High Court of Sindh at Karachi, Bench at Sukkur and Circuit Courts at Hyderabad and Larkana
Bench Wise Judgments / Orders
Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgments/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.
Total Judgements/Orders :
Code
S.No.
Citation
Case No.
Case Year
Parties
Bench
Order_Date
A.F.R
Head Notes
Judgement/Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
168384
1
Const. P. 1950/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Abdul Majid (Petitioner) VS Dist: Judge/Appellate Authority SNG & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-JUN-22
No
168386
2
Const. P. 1992/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Ali Akbar (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-JUN-22
No
168388
3
Const. P. 1994/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Shah Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-JUN-22
No
168512
4
Const. P. 1554/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Regional Election Commissioner SBA and others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JUN-22
No
168514
5
Const. P. 2001/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Karim Bux Rind (Petitioner) VS Regional Election Commission SBA Div & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JUN-22
No
168520
6
Const. P. 2000/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Maqsood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-JUN-22
No
168522
7
Const. P. 2024/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Zaffar Ali (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-JUN-22
No
168524
8
Const. P. 2046/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-JUN-22
No
168526
9
Const. P. 2052/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Mehmood S/O Muhammad Rahim (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer Local Govt: Sanghar & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-JUN-22
No
168528
10
Const. P. 2053/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Fida Hussain (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer Local Govt: Sanghar & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-JUN-22
No
168530
11
Const. P. 2059/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Saifal (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
15-JUN-22
No
168532
12
Const. P. 2122/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Ali Jaan Brohi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-JUN-22
No
168534
13
Criminal Appeal 87/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
RAHIB ALIAS RAHU (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JUN-22
No
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
118370
14
Const. P. 714/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Javed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-SEP-17
No
Nil.
118371
15
Const. P. 3488/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent)
D.B.
21-SEP-17
No
Nil.
118390
16
Const. P. 6915/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-17
No
Nil.
146657
17
H.C.A 78/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
Fateh Sports Wear Ltd & Ors (Appellant) VS Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd (Respondent)
D.B.
07-AUG-20
No
Nil.
146658
18
Const. P. 4177/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/s I.S Traders (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-20
No
Nil.
146660
19
2021 PLD Sindh Note 76
H.C.A 24/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises (Respondent)
D.B.
30-SEP-20
Yes
Nil.
146694
20
Const. P. 1101/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/s Sun Metal Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
01-OCT-20
No
Nil.
147823
21
H.C.A 249/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. (Appellant) VS Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (Respondent)
D.B.
18-NOV-20
Yes
147825
22
H.C.A 347/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Naseem Ahmed Malik & others (Appellant) VS Saeed Iqbal & others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-20
Yes
147826
23
2021 PLD Sindh Note 108
H.C.A 241/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Syed Asadul Haq (Appellant) VS M/s.Balochistan Glass Ltd., (Respondent)
D.B.
30-SEP-20
Yes
147827
24
H.C.A 116/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shahzad Noor Muhammad (Appellant) VS Karachi Gymkhana & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-NOV-20
Yes
147870
25
2021 SBLR Sindh Note 460
H.C.A 251/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Government of Pakistan & Ors. (Appellant) VS Mian Khalid Manzoor (Respondent)
D.B.
09-OCT-20
Yes
147872
26
H.C.A 260/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mrs. Zarina Iqbal (Appellant) VS Haji Jaffar & others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-20
Yes
148784
27
H.C.A 149/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Farhat Rashid (Appellant) VS Saba Farhat Rashid & others (Respondent)
D.B.
31-AUG-20
No
149948
28
M.A. 8/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd. (Appellant) VS Jahangir Moghul (Respondent)
D.B.
09-FEB-21
Yes
149949
29
2021 CLC 389
H.C.A 422/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Zafar Ali Kayani & others (Appellant) VS Ahmed Saleem Khan & others (Respondent)
M/s State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan (Applicant) VS Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
D.B.
24-NOV-20
Yes
152917
31
Const. P. 8680/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Muhammad Muqeem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
31-AUG-21
Yes
153310
32
Const. P. 6559/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Imtiaz Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-SEP-21
No
153311
33
Const. P. 4028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Tanvir Jamshed (Petitioner) VS Muhamad Hanif and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-SEP-21
No
153746
34
Const. P. 8061/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Ms. Rahila Anjum Ansari (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
23-SEP-21
No
153747
35
Const. P. 5660/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mann-O-Salva Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
21-SEP-21
No
154408
36
Const. P. 8963/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Faisal Mubeen Jumani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-OCT-21
No
154410
37
Const. P. 1256/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mrs. Farida Mansoor (Petitioner) VS S.B.C.A and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
07-OCT-21
No
154596
38
Const. P. 7173/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Sheikh Imran Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The D.G KDA and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-21
No
154597
39
Const. P. 4634/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Idrees and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-SEP-21
Yes
154598
40
Const. P. 771/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2004
Capt. S. M . Asllam (Petitioner) VS Karachi Building Control Authority & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
12-OCT-21
Yes
154614
41
Const. P. 300/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Mian Trust (Petitioner) VS Lyari Expressway And ors (Respondent)
D.B.
