
2876) 485/2017 Cr.Misc. Javed Iqbal (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Imran (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.30-K/2018 Muhammad Imran Shaikh v. The State thr. P.G.Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2877) 1074/2019 Suit Ever Shine Constructors (Plaintiff) V/S Khairpur Special Economic Zone (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 )
Tag Line:Court having jurisdiction under section 20 Arbitration Act, 1940.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 65
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
2878) 25/2011 Civil Revision Abdul Jabbar and others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Mustafa and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
2879) 1494/2020 Suit Pak Airlift Aviation Services (Plaintiff) V/S Gulf Air B.S.C (c) & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1117
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
2880) 571/1997 Suit TRADING CORP OF PAKISTAN. (Plaintiff) V/S V/S M/S. PUNJAB TRADING AGENCY (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:suit for recovery and damages
Citation:2017 PLD Sindh 276, 2017 SBLR Sindh 1860
Advocates:M/S. SYED MAMNOON HASAN & CO(FIRM-260-SBC-KHI),K. A. Wahab(ADVO-71-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Safdar(ADVO-4807-SBC-KHI),M/S. KHALID DAWOOD POTA & CO.(FIRM-112-SBC-KHI),Syed Mamnoon Hasan(ADVO-393-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting
2881) 424/2023 H.C.A China Mobile Pakistan Limited (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It seems to be an attempt to modify the
license, directly without a recourse required under Section-22(2) of
Act 1996, the jurisdiction would not lie with the authority except
the scheme to be followed in terms of Section 22 of the Act 1996.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 881
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Nasir(ADVO-13381-SBC-KHS),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
2882) 891/2019 Const. P. M/s United Business Machines thr Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S Ghulam Hussain Hidayatullah & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 15 (Personal Bonafide Need) )
Tag Line:
-Section 15(2)(vii) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979requires demonstration of elements such as (i) honesty of purpose and (ii) reasonableness. From the statement of landlord/owner for the purpose of eviction of a tenant on the ground of personal bona fide need only an honest intention is to be deduced and there is no other formula to adjudge good and bad faith, for the purpose of eviction on the aforesaid count. If the Court on the scrutiny of the evidence comes to the conclusion that it was an honest intention then it would be immaterial whether he remained successful in achieving the object or not that is whether his son or daughter would join him in the business after completing their education. This requirement would be immaterial in the sense that the intention of the father in evicting the tenant was an honest one.Good faith is an abstract term not capable of any rigid definition and ordinary dictionary meaning describes it as "honesty of intention".
-The primary requirement and condition precedent for invoking provision of Section 15(2)(vii) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 claiming relief on the ground of personal bonafide need of landlord in good faith is that the landlord should be honest in his approach and sincerity of his purpose should be manifested by irreversible evidence and surrounding circumstances.
- Sufficiency of accommodation either for a commercial/industrial activity or for residential purpose is to be adjudged best by the landlord himself and it may vary not only on case to case basis but also on the basis of nature of business that one intends to establish an honest idea about future growth of the business and its prospects. Someone may have an idea of establishing humongous business set up and he may or may not be successful in achieving his object and plan but what is 9important, as a test, is the honesty of intention and there is nothing on record in the shape of cross-examination of the landlord/owner to demonstrate that it was not an honest and genuine intention for extending and enhancing business for himself and for his family members.
Citation:2023 YLR 40
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1108-K/2021 M/s. United Business Machines v. Ghulam Hussain Hidayatullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2883) 648/2019 Criminal Appeal MST. NAFEESA W/O NADEEM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Trial (Denovo Trial)
Tag Line:In this case death penalty is provided yet the accused was deprived of his right to cross-examination which, legally, is the only weapon to test the veracity and credibility of the witness. Such trial, legally, being defective, cant be stamped. At this juncture Ms. Sadia Khatoon further contends that though they preferred application for cross examination that was also not entertained, same is yet pending. Such addition makes the position rather miserable. Accordingly, this is a case of denovo trial, hence impugned judgment recorded by the trial court is hereby set aside. Case is remanded back at the stage of cross examination of the witnesses and thereafter trial court shall record statement under section 342 Cr.P.C., provide opportunity of defence and after hearing the parties decide the case on merits.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 53
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
2884) 6134/2024 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Suleman (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973, Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion andTransfer) Rules,1974
Tag Line:Promotion set-aside.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 762
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 07-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5164/2024 Kausar Abbas Saldera v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Health Services Regulation & Coordination, Islamabad and others,C.P.L.A.1845/2025 Dr. Kausar Abbas Saldera v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Health Services Regulation and Coordination, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Pending Adjourned
2885) 243/2012 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs. (Applicant) V/S Paramount Enterprises. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 367
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2886) 398/2022 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Legal Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Kolachee International, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2600
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 26-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
2887) 78/2010 Suit.B Haji Abdul Razzak (Plaintiff) V/S Faisal Bank Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line: Prima facie it seems that the MCB has filed Suit No.1674 of 1997 only for recovery of US $.51,066,208/-. Both counsel have also relied upon pleadings of Suit No.1674 of 1997 As far as this particular amount i.e. US $.26 Million is concerned, for which all rights claimed to have been transferred to M/s Al-Faisal Investment Bank Limited, MCB from its pleadings has shown no interest and it is only in pursuit of its claim of recovery that this amount was sought to be attached and it is on consideration of above facts and circumstances that this amount of US dollars was ordered to be released subject to execution of guarantee in terms as stated in the order of the Honble Supreme Court. After execution of the guarantee Al-Faisal Investment Bank got payments of US $.21 Million on 09.03.1998 and of US $.5 Million on 11.03.1998.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
2888) 1312/2021 Const. P. Waqar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Steel Mills (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:back benefits
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 737
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Sanaullah Noor Ghauri(ADVO-4123-SBC-KHI),Israr Ahmed(ADVO-19321-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1480/2022 The Chief Executive Officer, Pakistan Steel Mills,Karachi v. Waqar Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2889) 100/2011 Cr.Appeal Ubedullah Bangulani & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
2890) 13/2019 I. A Lachman Das & others (Appellant) V/S Tano Lal and Harji (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:The property in question being a public amenity cannot be encroached upon and as per the dicta laid down by the Honble Supreme Court, an area earmarked and reserved for an amenity like Massan/Graveyard and Aasaish, cannot be used for any other purposes
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
2891) 120/2022 Const. P. Mrs. Aseem Khalid (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Schools Education & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 63
Advocates:In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2892) 1178/2019 Const. P. Abdul Hayee S/o Allah Bux Dhamrah (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Haleema and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)---
----Ss. 17-A & 14---Suit for maintenance---Interim order---Scope---Petitioner assailed by Constitutional petition, order passed by Judge Family Court whereby he, on an application under S.17-A of Family Courts Act, 1964, was directed to pay maintenance to the respondent/wife till she rejoined him---Validity---Interim order was not an appealable order---Legislature, while denying the appeal against interim order, did not mean that the aggrieved person could approach the High Court under Art.199 of the Constitution and against final order could file an appeal before the court subordinate to the High Court---Entertaining a constitutional petition in ordinary case against interim order, which was neither without jurisdiction nor contrary to law, would defeat the very purpose of not providing appeal against interim order---Aggrieved party had to wait for final order and after final order, he could impugn both the interim and final order in appeal before the appellate court---Constitutional petition was dismissed.
Citation:2020 MLD 1523
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.531-K/2025 Sindh Revenue Board & another v. Pak Telecom Mobile Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2893) 122/2014 Cr.Appeal Noor Muhammad & Ors (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 21-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
2894) 27/2018 Civil Revision Haji Ghano Khan Jatoi and others (Applicant) V/S District Forest Officer a Forestation Division Larkana and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XLI Rule 31 )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 29-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
2895) 294/2015 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Muhammad Umair (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 23-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
2896) 309/2024 Suit OWAIS SALAM (Plaintiff) V/S THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Locus Standi to maintain a suit as against illegal construction, Whether notice period in Section 20 A of the SBCO, 1979 is mandatory; Jurisdiction of the Special Courts constituted under Section 18 A of the SBCO, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 343
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
2897) 4148/2020 Const. P. Ghulam Abbass (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We are of the considered view that the petitioners' situation regarding pensionary benefits is similar to the cases mentioned above. Their pension should be calculated from the date they were merged into TCP, rather than their later regularization dates in 2008 and 2011. This is because the petitioners were allowed to continue their service after the merger, and TCP continued to pay them until their superannuation. Since TCP acted upon the merger, any subsequent decision by the TCP Board is irrelevant. Therefore, in line with Supreme Court principles from the aforementioned cases, their pensionary benefits must be calculated from their merger date with TCP. This calculation should be completed and disbursed to them in accordance with law within three months.
13. These petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1663, 2025 SHC KHI 1675
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3673/2025 Trading Corporation of Pakistan Pvt Ltd thr. its Manager & others v. Ghulam Abbas and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
2898) 2849/2020 Const. P. Shahabuddin and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:quo warranto
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 674
Advocates:ORR. DIGNAM & CO.(FIRM-109-SBC-KHI),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.892-K/2020 Jam Abdul Fatah v. Federation of Pakistan & others,C.P.L.A.1333/2022 Shahabuddin Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2899) 6/2012 Cr.Acctt.A Shaikh Shahid Umar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB
Tag Line:Whether Complaint of a single individual falls within the definition of Public at Large so as to attract the provisions of Section 9(a) (ix) & (x) of the NAB Ordinance; Held No.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 3
Advocates:Mamoon Ahmed Khan Shirwany(ADVO-11042-SBC-KHS),S. Raza Ali Hashmi(ADVO-4564-SBC-KHI),Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Hassaan Sabir(ADVO-6909-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
2900) 1373/2018 Cr.Bail LUTUFULLAH S/O MAVAZ KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail After Arrest---497)
Citation:2018 MLD 794
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2901) 3268/2021 Const. P. Rehan Arif (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Import of vehicle under personal baggage and payment of duty and taxes under Para 6 of Appendix E of the Import Policy order 2020
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 13
Advocates:Afsheen Aman(ADVO-8828-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Bilal(ADVO-716-SBC-NSF),Aqeel Ahmed Khan(ADVO-12466-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 22-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1442-K/2021 The Federation of Pakistan & another v. Rehan Arif & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2902) 2124/2021 Const. P. M/s Star Denim Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:petitioner-M/s. Star Denim Pvt. Ltd. is asking for setting aside of the impugned letter dated 10.03.2021, whereby Audit Officers of the Sindh Employees Social Security Institution (`SESSI`) attempted to visit the establishment of the petitioner to verify the Secured Workers engaged by for issuing the R-5 cards so they could get the financial / Medical care facility--
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 982
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
2903) 1359/2021 Const. P. M/s Sakrand Sugar Mills (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 151
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Saleem Mangrio(ADVO-4620-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 14-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
2904) 320/2024 Cr.Bail Shahzaib Gul Wassan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Additionally the case against the applicant, in the absence of any independent witness of the alleged incident, requires further inquiry as contemplated under sub-section (2) to Section 497, Cr.P.C. In the case of Muhammad Tanveer v. The State (PLD 2017 Supreme Court 733) the Supreme Court while extending the grace, granted bail
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 720
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
2905) 103/2018 I. A Muhammad Anis (Appellant) V/S M/s. Pak Gulf Leasing Company Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 641
Advocates:Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-10676-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Ali(ADVO-2986-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2906) 972/2014 Const. P. Dr. Shabbir Hussain Hyderi (Petitioner) V/S Syed Rizwan Hussain Rizvi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui
Order Date: 07-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
2907) 124/1995 Civil Revision Ghulam Ali (Applicant) V/S Mst.Nawabzadi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 19-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
2908) 108/2024 Cr.Bail Jurail Shah (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2024 SHC MPK 681
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
2909) 548/2014 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Fauji Cement Company Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Deputy Collector of Customs & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 61
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3172/2021 Fauji Cement Company Limited (FCCL), Rawalpindi v. Deputy Collector of Customs (Appraisement-V), Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2910) 225/2015 Spl.H.C.A Muhammad Saleem Shaikh (Appellant) V/S M/s. KASB Bank Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Ali Raza(ADVO-11783-SBC-KHI),Faiz Mehmood Khan Durani(ADVO-4955-SBC-KHI),Samia Alam Durrani(ADVO-4007HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.372-K/2019 Muhammad Saleem Shaikh v. M/s KASB Bank Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
2911) 1691/2018 Const. P. Sultan Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Sohail Hasan(ADVO-9593-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Barrister Zulfiqar Ali Khan Jalbani(ADVO-17147-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
2912) 3673/2021 Const. P. Arshad Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S FBR and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Maintainability of Petition against a Show Cause Notice; held not maintainable.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1321
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 23-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
2913) 1909/2008 Const. P. Dr. Rubina Mangi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 25-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
2914) 16/2014 Criminal Appeal Hyder Ali Siyal (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Appeal (empties not recovered, blood of deceased not recovered, no eye-witness of the incident, no independent person was examined, motive not proved. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 28
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2915) 2707/2021 Suit M/S AGP LIMITED & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S M/S GALAXY PHARMA (PVT) LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:Undoubtedly and undisputedly the circumstances governed by an
agreement no longer exists to enable defendant No.1 to continue using
the registration. This drug was registered on the application of foreign
principal in favor of defendant No.1 enabling it to manufacture, market
and sell the products of the foreign principal. In view of severance of
relationship between plaintiff No.2 and defendant No.1, as disclosed
above the agreement came to an end.
---In the absence of any contract between foreign principal and
defendant No.1 it would be a matter of serious concern if defendant
No.1 would continue to manufacture, market and sell product of foreign
principal without its permission and authorization. Plaintiffs thus have
disclosed a prima facie case with balance of inconvenience and
irreparable loss in their favour.
Citation:2023 CLD 366, 2023 YLR 1177, 2023 SBLR Sindh 366
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Haroon Dugal(ADVO-35161-PBC-LHR),Mamoon Nawaz Chaudhry(ADVO-11348-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
2916) 7492/2022 Const. P. Ambreen Ali (Petitioner) V/S J.M XXVI East and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1181
Advocates:Syeda Khushbakht Shah(ADVO-19168-SBC-KHS),Zubeida Moton(ADVO-2984-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
2917) 7/2021 Criminal Appeal Ali Nawaz Lolai (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (Control of Narcotic 9(C) Appeal allowed On Ground contradictions in the evidence of complainant and mashir, )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 48
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
2918) 21/2011 II.A. Mst. Kishwar Begum & Ors (Appellant) V/S Rasheed Ahmed Qureshi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Transfer of Property)
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----Ss. 12 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 12(2)---Suit for specific performance of agreement and permanent injunction---Agreement to sell---Proof of ownership of vendor---Scope---Plaintiff filed suit for specific performance of agreement and permanent injunction wherein he claimed that he and paternal grandson of original owner entered into sale agreement for which he paid earnest money---Trial Court, on failure of vendor to file written statement, decreed the suit ex parte---During execution proceedings, rival claimant of subject property filed application under S.12(2), C.P.C. and got the ex parte decree set aside---Trial Court decreed the suit of plaintiff---Rival claimant filed an appeal which was allowed; Appellate Court remanded the case and proposed two additional issues---Trial Court, on remand, reversed its earlier findings and dismissed the suit---Appeal filed by plaintiff was allowed and suit was decreed---Validity---Rival claimant had filed application under S.12(2), C.P.C. to set aside the initial ex parte judgment by claiming that she was owner of the subject property on the basis of an agreement of sale with legal heirs of original owner---Perusal of her written statement showed that after setting aside of decree she had given up her claim on the subject property on the basis of sale agreement; she did not mention in her written statement that original owner was survived by three daughters and that she had purchased subject property nor did she made a counter prayer for declaration of ownership of suit property---Said lady had not filed any independent proceedings for seeking declaration of ownership of subject property---Original gift deed in favour of grandson of original owner was produced by plaintiff---Original gift deed in the hands of plaintiff was far more strong and cogent evidence of title as compared to the so-called power of attorney which was executed by unidentified daughters of original owner---Second appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.
Citation:2019 MLD 1044
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.502/2019 Mst. Kishwar Begum (decd) thr. her LRs v. Rasheed Ahmed Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2919) 713/2013 Const. P. Syed Zafar Ali Shah. (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4145/2019 Muhammad Hussain Ghumro & others v. Province of Sindh thr. its Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.P.L.A.4106/2019 Makhdoom Aqeeluz Zaman & another v. Syed Zafar Ali Shah & others,C.P.L.A.4433/2019 Shahzad Tahir Thaheem & others v. Syed Zafar Ali Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of
2920) 1740/2014 Suit Sadan General Trading LLC. (Plaintiff) V/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Measure of damages under section 73 of the Contract Act.
Assessment of reasonable compensation under section 74 of the Contract Act.
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh Note 57
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 25-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
2921) 613/2022 Const. P. Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 678
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
2922) 2566/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Fazul (Petitioner) V/S The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
2923) 448/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director Directorate PCA (Law) (Applicant) V/S M/s. R.J. Corporation (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 585
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
2924) 4471/2014 Const. P. Docks (Private) Limited (Petitioner) V/S The Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 948
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
2925) 3006/2022 Const. P. Jamal Nasir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 202
Advocates:Ameer Uddin(ADVO-10948-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Abdul Waheed Siyal(ADVO-10358-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1328-K/2022 Professor Lubna Ansari Baig v. Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2926) 2205/2013 Const. P. Abdul Razzak (Petitioner) V/S Election Commissiner of pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Election Matters
Tag Line: Jamate-Islami, under whose banner the petitioner has participated and contested the election, has boycotted the election and such fact via speech was covered by electronic media when the
leaders of the said political party expressed their views. In the light of such boycott as the petitioner was contesting as a candidate for Jamat-e-Islami he cannot said to be an aggrieved
person.
It is a well-known matter of common knowledge that the election laws;
being an Act of Parliament, already existed in the Country that contained
provisions about the existence of Election Tribunal and, above all, the detailed
provisions about the manner in which such petitions are to be filed. The manner
and details thereof are quite different from and stringent than normal pleadings in
a civil matter. Viewed in this background, Article 225 of the Constitution, double
phrased with negative phraseology and in unambiguous terms, ousts the
jurisdiction of any forum other than the Election Tribunal, which too, can be so
resorted to only in the manner prescribed by the law.
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 416
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
2927) 8642/2017 Const. P. Govind Ram (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakitan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Section 9), Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Section 5), Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Section 3 ), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 230)
Tag Line:The powers primarily were exercised under Section 176(1)(b) of Income Tax Ordinance, whereas investigation undertaken in terms of Section 9(1) of Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 by the investigating officer could commence, provided that the investigating officer acted, not later than seven days from the date of order of attachment made under sub-section (1) of section 8 or,
seizure of property under section 14 or section 15, on service of a notice of thirty days on the person concerned which may also be an assessee, however, no such pre-qualification exists.
We are therefore, of the view that unexplained amount which came in and went out of the account, could be inquired about and an explanation could be sought but until and unless an explanation is forwarded by the assesse to the dissatisfaction of the officer concerned, it is inconceivable at the said premature stage that it was laundered money which is defined under Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010. Any amount which is not accounted or not considered as
taxable amount not necessarily be the laundered money having meaning under AMLA-2010.
Citation:2022 PTD 634, 2021 SBLR Sindh 2408
Advocates:S. Mohsin Imam Wasti(ADVO-4357-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHI),Yousuf Ali(ADVO-18202-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2928) 261/2009 Cr.Acq.A. State/ Anti Narcotics Force (Appellant) V/S Saleem lodhi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
2929) 74/2008 Cr.J.A Sada Bux and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
2930) 44/2009 II.A. Mrs. Musarrat Islam (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Farzana Anwar & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.110-K/2022 Mst. Farzana Anwar v. Mst. Musarrat Islam & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2931) 732/2022 Const. P. Mst. Shazia Wajid W/o Wajid Ali (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Zeenat Khatoon and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 16)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1200
Advocates:Nisar Ahmed Dogar(ADVO-239-SBC-LAR),Muhammad Shoaib(ADVO-7701-SBC-KHI),Altaf Hussain(ADVO-17161-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Faheem(ADVO-15112-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.937-K/2023 Mst.Shazia Wajid v. Mst.Zeenat Katoon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
2932) 44/2014 Cr.J.A Bangul Kharos (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2933) 69/2022 M.A. M/s. Meerut Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (Appellant) V/S Shahid Akhtar Qureshi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Sindhi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 236, 2025 SHC KHI 2051
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
2934) 5282/2016 Const. P. Mst. Rashida Syed (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others, PLD 2003 SC 110
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 192
Advocates:Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-12115-SBC-KHI),Gul Farheen(ADVO-10616-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Hameed Siddiqui(ADVO-3991-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
2935) 1263/2016 Const. P. Abdul Waheed Memon (Petitioner) V/S N.B.P and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 799
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.833/2022 Abdul Waheed Memon v. National Bank of Pakistan through its President, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2936) 135/2010 Civil Revision Jan Muhammad and others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Siddik and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
2937) 508/2020 Cr.Bail ABDUL RASHEED S/O GHULAM RASOOL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2324
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 28-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
2938) 6462/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Najam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:deceased quota
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 408
Advocates:Abdul Samad(ADVO-9460-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 22-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2939) 370/2017 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2940) 656/2020 Suit M/s. Pak Steel Mills & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1048
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
2941) 2527/2016 Suit Asif Majeed & others(ISSUES) (Plaintiff) V/S Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1362
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
2942) 557/2017 Const. P. Salman Aziz (Petitioner) V/S Federal Urdu Unviersity and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
2943) 3467/2017 Const. P. Dr. Shaista Shoukat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 535
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
2944) 32/2017 Cr.Appeal MAIRAJ S/O TAJ MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 20-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
2945) 1676/2012 Cr.Rev Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S Party-2 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 28-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting
2946) 315/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Chawla Rubber & Plastic Industries (Pvt) Limited (Applicant) V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 1428
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 04-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.258-K/2015 Director, Directorate General of Inteligence & Investigation FBR v. M/s Chawla Rubber & Plastic Industries Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2947) 5/2011 Adm.A F.T. SELNES, a fishing trawler / vessel (Appellant) V/S Mega International Commercial Bank Company Limited, Taiwan, Republic of China (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 31-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting
2948) 2948/2014 Const. P. M/S Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Revenue Board and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 16-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
2949) 32/2018 Cr.Appeal Sajjad Ali & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.953/2018 Ali Gul v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed. Crl.M.A. 1558/2018 allowed.
2950) 116/2021 Suit GUNVOR SINGAPORE PTE LTD (Plaintiff) V/S PAKISTAN LNG LIMITED & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PPRA Rules, 2004
Tag Line:Procurement of LNG is a complexed but well settled process in
international market. It has a limited and defined market and limited
suppliers with a constant pressure of fluctuating market prices. The
suppliers are never seen at losses and at times poll in windfall gains
because of fluctuating market and this is how the system works.
Realistically they (LNG supplier) do not end up in losses, unless a
senseless decision is made. Pakistan like many other countries has a
limited capacity to dock/store and transport LNG.
----The bid bond is an entirely independent contract to the bidding
document and is enforced on the basis of the terms indicated in the bid
bond. Bid term's validity and enforcement were not discharged on the
Gunvor not being declared the most advantageous bidder on the opening
of bid but endured itself for the entire period during which the bid
remained valid i.e. up to 11.01.2021.
Citation:2023 CLC 1422
Advocates:Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ihjaz(ADVO-9650-SBC-KHI),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
2951) 1029/2015 Suit Asad Ahmad & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting
2952) 2867/2018 Const. P. Van Oord Dredging Contractors B.V. (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PTD 2008
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
2953) 2395/2021 Const. P. Abdul Basit (Petitioner) V/S The Secretary SWWB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The aforesaid petition is virtually against the transfer and posting order of the private respondent on Own Pay Scale basis.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1184
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 21-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2954) 255/2018 Criminal Miscelleneous MST. AMEER JAHAN @ BISMA NAUREEN (Applicant) V/S THE 11TH ADJ KHI SOUTH (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2421
Advocates:In Person(INP),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.59-K/2020 Bisma Noreen v. The State thr. P.G.Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2955) 2375/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Essa Bhutto and ors (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 09-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.722-K/2019 Ali Akbar Ujjan and others v. The Chairman Port Qasim Authority and others,C.P.L.A.723-K/2019 Akbar Adeeb Zubairi and another v. The Chairman Sindh Lobour Appellate and others,C.P.L.A.741-K/2019 Rasheed Ahmed Memon v. The Chairman Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2956) 1942/2009 Const. P. Ayazuddin and another (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 08-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
2957) 4/2024 E.P IRFANULLAH KHAN MARWAT (Petitioner) V/S ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAK & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Verification and oath on election petition. Section 144(4) Election Act.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1286
Advocates:Manzoor Ahmed Bhutta(ADVO-3418-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aziz Khan(ADVO-3324-SBC-KHI),Syed Ghulam Shabbir Shah(ADVO-13398-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
2958) 366/2019 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner I-R Zone-V (Applicant) V/S M/s. Faysal Bank Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Zubair Hashmi(ADVO-12273-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 28-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
2959) 34/2020 Spl.Cr.J.A Naimatullah Pathan (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1197
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
2960) 337/2013 Const. P. Malak Zahoor-ul-Haq (Petitioner) V/S 2nd Additional Judge, Sanghar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters)
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----S. 152--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199--- Constitutional petition---Correction in judgment--- Scope--- Ejectment order correction of---Reasonable period---Scope---Appellate Court while maintaining the judgment of Rent Controller directed the tenant to vacate the premises within a period of three months from the date of judgment but instead of "Three months" "three years" was typed in the judgment---Landlord moved an application for correction of mistake appearing in the judgment of Appellate Court which was accepted and correction was made as three "months" instead of "years"---Validity---Tenant could not satisfy as to how the Appellate Court could grant three years time to him while dismissing appeal which remained pending for almost two years and six months---If such was not a typographical mistake, same was against the fair play and equity which needed to be demonstrated by the court while exercising discretion available with the Rent Controller/Appellate Authority to grant a reasonable time for vacating the premises---If Appellate Authority were allowed to grant such unusual long period of time not by mistake but by conscious judicial mind to vacate the premises on dismissal of appeal of tenant then the effect of dismissal of appeal would be nullified---Rent Controller or Appellate Court could not specify an unreasonable period for vacating the premises to a tenant---Reasonable period could be few months keeping in view the circumstances of tenant and nature of tenement and any period beyond few months could only be granted by consent of the landlord---Period of three years was accidental slip or typographical error in the Appellate Court's order---Appellate Court had lawfully corrected the same and no right had accrued to the tenant---Tenant was directed to vacate the premises within specified period---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Nizam-ud-Din v. Ch. Muhammad Saeed and others 1987 CLC 1682; Jehanzeb Aziz Dar v. Messrs Maersk Line and others PLD 2000 Kar. 258; Muhammad Yakoob v. Baqar and 2 others 1998 CLC 456; Khawaja Imran Ahmed v. Noor Ahmad and another 1992 SCMR 1152; Khawaja Muhammad Razzak v. Dr. Sultan Mehmood Ghori and another 2007 SCMR 1866 and Muhammad Iqbal v. Sultan Akbar and 2 others 1994 SCMR 16 ref.
Nizam-ud-Din v. Ch. Muhammad Saeed and others 1987 CLC 1682; Jehanzeb Aziz Dar v. Messrs Maersk Line and others PLD 2000 Kar. 258; Muhammad Yakoob v. Baqar and 2 others 1998 CLC 456 and Khawaja Imran Ahmed v. Noor Ahmad and another 1992 SCMR 1152 distinguished.
(b) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----Ss. 14 & 15---Ejectment of tenant---Time for giving vacant possession to landlord---Reasonable period---Scope.
Citation:2015 CLC 468
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.347-K/2014 Malak Zahoor-ul-Haq through his Special Attorney Liaquat Ali Anjum v. Nasir Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2961) 401/2022 Cr.Bail SYED ADRISH BUKHARI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 66
Advocates:G. M. Bhutto(ADVO-8053-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
2962) 5975/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Toufiq Khan (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Atomic Energy and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 322
Advocates:Muhammad Rehan (ADVO-16127-SBC-KHW),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Waqas Ali(ADVO-18259-SBC-KHS),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1726/2023 Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) through its Secretary Islamabad v. Mohammad Taufique Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
2963) 333/2012 Suit M/s. FGBC Limited & Another (Plaintiff) V/S Director General Mines and Minerals Development & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 267, 2018 SBLR 1812
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 21-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
2964) 1431/2011 Const. P. Shakeel Ahmed Buriro (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Kausar Parveen and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 20-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting
2965) 100/2015 R.A (Civil Revision) Mrs.Nasira Khalique (Applicant) V/S Mrs.Rabia Sharif (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1371
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.946/2020 Mst. Rabia Sharif (decd.) thr. LRs. v. Mrs. Nasira Khalique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
2966) 841/2022 Const. P. Gulab Khan (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB
Tag Line:Application under s.265-K Cr.P.C. cannot be allowed if the matter requires evidence and there is a probability of conviction
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 421
Advocates:Raghib Ibrahim Junejo(ADVO-13637-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Rehman Ghous(ADVO-14269-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
2967) 67/2019 II.A. Muhammad Usman Soomro thr: L.Rs (Appellant) V/S Abdul Razzak Soomro (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 740
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.3147/2022 Abdul Razzak Soomro v. Muhammad Usman Soomro (decd.) thr. L.Rs Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed and Remanded
2968) 1529/2018 Suit Mohammad Ahmed Ansari (Plaintiff) V/S Interglobe Commerce Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Lifting the veil of incorporation
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 834
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
2969) 1979/2019 Suit Syed Sulaiman Jafri (Plaintiff) V/S United Bank Limited & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 836
Advocates:Imtiaz Ali Effandi(ADVO-3387-SBC-KHI),Syed Asghar Ali(ADVO-7775-SBC-KHI),Suleman Hudda(ADVO-8799-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
2970) 1134/2022 Const. P. Dr Shahzad Tarique & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1073
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 06-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
2971) 1097/2011 Cr.Bail Shahan and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 01-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting
2972) 37/2014 Criminal Appeal Ashique Ali Panhwar and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (Murder Appeal dismissed. Witnesses fully Supported the evidence During Cross not Challenged smell not coming from Baral.)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1088
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.159/2021 1. Ashique Ali Panhwar 2. Nisar Ahmed Panhwar 3. Momin Panhwar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
2973) 127/2005 Cr.J.A Muhammad Shafi @ Papan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
2974) 631/2019 Cr.J.A JAWAD ALI S/O DEEDAR ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1441
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Saleem Raza(ADVO-23228-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 13-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
2975) 1/2018 Divorce P. Ms. Khushnum Mormazd Muncherji (Plaintiff) V/S Hormazd Rusi Muncherji (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 492
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 06-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
2976) 879/1979 Suit Anjum Rehmat and another (Plaintiff) V/S Nemo (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 144 CPC)
Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----S. 144 & O. XX, R. 12(1) (b)---Delivery of possession of property to the plaintiffs by Nazir of High Court in execution of decree which was set aside---Reversal of decree---Wrongful possession---Mesne profit, recovery of---Application on behalf of Official Assignee for restitution of said property acquired by the plaintiffs---Scope--- Property/benefits of decree must be restored to the position as the same was on the date of passing of decree which had been set aside/reversed---Court was bound to place the parties in the position which they would have occupied prior to execution of decree---Such was directory for the court to pass order consequential on such variation or reversal of decree; order to include refund of cost, payment of interest even damages and compensation and mesne profit by the beneficiary of the decree for the period he had enjoyed the property or any other benefit but for the decree---Property should be restored to the Nazir of High Court through whom plaintiffs had acquired possession of the same---Decree had been reversed and plaintiffs were to be placed in the position which they had occupied prior to such decree---Official Assignee was not party when execution was ordered and decree was set aside---Suit would revive along with pending applications on remand or setting aside of judgment and decree---Official Assignee/Liquidator had first to prove that he was dispossessed from the property in execution of decree---Possession of property could not be handed over to the Official Assignee as same would violate the status quo and even at that time neither he was party to the suit nor his claim of bona fide owner was before the court---Plaintiffs should hand over peaceful possession of suit property to the Nazir---Plaintiffs remained in possession of the suit property for more than 24 years and 6 months under a decree which had been reversed and their possession from the date of reversal of decree till date of possession was wrongful possession---Benefits enjoyed by the plaintiffs for such period were liable to be refunded which could not be determined without inquiry---Nazir was directed to hold inquiry to ascertain the mesne profit---Application was disposed of accordingly.
Citation:2014 CLC 1019, 2014 SBLR 1495
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 23-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
2977) 3/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s.Dawlance Electronics Pvt.,Ltd. (Applicant) V/S The Collector of Customs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 25-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
2978) 3807/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1279
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Humayun Hanif(ADVO-11317-SBC-KHE),Syed Muhammad Ali Shah(ADVO-16316-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
2979) 469/2022 Const. P. Zain Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The I.G of Police and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:To elaborate further on the subject point of law, Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, guarantees equal treatment to all persons similarly placed. In terms of Article 27 of the Constitution, no citizen in the service of Pakistan or other persons shall be discriminated against in any manner. Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is in the clear negation of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements.
11. In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, and in addition to the jurisdiction conferred upon this Court under Article 199 (1)(c) of the Constitution 1973, we deem it appropriate to direct the competent authority of respondents, to take a fresh decision after providing meaningful hearing to the petitioner, within three months, without discrimination.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 623
Advocates:Kamran Asghar(ADVO-18430-SBC-KHW),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
2980) 112/2013 R.A (Civil Revision) NASREER KHAN (Applicant) V/S NISAR KHAN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Articles 117, 118 and 129 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, discussed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 783
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
2981) 1980/2015 Suit Engro Fertilizers Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Pak. Standards & Quality Control Authority & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Before parting I may observe that at an interlocutory stage this being not a petition or an appeal but an interlocutory application a detail discussion of the factual aspects of the matter and the Pakistan Standard & Quality Control Authority Act (Act VI of 1996) itself may prejudice case of the either parties.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
2982) 1412/2015 Cr.Bail Afzal-ur-Rehman alias Aatif (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 17-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
2983) 2/2009 II.A. Lal Bux and others (Appellant) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:1. In ex parte proceedings it is not mandatory to decree the Suit which in all situations has to be decided on the basis of available evidence
2. Public Documents are not always admissible in terms of Article 85 of the Qanoon e Shahadat Order 1984; exceptions to be looked into as well
3. Mutation entries are not title documents.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 714
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.709-K/2022 Lal Bux deceased through his legal heirs & others v. Government of Sindh through Executive District officer (Revenue) Khairpur & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2984) 22/2017 I.T.R.A M/S EYE TELEVISION NETWORK LIMITED (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 564
Advocates:Muhammad Iqbal Naim Pasha(ADVO-594-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 03-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
2985) 1781/2015 Const. P. M/s Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Abkari Act, 1878 (Section 35A)
Tag Line:----Section 35 of the ibid Act could empower Director General to
make rules in terms of mandate within the statute. The rules thus could
never be framed to pierce the contour of the statute itself.
-----Without prejudice to above, unless a parent statue provides such
levy, the rules by way of subordinate legislation cannot be legitimized.
The concept of subordinate legislation by way of rules is to toe the
object of the main statute and not to collide with scheme of law. The subordinate rules, even if conceived to be available, could only function in conformity with the main statute in order to give effect to the statutory provisions, which is not the case in hand.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 278
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 12-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
2986) 248/2021 Const. P. Azizullah Panhwar (Petitioner) V/S Ali Nawaz Panhwar and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Jurisdiction of Encroachment Tribunal.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 62
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
2987) 5899/2021 Const. P. M/s Yunus Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Rules, 2006
Tag Line:If any audit is conducted in respect of the sanctioned and paid refunds, it otherwise does not cause any prejudice so as to challenge the same in Constitutional Jurisdiction. The conduct of audit in the instant matter is to check accuracy, truthfulness and the veracity of the claim of refund of the Petitioners which already stands paid; hence, it does not cause any prejudice to that extent.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 795
Advocates:Syed Farhan Ali Shah(ADVO-16966-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
2988) 1879/2022 Const. P. Dr Arshad Ali Lodhi (Petitioner) V/S P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 379
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1417-K/2022 Dr. Khalid Iqbal Talpur v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of
2989) 42/2024 Criminal Appeal Irfan @ Jalal (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 135
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
2990) 58/2015 Suit.B National Bank of Pakistan. (Plaintiff) V/S Tuwairqi Steel Mills Ltd., & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
2991) 125/2011 Suit.B Habib Metropolitan Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Century 21 Textile & Sportswear (Pvt.) Limited and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 15-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
2992) 1203/2007 Suit NOUARTIS AG. & OTHR (Plaintiff) V/S NABIQASIM IND. PVT LTD (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: TRADE MARK
Tag Line:"Trade Marks Ordinance (XIX of 2001)---
----Ss. 8(1) & 40---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 54---Infringement of trade mark---Permanent Injunction---Application for grant of interim injunction under O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2, C.P.C.---Similarity and deceptivity in trade marks, determination as to--- Plaintiffs, pharmaceutical company owned trade mark ""LESCOL"" and got the same registered in year 1991---Trade mark ""DESCOL"" belonged to defendant, also a pharmaceutical company, which was registered in 2003---Plaintiff sought permanent injunction against use of defendant's trade mark and running of business thereunder contending that defendant's trade mark was phonetically, visually and structurally deceptive and confusingly similar and/or resembled plaintiff's trade mark and defendant's product was likely to pass off as that of plaintiff's product---Both trade marks involved sale of almost same medicinal product---Validity---Prescription of doctor and his expert opinion would be important factor in recommending medicine---Persons prescribing, dealing and offering medicines were specialist meant to protect passing of such medicine available at shop and sale of such medicine were carried out by authorized or licensed persons---Partially phonetically both trade marks were similar, but, for pharmaceutical products, the assigned names were given on basis of generics---No one could claim any proprietary right regarding such generic words as to its exclusive use---Trade mark was to be seen with complete getup, colour scheme, design and printing---Plaintiff's claim related to phonetic similarity between the two trade marks and not to the whole word or design or getup---No deceptive similarity existed between the two trade marks when seen as a whole---Pharmaceutical products were not ordinary goods which a person could point out at shop and buy at his choice---No case was made out for injunction---Application was dismissed, in circumstances."
Citation:2015 CLD 1162
Advocates:IRFAN & IRFAN ADVOCATES.(FIRM-125-SBC-KHI),Khurram Gul Ghory(ADVO-13962-SBC-KHI),Shazia Tasleem(ADVO-7429-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
2993) 3961/2020 Const. P. Ghulam Abbas Sangi & anoher (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In principle, the Courts cannot play the role of assessing body and sit in judgment over subjective evaluation; however, can examine whether the required objective criterion for promotion was followed or otherwise in a suitable case subject to grave illegality and perversity in the action of the authority having domain to the affairs
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 281
Advocates:Aamer Latif(ADVO-16121-SBC-KHE),Deputy Attorney General(),Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS),Ch: Azhar Alahi(ADVO-9535-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.292-K/2022 Ghulam Abbas Sangi & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Finance Division & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
2994) 1977/2022 Const. P. Sajid Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S NBP & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Factual controversy, writ not maintainable
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1702
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI),Nousheen Khan(ADVO-10691-SBC-KHE),Tajammul Hussain Lodhi(ADVO-10103-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
2995) 5570/2018 Const. P. Muneem Khan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Registrar Pakistan Nursing Council & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
2996) 2966/2020 Const. P. Raees Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) V/S The Karachi Dock Labor and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:enforcement of Board Resolution of Karachi Dock Labor Board
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 653
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.541-K/2021 Raees Ahmed & others v. Karachi Dock Labour Board through its Chairman Port Trust & another,C.A.97-K/2023 Raees Ahmed & others v. Karachi Dock Labour Board through its Chairman Port Trust & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ Appeal within 3 months ], Adjourned
2997) 3394/2013 Const. P. Gul Muhammad Palejo (Petitioner) V/S National Accountability Bureau (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 26-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.447/2014 Gul Muhammad Palejo v. National Accountability Bureau (NAB) thr. its Director General Sindh,C.A.624/2014 Gul Muhammad Palejo v. National Accountability Bureau (NAB) thr. its Director General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Partly Allowed,Disposed
2998) 154/2021 Const. P. TARIQ MASOOD (Petitioner) V/S SHER MUHAMMAD DIN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979, Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Ex parte Order Rent Controller &Appellate Court Set-aside )
Tag Line:The respondent may have proved the ownership of the property but then the relationship of landlord and tenant has to be established independently. It has to be proved through reliable evidence and documents that applicant/respondent apart from being owner of property was also the landlord of the occupant.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1211
Advocates:Naveed Anjum(ADVO-15581-SBC-KHE),Mian Mushtaq Ahmed(ADVO-2016-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
2999) 206/2023 Const. P. Wateen Telecom Pvt. Ltd. Hyd (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Sattar Khoso & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:No inquiry done under section 15 of the Sindh Payment of Wages Act 2015.
Case remanded.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 1076
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
3000) 570/2009 Suit Mirza Imtiaz Baig (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Pakistan Hockey Federation & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting
3001) 1905/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Riaz (Petitioner) V/S V/S Ministry of Petroleum & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman
Order Date: 12-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.M.A.5950/2016 Muhammad Riaz & others v. M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & others,C.A.1106/2015 Muhammad Riaz & others v. M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & others,C.P.424/2015 Muhammad Riaz & others v. M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Leave Granted
3002) 6026/2023 Const. P. Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S SBCA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 759
Advocates:Shahzeb Akhtar Khan(ADVO-13473-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
3003) 3642/2024 Const. P. Trading Corp of Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:State Owned Enterprise (SOE) no recovery proceedings can be initiated until Alternate Dispute Resolution Committee has decided the matter
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 891
Advocates:Mukesh Kumar(ADVO-11786-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 05-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
3004) 1/2019 Adm. Suit M/S. COMMERCIAL BANK INT (Plaintiff) V/S M.V. MISKI AN OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
There cannot be two decisions with regard to same loan transaction / finance facility; that is, one passed in the foreign jurisdiction as above and the other one in the present proceeding. the Judgment given by the Court of Sharjah (UAE) in the Case filed by present Plaintiff against Defendant No.2, can be executed through the present proceeding. Therefore, the Judgment of Sharjah Court in a sum of AED 5723557 (Five Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Seven Dirhams) together with 5% (five percent) of the legal interest, can be executed through the present proceeding.
Topic: Admiralty, Admiralty (Ship arrested)
Tag Line:There cannot be two decisions with regard to same loan transaction / finance facility; that is, one
passed in the foreign jurisdiction as above and the other one in the present proceeding. the
Judgment given by the Court of Sharjah (UAE) in the Case filed by present Plaintiff against
Defendant No.2, can be executed through the present proceeding. Therefore, the Judgment of
Sharjah Court in a sum of AED 5723557 (Five Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Five
Hundred and Fifty Seven Dirhams) together with 5% (five percent) of the legal interest, can be
executed through the present proceeding
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 02-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
3005) 214/1991 R.A (Civil Revision) Ameer Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Z.A. Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Untraced owner of Property)
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----S. 12----Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 23 & 24---Suit for specific performance of agreement---Proof---Inordinate delay of 40/45 years in disposal of the suit---Effect---Provision as to/ protection of property---Plaintiff was tenant of the suit/evacuee property prior to transfer of the title/ownership of the property to the defendant, and after the property had been officially transferred to the defendant, the plaintiff had become a statutory tenant, for which reason the defendant had initiated eviction proceedings during pendency of the present suit, in which the Rent Controller had passed an eviction order and the appeal filed against the same had been dismissed---Both courts below, having elaborately discussed the material evidence, had found that the plaintiff in view of his own admitted documents had failed to prove execution of the agreement of sale---Statement of the marginal witness had been belied during recording of the evidence---Plaintiff had perpetuated his possession over the suit property during about 45 years of litigation---Plaintiff, who was mere occupant without any legal character, thus, had defeated the rights/entitlement of the defendant granted under Arts. 23 & 24 of the Constitution in the name of the litigation---Plaintiff and his sub-tenant had continued to be in possession of the suit property under the cover of the interim orders passed by the courts---In view of facts and circumstances of the case, there was no misreading and non-reading of the evidence or lack of any proper reasoning for dismissal of the suit and appeal---Plaintiff and other occupants of the suit property who had no legal character/entitlement over the suit property for 40 years could not have been allowed to retain possession of same even for one day---Final eviction orders against the plaintiff were also in field, the execution of which had been stayed in the proceedings of present petition---Defendant had lost track of the case only on account of inordinate delay and conduct of his counsel---High Court dismissed revision for perpetuating plaintiffs' possession over the suit property for over 40 to 45 years through frivolous litigation before the Settlement authorities, through civil suit and also on account of realizing rent during the litigation---High Court directed that suit property be taken over by Nazir of the Court (as the defendant was not present before the High Court) and rented out and also directed to locate the defendant or his legal heirs---High Court observed that not only the counsel of the parties but the Court had also contributed in the inordinate delay in disposal of the suit---Revision petition was dismissed with cost of Rs.3,00,000 in circumstances.
Citation:2017 YLR 1365
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 05-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
3006) 281/2019 Criminal Appeal Khalil-ur-Rehman alias Bholoo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 593
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.166-K/2020 Sher Muhammad v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3007) 1225/2022 Suit Pakistan Beverage limited (Plaintiff) V/S State Bank of Pakistan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC)
Tag Line:No concluded terms of
remittance via Letter of Credit were concluded prior to the cut-of date
of 07.04.2022 and hence there is no retrospective applicability of
Circular dated 07.04.2022 to the contract between supplier and plaintiff
and such restrictions, as notified in the impugned circular, shall apply to
the case in hand
Citation:2023 CLD 125, 2023 SBLR Sindh 444
Advocates:Ghulam Ali Khan(ADVO-14769-SBC-KHI),Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
3008) 659/2018 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD SHAH @ SHAH JEE & ORS (Appellant) V/S GULSHAN ELLAHI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
3009) 245/2018 Criminal Appeal KARMAT HUSSAIN S/O MUBARAK HUSSAIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. Even in a case involving capital punishment, conviction can follow on circumstantial evidence, but that such circumstantial evidence should provide all links in an unbroken chain where one end of the chain touches the dead body and the other the neck of the accused.
2. Though evidence implicating an accused cannot be used to convict him if he was not confronted with it under section 342 Cr.P.C., but that does not mean to say that every inadequate examination under section 342 Cr.P.C. results in vitiating the trial, nor does it mean to say that the other independent evidence standing against the accused stands diminished. Rel. S.A.K. Rehmani v. The State (2005 SCMR 364). Even discarding the evidence not confronted to the accused under section 342 Cr.P.C., the chain of circumstantial evidence against him is complete and uninterrupted.
Citation:2021 YLR Note 37
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.196/2020 Karamat Hussain v. The State,Crl.A.398/2025 Karamat Hussain v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed
3010) 464/2005 Const. P. Amir Ali (Petitioner) V/S City District Government Karachi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 16-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
3011) 10/2021 Conf.Case REF. MADE BY 1ST ADJ/MCTC MALIR KARACHI (Appellant) V/S NADIR ALI @ BABAR & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Murder Trial (Mitigating Circumstances)
Tag Line:Turning to the quantum of sentence awarded to the appellants by the trial court we have considered the evidence produced by the prosecution and found that there were general allegations against the appellants of causing hatchet and knife injuries to the deceased
resulting in his death and all the witnesses have deposed that the appellants actively participated in the commission of offence.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 59
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3012) 51/2017 Suit Sultan Ahmed Hashmani (Plaintiff) V/S M/s Thatta Cement Company & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:Not even remotely, after two complete rounds of litigation upto
Hon'ble Supreme Court it can be imagined that the termination of the
plaintiff could be held as unlawful and consequently damages could
be granted in this suit. In the first round itself, the Tribunal and the
subsequent Hon'ble Courts held that the termination was lawful.
Granting damages on the preposition that it was an unlawful
termination, would amounts to ignoring and bypassing the
judgments of the Senior Civil Judge, Tribunal, this Court as well as
Hon'ble Supreme Court. There is no cavil that the dismissal of the
plaintiff from the service was held to be lawful and hence the plaintiff
cannot count on the imaginary unlawful dismissal, as he claimed, to
claim damages.
Citation:2023 PLC (CS) 527
Advocates:Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI),Afaq Yousuf(ADVO-6220-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3013) 2535/2010 Const. P. National Gases Limited (Petitioner) V/S Ministry of Railways & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 2552
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 12-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
3014) 67/2011 Cr.J.A Abdul Khalique (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Appeal (Dismissed on merits .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 03-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
3015) 1225/2021 Cr.Bail MANZOOR ALI S/O MAQBOOL AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed with direction to the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the subject case within three (03) months strictly in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 706
Advocates:Nazim Baig(ADVO-6196-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
3016) 701/2007 Suit UMAR GUL AGA & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S S.M.SHOIB BAGHPATI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Salim Thepdawal(ADVO-3099-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Idrees Sukhera(ADVO-4696-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shahid Qadeer(ADVO-7509-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
3017) 337/2016 Const. P. Asadullah Khand (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article 4,5 and 25 fundamental rights)
Tag Line:Provision of Gas
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 516
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 23-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3018) 204/2025 Const. P. M/S International Credit Information Lt & another (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Wahab Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 3561
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-25
Approved for Reporting
3019) 75/2022 Const. P. Ali Raza and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 658
Advocates:Muhammad Haseeb Jamali(ADVO-10211-SBC-KHI),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Barrister Zulfiqar Ali Langah(ADVO-9914-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 14-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
3020) 312/2013 Cr.Misc. The State / Anti-Narcotic Force (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Nawaz S/o Said Ahmed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Cancellation (Bail order Maintained)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 24-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
3021) 51/2018 Cr.Misc. Mukhtiar Ali Kolachi (Applicant) V/S The State & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
3022) 107/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. GHULAM SHABBIR @ PAPPI S/O PERVEZ (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeal (Appeal is dismissed. Arrested at Spot with Pistol, Committed robbery, no ill will with complainant. )
Citation:2020 MLD 1417
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
3023) 454/2012 Const. P. Mst, Sahib Khatoon Sunani (Petitioner) V/S S.H.O P.S Garhi Khairo and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 24-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting
3024) 235/2009 H.C.A Hameed A.Haroon (Appellant) V/S Yousuf A.Haroon & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 507
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.894/2020 Muhammad Hanif & another v. Hameed A. Haroon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 09-Dec-25)
3025) 834/2016 Cr.Bail ABDUL GHAFFAR S/O SHAMSUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 04-JUL-16
Approved for Reporting
3026) 399/2021 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa Bugti (Petitioner) V/S S.E Operation Circle SEPCO Larkana & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Transfer and Posting
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1195
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
3027) 6/2020 Cr.J.A Muhammad Mavia (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 446
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
3028) 1709/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Farogh Naseem (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
3029) 2761/2010 Const. P. Saud Nasir Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Fed Of Pakistan & Others (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 10-NOV-11
Approved for Reporting
3030) 9/2022 II.A. M/S Haider Builders & Developers (Appellant) V/S Parkash Kumar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Against Judgment
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 913
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4447/2023 M/s Haider Builders and Developers through its Managing Director Hyderabad v. Parkash Kumar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3031) 174/2016 S.M.A Ms.Ghazala Mansuri and another (Petitioner) V/S nil (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 22-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
3032) 32/2018 Cr.J.A Lal Muhammad Brohi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 300
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.78/2021 Lal Muhammad v. The State,Crl.A.235/2023 Lal Muhammad v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
3033) 91/2022 Const. P. Yasser ul Haq Effendi and Others (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 180
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.444/2022 Yasser ul Haq Effendi and another v. Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Law, Justice & Parliamentary Affairs Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
3034) 349/2019 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Sindh Revenue Board (Applicant) V/S M/s. Logon Broadband (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2762
Advocates:Shamshad Ahmed Narejo(ADVO-2185-SBC-HYD),In Person(INP),Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto(ADVO-3732-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
3035) 1376/1997 Suit Syed Sajid Raza (Plaintiff) V/S City District Government & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Section 42 & 12 of Specific Relief Act)
Tag Line:Nil.Declaration, cancellation, damages, mandatory/ permanent injunction.
Order 1 Rule 9 of CPC, Section 39,42 of Specific Relief Act.
Necessary and non-necessary parties have to be distinguished.
Registered Document can only be cancelled in terms of Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act.
Citation:2017 YLR 2197
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
3036) 782/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD RAFIQ S/O GUL RAUF (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Statutory ground of delay. Bail granted.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1063
Advocates:Malik Sher Afsar(ADVO-7147-SBC-KHI),Tahir ur Rehman(ADVO-6031-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
3037) 58/2016 II.A. Muhammad Shafat (Appellant) V/S The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical College Foundatio (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service
Tag Line:No employ can coerce his master for continuation of his employment as long as he himself wishes to continue. A legitimate expectation of a notice fulfilled by payment of a months salary and that is only the wisdom behind this one month notice before termination.
Advocates:Dr. Raana Khan(ADVO-4571-SBC-KHI),Qadir Hussain Sayeed(ADVO-29-SBC-KHI),Yousuf Ali Sayeed(ADVO-7167-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
3038) 798/2007 Const. P. Manzoor Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Mr. Justice Malik Muhammad Aqil
Order Date: 11-MAR-09
Approved for Reporting
3039) 237/2021 Criminal Appeal ALI DINO (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 451
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
3040) 119/2012 H.C.A Ahmed Kuli Khattak & another (Appellant) V/S Creek Marina (Singapore) Pvt Ltd. & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh Note 21, 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 617
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1433-K/2020 Ahmed Kuli Khan Khattak & another v. Creek Marina (Singapore) Pvt.Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3041) 21/2012 J.M MS. ZAINAB (Petitioner) V/S MUHAMMAD JAWED & OTHERS (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 16
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
3042) 22/2012 Civil Revision Ghulam Mustafa Malak (Applicant) V/S Divisional Forest Officer & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 1742
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3043) 3555/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 28-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4307/2017,C.M.A.8212/2017,C.P.L.A.1247/2018,C.A.170/2018,C.A.171/2018,C.P.L.A.4865/2017 SCP Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered & fixed in Next Week.,Disposed Dismissed(Bench=HJ(12)+HJ(16),Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
3044) 5862/2015 Const. P. Fareed Ahmed Yousufani (Petitioner) V/S The State throug NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 18-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting
3045) 476/2018 Cr.Bail MST. RUDAB BIBI D/O SYED AKBAR ALI SHAH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---
----S.497(1), first proviso---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.406 & 489-F---Criminal breach of trust, dishonestly issuing cheque---Bail, grant of---Accused, a lady---Statutory concession for accused lady---Scope---Burden of proof---Scope---Complainant had alleged that he, along with his near ones, invested a huge money with the firm of accused (lady) through her frontman---Later on, complainant came to know, the accused had defrauded and cheated many persons through her frontmen including her fiancee---When invested amount was demanded, accused issued many cheques and agreement was also signed by her frontman---Two cheques were dishonoured on presentation--- Validity--- Accused (lady) was nominated in the FIR and two dishonoured cheques of Rs. 3,26,94,200/- signed by her, was mentioned in the FIR---Assertion of the accused was immaterial that said cheques were not given by her to the complainant but by the co-accused (frontman) as burden of proof under S.489-F, P.P.C. was on the accused and not on the prosecution---Burden of proof of honestly issuing cheques being on the lady, therefore, the amount, for which allegedly cheques were issued, had to be secured---Accused could be admitted to bail on ground of statutory concession to her in terms of first proviso to S. 497, Cr.P.C and also that the punishment was only three years, therefore, the accused was admitted to bail subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 3,26,94,200/- and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court---Bail was granted to accused accordingly
Citation:2018 YLR 239
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 06-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
3046) 6243/2016 Const. P. Mehtab Ahmed Siddiqui and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Public Sector Companies (Corporate Governance Rules 2013 (Section 13)
Tag Line:The Competent Authority of HBFCL is directed to forthwith initiate the process for selection of an eligible person to be appointed against the aforesaid public office / posts in HBFC, inter alia, having regard to the principles and law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 205
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3047) 751/2020 Const. P. Moosa Khan (Petitioner) V/S P.D.O.H.A & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 776
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.401-K/2020 Moosa Khan v. Pakistan Defence Housing Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3048) 182/2018 Cr.Misc. AQUIL USMAN DHADUK & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S MUHAMMAD SALAM & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3049) 375/2023 H.C.A Zahidullah Khan (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:"Inordinate delay; judgment set aside on the sole ground of inordinate delay."
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 714
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4902/2024 Zahidullah Khan v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (DHA) through its Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
3050) 159/2012 Spl. Federal Excise Reference Application Commissioner of Inland Revenue. (Appellant) V/S M/S I.D.B.P (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1980
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3051) 1638/2022 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Jamshed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Regularization to seek regularization initial contract appointment must be in accordance with law
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1721
Advocates:Samiullah Soomro(ADVO-960-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
3052) 4009/2013 Const. P. Mr. Hamid Saleem (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 401
Advocates:Muhammad Javed Khalid(ADVO-10737-SBC-KHC),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI),Tania Alam(ADVO-8924-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.449-K/2023 Mr. Hamid Saleem v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defence, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned
3053) 365/2019 Const. P. Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3054) 318/2012 Cr.Bail Mehmood Soomro (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
3055) 2338/2015 Suit China Harbour Engineering Co.(CHEO). (Plaintiff) V/S Karachi Port Trust. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Award set aside)
Tag Line:Section 30 of the Arbitration Act 1940 - Arbitration Award of Umpire on issue not referred to him by the Arbitrators cannot be sustained- Set aside - Award by Arbitrators should be in conformity with the Agreement between parties.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
3056) 2442/2014 Const. P. Shaikh Aadil Jamil (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
3057) 1342/2025 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD SHAIKH ALAMGIR S/O SHAIKH JAMALUDIN & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1835
Advocates:Muhammad Jawed Bangash(ADVO-10874-SBC-KHS),Zulfiqar Ul Haq(ADVO-16319-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
3058) 214/2018 Const. P. Mateen-ud-din Ahmed & another (Petitioner) V/S FOP & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 595
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3059) 271/2019 Const. P. Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Son Quota (Dismissed))
Tag Line:In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of Son/Shaheed quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3060) 31/2019 M.A. M/s. Mehran Oils (Pvt) Limited (Appellant) V/S Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002)---
----S.12(2)---Appeal---Regulating activity---Scope---When decision is 'concerning a regulating activity' which adversely affects licensee, the aggrieved licensee can approach High Court as no other adequate remedy is provided in Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 to deal with such decision of Authority.
(b) Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002)---
----Ss. 12(2) & 45---Pakistan Oil and Gas (Refining, Blending, Transporting, Storage and Marketing) Rules, 2016, R. 12(1)(c), Schedule-V, Part-A---Appeal---Existing blending plant---Phrase 'notwithstanding anything contained in the Ordinance'---Scope---Appellant was running lube and oil blending plant prior to promulgation of Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002---Appellant assailed letter issued by Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority imposing additional conditions on its licence---Validity---Use of phrase 'notwithstanding anything contained in the Ordinance' and its repetition in relevant Rule of Pakistan Oil and Gas (Refining, Blending, Transporting, Storage and Marketing) Rules, 2016, indicated that decision and direction contained in letters in question were not applicable to appellant who fell within the category of existing operations/existing blending plants which were in field before commencement of Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002---Non-obstante clause was repeated by Pakistan Oil and Gas (Refining, Blending, Transporting, Storage and Marketing) Rules, 2016,making the Authority while making Rules in exercise of powers conferred on the Authority wherever it referred to the existing lubricant blending plant, which amounted to acknowledgement of the Authority that Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 and Pakistan Oil and Gas (Refining, Blending, Transporting, Storage and Marketing) Rules, 2016, would not affect or apply on existing Lube Oil blending plant---High Court refrained the Authority from applying additional condition on the licensees to whom licences were granted under R.13 of Pakistan Oil and Gas (Refining, Blending, Transporting, Storage and Marketing) Rules, 2016, including appellant as they were already carrying out regulated activities of running lube oil blending plants immediately before commencement of Pakistan Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, and requirement of Part-A of Schedule-V of R. 12 (1)(c) of Oil and Gas (Refining, Blending, Transporting, Storage and Marketing) Rules, 2016,were not enforceable against them---Appeal was allowed in circumstances.
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh Note 67
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
3061) 18/2006 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Muhammad Shoukat and Abdul Wahab Afghani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 21-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
3062) 1625/2016 Suit M/s. Fine Enterprises Traders.. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Constellation Co-Op. H.S. Ltd., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Suit by a partner on behalf of firm---Maintainability---Partner was not required to have an authority from other partners before initiating any action by way of a suit---No adverse consequence had been mentioned in the provision of O. XXX, R. 1, C.P.C. if compliance was not made---Partner could neither relinquish a claim of the firm nor withdraw a suit or proceeding without the authorization or endorsement of the other partners of a firm.
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O. XXX, R. 1. Application dismissed.)
Tag Line:Suit by a partner on behalf of firm---Maintainability---Partner was not required to have an authority from other partners before initiating any action by way of a suit---No adverse consequence had been mentioned in the provision of O. XXX, R. 1, C.P.C. if compliance was not made---Partner could neither relinquish a claim of the firm nor withdraw a suit or proceeding without the authorization or endorsement of the other partners of a firm.
Citation:2019 CLD 185
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
3063) 4435/2023 Const. P. Asif Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (section 179-A)
Tag Line:Approval of Layout Plans in Cantonment Areas under Section 178 AA and 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1114
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Mirza Sikandar Baig(ADVO-17936-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Vishwa Mittar(ADVO-19681-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
3064) 621/2010 Const. P. Nisar Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S VIIth Additional District Judge, District South & Mrs. Kulsoom Shabbir (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 05-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
3065) 14/2015 II.A. Col. (Retd) Mir Nawaz (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Haroon (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui
Order Date: 07-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
3066) 74/2020 Criminal Appeal Mir Muhammad (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 431
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.119-K/2022 The State / Director General, Anti Narcotics Force, Sindh v. Mir Muhammad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3067) 33/2015 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhab ALi (decd), thr: L.Rs: and others (Applicant) V/S Mukhtiar Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1474, 2025 CLC 1018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3068) 2216/2019 Const. P. Abdul Khalique (Petitioner) V/S S.P.S.C and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3069) 546/2025 Const. P. Sohail Hameed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:Challenge to a Bill before it is passed by the Assembly; Held No. Petition premature; dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 152
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Saleem Mangrio(ADVO-4620-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP),Fayaz Ali Metlo(ADVO-16510-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 25-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
3070) 79/2018 Const. P. William John alias William Masih Thr. Mrs. Farooq (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Naseem Bibi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1053
Advocates:Masood Anwar Ausaf(ADVO-7164-PBC-LHR),Syed Ehsan Raza(ADVO-4790-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
3071) 15/2015 F.R.A Airport Hotel (Appellant) V/S Khursheed Pervaiz & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sind Rented Premises Act - Eviction---15 (Imposed Special Cost Illegal and Unsustainable )
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
3072) 2710/2017 Suit Iran Central Iron ORE Company. (Plaintiff) V/S PKistan Steel Mills Corporation. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 YLR 613
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
3073) 1808/2017 Suit CPLC-Neighborhood Care & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
3074) 2580/2021 Suit AL-KARAM TOWEL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Re: Concessionary Tariff of RLNG.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 220
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Ghazi Khan Khalil(ADVO-18768-SBC-KHE),Ali Nawaz Khuhawar(ADVO-16396-SBC-KHS),Ameer Nausherwan Adil Memon(ADVO-15705-SBC-KHS),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3075) 1644/2018 Cr.Bail NAZIM HUSSAIN S/O HADI HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
3076) 1344/2016 Suit Aviserv Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Civil Aviation Authority (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O. XXXIX, Rule 1 & 2 Dismissed.)
Tag Line:Specific performance of un-registered agreement to lease. The Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that it was ready and willing to perform the same. Stay application dismissed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1033
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Blosch Ahmed Junejo(ADVO-12921-SBC-KHS),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
3077) 378/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous Zulfiqar Ali Khoso (Applicant) V/S SIO Crime No.141/2023 PS Mehar and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 119
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3078) 903/2021 Cr.Bail AMEERUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail before arrest Dismissed, U/S 9 C Narcotics )
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 956
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
3079) 492/2022 Criminal Appeal SOHAIL MAJEED AYAT (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 389
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3080) 102/2016 Cr.J.A MST. REHMAT BIBI WD/O M. ASLAM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 03-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
3081) 79/2021 Criminal Appeal ABDUL RAHEEM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 238
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.647/2023 Abdul Raheem v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor A.N.F. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3082) 60/2016 R.A (Civil Revision) Haji Umar Lakhany & others. (Applicant) V/S Mst. Khatoobai Haji Noor Muhammad & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 391
Advocates:Imran Ahmed(ADVO-2097-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
3083) 0/2007 Suit Mureed Fatima and others (Plaintiff) V/S Home Secretary and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Delay in payment of Court Fee)
Mr. Justice Dr. Qammaruddin Bohra
Order Date: 13-JUN-08
Approved for Reporting
3084) 89/2009 Cr.Acq.A. Chutto Khan (Appellant) V/S Haji Kambir and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2326
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3085) 3100/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Nusrat and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Supreme Court in the case of Nazeer Ahmed Chkrani v Government of Pakistan (2004 SCMR 623), reiterating the principle from Pakistan International Airlines v Nasir Jamal Malik (2001 SCMR 934), established that a promoted employee cannot be demoted without being given a chance to be heard and present their case. In the Nazeer Ahmed Chkrani case, the petitioner was promoted to General Manager in 1995 and then demoted to Deputy General Manager in 1997 without any prior explanation sought regarding the circumstances of their promotion or their capability to hold the higher post. The demotion order also lacked any stated reasons for the Competent Authority's opinion that the promotion was wrongful. The Supreme Court, without delving into the merits of the case, held that the demotion violated the principles of natural justice ("no one should be condemned unheard"). Consequently, the petition was converted into an appeal and allowed, setting aside the Federal Service Tribunal's order and the departmental demotion order. The Supreme Court clarified that the Pakistan State Oil Company Limited remains free to initiate fresh action against the petitioner, provided they follow the correct legal procedure, and no order regarding costs was issued. In recent judgment of 2022, the Supreme Court has ruled that no decision be taken effacing the right of any person without first being informed of the case and affording an ample opportunity of defense, therefore judicial propriety demand that this matter needs to be taken care of by the competitive authority of respondents before taking adverse view until and unless there is strict compliance of the Supreme Court decisions.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1415
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3086) 498/2021 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD UMAIR @ KABO S/O MUHAMMAD USMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 ((No legal bar or restriction to consider statement of official witnesses))
Tag Line:No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellant against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 813
Advocates:Muhammad Hanif Samma(ADVO-4046-SBC-KHI),Samina Hanif Samma(ADVO-11659-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
3087) 1775/2023 Cr.Bail SYED SULEMAN SHAH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 934
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
3088) 2701/2022 Const. P. Abdul Shakoor Abro... (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In this context, it may be observed that the writ jurisdiction of this Court is not meant to be exercised to compel the competent authority to promote a Civil Servant against whom prima facie involvement in serious charges of misconduct was available, for the reason that any such direction would be disharmonious to the principle of good governance and canons of service discipline causing undue interference to hamper the smooth functioning of the departmental authorities. This view is fortified by the decision rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mst. Ifat Nazir vs. Government of Punjab and others, 2009 SCMR 703. It is a well-settled law that in case of promotion vested / fundamental rights cannot be claimed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 645
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
3089) 1357/2022 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Khuhro & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:Petition of a civil servant in respect of his posting; not maintainable, whereas, pursuant to Section 10 of the Civil Servant Act, 1973, a Civil Servant cannot claim any specific posting or assignment while discharging his duties.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 710
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 23-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
3090) 3232/2018 Const. P. Muzaffar Iqbal Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2945/2018 Secretary Ministry of National Food, Security & Research Department, Islamabad and others v. Muzaffar Iqbal Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3091) 8620/2017 Const. P. M/s Pakistan International Container Terminal Ltd (Petitioner) V/S SLAT and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3092) 335/2012 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Forte Impex Lahore (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (section 162), Custom Act, 1969 (section 163)
Tag Line:Simply mentioning that there is danger of removal of goods is not
sufficient. The officer must state grounds which justify apprehension of
danger of such removal and so also information that he received from an
individual having name and that the concerned party has taken steps or
about to take steps for the removal of the goods. Nothing of such sort is
mentioned in the under considered warrant allegedly issued under
section 163 of Customs Act, 1969.
Citation:2022 PTD 245
Advocates:Kashif Nazeer(ADVO-11582-SBC-KHI),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 25-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3093) 3073/2021 Const. P. United Refrigeration Ind Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:Exemption from selection for audit. Benefit of Clause 105 of Part IV of 2nd schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 is not available to persons availing exemption from advance tax under Clause 72B ibid;
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1141
Advocates:Faheem Ali(ADVO-16513-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 03-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
3094) 29/2020 M.A. Roshan Ali Kanasro S/o Muhammad Safar (Appellant) V/S P.E.M.R.A. and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2227
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1254-K/2020 Roshan Ali Kanasro v. Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3095) 6632/2019 Const. P. Fareed Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review.
Tag Line:regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2213
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3640/2020 Abdul Haque Shaikh and others v. Province of Sindh thr. its Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Sindh Sectt. Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
3096) 3380/2019 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali Bhutto (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (CP Allowed. After retirement he is entitled to Promotion . promotion will not affect the seniority of any person. )
Tag Line:proforma promotion
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 413
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Kazi Wali Mohammad(ADVO-4745-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
3097) 1/2002 Insolvency Abdul Razzak (Petitioner) V/S Ms. Rahat Bano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
NIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Ahmed Khan
Order Date: 25-JAN-06
Approved for Reporting
3098) 3247/2017 Const. P. Nazir Hussain & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3099) 59/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s.T.M.Enterprises (Applicant) V/S Directoer Intellignece & Investigation. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 04-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
3100) 2811/2013 Const. P. Capt. Saifuddin (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
3101) 91/2011 Cr.J.A Jan Mohammad Chachar & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Jail appeal allowed, on the Ground Material Contradiction ,Identification Prada not held, how Knew accused.)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 363
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3102) 222/2012 Suit NADIR AKMAL KHAN LEGHARI (Plaintiff) V/S ASIM ARSHID & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2012 CLD 1588
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
3103) 923/2021 Cr.Bail Rajab Ali & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Bail Matters (Pre arrest bail dismissed In Section 324, 506/2, 337-A (i), 337-F (ii), 3374- H (ii), 504 & 35 PPC.)
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 230
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.152-K/2021 Rajab Ali Shah & another v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh,Crl.A.17-K/2021 Rajab Ali Shah & another v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
3104) 1089/2016 Const. P. MAL Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S PAKISTAN through secretary revnue Division (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Amendment of pleadings )
Tag Line:Through this common order the applications under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151, CPC filed in C.P.No.1089/2016 and filed in C.P.No.D-1720/2016 respectively were disposed of.
In this case, it was discussed and observed that there is no cavil to the legal proposition that Court always has the jurisdiction under Order VI, Rule 17, C.P.C. and enjoys vast discretionary powers to allow amendments in a plaint at any stage of the proceedings, which in the opinion of the Court, are just and necessary for final disposal of case between the parties in accordance with law. However, at the same time, the Court is bound to exercise such discretion in accordance with settled judicial principles, It needs no reiteration that while allowing amendment in the plaint, the defendant's right should also be kept in view and no amendment should be allowed, which is aimed to change complexion of the case altogether or to introduce a new case based on new cause of action.
It was further observed that keeping in view of the legal position, the proposed amendments if allowed to be incorporated in the existing pleadings of the petitioners, the same shall not either change the nature or complexion of the case, as the proposed amendments sought to be incorporated are legal questions, which even otherwise do not require any factual investigation. Conversely, since the present cases are constitutional petitions therefore, in order to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings, all constitutional points relating to subject issue can be dealt with comprehensively in the present constitutional petitions. Furthermore, since the respondent will have the right to amend their pleadings as well, in the event, the proposed amendments if allowed to be incorporated, therefore, we are of the view that no prejudice will be caused to the respondents.
Citation:2017 CLC 1204, 2017 SBLR Sindh 1052
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
3105) 943/2019 Const. P. Ghulam Rasool & another (Petitioner) V/S Jawaid Ali & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (G&W Section 25 allowed In Fever of Father Maintained by high Court as after death of his wife not remarried . )
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 827
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3106) 6/2021 Criminal Appeal Zahid Ali Mastoi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (section 15, 17, 24 Gas Theft Control and Recovery Act, 2016. sentence awarded to the appellant is Suspended. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 741
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.311/2023 Niaz Muhammad v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3107) 102/2020 Criminal Appeal Gulab (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 758
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
3108) 281/2019 Cr.Misc. Ashfaqur Ali (Applicant) V/S Learned 1st A.D.J Badin & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 525
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
3109) 49/2020 Cr.J.A Qadir Bux Buledi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 182
Advocates:Muhammad Afzal Jagrani(ADVO-871-SBC-LRK),Ali Anwar Kandhro(ADVO-9767-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3110) 124/2023 Cr.Rev NADIR HUSSAIN ADV (Applicant) V/S DR MUHAMMAD ALI ZAIDI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1601
Advocates:Farooq Hashmat Abbasi(ADVO-4616-SBC-KHC),Mohammad Arif(ADVO-4057-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Syed Hassan Mujtaba Abidi(ADVO-15596-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3111) 88/2018 Criminal Appeal Hafeez Machi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Accused Acquitted, in Police Encounter . All Witness are Police official but their Statement U/S 161 Crpc Recorded after 15 days )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1089
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
3112) 1594/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Adnan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Kulsoom Bibi(ADVO-19414-SBC-KHE),Mohammad Mazharul Hasan(ADVO-4213-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
3113) 5871/2014 Const. P. Allama Mousa and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.880-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Allana Mousa and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3114) 939/2010 Suit CLIFTON BLOCK-7 RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S ZUBAIR AHMED & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C (Allowed.)