18-OCT-21
Yes
154722
42
Const. P. 4454/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Tariq Wali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-OCT-21
Yes
155423
43
Const. P. 5539/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Mst Aysha Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-21
Yes
155624
44
Const. P. 1893/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-NOV-21
Yes
155987
45
Const. P. 4882/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Khalid Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Court of Minister of Cooperation & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
09-DEC-21
Yes
162125
46
Const. P. 2387/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Jason Charles (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-21
No
162146
47
W.T.A 938/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: WTA 939 of 2000
2000
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) VS M/s Hashwani Services (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-20
Yes
162257
48
Const. P. 4886/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
M/s Amadeus I.T Group S.A (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-SEP-21
No
162258
49
Const. P. 5588/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
M/s IGI Holdings (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-SEP-21
No
162417
50
Const. P. 319/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Mubashir Qadir Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-AUG-21
No
162420
51
Const. P. 3906/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Muhammad Tufail (Petitioner) VS Administrator Through CDGK and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
24-AUG-21
No
162425
52
Const. P. 849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Barkat Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-AUG-21
No
162427
53
Const. P. 1516/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Asjad Sattar Adv (Petitioner) VS DG SBCA and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-AUG-21
No
162429
54
Const. P. 2440/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Shahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-AUG-21
No
162432
55
Const. P. 6734/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mst. Bilqis Bano and Others (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Defence and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-AUG-21
No
162461
56
Const. P. 5849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Shafi Muhammad Jokhio (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiarkar Gadap Malir and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-SEP-21
No
162462
57
Const. P. 7578/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Abdul Quddus Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
28-SEP-21
No
162463
58
Const. P. 3207/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Bawar Tawfiq & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-SEP-21
No
162466
59
Const. P. 1146/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Irshad (Petitioner) VS SBCA & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
01-SEP-21
No
162467
60
Const. P. 8092/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Barrister Mujtaba Sohail Raja and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-SEP-21
No
164782
61
Const. P. 2116/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mst. Nighat Naeem (Petitioner) VS K.D.A and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
08-APR-22
Yes
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
137356
62
Const. P. 6274/2017 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Bushra Jabeen and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
F.B.
08-APR-19
No
Nil.
137356
62
Const. P. 6274/2017 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Bushra Jabeen and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
F.B.
08-APR-19
No
Nil.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
106727
63
2017 YLR 242, 2017 YLR 424
Const. P. 846/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Abdul Haq and Others (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-APR-16
Yes
Constitutional petition---Claim of petitioner was disputed by respondents and Revenue Authorities---Due process of law---Applicability---Due process of law was of wide import and its applicability varied from case to case in accordance with the set of facts and circumstances---Due process of law was also directly related to the rights, interest and entitlement of a person as recognized by law---Petitioners could not make out a prime facie case of their legal entitlement of possession of suit property---Entries in the revenue record about their alleged claim were under scrutiny before the concerned authorities---Term "due process of law" was not applicable in circumstances---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.
106735
64
2018 PLC Lab. 36
Const. P. 84/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Mst. Samina Pathan (Petitioner) VS National Database and Registration Authority [NADRA] (Respondent)
D.B.
17-MAY-16
Yes
Dismissal from service in undue haste and in violation of statutory service rules, can be assailed in a writ jurisdiction.
106736
65
Const. P. 718/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2012
Ali Hassan & Others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-APR-16
No
Mere issuance of conditional appointment letters that too for a contract employment, cannot be invoked for seeking a relief for issuance of writ of mandamus, when official respondents have categorically disputed the relationship of the employment.
Non-fulfillment of other codal formalities as mentioned in the offer letter has disentitled the petitioners from invoking the writ jurisdiction.
112137
66
Const. P. 4570/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2015
Munir Ahmed (Applicant) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
D.B.
06-APR-16
Yes
Mere fact that petitioner opted for plea bargain, which was not even recommended by the NAB Authorities, or duly approved by the Accountability Court, cannot operate as a bar for withholding the bail, if the accused otherwise makes out a case for grant of bail on merits.
112148
67
2017 MLD 200
Const. P. 424/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2016
Shabbir Ahmed (Applicant) VS Chairman NAB and others (Respondent)
D.B.
04-FEB-16
No
Recovery of 'amount due'---Willful default---Quashing of proceedings---Petitioners alleged to have committed offences of corruption and corrupt practice and had entered into Voluntary Return under S. 25(a) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999---Petitioners failed to deposit amount settled under Voluntary Return, therefore, NAB filed fresh reference against them---Validity---When a person did not pay entire agreed amount as determined by Trial Court, then such default did not fall within the mischief of 'wilful default' as mentioned in S. 5(r) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999---Remedy for NAB in such default lay in invoking S. 33-E, of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, as the same had been termed as a special provision to execute recovery of 'amount due' under National Accountability Ordinance, 1999---Petitioners had agreed to pay back the amounts as determined by NAB, by signing Voluntary Return agreements, therefore, subsequent filing of NAB Reference against petitioners was not justified and the same was tainted with malice---High Court directed petitioners to pay Voluntary Return amounts in four equal instalments and quashed proceedings pending before Trial Court---Constitutional Petition was allowed in circumstances.
112271
68
2017 CLC 1650
Const. P. 2199/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2016
Haji Khan (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-JUN-16
No
The eligibility criteria f a contesting candidate mentioned in the Sindh Government Act, 2013 (2013 Act), is to be interpreted keeping in view the basic concept of 2013 Act, which spells out that if a candidate is voter registered in an urban area, then he can only be elected for a Council falling within an urban area of the District as envisaged in Section 8 and 15 of the 2013 Act, including town committees; irrespective of the fact that a candidate is voter of the same district.
112297
69
2017 PLC CS 625
Const. P. 1519/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2011
Abdul Ghafar (Applicant) VS Govt of Sindh & ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-APR-16
Yes
Group Insurance being not part of inheritance (Tarka) and the same is payable to the nominee mentioned therein. Since, it is an admitted position as also supported by all documentary evidence, the present petitioner has been mentioned as nominee in the Nomination Form of State life Insurance Corporation, therefore, petitioner is entitled to amount of group insurance.---Rules 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 of the West Pakistan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1963 are interpreted and pensionary benefits were allowed to the petitioner being a nominee.
112328
70
Const. P. 198/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2016
Abdul Majeed (Applicant) VS NAB and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAY-16
No
Bail Granted---
Petitioner was a Bank official and arrested by National Accountability Bureau on a complaint by manager of a private Bank that he, along with co-accused persons, misused their authority and misappropriated/embezzled funds of bank by illegally opening an imprest account---Validity---Fact that as to how much amount landed in pocket of petitioner as beneficiary was not highlighted. No loss was caused to public exchequer as matter pertained to a private Bank. Company in whose favour purported fake Letters of Guarantee were issued also did not come forward with their claim or complaint. Validity of Letters of Guarantee had expired. Under instruments, no fiscal fraud of cheating was committed. Prosecution had to still prove its case before Trial Court and therefore, case fell within established ingredients for grant of bail, as it was a case of further inquiry in order to prove guilt of petitioner.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
130235
71
Const. P. 1464/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Punhal Khan (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-15
No
Nil.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
106724
72
Const. P. 2524/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Ali Muhammad & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
D.B.
22-AUG-16
No
Registered sub-leases in respect of two apartment / units which were non-existent at the time of registration and even till the decision of the instant petition, have been directed to be cancelled by Nazir of Sindh High Court. It is an admitted position that these apartments are to be located at the third floor / story of the building which is not even constructed by the Builder.
Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, cannot be construed so as to include an immoveable property, which is not even existing at the time of registration. Property sought to be registered should be of ascertainable description. Similarly, Section 2, subsection (6) of the Registration Act, 1908, wherein an immoveable property is defined, inter alia, means that an immoveable property should be a tangible one and physically exists.
Different orders passed by this Court in various constitutional petitions, crux of which is that no registration of a residential or a commercial unit of a multistoried building should be done without a completion plan / occupancy certificate, are the decisions in rem, and thus applicable to the present case as well.
One of the main objectives, that can be achieved by looking at the completion plan / occupancy certificate is that it can help in identifying the property sought to be registered and also verify the fact that a multistoried building is Regulations compliant, particularly having structural stability.
Rule 135 of the West Pakistan Registration Rules, 1929, is not applicable to the facts of subject constitutional petition as the illegality of sub-leases in question were floating on surface and no further inquiry was required for ascertaining the validity of these sub-leases in question. Even otherwise a rule cannot be interpreted in such a manner that results in perpetuating illegality rather preventing it.
133873
73
Const. P. 2149/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: Const. P D 4729/2015
2015
Abdul Hameed and another (Petitioner) VS Provicne of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
30-MAY-18
Yes
Nil.
138182
74
Const. P. 1007/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2018
Muhammad Mehboob (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent)
D.B.
28-MAY-18
Yes
Nil.
152890
75
I. A 5/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2015
Abdul Samad Mahar & others (Appellant) VS The Habib Bank Limited & another (Respondent)
D.B.