Tag Line:(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----Ss. 42 & 54---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.23, 189 & 201---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.11, Expln.VI & O.VII, R.11---Suit for declaration and injunction---Res judicata, principle of---Rejection of plaint---Public importance issue---Plaintiffs were residents of road in question and they assailed commercialization of the road---Defendants sought rejection of plaint on the plea that commercialization of road in question had already been decided in earlier proceedings in presence of plaintiff's registered Association--- Validity--- Once registered Association of residents of the area was present before Court and 'issue' of public importance for and on behalf of residents was raised by them and the Court had decided the 'issue', the individual members or other residents of same locality were bound by the decision of Court on that particular 'issue' in which they were very much interested and they could not claim that such decision of the Court on the said 'issue' was not binding on them because they were not individually party to that judgment---Plaintiffs were no other than the community of residents of same locality and the issue re-agitated by them through the suit had already stood answered by Division Bench of High Court, therefore, earlier judgment was binding on them in terms of Expln.VI to S.11, C.P.C.---Plaintiffs abused process of Court in denying defendants to freely exercise their fundamental right to acquire, hold and 'dispose of property' guaranteed to them by Art.23 of the Constitution---Plaintiffs attempted to persuade the Court to pass orders against mandate of Arts.189 & 201 of the Constitution---Suit was dismissed with costs in circumstances.
Citation:2015 CLC 1090
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 04-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
3115) 102/2019 Cr.Bail Abdul Rehman (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3116) 4486/2013 Const. P. The State / Anti Narcotics Force (Petitioner) V/S Mushtaq Ahmed Malik & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PTD 2881
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting
3117) 2011/2018 Const. P. Energy Solution (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S The President of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 1639, 2019 CLD 1194
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.148-K/2019 Energy Solution (PVT) LTD., v. The President of Pakistan through Director (Legal) Presidents Secretariat (Public) Aiwan-e-Sadar, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3118) 122/2010 Cr.J.A Muhammad Saleem Arain (Appellant) V/S the state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 26-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.429/2014 Muhammad Saleem Arain v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Partly Allowed. Death sentence is reduced to L.I.
3119) 214/2017 Criminal Appeal AKHTER HUSSAIN S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN GUJJAR (Appellant) V/S SHO SACHAL & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
3120) 15/2016 H.C.A Karachi International container Terminal Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Brig (Retd.) Arif Mahmud Malik (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 1359
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3121) 82/2024 I.T.R.A Rakesh Keshwani S/o Lachman Dan (Applicant) V/S Assistant/Deputy Commissioner & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Time Barred Appeal. Non reading of facts; copy paste attitude deprecated
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1320
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 14-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3122) 2438/2016 Const. P. P.P.L Officers and Associates & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.681-K/2017 Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association thr. its Chairman v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3123) 128/2022 H.C.A M/s. Shaheed Shah Inayat Village & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Ashiq Hussain Vighio & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1148
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Mukesh Kumar G. Karara(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.548-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home and others v. M/s Shaheed Shah Inayat Village Residents Welfare Association and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3124) 6187/2021 Const. P. Khan Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 824
Advocates:Ghulam Rasool Shaikh(ADVO-1824-SBC-KHP),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 11-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
3125) 2874/2014 Const. P. KHALID AFTAB KHAN (Petitioner) V/S THE DIRECTOR GENERAL NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 18-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
3126) 99/2020 Const. P. Mst. Syeda Sheerin (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 709
Advocates:Muhammad Haseeb Jamali(ADVO-10211-SBC-KHI),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
3127) 349/2006 Cr.Appeal Abdullah Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 11-MAY-10
Approved for Reporting
3128) 1056/2022 Suit Mrs. Zulekha & another (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 812
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3129) 4428/2014 Const. P. Ahmed Ali Bhambro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Citation:2018 SCMR 2116
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.80-K/2017 National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ahmed Ali Bhambro and others,C.P.L.A.440-K/2017 National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ahmed Ali Bhambro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
3130) 39/2007 Cr.Appeal Jaffar and Three Others (Appellant) V/S Jaffar and Three Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
3131) 225/2009 Cr.Appeal Jantan Bibi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 29-OCT-09
Approved for Reporting
3132) 1370/2013 Const. P. Shaikh Muhammad Nadeem (Appellant) V/S National Accountability Bureau (NAB) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 23-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
3133) 1309/2024 Const. P. Manahil Imran and Another Thr. Imran Latif (Petitioner) V/S Mohammad Sadiq Khurshid and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Scheme of the law envisioned under Sections 7 and 19 of the Guardian & Ward Act, 1890.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1832
Advocates:Shazia Nazir(ADVO-22572-SBC-KHE),Aadil Channa(ADVO-20822-SBC-KHS),Irfan Bashir Bhutta(ADVO-14755-SBC-KHI),Rehan Kayani(ADVO-12724-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 07-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
3134) 222/2013 Cr.J.A Shah Bali and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 31-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
3135) 124/2016 II.A. Abid Hassan (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Shoukat Naheed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
3136) 31/2023 Suit.B ASKARI BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. EXECUTIVE AVIATION (PVT.) LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Discussion on prescriptions of Section 9(5) & 10(2) of FIO
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 301
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Shahid Ali(ADVO-18050-SBC-KHE),M/S. BADAR ALAM & COMPANY(FIRM-261-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
3137) 434/2023 Const. P. Sarfarazuddin S/o Rafiullah (Petitioner) V/S M/s. Paras Commercial Company and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979
Tag Line:Limitation condoned. The Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 380
Advocates:Qazi Ajmal Kamal(ADVO-8710-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Kamran Mirza(ADVO-11996-SBC-KHI),Junaid Alam Khan(ADVO-8752-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
3138) 794/2010 Const. P. Ghulam Mohiuddin Warsi (Petitioner) V/S Qutibuddin & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
3139) 396/2016 Const. P. Naseer Uddin Jatoi (Petitioner) V/S Ms.Reham Asad and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bridal gifts given by a husband are the absolute property of a wife and cannot be taken away from her. A bride can always recover the articles of bridal gifts, ???WARI??? and presents given to her by a bridegroom or his family at the time of the marriage
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1193
Advocates:Shahid Iqbal(ADVO-1430-SBC-HYD),Muhammad Irfan(ADVO-2691-SBC-KHI),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-4827-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
3140) 667/2017 Cr.Bail FARHAN HASSAN S/O SAGHEER HASSAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 MLD 1389
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
3141) 319/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. ALI AHMED @ KHATIYA S/O MUMTAZUL HAQ (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
3142) 572/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Fazil Khan (Petitioner) V/S Aziz Khan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Judgment of Rent Controller& Order Appellate Court is maintained . C P dismissed .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
3143) 99/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous Sikandar Ali Lund (Applicant) V/S DSP complaint Cell N/Feroze and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1766
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3144) 1087/2020 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD SALEEM S/O GHULAM HAIDER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 144
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
3145) 1459/2024 Const. P. Murad Ali Lehri (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 940
Advocates:Muhammad Asadullah Shaikh(ADVO-13708-SBC-KHI),Bilal Haider(ADVO-352019-BBC-QTY),Shariq A. Razzak(ADVO-15492-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
3146) 83/2011 R.A (Civil Revision) Ghulam Rasool through L.Rs & Ors (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 599
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
3147) 71/2021 Spl.Cr.J.A Hayatullah Noorzai (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 834
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 24-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
3148) 699/2013 Const. P. Nisar Raja (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line: mere pendency of representation seeking exemption does not entitle petitioner to seek provisional release under Section 81 of the Customs Act
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 22
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Nale Mitho @ Muhammad Ishaq(ADVO-623-SBC-MPR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
3149) 4362/2017 Const. P. Omer Razzaq Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
3150) 39/2016 M.A. Liaquat Ali (Appellant) V/S Mst. Huma Faiz and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Federal Employees Benevolent Fund and Group Insurance Act, 1969, Succession Act, 1925 (S. 372)
Tag Line:Succession Certificate could have been granted only in respect of assets left by
the deceased either in favour of widow or any of the brothers of deceased as
deem fit and proper and the purpose of granting succession certificate was the
distribution of assets amongst the legal heirs, which is not the case here at
least for these financial heads which does not form assets of deceased.
--Widow being nominee is entitled for such funds i.e. provident fund,
gratuity, group insurance, welfare funds and benevolent fund without having
any recourse of obtaining any succession certificate.
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 251
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Ramzan(ADVO-7072-SBC-KHI),Sajjad Hussain(ADVO-14677-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.28-K/2018 Liaquat Ali v. Mst: Huma Faiz and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3151) 1471/2021 Const. P. Shahid Ahmed Khan Qaboolio (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 902
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3152) 7/2015 II.A. Mohammad Rafique Aghani (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Ali Aghani and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Article 79 of Qanoon-e-Shahdadat)
Tag Line:The requirement of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 is that if a document is required by law to be attested, it shall not be used as evidence until two attesting witnesses at least have been called for the purpose of proving its execution, if there be two attesting witnesses alive, and subject to the process of the Court and capable of giving evidence. There is a proviso for a registered document, but that is not relevant for the present purposes.
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 120
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3153) 18/2022 Cr.Acctt.A MUHAMMAD SALIK NUKRICH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB
Tag Line:Appeals allowed.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 348
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.125-K/2025 M/s Pak Ideal Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Karachi v. Muhammad Salik Nukrich & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3154) 7255/2017 Const. P. Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 579
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3155) 102/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 263
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Ali Asghar(ADVO-18230-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 28-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.714-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Uris Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3156) 364/2007 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. State Life Insurance Corportion of Pak. (Applicant) V/S The Collector of Sale Tax & Central Exice (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 24-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
3157) 1709/2023 Const. P. Malak Muneer & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1152
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.268-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Malak Muneer and others,C.P.L.A.1434/2024 Malak Muneer and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned + Before 3JJs, Adjourned + Before 3JJs
3158) 193/2011 R.A (Civil Revision) Rasool Bux (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Colonization and disposal of Government Lands Sindh Act, 1912
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 340
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3159) 223/2023 Suit ARY COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Injunction granted for broadcasting PSL-8.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1120
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3160) 242/2024 Const. P. Mst. Uroosa & another (Petitioner) V/S The Learned IX-ADJ Hyderabad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1582
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3161) 576/2020 Cr.Bail Muhammad Moosa (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1560
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
3162) 78/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Zubair Ahmed Kolachi (Applicant) V/S Mahesh Kumar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 816
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
3163) 60/2012 II.A. Muhammad Ahmed & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Nargis Nawaz & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 126
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3164) 1166/2007 Suit MANSOOR-UL-HAQUE SOLANGI (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATIOIN OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 463
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3165) 645/2010 Suit MST.SHABANA HANIF (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.NEW CHALI TRADE CENTRE (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Section 13(3) SBCO, 1979. Interpretation of. Regulation 5-1.22 KBTPR, 2002. Section 22(1) of Limitation Act, 1908. Time runs from date of joinder application.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 185
Advocates:Muhammad Hashim Siddiqui(ADVO-3026-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Nouman Jamali(ADVO-10431-SBC-KHI),Shabbir Ahmed Shaikh(ADVO-2643-SBC-KHI),Imran Ahmed(ADVO-2097-SBC-KHI),Kamran Arshad(ADVO-8689-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
3166) 7434/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Sami Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:it is now well settled that if a person during the pendency of constitutional petition fulfilled the requisite qualification to hold such a post then writ of quo warranto could not be issued against such person as such Employees no more suffered disqualification to hold the post in question. On the aforesaid proposition the Supreme Court in the case of Asif Hussain and others v. Sabir Hussain and others
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1248
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
3167) 1462/2020 Const. P. Zakir Hussain Dharejo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:It is well-settled that the exercise of writ jurisdiction is discretionary. Principles of equity, such as delay, acquiescence, and waiver, must be considered. Petition is dismissed being hit by laches.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 905
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
3168) 144/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SHAHID WILAYAT S/O WILAYAT MASIH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 6
Advocates:Azhar Hussain(ADVO-12024-SBC-KHI),Liaquat Hussain(ADVO-4258-SBC-KHI),Syeda Nuzhat Ara(ADVO-18769-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
3169) 948/2015 Const. P. Umer Yamin (Petitioner) V/S I.G Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of Junior Clerk on the basis of Son/ quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment in Sindh Police can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.
Topic: Service matters (Son Quota (Dismissed))
Tag Line:In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of Junior Clerk on the basis of Son/ quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment in Sindh Police can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) 415
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.621-K/2019 Umar Yameen v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deptt: and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3170) 2722/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
3171) 1216/2022 Cr.Bail Arbab (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Earlier court case)
Tag Line:Conversely, the case law relied upon by Applicants counsel is relevant, wherein bail was granted, inter alia, considering the earlier Court case. Both male members of a family are behind bars who are bread earners. There is no record of earlier conviction. Guilt of accused is yet to be determined in the above circumstances, because at this stage a deeper appreciation of facts cannot be made.
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 677
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
3172) 89/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Mohammad Sharif (Applicant) V/S Abdul Baseer Shamsi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 485
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
3173) 71/2010 Const. P. Manzoor Muhammad and others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.18-K/2019 Karachi Port Trust and others v. Manzoor Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3174) 261/2012 Cr.Rev Ghulam Sarwar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 06-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
3175) 140/2022 Cr.Tran THE STATE THROUGH ADDL ATTORNEY GENERAL PAKISTAN (Appellant) V/S ZAFAR KHAN @ RAM & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1216
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 22-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
3176) 709/2019 Const. P. Rab Dino (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Ehtram-e-Ramazan Ordinance, 1981 (Section 5)
Tag Line:Since in all the petition, the places mentioned does not fall within exemption given under section 5 of the Ordinance, therefore, all the petitions are dismissed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
3177) 2253/2018 Const. P. Syed Mureed Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3178) 111/2018 I. A Muhammad Asif (Appellant) V/S M. C. B. Bank Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLD 733
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3179) 265/2024 H.C.A Muhammad Nasser Janjua & Others (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1436
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 11-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1132-K/2024 Muhammad Nasser Janjua and others v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
3180) 1043/2016 Const. P. M/s. CCL Pharmaceutical (Pvt.) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 07-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.3953/2016 CCL Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy. M/o Health Services and another,C.A.470/2017 CCL Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy. M/o Health Services and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Pending Adjourned
3181) 271/2022 Cr.Rev BASHEER AHMED SODHAR S/O BAKSHAL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Coming to the main issue, the offenses under the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 2010, are cognizable. This means that the police have the authority to arrest the accused without a warrant and investigate the case further, which provision of the law ought to have been invoked by the Police, however, they rather preferred to invoke the jurisdiction of ATC on the purported plea that revenue officials were deterred from their duties with terror charges, but it is yet to be determined by the court whether sections 6, 7, and 8 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 were/are attracted or otherwise as the contents of F.I.R, prima facie show the allegations of general nature as such these offenses of PPC could be tried by the ordinary/regular court rather than the special court, in terms of the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Hussain case, just on the plea of Mukhtiarkar and Police to the effect that injury was caused to them; however, the police report lacks a medical certificate required to charge the accused under section 337-A (i) PPC. Besides it is unclear whether the official intended to remove encroachment from public or private land. A regular court should determine this aspect of the case after framing the charge, and transfer the case if necessary under the law for the reason that Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 allows for the transfer of a case from an Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) to an ordinary court.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1493
Advocates:Barrister Zulfiqar Ali Khan Jalbani(ADVO-17147-SBC-KHS),Abdul Aziz(ADVO-20687-SBC-KHS),Saddam Bhutto(ADVO-19398-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
3182) 5987/2021 Const. P. Waqar Ali Khoso and Others (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 517
Advocates:Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 19-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.473-K/2022 Ghayasuddin Shahani & others v. The Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary, & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3183) 20/2007 II.A. Mst. Rukhsana Tabassum Shaikh (Appellant) V/S Kazim Imam Jan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 08-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
3184) 1969/2016 Const. P. Saifullah Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Faiza Mughal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Rule 22 W.P Family Court Act, 1964.
Appellate Court decided appeal on merits, hence condoned the limitation.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 543
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 06-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.695-K/2023 Saifullah Abbasi v. Mst. Faiza Mughal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3185) 673/2016 Const. P. Ahmed Ali Saharan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 417
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.591-K/2019 Ahmed Ali Saharan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3186) 455/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner Inland Revenue (Applicant) V/S M/s. New Allied Electronics Industries (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (section 195), Custom Act, 1969 (section 79), Custom Act, 1969 (section 193), Sale Tax Act 1990 (section 47)
Tag Line:Under Customs Act, 1969, Section 79 onwards is a procedure
which regulates the import through filing of Goods Declaration along
with necessary documents including examination of imported goods and
clearance thereof. Such mechanism was adopted and exhausted by the
customs when goods declaration was dealt with. The purported
allegation of misdeclaration was in fact within the domain and
jurisdiction of Collectorate of Customs, which, in case of any
controversy, could have retained the consignment/goods for further
inquiry or chemical test and determine the duty provisionally till
disposal of the inquiry or reassessment. This has not happened in the
instant case as had it been a misdeclaration of the goods, the officers
concerned may have taken cognizance and could have objected to the
assessment in terms of Section 193 and 195 of Customs Act, 1969 read
with Section 32 of the said Act. Sales Tax Act, 1990 does not deal with
issue of misdeclaration as being dealt with by the customs officials under
Customs Act, 1969. Therefore, unless a misdeclaration is established by
the customs officials such recourse of recovery of short levy of sales tax
could not have been triggered. The dispute of classification was never
raised at customs level.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 691
Advocates:Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 08-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
3187) 29/2015 Judicial Companies Misc. Total Parco Pakistan limited & another (Applicant) V/S NA (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters
Tag Line:This is not a conveyance or sale deed under Transfer of Property
Act which requires registration and stamping under Registration Act and
Stamp Act ibid, before Sub-Registrar; rather it is a Scheme of
Arrangement not required to be registered under the two ibid
enactments before the Sub-Registrar. It is approved by a Court of law as
an instrument confirming scheme and forwarded to any authority
concern in the format as defined in Form A ibid. Since the aforesaid
transfer under Scheme of Arrangement is not in pursuance of Land Grant
Policy, therefore, the charges as being claimed for the transfer of plot
are not applicable on this count also.
Citation:2023 CLD 241
Advocates:Munawar Ali Issani(ADVO-2125-SBC-KHI),Abraiz Ali Khan(ADVO-15124-SBC-KHS),ORR. DIGNAM & CO.(FIRM-109-SBC-KHI),Taha Ali Zai(ADVO-7361-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3188) 8172/2017 Const. P. E-Movers (Pvt.) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 410
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.280-K/2019 Federation of Pakistan and another v. E-Movers (Pvt) Ltd and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3189) 484/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. A.B. Saeed (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 809
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3190) 512/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Afeef Trading & Furniture (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1160
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3191) 28/2008 Civil Revision Muhammad Naseer and others (Applicant) V/S H.M.C. and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 777
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3192) 180/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director of Customs Valuation (Applicant) V/S M/s. Hanna Dairies, I-301 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 318
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Khalid Hidayat Khan(ADVO-16304-SBC-KHE),Mutahir Khalid Khan(ADVO-15037-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
3193) 2144/2010 Const. P. Mst. Rubina Kousar Mughal (Petitioner) V/S District Police Officer, Sukkur & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 22-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting
3194) 208/2010 Civil Revision Absar Ahmed Siddiqui (Applicant) V/S M.s Union Bank & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
3195) 1160/2021 Cr.Bail KHURRAM SHAHZAD S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF BHATTI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the above, the applicant / accused Khurram Shahzad son of Muhammad Yousuf Bhatti is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The instant bail application stands disposed of in the above terms.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 979
Advocates:Naeemullah Bhutto(ADVO-10813-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Syed Ghulam Shabbir Shah(ADVO-13398-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3196) 963/2018 Suit M/s. Ruknuddin (Pvt.) Ltd (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Suit not maintainable against acquisition proceedings under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 116
Advocates:Sameer Ghazanfar(ADVO-11222-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI),Barkat Ali(ADVO-15305-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
3197) 7170/2022 Const. P. Moulvi Iqbal Haider (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 580
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
3198) 21/2021 Cr.J.A Ghulam Shabeer Chandio (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 825
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3199) 98/2012 Spl.H.C.A Irfan Nawab (Appellant) V/S Soneri Bank (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 CLD 1922
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Mian Raza Rabbani(ADVO-3376-SBC-KHI),Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI),Saalim Salam Ansari(ADVO-3307-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
3200) 1062/2020 Suit Siddiqsons Private Limited & another (Plaintiff) V/S Creek Marina Singapore PTE Limited & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order II Rule 2 CPC), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXVII, Rule 1)
Tag Line:Out of a common cause, parties may have different reliefs and
remedies available to them within same jurisdiction of the Court but
with different procedural way outs for reliefs and remedies claimed such
as original civil jurisdiction and jurisdiction under Summary Chapter,
though later is also categorized as original jurisdiction.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 101
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
3201) 2082/2015 Const. P. Brigadier (R) Kamran Jalil (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 598
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.490-K/2021 Brig (R) Kamran Jalil v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3202) 219/2011 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue (Applicant) V/S Kirther Pakistan B.V. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.190-K/2014 Commissioner Inland Revenue (Zone III) Large Tax Payer Unit v. M/s Kirther Pakistan B.V. C/o Ford Rhodes Sidat Hyder & Co Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3203) 542/2020 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. The Commissioner Inland Revenue Z-II. CRTO (Applicant) V/S M/S Gull Metal (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Time Barred Order in Original; Time provided under Section 11(5) of the Sales Tax Act, 1190 is mandatory
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 540
Advocates:Munawar Ali(ADVO-10937-SBC-KHE),Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-3297-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 22-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
3204) 3853/2022 Const. P. PTCL (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether learned Member NIRC enjoy the jurisdiction to issue contempt notices
Citation:2024 PLC Lab. 25
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 23-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
3205) 304/2024 Const. P. Shakeel Ahmed S/o Jaffar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khalidah and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1292
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Akbar(ADVO-1889HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
3206) 1501/2020 Const. P. Mst Rani Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 273
Advocates:Jan Muhammad(ADVO-186-SBC-THT)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3207) 758/2006 Const. P. M/s.Baqai Foundation I.E.Baqai Hospital. (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh &Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 14-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
3208) 6167/2020 Const. P. Al - Ghazi Traders Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether the Sindh Human Rights Commission was/is empowered under Section 4 of the Sindh Protection of Human Rights Act, 2011, (Act, 2011) to entertain service-related issues and direct the reinstatement of the private respondents.
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 371
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3209) 630/2021 Criminal Appeal KAMRAN MIRZA S/O MIRZA RIAZ BAIG (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Trial (Corroboration of set of witnesses)
Tag Line:It is well settled that if a set of witnesses is disbelieved to the extent of some accused the same cannot be believed in respect of the remaining accused facing the same trial without any independent and strong corroboration. Upon scrutiny of the material available on record, we find no corroboration to maintain the conviction and sentence of the appellant.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 157
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Asst Attorney Gen(AsstAG),Shamshad Ali(ADVO-19351-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.33-K/2023 MCB Bank Limited v. Kamran Mirza Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3210) 1848/2019 Const. P. Asif Ali and others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 957
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
3211) 13/2012 Cr.Acctt.A Muhammad Akbar Zardari & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2012 PCr.LJ 1677
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar
Order Date: 19-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting
3212) 73/2024 Cr.Bail Muhammad Iqbal & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Loss to the government exchequers )
Tag Line:NAB Matter
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 394
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 29-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
3213) 1447/2020 Const. P. Yaseen Ali Ghunio (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:CP(D) 1447/2020 connected with CP(D) 228/2021 - Judgment in Sindhi
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 488, 2025 SHC SUK 2054
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
3214) 132/2009 Civil Revision Shafqat Ali (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Report of Commissioner appointed by the Court is not always sacrosanct and binding but is a tool for arriving at a just and fair conclusion
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 518
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3215) 122/2013 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. POWER LINKS (Applicant) V/S THE DIRECTOR INTELLIGENCE & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 24-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.75-K/2014 Director, Directorate General of Intellignece v. M/s Power Links and another,C.A.1682/2014 Director, Directorate General of Intellignece v. M/s Power Links and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
3216) 1489/2022 Const. P. Mst Shabnam (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Petitioner entitled to appointment under disable quota - disability ratio alien to law
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2084
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1070-K/2025 Province of Sindh & Others v. Mst. Shabnam wife of Shahbaz Dino Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3217) 76/2022 Criminal Appeal Azam @ Aziz (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 146
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
3218) 521/2014 Suit Mrs Naila Arshad (Plaintiff) V/S PDOHA through Administrator (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 29-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
3219) 1215/2022 Cr.Bail Tayyab (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Earlier court case)
Tag Line:Conversely, the case law relied upon by Applicants counsel is relevant, wherein bail was granted, inter alia, considering the earlier Court case. Both male members of a family are behind bars who are bread earners. There is no record of earlier conviction. Guilt of accused is yet to be determined in the above circumstances, because at this stage a deeper appreciation of facts cannot be made.
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 796
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
3220) 944/2018 Cr.Bail Shadu & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 943
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
3221) 1622/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Suleman and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Legitimate expectation.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1589
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Syed Aminuddin Fakir(ADVO-14649-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 29-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3222) 7073/2022 Const. P. Imran Khan (Petitioner) V/S Malik Amanullah Khan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 964
Advocates:Abdul Wahab Baloch(ADVO-5874-SBC-KHS),Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Syed Ghulam Shabbir Shah(ADVO-13398-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.487-K/2023 Malik Amanullah Khan v. Imran Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
3223) 4066/2023 Const. P. Amreli Steel Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Any decision by NEPRA, including a decision to give retrospective effect to it is appealable under Section 12G of the NEPRA Act; petitions not maintainable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 584
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 20-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
3224) 5703/2022 Const. P. Ali Haider and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 491
Advocates:Abdulullah Narejo(ADVO-4889-SBC-KHI),Raja Rashid Ali(ADVO-13092-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Abdul Nabi(ADVO-13636-SBC-KHI),Firdos Perveen(ADVO-18454-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3225) 2371/2019 Const. P. Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Direction
Tag Line:A public office cannot be offered / bartered or given in consideration of some donation, but a vacancy in respect of a public office is to be filled up strictly in accordance with law and the recruitment rules so that merit is not compromised and nepotism is curbed.
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 269
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 18-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
3226) 51/2013 Criminal Appeal Mujahid Ali Dawachi and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (prosecution has proved the case against the appellants beyond a reasonable doubt .Appeal dismissed in Murder case.)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1086
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
3227) 310/2005 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Islam (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 16-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
3228) 6736/2020 Const. P. Imtaiz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 482
Advocates:Salman Aziz(ADVO-14423-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Faheem(ADVO-15112-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.209/2022 Civil Aviation Authority, CAA, Headquarters, Terminal No.1, Jinnah International Airport, Karachi and others v. Imtiaz Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3229) 189/2023 Criminal Appeal MST. SHABANA KAUSAR D/O MUHAMMAD ASHRAF (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1306
Advocates:Tamar Victor Lawrence(ADVO-18974-SBC-KHE),Zia Ahmed Awan(ADVO-3217-SBC-KHI),Ahmad Shahmir(ADVO-18961-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3230) 697/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Fahad Ahmed Gulzar S/o Gulzar Ahmed & another (Applicant) V/S ASI/IO Saeed Mahroof & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:On the aforesaid proposition, the learned counsel for the applicants contended that the Judicial Magistrate had no authority to interfere in the investigation and exceeded his jurisdiction while directing the Investigating Officer to present the chargesheet before the Intellectual Property Tribunal in Section 66-A of the Copyright Ordinance 1962. On facts, he contended that Sub Inspector PS PIB colony had lodged a false case against the applicants, as the alleged occurrence did not take place. The prosecution specifically alleged that the applicants had stocked different brands of Cigarettes, injurious to health but the same was never referred to the chemical examiner for verification. He maintained that in the peculiar circumstances of the case chemical examination of the purported case property was essential to corroborate the ocular account. The learned counsel further submitted that even if the prosecution version was assumed to be correct, Section 66-A of the Copyright Ordinance 1962 could not be invoked against them. The impugned order had thus seriously prejudiced the applicants.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1104
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Qureshi(ADVO-3530-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Salaman Khan(ADVO-18081-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Waqar Alam Abbasi(ADVO-13665-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
3231) 74/2018 I. A Intekhab Hussain Shah (Appellant) V/S National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLD 1021
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.593-K/2019 Intakhab Hussain Shah and another v. National Bank of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3232) 10/2020 I. A JS Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Shabir & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:The public notice "alone" in the newspaper,
as issued by the Bank in the generalized form for the auction of pledged
goods of different customers including gold ornaments of respondent, without
any specific name of alleged defaulter(s), could hardly meet the requirement of
law for effecting service of notice before auction, either under the Contract Act
or the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001. Such
notices should be specific and in personam.
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 784
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 13-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
3233) 12/2021 Spl.Cr.A.A THE STATE THROUGH DIR. GEN. I&I CUSTOM (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD YOUNUS DAWOOD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Acquittal Appeal . (265-K Cr.P.C)
Tag Line:Ordinarily the accused are not be acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C as a matter of routine; Customs Court passed orders by misapplying the observations and directions of this Court; Orders set-aside; Acquittal Appeals allowed with directions to proceed with trial and record evidence.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 555
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
3234) 127/2007 Suit Muhammad Akbar (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Tariq & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 15-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
3235) 11/2016 I. A Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Works & Service (Appellant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) Hyd & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 433
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3236) 269/2023 Cr.Rev M/S MAPLE PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD & ORS (Applicant) V/S LEARNED CHAIRMAIN DRUG COURT KHI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is well settled that the report of an expert cannot be used as evidence without taking it on record and exhibiting it to provide an opportunity for cross-examination. The Cr.P.C. allows certain expert reports to be admitted in evidence without calling the expert as a witness. This is to save time and speed up trials. However, the court may still summon and examine the expert if necessary. The admissibility of test reports has been questioned. However, the Qanun-e Shahadat Order (QSO) and Cr.P.C. should be interpreted progressively to give more space to modern forensic science.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1176
Advocates:Barrister Rashid Mureed(ADVO-17151-SBC-KHC),Deputy Attorney General()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
3237) 872/2010 Cr.Bail Shahnawaz Ishtiaq (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 08-OCT-10
Approved for Reporting
3238) 1489/2007 Suit Adnan Aziz Ahmed (Plaintiff) V/S Rakil Ahmed Zaman& Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:As far as strength and defence of sale certificate, as relied upon
by the defendants, who are the other set of legal heirs are concerned,
the subject property never vested with the Nazir of this Court, which
could enable him to sell the same and issue sale certificate. Nazir was
never given any authority to sell the property on behalf of legal heirs. It
was a private sale and some of the legal heirs arranged a buyer and
presented him before the Court. Thus, the act of issuing sale certificate
by the Nazir was without jurisdiction and/or mandate.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 851
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
3239) 1946/2006 Const. P. Ghulam Shabir Pechuho (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A.C. &Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.945/2017 Pakistan International Airlines and another v. Ghulam Shabbir Pechuho and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3240) 387/2018 H.C.A Pak Maniar Investment Ltd. & others (Appellant) V/S Salebhoy & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Against judgment and preliminary decree
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1031
Advocates:Syed Wajahat Abbas(ADVO-7318-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.958-K/2023 Pak Maniar Investment Limited & others v. Salehbhoy deceased through its legal heirs & others,C.P.L.A.885-K/2023 Salehbhoy v. M/s. Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending
3241) 357/2017 H.C.A Deputy Commissioner I-R Services (AEC) & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. Clariant Pakistan Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 531
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Kafil Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-7764-SBC-KHI),Waqar Ahmed Ch:(ADVO-11376-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.12-K/2023 Archroma Pakistan Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue Service (AEC) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3242) 2110/2020 Const. P. Arshad Riaz Mughal (Petitioner) V/S POS and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 899
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
3243) 5691/2019 Const. P. Sharjeel Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:This Court recognizes similar work, responsibilities, and standing between High Court establishment and district judiciary employees, despite different tiers, as both contribute to provincial justice administration. The High Court's administrative control under Article 203 of the constitution supports equal treatment under the "rule of parity." This applies to pay scales (equal pay for equivalent grades), standardized allowances (Judicial and Utility, with High Court percentage revisions extending to the district judiciary), other benefits (medical, housing, etc.), and pension benefits (if allowances are pensionable for High Court employees, the same should apply to the district judiciary). The rule of parity mandates equal treatment for similarly situated groups without discrimination in terms of Article 25 of the Constitution. The Government of Sindh is under its obligation to treat the employees of entire judiciary equally, so far as their perks and privileges are concerned without discrimination.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1052
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3354/2025 The Province of Sindh, through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and others v. Sharjeel Akhter and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
3244) 339/2025 Const. P. Munawar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and conditions of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. the Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456]. The Supreme Court in paragraphs 146 to 150 has decided the issue in hand no need for further deliberation on our part.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 518
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
3245) 950/2021 Suit CHINA MOBILE PAKISTAN LIMITED (ZONG) & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 27.08.2021 whereby C.M.A. No. 8722 of 2021 filed by defendants 3 and 4, seeking return of the plaint, was dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 6
Advocates:Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),M/S. RIAA BARKER GILLETTE(FIRM-174-SBC-KHI),Salman Akram Raja(ADVO-3960-PBC-LHR),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS),Basil Nabi Malik(ADVO-13956-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
3246) 2717/2020 Const. P. Tabros Pharma Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 239
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 19-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
3247) 133/2025 Const. P. Shaikh Faisal Habib (Petitioner) V/S Yasir Ahmed Awan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In the light of what has been discussed above, the instant petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 337
Advocates:Rehman Aziz Malik(ADVO-8586-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Mustafa Mamdani(ADVO-16160-SBC-KHE),Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Shahzad Mahmood(ADVO-12500-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3248) 41/2015 Suit Artistice Denim Mills Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federal Baord of Revenue & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PTD 730
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-JUL-16
Approved for Reporting
3249) 398/2019 Const. P. Pfizer Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 MLD 1849
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1510/2019 Pfizer Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o National Health and Services, Rugulation & Coordination, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3250) 79/2014 Criminal Miscelleneous M/s.Abid S. Zuberi and others through M/s. Arshad Tayebaly, Abdul Hafeez Lakho, Syed Ghulam Shabbir Shah, Faisal Siddiqui, Abdur Rehman and Amanullah Khan, Advocates. : (Applicant) V/S M/s. Khawaja Shams-ul-Islam and Khawaja Saif-ul-Islam, advocates. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 17-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
3251) 3193/2021 Const. P. Popular Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 565
Advocates:Abdul Jabbar(ADVO-13242-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Atta Mohammad Qureshi(ADVO-584-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 14-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3252) 469/2022 Const. P. Zain Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The I.G of Police and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not apply, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, rather he has been acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it is well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been set at naught by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v. Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420.
12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to do away with the candidature of the petitioner.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 534
Advocates:Kamran Asghar(ADVO-18430-SBC-KHW),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
3253) 2868/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Awais (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2580
Advocates:Muhammad Hussain Raza(ADVO-19925-SBC-KHC),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 29-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
3254) 113/2010 Cr.Acq.A. The State through P.G. Sindh Karachi (Appellant) V/S Khan Muhammad and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 23-AUG-08
Approved for Reporting
3255) 5381/2020 Const. P. Liberty Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Dumping Act, 2015 (Amendment of Anti-Dumping Duties Act 2015 through section 15 of Finance Act 2019)
Tag Line:It is hereby declared that amendment made through section 15 of the Finance Act, 2019 in the Anti-Dumping Duties Act, 2015, passed through Money Bill (and not through an Act of Parliament) does not fall within the parameters prescribed under Article 73 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, hence, is ultra vires to the Constitution, and is hereby struck down.
Citation:2021 PTD 1055
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3256) 40/2019 II.A. Wapda and another (Appellant) V/S Kadir Bakhsh and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1111, 2025 SHC KHI 2056
Advocates:Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP),Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI),Farkhanda Shaheen(ADVO-16027-SBC-KHW),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.17-K/2025 Kadir Bakhsh v. Water & Power Development Authority & others. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
3257) 786/2014 Suit Getz Pharma (Pvt.) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Servier Laboratories (France) & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 15-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
3258) 76/2021 I. A Abdul Karim Momnani & Another (Appellant) V/S M/S. Habib Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Section 12(2) CPC)
Tag Line:Appellant-Customer challenged the Banking Court judgment and decree not in appeal but by filing an Application under Section 12(2) CPC alleging that the branch manager had misappropriated funds from the Appellant-Customer's running finance account. Appellant-Customer grounds for alleged fraud and misrepresentation focussed on entries in the Statement of Accounts. No case was made out under Section 12(2) CPC. Appeal dismissed,
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 625
Advocates:Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Shahid Ali(ADVO-18050-SBC-KHE),Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-10676-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
3259) 1673/2009 Const. P. Abuzer Ghaffari Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of Defence and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 MLD 1806
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 15-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.540-K/2018 The Military Estate Officer (Karach Circle) thr. The Director and others v. Abuzer Ghafari Cooperative Housing Society and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3260) 55/2002 Cr.Acctt.A Mansoor Ahmed (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 21-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
3261) 144/2010 Cr.Appeal Zakarullah (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 06-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
3262) 5891/2016 Const. P. Jalil ur Rehman & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
3263) 38/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Hina Siraj Manoo W/o Siraj Sadiq Manoo (Applicant) V/S The State & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In the instant case when the proceedings against the accused were stopped by the consent of the parties, they were on bail. It is well settled that release/discharge in such a case can only be construed to mean release from the liability for attending the Court, consequent upon the stoppage of the proceedings, the case comes to an end for an indefinite period. Prima facie, the accused are, therefore, no longer required to attend the Court proceedings due to stoppage of the proceeding sine a die till disposal of Civil Suit No. 945 of 2015. In such a scenario I have come across section 249, Cr. P.C., which is like section 253 Cr. P.C., which was deleted in the wake of law reforms. The defunct section empowered the Court to "discharge" the accused at any stage of the case before framing of charge against him/her. However, the accused's discharge under the said section did not operate as a permanent closure of the case against him/her. After his discharge, if sufficient evidence became available, the case could be revived against him/her. Similarly the stoppage of the proceedings under section 249, Cr.P.C. has the effect of discharging the accused until such time when on availability of the requisite evidence the case could be revived against him/her. However, in the present case, the proceedings have been adjourned sine a die till disposal of the civil proceedings and the prosecution was set at liberty to file an application for bringing the case on file before the Court after disposal of the aforesaid civil proceedings. In the meanwhile the bail bonds and sureties of the accused were ordered to remain intact till further orders, which triggered the cause the surety/applicant to apply for discharging the surety with substitution of P.R bond in the like amount as ordered by the competent Court of law, when the bail of the accused was granted. It is admitted position that the Civil Suit between the parties is pending adjudication before this Court and the fate of that suit is yet to be decided, in the meanwhile keeping in view the legal position of the case that normally criminal proceedings should not be postponed pending the disposal of the civil litigation connected with the same subject matter, but where it is clear that criminal liability is dependent upon the result of the civil litigation or is so intimately concern with it that there is a danger of grave injustice being done in the case, if there be a conflict of decision between the civil Court and the criminal Court then in such event it was/is equally clear that that criminal Court has not only the right to proceed but should also stay its hand until the civil litigation is disposed of.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1185
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Abdullah Bhatti(ADVO-14335-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
3264) 923/2010 Suit ABDUL REHMAN (Plaintiff) V/S CHAIRMAN M/S.MARI GAS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Compensation.)
Tag Line:(a) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)---
----Art. 22 & S. 3---Suit for damages---Plaintiff sought damages and compensation for mental torture and harassment caused by the change in medical policy of its employer / defendant---Contention of defendant was that plaintiff retired in the year 2004, and enjoyed medical benefits till 2006, whereafter the medical policy was changed and having filed the suit in 2010, the same was barred by limitation under Art. 22 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1908---Held, that new medical policy was made effective in November, 2006, but the same was declared illegal by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction, in the year 2010, and the present suit was filed three months after order of High Court in the said constitutional Petition---Cause of action was therefore continuing and limitation period for filing suit started running from date of order of High Court in constitutional petition---Suit was, therefore, within time and maintainable.
(b) Tort---
----Agony and mental torture---Suit for damages and compensation---Quantum of damages, determination of---Rule of thumb, application of---Obligation of court to determine damages once it was established that plaintiff suffered mental torture---Scope---Once the Trial Court had come to the conclusion that the plaintiff suffered mental torture and agony for which defendant was responsible, the Trial Court had to grant damages as compensation---Such damages were obviously general damages and discretion was to be exercised in justifying the quantum of compensation to plaintiff---Such quantum of damages was to be determined by following the "rule of thumb", and any accurate and definite answer to the question of quantum of damages was not possible---While sufferings of human beings can be appreciated, but the magnitude / impact of mental torture could not be; and therefore, it was humanly impossible to assess a fair compensation to the satisfaction of a person who had complained of injury---Trial Court, even in absence of any method to determine a fair assessment of damage, was still under an obligation to decide an amount of money as compensation keeping in view facts and circumstances placed on record by the injured/plaintiff, to show how tortuous the conduct of the aggressor was and for how long the plaintiff remained under mental stress---While applying the "rule of thumb":, the conscious of the court should be satisfied that the damages to be awarded, if not completely, then satisfactorily compensate the plaintiff.
Citation:2015 MLD 61
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 02-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
3265) 6967/2017 Const. P. Talha Nasir and Ors (Petitioner) V/S P.M.D.C and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 88
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3266) 741/2022 Const. P. Ali Jan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 641
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 27-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting
3267) 61/2016 I. A United Bank Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Nabib Sheikh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance XLVI of 2001
Tag Line:Section 20(4)' s requirement is different than the gist of
complaint; ibid provision only enabled the Court to frame punishment if
the customer/whosoever, breached the terms by ???dishonestly issuing
cheques??? towards repayment of finance or fulfillment of such obligation
which was/were dishonored.
Citation:2024 CLD 864
Advocates:Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-13137-SBC-KHS),Habibullah(ADVO-15333-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 03-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
3268) 43/2022 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD IQBAL S/O ABDUL QADIR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 903
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Khalid Mehmood Khan Kayani(ADVO-11156-SBC-KHI),Amir Nawaz(ADVO-12726-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
3269) 3508/2018 Const. P. Riasat Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. Pursuant to Article 129 of the Constitution, the executive authority of the Provincial Government is to be exercised by the Provincial Cabinet as a collective entity albeit in the name of the Governor. When a Provincial statute, such as the Sindh Agriculture University Act, 1977, provides for the exercise of executive authority by the Provincial Government, that is to be done and the decision for that has to be taken by the Provincial Cabinet and not by the Chief Minister alone. Rel: Mustafa Impex v. Government of Pakistan (PLD 2016 SC 808); Karamat Ali v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2018 Sindh 8); Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Province of Sindh, C.P. No.D-8591/2018.
2. Having seen that the word Government in section 27(1) of the Sindh Agriculture University Act, 1977, as it stood amended at the relevant time by the Sindh Universities and Institutes Laws (Amendment) Act, 2014, could only mean the Provincial Cabinet, the decision to extend the tenure of the Respondent No.5 as Vice Chancellor for another term, and the terms and conditions of such extension, had to be taken by the Provincial Cabinet and not by the Chief Minister in isolation of the Provincial Cabinet.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
3270) 1073/2022 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa & others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Jurisdiction)
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 231
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
3271) 3031/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Akber Siyal & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 PLC CS 1378
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3272) 1409/2012 Suit SHAFIQUE AHMED QURESHI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S HYBERABAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 05-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
3273) 141/2020 H.C.A M/s. Masoomi Enterprise Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & ors (Appellant) V/S M/s. Ping Tan (Fishery Company) & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2311
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
3274) 13/2009 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Waseem Ahmad and Muhammad Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 10-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.115-K/2014 Mohammad Ali v. The State,J.P.904/2018 Waseem Ahmad v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:In Transit Dismissed,Pending
3275) 7146/2019 Const. P. Waqar Zaka (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 855
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3276) 7782/2015 Const. P. Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar (Petitioner) V/S The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 30-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1783/2017 Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3277) 527/2022 Suit MUHAMMAD UBAID KHURSHEED (Plaintiff) V/S PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINE (PIAC) & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 532
Advocates:Zafar Ahmad(ADVO-16778-SBC-KHE),Abdul Rauf(ADVO-16009-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
3278) 812/2001 Suit Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 10-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
3279) 958/2013 Const. P. Murk Rahira and Others (Respondent) V/S SMBBMU Larkana and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 28-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.264-K/2014 Murk Rohira and others v. Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3280) 3364/2016 Const. P. Syed Mouj Ali Shah and another (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad ismail and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 63
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1287-K/2023 Syed Mouj Ali Shah & others v. Muhammad Ismail through his legal heirs & others,C.P.L.A.1275-K/2023 Pir Abrar v. Syed Mouj Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned,Pending Adjourned
3281) 408/2011 Const. P. Saleem Shehzada (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 2077, 2020 CLD 894
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3164/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Authority thr. its Assistant Director, Karachi v. Saleem Shehzada & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3282) 6609/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Rafique and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 788
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
3283) 334/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Kundi Services & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 664
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3284) 7655/2017 Const. P. Syed Kashif Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Disciplinary proceedings against employee of PSO--We, thus, are of the view that it is for the Respondent-Company to place its employees in accordance with its Service Rules and Regulations, which is an internal matter of the Respondent-Company, thus devoid of any Constitutional interference, at this juncture. Our view is supported by the latest decision announced on 13.5.2019 by the Honorable Supreme Court in an unreported case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals (2019 SCMR 984)--we are not inclined to interfere in the terms and conditions of the service of the Petitioner, in Constitutional Jurisdiction, being non-statutory Rules of Service, therefore, the instant petition is dismissed.
Topic: Service matters (disciplinary proceedings)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3285) 611/2022 Suit WESTERN TEXTILE INDUSTRIES (Plaintiff) V/S THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: OGRA, Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Undoubtedly, the provisions of OGRA Law and its purposive interpretation given by the Courts, have comprehensively elaborated the statutory scheme. However, in the present cases, issue of implementation of Policy concerning RLNG is to be considered, coupled with the fact, that Plaintiffs have seriously disputed the Undertakings given by them for supply of RLNG and the apprehended discontinuance of Gas Supply, as it was done before. Therefore, in my considered view, the facts of present case fall within the exception to the Rule laid down in the above Case Law relied upon by the learned Advocate of Defendant No.2, and the plaints of both these Suits should not be rejected at this stage.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 164
Advocates:Ali Nawaz Khuhawar(ADVO-16396-SBC-KHS),Ameer Nausherwan Adil Memon(ADVO-15705-SBC-KHS),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
3286) 3238/2013 Const. P. Ghulam Ali Gopang (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Shaheed compensation)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1354
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
3287) 4/2023 I. A anaging Director, SSGCL & others (Appellant) V/S The Learned Presiding Officer,K@Kandhkot & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:There is no provision under the Sindh Consumer Protection Act which enables class action complaints or complaints on behalf of unrepresented parties to be entertained by a Consumer Court. Appeal allowed.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 273
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
3288) 217/2017 H.C.A Dawlance Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Appellant) V/S G-Force Communicaton & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.385-K/2019 G.Force Communications and others v. Dawlance Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. and another,C.A.12-K/2020 G.Force Communications and others v. Dawlance Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
3289) 22/2014 M.A. Telecard Limited (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
3290) 905/2015 Const. P. Miss. Erum & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Tag Line:Petitioner in pursuance advertisement applied for drawing teacher & Orientale teacher. They claimed on conducting the written test they declared successful candidate. they approached obtaining offer letter but could not. State council informed that since irregularities were found in the test no result of written test was announced .However, only offer letter issued them on contract basis which were canceled and not appointed. merely issuance of offer order is no ground to claim appointment order as the respondents had found something fishy in the matter and recommended for scrapping of the
whole recruitment process. The material placed on record before this Court clearly shows that a policy decision was taken by the Government to have the recruitment undertaken for the posts by way of fresh advertisement. In the light of above facts and the observation made by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Civil petition no 186K/2013 Muhammad Arif & others vs. Province of Sindh &others(supra), consequently, all the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.283-K/2019 Miss Erum and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3291) 5723/2020 Const. P. Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:water tankers / business--it is the basic duty of the Karachi Water & Sewerage Board to supply water to the citizens of Karachi. When Karachi Water & Sewerage Board was / is unable to meet the water needs of the city of Karachi, a water tanker mafia had sprung up in Karachi. During the argument, we have been informed that there is certain direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court for the closing of illegal hydrants from Karachi city. Prima-facie, the Management of KW&SB has failed to remove illegal hydrants operating in the city despite Honorable Supreme Court directions. Moreover, the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan had directed the Management of KW&SB to focus upon their core operations to provide portable water via a regular distribution network. Even, if hydrants are needed, there should be a rational and scientific study to evaluate the need for hydrant services in water-scarce areas. The hydrant services preferably should supply water to improvised population. On the aforesaid proposition, this Court has already settled the issue in the case of Muhammad Rafique Sia vs Province of Sindh and others, 2016 CLC 170. Besides that, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in HRC No.28963/2014 directed the respondents to take action against illegal and unauthorized hydrants--Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1634
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3292) 2587/2021 Const. P. Iltaf Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1071
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 20-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3387/2021 Iltaf Hussain and another v. The Federation of Pakistan through Chairman NAB, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3293) 35/2022 I. A Athar Waseem & Another (Appellant) V/S Shaikh Anjum Rehmat (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 439
Advocates:Liaquat Ali(ADVO-14595-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Hafiz Muhammad Yahya(ADVO-16854-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 17-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
3294) 301/2025 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD ASIF S/O MUBEEN AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 627
Advocates:Sohail Ahmed(ADVO-2676-SBC-KHP),Spl. Prosecutor General Sindh(SpPGS),Shafique Ahmed(ADVO-12780-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo
Order Date: 07-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3295) 910/2019 Const. P. Abdul Sami Memon & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Issue of promotion of PSE-IV in Pakistan Steel Mill
Citation:2020 PLC Lab. 125
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.551-K/2019 Abdul Sami Memon and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3296) 1101/2014 Const. P. Roshan Ali Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Family Judge Shahdadkot and an others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Family matter
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 25-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
3297) 260/2009 Cr.Acq.A. State / Anti Narcotics Force (Appellant) V/S Saleem Lodhi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 17-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
3298) 1563/2006 Suit DR.JAVED AKHTER (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.RUFI BUILDERS & DEV. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 456
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI),Ahmadullah Faruqi(ADVO-63-SBC-KHI),Ramesh Kumar(ADVO-8459-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 05-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
3299) 31/2010 Cr.J.A Haji Khan and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 6
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3300) 243/1989 Civil Revision Deputy Comm Thatta (Applicant) V/S Karim Bux (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. VIII, R. 10, O. IX, R. 9 & S. 79---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts.2(c), 70 & 72---Sindh Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Ss.172 & 161---Suit for declaration---Defence, striking off---Scope---Trial Court while dismissing application for adjournment to file written statement ordered for ex parte proceedings and on the basis of affidavit in ex parte proof decreed the suit---Validity---Trial Court had decreed the suit without examining the plaintiff on oath---Original documents were never filed by the plaintiff with his affidavit in ex-parte proof---Mere filing of an ex parte proof by an affidavit was not production of evidence---Only photocopies had been produced as evidence, which were not admissible in evidence---Trial Court was bound to examine the correctness, veracity and truth of the claim of plaintiff set out in the plaint---Parties approaching the court should succeed on the merits of their own case and not on account of weakness of other side---Requirement of evidence could not be ignored by the courts while pronouncing judgment under O.VIII, R.10, C.P.C.---Defendants were government functionaries and not the government themselves---Suit should have been dismissed on account of non-compliance of provisions of S.79, C.P.C. as Government had not been impleaded in the same---Plaintiff had challenged the order of Deputy Commissioner with regard to boundaries of suit plot which was appealable---Civil courts had no jurisdiction in the matters within the jurisdiction of revenue authorities---When remedy of appeal was available under special law then jurisdiction of civil court could not be invoked without exhausting the remedies provided in the statute itself-- Present suit was barred by law---Plaintiff had not adduced evidence in accordance with law in support of his claim before the Trial Court---Public functionaries were not produced in the witness box to confirm the documents and verify contents thereof filed by the plaintiff with the plaint---Both the courts below had failed to exercise jurisdiction vested in them---Impugned judgments and decrees were set aside and suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Nisar Ahmed and others v. Habib Bank Ltd. 1980 CLC 981; Haji Muhammad Moosa and another v. Provincial Government of Balochistan 1986 CLC 2951; Malik Muhammad Saeed v. Mian Muhammad Sadiq 1985 MLD 1440; Divisional Forest Officer, Afforestation Division, Sanghar at Khipro v. Khan through Legal Heirs and 10 others 2008 SCMR 442; Government of Balochistan, CWPP&H Department and others v. Nawabzada Mir Tariq Hussain Khan Magsi and others 2010 SCMR 115; Province of Punjab v. Muhammad Hussain PLD 1993 SC 147 and Haji Abdul Aziz v. Government of Balochistan through Deputy Commissioner, Khuzdar 1999 SCMR 16 rel.
(b) Sindh Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967)---
----S. 161---Appeal before revenue authority---When remedy of appeal was available under special law then jurisdiction of civil court could not be invoked without exhausting the remedies provided in the statute itself.
(c) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)---
----Art. 2(c)---Evidence---Scope---Evidence could be produced by making a statement on oath.
Citation:2016 CLC 1372
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 12-JAN-16
Approved for Reporting
3301) 877/2020 Const. P. Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2196
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 04-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.737/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. P.G. NAB, Islamabad v. Sarvech Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3302) 387/2015 Cr.Bail Abdul Hadi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shaukat Ali Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 07-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
3303) 10/2019 Suit.B Soneri Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Quetta Textile Mills Limited & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 446
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Salim Thepdawal(ADVO-3099-SBC-KHI),Waqar Ahmed Ch:(ADVO-11376-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
3304) 996/2023 Const. P. Amjad Hussain S/o Sardar Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Shamsa Kanwal and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 860
Advocates:Bahri Kamal(ADVO-15015-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3305) 991/2015 Suit China Harbour Engineering Co., Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:"Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----
----Ss. 121, 124(4), 129, 132 & 137(2)---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 39, 42 & 54---Suit for cancellation, declaration and permanent injunction---Best judgment assessment---Assessment giving effect to an order---Disposal of appeal by the Appellate Tribunal---Due date for payment of tax---Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) had been directed to decide the plaintiff's appeal within certain period and till final disposal of the plaintiff's appeal, the defendants had been restrained from taking any coercive action against the plaintiff---Tabulation made by the plaintiff, wherein certain heads of account had been either deleted or sent for rectification under S. 221 of Income Tax Ordnance, 2001, was not disputed---In terms of S. 124 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, where direct relief was provided in order under Ss. 129 & 132 of the Ordinance, the Commissioner would issue Appeal Effect Order within two months of the date the Commissioner was served with the order---In pursuance of S. 137 (2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, where any tax was payable under assessment order or amended assessment order or any other order issued by the Commissioner under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, a notice would be served upon the taxpayer in the prescribed form specifying the amount payable and thereupon the sum so specified would be paid within 15 days from the date of the service of the notice---Original demand notice had been issued prior to amended assessment; hence, the same was not sufficient compliance of issuing notice of demand in pursuance of amended assessment to provide opportunity of 15 days specifying the total amount in pursuance of amended assessment---Compliance to Ss. 124 (4) & 137(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was necessary---Appeal Effect Order was an amended assessment tabulation and the same had to be given effect like any other amended decree---High Court directed the defendants to deposit the amount, which had been recovered by them from the Bank account of the plaintiff, in the Court till further orders."
Citation:2017 PTD 1852
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting
3306) 181/2009 Suit.B Emirates Global Islamic Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Abdul Salam Khan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 21-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
3307) 3009/2010 Const. P. Shaikh Pipe Mills & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 346
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.775-K/2021 Model Customs Collectorate v. M/s. Shaikh Pipe Mills & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3308) 16/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. RANA MUHAMMAD SAQIB S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Fatima Jameela Jatoi(ADVO-10307-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Hyder Farooq Jatoi(ADVO-12402-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 24-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
3309) 630/2020 Suit Mohammad Tarique Khan (Plaintiff) V/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:
1- A promotion cannot be deferred till such time the enquiry and/or
disciplinary proceedings are finalized as a person is presumed to be
innocent until found guilty1
. Pendency of inquiry and minor penalties
could not come in way of promotion; enquiry proceedings pending
against plaintiff for an indefinite period smacked of arbitrariness and
mala fide and is a hanging sword on head of employees; such treatment
could not sustain in eye of law to deprive the plaintiff of promotion2
.
Pendency of inquiry was no ground for denying promotion to the
employee and no one could be punished by denying promotion before
establishing charge3
. Any such rule formed in deviation of settled
principle of law would not come in the way of equality rights guaranteed
by Constitution.
2--As regards rejection of plaint under order VII rule 11 CPC on the
ground of res judicata is concerned, the defendants plead that the
subject matter of instant suit has been decided in the earlier suit and/or
the subject matter of earlier suit. In this regard firstly the subject
matter of instant suit is a subsequent show-cause notice which was not
even in existence at the time of filing earlier suit. Therefore neither
principle of order 2 rule 2 nor doctrine of order 23 rule 1 CPC would
apply.
Citation:2024 PLC CS 91, 2023 SBLR 22
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Umair Usman Ghani(ADVO-17297-SBC-KHE),Syed Kawish Hussain Naqvi(ADVO-19083-SBC-KHS),Fayaz Ali Metlo(ADVO-16510-SBC-KHS),Junaid Ahmed(ADVO-15448-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3310) 4323/2022 Const. P. M.A Flour Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Change in rate of sales tax before filing of Goods Declaration; No vested right accrues in view of Section 6(1A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 129
Advocates:Abdul Rahim Lakhani(ADVO-4061-SBC-KHI),Abdul Jabbar(ADVO-13242-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General(),Atta Mohammad Qureshi(ADVO-584-SBC-SUK),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 07-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
3311) 616/2020 Cr.Bail Sabz Ali Badani Jatoi V/S (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters, Bail Matters (Bail After Arrest---497- Under S. 302 PPC)
Tag Line:Applicant seeks post arrest bail for offences punishable under section 302, 324, 148, 149, 114, 429, PPC. Complainant Mst. Khanzadi, stating therein that there is dispute between them and accused Ahmed Ali Jatoi. She took meals to them. At 1200 hours there came accused Ahmed Ali, Noor Hassan, Ali Hyder, Wahid Ali, Jumo having K.K rifles, Sabz Ali, Rasheed and 03 unknown persons having guns. On the instigation of Ahmed Ali, accused Ali Hyder fired at Qalandar Bux, accused Noor Hassan fired at Karim Dino and Sabz Ali fired at Akhtiar. Admittedly the name of the present applicant transpires in the FIR with specific role of causing gunshot injury upon P.W Akhtiar and in this unfortunate incident one person, namely, Qalandar Bux has lost his life and two persons received firearm injuries. All the eye witnesses including the injured witnesses supported the case in their statements under section 161 Cr.P.C. Bail and the same is dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 340
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3312) 390/2001 Suit CAPT. TARIQ MEHMOOD MALIK. (Appellant) V/S P.A.L.P.A. (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Recovery of amount/damages)
Tag Line:Claim of Plaintiff has been disproved that he suffer any loss (financial or otherwise) or mental anguish on account of any decision or acts on the part of Defendant. Plaintiff was adequately
compensated monetarily by his erstwhile employer - PIAC, International Association as well as Defendant, coupled with the fact that he was reemployed by PIAC. Consequently, not encashing the cheque given by Defendant will not improve the case of Plaintiff, who is not entitled for any further amount in view of Bye-Law 25(v). Both Issues are answered in
affirmative that Plaintiff received his insurance and other compensation.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 402
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
3313) 3816/2011 Const. P. Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
whether the private Respondents who are holding the present postings qualify to continue the office? Whether the Chief Minister, Sindh is/was competent under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964 to nominate person as Assistant Commissioner? Whether the Chief Minister is competent to grant exemption to the private respondents from qualifying in passing the Departmental Examination prescribed for the posts under reference for regularization and promotion of the private respondents?
Topic: Service matters (Quo warranto )
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4105/2019,C.P.L.A.4144/2019,C.P.L.A.622-K/2019,C.P.L.A.4410/2019 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
3314) 1310/2013 Suit Gavin Venantius and others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mrs.Humaira Hassan and others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 1 Rule 10 CPC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 06-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
3315) 150/2025 Const. P. Dr.Tariq Hasan Memon (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: WAPDA CASES
Tag Line:WAPDA Employees: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Federal Service Tribunal under Article 212 of the Constitution
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1604, 2025 SHC HYD 1616, 2025 SBLR Sindh 2048
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar
Order Date: 30-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.831-K/2025 Dr. Tariq Hasan Memon v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (To be fixed before 3 Member Bench)
3316) 4131/2018 Const. P. Rustam Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 631
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
3317) 4036/2023 Const. P. M/s Young (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:exemption from Additional customs duty under SRO 967; held; only available to imports chargeable to customs duty under the 5th Schedule and not the 1st Schedule.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 705
Advocates:M/S. EXPERT LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-429-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS),Imran Iqbal Khan(ADVO-9206-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 27-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
3318) 2105/2016 Const. P. Mst. Bhalan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 11-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
3319) 81/2014 Cr.J.A KARIM BUX LASHARI S/O AYOUB (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.590/2019 Karim Bux Lashari v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
3320) 316/2021 Cr.Bail Ghazi Haleli Jatoi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 974
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
3321) 2224/2016 Suit Abdul Samad & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Choudhry Abdul Waheed Nasir & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 YLR 426
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 30-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
3322) 5001/2024 Const. P. Sania Zahra and Another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In a landmark 2019 judgment, the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of the National Commission on Status of Women v Government of Pakistan PLD 2019 SC 218 declared jirgas illegal, citing violations of international human rights laws and the Constitution of Pakistan. The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of equal protection before the law, due process, and fair trial, rights that are often denied in jirga proceedings. This judgment is a significant step towards upholding women's rights and ensuring that justice is administered through legal channels. It is crucial to continue to monitor the implementation of this decision and to address the social and cultural factors that contribute to the persistence of harmful practices. In this regard, FIR can be lodged against the holding of illegal jirga by the chieftain and all others who participated in the Jirga in violation of the 2019 Supreme Court judgment. This judgment declared the jirga system as illegal and against the fundamental rights of citizens. Law enforcement agencies are obligated to take action against those who organize or participate in such jirgas. Let at the first instance, FIR be lodged by the SSP concerned and bring the culprits into justice without fail.
8. So far as FIR No.412 of 2024 of PS Malir Cantt, District Malir, Karachi registered under Section 365-B PPC is concerned the same is hereby quashed and such summary report be submitted before the concerned Magistrate for disposal of the case. He is directed to take action against all concerned police officials who failed and neglected to perform their duties to curb this menace.
9. The IGP Sindh is directed to take stock of the things and take prompt disciplinary action against all police officials of the concerned district/police station in accordance with the law.
10. In view of the statement of the parties, the private respondents are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs.500,000/- each before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose.
11. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 925
Advocates:Majid Ali Shaikh(ADVO-16203-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Sabar Jogi(ADVO-50386-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
3323) 690/2012 Cr.Bail Muhammad Shakir S/o M Sabir (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 13-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting
3324) 2559/2009 Const. P. Asia Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 29-FEB-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.821/2012 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Asia Petroleum Service Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3325) 121/2021 Const. P. Tanveer Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Service Matter; mere fact that petitioners were selected for appointment to vacancies, pursuant to an advertisement did not confer any right to be appointed to the post in question or to entitle the selectees to a writ of mandamus or any other writ compelling the authority to make the appointment
Even if an appointment order has been issued, and subsequently, it transpires that there is some irregularity or the same has been issued in contravention of the rules or the advertisement, the same also does not create any vested right and can always be revoked.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 597
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 02-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1828/2022 Tanveer Ahmed and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Chairman/Secretary, Pakistan Railways Boards Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned on application.
3326) 43/2013 Cr.Rev Hubdar Kalhoro (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 08-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
3327) 111/2019 H.C.A M/s. Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. Ahmed Brothers & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1212
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 20-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
3328) 421/2016 Const. P. Amir Khursheed (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Imdad Khan(ADVO-9959-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
3329) 1213/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Taj Gasoline (Pvt) Ltd., Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Finding of fact recorded by Tribunal cannot be interfered with under Section 196 of the Customs Act
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 156
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
3330) 16/2020 Suit Mohammad Ahmed Kausar (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC)
Tag Line:I am unswayed with the submission of the learned counsel on the ground that the plaintiffs employees have not been terminated hitherto which is an admitted position and are seeking enforcement of their fundamental right of fair trial and due process hence the principle of
master and servant is not attracted at this stage of the case at hand.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 711
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
3331) 623/2020 Const. P. Haji Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) V/S The Province of Sindh through Home Secretary, Karachi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 570
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 05-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
3332) 5593/2020 Const. P. Shahbaz Ali (Petitioner) V/S Chairman S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Constitutional Petition against an interim order of a Labour Court or Labour Appellate Tribunal. HELD Not maintainable
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 905
Advocates:Syed Jamal Uddin Bukhari(ADVO-14803-SBC-KHI),Syed Ahsan Imam Rizvi(ADVO-11801-SBC-KHI),Syed Haider Imam(ADVO-8703-SBC-KHI),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
3333) 2088/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) V/S Mst Haseena & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Family matter
Tag Line: Two things are admitted in the cross-examination of the petitioner / defendant No.1; first is that certain dowry articles were retained by him and that in the other set of evidence he stated that only golden ornaments were taken away by the plaintiff / respondent No.1 from the house. The first part insofar as above dowry articles are concerned, the same are admitted whereas for the other dowry articles i.e. golden ornaments, the burden was on defendant / petitioner to establish that she (respondent No.1) took away all of them.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
3334) 6/2013 Cr.J.A Ghulam Sarwar Jagirani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.44/2019 Ghulam Sarwar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
3335) 60/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Khamiso & another (Applicant) V/S Mansigno & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 548
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3336) 794/2018 Cr.Bail GAJDHAR @ ANAND S/O JEEWAT (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
3337) 22/2006 F.R.A Shaikh Muhammad Sadiq (Appellant) V/S Mst. Zarin Islam (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
NIL
Topic: Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963 (FRA dismissed. )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zia Perwez
Order Date: 25-SEP-07
Approved for Reporting
3338) 74/2007 H.C.A S.M.Muzzafar Hussain (Appellant) V/S Taj din & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 16-NOV-10
Approved for Reporting
3339) 1203/2006 Suit SYED NIAZ AHMED (Plaintiff) V/S NATIONAL REFINERY LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Shahid Anwar Bajwa & Co(FIRM-152-SBC-KHI),Mushtaq Ahmed A. Memon(ADVO-1988-SBC-KHS),Aga Faquir Mohammad(ADVO-2855-SBC-KHI),Shaukat Hussain Zubedi(ADVO-53-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
3340) 3028/2021 Const. P. Umair Jam (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Occupational Groups and Services (Probation, Training, and Seniority) Rules, 1990
Tag Line:The questions in the context are whether the petitioner has any enforceable right to seek direction to respondents to allow him to join 49th Common Training Program 2021, commencing in the ensuing month. And whether the respondents are required to act fairly, in a manner which is not arbitrary and in accordance with the established practice followed by it over a long period in making such deferments to other candidates namely Hamood-ur-Rehman, Taveer Shahoor Rana, Abraiz Ali Abbasi, Ahmed Saeed Manj and Ateeq-Ullah under the prevailing occupational groups and services (Probation, Training, and Seniority) Rules, 1990.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 720
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3341) 34/2017 Cr.Rev Imam Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
3342) 417/2018 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Niaz Muhammad & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Exclusion in SRO 499 of 2009.
Citation:2022 PTD 1174
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.730-K/2021 Niaz Muhammad v. The Collector of Customs & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
3343) 675/2014 Suit M/s. Fateh Textile Mills Ltd. & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 267, 2018 SBLR Sindh 1812
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
3344) 64/2012 I.T.R.A Premier Mercantile Service(Pvt)Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Commissioner Inland Revenue. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Transaction between associated companies; loan given can be added as income under Section 85 read with Section 108 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 674
Advocates:Aminuddin Ansari(ADVO-3574-SBC-KHI),S. Asif Ali(ADVO-3123-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 28-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
3345) 2378/2015 Suit Muhammad Riaz & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 YLR 462
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
3346) 128/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. Ghulam Shabir Lashari (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Testimony of defence witness)
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 874
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 05-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
3347) 375/2014 Const. P. Abdul Karim (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Waheed and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1529
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
3348) 1774/2015 Const. P. M/S Housing Enterprises (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S KDA and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 30-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
3349) 62/2015 Cr.J.A Tariq Mastoi and others (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 631
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
3350) 8/2017 Cr.Appeal Riaz Jagirani (Appellant) V/S he State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2018 YLR 2059
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 06-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
3351) 141/2023 Const. P. Yasmeen Nagori (Petitioner) V/S Dy.Director (RCMHC) & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 671
Advocates:Kamran Shahzad Siddiqui(ADVO-8203-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3352) 27/2023 H.C.A Sheraz Hakeem (Appellant) V/S Agha Khan University & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 461
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI),Shahzad Mahmood(ADVO-12500-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 11-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
3353) 1305/1998 Suit Crescent Greenwood Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Sea Land Service (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Recovery and Damages (Recovery and Damages )
Tag Line:Suit filed by unauthorized person, it is mandatory that an authorized person, by the board of directors in duly convened meeting, may proceed the legal affairs.
Citation:2017 YLR 633
Advocates:SURRIDGE & BEECHENO(FIRM-101-SBC-KHI),Ishrat Zahid Alvi(ADVO-6918-SBC-KHI),M/S. ZAHID & TARIQ ADVOCATES(FIRM-213-SBC-KHI),Mirza Khalid Anisur Rehman(ADVO-2346-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting
3354) 1769/2013 Const. P. Ms. Lamika Zuberi (Petitioner) V/S M/s Logo Guru (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
3355) 918/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous BABAR ZULIFQAR NIZAMI & ORS (Appellant) V/S KHURSHEED ALI SHAH & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 117
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
3356) 803/2015 Const. P. Tanzeel-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.124-K/2019 Tanzeel-ur-Rehman Khan Niazi v. Govt. of Sindh thr.Secy: and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3357) 19/2014 F.R.A SHAM KUMAR S/O HUND RAJ (Appellant) V/S ULFAT SHAHEEN & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Rent Controller Order Maintained, Executant Court is directed to police aid ,break open on first summon as already six year time Consumed .)
Tag Line:Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)---
----S. 17---Ejectment of tenant---Denial of relationship of landlord and tenant by the tenant---Default in payment of rent---Effect---Rent Controller accepted ejectment petition and directed the tenant to vacate the demised premises---Validity---Tenant had admitted that he had paid rent to the husband of landlady---Relationship of landlord and tenant existed between the parties---Tenant had not denied the ownership of landlady and he had entered in the demised premises as tenant---Tenant had committed default in payment of rent in the present case---Tenant had neither sent rent to the landlady or her husband through money order nor deposited the same in the Court---Tenant was directed to pay the defaulted rent and vacate the demised premises within fifteen days---Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.
Messrs MFMY Industries v. Federation of Pakistan 2015 SCMR 1550 rel.
Citation:2020 CLC Note 51
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
3358) 97/2020 H.C.A Mian Ahmed Akbar & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. Al-Dahra Agriculture Co. Pak (Pvt) Ltd. & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Test of section 34 Arbitration Act, 1940. Appeal against stay dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Mansoor Hassan Khan(ADVO-14389-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 23-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.459-K/2025 Mian Ahmed Akbar & others v. M/s Al-Dahra Agriculture Co. Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd & others,C.P.4584/2021 Al-Dahra International Investment SP LLC, Karachi v. Mian Ahmad Akbar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Session),Disposed Disposed of
3359) 529/2022 Const. P. Flying Paper Industries Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 529
Advocates:Afsheen Aman(ADVO-8828-SBC-KHI),Munim Masood(ADVO-25106-SBC-KHE),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3360) 51/2010 I. A Province of Sindh and another (Appellant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 806
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
3361) 1611/2020 Const. P. Election Committee, SHC Bar Association (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Sindh High Court Bar Association Hyderabad 2020 Elections
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 723
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 13-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
3362) 750/2020 Const. P. Total Parco Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 784
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 28-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3363) 3854/2022 Const. P. Muneeb Ahmed Abdullah (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 470
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 22-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
3364) 1042/2017 Suit Khalid Mehmood and others (Plaintiff) V/S M/s Multi Plus Corporation Private Limited and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Scope of Review under section 114 CPC
Tag Line:The Limitation Law is a part of positive law as held in Ghulam Qadir case (ibid) and should be given due effect in the light of numerous dicta. When an action is filed after the prescribed period of limitation, it can prejudice rights and interest of opponents, which right have accrued in the intervening period, hence, time barred actions cannot be termed as a mere technicality.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 05-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
3365) 192/1993 I.T.R Commissioner of Income Tax (Applicant) V/S Metropolatan Steel Coporation Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 467
Advocates:Fayaz Ahmed(ADVO-14473-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 24-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3366) 926/2014 Cr.Bail Ali Gul & An other (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 25-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
3367) 146/2010 Cr.Appeal Nazar Hussain (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.333/2012 Nazar Hussain v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
3368) 491/2020 Cr.Bail Janib Jagirani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters (Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved unless case is tried)
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 538
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.39-K/2021 Agha Imran Khan v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3369) 1587/2013 Suit M/S. PRIME BUILDERS . (Plaintiff) V/S PAKISTANINDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORP. (PVT) LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 493
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
3370) 592/2020 Cr.Bail Shah Zaman Ashraf (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 48
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
3371) 7/2018 Adm. Suit Fair Sea International FZC (Plaintiff) V/S MV "MISKI" & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Plaintiff has incurred and still incurring expenses for supply of necessaries and other products to Defendant No.1 since or about 09.10.2017 and onwards, when the Defendant No.1 (subject Vessel) is berthed at Karachi Port; therefore, only those documents can be considered, which relate to this period and onwards, or, when the subject Vessel entered territorial waters of Pakistan and not before that. Suit of the Plaintiff is partly decreed to the extent of US Dollars-120,710.6 (US Dollars One Lac Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred and Ten only) and Pak Rupees-22,42,497/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lacs Forty Two Thousand and Four Hundred Ninety Seven only).
Topic: Admiralty
Tag Line:Plaintiff has incurred and still incurring expenses for supply of necessaries and other products to Defendant No.1 since or about 09.10.2017 and onwards, when the Defendant No.1 (subject Vessel) is berthed at Karachi Port; therefore, only those documents can be considered, which relate to this period and onwards, or, when the subject Vessel entered territorial waters of Pakistan and not before that. Suit of the Plaintiff is partly decreed to the extent of US Dollars-120,710.6 (US Dollars One Lac Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred and Ten only) and Pak Rupees-22,42,497/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lacs Forty Two Thousand and Four Hundred Ninety Seven only).
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 23-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3372) 1111/2017 Const. P. Saif-uz-Zaman Khan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Petition dismiss)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 28-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
3373) 2119/2024 Const. P. DVCOM Data (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996
Tag Line:estoppel can
form a foundation of waiver to assert a right but does not automatically
lead to waiver as it requires initial relinquishment while estoppel is a
right of evidence that prevents a party from acting inconsistently with
previous conduct.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 263
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin(ADVO-11774-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 08-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4942/2024 M/s DVCOM DATA (Pvt) Ltd, thr. its duly authorized officer, Karachi v. Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) through its Chairman. Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3374) 962/2020 Const. P. Syed Ashraf Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1252
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
3375) 466/2020 Criminal Appeal JAMILA W/O ALLAH DITTA @ KALOO & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 674
Advocates:Shabana(ADVO-14916-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Nazeer Ahmed(ADVO-10745-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3376) 1896/2022 Const. P. Jalal uddin and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 643
Advocates:Akhtar Hussain Shaikh(ADVO-735640-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3377) 640/2008 Suit PSO LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CANTONMENT BAORD CLIFTON & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonments Act 1924, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Permanent Injunction)
Citation:2019 CLC 1253
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 26-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
3378) 471/2020 Const. P. Nasir Ali Zangejo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Deceased Quota
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 220
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
3379) 5958/2023 Const. P. Shakar ud Din (Petitioner) V/S M/s Twin Badar and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Estoppel
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 169
Advocates:In Person(INP),Muhammad Ali(ADVO-10647-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.594-K/2025 Shakar Ud Din v. M/s Twin Badar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3380) 6192/2018 Const. P. The Coca-Cola Export Corp. PB (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 406
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3381) 2298/2018 Const. P. Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
EOBI--pension of the petitioner was stopped by the respondent/institution without disclosing any reasonable cause--We are of the firm view that the petitioner did not qualify the minimum years of service as laid down under Section 22(b) of the Act, whereby the qualifying service for being entitled to pensionary benefits is 15 years, whereas, it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was an employee of the private company and had served it only for a period of 13 years. Petitioner does not meet the requisite criteria stipulated in the said Section to claim old age pension--Adverting to the next contention that the Labor Policy-2010 was fully applicable in the case of parties, in our view, Circular No.3 of 2010 (Policy) cannot override the Act, 1976, therefore, no benefit can be obtained arising out of it--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition, being devoid of any legal standing, is hereby dismissed along with pending application with no order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2454
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.206-K/2020 Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3382) 6686/2014 Const. P. Engr. Daroo Khan Achakzai & Another (Petitioner) V/S Regulator of Trade Organisations & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLD 598
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 18-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
3383) 83/2017 Criminal Appeal Rafique Ahmed Peerzado (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (appellant is acquitted of the offence punishable u/s 302(b) PPC by way of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.PC.)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 527
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3384) 148/2019 Criminal Appeal Safeer Ali as Ali Dino son of Moula Bux Aheer (Petitioner) V/S The State (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Trial (Joint trial of main and offshoot/connected cases)
Tag Line:where an accused is alleged to have used an arm in the commission of an offence triable by Court of Sessions, his trial under the Sindh Arms Act, 2013 must be held jointly by Sessions Judge/Additional Sessions Judge trying the main case, to avoid possibility of conflicting judgments by different trials by same or different Courts on the point of possession of Arms by the accused i.e. one given by Sessions Judge/Additional Sessions Judge trying the main case and the other by same or other Court by recording and appreciating evidence separately
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 694
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 04-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
3385) 4561/2024 Const. P. Tasneem Enterprises Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S National Tarrif Commission and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Dumping Act, 2015 (Section 70(1)(i) - appeal - specified conditions only)
Tag Line:Can a Constitutional High Court come to the petitioner's rescue to restrain an inquiry (like suspending an initial investigation) when the frame of the statute does not enable it? If the answer is in the affirmative, then under what situation(s)/scenario(s)?
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 330
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Saifullah Khan(ADVO-3119-IBC-ISB),Syed Kawish Hussain Naqvi(ADVO-19083-SBC-KHS),Junaid Ahmed(ADVO-15448-SBC-KHE),Tania Alam(ADVO-8924-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.452/2025 Tasneem Enterprises (Private) Limited Karachi v. National Tariff Commission through its Chairman, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3386) 15/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) Allah Bux and others (Applicant) V/S Ali Mohammad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 432, 2025 CLC 1973
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3387) 135/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. MUHAMMAD ASIF @ BHAYA S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 499
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Abbas Hyder Gaad(ADVO-748-SBC-LAR),Iftikhar Ahmed Shah(ADVO-17182-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.414/2023 Muhammad Asif @ Bhaya v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
3388) 188/2022 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Bachal and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 215
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
3389) 6061/2019 Const. P. Azra Parveen (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:up-gradation and promotion issue in NICH
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 758
Advocates:Ghulam Muhammad(ADVO-1485-SBC-LRK),Deputy Attorney General(),Moin Azhar Siddiqui(ADVO-3955-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Imdad Ali Tunio(ADVO-814-SBC-LRK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
3390) 50/2005 J.M MUHAMMAD YOUNUS (Applicant) V/S VENUE GURDAS ADVANI & ORS. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:After minutely examining the applications in hand and the material on record as well as the law cited at the bar with the able assistance of the learned counsel for the parties and giving due consideration to the arguments advanced by them, the conclusion of the above discussion is that the applicants have no locus standi to file the instant applications ; the impugned orders could not be challenged under Section 12(2) CPC ; the fraud alleged by the applicants was not in connection with the proceedings before the Court nor was any fraud played upon the Court when the impugned orders were passed ; the applicants have failed to fulfill the mandatory requirement of Section 12(2) CPC by not specifically disclosing and pleading the relevant and material details of the alleged fraud ; and, J. Misc. No.47/2012 is hopelessly barred by time. Consequently, J. Misc. No.50/2005 and J. Misc. No.47/2012 are dismissed along with the listed applications with no order as to costs.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
3391) 47/2010 II.A. Saeed Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Iqbal and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
3392) 85/2021 Criminal Appeal Dilshad Mahar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 850
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
3393) 1/2018 E.P AHMED NADIM MUGHAL (Petitioner) V/S THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 389
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
3394) 36/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Quick Contractors & Traders (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1286
Advocates:Muhammad Bilal Bhatti(ADVO-15212-PBC-LHR),Syed Asif Ali (ADVO-10999-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.519-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Quick Contractors & Traders Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3395) 415/2015 Const. P. Amrat Lal Matlani (Petitioner) V/S Shrimati Pari Bai & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.226-K/2019 Amrat Lal v. Shrimati Pari Bai and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3396) 607/2020 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD MUREED S/O GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1855
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
3397) 61/2024 Cr.J.A Irshad Ali (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 1959
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
3398) 642/2019 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD SHOIB S/O MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Trial (Denovo Trial)
Tag Line:In this case death penalty is provided yet the accused was deprived of his right to cross-examination which, legally, is the only weapon to test the veracity and credibility of the witness. Such trial, legally, being defective, cant be stamped. At this juncture Ms. Sadia Khatoon further contends that though they preferred application for cross examination that was also not entertained, same is yet pending. Such addition makes the position rather miserable. Accordingly, this is a case of denovo trial, hence impugned judgment recorded by the trial court is hereby set aside. Case is remanded back at the stage of cross examination of the witnesses and thereafter trial court shall record statement under section 342 Cr.P.C., provide opportunity of defence and after hearing the parties decide the case on merits.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 134
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
3399) 2722/2018 Const. P. Abdul Hameed Solangi and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 345
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2377/2018 Abdul Hameed Solangi & others v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Education & Litreracy Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn.CMA.1027/2020 for withdrawal is Allowed
3400) 3191/2022 Const. P. Dr. Shaista Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 982
Advocates:Amna Saeed Ghani(ADVO-19044-SBC-KHE),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
3401) 186/2016 H.C.A Shell Pakistan Limited (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Sohail Hayat Khan Rana(ADVO-2078-SBC-KHS),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Syed Ahsan Imam Rizvi(ADVO-11801-SBC-KHI),Syed Haider Imam(ADVO-8703-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 08-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.24-K/2018 Cantonment Board Malir v. Shell Pakistan Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3402) 826/2019 Suit Mrs. Samina Yaqub (Plaintiff) V/S Jalil Ahmed Kapoor & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, ad-interim order is recalled/ vacated.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 603
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
3403) 3232/2022 Const. P. Qurban Ali Kalhoro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:Pension of a person convicted of a serious crime can be withheld or withdrawn by the government.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 429
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza Korai(ADVO-14432-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
3404) 860/2021 Cr.Bail AMEER MAVIYA @ MAVIYA & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Bail Matters (Pre arrest bail dismissed In Section 324, 506/2, 337-A (i), 337-F (ii), 3374- H (ii), 504 & 35 PPC.)
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 326
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.146-K/2021 Ameer Maviya @ Maviya & others v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3405) 8/2022 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Touqeer and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 645
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
3406) 2/2013 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Ishtiaq Ahmed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal (Answered in Negative .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 18-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
3407) 71/2022 Cr.Rev Zulfiqar Ali @ Bhutto & Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 620
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
3408) 1/2013 Cr.J.A Abdullah Junejo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (Judgment Sataside ,Appeal allowed.Accused Acquitted .)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 836
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3409) 20/2012 II.A. Khayyam Ahmed Khattani (Appellant) V/S M/s. Orix Leasing Pakistan Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 1052
Advocates:Sayed Yasir Ahmed Shah(ADVO-11570-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Arshaque Memon(ADVO-10957-SBC-KHI),Liaquat H. Merchant(ADVO-1696-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.100-K/2022 Mr. Darya Khan v. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Dismissed as Withdrawn
3410) 239/2014 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Lake View Forest (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:-The scheme of the Customs Act reveals that the subject is governed in terms of Section 25 of the Customs Act and in case it could not be determined under Section 25, then the recourse is available by applying valuation ruling if available in terms of Section 25-A whereafter it is finalized under the Customs Act, 1969. After the assessment and the release of the consignment, the goods are made out of any charge of the Customs. In case the aforesaid process is required to be revisited, (in appropriate cases), the mechanism is available under the law such as Section 32, 193 and 195 of the Customs Act, 1969.
--The event of post scrutiny of the goods declaration after assessment and release of goods, is not covered by Section 80(3), as undertaken. It is applicable at the time of original checking of the goods declaration in his hands and goods are yet to be assessed and released and not at belated stage when even the goods have been released. This situation (for appropriate cases) is catered by Section 32, 193 and 195 of the Customs Act, 1969 where under a show cause and/or an appeal within 30 days could have been preferred, or the Board or the Collector of Customs or the Collector of Custom (Adjudication) may, within his jurisdiction, call for the examination of the records of any proceedings under the act for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any decision or order passed by a subordinate officer respectively, could have been followed, however, none of them were invoked. Surprisingly the applicant opt to invoke Section 80(3) of the Customs Act which is then shown to have been followed by consequences. It is thus under above referred provisions when the competent authority is of the view that the assessment was not made in accordance with law, the past and closed transaction could be reopened but not in the manner as done in the instant case. Prima-facie it is neither a case of mis-declaration as correct PCT was claimed by the consignee nor this is a case of mis-declaration in terms of its value declared, to make out a case under Section 32 of the Act.
--- Without prejudice applicants case is that Section 80(3) of Act was rightly invoked under the given facts and circumstances. In the instant case, if at all, there was any illegality in the assessment of the goods, it could be attributed to the sub-ordinate officers of the Customs and hence the implication of Section 32 of the Customs Act, 1969 would not be attracted to penalize the respondent or their directors. The purported action by Customs was triggered under Section 80(3) of the Customs Act, 1969 does not have a legal cover in view of the goods being out of charge and the recourses which could have been made were under Section 32, 193 and 195 of the Customs Act, 1969 which were not directly invoked.
Citation:2021 PTD 1955
Advocates:Muhammad Saddique Zia(ADVO-17436-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI),Imran Iqbal Khan(ADVO-9206-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 23-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
3411) 784/2023 Const. P. Ali Muhammad Khan Jatoi & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 613
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
3412) 2/2011 R.A (Civil Revision) Syed Mazahir Hussain (Applicant) V/S Syed Tajammul Hussain & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 931
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
3413) 1541/2009 Suit KHAWAJA TARIQ SIDDIQ (Plaintiff) V/S THE CHAIRMAN KESC & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 725
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3414) 274/2022 H.C.A A.M Qureshi through Mst. Afroze Begum (Appellant) V/S Deputy Commissioner District East and Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 527
Advocates:Khalil Ahmed(ADVO-6793-SBC-KHI),Syed Mureed Ali Shah(ADVO-12250-SBC-KHI),Muzafar Ali Leghari(ADVO-239-SBC-MPR)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 22-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.37-K/2023 A.M. Qureshi Since deceased through his legal representative v. Deputy Commissioner District East & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
3415) 23/2018 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S CENTRAL DEPOSITORY COMPANY PAKISTAN LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Altaf(ADVO-7751-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1304-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal) v. Dr.Ursula Chohan Rizvi,C.A.3812/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal) v. Dr.Ursula Chohan Rizvi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, Fix in Islamabad.,Disposed Dismissed
3416) 338/2011 Criminal Appeal Mst. Shumaila (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---
----S. 302---Qatl-i-amd--- Appreciation of evidence---Accused was alleged to have murdered her husband by strangulation----Neither the injuries to the victim in the present case were proved to have been caused by accused nor strangulation was proved by medical reports as postmortem report was declared substandard by Medical Board and except her natural presence at the scene of incident being wife nothing else was before the court to treat as circumstantial evidence connecting accused with the offence---Alleged rope said to have been used for strangulation was not recovered by prosecution---Trial Court in the impugned conviction order had already held that prosecution had failed to prove motive and medical evidence did not prove strangulation, thus accused had no reason/motive to kill and same was sufficient to disbelieve the prosecution story---Burden was on prosecution to prove accused's involvement particularly her criminal role in the unnatural death of her husband to be treated as murder but Trial Court shifted the burden on accused---Mere unnatural death without any corroborating piece of evidence in shape of medical reports could not be treated as murder on suspicion alone---Trial Court convicted the accused on sole presumption that sudden death of deceased in short span of time without any clinical cause and reason was unusual and since the death took place inside the house of the lady accused in the night hours, her failure to provide necessary treatment was wilful, though it was not the case of prosecution that deceased suffered death as medical aid was denied to him---Trial Court outrightly rejected or ignored the medical evidence---Trial Court had misunderstood place and value of motive in criminal cases and had declared that motive in a criminal case was of no consequence and its existence and non-existence by itself neither proved nor disproved commission of a crime---Judgment of Trial Court, in circumstances, was set aside and the accused was acquitted of charge, accordingly.
PLD 1966 SC 664 rel.
Citation:2016 YLR 1216
Advocates:Ammar Yasser(ADVO-15401-SBC-KHI),Jamshed Iqbal(ADVO-10830-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Akhtar Qureshi(ADVO-3582-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 28-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
3417) 647/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous Khadim Hussain Kori (Appellant) V/S The State and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1313
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
3418) 1/2016 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. THE STATE / NAB (Appellant) V/S MOHAMMAD SARDAR KHAN (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB (r section 265-K Cr.P.C does not suffer from any illegality to call for interference by this court with the impugned order. Nab Appeal dismissed. )
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 840
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
3419) 229/2000 H.C.A Muhammad Feroz Punjani (Appellant) V/S Syed Badshah Hussain & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLD 70
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 05-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
3420) 20/2013 I.T.R.A The Commissioner Inland Revenue. (Applicant) V/S Pakistan Re-Insurance Co Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Lubna Pervez(ADVO-4444-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Siddiq Mirza(ADVO-2407-SBC-KHI),Shafqat Zaman(ADVO-11-3116-KBC-HAZ)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
3421) 8/2008 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Ammer Bux alias Ghous Bux alias Ghouso Brohi alias Sudhir Brohi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 20-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
3422) 1646/2008 Suit Arshad Mahmood & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Since the Hindu Gymkhana is a Government-owned protected heritage and the Subject Agreement is not with any private-owner of protected heritage under sections 7(3) to 7(5) or section 8 of the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Preservation) Act, 1994 [the Heritage Act], the role of the Advisory Committee envisaged under the said provisions is also not attracted. For the same reason the power of the Advisory Committee to pass a prohibitory order under section 10 of the Heritage Act, which is dependent on an agreement with the private owner under section 8 of the Act, is also not attracted. The record does not show that the Government sanctioned custodianship of the Hindu Gymkhana to the Advisory Committee under section 7(1) of the Heritage Act; nor does the criteria of section 13 of the Heritage Act seems to be met by the Hindu Gymkhana. Thus, having seen that the provisions of sections 7, 8, 10 and 13 of the Heritage Act are not attracted to the circumstances of the case, prima facie it cannot be said that construction of a theatre by NAPA on the land granted to it was prohibited by the Heritage Act, or that the said Act required NAPA to obtain the approval of the Advisory Committee before raising such construction. Impugned notice to remain suspended pending suit.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
3423) 28/2014 Cr.Appeal Abdul Ghaffar and Saddam Hussain (Appellant) V/S State (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 29-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting
3424) 2072/2017 Const. P. Jawed Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S Sect: Education and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 04-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
3425) 713/2012 Cr.Bail Naseer Ali @ Shalo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 22-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
3426) 1056/2019 Const. P. Nazeer Ahmed Hisbani (Petitioner) V/S Pir Sadruddin Shah and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 271
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1705/2022 Nazeer Ahmed Hisbani v. Pir Sadruddin Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3427) 491/2021 Cr.Acq.A. HAKIM ALI S/O MUHAMMAD ISMAIL (Appellant) V/S VIIITH ADJ KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 507
Advocates:Zulfiqar Ali Qureshi(ADVO-16008-SBC-KHS),Jehangir Rahujo(ADVO-10013-SBC-KHI),Ubedullah Malik(ADVO-19133-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
3428) 7/2023 I. A S.S.G.C. L (Appellant) V/S Irshad Ali Bhutto and antoher (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Gas (Theft, Control and Recoverey) Act, 2016 (Section 6 -Complaints and Suits), Gas (Theft, Control and Recoverey) Act, 2016
Tag Line:The suit filed by SSGC was hopelessly time-barred. Gas Utility Court is not obliged to decide the question of maintainability after its decision on the leave to defend application. Gas Company's allegation that the Defendant-Customer was involved in the theft of gas, no ground to condone limitation..
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 1385
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 01-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
3429) 562/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) V/S Consumer Court, Civil Judge/J.M & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 425
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
3430) 2515/2010 Const. P. Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd., & Ors. (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 MLD 433
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 04-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.195-K/2013 Pakistan Standard & Quality Control Authority and another v. Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3431) 6/2014 Cr.Misc. State (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Mustafa (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 21-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
3432) 90/2024 H.C.A Basham Baloch and Others (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 369
Advocates:Noor Muhammad(ADVO-19007-SBC-KHE),Rizwana Ismail(ADVO-4484-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 28-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.518-K/2024 Basham Baloch through L.Rs. and others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others,C.P.L.A.247-K/2024 Hussain Bux Soomro v. Atta Muhammad Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending
3433) 1476/2019 Suit Latif Farooqi (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airline Corporation Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In terms of the written understanding, the plaintiff`s insurance claim
should have been forwarded to the Insurance Department with available record,
immediately after 12.6.2017 however, they took about six months when the
Manager Insurance and Terminal Benefit for payment of loss of license
insurance was appraised of such fact of the plaintiff`s medical inability. The
reference to insurance company was made through AGM claims on 27.6.2018
i.e. after more than a year of expiry of policy and plaintiff being declared unfit.
The plaintiff was then informed that the insurance company rejected claim of
the plaintiff as insurance policy was expired and his case was forwarded to
relevant insurance company belatedly
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 669
Advocates:AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3434) 320/2016 Cr.Bail Mian Jamshed Inamullah S/o Mian Khursheed (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 02-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
3435) 6592/2020 Const. P. Ayaz Ali Rajpar (Petitioner) V/S Advocate General Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 533
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Imdad Ali Unar(ADVO-1879-SBC-HYD),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5480/2021 Ayaz Ali Rajpar v. Advocate General Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3436) 524/2016 Cr.Bail Imran (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 30-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
3437) 155/2003 R.A (Civil Revision) Khalid Mehmood & Others (Applicant) V/S Ramzan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Mere mutation entry or sale deed would not prove the original title)
Tag Line:Plaintiff must prove its case on the basis of his own averments and evidence and not on Defendants weaknesses, if any. Without proving original allotment and ownership; even sale deeds are of no help.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 1096
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
3438) 192/2020 II.A. Mrs. Raisa Bano and others (Appellant) V/S Ms. Tooba Shoaib and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1366
Advocates:Abdur Razzaq(ADVO-11476-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Hyder Shaikh(ADVO-10758-SBC-KHI),Arjumand Saeed(ADVO-6780-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.212-K/2024 Mrs. Raisa Bano and others v. Ms. Tooba Shoaib and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
3439) 9/2013 Judicial Companies Misc. South Asia Geophysical Services (SAGeo) (Applicant) V/S New Horizon Exploration & Production Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 SBLR Sindh 2173
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-16
Approved for Reporting
3440) 47/2019 Cr.Rev Muhammad Sadiq (Applicant) V/S Faizan Ali & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 418
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
3441) 715/2011 Const. P. Piyar Ali Gadiwan (Petitioner) V/S Province of sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 09-MAR-12
Approved for Reporting
3442) 17/2006 II.A. Saeed Akhtar & Another (Appellant) V/S Zafarullah Khan & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1113
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1038-K/2024 Zafarullah Khan and another v. Saeed Akhtar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed (Marked to Mr.Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui)
3443) 48/2012 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner Inland Revenue (Applicant) V/S Sujnani Wine Shop. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 20-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
3444) 1276/2025 Const. P. M/s Abbott Laboratories (Pakistan) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Drug Pricing Policy 2018
Tag Line:Mandatory and directory provisions; Rules 7 and 10 of Drug Pricing Policy 2018 interpreted
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1731
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Abdullah Nizamani(ADVO-14295-SBC-KHI),Mamoon Nawaz Chaudhry(ADVO-11348-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 18-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
3445) 973/2008 I.T.R.A Commissioner (Legal Division) (Applicant) V/S State Life Insurance Corp. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:Section 65 of 1979 Ordinance, which is in relation to additional
assessment, provides that no proceedings thereunder i.e. subsection (1)
of Section 65 shall be initiated unless definite information has come into
the possession of (Deputy Commissioner) and he has obtained a previous
approval of the Inspecting (Additional Commissioner) of the Income Tax
in writing to do so. Subsection (3) of Section 65 further reiterated that
notice under subsection (1) in respect of any income year may be issued
within ten years of assessment year in which total income of the said
year was first assessable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 327
Advocates:Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-13137-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 31-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3446) 154/2016 Criminal Appeal Manzoor & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 366
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
3447) 625/2025 Const. P. Hafeezullah Lashari (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1972
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
3448) 3081/2019 Const. P. Umar Rasheed Malik and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Tag Line:It is trite law that contractual employees could not be considered to have a generic entitlement for regularization. In the present case the petitioners did not claim to be contractual employees of KPT but that of Aquatech, being a third party entirely. Petitioners counsel has been unable to identify any specific law conferring any right upon the petitioners to be considered for regularization. Petitioners contracts, albeit third party, have admittedly lapsed and any claim in pursuance thereof may lie, if at all, with respect to parties privy thereto and not with respect to others. It is, thus, our deliberated view that the petitioners have failed to set forth a case for exercise of the writ jurisdiction of this Court.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 994
Advocates:Muhammad Salim Thepdawal(ADVO-3099-SBC-KHI),Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General(),Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.278-K/2022 Waqar Ahmed & others v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3449) 112/2005 Civil Revision Abdul Hakeem (Expired),thr:his L.Rs. (Applicant) V/S Mst.Allah Dini and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:A pedigree table is not a mandatory condition to claim share in the estate of the deceased but the case has to be proved through cogent evidence. In Pakistan it is a presumption that a muslim to a lis is a follower of Sunni Sect; unless the contrary is pleaded and proved.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 981
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.290-K/2022 Allah Dini & others v. Abdul Hakeem & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3450) 8984/2018 Const. P. Farzana Shafiq (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner??? late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner??? late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Tag Line:Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 931
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1756/2020 Managing Director, Pakistan Television Corp. Ltd(PTVC), Islamabad and another v. Farzana Shafique and another,C.A.4164/2022 Managing Director, Pakistan Television Corp. Ltd(PTVC), Islamabad and another v. Farzana Shafique and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
3451) 82/2020 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SYED RIZWAN ALI S/O SYED AIJAZ ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2204
Advocates:Ubedullah(ADVO-14900-SBC-KHI),Jamal Ahmed Mufti(ADVO-28-SBC-LAR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Farooque Ahmed(ADVO-14266-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
3452) 4776/2021 Const. P. M/s Al-Hamd Steel Furnace (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (amendment of Import General Manifest IGM)
Tag Line:The amendment, as sought by the petitioner, could not have been
carried out in terms of Section 45(2) of Customs Act, 1969 as this section
relates to an obvious error in the import manifest or an omission
which in the opinion of such officer was result of an accident or
inadvertence. Petitioners case has not fallen in any of such exceptions
inviting and/or calling for an amendment or issuance of supplementary
import manifest as it is apparently a deliberate attempt to provide an
umbrella to the original consignee as against recovery of Rs.71.179
Million.
--Previously there was absolutely no permission whatsoever for
carrying out any amendment in the import manifest except as provided
in subsection (2). This subsection (3) was replaced by a proviso
introduced through Finance Act 2021 which now provides that before
berthing of vessel or the crossover of the vessel, as the case may be,
the person incharge of a conveyance or his duly authorized agent may
amend the import manifest subject to rules notified by the Board.
---The replaced subsection (3) of Section
45 would be applicable in the sense that except as provided in
subsection (2) no import manifest shall be amended. Event disclosed is
prior to amendment carried out via Finance Bill 2021. This would leave a
very little margin, in fact no margin, for the amendment sought to be
carried out in the import manifest in terms of subsection (2) as it is
specifically for an obvious error or in fact an omission, which in the
opinion of the concerned officer is a result of accident or inadvertence.
In fact petitioners case has not fallen in either of the two i.e. its case is
neither covered by subsection (2) of Section 45 nor the proviso recently
inserted by Finance Act, 2021.
Citation:2021 PTD 1858, 2021 PTCL 835
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Imran Iqbal Khan(ADVO-9206-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 09-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
3453) 503/2009 Const. P. Niaz Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
3454) 2273/2017 Suit Mst. Shehnaz Sultana (Plaintiff) V/S Kamal Ahmed Qureshi & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Administration Suits
Tag Line:Indeed in our society women have been deprived of their due share in the property but the preponderance of evidence yield it other way as not only has she admitted to have received Rs.4 lacs as her share in the property but also admitted to have been maintained throughout her life by her brother/defendant No.1. No other sibling came to support her claim.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 783
Advocates:Jamila Siraj(ADVO-7291-SBC-KHI),Sajid Ali(ADVO-869-SBC-NWB),Wasimuddin Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-13347-SBC-KHI),Ahsan Bader(ADVO-10112-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
3455) 4441/2016 Const. P. Mst. Marina (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
3456) 715/2018 Const. P. M/s Cellandgene Pharmaceutical International (Petitioner) V/S FOP & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Audit for successive tax years.
Citation:2022 PTD 1464
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3457) 543/2010 Cr.Acq.A. The State / ANF (Appellant) V/S Basar Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: LIMITATION (Article 157)
Tag Line:On a careful scrutiny of above provision in our view it is clear that the prescribed period of Limitation of thirty days and sixty days respectively is available only for those criminal acquittal appeals which are filed by the complainant or person aggrieved respectively. We have found no specific period of Limitation under the amended provision as regards the acquittal appeals under sub-section (1) to section 417, Cr.P.C. is prescribed. We have also examined the Article 157 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which reads as under:- Description of Appeals Period of limitation Time from which period begins to run 157. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, from an order of acquittal. Six months The date of the order appealed from.
Citation:2020 YLR 2053
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
3458) 471/2006 H.C.A Mst. Haslima Tahir &Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Naheed Ejaz & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 18-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
3459) 100/2019 Const. P. Tanzeem Fikr o Nazar Sindh (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 22-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.351/2019 Tanzeem Fikr-o-Nazar Sindh thr. its President Asghar, Sukkur v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Local Government, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3460) 200/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst. Rashida Begume & Others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Karim & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Judicial integrity upheld, fraud must be proven, not presumed. Admissions and established legal principles affirm the validity of registered documents.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1541
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3461) 651/2020 Cr.Bail Bhagio Khan Bangulani & Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters (Pre arrest bail Rejected, 452, 324, 427, 114,504,506/2,337-H(ii), Medical evidence Supported, With Specific Role.)
Tag Line:BAIL BEFORE ARREST
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1172
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.45-K/2021 Bhagiyo Khan & others v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3462) 197/2019 Suit Ghulam Yaseen & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Hussainullah & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 153
Advocates:Khawaja Amajad Pervaiz(ADVO-3087-SBC-KHI),Nazirullah Mehsood(ADVO-13809-SBC-KHS),Zahooruddin(ADVO-8212-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
3463) 1123/2017 Const. P. Shaikh Sultan Ahmed S/o Abdul Khalique (Petitioner) V/S Iftikharuddin Paracha & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.706-K/2018 Sh. Sultan Ahmed v. Itfikharuddin Paracha and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution as well as on merit.
3464) 58/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Bux through Lrs. (Applicant) V/S Wali Muhammad & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:a "relevant" and "admissible" fact, is admitted as a piece of evidence, only when the same has been proved by the party; Article 79 QSO mandatorily requires proof of document to be attested, and shall not be used as evidence until two attesting witnesses have been examined; Exclusion to this rule has been provided only with respect to those registered documents which are admitted; in matters pertaining to financial or future obligations, an instrument if reduced to writing, shall be attested by two men or one man and two women; mere assertion of death of marginal witness would not discharge the burden of a party; Simply alleging that a witness has died or cannot be found, would not assuage the burden to locate and produce him; if no effort was made to prove death of the witness, strong presumption of withholding best evidence would be drawn against such party as entailed under Article 29(g) of the QSO; even for those registered documents which have been challenged, the exercise of proof of document through marginal witnesses is to be mandatorily complied with, and no statutory presumption could be attached to it; power of Court under Order XIV Rule 15 CPC can be exercised at any stage prior to the final disposal of the case; parties are also under duty to make application for amendment or correction of Issues settled by the Court; section 115 CPC confers an exceptional and necessary power intended to secure effective exercise of its superintendence and visitorial powers of correction, unhindered by technicalities; Article 117 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 requires the primary burden to prove a fact on such person, who asserts such fact
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 10
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
3465) 719/2014 Suit Malik Zulfiqar Hussain. (Plaintiff) V/S Anees Parekh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 321
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
3466) 6/2004 Spl. Cr. A. Tariq Irshad (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Forfeiture of assets for smuggling narcotics. Jurisdiction lies with Court under CNS Act, not under Sections 30 & 31 of PSA. Appeal by ANF under Section 43 PSA, not maintainable.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 543
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
3467) 1377/2014 Const. P. Akmal Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Establishment Government of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 128, 2019 PLC (CS) 2013
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.14-K/2018 Akmal Hussain v. The Secy: Estabishment Div. Govt. of Pakistan, Islambad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3468) 49/2020 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Ali Abro (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court( Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 232
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
3469) 162/2022 H.C.A Dr. Masuma Hasan (Appellant) V/S Imtiaz Ali Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Factors regarding whether a dispute or objection of an objector, other than the legal heir of the deceased, as to ownership of property could be adjudicated within the framework of a suit for administration. Muhammad Zahid v. Mst. Ghazala Zakir and Others, PLD 2011 Karachi 83 followed along with updating and cross-referencing the several Judgments/Orders of the Division and Single Bench of this Court from 2015 onwards applying the principles laid down in the Ghazala Zakir case.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1117
Advocates:Abida Rasheed(ADVO-12320-SBC-KHI),Wiqas Ahmed Khan(ADVO-5650-SBC-KHI),Zaibun Nisa(ADVO-11860-SBC-KHI),Asad Ali Khan(ADVO-12863-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 06-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
3470) 496/2018 Cr.Misc. SAADULLAH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
3471) 117/2020 H.C.A Muhammad Ayaz & another (Appellant) V/S Mst. Rasheedan Bibi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 499
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
3472) 26/2016 Criminal Appeal Gulzar Ahmed Soomro (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Appeal ( Appeal dismissed as accused misappropriated G3 Rifle during duty being Police Official. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 202
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.359/2021 Gulzar Ahmed v. The State thr. P.G. SIndh,Crl.A.135/2022 Gulzar Ahmed v. The State thr. P.G. SIndh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
3473) 78/2012 Cr.Appeal Raja alias Wahid Bux and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Criminal Trial ( Benefit of doubt )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3474) 462/2021 Suit Hayat Muhammad Sher & others (Plaintiff) V/S Mukhtiyarkar Gulzar-e-Hijri & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 850
Advocates:Umair Bachani(ADVO-15300-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-8216-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Choudhary Atif Rafiq(ADVO-11896-SBC-KHI),Zahooruddin(ADVO-8212-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3475) 783/2017 Suit Anees Vayyani (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Zarina Vayyani & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 20 Rule 13 CPC)
Tag Line:Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)---
----Ss. 295 & 278---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XX, R.13 & S.114---Succession---Procedure in contentious cases---Decree in administration suit---Nature of order under S.295, Succession Act, 1925---Conversion of proceedings under Succession Act, 1925 to a suit of administration under O.XX, R.13, C.P.C.---Preliminary decree---Scope---Orders passed in absence of legal heirs could not be treated as orders passed on "objections" in order to treat an application for letter for administration as contentious, which could only be converted into a suit if the objections filed were prima facie tenable and objectors were to be treated as defendants in terms of S.295, Succession Act, 1925---When there was neither "objections" nor "objectors" on record, order under O.XX, R.13, C.P.C. could not be passed.
Citation:2018 CLC 390
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 15-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
3476) 8554/2019 Const. P. Unity Foods Ltd (Petitioner) V/S S.E.C.P & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies Act, 2017
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 12
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Raja Qasit Nawaz Khan(ADVO-3457-SBC-KHI),Syed Imran Shamsi(ADVO-10257-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 11-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
3477) 240/2021 Cr.Acq.A. HUZOOR BUX (Appellant) V/S PIR SIDDIUE SAJJAD GHOUS SHAH & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 940
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3478) 6900/2018 Const. P. M/s S.P (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
3479) 792/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Lucky Core Industries Limited, Karachi (Applicant) V/S The Director, D.G I & I (Customs) Karachi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Classification of partial shipment of project consignment; domain of Classification Committee; matter remanded
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 413
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI),Umer Ilyas Khan(ADVO-20501-SBC-KHS),Maryam Riaz(ADVO-17644-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 13-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.473-K/2025 Lucky Core Industries Limited v. The Director, Directorate General Intelligence & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3480) 5030/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Rafique Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Possession (Official Accommodation Possession)
Tag Line:the petitioner has prayed that official respondents be directed to take over possession of the subject official accommodation i.e House No. Annexe No.2 situated at GOR-1 Bath Island Karachi from respondent No. 3 and to hand over the same to him as it has been allotted to him vide allotment order dated 16.11.2017
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1336
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),M.S. Bukhari(ADVO-17093-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1605-K/2021 Dr.Zeba Hussain Soomro v. Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3481) 2/2016 Conf.Case Reference made by the D.&.S.J KHI WEST (Appellant) V/S TAJ MUHAMMAD S/O BAKHT ZAMEEN & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
3482) 1304/2024 Cr.Bail AYAZULLAH S/O SYED UMER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:A bare perusal of the aforementioned provisions of law demonstrates that the same is applicable in the class of persons, who trade in such stolen articles known as receivers as the complainant has failed to recognize the applicant. Primarily, a person, immediately, after theft found to be in possession of the stolen property, the presumption would be that either he is a thief or in possession of goods with knowledge that those are stolen. Mere possession of the stolen property is not sufficient to constitute an offense under the aforementioned provisions rather in addition it has to be established that the person in possession of the stolen property had dishonestly received or retained the property knowing or having the reasons to believe the same to be stolen. The onus is always on the part of the prosecution to prove the essential elements of the offense. In case of failure on the part of the prosecution to prove the basic ingredients i.e. receipt or retention of property belonging to someone else, the property being stolen, the existence of knowledge or belief on the part of the person found in possession, and the receipt and retention as dishonest, no bail can be refused as in such circumstances it is well settled that no conviction can be awarded on such analogy. The prosecution to establish an offense under the aforesaid section, must not only prove that the property is stolen, but it must also be established that the person charged with having stolen property either knows the property to be stolen or has reasonable grounds for believing the same to be stolen.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1160
Advocates:Jehanzeb Khan(ADVO-3802-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
3483) 286/2019 Cr.Bail Cr. Muzafar Ghanghro (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Case falling within the ambit of sick person as mentioned in the first proviso of Section 497 Cr.P.C., Applicant is entitled to the concession of bail. Challan submitted. Applicant was not required for further investigation. In order to prove the guilt of the Applicant and to connect him with the commission of the offense, matter requires further inquiry, which can only be done after conclusion of trial.
Bail granted.
Topic: Bail Matters (Sick Person)
Tag Line:Case falling within the ambit of sick person as mentioned in the first proviso of Section 497 Cr.P.C., Applicant is entitled to the concession of bail. Challan submitted. Applicant was not required for further investigation. In order to prove the guilt of the Applicant and to connect him with the commission of the offense, matter requires further inquiry, which can only be done after conclusion of trial.
Bail granted.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
3484) 1837/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Arif Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 657
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.852/2018 Muhammad Arif Akhtar & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed.there is also a short order/CO by HCJ
3485) 11/2022 Criminal Appeal Notan Mal Hindu (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 133
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
3486) 14/2023 Cr.J.A SAIFULLAH S/O MANSOOR KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 191
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Habibullah(ADVO-13380-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 02-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3487) 263/2021 Const. P. Asif Ahmed Khan S/o Muhammad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Salma Asif and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Islam confers right of Khula to women
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 380
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
3488) 229/2017 Suit Aga Khan Fund For Economic Development S.A. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 4B)
Tag Line:It is held that provisions of Treaty, which are statutorily recognized in terms of Section 107 of the Income Tax Law, has been given preference and would prevail over the provisions of the Income Tax Law. In Paragraph-9 of the above judgment, question of imposition of Super Tax has been specifically dealt with and the contention of the Department / Suit No.229 of 2017 present Defendants, has been discarded.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 119
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3489) 4394/2013 Const. P. Younus Rizwani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 25-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
3490) 36/2021 II.A. Mst. Fakhra Ahmed Thr. Wajih-ul-Husnain Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Sajid Abbasi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 134
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS),Fazal Ur Rehman(ADVO-4319-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.117-K/2024 Nasir Ahmed Siddiqui and another v. Mst. Fakhra Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3491) 89/2008 Civil Revision Late Mrza Masood Ali Warsi and others (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Bali Bai and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 03-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
3492) 949/2010 Suit HAJI NAIMATULLAH (Plaintiff) V/S THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 )
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 19-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
3493) 873/2019 Cr.Bail Masood (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
3494) 6254/2017 Const. P. Prof: Abdul Razzaque Sheikh (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.655-K/2017 Prof: Abdul Razzaque Shaikh v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3495) 2588/2019 Const. P. Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
3496) 4469/2019 Const. P. Nestle Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 PLC Lab. 95
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Rafiullah(ADVO-4519-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1285-K/2022 Saeed Ahmed v. Nestle Pakistan Ltd. & others,C.A.137-K/2022 Saeed Ahmed v. Nestle Pakistan Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of. CPLA 1285-K/2022 is restored
3497) 1830/2016 Cr.Bail Imran (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 06-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.3-K/2017 Imran v. Mst. Anita and another,Crl.P.9-K/2017 Imran v. Mst. Anita and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed & Bail Granted.
3498) 2260/2022 Const. P. Syed Meeral Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 996
Advocates:Moula Bux Khatian(ADVO-13552-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3499) 25/2014 I. A Mrs. Farnaz Ahmed (Appellant) V/S M/s. Faysal Bank Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 251
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.309-K/2021 Mrs.Farnaz Ahmed v. M/s. Faysal Bank Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3500) 3234/2025 Const. P. Liaquat Ali Fazlani (Petitioner) V/S General Manager SSGCL & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Relationship of employee Governed under principle of Master and Servant
Petition not maintainable
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1933
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
3501) 41/2025 Cr.Bail Imran Shaikh (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1812
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1267/2025 National Accountability Bureau thr. Its Chairman, Islamabad v. Imran Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3502) 857/2019 Const. P. Ramzan (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
3503) 42/2007 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Bux and others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Ghafoor and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Burden of proof. Articles 117 and 119, Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order 1984
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1361
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3504) 746/1998 Suit MUHAMMAD ISMAIL & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
3505) 6381/2018 Const. P. Barkat Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
3506) 44/2017 Cr.Rev THE STATE / ANF (Applicant) V/S SHARIFULLAH @ MIANJEE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Shah Imroze Khan(ADVO-4901-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ishaque Memon(ADVO-13263-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
3507) 34/2023 H.C.A Dr. Nafees Zubair through her attorney (Appellant) V/S Saeeda Bano & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Transfer of Property Act 1882
Tag Line:*-Performance is equity based, court is obliged to perform equity as performance is not vested
right.
**An oral (unregistered) gift alone, or any private communication between donor and donee,
would not be an obstacle in seeking performance against the title holder
being a last registered instrument.
***Deed of Redemption is no doubt claimed to be a registered instrument however this
Redemption Deed is just a privileged document between the mortgagor
and the mortgagee but the Redemption Deed itself does not confer title.
****the performance cannot be declined on the execution of oral gift and that due diligence was not made. Performance could only be sought against title holder. If these "oral gifts" are allowed to come in the way of performance, then no suit for performance could succeed.
*****It would not be an equity if appellant is allowed the performance realizing the no efforts were made to deposit the balance amount at the time when injunction was sought and/or when suit was filed, since doctrine of lis pendence is also an obstacle for seller.
Citation:2024 CLC 1146, 2024 SBLR Sindh 178, 2024 SBLR Sindh 553
Advocates:Ikram Ahmed Ansari(ADVO-134-SBC-KHI),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Imtiaz Ahmed Ansari(ADVO-4201-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 16-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.536/2024 Dr. Nafees Zubair v. Saeeda Bano (deceased) thr. her L.Rs. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3508) 4357/2013 Const. P. Noor Mohammad (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Iqbal and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 31-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
3509) 2242/2017 Const. P. Tashkeel Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 920
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
3510) 487/2024 Cr.Bail Mujeeb-Ur-Rehman Jakhrani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:(i). Honour killing is just murder (Qatl-i-Amd), which is forbidden by both the law, religious teachings, and the supreme law of the land. (ii). Killing of a woman on the pretext of honour is un-Islamic, unconstitutional and an offence against the State and society. (ii). Discussion on affidavit of no objection by the complainant side.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 1360
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.157-K/2024 Mujeeb-ur-Rehman v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3511) 141/2012 Suit M/S.HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD (Plaintiff) V/S PROV.OF SINDH & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Under section 20(c) CPC, notification of statute is not place of cause of action.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 467
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
3512) 198/2023 Const. P. Waqar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Federal Public Service Commission to issue transcript to all candidates appearing in the examinations.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1513
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3513) 7687/2017 Const. P. AssetLink Asia (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 410
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
3514) 973/2022 Const. P. Qamar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Penalty of indefinite demotion.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 2009
Advocates:Aamer Latif(ADVO-16121-SBC-KHE),Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS),Ch: Azhar Alahi(ADVO-9535-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3515) 42/2023 Judicial Companies Misc. Muhammad Sohail & Abdul Wahab (Applicant) V/S M/s. Union Cargo (Private) Limited & 4 ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Whether an agreement in respect of the transfer of shares can be repudiated in the Company jurisdiction
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1439
Advocates:Farhat Hussain(ADVO-4881-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Syed Kawish Hussain Naqvi(ADVO-19083-SBC-KHS),Tarique Mehmood(ADVO-4864-SBC-KHI),Junaid Ahmed(ADVO-15448-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 17-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
3516) 322/2021 S.M.A Aiman Fatima D/o Hasan Mahmood (Petitioner) V/S Fozia Hasan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 271
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
3517) 7/2007 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Namoos Khan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 22-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
3518) 631/2010 Const. P. Shamim Begum (Petitioner) V/S Azizul Hasan Khan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters)
Tag Line:Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----Ss. 15 & 18---Ejectment of tenant---Change of ownership---Denial of relationship of landlord and tenant by the tenant---Default in payment of rent---Expression "or by such other mode" in S.18, Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979---Scope---Agreement of sale---Scope---Landlord purchased demised premises through sale agreement and requested the tenant for payment of rent to him---Tenant did not pay rent to the new owner---Eviction petition was moved for personal use and on the ground of default in payment of rent---Contention of tenant was that she had purchased the demised premises from its previous owner through agreement of sale---Eviction petition was accepted concurrently---Validity---Previous Landlord had an agreement of sale and registered general power of attorney in his favour executed by the original owner---Landlord had even authority to sell and mortgage the demised premises on the basis of registered irrevocable general power of attorney---Tenant had only an agreement of sale the execution of which had been denied by the original owner---Tenant had not filed suit for specific performance of agreement to sell to get such denial declared false and got her title perfected through due process of law---Agreement to sell in favour of tenant had been disputed by the original owner of demised premises---Landlord had discharged his burden to prove the relationship of landlord and tenant---Tenancy on service of notice under Section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 on the tenant was created by operation of law---Landlord was entitled to claim eviction of tenant on the ground of default as well as personal need---Use of phrase "or any other mode" in Section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 in favour of new owner did cover transfer of property by registered irrevocable power of attorney duly registered with Registrar of property when such power was coupled with sale agreement showing consideration---When tenant had claimed ownership on the basis of mere sale agreement and he/she had failed to establish the same then default stood proved in favour of landlord---Tenant was directed to vacate the demised premises within thirty days---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Rahmatullah vs. Ali Muhammad and another 1983 SCMR 1064 and Iqbal and 6 others v. Mst. Rabia Bibi and another PLD 1991 SC 242 distinguished.
Citation:2019 CLC 1557
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.213-K/2019 Shamim Begum v. Aziz-ul-Hassan Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3519) 2788/2020 Const. P. Mohammad Siddiq Mughal (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Entitlement of pension to a person contribution in respect of whom was not paid for at least fifteen years; Held YES
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 842
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Kamran Mirza(ADVO-11996-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.408/2023 Employees Old-Age Benefits Institution through its Chairman, Karachi v. Muhammad Siddique Mughal and another,C.A.316/2024 Employees Old-Age Benefits Institution through its Chairman, Karachi v. Muhammad Siddique Mughal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
3520) 44/2004 I. A Hafiz Prof. Abdul Ghaffar (Appellant) V/S The Assistant Commissioner & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:The land acquisition proceedings commenced well before 1997 and 1998 and the appellants originally were not made party to the proceedings. The dispute in the shape of Suit No.108/1996 was pending adjudication between private parties which was resolved somewhere in December 2002 as informed. This question of such references being barred by time was considered by different benches having their independent views, however, this question was ultimately set at rest by Honble Supreme Court in the case of Government of West Pakistan (Now Government of N.W.F.P.) through Collector, Peshawar v. Arbab Haji Aimed Ali Jan and others reported in PLD 1981 Supreme Court 516. The Honble Supreme Court, in the aforesaid judgment, examined the judgment of the Full Bench of Peshawar High Court in appeal. The Full Bench of Peshawar High Court was of the view that it is the reference of the Collector which invests the Court with necessary jurisdiction to enquire into objections mentioned in Section 19 of the Act and not the objection application filed by an interested person before the Collector.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 25-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
3521) 1152/2004 Suit INAYAT MASIH & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S WAQAR AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Tag Line:Outcome of a criminal proceeding would not adversely affect determination of a Civil liability in a fatal accident suit, inter alia, because standard of proof in both proceedings is different.
Family of the deceased is also entitled for damages for "loss of consortium", that is, deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to the death caused by a tortfeasor. Suit decreed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 837
Advocates:Muhammad Nazim(ADVO-20865-SBC-KHE),Salah-ud-Din Khan Gandapur(ADVO-2969-SBC-KHS),Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Tariq(ADVO-8862-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
3522) 640/2009 Suit Shakeel Aijaz (Appellant) V/S Mst. Shakeela Naseem & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 23-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
3523) 12/2011 I. A U.I.G. (Private) Limited (Appellant) V/S Bank Al-Falah Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 452
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.352-K/2014 M/s U.I.G. (Pvt) Ltd. and others v. Bank Al-Falah Ltd. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3524) 764/2013 Const. P. Muhkamuddin Metlo & others (Petitioner) V/S Province & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 18-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.663-K/2015 The Province of Sindh and others v. Mukhamuddin Metlo and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3525) 663/2024 Const. P. Syed Wajahat Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Banking Court No. 5 Karachi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 957
Advocates:Sami Ahsan(ADVO-6815-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
3526) 2037/2021 Suit Natasha Malik (Plaintiff) V/S Naeem Malik & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Injunction Granted. )
Tag Line:As per Article 128 of the |Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 the
only person competent to dispute the parentage of the plaintiff would
be her putative father (and that too only if the father had refused to
own the child from the outset). However, defendants No.1 and 2
contend that Article 128 is only applicable to cases where illegitimacy is
being contended and not to cases of adoption. The approach of our
superior courts in response to Article 128 covers both.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1150
Advocates:M/S. MANSOOR AHMED KHAN & CO.(FIRM-106-SBC-KHI),Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-3719-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Shumaila Saghir(ADVO-6893-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
3527) 5220/2017 Const. P. Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1354
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1188/2021 Sindh Revnue Board through its Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi v. M/s Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Limited Karachi and another,C.P.L.A.317-K/2021 The Provice of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. M/s. Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
3528) 7700/2019 Const. P. Husnain Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Health Department, Government of Sindh, whereby the petitioners may be allowed to pursue their academic medical career subject to extraordinary leave (without pay) for the required period--At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners in substance has pleaded discrimination as they were not sent for training within time, however, he has seriously submitted that their other batch mates on the same consideration were considered and were sent for training and the petitioners were left out except petitioners No.6, 9, 10, and 14.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 135
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 22-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
3529) 2083/2018 Const. P. Mst. Farhana Mansoor (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
3530) 1/2014 Cr.J.A Rehmatullah Rind and another (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain M. Sheikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 27-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
3531) 52/2023 Const. P. Mst Yaseena Kalwar (Petitioner) V/S Lal Bux Kalwar & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 584
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3532) 6015/2020 Const. P. M/s Harris Silicons & Glass Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1218
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
3533) 187/2010 I.T.R.A Pakistan Steel Mills (Applicant) V/S Commissioner Inland Revenue (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 23-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.457/2012 Pakistan Steel Mills Corp. Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Inland Revenue and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
3534) 1040/2007 Suit MST. MUQADAS & OTHERS. (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C. LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident
Tag Line:Fatal Accidents Act (XIII of 1855)---
----S. 1---Electricity Act (IX of 1910), S.33---Fatal accident---Suit for compensation---Deceased 36 years of age, a Head Constable in Traffic Police, died on account of electrocution by coming into contact with energized pole erected by Electric Supply Company---Plaintiffs being legal heirs of the deceased filed suit for recovery of compensation against the Company---Issues in question were whether the suit was not maintainable; whether no cause of action had accrued to the plaintiffs to file the suit and whether the plaintiffs had alternate remedy under S.33 of the Electricity Act, 1910 to get redressal of their grievances---Burden of proof of said issues, was on the defendant Company---Defendant, having not advanced any arguments on the issues, same were answered against the Company---Burden of proof that deceased died due to electric shock owing to negligence and wrongful act of the defendant company and about deceased's earning was on the plaintiffs---Evidence on record had proved that deceased had died due to electrocution, and there was also a clear evidence that monthly salary of deceased was Rs.9945 as he was Head Constable in Police Department---Documents produced on record had confirmed that the cause of death of the deceased was due to electricity current in the electric Pole---Plaintiffs, in circumstances, were entitled for the relief they had claimed as compensation for the death of the deceased---Plaintiffs being immediate family of the deceased, directly affected by accidental death of the deceased had given well calculated figures to claim quantum of damages amounting to Rs.10,802,220---Defendant company, in cross-examination, had not even disputed the calculation given in the plaint as well as in the affidavit-in-evidence on oath and conceded that the figures of quantum of damage given in the affidavit, were proper calculation---Quantum of compensation had been determined keeping in view life span of the deceased, future benefit with the charge in salary etc.---Plaintiffs, were widow of the deceased, his mother, one son and four daughters---Preamble of the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 had explained that purpose of the said Act, was to provide compensation to the families for loss occasioned by the death of a person caused by actionable wrong---Suit was decreed with cost and the defendant was directed to deposit, decretal amount with Nazir of the court within 30 days.
Citation:2018 SBLR 1039, 2018 MLD 1054
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 19-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
3535) 201/2011 Cr.Acq.A. Soorto (Appellant) V/S Pirdan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-08
Approved for Reporting
3536) 521/2022 Criminal Appeal RAMEEZ ARSHAD S/O ARSHAD MEHMOOD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE PG SINDH (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1486
Advocates:Tousif(ADVO-16490-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Abdul Qadir(ADVO-736-SBC-KHP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
3537) 148/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. FAIZ UR REHMAN S/O ABDUL REHMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 13
Advocates:Mamoon Ahmed Khan Shirwany(ADVO-11042-SBC-KHS),Majid Ali Rajper(ADVO-4164-SBC-HYD),Nehal Khan Lashari.(ADVO-50002-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Khadim Hussain Lashari(ADVO-19500-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 23-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
3538) 841/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Safdar (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Pre-arrest Bail Granted)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
3539) 1556/2015 Const. P. Khuda Bux and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.200-K/2019 Khuda Bux and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Health Department Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3540) 1194/2020 Const. P. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (recruitment / examination process)
Tag Line:The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 791
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.442-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary & another v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi & others,C.P.L.A.1840/2020 Aijaz Ali Sahto thr. University & Board Department of the Province fo Sindh and others v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
3541) 196/2023 Const. P. Ali Dost Shahani (Petitioner) V/S Mst Sadaf Shaheen (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 259
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.2-K/2024 Ali Dost v. Mst. Sadaf Shaheen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3542) 590/2015 Const. P. Shoukat (Petitioner) V/S Director School ducation Mirpurkhas & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
3543) 5956/2018 Const. P. Seemah Irfan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Tax matter
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4114/2019 Dr. Seema Irfan & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary Revenue M/o Finance Ex-Officio Chairman FBR, Islamabad & others,C.A.113/2020 Dr. Seema Irfan & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary Revenue M/o Finance Ex-Officio Chairman FBR, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted/Status quo,Pending
3544) 2750/2021 Const. P. Mehtab Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:As a Constitutional Court, this Court is tasked with ensuring public sector institutions operate lawfully, safeguarding public interest and citizens' rights. In this case, the regularization process for the petitioner was found to lack the backing of law, rules, or policy, thereby precluding their claim for regularization. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate any illegality or irregularity in the respondents' actions, thus providing no basis for this Court's interference under its writ jurisdiction to regularize his services based on ELP enrollment which concluded on January 16, 2020.
12. This petition lacks merit and is therefore, dismissed, along with any pending application(s).
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1752
Advocates:Muhammad Nasir(ADVO-13381-SBC-KHS),Nabi Bux Laghari(ADVO-18423-SBC-KHS),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Mukesh Kumar G. Karara(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
3545) 35/2016 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Qasim Bhutto (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Appeal (Anti Corruption Appeal allowed. on the ground e number of loopholes in the prosecution case. )
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 432
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 14-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
3546) 4508/2019 Const. P. Dr. Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1089
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.269-K/2021 Dr.Dilshad Ahmed v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3547) 74/2018 II.A. Brig (Rtd) Raja M. Saleem Khan (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Nabeela Azam (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The learned counsel for the Appellant has failed to identity any substantial error in the Impugned Judgement. In light of what has been held above no case for interference in the Impugned Judgment(s) and decree(s) is made out. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 394
Advocates:Khawaja Naveed Ahmed(ADVO-2102-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Islam Leghari(ADVO-2613-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Faisal Khan(ADVO-14117-SBC-KHI),Salman Javed Mirza(ADVO-19988-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
3548) 96/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I & I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S M/s. Awais & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 575
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.29-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s.Zamzama Ceramcs Centre Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3549) 123/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director Directorate PCA (Customs) (Applicant) V/S M/s. Century Paper & Board Mills Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:competency of Director Post Clearance (Audit) to file a Reference Application under Section 196 of the Customs Act, 1969; held; No.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 285
Advocates:Muhammad Rashid(ADVO-8654-SBC-KHI),Arshad Siraj Memon(ADVO-3708-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 31-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3550) 764/2007 Suit MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN SIDDIQUI. (Plaintiff) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed
Order Date: 20-JAN-09
Approved for Reporting
3551) 71/2020 R.A (Civil Revision) Sodho Khan thr: L.Rs (Applicant) V/S Raja Imtiaz Ali & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1057
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
3552) 544/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Munir @ Munir Sharif S/o Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) V/S Anum Thanvi and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bridal gifts given by a husband are the absolute property of a wife and cannot be taken away from her. A bride can always recover the articles of bridal gifts, ???WARI??? and presents given to her by a bridegroom or his family at the time of the marriage.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1219
Advocates:Munir Ahmed Malik(ADVO-14377-SBC-KHS),Sikandar Ali Shah(ADVO-195-SBC-THT),Har Chand Rai(ADVO-8219-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.667-K/2024 Muhammad Munir @ Munir Sharif v. Anum Thanvi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3553) 3068/2019 Const. P. M/s Quick Contractor & Traders (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Import Policy
Tag Line:With this observation since Import Policy Order 2013 in its present
form is exactly the same (for present purpose) as it stood in 2009, the
clarification will be carried forward and the objections of the
department insofar as the two dissimilar brands/makes i.e. crane and
truck are concerned, would not be tenable. It was never the
requirement of Import Policy Order 2013 that a truck-mounted crane
should be factory-fitted or that the crane and truck should not be
dissimilar as far as their makes are concerned.
Citation:2022 PTD 1302
Advocates:Pir Darwesh Kheshgi(ADVO-10483-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 24-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
3554) 12/2022 Criminal Miscelleneous Sajid Hussain and Another (Applicant) V/S The State and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Transfer application under section 23 ATA, 1997. Jurisdiction of ATC under third schedule of the ATA, 1997
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 1140
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 15-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3555) 153/2022 Spl.H.C.A Fateh Textile Mills Pvt Ltd & Others (Appellant) V/S Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Scheme of auction proceedings highlighted in order XXI Rule 66, 84, 85, 89, 90 and 92)
Tag Line:It seems that while the claim of the bank is being multiplied
continuously with the passage of time, whereas, the value of the
property as determined in the year 2016 was fixed to be set off against
current exaggerated claim of Bank. This is no justification. No one
should suffer on account of court???s error whether it is a borrower or the
bank. If at all the claim is to be set off, it should be set off in terms of
the present market value and not on the basis of value of 2016 against
claim of bank, as exist now. Six years have been passed and the
properties must have been multiplied manifolds, which was not
accounted.
Citation:2024 CLD 604
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 30-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
3556) 2535/2014 Suit Malik Abdul Qayyum Kakar. (Plaintiff) V/S D.G. Intelligence & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
3557) 679/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
whether the petitioner can be regularized in the Respondent-Department. We have noticed that the Petitioner has admitted that he accepted the contingent/work charged appointment--Petitioner's contingent/work charged service could not be converted into regular service--The Petitioner, in our view, has failed to make out his case for regularization of his work charged service as his case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant Petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s)---Before parting with this judgment, we may observe that that the petitioner has served from 1992 with some breaks but the fact of the matter is that he has a long service of more than two decades at his credit, therefore, it is not justified at the end of department after sucking the youth of petitioner and kicked him out on the pretext that his case does not fall in the aforesaid policy and that the post held by him being temporary and contingent/work charge paid, being not pensionable. Since the Petitioner is 58 years old and two years remaining to attain the age of superannuation, therefore, his services be continued till his date of superannuation. The salary issue of the Petitioner for the intervening period may be decided in accordance with the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order.
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) 51
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3558) 58/2013 S.M.A Mrs. Atteeya Mahmood (Petitioner) (Petitioner) V/S Nighat Muzaffar and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: S.M.A (Review Application dismissed)
Tag Line:The Objectors' counsel has failed to point out any error, factual or legal in the order dated 30-01-2017, sought to be reviewed by the present applicant. C.M.A dismissed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 12-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
3559) 620/1994 Suit ISMAIL MEMORIAL TRUST (Plaintiff) V/S KARACH COOP H.S. UNION LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Amenity Plot (The Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002.), Amenity Plot
Tag Line:Hospitals fall within the category of amenity plots, as envisaged in Article 52-A of the Karachi Development Authority (KDA) Order, 1957. Suit decreed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 06-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
3560) 5033/2013 Const. P. Saadat Khan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 1615
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 30-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.233-K/2014 Director, Directorate General of Intelligence and Investigation (FBR) v. Saadat Khan and others,C.A.20/2015 Director, Directorate General of Intelligence and Investigation (FBR) v. Saadat Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of
3561) 737/2019 Cr.Bail Jatoi Dahar & others VS (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (dismissed, specific roles and participation; motive has been admitted by the applicant's )
Citation:2020 MLD 1455
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.192/2020 Jatoi S/o Ghulam Rasool & others v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3562) 1339/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector Model Customs Collectorate (Applicant) V/S M/s. Venus Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Citation:2024 PTD 997
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 07-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3563) 4422/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Qaiser Patel (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Rights of Allottee in Illegally constructed buildings and Scope for Regularisation under the provisions of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 82
Advocates:Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-15248-PBC-LHR),Aftab Ayub(ADVO-17674-SBC-KHC),Syed Shahnawaz Hussain(ADVO-10115-SBC-KHE),Sohail Hameed(ADVO-3726-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
3564) 324/2018 Const. P. World Call Cables (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
3565) 1216/2018 Const. P. Mst. Farzana Javed (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Nighat Sultana & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sind Rented Premises Act - Eviction---15
Tag Line:(a) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----S.15---Eviction petition---Default in payment of rent---Personal bona fide need of landlady---Scope---Trial Court dismissed the petition holding that landlady had failed to prove her personal need of the rented premises---Trial Court did not decide the issue of default on the ground that it was not agitated by her counsel at the time of final arguments---Appellate Court allowed the appeal and directed the tenant to vacate the rented premises---Validity---Held; it could not be believed that the counsel who filed case for default then filed an application for tentative rent order and after obtaining certified copies of ledger of Nazir filed an application for striking off defense, had failed to agitate ground of default in final arguments---Trial Court was entrusted with the duty of doing justice between the parties, to decide each issue between them in accordance with law on merit on the basis of record and evidence irrespective of arguments by the counsel---In presence of record/evidence, unless the question of default was dropped in writing, Trial Court was not supposed to leave a crucial issue between the parties undecided merely for want of arguments---Findings of Trial Court on the issue of personal bona fide need of landlady were equally perverse and contrary to the record and evidence---Tenant neither in her written statement nor in her affidavit-in-evidence had alleged that two flats of the landlady were lying vacant in the same building, but the Trial Court had relied on such purported statement of tenant---High Court, while maintaining the order of Appellate Court, dismissed the constitutional petition with costs.
(b) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----S.15---Eviction petition---Personal bona fide need of landlady---Choice of landlord---Even if more than one premises were available with the landlord and he/she chose to occupy for personal need a particular one, the tenant had no right to challenge such choice of the landlord.
(c) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----S.16---Defense, striking off---Scope---Striking off defense in the case was not a mere technicality---Refusal to strike off defense amounted to denying statutory right accrued to the landlord---Use of word "shall" in S. 16(2) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 left no room for the Rent Controller to form even 'a humble opinion' to deny a statutory right accrued to landlord.
Citation:2019 CLC 687
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 18-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
3566) 2589/2021 Const. P. Saddique Ali Laghari (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1341
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 20-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3389/2021 Saddique Ali Laghari v. The Federation of Pakistan through Chairman NAB, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3567) 381/2020 Const. P. Hyderabad Railway Cantt: Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1403
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
3568) 1702/2007 Const. P. Federation of Pakistan & another. (Petitioner) V/S Official Assignee & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3535/2019 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secratary Ministry of Finance , Islamabad and another v. Office Assignee/ Official Liquidator in matter of Pakistan Fertilizer Company Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3569) 4056/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Afzal (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PCr.LJ 316
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
3570) 5/2010 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. The Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s FMC United (Pvt) Ltd., (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 09-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.738/2013 Collector of Customs (MCC) v. M/s. FMC United (PVT) LTD. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3571) 4190/2016 Const. P. Askari Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S President of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3572) 368/2023 Suit ZEDCO (Plaintiff) V/S TERUMO BCT ASIA PTE LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: DRUG REGULATORY AUTHORITY ACT, 2012
Tag Line:No interim relief can be granted, which is not prayed for in the main suit. The prayer clause in the main suit seeks orders to restrain Defendants from transferring the Plaintiff???s licence to another person. But the impugned decision of Defendant No.2 does not relate to the transfer of the import license. The impugned decision is for the cancellation of the import license of Plaintiff and not transfer. Thus, the interim relief sought by Plaintiff in CMA No.9885/2023 is not pleaded in the main suit.
Further, Court proceedings will take their own time, whereas the medical devices of Defendant No.1 in circulation have a limited shelf life. A court should be mindful that when granting discretionary relief, its decision may not create a potential risk to the public. Therefore, this Court should avoid creating a new situation from a public health perspective too and is not inclined to withdraw the impugned decision on this score too.
CMA No.9885/2023 is dismissed with directions to the Appellate Board of the Authority that if the Plaintiff prefers an appeal to the impugned decision before the Board, then the Board will give the Plaintiff an opportunity to be heard, including a personal hearing before passing any final order in the appeal.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 441
Advocates:Barrister Rashid Mureed(ADVO-17151-SBC-KHC),Haroon Dugal(ADVO-35161-PBC-LHR),M/S. CEPAL & CO(FIRM-392-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 07-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
3573) 1169/2023 Const. P. Dr Shafi Muhammad Ghanghro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 216
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3574) 1206/2023 Cr.Bail MST. FARZANA W/O AJAD ALI & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1063
Advocates:Farzana(ADVO-1221-SBC-LRK),Raham Ali(ADVO-12316-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
3575) 309/2017 Cr.J.A ARSHAD HUSSAIN S/O ABBASS HUSSAIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (all the sentences awarded to the appellants on each count in all three cases, run Concurrently .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
3576) 1205/2005 Suit HASAN AHMAD (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD FAROOQ & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Since sale transaction in respect of the Suit Property has been proved by Plaintiff, therefore, Specific Performance can be granted,
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 106
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3577) 3133/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) V/S NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 334
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.334-K/2020 Ali Akbar Bhurt v. Federation of Pakistan through NAB Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3578) 58/2010 J.M Hashmi Charitable Trust (Applicant) V/S Javed Baloch & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 YLR 395
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 17-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
3579) 4622/2016 Const. P. Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1456-K/2018 The Secy: M/o Port & Shipping Now M/o Maritime Affairs and another v. Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3580) 504/2006 Const. P. Sadaruddin (Appellant) V/S Aslam Madad & Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 8 (Fair Rent))
Mr. Justice Khawaja Naveed Ahmed
Order Date: 02-APR-08
Approved for Reporting
3581) 987/2024 Cr.Bail Shahid S/o Abdul Ghani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is settled that when an offense is also punishable with a fine only, the accused shall be entitled to bail as of right because if at the trial he is only sentenced to a fine, period as under trial prisoner due to refusal of bail shall amount to a case of double jeopardy. The Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799, has held in categorical terms that granting of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be a exception and directed the Courts of the country to follow this principle in its letter and spirit because principles of law enunciated by the Supreme Court are constitutionally binding [under Article 189] on all Courts throughout the country.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 909
Advocates:Naveed Ahmed (ADVO-16359-SBC-KHE),Naeemuddin Qureshi(ADVO-2652-A-HLC-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Hyder Farooq Jatoi(ADVO-12402-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
3582) 7101/2015 Const. P. Anwar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 12-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.634-K/2017 Anwar Ahmed and others v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority and others,C.P.L.A.4383/2017 Clifton Cantonment Board, Karachi v. Anwar Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3583) 2099/2013 Const. P. M/s Ahmed CNG Station (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 29-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.4585/2018 M/s Ahmed CNG Station, Lahore v. The Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary (Revenue Division), F.B.R., Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3584) 29/2010 II.A. Ahmed Raza Thaheem & others (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Mohiuddin & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
3585) 128/2014 Suit Bank Alfalah Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Neu Multiplex & Entertainment Square Co. (Pvt) Ltd (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O. XXXIX, Rule 1 & 2 Dismissed.)
Citation:2015 YLR 2141
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Neel Keshav(ADVO-190-SBC-MPR),Mir Muhammad Ali Talpur(ADVO-13012-SBC-KHI),Ameen Mohammed Bandukda(ADVO-13832-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
3586) 2495/2014 Suit Javed Akhtar Chauhan (Plaintiff) V/S Mumtaz Ali & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 19-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
3587) 526/2014 Const. P. profile not available in database as case pertains to Hyd (Petitioner) V/S profile not available in database (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.204-K/2016 Federation of Pakistan and others v. M/s New Allied Electronics Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3588) 203/2017 I. A Sheikh Adeel Imtiaz (Appellant) V/S Faysal Bank Limited & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.613/2020 Sheikh Adeel Imtiaz v. Faysal Bank Ltd, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3589) 621/2017 Suit Mir Jeeand Badini. (Plaintiff) V/S Model Collectorate of Custom Appraisement & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Import Policy Order)
Tag Line:Import-ability of Dump Trucks after amendment in Import Policy decided in this case
Citation:2020 PTD 213
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 05-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
3590) 1329/2016 Const. P. BYCO PETROLEUM PAKISTAN LTD (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1365
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.6-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revnue v. M/s. Byco Petroleum Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3591) 1684/2012 Const. P. Matloob Ahmed Khan and others (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3592) 2550/2019 Const. P. Mohsin Ali & Other (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
3593) 1310/2018 Const. P. Mir Shabbir Ali Khan Bijarani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 603
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
3594) 6868/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Arsalan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed.
Topic: Service matters (cancel the result of test / interview)
Tag Line:the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1197
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.369-K/2020 Muhammad Saleem v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3595) 34/2015 S.M.A Fehmila Akhtar D/o. Muhammad Rafiq (Petitioner) V/S legal heirs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 23
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
3596) 111/2018 Cr.J.A Jan Muhammad @ Khafai Phore & Another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 78
Advocates:Ali Anwar Kandhro(ADVO-9767-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3597) 128/2010 Cr.Appeal Ghulam Mustafa Bugt (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 25-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting
3598) 2512/2021 Const. P. Abrar Ali Khichi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 502
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3599) 178/2018 H.C.A M/s. Democrat Construction Co. Pvt Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Abdul Hameed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1188
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.873-K/2023 M/s. Democrat Construction Company (Pvt) Ltd. v. Abdul Hameed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3600) 2/2013 Judicial Companies Misc. Zafar Iqbal and Others (Applicant) V/S Naseem Ahmed and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (Companies Ordinance, 1984)
Tag Line:It is not a question of embarking upon the jurisdiction, but a
question which involves adjudication of issues before this Court. The
question of overlapping is also not tenable as the title of these shares
is not subjudice before Senior Civil Judge at Multan. I may however
observe that the District Judge may pass its own independent order
and any observation here shall not influence proceedings before any
other forum including trial of Suit No.54 of 2013.
Citation:2014 CLD 1039
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
3601) 3758/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S NAB And ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 04-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
3602) 1402/2023 Cr.Bail MST. TASLEEM W/O ABDUL WAHAB & 05 ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 240
Advocates:Naeemullah Bhutto(ADVO-10813-SBC-KHI),Shahzad Afzal(ADVO-12023-SBC-KHI),Taufique Qader(ADVO-18213-SBC-KHE),Abdul Ghaffar Khan Niazi(ADVO-4671-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
3603) 202/2019 H.C.A Mahmooda Tapal & another (Appellant) V/S Standard Chartered Bank Pakistan Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 479
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Liaquat H. Merchant(ADVO-1696-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Hassan Arif(ADVO-15120-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3365/2024 Mahmooda Tapal (deceased) through her legal heirs and another v. Standard Chartered Bank Pakistan ltd Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice) Repeat. 3 members bench
3604) 203/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s. Universal Enterprise (Applicant) V/S The Customs Appellate Tribunal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 25-A)
Tag Line:The amount of remittance may not
be of any importance as the actual evidence is invoice which is relied upon.
Hence the price actually paid could very conveniently be determined on the
basis of such documents and notwithstanding the insertion / amendment
made in the year 2017 as far as the second proviso to Section 25A is
concerned, it is the amount, which is actually paid or payable which is
considered as customs value for the goods when sold for export to Pakistan.
Citation:2022 PTD 94
Advocates:Sarfaraz Khan(ADVO-1124-KBC-PWR),Syed Nadeem-ul Haq(ADVO-6993-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3605) 64/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Z. A. Industries (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 213
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
3606) 2518/2016 Const. P. Jaag Borad Casting System Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S PEMRA and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 49
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2363/2023 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority through its Chairman, Islamabad and another v. Jaag Broadcasting Systems Pvt Limited Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3607) 5497/2019 Const. P. Manzoor Ahmed Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The provided rule and Supreme Court precedents establish a civil servant's entitlement to pro-forma promotion. The Supreme Court in Secretary Schools of Education v. Rana Arshad Khan (2012 SCMR 126) granted proforma promotion to retirees due to unjustifiable departmental delays in their promotion process before retirement. Similarly, Federation of Pakistan v. Jahanzaib (2023 PLC (C.S.) 336) held that proforma promotion is applicable when an administrative oversight delays consideration for promotion until after retirement. Furthermore, in Homeo Dr. Asma Noureen Syed v. The Government of Punjab (2022 SCMR 1546), the Supreme Court remanded a case back to the Service Tribunal for fresh consideration of proforma promotion for a retired civil servant. These judgments underscore that employees should not suffer due to departmental failings regarding timely promotion consideration.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1062
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3608) 137/2017 H.C.A M/s. Rahat & Company (Appellant) V/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLC 1221
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.649-K/2017 M/s Rahat & Company thr. Syed Naveed Hussain Shah v. Trading Corporation of Pakistan,C.A.91-K/2017 M/s Rahat & Company thr. Syed Naveed Hussain Shah v. Trading Corporation of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
3609) 38/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (East) (Applicant) V/S M/s. Forte Marketing Services (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 450
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-20773-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.90-K/2023 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Forte Marketing Service Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Judgment Reserved Judgment Reserved
3610) 113/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Bahadur & others (Applicant) V/S Qaimuddin Golo & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 3122
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
3611) 1384/2014 Suit Shamsheer Khan (since deceased) thr. his LR (Plaintiff) V/S Gul Khan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Advocates:Faraz Faheem Siddiqui(ADVO-12257-SBC-KHI),Masjood Ali(ADVO-12413-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
3612) 741/2020 Const. P. Mst. Nabeela Kausar D/o Muhammad Lateef (Petitioner) V/S Ehtisham ul Haq and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 227
Advocates:Mohammad Farooq(ADVO-6083-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
3613) 2616/2018 Const. P. M/s Sea King Shipping (Petitioner) V/S Asstt: Collector of Custom and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Section 202 of Customs Act, 1969 does not extend its arms against
a clearing agent acting in good faith without any collusion or negligence
to cause financial loss to national exchequer. As observed, neither a
show-cause was issued nor the assessment order declared such terms of
recovery to be made against clearing agent. In fact the importer failed
to substantiate his declared value in terms of Section 25 of the Customs
Act, 1969 read with Rule 109 of the Customs Rules, 2001. The declared
value may have varied with the advice of Director General Customs
Valuation however, the connivance of clearing agent to cause losses to
national exchequer is missing. Not all such Goods declarations be
categorized as false or untrue statement and hence require a burden to
be discharged by customs officials, if such is attributed separately
against importer and clearing agent. Not necessarily a declared value,
which is objected by the customs officials be always considered to be a
willful act of causing losses to national exchequer in terms of duties and
taxes, however, a mechanism is provided to levy duties and taxes in
terms of transactional value i.e. price actually paid or payable for the
goods under section 25 of Customs Act, 1969 when sold for export from
Pakistan, subject to provisos therein
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1132
Advocates:Zia -ul- Hasan(ADVO-9389-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General()
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 24-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
3614) 2870/2015 Const. P. Mushtaque Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Mumtaz Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:The grounds assigned by the appellate Court while allowing the application under Order VII Rule 11 does not germane to the requirement for rejecting of plaint under Order VII Rule 11. This is no ground that the petitioner was not in possession of the suit property since last so many years. It is also immaterial that the father has not challenged the title of his own son / sons during his lifetime. This is not disputed that the property was purchased at the time when these claimants from whom respondent No.14 has acquired the property now were only minors. It is also not denied that there is no such specific denial as far as alleged rights of the petitioner are concerned as merely in possession of the suit property does not mean that the rights of the petitioner were also denied. At the most the right of the petitioner could be said to have been denied prima facie, when an attempt was made to execute the sale deed in favour of respondent No.14 Mst. Hina Perveen which was the right accrued to the petitioner to file a suit to seek declaration as made in the plaint, hence this is a case of conflicting findings of two courts below. The reasoning and findings assigned by the appellate Court insofar as rejection of plaint is concerned, is not sustainable under the law. The appellate Courts order is set aside, however, this being a mixed question of law and fact, trial Court is directed to frame issues amongst others and this being a preliminary issue, parties be directed to record evidence on this issue as well as on other issues as and when framed by the trial Court, however, since the matter is pending for quite some time, we expect that the trial Court shall conclude the trial and pronounce the judgment preferably in four (04) months with compliance report to Additional Registrar of this Court.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 29-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
3615) 11/2009 Civil Revision Muhammad Ayub (Applicant) V/S Barkat Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Lis Pendens )
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 05-NOV-10
Approved for Reporting
3616) 845/2016 Suit Ashraf Hussain Khan. (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Rehman Khan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Cases involving rights of inheritence are at higher pedestal, inter alia, in view of the Sharia Act, 1991.
Topic: Administration Suits
Tag Line:Cases involving rights of inheritence are at higher pedestal, inter alia, in view of the Sharia Act, 1991.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3617) 730/2011 Const. P. Syed Hashmat Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
3618) 48/2018 Cr.J.A Jhangal Dahani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Murder Appeal dismissed, Conviction Maintained, witnesses are relatives no ground to discard evidence. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 752
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.20/2021 Jhangal v. The State,Crl.A.164/2023 Jhangal v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
3619) 38/2014 S.M.A Muhammad Aijaz Khan S/o (Late) Haji Faiz Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Sikandar Begum (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2322
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3620) 829/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Director DGI&I-FBR (Applicant) V/S Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench-II & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Section 181 of the Customs Act; SRO 499(I)/2009; Vehicle carrying smuggled goods exclusively; liable for outright confiscation; cannot be released either unconditionally or even on redemption fine
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 614
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Asim Muneer Bajwa(ADVO-3939-SBC-KHI),Kashif Nazeer(ADVO-11582-SBC-KHI),Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 06-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
3621) 634/2013 Const. P. M. Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits), Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 25
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
3622) 81/2025 R.A (Civil Revision) M/s. Sami Trading (Applicant) V/S Sardar Abdul Rehman & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2575
Advocates:Muhammad Ali(ADVO-23293-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Nadeem(ADVO-12381-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
3623) 294/2009 H.C.A Coca Cola Mazdoor Union (Appellant) V/S Registrar of Trade Unions, Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Mr. Justice Mushir Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Muhammad Shaikh
Order Date: 14-FEB-12
Approved for Reporting
3624) 164/1996 Suit LT.CDR.MIRZA MANSOOR HUSSAIN (Plaintiff) V/S S.MUHAMMAD FAHEEM (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Suit for declaration, cancellation, damages and mandatory injunction
Tag Line:I am of the view that though the defendants No.3 & 4 have not opted to issue public notice before purchase of property however it would be difficult to assume that it was done in bad faith, particularly when the record of the DHA shows the alleged entitlement of defendant No.2 to sale. Off course the defendants No.3 & 4 could not have traced the forgery as now come on surface. More importantly the defendants No.3 and 4 still are in occupation of the premises in question and raised construction at the relevant time. Had there been an iota of fraud they would have got away in these six years i.e. from 1990 to 1996. Since public notice is not considered as a legal requirement it cannot be stretched down to the wire that it was in fact in bad faith. Therefore, it cannot contribute towards mala fide which could cast any shadow on his bona fide. Hence, I am of the view that the issue No.4A is decided in affirmative that the defendant is a bona fide purchaser without notice. The plaintiff is however entitled to claim damages, which are to be calculated according to the market value of the subject plot.
Citation:2016 YLR 748
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
3625) 1761/2010 Suit Syed Muzaffar Hussain Shah (Plaintiff) V/S Karachi Electric Supply Company Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law (Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 )
Citation:2016 YLR 196
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 09-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
3626) 8536/2018 Const. P. Riffat John (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (change of domicile)
Tag Line:Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1830
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.294-K/2020 Riffat John v. Province of Sindh & others,C.A.976/2020 Riffat John v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months., Adjourned
3627) 10/2018 E.P Ghulam Murtaza Jatoi (Petitioner) V/S Zulfiqar Ali Behan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1348
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
3628) 2247/2011 Const. P. Zahid Ali S/o Azhar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Station House Officer, P.S Patni, Taluka Rohri, District Sukkur & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 18-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting
3629) 2115/2014 Const. P. Mansoor and another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1168
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
3630) 3756/2012 Const. P. Anis-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.538-K/2019 Anis-ur-Rehman v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3631) 704/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S Abdul Hameed Sheikh & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Had it been registered then perhaps the lawful presumption would have attached to such registered document but no such document constitute evidentiary value for the purposes of the
impugned order passed by the Tribunal as such data of all the aforesaid documents are different and distinguishable and are not reconcilable.
The impugned orders, at least of the Tribunal, is not clear at all, particularly as to on what basis the vehicle is being released as the Motor Vehicle Tax Slip, Annexure-D to the memo of Reference, discloses the identity of the subject vehicle as Toyota Crown as against claimed
vehicle Toyota Surf Jeep.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 555
Advocates:Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 26-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
3632) 143/2014 Const. P. Mujib ul Islam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1154-K/2018 Mujib-ul-Islam v. Province of Sindh thr.Chief Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3633) 251/2008 H.C.A Government of Pakistan & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Mian Khalid Manzoor (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 460
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3634) 54/2021 M.A. M/s. National Tiles Ceramics Ltd (Appellant) V/S M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Applicability of Section 3 of the Gas Theft Control & Recovery Act, 2016
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 501
Advocates:Nabi Bux Laghari(ADVO-18423-SBC-KHS),Syed Shafqat Hussain Shah(ADVO-9095-SBC-KHI),Mukesh Kumar G. Karara(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK),Muhammad Aziz Khan(ADVO-3324-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 25-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3635) 34/2024 Spl.Cr.Bail MUZAMIL AKBAR MOTEN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Sales tax fraud in refund claims. Section 33 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. Bail granted.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 856
Advocates:Spl.Prosecutor Customs(SpPCus),Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Hamid Raza(ADVO-8717-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
3636) 1608/2014 Suit Syed Farrukh Mateen. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
3637) 392/2018 Cr.Misc. MUHAMMAD AKRAM FAHIM S/O MUHAMMAD FAHIM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
3638) 764/2015 Const. P. Inayatullah Lashari (Petitioner) V/S Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Service matters (Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees), Act, 2013)
Tag Line:Employee engaged on adhoc or under a time-bound contract has no vested right to regularization
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 1083
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 08-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.688-K/2023 Inayatullah v. The Commissioner Larkana & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3639) 57/2012 Civil Revision Naveed Anjum (Applicant) V/S Ali Raza and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVII Rule 3 CPC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 17-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
3640) 5/2018 Cr.Acctt.A ALTAF AHMED S/O GUL HASSAIN SHAIKH (Appellant) V/S NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB (Conviction upheld, As accused misappropriation of funds, fraudulently prepared fake bills against procurement of material, through Ghost Shop. )
Citation:2020 MLD 1676
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
3641) 144/2007 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Mithal (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 11-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.86/2016 Muhammad Mithal v. The State,Crl.A.478/2020 Muhammad Mithal v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Partly Allowed,Disposed
3642) 279/2010 Spl.H.C.A M/s.Moghul & Sons (Appellant) V/S NIB Bank Ltd., & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Syed Mazhar Ul Haq(ADVO-4675-SBC-KHI),M/S. SYED MAMNOON HASAN & CO(FIRM-260-SBC-KHI),Syed Sammad ul Haque(ADVO-9232-SBC-KHI),Syed Mamnoon Hasan(ADVO-393-SBC-KHI),Nazish Rahman(ADVO-11276-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-12
Approved for Reporting
3643) 82/2019 Spl. Cr. A. Sultan Bahadur Yousufzai Pathan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 217
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 07-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
3644) 904/2002 Suit Major (Retd) Abdul Rauf Khan (Plaintiff) V/S National Logistic Cell (NLC) (Def.No.1), Federation of Pakistan called absent (Def.No.2) (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Nil
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Ahmed Khan
Order Date: 01-MAR-07
Approved for Reporting
3645) 47/2018 Civil Revision Govt of Sindh (Applicant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XIV Rule 5), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Dismissed)
Citation:2018 YLR 2441
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
3646) 3199/2018 Const. P. Anees Raja (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
3647) 213/2020 Const. P. Burhan (Petitioner) V/S Election Commisson Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 744
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 26-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
3648) 4658/2020 Const. P. Nafees Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Trustees of Port of Karachi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 325
Advocates:Qayyum Nawaz Kundi(ADVO-1083-KBC-DIK),M/S. M. S. MANGRIO & CO.(FIRM-162-SBC-KHI),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1855/2022 Nafees Ahmed through his General Power of Attorney, Karachi v. Trustee of the Port of Karachi through its Estate Manager Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3649) 5264/2019 Const. P. Dubai Islamic Bank Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3459/2019 Dubai Islamic Bank Pakistan Ltd v. Pakistan thr. its Secretary Revenue and Ex Officio Chairman, F.B.R., Islamabad & others,C.A.1954/2019 Dubai Islamic Bank Pakistan Ltd v. Pakistan thr. its Secretary Revenue and Ex Officio Chairman, F.B.R., Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Judgment Reserved Judgment Reserved
3650) 23/2002 Cr.Appeal Jalaluddin khaskheli (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 30-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
3651) 1042/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:regularization
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 773
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.429-K/2021 Muhammad Ahmed Khan v. Federation of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3652) 4462/2020 Const. P. Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:appointment for the post of Naib Qasid in respondent-School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Sindh--Rule 16 of The Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--The matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondents for afresh decision on the issue of appointment of Naib Qasid under law, and consider the case of the petitioner for the subject post within two months, from the date of receipt of the order of this Court and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court.
Citation:2023 PLC CS 194
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3653) 19/2018 E.P Jam Saifullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Section 144(4) of the Election Act provides that an Election Petition and its annexure shall be signed by the petitioner and the petition shall be verified in the manner laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 for the verification of the pleadings. This clearly overcomes the earlier provision of Section 55(3) of ROPA which provides that every election petition and schedule or annexure to the petition shall be signed by the petitioner and verified in the manner laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Thus, it is no longer required under present enactment that the annexures are to be verified as was the requirement earlier under ROPA. As far as the signatures on the annexures/schedule are concerned, the record shows that perhaps on an objection raised by the office it was complied with.
Citation:2020 YLR 132
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3654) 215/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) malook shah (Applicant) V/S buxan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 647
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
3655) 2223/2018 Const. P. Ali J. Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3656) 5783/2019 Const. P. Nazir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Adverse remarks ???Not Yet Fit???
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3657) 2534/2010 Const. P. ARY Communication (Pvt) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 25-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
3658) 2/2024 E.P Khurram Sher Zaman (Petitioner) V/S Mirza Ikhtiar Baig & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Where the Petitioner deposited costs in the old treasury account instead of the prevailing account, consequence of rejection in Section 145(1) of the Election Act is not attracted.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 397
Advocates:Ishfaq Ahmed(ADVO-18300-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Choudhary Atif Rafiq(ADVO-11896-SBC-KHI),Syed Ghulam Shabbir Shah(ADVO-13398-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
3659) 3701/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Mursaleen (Petitioner) V/S Member Slat & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2139
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
3660) 8233/2019 Const. P. Sapphire Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1164
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3661) 3/2018 Cr.Acctt.A SYED SALAHUDDIN S/O NIZAMUDDIN (Appellant) V/S THE NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 MLD 886
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.51-K/2020 Syed Salahuddin v. National Accountability Bureau/The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3662) 18/1998 M.A. Rijhomal S/o Shewakmal Hindu Lohano (Applicant) V/S Tarachand S/o Anand Singh Shahani (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 01-APR-11
Approved for Reporting
3663) 48/2007 M.A. Fazal Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Qamar Hashmi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1081-K/2018 Fazal Ahmed v. Muhammad Qamar Hashmi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3664) 365/1994 Suit SALEEM AHMED MIRZA (Plaintiff) V/S RETD. MAJOR SYED IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN ZAIDI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Permanent Injunction), Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----Ss. 42 & 8---Suit for declaration, possession, mesne profits and damages---Contention of plaintiff was that he was owner of suit land whose possession had been taken by the defendants forcibly---Validity---Plaintiff had established that he was owner of suit property---Possession of defendants upon the suit land could not be lawful---Unlawful occupant of suit property could only be termed as "trespasser"---No fraud had been committed in leasing the suit property in favour of plaintiff---Plaintiff had been denied to enjoy ownership right in the plot in question and he was entitled to mesne profit @ Rs. 500/ per day from the date of illegal possession of defendants---No documentary evidence had been produced to justify the claim of damages, therefore same could not be awarded on account of increase in cost of construction material---Plaintiff was declared lawful owner of suit land and he was entitled for vacant possession from defendants and mesne profits jointly and severally---Suit was decreed in circumstances.
Citation:2015 YLR 196
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 13-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
3665) 2283/2021 Cr.Bail NAUMAN AHMED SIDDIQUI S/O MUSHTAQ AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 24
Advocates:Jamshed A. Shaikh(ADVO-8896-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Hassaan Sabir(ADVO-6909-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3666) 8179/2018 Const. P. Tariq Aziz (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.766/2019 Pakistan Medical & Dental Council, Islamabad thr. its Chairman v. Tariq Aziz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3667) 8480/2019 Const. P. M/s Hayat Kimya Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Exemption of duty
Tag Line:Fire Fighting Equipment is equipment as defined in SRO SRO 41(I)/2009 and SRO 1097(1)/2012: entitled for exemption
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1316
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS),Sarmad Ali(ADVO-20178-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 11-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.470-K/2024 Collector of Customs and others v. M/s Hayat Kimy Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
3668) 330/2017 Cr.Misc. Tohal Khan Chandio (Appellant) V/S The State and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 07-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
3669) 63/2002 Spl.Cus.A. M/s.xavier company (Appellant) V/S Custom, Excise Sales Tax Appellate Tribu (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 566
Advocates:Ammar Yasser(ADVO-15401-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Sarfaraz Khan(ADVO-1124-KBC-PWR),Muhammad Shafi Mohammadi(ADVO-2176-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
3670) 37/2008 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Muhammad Qasim alias Umair and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 11-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.30-K/2013,Crl.A.27-K/2013,Crl.P.48-K/2013,Crl.P.69-K/2013 SCP Status:Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
3671) 543/2017 Const. P. Naveed Zarar Khan (Petitioner) V/S National Accountability Bureau and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3672) 24/1983 Civil Revision Wadhno and others (Applicant) V/S Kambir Khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:No notice before filing of a Suit is mandatory under section 70 of The West Pakistan Agricultural Development Corporation Ordinance, 1961 as it is only applicable in respect of an act purporting to be done under this Ordinance, whereas, impugned orders were passed under the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act,
Bar of jurisdiction of a Civil Court is not always absolute; but in exceptional circumstances when an action is without jurisdiction or is tainted with mala fides, the court has jurisdiction.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 697
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.287-K/2022 Shah Nawaz & others v. Kambir Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3673) 29/2012 Cr.J.A Ali Nawaz alias Nazoo and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Criminal Trial ( Benefit of doubt ), Appeal (Appeal)
Tag Line:Appellants by preferring Criminal Jail Appeal against judgment whereby they have been convicted u/s 302(b) PPC and sentenced to death and sentenced u/s 201 PPC to rigorous imprisonment for seven years. According to FIR deceased Sanwan aged about 18 years used to ply Chingchi Rickshaw. In the morning he used to go from village to Kandiaro and in the evening he used to return to home. Allah Bux alias Alloo,. Ali Nawaz alias Nazoo and three unidentified persons came at the bus stop, they hired Rickshaw of Sanwan and took him away towards Lakha road side .Chingchi Rickshaw, which Sanwan used to ply was secured by police party of P.S Mehrabpur . Complainant admittedly is not an eyewitness to abduction or death of the deceased. His evidence, as such is of no help to the case of prosecution. It was stated by PWs Illahi Bux and Rahib that they intimated the complainant that his son the deceased has been seen by them going with the appellants and few unknown culprits through Chingchi Richshaw when and at what time such intimation was furnished by them to the complainant, which has made the very intimation on their part to the complainant to be doubtful. Complainant to have got published news in daily newspaper with regard to missing of his son, the deceased. In that situation, no much reliance could be placed upon evidence of PWs Illahi Bux and Rahib as they are appearing to be managed witness. They even otherwise have not seen the appellants committing the death of deceased Sanwan. Judgment is set-aside, the appellants are acquitted
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.127-K/2019 Haji Saeed Khan Depar v. Ali Nawaz @ Nazoo and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3674) 7077/2015 Const. P. Amanullah and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (Constitution of Committee)
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 309
Advocates:Hussain Bux(ADVO-13264-SBC-KHE),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Mukesh Kumar G. Karara(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3675) 481/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Maqsood Faisal Printing Press (SMC-Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:change of classification of goods on the basis of test report; not always a case of misdeclaration warranting penal action
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 912
Advocates:Zafar Hussain(ADVO-15545-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 19-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
3676) 185/2011 Criminal Appeal Abid Jamali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1923
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
3677) 326/2022 H.C.A Mrs. Tanvir Qazi (Appellant) V/S Moin us Samad Khan & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (summary suit under section 37 Rules 1 and 2)
Tag Line:The burden of proving fraud is always on the party alleging it,
which in the instant case is appellant, which should be based on clear,
strong and convincing and/or independent evidence, particularly when
long period has expired and valuable rights have accrued to the other
side, which in the instant case is respondent No.1 who since 2008 is
pursuing his case for recovery.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1154
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 19-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.43-K/2024 Mrs, Tanvir Kazi v. Moin Us Samad Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3678) 1731/2016 Cr.Bail Muhammad Bilal (Appellant) V/S the State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 29-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
3679) 1197/2025 Cr.Bail AZMAT HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI S/O SHARAFAT HUSSAIN SIDDIQ (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2585
Advocates:Mushtaq Ahmed(ADVO-10705-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Ayoub Chaniho(ADVO-15383-SBC-KHS),Syed Hassan Ali Khalid(ADVO-21897-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
3680) 5714/2022 Const. P. Mst. Raana Alwi and Another (Petitioner) V/S Learned Dist: & Session Judge East & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 359
Advocates:Muhammad Yahya(ADVO-11464-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
3681) 8112/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Amin (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:Cancellation of an appointment process does not create a vested right; cannot be enforced until an appointment offer is made and accepted
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 653
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 20-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
3682) 944/2006 Const. P. Mst.Aqeela Begum (Petitioner) V/S Collector of Customs &Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Laches and delay in approaching the Court for redressal of a grievance; fatal, cannot be ignored casually
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 544
Advocates:Ahmed Khan(ADVO-6593-SBC-KHI),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI),Sohail Mazaffar(ADVO-2086-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 13-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
3683) 91/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Additional of Customs (Law) (Applicant) V/S M/s. G.A. Karela & brothers & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 618
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3684) 263/2006 Const. P. Evacuee Trust Property Board. (Petitioner) V/S Wahabuddin and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 562
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.710-K/2022 Evacuee Trust Property Board Government of Pakistan v. Wahabuddin & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3685) 9/2015 Cr.Acctt.A SYED ALI NAWAZ SHAH & 02 OTHERS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB
Tag Line:Article 47 of the Qanoon e Shahadat Order 1984; how to record evidence in a subsequent case. Earlier evidence cannot be considered if it is recorded in violation of Article 47 ibid.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 787
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3686) 5909/2019 Const. P. Sajid Jalil (Petitioner) V/S N.B.P and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
It is a well-settled proposition of law that the Competent Authority is entitled to make rules in the interest of exigency of service and to remove anomalies in Service Rules. It is the Service Rules Committee which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion and it is essentially an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and policy decision making of the Respondent-Bank and the interference with such matters by the Courts is not warranted as no vested right of a Bank employee is involved in the matter of promotion, or the rules determining their eligibility or fitness, and in Bank Cases, the High Court has no jurisdiction through Writ to strike it down, except in the cases in which policy framed is against the public interest. This proposition of law has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in a plethora of judgments. Moreover, petitioner has not been able to point out any case where other employee(s), having rating equivalent to or lower than him, was / were promoted by the respondent-bank. Thus, prima facie it appears that the policy of the respondent is uniform and without any discrimination at least to the extent of the instant case.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1231
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.269/2021 Sajid Jalil v. National Bank of Pakistan through President, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3687) 3582/2024 Const. P. Moshsin Ghayur Haider (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: National Electric Power Regulatory Authority, 1997
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 132
Advocates:Sohail Hameed(ADVO-3726-SBC-KHI),Walid Anwar Ansari(ADVO-3562-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 08-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
3688) 4428/2016 Const. P. Ali Akbar Narejo (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Termination from service)
Tag Line:Termination from service pursuant to involvement in a criminal case; acquittal thereafter; entitled for reinstatement if no other disciplinary proceeding initiated.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 798
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Sanaullah Noor Ghauri(ADVO-4123-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP),M. G. Dastagir(ADVO-57-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1419-K/2022 The Chief Executive Officer, Pakistan Steel Mills & others v. Mr. Ali Akber Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3689) 517/2019 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD RIZWAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2402
Advocates:Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Imdad Ali Saheto(ADVO-16074-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
3690) 7/2024 E.P Khalid Mehmood Ali (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Power of Election Tribunal to order recount.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 204
Advocates:Abdul Wahab Baloch(ADVO-5874-SBC-KHS),Irshad Ali(ADVO-10971-SBC-MLR),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Kashif Imran(ADVO-21460-SBC-MLR),Ghulam Nabi(ADVO-15504-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3691) 8356/2018 Const. P. Qamar Shahid Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
3692) 285/2007 H.C.A Mst. Nafeesa Siddiqui & others (Appellant) V/S Danish Rafiq & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1178-K/2018 Mst: Nafeesa Siddiqui and others v. Danish Rafique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3693) 410/2020 Const. P. Sanofi Aventis Pak Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1362
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3694) 7/2018 E.P Mst. Nusrat Anwar (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Abbas jaffari (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
3695) 380/2020 Const. P. Ali Muhammad Bijrani and others (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Election Committee and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Impugned Order
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 1619
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 18-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3696) 13/2019 Criminal Appeal Dilbar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Conviction (Police officials are good witnesses and recovery proved) )
Tag Line:No direct enmity or ill will can be suggested among appellants with the complainant who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during the cross-examination. However, the provision of Section 25 of the CNS Act has provided the exclusion of Section 103 Cr.P.C
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 741
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.455/2022 Dilbar Chandio v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3697) 9/2010 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A The State (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Kamran & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 26-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
3698) 27/2018 I. A M/S Z.T.B.L and others (Appellant) V/S Yaseen Dahri (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Law of limitation will also apply to Sale of property by a Financial Institution
under Section 15 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance 2001.
If limitation to file a Suit for recovery under section 9 of the Ordinance has expired, then no
sale could be conducted under section 15 as well.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 654
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 27-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1706-K/2021 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited & another v. Yaseen Dahri & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3699) 147/2020 Const. P. M/s Sahib Din Logistics (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Challenge to a s.37 STA notice couched in quo warranto.
Citation:2021 PTD 1245
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3700) 4310/2017 Const. P. State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) V/S Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 575
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI),Syed Shohrat Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-11585-SBC-KHI),Rehmat -un- Nissa(ADVO-9852-SBC-KHI),Mian Mushtaq Ahmed(ADVO-2016-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 14-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.835/2024 Karachi Cantonment Board thr. Cantonment Executive Officer, Karachi v. State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 05-Aug-24)
3701) 1161/2019 Suit Syed Muhammad Iqbal & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airline Corp. Ltd & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Issue of foreign posting of Engineers of PIA involved. Injunction dismissed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
3702) 2526/2021 Const. P. Shumaila Salman Shah & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakisan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Reasons assigned to the short order dated 23.4.2021 passed in C.P.Nos.D-2526 & 2623 of 2021 by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito with regard to the prayer for awarding School Assessed Grades rather than holding physical exams for A and AS levels and O level.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 462
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 21-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
3703) 300/2019 I.T.R.A Mr. Muhammad Irfan (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Syed Irshad ur Rehman(ADVO-8599-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Waleed(ADVO-16114-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3704) 632/2005 Suit MRS. THIRTY K. BANKWALA (Plaintiff) V/S M/S SHELL PAKISTAN LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
3705) 459/2020 Cr.Bail ALLAH DINO @ DINO & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 767
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
3706) 1612/2021 Const. P. Sanaullah Shaikh & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1150
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 02-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
3707) 229/2014 Cr.Appeal Faiz Ahmed (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 15-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
3708) 507/2019 Const. P. D.U.H.S & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others\ (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 MLD 357
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3709) 173/2015 H.C.A Sajida Yousuf (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Zahid Khan in person and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 24-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
3710) 174/2010 Civil Revision Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 19-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
3711) 607/2021 Const. P. Dawood Khan S/o Sher Ali (Petitioner) V/S Rana Muhammad Rafique and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It would be seen that it has been consistently held by the Honble Supreme Court that if the tenant asserts that he is no more a tenant as he had purchased the property, even then he has to vacate the property and file a Suit for specific performance of the sale agreement, and he would be entitled to possession of the property in accordance with law only if he succeeds in his Suit. It is also well-settled that till such time the Civil Court passes a decree against the landlord in a Suit for specific performance, landlord would be entitled to recover rent. In the present case, it is an admitted position that compliance of the tentative rent order was not made by the petitioner, therefore, the Rent Controller had no option, but to strike off his defence as held by the Honble Supreme Court in Safeer Travels (Pvt.) Ltd. V/S Muhammad Khalid Shafi through legal heirs, PLD 2007 S.C. 504. The impugned orders are in accord with the law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court. Accordingly, the petition and listed application are dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 641
Advocates:Taj Fareen Khan(ADVO-9449-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
3712) 3971/2022 Const. P. Senator Khalida Ateeb (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Public interest litigation.
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 273
Advocates:Muhammad Tariq Mansoor(ADVO-18173-SBC-KHE),Nabi Bux Laghari(ADVO-18423-SBC-KHS),Mukesh Kumar G. Karara(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK),Saeed Akhtar(ADVO-3501HLC-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.823-K/2023 Senator Khalida Ateeb v. The Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Govt. of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3713) 6812/2015 Const. P. M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) V/S SLAT and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 05-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3714) 380/2011 Cr.Bail Dr. Anjum Ara Manzar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 04-OCT-11
Approved for Reporting
3715) 39/2020 Cr.Acq.A. Nazir Ahmed Lakhair (Appellant) V/S Abdul Qadir And Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1315
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
3716) 2195/2017 Suit Sohrab Khan (Plaintiff) V/S Allied Bank of Pakistan Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 536
Advocates:M/S. FAIZ H. SHAH & CO(FIRM-222-SBC-KHI),Shahid Anwar Bajwa & Co(FIRM-152-SBC-KHI),Iqtidar Hussain(ADVO-11454-SBC-KHC),Akhtar Hussain Shaikh(ADVO-735640-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
3717) 339/2012 Const. P. Dr. Abdul Rauf (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 02-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.112-K/2015 The Province of Sindh and others v. Muhammad Asif and others,C.P.L.A.130-K/2015 The Province of Sindh and others v. Muhammad Asif and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Leave Granted & Appeals to be heard in the Next Session.
3718) 101/2016 Cr.J.A Nizamuddin Pahore (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 383
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.509/2020 Nizamuddin v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3719) 5967/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Ayub Alvi (Petitioner) V/S Admin Incharge Pakistan Cotton and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1166
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Mohammad Qutubuzzaman(ADVO-4375-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3720) 3/2021 Election Appeal Qadir Khan Mandokhail (Appellant) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Senate elections; appeal against acceptance of candidature rejected.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 791
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3721) 122/2014 Civil Revision Mst Yasmeen (Applicant) V/S Mst Saeeda Begum and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3722) 2298/2018 Const. P. Raza Muhammad & others (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Home Department, Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.382-K/2019 Salman Tahir and others v. Secy: Home Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3723) 3812/2020 Const. P. Mst. Hajra (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Missing Person
Tag Line:In view of the above facts and circumstances, SSP Operation is directed to hold an inquiry against the complainant and witnesses of arrest of the missing person on 21.8.2020 before registering FIR No.560/2020 and take stern action against the police personnel responsible for adding to the agony of the family of missing person on his release by the agencies
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1185
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 26-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
3724) 31/2014 Cr.Misc. Abdullah Mahar and others (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 26-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
3725) 4401/2020 Const. P. Mst. Salma (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 399
Advocates:Muhammad Wasiq Mirza(ADVO-13772-SBC-KHI),Manzoor Hussain Khoso(ADVO-18789-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.784-K/2022 The Vice Chancellor Dow University of Health Sciences & others v. Province of Sindh through/Chancellor of Universities of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3726) 3552/2017 Const. P. Master Motor Corp. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 117, 2019 SBLR Sindh 709
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.446-K/2019 Master Motor Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3727) 24/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Naeem & Others (Applicant) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1167
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
3728) 137/2017 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD ALI S/O GUL MUAHMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2313
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
3729) 32/2019 Conf.Case Muhammad Yousif (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 586
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3730) 1578/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Saqib (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:departmental proceedings initiated against him as contemplated under Section 3(b)(c) of the Efficiency and Discipline Rules, 1988--as to how this petition is maintainable against departmental proceedings initiated against him and the final order for dismissal from service served upon him, which action of the respondent-department ought to have been assailed before the learned Sindh Service Tribunal (SST) at Karachi.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 437
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
3731) 6136/2021 Const. P. Allah Bux Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Applicability of the Blacklisting of Bidders, Contractors, Supplies and Consultants Regulations,2023
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1234
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3732) 3705/2012 Const. P. Abdullah Hanjrah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 19-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.373-K/2012 Abdullah Hanjrah v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3733) 761/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Ibrahim Khooharo (Petitioner) V/S Secretary to Govt. Local Dept: and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice RIAZAT ALI SAHAR, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 02-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.401-K/2014 Muhammad Yasin v. Nizamuddin and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3734) 251/2019 Cr.Bail Yar Muhammad son of Jan Muhammad (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
3735) 379/2005 Suit MISS. UZMA AMJAD ALI & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S MRS.SAEEDA BANO & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877)
Tag Line:Since the Defendant No.1 has accepted a substantial amount of rupees six million as part payment towards sale price, and never returned the same till the above Order was passed, which means for almost seven years the same was beneficially utilized by her, therefore, Defendant No.2 (Purchaser) despite the afore discussed lacuna in her claim for damages, is entitled for monetary relief, in view of the judicial consensus, that by invoking Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, where the circumstances so permit, monetary compensation can be given, while refusing the specific performance to plaintiff
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 177
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
3736) 8115/2022 Const. P. Amma Foundation (trust) & Barkati Foundation (Petitioner) V/S Province of sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1883
Advocates:M/S. IQBAL AND ASIM(FIRM-226-SBC-KHI),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI),Syed Muhammad Ishaq Shah(ADVO-13528-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1167-K/2025 Amma Foundation (Trust) & Barkati Foundation v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
3737) 1196/2020 Const. P. Mst. Yasmeen (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 481
Advocates:Saud Ahmed Khan(ADVO-13763-SBC-KHI),Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Abdullah Nizamani(ADVO-14295-SBC-KHI),Syed Ansar Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-12809-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
3738) 4439/2025 Const. P. Najam uz Zaman (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2393
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Kashif Khan(ADVO-19805-SBC-KHS),Abdul Qadir(ADVO-20685-SBC-KHS),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4429/2025 National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman v. Najmuzaman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 3 weeks). To be heard along with CPLA No.4767/2025
3739) 14/2016 Spl. Federal Excise Reference Application Alfalah GHP Investment Management Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 481
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Rashid Anwar(ADVO-6374-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
3740) 248/2008 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s.Shahrukh Enterprises (Applicant) V/S The Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 01-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
3741) 738/2014 Const. P. M/S Unique Spining Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Commissioner Workmen's Compensation & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 PLC 310
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 20-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
3742) 7/2023 Election Appeal Ghulam Mustafa. (Appellant) V/S Election Commission of Pkaistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 1987
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3743) 570/2022 Const. P. Nasreen Bibi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 206
Advocates:John William(ADVO-5904-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
3744) 1097/2016 Const. P. Bakhu Khan (Petitioner) V/S Aamir Noor & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3745) 1498/2011 Const. P. Ali Akbar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.M.Appeal.12/2019 Ali Akbar v. Secretary, Government of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
3746) 154/2015 Cr.Rev ALI MUHAMMAD S/O LATE HAJI MOOSA (Applicant) V/S SHAHZAD S/O ALI MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 YLR 360
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 25-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
3747) 73/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Alhaj Ajab Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 703
Advocates:Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Tanvir -u- Sibtain Mahmood(ADVO-6772-SBC-KHI),M/S. IQBAL KHURRAM LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-231-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 09-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3748) 822/2010 Const. P. Assistant Administrator, Evacuee Trust Property Board (Petitioner) V/S The Secretary to the Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Minorities (Minorities Affairs Division) & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Iftikhar Jawed Qazi(ADVO-2356-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Naeem Rehman(ADVO-1485-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Abdur Rehman(ADVO-8546-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Shafi Siddiqui(ADVO-3965-SBC-KHI),Masood Khan Ghory(ADVO-3739-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
3749) 5663/2020 Const. P. Jawad Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Sect: Ind & Production and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:policy decision---Prima facie, the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV was/is a policy decision which has already been taken care of by the Secretary Ministry of Industries and Production, Government of Pakistan, whereby the request of PSMC was declined for delinking of the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme from the privatization process vide letter dated 13.04.2015. Besides the subject matter in these proceedings is a policy matter and Privatization Commission has already taken back the decision vide letter dated 16.02.2015 for the launching of aforesaid Society till the privatization of PSMC which is the policy decision of respondents; and, in the given circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the policy decision under its Constitutional jurisdiction, for the reasons already given hereinabove.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 595
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3750) 6004/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Paklistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Jurisdiction: Remedy before proper forum)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 328
Advocates:Mahmood Baig(ADVO-4572-SBC-KHC),Saira Sheikh(ADVO-10895-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Saleem(ADVO-2477-SBC-KHS),Khurram Gul Ghory(ADVO-13962-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 02-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
3751) 630/2019 Const. P. Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Nizamani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We have noticed that the respondents have complied with the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court passed in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 in C.A. 30-K of 2014 and Crl. M.A 37-K of 2017 in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 and petitioner has been given a proforma promotion in BPS-20 with effect from 12.3.2017 one day before his retirement from service on 13.3.2017; thus no further indulgence of this court is required in the matter. It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others, PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 279
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3752) 97/2009 Cr.Rev Mst. Laiba Anthony (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 14-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.41-K/2024 The Station Commander Hyderabad Cantonment and others v. Nooruddin through L.Rs. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice)
3753) 8295/2018 Const. P. Tariq Mehmood & Os (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 521
Advocates:Muhammad Haseeb Jamali(ADVO-10211-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.574-K/2023 Tariq Mehmood & others v. Federation of Pakistan, Ministry of Production & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC
3754) 28/2013 M.A. SOBIA AAMIR (Appellant) V/S REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: TRADE MARK (Section 114 of Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001)
Tag Line:Admittedly that office which passed order and conducted proceedings is not within the territorial jurisdiction of this court. Thus, the appellants are not legally justified in preferring and pressing the M.A(s) before this Court particularly when they (appellants ) do not claim that their case is covered by providing clause i.e any matter relating to trade mark in question is pending before this Court or before District Court, falling under jurisdiction of this Court.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 359
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3755) 849/2011 Suit ABDUL REHMAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S ABDULLAH SAULEH AL-BASSAM (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
3756) 28/2015 Criminal Appeal Asghar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.716/2019 Asghar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3757) 81/2019 Cr.J.A Karim Bux (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2278
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 17-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3758) 327/2012 Cr.Acq.A. Mazhar Iqbal (Appellant) V/S Sikandar and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.711/2018 Mazhar Iqbal v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed. Crl.M. 1152-1153 of 2018 Allowed.
3759) 130/2012 Cr.Misc. Shafi Muhammad Bhangwar and others (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 29-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
3760) 964/2022 Const. P. Mst. Ayesha & another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1647, 2025 SHC HYD 1694
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3761) 163/2025 Const. P. Mst Maria & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Appointment of differently abled persons.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 390
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.823-K/2025 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary (Schools) Education & Literacy Department, Karachi & others v. Mst. Maria Channa & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Notice
3762) 35/2019 Criminal Appeal Akhtiar Ali Langah & Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 556
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3763) 12/2018 E.P Abdul Razzak Khan Khoso (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Elections Act, 2017 (Section 144), Elections Act, 2017 (Section 142), Elections Act, 2017 (Section 143)
Tag Line:Pleading is general structure of facts and allegations. Blacks Law Dictionary provides it to be A formal document in which a party to a legal proceeding (esp. a civil lawsuit) sets forth or responds to allegations, claims, denials, or defenses. In civil procedure, the main pleadings are the plaintiffs complaint and the defendants answer. The pleadings get support and strength through the evidence to be recorded in support thereof. Thus, it needs not to be an encyclopedia, it should contain material facts, allegations and grounds with particular references, which in the present case, are available.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3764) 163/2023 H.C.A Syed Abbas Raza (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension)
Tag Line:Employers have no right to withhold or postpone the pensionery benefits.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1175
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4056/2023 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGCL), Karachi v. Syed Abbas Raza and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. After 3 weeks. Relist before a 3 members bench
3765) 77/2013 Spl.H.C.A M/s. Brecast Industries (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S House Building Finance Corporation (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1176
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3766) 3/2023 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MEHBOOB AKHTAR MIAN S/O NIZAMUDDIN SHAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1793, 2025 SHC KHI 1794
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.159-K/2025 Karim Bux since deceased through his LRs v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3767) 1763/2014 Suit Mrs. Farha Zafar. (Plaintiff) V/S Major (R) Wasim Pasha Tajammal & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 15-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
3768) 450/2014 Const. P. Aqeel Karim Dhedhi (Petitioner) V/S National Accountability Bureau (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 18-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
3769) 237/2015 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Zubair Ahmed alias Ladu (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 29-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
3770) 2318/2020 Const. P. Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. As an interim measure, respondents are directed to consider the case of the present petitioner for promotion strictly on merits and in accordance with law. In case, his case is deferred and/or rejected, the competent authority shall pass a speaking order after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. To be listed on 07.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 261
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 29-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
3771) 526/2022 Cr.J.A MEHBOOB ALI S/O MUHAMMAD AYOOB MALLAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2450
Advocates:Nasrullah Malik(ADVO-11854-SBC-KHE),Through Superintendent Central Prison Hyderabad(SCPHyd),Gul Hafsa(ADVO-10689-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 22-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
3772) 808/2014 Cr.Bail Liaquat Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 23-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
3773) 459/2010 Criminal Appeal Mehmood-ul-Hasan alias Muna (Appellant) V/S The State (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 15-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
3774) 5391/2020 Const. P. Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (Pending)
Tag Line:In view of the statement of learned AAG, let notice be issued to the Chief Secretary, Sindh, to submit complete details of such cases of the Civil / Government Servants who are facing disciplinary proceedings or criminal cases, and enjoying the posting even those who entered into plea bargaining and Voluntary Return (VR) under the NAB law. To be listed on 21.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1902
Advocates:Irtafa Ur Rehman(ADVO-19686-SBC-KHS),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Nabi Bux Laghari(ADVO-18423-SBC-KHS),Mukesh Kumar G. Karara(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
3775) 4/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Jan Muhammad Jakhrani (Applicant) V/S Late Qamaruddin & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 2353
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
3776) 33/2021 Judicial Companies Misc. NUTRICO MORINAGA (Private) Limited. (Applicant) V/S NA (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters, Companies matters (Merger Under Companies Act,2017)
Tag Line:To question the merger it is rather to be seen from the perception
that a wise group of businessmen has taken a decision considering all its
pros and corns. While taking such decision there are chances of success
and failure but then while questioning such decision the bona fide is the
real litmus test. A businessman takes decision foreseeing the future
aspect. The Court could only see that all legal formalities have been
fulfilled and that the scheme is neither unjust nor unfair or against the
national interest but cannot challenge the wisdom of a decision of
businessman as by doing that the Court would be overriding the wisdom
of a businessman and their prerogative. Even otherwise the report of
Chartered Accounts is also very material who were engaged for
calculating the swap ratio in respect of envisaged scheme of
arrangement.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 319
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3777) 73/2007 H.C.A Tariq Qureshi & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Afroz Shah & Or (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.353-K/2019 Muhammad Faisal and another v. Mrs. Mumtaz Muzakkir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3778) 2739/2011 Const. P. Haji Muhammad Ashraf Memon (Petitioner) V/S Ministry of Housing & Works & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The High Court's constitutional jurisdiction is extraordinary and should only be used when other remedies are unavailable. The Supreme Court's judgment in Dr. Abdul Nabi's case (2023 SCMR 1267) supports this view.
???The extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is envisioned predominantly for affording an express remedy where the unlawfulness and impropriety of the action of an executive or other governmental authority could be substantiated without any convoluted inquiry. The expression "adequate remedy" signifies an effectual, accessible, advantageous, and expeditious remedy that should also be remedium juris, i.e. more convenient, beneficial, and effective. To effectively bar the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, the remedy available under the law must be able to accomplish the same purpose which is sought to be achieved through a writ petition. This extraordinary jurisdiction is provided as a remedy to cure illegality which can be established without any elaborate inquiry into disputed facts???
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 450
Advocates:Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
3779) 1412/2021 Const. P. Ameet Kumar (Petitioner) V/S The Chief Secretary Government of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:joining, seniority and qualification
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 339
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.438-K/2022 Tahir Hussain & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice to Respondents and AG)
3780) 6/2018 Adm. Suit FAREED AHMED KHAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S M.V. MISKI & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Admiralty
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
3781) 402/2011 Cr.Bail Bashir Ahmed & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 04-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.417/2016 Bashir Ahmed v. The State,Crl.A.529/2020 Bashir Ahmed v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Partly Allowed
3782) 919/2018 Const. P. Pir Bux & another (Petitioner) V/S Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2605/2018 Sikandar Ali Abro v. The Chairman NAB and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3783) 7772/2018 Const. P. M/s ABC Industries (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
3784) 5269/2019 Const. P. Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Bar of Jurisdiction )
Tag Line:It has already been admitted before us that the petitioners claim is in respect of unpaid salary and its implication on post retirement dues. Such a claim has been found by the
superior courts to be a cause of action of a recurring nature. Even otherwise, the law of limitation envisages exclusion of time expended in bona fide proceedings before a court devoid of primary jurisdiction. We are sanguine that any learned civil court of competent jurisdiction would consider the issue of limitation guided by the principles illumined by the superior courts and would never endeavor to non-suit a supplicant if the same would prima facie perpetuate injustice.
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 687
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Sanaullah Noor Ghauri(ADVO-4123-SBC-KHI),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
3785) 1412/2015 Const. P. Sajjad Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 156
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
3786) 2/2024 Cr.J.A Muhammad Siddique (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 449
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3787) 229/2024 Cr.Rev Pakistan Air Force (Applicant) V/S Assad Naeem S/o Naeem Akram & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 487
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.476/2025 Pakistan Air Force, Judge Advocate General (JAG) Branch, Southern Air Command PAF v. Assad Naeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3788) 221/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. Ali Gohar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 98
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
3789) 1802/2017 Const. P. Premier Battery Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Karachi Water and Sewerage Board and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner had not participated in bidding process and assailed Public Notice and bidding process without fulfilling any of the conditions mentioned in the Public Notice---Validity---Petitioner had commercial motive that entire process should be started afresh--- Once the procuring authorities started bidding/ tendering process, provisions of Rr. 17(3) & 18 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, would be applicable and such stage was a subsequent one and had not reached---Petitioner did not have any locus standi to assail procurement process, as it did not even participate in first stage of the process by submitting Expression of Interest---Public Notice in question did not violate any of the provisions of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010---Basic information according to R. 73 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, contained about subject project, eligibility of participants, date of purchase of Expression of Interest document and the same could also be down loaded from Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority website and last date of submission also---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Topic: Public Procurement matters (Public Notice/Bidding process), Tender (Financial health of petitioner), Tender (Locus standi of petitioner)
Tag Line:Once the procuring authorities started bidding/ tendering process, provisions of Rr. 17(3) & 18 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, would be applicable and such stage was a subsequent one and had not reached---Petitioner did not have any locus standi to assail procurement process, as it did not even participate in first stage of the process by submitting Expression of Interest---Public Notice in question did not violate any of the provisions of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010---Basic information according to R. 73 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, contained about subject project, eligibility of participants, date of purchase of Expression of Interest document and the same could also be down loaded from Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority website and last date of submission also---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2019 CLC 583
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 15-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.481-K/2017 Premier Barrtery Industries (Pvt) Ltd v. Karachi Water & Seawerage Board and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3790) 802/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Arif (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Admittedly, these are the cases of harassment at the hands of police in connivance with private respondents. The meaning of the word "harass" has been explained as "Injure and injury???; these words have numerous and comprehensive popular meanings, as well as having a legal import. A line may be drawn between these words and the word "harass" excluding the latter from being comprehended within the word "injure" or "injury". The synonyms of "harass" are: Weary, tire, perplex, distress tease, vex, molest, trouble, and disturb. They all have relation to mental annoyance." In the Oxford Dictionary of New Words, the meaning of the word "harassment" has been explained, which reads as "The subjection of a person to aggressive pressure or intimidation. ???Harassment" should be interpreted as potentially producing some unreasonably adverse impact on the victim. The conduct should produce more than "worry", "trouble", "discomfort" or "unease" unless perhaps these are experienced to an extreme degree."
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 192
Advocates:Muhammad Nazir Tanoli(ADVO-5564-SBC-KHI),Manzoor Ahmad Rajput(ADVO-4689-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
3791) 3479/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Irfanullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years??? service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (Counting of previous service for pension)
Tag Line:the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2478
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1662/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Irfan Ullah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
3792) 71/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Island Textile Mills Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1074
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3793) 671/2025 Const. P. Ashfaq Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan are binding on all other courts, including High Courts, to the extent that they decide a question of law or enunciate a principle of law. All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid of the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution.
10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 134
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3794) 963/2021 Const. P. Waseem Younus Chugtai (Petitioner) V/S Arooba Rana (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1001
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Ali Shah Kazmi(ADVO-13652-SBC-KHI),Sikandar Zulqarnain(ADVO-13387-SBC-KHI),Manzar Bashir(ADVO-13572-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.856/2023 Mst. Arooba Rana v. Waseem Younus Chughtai and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3795) 466/2025 Const. P. Humayu Sultan (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Suspension of licence of customs agent; Held: Not justified without notice and assigning of reasons; Rule 102(4) of the 2001 Rules interpreted
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 5
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Pooja Kalpana(ADVO-8787-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 11-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
3796) 1616/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Sharif (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Tender , Tender (Feeding fry in Manchar Lake)
Tag Line:Since water quality plays significant role for aquatic life, we have
enquired about tentative water quality assessment from officials who have not
satisfactorily assisted. pH and TDS plays a significant role in determining the
quality of water and its conduciveness for fish growth. It is very alarming if these
tenders could be awarded without water assessment and thus would be a futile
attempt for such purpose and may have a financial catch for some individual[s].
pH is a measurement of concentration of hydrogen ions in water. Lower pH
means more hydrogen ions and higher PH means fewer hydrogen ions. pH has
a scale from 1-14 which measures acidity and Alkalinity of water, anything
above 7 in an alkaline based water whereas less than 7 is acidic. Similarly TDS
is actually total dissolved solids in water which include both organic and
inorganic substance. Research shows the effect of varying pH value differently
on different commodity.
Citation:2024 CLC 371
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 24-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
3797) 57/2020 Criminal Appeal Nabi Bux Jakhrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 1183
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3798) 33/2017 Judicial Companies Misc. Mozaffar Islam & another. (Applicant) V/S Dilkusha Enterprises (Pvt.) Ltd. & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 160
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
3799) 561/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs Model (Applicant) V/S M/s Sealink Trading Company (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Quantum of fine in lieu of confiscation is to be calculated as per SRO issued under Section 181 of the Customs Act 1969
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 251
Advocates:Muhammad Rashid(ADVO-8654-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Hyder Shaikh(ADVO-10758-SBC-KHI),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3800) 208/2023 Criminal Appeal QAMBAR S/O KHAIR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We have noticed that the sample of purported narcotics was received by the chemical analyzer on January 5, 2022, from the I.O of Gulbahar Police Station, though the alleged recovery was made on December 30, 2021. The sample must be sent to the lab within 72 hours of seizure. All items in the police station's storeroom must be recorded in Register No. XIX. In the present case, the prosecution failed to send the drug sample to the lab within 72 hours as required by the law. The prosecution has not provided a valid reason for the 6-day delay. The issue raised has created reasonable doubt, but the lower courts failed to consider this aspect of the case in favor of the appellant. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Asif Ali v The State 2024 SCMR 1408, Muhammad Hazir v The State 2023 SCMR 986, Qaiser & another v The State 2022 SCMR 1641.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 611
Advocates:Mamoon Ahmed Khan Shirwany(ADVO-11042-SBC-KHS),Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Zainab Bibi(ADVO-11676-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Nadir Khan Burdi(ADVO-13227-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
3801) 123/2019 Criminal Appeal Hassan Alias Ali HASSAN (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Murder Trial (Mitigating Circumstances)
Tag Line:The murder of two persons at the hands of appellant has although been proved beyond a shadow of doubt but the motive alleged has not been established. All these factors point out to circumstances overwhelmingly mitigating in nature and justify conversion of death sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and conviction of the appellant is maintained but his death sentence is converted into life imprisonment each against each murder.
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 668
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
3802) 1215/1999 Suit Syed Sardar Alam Zaidi (Plaintiff) V/S M/s Pakistan Gum and Chemicals limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 30-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
3803) 859/2022 Const. P. Dr. Nadeem ur Rehman Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Once promoted; no person can be demoted from a higher grade to a lower grade without notice and or disciplinary proceedings.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 649
Advocates:Nusrat Sultana(ADVO-414-SBC-NWB),Riaz Ahmed Phulphoto(ADVO-16022-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.40-K/2023 Government of Sindh through the Chief Secretary & others v. Dr. Nadeem-ur-Rehman Siddiqui Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
3804) 4570/2015 Const. P. Munir Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Mere fact that petitioner opted for plea bargain, which was not even recommended by the NAB Authorities, or duly approved by the Accountability Court, cannot operate as a bar for withholding the bail, if the accused otherwise makes out a case for grant of bail on merits.
Topic: NAB
Tag Line:Mere fact that petitioner opted for plea bargain, which was not even recommended by the NAB Authorities, or duly approved by the Accountability Court, cannot operate as a bar for withholding the bail, if the accused otherwise makes out a case for grant of bail on merits.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 06-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
3805) 116/2010 Cr.J.A Sikandar Teghani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 29-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.625/2018 Sikander Teghani v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
3806) 53/2012 Cr.Appeal Shaman @ Shaman, Ghulam Nabi @ Rato, Moula Bux (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 10-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
3807) 942/2024 Cr.Bail ISMAIL S/O MOMIN KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Bail Confirmed), Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Offence not falling with in prohibitory clause of section 497 (2))
Tag Line:On the point of the defense version, as pleaded by the accused, is concerned, he submitted that this Court is not to make a probe into the defense version to advance a plea of bail, rather it has to assess tentatively the material produced before it and to see if reasonable ground exists to believe, prima facie involvement of accused in the commission of the offense and if the accused found connected with the commission of the offense, he will not be released on bail based on further inquiry. Per learned counsel, the applicants/Accused has failed to demonstrate mala fide or ulterior motive on the part of the complainant or police to falsely implicate him in this case. He next argued that so far as the plea of the applicant/accused Ismail that his extra-judicial confession was recorded in police custody, thus not admissible under Articles 38 & 39 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, is concerned, the legal position in such a case is that if any incriminatory material related to the case is recovered or any fact is discovered in consequence of the information conveyed by the accused person, then the information so received would be admissible in evidence within the purview of Article 40 of the Qanun-e- Shahadat Order, 1984 because then the presumption would be towards its truthfulness. Since the disclosure of the accused Ismail has been followed by the recovery of some stolen property as well as the discovery of new facts of selling the gold ornaments including the present applicant/accused Habibullah, which earlier was not known. He argued that Article 40, of Qanoon-e-Shahadat, provides that when any fact is revealed in consequence of information received from any accused in the custody of a police officer, such information whether it amounts to a confession or not as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. The information supplied by the applicant Ismail under Article 40 ibid relating to incriminating articles is admissible. In support of his contention, he relied upon the case of Muhammad Akbar v The State 1995 SCMR 693, Murad Khan v Fazl-e-Subhan PLD 1983 SC 82, and copy of the charge-sheet, statements of ASI Shahbaz Ali and PC Humayoon Baig recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1253
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
3808) 2207/2021 Const. P. Hafeez ur Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:suspension from the service--SBCA--we are of the considered view that the Petitioner has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the disciplinary proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1429
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3809) 210/2012 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue. (Applicant) V/S K.E.S.C (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 113 (3) - tariff adjustment subsidy availed by DISCO part of turnover)
Tag Line:Subsidy/tariff adjustment availed by DISCO (and shown in its books of account) as a receivable from the Government of Pakistan constitutes turnover under Section 113(3) is leviable to charge of minimum tax under section 113 of ITO, 2001
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1327
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4905/2024 Karachi Electric Supply Corporation, (presently K-Electric Ltd.) Karachi v. Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-III, LTU, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3810) 2034/2017 Suit Muhammad Sajjad. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 185
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 17-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3811) 2837/2016 Const. P. Mitho and others (Petitioner) V/S Ashique Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1634/2019 Ashique Ali & others v. Mitho (decd) thr LRs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3812) 133/2025 Cr.Bail MST. MOEENA W/O MUHAMMAD RAFEEQ (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 159
Advocates:Ghulam Asghar(ADVO-15799-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3813) 268/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Saeed Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Shabbir Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 314
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3814) 133/2024 Const. P. Sheeraz Saeed (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Maria Sarwar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 760
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
3815) 91/2015 Cr.Appeal SAIFULLAH S/O NOOR REHMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 24-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
3816) 24/2019 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Sohail (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3817) 59/2012 M.A. Muhammad Ashraf Sangri (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1372/2013 Muhammad Ashraf Sangri v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3818) 2568/2017 Const. P. Sarem Mukhtar S/o Arif Mukhtar (Petitioner) V/S Sadia Aquil Ahmed & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1323
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.4479/2018 Sadia Aquil Ahmed v. Sarem Mukhtar & others,C.P.4480/2018 Sadia Aquil Ahmed v. Sarem Mukhtar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
3819) 117/2021 Cr.Rev Muhammad Khan (Applicant) V/S Saroop Singh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 743
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.231/2022 Muhammad Khan v. Saroop Singh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
3820) 128/2022 Cr.Rev MUSHTAQUE ALI (Applicant) V/S MUHAMMAD ALI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Owner unable to utilize his property, in effect is dispossessed, case falls within Section 3 of Illegal Dispossession Act.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 884
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
3821) 2866/2023 Const. P. Tahir Nawaz (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Blocking of NTN one mere notice)
Tag Line:No coercive action including blocking of NTN can be done on mere issuance of notice.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 91
Advocates:Amjad Hayat(ADVO-53613-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 12-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
3822) 640/2022 Criminal Miscelleneous KARIM BUX JOKHIO @ JAVED & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:We have noticed that the Judicial Magistrate has been conferred with wide powers to take cognizance of an offense not only when he receives information about the commission of offense from a third person but also when he has knowledge or even suspicion that the offense has been committed. The Magistrate has the power to independently review a police report, even if it concludes that no offense was committed. They can disagree with the police's opinion and take cognizance of the offense, ordering further investigation or issuing process to the accused. The Magistrate's decision is based on their assessment of the facts, not solely on the police's opinion. The terms "charge sheet" and "final report" are not formally defined in the Code. However, they are commonly used in police rules to refer to reports filed under Section 170 Cr.P.C. Reports filed under Section 169, where there's insufficient evidence, are often termed "referred charge," "final report," or "summary."
16. In view of the above we, therefore, dispose of these Criminal Miscellaneous Applications along with the pending application(s), with direction to the trial court to proceed with the matter, frame the charge, and culminate the Criminal proceedings in its logical conclusion within a reasonable time.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 428
Advocates:Khalid Saifullah (ADVO-17783-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Ashraf Samoo(ADVO-8176-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
3823) 1737/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD KHAN KHOSO S/O KHAN MUHAMMAD KHOSO (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Post-arrest bail--it appears that the applicant is Head Constable in Police Department and is bound to prevent the offenses in the area concerned; and, if he, from his acts or omissions, allows happening of the offense (s), or commits the offense, by escorting the vehicle, whereby he facilitated the co-accused to transport, the theft oil, thereby he breaches his official duties/obligations. The applicant, prima facie appears to be linked with the alleged offense of theft of a huge quantity of diesel oil, by allowing co-accused to tamper with the main Petroleum Pipe Line of PARCO--
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1134
Advocates:Tarique Ali Jakhrani(ADVO-2406-SBC-HYD),Ahmed Raza(ADVO-109-SBC-KSH),Safdar Ali(ADVO-768-SBC-LRK),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
3824) 42/2013 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Shahab Zaman (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 16-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
3825) 364/2023 H.C.A Zaheer Uddin Memon (Appellant) V/S Security Papers Limited & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1177
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Imtiaz Ali Shah(ADVO-16001-SBC-KHS),Arshad Mohsin Tayebaly(ADVO-3740-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 23-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1350-K/2023 Zaheer Uddin Memon and another v. Security Papers Limited and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
3826) 1635/2018 Cr.Bail AMIR S/O MIR ZAMAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3827) 1214/2013 Suit Muhammad Nasir (Plaintiff) V/S Zeehsan Parvez (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 241
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
3828) 2020/2021 Suit M/S FORTUNE FOUR LLP (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:Buying property on "as
is where is basis" does not conclude that it was purchased with this
understanding that there is no right of way from the northern side
(Jinnah Avenue). The right of way was only objected by Civil Aviation
Authority much later, but that has not been justified by the Civil
Aviation Authority at this interlocutory stage and mere objection alone is
not enough when the title of 1994 and 1996, prior to it being mortgaged
with the Bank of Khyber identified the metes and bounds.
Citation:2024 MLD 387
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Khurram Rashid(ADVO-9224-SBC-KHI),Rehmat -un- Nissa(ADVO-9852-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3829) 371/2019 Const. P. Asif Ali & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Service matters (Son Quota (Dismissed))
Tag Line:In view of the above, it is crystal clear that the respondents cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment against son quota by issuing Standing Order for recruitment in Sindh Police against Shaheed Quota, Son Quota without approval of the Provincial Government
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3830) 5879/2016 Const. P. M/s Tuwairqi Steel Mills (Petitioner) V/S 3rd SCJ kARACHI SOUTH (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Suit for Recovery, Dismissed.), Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:The petitioner through the petition has challenged the order passed by learned IIIrd Senior Civil Judge Karachi (South) whereby the application under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 of CPC of respondent No.2 was allowed.
Provision of Order XXXVIII Rule 5 of CPC and Article 199 of constitution were discussed in the case.
It was observed that the court should be satisfied that there is reasonable chance of a decree being passed in the suit against the defendant. And that the plaintiff has a prima facie case. If averments in the plaint and documents produced in support of it, do not satisfy the court about the existence of a prima facie case, the court will not go to the next stage of examining whether the interest of the plaintiff should be protected by exercising power under Order 38 Rule 5 of CPC. As has been viewed in the case of Mohiuddin Molla Vs. The Province of East Pakistan and others (PLD 1962 SC 119).
Citation:2017 CLC 1322
Advocates:Khadim Hussain(ADVO-4545-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
3831) 1065/2020 Suit Advocate General Sindh (Plaintiff) V/S Rt. Rev. Sadiq Daniel & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 686
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3832) 5549/2022 Const. P. Syed Mohsin Mahzar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Scope of Deemed Approval, Alteration and Regularisation under the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations , 2002 and the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1251
Advocates:Ahmed Nawaz(ADVO-7613-SBC-KHI),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
3833) 928/2024 Cr.Bail UBEDULLAH S/O GUL MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Now, I may take up the ground of statutory delay a bare perusal of the above quoted third proviso would show that the Court is obliged to release a person on bail, who, being accused of an offense not punishable with death if he has been detained for such an offense for a continuous period exceeding one year and whose trial for such offense has not been concluded. Similarly, under clause (b) of the above proviso, the Court is obliged to release a person, who, being accused of an offense punishable with death, has been detained for such offense for a continuous period exceeding two years and whose trial for such offense has not been concluded. However, this is subject to the condition provided in the above third proviso, i.e., the delay in the trial of the accused should not have occasioned by any act or omission of the accused or any other person acting on his behalf, while, the fourth proviso provides a further rider on the above statutory right of an accused person to bail on the above ground of statutory delay by laying down that the third proviso to above subsection shall not apply to a previously convicted offender for an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or a person who in the opinion of the Court is a hardened, desperate or dangerous criminal or involved in terrorism. In principle the right of an accused to be enlarged on bail under the proviso, referred to ibid, is a statutory right that cannot be denied under the discretionary power of the Court to grant bail, however, if the case falls under the fourth proviso, bail can be refused by the Court.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 417
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Naveed Ahmed(ADVO-652-BBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
3834) 6666/2015 Const. P. Mohsin Furqan (Petitioner) V/S N.B.P and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Proforma Promotion)
Tag Line:proforma promotion in the rank of SEVP--NBP--Thus in our opinion, the impugned action taken by the competent authority of the respondent-bank was proper and based on reasonable grounds as well as in the terms of the promotion policy in vogue--it is a well-established principle in service jurisprudence that promotion from the backdate to the retired Public Servant cannot be granted until and unless he meets the criteria prescribed under the law; and, after his retirement from the respondent-bank in the light of the decision of Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the case of Government of Pakistan and others v. Hameed Akhter Niazi and others (PLD 2003 SC 110)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 919
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.434-K/2021 Mohsin Furqan v. National Bank of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3835) 8065/2019 Const. P. Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) V/S E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Upgradation), Service matters (Employees' Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976)
Tag Line:we asked the learned counsel for respondent-Institution under what law and authority they attempted to nullify the effect of the judgment passed by this Court, maintained by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed supra.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1328
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4384/2021 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI) & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn.CMA.10973/21 for impleadment is Dismissed as not pressed.
3836) 3128/2011 Const. P. Lt. Col (R) Asif Saeed and another (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Section 7), Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Section 6), Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Section 13)
Tag Line:Section 6(2)(d) the action was designed in such a way that it is
likely to cause death or endanger a persons life. Section 6(2)(ee), define
use of explosive substance. Section 6(2)(i) pertains as to an action
leading to a serious risk to safety of the public or a section of in the way
it has been designed to frighten the general public. Section 6(2)(j) and (n)
is also attracted/involved as the action pertains to burning of vehicles
and violence against police force and public servants etc.
Advocates:Muhammad Haseeb Jamali(ADVO-10211-SBC-KHI),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aziz Khan(ADVO-3324-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ilyas Khan(ADVO-1410-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1102/2016 Lt. Col (R) Asif Saeed & another v. The State & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3837) 3668/2020 Const. P. Dadan Khan Pirzado and Others (Petitioner) V/S The Sect: Education and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Tag Line:Prima facie, the impugned order dated 04.8.2020 does not disclose the justiciable reasons for recalling the promotion of the petitioners, however, the respondents have reservations against such promotion of the petitioners which primarily needs to be looked into by the competent authority under the relevant law and this Court, at this juncture, is not a position to thresh out such
allegations and counter-allegations so raised by the parties hereinabove under writ jurisdiction.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 131
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3838) 359/2018 H.C.A Shahnawaz Jalil (Appellant) V/S Rani & Company & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The appeal is allowed in terms herein contained.
Citation:2019 CLD 1338, 2020 SBLR Sindh 412
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.306-K/2019 M/s Rani & Company v. Shahnawaz Jalil and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3839) 1/2023 M.A. Independent Newspapers Corp. (Pvt.) Ltd & Others (Appellant) V/S Learned VIth ADJ, Karachi South and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2386
Advocates:Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHI),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
3840) 34/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Mateen S/o Abdul Salam (Applicant) V/S Syed Asim Nisar Thr. Attorney M. Umar Siddiqui (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Rejection of Plaint in respect of Oral Agreement of Sale
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1198
Advocates:Muhammad Sohail Hasan(ADVO-9593-SBC-KHI),Muzafar Ali(ADVO-17974-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 25-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
3841) 5396/2014 Const. P. Naeem Akhtar Chang (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits), Service matters (Reinstatement into service)
Tag Line:The petitioners were employees of NADRA in their respective petition they have challenged order imposition of Major Penalty of reduction to a lower stage (two stages).
Provisions of Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1973, Fundamental Rules and Constitution of Pakistan were discussed.
It was decided in the case that the impugned order and imposition of Major Penalty of reduction to a lower post, passed against the petitioners were not sustainable in law. Consequently, these petitions were allowed the impugned orders were set-aside with the directions to pay the back benefits to the petitioners curtailed due to imposition of major penalty.
Citation:2017 PLC Lab. Note 100
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Deputy Attorney General(),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
3842) 539/2000 Adm. Suit Al-Riaz (Pvt.) Limited and another (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Ismail and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 14-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
3843) 2949/2014 Const. P. Abdullah Mushtaq (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.830-K/2018 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation v. Abdullah Mushtaq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3844) 137/2022 Spl.Cr.J.A Muhammad Afzal Chandio (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1044
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
3845) 188/2009 Spl. Federal Excise Reference Application M/s.Pakistan Beverages Ltd., Karachi. (Appellant) V/S Additional Collector & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Federal Excise Duty
Tag Line:no excise duty if royalty or franchise is not paid or established.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 302
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
3846) 2766/2021 Suit MIRPURKHAS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sugar Factories Control Act, 1950 (Section 16)
Tag Line:This would be an extraneous issue if sugarcane price in the province of
the Punjab is compared with the minimum price in Sindh as the factors
involved in fixation of minimum price in the Punjab are not available before
this court. Although this is not the core issue arising out of the litigation as here
I have to see whether provision of Section 16 of the Act, 1950 have been
complied substantially, however, the factors that rendered difference of prices
between the two provinces are that harvesting season of two provinces is
different; Fertility of the Punjab soil that normally yields more per acre than in Sindh; irrigation water; subsidy on fertilizer and higher level sucrose. These are
only tentative assessment since Mr. Pirzada has, in terms of the minimum price
of the sugarcane historically, has questioned its fixation to have been always
more than Punjab sugarcane price whereas it is always been less in the province
of Sindh
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 80
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Syed Mureed Ali Shah(ADVO-12250-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3847) 1144/2014 Const. P. MST. ADEEBA BEGUM (Petitioner) V/S TRAVEL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
3848) 71/2010 Cr.Appeal Tanveer (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 09-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
3849) 127/2013 Cr.Rev Nazakat Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 09-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting
3850) 221/2017 I. A Khurram Shehzad (Appellant) V/S United Bank Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLD 1205
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
3851) 20/2012 J.M Hafiz Muhammad Abdullah and others (Applicant) V/S Hafiz Muhammad Adnan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 22-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
3852) 15/2006 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst: Begum and Others (Applicant) V/S Irshad Ahmed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 210
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
3853) 424/2022 Suit MADNI AHMED ALI ARFAT SIDDIQUI (Plaintiff) V/S SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Length of service only is not a criteria for promotion; present qualification of plaintiff should have direct nexus with the Posts advertised.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 2
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
3854) 1559/2019 Const. P. Dr. Wahid Bux Chadhar & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) 329
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
3855) 46/2020 Criminal Appeal Aijaz Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 793
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.147-K/2020 Aijaz Ali Rajpar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3856) 3685/2017 Const. P. Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) V/S Director General NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
3857) 49/2013 Cr.Bail Ghulam Mustafa Khaskheli (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 09-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
3858) 246/2007 Cr.Appeal Namoos Khan and other (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 22-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
3859) 566/2018 Cr.J.A SAEED NOOR S/O AMEER HAMZA (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal (Appeal)
Tag Line:Appeal filed against Conviction under Sections 302 PPC. Mst. Saeeda Khatoon On the day
of incident with her son was available in the street, . accused Saeed Noor caught him hold with collar and started beating him, then she rashly reached in gali and found that his son was laying down in
the street and Saeed Noor was beating him, when she tried to save him and restrain the accused, the accused also gave her beatings with fist and kicks. She further alleged that then she brought her husband, however, accused Saeed Noor also used abusive language against him, caught hold him with collar and fired on his left eye due to personal enmity, with the result he died at the spot.
I am of the firm opinion that there is no justification for discarding the evidence of complainant and other witnesses merely on the ground that they are related to the deceased. defense plea that no offensive weapon was recovered . appellant was arrested after about eight months of the alleged
incident, therefore, he had sufficient time to destroy this important piece of evidence. judgment of conviction and sentence , is hereby maintained.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 926
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Muhammad Hanif Noonari(ADVO-16967-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.619/2021 Saeed Noor v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3860) 2/2016 Suit Ali Mushtaq & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others.. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 CLC 18
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 19-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3861) 39/2019 Const. P. Arif (Petitioner) V/S Civil Family Judge Matli & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
3862) 1562/2010 Suit MUHAMMAD ARGHUMAN HUSSAIN (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD SUHAIL SHMASI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (Section 86 issue)
Tag Line:Section 86 of the Companies Ordinance 1984 - Default in calling Extra Ordinary General Meeting and non-compliance of S.86 of the Companies Ordinance - Injunction granted.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3863) 6268/2020 Const. P. Danish Parabha Shankar Kaneria (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 497
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Taffazul Haider Rizvi(ADVO-11703-PBC-LHR),Deputy Attorney General(),Syed Hasnain Hiader(ADVO-26130-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1318-K/2022 Danish Parabha Shankar Kaneria v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Inter Provincial Coordination & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3864) 16/2019 Cr.Acq.A. Khawand Bux (Appellant) V/S Allah Dino & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2369
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
3865) 1181/2014 Const. P. Ms. Allah Bachai Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 403
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
3866) 1031/2010 Suit RASHEED AHMED (Plaintiff) V/S PTCL & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 449
Advocates:Muhammad Aqil Awan(ADVO-3432-SBC-KHI),Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Monawwer Ghani(ADVO-147-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Abdul Ghani(ADVO-4801-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting
3867) 5879/2016 Const. P. M/s Tuwairqi Steel Mills (Petitioner) V/S 3rd SCJ kARACHI SOUTH (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Khadim Hussain(ADVO-4545-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 13-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
3868) 4479/2018 Const. P. M/s Universal Brothers (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 2561, 2019 SBLR Sindh 2158
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.696/2019 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, M/o Religious Affairs & Interfaith Harmony & others v. M/s Universal Brothers (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3869) 1500/2014 Const. P. Prof. Doctor Nazir A. Mughal (Petitioner) V/S Governor of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
3870) 5519/2017 Const. P. Dr. Kelash Babu (Petitioner) V/S SPSC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
3871) 468/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs Model (Applicant) V/S Great Eastern Trading Co (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1133
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
3872) 2019/2014 Const. P. Ashkaran @ Aashankar (Petitioner) V/S The State (NAB) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: NAB (Pre arrest bail rejected, offence could not be committed without active involvement of others in chain of events .)
Citation:2020 MLD Note 763
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 10-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.882/2020 Aashakaran @ Aashankar v. The State (NAB) thr. its Director General, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3873) 2135/2024 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali & others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 3471
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3874) 968/2010 Const. P. Kamran Khan (Petitioner) V/S Governor Sindh/Chancellor University of Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 16-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.108-K/2020 Kamran Khan v. Govt. of Sindh / Chancellor University of Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3875) 734/2022 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD ANWAR S/O MURTAZA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Primarily, seized vehicles can generally be released during criminal trials. However, under the CNSA, vehicle release during drug offense trials is restricted. Only the lawful owner, who was/is unaware of the intended crime and has no connection to the accused, can seek release on Superdari. The prosecution must prove the owner's knowledge during the trial. The court can grant interim release if satisfied with the owner's claim and lack of association with the crime. To prevent the registration of crime-involved vehicles, the Supreme Court in the case of Amjad Ali Khan Vs the State vide order dated 13.03.2020, considered amending the Motor Vehicle Ordinance (MVO) and its rules. Additionally, develop an online verification system for vehicle crime history, require a No Objection Certificate from the police or an affidavit from the transferor/transferee at the time of registration.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1401
Advocates:Muhammad Hanif Samma(ADVO-4046-SBC-KHI),Samina Hanif Samma(ADVO-11659-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
3876) 86/2021 Criminal Appeal Shoukat Ali Sundrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 553
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
3877) 1237/2022 Suit Alhaushabi Stevedores (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Suit for abuse of dominant position. Exclusive jurisdiction with Competition Commission. Suit barred.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1037
Advocates:Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
3878) 180/2023 Const. P. Mohammad Umar Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S The Secretary Local Govt:, Karachi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 284
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
3879) 1090/1991 Suit Sunray Corporation (Private) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Total Parco Marketing Ltd (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tort Law (Recovery of Damages)
Tag Line:The Defendant in breach of its contractual obligation did not purchase the lubricants product from plaintiff. Suit decreed by awarding damages with markup rate of 12% from the date of institution of the suit till realization amount.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 14-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
3880) 4932/2020 Const. P. Zakia Naz (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:petitioner has impugned the Notice dated 04.09.2020 issued by the respondents for vacating the official accommodation i.e. Flat No. B-18, situated in Government Official Residence (GOR-II) Sindhi Muslim Co-operative Housing Society ---Since the issue involved in this petition is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-4129 of 2020 and other connected petitions vide common Judgment dated 12.10.2020, therefore, the instant petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution is dismissed accordingly, leaving the petitioner to avail and exhaust her remedy, if any, as provided under the law.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1296
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1442-K/2020 Zakia Naz v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3881) 233/2010 Cr.Bail Zain Khan & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 06-SEP-10
Approved for Reporting
3882) 140/2024 Criminal Appeal Nano @ Razi Khan Marfani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2370
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
3883) 71/2011 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Yousif Tunio & an ors (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 11-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
3884) 33/2018 I. A CitiBank N.A. (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Tasleem & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 180
Advocates:Muhammad Ilyas(ADVO-13360-SBC-KHS),Nabeel Nazeer Ahmed(ADVO-13014-SBC-KHI),Asif Ali Jokhio(ADVO-14779-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 30-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
3885) 326/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Mr. Kristof W. Duwaerts (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 533
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
3886) 145/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. BNN Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 471
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
3887) 103/2019 II.A. Mst. Aneela Zehra (Appellant) V/S Kaleem Haider & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 CLC 73
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
3888) 27/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Achar & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (Petition dismissed as Other remedy is available . )
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 106
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
3889) 1/1986 Civil Ref. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KARACHI (Appellant) V/S SUJAWAL & ORS. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 399
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
3890) 3353/2018 Const. P. Ikramullah and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PTD 1702, 2020 TAX 261
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.343-K/2019 Federation of Pakistan and another v. Ikram Ullah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3891) 1381/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Time Press (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 899
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3892) 1406/2024 Suit WSKB & Company (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Public Procurement - In absence of material violation of law on public procurement, Court will not interfere in public projects.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 542
Advocates:Sarmad Hani(ADVO-14089-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
3893) 6/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Mir Khan Jakhrani (Applicant) V/S Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Jurisdiction
Tag Line:In view of the observations of the Division Bench in the unreported case of Nooruddin-SITE (supra) following the judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the Counsel for SK Jakhrani???s arguments to dislodge the applicability of the principles of res judicata on the ground that the pecuniary jurisdiction of the civil court which passed the judgment in the first suit is different from the pecuniary jurisdiction of the civil court in the subsequent suit, is reduced to a cipher
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 297
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
3894) 521/2021 Const. P. M/s Fauji Fertilizers Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Syed Jawad Ali Shah and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 903
Advocates:Muhammad Ali(ADVO-7350-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Shuja Uddin(ADVO-11034-SBC-KHI),Jamshed Ahmed Faiz Mahar(ADVO-856-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3151/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others v. M/s Sunny Floor Mill, through Attorney, Muhammad Hassan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3895) 513/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Younus Billoo S/o Sharaif Billoo (Petitioner) V/S Mrs. Piyari Sadiq Wahab and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1670
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
3896) 67/2016 Cr.Rev ALEEMUDDIN S/O ABDUL QAVI (Applicant) V/S BALBAN HAMEED & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 (Section 3 & 4)
Tag Line:Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005)---
----Ss. 3 & 4---Illegal dispossession---Appreciation of evidence---Complainant had alleged that he was absolute and exclusive owner of the suit property being purchaser of the same---Proposed accused persons/respondents had encroached upon the same without any lawful authority---Record showed that complaint was filed along with the report of police inquiry---Documents annexed with the criminal revision against the proposed accused persons/respondents were copies of documents from an earlier complaint, which was dismissed---Basic ingredients of a complaint in terms of S. 3 of the Act were missing---Allegation of use of force for dispossession of the appellant/ complainant from the premises in question was not mentioned anywhere in the complaint---Even date of dispossession was not given in the memo---Allegedly, plot was purchased by complainant from attorney of the original owner but power of attorney was not on the record---Complainant was not in possession of suit plot for over twenty years as the plot was not demarcated---Earlier complaint of complainant/appellant was dismissed and if he was aggrieved by the disposal of his earlier complaint, he should have filed appeal/revision---Filing a fresh complaint on the same facts was not permissible---Circumstances established that dispute, in the present case, of civil nature and could only be resolved in civil court---Application was, therefore dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2018 YLR 41
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 18-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
3897) 592/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD NAWAZ S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Parameters for pre-arrest bail.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 882
Advocates:Amna Salman Ahmed(ADVO-15517-PBC-LHR),Nazir Ahmed(ADVO-7463-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
3898) 2265/2021 Cr.Bail SOHAIL AHMED S/O ATTA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 43
Advocates:Muhammad Iqbal(ADVO-6589-SBC-KHI),Sajid Iqbal(ADVO-18288-SBC-KHW),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3899) 4/2011 Cr.Rev Eidal Khan Metlo (Applicant) V/S Imam Ali @ Bali Jatoi & an ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 09-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
3900) 4609/2019 Const. P. Asadullah & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Regularization
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 571
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
3901) 17/2017 II.A. Niaz Ahmed & Another (Appellant) V/S Zain-ul-Abedin & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 492
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1330-K/2020 Niaz Ahmed & another v. Zain-ul-Abedin & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3902) 4112/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Petitioner seeks appointment in the Karachi University as Adhoc Teacher, based on differently-abled quota on the premise that he was/is a qualified and fit person to be considered for the subject post.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1374
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 12-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
3903) 196/2024 Suit EXIDE PAKISTAN LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Suit Not maintainable; Bar under Section 56(e) of Specific Relief Act; no injunction against criminal proceedings
Also not maintainable if 50% amount is not deposited as per Impugned Notice;
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 812
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHI),Furqan Mushtaq(ADVO-20825-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
3904) -3416/2021 Suit MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:laintiff was appointed by defendant No.3
when it acquired the corporate status and hence the relationship is governed the
rule of `master` and `servant`. The Human Resource Manual which is relied
upon by the plaintiff itself suggests that the termination of the service could be
effected without assigning any reason or as a measure of retrenchment, after
giving him a notice of three months or payment in lieu thereof
Citation:2023 PLC (CS) 889
Advocates:Syed Ashiq Raza(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHI),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
3905) 3644/2014 Const. P. Mrs. Farhana Muzaffar (Petitioner) V/S National Accountability Bureau and 4 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
3906) 2363/2021 Const. P. Imtiaz Ali Isani (Petitioner) V/S I.G Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 100
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3907) 814/2015 Cr.Bail AGHA MUNEER AHMED S/O AHMED YAR KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 22-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
3908) 4357/2014 Const. P. Syed Abdul Khalique (Petitioner) V/S Model Custom Collectorate and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 30-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
3909) 65/2016 F.R.A Muhammad Aamir Malik (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Afshan Ateeq & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 1913
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
3910) 1689/2014 Const. P. Syed Aamir Hashmi and others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
3911) 20/2007 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Party-1 (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 26-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
3912) 83/2019 I. A M/s. Hussaini Textile Industries & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. United Bank & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 24
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3913) 765/2024 Const. P. Dr. Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Tag Line:Ensuring equal treatment and Merit-Based Regularization: Upholding legislative intent and Constitutional mandates for contractual Doctors under the Doctors Regularization Act, 2018.
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 784, 2025 SBLR Sindh 1528
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar
Order Date: 07-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3914) 238/2012 Cr.Bail Riaz Magsi (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 01-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
3915) 2/2014 Cr.J.A Abdul Waheed Larik (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Murder Appeal dismissed, Conviction Maintained, witnesses are relatives no ground to discard evidence. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 950
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.146/2021 Abdul Waheed v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3916) 428/2018 H.C.A Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. Data Stee Pipe Industries Pvt Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 571
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
3917) 1261/2003 Suit BASHIR (Plaintiff) V/S FAIZA QURESHI & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 126
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3918) 288/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SADDAM KAKAR S/O SAADULLAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeal (Conviction upheld, In u/s 23(i)A of Sindh Arms Act, 2013 , are witness are Police official ,no ill will and enmity proved .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
3919) 42/2017 Civil Revision Pir Ghulam Kareem Shah (Applicant) V/S Ali Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
3920) 785/2016 Const. P. Pakistan Telecome Mobile (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Idrees Hadi and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 12-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
3921) 360/2013 Suit GHULAM ALI ALLANA (Plaintiff) V/S LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES SUISSEE SA & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Test for attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 167
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Salman Hamid(ADVO-3747-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Shaiq Usmani(ADVO-2667-SBC-KHI),Agha Zafar Ahmed(ADVO-9944-SBC-KHI),M/S. USMANI & IQBAL(FIRM-309-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3922) 2951/2017 Const. P. Gulzar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench of NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Suspension )
Citation:2017 SBLR Sindh 1791
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
3923) 1700/2020 Cr.Bail Naresh Kumar @ Jani son of Shaman Lal (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1727
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 08-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.14-K/2021 Naresh Kumar @ Jani v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3924) 151/2023 H.C.A SSGC Limited & Others (Appellant) V/S Syed Abbas Raza and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension)
Tag Line:Employers have no right to withhold or postpone the pensionery benefits.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 60
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Shahzad Mahmood(ADVO-12500-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4055/2023 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGCL), Karachi v. Syed Abbas Raza and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. After 3 weeks. Relist before a 3 members bench
3925) 1198/2013 Cr.Bail YOUNUS RIZWANI S/O MEHBOOB HASSAN (Petitioner) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
3926) 5657/2019 Const. P. Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S N.B.P (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:NBP--Dismissal from service
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1062
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.467-K/2021 National Bank of Pakistan v. Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi,C.A.17/2024 National Bank of Pakistan v. Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
3927) 47/2021 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Siddique & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 612
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
3928) 201/2013 Cr.Acq.A. THE STATE (Appellant) V/S M/S GALXCO SMITHKLINE PAK LTD & 06 ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 615
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 06-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
3929) 32/2022 II.A. Muhammad Sachal thr LRs (Appellant) V/S P.o Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 259
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3930) 6696/2014 Const. P. Khayaban-e-Iqbal (Pvt) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Through instant petition the petitioner, inter alia, has sought refund of amount Rs.7183168/- which was collected by the respondents from the petitioner on its electricity bills for the month of August 2013 on account of 5% extra GST and 1% further GST.
Sales Tax Act and Article 199 of the constitution of Pakistan, Pakistan were discussed in the case.
In this case, it was observed that absence of any order from competent forum regarding illegality of suspension of Sales Tax Registration of petitioner, it cannot be presumed that such suspension of the petitioner was patently illegal or amounted to abuse of authority by respondent, which could be treated as nullity in the eyes of law. That any consequential payment of tax, extra GST on account of delayed filing of return and tax, would also be treated as illegal and would not eventually give right to the petitioner to seek refund of such payments by filing a Constitution Petition at this belated stage of proceedings. Petition was dismissed.
Citation:2017 PTD 2191
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
3931) 111/2017 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. AMEENULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD NAZEER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
3932) 75/2010 H.C.A M/s.Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S Nisar Ahmed Akhoond (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 17-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.208-K/2017 M/s Industrial Development Bank Ltd. v. Nisar Ahmed Akhoond Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed with Cost
3933) 432/2022 H.C.A Saeed Noor Khan & Others (Appellant) V/S Syed Adnan Ali and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Attachment of property of third party as surety -
** on consideration of a valuable property, which was purportedly attached, as deemed necessary by the learned Judge, the surety amount was considered much less than it should have been in normal course where the property is not available - property of a third party was wrongly attached and thus the surety amount is also liable to be re-settled. ....
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 538
Advocates:Zark Ahmed Khan Ghory(ADVO-19084-SBC-KHE),Saira Sheikh(ADVO-10895-SBC-KHI),Khurram Gul Ghory(ADVO-13962-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Arif(ADVO-4057-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 25-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.599-K/2024 Syed Adnan Ali v. Saeed Noor Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3934) 510/2021 Cr.Bail Abdul Rehman and others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 336
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
3935) 895/2024 Cr.Bail Shafqatullah (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1031
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 09-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
3936) 595/2011 Suit INAM HAFIZ SIDDIQUI (Plaintiff) V/S PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION LTD. & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 19-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
3937) 3907/2016 Const. P. Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
3938) 46/2024 Criminal Appeal Barkat Bakhrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1761
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
3939) 1634/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Amjad (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 280
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
3940) 1379/2023 Const. P. M/s Adamjee Insurance Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S President of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Insurance Ordinance, 2000 (Section 122 and 127)
Tag Line:The Jurisdication of the Insurance Ombudsman extends to the extent of maladministration. Surveyor's performance cannot be kept in the
basket of petitioner's maladministration per Section 127 of Insurance Ordinance, 2000. It is the decision, process, recommendation, act of omission
or commission of Insurance Company, which could be framed as
maladministration.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 665
Advocates:Syeda Abida Bokhari(ADVO-15919-SBC-KHE),Wahaj Ali Khan(ADVO-20055-SBC-KHC),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE),Abdul Rashid Rajar(ADVO-10878-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 05-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4886/2024 Ismail Godil Director, M/s United International Industries, Karachi v. The President, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3941) 26/2016 Civil Revision Muhammad Ahsan Mushtaq Paracha (Applicant) V/S Shaikh Arif ur Rehman (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
3942) 4/2021 Election Appeal Ghulam Mustafa Memon (Appellant) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Senate election; Technocrat seat; candidature rejected.
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh 1144
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3943) 1018/2007 Suit PAKISTAN DEVELOPERS (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) V/S C.D.G.K. & AN OTHER. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 275
Advocates:Muhammad Aqil(ADVO-3154-SBC-KHE),Khursheed Javed(ADVO-8182-SBC-KHI),Thawur Ali Khan(ADVO-2306-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3944) 28/2017 Cr.J.A Karim Bux Bhayo (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 327
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.479/2020 Karim Bux v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3945) 4818/2023 Const. P. Fakhar Shabbir & Others (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 491
Advocates:Abdur Razzaq(ADVO-11476-SBC-KHI),M/S. IQBAL KHURRAM LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-231-SBC-KHI),Usman Farooq(ADVO-16057-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.333-K/2024 Fakhar Shabbir v. The Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
3946) 11/2022 Judicial Companies Misc. M/S LIVEN PHARMACEUTICALS (PVT) LTD AND ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S M/s. Landmark Spining Industries Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Amalgamation Scheme approved.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 518
Advocates:Ammar Ather Saeed(ADVO-13697-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Usman Alam(ADVO-12119-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
3947) 104/2009 Civil Revision Muhammad Saleem & Ors (Applicant) V/S Khuda Bux & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 22-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting
3948) 855/2020 Const. P. Waheed Ali & Others (Petitioner) V/S Ghulam Nabi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1083
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1278-K/2020 Waheed Ali & others v. Ghulam Nabi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
3949) 5649/2018 Const. P. Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Contempt--Prima-facie the question of downgrading some of the petitioners in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the aggrieved persons to avail their respective remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondent-company, if any.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1135
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3977/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. Rao Muhammad Gulzar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
3950) 7827/2019 Const. P. Agha Syed Attaullah Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1275
Advocates:Muhammad Tariq Mansoor(ADVO-18173-SBC-KHE),In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
3951) 83/2013 Cr.J.A Muhammad Mithal Narejo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 416
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3952) 6319/2019 Const. P. Naseem Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Upgradation
Tag Line:we are clear in our mind that the petitioner proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of actualization of up-gradation of his post in BPS 17 and ancillary benefits. On the subject, we are guided by the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioner has been unable to make out a case for the actualization of upgradation of his post in BPS 17 and ancillary benefits with retrospective effect, based on the office order dated 31.8.2018.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 544
Advocates:Azra Muqeem(ADVO-4332-SBC-KHI),M/S. IQBAL KHURRAM LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-231-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1600-K/2021 Naseem Ahmed v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Ministry of Local Bodies & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
3953) 3867/2018 Const. P. Trading Corp. of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Khan Muhammad and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 796
Advocates:Zubair Ali Khaskhali(ADVO-14367-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Latif(ADVO-3023-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5052/2024 Trading Corporation of Pakistan Pvt Limited through Manager, Karachi v. Khan Muhammad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3954) 5932/2015 Const. P. Talha Ali Mehboob (Petitioner) V/S The State throug NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 18-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting
3955) 3009/2016 Const. P. Dr. Abdul Qadir Akhund (Petitioner) V/S M/s Hermain Travels Pbvt Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 48
Advocates:Badar Alam(ADVO-3219-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Naveed Ahmed(ADVO-2102-SBC-KHI),Farzana Yasmeen(ADVO-3602-SBC-KHI),Irfan Bashir Bhutta(ADVO-14755-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General()
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
3956) 1235/2024 Const. P. Sunni Ittehad Concil (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 758
Advocates:Tassaduq Nadeem(ADVO-13712-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Zahida Abdul Sattar(ADVO-21374-SBC-KHS),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 08-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
3957) 1447/2020 Const. P. Yaseen Ali Ghunio (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:CP(D) 1447/2020 Connected with CP(D) 228/2021 - Judgment in Urdu
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 124, 2025 SHC SUK 2055
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
3958) 130/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) Masood Alam (Applicant) V/S Mst. Ghulam Fatima & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Application of Article 113 of First Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1908 and the Application of Section 35 and Section 36 of the Stamp Act, 1899
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 699
Advocates:Danish Raza(ADVO-13594-SBC-KHS),Shabana Shaikh(ADVO-10319-SBC-KHI),Jawed Raza(ADVO-2230-SBC-KHI),Naheed Afzal(ADVO-2381HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3959) 1079/2020 Const. P. M/s Junaid Jamshed Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1093
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 03-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
3960) 1272/2020 Const. P. Mst. Salma @ Ume-Salma (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh, through Secretary Home Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 652
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
3961) 4/2004 F.R.A Mrs. Agnes Joseph Wd/o Late Anthony Joseph & others (Appellant) V/S Miss Rubina d/o Kamaruddin & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
3962) 1615/2022 Const. P. Allah Dino Chachar (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 943
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3963) 3141/2024 Const. P. M/s Pak Sun Green (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:FIA Inquiry
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 269
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.898-K/2025 M/s. Pak Sun Green (Pvt) Limited & others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Interior Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice)
3964) 177/2022 Cr.Misc. LALOO (Applicant) V/S SSP DISTRICT MIRPURKHAS & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 51
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3965) 1853/2020 Const. P. Aurangzaib (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PTD 1026
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3966) 3175/2015 Const. P. Mst Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1461-K/2018 Mst. Sahib Khatoon Panhwar v. The Province of Sindh & others,C.A.139-K/2019 Mst. Sahib Khatoon Panhwar v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
3967) 576/2020 Const. P. Mahmood Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 713
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Manzoor Hussain Khoso(ADVO-18789-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3968) 618/2012 Suit ABDULLAH RAFI (Plaintiff) V/S DIRECTOR PROPERTY AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Sindh Entertainment Duty Act, 1958
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 121
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
3969) 731/2020 Cr.Bail LIAQUAT ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 469
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
3970) 5618/2021 Const. P. Khalid Akram & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Service Matter
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 474
Advocates:Mansoorul Haque Solangi(ADVO-6746-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
3971) 101/2012 Criminal Appeal Jumo Brohi (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 645
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
3972) 462/2021 Suit Hayat Muhammad Sher & others (Plaintiff) V/S Mukhtiyarkar Gulzar-e-Hijri & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 861
Advocates:Umair Bachani(ADVO-15300-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-8216-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Choudhary Atif Rafiq(ADVO-11896-SBC-KHI),Zahooruddin(ADVO-8212-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3973) 10/2017 Adm. Suit M/S. SING FUELS PTE LTD (Plaintiff) V/S M.V. YASA AYSEN AND OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Admiralty case for arrest of Vessel in respect of Bunker Supply
Tag Line:Through this is a Suit under Section 3(2) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction of High
Courts Ordinance, 1980 the Plaintiff had sought recovery of US$ 667,599.35
in respect of the principal outstanding amount, interest, damages and legal
costs etc. and had also sought issuance of warrants of arrest for the Vessel
i.e. Defendant No.1 and detain the same until sufficient guarantees are
furnished for the outstanding claim of the Plaintiff. As an interim measure the
vessel was arrested and allowed to sail after furnishing surety for the
principal amount. According to the Plaintiffs the Defendant No.5 (?Charterers?)
contacted for supply of bunkers to the Vessel in question owned and
operated by Defendant No.2 to 4 (?Owners?). It is the case of the Plaintiff that
requisite bunkers were supplied, whereas, Charterer has defaulted in making
payments and therefore, owners as well as Charterers are liable to pay jointly
and severally. The plaintiff?s argument has been repelled by the Court and
the application for arrest of vessel has been dismissed in this matter and
surety has been ordered to be released / discharged in favor of the owners
as the bunker delivery note very clearly and specifically mentions that the
supply of bunkers by the bunker supplier is on ?Charterers Account?. This is
an admitted document and placed on recorded by the Plaintiff itself.
Admittedly nothing has been placed on record so as to suggest that at any
point of Time; the plaintiff ever approached the owners of the Vessel before
entering into any contract for supply of the bunkers. Nothing has been placed
or even pleaded as to whether any consent of the owners of the Vessel was
ever sought for making supplies of bunkers and the liability of any payment
on the part of the owners in case of any default. It has been further held that
the Plaintiff here has not been able to show or substantiate that the Time
Charterer had any sort of authority to contract on behalf of the owners or the
Vessel; and secondly, even otherwise to safeguard its interest, knowingly
that its claim against the Vessel and owner would fail, had obtained sufficient
security in the shape of postdated cheques, and is at full liberty to seek its
encashment, and if not, then any other appropriate remedy as may be
available for it in accordance with the applicable laws. The Plaintiff under no
circumstances can be permitted to take undue advantage under the Admiralty
jurisdiction of this Court by arrest of the Vessel and then compelling and
dragging the owners to pay the amount being claimed when no case for a
claim in personam has been arguably made out. The application is therefore
dismissed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 29-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
3974) 8512/2019 Const. P. Feroz Bari (Petitioner) V/S Syed Ayaz Hussain and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 567
Advocates:Asif Rasheed(ADVO-4221-SBC-KHI),Ikram Ahmed Ansari(ADVO-134-SBC-KHI),Zeeshan Hyder(ADVO-13142-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
3975) 2440/2020 Const. P. Waseem Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The State and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
In view thereof, the petitioner has made out his case for grant of bail, under these circumstances, C.P.No.D-2440 of 2020 is allowed. Petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs.500000/- (Rupees Five Lacs) and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. However, the Ministry of Interior is directed to put the name of petitioner on the ECL. A copy of this order be sent to the Secretary, Ministry of Interior Government of Pakistan for compliance.
Topic: NAB (Bail granted, as accused made Pardon granted to him , main co accused already on bail.)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 358
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
3976) 25/2021 Cr.Bail Sultan Ahmed Rind and Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:PROTECTIVE BAIL
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 235
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
3977) 138/2017 Criminal Appeal Rahim Bux Soomro S/O: Muhammad Siddique (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Accountability Appeal(NAB Matter)
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 654
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
3978) 48/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) Gahi @ Gada Hussain Samtio and others (Applicant) V/S Shaman Samtio and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Section 11 C.P.C enunciates that once a court has conclusively adjudicated an issue, it cannot be re-litigated in a subsequent suit
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 63
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
3979) 24/2018 H.C.A Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law
Tag Line:Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) issued by the Company can be considered as directions /instructions with a binding effect provided it is not violative of fundamental principles of law
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh Note 76
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1054-K/2020 Pakistan State Oil Company Limited v. M/s.Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises,C.A.4-K/2022 Pakistan State Oil Company Limited v. M/s.Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
3980) 6/2016 II.A. Production Engineer PPL and Others (Appellant) V/S Azizullah Chachar and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 259
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1220-K/2023 Province of Sindh through its Secretary (Revenue Department) and others v. Production Engineer PPL and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 3 weeks)
3981) 209/2010 Suit MOHSIN ALI (Plaintiff) V/S SAFDAR HUSSAIN BIRLAS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Recovery of Possession and damages
Tag Line:Suit for Specific Performance should have been filed and no possession can be given without seeking a Declaration in respect of title, because Agreement of Sale cannot be considered as a title / ownership document.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 29-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
3982) 2839/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:recruitment process of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 and their participation in SPSC.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1389
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 19-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
3983) 214/2016 Const. P. Zuhair Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3111/2017 Zuhair Siddiqui v. Chairman NAB, thr. the Officer of NAB, Karachi and another,C.P.68/2017 National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman v. Zuhair Siddiqui and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of with observation,Disposed Dismissed
3984) 1408/2016 Suit Mirza Naseem Baig.. (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C. Employees Co-Op.H.S. Ltd., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 01-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
3985) 699/2019 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD IMRAN @ MAMA S/O MUHAMMAD BASHIR @ KAKA (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 523
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
3986) 7902/2018 Const. P. Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 175
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Mushaffy Ahmed(ADVO-4912-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Farman Ullah(ADVO-11315-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
3987) 2025/2017 Suit Mazharullah Khan & others (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Zainab & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 169
Advocates:Muhammad Aslam Rajpar(ADVO-9871-SBC-KHS),Saifuddin(ADVO-3814-SBC-KHI),Masood Khan Ghory(ADVO-3739-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
3988) 257/2016 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Shahzad alias Pakora (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 25-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
3989) 1755/2008 Suit Ahmed Saeed and others (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh, through the Secretary, Education Department and two others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 06-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
3990) 8680/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Muqeem (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 833
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 31-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
3991) 1813/2022 Const. P. Naveed Hussain Tunio (Petitioner) V/S V.C SMIU & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 281
Advocates:In Person(INP),Fayaz Ali Metlo(ADVO-16510-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
3992) 284/2024 II.A. Faisal Akram S/o Muhammad Akram (Appellant) V/S Pervaiz Iqbal since deceased thr LRs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1517
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.986-K/2025 Faisal Akram v. Pervaiz Iqbal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
3993) 2841/2021 Suit ALI ADNAN ARIF TABBA (Plaintiff) V/S NADRA & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NADRA Employees (Service) Regulations, 2002
Tag Line:In the absence of any substantial relief being matured, no consequential relief could be claimed, be that damages. Neither any jurisdictional error was highlighted nor the plaintiffs case is within the frame of such jurisdictional error hence plaintiffs case could not be isolated on such count alone.
Citation:2024 PLC CS 890
Advocates:Khadim Hussain(ADVO-4545-SBC-KHI),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Arshad Hussain Lodhi(ADVO-2402-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
3994) 1661/2015 Suit Dewan Steel Mills and others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
3995) 381/2003 Suit Mall Nigran Welfare Association (Plaintiff) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Societies Registration Act, 1860)
Tag Line:Societies Registration Act (XXI of 1860)---
----Ss.1 & 20---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss.12, 42 & 54--- Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell, declaration and injunction--- Power of court--- Aims and objects of society--- Plaintiff, a welfare association sought direction to authorities to allot plots to its members in new Sabzi Mandi--- Validity--- Civil Court could not pass discretionary decree of specific performance in favour of group of dubious / unidentified plaintiffs in respect of an unidentified immovable property on payment of an unidentified price/sale consideration against defendants who were neither owners nor authorized to sale any immovable property--- Aims and objects of plaintiff association appeared to be only an eyewash or an attempt to defraud statute namely Societies Registration Act, 1860--- For the last 20 years not a single Dispensary or Health Center was established by the plaintiff, therefore, plaintiff association even if it was formed for the 'purpose' described in S.20 of Societies Registration Act, 1860, had failed to take any step in furtherance of its aims and objects--- All other aims and objects of plaintiff were of general utility and did not construe to be an object for any of the 'purpose' for which S.20 of Societies Registration Act, 1860 had been enacted--- Suit was not filed to protect and/or promote aims and objects of plaintiff association--- Objects of association/society which were inconsistent with the provision of S.20 of Societies Registration Act, 1860, were inoperative and had no legal consequences---Plaintiff Association was not entitled to any relief and suit was not maintainable---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2018 YLR 848
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 19-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
3996) 1019/2024 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1121
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
Order Date: 05-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
3997) 743/2025 Cr.Bail FAHAD MUHAMMAD MOHSIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2026 SHC KHI 709
Advocates:Haad Abid(ADVO-15656-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General()
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana
Order Date: 08-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
3998) 115/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MIR SALMAN ABRO (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 12
Advocates:Ghulam Mustafa Mahesar(ADVO-7947-SBC-KHS),Sajid Hussain(ADVO-18937-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Asad Ashfaq Tola(ADVO-17101-SBC-KHS),Haq Nawaz Talpur(ADVO-11466-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
3999) 340/2006 H.C.A Mst. Tahira Begum & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Nasira Ansari & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1145
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.41-K/2021 Mst. Nasira Ansari and others v. Late.Tahira Begum through legal heirs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4000) 7/2008 R.A (Civil Revision) Nawabzada Saeed Ahmed Khan (Applicant) V/S Mst Aisha and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 895
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
4001) 1279/2013 Cr.Bail Nizar Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
4002) 1035/2018 Const. P. Syed Sabir Ali (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
4003) 4738/2021 Const. P. Inayat N. Din and Others (Petitioner) V/S Salman Talibuddin and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 683
Advocates:Raghib Ibrahim Junejo(ADVO-13637-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Rehman Ghous(ADVO-14269-SBC-KHI),Tabasum Ghazanfar(ADVO-2492-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 15-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.6302/2021 Inayat N. Din and others v. Salman Talibuddin, Advocate General Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4004) 160/2002 Adm. Suit Syed Mohsin Ali (Petitioner) V/S Evacuee Trust Property Board and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 06-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
4005) 46/2005 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Muhammad Tariq Raza Attari (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 05-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.124/2015 Muhammad Tariq Raza Attari v. The State,Crl.A.40/2018 Muhammad Tariq Raza Attari v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
4006) 7068/2021 Const. P. M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Ghulam Murtaza and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 942
Advocates:Muhammad Ali(ADVO-7350-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Asadullah Shaikh(ADVO-13708-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Shuja Uddin(ADVO-11034-SBC-KHI),Waqas Shaikh(ADVO-13766-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.525-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Ghulam Murtaza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4007) 30/2013 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs. (Applicant) V/S Tafzeel Ahmed Shah. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 159
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
4008) 1602/2012 Suit Adnan Abid (Plaintiff) V/S Munaf Attara & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Munawar Malik(ADVO-1783-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Rehman Ghous(ADVO-14269-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Anwar Tariq(ADVO-365-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
4009) 4745/2024 Const. P. Tufail Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Supreme Court's judgment, being in rem, applies to all and can be referenced even if the petitioner was not directly involved in the case. However, the Sindh government incorrectly repatriated the petitioner to a non-existent organization at the relevant time. They should have sent him to the Establishment Division as per the Supreme Court's order. But at the same time, we are cognizant of the fact that a non-civil servant does not fall under the category of individuals covered by Section 11-A of the Civil Servants Act, 1973. This section specifically applies to civil servants who are rendered surplus due to the reorganization or abolition of a division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, are not subject to the provisions of the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the employing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section 11-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not apply to non-civil servants.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 135
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
4010) 4385/2014 Const. P. M/s HASCOL Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 05-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
4011) 3906/2012 Const. P. Pakistan Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Association (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 628
Advocates:Barrister Rashid Mureed(ADVO-17151-SBC-KHC),Sajeel Shehriyar(ADVO-29442-PBC-LHR),Syed Mohammad Iqbal(ADVO-3496-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Shoukat Ali()
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 03-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
4012) 63/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Iqbal Naseem (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Shaheed quota
Citation:2023 PLC CS 700
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4013) 1137/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Creative Electronics (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Limitation provided under Section 179 of the Customs Act, 1969, for passing an Order in Original is mandatory.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 511
Advocates:Kashif Nazeer(ADVO-11582-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 07-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4014) 161/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. KIFAYATULLAH S/O KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Mitigating Citrcumstances )
Tag Line:The motive is always a double-edged weapon. No doubt, the previous enmity can be a reason for the appellant to commit the alleged crime, but it can equally be a reason for the complainant side to falsely implicate the appellant in the case of a previous grudge.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 773
Advocates:Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
4015) 3993/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Ibrahim Abro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article 207 and 260)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1111
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 25-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4016) 5496/2019 Const. P. Hassan Jan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
4017) 33/2005 H.C.A Najibul Haq & Ors (Appellant) V/S M/s. Works Coop. Housing Society and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(i). Discussion on Articles 91, 120, 142 of Limitation Act. (ii). In a case where one denies to be a party to the transaction, he can simply ask for a declaration that the document shall not be deemed to be operative as against his rights and the Court need not give any relief of cancellation thereof.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1305, 2025 CLC 1472
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.361-K/2025 Mufti Muhammad Rafi Usmani & others v. M/s Works Cooperative Housing Society Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4018) 2113/2019 Const. P. Mst. Maryam Nizamani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 844
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
4019) 984/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Masood and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
4020) 3525/2016 Const. P. Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) V/S E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Manzoor Arain(ADVO-7893-SBC-KHI),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.431/2018 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4021) 17/2017 I. A Mst. Shaneela Raza & another (Appellant) V/S Allied Bank Limited & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1146
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 08-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
4022) 48/2011 I. A M/s. Sadia Industries & 3 others (Appellant) V/S Soneri Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 08-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
4023) 150/2025 I. A Habib Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Syed Mansoor Ahmed and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3247
Advocates:Muhammad Nazir Tanoli(ADVO-5564-SBC-KHI),Manzoor Ahmad Rajput(ADVO-4689-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-25
Approved for Reporting
4024) 7/2016 J.M Muhammad Iqbal Pirani. (Applicant) V/S Khurram Ashraf & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) C.P.C Allowed. )
Tag Line:Framing of Issues not mandatory. In exceptional cases while deciding 12(2) application, main case may also be decided.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
4025) 40/2025 Cr.Bail imran Shaikh (Applicant) V/S The State & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1817
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1266/2025 NAB thr. Its Chairman v. Imran Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4026) 332/2011 Cr.Appeal Wahid Bux @ Bhutto (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
4027) 4116/2014 Const. P. Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PTD 603
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 06-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
4028) 4250/2012 Const. P. Jameela (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1454-K/2018 Mst. Jameela v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4029) 4233/2024 Const. P. Abdul Monem (Petitioner) V/S Vice Chief of the Air Staff and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953. Section 20 a valid Provision. Due Process not followed Dismissal Order set-aside. Principles of Policy in the Constitution, 1973.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2791
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Umar Farooq(ADVO-18521-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
4030) 70/2013 Criminal Appeal Abu Bakar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 19-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.284/2020 Abu Bakar @ Babar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
4031) 97/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous SYED USMAN HABIB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2589
Advocates:Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
4032) 1162/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD FAROOQ S/O SHOUKAT ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 512
Advocates:Faheem Ahmed Siddiqui(ADVO-17273-SBC-KHI),Amrat(ADVO-14480-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
4033) 169/2020 Cr.Bail ABDUL GHANI S/O WASAYO (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2113
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
4034) 1573/2012 Const. P. Irfan Marchant (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 CLC 853, 2013 SBLR Sindh 1045
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 11-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.76-K/2013 Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority v. Irfan Marchant and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Adjourned
4035) 3239/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Muneer (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
4036) 1259/2016 Cr.Bail SHAIKH NOOR MUHAMMAD S/O SHAIKH JAMAL KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
4037) 750/2014 Suit Muhammad Rafiq. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. ARD Assciates & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 YLR 657
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
4038) 493/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Abdul Sattar & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 512
Advocates:Kashif Nazeer(ADVO-11582-SBC-KHI),Dr. Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-9924-SBC-KHI),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 10-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
4039) 882/2013 Suit SHAFAT HYDRI & ANOTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S NAILA HYDRI & ANOTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 942
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
4040) 384/2016 Const. P. Qazi Nazimuddin & others (Petitioner) V/S The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.288-K/2019 Qazi Nasimuddin v. Syed Sabit Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4041) 1449/2019 Const. P. Mst, Nadia (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
4042) 1344/2024 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Awan (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Coming to the main case, the concept of Proforma Promotion is to remedy the loss sustained by an employee / civil servant on account of denial of promotion upon his/her legitimate turn due to any reason but not a fault of his own.
15. To appreciate the controversy from a proper perspective, we think it appropriate to have a glance at Rule 7-A of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 385
Advocates:Akhtar Hakeem Kalwar(ADVO-17028-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
4043) 182/2018 I.T.R.A M/S KARACHI PORT TRUST (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income-tax, Alternate Dispute Resolution
Tag Line:Cases of State Owned Enterprise; mandatorily to be referred to ADR;
amendment in Section 134A is procedural and is applicable on cases pending in High Court
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2022
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI),Barkat Ali(ADVO-15305-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 11-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
4044) 1111/2018 Const. P. Nafeesa Begum (Petitioner) V/S State Life Insurance Corporation & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (section 12)
Tag Line:The expression subject to agreement is occasionally used in the
correspondence exchanged between the parties during contract
negotiations. These words denote that the document is not an offer or
acceptance and negotiations are still going on. The expression, which
may be found similar and closer to the term subject to agreement, is
without prejudice, which may not be a synonym but much closer to
the essence of expression subject to agreement/contract.
Citation:2021 CLC 98
Advocates:Muhammad Siddiq Mirza(ADVO-2407-SBC-KHI),Manzar Bashir(ADVO-13572-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
4045) 1440/2009 Suit Mst.Shabana Yasmeen (Applicant) V/S Prov.of Sindh (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:For the purpose of existence or absence of a prima facie case in relation to exercise under
Order XXXIX rules 1 & 2, facts canvassed by both sides have to be examined and it is on
preponderance of facts as based on documentary material and averments in the way of affidavits
that concept of arguable case has to be determined. In addition, while deciding application under
Order XXXIX rules 1&2 CPC, Court is required to travel beyond four corners of plaint to
determine, though tentatively, as to on what facts, finding is to be based. Thus spectrum of Order
XXXIX rules 1 & 2 CPC is broader and more comprehensive
Citation:2013 CLC 164
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
4046) 22/2020 M.A. M/s. AJ & Enterprises & others (Appellant) V/S Anti-Dumping Appellate Tribunal & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Dumping Act, 2015 (Jurisdiction )
Tag Line:Here the situation is different as the Tribunal is constituted at Islamabad. Admittedly the appeals preferred by the appellants at Islamabad Tribunal and all parties contested their case at Rawalpindi Bench in FAO, against the said order four appeals are filed at Islamabad High Court, hence I agree with the same referred observation and hold the present appeal (s) to be
incompetent. Accordingly, captioned appeals are dismissed on the point of jurisdiction
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 990
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4047) 740/2011 Const. P. OFSPACE Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 05-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
4048) 5828/2020 Const. P. Shiraz Mazhar (Petitioner) V/S D.H.A and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Article 199 of the Constitution allows this Court intervention only when: All other legal remedies have been exhausted, or, no alternative legal remedies exist. To invoke the jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioner must demonstrate a vested/legal right or interest that has been violated, which the petitioners failed to demonstrate by producing cogent material on record, merely saying that reclassifying Plot No. 12-B for commercial use is not sufficient until and unless it is proved in evidence that it is illegal as the Board of DHA has no power and authority to do so under the relevant regulations, which involve zoning approvals and environmental impact assessments, depending on the proposed commercial use. Besides it is yet to be determined that Plot No. 12-B, a corner plot on Commercial Avenue, was always shown as an open plot for residential purposes, however, respondents had shown the plot's purpose as a "Sewerage Pump" station on older maps and now relocated it somewhere else. These all facts require evidence and this court at this stage cannot give concrete findings on the subject issue.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 222
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
4049) 527/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director Customs Valuation (Applicant) V/S M/s Usman Traders (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1415
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4050) 63/2020 Cr.Rev MUHAMMAD NOMAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Restoration of vehicle on supardari )
Tag Line:The applicant is lawful owner of the subject Car. It is no more required by the police for further investigation. No useful purpose would be served, if the applicant is denied custody of the Car on superdari pending disposal of the case.
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 119
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
4051) 517/2019 Const. P. Abid Hussain & another (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 299
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 10-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.103/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Abid Hussain Yousafzai and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4052) 1431/2013 Cr.Bail MIRCHOOMAL KHATRI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 23-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
4053) 1257/2017 Const. P. Abdul Qadeer Khan Durrani (Petitioner) V/S State Bank of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLD 1228, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1230
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.481-K/2019 Abdul Qadeer Khan Durrani v. State Bank of Pakistan and others,C.A.16-K/2021 Abdul Qadeer Khan Durrani v. State Bank of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
4054) 1802/2011 Const. P. Allah Dino & Others (Petitioner) V/S Ali Muhammad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
4055) 17/2003 Civil Revision Mst.Aisha Kazi and others (Applicant) V/S Anwar Ahmed (died),through his L.Rs. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:The registration of a document does not help in proving the contents of the document. This burden is to be discharged separately under the Evidence Act, 1872 and/or the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Mere alleged registration does not prove the contents of the instrument. The quantum of evidence to establish a testamentary paper must always depend upon the circumstances of each case. Burden to prove execution lies on those propounding a Will to affirm positively execution of the Will. Opposite side should not be burdened with onus to prove that Will had not been executed or that it was a forged one.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
4056) 749/2005 Suit DR. NAFEES ZUBAIR (Plaintiff) V/S MRS. SAEEDA BANO & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877)
Tag Line:Since the Defendant No.1 has accepted a substantial amount of rupees six million as part payment towards sale price, and never returned the same till the above Order was passed, which means for almost seven years the same was beneficially utilized by her, therefore, Defendant No.2 (Purchaser) despite the afore discussed lacuna in her claim for damages, is entitled for monetary relief, in view of the judicial consensus, that by invoking Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, where the circumstances so permit, monetary compensation can be given, while refusing the specific performance to plaintiff
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 248
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
4057) 5158/2014 Const. P. Zeeshan Mustafa Lashari and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Re-investigation of Case (Challan submitted ,Cognizance taken . Inspector General Ordered Re Investigation .Order Sat aside of Re Investigation .Petition is allowed.)
Citation:2015 SBLR Sindh 553
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
4058) 161/2021 Const. P. Abdul Karim Khan and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 474
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Arbab Imtiaz Khan(ADVO-19984-SBC-KHE),Atta Muhammad(ADVO-10961-SBC-KHI),Abdul Ghaffar Khan Niazi(ADVO-4671-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
4059) 2565/2024 Const. P. Tipu Sultan Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1915
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Khan(ADVO-8525-SBC-KHI),S. M. Intikhab Alam(ADVO-8236-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Qamar Iqbal(ADVO-9999-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 22-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
4060) 3117/2011 Const. P. Syed Naseer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The State (NAB) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (bail granted in NAB case)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 23-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
4061) 1847/2023 Cr.Bail KHAIR MUHAMMAD S/O GHURAM KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 201
Advocates:Shah Nawaz Dahri(ADVO-12504-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 05-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
4062) 846/2010 Suit MRS.PARVEEN AKHTAR (Plaintiff) V/S LUCKNOW C.H.S.& ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C
Tag Line:Co-operative Societies Act (VII of 1925)---
----Ss. 54 & 70---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII, R. 11 & S. 9---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42---Suit for declaration---Rejection of plaint---Notice---Requirement---Cancellation of allotment---Scope---Contention of defendant was that plaintiffs were bound to send notice to the Registrar before filing suit against the society--- Validity--- Plaintiffs were members of society and byelaws of the society were binding on them---Allotment of plots was cancelled on the basis of scrutiny of file by the society---Plaintiffs were at issue with the society and dispute was of civil nature with regard to business of society---Society had allotted plots to the plaintiffs and had cancelled the same by acting on its byelaws---If allotment of plots to its members was the business of society then cancellation of said allotment on scrutiny of files of its members on findings that allotments were in violation of byelaws or any other relevant rules and regulation was also business of society---Dispute should be referred to the Registrar for its resolution being a mandatory requirement of S. 54 of Co-operative Societies Act, 1925---Registrar of Society was empowered to decide even complicated question of law and facts---Plaintiffs should have taken their dispute with the society to the Registrar and if they were not willing to avail arbitration for redressal of their grievance then they were bound to send notice to Registrar before filing suit against the Society---Plaintiffs had not sent any notice to the Registrar, Co-operative Societies that they were aggrieved by action of the society and they proposed to take the Society to the court---Ss. 54 & 70 of Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 had provided first a statutory remedy of arbitration to the aggrieved party and then to avail jurisdiction of civil court to try such dispute of civil nature---Courts were not supposed to assume the jurisdiction of competent forum available within the statute governing the issues and relations between the parties---Civil court could not try and adjudicate the dispute with regard to business of a society---Civil court could not usurp the power of statutory forum to take cognizance of such dispute of civil nature in presence of such statutory forum---Plaint was rejected in circumstances.
Citation:2014 YLR 1539
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 13-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
4063) 1063/2016 Suit Abdul Rauf & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Amin Lakhani & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
4064) 4/2017 Cr.Acq.A. Kamran (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Imran & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 888
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 04-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
4065) 4978/2021 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Challenging Recruitment Process
Tag Line:It is pertinent to mention that petitioner is working in BPS-19 and his promotion will be due after one year hence at this juncture questioning direct appointment on BPS-20 cannot be termed justified and legal; hence instant petition is dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 708
Advocates:M.S. Bukhari(ADVO-17093-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4066) 34/2004 M.A. Jatco Kaburshiki Kaisha (Applicant) V/S The Registrar of Trade Marks (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Justice Muhammad Tasnim
Order Date: 04-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
4067) 1233/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The D. G. Customs Valuation, Karachi & another (Applicant) V/S M/s. Shamim Tin Merchant, Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Custom Appellate Tribunals function and powers under Section 194C of the Customs Act, 1969.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 978
Advocates:Muhammad Afzal Awan(ADVO-14801-SBC-KHI),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS),Zafar Hussain(ADVO-15545-SBC-KHE),Faheem Raza(ADVO-3408-IBC-ISD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 28-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
4068) 90/2015 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. UZMAEE S/O MUHAMMAD SALEEM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
4069) 2636/2009 Const. P. P.N.S.C. (Petitioner) V/S FEd of Pakistan & Orsd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Supreme Court in Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited vs. President of Pakistan (2020 SCMR 242) followed its precedent set in Peshawar Electric Supply Company Ltd. v. Wafaqi Mohtasib, supra. Quoting the PESCO case, the Court reiterated that the Wafaqi Mohtasib lacks jurisdiction under Article 9 of The Order, 1983, to entertain complaints regarding appointments or recommend appointments by relaxing age limits in public sector companies, as these are executive functions. Consequently, the Supreme Court in the Sui Northern case held that the Wafaqi Mohtasib did not have jurisdiction to hear Respondent No.3's case against the Petitioner Company, and the Lahore High Court erred in dismissing the Writ Petition.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1054
Advocates:Choudhry Rashid Ahmed(ADVO-2453-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Latif(ADVO-3023-SBC-KHI),Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4070) 41/2019 I. A Allied Bank LImited (Appellant) V/S M/s SAS Constructions (Pvt) Ltd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XXI Rule 64/66)
Tag Line:*To upset the confirmed
auction in respect of properties is not tenable under the law as one
should not be allowed to take advantage of a re-thought process in a
confirmed auction
**The purpose of summary proceedings does not exclude expeditious trial
and such summary process could not be restricted to a decision on the
basis of affidavit alone filed in respect of the applications.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1087
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 16-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
4071) 32/2025 Cr.Bail Inayatullah Cahnna (Applicant) V/S NAB though Chairman NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1813
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
4072) 2320/2016 Suit Syed Feroze Ali. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Aurora Broadcasting Service (Pvt) Ltd., & Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 351
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
4073) 1/2018 Election Appeal Ghulam Muhammad (Appellant) V/S Election Commission Of Pakistan and Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2019 CLC 1173
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
4074) 6383/2017 Const. P. Imtiaz Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 115
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
4075) 30/2024 E.P MUHAMMAD ALAMGIR KHAN (Petitioner) V/S ECP AND OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Failure to join a contesting candidate ??? effect. Non-compliance of section 68 Election ??? effect.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 444
Advocates:Mian Shahbaz Ali(ADVO-18355-SBC-MLR),Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Naeem(ADVO-16115-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Asif Malik(ADVO-8425-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
4076) 148/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Aisha Steel Mill Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 626
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
4077) 458/2012 Cr.Bail Abdul Aziz Khoso (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 13-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
4078) 3/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. GHULAM RASOOL RABBANI S/O MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 557
Advocates:Mansoor Khan(ADVO-11327-SBC-KHI),Shahid Hussain Soomro(ADVO-15163-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
4079) 407/2012 Const. P. Mr. Ghulam Akbar Allana (Petitioner) V/S National Bank of Pakistan & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Proforma Promotion)
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 109
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
4080) 7070/2015 Const. P. Ali Sher (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 26-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.116-K/2017 Ali Sher v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
4081) 1306/2012 Const. P. MCB Bank ltd V/S Abdul Waheed Abro & ors (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Waheed Abro & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shaukat Ali Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
4082) 100/2019 Cr.J.A Ghulam Rasool Ogahi & Another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 276
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.652/2023 Ghulam Rasool S/o Allah Warayo Oghai and another v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4083) 633/2021 Const. P. S. M. Kamal Shamim S/o Syed Shamim Alam (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Rubab and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1212
Advocates:Abdul Karim Khan Faheem(ADVO-3829-SBC-KHI),Javed Haleem(ADVO-9588-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
4084) 1464/2021 Cr.Bail BILAL S/O SHAH JAHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed with direction to the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the subject case within three (03) months strictly in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 3
Advocates:Irshad Ali(ADVO-10971-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
4085) 1127/2016 Const. P. Sajid Ali and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 480
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
4086) 1639/2016 Const. P. Shafique Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.M.A.2348/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.3787/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered and also notice be issued,Disposed Disposed of
4087) 546/2005 Const. P. Executive Association H.B.L. (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan And Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 17-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
4088) 310/2020 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD IQBAL S/O MUHAMMAD AMIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 675
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Muhammad Hanif Noonari(ADVO-16967-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
4089) 212/2021 Cr.Bail Ghulam Nabi @ Shuti Bhayo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 739
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
4090) 2410/2021 Const. P. Abdul Basit (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (it appears that the policy of the respondent is uniform and without any discrimination .CP dismissed.)
Tag Line:promotion issue
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 753
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 21-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
4091) 2132/2017 Suit Karachi Customs Agents Association. (Plaintiff) V/S Provisional Assistant Registrar & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 76
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 22-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
4092) 1630/1998 Suit.B Northern Polythene Limited (NPL (Plaintiff) V/S National Bank of Pakistan and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 27-FEB-12
Approved for Reporting
4093) 3441/2012 Const. P. Mohammad Ikram (Applicant) V/S Principal & Chairman, Admission Committee, G.M.M.M College Sukkur & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
4094) 436/2018 Cr.Bail Mumtaz Solangi & Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 10-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
4095) 197/2019 Criminal Appeal Ameer & Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 384
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.199/2022 Ameer Ali & 2 others v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4096) 226/2023 II.A. Abdul Razzaq S/o Muhammad Abdullah (Appellant) V/S Sohail Ahmed and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: II Appeal
Tag Line:Specific Performance; discretionary relief; not always mandatory for the court to grant the same
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1041
Advocates:Iftikhar Jawed Qazi(ADVO-2356-SBC-KHE),Shoukat Ali Rajput(ADVO-6678-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
4097) 113/2015 Cr.Misc. Suleman Lalani S/o Shamsuddin (Applicant) V/S The State & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---
----S. 561-A---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 503 & 506---Quashing of proceedings, application for---Criminal intimidation---Respondent/ complainant, who was Executive Director of a Sugar Mill, lodged complaint that applicant, who was also one of the Directors of same Mill, and also Chief Executive of another company, in the meeting of Board of Directors of the Mill, had threatened the respondent to kill him and his family---After investigation and recording statements under S. 161, Cr.P.C., of the participants of the meetings of the Board of Directors, prosecution had submitted charge sheet against the applicant in the court of Magistrate, showing the name of applicant in column No.2 as absconder---Applicant had filed application under S.561-A, Cr.P.C., for quashing the proceedings, against him---Facts which had negated the claim of the complainant that he and his family were under threat of the death by the applicant were; that the conduct of applicant/accused did not show that at any point of time he had the will or wish to take the law in his hands; that alleged incident took place within 15 minutes of the start of the meeting of the Board of Directors, and meeting did not end in fiasco---Requirements of the S.503, P.P.C., therefore, were missing in the case---Complainant did exactly what he wanted to do, and did nothing which he was not legally supposed to do; that minutes of the meeting were silent about any untoward incident during the meeting---Contents of FIR and the statements under S. 161, Cr.P.C., of the prosecution witnesses stood contradicted by the record of the minutes of the meeting, during which alleged threats were issued by applicant/accused; that very fact that applicant, after the meeting, instead of committing any threatened criminal offence, preferred to file a civil suit, which had further confirmed that applicant had no will or wish and intention of causing any injury or harm to the complainant and his family; that there was a delay of eight days in lodging FIR; that no record of any attempt to arrest applicant/accused had been disclosed by the prosecution; that applicant/accused having not used any weapon in the course of alleged intimidation, there was no justification to register case under S. 506, P.P.C.; that Judicial Magistrate, also acted mechanically by accepting the challan, and did not exercise his authority in terms of S. 173, Cr.P.C.---Contents of FIR and statements of the prosecution witnesses recorded under S.506, P.P.C., were not enough to constitute a cognizable offence; that Magistrate, not only failed to exercise his jurisdiction with conscious mind under S.173, Cr.P.C., but also started proceedings in an unprecedented haste---Cognizable offence under S.506, P.P.C., was not made out for trial---Trial of a case on the facts of FIR lodged by respondent/complainant, was waste of precious time of court, besides uncalled for harassment to the applicant---Magistrate, did not apply his judicial mind to the provisions of S.173, Cr.P.C., in accepting the challan of case, which on the face of it was lacking in the material to support the prosecution story---Applicant was justified in approaching High Court---Since no cognizable offence had been made out against the applicant, prosecution of the case before Judicial Magistrate, arising out of FIR, was sheer abuse of process of the court---FIR and proceedings of the case, stood quashed in circumstances.
Citation:2016 PCr.LJ 114
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 02-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting
4098) 23/2001 I. A Rano son of Loung (Appellant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer & SDM Kotri (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.628-K/2017 Military Estate Officer, Hyderabad and another v. Rano and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4099) 48/2013 J.M M/s.Pearl Fabrics Corporation & others (Applicant) V/S M/s.KASB Bank Ltd., & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12(2))
Tag Line:(a) Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)---
----S. 19(1), 19(2), 4 & 9---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 12(2) & O.XXIII, Order XXI---Interpretation of S. 19 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Execution of decree---Power of Banking Court---Applicability of provisions of C.P.C. to execution of decrees under the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Scope---Execution of decree and sale of mortgaged property---Judgment-debtor sought setting aside of order of Banking Court whereby application for execution of decree was allowed to be withdrawn and permission for filing a fresh application was given to the decree holder bank---Contention of judgment-debtor was inter alia that impugned order violated O.XXIII, Rule 4, C.P.C.---Held, that the Banking Court derived its power for execution of its decree from S. 19(1) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 and not from S. 19(2) of the Ordinance---Reference to provisions of the C.P.C. in said S. 19(2) of the Ordinance was for the purpose of adopting a "procedure" for execution of the Banking Court's decree---Procedure to be followed by a court and exercise of its authority were two different things---Powers conferred on an ordinary court under the C.P.C. were alien to the powers conferred on the Banking Court---Authority/power of Banking Court was not subservient to powers conferred on a Civil Court under provisions of the C.P.C.---Banking Courts, as a practice, allowed the plaintiff Financial Institution to file a formal execution application in terms of O.XXI, Rule 11 of the C.P.C. for sake convenience for satisfaction of decree passed by the Banking Court and merely accepting such an application under any provision of the C.P.C. did not mean that such proceedings were converted into execution of a decree in an ordinary suit and did not therefore entail that power conferred on Banking court under the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 stood compromised or nullified---Subsections (1) and (2) of S. 19 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 were to be read together---Any embargo in terms of O.XXIII, Rule 4, C.P.C. regarding applicability of provisions of O. XXIII, C.P.C. in the execution proceedings had no bearing on power of Banking Court in execution of a decree---Irrespective of fact that certain provisions of C.P.C. were mentioned in execution application of decree-holder Bank, Banking Court under S.19(1) of the Ordinance had power to allow decree-holder to withdraw earlier application and file a fresh one---Power of Banking Court in terms of S.19(1) of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 was protected by section 4 of the Ordinance whereby provisions of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 had an overriding effect on provisions of C.P.C.---Application under S.12(2), C.P.C. was dismissed, in circumstances.
(b) Interpretation of Statutes---
----All provisions of a statute were to be read together and any particular provision of a statute was not to be considered in isolation unless and until there was a clear-cut conflict, which was irreconcilable.
Citation:2015 CLD 243
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 22-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
4100) 5818/2014 Const. P. Abdul Nasir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 452
Advocates:Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-13627-SBC-KHI),Zaheeruddin Mujahid(ADVO-4421-SBC-KHI),Waqarullah(ADVO-11388-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.298-K/2015 Noor Jahan Mangi v. National Accountability Bureau,Crl.A.14-K/2025 Abdul Nasir v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Disposed of
4101) 358/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Allmed Laboratories, Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:No Reassessment under Section 80(3) of the Customs Act, when goods are out of charge and released
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 249
Advocates:Saad Fayaz(ADVO-15882-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Azam Khan(ADVO-7754-SBC-KHI),Ayaz Ali(ADVO-21000-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Rizwan Saeed(ADVO-13041-SBC-KHI),Raja Muhammad Arsalan(ADVO-16013-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 18-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
4102) 133/2019 Cr.Misc. Aijaz Ali (Applicant) V/S Deputy Inspector General of Police Shaheed Benazirabad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
4103) 603/2020 Cr.Bail Rasool Bux and others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1290
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
4104) 6233/2021 Const. P. Mst. Ammara Khalid (Petitioner) V/S Ministry of Interior & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 505
Advocates:Zulfiqar Ali Qureshi(ADVO-16008-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
4105) 1408/2021 Cr.Bail UMER ZAIB S/O CHAN ZAIB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1265
Advocates:Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-13627-SBC-KHI),Kashif Ahmed Khan(ADVO-14626-SBC-KHE),Shamshad Ali(ADVO-105-SBC-BDN),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
4106) 238/2012 Cr.Rev Shoukat Ali (Applicant) V/S Asad Khan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal
Tag Line:Appellant Asad Khan dissatisfied with the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi whereby the appellant Asad Khan was convicted for committing Qatl-e-Amd of his wife Mst. Aneela an offence under section 302 PPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.50,000/- Complainant stating therein that about two years back, his daughter Aneela married with Asad . Since the beginning of the marriage, the attitude of in-laws of his daughter was not good Aneela informed him on the telephone that she is coming to him at Qasim Town but till 08:30 P.M, she did not come at Qasim Town and her father made a telephonic call to her maternal Aunt Mst. Bano wife of Muneer Ahmed, who is residing in the neighbor of Aneela and informed her about the arrival of Aneela at Qasim Town .Complainant came to know that his daughter Aneela has been killed by causing her knife and dagger injuries at her house. the strong circumstantial evidence is available to connect the appellant with the commission of offence; that the appellant has admitted his guilt before the Cameraman, which was recorded in CD/USB flashed on TV. e. The admission of the appellant came in media and newspaper. In cross examination, he has denied the suggestion that he has given the name of the appellant on the instance of Mohalla people. In order to support his contention, the prosecution examined Mst. Aqeela Bano, who has also supported the version of the complainant and further deposed that she went to the house of Anila but was locked. All the circumstances, consisting on unnatural death of deceased inside the house with dagger; finding the house locked from outside as well leaving away the house are also making a chain of circumstances against the appellant and in such like eventuality the defence was required to prove otherwise. instant appeal filed by the appellant merits no consideration, which is dismissed .
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
4107) 36/2016 I. A M/s. House Building Finance Co. Ltd. (Appellant) V/S The Judge Banking Court No. IV Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1940
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4108) 181/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD RASHID S/O ASHIQ ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1958
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
4109) 143/2013 Const. P. Syed Abbas Raza (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4960/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Syed Abbas Raza & others,C.A.506/2020 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Syed Abbas Raza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Allowed
4110) 2717/2018 Const. P. Rizwana Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The 2011 letter granted certain benefits. It is the Competent Authority's responsibility to determine if these benefits apply to the petitioners, based on the FST decision. This Court cannot intervene, as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Hameed Akhtar Niazi (1996 SCMR 1185). This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy.
9. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 978
Advocates:Muhammad Mushaffy Ahmed(ADVO-4912-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Deputy Attorney General(),Shan Ur Rehman(ADVO-18564-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.544/2025 Rizwana Akhter and another v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of Finance (Finance Division), Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
4111) 5496/2020 Const. P. Imkaan Welfare Organization (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Order passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P. No.D-5496/2020 for the implementation of Sections 9 and 10 of the Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018 with regard to Juvenile Justice Committee.
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 245
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 02-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
4112) 39/2009 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Gul Muneer (Appellant) V/S the State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 06-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
4113) 44/2022 II.A. Riaz-ul-Din @ Rajab Ali. (Appellant) V/S P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 494
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1017-K/2023 Riaz-ul-Deen Rajab v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
4114) 1738/2008 Suit SYED HUSSAIN ALI (Plaintiff) V/S SYED AKHTAR ALI & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1196
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
4115) 712/2022 Const. P. Leela Kalpna Devi (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Minority Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Hindu Panchayat Election)
Tag Line:Hindu Panchayat, is not a 'person' in terms of Article 199(5), therefore no writ of Certiorari or Mandamus can be issued against its office holders, in terms of Article 199(1) (a) supra. Hindu Panchayat, has no status of a public body; therefore, Hindu Panchayat is not a person exercising functions in connection with the affairs of Federation / Province and Local Authority in terms of Article 199(1)(a)(i) and (ii) of the Constitution.
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 60
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 02-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
4116) 2674/2024 Const. P. Abdul Aleem Uqaili and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the SPSC conducted the interviews and assessed the
suitability of the candidates, which were adjudged accordingly and
petitioners were not disclosed as successful. We cannot make further petitioners were not disclosed as successful. We cannot make further
probe in this regard since earlier petition was disposed with certain
directions, which directions were complied with by virtue of press
release. However, as far as the present failures, in the shape of
petitioners are concerned, this Bench cannot be a substitute of SPSC, to
assume the role of interviewing panel and adjudge the suitability for the
appointment of these candidates who were adjudged accordingly and
not recommended.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 923
Advocates:Abdul Karim(ADVO-14560-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 21-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
4117) 5016/2021 Const. P. Sohail Memon and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 616
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.569-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others v. Sohail Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned
4118) 3/2013 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD NAWAZ BHUTTO (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 31-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
4119) 1585/2019 Cr.Bail ASIF S/O BASHIR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 19-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
4120) 6/2022 Criminal Appeal Razi @ Riaz Jaffery (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 2503
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date: 25-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
4121) 52/2024 E.P ZAIN PERVEZ (Petitioner) V/S ECP AND OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Interpretation of section 144(2)(a) of the Election Act, 2017. Consequence of defective affidavits by witnesses.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 557
Advocates:Mian Shahbaz Ali(ADVO-18355-SBC-MLR),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Aman Aftab(ADVO-18333-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
4122) 3376/2012 Const. P. Syed Sharafat Hussain & Ors. V/S Chief Secretary (Petitioner) V/S Chief Secretary Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1350
Advocates:In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
4123) 16/2020 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. MUHAMMAD WAQAS QURESHI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 467
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Muhammad Hanif Noonari(ADVO-16967-SBC-KHS),Mumtaz Hussain(ADVO-7691-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
4124) 32/2003 Suit.B BANKERS EQUITY LTD. & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN &ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 06-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
4125) 826/2020 Suit Security Organizing System Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S National Bank of Pakistan & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 973
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 28-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
4126) 78/2025 Const. P. Gulzaib (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Umme Lubaba & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1583
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4127) 1635/2023 Cr.Bail ASIF KHAN @ MOTA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 221
Advocates:Ghulam Muhammad Khan(ADVO-7391-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4128) 637/2020 Cr.Bail Shoukat Ali Memon (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:BAIL BEFORE ARREST
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
4129) 7998/2018 Const. P. Zain ul Abideen and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
4130) 94/2019 Cr.Bail Deedar Ali son of Allah Bux Lakho (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
4131) 6228/2017 Const. P. Arshad Noor Khan (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh through Home Secretary and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 09-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
4132) 52/2006 Const. P. Israrul Haq (Petitioner) V/S Nooruddin (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Abdullah Chandio(ADVO-1763-SBC-KHI),Qaiser Hassan Khan(),Altaf Hussain(ADVO-6690-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
4133) 1731/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD AWAIS S/O SALAHUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:whether, the criminal prosecution in such a circumstances, as required under Section 195 Cr.P.C., could be initiated at the complaint of the said Court and not by the private person---Primarily, the entire case as put forward by the parties, depends upon the documentary evidence, which is available with the prosecution; and it is yet to be determined by the learned trial Court, whether Sections 420, 468, 471 PPC are attracted in the present crime or otherwise, which could only be done, after recording of the evidence; besides that there is a delay of almost two years in lodging the FIR, which is sufficient ground to confirm the pre-arrest bail
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 147
Advocates:S. Hafizuddin(ADVO-2513-SBC-KHI),Syed Qamar Abbas(ADVO-11019-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
4134) 219/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S Khalid Uddin Shah & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 182
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3140/2021 Director, Directorate General, Intelligence & Investigation (Customs), Karachi v. Khalid Uddin Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4135) 284/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. M.M. Flour Mills (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 731
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4136) 519/2014 Suit Ali Ahmed Lund (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Date of Birth )
Tag Line:"Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973---
----R. 12-A---Correction of date of birth in service record---Scope---Contention of plaintiff was that his date of birth was 2-4-1956 instead of 2-4-1954---Validity---Plaintiff passed Central Superior Service examination in the year 1983 and became civil servant in the said year and he had been since then maintaining his date of birth as 2-4-1954---Employee could not rectify his date of birth after insertion of R.12-A in Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973---After 30 years of service it had revealed to the plaintiff that his actual date of birth was 2-4-1956---Once date of birth in the record at the time of joining service was mentioned the same should be final and no alteration was permissible--- Insertion of R.12-A in Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973 was logical and statutory in nature---Suit being not maintainable was dismissed in circumstances---Plaintiff had reached to the age of superannuation and any salary, perks, privileges or any benefits availed subsequent to the age of superannuation should be returned forthwith."
Citation:2016 PLC (CS) 92
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
4137) 2378/2015 Const. P. Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
4138) 1345/2023 Const. P. M/s Sino Sindh Resources (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line: No directions can be issued for Post Importation Inspection of Used Vehicles in violation of the Import Policy
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1161
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Qureshi(ADVO-3530-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Salaman Khan(ADVO-18081-SBC-KHE),Barrister Dr. Huma Sodher(ADVO-8700-SBC-KHC),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Nadeem Taqi(ADVO-5852-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 12-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
4139) 900/2023 Const. P. Jamsher Ali Sial & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Service matters (Bar of Jurisdiction )
Tag Line:Section 4 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 provides for in clear terms that any civil
servant aggrieved by any final order, whether original or appellate, made by a departmental authority in respect of the terms and conditions of his service may, subject to stipulated limitation period, prefer an appeal to the Tribunal having jurisdiction in the matter. It seems that the petitioners have an adequate and efficacious remedy available before the Sindh Service Tribunal, and not before this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution.
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 224
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 28-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.180-K/2024 Irshad Ali Soomro and others v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4140) 24/2011 II.A. Bibi Amirunnisa (Appellant) V/S Syed Ghulam Hyder Shah (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
4141) 572/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Additional Director D.G of Intelligence (Applicant) V/S Bashir Ahmed & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.790-K/2016 Director Directorate General of Intelligence and Invertigation-FBR (Anti-Smuggling Customs) v. Bashir Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4142) 1808/2020 Const. P. Mst Razia Bibi (Petitioner) V/S P.T.C.L & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Pension declined. Benevolent Fund and Group Insurance allowed.
Citation:2025 PLC CS 1204
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Azher Mehmood(ADVO-9556-SBC-KHI),Syed Ansar Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-12809-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4143) 953/2016 Const. P. Abdul Kareem (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 22-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
4144) 664/2008 Suit MRS. SAKINA SULEMAN (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD ARIF JANJUA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 913
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
4145) 69/2017 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Arif & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Repatriation)
Tag Line:Petitioners have impugned the Notification whereby they have been relieved / repatriated to their parent department that is Karachi Development Authority. The reason assigned by the competent authority in the said impugned Notification is that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan passed directives vide order dated 01.08.2016 on CMA No. 243/2016 in C.P No.108-K of 2014 to repatriate the officers/officials absorbed in Malir Development Authority to their parent department .In our view, once the Honble Supreme Court has passed order the terms that any official working on deputation or otherwise absorbed in the MDA shall immediately report back to his parent department this Court has no justification to take contrary view of the same. We are of the view that the only remedy available to the Petitioners is to approach the Honble Apex Court in Review and not this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Consequently ,both the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 61
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.541-K/2017 Syed Muhammad Arif v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.4581/2018 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad v. Jameel Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of
4146) 4064/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Yaseen Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
NADRA
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
4147) 30/2014 Cr.J.A Ghulam Abbas Magsi (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (prosecution has proved in Murder Case. prosecution who were the natural witnesses, and the evidence of witnesses is fully supported.)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 105
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 19-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.192/2022 Ghulam Abbas Magsi v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
4148) 47/2012 Civil Revision Mst.Asifa through LRS (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Hanif & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 21-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
4149) 456/2012 Suit ARABTEC PAKISTAN (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) V/S V/S ENSHAA NLC DEVELOPMENTS (PVT) LTD (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Balal Ahmed Khawaja(ADVO-2138-SBC-KHI),Munir A. Malik(ADVO-1969-SBC-KHI),Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(ADVO-6819-SBC-KHI),M/S. MUNEER A. MALIK & CO(FIRM-197-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 27-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
4150) 7/2015 II.A. Mohammad Rafique Aghani (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Ali Aghani and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Article 79 of Qanoon-e-Shahdadat)
Tag Line:The requirement of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 is that if a document is required by law to be attested, it shall not be used as evidence until two attesting witnesses at least have been called for the purpose of proving its execution, if there be two attesting witnesses alive, and subject to the process of the Court and capable of giving evidence. There is a proviso for a registered document, but that is not relevant for the present purposes
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 346
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 26-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
4151) 45/2015 Cr.J.A Turk Ali Brohi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
4152) 3052/2016 Const. P. Ayaz Ali Thahim (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:suspension
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 654
Advocates:Qadir Hussain(ADVO-6245-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
4153) 1474/2019 Const. P. Altaf Ali Buriro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Remissions to convict-Lifer
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2717
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4796/2025 Mehboob Ali v. Altaf Ali Buriro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned Relist 3 Member bench
4154) 731/2010 Suit MUHAMMAD HAROON (Plaintiff) V/S PROV.OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
4155) 207/2024 Const. P. Ali Akbar (Petitioner) V/S Province of sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Tag Line:The learned counsel(s) for the private respondents and learned A.P.G with one voice state that neither they caused harassment to the petitioner nor they intend to do so in the future. Learned A.P.G further states that protection will be provided to the petitioner in accordance with law.
3. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with the direction that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner and police shall be neutral in private affairs; however, if any cognizable offense is committed police shall be free to take action in accordance with law.
Citation:2024 SHC MPK 1466
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
4156) 157/2018 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD URS S/O NAGAR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.221/2022 Abdul Hameed v. The State,J.P.204/2023 Miroo @ Mir Muhammad v. The State,Crl.A.441/2025 Miroo @ Mir Muhammad v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Partly Allowed,Disposed
4157) 3821/2016 Const. P. KES Stockbrokers Association and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Chairman SECP and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 822
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4158) 257/2025 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali Kariro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. the Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456]. The Supreme Court in paragraphs 146 to 150 has decided the issue in hand no need for further deliberation on our part.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 199
Advocates:Syed Zaeem Hyder Musavi(ADVO-15365-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
4159) 544/2013 Const. P. Ali Zahir Jafri (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2019 PTD 1765
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.638-K/2018 Ali Zahir Jafri v. The Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4160) 240/2010 Const. P. Mujeeb-ur-Rehman and others (Petitioner) V/S Provincial Police Officer and othes (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Service
Tag Line:hus the matter was referred to the Police Recruitment Board to be placed in a meeting before them for a decision within the period prescribed therein and to submit report to this Court. In pursuance of the order dated 27.05.2017 the report was submitted and out of 19, 4 were declared as successful at serial No.1 to 4 in the compliance report available at page 477, relevant page 479. Candidates from serial No.5 to 9 were failed whereas candidates at serial No.10, 11, 12 and 16 were appointed in other department. Some of the candidates refused to receive notices. Three separate statements to the above extent were filed which are taken on record. We do not see any error or impediment in the implementation and compliance of the report of Mr. Bashir Ahmed Memon by the Police Recruitment Board. After passing of so many years, the interview by the Police Recruitment Board was inevitable and it is borne out from the order dated 27.05.2017 for placing the report before the Police Recruitment Board for decision, otherwise the order of their appointment could have been passed then and there by this Bench.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 29-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1182-K/2018 Muneer Ahmed and othes v. Provincial Police Officer Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4161) 45/2007 Cr.J.A Juman Solangi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 20-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
4162) 2/2022 Judicial Companies Misc. DIN FARM PRODUCTS (PVT) LTD (Applicant) V/S Security & Exchange Commissioner of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (reduction of share capital)
Tag Line:Share Reduction Allowed
Citation:2023 CLD 219, 2024 SBLR Sindh 166
Advocates:Waqas Shaikh(ADVO-13766-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
4163) 250/2004 Civil Revision Jameel Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Nazir Ahmed & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Civil Revision ), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration, injunction and cancellation)
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----Ss. 42, 39 & 54---Suit for declaration cancellation of document and injunction---Title of ownership---Proof---Cross claims---Respondent filed suit for declaration and possession of suit property as owner by virtue of allotment order dated 27-3-1962, which allotment matured into registered lease deed dated 18-2-1987 conversely the applicant, sought declaration and cancellation of lease deed dated 18-2-1987--Trial Court as well as Lower Appellate Court concurrently decreed suit filed by respondent and dismissed that filed by applicant---Validity---Applicant in his plaint claimed his entitlement for lease on the ground that he had occupied suit property in year 1961 when it was lying vacant---By occupying property which was lying vacant, one could not acquire any right in such property, particularly when the property belonged to government institution---Such property had to be disposed of in accordance with law---Applicant made first application to Karachi Development Authority in year, 1980, without disclosing that as to under what circumstances he entered into property and despite the fact that he was facing rent case instituted against him by respondent, who held official allotment order of suit property issued by competent authority---Other document such as certificate of Justice of Peace issued in year, 1980, and electricity bills of year 1996, etc. did not confer any title better than allotment issued by competent authority in year, 1962 and subsequent registered lease deed by competent authority---Claim of applicant was frivolous and he was also guilty of abusing process of Court to perpetuate his illegal occupation over suit property for more than 25 years---High Court declined to interfere in concurrent findings of two Courts below---Revision was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2017 YLR 829
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 23-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting
4164) 126/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. ABID KALOO S/O DUR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Appeal (Death Sentenced Converted to life Imprisonment , Evidence in Shape of Medical and Confessional Statement before Judicial Magistrate, )
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 641
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
4165) 2039/2019 Suit Mst. Shaista Bibi & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Brig. (R) Ijaz Naseer Bhatti & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 336
Advocates:Muhammad Haseeb Jamali(ADVO-10211-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
4166) 165/1992 H.C.A Pakistan Buemah Shell Ltd (Appellant) V/S Karachi Port Trust & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 24-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
4167) 1182/2016 Const. P. Habib Bank Limited (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Yameen and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.721-K/2018 Habib Bank Limited v. Muhammad Yameen and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4168) 592/2024 Cr.Bail Imtiaz Hussain @ Imtiaz & Another (Applicant) V/S The State & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 540
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
4169) 404/2023 Const. P. Ali Hassan Bugti & others (Petitioner) V/S P.O SIndh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Appointment of Prison Constables
Citation:2024 PLC CS 396, 2024 SBLR Sindh 257
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4228/2023 Ali Hassan and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4170) 246/2021 Criminal Appeal KHADIM HUSSAIN S/O FAQEER MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 207
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.31-K/2023 Ashique Hussain Shaikh v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4171) 13/2024 Cr.J.A Muhammad usman (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2024 SHC MPK 1488
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
4172) 2272/2012 Const. P. Liquat Ali and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
4173) 2270/2021 Const. P. Latifa (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:C.P No.D-2270 of 2021
C.P No.D-3280 of 2018
C.P No.D-7067 of 2022
C.P No.D-4537 of 2023
C.P No.D-4509 of 2023
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 631
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Usman Farooq(ADVO-16057-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
4174) 450/2014 Const. P. Aqeel Karim Dhedhi (Petitioner) V/S National Accountability Bureau (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 18-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
4175) 986/2018 Cr.Bail Muhammad Nasir & Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Protective Bail Allowed)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
4176) 6604/2020 Const. P. Nasim Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the petitioner is an educationist and has been serving in the Public Education Sector in Sindh since 1987. Per learned counsel the Universities and Boards Department, the Government of Sindh, Karachi invited application for the position of Chairman-Board and petitioner was one of the candidates for the aforesaid post--
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 786
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 13-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
4177) 102/2006 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Mehran Sugar Mills Ltd (Applicant) V/S The Collector Collectorate of Customs Sales (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 564
Advocates:Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-3297-SBC-KHI),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS),Shoukat Ali Qureshi(),Sakhawat Ali(ADVO-52737-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 16-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.819-K/2023 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Mehran Sugar Mills Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4178) 1389/2016 Const. P. Anwar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Repatriation)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1217
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
4179) 5596/2020 Const. P. M/s Zarif Khan Zai and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: Appendix "H" of
Import Policy Order 2016 provides list of Pre-shipment Inspection
Companies which includes M/s SGS whose certificate was provided by
the respondent at the time of import. The Committee, allegedly
constituted for compliance of Import Policy Order 2016, however
considered the manufacturing year of the vehicle as 2006 on the basis of
seatbelt, which perhaps is extraneous consideration; there is no serious
challenge to the pre-shipment report of M/s SGS which is one of the preshipment inspection companies, as structured in Appendix "H" of Import
Policy Order 2016. There has to be material of evidentiary value to form
a different view than the one disclosed in M/s SGS certificate.
Citation:2022 PTD 779
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 06-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
4180) 308/2011 Criminal Miscelleneous Yasmin Gul Khanani and another (Applicant) V/S Tariq Mehmood and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting
4181) 275/2018 Cr.J.A MST. RAZIA (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1690, 2025 SHC HYD 1692, 2025 SHC HYD 1693
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.694/2025 Razia v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4182) 8/2022 Criminal Appeal SYED SHARAFAT ALI ZAIDI (Appellant) V/S DR. PIYAR ALI SOOMRO & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 782
Advocates:Shaikh Riaz Ahmed(ADVO-2414-SBC-KHI),Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-243-SBC-KSH),Syed Abrar Ahmed Bukhari(ADVO-3063-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
4183) 563/2010 Const. P. Hussain Jamal (Applicant) V/S VIIth Addl: District Judge (South) Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters), Sind Rented Premises Act - Eviction---15
Tag Line:Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
---Ss. 16 & 15---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Ejectment of tenant---Tentative rent order, non-compliance of---Effect---Compromise between landlord and tenant before the court---Scope---Ownership of tenement in possession of tenant had not been conferred upon him---Mere taking plea of denial of tenancy was not enough to take away the jurisdiction of Rent Controller to pass tentative rent order---Tenant would continue to be tenant unless he established his ownership rights conferring title on him---Rent Controller had passed order for payment of arrears of rent and future rent that same would be subject to withdrawal after final judgment/order and interest of tenant had been secured---Tenant had willfully disobeyed the tentative rent order---Tenant knowing the penal consequences of non-compliance of tentative rent order should have deposited the rent in the court instead of putting his claim of ownership at risk and physical possession from the tenement---Compromise before Rent Controller could not be termed as absolute transfer of ownership right in favour of tenant nor terms of compromise could be enforced against landlord in a fresh round of litigation before Rent Controller---Compromise was not enforceable through Rent Controller and same could not be defence to deny payment of rent to the owner---Tenant should have file a suit for specific performance of contract/ compromise to enforce terms of the same---Compromise between the parties before the court was not more than a mere contract and a breach of the same would give rise to fresh cause of action and fresh suit could be filed by an aggrieved person for redressal of his grievance---Tenant could not be allowed to enjoy the tenement as an absolute owner pending the case on the grounds that landlord had promised to transfer the title in his favour---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2014 YLR 2012
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 30-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
4184) 97/2012 II.A. Taha Mubeen Qureshi (Appellant) V/S Karim Housing (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1268
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.83-K/2012 Mst. Ishrat Zaidi v. Sabir Hussain Siddiqui and others,C.P.330-K/2012 Mst. Ishrat Zaidi v. Sabir Hussain Siddiqui and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Leave Granted
4185) 594/2024 Const. P. M/s Tec Style Emporium (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Auction Purchaser; issuance of delivery order; No Right; can be cancelled under Rule 75 of the Customs Rules 2001 when Importer had already filed GD and had paid the duties and taxes
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 819
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Agha Shahid Majeed Khan(ADVO-19361-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Zakir(ADVO-20071-SBC-KHC),Sakhawat Ali(ADVO-52737-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 07-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
4186) 418/2016 Const. P. M Parvaiz Hayat (Petitioner) V/S VII ADJ (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979
Tag Line:In case the two tenements of same nature are allowed to be
evicted under section 14 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 it
would be in defiance of a restriction in terms of subsection 2 of Section
14 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 that he (landlord) is not in
occupation of a building (or independent portion) owned by him in any
locality. Once he (landlord) got possession of an independent portion of
the building or a premises then he automatically ceased to be entitled
under the said provision for a second shop. He may avail benefit under
other provisions of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 for eviction
of tenant but at least for the purposes of Section 14 Sindh Rented
Premises Ordinance, 1979 his remedy ceases when one portion of the
building or an independent premises got vacated.
Advocates:Iftikhar Jawed Qazi(ADVO-2356-SBC-KHE),In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
4187) 107/2013 Cr.J.A Ali Nawaz and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 YLR 1843
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
4188) 1198/2021 Cr.Bail ABRAR AHMED SIDDIQUI S/O MUKHTAR AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the above, the applicant / accused Abrar Ahmed Siddiqi has made out a case for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him vide order dated 23.06.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. It is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative in nature which shall not prejudice the case of either party nor shall they influence the learned trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits in accordance with law.
This bail application is allowed in the above terms.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 236
Advocates:Jahanzeb Balouch(ADVO-18867-SBC-KHS),Waqas Ali(ADVO-18259-SBC-KHS),Irfan Aziz(ADVO-6448-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4189) 1857/2016 Const. P. M/s NIT State Enterprises Fund (Petitioner) V/S Addl: Commissioner I.R and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1854
Advocates:Naveed Amjad Andrabi(ADVO-1773-PBC-LHR),Anwar Kashif Mumtaz(ADVO-11772-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
4190) 3842/2014 Const. P. Ranjho (Petitioner) V/S P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:The petitioner has every right to pursue his remedy against it, which he failed. The amount paid to the father could never be considered as the dower amount paid to the bride and that she was liable to return at the time of dissolution of marriage by way of khulla. Even the ring as mentioned in the nikahnama was refused / declined to have been received by her and no confidence inspiring evidence was recorded by the defendant to believe that version. In this constitution petition such deeper re-appraisal of evidence is not within the domain of this Court when two efficacious remedies i.e. trial Court and appellate Court were exhausted.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
4191) 204/2017 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S MAPAK EDIBLE OIL (PVT) LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
4192) 1355/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. JW SEZ (Pvt) Ltd., Lahore (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Transactional value; identical goods method; Section 25(5) read with Rule 107 of Customs Rules 2001; at or about the same time; 90 days period
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 3
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Rashid Malik(ADVO-9598-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Irfan Ali(ADVO-17931-SBC-KHS),Faheem Raza(ADVO-3408-IBC-ISD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.335-K/2024 The Collector of Customs v. M/s JW SEZ. Pvt. Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed. Order dictated to Mr. M. Iqbal, PS
4193) 233/2007 H.C.A M/s Hero Motors Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Babar Auto Trading & Manufacturing Co (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 06-OCT-09
Approved for Reporting
4194) 537/2021 Const. P. M/s. National Advertiser (Pvt.) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S M/s. Pakistan National Shipping Corporation & Anr (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1050
Advocates:Zafar Iqbal(ADVO-2696-SBC-KHI),Saadat Yar Khan(ADVO-8217-SBC-KHI),Ashraf Yar Khan(ADVO-4918-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1510/2023 M/s National Advertiser Pvt Ltd, Karachi v. M/s Pakistan National Shipping Corporation, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Not Reached
4195) 4163/2025 Const. P. Shakeel Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2680
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
4196) 104/2019 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner I-R Zone-I (Applicant) V/S M/s. Faizan Steel (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007, Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 71)
Citation:2022 PTD 390, 2022 PTCL 396
Advocates:S. Mohsin Imam Wasti(ADVO-4357-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 18-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1679-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Reveue v. M/s. Faizan Steel,C.A.442/2023 Commissioner Inland Reveue v. M/s. Faizan Steel Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed
4197) 5062/2023 Const. P. Arshad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Furqan uddin Usmani and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:Petitioner did not file a List of Witnesses under Order 16 Rule 1 CPC at the appropriate stage of the trial. Application to introduce material witnesses to Sale Agreement as Defendant Witnesses dismissed (by trial court???s Order dated 11.01.2022). Subsequently, an Application to summon Government Officers as Court witnesses was also dismissed (by trial court???s order dated 28.05.2022). In Civil Revision and, again in Petition, the Court cannot consider the trial court???s Order dated 11.01.2022 in a Petition/Revision, which challenges the trial court???s order dated 28.05.2022 and vice versa as pleaded in a separate Petition. Court ability to mould relief in writ jurisdiction constrained under Article 199 of the Constitution.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 270
Advocates:Syed Mudasser Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-11456-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
4198) 58/2013 Cr.Misc. Izhar Alam Farooqui, Advocate (Applicant) V/S Nayyar Ziauddin & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Cancellation (Bail order Maintained)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 25-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
4199) 2347/2022 Cr.Bail KALEEMULLAH S/O HAZAR KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 20
Advocates:Tabassum Yousaf(ADVO-15371-SBC-KHE),Dur Muhammad(ADVO-25986-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
4200) 3559/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Tariq and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1221
Advocates:Naeem Mehmood(ADVO-10944-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Muhammad Ishaq(ADVO-9362-SBC-KHS),Syed Muhammad Nehal Hashmi(ADVO-3490-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
4201) 406/2023 H.C.A Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Appellant) V/S Ayesha Chowdhry & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:NIL
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 167
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Hamza Hussain Hidayatallah(ADVO-16940-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.580-K/2025 Ayesha Chowdhry v. Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Energy Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4202) 38/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collecor of Custom (Applicant) V/S M/s. Salman Paper Products (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Show Cause Notice)
Tag Line:Questions of facts cannot be discussed by High Court in Reference Application.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1152
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Bilal(ADVO-716-SBC-NSF),Aqeel Ahmed Khan(ADVO-12466-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1139-K/2023 The Collector of Customs v. M/s Salman Paper Products (Pvt.) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4203) 2963/2017 Const. P. Mst. Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S THE State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
4204) 64/2017 II.A. Sher Khan & Another (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Saleem & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Delay in payment of Court Fee)
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 675
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.779-K/2022 Sher Khan v. Muhammad Saleem & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4205) 61/2015 Cr.J.A Roshan Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Murder Trial (Reduction in sentence due to lack of deep-rooted enmity.)
Tag Line:Life Imprisonment
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 442
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 01-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
4206) 5/2012 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Syed Abbas Ali (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 21-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
4207) 163/2016 H.C.A National Refinery Ltd. & another (Appellant) V/S Syed Niaz Ahmed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Servants Act, 1973, Law Reforms Ordinance,1972, Services Tribunal Act, 1973
Tag Line:The terms of the service were ensured at the time of his (respondent's) transfer, which cannot be lifted unilaterally depriving an employee of his post-retirement benefits or any of the terms of transfer, to which he was entitled at the time when he was inducted/transferred.
The transfer confirmation letter dated 08.03.1992 does suggest variance in Scheme for employees but the boards decision has prospective application as far as lifting of any beneficial arrangements are concerned. Wisdom should have prevailed at the time when employees were being transferred and not at the twilight of their career when they (employees) only hoped to get their retirement benefits..
Citation:2022 PLC CS 197
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 07-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.711-K/2019 National Refinery Ltd another v. Syed Niaz Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4208) 3240/2020 Const. P. Shoe Planet Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S The Collector of Custom and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 PTD 875
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4209) 1788/2024 Const. P. Saadabad Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Notification to supersede the Society, set-aside
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 57
Advocates:Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-16249-SBC-KHE),Khalil Ahmed(ADVO-6793-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
4210) 48/2008 Civil Revision Abdul Sattar (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Zafar Shaikh & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 01-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
4211) 185/2020 Cr.Misc. Akhtar Hussain Mangrio (Applicant) V/S SHO P.S Mahi Makol & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
22 A-B
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 476
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4212) 252/2013 Suit Dr. Muhammad Iqbal & others (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Medical Association (Centre) (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bye-law 48(d) provides that all delegates will be elected by the respective branches and the Branch Secretaries have to get their names registered with PMAC one month before the conference in order to prepare an electoral list. It appears that such exercise has been carried out by PMA Hyderabad and Dr. Muhammad Waseem Shaikh, the Honorary General Secretary, has provided the list. The only controversy that needs to be resolved is that of Annexure P/8, which is the letter of PMA Hyderabad concerning their general body meeting wherein they have decided the names of the delegates. In order to resolve such controversy I have gone through the relevant articles and bye-laws of the Association. Sending names of delegates of a branch in pursuance of relevant bye-laws are only the prerogative of concerned branch and as far as any decision taken in the general body meeting of PMA Sindh is concerned, it carries no role in the branch decision concerning delegates. PMA Sindh could only forward list of the delegates provided by the concerned branch. It is important to note that as far as General Body Meeting of PMA Hyderabad is concerned, it has not been objected by any member of PMA Hyderabad that the delegates of PMA Hyderabad were not elected. It was only PMAC which claims that the list of Hyderabad delegates was not sent. Now if anybody who could have a valid objection as far as election of delegates are concerned that could be a member or members of PMA Hyderabad, certainly not PMAC or PMA Sindh. None of the members of PMA Hyderabad has objected to the process of sending names of delegates of PMA Hyderabad so it does not lie in the mouth of defendants to object to such list of delegates (as far as election is concerned) when they themselves have no role in the process of sending list of delegates. Importantly in electoral list the names of delegates from Hyderabad Branch have not been included and it was only central councillors who have been inducted. Byelaw 48 speaks for election of delegates and for sending its name by General Secretary of that particular branch.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
4213) 6234/2014 Const. P. Mehr Iqbal Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee), Service matters (Reinstatement into service)
Citation:2017 SBLR Sindh 1046, 2017 SBLR Sindh 1419
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.86-K/2017 Mehar Iqbal Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4214) 103/2020 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD ASAD QURESHI S/O MASOOD AHMED (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 628
Advocates:M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),S K Lodhi(ADVO-17539-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 25-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4215) 1599/2015 Suit Lt Col (Retd) Shahid Hamid. (ISSUES) (Plaintiff) V/S State Bank of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
4216) 3616/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Salim (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 226
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Fouzia Rasheed(ADVO-6865-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI),Mamoona Nasreen(ADVO-13686-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 23-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
4217) 151/2023 Criminal Appeal Inayat (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 124
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4218) 22/2021 Criminal Appeal Mukhtiar Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 389
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4219) 46/2024 Cr.J.A Aftab (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1865
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
4220) 9013/2018 Const. P. Raja Naved Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
fake appointment--Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Hon???ble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable.
Topic: Service matters (Fake Appointment)
Tag Line:Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Honble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 541
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
4221) 10/2021 Election Appeal Yasha Ullah Khan Afghan (Appellant) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Senate elections; candidature restored.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 282
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4222) 10/2016 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-II & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 296
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4223) 628/2014 Const. P. Rasool Bux Shar (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Whether the Petitioner is entitled to payment of pensionary benefits of his 14 years??? service in PQA in addition to Contributory Provident Fund received by the Petitioner from KoFHA upon his retirement in the year 2008?
Tag Line:pensionary benefits
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 913
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
4224) 3213/2012 Conf.Case MUhammad Mustafa V/S Syed Azfar Ali & Others (Appellant) V/S Syed Azfar Ali & Others (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 17-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
4225) 3670/2023 Const. P. Rehan Pervez (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: It is well settled now that unexcused absence from duty is misconduct. This court cannot offer relief simply because the absence was brief or otherwise. Interpreting absence from duty as potentially extending to a certain period, improperly rewrites the law on the subject issue, effectively changing the threshold for misconduct. This is an incorrect interpretation.
13. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is established and the employee is found guilty after due process of law, it is the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the various penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct is not adequate but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a structured and lawful manner.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 392
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Talha Abbasi(ADVO-19799-SBC-KHS),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
4226) 196/2009 H.C.A Fateh Textile Mills & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Alied Bank Ltd., (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 17-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.M.A.9506/2017 Fateh Textile Mills Ltd & others v. Allied Bank of Pakistan, Ltd,C.P.L.A.2338/2014 Fateh Textile Mills Ltd & others v. Allied Bank of Pakistan, Ltd Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed
4227) 76/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Large Taxpayers Unit (L.T.U.) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 597
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI),Zahrah Sehr Vayani(ADVO-15100-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 04-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
4228) 1/2024 I. A Ali Raza Mugheri (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Rasool Abro and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Leave to Defend)
Tag Line:Banking Court assessed whether the Customer had any cause of action based on facts alleged and documents filed by the Financial Institution with its application for leave to defend. The Banking Court did not decide the leave to defend application and dismissed the suit based on finding no cause of action. The Banking Court had to assess the issue of cause of action based on the Plaint filed by the Customer. The customer's Appeal was allowed. The Banking Court to decide the leave to defend application first which may well include the issue of cause of action.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 1399
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
4229) 1905/2011 Const. P. Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Land Acquisition Act,1894 (Section 11), Land Acquisition Act,1894 (Section 12)
Tag Line:Law Discussed: Land Acquisition Act, 1894-----
Standing Order of the revenue department No.12, subsection 31 regarding land acquisition provides that if the land was not required for the purpose it was acquired, it should be relinquished and should be offered to the original occupant/owner on payment of compensation received by them and in case of their refusal to have it back on the said terms, it should be considered as a government property in the record.
The proceedings of acquiring land could only be ended once the compensation is deposited and the possession was taken over by the acquiring agency. Thus, this would be in severe violation of Articles 23 and 24 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, depriving the land owner not only from enjoying the property but also from its compensation. Thus, there is no justification that he (the owner/private respondent) may be granted interest now after almost three decades of litigation when the value of the property multiplied several hundred folds, as against the compensation, the value of which was determined three decades before and grant of interests under Land Acquisition Act, under the circumstances has no justification.
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1473
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 08-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.420-K/2020 Hyderabad Municipal Corporation v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4230) 1764/2022 Const. P. M/s Dolmen Real Estate Management Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 100
Advocates:Syed Zaeem Hyder Musavi(ADVO-15365-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Fazle Rabbi(ADVO-7937-SBC-KHC),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 26-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
4231) 137/2020 Cr.Misc. Dost Muhammad (Applicant) V/S Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate-III, and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 129
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
4232) 3960/2021 Const. P. Syed Asif Shah (Petitioner) V/S Mazhar Javed and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XXI Rule 89& 26 CPC)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 890
Advocates:Nusrat Sultana(ADVO-414-SBC-NWB),Tahir Hasan Qureshi(ADVO-4229-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-8216-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4233) 2616/2014 Const. P. Gulsher Siyal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:CSR Article 420 states that a break in an officer's service typically forfeits their previous service, except in these situations: (a) Approved leave. (b) Unauthorized absence directly following approved leave, as long as their position isn't permanently filled. If it is, the prior service is lost. (c) Suspension is immediately followed by reinstatement (in the same or a different role), or if the officer dies, retires, or is retired while suspended. (d) Abolition of their position or job loss due to staff reduction. (e) Transfer by a competent authority to non-pensionable service within government control (voluntary resignation from pensionable service forfeits this). Transferring to a grant-in-aid school also leads to forfeiture. (f) Transfer to the President's household staff. (g) Time spent traveling between appointments when transferred by a competent authority or, for non-gazetted officers, with their previous head of office's consent. (h) Any other reason provided the break wasn't due to the government servant's fault or intentional action (like unauthorized absence, resignation, or removal). Besides CSR Regulation 423 provides automatic relaxation of six months in case of short service, if he or she, is entitled for pensionary benefits as such the question of latches are of no significance at this stage as the petitioner is requesting for continuation of his past service in different government departments.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 614
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Mughal(ADVO-2678-SBC-KHS),Waqar Muhammad Khan Lodhi(ADVO-2069-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4234) 5455/2021 Const. P. Inayatullah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article 212)
Tag Line:The petitioner has challenged the notification dated 02.09.2021, in respect of his posting and transfer order as Principal (BS-20) National AGRO Technical Training Centre Hyderabad on the ground, inter alia, that the impugned notification was issued to post him under the junior officer--We are of the view that Article 212 of the Constitution ousts the jurisdiction of this Court in respect of the matters about terms and conditions of Civil Servants.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 745
Advocates:Liaquat Ali Khaskheli(ADVO-7862-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4235) 38/2012 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Ali AKbar & 2 Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 16-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
4236) 604/2023 Criminal Appeal NOOR MUHAMMAD S/O RAHEEM KHAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1361
Advocates:Nisar Ahmed(ADVO-182-SBC-THT),Muhammad Ramzan(ADVO-7072-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 01-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
4237) 6955/2017 Const. P. Sidra Khan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
whether in the appointment of Respondent No.3, the discretion was rightly observed or not by the Competent Authority.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
4238) 3678/2016 Const. P. Kashif Hussain Shoro and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1502
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4239) 2091/2024 Const. P. Sheikh Ali Baakza (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Word ???Imports??? cannot be substituted or replaced with ???offloading??? or ???discharge??? of cargo by the Ministry of Food. The word ???import??? in ordinary parlance means bringing into the Country.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 938
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 14-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
4240) 3378/2018 Const. P. Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1396, 2025 PTD 538
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
4241) 389/2024 Const. P. Dr Imamuddin & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 410
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 08-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
4242) 1938/2022 Suit SHERAZ HAKEEM (Plaintiff) V/S AGHA KHAN UNIVERSITY & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 966
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
4243) 342/2004 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Yaseen (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---
----S. 320---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 340(2) & 342---Qatl-i-Khata by rash or negligent driving---Appreciation of evidence---Di'yat, non-awarding of---Accused was allegedly driving vehicle rashly and negligently and as a result, accident took place and six people lost their lives while fourteen were injured---Trial Court convicted the accused and sentenced him for five years imprisonment but did not order payment of Di'yat amount---Validity---Accused in order to disprove allegation of rash and negligent driving should have made a statement on oath under S.340(2), Cr.P.C.---Accused, in his statement under S.342, Cr.P.C., was unable to make any explanation as to why evidence had come on record against him---Trial Court rightly convicted the accused but should have added punishment of payment of Di'yat to legal heirs of each deceased---Trial Court in view of the use of word 'shall' in S.320,P.P.C. had no option to avoid ordering payment of Di'yat to legal heirs of deceased while convicting accused---High Court maintained the conviction but modified the sentence and included payment of Di'yat to legal heirs of the deceased person by the accused---Appeal was dismissed accordingly.
Citation:2016 PLD Sindh 521
Advocates:Nusrat Gul Malik(ADVO-9713-SBC-KHI),Jamroz Khan Afridi(ADVO-4809-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 03-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
4244) 5814/2017 Const. P. Tariq Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:recruitment rules
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 511
Advocates:Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
4245) 35/2013 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Unilever Pakistan Pakistan Ltd. (Applicant) V/S The Commissioner of Inalnd Revenue. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Amnesty schemes in tax matters is to be construed liberally; no surcharge payable under section 34 of the Sales Tax Act as it stands omitted from 1.7.1996
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 209
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Salat(ADVO-1922-SBC-KHI),Saleem ul Haq(ADVO-11690-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Siddiq Mirza(ADVO-2407-SBC-KHI),Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-3297-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 26-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
4246) 74/2012 Cr.Rev Ali Sher Rahu (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
4247) 132/2024 Criminal Appeal Waqar Ahmed & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1742
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1174/2025 Mst. Ayesha v. The State thr. PG Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4248) 2356/2019 Const. P. Agha Siraj Khan Durrani (Petitioner) V/S The State (NAB) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB
Tag Line:Petitioners, accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means while acting as a Minister of Local Government ,Other petitioners, accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc., are identified as Benamidar/ostensible owners of the properties actually owned and possessed by him. It is commonly known in our society, recognized almost as a convention, that parents purchase property in the name of their children, not for any base reason but only to ensure their safety, security and welfare in future. It is not disputed that accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani is a politician and has held different positions. Therefore, when he buys a property in the name of his wife or children, or makes payments at their behest for this purpose, there would normally be no reason for them to get alarmed or suspect that he has done corruption and is providing money from the wealth earned by him as such. Normal presumption, his children or for that matter any prudent mind would get, would be of his acting bona fide and providing the amounts from his legitimate sources of income. Gulzar Ahmeds is said to have aided and abated accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani in acquiring illegal assets; and utilizing accounts of PW Sadaf Chohan and Syed Mobin Saeed by parking money therein for such Page 15 of 19purpose. Bail of Agha Siraj Khan Durrani (C.P.No.D-2356/2019) is dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1371
Advocates:Amer Raza Naqvi(ADVO-3585-SBC-KHI),Afaq Ahmed(ADVO-4782-SBC-KHI),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1128/2020 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Agha Siraj Khan Durrani,C.A.296/2021 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Agha Siraj Khan Durrani,C.P.L.A.5747/2021 Agha Siraj Khan Durrani v. The State through Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of
4249) 869/2019 Const. P. Nadir Ali (Petitioner) V/S M.D STEVTA and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service.
Tag Line:Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1979
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4250) 46/2015 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Amjad Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 05-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
4251) 318/2022 H.C.A M/s. Askari General Insurance Co. Ltd (Appellant) V/S M/s. Tracking World Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 731
Advocates:Syed Asif Ali (ADVO-10999-SBC-MLR),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
4252) 182/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. RAO NADEEM @ GOGA S/O HASSAN ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 19-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
4253) 8/2021 Cr.Rev IZZAT GUL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Revision (Order Sessions Judge is Sat aside ,Truck of applicant is Restore u/S 516 A CRPC.)
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 542
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4254) 207/2007 H.C.A Khawaja Feroz & another (Appellant) V/S Altaf & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Appointment of commissioner to record evidence)
Mr. Justice Farrukh Zia G. Shaikh
Order Date: 06-FEB-08
Approved for Reporting
4255) 319/2021 H.C.A Creek Marina Singapore PTE Ltd and Others (Appellant) V/S Siddiqsons Private Limited and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1130
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.297/2022 Siddiqsons Private Limited and another v. Creek Marina Singapore PTE Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4256) 347/2019 H.C.A Naseem Ahmed Malik & others (Appellant) V/S Saeed Iqbal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A, Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1786
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 17-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.94-K/2021 Naseem Ahmed Malik & others v. Saeed Iqbal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4257) 49/2021 Judicial Companies Misc. SPI INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S . (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (Merger Under Companies Act,2017)
Citation:2023 CLD 1088
Advocates:Taha Abdus Samad(ADVO-17810-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
4258) 459/2016 Cr.J.A YOUSUF BARMI S/O NABI HUSSAIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 27-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
4259) 38/2013 Cr.J.A Rafiq Sodhar and others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 01-APR-15
Approved for Reporting
4260) 11/2022 H.C.A The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appellant) V/S Team A Ventures Pvt Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3069
Advocates:Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
4261) 4/2010 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Mohsin Raza & Another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 25-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
4262) 288/2020 Suit Pakistan House International Limited (PHIL) (Plaintiff) V/S Engro Vopak Terminal Limited (EVTL) & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The exclusive items disclosed in Article 3.2 is inclusive but
not exhaustive. It includes Styrene Monomer [SM] Linear Alkaline Benzene
[LAB] which is being claimed by the plaintiff. The license of the plaintiff
issued by FBR is in fact for public bonded warehouse which too was later in
time after implementation agreement of defendant No.1 and defendant No.2
which grants exclusive handling of various chemicals and to establish its
terminal. This exclusivity was never challenged ever since these bonded
warehouse licenses were extended. For the sake of convenience of the plaintiff,
Mr. Almani submitted that the customers of the plaintiff may approach
defendant No.1 for effective handling of the cargo and after it being handled at
defendant No.1`s Jetty and transported to the plaintiff`s facility through the
pipeline at the fee to be paid to defendant No.1, the grievance could be
redressed.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 320
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
4263) 57/2016 Const. P. Ghulam Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters ( Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973), Service matters (Merger of services in other caders )
Tag Line:It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1118
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Ahsan Gul(ADVO-2084-SBC-HYD),Shazib Masud(ADVO-44528-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5245/2023 Ghulam Ali alias Tariq Ahmed and another v. Province of Sindh, through Chief Secretary to Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)
4264) 411/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Allied Industries Hub (Pvt) Ltd (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 646
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
4265) 1063/2016 Suit Abdul Rauf & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Amin Lakhani & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 680
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
4266) 2/2009 Adm. Suit M/s Megafeeder (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S M.V. H & H Tide & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line: For exercising admiralty jurisdiction the case is to be made out in terms of Section 3 of Ordinance 1980 and prima facie no claim appears to have been made out as against defendant No.1 under admiralty jurisdiction. The question now arises is whether defendant No.2 who was prepared to deposit US $.300,000/- with the Nazir of this Court was in lieu of the claim against defendant No1 or defendant No.2 stood surety for itself as well. The order referred above is clear in this regard. The defendant No.2 deposited the subject amount against arrested vessel and it is not a surety against defendant No.2 otherwise this amount could have been withhold. The amount that was deposited thus could only be considered as a surety for defendant No.1 vessel for which prima facie the case has not been made out.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 19-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
4267) 1513/2025 Const. P. Mr. Azhar Ali Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Chancellor Sukkur IBA University & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2343
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
4268) 187/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Mushtaque & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
4269) 288/2025 Const. P. Zuhaib Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 333
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
4270) 53/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) Gulsher Kosh (Applicant) V/S Government of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 150
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
4271) 34/2015 Cr.J.A aheemdad Mohammadani (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Saeed-ud-Din Nasir, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 04-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
4272) 6696/2014 Const. P. Khayaban-e-Iqbal (Pvt) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 28-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
4273) 6120/2024 Const. P. Saresh Kumar Manglani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the Supreme Court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the Supreme Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1154
Advocates:Sajid Ali Channa(ADVO-20643-SBC-KHS),Mukesh Kumar G. Karara(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
4274) 99/2001 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Muhammad Jamil Ahmed & anothers (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Mr. Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany, Mr. Justice Rahmat Hussain Jafferi
Order Date: 08-NOV-04
Approved for Reporting
4275) 409/2023 Criminal Appeal MEER ZAMAN S/O SHARAF KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1267
Advocates:Syed Ahmed Ali Shah(ADVO-4459-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.65-K/2024 Meer Zaman v. The State through P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
4276) 425/2019 Const. P. Sharaf Shipping Agency (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2490
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.37-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Finance Department & others v. Sharaf Shipping Agency (Pvt) Limited,C.P.L.A.439/2021 Sindh Revenue Board through its Chairman, Karachi v. Sharaf Shipping Agency (Private) Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending
4277) 6175/2021 Const. P. Mst Bisman Noreen / Ameer Jahan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 446
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 18-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
4278) 2908/2020 Const. P. M/s SKF Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 775
Advocates:Ammar Ather Saeed(ADVO-13697-SBC-KHC),Kafil Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-7764-SBC-KHI),Naveed Amjad Andrabi(ADVO-1773-PBC-LHR),Anwar Kashif Mumtaz(ADVO-11772-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 04-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
4279) 5063/2021 Const. P. M/s Gul Ahmed Energy Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Court of Commission for Worksmen Comp. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Payment of Wages Act, 2015 (Jurisdiction )
Tag Line:we decide this petition with direction to the Commission /Authority to frame legal issue with regard to jurisdiction, as stated above, particularly in paragraph-8 of the impugned order, and allow the parties to submit documents, including additional documents if not already filed, or lead evidence and thereafter finally decide the jurisdictional question
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 705
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
4280) 1321/2023 Cr.Bail ZOHAIB HUSSAIN S/O ASGHAR HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 686
Advocates:Amjad Ali Dayo(ADVO-19862-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 05-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
4281) 91/2023 Cr.Bail Peer Syed Fayaz Shah (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Murder Bail (Marks of violence and positive DNA report )
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 803
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 22-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
4282) 360/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous Muhammad Ali Khoso & others (Applicant) V/S The State & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1884
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
4283) 28/2016 Criminal Appeal JUMAN S/O ALOO (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Aziz Ur Rehman Akhund(ADVO-11615-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
4284) 39/2018 Cr.Appeal Qadir Bux alias Baboo Tunio (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 31-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
4285) 7122/2018 Const. P. Zamir Hussain Ujjan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh.
Topic: Service matters (Section 3 of Sindh Regularization Act, )
Tag Line:Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1267
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
4286) 212/1984 Suit MUHAMMAD ANWAR (Appellant) V/S V/S PAKISTAN & ORS. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 362
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
4287) 163/2022 H.C.A Syed Sulaiman Jafri (Appellant) V/S United Bank Limited & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 590
Advocates:Imtiaz Ali Effandi(ADVO-3387-SBC-KHI),Suleman Hudda(ADVO-8799-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 14-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.903-K/2025 Syed Sulaiman Jafri v. United Bank Limited, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice) to DAG & Respondents for Next Session
4288) 2402/2012 Const. P. Standard Chartered Bank Limited (Petitioner) V/S Karachi Metropolitan Corporation & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 10-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.214-K/2015 M/s J & S Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Khalid Ahmed Sheikh and others,C.A.86-K/2015 M/s J & S Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Khalid Ahmed Sheikh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted and appeals to be heard on 16.07.2015.,Judgment Reserved
4289) 1887/2013 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Chandio (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
4290) 6384/2014 Const. P. Engr. Jehanzaib (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 06-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
4291) 298/2023 H.C.A Ashraf Ali (Appellant) V/S Sarfaraz Khamisani & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 526
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Azher Mehmood(ADVO-9556-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Altaf(ADVO-18932-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 05-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
4292) 14/2006 Civil Revision Revo (Expired),thr:his L.Rs. (Applicant) V/S Chandu and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1171-K/2018 Revo thr. his L.Rs and others v. Chahdoo and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4293) 363/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director Directorate PCA (Customs) (Applicant) V/S M/s. Abdul Ghaffar (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 965
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4294) 23/2010 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Kamran and Another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 21-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
4295) 1161/2009 Suit MUHAMMAD FEROZE AKHTAR (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD NASIM AKHTAR (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Effect of Article 79 Qanun-e-Shahadat Order.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 169
Advocates:Raafia Rizwana(ADVO-6950-SBC-KHI),Usman Ghani(ADVO-3064-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Arif(ADVO-11800-SBC-KHI),Raja Abdul Fatah Shaikh(ADVO-10839-SBC-KHI),Yusuf Moulvi(ADVO-4051-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
4296) 4/2014 Suit.B National Bank of Pakistan. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Amna Export (Pvt) Ltd. & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 508
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
4297) 676/2019 Suit Fazal E Rabi (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Consignment of the Plaintiff was seized for alleged infringement of intellectual property rights of the complainant; however, the action taken was in violation of Rules 680 and 682 of the Customs Rules 2001 hence, the impugned seizure has been set aside by decreeing the Suit of the Plaintiff.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
4298) 150/2021 Cr.Misc. Abdul Rasheed Shar (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Shabir Shar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code (Cancelation Bail U/S 491 (5) Cr PC Is allowed. Bail Canceled .)
Tag Line:Cancellation of Bail; held Yes, if a bail granting order is perverse, it can be recalled.
Directions to complete trial or examination of witnesses
in a certain period of time is always directory and not mandatory.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 223
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4299) 49/2018 J.M Iftikhar Ahmed Qureshi (Applicant) V/S Mr. Muhammad Abrar Ahmed Qureshi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Tag Line:1. Substituted service by way of publication is only presumed to be personal service by virtue of Rule 20(2) of Order V CPC. Such presumption is rebuttable. Therefore, where service by publication is challenged, the first test is to see whether the conditions of Order V Rule 20 CPC had been met, viz., that the publication was resorted to after the Court was satisfied that the defendant was avoiding service, or there was some other reason to believe that summons could not be served in the ordinary manner; in other words, whether the ordinary modes of service available had been exhausted. Rel: Muhammad Anwar v. Abdul Haq (1985 SCMR 1228); Haji Akbar v. Gul Baran (1996 SCMR 1703); and Nargis Latif v. Feroz Afaq Ahmed Khan (2001 SCMR 99).
2. While a couriers receipt was filed to show that summons had been dispatched, there was no report of delivery by the courier to show that summons so dispatched were delivered or tendered within the meaning of Order V Rule 10 CPC. So far there is no statute that attaches a presumption of service to summons sent by a private courier service (as opposed to a public courier service). Rel: Inayatullah v. Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah (2014 SCMR 1477). Thus, it can be safely said that prior to publication neither the available modes of service were exhausted nor was there a verification that the modes of service so used had failed. In any case, the publication made was at best publication of the notice of the pending CMAs and there was no publication made of the summons of the suit.
3. Had it not been a case attracting section 12(2) CPC, the exparte judgment and decree could nonetheless be set-aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 160
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
4300) 49/1994 Const. P. Abdul Khaliq & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Mst.Razia Begum & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)--
----S. 20---Transfer of evacuee house to the occupants (petitioners and respondents)--Revisional courts/authorities were not supposed to record fresh evidence or direct the parties to prove anything by means of an affidavit or document at revisional stage---Fact which was not available on record of proceedings before lower forums could not be taken on record at the revisional stage to interfere with the impugned order.
Barkat Ali v. Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner PLD 1991 SC 610; Mst. Shahjahan Begum v. Mst. Shabbir Fatima and another PLD 1991 SC 614 and Mst. Shahzada Begum v. Ahmed Kamal and 18 others PLD 1991 SC 617 ref.
Citation:2016 YLR 2176
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 15-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.284-K/2016 Muhammad Ali Qureshi and others v. Secretary (RS & EP) Board of Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4301) 6168/2020 Const. P. Sardar Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) V/S The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 YLR 867
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4302) 6736/2018 Const. P. Francis S. Paul (Petitioner) V/S John Paul & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The Petitioner assailed the impugned orders as made on 05.05.2016 by the trial Court and on 07.08.2018 by the revisional Court on application U/s 12 (2) CPC. The Petitioner has failed to demonstrate any error or infirmity afflicting the Impugned Orders, and no case warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction stands made out. Petition is dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1399
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4303) 1351/2022 Const. P. Novex Dry Cleaners Hyd (Petitioner) V/S learned Sindh Labour Court Hyderbad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Service matters (Termination from service), Sindh Industrial Relations Act (SIRA) , 2013, (Section 77), Sindh Industrial Relations Act (SIRA) , 2013, (Section 34)
Tag Line:Since the discretion was exercised by the Tribunal in condoning
the delay within frame of SIRA Act 2013, we cannot replace our
discretion with that of the Tribunal as this petition is neither statutory
nor efficacious remedy. We are not sitting in appeal against order of
appellate labour tribunal. The petitioners have already exhausted the
remedy of appeal before Appellate Tribunal.
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 1373
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 18-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
4304) 969/2022 Const. P. Mehmood Khan & others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 386
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 20-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.81-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Home Secreatry and others v. Mehmood Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4305) 47/2021 Criminal Appeal AYAZ HUSSAIN (Appellant) V/S THRE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:9(C) Matter
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 745
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4306) 3520/2021 Const. P. Zahid Hussain Shah Naqvi (Petitioner) V/S Addl I.G Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:official accommodation
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 150
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
4307) 655/2000 F.R.A M/s.Delawala Enterprises (Appellant) V/S Salman Saeed Mahmood (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sind Rented Premises Act - Eviction---15
Tag Line:Rent accepted in lump sum, no default is committed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1453
Advocates:Basil Nabi Malik(ADVO-13956-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
4308) 1109/2025 Const. P. Sikandar Hayat Buriro (Petitioner) V/S The state & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2718
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
4309) 6825/2018 Const. P. Akbar Ali Dero (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
4310) 772/2002 Const. P. Ayazuddin & ano (Petitioner) V/S Vth ADJ (East) Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.53-K/2019 Asif Siddiui v. Ayazuddin and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4311) 4930/2018 Const. P. M/s Khurram Agencies (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 3)
Tag Line: A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan has pronounced the judgment on 18th January 2021 in the case of Al-Razzaq Fibres Pvt. Ltd. and others v. The Federation of Pakistan and another (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the vires of the amendment in in subsection (2)(b) of Section 3 and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge as well as SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(I)/2011 for being ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Divisional Bench of this Court has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: -
11. Accordingly, for the above reasons, instant petitions are allowed in the following terms:-
(i) Amendment in Section 3(2)(b) read with Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge, is ultravires to Constitution, and contrary to law, hence of no legal effect.
(ii) SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 issued in terms of and in purported exercise of powers conferred by, the amendment in Section 3(2)(b) and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(1)/2011, is declared to be ultra vires the Constitution, and is of no legal effect.
(iii) The respondents are restrained from demanding any duty in terms of SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 from the petitioners.
(iv) Provisions of Section 74A, suffice to say, have no relevance to the controversy in hand because it seeks validation of the acts of Federal Government, and not that of the Board, with the approval of the Federal Minister-in-Charge.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 867
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.615-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-I v. M/s.Khurram Agencies Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4312) 29/2000 Civil Revision Shafi Muhammad and others. (Applicant) V/S Mst.Jannat and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Under section 115 CPC while exercising revisional jurisdiction for a mere fact that another view of the matter was possible on appraisal of evidence, would not be a valid reason to disturb concurrent finding of fact recorded by the two court below.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 794
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
4313) 282/2017 Cr.Rev Qasim (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Mustafa @ Gulo and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Revision (dismissed, as there is no Provision In Special Laws to Record Evidence through Attorney . )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 08-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
4314) 74/2016 I. A Muhammad Bashir Javed Chaudhry & another (Appellant) V/S MCB Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1401
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
4315) 3998/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Sami (Petitioner) V/S NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 29-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
4316) 4522/2021 Const. P. Kh: Ghulam Ghous (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Acting Charge)
Tag Line:officers are posted on acting charge---Secretary Local Government says that he will examine the record as to whether Miss Shamona Sadaf is working in BPS-18 or BPS-16 till then he will relieve that lady and will not be posted on that post until the issue is resolved. In case, inquiry speaks that she is having BPS-18 or she is posted on same place on any other post and if she was working in BPS-16 and has been designated BPS-18, delinquent officers including that lady shall face the consequences to be carried out by the authorities.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 564
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 30-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
4317) 3901/2023 Const. P. Sultan Ali Jessani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Once a Valuation Ruling stands set-aside; then 3rd proviso to section 81 of the Customs Act does not apply and provisional release must be allowed as a right of the Importer
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1115
Advocates:Muhammad Adeel Awan(ADVO-14805-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 23-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1186-K/2023 The Collector of Customs v. M/s SUltan Ali Jessani and others,C.P.L.A.1185-K/2023 The Collector of Customs, MCC Port Qasim (Imports) v. Sultan Ali Jessani and others,C.P.L.A.1181-K/2023 Model Customs Collectorate MCC-Appraisement (SAPT) v. M/s Sultan Ali Jessani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
4318) 1625/2016 Suit M/s. Fine Enterprises Traders.. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Constellation Co-Op. H.S. Ltd., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 12-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
4319) 1503/2015 Const. P. Syed Tariq Mustafa (Petitioner) V/S National Insurance Corporation Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 29-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
4320) 673/2015 Cr.Bail Adil (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 24-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
4321) 1/2020 Const. P. Pegasus Consultancy Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 789
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
4322) 1288/2023 Const. P. Mst. Ruqaya and Another (Petitioner) V/S Iftikhar Ahmed Siddiqi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 639
Advocates:Muhammad Nazim(ADVO-20865-SBC-KHE),Imtiaz Ali Khoso(ADVO-14509-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
4323) 4604/2021 Const. P. Sohail Hameed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:It is not only the petitioner for whom the respondents, including
federal and provincial governments, have taken this decision but in fact
the respondents in pursuit of their responsibilities to take care of the
health of entire nation, have issued numerous notifications, circulars to
curb the virus spread. Petitioner, instead of being supportive, is being
troublesome in the smooth operation of effective measures undertaken
by government. The government is primarily responsible to take care of
health of 220 million citizens of Pakistan and hence the desire of one
person being petitioner cannot supersede the demand of ever-growing
spread of pandemic Covid-19. The Sindh Government has already taken
steps and are monitoring it periodically under the umbrella of Sindh
Epidemic Diseases Act, 2014. Section 3 of ibid Act enables the
government to take strict measures as they deem fit and proper in case
the provincial government feels the necessity of enforcing prescribed
measures to curb the threatened situation.
---This Covid-19 is exceeding and spreading for a number of reasons
that it is new virus meaning that no one has immunity for this virus. It is
highly contagious, meaning it spreads fast. Its novelty meaning scientists
are still not completely sure as to how it behaves since it is changing its
form and producing different variants and since they have a very limited
history to go on. It is being reported worldwide that Covid-19 will have
its short medium and long term effects for general population, health
care workers, patients and other citizens. As our general responsibility
we need to think ahead of ourselves and think beyond and stop being
selfish, not only for our survival but for the survival of our population.
The only way is to support the health care system.
Citation:2021 MLD 2085
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 31-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1106-K/2021 Sohail Hameed v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
4324) 8126/2017 Const. P. Riaz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP),Faiz Rasool Khan Jalbani(ADVO-18515-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 30-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4186/2019 Riaz Ahmad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Finance, Finance Division, Islamabad & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
4325) 6662/2016 Const. P. Moulvi Iqbal Haider (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 09-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
4326) 77/2000 H.C.A Export Promotion Bureau (Appellant) V/S Dadabhoy Padube Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 10-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
4327) 1135/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Rohail Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Classification of calcium batteries for automotive vehicles; HS COde 8507.8000
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 280
Advocates:Kashif Nazeer(ADVO-11582-SBC-KHI),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 06-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
4328) 5/2018 Cr.Appeal Shoaib Ali (Appellant) V/S Anti Narcotics force (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
4329) 30/2021 Cr.J.A Rajib Ali Naich and Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 363
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
4330) 6520/2018 Const. P. M/s Bayer Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 727
Advocates:Kamal Azfar(ADVO-1419-SBC-KHI),Dhani Bux(ADVO-14147-SBC-KHE),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Asad Shakil Khan(ADVO-15606-SBC-KHI),Zain Mustafa Soomro(ADVO-17295-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
4331) 3269/2012 Const. P. Ghulam Qadir Memon (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, Bail Matters
Tag Line:As far as the application of Rule 172 is concerned it applies to the Auditor and cannot apply to a sub Accountant which designation was held by these petitioners at the relevant time and as such there is no question of violation of Rule 172 of the Audit Manual & Treasury Rule. This fact is categorically admitted by PW-2 in his cross examination to Mr. M.A. Qazi. It is also admitted that the duties of the Auditor are different from those of Accountant. PW-1 has also categorically admitted that as per procedure sealed authority from the Accountant General Sindh was to be sent to DAO Hyderabad where it is entered in the inward register and that these sealed authorities after their entery in the ledger used to present before the DAO who on its opening mark it to concern ADAO after checking it and then the ADAO mark it to the Senior Auditor Pensions Section. PW-2 Altaf Hussain Mangi also admitted that Rules 172, 177 and 329 of the Audit Manual & Treasury Rule does not apply to the accused/Sub Accountant.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 13-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
4332) 1619/2015 Const. P. Aziz Nasir (Petitioner) V/S Shafiq Uddin & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters)
Tag Line:(a) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----S. 15---Ejectment of tenant---Personal bona fide need of landlord---Tenancy agreement being un-registered---Effect---Contention of tenant was that landlord had waived his personal need through registered tenancy agreement---Ejectment petition was accepted concurrently---Validity---Alleged tenancy agreement was compulsory registerable as tenant had claimed protection of his right to held tenancy for life for valuable consideration---Impugned tenancy agreement was not registered document and same was neither admissible in evidence nor it was enforceable in law---Relationship of landlord and tenant existed between the parties---Any dispute between the landlord and tenant could not adversely affect on the personal need of landlord---Finding recorded by the courts below did not suffer from arbitrariness nor same were perverse---Tenant was directed to vacate the demised premises within 30 days and in default Executing Court should issue writ of possession with permission to break open the locks and police aid and hand over the possession to the landlord---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. [Paras. 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the judgment]
Lal Khan through Legal Heirs v. Muhammad Yousuf PLD 2011 SC 657; Badruddin H. Mavani v. Government of Pakistan and others 1982 CLC 44; Muhammad Azizullah v. Abdul Ghaffar 1984 CLC 2837 and Commissioner of Income Tax, Peshawar Zone, Peshawar v. Messrs Sieman A.G. PLD 1991 SC 368 distinguished.
(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----Ss. 100 & 115---Appellate and revisional jurisdiction---Scope---Findings recorded by the courts below on the basis of evidence could not be interfered with by the second appellate court or revisional court simply because on the same evidence different conclusion could be drawn.
Citation:2016 YLR 32
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 18-JAN-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.91-K/2016 Aziz Nasir v. Shafiquddin and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4333) 50/2024 Criminal Appeal Abdul Wali Achakzai (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 290
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
4334) 55/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Tobria S/o Ismail (Applicant) V/S The Board of Trustee KPT and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Karachi Port Trust Act, 1886 (Section 87)
Tag Line:- The licences on which respondents were relying were expired somewhere in 2013. After the expiry of the alleged licences the Karachi Port Trust started receiving amount as being lease money and a period of lease was also disclosed in the challans issued by Karachi Port Trust to applicants though separately describing them as licensee as well.
- In this primary examination perhaps the respondents have not demonstrated to have passed the criteria and test to adjudge them (applicants) as licencees. Since the rental receipts were issued for a lease period, as available on record, therefore, notice under section 87 of the KPT Act for the eviction cannot be read to have been issued in pursuance of the aforesaid Act as a lessee cannot be evicted without due process of law. Hence, such action is not deemed to have been taken or purported to have been taken under the ibid Act.
- When an action was not deemed to have been taken under the Act, the barring provision of Section 87 would not apply and plaint in this regard for a colourable exercise of powers by official of KPT cannot be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC. It requires a trial as to whether action was in accordance with law or otherwise. The appeal preferred by the applicants met the same fate as it was dismissed.
- I am of the firm view that the issue of notice of eviction to an occupant of the nature as described above is not warranted under the law and on such threat of eviction he cannot wait for a period mentioned in the barring section i.e. Section 87 of KPT Act and is not covered by any of the provisions of Act when status of applicants is adjudged as lessee in the last challan issued. It needs trial for a conclusive determination. When the applicants claimed to have been in occupation as lessee by virtue of challan issued to them the status of licencee was not carried forward and altered to a status of lessee by virtue of such challan and the descriptions provided therein. This is at least tentative view which should have been formed
Citation:2021 YLR 2278
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
4335) 606/2024 Suit MESSRS. GALAXY IMPEX (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Suit Not maintainable against suspension of sales tax Registration; alternate remedy under Section 46 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 324
Advocates:Barrister Zulfiqar Ali Khan Jalbani(ADVO-17147-SBC-KHS),Daniyal Muzaffar(ADVO-12090-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
4336) 229/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) Ovais Akhter & Ors (Applicant) V/S Abdullah & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Section 42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877)
Tag Line:provisions of 42 of the Specific Relief Act
The provisions of Section 115, C.P.C
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 847
Advocates:M/S. K. A. WAHAB & CO.(FIRM-119-SBC-KHI),Hafiz Abdul Baqi(ADVO-1417-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
4337) 19/2010 Cr.Bail Shoukat Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 08-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
4338) 11/2016 Conf.Case Reference made by the IIIrd Addl.S.Judge Khi Cenra (Appellant) V/S BABAR MASIH S/O SABIR MASIH (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal (Answered in Negative .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
4339) 1658/2012 Const. P. Mehmood Ali Qaimkhani (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.115-K/2014 Farhan Amin v. The Learned Chairman Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4340) 841/2013 Const. P. Muneer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 574
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.452-K/2022 Muneer Ahmed Abro v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4341) 2196/2022 Const. P. Deen Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 331
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1119-K/2023 Deen Muhammad v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary M/o Interior and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4342) 411/2016 H.C.A M/s. Zaidi Enterprises (Appellant) V/S Civil Aviation & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 MLD 792
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.985-K/2018 M/s Zaidi Enterprises thr. its Proprietor v. Civil Aviation Authority and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4343) 6548/2016 Const. P. Bibi Hajra (Petitioner) V/S The Trustees of the Port of Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Date of Birth )
Citation:2019 PLC Lab. 233
Advocates:Aamer Latif(ADVO-16121-SBC-KHE),Farhan Ahmed Mangi(ADVO-14154-SBC-KHE),Bashir Ahmed(ADVO-14353-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Rasool Mangi(ADVO-8411-SBC-KHI),Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1501-K/2021 The Trustees of Port of Karachi v. Bibi Hajra & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
4344) 261/2012 Cr.Misc. Rehana Kausar (Applicant) V/S The State & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Miscellaneous Application . (Final Report under A, B & C Class)
Tag Line:Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application is being disposed of with the directions to the I.O.
to investigate the FIR No.149/2012 against the above named accused persons only, in accordance with law, whereas the applicant Mst. Rehana Kausar shall not be harassed in any manner in the above matter. If the complainant fails to establish the prima-facie case against the above accused persons or does not cooperate with the investigation by producing any material, which may connect them with the instant crime, the I.O. of the case may submit Final Report under section 173 Cr.P.C. for disposal of the case in accordance with law preferably within a period of two weeks from today. The concerned Magistrate is directed
to pass appropriate orders on such report strictly in accordance with law within a period of two weeks.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 24-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
4345) 53/2018 Criminal Miscelleneous MST. AMEER JAHAN BISMA NOREEN (Applicant) V/S THE IXTH ADJ KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1915
Advocates:In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
4346) 5/2017 Civil Revision Nill (Applicant) V/S Nill (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 01-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
4347) 317/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Irfan (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Samina & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 84
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.569-K/2020 Muhammad Irfan v. Mst.Saima & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4348) 1894/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf Arain (Petitioner) V/S Water and Power Development Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1165
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
4349) 47/2019 Execution First Appeal A. QUTUBUDDIN KHAN (Decree Holder) V/S CHEC MILLWALA DREDGING CO. (PVT.) LTD (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies Act, 2017 (Section 425 (5) Director's personal liability)
Tag Line:Under what situation can the company's directors/shareholders/officers be held personally liable? Separate Legal Entity - Piercing the Corporate Veil - Company Easy Exit Scheme
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 109
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Balal Ahmed Khawaja(ADVO-2138-SBC-KHI),Nadeem Qutab(ADVO-7785-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-8124-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
4350) 135/2007 Cr.Acq.A. The State (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Siddique (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 30-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
4351) 284/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Muslim (Petitioner) V/S Azeem Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters)
Tag Line:Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----Ss. 15 & 18---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. I, R. 10 & S.12(2)---Ejectment of tenant---Execution petition---Conversion of application under O. I, R. 10, C.P.C. to an application under S. 12(2), C.P.C.---Scope---Execution petition was moved wherein an application for impleadment was filed which was converted into application under S.12(2), C.P.C. by the Rent Controller but Appellate Court set aside the said order---Validity---If tenant after entering into rent proceedings had chosen not to contest the same then order of his eviction could not be said to have been obtained fraudulently---Once tenant entered appearance in the proceedings and filed written statement then disposal of the case was on merits---Application under O. I, R. 10, C.P.C. could not be converted into an application under S. 12(2), C.P.C.---Ingredients of S. 12(2), C.P.C. were missing from the contents of application under O.I, R. 10, C.P.C.---Applicant had not alleged fraud and misrepresentation or that Rent Controller had no jurisdiction to entertain the case---Dispute and allegations levelled by the applicant were in the nature of civil matter which were outside the jurisdiction of Rent Controller---Applicant had prayed to be impleaded as intervener in the execution proceedings---Petitioner had not contended that eviction order was without jurisdiction or on account of any misrepresentation---Ownership of tenement could not be frustrated through a collateral proceedings pending before a civil Court---Applicant was neither landlord nor tenant in the demised premises from the date of execution of registered sale deed---Title of tenement stood transferred in favour of landlord by operation of law---Executing Court might evict the tenant in execution of its order passed in rent case---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2017 MLD 1857
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 18-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
4352) 611/2011 Const. P. Pakistan State Oil Company (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Zulekha Khanum and 6 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 15-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
4353) 391/2018 Const. P. Fayyaz Khan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1096
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4118/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi v. Fayyaz Khan and others,C.A.1563/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi v. Fayyaz Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.impugned is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Disposed of
4354) 211/2018 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD NASIR KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD MUKHTIAR (Appellant) V/S TH STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 28-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
4355) 1276/2001 Suit VIRGIN ENTERPRIES LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S VIRGIN EXPRESS INT. PVT. LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: TRADE MARK
Tag Line:Following the establishment of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of Sindh at Karachi, even if the Companies Act, 2017, provides a framework to change/rectify a company's name, where, in the opinion of the Registrar, the name of the Company is identical to or resembles or is similar to the name of a company, the High Court cannot transfer the suit partly relating to Trade Marks and Passing off while retaining the suit regarding injunctive relief under the Companies Act, 2017. The entire suit has to be transferred to the Intellectual Property Tribunal and left to the Plaintiff to take appropriate steps to seek such relief in accordance with law.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 27
Advocates:IRFAN & IRFAN ADVOCATES.(FIRM-125-SBC-KHI),Gohar Iqbal(ADVO-4248-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 29-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4356) 39/2024 H.C.A Province of Sindh and Others (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Faisal and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:
Even if we presume the impugned order to be a consent order/
decree, while passing such consent decree it is to be carefully seen if
the relief granted is within the frame of the suit, particularly when the
land originally belongs to the government and there is every possibility
of collusive proceedings in connivance with the government
functionaries/officials passing such oral instructions
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1861
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 25-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
4357) 72/2017 Cr.Acq.A. Mst. Abida Khatoon (Appellant) V/S Khalid Hussain and an others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
4358) 40/2016 Cr.Appeal Gahno Gishkori (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 28-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
4359) 1237/2021 Cr.Bail ADNAN S/O MUHAMMAD AYOUB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed with direction to the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the subject case within three (03) months strictly in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1360
Advocates:Rizwan Khan(ADVO-15380-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4360) 258/2014 Suit Feroz Ali Gaba (Plaintiff) V/S Fisherman's Cooperative Society Limited & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 11-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
4361) 2833/2013 Const. P. Sadar Amin Farooqi (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 766
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
4362) 5066/2017 Const. P. Karachi International Container Terminal (Petitioner) V/S Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
4363) 984/2021 Const. P. Munawar Ali & others (Petitioner) V/S Umar Daraz & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1416
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
4364) 4924/2013 Const. P. Abdul Rasheed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 MLD 561
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 05-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
4365) 25/2016 I. A Zafar Hasan Khan & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. Habib Bank Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Banking Law, Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance XLVI of 2001
Tag Line:The issuance of warrants in respect of
decrees, which were allegedly unaccomplished, is not a routine
matter. The case of Abdul Basit Zahid1 and the case of Precision
Engineering Ltd.2 speaks volume. In the first case the Division Bench
was of the view that Section-51 CPC provides for execution of a
decree through arrest and detention of the judgment-debtor and the proviso thereof furnishes certain safeguards against the deprivation
of liberty and contemplates that such power can only be exercised
under certain given situations. In the instant case, such situations
were not considered prior to the issuance of warrants.
Citation:2024 CLC 1068, 2024 CLD 770
Advocates:Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS),Zamir Ahmed(ADVO-13478-SBC-KHE),Suleman Hudda(ADVO-8799-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 15-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
4366) 206/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Anwar Ali & Others (Applicant) V/S The State & Another (Complainant)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 370
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.149-K/2024 Mst. Madiha Bano v. Senior Superintendent of Police Complaint Cell South Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:In Transit Dismissed
4367) 36/1986 I. A L.A.O Nawabshah & others (Appellant) V/S Haji Ghulam Nabi thr: L.Rs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Land Acquisition Act,1894 (Limitation)
Tag Line:LAND ACQUISITION ACT.
No Notice under Section 12. Limitation of six months as mentioned in Section 18 2(b) applies.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 785
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
4368) 4/2016 I. A Dr. Bhagwandas and another (Appellant) V/S Mashooq Ali Jatoi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Defamation Ordinance, 2002. (Non-compliance of Section 8)
Tag Line:Defamation suits are regulated by special law. The non-compliance of the statutory requirement under Section 8 meant that the defamation claim could not be maintained. The first Appeal was dismissed.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 126
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
4369) 28/2008 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Shahid @ Aamir & another V/S The State (Appellant) V/S Shahid @ Aamir & another V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
4370) 336/2024 Suit JAVED AKHTAR ARBAB (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERAT (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Stay on transfer order)
Tag Line:Injunction Application against the Transfer Order is dismissed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1446
Advocates:Hafeez Ullah(ADVO-18295-SBC-KHE),Sayed Yasir Ahmed Shah(ADVO-11570-SBC-KHI),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Touqeer Ahmed(ADVO-52245-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
4371) 2483/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD FAROOQ S/O ADUL WAHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bail can be denied in cases involving fraud, forgery, cheating, and criminal conspiracy if the prosecution can establish a strong prima facie case against the accused. In the present case, the learned counsel for the applicant has been unable to explain why the applicant has been a beneficiary of Rs. 2200,000/- credited into his account No. 1286-0221929371001739 from the account of his brother Abdul Latif Sheikh (co-accused). The learned counsel although submitted the said payment was the internal transaction between two brothers i.e. Abdul Latif and the applicant, yet remained unable to explain the nature of the said transaction.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 424
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
4372) 131/2025 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Alam Shah (Petitioner) V/S PO sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Ghotki-Kandhkot Bridge Development Project falls in the Policy making domain of Executive. This Court cannot interfere in policy matters under Writ Jurisdiction.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 912
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2415/2025 Syed Muhammad Alam Shah v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4373) 1629/2014 Const. P. Trade Link Corporation (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 03-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
4374) 2833/2017 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Waseem and 4 others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
4375) 1637/2020 Const. P. Mrs. Naheed Durrani (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB
Tag Line:Petitioners, accused in reference were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court . NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court and remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250 . The case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, for committing corruption and corrupt practices illegal means while Other petitioners, accused in the reference, said to be his family members ,associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, are identified as Benamidar/ ostensible owners of the properties actually owned and possessed by him. foreign currency and estimation of value of properties held by his Benamidars and his family members, Copies of pay orders got issued from banks, by his servants or the officials working with him, is yet another prima facie piece of evidence against him in this respect. when he buys a property in the name of his wife or children, or makes payments at their behest for this purpose, there would normally be no reason for them to get alarmed or suspect that he has done corruption and is providing money from the wealth earned by him .petitions of Mrs. Naheed Durrani (C.P.No.D-1637/2020),allowed and their bail is confirmed on the same terms and conditions they were granted ad interim pre arrest bail on.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1373
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.6304/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Mrs. Naheed Durrani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4376) 52/2025 M.A. Naseem Fatima (since deceased) thr. LRs (Appellant) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2574
Advocates:Ibad Jawed(ADVO-23217-SBC-KHS),Abdul Hameed(ADVO-13458-SBC-KHI),Zeeshan Asad(ADVO-530-SBC-SGR),Javed Ahmed(ADVO-4482-SBC-KHE),Nadir Khan Burdi(ADVO-13227-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
4377) 117/2010 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. SALMAN TIN MERCHANT (Applicant) V/S COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 742
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 29-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.768/2014 The Collector of Customs v. M/s Salman Tin Merchant,C.P.L.A.116-K/2014 The Collector of Customs v. M/s Salman Tin Merchant Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Leave Granted
4378) 816/2018 Criminal Miscelleneous Syed Ahmed Ali Shah (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
4379) 38/2013 Cr.Rev M/S Sardar Muhammad Ashraf Baloch (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon
Order Date: 10-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
4380) 4534/2019 Const. P. Faisal Rasheed (Petitioner) V/S SESSI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article
199 of the Constitution.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1285
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2744/2022 Faisal Rasheed v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4381) 235/2010 H.C.A Chief Engineer, Building and Road Department, Government of Balochistan Quetta (Appellant) V/S M/s Umar Khan through Mr. Mumar Khan Managing Partner I-E-4/1-A Nazimabad Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1552/2014 Chief Engineer, Bulding & Road Department, Govt. of Balochistan, Quetta v. M/s Umar Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4382) 1132/2011 Suit NASIR HUSSAIN (Plaintiff) V/S MST.SHAHNAWAZ BEGUM & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 157
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
4383) 5505/2021 Const. P. Faheem Ali (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman SIndh Service Tribunal (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Maintainability of Petition)
Tag Line:we do not find that this Court has jurisdiction under Article 199(1) (ii) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as well as in terms of the ratio of the decisions rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Khalilullah Kakar v. Provincial Police Officer, 2021 SCMR 1171, and Chief Secretary Government of Punjab Lahore, etc v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390, to take into consideration all the grounds raised by learned counsel for the petitioners in the memo of petitions which wholly pertain to matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of the petitioners against which Article 212(3) of the Constitution imposes a specific bar.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 186
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.833-K/2022 Faheem Ali v. The Chairman Sindh Service Tribunal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of [ Remanded to SST ]
4384) 397/2023 H.C.A Amir Khan through Attorney M. Feroze (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal (dismissed as impugned Order ad-interim - Parties right of appeal when applications finally decided)
Tag Line:Appeal filed against an ad-interim Order, parties will have a right of appeal when the applications are finally decided. At the moment, Pink Residency obtained an injunction when no final decree could be passed which issue is yet to be finally decided. Parties (Appellant, Intervener/Pink Residency/Official Government) chain of title in Suit Property yet to be decided? Intervener/Pink Residency is yet to explain how it obtained possession after Nazir presumably handed it over to the Appellant. Several issues are yet to be decided, Appeal dismissed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 918
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI),Shamail Sikander(ADVO-18733-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 02-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
4385) 161/2023 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. GHULAM RABBANI S/O ABDUL KAREEM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 520
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Shahzad Ahmed(ADVO-14236-SBC-KHW),Ashraf Ali Shah(ADVO-10706-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 23-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
4386) 40/2015 Suit Technova Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Sohail Tayyab Ali & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
4387) 4581/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Hassan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Regularization of Project Employees
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 631
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.764-K/2025 Muhammad Hassan v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Notice
4388) 6242/2018 Const. P. Raheel Mehtab (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The preceding analysis constrains the conclusion that NADRA's Regulations are non-statutory. Although the petitioner proceeded against the statutory Rules of 1973, their adoption under Regulation 23 of the non-statutory Regulations gives them a non-statutory status in this context. Consequently, this constitutional petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution more particularly in terms of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Maj. (Retd.) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas's case supra and is therefore, dismissed with the pending application(s).
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1055
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4389) 3542/2015 Const. P. M/s UBL (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Afzal Solangi and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Tariq Mehmood Mughal(ADVO-3329-PBC-LHR),Muhammad Ameen(ADVO-8307-SBC-KHI),Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
4390) 7271/2021 Const. P. Atlas Honda Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 37
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI),Asad Khan(ADVO-155521-KBC-PES),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 22-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.825-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Atlas Honda Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
4391) 4356/2019 Const. P. Arshad Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Civil Servant Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 (Group Insurance)
Tag Line:Without prejudice to above, since there is consent order, no review was preferred even that order was not assailed. In case, if there was no deduction by the department and they were sending salary directly to the account; that is not justification to withhold group insurance. Accordingly, Secretary Health, Government of Sindh shall ensure that group insurance amount is paid as per her entitlement to the nominee without any delay. While parting this order, learned AG Sindh shall ensure presence of any focal person of Accountant General Sindh (A.G. Sindh) to assist this Court that under what capacity complete salary was transferred and they failed to deduct the amount and who were responsible with regard to such irregularity, if any. This exercise shall be completed within 15 days.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 210
Advocates:Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Nazeer Ahmed Shar(ADVO-9655-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4392) 8903/2018 Const. P. M/s Crescent Star Insurance (Petitioner) V/S SECP and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1039
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI),Manzar Bashir(ADVO-13572-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 31-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
4393) 35/2009 Judicial Companies Misc. The Securities & Exchange Commissioner of Pakistan (Applicant) V/S Natover Lease Reliance Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (Companies Ordinance, 1984)
Tag Line:Incorporation does not fully cast a veil over the personality of a limited company through which
the courts cannot see. The courts can, and often do, pull off the mask.
They look to see what really lies behind. A corporation will be looked upon as a legal entity as a general rule but when the notion of legal entity is used to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, protect fraud or defend crime the law will regard the corporation as an association of
persons
Citation:2023 CLD 225
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
4394) 16/2025 Criminal Appeal Bakhshal Bozdar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1882
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
4395) 669/2012 Suit ABDUL JABBAR MOTIWALLA (Plaintiff) V/S ISMAIL ABDUL SHAKOOR SECURITIES (PVT)LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
4396) 292/2024 Const. P. Suleman Eqbal S/o Eqbal Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sabeen Suleman and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1443
Advocates:Syed Irshad ur Rehman(ADVO-8599-SBC-KHI),Mariam Salahuddin(ADVO-19747-SBC-KHE),Abdul Rehman Adeed(ADVO-19876-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
4397) 2561/2018 Const. P. Syed Taj Hussain Shah (Petitioner) V/S Dr. Sara Mihnas & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1578
Advocates:Faiz Mehmood Khan Durani(ADVO-4955-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aziz Khan(ADVO-3324-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.70-K/2020 Syed Taj Hussain Shah v. Dr.Sana Minhas and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4398) 3143/2018 Const. P. Shafi Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
4399) 10/2017 Cr.Appeal SULEMAN S/O MAQBOOL AHMED (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 06-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
4400) 59/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous Babu Bhatti (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:164 Cr. P.C Statement of witness.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 700, 2025 SHC LAR 741
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4401) 65/2021 Criminal Appeal Adam Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 YLR 2831, 2023 SBLR Sindh 1875
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.360/2023 Adam Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4402) 7292/2018 Const. P. Pathfiner International, USA (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
4403) 202/2014 Cr.Appeal Aadil (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 07-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.483/2015 Aadil v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4404) 48/2016 Judicial Companies Misc. TPL TRAKKER LIMITED & OTHERS (Petitioner) V/S V/S (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLD 33
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
4405) 200/2019 Suit Agha Steel Industries Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Directorate of Intelligence & Investigation & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tax matters (Conduct of raid u section 175 of I Tax Ord and u/s 38 of Sales Tax Act 1990)
Tag Line:Sales Tax Act & Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 - Power to search premises of a taxpayer under S. 38 of Sales Tax Act and Section 175 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 can only by permitted when "some proceedings" are already pending before the officer.
Citation:2019 PTD 2119
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
4406) 4510/2024 Const. P. Adeel Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 743
Advocates:Umer Ilyas Khan(ADVO-20501-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 16-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5098/2024 Adeel Khan v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary Revenue, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4407) 7101/2021 Const. P. Zakwan Steel & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed.of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 624
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.919-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Zakwan Steel & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4408) 57/2024 Criminal Appeal ABDUL REHMAN S/O MUHAMMAD SULTAN@ MUHAMMAD AYYAZ (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is a settled principle of law that no one should be convicted of a crime based on presumption in the absence of strong evidence of unimpeachable character and legally admissible. Similarly, the mere heinous or gruesome nature of the crime shall not detract the Court of law in any manner from the due course to judge and make the appraisal of evidence in a laid down manner and to extend the benefit of reasonable doubt to an accused person being indefeasible and inalienable right of an accused. It is also an established principle of law that an accused person is presumed to be innocent until and unless he is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and this presumption of his innocence continues until the prosecution succeeds in proving the charge against him beyond a reasonable doubt based on legally admissible, confidence-inspiring, trustworthy and reliable evidence. It has also been held by the Superior Courts that conviction must be based upon unimpeachable evidence and certainty of guilt and any doubt arising in the prosecution case must be resolved in favor of the accused
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 480
Advocates:Muhammad Imran Khan(ADVO-8714-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
4409) 1066/2020 Cr.Bail SHABBIR AHMED S/O GUL MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1579
Advocates:Qaim Ali(ADVO-11490-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
4410) 3/2014 II.A. Abdul Samad Soomro (Appellant) V/S Mst Nazir Bano and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1356
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.157-K/2022 Abdul Samad v. Mst.Nazir Bano & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
4411) 2072/2014 Const. P. General (Retd.) Pervez Musharraf (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLD Sindh 389
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.870/2014,C.M.A.2411/2016,C.P.2488/2014,C.M.A.2412/2016,C.P.1050/2014,C.P.1030/2014 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relief also Granted.
4412) 826/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Samad Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the show-cause notice is without jurisdiction on the count that the customs authorities have not been conferred with the powers of adjudication as far as Sales Tax Act, 1990 and the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 are concerned. Customs Authorities have powers to collect sales tax/income tax etc. at the import stage in the capacity of collecting agents on the basis of registration certificate and the status is being adjudged by the registration authority itself.
In the absence of any evidence which could contravene the requirements of the subject SRO, no other view is deducible as these are questions of facts alone, which are thus answered accordingly in favour of respondent and against the applicant.
Citation:2022 PTD 796, 2022 SBLR Sindh 22
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 30-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1602-K/2021 The Colelctor of Customs, Karachi v. M/s. Samad Enterprises Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4413) 7991/2019 Const. P. Saeed Hassan (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB
Tag Line: Accountability Courts Sindh at Karachi ,rejecting the report recommending closure of investigation undertaken by National Accountability Bureau against petitioner on a complaint . The petitioner, a builder, statedly a part of Saddar Market Development Consortium, was entrusted to build additional six floors on Saddar Cooperative Market Karachi after a bidding process carried out under the auspices . Ostensibly ,nothing incriminating was found against him, and despite all the hurdles, he succeeded in completing about 95% of the work on the project. On one occasion, since the issue happened to be between two government departments, the matter was referred to the Chief Secretary Sindh for resolution. He, however ,could not prove to be of any assistance, and in view of controversial claims of each party on the issue failed to achieve any result and communicated his inability to the court in writing. Petition is allowed as prayed .
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1322
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 17-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
4414) 2946/2020 Const. P. Aijaz Ali Pathan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:An employee who has been superseded once; cannot be considered for promotion until expiry of one year as provided in Rule 10(5) of Civil Servants Promotion (BPS-18 to BPS-21) Rules 2019.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 584
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
4415) 43/2024 Cr.J.A Ayaz Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1506
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4416) 3503/2016 Const. P. Syeda Imammah Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Yaqoob and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code (Further enquiry), Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:This petition was directed against the order passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge, Karachi (South), acting as Ex.Offcio of justice of peace on the application under Section 22-A (6)(i), Cr.P.C.
Scope of Article 199 of the constitution, Scope of Section 22-A, Cr.P.C. (Powers of Justice of Peace), Section 22-B, Cr.P.C. (Duties of Justice of Peace) and Section 25, Cr.P.C. (Ex.Offcio of justice of peace) in the light of Larger Bench Judgment in the case of Younus Abbas and others v. Additional Sessions Judge, Chakwal and others (PLD 2016 S.C. 581) have been discussed.
It was observed that par Article 199 of the Constitution, the High Court to act in the aid of law and protects the rights within the frame work of Constitution, and if there is any error on the point of law committed by the courts below or the tribunal or their decision takes no notice of any pertinent provision of law, then obviously High Court may exercise Constitutional jurisdiction subject to the non-availability of any alternate remedy under the law. The jurisdiction conferred under Article 199 of the Constitution is discretionary with the objects to foster justice in aid of justice and not to perpetuate injustice.
Citation:2017 SBLR Sindh 489, 2018 SBLR Sindh 508, 2017 MLD 806
Advocates:Shahzad Qamer Abbas(ADVO-11370-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
4417) 4859/2013 Const. P. Khalil Ahmed Jalil and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.513-K/2018 M/s Pakistan Steel thr. its Chairman/CEO and another v. Khalil Ahmed Jalil and others,C.A.328/2020 M/s Pakistan Steel thr. its Chairman/CEO and another v. Khalil Ahmed Jalil and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 2 weeks a/w C.A.34-K/2019 etc, Adjourned (Next Date: 20-Jan-25)
4418) 6400/2022 Const. P. Aaimr Hussain (Petitioner) V/S The Accountability Court VI and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB
Tag Line:Bail granted to the accused after transfer of case by Accountability Court to District Judge East and no Court has taken cognizance.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 526
Advocates:Mehmood Ahmed(ADVO-14176-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Rahib Lakho(ADVO-11166-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
4419) 117/2011 Suit.B I.G.I. Investment Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S M/S Admore Gas (Pvt) Ltd & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 06-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
4420) 979/1995 Const. P. Ray Shipping Enterprises (Petitioner) V/S Astt.Collector of Customs & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1845/2016 Ray Shipping Enterprise Ltd thr. its Chief Executive v. Assistant Collectos of Customs Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4421) 730/2021 Cr.Bail Jinsar Ali Lund (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 1198
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 23-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
4422) 62/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. NADEEM @ CHITTA S/O SIRAJUDDIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Mumtaz Ali Khan Deshmukh(ADVO-3555-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
4423) 78/2013 Suit.B Habib Metropolitan Bank Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Shahi Textiles and others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891, Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (section 9(2))
Tag Line:the statement of account filed along with the plaint cannot be
stated to be a statement of account under the provisions of Banker
Books Evidence Act, 1891 and cannot support the claim of the plaintiff in
terms of the provisions of Section 9 subsection (2) of the Financial
Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001.
Advocates:Samia Alam Durrani(ADVO-4007HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
4424) 200/2007 Const. P. M/s. Asian Busniess Corporation (Petitioner) V/S M/s. PNSC & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
4425) 1178/2016 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa and others (Petitioner) V/S Jashan Mal and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:The question of the pendency of the suit and necessary registration under Section 18 of the Registration Act is misconceived since the decree had already been passed and as such the defence, as claimed in terms of the registration of an agreement of sale under Section 18 of the Registration Act was not available.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
4426) 68/2009 Const. P. Gulshan and others (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 662
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 15-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
4427) 2278/2018 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Ayub and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Interpretation , Interpretation (Interpretation of document)
Tag Line:The syntax concerning the slash (/) sign repeatedly used in the General Power of Attorney has, context and deeper meaning, is a tool of interpretation and provides a signpost to the person relying on it to plead his rights. Therefore, there is merit in spending some time with the slash (/) sign to decide this Petition. The Orders of the trial court and the District Court, both forums have not given importance to the slash ( / ) sign appearing in the General Power of Attorney.???. The use of slash (/) meant that the word ???case??? and ???property??? should be read interchangeably. As discussed hereinabove as ???case and/or property???. This meant that all the powers set out in the General Power of Attorney related to both the Suit and the Subject Property. A restrictive meaning could not be read into the General Power of Attorney. A power of attorney, which is related to the accretion of the right to the properties and assets of the principal, has to be interpreted liberally and not in a restrictive and stringent manner. Petition allowed. Application under Section 12(2) remanded to the trial court.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 600
Advocates:Arshad Jamal Siddiqui(ADVO-5521-SBC-KHI),Syed Ashar Askar Zaidi(ADVO-19830-SBC-KHS),Adnan Ahmed(ADVO-3134-SBC-KHI),Bilawal Channa(ADVO-16039-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3996/2024 Abdul Ghaffar Jamali and others v. Province of Sindh to be served through Home Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4428) 7/2022 Criminal Appeal LAL BUX @ LAL (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:9(c) matter
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4429) 52/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and others (Applicant) V/S Manohar Lal (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 997
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
4430) 516/2020 Criminal Appeal FAROOQUE S/O SIDDIQUE (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 646
Advocates:Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Siraj Ahmed(ADVO-21557-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4431) 331/2021 Const. P. Waqas Behlum (Petitioner) V/S KPT and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:KPT-fresh show cause notice--allegations of misconduct--It is a well-settled principle of law that a public Servant has no vested right to call in question the disciplinary proceedings in Writ Petition. During arguments, we have been informed that the petitioners service has not yet been dispensed with under the disciplinary proceedings, however, they are at liberty to conclude the disciplinary proceedings (if not earlier concluded) within a reasonable time under law after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1260
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4432) 273/2023 Suit ISMAIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Pakistan Plant Quarantine Act, 1976 (Pakistan Quarantine Rules, 2019)
Tag Line:Plaintiff is seeking the release of a consignment of imported raw peanuts after court-tested Lab Reports observed levels of aflatoxin exceeded the permissible limit of 20 ppb enforced by the Department of Plant Protection. Pleadings sought relief based on errors in gathering samples for testing of aflatoxin levels sent to different Labs across Pakistan. Plaint did not impugn the testing standards of PPD, challenged sampling only (applying plant standards to food items), USDA procedure for aflatoxin thought adopted by DPP, not properly applied and pest (fungi) causing aflatoxin not codified. Plaintiff could not plead a different case. Challenge not set up in Plaint, argued orally, cannot help Plaintiff's cause when seeking discretionary relief. Single Judge Order not binding, distinguishable on facts, prima facie case not made out as Court-ordered Report confirming higher than allowable levels of aflatoxin in consignment not appealed or challenged.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 315
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza Korai(ADVO-14432-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Danish(ADVO-14246-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Yousuf Alam(ADVO-14083-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
4433) 39/2012 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Ali AKbar & 2 Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 16-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
4434) 1291/2003 Suit MRS.SANA RIZWAN (Plaintiff) V/S MRS.AMNA FAHIM & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Contract Act (Contract Act )
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---
----S.12---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 17, 79 & 129, illustration (g)---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Agreement, proof of---Withholding of evidence---Plaintiff claimed to have entered into agreement with defendant regarding sale of suit property---Second instalment was payable by plaintiff to defendant within seven days after publication of advertisement inviting objections to sale---Plaintiff never published any public notice in newspaper inviting objections to her intended purchase of suit property, during 90 days period of time and therefore, did not offer to make payment of second instalment in breach of agreement---To the contrary, through a letter, plaintiff proposed that defendant should hand over possession of suit property immediately without further payment---Effect---Intention and conduct were going in directions which could not be termed as anything except an intended breach of terms and conditions of agreement of sale---Requirement of Arts. 17 & 79 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, to prove execution of contract by producing two attesting witnesses had not been done, therefore, reference to Art. 129, illustration (g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, was misconceived---Plaintiff herself had failed to produce the best evidence without explaining circumstances of her failure---High Court decided issues against plaintiff---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2015 YLR 1834
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 20-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
4435) 574/2015 Suit Syed Abdul Ghani (Plaintiff) V/S Malir Development Authority and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Manzoor Ahmed(ADVO-2423-SBC-KHI),M/S. IQBAL KHURRAM LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-231-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Irfan(ADVO-9580-SBC-KHI),Nazeer Ahmed Shar(ADVO-9655-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
4436) 821/2016 Suit Ayesha Solvent Plant (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 1976
Tag Line:Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 1976---
----R. 8(1)(5)---Phytosanitary certificate---Place of origin, determination of---Principle---Goods in transit/re-export---Consignment in question consisted of soyabean of Brazil and US origin imported by an importer in Egypt and was off loaded at an Egyptian port---Relevant authorities of Brazil and USA had issued Phytosanitary certificates and on basis of same certificates, consignment was exported to Pakistan---Authorities declined to issue necessary plant protection release order in relation to consignment in question on the ground that origin of consignment was Egypt, not Brazil/USA therefore, Phytosanitary certificate had to be issued by Egypt, not Brazil/USA---Validity---Shipment from port of Egypt was being made after a delay of about six months and it might or might not be in transit---Provisions of R.8(1) of Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 1967 required that such plant or plant material should carry official certificate from a plant quarantine authority of that country and did not only relate to a country where such plants or plant products were grown--- Place of origin varied according to situation and requirement of a Phytosanitary status---Place of origin under the Convention and Act referred to a place from where a consignment gained its Phytosanitary status where possibility of exposure to infestation or contamination of pests was evident and could not be ruled out---Place where commodity was grown was not always considered as place of origin---If a commodity was stored, its Phytosanitary status could change over a period of time as a result of its new location---In such cases, new location could change Phytosanitary status and might be considered as place of origin---Place of origin was dependent upon Phytosanitary status not place of growth---Commodity could gain its Phytosanitary status from more than one places and NPPO of all such countries providing certificates should decide about place or places of origin depending upon the situation that they had undergone which might have changed Phytosanitary status---Egypt was to be considered as place of origin for such shipment, and the definition of 'place of origin' in policy would not turn the situation unless such certificates were made available, authorities in Pakistan under Quarantine Act were justified in not issuing release order---In terms of R.8(5) Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 1967, shipment arrived without certificate or declaration meant in R. 8(2) of Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 1967 and with permit were liable to be confiscated or destroyed or to be returned to the port of origin at the expense of importer---Application was disposed of with order and observations by the High Court.
Citation:2016 PLD Sindh 532
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
4437) 239/2018 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Umar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 523
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
4438) 5483/2016 Const. P. Papoo Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1158-K/2018 Papoo Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4439) 48/2021 Cr.J.A Mohammad Siddique Brohi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Explosive Substances Act. Benefit of doubt. Acquittal.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1242
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4440) 27/2009 J.M ROYAL PVC (PVC) LTD (Petitioner) V/S THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 29-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting
4441) 69/2022 M.A. M/s. Meerut Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (Appellant) V/S Shahid Akhtar Qureshi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Urdu
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 880, 2025 SHC KHI 2050
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
4442) 27/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst. Muneera Khatoon D/o Late Maulana Abdul Quddus (Applicant) V/S City District Government Karachi (CDGK) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----Ss.96, 115 & O.I, R.10---Appeal or revision on behalf of a party having no grievance against dismissal of suit---Maintainability---Applicant was impleaded in the suit under O.I, R.10, C.P.C., but she neither filed written statement nor appeared in the witness box---Suit was dismissed on merits against which no appeal had been filed on behalf of plaintiff---Validity---Defendants were not supposed to have any grievance against the dismissal of suit unless they had raised a counter claim in their written statement against the plaintiff which had also been dismissed or not decided by the Trial Court---No adverse observations had been passed against the applicant in the case---If applicant wanted the suit to be decreed then she should have either filed a separate suit or should have paid court fee to become co-plaintiff provided she had any claim in the suit property to be adjudicated in her favour---Applicant, after having been impleaded as defendant had not filed written statement nor she had appeared in the witness box---Suit had been dismissed on merits against which no appeal had been filed on behalf of plaintiff---Present suit could not be decreed against main contesting defendants on appeal by one of the defendants who had not filed even written statement in the Trial Court---Applicant was not aggrieved person in consequence of impugned judgment---Revision as well as appeal pending before Appellate Court filed by the applicant were not maintainable, which were dismissed with cost, in circumstances.
H.M Yahya & Co., Karachi v. Wazir Ali Industries Ltd., Karachi and another PLD 1969 SC 65; Syed Musarat Hussain Zaidi and another v. Syed Salim Jawaid Zaidi and another PLD 1983 Kar. 548; Habibullah v. Zakir Ali and another PLD 2000 Kar. 238 and Mst. Arfa Arif v. Mst. Kulsoom Naqvi PLD 2000 Kar. 31 rel.
Citation:2020 CLC 1878
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
4443) 2513/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Hussain (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
4444) 16/2014 I. A MS United Energy Pak Beta Gmbh through its Manager (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Mohammad & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 647
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
4445) 287/1990 Adm. Suit Jugolinifa (Plaintiff) V/S Sayeed A.Tayyab (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Rule of 'best evidence' explained; according to which, if a best piece of evidence is not produced by a party or is withheld, then an adverse inference would be drawn against such party, that it deliberately not produced the evidence coupled with some ulterior motive.
Objection can be taken during pendency of case that the Suit has been instituted by a person who was not duly authorized or competent to file the proceeding, as envisaged under Order XXIX, Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, even though no specific Issue was framed in this regard, but, in the evidence the Plaintiff witness was cross-examined on this particular fact and was given an opportunity to produce relevant authorization, under which the suit was instituted, but, he failed to do so. Since defect in filing proceeding was incurable, hence, suit was dismissed.
Topic: Admiralty
Tag Line:Suit filed by unauthorized person---Defect in filing proceeding was incurable, hence, suit was dismissed
Citation:2016 SBLR Sindh 1651
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 28-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
4446) 69/2010 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Faisal Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 644
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 03-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.251/2015 Collector of Customs v. M/s Faisal Enterprises,C.P.L.A.89-K/2014 Collector of Customs v. M/s Faisal Enterprises Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted
4447) 2899/2017 Const. P. Yasse Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Repatriation)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
4448) 639/2022 Criminal Miscelleneous KARIM BUX JOKHIO @ JAVED & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Return of final report U/S 173 Cr.P.C to investigation officer for placing before special court )
Tag Line:We have noticed that the Judicial Magistrate has been conferred with wide powers to take cognizance of an offense not only when he receives information about the commission of offense from a third person but also when he has knowledge or even suspicion that the offense has been committed. The Magistrate has the power to independently review a police report, even if it concludes that no offense was committed. They can disagree with the police's opinion and take cognizance of the offense, ordering further investigation or issuing process to the accused. The Magistrate's decision is based on their assessment of the facts, not solely on the police's opinion. The terms "charge sheet" and "final report" are not formally defined in the Code. However, they are commonly used in police rules to refer to reports filed under Section 170 Cr.P.C. Reports filed under Section 169, where there's insufficient evidence, are often termed "referred charge," "final report," or "summary."
16. In view of the above we, therefore, dispose of these Criminal Miscellaneous Applications along with the pending application(s), with direction to the trial court to proceed with the matter, frame the charge, and culminate the Criminal proceedings in its logical conclusion within a reasonable time.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 733
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
4449) 5020/2020 Const. P. Irfan Mukhtar Bhutto (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Petition dismissed. Departmental proceedings is in filed , hence Can not Claim Promotion . )
Tag Line:deferment of the Petitioners promotion on grounds of the pending disciplinary proceedings
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1357
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4450) 66/2021 S.M.A Syeda Shakira Raza w/o Ghulam Raza (Petitioner) V/S . (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 57
Advocates:Atir Aqeel Ansari(ADVO-21844-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ajmal Khan(ADVO-10273-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
4451) 260/2018 Const. P. Mazhar Ali Kalhoro (Petitioner) V/S Secretary to Govt. of Sindh & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 505
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 18-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
4452) 2308/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 314
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2394/2022 Jawaid Juman Lund Baloch v. The Election Commission of Pakistan through Chief Election Commissioner, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4453) 2084/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Imran S/o Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) V/S Court of IVth Rent Controller Khi South & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Mustafa Lakhani(ADVO-208-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ahmed Hussain(ADVO-15940-SBC-KHI),Iftikhar Ali Larik(ADVO-497-SBC-SUK),Nasrullah Malik(ADVO-11854-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.627-K/2018 Karachi High School owned & operated by the Civil Lines Educational Society thr. Director and another v. Muhammad Imran Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4454) 17/2025 R.A (Civil Revision) Yar Muhammad (Applicant) V/S wazir and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Revision is allowed, the judgment of the appellate Court is set aside and the order of the trial Court is restored.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1996
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
4455) 1080/2021 Cr.Bail ZAHID (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Bail After Arrest.
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 198
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 03-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
4456) 12/2021 Election Appeal Hasnain Ali Chohan S/o Mumtaz Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Miftah Ismail Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Election Matters
Tag Line:To a specific query, Appellant replied, which is supported by the record, that till date Respondent No.1 has not been convicted in the NAB Reference pending against him; but his assets have been frozen by the NAB (National Accountability Bureau), which shows that he is involved in corrupt and illegal practice. This argument is not acceptable as there is no
supporting record, including any judicial order. No information or material has been brought on record to prima facie show that Respondent No.1 is a defaulter of loans, taxes and Government dues, as envisaged in sub-section (4) of Section 63 of the Elections Law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 613
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
4457) 948/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Abdullah Traders (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 25-D), Custom Act, 1969 (Section 25-A)
Tag Line:The goods declaration for the release of the consignments were filed prior to the insertion of sub section 4 of Section 25-A. Learned counsel for the applicant does not controvert these facts. Thus at the relevant time when the goods were cleared and/or goods declarations were filed, benefit of sub section 4 of Section 25-A was not available with the applicant for enforcing
earlier Valuation Ruling dated 10.12.2007 which was reviewed on 1.9.2008 issued by the competent authority under Section 25-A and 25-D of the Act. Undoubtedly before insertion of sub section 4 the continuity of an earlier time lapsed Valuation Ruling could not have
been enforced.
Citation:2022 PTD 372, 2022 PTCL 420
Advocates:M/S. IQBAL KHURRAM LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-231-SBC-KHI),Iqbal Masih Khurram (Iqbal M. Khurram)(ADVO-4370-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 22-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
4458) 74/2016 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Nasir Khan & Sons (Applicant) V/S Sindh Revenue Board (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Aminuddin Ansari(ADVO-3574-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Hyder Shaikh(ADVO-10758-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
4459) 3651/2018 Const. P. Saleem Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
4460) 2038/2015 Const. P. Ashraf Suleman (Petitioner) V/S IXth ADJ (South), Karachi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979
Tag Line:in order to avail a remedy under section 14 of the SRPO, 1979 the applicant/landlord is required to establish his personal need. In that case there would be no distinction left between section 14 and 15(2)(vii) of the SRPO, 1979 and the object of scheme and the purpose for which it was provided would be frustrated. The provisions of Section 14 is meant for a particular class of a landlord and hence the burden of establishing bona fide requirement or even a requirement was lifted. Section 14 has its own barrier and it is not an un-probed provision. Subsection (2) of Section 14 of the SRPO provides that nothing in this subsection shall apply where the landlord has rented out a building after he has retired or attained the age of 60 years or, as the case may be, i.e. landlord has become widow or orphan.
Advocates:Islamuddin(ADVO-4054-SBC-KHI),Adnan Usman(ADVO-9736-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Mohammad Ali Waris(ADVO-4491-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.882/2023 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd (SSGCL) through its M.D. Karachi and another v. Abdul Aziz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4461) 829/2020 Cr.Bail ALLAH MUHAMMAD S/O KHUDA NOOR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(1) Direction by a superior Court to the trial court to conclude a trial within a specified period is an administrative direction, and non-compliance thereof does not ipso facto entitle an accused person to be admitted to bail.
(2) Return of the stolen amount by the accused cannot be taken as a ground in itself to grant bail independent of the merits of the case.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1935
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
4462) 213/2014 H.C.A Pervaiz Ahmed Siddiqui & another (Appellant) V/S Aijaz Ahmed Siddiqui (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
4463) 251/2011 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue. (Applicant) V/S Medicaids Pakistan Pvt Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.480-K/2015 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Medicaids Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.1851/2016 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Medicaids Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 24-Jun-25)
4464) 35/2013 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SYED RIZWAN AHMED S/O JALEEL MIAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Khan Zaman(ADVO-10725-SBC-KHI),Nasir Mehmood(ADVO-7305-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 25-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
4465) 142/2009 Const. P. Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: TVO Employees Service Rules (Rule 14)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh
Order Date: 16-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting
4466) 7120/2019 Const. P. Zamir Ahmed Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Lt Cdr (R) Kashif Ahmed Abbasi and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Additional Secretary is directed to ensure that vacant possession of the subject flat is taken over from respondent No.1 and/or from any person(s) in possession on his behalf, and is handed over to the present petitioner without fail within seven (07) days from today. Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh, is directed to pay a sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) to the petitioner on or before the next date of hearing as compensation. The Additional Secretary, Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, is directed to submit a complete list before this Court on the next date of hearing of all such quarters, flats, bungalows and Government accommodation that are in unauthorized occupation or possession of such persons who are not entitled to enjoy possession thereof. Adjourned to 26.02.2020 at 11:00 am when above named Additional Secretary shall be in attendance. Let notice be issued to Chief Secretary Sindh to ensure compliance of this order in letter and spirit.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2246
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
4467) 6627/2022 Const. P. Mrs. Afreen Begum (Petitioner) V/S Malir Cantonment Board (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (Section 185)
Tag Line:Regularisation under the Cantonment Malir Cantonment Building Byelaws 2023.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 832
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Syed Ahsan Imam Rizvi(ADVO-11801-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Atique -ur- Rehman(ADVO-9468-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
4468) 10/2020 Cr.Appeal ZAHID ALI MIRJAT (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 914
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 14-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
4469) 397/2024 Cr.Bail Haji & Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 799
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
4470) 89/2017 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Ali Chachar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 27-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
4471) 78/2021 I. A M/S Qalandri Filling & CNG Station (Appellant) V/S The Manager SME Leasing Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance XLVI of 2001
Citation:2024 CLD 106
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 28-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1277-K/2023 M/s. Qalandri Filling & CNG Station v. The Manager S.M.E. Leasing Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4472) 3305/2018 Const. P. Shahrukh Ul Hassan & Other (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 220
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1263-K/2022 Shahrukh ul Hassan & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary, Local Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
4473) 345/2019 Criminal Appeal HABIBULLAH S/O HAJI FAZAL HAQ (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 184
Advocates:Habib Ur Rehman Jiskani(ADVO-15384-SBC-KHI),Intikhab Ahmed(ADVO-9014-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.41/2023 Habibullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4474) 136/2014 Criminal Appeal BASAR, MOOSA, BABU ALL S/O QASIM OTHO (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal (Appeal), Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 (Section 3)
Tag Line:Present criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge Thatta, whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 3(2) of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 to suffer R.I. for two years each with directions to pay Rs.25,000/- each as compensation to the complainant.
The matter was taken into consideration in the light of the provisions of Illegal Dispossession Act 2005, and the main ingredients of Section 3 of Act (ibid) viz. Dispossess, Grab, Control, Occupy, without lawful authority and Intention to dispossess, grab, control or occupy property from owner were also considered.
It was observed that the application of said provision can only be justified when there is clear Intention to do such act of dispossession, hence the question of Mens rea is to be proved by the complainant on all counts and it is basic principle of law of evidence that he who alleges a fact has to prove the same and especially in criminal cases the proof must be beyond any reasonable doubt. In this respect case of Waqar Ali and others v. The state and others (PLD 2011 SC 181) was considered.
It was also observed that an accused has only to show a dent having occurred/created in the evidence/care of the prosecution, and that he is entitled to the benefit of even a single doubt, found in the evidence of the prosecution, and that he has not to show that its case suffers from more than one doubt.
It was also taken into consideration that the quality of the evidence and not the quantity of the evidence has a bearing on the fate of the case of the prosecution; such is the guideline given by Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Haq Nawaz and others v. The State and others (2000 SCMR 785).
It was discussed that in the present case it was the duty of complainant to link all the chain of evidence in a manner that it should form such a continuous chain which link to one end of appellants/accused persons and the other to act of dispossession, when one chain link is missing, the same loses its validity.
It was opined that the impugned judgment did not qualify the parameters of Section 3 of illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 as the complainant and the entire chain of evidence had not proved the ingredients of illegal Dispossession in any manner. Appeal was allowed.
Citation:2018 YLR Note 228
Advocates:Ghulam Akbar Jatoi(ADVO-201-SBC-SHK),Dhani Bux Otho(ADVO-3941-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Arif(ADVO-4057-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.28-K/2017 Fakhar-ul-Jamil v. Basar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed [Crl.M.A.106-K/2017Allowed]
4475) 8331/2018 Const. P. Mehboob Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Tag Line:Regularization Act 2013 does not suggest that all those contractual employees for whom the basic requirements of transparency is not fulfilled, are also entitled to be regularized. Regularization of Ad-hoc or contract employees under Act of 2013 is not open for all those contractual and ad-hoc employees for whom the codel formalities have not been fulfilled thus a competition should have been made available amongst all those who were interested in the appointments on subject posts. We would not approve the process involved in the appointment of petitioners, which could ultimately deprive the eligible and entitled persons of a fair competition and a precedent could be made to cater the system where the appointment of selected persons, can be legitimized.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 11-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.614-K/2019 Mehboob Ali and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4476) 220/2010 Const. P. PASPIDA (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Customs Act, 1969: 25-A, 25-D, 79, 80, 193
The provisions of section 25A onwards provide for manner of determination of valuation and if a party is aggrieved by a valuation ruling, a review under section 25D is provided to the Director General of Valuation.
On import of the consignment, goods declaration was filed by the petitioner under section 79 of the Customs Act in which the petitioner itself made the assessment of goods imported by it which assessment was not accepted by the Customs officer who on the basis of valuation ruling reassessed the imported consignment. The order of re-assessment is conceded to be that of under section 80 of the Act and in terms of section 193 of the Act, an appeal is provided to the Collector of Customs (Appeal) against such re-assessment order. The order of dismissal of review application by the Director General of Valuation seems to be ancillary and incidental to the very reassessment and perhaps will merge in the order of reassessment itself, which will be open to appeal.
In view of the forgoing legal position, it was found that there was no apparent mistake of any law floating on the face of the order dated 29.1.2010 as the same speaks of the same legal position as is mentioned above. No justification was found to review such order and therefore, the application was dismissed.
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 18-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
4477) 11/2001 Cr.Acctt.A Mian Waqar Akhtar Paganwala (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Thus based on the discussion made hereinabove we are of the considered view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt against the appellant by producing reliable, trustworthy, and confidence-inspiring oral evidence as well as documentary evidence in support of the same. We, therefore, uphold all the sentences, fines, and penalties for each offence in the judgment whilst dismissing the appeal.
Topic: NAB (Appeal dismissed, as appellant had accepted and had taken over the project with acceptance of all liabilities from previous management.)
Tag Line:Thus based on the discussion made hereinabove we are of the considered view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt against the appellant by producing reliable, trustworthy, and confidence-inspiring oral evidence as well as documentary evidence in support of the same. We, therefore, uphold all the sentences, fines, and penalties for each offence in the judgment whilst dismissing the appeal.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1648
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4478) 1041/2021 Const. P. Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:regularization
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 111
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4479) 23/2024 M.A. Muhammad Sadiq Thr. Attorney Mohammad Tahir (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Hassan and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The ???awareness??? of the Appellant and the alleged ???concealment??? cannot conceivably be grounds for rejection of the plaint. In light of what has been held above, the Impugned Order is hereby set-aside, consequently the matter is remanded back of the learned Tribunal for deciding the same on merits after recording of evidence. The learned Tribunal is further directed not to be influenced with the findings in the Impugned Order. Accordingly, instant Misc. Appeal is allowed in the above terms with no order as to cost.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 508
Advocates:Muhammad Furqan Qureshi(ADVO-12628-SBC-KHI),Haji Akber(ADVO-11765-SBC-KHW),Adnan Asif Mangi(ADVO-20400-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4480) 58/2011 Cr.Acq.A. Allah Diwayo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 10-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
4481) 120/2020 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner I-R Zone-I (Applicant) V/S M/s. Indus Dyeing Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1970
Advocates:Muhammad Zubair Hashmi(ADVO-12273-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 12-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
4482) 669/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Cusotms (Applicant) V/S M/s. Ghani Glass Limited. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 142
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4483) 97/2018 Cr.J.A SANWAL @ CHARYA S/O RANA MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Murder Trial (Non-examination of Investigation officer )
Tag Line:Non-examination of SIP Qadir Khan who allegedly recovered the incriminating pistol from accused for no obvious reason apparently has defeated the alleged recovery.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 483
Advocates:Through Supdt Central Prison Karachi(),Qadir Hussain(ADVO-6245-SBC-KHE),Abida Perveen Channar(ADVO-7319-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
4484) 666/2012 Cr.Bail Muhammad Sulaiman Balouch (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 27-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
4485) 360/2012 Const. P. Sheikh Muhammad Rases (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Rehana Batool & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.66-K/2014 Shaikh Muhammad Raees v. Mst. Rehana Batol and others,C.P.246-K/2014 Shaikh Muhammad Raees v. Mst. Rehana Batol and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
4486) 5281/2021 Const. P. Ayaz Ahmed and Othes (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sacked Employees Reinstatement Act, 2010 (SERA 2010)0 (Interpretation of judgment passed by Apex Court)
Tag Line:relieving letters of employer (SSGC Limited/respondents No.2 and 3) is against the spirit of the judgment and that paragraph 61 of the judgment cannot be treated as against the petitioners, hence SSGC has taken wrong decision in interpretation of that judgment--It is settled principle of law that promulgation of Ordinances are passed only when the assembly is not in session. The Ordinances are meant to deal with a situation of emergency required to be endorsed by the Assembly--Without prejudice to the above, it may safely be added that interpretation may be done of the judgment of Honourable Apex Court but such course would not be available when the consequence of judgment of Honourable Apex Court is being challenged while referring to interpretation thereof by this Court. If such view is allowed to hold the field, the same shall open the rooms for making a challenge to consequences of judgment(s) of Honourable Apex Court which, we would insist, may prejudice the binding effect thereof, as insisted by Article 189 of the Constitution. In the instant matter, the authority claims to have passed the order in compliance of the judgment of Honourable Apex Court. The legal position, being so, leave us with no other option but to add that appropriate remedy to challenge the consequence of judgment of Honourable Apex Court is only by approaching the Apex Court. The instant petition, being incompetent, is dismissed in limine.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 67
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5610/2021 Ayaz Ahmed Mahar and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
4487) 417/2011 Cr.Misc. Ghulam Mustafa Babar (Applicant) V/S Arbab @ Wadho and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Bail Cancellation (Bail order Maintained)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 21-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
4488) 409/2023 Cr.Bail Sajjad Ali Sarwari (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:According to Section 324 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), there is no differentiation made between vital and non-vital parts of the human body. Once the trigger is pressed and the victim is successfully targeted, the element of "intention or knowledge," as outlined in Section 324, PPC, becomes evident. The trajectory of a bullet is not influenced or directed by the assailant's choice, and they cannot use poor marksmanship as a justification for leniency during the bail stage. .
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1052
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 02-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
4489) 106/2020 Criminal Appeal FAHEEM @ BARA S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Appellant) V/S THE LD IXTH ASSTT S.J KHI SOUTH & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1253
Advocates:Qaim Ali(ADVO-11490-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4490) 79/1999 Criminal Appeal Taj Mohammad (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 174
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
4491) 88/2022 Spl. Cr. A. Abdul Raheem Dayo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 409
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 23-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
4492) 322/2024 Const. P. Guloo Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Recovery held illegal without conducting departmental proceedings.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2060
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 20-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
4493) 67/2015 Criminal Appeal MST. KARIMA W/O MUHAMMAD REHMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Javed Ahmed Qazi(ADVO-13711-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
4494) 16/2019 Cr.J.A Ali Jan Mahessar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 1759
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.485/2020 Ali Jan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4495) 13/2018 Cr.Rev AZAM ALI (Applicant) V/S SPL.JUDGE NARCOTICS JAMSHORO & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 12-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
4496) 5776/2018 Const. P. Dr. Imran Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:University of Karachi--we deem it appropriate to set aside the findings of the Selection Board dated 28.06.2018 to the extent of petitioners and private respondents. Consequently, the matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondent-University to determine afresh as to whether the candidates i.e. petitioners and private respondents were having requisite academic qualifications duly recognized under the law for the subject posts in respondent-University, at the time of the cutoff date provided in the public notice dated 26.12.2014.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 703
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.582-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Imran Ali Hashmi & others,C.P.L.A.733-K/2021 Dr.Masooda Qadri v. The University of Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
4497) 446/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director Directorate I&I-FBR (Applicant) V/S M/s. Muhammad Bilal (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1401
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4498) 63/2024 Const. P. Haji Muhammad Umer Bughio (Petitioner) V/S POS & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 1507, 2025 SHC MPK 1695
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4499) 200/2006 Cr.Appeal Gamoon and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-JUL-11
Approved for Reporting
4500) 30/2007 II.A. Mrs. Naseem Akhtar (Appellant) V/S Mst. Rehana Nihal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 11-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1-K/2018 Mrs. Naseem Akhtar v. Mst: Rehana Nihal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4501) 237/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Khurshid Sons (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 72
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
4502) 5/2017 Adm. Suit Spectre Consulting Limited (Plaintiff) V/S MT EVERRICH' 6 & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 136
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
4503) 285/2020 Const. P. KHURRAM BAIG (Petitioner) V/S MST. SAIMA & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 795
Advocates:Shehar Yar Ali Tak(ADVO-15971-SBC-KHC),Wiqas Ahmed Khan(ADVO-5650-SBC-KHI),Zaibun Nisa(ADVO-11860-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
4504) 3/2013 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Abdul Qadir alias Fauji (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 17-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
4505) 30/2022 Cr.Acctt.A GOHARULLAH S/O INAYATULLAH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:BAIL GRANTED UNDER SECTION 426 CR.P.C.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 244
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 21-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
4506) 72/2013 Cr.Acq.A. Anti Narcotics Force. (Appellant) V/S Refaqat Ali. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 29-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
4507) 168/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Arif Hafeez Qadir S/o Bashir Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Zahid Maqsood Qureshi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1165
Advocates:S. M. Intikhab Alam(ADVO-8236-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 17-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4508) 388/2019 Criminal Appeal Faizan Ali Farooqi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 214
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
4509) 1573/2012 Const. P. Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) V/S HESCO and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 938
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
4510) 1700/2016 Const. P. Usman Khan (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Nazim and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XLI Rule 27 -Additional Evidence), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Dismissed)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui
Order Date: 02-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
4511) 18/2021 Criminal Appeal Arsallah (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:The present appellant has been convicted by the trial Court on the same set of facts and evidence, above mentioned, which this Court has not considered sufficient to warrant conviction of the appellants of Crl. Appeal No. 61 of 2016 and award them afore-mentioned sentences. So far the case of present appellant is concerned; we do not find any special features that distinguish his case/role from those of said appellants, justifying recoding conviction and sentence to present appellant. Hence, the present appellant is also entitled to the same benefit of doubt earlier extended in favour of appellants of Crl. Appeal No. 61 of 2016. Consequently, we allow this criminal appeal, set aside the conviction and sentences of appellant recorded by the trial Court vide impugned judgment and acquit him of the charges. He shall be set at liberty forthwith, if not required to be detained in any other case
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 537
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
4512) 839/2023 Const. P. Sarfaraz Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 746
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3038/2023 Ghulam Rasool v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary Education Department, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Not Reached (Next Hearing: Week commencing 17-Nov-25) be fixed in top 20 serials (VO)
4513) 134/2015 H.C.A Novartis AG (Appellant) V/S Nabiqasim Industries (Private) Limited & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 03-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
4514) 195/2012 Cr.Misc. Khan Muhammad (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
4515) 1/2018 Adm. Suit Cress LPG (Pvt.) Ltd (Plaintiff) V/S M.T. Maria III & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLD 972
Advocates:Muhammad Mansoor Mir(ADVO-10036-SBC-KHI),M. Omair Nisar Khan(ADVO-10502-SBC-KHI),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI),Agha Zafar Ahmed(ADVO-9944-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 13-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
4516) 2002/2019 Cr.Bail MUHGAMMAD FAYYAZ S/O IFTIKHAR AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 944
Advocates:Abdul Latif(ADVO-13883-SBC-MLR),Suleman Badshah(ADVO-3999-SBC-KHI),Tahir ur Rehman(ADVO-6031-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
4517) 45/2020 Criminal Appeal Bashir Ahmed (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 864
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
4518) 4793/2020 Const. P. Kashif Feroz (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Implementation petitions.
Citation:2021 PTD 867
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
4519) 230/2012 Const. P. Syed Qasim Hassan (Petitioner) V/S Syed Muhammad Hassan & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Mir Naqi Ali(ADVO-8402-SBC-KHI),Syed Muhammad Akbar(ADVO-1889HLC-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 30-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.341-K/2015 Syed Qasim Hassan v. Syed Mehdi Hassan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4520) 139/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Agha Abid Majeed Khan Thr. Ghous Bakhsh Sahqani (Applicant) V/S Idrees Ahmed and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 809
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4521) 1305/2019 Cr.Bail NASIR MAHMOOD S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 21-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
4522) 12/2010 H.C.A Qamaruddin Arain (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 28-JAN-11
Approved for Reporting
4523) 1094/2016 Const. P. Mst. Irshad Begum (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Shamim & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
4524) 883/2009 Suit MUHAMMAD RAZI & OTHER (Plaintiff) V/S KESC & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
4525) 4132/2017 Const. P. Shahnawaz Khatri (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1209
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
4526) 1545/2013 Const. P. M/s Vellani and Vellnai (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
4527) 2175/2012 Const. P. Syeda Waheeda Shah (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 01-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1145/2012 Syeda Waheeda Shah v. Election Commission of Pakistan thr. its Chief Election Commissioner, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4528) 279/2018 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM S/O MUHAMMAD ANWAR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 28-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
4529) 2511/2021 Const. P. Inspector Syed Saeed Akhtar Naqvi and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:At this juncture, learned AAG contends that there is another judgment i.e. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Punjab Lahore etc. v. Ms. Shamim Usman (Civil Petition No.1097-L of 2020) and extends his no objection that if the matter is referred to the Competent Authority, who shall examine the case of the petitioners alongwith their batch-mates as well seniors within the guidelines of dicta laid down by the apex Court and rules in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 03 months. Needless to mention that any findings of that Committee can be challenged by the petitioners or by any aggrieved person through independent proceedings and not under the contempt proceedings.
At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners, contends that in another inquiry competent officers opined that the case of Gul Hassan Jatoi (supra) is not applicable to them with regard to promotion, suffice to say that Police Rules are binding upon authorities, however, interpretation of the apex Court and guidelines provided in judgment, particularly paragraphs 56 and 71, shall be examined as afresh and earlier opinion shall not come in the way of promotion.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 711
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Shahzad Mahmood(ADVO-12500-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4530) 2513/2021 Const. P. Asif Ali Unar and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:posting and transfer of District Food Controllers (DFCs) and Assistant District Food Controllers (ADFCs) in Food Department, Government of Sindh--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the transfer and posting is the prerogative of the respondent department as provided under Section 10 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973. However, the petitioners have raised the hue and cry in the matter with the assertion that their transfer and posting is based on malafide intention to accommodate the beneficiaries to usurp the huge amount or kickbacks in the disbursement of wheat in their respective area. If this is the factual position of the case, the Chief Secretary, Sindh, and Secretary Food Department, Government of Sindh, are directed to look into the affairs of disbursement of wheat in the Province of Sindh personally and ensure that the wheat is disbursed strictly under the law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1007
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
4531) 50/2015 Suit Waterlink Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Farrell Lines & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:"Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908).--
---O. XXXVIII, R. 5---Attachment before judgment---Transportation of goods from one country to another---Breach of obligation---Attachment of container-- Word ""intent""---Scope---Plaintiff had sought attachment of containers which were belonged to Shipping None of the containers sought to be attached could be deemed to be in Pakistan as ultimate destination of such goods was Afghanistan---Said goods were only available at Port in Pakistan for the purpose of clearance and transshipment i.e. for transit period only---Plaintiff had no claim with regard to the containers-,-- Detention charges must have been accrued for shipping line---Goods did not belong to the consigner rather same belonged to the consignee in Afghanistan-Goods were neither deemed to have arrived or existed in Pakistan nor it would belong to consignor for the purpose of attachment-- Plaintiff had no privity of contract with the consignee---Present suit had not been filed against the consignee of the attached goods but against contractor of the consignee against whom plaintiff had a claim of recovery---Neither containers nor the goods therein were liable to be attached for the purpose of claim of plaintiff---Goods were meant to be transshipped to Afghanistan which were in Pakistan only in transit---Goods were not removed with ""intention"" to frustrate the decree which might be passed-- Application for attachment of goods was dismissed in circumstances."
Citation:2015 YLR 2436
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Abdur Rehman(ADVO-8546-SBC-KHI),Arshad Mohsin Tayebaly(ADVO-3740-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Hasan(ADVO-6820-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUN-15
Approved for Reporting
4532) 836/2023 Const. P. Zaidi Tufail Scheikh S/o Tufail Muhammad Sheikh (Petitioner) V/S Salman Ahmed Qureshi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1081
Advocates:Zark Ahmed Khan Ghory(ADVO-19084-SBC-KHE),Saira Sheikh(ADVO-10895-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS),Khurram Gul Ghory(ADVO-13962-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3812/2023 Salman Ahmed Qureshi v. Zaidi Tufail Sheikh and others,C.A.451/2025 Salman Ahmed Qureshi v. Zaidi Tufail Sheikh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Partly Allowed and remanded,Disposed
4533) 3416/2025 Const. P. Haji Muhammad Yousuf Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2389
Advocates:Sufiyan Zaman(ADVO-15548-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
4534) 3974/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Laches)
Tag Line:Laches must be explained; The principle enunciated in Hameed Akhtar Niazi (Supra) is only available where a question of law is decided by the Supreme Court in a service matter, and not otherwise
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 283
Advocates:Waqarullah(ADVO-11388-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4535) 1591/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) V/S IInd ADJ Karachi Central & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 29-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.530-K/2019 Muhammad Hanif v. Syed Nazir Hussain Rizvi (decd) thr. his L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4536) 471/2024 Criminal Appeal The State/ANF through Assistant Director (Law) (Appellant) V/S Sheikh Kaiser Waheed & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Coming to the rule position of the case, Rule 22.16 of the Police Rules, 1934, outlines the procedures for handling case property, Police must seize relevant items and mark them with details of the case and the person from whom they were seized. Seized items must be stored securely until further legal action. Items connected with cases sent for trial or suspicious/unclaimed items ordered by a Magistrate must be submitted to headquarters or outposts. Detained material must be presented to a Magistrate for early disposal or release on security. The Police Rules require that case property be stored in the Malkhana and recorded in Register No. XIX. The police and prosecution are responsible for ensuring the safe custody of the property, including its secure transportation to laboratories for analysis. This procedure guarantees the integrity of the case property until it is presented in court.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1133
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
4537) 7714/2019 Const. P. Shah Rehman Dostay (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
We find the case of petitioner Jam Abdul Razaq Dahar is one of further inquiry as has been discussed above therefore the petitioner Jam Abdul Razaq Dahar has made out his case for confirmation of his pre-arrest bail which is confirmed on the same terms and conditions.--In view of the above, (a) we dismiss the petition for post-arrest bail of the petitioner Shah Rehman and allow the petition for post-arrest bail of petitioner Muhammad Hussain and grant him bail subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 1000000/= (Ten Lacs) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Nazir of this court. (b) As regards the petitions for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners namely Jamal ud din Mahar, Pervaiz Ahmed Malik, Manzoor Ali Dars and Muhammad Liaquat Ali Khan all such petitions are dismissed, and interim pre-arrest bail granted to them earlier is recalled with immediate effect. (c) The petition for pre-arrest bail filed by the petitioner Jam Abdul Razaq Dahar (Sub-registrar) is allowed, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him is hereby confirm on the same terms and conditions.
Topic: NAB (Post arrest rejected, as accused made forged entry, in Government land, issued entry as gift deed which not existent. )
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 150
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
4538) 678/2013 Const. P. aseen Mustafa Chandio (Petitioner) V/S Ex. Engineer SEPCO Larkana and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
4539) 2646/2024 Const. P. Shahid Hussain and Others (Petitioner) V/S M/s PEMRA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002 (Code of Conduct - 2015 - Court Reporters), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XLVII Rule 1)
Tag Line:PEMRA's impugned directive was declared illegal and out of sync with PEMRA laws. Exercise of judicial restraint. Where two options are available to the Constitutional Court one on constitutional ground and the other ground of statutory construction, Court may opt for the latter option. Petition allowed. REMARKS EXPUNGED - COSTS IMPOSED REDUCED - Order dated 11 December 2024
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 143
Advocates:Muhammad Tariq Mansoor(ADVO-18173-SBC-KHE),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.470/2025 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) through its representative, PEMRA, Islamabad v. Shahid Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4540) 184/2023 Civil Revision Chatro & another (Applicant) V/S Anchalising & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 93
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
4541) 1778/2014 Suit Muhammad Iqbal. (Plaintiff) V/S Zafar Hussain & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Damages)
Tag Line:With regard to the claim of damages of Rupees Two Hundred Crores, for suffering mental agony and physical torture, no evidence has been led by the Plaintiff in support of the same. If Plaintiff was physically assaulted, the first thing, which comes to mind, is that whether any complaint was lodged with the Police? Plaintiff has not led any evidence, nor brought on record anything about the fact that he was physically tortured or suffered mental agony. Thus, this claim also cannot be accepted in absence of positive evidence, as onus to prove the same is on Plaintiff, but he failed to discharge it.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 995
Advocates:S. Shamim Ahmed Riazi(ADVO-2732-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
4542) 1068/2016 Const. P. Riffat Humayun (Petitioner) V/S P.T.V and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SBLR Note 654
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.637-K/2018 Riffat Humayun v. Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd. thr. its Managing Director and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4543) 67/2013 Cr.Appeal Sibghatullah Chachar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.123-K/2019 Hafiz Ghulam Rasool v. The State and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4544) 3105/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Aadill Khan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 876
Advocates:Muhammad Haseeb Jamali(ADVO-10211-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Aga Faquir Mohammad(ADVO-2855-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.573-K/2023 M. Asghar Janjua & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC
4545) 363/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 687
Advocates:Abdul Samad(ADVO-9460-SBC-KHI),Qaim Ali(ADVO-11490-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
4546) 29/2006 H.C.A Muhammad Imran Mustaqeem & Ors (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Mustaqeem & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A (Appeal Against Auction conducted in Succession Matter, Accepting Lower offer)
Tag Line:The object of petition for Letters of Administration is only to the extent of its grant or otherwise
and the question of sale and purchase of the properties does not arise
whereas in the instant matter despite objections taken by one of the
legal heirs for its conversion into a suit, the property was attempted to
be auctioned. Once the property devolved amongst the legal heirs that
was and is the end of the lis filed in shape of petition for Letters of
Administration.
Hence, in all fairness not only the impugned order is set aside and
appeal is allowed but now since the property is to be devolved amongst
the legal heirs, the Letters of Administration be issued accordingly, if it
has not been issued as yet, leaving it up to them i.e. legal heirs to
see/decide the fate of their property as they deem fit and proper and
not in a petition, which is/was only to the extent of grant of Letters of
Administration.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 182
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 27-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
4547) 2814/2021 Suit REHAN HAMID (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O VII R 10)
Tag Line:Plaint Returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.
---The only defence taken by the learned counsel for the plaintiff is
that when he landed at Karachi Airport he came to know about
impugned notification dated 26.11.2021, therefore, the cause accrued
within the territorial limit of this Court. I am afraid this kind of logic is
not tenable in law. The cause of action was accrued when and from
where the impugned notification was issued and also at place where in
pursuance of such agreement he works or worked for gain, and not
where he on his arrival or departure informed or where it was brought to
his knowledge. Furthermore, the plaintiff was appointed with defendant
at Hyderabad and throughout he was employed there, therefore, if this
plea is taken to be lawful it will make entire scheme of jurisdiction as
redundant and such was not the intention of legislation.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 938
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
4548) 233/2024 Const. P. Munawar Hussain Mangrio (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1412
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
4549) 4260/2019 Const. P. Martin Dow Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1325
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1818/2020 M/s. Martin Dow Limited v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Ministry of Health Services, Regulation and Coordination, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4550) 2421/2016 Const. P. Young???s (Private) Limited & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.4258/2017,C.P.561-K/2017,C.A.2151/2017,C.A.2133/2017 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ For an early date ],Disposed Leave Granted [ For an early date ],Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
4551) 728/2016 Const. P. Mst. Najma Nighat (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Hira Qureshi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
NIl
Tag Line:Orphans, orphanage houses, Sindh Orphanages (Supervision and Control) Act, 1976, Private Educational Institutions (Regulations and Control) Rules, 2005, Secretary Social Welfare Department,
Advocates:Syed Bashir Hussain Shah(ADVO-3638-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
4552) 2679/2021 Suit TUFAIL AHMED SHAIKH (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:There is no cavil to the fact that the plaintiff is an engineer and
Member Technical as disclosed in the transfer letter of 08.11.2021. The
gazetted rules that concerns with the posting and transfer in terms of
Chapter V of the National Highway Authoritys Employees Service Rules,
1995 framed under National Highway Authority Act, 1991 duly framed by
the federal government, recognizes that the competent authority may
post or transfer an employee of the authority to the head office or to
any of the subordinate offices in Pakistan under its administrative
control or management, which has only gained strength on the basis of
NHA Code 2005 which excludes Chairman and Member from the
applicability of normal tenure for an officer on the same post for three
years and not extendable for a period of more than five years in all.
Thus, even the Code excludes Chairman and Member Technical from
application of such normal tenure of an officer/employee.
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 1125, 2023 PLC (CS) 202
Advocates:Syed Zaeem Hyder Musavi(ADVO-15365-SBC-KHS),Sayed Yasir Ahmed Shah(ADVO-11570-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
4553) 1043/2016 Suit Hazara Efficient Gas. (Plaintiff) V/S Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
4554) 1429/2018 Const. P. Shahnawaz Dehraj (Petitioner) V/S P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Sindh Zakat and Ushr Act, 2011 (Section 23)
Tag Line:In defence, all that has been argued was that his father was only a covering candidate and has not secured even a single vote as the candidature was withdrawn. This is no reason to defend above misconduct and misuse of authority that since he was only a covering candidate and has not secured even a single vote, therefore, a sympathetic view should be taken against him. Success of a candidate to whom the incumbent Chairman was supporting is not a condition precedent as far as violation or misuse of office or authority is concerned. It is the active participation, influence and publicity which activated the authority concerned to remind him of his duty which ultimately ended up as a notification, whereby the petitioner was rescinded. There was no material in defence available nor even pleaded. He admitted his presence at the time of submitting nomination papers. He admitted his presence at some of the occasions where the candidate delivered speeches in a corner meeting and also his photographs in huge panaflex, signboards, hoardings, etc. and the only reason of his availability and pictures, panaflex, hoardings and publicity boards was to influence public at large and misuse of his office.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 09-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
4555) 1162/2020 Const. P. Ghulam Shabbir Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 692
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
4556) 5661/2021 Const. P. Shamroze Khan (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1330
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Tariq(ADVO-3425-SBC-KHI),Aslam Pervez(ADVO-14570-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 24-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4557) 59/2021 Criminal Appeal KAMRAN @ KAMI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 699
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
4558) 142/2025 Cr.Bail WARIS S/O ARSALANA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 625
Advocates:Nusrat Gul Malik(ADVO-9713-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.88-K/2025 The State Prosecutor General Sindh v. Waris Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4559) 77/2010 Cr.Appeal Asif Ali Jagirani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon
Order Date: 29-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting
4560) 2780/2013 Const. P. M/S New Allied Electronics Industries & Ors. (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2019, 2025 SHC KHI 2081
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 11-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4608/2025 The Chairman Evacuee Trust Property Board, Lahore and another v. M/s. New Allied Electronic Industries (Pvt) Ltd thr. its CEO and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4561) 192/2024 Cr.Bail Abdul Haneef Machhi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Brutal murders of innocent girls on the pretext of 'siyahkri??? are against the State and society and not against an individual
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 359
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
4562) 2139/2021 Suit SPIRIT INDUSTRIES PVT LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Public Procurement Rules 2010, Contract Act
Tag Line:It seems that strategically parties resorted to litigation to
have an order of the Court in presence of media campaign and were not
willing to do it themselves. Cause for filing this suit is only to the extent
that defendants gave a deaf ear to the requests of plaintiffs as far as
supply and its acknowledgment is concerned. Defendants are within
their rights to accept and inspect the goods as per specifications before
goods could be acknowledged. Therefore, if a Committee is created or
formed for inspection of goods, the plaintiffs should not shy away and
the only purpose left for the Committee is to carry out above mandate
as per terms of the contracts-
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 644
Advocates:Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Asif Malik(ADVO-8425-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4563) 68/2021 I. A Zafar Hassan Khan (Appellant) V/S M/s. Habib Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1179
Advocates:Afsheen Aman(ADVO-8828-SBC-KHI),Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS),Mukhtiar Ahmed Kobhar(ADVO-6584-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
4564) 454/2022 Const. P. Sami Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Exemption in custom duty)
Tag Line:Exemption in Customs Duties
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 136
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General(),Mamoon Nawaz Chaudhry(ADVO-11348-SBC-KHE),Imran Ali Mithani(ADVO-15070-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.927-K/2024 The Chief Collector of Customs and others v. M/s Sami Pharmaceutical Private Limited and others,C.P.L.A.934-K/2024 The Chief Collector of Customs and another v. M/s Sami Pharmaceutical Private Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Notice,Pending Notice
4565) 227/2012 Cr.Misc. Pervez Ali Maitlo (Appellant) V/S PO Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 14-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting
4566) 1691/2010 Suit Habiba Mehboob Ali Khan (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Masood Mehmood & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 585
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Shahid Husain Jalil(ADVO-7438-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Iqbal(ADVO-3445-SBC-KHI),Waqar Ahmed Ch:(ADVO-11376-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
4567) 311/2022 Suit ATIF AHMED & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMM. PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 154
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting
4568) 2008/2022 Suit MST SAMIA QAZI (Plaintiff) V/S THE PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:There cannot be parallel trial of same questions before two
forums under doctrine of election. Once the questions raised by
directorate and passed through appellate forum which decides the
issues after hearing the appeal of plaintiffs, who opt to prefer an
appeal, this original jurisdiction cannot be exhausted, not even as an
Appellate authority against the decision of two forums including
Appellate Authority created under the Sindh Coal Act, 2012 and the
relevant Rules.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 504
Advocates:Abid S. Zuberi & Ayan M. Memon Law Associates(FIRM-425-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
4569) 1652/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Ishaque & another (Petitioner) V/S Trust / Waqf & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
4570) 1595/2017 Const. P. Fazl - e - Akbar (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Defence Housing Authority and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (statutory or non statutory rules of service)
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 245
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
4571) 851/2023 Cr.Bail GHULAM RASOOL @ RASOOLI S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STASE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 990
Advocates:Nazir Ahmed(ADVO-7463-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.174/2024 Zulfiqar Ali v. The State thr. PG Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4572) 477/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S M/s Shoaib Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1202
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4573) 585/2022 Suit KHALID INAM (Plaintiff) V/S MRS. SUMMAYA REHMAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 80
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-8216-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS),S. Ahsan Ali Shah(ADVO-16440-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
4574) 6090/2017 Const. P. Dr. Farrukh Mirza (Petitioner) V/S The Sect: and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension)
Tag Line:The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1587
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.386-K/2020 Dr. Farrukh Mirza v. The Secretary Finance Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
4575) 8251/2019 Const. P. Jamal Nasir (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
STEVTA--promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA under Rule 7-A of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--a civil/government servant is entitled for proforma promotion, once during his service his promotion is approved by the Competent Authority and in the meanwhile if he superannuates, he is entitled for all benefits as admissible under the law--we deem it appropriate to send the matter of the petitioner for the promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA to the Competent Authority of Sindh Government for consideration in accordance with law.
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Tag Line:STEVTA
Citation:2022 PLC CS Note 24
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
4576) 96/2009 Civil Revision Syed Himat Ali Shah (Applicant) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Specific Relief Act,
Tag Line: Prima facie, such declaration could only be sought in case the respondent Ghulam Hussain was in the process of seeking any declaration as to his own entitlement over the subject land but that is not the case, hence, I agree with the contention of the State Counsel that the suit is hit by the provisions of Sections 42 and 56 of the Specific Relief Act. In addition to the above, the government of Sindh was not sued through concerned Secretary of the Revenue Department, and even if any opportunity is given, in terms of the reported judgment of Government of Balochistan, CWPP&H Department and others v. Nawabzada Mir Tariq Hussain Khan Magsi and others reported in 2010 SCMR 115, the suit would have been time barred against the officials whose order was challenge. Hence, I do not agree with the reasoning assigned by the appellate Court without considering the consequences of the above legal issues.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
4577) 609/2025 Const. P. Western Freight Shipping Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line: Transportation of Afghan Transit Cargo; decision under Rule 1124 of the Tracking & Monitoring Rules, 2023; held justified and correct in law
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 278
Advocates:Muhammad Anas Makhdoom(ADVO-11934-SBC-KHI),Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Farhaj(ADVO-11830-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 03-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
4578) 2779/2023 Const. P. Nisar Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S NHA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Principles for the Exercise of Discretion by a Public Authority
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 973
Advocates:Hafeez Ullah(ADVO-18295-SBC-KHE),Zakaullah Rana(ADVO-18064-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Masood Khan(ADVO-14976-SBC-KHI),Touqeer Ahmed(ADVO-52245-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 03-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4579) 433/2012 Cr.Bail Sajjad @ Sijoo Shaikh (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters
Tag Line: Prima facie, it appears that the injury allegedly caused by the applicant is at the elbow of the right arm which went through and through and the medical report that has been read over by the learned State counsel is in fact to the extent that the fatal injury was one which is caused by Wahab which is the stomach injury in view of the above it has become a case of further enquiry despite the fact that the applicants bullet was allegedly hit at the elbow he, at this stage could not be presumed to have come with the intention to kill unless such contention is proved in evidence.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting
4580) 2276/2018 Const. P. Azizullah and Ors (Petitioner) V/S The Board of Revenue and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 775
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4581) 72/2018 Cr.J.A Nazeer Ahmed & an other (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (presumption in the absence of strong evidence of unimpeachable character and legally admissible one, Murder Appeal Allowed7& Judgment Sat aside .)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 2
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
4582) 53/1990 R.A (Civil Revision) Mohammad Ibrahim (Applicant) V/S Mst.Zubeda Begum & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:PTD Valid - Acquiescence.
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1106
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
4583) 1749/2017 Suit M/s. Indus Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd & ors (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
4584) 904/2025 Cr.Bail RAMZAN ALI S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1058
Advocates:Zahoor Ahmed Khan(ADVO-10377-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4585) 5412/2022 Const. P. Nisar Hussain Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Proforma Promotion
Citation:2025 PLC CS 1084
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
4586) 415/2025 Const. P. Faraz Aziz Through Attorney (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Legitimate expectation must be based on an express promise or codified law; it cannot be presumed. Petition stands dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1791, 2025 SHC SUK 1804, 2025 SHC SUK 1833
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4587) 112/2006 Suit PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHOR (Plaintiff) V/S MST. GUL RUKH SAMINA BUTT & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 297
Advocates:Iqbal Latif Bawany(ADVO-1734-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Tariq Qureshi(ADVO-3952-SBC-KHI),Nazar Hussain Dhoon(ADVO-2640-SBC-KHI),Amanullah Khan(ADVO-1997-SBC-KHI),M/S. HALEEM & KHAN(FIRM-248-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
4588) 1154/2013 Const. P. Youth Action for Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2221/2019 Youth Action for Pakistan thr. Ghulam Murtaza Sheikh, Jamshoro v. Province of Sindh thr. the Secretary, Relief Department, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4589) 1027/2022 Suit Syed Qadir Dad Shah (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airline Company (PIACL) (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service
Tag Line:Undoubtedly the aircrew needs to be looked after by specially
trained staff and for this reason such job training is inevitable. The
normal take care of an employee (patient) of defendant No.1 are
different from those who operate flights and there could be no two
opinions about it. The officials of defendant No.1 may have awaken late
in realizing their duties and it is they who could be blamed for earlier
flight operations through untrained staff but the passengers cannot be
left at the mercy of those who lacks such qualification/training, be it an
"on job training"
Citation:2023 YLR 2101, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1037
Advocates:Muhammad Saad Siddiqui(ADVO-12321-SBC-KHI),Abdul Qayyum Khan Abbasi(ADVO-7342-SBC-KHI),ABRAHAM & SARWANA ADVOCATES.(FIRM-107-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
4590) 714/2018 Const. P. Msr Mehfooza Bano (Petitioner) V/S M/s Haji Ahmed Memorial & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1480-K/2018 Mehfooz Bano v. M/s Haji Ahmed Memorial Dispensary & Meternity Home and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4591) 148/2024 Criminal Appeal Kamran (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1691
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
4592) 10/2013 Cr.Acq.A. Muhammad Hanif Khan (Appellant) V/S The State and 3 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
4593) 1500/2011 Suit VIRGOZ OILS & FATS (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S FAISAL EXPORTS (PVT) LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Suit for enforcement of a Foreign Arbitral Award, is dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 49, 2025 SHC KHI 50
Advocates:M/S. LARI & CO.(FIRM-272-SBC-KHI),Mazhar Imtiaz Lari(ADVO-4503-SBC-KHI),Naveed ul Haq(ADVO-11136-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Y. Mandviwala(ADVO-3668-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
4594) 4/2017 II.A. M/s Adam Hilding Ltd: (Appellant) V/S P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 133
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.106-K/2022 M/s Huffaz Seamless Pipe Industries v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4595) 29/2023 Const. P. Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Faisal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Filing of ejectment application itself is treated as a notice under Section 18 of the SRPO, 1979.
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1032
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
4596) 79/2021 I. A M/S Qalandri Filling & CNG Station & others (Appellant) V/S SME Leasing Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 432
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 28-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1291-K/2023 M/s. Qalandri Filling & CNG Station & others v. The Manager S.M.E. Leasing Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4597) 249/2011 Civil Revision Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Applicant) V/S Major (Red) Gulzar Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
4598) 675/2017 Suit Rao Noor Ahmed (Plaintiff) V/S Shabbir Hussain Kapasi & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 28-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
4599) 195/2012 Suit KHURRAM ZAFAR (Plaintiff) V/S MST. SARAH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 YLR 91
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 12-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
4600) 16/2003 Adm. Suit Amsa Marine Aid (Plaintiff) V/S M.V. Tolmi & Another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Admiralty suit filed for necessaries sustainable in rem against the same vessel but to operate against any other vessel action must meet statutory requirements of Section 4 of the Admiralty Jurisdiction of High Courts Ordinance, 1980 unless Plaintiff succeeds in establishing fraud.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 562
Advocates:Fasih-uz-Zaman Abbasi(ADVO-7446-SBC-KHI),Aga Faquir Mohammad(ADVO-2855-SBC-KHI),Syed Amjad Hussain(ADVO-1736-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 07-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4601) 64/2009 Cr.Appeal Abdul Ghafoor Chandio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 29-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
4602) 166/2015 Cr.Appeal Ali Bux (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 11-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.16-K/2016 Ali Bux and another v. The State,Crl.P.50-K/2016 Ali Bux and another v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Partly Allowed [Death to Life],Disposed Leave Granted
4603) 215/2018 Cr.Appeal MST. TAZEIN @ JASMINE D/O SULTAN QURESHI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1071
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
4604) 1827/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Ilyas (Petitioner) V/S C.A.A and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 483
Advocates:Rafiq Ahmed Pirzada.(ADVO-4685-SBC-KHS),Rana Muhammad Idris(ADVO-3616HLC-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aslam Khan(ADVO-8099-SBC-KHE),Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Dr. Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
4605) 142/2015 H.C.A Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (Appellant) V/S Malik Mohammad Asghar (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A (reinstatement in service)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 25-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.504-K/2017 Advocate Malik Muhammad Asghar v. Pakistan Defence Officer Housing Authority Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4606) 1843/2018 Suit Syed Nasir Ali (Plaintiff) V/S Government Teachers Co-operative Housing Society (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
4607) 210/2020 Suit Mst. Yasmeen Mirza & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Batool Amir Ali & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: The proposed
compromise is absolutely contrary to the rights of minor. They should
have disclosed all such facts in suit as well as in the application and it
would be up to Court either to release share of the minor to Guardian Ad
Litem or to retain it under a deposit scheme, with the Nazir of this
Court. However entire plaint and these applications are silent in respect
of share of the minor. I would take it as if minor is being deprived of her
lawful share deliberately.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 788
Advocates:Muhammad Zahid Kabeer(ADVO-10594-SBC-KHI),Makhdoom Muhammad Talha(ADVO-14511-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-14576-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
4608) 4/2015 Conf.Case Asghar (Appellant) V/S THe State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 14-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
4609) 68/2019 Cr.Acctt.A Mehboob Ali Zardari (Appellant) V/S NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 558
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.96-K/2020 Mehboob Ali Zardari v. The State (NAB),Crl.P.L.A.125-K/2021 Nazir Ahmed Abro & another v. The Chairman NAB & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned,Pending
4610) 3201/2024 Const. P. Syed Saulat Hussain Rizvi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 753
Advocates:Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 12-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
4611) 1612/2022 Const. P. Ghulam Shabbir and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:Petition of a civil servant in respect of his posting; not maintainable, whereas, pursuant to Section 10 of the Civil Servant Act, 1973, a Civil Servant cannot claim any specific posting or assignment while discharging his duties.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 456
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Zafar Imam(ADVO-7019-SBC-KHI),Mamoon Nawaz Chaudhry(ADVO-11348-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 23-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.638/2023 Ghulam Shabbir and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman FBR, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4612) 503/2019 Cr.J.A SUBHAN S/O MUHAMMAD FAREED & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 85
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
4613) 60/2020 I. A Abdul Basit Khan (Appellant) V/S Bank Islami Ltd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:*the appellant is none but
a stranger to these proceedings and the observation of the executing
Court does not call for any interference as it is a dispute between
financial institution and the customer and appellant is thus not in any
way a proper and necessary party and that too after the disposal of suit,
when it was decreed and execution proceeded.
** In terms of Order XXI Rule 60 CPC release of a property from
attachment can be allowed only in case the objector/claimant had a
title or right over it, whereas in the instant case on one hand appellant
has no valid title in his favour and on the other there is a registered
document whereby the judgment debtor is the sole owner of the subject
property
Citation:2024 CLD 631
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 04-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
4614) 583/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Ammar Brothers, Lahore & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Show Cause Notice)
Tag Line:Questions of facts cannot be discussed by High Court in Reference Application.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 444
Advocates:Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1157-K/2023 The Collector of Customs v. M/s Ammar Brother and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4615) 217/2022 II.A. Saud Anjum Qazi S/o Muhammad Siddique (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Qasim and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1209
Advocates:M.Yasin Shahid Bhatti(ADVO-8850-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Sarmand Qurban(ADVO-25533-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
4616) 15/2011 Suit.B NIB BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.VENUS CHEMICALS PVT LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Statement of account filed by the bank did not bear the name and official title of the persons certifying the same as required by section 9(2) of the FIO, 2001 read with section 2(8) of the Bankers Books Evidence Act, 1891. Such was not a certified copy and did not attract a presumption of correctness. The bank will have to prove the same as any other document.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 749
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
4617) 5960/2017 Const. P. Raja Shoaib and Ors (Petitioner) V/S I.G Sindh Police and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
4618) 4203/2017 Const. P. Kausar Jabeen (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB (Pre arrest bail rejected , They Cheated public at large by Launching bogus housing Society, obtained money and not given Plot.)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2068
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.829-K/2020 Kausar Jabeen & another v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
4619) 97/2018 Criminal Appeal Lakhmir (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 951
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
4620) 4168/2016 Const. P. Syed Muhmmad Ali Asad (Petitioner) V/S L.D.A and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
4621) 4111/2020 Const. P. Amir Mahmood (Petitioner) V/S Izharuddin and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 401
Advocates:Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-8216-SBC-KHI),Abdul Qayyum Khan Abbasi(ADVO-7342-SBC-KHI),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Mohammad Fahim Zia(ADVO-4777-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 06-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
4622) 11/2007 Const. P. Misbahuddin (Petitioner) V/S Member Board of Revenue and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim, Mr. Justice Maqbool Ahmed Awan
Order Date: 28-MAY-09
Approved for Reporting
4623) 6241/2016 Const. P. Anjum Badar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Contract appointments)
Tag Line:Advocate General Sindh is also put on notice to satisfy the Court on the next date regarding vires of Section 3 of the Act of 2013, which, prima facie, appears to be in clear conflict with the above mentioned authority of the Honble Supreme Court to the extent of regularization of service in BS-16 and above. Let notice under Rule 1 of Order XXVII-A CPC be issued to learned Advocate General Sindh.
To come up on 18.03.2020 at 12:00 noon.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1482
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Rana Khalid Hussain(ADVO-15716-SBC-KHI),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 12-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.735-K/2021,C.A.28-K/2021,C.A.27-K/2021,C.M.A.589-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1727-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1728-K/2021 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed [ C.P. be numbered & leave granted & C.A. be fixed after three months ],Disposed ,Disposed
4624) 199/1999 Civil Revision Professor Muhammad Rahim & Others (Applicant) V/S Municipal Committee Mirpurkhas (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 137
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
4625) 1062/2012 Const. P. Mst. Naureen (Petitioner) V/S Nadir Ali Rajpur (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 28-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
4626) 13/2020 Cr.Bail SOHAILUDDIN S/O MOINUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1324
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
4627) 117/2009 Cr.Appeal Munwar Ali Jatoi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 23-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting
4628) 104/2010 Suit A.J CORPORATION (Plaintiff) V/S FAUJI FERTILIZERS BIN QASIM (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 01-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
4629) 151/2010 Suit.B DAWOOD ISLAMIC BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.AFTAB TECHNOLOGIES (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line: It is also very pertinent to mention that even the defendants
along with their leave to defend application have filed their own
statement of account such as one available as Annexure D/38 onwards
and it is in consonance with the statement of account shown by the
plaintiff. Hence, I do not see any reason to disagree with the statement
of account given by the plaintiff.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
4630) 3/2017 Cr.J.A Manzoor Ahmed (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1861
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.339/2020 Manzoor Ahmed v. The State,Crl.A.167/2023 Manzoor Ahmed v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
4631) 219/2019 Cr.J.A Javeed Iqbal & Eido (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Murder Trial (Unseen incident)
Tag Line:The FIR of the incident has been lodged with delay of about four days; such delay could not be overlooked. Complainant Khalid Mahmoud and his witnesses were fair enough to admit
that none has seen the alleged incident. The appellant has been involved in commission of the alleged incident on the basis of recovery of Car of the deceased, CDR report and his extra-judicial confession.
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 759
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
4632) 11/2010 II.A. Muhammad Iqbal (Appellant) V/S Nazeer Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 791
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
4633) 1542/2025 Const. P. Anam Salman Jamali and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Petitions challenging the 2 years active practice eligibility requirement for appointment as civil judge / judicial magistrate.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 222
Advocates:Muhammad Haseeb Jamali(ADVO-10211-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shahrukh Siddiqui(ADVO-22718-SBC-KHC),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4634) 5689/2019 Const. P. Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 145
Advocates:Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1113-K/2021 Abdul Qayoom Solangi v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4635) 67/2020 Criminal Appeal SHAHRUKH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 823
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
4636) 10/2009 J.M SARA AHMED SOOMRO (Applicant) V/S SARWAT UN NISA & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:in such a situation where the powers have
been delegated to a counsel and who acted upon it, is allowed to be
challenged in such a manner, as is in this case, then perhaps there will
no end to the litigation and the authority of the counsel, to whom the
powers have been delegated, would always remain under shadow of
doubt. Insofar additional property which was not initially available in the
plaint filed by applicant herself, the special Power of Attorney is
available to validate the authority of respondent No.1 to compromise on
behalf of applicant
Citation:2017 YLR 582, 2016 SBLR Sindh 1476
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
4637) 5/2020 R.A (Civil Revision) Mir Nisar Ali (Applicant) V/S Abdul Rasheed through L.Rs and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 377
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
4638) 193/2000 Civil Revision Syed Gul Hassan Shah (Applicant) V/S Allah Warayo & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 92
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
4639) 22/2021 I. A Muhammad Yousif Mahar (Appellant) V/S M/S Zarai Tarakiyati Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 121
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
4640) 946/2013 Const. P. Astro Plastic (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:ADR under Customs Act, 1969.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 944
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 26-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
4641) 2174/2016 Const. P. Sahibzadi Shah Bano (Petitioner) V/S Senior Member B.O.R & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 27-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
4642) 82/2014 Cr.J.A Yousaf and Muhammad Irfan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 434
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
4643) 273/2021 Cr.Rev JAHANZAIB ANWAR S/O MUHAMMAD ANWAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 723
Advocates:Shaikh Jawaid Mir(ADVO-5446-SBC-KHI),Farrukh Nawaz Khan(ADVO-403-BBC-QTA-QTA)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 10-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
4644) 2795/2018 Const. P. ARY Communication Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 924
Advocates:Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1716/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. ARY Communications Limited, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4645) 27/2021 H.C.A Muhammad Moeed Khan thorugh Attorney Saeed Khan (Appellant) V/S Mst. Sehar Gul & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1081
Advocates:Mitha Ram Dharani(ADVO-2624-SBC-HYD),Ashok Kumar(ADVO-719-SBC-MKS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 16-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.536-K/2021 Muhammad Moeed Khan v. Mst.Sehar Gul & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4646) 477/2024 Suit M/S. ASG METAL LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S THE COMMISSIONER-IR, ZONE-IV & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:No Suit maintainable against Show Cause Notice; Non deposit of 50% amount is also mandatory
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1297
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
4647) 1151/2014 Const. P. Mst Kounjan Shar (Petitioner) V/S SHO PS Lakhi Ghulam Shah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting
4648) 1874/2021 Const. P. Ms. Shahid Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:transfer and posting issue
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 80
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
4649) 7/2012 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Rashid Aslam & Arshad Nabi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 25-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
4650) 92/2021 Spl.Cr.J.A Najeebullah Brohi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Conviction (Police officials are good witnesses and recovery proved) )
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1060
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 21-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.23/2024 1. Najeebullah Brohi 2. Abbas Ali Baloch v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4651) 3486/2016 Const. P. Jawaid Alam (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1435-K/2018 Javed Alam v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Inter Provincial Co-Ordanation Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4652) 1614/2019 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Retrospective regularization cannot be granted without statutory backing. Petition dismissed along with listed applications..
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1788
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
4653) 708/2011 Cr.Bail Mohammad Ibrahim Tunio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting
4654) 837/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Faraz Rehan S/o Muhammad Rehan (Petitioner) V/S SHO P.S. Sir Syed (Central) Khi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Father writ of Habeas Corpus against Grand mother of minor dismissed with direction to approach G&W Court . )
Tag Line:Habeas Corpus directing the respondent-police officials to produce his minor son namely Master Zohan Faraz aged about 02 years to enable him to take his custody--I am of the view that the purpose of filing this petition is served as the minor has been produced before this Court; and, prima-facie the minor is no more in illegal custody as discussed in the preceding paragraph. Primarily, in the cases, concerning the custody of a child, this Court is not required to go into the intricacies/technicalities of the matter in constitutional jurisdiction and should confine its findings to the extent of the welfare of the child/minor which is a paramount consideration and it is for the learned Guardian and Wards Court to take appropriate measures in this regard.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1320
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4655) 3541/2017 Const. P. Unilever Paksitan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Os (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PTD 2052
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4656) 31/2019 Cr.J.A Moule Dino (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 611
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
4657) 2258/2022 Cr.Bail SHAIKH GHULAM MURTAZA ADV (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 75
Advocates:Mamoon Ahmed Khan Shirwany(ADVO-11042-SBC-KHS),S. Shafqat Ali Shah Masoomi.(ADVO-328-SBC-SUK),Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Abdul Wali(ADVO-12332-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
4658) 14/2015 F.R.A Airport Hotel (Appellant) V/S S. Imtiazuddin & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sind Rented Premises Act - Eviction---15 (Imposed Special Cost Illegal and Unsustainable )
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
4659) 135/2022 H.C.A Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1184
Advocates:Nazia Hanjrah(ADVO-15954-SBC-KHS),M/S. IQBAL KHURRAM LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-231-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Tufail F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4797-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4274/2023 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited, Karachi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary, Land Utilization Department, Board of Revenue, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
4660) 352/2000 Suit plaintiff (Plaintiff) V/S Defendant (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
4661) 2166/2013 Const. P. MKB Enterprises Private Limited (Petitioner) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 1159
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 17-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
4662) 3776/2012 Const. P. K.E.S.C. Labour Union & Others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Privatization Commission Ordinance 2000 (section 28)
Tag Line:1. A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan has pronounced the judgment today i.e. on 21st January 2021 in the case of K.E.S.C. Labour Union and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the privatization process adopted by the Respondents Nos.2 and 3 i.e. Privatization Commission through its Secretary and Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. through its Managing Director in respect of sale/transfer of the shares of KESC for being illegal, irrational and without lawful authority. Whereas, further declaration has been sought to the effect that purported sale and transfer of shareholding and management control in KESC to M/s.Hassan Associates consortium, is void, malafide and opposed to law and public policy. Various other Constitutional and legal grounds were agitated during the course of hearing of above Petitions and after hearing all the learned counsel for the parties, in detail, learned Divisional Bench of this Court through an exhaustive judgment pronounced today has been pleased to dismiss the above Petitions in the following terms: -
62. In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of the case, the aforesaid petitions are disposed of in the following terms:-
a) The privatization process adopted by the respondents No.2 & 3 in respect of sale/transfer of the share of KESC does not violate the constitutional mandate, whereas, substantial compliance of the provisions of Privatization Commission Ordinance, 2000 read with Privatization Commission (Modes and Procedures) Rules, 2001, has also been made, therefore, no interference is required by this Court. Accordingly, aforesaid Constitutional Petitions being devoid of any merit, are hereby dismissed along with listed applications.
b) That without prejudice to above finding, we hereby declare that the petitioners have failed to establish the malafide on the part of respondents in respect of sale/transfer of the share to KESC through negotiated sale to a private company, which is otherwise permissible in law and as per rules referred to hereinabove, therefore, the allegation of malafide by the petitioners on the part of the respondents stands rebutted, hence petitions are dismissed on this ground also.
c) Nothing has been produced by the learned counsel for the petitioners in support of their submission that electricity being an essential service cannot be privatized, therefore, such plea of the petitioners also stands rebutted and the petitions are hereby dismissed on this account also.
2. Before parting with the aforesaid judgment, learned Divisional Bench of this Court has been further pleased to observe that plea of the learned counsel for the petitioners requiring the Court to take cognizance of subsequent events of privatization, issue directions to the Auditor General of Pakistan for conducting scrutiny and audit of the accounts of the K-Electric (KESC), cannot be acceded in these Petitions, as it would amount to granting a relief to the petitioners beyond the pleadings, while changing the complexion of the proceedings, to the disadvantage of the respondents, which is not permissible in law. However, it has been observed that this aspect of the matter can be agitated as a separate cause before the relevant forum/authority/Court of law, by filing appropriate proceedings, however, subject to all just exceptions and in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 450
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 21-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4663) 158/2020 Const. P. M/s Western Silk Mills (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan has pronounced the judgment on 18th January 2021 in the case of Al-Razzaq Fibres Pvt. Ltd. and others v. The Federation of Pakistan and another (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the vires of the amendment in in subsection (2)(b) of Section 3 and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge as well as SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(I)/2011 for being ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Divisional Bench of this Court has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: -
11. Accordingly, for the above reasons, instant petitions are allowed in the following terms:-
(i) Amendment in Section 3(2)(b) read with Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge, is ultravires to Constitution, and contrary to law, hence of no legal effect.
(ii) SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 issued in terms of and in purported exercise of powers conferred by, the amendment in Section 3(2)(b) and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(1)/2011, is declared to be ultra vires the Constitution, and is of no legal effect.
(iii) The respondents are restrained from demanding any duty in terms of SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 from the petitioners.
(iv) Provisions of Section 74A, suffice to say, have no relevance to the controversy in hand because it seeks validation of the acts of Federal Government, and not that of the Board, with the approval of the Federal Minister-in-Charge.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1277
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.519-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Western Silk Mills Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4664) 3787/2015 Const. P. M/s Rajby Industries (Petitioner) V/S Rahim Dad And ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Tahir Abbasi(ADVO-13193-SBC-KHI),Rafiullah(ADVO-4519-SBC-KHI),Farman Ullah(ADVO-11315-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.684-K/2019 M/s Rajby Industries v. Rahim Dad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4665) 1171/2022 Cr.Bail NAIMATULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD NAZIR KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 442
Advocates:Asma Khan(ADVO-13894-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 08-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
4666) 200/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD NADEEM KHAN S/O FAHEEM KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 15-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
4667) 982/2023 Const. P. Latifullah S/o Abdul Salam (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Sabir and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 485
Advocates:Abdul Khursheed Khan(ADVO-2964-SBC-KHS),Rashid Ali(ADVO-19840-SBC-KHE),Khaqan Baber Mughal(ADVO-7103-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
4668) 1710/2015 Suit Syed Shafaat Ali.(ISSUES) (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Feroz Ali. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
4669) 2382/2016 Const. P. Syed Sohail Hasan (Petitioner) V/S D.G NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Abdul Qadir Halepota(ADVO-10236-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Anwar Tariq(ADVO-365-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 16-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
4670) 948/2021 Const. P. Mst. Ameer Jahan / Bisma Noreen (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Epidemic Diseases Act, 2014, 5G Technology (Telecommunication)
Tag Line:COVID VACCINATION AND 5G TECHNOLOGY
---Fifth Generation technology is making its roots across the world and all countries have framed policies to get benefit out of it. Fifth Generation technology caters for faster browsing, streaming, uploading and downloading speed with better connectivity. Its adoption perhaps is the only way out to be at par with rest of the world. Its application is nowadays common in robotic devices, self-driven cars, medical devices etc.
Insofar as Covid-19 is concerned, perhaps the petitioner is not even remotely aware of the consequences of Corona Virus disease that triggered in 2019 and is yet to be controlled; there are international and national policies which are being towed by different departments of the provincial as well as federal government including health departments.
The world is facing this novel experience which is never seen before is pandemic in nature and since last two years efforts are being made to have a complete control over it. Research progress is continued however the precautionary measures to control its maximum effect is being taken and monitored in the entire world by way of enhancing the immunity of
body i.e. resistance against the virus (Covid-19). One should not be an obstacle by saying that he/she is not interested in such scheduled vaccination as this might result in rapid growth/increase/ontogenesis of Corona Virus.
Citation:2022 MLD 73
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 05-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.51/2022 Bisma Naureen/Ameer Jehan v. The Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Defence, Islamabad Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4671) 153/2020 Const. P. Pervez Leghari (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Naseema & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1878
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
4672) 282/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Kazim Larik and others (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
4673) 882/2015 Const. P. Abdul Hameed & others (Petitioner) V/S IV Addl DJ Hyd and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 45
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
4674) 2800/2017 Const. P. Unique Food Services Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.568-K/2017,C.P.L.A.4251/2017,C.A.2140/2017,C.A.2144/2017 SCP Status:Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
4675) 3597/2018 Const. P. Abdul Rauf Khan (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Petitioners questioned their transfer and posting orders issued by the respondent-Cantonment Board by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court asserting that the post against which the petitioners were appointed was/is a non-transferable under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule 5 of the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1022
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
4676) 3/2025 Criminal Appeal rafique (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1866
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
4677) 344/2021 Const. P. Abbas Ali (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 866
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
4678) 169/2013 Suit ABDUL REHMAN KHAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINE CORP. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order I Rule 1)
Tag Line: In my view under the
present facts and circumstances where a circular has been challenged
which involves a common question of fact and since involves common
grounds, it certainly involve common question of law as such is covered
by Order 1 Rule 1 CPC.
Citation:2014 CLC 1714
Advocates:Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
4679) 71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting
4680) 3527/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Haseeb Mirza and Others (Petitioner) V/S M/s Indus University and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 423
Advocates:Javed Ahmed Qazi(ADVO-13711-SBC-KHI),Abdul Qayyum Khan Abbasi(ADVO-7342-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4681) 767/2024 Cr.Bail Altaf Ahmed Jatoi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 486
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
4682) 300/2023 H.C.A The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S CNERGYICO PK LIMITED & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A
Tag Line:High Court Appeal against ad-interim orders passed by a Single Judge; held, Not maintainable as a matter of routine; such practice deprecated.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 301
Advocates:Syed Imran Shamsi(ADVO-10257-SBC-KHE),Arshad Mohsin Tayebaly(ADVO-3740-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 04-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
4683) 366/2017 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S FAZAL TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1437
Advocates:Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4684) 27/2018 Cr.Acq.A. Mukhtiar (Appellant) V/S Session Judge & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 930
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4685) 30/2004 Spl.Cus.A. Pakistan International Airlines Corporat (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs (Preventive) Custom (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Imposition of penalty; element of mens rea must be established
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 855
Advocates:Muhammad Iqbal Raja(ADVO-3479-SBC-KHI),Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Hyder Shaikh(ADVO-10758-SBC-KHI),M/S. AWAN LAW CHAMBERS(FIRM-299-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 07-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
4686) 2/2013 Suit.B UNITED BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S FASHIONWEAR (PVT) LTD & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Banking Law (Recovery )
Tag Line:Contents of the plaint as well
and it appears that the defendant has evasively denied his liabilities in
the leave to defend application which is not requirement of Order VIII
Rule 4 CPC. Under the law every allegation of fact in the plaint should
be denied specifically and if not it would amount to an evasive denial.
---Insofar as the claim of the mark up is
concerned as it should be strictly subject to agreement as in chart given
as the plaintiff has not cited any agreement to entitle them to
claim mark up as sought, however no dispute with cost of funds from the
date of default
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Khursheed Javed(ADVO-8182-SBC-KHI),Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
4687) 34/2009 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Muhammad Zubair (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 31-JUL-10
Approved for Reporting
4688) 2860/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:chowkidar in the office of District & Sessions Judge, Karachi East based on son quota--Therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings as it would fall within mischief of constructive res-judicata. Reliance is placed on the case of State Bank of Pakistan through Governor and others vs. Imtiaz Ali Khan and others (2012 SCMR 280).
5. In our view, once the stance of the petitioner on the aforesaid analogy has been set at rest by the Administrative Committee, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution as writ does not lie against such decision of the Administrative Committee.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2357
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
4689) 303/2021 Const. P. Manzoor Ali & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 627
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 29-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4690) 836/2014 Const. P. KHURRAM S/O LAL MUHAMMAD LAKHO (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 22-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
4691) 11/2019 M.A. Farhan Yasir Danwar (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1319
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
4692) 108/2021 H.C.A Professor Dr. Lubna Ansari Baig (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction), Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:--we are only of the view that once an earlier injunctive order was passed, a follow up order to carry the real object of the earlier order should have been passed.
Presumably, earlier order was passed after a tentative assessment of
well-known principle of granting injunction. Learned Single Judge would
have been empowered to revisit and decide the applications finally,
based on three ingredients, referred above, but not in a cursory manner
and that too after passing adverse remarks.
--This selection of observation by the learned Single Judge has perhaps overlapped and
overshadowed the earlier order and the mandate and without actually
the applications being heard and decided. The cursory proceeding
normally leads to miscarriage of justice and cumulative effect of the
impugned order render it as confounded and in variance.
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) 1304
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE),Omer Memon(ADVO-15196-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 14-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
4693) 119/2013 I.T.R.A Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 13-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
4694) 88/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) Ali Anwar & another (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 526
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
4695) 50/2011 R.A (Civil Revision) Rafiq Ahmed Khichi (Applicant) V/S Ashok Kumar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XLI Rule 27 -Additional Evidence)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
4696) 2/2016 Service Appeal Ghulam Shabir Soomro (Appellant) V/S The Chief Justice Honorable High Court of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Ghulam Shabbir Babar(ADVO-10219-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
4697) 4/2009 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. Mst. Parveen Akhtar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 08-APR-11
Approved for Reporting
4698) 814/2010 Const. P. State Life Insurance Corp (Petitioner) V/S K.R. Khan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 07-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
4699) 1/2010 Civil Ref. REFERENCE MADE BY DDO (REVENUE) SHAH FAISAL (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD KARIM-UD-DIN QURESHI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 244
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting
4700) 682/2023 Const. P. Farman Ali and Others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2640
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
4701) 1546/2007 Suit Trustees of the Port of Karachi (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Fazal Mahmood Shah (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 25-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
4702) 14/2010 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Muhammad Ramzan & other (Appellant) V/S the State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 23-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
4703) 257/2019 Cr.Bail Imtiaz Magsi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2012
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
4704) 5434/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Bashir & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 460
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
4705) 95/2007 R.A (Civil Revision) Sain Dino and others (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 826
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
4706) 10/2016 Conf.Case Ghulam Rasool (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1184
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4707) 126/2014 Const. P. M/S HERBERTSONS PAKISTAN PVT LTD (Petitioner) V/S THE IIIRD RNET CONTROLLER WEST & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
4708) 417/2010 Const. P. Raja Zaheer Ahmed Khuharo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Service matters (Shaheed Quota (Dismissed))
Tag Line:Shaheed has been defined in Standing Order No.225/2008 who lost his life in the line of duty as an act of terrorism / target killing, encounter with criminals, also include traffic officials on traffic duty killed by vehicle of any kind. Legal heirs means son /daughter /widow /brother or sister. Claim of the petitioner did not fall within the purview of above definition as is evident from the F.I.R mentioned above, in which it is stated that P.C Khan Muhammad was killed due to enmity between the parties. Petitioner has no statutory right or a right recognized by the law to seek recruitment as constable against Shaheed Quota. Therefore, petitioner cannot be said to be an aggrieved person.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 28-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
4709) 108/2009 R.A (Civil Revision) Peeral @ Peer Bux and others (Applicant) V/S Mushtaque Ali, thr:L.Rs.&Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Appreciation of Evidence. Cross examination is to be looked into and not merely the Examination in Chief. Evidence to be read as a whole.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 636
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.780-K/2022 Mushtaq Ali through his legal heirs & others v. Peeral @ Peer Bux through his legal heirs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned
4710) 220/2018 Cr.Bail Aftab Ahmed Lashari (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 27-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
4711) 4275/2014 Const. P. Abdul Latif and ORs (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 98
Advocates:Rehan Aziz Malik(ADVO-9421-SBC-KHI),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4712) 4460/2012 Const. P. Marvi Aslam & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
4713) 184/2021 Cr.Bail Bhano Khan Hattar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail Granted After arrest In Section U/S 302 ,504,109 PPC .)
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 798
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
4714) 65/2024 Cr.Bail Hussain Ali & Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:There is neither a legal nor an ethical obligation to keep the individuals in jail merely on the allegation that they have committed an offence punishable with death unless there are credible reasons to believe in their involvement. The eventual conviction and imprisonment of a guilty individual can rectify the error of mistakenly granting him bail. However, there is no adequate compensation that can be given to an innocent person for the psychological, emotional and social damage caused by his unjustified incarceration at any stage of the case, even if he is ultimately acquitted.
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 8
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
4715) 7277/2018 Const. P. Masood Alam Niazi (Petitioner) V/S The State Through Chairman NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 07-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.M.A.76/2020 Chairman NAB thr P.G. NAB v. Masood Alam Niazi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed
4716) 78/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Dur Muhammad Malik (Applicant) V/S Zafarullah Malik & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Paternity of child questioned )
Tag Line:Respondent/Zafarullah, born in the year 2000, claimed paternity from Applicant/Dur Muhammad, except that his father, Dur Muhammad, took the position that he divorced Zafarullah's mother, Zulekhan, in 1998. Zafarullah's mother, his phuppi and step-father, all gave oral testimony that Zafarullah's mother was divorced in 2002. Dur Muhammad produced no evidence under DMMA in support dissolution of marriage that he divorced his first wife (Zafarullah's mother) in 1998. DNA testing would not come to his aid in the facts and circumstances of the case. Presumption of Article 128 of Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984, presumption of marriage and his evidence did not support Dur Muhammad's cause. Revision Dismissed.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 164
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
4717) 752/2022 Const. P. Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Elections Act, 2017 (Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:The plea taken by the parties could not be agitated in Constitution petition, as this court is not in a position to look into the allegations and counterallegation in an election matter, in terms of section 60 of the Election Act, 2017, which is also covered by Article 63 of the Constitution.
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 912
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 02-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
4718) 29/2016 Judicial Companies Misc. Pervez Arshad & another (Applicant) V/S Rauf Textile & Printing Mills (Pvt.) Ltd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 11-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1082-K/2018 Pervez Arshad and others v. Rauf Textiles & Printing Mills (Pvt) Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4719) 3316/2017 Const. P. Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner has rendered 32 years??? service, however, the benefits as provided under clause 19 of the Resolution as discussed supra have been denied to him and no plausible reason has been assigned for withholding the same, for which the Petitioner cannot be held responsible.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
4720) 17/2024 Spl.Cr.Bail ATTAULLAH S/O ALLAH DIWAYO KHUSHIK & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bail. Smuggling by way of en-route pilferage of transit goods.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1304
Advocates:Spl.Prosecutor Customs(SpPCus),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Shah Muhammad Zaman(ADVO-14965-SBC-MLR),Nasrullah Korai(ADVO-11200-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.2-K/2024 Attaullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4721) 5/2007 Suit NOMAN ABID CO (Plaintiff) V/S NAVEED HAIDER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The Plaintiff has already received the amount of disputed cheque, therefore, the present suit was filed with mala fide intention and is not maintainable. Not only this, the overall conduct of the Plaintiff Company, from the time of granting Leave to Defend Application was not of a bona fide litigant. Hence, the present suit is dismissed with costs.
Tag Line:The Plaintiff has already received the amount of disputed cheque, therefore, the present suit was filed with mala fide intention and is not maintainable. Not only this, the overall conduct of the Plaintiff Company, from the time of granting Leave to Defend Application was not of a bona fide litigant. Hence, the present suit is dismissed with costs.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 19-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
4722) 283/2012 Const. P. Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
4723) 4973/2014 Const. P. Maersk Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistn through Secretary Ministry of Overseas Pakistanis (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Service matters (NIRC), Industrial Dispute
Tag Line:The questions, which require determination in the present case, were that whether the law expressly empowers the Commission to pass such an interim order in proceedings of unfair labour practice. If not, whether such a power necessarily follows, or is implicit in the powers expressly conferred, being incidental or ancillary to it or consequential to the power to find an employer guilty under the Industrial Relation laws.
Provisions of National Industrial Relation Commissions (Procedure & Functions) Regulations, 1973, and Article 199 of constitution were discussed.
It was observed that Learned Member NIRC failed to advert the grounds taken in the termination letter and other issues relating to the jurisdiction to pass ante status quo have also not dealt with in a proper manner. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded with the direction to decide the application of respondent No. 3 to 12 afresh.
Citation:2017 PLC Lab. 176
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.153-K/2017 Safdar Yousuf and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4724) 546/2014 Const. P. Sikandar A. Karim (Petitioner) V/S Chairman N.A.B and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 28-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.95-K/2017 Fida Hussain and others v. The Secy: Local Government of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4725) 2328/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Tanveer (Petitioner) V/S M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corp Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 421
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 14-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1027-K/2025 Pakistan Steel Mills v. Muhammad Tanveer Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4726) 89/2012 Suit.B HABIB METROPOLITAN (Plaintiff) V/S ABID NISAR (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Citation:2014 CLD 1367
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS),Arshad Mohsin Tayebaly(ADVO-3740-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
4727) 611/2016 Suit Abu Bakar Bin Abdul Qadir and another (Plaintiff) V/S Laeeq Ahmed and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Defendant sought rejection of plaint on the ground that plaintiff had concealed material facts---Validity---Object and principle of O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C. was that a frivolous litigation should be laid to rest at the earliest and bona fide parties should be saved from rigors of such a litigation---Subject matter of litigation in question, i.e. the house property was not in dispute and sale consideration was admitted---Communication of offer and acceptance by parties to each other with regard to subject matter and total sale consideration was acknowledged by both the parties---All ingredients of a valid agreement enforceable as a contract existed---Defendants failed to make a case for grant of application under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C.---Application was dismissed in circumstances.
Topic: Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C (Dismissed.)
Tag Line:Defendants failed to make a case for grant of application under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C.---Application was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2018 CLC Note 24
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 07-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
4728) 8180/2019 Const. P. Saif Shujaat and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject to the approval of the competent authority.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1180
Advocates:In Person(INP),Muhammad Rasheed(ADVO-9875-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shahzad Gul Jatoi(ADVO-16372-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-14513-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
4729) 882/2019 Const. P. M/s Mediflow Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 MLD 185
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
4730) 1661/2024 Const. P. Dr Rahim Bux Khokhar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Upholding statutory remedies and procedural fairness???A Judicial Review under Section 36 of MUET Act, 1977 & Paragraph 14 of MUET E&D Statutes, 1978.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1536
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar
Order Date: 23-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4731) 1/2023 Cr.Rev Muhammad Amir Kalwar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 866
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4732) 71/2024 Cr.Bail Anoop Kumar (Applicant) V/S The State & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Loss to the government exchequers )
Tag Line:NAB Matters
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1276
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 29-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
4733) 426/2022 H.C.A Prof. Dr. Amir Bux Channa & Another (Appellant) V/S Isra Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) Ltd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 484
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
4734) 978/2020 Const. P. Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Appointment of Vice Chancellor ), CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:In the captioned Petition bearing No.D-1970 of 2019, the only issue involved is the issuance of two Corrigendum dated 11.03.2019 & 16.6.2019 respectively relating to advertisement . The Petitioner has assailed the legality of the above-specified Corrigendum whereby Respondent-Board changed the academic qualification of candidates as well as the upper age limit from 62 to 65 years for the post of Vice-Chancellor of Peoples University . We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the Search Committee to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor PUMHSW, Shaheed Benazirabad in pursuance of corrigendum as discussed supra was without lawful authority and awarding marks to the candidates by the Search Committee is also held to be against the clear command of the Honorable Supreme
Court in the cases discussed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we direct the Search Committee /competent authority to hold a fresh interview of the shortlisted candidates made before the issuance of corrigendum and make recommendation to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor, PUMHSW, petitions are disposed of.
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1132
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
4735) 1415/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt.of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.571-K/2018 Umerdin Saand and another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4736) 87/2023 Cr.J.A NIAZ ALI @ ALI PATHAN S/O GHULAM NABI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 422
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Habib Ur Rehman Jiskani(ADVO-15384-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
4737) 5/2020 Cr.J.A Rahib Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 850
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.424/2023 Rahib Ali v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4738) 811/2020 Cr.Bail SADDAM HUSSAIN JAMALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 389
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 10-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
4739) 36/2023 Const. P. Abdul Rasheed Khan Thr. Attorney Mirza Amir Baig (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Rizwan Kamali and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 969
Advocates:Abdul Latif(ADVO-11293-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Abu Bakar Khalil(ADVO-17482-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.185/2023 Javed Iqbal Khan thr. his authorized attorney and others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Revenue Division/Chairman FBR House, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 04-Jun-24)
4740) 233/2013 Cr.Misc. Mst Abida Mangrio (Appellant) V/S SHO PS Ratodero and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Two Hours For meeting allowed in Every Saturday .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 25-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
4741) 25/2023 Cr.Rev BASHIR AKBAR ALI (Applicant) V/S SYED MUHAMMAD TAHA & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 388
Advocates:Mamoon Ahmed Khan Shirwany(ADVO-11042-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ahmed(ADVO-8568-SBC-KHI),Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Sher Afzal Khan(ADVO-4698-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.81-K/2025 Raja Imranullah Khan & others v. Bashir Akbar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
4742) 3854/2011 Const. P. Mst. Farah Naz (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Petition hit by laches )
Tag Line:we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in November 2011 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to her in June 2008 when her late husband availed the benefits of VSS, i.e. approximately 04 years before the filing of the instant petition.
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 1266
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4743) 233/2001 I.T.C COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TEX (Applicant) V/S KARACHI STOCK EXCHANGE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 186
Advocates:Munawar Ali(ADVO-10937-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 08-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.985-K/2023 Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited v. Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone -VI, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4744) 750/2016 Suit Syed Farukh Mazhar (Plaintiff) V/S SGS Headquarters and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Appointment of commissioner to record evidence)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 23-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
4745) 11/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) V/S Shamsuddin & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
4746) 414/2011 Criminal Appeal Deen Muhammad Memon (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
4747) 95/2025 Cr.Bail Aamir Ali Dero (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 440
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo
Order Date: 28-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
4748) 5199/2021 Const. P. Sadullah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 63
Advocates:Nousheen Khan(ADVO-10691-SBC-KHE),Tajammul Hussain Lodhi(ADVO-10103-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 11-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
4749) 5969/2015 Const. P. Atta Abbas Zaidi and others (Petitioner) V/S The State throug NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 18-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting
4750) 48/2023 Criminal Appeal Rasool Bux (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1787
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
4751) 15/2019 Judicial Companies Misc. GULISTAN SPINNING MILLS LIMITED & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S NA (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies Act, 2017
Tag Line:Ss. 280, 281, 282, 283 & 285(8)---Scheme of Arrangement---Rights of parties---Petitioners sought approval of understandings and arrangements reached at between borrower and financers/creditors---Validity---High Court could not sit as Court of appeal over and above wisdom disclosed by borrower and creditors while agreeing to certain terms of repayment, provided it was within the frame of company law and within the contours of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---To such extent High Court was bound to watch and commercial wisdom of participant of the Scheme could not be pierced by a Bench who might have its own opinion---Company jurisdiction of High Court in such matters was peripheral and supervisory and not of an appellate authority---By taking into confidence all stakeholders, a policy was devised to settle and pay liabilities of all secured creditors in a befitting manner---To achieve such goal, charged assets of petitioner company were put to sale through Assets Sale Committee consisting of representatives of banks---High Court set aside all objections and approved the Scheme of Arrangement---Petition was allowed, in circumstances
Citation:2024 CLD 496
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Shahid Iqbal Rana(ADVO-27398-PBC-LHR),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Carnelines, Lane & Mufti(),Muhammad Hamza(ADVO-21528-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
4752) 5008/2025 Const. P. Ashfaq Ali Panhwar Adv (Petitioner) V/S Zia ul Hassan Lanjar & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3128
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 30-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
4753) 530/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s. JW SEZ (Pvt) Ltd, Lahore (Applicant) V/S The Dir. Direct. of Post Clearance Audit (South), (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 453
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Rashid Malik(ADVO-9598-SBC-KHI),Irfan Ali(ADVO-17931-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 27-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1053/2025 The Director, Directorate of Post Clearance Audit (South) Customs House, Karachi v. M/s JW SEZ Pvt Ltd, Lahore Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4754) 1677/2011 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
4755) 1945/2013 Const. P. Ehsanullah Khan, Addl. Director FIA (Retired) (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Service matters (Promotion)
Tag Line:The petitioner through the instant petition has challenged recommendation/decision dated 13.02.2013 of CSB regarding supersession of the petitioners promotion.
Provisions of Services Tribunal Act 1973, Civil servants Act 197 Article 199 and 212(2) of Constitution of Pakistan and Fundamental Rules 17(1) were discussed in the case.
It was observed that the Petitioner was entitled to get the benefit of Office Memorandum No. F.No.4 (6)imp/FR-17/2013-277 dated 18.09.2015. The respondents were directed to consider his case of promotion in the light of revised guidelines issued by Finance Division (Regulation Wing), Government of Pakistan vide its Office Memorandum No. F.No.4 (6)imp/FR-17/2013-277 dated 18.09.2015, without being influenced by the decision by CSB, strictly in accordance with law.
Citation:2018 PLC CS Note 89
Advocates:Ahsanullah(ADVO-11208-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Naila Tabassum(ADVO-8444-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.680/2017 Secretary Establishment Division and others v. Ehsanullah Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4756) 184/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. ARSHAD S/O ABDUL SATTAR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1553
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 15-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
4757) 1408/2012 Suit SHAFIQUE AHMED QURESHI & OTHERS (Petitioner) V/S HYDERABAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 7
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 05-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting
4758) 7/2023 Spl.Cr.A.A THE STATE THOROUGH COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS KHI (Appellant) V/S TALIB HUSSAIN & ANOHTER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Sufficient cause to condone limitation in Criminal Acquittal Appeal under Customs Act.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 865
Advocates:Zulifiqar Ali Arain(ADVO-1899-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
4759) 734/2022 Cr.Bail ATEEQ AHMED KHAN S/O SHAMIM AHMED KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1213
Advocates:Khalid Rahim(ADVO-9042-SBC-KHE),Ali Gohar(ADVO-4312-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
4760) 5/2021 Election Appeal Tufail Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Dr. Shahab Imam & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Senate Election; Technocrat seat; nomination upheld.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1177
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4761) 246/2018 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Syed Rehan Zaidi alias Ali Buddha (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Trial ( Benefit of doubt ), Appeal (Appeal)
Tag Line:Appellant by way of appeals has Challenged the judgment Where he was Convicted for the offence U/s 7(h) of ATA, 1997 R/w section 353/324 PPC. Appellant allegedly was apprehended by police party of police station Mochko, Karachi led by SIP Khadim Hussain after encounter and on search from him were secured one unlicensed 30 bore pistol. Memo of arrest and recovery so prepared by them allegedly at the place of incident after encounter does not contain time of its preparation. Such omission could not be overlooked. Admittedly none sustained fire shot injury as result of such encounter. The change of serial numbers of the pistol and hand grenade have made the very recovery to be doubtful. No independent witness was examined by SIO. It was obviously table investigation In these circumstances. Appeals are allowed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
4762) 5859/2019 Const. P. Kamran Chandio (Petitioner) V/S P.D.O.H.A and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Inquiry proceedings against employee of PDHA. Employee of PDHA cannot approach this court in Constitutional Jurisdiction, as they are regulated by the Pakistan Defence Housing Authority Service Rules 2008, which are non-statutory.
Citation:2023 PLC CS Note 94
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
4763) 8456/2019 Const. P. Farrukh Imran and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:This issue as raised firstly could be resolved by the competent authority of PSO at their end within three months from the date of receipt this order and if the respondent company decide the cases of the petitioners on the same analogy as put forward by the petitioners then the matter shall be over once for all, however if the decision goes against the petitioners they may recourse to the legal remedies as provided under the law, however the petitioners cannot be non-suited based non-statutory rules of service in terms of Supreme Court decision. This petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1041
Advocates:Shoukat Ali(ADVO-10357-SBC-KHI),Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-3719-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Javed Asghar(ADVO-4324-SBC-KHS),Choudhary Atif Rafiq(ADVO-11896-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4764) 15/2016 Civil Tran Muhammad Warail (Applicant) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Transfer Application (Allegation against presiding officer ), Transfer Application (Dismissed)
Citation:2018 MLD 1438
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
4765) 551/2017 Cr.Bail Gul Mazari (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Murder Bail (No Specific Role and Mere Presence), Murder Bail (Granted)
Tag Line:No doubt, the applicant has been nominated in the F.I.R, but no specific role of causing any injury to deceased is assigned to him, though he was allegedly armed with T.T pistol, but he did not use the same in the commission of alleged offence. The applicant has acted as instigator only and the motive is also not attributed to him.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 23-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
4766) 688/2012 Suit Ambia Khatoon (Plaintiff) V/S Hidayatullah & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 13-APR-16
Approved for Reporting
4767) 60/2013 I. A Ahmed Ali (Appellant) V/S M/s. Faysal Bank Ltd. & others (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 24-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
4768) 31/2021 M.A. Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Kirshan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1020
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
4769) 1593/2012 Suit NAZAR GUL (Plaintiff) V/S MAYMAR HOUSING SERVICE (PVT) LTD. & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
4770) 1740/2022 Suit MUHAMMAD RAMEEZ KHAN & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S THE PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Application(s) for withdrawal of Suits dismissed. Directions given.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 305
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
4771) 245/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Syed Shahid Hussain Shah (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ameen Komboh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 500
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
4772) 197/2015 Const. P. Interman Trading FZE (Petitioner) V/S Sui Southern Gas Company & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLC 1
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 06-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting
4773) 520/2021 Criminal Appeal SHAHZAIB @ KAKA S/O ALI BUKSH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 ((No legal bar or restriction to consider statement of official witnesses))
Tag Line:while awarding the conviction in cases of capital punishment also has no force as the
reluctance of the general public to become a witness in such cases has become a judicially recognized fact and there was no way out but to consider the statement of the official witnesses as no legal bar or restriction has been imposed and even then there was no time to collect independent witnesses.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 7
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Arshad Rauf(ADVO-4556-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Khan(ADVO-15980-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
4774) 79/2014 Cr.Misc. M/s.Abid S. Zuberi & others (Applicant) V/S M/s.Kh.Shamsul Islam and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 26-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
4775) 224/2020 H.C.A Mst. Khursheed Begum & others (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Iqbal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Scheme of auction proceedings highlighted in order XXI Rule 66, 84, 85, 89, 90 and 92)
Tag Line:The rights of
the legal heirs to intervene in terms of Order XXI Rule 89 and 90 CPC
(though both rules are separate in nature), to be exercised within 30
days??? time of the acceptance of offer, as sale certificate was also
ordered to be issued
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 949
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 24-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.732/2024 Faraz Ali v. Mst. Khursheed Begum and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. (-) Mr Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
4776) 1961/2022 Suit Amir Hussain (Plaintiff) V/S Sir Syed University of Engineering & Tecnology (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:It is thus a private University which was formed and is
governed by the statute. I would conclude that there is a
relationship of master and servant between the plaintiff and
defendant
Citation:2024 PLC CS 943
Advocates:Syed Jamal Uddin Bukhari(ADVO-14803-SBC-KHI),Tasawar Ali Hashmi(ADVO-2778-SBC-KHI),Syed Ahsan Imam Rizvi(ADVO-11801-SBC-KHI),Syed Haider Imam(ADVO-8703-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
4777) 192/2024 Const. P. Syed Kashan Ali (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Uroosa & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1581
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4778) 7941/2015 Const. P. Mst. Sabiha Ilyas (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) Note 13
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
4779) 521/2017 Const. P. Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
whether there is any violation of Statutory Law, compelling the Petitioner to invoke the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court?
Topic: Service matters (Compulsory Retirement)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another,C.P.L.A.4190/2019 Muzafar Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Cabinet Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4780) 5473/2017 Const. P. Umer Ansari and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Drawing an analogy from the present situation and, more importantly, guided by the principles established by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Dr. Naveeda Tufail and 72 others v. Government of Punjab and others (2003 SCMR 291) and Shahzad Shahmir and others v Government of Sindh & others (2021 SCMR 824). The Dr. Naveeda Tufail case shows that the Federal Government regularized ad hoc employees through the Public Service Commission. While the Petitioners, as provincial contract employees, cannot automatically claim this, Article 25 of the Constitution calls for equal treatment. In Naveeda Tufail, the Supreme Court recognized a legitimate expectation of regularization for Punjab's ad hoc lecturers due to continuous ad hoc appointments. The Supreme Court directed the Punjab government to regularize them via the Punjab Public Service Commission, following the Federal model with some concessions, ensuring separate consideration from direct recruits and non-retention of unsuitable candidates. This case highlights the need for fairness and the Public Service Commission's role in regularization. However, the Supreme Court in the case of Shahzad Shahmir held that appointments to BPS-17 under Article 242 of the Constitution must be made by the Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC), rendering contract appointments to such posts illegal from the outset.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 496
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.869-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi & others v. Umer Ansari & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
4781) 2805/2021 Const. P. Dr. Shamim Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S J.S.M.U and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1414
Advocates:Muhammad Haseeb Jamali(ADVO-10211-SBC-KHI),Abdul Samad(ADVO-9460-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Abdul Waheed Siyal(ADVO-10358-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 23-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
4782) 93/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Hajjan Channo (Applicant) V/S Abdul Haleem Jessar and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1607
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4783) 81/2011 Cr.J.A Abdul Fattah @ Fattoo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Criminal
Tag Line:Whether every member of an unlawful assembly, in respect of an offence committed in prosecution of common object/intention, is guilty of that offence?
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
4784) 15/2025 J.M M/S PORSCHE MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA FZE (Applicant) V/S M/S PERFORMANCE AUTOMOTIVE (PVT.) LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1515
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4785) 30/2014 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SHOUKAT ALI @ BABA @ SHOUKI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
4786) 4890/2020 Const. P. Garibdas (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin)
Tag Line:It is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, competent authority and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court.
With the above observations and direction, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Let notice be issued for compliance to the Chief Secretary Sindh and the Secretaries of all the departments of the Government of Sindh.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2325
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
4787) 293/2020 Const. P. Adil & Other (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Matter falls within the competence of Tribunal as such challenge to the subject Notification does not lie under Article 199 of the Constitution in view of bar set out in Article 212 of the Constitution.
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1424
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
4788) 1349/2020 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD ANWAR S/O AYOUB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 709
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4789) 51/2017 Cr.Appeal TALIB HUSSAIN S/O MUHAMMAD AZEEM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 28-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.116/2019 Sarfraz Aliyana v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh at Karachi & others,Crl.A.174/2019 Sarfraz Aliyana v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh at Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of.Crl.M.153-154/19 Allowed. Crl.M.A.155/19 disposed of.
4790) 97/2009 Suit.B M/S. Habib Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Mahmood Alam Sherani & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 10-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
4791) 245/2017 Const. P. M/s GBM Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2166
Advocates:Umair A. Qazi(ADVO-37828-PBC-LHR),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
4792) 139/2022 Cr.Rev MUHAMMAD AKHTAR S/O BASHIR AHMED (Applicant) V/S VTH ADJ KHI CENTRAL & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1075
Advocates:Asif(ADVO-16522-SBC-KHI),Fozia Aftab(ADVO-16170-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3744/2023 Agha Abid Majeed Khan v. Idrees Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4793) 36/2017 Cr.Rev The State/ANF through Assistant Director ANF P.S Sukkur (Applicant) V/S Hazar Khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
4794) 1/2012 J.M OGRA Sui Southern Gas Company (Applicant) V/S Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 (sections 12(2)), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 1 Rule 10 CPC), OGRA
Tag Line:The jurisdiction under section 12(2) of Ordinance 2002 is limited to the extent that this Court could only apply judicial view as to whether the procedural requirement as required under Ordinance 2002, Rules and the Licenses have been followed. This Court cannot sit as a Court of appeal and consider those details which the OGRA has undertaken. This Court is neither concerned with the policy nor with the rates. The price fixation mechanism is not a function which is to be undertaken by this Court, off course to the extent where the procedural requirements have been flouted, the Court may provide indulgence. In the given frame this Court has minutely seen all such procedural requirements which were undertaken and considered by the regulatory authority. These specialized performances which are assigned to regulatory authority could hardly be undertaken by this Court in exercise of their judicial discretion. Judicial intervention in the instant matter is required only where the person aggrieved i.e. SSGCL could show that the tariff fixation is a procedure bypassed, arbitrary and ultra vires. It could only then if the statutorily prescribed procedure is not followed, a tariff could be held ultra vires to be remanded back.
Citation:2017 PLD Sindh 567
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1066/2016 The Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd (SSGC), Karchi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed
4795) 387/2020 Const. P. MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR (Petitioner) V/S MST. LUBNA IMRAN (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 378
Advocates:Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS),Jameel Ahmed(ADVO-12971-SBC-KHI),Nadir Khan Burdi(ADVO-13227-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
4796) 14/2012 I. A Mst. Pathani (Appellant) V/S Habib Bank Ltd and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 20-APR-12
Approved for Reporting
4797) 104/2015 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. ZULQARNAIN alias SULEMAN S/O MUHAMMAD UMAR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 14-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
4798) 1367/2007 Suit Muhammad Iqbal Dawood and another (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Qayoom Hot and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Suit for possession of immovable property and mesne profits---Defendant was inducted by the plaintiffs as care taker to look after the suit land---Defendant/care taker had committed default in payment of money earned from the cultivation to the plaintiffs---Defendant had kept the plaintiffs out of possession of suit property---Plaintiffs were deprived of use and enjoyment of their land---Suit land was leased out to the plaintiffs and period/term of lease had been consumed by the care taker, mesne profits was to be granted to the plaintiffs in circumstances---Care taker was directed to hand over vacant possession of suit land to the plaintiffs free from all encumbrances and claims---Defendant/care-taker should pay mesne profits and contract money to the plaintiffs---Suit was decreed accordingly.
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Suit for Possession & Mesne Profit)
Tag Line:Suit for possession of immovable property and mesne profits. Suit Decreed
Citation:2018 YLR 1319
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 11-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
4799) 939/2012 Const. P. President Poors Welfares (Petitioner) V/S Regional Police Officer and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 21-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.797/2019 Mansoor Ashraf v. President Poors Welfare Association Sukkur thr. its President Hazoor Bux & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4800) 644/2015 Cr.Bail Abdul Basit (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 24-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
4801) 163/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SYED MEHROZ MEHDI ZAIDI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PCr.LJ 1609
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
4802) 525/2019 Cr.Bail Asif Ali @ Ghazi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail before arrest Granted In Section 337-L(2), 337-A (iv) 337-A(i) and F(i) and F(iv) .)
Citation:2020 PLJ 1518
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
4803) 3836/2021 Const. P. Javed Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Tag Line:In view of the foregoing, we are of the considered view that the matter of the petitioners needs to be processed further for regularization of their services as Naib Qasid and Driver as they have been appointed on regular posts (LARMIS), through a competitive process.
11. For all the above-mentioned reasons, we allow these petitions along with all pending application(s) in terms of order dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court in C.P. No. D-4291 of 2020 and C.P. No. D-7528 of 2018, which decision was upheld by the Supreme Court vide order dated August 24 2023 in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 517-K of 2023.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1653, 2025 SHC KHI 1768
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.985-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Board of Revenue & Others v. Javed Solangi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:
4804) 67/2021 Cr.J.A Allah Warayo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Conviction (Police officials are good witnesses and recovery proved) )
Tag Line:The sole evidence of a material witness i.e. an eyewitness is always sufficient
to establish the guilt of the accused if the same is confidenceinspiring and trustworthy and supported by another independent source of evidence because the law considers the quality of evidence and not its quantity to prove the charge.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 602
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
4805) 3/2007 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Asadullah (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 12-MAY-07
Approved for Reporting
4806) 857/2007 Suit Standard Construction Company (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Trh Secretary Ministyry Communication (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed
Order Date: 01-SEP-09
Approved for Reporting
4807) 20/2020 Cr.Misc. ALLAH WARAYO (Applicant) V/S SESSIONS JUDGE JUSTICE O PEACE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 888
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
4808) 57/2018 II.A. Muhammad Iqbal (Appellant) V/S Mehmood Ali & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 940
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1473-K/2022 Muhammad Iqbal deceased through his LRs. & others v. Mehmood Ali & others,C.A.1013/2024 Muhammad Iqbal deceased through his LRs. & others v. Mehmood Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
4809) 163/2011 Civil Revision Irtiza Nisar (Applicant) V/S Dr. Irfan Tariq Mirza & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 15-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
4810) 125/2016 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-II (Applicant) V/S M/s. Habib ADM Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Irfan Mir Halepota(ADVO-9555-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
4811) 771/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S Yameen Ali another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1028
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 01-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
4812) 403/2014 Suit Mrs. Ismat Ashraf (Plaintiff) V/S SalateenTrust & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Injunction against a charitable trust when the plaintiff is advancing his own personal interest.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 976
Advocates:Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
4813) 8499/2017 Const. P. Haris Hamid (Petitioner) V/S Port Qasim Authority and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. the Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456]. The Supreme Court in paragraphs 146 to 150 has decided the issue in hand no need for further deliberation on our part.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 426
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
4814) 5504/2021 Const. P. Zuhaib Hussain (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman Sindh Serices Tribunal (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Maintainability of Petition)
Tag Line:we do not find that this Court has jurisdiction under Article 199(1) (ii) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as well as in terms of the ratio of the decisions rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Khalilullah Kakar v. Provincial Police Officer, 2021 SCMR 1171, and Chief Secretary Government of Punjab Lahore, etc v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390, to take into consideration all the grounds raised by learned counsel for the petitioners in the memo of petitions which wholly pertain to matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of the petitioners against which Article 212(3) of the Constitution imposes a specific bar.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 256
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.832-K/2022 Zuhaib Hussain Soomro v. The Chairman Sindh Service Tribunal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of [ Remanded to SST ]
4815) 922/2012 Const. P. Capri Autos (Petitioner) V/S Dr. Masuma Hasan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979
Citation:2019 YLR 2500, 2019 SBLR Sindh 1096
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.907-K/2018 Dr. Masuma Hasan v. Capri Autos Motor Cycle Dealer and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4816) 87/2012 Civil Revision Noor Muhammad & others (Applicant) V/S Allah Warayo & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting
4817) 27/2013 I. A HASSAN PERVEZ (Appellant) V/S SHEHZAD AYUB & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 03-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.72-K/2014 Hassan Pervez v. Shehzad Ayub and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of
4818) 317/2003 M.A. Shezan Services (Pvt) Limited (Appellant) V/S Shezan Bakers & Confectioners (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The interpretation of subsection 2 of Section 10 of Trademark
Act, 1940, in view of the above, cannot be restricted to a simple
concurrent use irrespective of any agreement. Use of trademark under
the agreement is not only permissive use but conclusive rights were
being delegated and hence the use is concurrent to the use of the
inventor. The subject use thus would come within honest concurrent use
under the circumstances described in the agreement. It is inconceivable
that the appellant would enjoy the consideration of a rental premises if
the right of trademark is excluded. Certainly the consideration was for a
particular territory i.e. Lahore division which was taken care of by the
Registrar
Citation:2018 CLD 1305
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.57-K/2018 Shezan Services (Pvt) Ltd v. Shezan Bakers & Confectioners (Pvt) Ltd and another,C.P.838-K/2018 Shezan Services (Pvt) Ltd v. Shezan Bakers & Confectioners (Pvt) Ltd and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted
4819) 222/2012 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Faiz Chemical Industries (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 289
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4820) 1/2021 Cr.Rev Murad @ Mann (Applicant) V/S Manzoor Ahmed & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 573
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
4821) 4224/2013 Const. P. Shahid Ali and ors (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1000
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
4822) 2036/2016 Const. P. Salim Ahmed & Another (Petitioner) V/S Nasim Imtiaz and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters)
Tag Line:Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)---
----Ss. 15 & 21---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 23---Eviction of tenant---Bona fide personal need of landlord for business---Scope---Invocation of extra-ordinary constitutional jurisdiction of High Court after availing remedy provided under the relevant-law---Scope---Petitioner/tenant contended that respondent/landlord also owned other properties, through inheritance, to start his business---Validity---Filing of constitutional petition by tenant to delay his/her eviction was deprecated by High Court---High Court while seizing petition under Art. 199 of the Constitution against the judgment of Court or Tribunal of lower jurisdiction could not superimpose its opinion, merely because in its opinion the decision of Tribunal/Court was wrong---Fundamental right of a party guaranteed under Art. 23 of the Constitution could not be sacrificed against the party who had already exhausted his constitutional protection under Art. 4 of the Constitution by availing the remedy provided under the relevant law---High Court directed the petitioner to vacate the demised property within thirty days---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.
Citation:2019 CLC 1266
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.84/2019 Salim Ahmed & another v. Nasim Imtiaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4823) 5982/2019 Const. P. Jalil ur Rehman Khonbati (Petitioner) V/S PSO Co. Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:For the reasons stated, the court finds that a "Master and Servant" relationship exists between the Petitioner and the Respondent-Authority. Consequently, the petitioner's grievance pertains to the terms and conditions of service, which cannot be enforced through a Writ Petition, especially since the Service Rules involved are non-statutory and are considered internal instructions for the Respondent-Company's employee management. This view aligns with the principles established by the Supreme Court in Shafique Ahmed Khan and others v. NESCOM through Chairman Islamabad and others (PLD 2016 SC 377) and Muhammad Zaman etc. v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Finance Division (Regulation Wing), Islamabad (2017 SCMR 571), which differentiate between statutory and non-statutory service rules in the context of writ jurisdiction.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1033
Advocates:Rajesh Kumar Khagaija(ADVO-51467-SBC-KHS),Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI),Tahir Rahim(ADVO-4795-SBC-KHI),Majid Ali(ADVO-17446-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4824) 90/2018 Cr.Bail Mujahid @ Abdul Latif (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 17-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
4825) 536/2004 Suit SHAUKAT ZAIB and 8 others (Plaintiff) V/S KHURAM ZAIB and 3 others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 20 Rule 13 CPC)
Tag Line:Keeping in view the above position, discussion and case law cited above, the suit of the plaintiffs is decreed to the extent of Mukaram Market constructed on Plot No. R-50, Sector 5-C/4, Karachi consisting with one house and 07 shops which is mutated in the name of deceased Mst. Shahida Begum, which supports the plaintiffs plea and direct the final decree be prepared accordingly. Nazir of this Court who has already been appointed as Commissioner is to act as an Administrator of Mukaram Market left by deceased Mst. Shahida Begum. The expenses will be met from the assets left by deceased Mst. Shahida Begum. The property is not partition-able horizontally or vertically to sell the same and distribute the shares amongst the legal heirs of deceased Mst. Shahida Begum. I therefore, pass decree as provided under Order 20 Rule 13 CPC read with Form-18 of Appendix-D to Schedule-1 of the Code of Civil Procedure and appoint Nazir of this Court as Receiver with all powers to auction the said property. The plaintiffs and Defendants are allowed to participate in the same proceedings, distribute the sale price amongst all the Plaintiffs and defendants according to Mohammadan Law of Inheritance.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
4826) 6/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Hazique Ali Khan & Others (Petitioner) V/S the.10 A.D.J Hyd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 160
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.655-K/2022 Syed Amir Moin Kazmi v. Muhammad Haziq Ali Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4827) 1490/2024 Const. P. Aamir Ali Shar (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others0 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 117
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 08-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
4828) 2108/2017 Const. P. Mst. Abeera Khan D/o M. Tanseer Khan (Petitioner) V/S Adnan Jamil & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.946-K/2018 Adnan Jamil v. Mst: Abeera Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4829) 185/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) District Coordination Officer Sukkur & others (Applicant) V/S Khan Muhammad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting
4830) 113/2024 Suit M/S PENG (Plaintiff) V/S THE PURPLE PINK & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Intellectual Propoerty Organization of Pakistan Act 2012 (Rejection of Plaint or transfer to IP tribunal or Continuing hearing by High Court)
Tag Line:A claim seeking enforcement of contractual rights arising from a Franchise Agreement, which regulates Intellectual Property rights between parties and prays for the ancillary relief of damages/compensation, can only be instituted before the Intellectual Property Tribunal under the IPOP Act, 2012.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 137
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Rameez Lalani(ADVO-20331-SBC-KHS),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Zahrah Sehr Vayani(ADVO-15100-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4831) 45/2015 M.A. Independent Media Corporation (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 01-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
4832) 30/2024 Criminal Appeal Farooque Dashti (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Trial of a Juvenile Offender under ordinary law held illegal
De novo trial under Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018
Special Law overrides the general law
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1593
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
4833) 19/2018 E.P Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) V/S Shahid Thahim & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 540
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
4834) 406/2012 Cr.Misc. Aamir Malik Khan (Applicant) V/S Labour Officer (Factories) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Revision (Disposed of, Order Under Rule 1 (10 ) is not Applicable in Civil Matter .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
4835) 48/2010 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Abdul Baqi @ Talaha & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 06-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
4836) 25/2015 R.A (Civil Revision) Midhat Hamid & Others (Applicant) V/S Shaikh Ahmed Hussain & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2177
Advocates:S. Shafqat Ali Shah Masoomi.(ADVO-328-SBC-SUK),Syed Shahbaz Ali Shah Masoomi(ADVO-13597-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Ali Waris(ADVO-4491-SBC-KHC),Haq Nawaz Talpur(ADVO-11466-SBC-KHI),Mahfooz ul Haq(ADVO-1848-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
4837) 47/2017 S.M.A Raza Muhammad S/o (Late) Muhammad Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Nil (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petition not maintainable. Dismissed.
Topic: S.M.A
Tag Line:Petition not maintainable. Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 367
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
4838) 110/2014 Criminal Appeal Abdul Ghafoor (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 MLD Note 1202
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
4839) 224/2025 Const. P. Ali Sher Kaloo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2739
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1190-K/2025 Abid Hussain & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4840) 535/2016 Const. P. M. Qasim Jakhar (Petitioner) V/S Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Enforcement of Decision of SST)
Tag Line:Enforcement of decision of SST---Besides above, the point of laches is also involved in this matter on the ground that the petitioner has approached this court in the year 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in the year 2007 when he was purportedly terminated from his service, the reasoning assigned by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has approached this court based on decision passed by the learned SST in the year 2010; that a constitutional petition involving violation and infringement of fundamental rights of the citizens could not be thrown out on the ground of delay in filing the same. We do not concur with this assertion of the learned counsel for the Petitioner with his explanation of laches as rights of the petitioner were not dependent upon other petitioners in the referred petition. We are of the considered view that the instant Petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the Petitioner filed the instant Petition in January 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in the year 2007, i.e. approximately 08 years before the filing of the instant Petition. It is well-settled law that those who slept over their rights cannot be given a premium of their own fault because such conduct does trigger the principle of waiver. The observations of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee v. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) is a guiding principle on the issue of laches.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 295
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
4841) 57/2017 M.A. Muhammad Amir Thr. Nabeel Ali (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Sarfaraz & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 04-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
4842) 68/2008 M.A. Smithkline Beecham P.L.C. (Appellant) V/S The Registrar of Trade Marks and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 02-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
4843) 274/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) V/S Yasir & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
Citation:2025 SHC MPK 494
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
4844) 1620/2001 Suit AMIR AFZAL KHAN (Plaintiff) V/S REPUBLIC SECURITIES LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Central Depository Act, 1997)
Tag Line:Where livelihood of the citizens is snatched and when they take all the pains before the courts to prove their cases and whereas throughout this tiring process they remain out of pocket owing to the negligent acts of the defendants, then a heavy duty casts upon the Courts to grant damages and compensate citizens??? suffering through appropriate money decrees
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 202
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Muhammad . Mazharul Hassan(),Mahmood Y. Mandviwala(ADVO-3668-SBC-KHI),Nisar Ahmed Tarar(ADVO-4936-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4845) 113/2019 Cr.Bail Muhammad Saleem (Applicant) V/S THe State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.190-K/2019 Naveed Mumtaz Abbasi v. The State thr. P.G.Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4846) 151/2006 Cr.Appeal Alam Zaib (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 21-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
4847) 1/2023 F.R.A Mirza Nadeem Baig (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Kaimkhani Education Trust (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963 (Determination of Fair Rent)
Tag Line:Rent Controller determined unfair rent instead of fair rent. Order set-aside.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 992
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1004-K/2023 Pakistan Kaimkhani Education Trust v. Mirza Nadeem Baig Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of
4848) 1447/2020 Const. P. Yaseen Ali Ghunio (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 134
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
4849) 34/2011 Cr.Appeal Fida Hussain Sethar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Judgment about Criminal Appeal No.D34of2011
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 19-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
4850) 3842/2021 Const. P. Niaz Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Sect: School Education & Literacy Dept: & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 504
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
4851) 7189/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression ???terms and conditions of service??? and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed.
Topic: Service matters (frequent transfer and posting)
Tag Line:Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression terms and conditions of service and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 132
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
4852) 1382/2023 Const. P. Syed Hussain Ali Shah & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Mal-administration, abuse of authority and corrupt practice by Government )
Tag Line:This Province is longing for a good governance, but due to dishonest and corrupt officials, the sufferings of people at large are increasing day by day and an ordinary citizen does not even have access to Senior Officials, for redressal of their grievances and to hear complaints against the Subordinate Officials. This continuous mal-administration, abuse of authority and corrupt practices have resulted in an unprecedented level of litigation against the Government, which is unnecessarily burdening the Courts.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 329
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 22-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
4853) 5497/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Naseer Rais (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Principally, Courts should avoid pejorative remarks against non-parties and unjust criticism of parties, vilifying them should also be avoided. Judges can criticize relevant matters and witnesses but should avoid criticizing those in official positions without valid justification that is subject to jurisdiction. A presiding officer of the Court must give a person the opportunity to explain condemnatory facts before criticizing him/her. This is especially important for public servants, who should be given a chance to defend themselves before being criticized. Criticizing someone without giving them a chance to respond is unfair and may be considered outside the judge's jurisdiction. Judges must be independent, but also fair and restrained. They should only criticize people if they have a chance to defend themselves if there is evidence to support the criticism, and if it is necessary for the case. Judicial pronouncements should be sober, moderate, and reserved. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Nusrat Yasmin v. Registrar, PHC,(PLD 2019 SC 719) and Aijaz Ahmed v. State. (PLD 2021 SC 752).
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 774
Advocates:Shahriyar(ADVO-5376-SBC-HYD),Aayatullah(ADVO-21-SBC-TAY),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
4854) 2215/2014 Suit Muhammad Kashif Vohra. (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Ismail & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. A suit for specific performance of contract of immovable property brought by the vendee can be dismissed without going through a trial where the plaintiff, when put on terms to deposit the sale consideration in Court, fails to do so. That has been the consistent approach on the Original side of this Court. The wisdom behind that of course is that when called upon by the Court, if the plaintiff/vendee cannot demonstrate that he is ready and willing to make payment to perform his part of the contract, which is the primary test for grant of equitable discretionary relief in a suit for specific performance, then that is sufficient reason for the Court to decline the exercise of discretionary jurisdiction.
Rel: Allah Ditta v. Bashir Ahmed (1997 SCMR 181); Abdul Hameed Khan v. Ghulam Rabbani (2003 SCMR 953); and Hamood Mehmood v. Shabana Ishaque (2017 SCMR 2022);
2. It is not in every case that the Court may require the plaintiff of a suit for specific performance of contract to deposit the sale consideration in Court.
Rel: Bin Bak Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Friends Associates (2003 SCMR 238).
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
4855) 1932/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem @ Muhammad Soomar (Petitioner) V/S Senior Member Board of Revenue & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
4856) 131/2018 Cr.Misc. Aslam Pervaiz Abro and an others (Applicant) V/S Tameer Ali Dinari and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2019 YLR 228
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
4857) 214/2024 Const. P. Dr. Zulfiqar Ali Mirza (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 732
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.161/2024 Sajjad Ali v. Dr. Zulfiqar Ali Mirza and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4858) 4917/2021 Const. P. Penta International (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Tabulation of redemption fine.
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 900
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Mustafa Mamdani(ADVO-16160-SBC-KHE),Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Muhabbat Hussain Awan(ADVO-13542-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1604-K/2021 Penta International v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed
4859) 1235/2017 Suit Muhammad Sohail Tabba & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 93
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
4860) 36/2005 R.A (Civil Revision) Piyaro Gurgaje (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Qadir Gurgaje (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:1.Limitation not alway to be proved by parties but is to be decided by court
2. Proving an agreement- attesting witnesses to be examined
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 253
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.830-K/2022 Ghulam Qadir v. Piyaro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4861) 4896/2020 Const. P. Muzaffar Hussain Katpar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:suspension order
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 487
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 23-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
4862) 1921/2023 Suit MALIK PANJWANI & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S FAROOQ NASIR & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Appointment of receiver.
Citation:2024 CLC 1896
Advocates:Ehtasham Zia(ADVO-11994-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Arif(ADVO-11800-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
4863) 1608/2005 Const. P. Ms. Talat Ejaz (Petitioner) V/S City District Govt. Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1853
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 24-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
4864) 2149/2012 Const. P. Sharyar Khan Rajput (Petitioner) V/S Governor Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 14-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting
4865) 210/2007 Const. P. Muhammad Swaleh (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Asma Yasin & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 15 ), Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 15 (Personal Bonafide Need) )
Tag Line:The burden of proving payment of rent in advance was in fact apparently discharged when on a suggestion the petitioner/tenant himself admitted in the cross-examination that the rent was payable on or before 10th of each calendar month. Thus, the tenant had only a grace period of 15 days for its payment on its becoming due. Rent was due on 10th of each calendar month and grace period of 15 days makes it 25th of each month. The money order for the month of December 2001 and January 2002 was in fact tendered on 19.02.2002, by the time the default for these two months at least had already been committed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.606-K/2018 Muhammad Swaleh v. Mst: Asma Yasin and others,C.P.701-K/2018 Mst: Asma Yasin v. Muhammad Swaleh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
4866) 479/2011 Cr.Bail Dilawar Hussain & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting
4867) 185/2021 Cr.Bail Pathan Khan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line: For the aforesaid reasons, the interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicant vide order dated 30.4.2021 is hereby confirmed. However, the applicant is required to furnish further solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50000/- (Fifty Thousand Rupees) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Registrar of this Court within one week from today.
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 199
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
4868) 563/2007 Suit MCB Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S EMAD UL HASAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 21-Comparison Pecuniary, Territorial and Subject-Matter Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:Plaintiff-Bank elected to proceed against Customer for recovery of loan in the ordinary civil jurisdiction. The trial court never framed any issue of jurisdiction, and parties had concluded evidence. Appellate Court framed issue of jurisdiction to be decided by the trial court. Defendant urged that returning the Plaint to the Banking Court after 16 years would be tantamount to failure of justice. Principles discussed in unreported Judgement dated 11.01.2024 in High Court Appeal No.129 of 2017, Nooruddin & others Versus M/s Sindh Industrial Trading Estate & others applied. The factor of delay may be one of the considerations when examining the question of territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction but not subject-matter jurisdiction. Delay in identifying subject-matter jurisdiction may not be considered as a failure of justice as set out in Section 21 of CPC.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1279
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 01-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
4869) 3/2022 II.A. Nina Industries Limited (Appellant) V/S Bhanero Textile Mills (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation ), CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article 24 of Constitution of Pakistan )
Tag Line:A legitimate claim is also proprietry, protected under Article 24 of the Constitution.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 722
Advocates:Waqar Ahmed(ADVO-15702-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),Abdallah Azzaam Naqvi(ADVO-15005-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
4870) 555/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Saraj Din & Sons,Lahore (Applicant) V/S Member Judieial Appellate Tribanal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 09-SEP-11
Approved for Reporting
4871) 300/1988 Suit MST. UME AIMAR & ORS.. (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD YOUSUF & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
4872) 6236/2020 Const. P. Raza Muhammad & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed in limine along with the pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 293
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1220-K/2025 Raza Muhammad Alias Kaloo & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending
4873) 4322/2018 Const. P. Niaz Ahmed Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:payment of technical allowance cannot be made by designation but only on the basis of qualification as per Regulation 9 of the State Life Employees (Service) Regulations 1973.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 487
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
4874) 2841/2023 Const. P. M/s Faizan Enterprises (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:A Portion of Road Cannot be Leased for Private Parking
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 248
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Khan(ADVO-8525-SBC-KHI),Samir Arshad(ADVO-11608-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Furqan Qureshi(ADVO-12628-SBC-KHI),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
4875) 413/2012 Cr.Bail Ghulam Qadir Umrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
</