19-DEC-17
Yes
152891
76
First Appeal Against Order 6/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2015
Yameen Ali (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent)
D.B.
07-DEC-17
Yes
152892
77
I. A 5/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2013
Javed-ur-Rehman and others (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & another (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-17
Yes
152967
78
I. A 7/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2014
Chaudhry Abdul Jabbar (Appellant) VS Presiding Officer, Banking Court-II, Sukkur & others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-DEC-17
Yes
152968
79
I. A 9/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2011
Nand Lal and another (Appellant) VS M/S Askari Bank Ltd.and others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-MAR-18
Yes
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
144599
80
Const. P. 2371/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-MAR-20
Yes
Direction
144603
81
Const. P. 302/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Secretary Board of Revenue & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-MAR-20
Yes
Service
144661
82
Const. P. 411/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
High Court Bar Hyd (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
18-MAR-20
Yes
Nil.
145280
83
Const. P. 1905/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cp.D 1932/2011 &1269/2016
2011
Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-APR-20
Yes
145281
84
2020 YLR 2597
Const. P. 2180/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2017
Masood Ahmed Wassan & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-APR-20
Yes
145282
85
2020 YLR 2188
Const. P. 620/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
The Fauji Foundation Charitable Trust (Petitioner) VS Federal Land Commission & others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-APR-20
Yes
145283
86
2021 PCr.LJ 1270
Const. P. 2147/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Abdul Ghafar S/o Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-MAR-20
Yes
Every disease, if not attended properly, would cause negative and hazardous effect to life but it doesn???t mean that its medical remedy is bail from the recovery of such diseases. His treatment in a best available hospital under a care of best team of doctors could serve the best option. These stresses and pressures discussed could only be ruled out if a patient remains away from all these stresses and strains and the best possible place for the prescribed health issues is a Hospital where a patient could be treated free from all such stress possibilities.
160570
87
Const. P. 370/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
Mst Bibi Naz Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-JAN-20
Yes
160864
88
2020 SBLR Sindh 744
Const. P. 213/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Burhan (Petitioner) VS Election Commisson Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
26-FEB-20
Yes
160939
89
Const. P. 321/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2000
Grandiphar Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Drug Appellate Board & others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-MAR-20
No
167676
90
Const. P. 2655/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2015
Anwar Naeem Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive Officer (HESCO) & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
04-MAR-20
No
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
132836
91
Const. P. 552/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2015
Asma kaka (Petitioner) VS DEO Matiari (Respondent)
D.B.
25-OCT-18
No
Nil.
132837
92
Const. P. 804/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2009
Mst: Shahnaz Akhtar (Petitioner) VS WAPDA and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
01-NOV-18
No
Even departmental rules, regulations and instructions, which are non-statutory, have to be adhered to and an employer (Organization) cannot deviate from such rules and instructions, which are in the nature of a contract, binding on the parties. With regard to the Policy matters, it has been held, that even in the absence of vested right, the principle of policy is enforceable. The Respondents have failed to justify the issuance of impugned Officer Order, which ex facie is violative of the policy of the Respondent No.1 contained in Office Memorandum dated 13-04-1988 besides being unreasonable, hence, having no legal sanctity. Consequently, the impugned Office Order is of no consequence and is set aside. Accordingly, petition is accepted and the grant of BPS-15 to the Petitioner is restored with effect from 14-10-1991 and her other service benefits have to be fixed and calculated accordingly.
134032
93
Const. P. 416/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad & others (Respondent)
D.B.
01-NOV-18
No
Nil.
134052
94
Const. P. 741/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2015
Muhammad Haroon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary [L.U], Board of Revenue & 4 others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-DEC-18
No
Nil.
134473
95
I. A 44/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
M/s CIE Computers through its Manager Aqeeel Hassan Khan & 2 others (Appellant) VS NIB Bank Limited Banking Company through its Manager Mr. Sajid A. Shaikh (Respondent)
D.B.
11-OCT-18
No
Nil.
134572
96
Const. P. 222/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Abdullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-NOV-18
Yes
Nil.
134577
97
Const. P. 2732/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Hayat Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
12-NOV-18
Yes
Nil.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
149576
98
Const. P. 1094/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2020
Suresh Kumar Hindu (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-FEB-21
Yes
165977
99
Const. P. 861/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2015
Imdad Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-JAN-21
No
165978
100
Const. P. 5017/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2016
Ihsanullah Khan & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
D.B.
28-JAN-21
No
165980
101
Const. P. 1071/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2020
Manzoor Ahmed Lashari (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-FEB-21
No
165981
102
Const. P. 1226/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C. P. No. D-721 of 2017
2017
Kashmir Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-FEB-21
No
165982
103
Const. P. 1542/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2020
Muhammad Siddique Pathan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-FEB-21
No
165983
104
Const. P. 1568/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur