Export
Report-002 AFR

Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.

Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:

Show Only Authored Judgements/Orders

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui

High Court of Sindh, Principal Seat Karachi, Bench at Sukkur, Circuit Courts at Hyderabad and Larkana
S.No. Citation Case No. Case Year Parties Bench Type Order/Judgment Order_Date A.F.R Head Notes/ Tag Line Bench Apex Court Apex Status
1 Const. P. 273/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2009 Khair Mohammad Soomro and an other (Petitioner) VS District Nazim Sukkur and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2 Suit 448/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 M/s. Universal Freight (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Air France (Decree Holder) S.B. Order 11-JUN-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3 Const. P. 2372/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mst. Zebul Luhur and another (Petitioner) VS SHO PS New Foujdari Shikarpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
4 Const. P. 1059/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Roman Mangrio (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Market and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
5 Const. P. 175/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Wali Muhammad Abro (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Dokri and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
6 Const. P. 986/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Daim Khan Soomro (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
7 Const. P. 113/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Jamaluddin Bangulani (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
8 Cr.Misc. 195/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mandhro Jaiffri (Petitioner) VS The SHO PS Karan Sharif and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Crl.P.15-K/2013 Qurban Ali v. The State and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
9 Cr.Acq.A. 117/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Anwar Ali Nohri (Appellant) VS The State and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 17-OCT-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
10 Const. P. 949/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Zainal Abden Sarki (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Civil Line Jacobabad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
11 Cr.Bail 218/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2010 Ghulam Shabir @ Shabir Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
12 Cr.Bail 318/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mehmood Soomro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
13 Cr.Bail 84/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Muhammad Ali Brohi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
14 Cr.Bail 675/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Shoukat Ali alias Barkat (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-OCT-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
15 Civil Revision 318/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Jethanand (Applicant) VS Mumtaz Ali & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
16 2016 PTD 622, 2016 SBLR Sindh 1484 Suit 1764/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Hussain & Others (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & Others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 08-SEP-15 Yes Faced with the presumptive taxation of imports, supplies, contract, exports etc. under section 80-C and 80-CC of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, where tax payers challenged the constitutionality of presumptive taxation, the Supreme Court of Pakistan in its landmark judgment of Ellahi Cotton Mills (Supra) held that section 80C and 80CC (Section 148 and 153 and 154 in Ordinance 2001) provides for presumptive taxation of income within the category of presumptive tax as under the same the persons covered by them pay a pre-determined amount of presumptive tax in full and final discharge of their tax liability in respect of the transactions on which above tax is levied. If Entry 47 is read in isolation without reference to Entry No.52 one can urge that Entry 47 does not admit the imposition of presumptive tax as the expression tax on income employed therein should be understood as to the working out of the same on the basis of computation as provided in the various provisions of Ordinance. Thus, it can be held that presumptive tax is in fact akin to capacity tax i.e. capacity to earn. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
17 H.C.A 7/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Tharparkar Sugar Mills Limited (Appellant) VS Bankers Equity Limited (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-JUN-14 Yes "Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)--- ----Ss. 27 & 22---Interpretation of S.27 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Suit for recovery was decreed in terms of compromise between the parties, and subsequently, the defendant filed another suit seeking to take advantage of a State Bank Circular---Contention of the defendant was inter alia, that till such time the proceedings of the second suit culminate, status quo with regard to mortgaged property had to be maintained---Held, defendant had sought indirect relief for setting aside or modification of the judgment and decree passed in the first suit, against which defendant had not filed appeal and decree had obtained finality---Under S.27 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 no court or authority was prohibited to revise, recall, call or permit or call into question the judgment and decree of Banking Court or the legality or propriety of anything done by the Banking Court, subject to provisions of S.22 of the Ordinance---Legislature in its anxiety to protect orders of the Banking Court had gone to the extent of ordaining that no authority other than the appellate forum shall even allow to throw a challenge to the validity of orders of the Banking Court and the same could not be assailed before any forum except by the way of appeal---Only possibility in which an injunction or restraining orders against execution of decree and sale of mortgaged property could be granted, would be on the presumption that decree in the first suit might be modified, altered and or set aside, which could not be presumed under provisions of S.27 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001--- Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.311-K/2013 M/s Tharparkar Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Bankers Equity Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
18 E.P 9/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ismail Shah Rashdi (Petitioner) VS Naeem Ahmed Kharal & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-19 Yes The requirement of the nomination form is the disclosure of candidates assets and liabilities and that of dependents. The returned candidate did disclose the liabilities on him or his dependents as Rs.88,53,710/-, however, the heads of these liabilities are not available nor was it questioned by petitioners counsel. Though he is only required to disclose his assets and liabilities, he was not required to disclose the liabilities of independent children or of his elder brother, who is now deceased, and has a family, which in no way, was/is dependent on him. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
19 Const. P. 864/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Muhammad Sohail (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
20 Const. P. 1180/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mst Farzana Panhwar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
21 Const. P. 929/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mst Anwar Khatoon (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
22 Const. P. 115/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Bilal Ahmed Dreho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
23 Const. P. 1394/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ajeeb-u-Rehman Malano & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
24 Civil Revision 105/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Ghulam Rasool Abbasi & others (Applicant) VS Mian Himat Ali & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
25 Civil Revision 196/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Muhammad Hassan and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Sulleman and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
26 Const. P. 744/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Muhammad Ali Bayo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
27 Const. P. 748/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Irfan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
28 Const. P. 4921/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Asif Ali Dharejo (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
29 Const. P. 2272/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Sardar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
30 Const. P. 658/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul Ghafar Gadani (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
31 Const. P. 2194/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Sher Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Mazhar Ali S/o Mir Muhammad & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
32 Const. P. 2356/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Masood Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
33 Const. P. 133/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Khalid Malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
34 Const. P. 229/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Atique-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
35 Const. P. 479/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mai Kalsoom Paliyo (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
36 Civil Revision 61/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2005 Saindad through his attorney Dodo Phulpoto. (Applicant) VS Walidad Mangrio and others. (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-18 Yes , it challenged the orders passed under hierarchy of Revenue Law, and the last ultimate order is of Member Board of Revenue, which was passed on 26.06.2000. If that date is to be taken as a last date whereby the cause was triggered to the plaintiff / respondent, the first suit apparently was within time prescribed under the law. Though the subject suit was withdrawn, the latter suit was filed on the same day i.e. 08.04.2004 with the permission of the trial Court. Apparently, there appears to be no question involve as to whether respondent / plaintiff challenging the ultimate order of the revenue authority i.e. Member Board of Revenue is barred by time. However, if it was barred under any other law as being not maintainable, an issue could be framed by trial Court. In view of the above, I deem it appropriate to direct the trial Court to frame the issue of limitation as a preliminary issue as being mixed question of law and facts, and record evidence in the matter along with other issues and this issue of limitation shall remain open to be decided by the trial Court without being influenced by any of the observations of the appellate Court or this Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
37 Const. P. 6183/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Hakeem (Petitioner) VS Provincial Ombudsman (Mohtasib) Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
38 Const. P. 3461/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shehzadi Erum (Petitioner) VS M.S Leprosy Hospital and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-21 Yes review application Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
39 Civil Revision 139/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Haji Muhammad Ismail Qureshi (Applicant) VS Mst: Ramzano and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
40 2022 PLC CS 197 H.C.A 163/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 National Refinery Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Syed Niaz Ahmed (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-19 Yes The terms of the service were ensured at the time of his (respondent's) transfer, which cannot be lifted unilaterally depriving an employee of his post-retirement benefits or any of the terms of transfer, to which he was entitled at the time when he was inducted/transferred. The transfer confirmation letter dated 08.03.1992 does suggest variance in Scheme for employees but the boards decision has prospective application as far as lifting of any beneficial arrangements are concerned. Wisdom should have prevailed at the time when employees were being transferred and not at the twilight of their career when they (employees) only hoped to get their retirement benefits.. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.711-K/2019 National Refinery Ltd another v. Syed Niaz Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
41 Const. P. 750/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Total Parco Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
42 Criminal Appeal 43/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Naveed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
43 Const. P. 1733/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Al-Raheem Textile (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
44 Const. P. 5162/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Battery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
45 Const. P. 2938/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Asif Ashfaq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
46 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 6/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Al-Hamra Trading Company (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
47 Const. P. 4773/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Crown Feed (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
48 Const. P. 8259/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 New Hampshire Insurance Co. (Petitioner) VS S.R.B and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
49 Cr.Bail 1570/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 ZAFAR ALI MAGSI S/O FAZAL MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
50 Const. P. 5445/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Iqbal Khalid Tabba (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
51 Const. P. 5292/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saeed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
52 Const. P. 2943/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Shaikh Pipe Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
53 Const. P. 5564/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Al Hafi and Co. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
54 Const. P. 4988/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Al-Mashood Oil & Ghee Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
55 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 742/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Qamar & Co. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
56 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 488/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Rauf (Applicant) VS Member Judicial Customs Appellate Tribuna & anor (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
57 Const. P. 4266/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Premier Mercantile Services Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
58 Const. P. 4989/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Khurram Hussain Naqvi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
59 Const. P. 8809/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Syed Shah Faisal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
60 2018 CLD 389 Judicial Companies Misc. 30/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Gulshan Weaving Mills Limited & others (Applicant) VS OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-APR-17 Yes This Scheme of Arrangement although is silent as to suretys liability but it was argued to propose and suggest in a manner which tend to take away the statutory rights of non-consenting creditors of the same class or of any other class of creditors. There are of course contractual rights and statutory rights which members of the same class of creditors may barter for any consideration but the consent of the majority of one class of creditors cannot sweep the statutory or legal rights available to them under the law unless the variance is established. The majority view could prevail over minority and releases the guarantors only in case of variance in terms of repayment and in its absence it does not interfere any other statutory rights. Such sanction could only be deemed to be to the exclusion of objectors or non-consenting creditors who merely seeks to enforce statutory rights available to them under the law. The principle of Section 133 of the Contract Act in its strict sense would not apply to a case of Scheme of Arrangement under the present circumstances of the case. --It is perhaps this common interest of consenting creditors which distinguishes the objector from rest of the secured creditors and since there is no commonality of interest between the objector and the consenting secured creditors the effect of this Scheme of Arrangement would not bind the objector. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
61 Const. P. 2096/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 N & N Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
62 2022 PTD 390, 2022 PTCL 396 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 104/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Commissioner I-R Zone-I (Applicant) VS M/s. Faizan Steel (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.1679-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Reveue v. M/s. Faizan Steel,C.A.442/2023 Commissioner Inland Reveue v. M/s. Faizan Steel Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
63 Const. P. 5933/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
64 Const. P. 4276/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Bed & Blanket (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
65 2021 CLD 1008 H.C.A 284/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Famous Brands (Private) Limited (Appellant) VS Samsonite IP Holdings S.A.R.L & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAR-21 Yes By moving an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant does not surrender to the jurisdiction of the Court. The jurisdiction is conferred by law based on facts. A litigant may be right or wrong in asserting that the Court had no jurisdiction or that the suit is barred by law. But, this act of litigant would neither confer and/or bestow nor take away any jurisdiction which in fact is conferred by law. Actions of parties prior to litigation leads to constitution of a cause to initiate proceedings in Court of competent jurisdiction. - If the two applications were not moved simultaneously and would have been filed one after the other, will a litigant still be debarred from filing the other application such as Order VII Rule 10 CPC.A simple answer to this proposition is No as rejection of plaint has its own reasons whereas return of plaint has its own. In an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant has only to show that it does not disclose a cause of action; the relief claimed is undervalued or is not properly valued and that the suit appears to be barred by law. None of these rational is available while entertaining an application under order VII rule 10 CPC, which is for return of plaint on numerous counts including but not limited to pecuniary jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction. Courts when plaint is presented are required to see whether they are bestowed with pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction whereas under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Courts are required to see whether it is barred by law. The Court had to apply law to decide the issue of jurisdiction; it is the law that confers or takes away the jurisdiction of the Court and not based on moving of application under the aforesaid provision of law. Another proposition is that while entertaining and hearing application under order VII rule 11 CPC Court is empowered to return the plaint if the circumstances so warrants as required under the law. -Section 86(3) of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001 provides that owner of the trademark which is entitled to protection under the Paris Convention as a well-known trademark shall be entitled to restrain by injunction the use in Pakistan of a trademark which, or the essential part of which, is identical or deceptively similar to the well-known trademark in relation to identical or similar goods or services, where the use is likely to cause confusion or where such use cause dilution of the distinctive quality of the well-known trademark. - At the very outset there is nothing in the instant case which could attract Section 81 of Trademark Ordinance, 2001. The proprietor of the mark never gave up their right or it has not been demonstrated that for continuous period of five years from the date of alleged registration (in favour of user) in the use of registered mark in Pakistan, the proprietor was aware of it and that the proprietor ceased to be entitled on the basis of that earlier trademark or other rights. The engagement of the appellant with the respondent itself is enough to understand that there was no case of acquiescence at all. In fact the appellant conceded when they assumed the role of a distributor. -The appellate Court normally avoid interfering in the orders of the interlocutory nature involving exercise of discretion as the appellate Court cannot substitute its own discretion unless when the discretion has been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, perversely or where the Court has ignored certain principles regulating grant or refusal of injunction. The appellate Court is not required to reassess the material to reach a conclusion different from the one reached by the trial Court/learned Single Judge on the consideration that another view is possible. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.4034/2021 Famous Brands (Private) Limited, Lahore v. Samsonite IP Holdings S.a.r.l., Luxembourg through its Attorney Abdul Rasheed, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
66 Const. P. 6093/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
67 Const. P. 3344/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s The Legend (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
68 Const. P. 1737/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Mohsin Metal Works (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
69 Const. P. 2967/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Safa Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
70 Const. P. 5409/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Bulls & Bulls (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
71 Const. P. 5610/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Spectrum Enterprises & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
72 Const. P. 321/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shafiq Ahmed S/o Shabbir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Iftikhar Hussain Qureshi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-21 No Petitioner was inducted in the premises as tenant. He claimed to be in relation with the brother of respondent No.1 Iftikhar Hussain Qureshi as landlord/ tenant who sold this property to his brother. The status of the petitionerwith regard to premises in question would thus remain as a tenant. Petitioner has claimed that no notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was served however he concedes that despite receipt of notice of eviction application and the documents,he did not tender the rent to the new landlordi.e. respondent No.1. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
73 Const. P. 1783/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noshasba Talat (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
74 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 196/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. U.C.C. (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) VS Customs Appellate Tribunal & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
75 Const. P. 1894/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 S.S.G.C Ltd (Petitioner) VS The Registrar of Trade Union and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan C.P.4450/2019 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. The Registrar of Trade Unions, C/o National Industrial Relations Commission, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
76 Const. P. 4243/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 M.Sabir Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
77 Const. P. 269/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Farrukh Iqbal Mirza S/o Mirza Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS The Ld. District Judge, Karachi East and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
78 2021 MLD 1905 Const. P. 971/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Habib Bank Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Mst. Neelofar Awan and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-MAY-21 Yes In view of above I am of the view that tentative rent order should have been complied and for the period of March and April, the tenant/petitioner could have asked for adjustment of half of the rent but this was only possible after compliance and not after defiance. The rent of May/June 2020 was alsonot deposited in time. I do not find any portion of the order to be unlawful and hence the principle that since some portion of the order is not lawful, entire order is to be set aside, is not applicable here. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
79 Const. P. 5430/2020 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Imad Samad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) F.B. Judgement 10-SEP-21 Yes - Import of vintage cars on the strength of SRO No.833(I)/2018 dated 03.07.2018 followed by a decision in the case of Moin Jamal Abbasi in CP No.D-4124 of 2019 reported as 2020 PTD 660. --Full Bench was constituted to consider the question arising out of litigation:- Whether the subject SRO No.833(I)/2018 issued in terms of Section 19 of Customs Act, 1969 can also be treated as SRO issued by the Ministry of Commerce in terms of Section 3 of the Import & Export Control Act, 1950, permitting import of vintage cars which are otherwise not importable as being old and used in terms of the Import Policy Order of both 2016 and 2020. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro
80 Const. P. 4831/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s K.P Services (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
81 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 76/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 The Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Rehman & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
82 Const. P. 8331/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mehboob Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-OCT-19 Yes Regularization Act 2013 does not suggest that all those contractual employees for whom the basic requirements of transparency is not fulfilled, are also entitled to be regularized. Regularization of Ad-hoc or contract employees under Act of 2013 is not open for all those contractual and ad-hoc employees for whom the codel formalities have not been fulfilled thus a competition should have been made available amongst all those who were interested in the appointments on subject posts. We would not approve the process involved in the appointment of petitioners, which could ultimately deprive the eligible and entitled persons of a fair competition and a precedent could be made to cater the system where the appointment of selected persons, can be legitimized. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.614-K/2019 Mehboob Ali and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
83 Const. P. 5386/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Galaxy Enterprises and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
84 Const. P. 825/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Digri Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Petitioners counsel has placed before us a letter dated 11.12.2019, which was issued in pursuance of Section 40B of the Sales Tax Act,1990 to monitor different Sugar Mill which include the Petitioner as well. In the instant petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.01.2019 issued by the Commissioner Inland Revenue, with the contention that Commissioner Inland Revenue after the amendment in the ibid law, through Finance Act, 1990 does not enjoy powers and authority. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
85 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 207/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Al-Hayat Brothers (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
86 Const. P. 3786/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Rajby Industries (Petitioner) VS Sajjad Ali And ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-OCT-19 Yes The private respondents in these cases were gatekeepers and labours respectively and were terminated in terms of Section 12(3) of the Standing Order, 1968, thus it is not an industrial dispute which could empower the Commission to assume and exercise its jurisdiction in terms of Sections 54 and 57 of the IRA, 2012. Such provisions empowering the Commission in terms of Sections 54 and 57 of the IRA, 2012 were also in existence well before its promulgation and also while the provisions of IRO(xxiii) of1969 were in existence. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.683-K/2019 M/s Rajby Industries v. Sajjad Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
87 2017 MLD 249 J.M 37/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M/s. Drug Regulatery Agency (Applicant) VS Zam Zam Corporation & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 07-APR-16 Yes If the provisions of Section 12(2) CPC are allowed to facilitate a stranger to the suit whose rights have not been affected by the outcome, the provisions are not available for the applicant as otherwise it would open the floodgate of litigation for initiating the proceedings. The application under section 12(2) CPC filed by Saeed Allahwala appears to be misconceived. He may have remedy available with him to initiate proceedings in relation to the warning letter issued but by moving this application he could achieve nothing in this regard. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
88 Const. P. 988/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Chemifar International (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
89 Const. P. 4976/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Matool (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
90 Const. P. 310/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Habib Bank Limited (Petitioner) VS IXth Rent Controller, Khi (Central) & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-APR-21 Yes -Since statute does not provide remedy of appeal, this petition has been filed to invoke jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. By dismissal of an application under order VII rule 11 CPC, none of the fundamental right of the petitioner was violated to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court. -The whole gummit of the lis is yet to be decided and hence if an appeal against such order could not be maintained, how this alternate recourse be made available, when no fundamental right of the petitioner seems to have been violated. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
91 Const. P. 6799/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imtiaz Provisions Store (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
92 Const. P. 2169/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Everfresh Farms (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
93 Const. P. 6222/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muna Manzoor Ul Hasan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
94 Const. P. 276/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sarfaraz Khan S/o Gulsher Khan (Petitioner) VS Jama Masjid Muhammadi & Madrasah Tehfeesz-ul-Quran (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.4009/2021 Mst. Nazma Bibi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department at Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
95 Const. P. 2412/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Puma Energy Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.215-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Puma Engery Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
96 2023 CLC 372 Suit 3084/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHARIF ULLAH KHAN (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORP. LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-22 Yes In terms of Section 60/62 of the Easement Act it is not vested right of a licensee to enforce the terms of such agreement which in its present form only presents permissible rights i.e terms of agreement as stated therein which could be withdrawn, even without notice in case of a license. Hence in view of that, the plaintiffs right is not matured to enforce rest of the agreed obligation including the tenure of one year. In case the plaintiff is of the view that under the general law it has been unlawfully terminated without assigning any reason, they have already secured it by way of this suit in the shape of recovering damages. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
97 Const. P. 6595/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s MATCO Foods Ltd (Petitioner) VS Commissioner IR (Appeals-II) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
98 Const. P. 7251/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aitkenstuart Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
99 Const. P. 1631/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sarfaraz Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
100 Const. P. 3932/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Ayan Energy Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
101 Const. P. 6923/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s SEPCO III Electric (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
102 Const. P. 6930/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 JS Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
103 Const. P. 6961/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Allied Engineering & Services (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
104 Const. P. 7334/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shahmurad Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
105 Const. P. 6624/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aligarh Institute of Technology (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
106 Const. P. 7847/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Swiss Specialty Chemicals (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
107 Const. P. 6702/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
108 Const. P. 8568/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Falak Jan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.272/2022 Falak Jan v. The Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
109 Civil Revision 212/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Darhoon (Applicant) VS Abdi Since dead Thr: His Legal Heirs & an Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 17-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
110 Const. P. 647/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Sattar S/o Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Hussain and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
111 2015 CLC 1278 Execution 64/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Decree Holder) VS SULTAN ALI AKHANI (Judgment Debtor) S.B. Judgement 05-MAR-15 Yes "Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) --- ----S. 47 & O. XXI, R. 23-A---Arbitration Act (X of 1940), S. 14---Application for making award as rule of court---Consent decree---Execution petition---Objections---Contention of decree holders was that objections to execution petition could not be considered unless judgment debtor had deposited the decretal amount or furnished security in lieu thereof---Validity---Validity of decree could only be challenged before the Executing Court if the same was void or had been passed by the court having no jurisdiction---Provisions of O.XXI, R.23-A, C.P.C. were mandatory and objections to the execution by a judgment debtor could not be considered unless judgment debtor had deposited the decretal amount or furnished security in lieu thereof---Executing Court could not go beyond the decree---Judgment debtor could not escape from his obligation under the decree---Requirement of notice and hearing were duly complied with at the time of trial---Executing Court could not be burdened with re-trial---Compromise decree was in fact a contract, breach of which might give rise to fresh cause of action to decree holder---Decree was neither void nor it had been passed by a Court having no jurisdiction---Objections to execution application taken by the judgment debtor were over-ruled, in circumstances." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
112 Const. P. 1114/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ferozuddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-FEB-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
113 Suit 1431/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 AHMED JAFFER & CO (Plaintiff) VS NEW HOLLAND KOBELO CONST. (Defendant) S.B. Order 13-APR-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
114 Const. P. 6354/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Gilani Hygenic Products Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
115 Adm. Suit 3/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S Cockett Marine Oil DMCC (Plaintiff) VS M.V ATLANTIC ENTERPRISE & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 11-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
116 Const. P. 4880/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ammiza Transport (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
117 Civil Revision 76/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mst Nagina (Applicant) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
118 Const. P. 1029/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Aroosha (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
119 F.R.A 34/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Fazal Jamil S/o Jamil Ahmed (Appellant) VS Akhlaq Ahmed and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
120 Const. P. 549/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Muhammad Sabir (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Hayat & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-NOV-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
121 Const. P. 8224/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Hassan (Petitioner) VS Abdullah Gaddi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
122 Const. P. 6924/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Al Haj Pakistan Kirthar B.V (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.187-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Al Haj Pakistan Kirthar B.V. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
123 Suit 2085/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Mukesh Kumar & others. (Plaintiff) VS Sindh Employees (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
124 Suit 863/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Iqbal Khan (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan International Airlines Comp Ltd & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 11-MAR-22 No A show-cause notice was originally contested by filing a suit however no substantial relief was availed by the plaintiff and consequently he received a dismissal order from service on 12.11.2019. It is the case of the plaintiff that he has already filed an appeal against such dismissal which is a remedy under the PIACL Employees (Service & Discipline) Regulations 1985, copy of which is available at page 191 of the file. Learned counsel for plaintiff submits that there is no rational and reason provided in the dismissal order as to why he (plaintiff) would submit forged and fabricated degree of B.Sc. when it was never required at the time of his appointment. Such point requires consideration but since the plaintiff has surrendered himself to the jurisdiction of appellate authority of the department available to him at the relevant time under the Regulations, it would be appellate authority which is supposed to give its finding specially on this defence taken by the plaintiff that there was no necessity or requirement under the advertisement to submit bachelor degree i.e. BSc at the relevant time though he concedes that he presented a mark sheet of second year BSc wherein he failed. Learned counsel for defendant No.1 during course of his arguments has also conceded that the remedy for the plaintiff is by way of appeal in terms of the Regulations prevailing at the relevant time. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
125 Judicial Companies Misc. 41/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Gadoon Textile Mills Ltd. and Others (Applicant) VS .. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-JUN-14 Yes "Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984)--- ----Ss. 284, 285, 286, 287 & 288---Demerger of companies---Collective business decision---Scope---Determination of consideration including the commercial aspect of the merger along with manner of the swap ratio was primarily and substantially the prerogative of the members of the respective companies---Businessmen had to take decision considering all the pros and cons of demerger and merger of companies---While taking such decision there would be chances of success and failure but while questioning such decision the bona fides was the real test---Businessmen could take decision foreseeing the future aspect---Court could only see that all the legal formalities had been fulfilled and scheme was neither unjust nor unfair or against the national interest but could not challenge the wisdom of a decision of businessmen---While demerging shares of Real Estate and Textile the representatives or shareholders might decide to keep them separately which could not be challenged before the court---Company was conducting two business which were being separated---Advantages and disadvantages of keeping them together would remain there by disassociating the two businesses and their shareholding---Both would separately yield profit and loss hence the cumulative effect of the net result would not matter---Proposed scheme was based on the principle that each shareholder would get its respective share in terms of percentage that he was in collective business---Petition for demerger of companies was granted." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
126 Suit 171/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SYED MUSTAFA NAWAB ZAIDI (Plaintiff) VS MS KHADIJA ZAIDI & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
127 Const. P. 2243/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Reckitt Benckiser (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.6189/2021 Reckitt Benckiser Pakistan Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Law Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and others,C.A.323/2022 Reckitt Benckiser Pakistan Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Law Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
128 Const. P. 1420/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Riaz Ahmed Channo and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
129 Const. P. 501/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Fayyaz Ali Shahani and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
130 Const. P. 594/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.Ps No.D-634, 677, 700, 750, 794, 841, 896, 899, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 907, 910, 914, 916, 917, 919, 922, 924, 925, 927, 928, 929, 931, 932, 933, 935, 936, 937, 940, 942, 943, 948, 949, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955, 956, 957, 958, 960, 961, 962, 963, 980, 995, 996, 999, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1014, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1020, 1021, 1027, 1028, 1033, 1038, 1039, 1049, 1051, 1055, 1057, 1058, & 1062 of 2022 2022 Mukhtiar Ahmed and other (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
131 Spl.Cr.Bail 81/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ATHAR HAYYAT & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
132 Const. P. 1827/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Rashid (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-22 No Co-owners/sharers cannot be excluded from a declaration in respect of property in question on the basis of unregistered surrendered deed, unless they appear before the Court and give a statement on Oath in this regard. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
133 Const. P. 458/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Hasnain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
134 Const. P. 3004/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Lucknow Coop. Housing Society (Petitioner) VS XIIth A.D.J South Karachi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
135 Const. P. 7507/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mehtab Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
136 Const. P. 3312/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Shahid Brothers (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
137 Const. P. 4563/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shell Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
138 Const. P. 451/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Haji Abdul Raziq Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
139 Const. P. 2058/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Fintex Manufacturer Corp (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
140 Const. P. 1905/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Province Of Sindh & Others (Petitioner) VS Baxial & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
141 Const. P. 744/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
142 Const. P. 334/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Mst. Lubna & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
143 Const. P. 640/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Abdul Hafeez & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
144 Suit 2273/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Shehnaz Sultana (Plaintiff) VS Kamal Ahmed Qureshi & others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 05-NOV-22 Yes Indeed in our society women have been deprived of their due share in the property but the preponderance of evidence yield it other way as not only has she admitted to have received Rs.4 lacs as her share in the property but also admitted to have been maintained throughout her life by her brother/defendant No.1. No other sibling came to support her claim. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
145 2023 PLD Pesh. 174 Suit 182/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 PAKISTAN STATE OIL CO. LTD. (Plaintiff) VS ABDUL ALI & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-22 Yes that the defendants are not precluded from using their land in pursuance of Rule 10 of ibid Rules 1951 however the reasonable restriction for the security and safety of the occupants be adhered to, which restriction shall not be arbitrary and fanciful and that such restriction would not be of such magnitude as would materially render and disentitle neighboring land owners from utilizing their land in accordance with law as it would then be in violation of Article, 4, 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Plaintiff has prayed in the suit that no structure/ construction shall be permitted and that defendants are not entitled to raise any construction within a distance of 200 sq. yards from the plaintiff key point installation i.e. category 1-A, Zulfiqarabad Oil Terminal, is thus misconceived and would amount to acquiring the property without its market value under acquisition laws. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
146 Execution 32/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sultan Kath S/o Haji Suleman (Decree Holder) VS Feroza D/o Haji Kassim & Others (Judgment Debtor) S.B. Order 16-NOV-22 Yes Nothing was adjudicated by the Court as to the entitlement of the parties and status of property; it was compromised out of Court which was reduced into writing and which was taken on record by this Court. Under the circumstances, Courts umbrella should not have been used in matter of execution which disputes were not adjudicated by Court. Nothing commented about the title of the subject property by trial Court, which was/is being conveyed by one private party to another in terms of the compromise reached amicably without adjudication Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
147 R.A (Civil Revision) 103/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Syed Hashmat & others (Applicant) VS Syed Azmat & other (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
148 Const. P. 287/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Rafique Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Abdul Razzaque & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
149 Const. P. 621/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Abdul Jabbar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
150 Const. P. 809/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Taj Muhammad and anothers (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
151 Const. P. 710/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Fida Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
152 Const. P. 645/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Muhassan Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
153 2023 CLD 225 Judicial Companies Misc. 35/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 The Securities & Exchange Commissioner of Pakistan (Applicant) VS Natover Lease Reliance Ltd (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-OCT-22 Yes Incorporation does not fully cast a veil over the personality of a limited company through which the courts cannot see. The courts can, and often do, pull off the mask. They look to see what really lies behind. A corporation will be looked upon as a legal entity as a general rule but when the notion of legal entity is used to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, protect fraud or defend crime the law will regard the corporation as an association of persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
154 Const. P. 1953/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Shoaib Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
155 Const. P. 1924/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Qazi Ahmed Kamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
156 Const. P. 1607/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Lal Jee (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Delimitation Matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
157 R.A (Civil Revision) 200/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Muhammad Ali & Others (Applicant) VS Haji Rahim Bux & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
158 H.C.A 410/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 K-Electric Ltd. (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.1426/2023 K-Electric Limited through its Duly authorized attorney, Karachi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
159 2023 CLD 624 Judicial Companies Misc. 16/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Awwal Modaraba Managment Limited & 3 others (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
160 Const. P. 1227/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Renata (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
161 Const. P. 1699/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ali Hyder (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
162 Const. P. 1832/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Khan Rind & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
163 Const. P. 995/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Burque Corp Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.2839/2023 M/s Burque Corporation (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Finance, Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
164 Const. P. 1576/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Rashid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others\ (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
165 Const. P. 2494/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Mansuri Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
166 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 726/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. BOL Media Group, Karachi (Applicant) VS Custom Appellate Tribunal, Karachi & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.2234/2023 M/s BOL MEDIA GROUP, Karachi v. Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench-I, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
167 H.C.A 251/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: H.C.A. No.227 & 250 of 2018 [Ghulam Mustafa v. Muhammad Younis, Mst. Nasreen & others] 2018 Ghulam Mustafa (Appellant) VS Mst. Nasreen & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
168 H.C.A 42/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Amar Khan & Another (Appellant) VS Sahibzada Khan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
169 Const. P. 5921/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Saeeda Begum (Petitioner) VS M/s AGE & Sons Pvt Ltd and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
170 I. A 224/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Sajid Brothers & Co. & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Allied Bank Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
171 H.C.A 412/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shah-e-Karbala Trust and Others (Appellant) VS Syed Masood Hasan Jafri & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
172 Const. P. 1949/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Gul Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
173 Const. P. 1081/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst Noureen & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
174 I. A 105/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Shoaib (Appellant) VS Aqil Abbas and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
175 Const. P. 1480/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D-172/2023 2020 Hafez Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
176 Const. P. 4643/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Pervez Arshad Choudhary (Petitioner) VS Farzana Saleem and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
177 Const. P. 7751/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Badar Sultana and Ors (Petitioner) VS Mushtaque Ahmed and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
178 H.C.A 176/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Hashim Raza (Appellant) VS Syed Muhammad Ali & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
179 Civil Tran 9/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 M/S Suhail Builders & Developers. (Applicant) VS Tufail Ahmed & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
180 H.C.A 180/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Shahid (Appellant) VS Sajid Ahmed Khan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
181 Const. P. 1647/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ayaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
182 Const. P. 1675/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Nadeem Textile Mills Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
183 H.C.A 124/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Muzaffar Hussain Shah (Appellant) VS Karachi Electric Supply Company Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
184 Const. P. 2803/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP D 2804 of 2022 2022 Irshad Ali (Petitioner) VS M/S Archroma Pakistan Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
185 Const. P. 1513/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghulam Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
186 I. A 120/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Faysal Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Masood Asghar & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-24 Yes Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (???FIO 2001???) is a special law and covers all proceedings upto execution. In the previous law that is Act of 1997, it enabled the Court to convert the proceedings into execution application on preferring an application whereas the frame of instant law is different as can be seen in terms of Section 19 of the FIO 2001. It provides that upon announcement of Judgment and decree the suit shall automatically convert into execution application. Thus no sooner the Judgment and Decree is passed the proceedings stand converted into execution application and the act does not provide a way to file a fresh execution application, as inadvertently did by the appellant. At the most, since an appeal was pending before this Court and the machinery of execution was not triggered, the application that was inadvertently moved as an execution application could at the most be considered for triggering machinery of the Banking Court where the suit was decreed and converted into execution application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
187 Const. P. 177/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Hafeez and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
188 Const. P. 382/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Yasir Nabi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
189 H.C.A 101/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Asghar Ali Agha & others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
190 Spl.H.C.A 291/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mohammad Irfan Sooria & another (Appellant) VS Bank Al-Falah (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
191 Const. P. 4313/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
192 Const. P. 2970/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sana Hussain Merchant and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
193 I. A 26/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Saleem Ahmed Khan (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Limited & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
194 H.C.A 196/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Shafiq & Others (Appellant) VS Abdul Salam Mandhro & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1308-K/2023 Muhammad Shafiq & others v. Abdul Salem Mandhro & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
195 Const. P. 2472/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cp D 2473/2019 2019 Imtiaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Sindh Text Book Board Jamshoro (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
196 Const. P. 6811/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Palpex Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
197 I. A 111/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s. Allied Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. State Life Insurance & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
198 Const. P. 5669/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Iqbal Siraj (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
199 H.C.A 52/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Khoula Siddiqui Advocate (Appellant) VS Tariq Bin Azad & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-24 Yes It was eventually be decided by the learned single Judge on the strength of the evidence likely to be recorded by the parties, however, prima facie it seems that the amount was paid from the account of deceased Azad Bin Haider and at this point of time respondent No.1 (son of deceased), cannot get away with the entire rental income of the aforesaid property depriving the daughters of deceased. In all fairness, he could only claim his share out of the rental income from the said property from the Nazir, whereas, rest of the amount shall remain with the Nazir duly invested in a profit bearing scheme, until and unless it is resolved by the court. Order accordingly. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
200 H.C.A 207/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Irfan Wahid & another (Appellant) VS Sheikh Imtiaz Hanif & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
201 H.C.A 176/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Amir Ali Charania (Appellant) VS Rizwan Ahmed (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
202 Const. P. 6397/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khawaja Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
203 Const. P. 1493/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Altaf Hussain Tunio (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Waseem Ghori & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
204 Const. P. 6815/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Pinnacle Biotech Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.L.A.657-K/2023 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal) v. M/s. Faisal Spinning Mills Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 15-Apr- 24
205 Const. P. 3386/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Hashim @ Abi & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
206 I. A 41/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 MCB (Appellant) VS Bilal Oil Depot (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
207 Const. P. 5416/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Khadeeja & Ors (Petitioner) VS Abdul Rehman Wariya & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
208 Const. P. 2603/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP. D 132 of 2019 2023 Faiza Saeed and Others (Petitioner) VS DHA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
209 Const. P. 3538/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Trump Management (Petitioner) VS Faisal Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
210 Const. P. 3660/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst: Farhana (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
211 Const. P. 4840/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Amir and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
212 I. A 59/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Arshad Mirza (Appellant) VS Darsyus T. Sethna & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-24 Yes There is no cavil to this proposition that under special summary chapter, only special jurisdiction is conferred upon the court, proceeding whereunder could only be seen under negotiable instruments and any deviation thereof would give rise to an exercise of jurisdiction not vested upon the court and the order/judgment is only a nullity. In the instant matter, a decree is passed under summary chapter against an individual who has not executed any negotiable instrument and hence could not have been subjected to summary proceedings. Certainly, if the presence of appellant/defendant No.2 was necessary and important in the wisdom of plaintiff/respondent No.1, in the sense that he was a guarantor or that amount could be recovered from him, then the case could have been proceeded against them/him under ordinary civil jurisdiction. When confronted, Mr. Fazal ur Rehman that this decree could not have been passed under summary chapter against him and/or could not be executed against the appellant, learned counsel for the respondents though initially insisted that it was a belated attempt on the part of the appellant to raise this point, but later conceded as no limitation would run against an order which is a nullity or without jurisdiction in the eyes of law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
213 R.A (Civil Revision) 13/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1998 Dr Abdul Ghani (Applicant) VS M/s.Danish Enterprises (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
214 H.C.A 389/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Nafees Arain and Others (Appellant) VS Administrator Market Committee Karachi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
215 H.C.A 134/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Federation of Pakistan & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Al-Hassan Tech Engg. SVC (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1343-K/2023 Federation of Pakistan & others v. M/s. Al-Hassan Tech Eng. SVC. (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
216 Suit 721/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 Arif Ali Shah (Plaintiff) VS Povice of Sindh & ors (Defendant) S.B. Order 15-JUN-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
217 Const. P. 630/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Yasmin Abbasi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Darri and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
218 Civil Revision 43/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Dilbar Hussain Solangi (Applicant) VS Ali Sher and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
219 Const. P. 1997/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2010 Ghulam Farooq Mirani (Petitioner) VS Managing Director P.I.A and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
220 Const. P. 111/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Dr Athar Hussain Shah and others (Petitioner) VS SSP Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
221 Cr.Bail 521/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Muhammad Sallah Junejo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-FEB-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
222 2014 PLD Sindh 268 Suit 1706/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Dr. Samrina Hashmi (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Medial Association (Centre) & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-DEC-13 Yes Certainly and undoubtly the cause of association is much higher than the cause of an individual. In this matter, it is to be seen whether injuries or irreparable loss that may be caused to the association is important than the personal injuries of the plaintiff. I have no confusion in my mind that the cause of the association is at higher pedestal. In priority the interest and reputation of the association has to be safe guarded. At the same time this does not mean that the cause of an individual is to be ignored. What is meant by this observation, is that in priority cause of the association is to be kept at higher forum. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
223 Const. P. 2013/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mst Rukhsana Shah (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Rasool Shah and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.1155/2021 Ejaz Spinning Mills Ltd Lahore v. Province of Sindh through the SecretaryExcise and Taxation Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
224 Const. P. 8/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Irshad Khatoon (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Badeh District Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
225 Const. P. 2338/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mumtaz Ali Joyo (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Nasirabad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
226 Const. P. 6/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Naseem Khatoon and another (Petitioner) VS SSP Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
227 Const. P. 603/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Ali Asghar Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Addl; District Judge Mehar and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
228 Const. P. 156/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Bashir Ahmed Noonari and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Dera Sarki and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
229 Const. P. 190/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Manzoor Hussain Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS V/S SHO PS Market Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
230 Civil Revision 11/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Manthar Jarwar (Applicant) VS Khuda Bux Phull and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
231 Cr.Bail 508/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Rasheed Ahmed Arain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
232 Cr.Bail 720/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Mouchar and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-OCT-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
233 Cr.Misc. 327/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Younus (Applicant) VS Muhammad Zafar Ali Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-13 Yes The trial Court appears to have passed the order summarily without touching the legal aspect as enshrined in aforesaid two cited cases and as described u/s 179 Cr.P.C. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
234 Cr.Bail 403/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mubarak Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-JUL-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
235 2016 PLC (CS) 1219 Suit 739/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Safdar Anjum & Others (Plaintiff) VS P.I.A. Corporation (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 11-APR-16 Yes "Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Employees (Service and Discipline) Regulations, 1985--- ----Reglns. 78 & 79---Employees of Pakistan International Airlines Corporation---Audio tapes instigating the employees to observe strike---Dispensing with regular inquiry---Non-providing of material to be used against the employees---Effect---Audio tapes---Prerequisites for admissibility and evidentiary value---Personal hearing of such employee---Requirements---Corporation ordered for dispensing with regular inquiry against the employees but no material/information was communicated to them on the basis of which inquiry was dispensed with---Validity---No material on the basis of which inquiry was dispensed with was communicated to the employees---Show-cause notice was silent as to the nature of material and information claimed to be in the custody and possession of authority---Impugned order to dispense with regular inquiry was devoid of judicious application of mind---Anyone in the authority who had decided to dispense with holding of an inquiry had rendered himself/herself an unfit person to conduct further proceedings of personal hearing---Dispensation order could only be passed once the material was shown and shared with the accused employee whose reply and response should become a basis of such decision---Authority or person giving personal hearing should not rely on personal knowledge and information as in that case the essence of impartiality would be lost---Person who recorded alleged audio tape conversation should be material witness and without he being confronted with the accusation such conversation should not be used as an evidence against him---Competent authority could dispense with inquiry if facts and circumstances of the case so warranted---Such Authority should not sit with prejudice mind that they had already dispensed with the inquiry and had made their mind---Substantial right of inquiry could not be snatched from the employees without hearing them---Impugned show cause notice of hearing was bad in law as it was without reasoning and same did not contain the material to be used against the employees---Competent authority was bound to record reasons in writing for dispensing with holding of inquiry---Audio tape recording could be admitted in evidence if it was produced in evidence by its maker---Prerequisites for admissibility of tape recording as evidence were that accuracy of recording had to be proved; voice recorded to be properly identified and court must consider the genuineness of the tape before it was accepted---No one should decide cases on the basis of personal knowledge as in that case he would become party to the proceedings---Competent authority should sit with judicious mind and impartially listen to the defence and response of the employees---Corporation was directed to provide all the material available which it felt sufficient to dispense with holding of inquiry---Employees should be provided reasonable opportunity which might not in any case exceed one week for filing of reply which should be considered at the time of hearing for passing appropriate orders---Employees would be entitled for all the benefits as they were receiving earlier till they continued to be employees of the Corporation." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
236 2017 CLD 1148 Execution 23/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Bankers Equity Limited & others (Decree Holder) VS M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd. (Judgment Debtor) S.B. Order 27-FEB-17 Yes The Banking Court while executing a decree passed under Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 is entitled to adopt any procedure deemed appropriate by it to effect sale of mortgaged properties in execution of a decree. Judicial sanctity in disposing of the mortgaged property through Court auction is required to be reaffirmed. Such sanctity could only be disturbed if there is a material irregularity which leads to fraud to cause loss to any one which is not the attribution. Mere allegation that the property worth more than it was evaluated is not sufficient. Every judgment debtor, if allowed to plead the value of his property there can hardly be any auction which could be conducted. There was nothing to prevent the judgment debtor during these ten years since decree was passed in 2006 to bring a buyer of its choice who could offer a price as it (judgment debtor) desires. The Court while considering the objections of the judgment debtor has also to weigh and consider the miseries and pain undertaken by the decree holder. It is within the domain and propagative of the banking Court to adopt any of the procedure it deems fit and proper and hence this question is not of any material importance that the bid is substantially low as compared to the reserved price or forced sale price. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
237 Suit.B 16/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Askari Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS Sajid Textile Industries (Pvt.) Limited (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 03-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
238 Const. P. 3841/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Ranjho (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes The petitioner has every right to pursue his remedy against it, which he failed. The amount paid to the father could never be considered as the dower amount paid to the bride and that she was liable to return at the time of dissolution of marriage by way of khulla. Even the ring as mentioned in the nikahnama was refused / declined to have been received by her and no confidence inspiring evidence was recorded by the defendant to believe that version. In this constitution petition such deeper re-appraisal of evidence is not within the domain of this Court when two efficacious remedies i.e. trial Court and appellate Court were exhausted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
239 Const. P. 154/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Sanaullah Rajar (Petitioner) VS Govt.of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
240 Civil Revision 84/1997 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 1997 Allah Bux Khan and others (Applicant) VS Iqbal Ahmed and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-FEB-19 Yes An attempt was made by the applicant / defendant while cross examining the plaintiffs witness to establish a case but nothing came out of the cross-examination as not even material questions were suggested. All assertions on oath almost went unrebutted. The share of Ahmed Khan and the mutation in the record in favour of his two sons was never challenged either in the shape of evidence / witnesses or cross-examination. Further the transactions in the shape of sale deeds by his two sons and then by subsequent buyer Deedar Ahmed Khan in favour of plaintiff / respondent also remained unchallenged along with revenue entries. The judgment and decree, which was referred by the applicant / defendant in the written statement, remained a discussion only to the extent of pleadings as the same was never unearthed. The said judgment, thus, has not seen the light of the day as far as record of this case goes. On the basis of these long standing entries in the revenue record and/or documents no adverse presumption could be attached in the absence of any challenged to them. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.359-K/2019 Allah Bux Khan (decd) thr. his L.Rs v. Iqbal Ahmed (decd) thr. his L.Rs,C.A.11-K/2022 Allah Bux Khan (decd) thr. his L.Rs v. Iqbal Ahmed (decd) thr. his L.Rs Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
241 2018 CLD 1305 M.A. 317/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 Shezan Services (Pvt) Limited (Appellant) VS Shezan Bakers & Confectioners (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-MAY-18 Yes The interpretation of subsection 2 of Section 10 of Trademark Act, 1940, in view of the above, cannot be restricted to a simple concurrent use irrespective of any agreement. Use of trademark under the agreement is not only permissive use but conclusive rights were being delegated and hence the use is concurrent to the use of the inventor. The subject use thus would come within honest concurrent use under the circumstances described in the agreement. It is inconceivable that the appellant would enjoy the consideration of a rental premises if the right of trademark is excluded. Certainly the consideration was for a particular territory i.e. Lahore division which was taken care of by the Registrar Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.57-K/2018 Shezan Services (Pvt) Ltd v. Shezan Bakers & Confectioners (Pvt) Ltd and another,C.P.838-K/2018 Shezan Services (Pvt) Ltd v. Shezan Bakers & Confectioners (Pvt) Ltd and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted
242 Const. P. 1452/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Eng. Nizamuddin (Petitioner) VS Dr. Shakeela Qazi & Another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 07-NOV-17 Yes The provisio of aforesaid Rules provided additional room for the subject cause to file a suit for dissolution of marriage and dower amount within the local limits where wife ordinarily resides. It is distinguished from rest of the jurisdiction wherein the parties were last resided and/or where cause wholly or in part has arisen. While applying the said Rule a suit for dissolution of marriage by way of Khulla can be filed at the address where wife ordinarily resides at the time of filing suit. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.11-K/2018 Engineer Nizamuddin v. Dr.Shakeela Qazi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
243 Const. P. 1497/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ghulam Shabbir Pathan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
244 Civil Revision 175/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mst. Nawab Khatoon (Applicant) VS Jagan Bhayo and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
245 Const. P. 727/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Muhammad Furqan Memon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
246 Const. P. 5189/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Abdul Manan (Petitioner) VS Municipal Commissioner Sukkur & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro C.P.265/2019 Abdul Manan v. Municipal Commissioner, Sukkur & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
247 Const. P. 4569/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Aijaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
248 Const. P. 3297/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Abdul Qadir Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
249 Const. P. 4697/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Mujeeb -ur- Rehman Mallah & Another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
250 Const. P. 2206/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mai Sarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
251 Const. P. 3824/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Aamir Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
252 Const. P. 2041/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Abid Ali Larik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
253 Const. P. 4957/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Abdul Majeed Kosh (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
254 Const. P. 4561/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Agha Ahsan Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
255 I. A 38/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Abdul Jabbar (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
256 Const. P. 4488/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Rajubdin Mastoi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
257 Const. P. 4735/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Abdullah Khoso (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
258 Const. P. 2413/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
259 Const. P. 2001/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Rehmatullah Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Managing Director Concrate Sleeper Factory and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
260 Const. P. 1518/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul Jabbar Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Govt; Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro C.P.1466-K/2018 The Province of Sindh & others v. Abdul Jabbar Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
261 Const. P. 1335/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Muhammad Rizwan and another (Petitioner) VS Shahid Ali and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio C.P.13-K/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Finance Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and another v. Muhammad Rizwan and others,C.A.1193/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Finance Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and another v. Muhammad Rizwan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after Summer vacation,Disposed
262 Const. P. 415/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ghulam Mehdi & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-18 Yes he subsequent judgment of the Member Board of Revenue dated 20.04.2017 not only ignored the order of his predecessor, but also ignored the fact that the suit, challenging the order of his predecessor, was also dismissed. These orders i.e. order of the Senior Civil Judge and more importantly the order of the Member Board of Revenue is implied res judicata as the subject matter of the appeal is nothing but the land which is defined as UA No.437 and 438. Here, it could safely be added that legally the litigation (s) are meant to decide controversies (issues). Where, the controversy / issue is that of general application and not limited to a party only then any decision thereon by a competent forum shall be binding upon all, including those who even were not before the legal forum / authority. A mere change of name of parties would never be sufficient to open a new round of litigation for the thing which otherwise stood decided by a lawful forum / authority. If this is ignored, there shall be no end to litigations and interested shall keep things hanging merely by substituting parties. An aggrieved however may get such decision reversed by appeal or reviewed, subject to law, but cannot seek another order from same forum / authority on plea of his being not a party to earlier lis. Any departure to such concept, shall result in frustrating the object of res judicata which otherwise has application in all matters, including Revenue jurisdiction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
263 Civil Revision 76/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2007 Allah Bux and others (Applicant) VS Govt.of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-18 Yes There is no cavil to the proposition that the entries were neither substantiated before trial Court nor before appellate Court and there was no reason to have relied upon those entries which have no basis as far as title is concerned and the appeal was rightly allowed and consequently the suit was dismissed. Similarly, taking into consideration the contentions of the learned State counsel regarding maintainability of suit, such being a question which is apparent on the face of it such as defect which is not curable and since it is legal, can be raised at any stage including revisional and appellate stage. There is no cavil to the proposition that Government functionaries / authorities are to be sued as required in terms of Article 174 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 as well as Section 79 CPC. In these proceedings, the Provincial of Sindh was sued through Deputy Commissioner which is not in consonance with the judgment of (1) Haji Abdul Aziz and (2) Government of Balochistan (supra) which provides a mechanism of suing the Government through Province of Sindh and through concerned Secretary to the Government. Commissioner under the hierarchy does not represent the Province in the manner as highlighted in the plaint and as such the objection raised by the learned State Counsel also goes on to prove that the suit at the very inception should have been buried as the legal mandatory formalities in terms of Section 79 CPC and Article 174 of the Constitution have not been complied. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1463-K/2018 Allah Bux & others v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
264 2019 YLR 574, 2019 SBLR Sindh 856 M.A. 10/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Aurora Broadcasting Services (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) VS PEMRA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
265 H.C.A 449/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Waseem Ahmed (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shahnawaz & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.712-K/2019 K-Elecric Ltd. v. Muhammad Shahnawaz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
266 Const. P. 1823/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Jaman & others (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.148-K/2017 Khan Muhammad v. National Accountability Bureau (NAB) thr. Its Chairman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
267 Cr.J.A 81/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Karim Bux (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
268 Const. P. 2419/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghazala Rehman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
269 Civil Revision 284/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zafar Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
270 Criminal Appeal 96/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Shareef (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author) Crl.P.5-K/2021 Sikandar Ali v. Shareef & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
271 Const. P. 1730/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Mubeen Ind & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
272 Const. P. 4678/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Habib Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
273 Const. P. 5796/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Muhammad Tahir Construction Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
274 Const. P. 6964/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Radium Silk Factory (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
275 2022 PTD 168 Const. P. 3682/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Samad Pipe Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 Yes Re-validation notice of bank guarantee was issued after a year of provisional assessment and unless final assessment or determination is made and placed for consideration, this re-validation notice of bank guarantee would be of no consequence i.e. even if it is revalidated there cannot be a question of its (bank guarantees) encashment on account of lapse of time for determining the duties and taxes finally in terms of Section 81 of Customs Act, 1969, as it prevailed at the relevant time. -- Had it been a case of final determination or final assessment, there was no occasion of releasing of consignment on securing differential amount through bank guarantee. The department should have asked for entire amount as being determined finally. This being the core issue, no satisfactory explanation was forwarded by respondents counsel for not complying with the requirements of Section 81 of the Customs Act, 1969. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1676-K/2021 The Collector of Customs & another v. M/s. Samad Pipe Industries (Pvt) Ltd. & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
276 Const. P. 3933/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Fazaia Housing Scheme Karachi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
277 Const. P. 5001/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Amjad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
278 Const. P. 27/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Trade Zone (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
279 Const. P. 496/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rehan Aziz Merchant (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
280 Const. P. 948/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Khalid S/o Wazir Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS The Court of IVth ADJ, Karachi Central and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-21 No The objections were to the extent that in a family suit the plaintiff seeking Khulla cannot be represented by her attorney. Learned counsel in support of this contention has cited Rule 85 of the Sindh Civil Court Rules and Section 18 of the Family Courts Act, 1964. So far as the earlier Rule of Sindh Chief Court is concerned, the same is not applicable to the proceedings in hand as they are governed by the Family Courts Act, 1964 and perhaps there is no applicability of such rule even on merit. Similarly, so far as Section 18 of the Family Court Act is concerned, it enables a Pardah Nasheen lady to be permitted and represented by an authorized agent. This is an enabling provision and does not restrict the right of a plaintiff who intends to proceed the matter through an attorney to represent her in the court of law including a family suit for the dissolution of marriage. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
281 Const. P. 2364/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Goldway Hygiene Products (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
282 Const. P. 5602/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/S Sahara Public Right Welfare (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
283 Const. P. 6192/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Tando Allayar Sugar Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
284 Const. P. 7008/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
285 Const. P. 3483/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ajeet Kumar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
286 Const. P. 6077/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehran Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
287 Const. P. 3969/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Brainchlid Communication Pak (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Othes (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
288 Const. P. 1348/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 National Foods Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
289 Const. P. 5401/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Ghandhara Ind Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
290 Const. P. 3491/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Kanhiya Lal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
291 I.T.R.A 60/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) VS WASIM AHMED (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1611-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-V v. Waseem Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
292 Const. P. 1638/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/S Agar International (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
293 Const. P. 5695/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Muhammad Farooq Rafi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
294 Const. P. 4818/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Haji Nazir Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
295 Const. P. 4507/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Dua Star Seafood (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
296 Const. P. 4109/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Farah Jawed (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
297 Const. P. 2204/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Julie (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
298 Const. P. 136/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SYED SHAFQAT ALI SHAH MASOOMI (Petitioner) VS CONTROLLER OF RENT & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
299 Const. P. 5152/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mrs. Khair un NIsa (M/s A.A Ship Breakers) (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
300 Const. P. 3980/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Falcon - I Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
301 Const. P. 5196/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Godil Cold Chain and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
302 Const. P. 1184/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Spectrum Communication (Petitioner) VS Commissioner IR and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
303 Const. P. 4517/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Omar Khalil Jan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
304 Const. P. 577/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Shoukat Ali S/o Muhammad Alam. (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-12 Yes The question of deletion of section 28-A of the Act and application of newly inserted proviso to section 16 is directly related to such question as to what could be the right time to determine the value of the land, which is to be acquired for public benefit. Will the intended desire of the acquisition authority be the right time; would the survey of the land to adjudge its suitability be the right time; or would it be the date of notification or would it be actual physical possession to be the right time. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
305 Const. P. 4571/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS M.D PPL & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
306 Const. P. 144/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Anwar S/o Muhammad Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Mazhar Ali B. Chohan & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-FEB-18 Yes The reliance on the agreement that petitioner had entered into with son of respondent No.2 is of no help as an agreement does not confer any title or a permission to have possession of the premises, which otherwise is owned by the respondent No.1. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
307 Const. P. 526/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Major Mehmood Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst.Sana Mehreen and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
308 Const. P. 885/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Nazia Munsif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
309 Suit.B 43/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK (Plaintiff) VS ZAFAR AHMED & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 19-NOV-12 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
310 Const. P. 4426/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Chamber Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
311 Const. P. 968/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Kamran Khan (Petitioner) VS Governor Sindh/Chancellor University of Karachi (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan C.P.108-K/2020 Kamran Khan v. Govt. of Sindh / Chancellor University of Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
312 Const. P. 4573/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s PSO (Petitioner) VS Abdul Baseer and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan C.P.13-K/2020 M/s Pakistan State Oil Company Limited v. Abdul Baseer and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
313 Const. P. 6139/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Panjwani International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
314 Const. P. 6643/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s SAMBA Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
315 Const. P. 7633/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
316 Const. P. 309/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Lucky Star Steel Ind. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
317 Const. P. 6073/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Al Haadi Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
318 Const. P. 1664/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Al-Asar Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
319 2013 CLC 316 Suit 1702/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2000 MRS. NAJMA VASEEM ADANWALA. (Plaintiff) VS MRS. ABIDA JAWAD (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 24-SEP-12 Yes At one hand the plaintiff claimed that he was and is ready to perform the part of her obligation pursuant to which she had issued notices at the address provided by the defendant and on the other hand she failed to deposit such amount in Court which she was willing to pay her. If the plaintiff could be exempted from the payment of Rs.1 Million at the required time on account of non-availability of the address or on account of the avoidance for the registration of the sale deed than at least the time when she filed suit, she should have come forward and should have deposited the sum of Rs.1 Million in Court. The fact that she was/is enjoying the possession of the said property, it became all that important for her to discharge this obligation as her first priority, which she failed but this non-deposit in Court does not constitute breach of agreement. The Court is also conscious of the fact that the plaintiff has not just made the payment of the token amount, in fact she has paid 60% of the total sale consideration against which the possession was handed over to her. This 60% was utilized by defendant. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
320 Const. P. 7263/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Pharma Net (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
321 Const. P. 4892/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mrs. Shazia Haroon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
322 Const. P. 5834/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khawaja Anver Majid (Petitioner) VS F.B.R & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
323 Const. P. 9020/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Talha Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
324 Const. P. 3485/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Shaikh Impex (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
325 Const. P. 7124/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Rubicon Builders & Developers (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
326 Const. P. 3254/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amanullah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
327 Const. P. 7063/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shah Transport Network (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
328 Const. P. 2413/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Puma Energy Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.216-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Puma Engery Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
329 2022 PTD 290 Const. P. 5113/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 OBS Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-NOV-21 Yes The impugned Circular has only restored the process of Section 170 of Ordinance 2001 for claiming refund only however actions which have already been taken thereunder are not open for a scrutiny at least under Section 221 of Ordinance 2001. For convenience however we may say that impugned Circular has prospective effect only. The adjustments made and allowed on the basis of Circular 4 cannot be subjected to provisions of Section 221 of Ordinance 2001. Applications made under section 170 of Ordinance 2001 for refund has the limitation of three years in terms of Section 170(2) i.e. deemed assessment or when tax was paid whereas deemed assessment itself could be subjected to amendment within five years of such deemed assessment hence the purpose which cannot be achieved under Section 170 is available under other provisions of Ordinance 2001. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.139-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Sanofi-Aventis Pakistan Limited,C.P.70-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. OBS Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
330 Const. P. 7342/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Project Managers (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
331 Const. P. 2310/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 National Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.309-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. National Refinery Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
332 Const. P. 3699/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Crete Sol (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
333 Const. P. 5488/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Kashif Younus (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
334 Const. P. 2100/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M.A.K Azmati (Petitioner) VS IIIrd ADJ Karachi South & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
335 Civil Revision 63/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Haji Qamaruddin (Applicant) VS D.P.O. and an Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
336 Civil Revision 79/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Mst. Rukhsana (Applicant) VS Nasir Hussain & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
337 Civil Revision 310/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ahmed Saeed Qureshi (Applicant) VS Abdul Salam and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
338 Const. P. 4963/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Atlas Metal (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
339 Const. P. 4169/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Javed Saeed (Petitioner) VS Commissioner I.R & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
340 H.C.A 368/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hassan Mehmood @ Mehmood Haravi (Appellant) VS Pervaiz Haravi (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
341 Const. P. 4199/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Farukh Sultana (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
342 Const. P. 546/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Khursheed Begum & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
343 Const. P. 210/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Hasnain Mehmood (Petitioner) VS Addl Commissioner-I Hyderabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
344 Const. P. 226/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 ISLAMUDDIN (LATE) THR LEGAL HEIRS (Petitioner) VS VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE & OTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
345 2015 CLD 1849 Suit.B 29/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2005 THARPARKAR SUGAR MILLS LTD. (Plaintiff) VS N.D.F.C. & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 18-NOV-14 Yes "Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)--- ----Ss. 9, 19, 22 & 27---State Bank of Pakistan, BPD Circular No.29 dated 15-10-2002---Suit for declaration and injunction---Auction of property---Plaintiff company filed application for restraining defendant Bank from auctioning its property to recover outstanding amount in pursuance of decree passed in an earlier suit---Plea raised by plaintiff company was with regard to applicability of State Bank of Pakistan, BPD Circular No.29 dated 15-10-2002---Validity---Enforcement of BPD Circular No.29 by individual Banks to their respective customers was in fact the prerogative of Banks and it was for them to decide whether such debt outstanding against customer was a lost debt or recoverable in terms of assets mortgaged with them---State Bank of Pakistan, BPD Circular No.29 was binding once the Bank reached to a decision that such debt was not recoverable or a lost category and then procedure and perameters as laid down therein were to be adopted as a binding parameter but prima facie not in terms of its mandatory application---Judgment. and decree passed in earlier suit could not be made subservient to the outcome of present suit in terms of Ss. 22 & 27 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Any mode whereby consent decree passed in earlier suit was sought to be deferred, modified, altered and reviewed was violative of law--??Application was dismissed in circumstances." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
346 Suit 1057/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 MRS. UZMA NASIR (Plaintiff) VS REHAN AHMED JANJUA & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 16-APR-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
347 Const. P. 1492/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
348 Const. P. 4549/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 MCB (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
349 Const. P. 2610/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Misbah Cosmetics Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
350 Const. P. 2068/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Waheed (Petitioner) VS Abdul Waheed and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
351 II.A. 58/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Shafat (Appellant) VS The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical College Foundatio (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 07-NOV-17 Yes No employ can coerce his master for continuation of his employment as long as he himself wishes to continue. A legitimate expectation of a notice fulfilled by payment of a months salary and that is only the wisdom behind this one month notice before termination. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
352 Suit 1075/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Feroza (Plaintiff) VS Sajid Ali Khan & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
353 Const. P. 4150/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Jaun Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
354 Const. P. 68/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Dhanjani Yasmeen and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
355 Suit 2150/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ABDUL RAUF ESSA (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ YOUSUF & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 28-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
356 Const. P. 6453/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
357 Const. P. 238/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Waris Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
358 Suit 1988/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Parvez Kurshid. (Plaintiff) VS Bank Al Falah Ltd.(ISSUES) (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
359 Const. P. 6052/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Pakistan Steel Mills Corp (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Arif And ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
360 Const. P. 136/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Naeem Ahmed Bhambhro (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
361 R.A (Civil Revision) 239/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Amanullah. (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
362 Const. P. 655/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Mst. Sana (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
363 Const. P. 624/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Hyder Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
364 Judicial Companies Misc. 29/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amir Bux Channa & Another through Attorney (Applicant) VS Isra Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) Limited. (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-FEB-23 No The disposal of contempt application whereby the contempt notice is discharged and contemnor is set free of consequences, does not mean that he is automatically restored to his position of a Registrar of University Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
365 Const. P. 854/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Khush Muhammad Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
366 Const. P. 1199/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.Ps. No. (D)-1207,1228,1229,1230 of 2022 Ramzan Ordinance cases 2022 Baitullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
367 Const. P. 537/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Ali Bux and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
368 Const. P. 730/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Aziz Ahmed Abro & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
369 Const. P. 646/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Sumaira & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
370 2023 MLD 1131 Suit 1294/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S KARACHI CABLE SERVICES (PVT) LTD. & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 Yes Even if there was a jurisdictional error with regard to action initiated by PEMRA authority it had to be objected and/or resisted before the concerned authority whereas to my grasp, it is not a jurisdictional error Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
371 Adm. Suit 13/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. Agro Trade (Pvt) Ltd (Plaintiff) VS M.V POAVOSA WISDOM III & 3 Others (Defendant) S.B. Order 26-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
372 Const. P. 2639/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ali Hyder (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
373 2023 SBLR Sindh 263 Suit 2637/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Tayyaba Motors (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Regal Automobiles Industries & another. (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-NOV-22 Yes The only concern of the plaintiff is that at the relevant time no notification was issued, which could identify the establishment of Tribunal if it was operating and functioning at the relevant time under section 16 of ibid Act, when the suit was filed. This is not borne out of the pleadings as no such grounds have been raised at the time of invoking jurisdiction of this Court. It was nowhere alleged that since there is no notification with regard to notifying the tribunal or appointment of presiding officer, therefore, plaintiff was compelled to file this suit. In the absence of such pleadings, it cannot be presumed or assumed that this Court had to exercise the jurisdiction, which jurisdiction otherwise vests with the Tribunal Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
374 Const. P. 824/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Muhammad Qasim & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
375 2023 CLC 1361 Suit -775/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SYED FARRUKH GHANI (Plaintiff) VS BANK OF PUNJAB & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 23-JAN-23 Yes It cannot be a heady acceptance if a jurisdiction is conferred on a mere desire of plaintiff who claimed to have received information at Karachi where he resides without considering the actual adjudication at a place which is away from our jurisdiction. If this is accepted, then the jurisdiction of any trial court may also be altered if it could be established that he/she heard the decision somewhere else. There is a heavy counter admission by plaintiff i.e. his surrender before a jurisdiction beyond this court. The law of jurisdiction takes its own course and while the plaintiff surrendered before the enquiry committee which is admittedly beyond the territorial limits of this court, the follow up procedure concludes his dismissal at Lahore. If the court would accept the statement of plaintiff that he was residing at Karachi hence would determine the jurisdiction, it would negate the long standing principle and doctrine as recognized under section 16-20 CPC. It is the ultimate cause which gives birth to a jurisdiction under normal circumstances and that is dismissal from service at Lahore where he surrendered. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
376 Const. P. 558/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Delimitation Connected Matters 2022 Fahad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
377 Const. P. 628/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Sharmeen & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
378 Const. P. 1600/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Syed Ghulam Nabi Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
379 Const. P. 1948/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
380 Const. P. 2655/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Anwar Naeem Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive Officer (HESCO) & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
381 R.A (Civil Revision) 98/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Bahadur Khan Thr: LRs (Applicant) VS Haji Darya Khan Thr: LRs. (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-NOV-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
382 Judicial Companies Misc. 4/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 THE CHANCELLOR MASTERS & SCHOLARS AND ANOTHER (Applicant) VS N/A (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
383 Const. P. 4079/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shakeel Ahmed Kanasa (Petitioner) VS Federal Tax Ombudsman and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-MAR-23 Yes Petitioners have neither been served any notice intimating them with regard to the complaints against which the investigations were to be conducted nor have been given fair opportunity to respond to the accusations of alleged maladministration and corrupt practices. Furthermore, the Federal Tax Ombudsman is authorized to summon record under section 10(9) of Ordinance 2000 and no reasons have been provided as to why the powers conferred therein have not been exercised and resort has been made directly to inspection of the petitioners offices. Indeed there must be some refusal by the petitioners to comply with Section 10(9) of the ibid ordinance before measures such as inspections are resorted to and/or a case has to be made out to jump/short-circuit the mechanics. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
384 Const. P. 1553/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Meclay Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
385 Const. P. 1628/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Basit Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
386 Const. P. 7554/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Exide Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.L.A.792-K/2023 Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Exide Pakistan Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
387 Const. P. 2100/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mansoor Nasir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
388 Const. P. 1793/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ajay & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
389 Const. P. 2623/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Rafiq Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
390 Suit 2037/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Natasha Malik (Plaintiff) VS Naeem Malik & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-MAY-23 Yes As per Article 128 of the |Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 the only person competent to dispute the parentage of the plaintiff would be her putative father (and that too only if the father had refused to own the child from the outset). However, defendants No.1 and 2 contend that Article 128 is only applicable to cases where illegitimacy is being contended and not to cases of adoption. The approach of our superior courts in response to Article 128 covers both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
391 Const. P. 5704/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amjadullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Syed Muhammad Iqbal and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
392 Const. P. 84/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Syed Mustafa Hussain Bukhari (Petitioner) VS Asad Ullah Bachaio & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
393 Const. P. 7184/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sohail Nomani (Petitioner) VS Amjad Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
394 H.C.A 347/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MCB Bank Ltd (Appellant) VS Zahid Ali & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.4509/2023 MCB Bank Limited Karachi v. Zahid Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
395 Const. P. 349/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Mumtaz Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Faisal Ali Shaikh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan C.P.1187-K/2023 Mst.Mumtaz Shaikh v. Faisal Ali Shaikh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
396 H.C.A 5/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Delhi Mercantile Muslim Co-Op Housing Society Ltd. (Appellant) VS Searle Company Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
397 Const. P. 1410/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
398 H.C.A 409/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammed AnisUddin (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
399 Const. P. 4325/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
400 Const. P. 5830/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Sarfraz Hussain (thru Legal Heirs) (Petitioner) VS Nazir Ahmed (thru Legal Heirs) & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-DEC-23 No In case the respondents pleads that even otherwise, after giving effect of Section 15 of the Limitation Act, the execution is barred by time, the Court may consider it, and they (respondents) have all the rights to plead their case before the two forums below afresh. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
401 Const. P. 6821/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Securpring (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
402 Const. P. 1196/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Farhan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
403 H.C.A 33/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Province of Sindh (Appellant) VS Inquilab Matri & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
404 Const. P. 1435/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
405 Const. P. 7460/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
406 Const. P. 7463/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
407 Const. P. 435/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Munchi Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
408 I. A 47/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Sajid Nawaz Khan (Appellant) VS Muzammil Rao & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
409 Const. P. 4307/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
410 Const. P. 3341/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saeed uz Zaman Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
411 Const. P. 1000/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
412 H.C.A 34/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s. Terry World Textile (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
413 I. A 67/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Adil Atta Hussain (Appellant) VS M/S Standard Chasrtered Bank (Pak) Ltd & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
414 H.C.A 360/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nurul Aziz & others (Appellant) VS Mst. Naila Asif (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
415 H.C.A 288/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Sanawar Begum (Appellant) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
416 Const. P. 886/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D-887 of 2023 2023 M/s Faraz Brothers Builders & Developers (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
417 Const. P. 1182/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr. AIjaz Ali Unar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
418 Const. P. 4421/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mehboob Sher (Petitioner) VS Talha Naseem and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
419 I. A 61/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shad Jan (Appellant) VS Iqbal Usmani (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
420 I. A 91/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Rashid Noorani (Appellant) VS M/s. J.S Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
421 I. A 74/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Badiya Tariq and another (Appellant) VS United Bank Limited and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
422 Const. P. 3093/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shakirulddin & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
423 Const. P. 2196/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Deen Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1119-K/2023 Deen Muhammad v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary M/o Interior and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
424 H.C.A 311/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mohammad Hanif (Appellant) VS ORO Industries (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
425 H.C.A 220/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Anees Haider (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
426 Const. P. 3171/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Karim Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
427 2012 PLD Sindh 449, 2012 SBLR 1411 Suit 1512/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 MOBIN RAFIQUE & OTHER (Plaintiff) VS RASHID AHMED & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 26-JUN-12 Yes The reasons that I have highlighted the occasions and circumstances ibid where a Receiver could be appointed is because I have gone through the entire affidavit filed in support of the application for appointment of Receiver and in none of the paragraphs the apprehension that the property would be wasted or it is in danger of being wasted was shown. The affidavit discloses that both the business concerns were in control, custody and possession of the defendants No.1 to 3 since the death of father i.e. 2005. It is also mentioned that the profits and income received from these business concerns were being collected and consumed and retained by defendants No.1 to 3 without sharing the same with the plaintiffs or other legal heirs. It has also been disclosed that the defendants are trying to sell the property in question, of course they mean the movable property (as immovable property is on rent) and they urged that they are entitled for their share out of the business income. However, they have not disclosed a single ground whereby this Court could exercise and invoke powers to appoint Receiver. Admittedly the business was being run by defendants No.1, 2 and 3 since 2005 and for reasons mentioned above it is sufficient to hold that the solvent grounds which could attract the provisions of Order XL rule 1 CPC are not available though apparently it seems that the plaintiffs rights and interests as far as their share in the business is concerned is being denied but certainly this alone is not sufficient to invoke the powers under Order XL rule 1 CPC which is a very harsh remedy which is to be used sparingly. The plaintiffs here alleges only exclusion and not waste or malversation. Even apprehension of mismanagement or misappropriation alone would not be sufficient to call for appointment of a Receiver, which is not the case of the plaintiffs Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
428 2016 CLC Note 10 Suit 549/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 MOBEEN RAZA and another (Appellant) VS M/S. ALLOO & MINOCHER DINSHAW (Appellant) S.B. Judgement 09-DEC-14 Yes Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 42---Suit for negative declaration seeking only the disentitlement of defendants in suit property---Maintainability---Interpretation of S.42, Specific Relief Act, 1877---Plaintiff sought declaration to the effect that the defendants had no interest in the suit property and were not entitled to sell or dispose of, the same---Question before the High Court was whether plaintiffs could seek such negative declaration in relation to the disentitlement of the defendants without claiming in ownership , interest or legal character for themselves in relation to the suit property ---Held, that plaintiffs had not sought relief in respect of property in question for themselves, nor any legal character had been attributed to suit property, hence no entitlement in terms of S.42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 was available to the plaintiffs---Plaintiffs had sought declaration to the effect that defendants had no locus standi or right in relation to the suit property; however such prayer would not entitle the plaintiffs to file suit for declaration when they were not claiming any interest, title or legal character in the property, and especially when defendants had established their interest in the property by placing a registered sale deed---Suit for negative declaration was only maintainable in certain exceptional cases---When a plaintiff demonstrated some interest in the property to which some legal sanctity could be attached only then plaintiffs could seek some legal character in terms of S.42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877---Suit for declaration, in the present case, sought declaration to the disentitlement of the defendants, and was not maintainable---Suit was dismissed, accordingly. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
429 Cr.Misc. 198/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Shafi Muhammad Shar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
430 Civil Revision 69/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mevo Brohi (Applicant) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
431 Cr.Misc. 21/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Rehmatullah Leghari (Applicant) VS Arbelo Vighio and other (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
432 Cr.Bail 238/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Riaz Magsi (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-FEB-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
433 Suit 14401/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Shabana Yasmeen (Plaintiff) VS Defendant (Defendant) S.B. Order 26-JUN-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
434 Const. P. 892/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Muhammad Hassan Mashori (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Bakrani and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
435 Cr.Appeal 71/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2009 Ashique chandio & an ors. (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
436 Const. P. 87/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Dr Shakeela Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Senior Superintendent of Police Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
437 Const. P. 309/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst. Aisha Narejo and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Taoojadero and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
438 Civil Revision 45/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mahfooz Ali Rajput (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Nabi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
439 Const. P. 1040/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Haji Gulab Shar (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Geehalpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
440 Const. P. 115/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Lakhi Gate Shikarpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
441 Const. P. 107/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Ghulam Qadir Barejo (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Nasirabad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
442 Const. P. 554/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Peeral Chandio (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Mirokhan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
443 Civil Revision 317/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Jethanand (Applicant) VS Mumtaz Ali & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
444 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-21 No recruitment process of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 and their participation in SPSC. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
445 Const. P. 849/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nofil Nawaz Mulkana (Petitioner) VS Sana Maqbool & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-JUN-18 Yes The proceeding in the nature of summary trial does not mean that process of effecting service will only be a formality. It is but the initial pillar in the procedure to achieve disposal on merit after effecting service. The trial Court Judge should have made efforts and that should be seen to have been done by trial Court in effecting service though nothing is available on record as far as Bailiffs report of refusal is concerned. There is nothing as far as reasoning is concerned as to why service was not effected at the address of Copenhagen and why address of the attorney Umer Al-Hamidi was considered as lawful. What convinced the trial Court to conclude that summons of the instant suit were to be served upon alleged attorney is mystery. The process of substituted service is not to be taken lightly by the trial Court. It is to be exercised only in case when it is required i.e. where the Court is satisfied with the reasons to believe that the defendant is keeping out of way for the purpose of avoiding service or that for any other reason summons cannot be served in the ordinary way the Court shall order for service of summons by: (a) affixing a copy of the summons at some conspicuous part of the house, if any, in which the defendant is known to have last resided or carried on business or personally worked for gain; or (b) any electronic device of communication which may include telegram, telephone, photogram, telex, fax, radio and television or (c) urgent mail service or public courier services or (d) beat of drum in the locality where the defendant reside; or (e) publication in press; or (f) any other manner or mode as it may think fit; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
446 Const. P. 1384/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Arshad Pervez (Petitioner) VS Kashif Mohammad Baig (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.82-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Arshad Pervez and others,C.P.1099-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Arshad Pervez and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
447 Const. P. 1385/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Sohail Mohammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Kashif Mohammad Baig (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.83-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Sohail Muhammad Younus and others,C.P.1100-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Sohail Muhammad Younus and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
448 Const. P. 85/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 CH: MUHAMMAD SHAFIUDDIN (Petitioner) VS MUHAMMAD ATEEQUE & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-FEB-18 Yes Section 8 provides determination of rent when all four or any one of them may exist. At times it is a cumulative effect of all four ingredients that may be taken in to consideration. One factor out of four may negate or cut off the effect of the other factor and hence it is the respective burden which is supposed to be discharged by the parties for having cumulative effect. If a party relying on any of the four factors of having negative effect, does not discharge burden, it does not restrict Rent Controller to pass order in determining fair rent on the basis of evidence on available factors. Once a fair rent is determined it cannot be said that it cannot be re-determined again under section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, if the circumstances so warrants. There may or may not be fluctuation in the four ingredients after first determination under section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 and hence could also be invoked subsequently by the parties if the circumstances so required. However, once the fair rent is determined, the provisions of section 9 would then be applicable with its limitations i.e. the first increase over and above fair rent should not be before three years and that too may not be in excess to 10% per annum and the future rent was also subject to the provision of Section 9(2) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 and hence the provisions of section 9(2) with its limitation would apply to fair rent and was ordered accordingly by the Rent Controller. Rent Controller applied the provision as required under section 9 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.321-K/2018 Ch. Muhammad Shafiuddin (Decd) thr. his L.Rs v. Muhammad Ateeque and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
449 Const. P. 599/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Phullan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
450 Const. P. 551/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2009 Moulvi Shahzado Drho (Petitioner) VS District Nazim Sukkur & orsd (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
451 Const. P. 1316/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Zamir Hussain Mirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
452 Const. P. 1506/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Shahzaib Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Secretary Sindh Local Govt; & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
453 Civil Revision 25/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Muhammad Rafique & anor (Applicant) VS Syed Warand Ali Shah & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-FEB-19 Yes Mutation itself does not create a title and a person driving title thereunder had to prove that the same was lawfully entered and attested, thus, no presumption of correctness was attached to the mutation entries till they are proved satisfactorily and independently through cogent evidence. Any subsequent entry or title on the basis of such entry of 1971 thus would also fall along with original sin. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
454 Const. P. 999/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mst Lal Khatoon (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
455 Const. P. 7/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Rustam Ali Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
456 Const. P. 650/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2004 Yasmin Sharfuddin (Petitioner) VS Dr. Ehtesham Naseerul Haque & 3 Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-OCT-17 Yes A Power of Attorney generally delegates all such powers which are required to be done on behalf of principal and the contents of the Power of Attorney would be such that all such things, which claimed to have been done by attorney on the basis of the Power of Attorney, could be construed from the language and meaning of the contents of the powers, which were delegated through different paragraphs. However, it needs not to be an encyclopedia that even a minor and insignificant act in furtherance of a main object is to be incorporated in the body of the Power of Attorney. ----it is the prerogative of the landlord who discloses the suitability of the premises. A landlord cannot be compelled to occupy any other premises which in his (landlords) wisdom or desire may not be suitable. The prerogative or choice to select the premises for the use and occupation of the landlord or for the use and occupation of their children cannot be questioned by any reasonable hypothesis. Besides this, in the instant case the cross-examination insofar as personal requirement is concerned is absolutely silent and could not be shattered Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.721-K/2017 Mrs. Yasmin Sharafuddin v. Dr.Ehtesham Naseer-ul-Haque and otehrs Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
457 Const. P. 5188/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Miss Hina & others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio C.P.21-K/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Finance Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and another v. Miss. Hina Qureshi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after Summer vacation
458 Const. P. 2101/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Naveed Ahmed Mirbahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
459 Const. P. 743/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ali Sher Shanbani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
460 Const. P. 1600/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Syed Pir Shah (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
461 Const. P. 2134/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mumtaz Ali Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
462 Const. P. 2357/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Shoaib Ali Lashari (Petitioner) VS Mir Muhammad & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
463 Const. P. 3895/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Naseer Ahmed Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
464 Const. P. 1137/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Allah Dino (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
465 Const. P. 2624/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Syed Muhammad Ali Shah Bukhari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
466 Const. P. 352/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mst. Aisha Gul (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
467 Const. P. 393/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul Shakoor Memon (Petitioner) VS Mst Samreen D/O Gul Muhammad Solangi (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
468 Const. P. 385/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
469 Const. P. 1826/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Sarfraz Ali Bhutto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
470 Const. P. 3426/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Shamim Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Shoaib Ahmed and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1468-K/2018 Sahmim Ahmed v. Shoaib Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
471 Civil Revision 132/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Allah Wassayo Samejo (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
472 Const. P. 5243/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Sundheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
473 2021 CLC 1437 Const. P. 5890/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ashiq Hussain Chaudhary & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-NOV-20 Yes If at all any alteration is inevitable or the open spaces that vests with the Cantonment Board now is required, the powers and jurisdictions vests with the Board with whose consultation the desired object could be materialized and not otherwise. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain C.P.1026/2021 The Officer In-Charge Army Housing Directorate, Karachi v. The Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of Defense, Rawalpindi Cantt and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
474 Const. P. 2902/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Mukhtiar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
475 Const. P. 1132/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Sagheer Ahmed Ansari & Ors (Petitioner) VS Yar Mohammad & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
476 Const. P. 2171/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Ms.Sadaf Gul (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
477 Const. P. 3217/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Muhammad Osama Shafiq (Petitioner) VS PEMRA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
478 Const. P. 1796/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Waheed Brothers Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.400-K/2019 Muhammad Panah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Local Govt. Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
479 II.A. 115/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Appellant) VS M/s. Interbras Petrobras Comerico & Another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.493-K/2019 M/s Trading Corporation of Pakistan v. M/s Interbras Petrobras Comerico International S.A. Brazil thr. their attorney and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
480 Const. P. 46/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Dr: Ahmed Bux (Petitioner) VS Sikandar Ali and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
481 Criminal Appeal 146/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Manzoor ALi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
482 Civil Revision 108/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1999 Abdul Majid (Applicant) VS Dur Muhammad & ORs (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-FEB-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
483 Const. P. 1099/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Siddique An Others (Petitioner) VS Ali Ahmed And Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
484 Const. P. 217/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst Najeeta &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
485 Const. P. 155/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Tehreek e Labaik (Petitioner) VS D.C Hyd (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
486 Const. P. 5703/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amir Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
487 Conf.Case 14/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Fouji Imam Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
488 Const. P. 7031/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Anwar Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
489 Const. P. 2586/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Mustafa Haidermota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
490 Const. P. 5025/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shams Abbas Hasan Bilgrami (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
491 Const. P. 4444/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aziz Tabba Foundation (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
492 Const. P. 3262/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s M. Usman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
493 Const. P. 5325/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Popular Cement Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
494 Const. P. 4853/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Marcus Evans Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
495 Const. P. 3877/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Sai Enterprises (Petitioner) VS S.R.B and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
496 Const. P. 6094/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
497 Const. P. 5736/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Irfan Ghazi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
498 Const. P. 7355/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Kompass Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
499 Const. P. 4750/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Alpha Insurance Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
500 Const. P. 6127/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sixth Constructon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
501 Const. P. 4578/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dolmen City Rent (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
502 Const. P. 2365/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Goldway Hygiene Products (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
503 Const. P. 7553/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Rask International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
504 Const. P. 3492/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Naresh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
505 Const. P. 1600/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Ahmed Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
506 Const. P. 1074/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Parveen Ara (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Hanif & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-APR-21 Yes Evidence available does not fulfill the requirement of Section 15-A of the SRPO as it has to be proved independently that the premises was re-let. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to prove its contention through evidence that it was a misuse of section 15 of the SRPO whereby the eviction of the petitioner was acquired through a mala fide attempt. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.580-K/2021 Mst.Parveen Ara v. Muhammad Hanif & others,C.P.1475-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Amir Asim Steel Re-Rolling Mills (Pvt) Ltd. & others,C.A.47-K/2021 Mst.Parveen Ara v. Muhammad Hanif & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Pending Adjourned
507 Const. P. 4454/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sheikh Imran ul Haque (Petitioner) VS Addl: Commissioner I.R and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
508 2018 PLC Lab. 232 Const. P. 149/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 National Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Mst.Farida Begum & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-DEC-17 Yes Once an application under order I rule 10 CPC was filed, respondent No.3/Commissioner assumes the jurisdiction to pass order under the law. Any order that transgresses its authority and jurisdiction is then to be tested on the touchstone of principle whether a substantial relief likely to be granted to the respondent No.1, has been impaired. Not only the petitioner was allegedly deleted but at an interim stage declaration has been made that petitioner is not the employer which is beyond the principle laid down in the case of Fauji Fertilizer Company Ltd. v. National Industrial Relations Commission reported in 2013 SCMR 1253. So if its authority and jurisdiction is to be analyzed on such touchstone it looks transgressed. By scoring off petitioner from the pleading it exercised jurisdiction not vested in him as in trial the determination was yet to be made. Scoring of petitioner from trial before trial is an act exercised with material irregularity. Presiding Officer held security company responsible and swap them and the intention was reflected in the order, (one comes in and other goes out). Besides this, such an option of reviewing the order was attempted to be exercised when an application under order IX rule 9 read with section 151 CPC was filed to set aside order dated 14.05.2011 which also met its conclusive dismissal on 05.01.2012 and the matter thereafter was fixed for framing of issues. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
509 Const. P. 790/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zafar Ali Palejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-NOV-19 Yes in the absence of a challenge to the recommendation of DPC by any aggrieved person, we do not conceive it to be justified in withholding notification as to promotion of petitioner in pursuance of recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee. We, therefore, had allowed this petition vide short order dated 21.11.2019 on the strength of the recommendation of the Committee and subsequent approval by the Chairman. The respondents are thus directed to issue a notification in consequence of such recommendation Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
510 2018 CLC 1357 R.A (Civil Revision) 166/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Jacob (Applicant) VS English Biscuits Manufactures (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 12-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
511 Const. P. 180/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Nadeem ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Faisal & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
512 2020 SBLR Sindh 1735 Suit 1222/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Forte Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. (Defendant) S.B. Order 07-FEB-17 Yes -The contract in question contains specific terms in relation to any default of the plaintiff including but not limited to late delivery of the goods. It is also an admitted fact that on account of late deliveries of certain goods, in pursuance of such clauses relating to late deliveries the defendant No.1 had already deducted liquidated damages from the subject bills/invoice. Hence, once such late delivery charges have been recovered/deducted, the encashment of subject guarantee in relation to same issue is a debatable issue. It amounts to collecting liquidated damages twice over the same alleged default and can be termed as vexing the plaintiff twice which is also hit by Section 74 of the Contract Act. Therefore, any attempt to collect further amount on the basis of same default would tantamount to be in violation of Section 74 of the Contract Act which prima facie prohibits compensation/penalty in excess of any amount stipulated in the contract itself. --Insofar as second contention, which relates to complying with the terms and conditions of new obligations of the documents dated 09.10.2012 and performance guarantee dated 21.12.2010 is concerned, it only covers the obligation as contained in the purchase order dated 08.12.2010 and 13.12.2010 and any other subsequent amendment, novation, additional obligation, that may arise in relation to the project shall not be covered by the terms thereof. The ultimate paragraph of this performance guarantee is in support of above observation. Such recourse is deducible out of section 128 of the Contract Act, which allows the guarantee obligation to be limited by way of contract. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
513 Suit 378/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M/s. Emocon Engineering (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Exterran and another (Defendant) S.B. Order 25-JAN-16 Yes The nature and scope of Act XVII of 2011 is such that the discretion, as available in Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, is not available. A party to an arbitration agreement against whom legal proceedings have been brought and in respect of a matter which is covered by the arbitration agreement, may upon notice to the either party to the proceedings, apply to the Court in which the proceedings have been brought, to stay the proceedings insofar as the subject matter is concerned unless the arbitration agreement is claimed to be null and void or any part is incapable of being performed, which is not the case here as in terms of Para 27 of plaint the plaintiff himself seeks application of the subject agreement in letter and spirit, which includes the arbitration clause. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
514 Const. P. 3730/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mohsin Jameel & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
515 Suit 792/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 MRS.ATIYA SULTANA (Plaintiff) VS THE KESC E.C.S & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-15 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
516 2021 PLC (CS) 1304 H.C.A 108/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Professor Dr. Lubna Ansari Baig (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-JUL-21 Yes --we are only of the view that once an earlier injunctive order was passed, a follow up order to carry the real object of the earlier order should have been passed. Presumably, earlier order was passed after a tentative assessment of well-known principle of granting injunction. Learned Single Judge would have been empowered to revisit and decide the applications finally, based on three ingredients, referred above, but not in a cursory manner and that too after passing adverse remarks. --This selection of observation by the learned Single Judge has perhaps overlapped and overshadowed the earlier order and the mandate and without actually the applications being heard and decided. The cursory proceeding normally leads to miscarriage of justice and cumulative effect of the impugned order render it as confounded and in variance. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
517 2020 SBLR Sindh 239 Const. P. 569/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Shahzad Ali (Petitioner) VS Syed Abid Ali & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-NOV-17 Yes Hence the only presumption, deducible in absence of any contrary evidence is that it was executed and authenticated in presence of Notary Public who is one of the authority to authenticate the subject document i.e. Power of Attorney. -- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
518 Const. P. 6475/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Pharma Net (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
519 Const. P. 6920/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Print Textiles Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
520 2022 PTD 94 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 203/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s. Universal Enterprise (Applicant) VS The Customs Appellate Tribunal & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes The amount of remittance may not be of any importance as the actual evidence is invoice which is relied upon. Hence the price actually paid could very conveniently be determined on the basis of such documents and notwithstanding the insertion / amendment made in the year 2017 as far as the second proviso to Section 25A is concerned, it is the amount, which is actually paid or payable which is considered as customs value for the goods when sold for export to Pakistan. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author)
521 I.T.R.A 363/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) VS M/S ARSHAD AMJAD & ABID (PVT) LIMITED (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
522 Const. P. 6445/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Zeal Pak Cement Factory Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
523 Const. P. 6599/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 M/s Lucky Cement (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.21/2022 Lucky Cement Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Division, Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Ministry of Finance and Revenue, Islamabad and another,C.A.318/2022 Lucky Cement Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Division, Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Ministry of Finance and Revenue, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
524 Const. P. 2308/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 National Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.321-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. National Refinery Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
525 Const. P. 6964/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shah Murad Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
526 Const. P. 7123/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Rubicon Builders & Developrs (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
527 Const. P. 6889/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Tahir Engineers & Contractors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
528 Const. P. 6554/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sugrah Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
529 Const. P. 6794/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Noor Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
530 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 447/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS Fareed Ahmed Shager & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-21 Yes The initial burden is on the department, which has to be discharged in the light of registration book which carries all presumption to its genuineness and more important when copies of such documents were sent to customs department. In the absence of any record of the excise department at the time when the subject vehicle was transferred in favour of the respondents, no question arises out of the proceedings to cast any doubt over the bona fide transfer of the vehicle and hence no interference is required as far as impugned decision is concerned. The proposed questions, though not arises out of the Tribunals order, yet are deliberated upon to avoid any element of they (respondents) being condemned unheard Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
531 Const. P. 2111/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s J.R Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
532 2023 PTD 576 Const. P. 4729/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Wazir Ali Ind Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 Yes Since 2010, Commissioner entrusted with the mandate of calling the record as and when required. Now one thing is for sure that this "as and when required" is not meaningless as being consistently followed and maintained throughout. We now need to understand what could be the event or stage when this phrase may come into play and be given some meaning. Eventually when a Commissioner examines the return of a tax payer, he may have some queries which might be tempting to call record as he may not be able to reconcile and/or resolve them through return statement. Those queries must be understood and settled to the satisfaction of the commissioner before he could make up his mind further. Now the audit is nowhere in the scheme when such questions came for consideration after going through the returns while the Commissioner acts under 25(1) of Sales Tax Act, 1990. Surely the record may satisfy the curious mind but queries must be genuine at the time of calling the record which could not have been answered without going through the record required. Therefore, record calling could not be a roving exercise and cannot be a courtesy call either. The phrase "as and when required" had remained part of Section 25 throughout ever since it was introduced. It is not "as and when desired" but "as and when required". Therefore, the reasons in the shape of "mindful queries" must be in existence and disclosed before calling record for the fulfillment of requirement "as and when required". The requirements of 25(1) are neither unfettered nor are so liberal that a hunting expedition would commence. It is the periodical transfiguration of the provisions of Section 25 that led us believe that there has to be an event or occasion when the Commissioner required the record and documents maintained under this Act or any other Act. Even requiring the documents/record for satisfaction of queries must be revealed so that notice may not transform into a hunting time. However, if the mindful queries were not met, he may authorize an officer of the Inland Revenue, on the basis of record obtained under subsection (1) by him, to conduct audit. Now, if the officer of the Inland Revenue subordinate to the Commissioner is under the obligatory command of Commissioner to conduct audit then the Commissioner must disclose the discrepancies he found while forwarding record already obtained by him, for audit be conducted in pursuance of the queries of the Commissioner, which queries must see the daylight so that the officer of the Inland Revenue proceed accordingly. The officer of the Inland Revenue on his own without having knowledge of discrepancies, queries of the Commissioner, cannot start the proceedings of audit which has to be under the authorization. It would only be general audit but not as contemplated under section 25(1) which compelled the commissioner to call record. The authorization thus should contain the reasons and mindful queries required to be processed through the audit which he has passed on to designated officer. Thus, insofar as Section 25 is concerned, we would conclude that for purposes of Section 25(1) Commissioner must frame legitimate mindful queries to the knowledge of a taxpayer after going through the returns which must be either be satisfied after calling the record or otherwise. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.315-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Wazir Ali Industries Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
533 Const. P. 7064/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shah Transport Network (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
534 Const. P. 773/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Salman Naeem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
535 Const. P. 975/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Muhammad Iqbal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Azhar Abbas Butt & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
536 Const. P. 6403/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
537 Const. P. 842/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zoom Marketing Oil Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.5348/2021 Zoom Marketing Oils Pvt Limited Lahore v. The Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Karachi and others,C.A.1617/2021 Zoom Marketing Oils Pvt Limited Lahore v. The Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relied,Pending
538 2022 PTD 984, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1536 Const. P. 5791/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Zona Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-JAN-22 Yes There is no space of interpretation provided by petitioners in relation of Foreign Exchange Manual read with Section 154 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Similarly, there is no applicability of extra territorial operation for giving effect to Article 141 of the Constitution. Hence we conclude accordingly. The doctrine of occupied field would also not come into play as we are of the view that Entry 49 of Federal Legislative List, as structured after 18th Amendment, empowers the province to legislate on the subject under consideration. The legislative powers defined under Articles141, 142 and 143 of the Constitution have not been violated while encompassing services rendered by indenters to be within the frame of SSTA 2011 and find its place within exclusion defined in Entry 49 of Federal Legislative List of Fourth Schedule of Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.917/2022 Zona Pakistan (Private) Limited Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Secretary, Karachi and others,C.A.4024/2022 Zona Pakistan (Private) Limited Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted, CMA Notice, Relist with connected appeals after vacations at Islamabad,Disposed Disposed of
539 Const. P. 7225/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sadruddin Gilani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
540 Const. P. 6519/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shad & Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
541 2022 PTD 1444 Const. P. 310/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Al Tariq Construction (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
542 Const. P. 6294/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naveena Steel Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
543 Const. P. 2411/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Puma Energy Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.214-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Puma Engery Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
544 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 38/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Director General Customs Valuation (Applicant) VS M/s. Indus Trading Co. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
545 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 215/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Suleman Sons, Karachi (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
546 Const. P. 6557/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Saleem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS VIIth Sr. Civil Judge Karachi (Central) & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
547 Const. P. 3827/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Asif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
548 Const. P. 892/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Kashif Keerio (Petitioner) VS Dr. Khushbo & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
549 Const. P. 4882/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Bilal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JUL-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
550 Const. P. 663/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abrar Hussain Danish S/o Mukhtar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst. Eram Maqbool and another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 No In view of the examination-in-chief recorded by the trial Court on oath there was no substantial denial of the dowry articles and its value by the petitioner. The findings of the appellate Court as far as factual assertions are concerned have reached conclusion therefore, in terms of Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan such conclusion cannot be interfered under Article 199 of the Constitution and constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. No case for interference is made out. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
551 Const. P. 2614/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Filters Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
552 Const. P. 3676/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Asad Trading (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
553 II.A. 23/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Ms. Al Fiza Glass Tower (Appellant) VS Mst. Humera Mateen Mateen (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
554 H.C.A 75/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Zia ul Haq (Appellant) VS Alexis Hague Malik & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
555 Const. P. 4566/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Akbar Ali (Petitioner) VS Director Land Management KDA & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
556 R.A (Civil Revision) 11/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Military Estate Officer & others (Applicant) VS Karim Bux and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
557 R.A (Civil Revision) 237/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Muhammad Yousuf & Others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Usman & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
558 Suit.B 51/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sindh Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS M/s Pak Ethanol (Pvt) Limited & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 11-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
559 Suit 21/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Jamshed Lodhi (Plaintiff) VS Amir Hamayun (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
560 2012 SBLR Sindh 1407 Cr.Bail 629/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Khaista Meer & Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-JUL-12 Yes "Pakistan Penal Code, 1860---Sections,. 34, 392 & 397-- Contradiction in statementFurther Inquiry " Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
561 R.A (Civil Revision) 55/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Abdul Jabbar Ggoto & another (Applicant) VS Rehmat Ali Arain & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 22-MAY-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
562 R.A (Civil Revision) 78/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2004 Federation of Pakistan and others (Applicant) VS Devri Sahib of Satramdass of Raharki (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-MAY-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
563 Civil Revision 78/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Teekchand S/O Shewa Ram (Applicant) VS Ahmed Hussain & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
564 2015 YLR 2141 Suit 128/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Bank Alfalah Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Neu Multiplex & Entertainment Square Co. (Pvt) Ltd (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 14-JUL-14 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
565 Const. P. 4814/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhamnad Aneees Iqbal Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
566 Suit 683/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mrs. Yasmeen (Plaintiff) VS Rovina Kaiser (Defendant) S.B. Order 15-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
567 Const. P. 2203/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sheraz Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
568 Cr.Bail 1001/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ABDUL HAKEEM CHISHTI S/O MIAN GHULAM FAREED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
569 Const. P. 223/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 YOUNUS MASIH (Petitioner) VS The Province Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
570 Const. P. 1950/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Yahya & Anothers (Petitioner) VS Govt of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-OCT-20 Yes Service Matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
571 Const. P. 1109/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Salamat Ali (Petitioner) VS Learned 2nd Family Judge Badin & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
572 Const. P. 1626/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
573 Judicial Companies Misc. 3/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ali Husain Rajabali Limited (Applicant) VS Security & Exchange Commissioner of Pakistan (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-JAN-22 Yes The company claimed to have been authorized under Article 6.4 of its Articles of Association to pass special resolution in this regard which it did subject to confirmation of this Court, as required under section 89 of Companies Act, 2017. The Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) was carried out on 30.01.2020 after issuance of notices dated January 8, 2020 and on the recommendation of the Board of Directors the resolution was passed on 08.01.2020. The Board unanimously through a special resolution passed on 30.06.2020 in terms of Section 89 of the Companies Act, 2017 resolved that the paid up share capital of the company be reduced in terms of the above. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
574 Const. P. 4687/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Ayoub Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
575 Const. P. 1976/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Liaquat Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
576 Const. P. 3359/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saad Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
577 Suit 210/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Yasmeen Mirza & another. (Plaintiff) VS Batool Amir Ali & another. (Defendant) S.B. Order 07-MAR-22 Yes The proposed compromise is absolutely contrary to the rights of minor. They should have disclosed all such facts in suit as well as in the application and it would be up to Court either to release share of the minor to Guardian Ad Litem or to retain it under a deposit scheme, with the Nazir of this Court. However entire plaint and these applications are silent in respect of share of the minor. I would take it as if minor is being deprived of her lawful share deliberately. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
578 2013 MLD 584 Suit 729/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 ABDUL WADOOD (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 01-OCT-12 Yes (a) Malicious prosecution--- ----Suit for malicious prosecution, recovery of damages and compensation---F.I.R. was registered by defendants against the plaintiffs---Trial Court acquitted the plaintiffs in connection with the F.I.R. under S. 245(1), Cr.P.C on the basis that prosecution had failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt---Plaintiffs instituted present suit with the contention that they had been maliciously prosecuted by the defendants by registration of an F.I.R.---Validity---Plaintiffs were acquitted by the Trial Court on account of the fact that prosecution had failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt---Judgment of Trial Court was silent with regard to the "malice" of the defendants and also with regard to the "falsehood" of the F.I.R.---Plaintiffs had failed to establish that there was "no reasonable and probable cause" for their prosecution---Plaintiffs had also not proved claimed special or general damages----Simple affidavit in evidence had been filed by plaintiffs without support of any documentary evidence claiming professional fee, travelling charges, business loss, mental torture/discomfort, damages on account of loss of reputation and defamation in public---Suit for malicious prosecution was dismissed accordingly. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
579 Const. P. 1539/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rana Jaweed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
580 Const. P. 177/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sardar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
581 Const. P. 6615/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Karimi Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
582 2023 PLD Sindh 400, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1938 H.C.A 192/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Aqeel & Others (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-JUN-22 Yes -----Learned Division Bench on the apprehension of the appellants and the counsel representing Board of Revenue, Government of Sindh that the private respondents will create third party interest as the construction was being raised regularly, granted an interim order that no further third party interest shall be created, however, nowhere the order suggests that the powers of learned Single Judge to pass any other injunctive order that may require in the interest of justice before or at the time of disposal of the injunction application, were also curtailed. This aspect of the argument of appellants cannot be termed as ratio of judgment. ------If the learned Single Judge was empowered to pass an order while deciding the injunction application finally, then the said judge equally enjoys the powers to pass interim or ad interim orders of the restraining nature, on the tentative assessment of claims, keeping the interest of the parties and to save interest of the litigants involved. Discretionary powers of the court are wide enough to foster the interest of justice and equity, as it demands. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
583 I. A 61/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Anwar (Appellant) VS Haji Hamza Khan Jamali & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
584 Const. P. 149/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Shrimati Shela (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
585 Const. P. 775/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Abdul Hameed & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
586 Const. P. 97/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
587 Const. P. 3289/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Manzoor Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
588 J.M -188/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Mehfooz Ali Hashmi (Applicant) VS Khurshid ul Hannan & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
589 Const. P. 710/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Nadir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiakar R.Hyderbad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
590 2023 CLD 125, 2023 SBLR Sindh 444 Suit 1225/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Pakistan Beverage limited (Plaintiff) VS State Bank of Pakistan & another (Defendant) S.B. Order 12-OCT-22 Yes No concluded terms of remittance via Letter of Credit were concluded prior to the cut-of date of 07.04.2022 and hence there is no retrospective applicability of Circular dated 07.04.2022 to the contract between supplier and plaintiff and such restrictions, as notified in the impugned circular, shall apply to the case in hand Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
591 Const. P. 1673/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Shahfique Ahmed Arain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
592 Const. P. 3853/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 PTCL (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUN-22 Yes whether learned Member NIRC enjoy the jurisdiction to issue contempt notices Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
593 H.C.A 57/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Askari Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
594 Const. P. 7333/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Tasveer Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
595 Const. P. 1758/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Taimoor Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
596 2023 PTD 908 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 136/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. OBS Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) VS The Customs Appellate Tribunal & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAR-23 Yes Since the jurisdiction of this Court under section 196 of Customs Act, 1969 is limited to the extent of question of law, which we do not see arising out of the impugned judgment, specially in terms of two questions put forth by the applicant for determination of this Court and on the basis of which this Reference was admitted for hearing, this Special Customs Reference Application is dismissed and the two questions, which are not based on law but on facts and in terms of the conclusion are decided already by the Tribunal, are decided accordingly against the applicant and in favour of the respondents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
597 Const. P. 3293/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Shafi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
598 Const. P. 2948/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Asif Jamali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
599 Const. P. 1369/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
600 Const. P. 2459/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Irfan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
601 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1039/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. Jalal Bros, Karachi (Applicant) VS The Principal Appraiser (Group-III), Kar & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.2679/2023 Jalal Bors, Karachi v. The Principal Appraiser (Group-III), Model Customs Collectorate of Appraisement (PMBQ), Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
602 Const. P. 2144/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mi Tingbin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
603 Const. P. 3213/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mohabbat Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1260-K/2023 Mohbat Ali v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Works and Services and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
604 Const. P. 4028/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aslam Assi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
605 Const. P. 6813/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S Maskatiya Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
606 H.C.A 324/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Marine Resorts (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Ghayas Uzzaman Siddiqui (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
607 H.C.A 74/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Standard Chartered Bank (Pak) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Mst. Fatima Ehsan Al Ghori & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-23 Yes The appellant perhaps on their own obtained expert opinion on the basis of the photocopies which could not be considered at all on several counts. Firstly, it was done at their own and whatever material provided to the alleged expert is not known either to the respondent or to the Court. Secondly, undisputedly the report was based on the photocopy of a material document which is seriously disputed and was never produced throughout the proceedings and any forensic report of an expert based on photocopy, that too obtained unilaterally, cannot be relied upon and would be gross miscarriage of justice, if that is considered. Who acknowledged those bearer certificates is also a mystery and where and how such certificates were encashed (although were bearer) is also an untraced history and the appellant negligently avoided to lead evidence. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
608 Const. P. 4197/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Sher Bacha (Petitioner) VS VIIth A.D.J East and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
609 Const. P. 2797/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mir AKbar Askani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
610 H.C.A 379/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Town Municipal Corporation, Gadap Town (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
611 Const. P. 1860/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 M/S Al-Rehman Medical Store (Petitioner) VS HBL and an Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
612 H.C.A 14/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Province of Sindh and Others (Appellant) VS Aziz Khalid and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
613 Const. P. 4326/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
614 Const. P. 5166/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Amin Chapal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
615 Const. P. 6819/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Hoora Pharma (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
616 Const. P. 46/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Hassan Hoth (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Tayab & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
617 H.C.A 224/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Khursheed Begum & others (Appellant) VS Muhammad Iqbal & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JAN-24 Yes The rights of the legal heirs to intervene in terms of Order XXI Rule 89 and 90 CPC (though both rules are separate in nature), to be exercised within 30 days??? time of the acceptance of offer, as sale certificate was also ordered to be issued Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
618 H.C.A 393/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. Central Government E.C.H.S.Ltd (Appellant) VS Muhammad Izhar ul Hassan Haidery & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
619 H.C.A 455/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Waseem Ahmed (Appellant) VS Mst. Ayesha Fatima Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
620 H.C.A 80/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Garibsons (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) VS Faran Sugar Mills & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
621 H.C.A 92/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Hussain Bux Soomro (Appellant) VS Atta Muhammad Soomro (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
622 H.C.A 103/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Creek Marina Pvt.,Ltd., (Appellant) VS Muhammad Zakir Khan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
623 Const. P. 2597/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ashique Ali (Petitioner) VS Chanellor,Qaide Awan University & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
624 Spl.H.C.A 153/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Fateh Textile Mills Pvt Ltd & Others (Appellant) VS Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-JAN-24 Yes It seems that while the claim of the bank is being multiplied continuously with the passage of time, whereas, the value of the property as determined in the year 2016 was fixed to be set off against current exaggerated claim of Bank. This is no justification. No one should suffer on account of court???s error whether it is a borrower or the bank. If at all the claim is to be set off, it should be set off in terms of the present market value and not on the basis of value of 2016 against claim of bank, as exist now. Six years have been passed and the properties must have been multiplied manifolds, which was not accounted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
625 Const. P. 5811/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Rehan Mansoor (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
626 H.C.A 63/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s EFU Life Assurance Limited (Appellant) VS Mst. Amber Kazim (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
627 Const. P. 622/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Naseer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mrs. Riyasat Begum and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
628 Const. P. 6664/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ghulam Ali (Deceased) and Ors (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Nabi (Deceased) & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
629 H.C.A 52/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Gohar Yaqoob Khan through attorney Ghulam Qadir (Appellant) VS Abdul Rasheed Memon and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
630 H.C.A 391/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue MTO (Appellant) VS J.S Global Capital Ltd (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
631 H.C.A 342/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Amir Ahmed Sethi & Others (Appellant) VS Aftab Ahmed Sethi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
632 Const. P. 652/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Aftab Sattar Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
633 I. A 53/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Abdul Wali (Appellant) VS Shahid Ghani & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
634 I. A 11/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Zafar Hussain (Appellant) VS Karim Bakhsh & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
635 Const. P. 922/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Shahabuddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
636 H.C.A 231/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Nasir Zahoor through Attorney (Appellant) VS Shakeel Raza Khan & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
637 I. A 42/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Niaz Yousuf (Appellant) VS Jehantab s/o Jahangir Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
638 Const. P. 1875/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Aslam & Another (Petitioner) VS P.o Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
639 I. A 78/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: I.A D 79/2021 2021 M/S Qalandri Filling & CNG Station (Appellant) VS The Manager SME Leasing Ltd (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan C.P.1277-K/2023 M/s. Qalandri Filling & CNG Station v. The Manager S.M.E. Leasing Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
640 I. A 5/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Faheem Hussain Zaidi (Appellant) VS Saeed & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
641 Const. P. 7783/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Shama Aslam (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
642 Const. P. 3573/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Qadir Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Ld. Anti-Encroachment Tribunal MPK & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
643 I. A 12/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Atif Ikram (Appellant) VS Hafiz Wali ur Rehman & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
644 Const. P. 350/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.Ps No.S-351, 352, 353, 354, 355 and 356 of 2023 2023 Ayazuddin (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Iqbal & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
645 H.C.A 271/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Farzana Arshad & Another (Appellant) VS Mst. Shazia Kamran & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
646 Const. P. 1054/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Ghulam Sarwar Kanasiro and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Hyderi Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
647 Const. P. 13/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Allah Noor and another (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
648 Cr.Bail 309/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Abdul Haque Chawro (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 Yes It appears that the entry allegedly referred pertains to the year 2003, whereas the FIR was lodged in the year 2012, thus there is inordinate delay of nine years. Although the entry pertains to the year 2003, however, it is yet to be ascertained as to whether such entry was on account of the fraudulent act of the applicant who was neither posted nor claimed to have been acted and for that how the applicant could be made responsible. All that has been pointed out is that the sale certificate on the basis of such entry was made, which per learned State Counsel was bogus entry and have bogus sale certificate. It is also yet to be determined as to whether this forged entry was inserted in the record of rights during his tenure or prior to him. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
649 Const. P. 105/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Fozia Parveen Siyal (Petitioner) VS The SHO PS B Section Shahdadkot and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
650 Const. P. 73/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst: Bilqees & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
651 Cr.Bail 443/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Bashir Muhammadani (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 Yes It is matter of fact that the present applicant Bashir Muhammadani though has been named in the FIR but no specific role is alleged against him. Neither the offence such as of instigation or prompting the main accused Bugho was attributed to the applicant. The role of other main accused is totally different from the role of the present applicant. Consequently, I admit the applicant on bail subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.250,000/- (Rupees two hundred fifty thousands only) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
652 Cr.Rev 57/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Paltoo Khan Rajput (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
653 Const. P. 991/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Sanjesh Kumar Panjwani (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Gaheja and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
654 Const. P. 1010/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Shoukat Ali Zardari (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
655 Cr.Bail 413/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Ghulam Qadir Umrani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 Yes It appears that the present application is only confined to the crime under Section 9(c) of C.N.S. Act. I have very minutely and carefully perused the record and the alleged recovery of 1900 grams Charas and it is noted that no private mashirs were associated. It is also inconceivable to learn that on spy information the applicant was found roaming around the place of incident alongwith weapon and charas. It is clearly a case of further enquiry. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
656 Const. P. 31/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Rani Panhwar (Petitioner) VS The SHO PS KN Shah and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
657 2014 SBLR Sindh 416 Const. P. 2205/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Abdul Razzak (Petitioner) VS Election Commissiner of pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-MAY-13 Yes Jamate-Islami, under whose banner the petitioner has participated and contested the election, has boycotted the election and such fact via speech was covered by electronic media when the leaders of the said political party expressed their views. In the light of such boycott as the petitioner was contesting as a candidate for Jamat-e-Islami he cannot said to be an aggrieved person. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
658 Const. P. 36/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Allah Jurio Lashari (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Warah and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
659 Const. P. 729/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2010 Imtiaz Ali Sand (Petitioner) VS Yousif Jamali and ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
660 Cr.Bail 292/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Imdad Ali Shar and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 Yes It appears that in the FIR categorical allegations were raised against the two applicants. It was categorically mentioned in the FIR that they were brought in the police mobile at Police Station Dakhan where cash was taken from them. It was further mentioned in the FIR that on cries of Shabir Malangi he was beaten by the SHO Imdad Shar. Despite asking for mercy the applicants did not allow them to go they were beaten mercilessly ultimately, in the morning both the applicants left the Police Station by abusing that they have taught lesson for extending threats. They also did not return the amount that was taken by the applicants. It is alleged that they went to DSP as well as to Police Station New Fojdari for appropriate action however, all in vain and ultimately FIR was registered under the orders of the District & Sessions Judge, Shikarpur. The document which is a root cause in deciding the instant bail application is a final medicolegal certificate issued on 23.4.2012 in terms whereof Alif Khan son of Ali Bux Khrose the complainant, shown that in terms of X-Ray of left foot, fractures were seen in first and second metatarsal bones with soft tissue swelling and dislocation of calcanium. The injury No.1 opined by the doctor is Jurh Ghayr Jaifah Hashima caused by hard blunt substance (history of violence) . Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
661 Cr.Misc. 210/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Akhtiar Shaikh (Applicant) VS SHO.P.S.Ghouspur & an other (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
662 Cr.Tran 11/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 The State (Applicant) VS Sain Bux Nindwani (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
663 Cr.Bail 62/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Riaz u Rehman Memon (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
664 Const. P. 895/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Allahdad Abro (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Sharif Kharos District Shikarpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
665 Cr.Bail 546/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Muhammad Usman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-JUL-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
666 Const. P. 6445/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Al Huda Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
667 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-21 Yes recruitment process of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 and their participation in SPSC. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
668 Const. P. 1123/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shaikh Sultan Ahmed S/o Abdul Khalique (Petitioner) VS Iftikharuddin Paracha & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.706-K/2018 Sh. Sultan Ahmed v. Itfikharuddin Paracha and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution as well as on merit.
669 Const. P. 1679/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mrs. Tahmina Amir Khumbati & Another (Petitioner) VS Akbar Ali & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.875-K/2018 Mrs: Tehmina Amir Khambati and another v. Akbar Ali (decd) thr. his L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
670 Const. P. 1429/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Shahnawaz Dehraj (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-APR-19 Yes In defence, all that has been argued was that his father was only a covering candidate and has not secured even a single vote as the candidature was withdrawn. This is no reason to defend above misconduct and misuse of authority that since he was only a covering candidate and has not secured even a single vote, therefore, a sympathetic view should be taken against him. Success of a candidate to whom the incumbent Chairman was supporting is not a condition precedent as far as violation or misuse of office or authority is concerned. It is the active participation, influence and publicity which activated the authority concerned to remind him of his duty which ultimately ended up as a notification, whereby the petitioner was rescinded. There was no material in defence available nor even pleaded. He admitted his presence at the time of submitting nomination papers. He admitted his presence at some of the occasions where the candidate delivered speeches in a corner meeting and also his photographs in huge panaflex, signboards, hoardings, etc. and the only reason of his availability and pictures, panaflex, hoardings and publicity boards was to influence public at large and misuse of his office. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
671 2019 CLC 657 Const. P. 704/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 ANTHONY D SILVA (Petitioner) VS SAFRAZ ALI (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.40-K/2018 Anthony D'Silva v. Sarfraz Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
672 Const. P. 1992/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mujeeb ur Rehman and others (Petitioner) VS S.M Javaid Ahmed and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.602-K/2017 Mujeeb-ur-Rehman and others v. S.M. Javaid Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed - 3 Months time allowed.
673 Const. P. 2084/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Imran S/o Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Court of IVth Rent Controller Khi South & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 17-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.627-K/2018 Karachi High School owned & operated by the Civil Lines Educational Society thr. Director and another v. Muhammad Imran Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
674 Const. P. 1974/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Nadeem Ahmed Jatt (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
675 Const. P. 593/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Christion construction the Mega Structure (Petitioner) VS DCO Admin Sukkur and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
676 2020 SBLR Sindh 232 Const. P. 233/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Mst. Fozia Aqeel Zaheer Lari and Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-JAN-18 Yes The personal bona fide need of the landlord/landlady is measured on the basis of a gauge which is dependent upon consistent and conscious inspiring evidence and the existence of such evidence provides presumption as to existence of genuineness unless evidence contrary to such bona fide requirement is available. The touchstone provided by the Honble Supreme Court in such circumstances is that the landlord/landlady should be expressive as to the insufficiency of space already in possession. She may have obtained possession of any adjacent premises under section 14 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 but bona fide requirement of subject shop is to be determined on the basis of available evidence. The bona fide requirement also get disturbed or shaken when the landlady was found to have let out other premises or found to have handed over possession of the premises, which was the subject matter of connected rent application, wherein the very premises required for personal need (as could be ascertained from evidence) was handed over to other tenant irrespective of the fact if it was acquired under 14 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.104-K/2018 Mst: Fozia Aqeel Zaheer Lari v. Muhammad Aslam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
677 Const. P. 2414/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Ayaz Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
678 E.P 21/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Irfan Ahmed Khan Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Abid Hussain Bhayo & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-19 Yes I would take into consideration is the service to be effected upon respondents before or at the time of presenting the petition. This petition was sent through courier on 19.09.2018 at 09:54 p.m. The receipts are available in the miscellaneous file, which is a part of the main file. The courier was sent to this Tribunal and all other contesting respondents including the returned candidate. No doubt, in Section 143(3) of the Elections Act, 2017, the intention of the legislature is clear as it talks about petitioner to serve a copy of the petition along with annexures to the respondents, however, the record reveals that it was sent to the Tribunal as well as to the contesting respondents at the same time. It was received by the Tribunal at 12:00 noon on 22.09.2018. The agent / TCS courier may have consumed time in preparing different receipts and for that reason, different time is disclosed in the receipts but for all intent and purposes, it was done at the same time. The Tribunal was shown to have delivered this petition, as stated above, on 22.09.2018 at 12:00 noon, whereas, other for other consignees, the date and time of delivery is not disclosed. Although, the presumption is only attached to the registered post in terms of Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, but in view of the above facts and circumstances, it would amount to stretching it too far in case it is presumed that the notices of the petition were not delivered or served presumably at the same time when this Tribunal received the memo of petition along with annexures. It may also be noted that 20th and 21st of September were declared as public holidays being 9th and 10th of Moharram-ul-Haram. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
679 2020 CLC 92 E.P 7/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Muzaffar Ali Brohi (Petitioner) VS Meer Nadir Ali Magsi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes The question now which remains for resolution is whether the omission on part of the Oath Commissioner in mentioning, in the attestation of verification or the affidavit, if the oath had been administered to the appellant/deponent, shall have the effect of invalidating the election petition. As regards the above, suffice it to say that according to the provisions of Article 129, illustration (e) of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, there is presumption of correctness attached to an official act and it could not be controverted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the oath commissioner who is appointed by the respective High Courts under the law shall be performing the official acts for which he was appointed. However, he has stressed that the administration of oath before attestation by the Oath Commissioner should not be presumed in this case rather should reflect from the contents of attestation. We have applied our mind to this aspect of the matter and hold that in order to meet the real object and the spirit of the election laws which require verification on oath, in an ideal situation, the Oath Commissioner at the time of verification of the petition etc. and also the affidavit, must record and endorse verification/attestation that the oath has been actually, physically and duly administered to the election petitioner/deponent. But as the law has not been very clear till now, we should resort to the principle of presumption stipulated by Article 129(e) ibid in this case for avoiding the knock out of the petition for an omission and lapse on part of the Oath Commissioner. But for the future we hold that where the election petition or the affidavit is sought to be attested by the Oath Commissioner, the election petitioner shall insist and shall ensure that the requisite endorsement about the administration of oath is made, otherwise the election petition/affidavit shall not be considered to have been attested on oath and thus the election petition shall be liable to be, inter alia, dismissed on the above score. We consciously and deliberately neither apply this rule to the instant case nor any other matter pending at any forum (election tribunal or in appeals). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
680 2024 CLC 18 Suit 2/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ali Mushtaq & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others.. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 19-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
681 Const. P. 1941/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Baqir Ali Malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
682 Const. P. 203/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Sadam Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
683 Const. P. 458/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Muzafar Ali Seelro (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
684 Const. P. 2303/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Abdul Fatah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
685 Const. P. 1504/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Qasim Ali Mahar (Petitioner) VS Govt; Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
686 Const. P. 1062/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Muhammad Khan Rind (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
687 Const. P. 162/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Hussain Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio C.P.1060-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Khalid S Tirmizy Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
688 Const. P. 2870/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Mushtaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mumtaz Ahmed and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-18 Yes The grounds assigned by the appellate Court while allowing the application under Order VII Rule 11 does not germane to the requirement for rejecting of plaint under Order VII Rule 11. This is no ground that the petitioner was not in possession of the suit property since last so many years. It is also immaterial that the father has not challenged the title of his own son / sons during his lifetime. This is not disputed that the property was purchased at the time when these claimants from whom respondent No.14 has acquired the property now were only minors. It is also not denied that there is no such specific denial as far as alleged rights of the petitioner are concerned as merely in possession of the suit property does not mean that the rights of the petitioner were also denied. At the most the right of the petitioner could be said to have been denied prima facie, when an attempt was made to execute the sale deed in favour of respondent No.14 Mst. Hina Perveen which was the right accrued to the petitioner to file a suit to seek declaration as made in the plaint, hence this is a case of conflicting findings of two courts below. The reasoning and findings assigned by the appellate Court insofar as rejection of plaint is concerned, is not sustainable under the law. The appellate Courts order is set aside, however, this being a mixed question of law and fact, trial Court is directed to frame issues amongst others and this being a preliminary issue, parties be directed to record evidence on this issue as well as on other issues as and when framed by the trial Court, however, since the matter is pending for quite some time, we expect that the trial Court shall conclude the trial and pronounce the judgment preferably in four (04) months with compliance report to Additional Registrar of this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
689 Const. P. 5009/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Nadeem Ahmed Sandilo (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
690 Const. P. 404/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul Aziz Memon (Petitioner) VS Additional District Judge -11, Sukur & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
691 Const. P. 146/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Secretary Health & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
692 Const. P. 1248/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abid Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary govt of sindh secretary khi & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
693 II.A. 46/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Muhammad Aqil (Appellant) VS Muhammad Amir & Another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-MAY-18 Yes The newly developed question in these proceedings while the instant appeal was pending adjudication is the alienation of the property by respondents No.1 and 2 to respondent No.3. It is claimed to have changed hands and respondent No.3 claimed to have acquired rights in the property and very ably represented by the same counsel who represents the respondents No.1 and 2. Its alienation was effected while the interim order was operating. Additionally Mr. Abrar argued issue of lis pendens. Admittedly the notice under section 18 of the Registration Act in terms of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act was not issued. The question of lis pendens would take its effect when proceedings would be initiated in terms of section 18 of the Registration Act, 1908 for its effectiveness and cure as required in terms of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.975/2018 Syed Muhammad Sami-ud-Din v. Muhammad Aqil & others,C.A.976/2018 Muhammad Amir & another v. Muhammad Aqil & another,C.A.32-K/2018 Muhammad Aqil v. Muhammad Amir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending ,Disposed Dismissed
694 Const. P. 1734/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Shahryar Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
695 2020 CLC 1173 H.C.A 381/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Jamil (Appellant) VS Mst. Waheeda Aslam & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-JUL-19 Yes It is plaintiff (respondent No.1) who has come for execution of decree of money. Now money decree was matured only on account of her relinquishment of share in the immovable property being auctioned. Had she not relinquished her share in the property, her money decree would not have been passed. The property which she relinquished was auctioned for her money decree Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.527-K/2019 Mst: Waheeda Aslam and others v. Muhammad Jamil and others,C.P.592-K/2019 Ali Sufyan and another v. Muhammad Jamil and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
696 Const. P. 110/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mir Muhammad and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
697 2020 PTD 1952 Const. P. 4867/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Qasim International Container Terminal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JAN-20 Yes The main object of the Customs Act, 1969 is to make it expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to levy and collection of customs duties, fee and service charges and to provide for other allied matters. So it does not matter that the amending provisions do not itself qualify as one imposing duties and taxes etc. All other ancillary and allied provisions in the Customs Act are meant to facilitate the officials to carry out their main objective and mandate and that is the collection of duties and taxes by applying law. Customs Act is nothing but a fiscal Statute meant to extract customs duties and other taxes. A simple reading of Article 73(2) (a to g), may distract the ideal conclusion but it is to be seen that these very amendments are inserted in a fiscal statute, the main object of which is to extract duties, taxes etc. These amendments are thus nothing but to toe and facilitate the main object of the statute and hence it is ancillary and incidental to main object of imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax which they would ultimately perform while performing their duties within the premises of these private port/terminal operators to whom licenses were issued. Each statute carry different mechanics to assign a varying meaning of the "same word". The meaning of same word may vary from one legislation to another and it is the Statute and the very provision itself that would determine as to which varying definition would come into play to carry the object of such legislation. In order to find intent of word in any provision of statute, it is always wise or logical to discover individual meaning of a solitary word first, however at times it is to be read in connection with entire provisions to find logical meaning closer to the functioning of the Statute and provisions. A word may have potential to be explained differently. Meaning of a word discovered judicially to understand a provision of statute does not necessarily be applied to provision of another Statute as it may dis-balance the scheme of that Statute. It may tend to carry same meaning in a similar Statute, if used in different provisions/Sections etc. but may not necessarily carry same intent in another Statute. Entertaining an application by an adjudicating authority is altogether different in the present contest as they (port operator) do not enjoy such authority and authorization as far as adjudication is concerned. Certificate itself is adjudication by someone having authority in this regard which require no more deliberation by private port operators. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan C.P.426/2020 Qasim International Container Terminal Pakistan Ltd, Karachi & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary, Revenue Division, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others,C.A.194/2020 Qasim International Container Terminal Pakistan Ltd, Karachi & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary, Revenue Division, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted/Stay,Pending
698 Const. P. 3004/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ramzan and others (Petitioner) VS Ch. Ghulam ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
699 Const. P. 401/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zakir Hussain Larik (Petitioner) VS Provice of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
700 2023 CLD 253 Suit.B 2/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Bankers Equity Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Galadari Cement (Gulf) Ltd., & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-NOV-22 Yes The primary consideration however remains that Order I Rule 10(2) CPC which is being heard, does not allow the applicant to be either necessary or proper party. Necessary party is one who ought to have been joined as party in whose absence no effective decree could be passed whereas proper party is one whose presence before the Court is necessary to enable the Court to effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all questions involved in the suit. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
701 Const. P. 2196/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 M/S Fintex Mfg Corp Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.A.1601/2021 Fintex MFG. Corporation Pvt Ltd Karachi v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary, Excise & Taxation Department, Karachi and others,C.P.5582/2021 Fintex MFG. Corporation Pvt Ltd Karachi v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary, Excise & Taxation Department, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relief
702 Const. P. 4791/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s HSJ Metal (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
703 Const. P. 4801/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 DHL Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
704 Const. P. 4280/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khurram Gul Agha (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
705 Const. P. 4914/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Deepak J. Motiani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
706 Const. P. 4550/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Prime Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
707 Const. P. 7758/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 IGI Holdings Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.5665/2021 IGI Holdings Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Revenue Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
708 Const. P. 4579/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dolmen City Rent (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
709 2021 YLR 2278 R.A (Civil Revision) 55/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Tobria S/o Ismail (Applicant) VS The Board of Trustee KPT and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-APR-21 Yes - The licences on which respondents were relying were expired somewhere in 2013. After the expiry of the alleged licences the Karachi Port Trust started receiving amount as being lease money and a period of lease was also disclosed in the challans issued by Karachi Port Trust to applicants though separately describing them as licensee as well. - In this primary examination perhaps the respondents have not demonstrated to have passed the criteria and test to adjudge them (applicants) as licencees. Since the rental receipts were issued for a lease period, as available on record, therefore, notice under section 87 of the KPT Act for the eviction cannot be read to have been issued in pursuance of the aforesaid Act as a lessee cannot be evicted without due process of law. Hence, such action is not deemed to have been taken or purported to have been taken under the ibid Act. - When an action was not deemed to have been taken under the Act, the barring provision of Section 87 would not apply and plaint in this regard for a colourable exercise of powers by official of KPT cannot be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC. It requires a trial as to whether action was in accordance with law or otherwise. The appeal preferred by the applicants met the same fate as it was dismissed. - I am of the firm view that the issue of notice of eviction to an occupant of the nature as described above is not warranted under the law and on such threat of eviction he cannot wait for a period mentioned in the barring section i.e. Section 87 of KPT Act and is not covered by any of the provisions of Act when status of applicants is adjudged as lessee in the last challan issued. It needs trial for a conclusive determination. When the applicants claimed to have been in occupation as lessee by virtue of challan issued to them the status of licencee was not carried forward and altered to a status of lessee by virtue of such challan and the descriptions provided therein. This is at least tentative view which should have been formed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
710 Const. P. 848/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/S. ADAMJEE IMPEX (Petitioner) VS SHAIKH MUHAMMAD KHALID & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-APR-21 Yes In view of above, I found that the orders passed under section 16(2) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was harsh inasmuch as it struck off the defence without a proper scrutiny of ledgers ofthe rent that has already been deposited in MRC, interestingly in the name of same landlord and there could have been no inconvenience to the respondent/landlord for the recovery of amount from such MRC. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
711 Const. P. 5581/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Burshane LPG (Pakistan) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
712 Const. P. 2607/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Nasir Engineering Works & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
713 I.T.R.A 16/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) VS M/S. ROCHE PAKISTAN LTD. (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No We have also noticed that invariably references are being filed by the department where they themselves frame questions. We would appreciate if the counsels who are filing such references also apply their mind and after going to the root of the case and the cause as to what in fact serious questions of law arising out of the order and only then such proposed questions of the department could be finalized by the counsels themselves. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
714 Const. P. 5496/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tariq Mangrani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
715 Const. P. 7304/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Amcorp Engineering & Construction Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
716 Const. P. 2661/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Gulzar & Sons (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.L.A.847-K/2023 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Shirazi Investments (Private) Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 15-Apr- 24
717 Const. P. 5236/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Heinz Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
718 Const. P. 308/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Saima D/o Fareed ul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Marium Bibi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
719 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 177/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Kaikobad Pestanjee Kakalia (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
720 Const. P. 1274/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
721 Const. P. 1382/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Union Cooperative Club Ltd., Thr. M. Asim Khan (Petitioner) VS M/s. A.A.G. Foods and another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
722 Const. P. 4675/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Zain Brothers (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
723 Const. P. 4665/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s TSD Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS FBR & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
724 2022 PTD 266 Const. P. 4778/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Pakistan Mobile Communication (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-OCT-21 Yes The impugned enactment is for area which formed part of province i.e. Sindh hence for all intent and purposes Article 142(c) is significant. It emphasized Provincial Assembly to legislate with respect to any matters not enumerated in the Federal Legislative List. The impugned Act whereby Serial No.6A was introduced to the First Schedule forming part of Table-II is introduced through a Money Bill in terms of Article 73 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. No other Entry of Part I of the Federal Legislative List could then be taken into account as this was a money bill which is primarily covered from Entry No.43 to 53 as routed through Article 73 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The federation has already conceded and we are not required to deliberate on the point that for a tax to fall under the said Federal Legislative List it must be covered by Entries No.43 to 53. This, as claimed to be a sales tax/Federal Excise Duty, is apparently covered in terms of Entry 49 to the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Thus, the 18th Amendment excludes the Federation by virtue of the Entry 49 from the competence to legislate on the subject of services rendered in their province on account of SSTA, 2011 w.e.f. 01.07.2011. --It is neither in the competence of the federation to legislate after 18th Amendment nor it relates to federation to invoke Entry No.58 of the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Similarly, Entry No.59, as relied upon by the respondents counsel, that these matters are incidental or ancillary to any matters enumerated in this part, is also inconsequential as this cannot be invoked independently unless a reciprocal entry is found within the competence of federation. One may argue this Entry 59 may have a bridged with Article 151 but we have already discussed non-application of Article 151. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.6171/2021 Federal Board of Revenue through the Secretary Revenue, Ex-officio Chairman FBR, Islamabad and others v. Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd, Karachi and another,C.A.3109/2022 Federal Board of Revenue through the Secretary Revenue, Ex- officio Chairman FBR, Islamabad and others v. Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
725 Const. P. 3698/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Xara Soft (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
726 Const. P. 3580/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Yasmeen Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
727 Const. P. 4296/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Karachi Marriage Hall Associations (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
728 Const. P. 6102/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Fine Star Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
729 Const. P. 4549/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Oleocorp (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
730 Const. P. 4667/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 TPL Properties Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
731 Const. P. 3962/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 IGI Holdings Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1553-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. IGI Holdings Limited & others,C.A.3410/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. IGI Holdings Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted, transfered to Islamabad.,Pending
732 Const. P. 59/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aryan Hussain S/o Muhammad Shahadat Hussain (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.L.A.755-K/2023 Commissioner Inland Revenue & others v. M/s. Ahmed Textile Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 29-Feb-24)
733 Const. P. 4725/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Medipak Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
734 2020 PLC CS Note 26 Const. P. 4527/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Muhammad Aslam and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
735 2023 YLR 40 Const. P. 891/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s United Business Machines thr Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Hussain Hidayatullah & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-MAY-21 Yes -Section 15(2)(vii) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979requires demonstration of elements such as (i) honesty of purpose and (ii) reasonableness. From the statement of landlord/owner for the purpose of eviction of a tenant on the ground of personal bona fide need only an honest intention is to be deduced and there is no other formula to adjudge good and bad faith, for the purpose of eviction on the aforesaid count. If the Court on the scrutiny of the evidence comes to the conclusion that it was an honest intention then it would be immaterial whether he remained successful in achieving the object or not that is whether his son or daughter would join him in the business after completing their education. This requirement would be immaterial in the sense that the intention of the father in evicting the tenant was an honest one.Good faith is an abstract term not capable of any rigid definition and ordinary dictionary meaning describes it as "honesty of intention". -The primary requirement and condition precedent for invoking provision of Section 15(2)(vii) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 claiming relief on the ground of personal bonafide need of landlord in good faith is that the landlord should be honest in his approach and sincerity of his purpose should be manifested by irreversible evidence and surrounding circumstances. - Sufficiency of accommodation either for a commercial/industrial activity or for residential purpose is to be adjudged best by the landlord himself and it may vary not only on case to case basis but also on the basis of nature of business that one intends to establish an honest idea about future growth of the business and its prospects. Someone may have an idea of establishing humongous business set up and he may or may not be successful in achieving his object and plan but what is 9important, as a test, is the honesty of intention and there is nothing on record in the shape of cross-examination of the landlord/owner to demonstrate that it was not an honest and genuine intention for extending and enhancing business for himself and for his family members. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1108-K/2021 M/s. United Business Machines v. Ghulam Hussain Hidayatullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
736 Suit.B 55/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 M/S.MYBANK LTD (Plaintiff) VS M/S.APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LTD (Defendant) S.B. Order 31-JAN-17 Yes The case under banking jurisdiction is governed by special statute i.e. Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 and in terms of Section 9(2) this special statute requires the statement of account to be certified under Act 1891. The provisions of this law would become redundant in case the contention of the plaintiff is considered to be correct. This sole ground is sufficient to grant unconditional leave to the defendants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
737 Const. P. 4587/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naseer Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
738 Const. P. 5385/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Farm Plant (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
739 II.A. 215/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Allah Bux S/o Muhammad Umer Baloch (Appellant) VS Shahnawaz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
740 2017 PLC (CS) 409 Suit 207/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 ARBAB A.MUNIR (Plaintiff) VS MACKINNONS MACKENZIE & CO (Defendant) S.B. Order 27-JAN-16 Yes Insofar as the amended clause-8A in the Supplemental Trust Deed for superannuation fund is concerned, since the plaintiff resigned much prior to the alleged amendment, it cannot be applied retrospectively though the subject clauses such as (ii) and (iii) of clause-8A of the aforesaid Deed have not been challenged but apparently it amounts to usurping the rights of the member/ pensioner who has throughout his life has done only one business and that it would be unlawful for a company to enforce such terms which are contrary and violative of the fundamental and constitutional rights as guaranteed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
741 Const. P. 6426/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Conwill Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
742 Const. P. 6359/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s International Entperises (Petitioner) VS Fed.of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
743 Const. P. 6609/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Battery Hodgson Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
744 Const. P. 2470/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s PSO Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.219-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Pakistan State Oil Company Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
745 Const. P. 6892/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sohail Aziz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
746 Const. P. 4888/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghandhara Ind Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
747 Const. P. 2903/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Needle Impressions (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
748 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 731/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Byco Petroleum Ltd. & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No What is more important is whether the goods allegedly retrieved by the seizing agency were smuggled or belongs to Byco Petoleum Limited. Byco Petoleum Limited itself has come forward when they filed an appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 26.5.2015. The Order-in-Appeal was passed on 15.4.2015 on an appeal preferred by Byco Petoleum Limited followed by an appeal before tribunal when ultimately the Petoleum Company succeeded in establishing their point of view. The subject documents if were doubted should have been verified through the Management of the Petoleum Company and more particularly, the samples drawn should have been tested through any forensic lab having expertise in this regard, which has not been done. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
749 Const. P. 3787/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Rajby Industries (Petitioner) VS Rahim Dad And ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.684-K/2019 M/s Rajby Industries v. Rahim Dad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
750 Const. P. 6598/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Liberty Power Tech Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
751 Const. P. 2234/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Byco Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.320-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Byco Petroleum Pakistan Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
752 Const. P. 6425/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Meskay & Femtee Trading Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
753 Const. P. 6725/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sarfaraz Ali Pario (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
754 Const. P. 6522/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahmed Fine Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
755 Const. P. 2235/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Byco Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.317-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Byco Petroleum Pakistan Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
756 Const. P. 6370/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s SEPCO Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
757 M.A. 11/1996 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1996 M/s.Rachna Soap Ind (Appellant) VS Registrar Trade Mark (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
758 2014 YLR 2315 Suit 1386/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 MS ROHEELA YASMIN (Plaintiff) VS MS. NEELOFAR HASSAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 21-APR-14 Yes "(a) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)--- ----S. 7---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XX, R. 13-Administration suit- Talaq-e-Bain- Effect--- Contention of plaintiff was that she being wife of deceased was entitled for deferred dower as well as share from his property whereas defendants contended that plaintiff had been divorced by the deceased and she was not legal heir to claim inheritance-Validity-Plaintiff was given Talaq-e-Bain and no question of reconciliation would arise---Such Talaq would become effective the moment same was pronounced-Plaintiff was not entitled for any inheritance however claim of dower amount was debt on the property of deceased which was to be paid first. (b) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)- --S. 7---Divorce--- Effectiveness of--- Scope---Marriage could abe dissolved by husband at his will without intervention of the court-Man who wished to divorce his wife should as soon as might be after pronouncement of Talaq give the Chairman Union Council a notice in writing of his having done so and should supply a copy thereof to the wife---Talaq would not be effective until the expiry of 90 days unless same was revoked earlier expressly or otherwise. (c) Islamic Law--- ---Talaq, Mubarat and Khula-Meaning-- -""Talaq"" was divorce which was pronounced by the husband whereas ""Mubarat"" was Talaq effected by mutual consent of parties and ""Khula"" was dissolution of marriage through court. (d) Islamic Law-- ----Talaq, kinds of-Scope-Talaq would be of three kinds i.e. Talaq-e-Ahsan, Talaq-e-Hassan and Talaq-e-Bain-Talaq-e-Ahsan could be pronounced by single pronouncement during ""Tuhrs"" followed by abstinence from going to wife to establish marital relationship till Iddat period-Talaq-e-Hassan was pronounce-ment of divorce through successive three ""Tuhrs"" without establishing physical relationship with wife in any of the three ""Tuhrs""---Talaq-e-Bain was the divorce by husband through pronouncement made through single ""Tuhr"" either in one sentence or in separate sentences---Talaq-e-Bain was irrevocable divorce whereas Talaq-e-Ahsan would become irrevocable on expiry of Iddat period and Talaq-e-Hassan on third pronouncement irrespective of Iddat period-Talaq-e-Bain would become irrevocable immediately on pronouncement of the same either uttered orally or written down on a piece of paper irrespective of Iddat period-Talaq-e-Bain did not provide any room for any reconciliation-Communication was not material ingredients or prerequisite for validity of Talaq." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
759 2016 PLC (CS) 92 Suit 519/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Ali Ahmed Lund (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 29-MAY-14 Yes "Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973--- ----R. 12-A---Correction of date of birth in service record---Scope---Contention of plaintiff was that his date of birth was 2-4-1956 instead of 2-4-1954---Validity---Plaintiff passed Central Superior Service examination in the year 1983 and became civil servant in the said year and he had been since then maintaining his date of birth as 2-4-1954---Employee could not rectify his date of birth after insertion of R.12-A in Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973---After 30 years of service it had revealed to the plaintiff that his actual date of birth was 2-4-1956---Once date of birth in the record at the time of joining service was mentioned the same should be final and no alteration was permissible--- Insertion of R.12-A in Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973 was logical and statutory in nature---Suit being not maintainable was dismissed in circumstances---Plaintiff had reached to the age of superannuation and any salary, perks, privileges or any benefits availed subsequent to the age of superannuation should be returned forthwith." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
760 Const. P. 6638/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Diamond Impex Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
761 Const. P. 5043/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Safa Steel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
762 Const. P. 1330/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s DRE (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
763 Const. P. 764/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 The Cantonment Board Faisal. (Petitioner) VS The Civil Aviation Authority & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
764 Const. P. 6259/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Syeda Anisa Bano (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
765 Const. P. 147/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2004 A Khan Oil Mill (Petitioner) VS Hyderabad Electric Supply (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
766 Const. P. 1197/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Zahoor Ahmed Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
767 Const. P. 440/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Nazeer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
768 Suit 1001/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 MST.CHAND BI KHAN (Plaintiff) VS MUBASHIR HUSSAIN AFRIDI & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
769 Suit -2773/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SAEED RAZA KHAN (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD (PSO) & AOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
770 Suit 313/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S S B TEXTILE MILLS (Plaintiff) VS SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
771 Const. P. 1648/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Tara Chand (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
772 R.A (Civil Revision) 318/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Jethanand (Applicant) VS Mumtaz Ali and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
773 2024 SBLR Sindh 319 Judicial Companies Misc. 33/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NUTRICO MORINAGA (Private) Limited. (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-FEB-22 Yes To question the merger it is rather to be seen from the perception that a wise group of businessmen has taken a decision considering all its pros and corns. While taking such decision there are chances of success and failure but then while questioning such decision the bona fide is the real litmus test. A businessman takes decision foreseeing the future aspect. The Court could only see that all legal formalities have been fulfilled and that the scheme is neither unjust nor unfair or against the national interest but cannot challenge the wisdom of a decision of businessman as by doing that the Court would be overriding the wisdom of a businessman and their prerogative. Even otherwise the report of Chartered Accounts is also very material who were engaged for calculating the swap ratio in respect of envisaged scheme of arrangement. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
774 Const. P. 6498/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Glitter House (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
775 Const. P. 2580/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nisar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
776 Suit 1738/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rashid Khan (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Naila & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
777 R.A (Civil Revision) 167/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 M/S Sindh Abadgar Sugar Mills Ltd (Applicant) VS Taluka Municipal Administrator & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
778 Const. P. 3/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
779 Suit 790/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Ayub Mughal & another (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Shahzad (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
780 Const. P. 457/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author) C.P.1678/2022 Raja alias Rajkumar and others v. Ali Nawaz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
781 Const. P. 1331/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Hassan Fadoo S/o Muhammad Aslam Fadoo (Petitioner) VS Learned IIIrd ADJ, Karachi South and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 27-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
782 Const. P. 3675/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s A.K Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
783 Civil Tran 23/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 The Hyderabad Municipal Corporation & Ors. (Applicant) VS M/S Trends Limited & Another. (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
784 Const. P. 3980/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amir Liaquat (Petitioner) VS The Sindh Cabinet of Provincial Govt & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
785 Cr.Bail 762/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Mujahid Hussain Brohi & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-MAY-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
786 R.A (Civil Revision) 191/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mir Ali Raza Talpur (Applicant) VS Rashid Khanzada (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
787 Const. P. 5753/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sarfaraz Miyoo (Petitioner) VS Home Dept: & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
788 Const. P. 8294/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Mazhar Ali Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
789 R.A (Civil Revision) 2/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Saleh & Others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Qasim & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-DEC-17 Yes "Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S.9---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII, R. 11---Suit for possession of immovable property---Application for rejection of plaint---Scope---Plaint was rejected on the grounds that plaintiffs had no legal right, character and title over the suit land and they were not in possession on the suit property---Validity---Relief in a suit filed under S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 was not dependent upon the title of suit property---Said suit was to be decided only on the ground as to whether plaintiffs were dispossessed from the immovable property without their consent and without due process of law---Plaintiffs in such suit could recover possession notwithstanding any other title that might be set up in that suit---Dispute of possession was a bundle of facts which could not summarily be decided while considering an application under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C.---Impugned orders passed by the Courts below were set aside---Matter was remanded to the Trial Court to frame issues including maintainability of suit and decide the controversy at the earliest within four months---Revision was disposed of in circumstances." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
790 Judicial Companies Misc. 29/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amir Bux Channa & Another through Attorney (Applicant) VS Isra Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) Limited. (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-22 No Function of the University has to carry on. The Foundation has nominated a Chancellor and by no means this purpose should be derailed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
791 Const. P. 407/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Abdul Hameed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
792 Const. P. 563/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Nazir Hussain Dahri and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
793 Const. P. 476/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Muhammad Azam Dogar and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
794 Const. P. 106/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Zeboo another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
795 Const. P. 876/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Humair Ahmed Mugha and others (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
796 2023 CLD 366 Judicial Companies Misc. 47/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 G.A ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND TWO OTHERS (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
797 Const. P. 1393/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ali Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Delimitation Matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
798 Suit 223/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ARY COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
799 Suit 1663/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MALIK MUHAMMAD RAFIQ (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Plaintiff on the strength of letter of intent, as being licensee of the subject ground, cannot enjoy the privilege to restrain defendant from dealing with their property and plaintiff consequently cannot file this suit for declaration on the strength that they were in possession of the subject football ground. Yes, they were in possession but such possession is only a permission to occupy under the license. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
800 2023 CLD 616 Judicial Companies Misc. 12/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 RAZAQUE STEELS (PVT) LTD AND ANOTHER (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-MAR-23 Yes Merger as Scheme of Arrangement Allowed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
801 Const. P. 7225/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Yousuf Master (Petitioner) VS A.D.J IV (Central) & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.L.A.4396/2022 UMAR TEXTILES thr. its Authorized Representative Mr. Muhammad Iqbal v. The Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
802 Const. P. 1423/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Naveed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
803 Const. P. 1565/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Pakistan Tentage Ind (Petitioner) VS Nisar Muhammad and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
804 Const. P. 1573/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
805 I.T.R 194/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2005 The CIT Zone E Karachi (Applicant) VS Masood Tariq (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
806 Const. P. 2849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS M/s Naqshbandi Ind. & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.1091-K/2023 Muhammad Ramzan v. M/s. Naqshbandi Industries Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
807 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 8/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Collector of Customs (Prdeventive) (Applicant) VS A G P (Pvt( Ltd (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 Yes Timeframe in passing orderin-original from the date of the show cause notice is mandatory, which can only be avoided subject to proviso Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
808 Const. P. 1595/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ahsan Ali Samo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
809 Cr.Tran 2/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUBEEN HAIDER KHAN (Appellant) VS ALI IMRAN QAIMKHANI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
810 Const. P. 2517/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Dwarka Das Keswani and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
811 Const. P. 2563/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Shehzad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
812 Const. P. 4317/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonement Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
813 H.C.A 227/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Mustafa (Appellant) VS Muhammad Younis & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
814 Const. P. 5769/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ashraf Khan (Petitioner) VS Islamic Republic of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
815 Const. P. 19/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.Ps. No.53, 54, 140 & 141 of 2022 2022 Ali Mardan Jamali &anothers (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
816 I. A 26/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Jabbar Soomro (Appellant) VS The Manager SMS Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
817 H.C.A 10/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Arif Ahmed Bahalim and Others (Appellant) VS Mst. Mehmooda Naz and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
818 I. A 75/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Jabbar Ghazaini (Appellant) VS Tahir Ahmed Khan & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
819 Const. P. 6657/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Universal Packaging Co. Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
820 Const. P. 6802/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Entree Food Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
821 I. A 24/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhamad Nawaz (Appellant) VS Saleem M. Gagai (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
822 Const. P. 3730/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Sarfaraz (Petitioner) VS Qamar Mushtari Begum and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
823 Const. P. 11/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Syed Ishtiaq Ali Tirmizi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
824 H.C.A 184/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER (Appellant) VS ARY COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
825 Const. P. 2618/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS V.C Quaid-e-Awam University SBA & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
826 Const. P. 249/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mrs. Shehla Balal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
827 Const. P. 8387/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Global Educational Constulting Society (Petitioner) VS Cantonmnet Board Korangi Creek and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
828 H.C.A 301/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (Appellant) VS M/s. Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-FEB-24 Yes As to the objection that decretal amount has to be deposited before this Court as without it appeal could not be heard and decided, we are of the view that Order XXI Rule 23-A PC, as relied upon by the learned counsel for respondent, does not demonstrate an embargo on powers being exercised by the appellate Court while hearing appeal; it only demonstrates that the executing Court hearing objections, filed by judgment debtor to the grant of execution, shall not proceed unless the decretal amount is secured. We are not executing Court who is hearing the objections of judgment debtor, rather an appellate authority Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
829 Const. P. 5293/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Riffat Saeed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Islamic Republic of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
830 Const. P. 3023/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Subak Majeed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.231/2024 Cantonment Board Clifton through Executive Officer, Karachi v. Subak Majeed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
831 Const. P. 1332/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Naseem Bano (Petitioner) VS Mst Noor Jehan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial C.A.3002/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Abdul Sallam Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
832 Const. P. 4172/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Laique Ali (Petitioner) VS UBL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No petitioner is a habitual litigant as for one reason or the other for some interconnected claims having a common cause he has been filing suits against the respondent Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
833 Const. P. 3764/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asadullah Khatri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
834 H.C.A 26/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Shujabad Agro Industries (Pvt) Ltd & another (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
835 Const. P. 435/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ashique Husain Gorchani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
836 Const. P. 3987/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s BBQ Delight (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
837 Const. P. 6816/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Eternal Group of Industries (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
838 Const. P. 7832/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Hashim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
839 I. A 216/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Raheel Saleem (Appellant) VS Muhammad Tahir (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
840 Suit 990/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 INAYATULLAH (Plaintiff) VS UMEED ALI & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Order 04-JUN-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
841 Suit 886/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 HUMAYUN AKHTAR JALIL (Appellant) VS CAPITAL ONE EQUITIES LTD & ORS. (Appellant) S.B. Order 28-MAY-15 Yes Prima facie it appears that the amount as agreed in terms of para-1 of CMA No.3223/09 is admitted as it is duly signed on behalf of defendant no.1 as well as through its Counsel. By this order the only question that is required to be resolved is the quantum of amount payable by defendant No.1 to plaintiff. How and from where such decree is to be satisfied is not being answered here nor it is prayed for. The present application is only to the extent of money decree. It is not a question raised and/or involved as to whether the amount i.e. to be paid by the defendant No.1 would be from the amount that has been procured by defendant No.1 by means which are against the interest of other creditors. It only relates to a money decree to which plaintiff is entitled in terms of admission made in the compromise application. Insofar as earlier application bearing CMA No.6629/09 is concerned, it rather based on a letter of defendant No.1 which is not filed by defendant No.1 hence I would not make it a basis for considering claim of plaintiff in terms of the order XII Rule 6 CPC rather CMA No.11562/09 (compromise application) would be the basis of granting CMA No.3223/09. The application to the extent of the above amount is allowed and the suit is decree against defendant No.1. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
842 Const. P. 128/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mushtaque Ahmed Domki (Petitioner) VS The SHO PS Kashmore and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
843 Cr.Bail 19/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Waseem Shahani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
844 Const. P. 965/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Director NASASK Sukkur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
845 Cr.Bail 547/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Muhammad Khan Brohi and an other (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 Yes injury in terms of the FIR was apparently caused by accused Gulzar who is stated to have used K.K with intention to commit murder of Amjad. Such report is also silent as far as other injury which allegedly caused by the lathi blows are concerned. The enmity that has been shown between Kalhoro and Brohi community is also vigorously pleaded and such can not be ruled out. As such the applicant has made out a case of further inquiry. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
846 Const. P. 324/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Rizwan Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Mst. Aneesa Gul and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
847 Adm. Suit 953/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Khalid Hussain Hakro and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Garello and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
848 Const. P. 59/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Shabana Joyo (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Muhammad Joyo and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
849 Const. P. 2097/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Ali Bux Memon (Petitioner) VS SSP Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
850 Const. P. 306/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst. Izat Khatoon Hajano (Petitioner) VS Wahido Lashari and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
851 Cr.Tran 91/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Abdul Sattar Kori (Appellant) VS Altaf Kori and an other (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
852 Cr.Bail 436/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Abdul Sattar Bhayo (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
853 Const. P. 929/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Akbar Ali Brohi (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
854 Const. P. 177/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Muhammad Azam Siddiqui and another (Petitioner) VS Mrs. Rana Ejaz and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-12 Yes The strength of the learned trial court order as well as of the appellate Court order is that one advocate namely Sardar Abdul Hameed Iqbal has filed an undertaking on behalf of the petitioner No.1. This could hardly be a ground to reject the application under section 12(2) CPC as primarily what is to be seen by the learned trial court as well as appellate Court is whether there was sufficient material in terms of the bailiffs report which is available on record to hold the service good against the petitioners or not. The question of filing of undertaking on behalf of petitioners is of no material consequence as it can be a managed one since it is not signed by the petitioners. Hence the learned trial court while rejecting the application under section 12(2) CPC as well as appellate Court has mainly /relied on the undertaking given by one advocate. The learned trial court has decreed the suit for specific performance against the petitioners and has ordered for registration of the conveyance deed in favour of respondent No.1. Such valuable rights in this case which were taken away from the petitioners are at stak Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
855 2016 PLD Sindh 479, 2018 SBLR Sindh 2022 Suit 62/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 26-MAR-15 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
856 Judicial Companies Misc. 23/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 U.B.L V/S (Petitioner) VS M/s Pak Rock Oil Trading Corporation (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 21-JUN-16 Yes As regards the prayer clause (d) to the effect that the action be taken against the directors of the respondent company under section 412, 413 and 414 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, learned counsel for the petitioner has not forcefully argued on the subject; nor the provisions of Section 305, 306 provides any relief of such nature as mentioned in Para d of the prayer clause. Perusal of the ibid sections would reveal that such an action can be taken by the Court only on an application of the Official Liquidator in the course/process of winding up of the company, which process is yet to commence and such recourse would still be available for petitioner. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
857 E.P 19/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Jam Saifullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
858 Suit 1216/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Jamshoro Joint Venture Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Sui Southern Gas Co., Limited. (Defendant) S.B. Order 05-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
859 Suit 1106/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Habib University Foundation (Plaintiff) VS Mecatch (Pvt.) Limited (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
860 Const. P. 75/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/S Shakoor Automobiles (Petitioner) VS Mst.Jamshed Malik and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 07-NOV-17 Yes The petitioner however chooses to deposit the rent continuously in the name of a deceased person despite having knowledge. He may have deposited the rent for the years of 2014 and 2015 but it was deposited after acquiring knowledge of sad demise of Riaz Malik hence it was not a lawful deposit after service of notice of ejectment application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.636-K/2017 M/s Shakoor Automobile v. Mst: Jamshed Malik and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
861 Const. P. 3013/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Imran (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
862 Civil Revision 26/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2009 Muhammad Mohsin and others (Applicant) VS Taluka Council Khairpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
863 Const. P. 1841/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ghulam Abbas Mallah & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
864 Const. P. 3128/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Lt. Col (R) Asif Saeed and another (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-NOV-12 Yes Section 6(2)(d) the action was designed in such a way that it is likely to cause death or endanger a persons life. Section 6(2)(ee), define use of explosive substance. Section 6(2)(i) pertains as to an action leading to a serious risk to safety of the public or a section of in the way it has been designed to frighten the general public. Section 6(2)(j) and (n) is also attracted/involved as the action pertains to burning of vehicles and violence against police force and public servants etc. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1102/2016 Lt. Col (R) Asif Saeed & another v. The State & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
865 Const. P. 262/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Shafique-ur-Rehman Arain (Petitioner) VS Govt: Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
866 Const. P. 2174/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Amanullah Ansari (Petitioner) VS Syed Ghulam Mujtaba Shah & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
867 Const. P. 704/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Majid Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
868 Const. P. 1676/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mumtaz Ali Soomro (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
869 Const. P. 988/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Asadullah Malllah (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
870 Const. P. 379/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Sadam Hussain Panhwar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
871 Const. P. 1709/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Muhammad Qasim Dhandhu (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
872 Const. P. 2529/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Agha Qurban Pathan and others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
873 Const. P. 1011/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
874 Const. P. 1517/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Rahamatullah Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Govt; Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro C.P.1465-K/2018 The Province of Sindh & others v. Rehmatullah Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
875 Const. P. 156/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Ghulam Mustafa Kalwar (Petitioner) VS Z.T.B.L LTD & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
876 Const. P. 340/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
877 Const. P. 2193/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ghulam Ali Junejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
878 Const. P. 700/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Aijaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
879 Const. P. 1121/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Pervez Ali Hisbani (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
880 Const. P. 1949/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Wazir Ali Bhutto (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
881 Const. P. 3687/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
882 Const. P. 2427/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Iftikhar Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS CDGK and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
883 Civil Revision 178/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Nouman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-FEB-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
884 Const. P. 1798/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Waqar Baig. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
885 Const. P. 2204/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Yar Muhammad Shah & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
886 Const. P. 1752/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 M/s Shadman Cotton Mills Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
887 I. A 49/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Fareed (Appellant) VS Al-Zamin Leasing Modaraba & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
888 Const. P. 4592/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Deharki Sugar Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
889 Const. P. 5065/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Pakistan Steel Imports Co. & another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
890 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 39/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Director I & I (Customs) (Applicant) VS M/s. MAG Corporation & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
891 Const. P. 5000/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Amjad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
892 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 354/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. A. R. & Company (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1647-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. A.R. & Company Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
893 II.A. 99/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Abdul Rahim Memon (Appellant) VS Mst. Amna Shaikh & ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 10-APR-21 Yes Whatever is deposed by the attorney, he deposed it on behalf of the principal on instruction and hence nothing could be taken away on the count that it was hearsay -Plaintiff/respondent has also examined one of the witnesses of the agreement whereas the other had expired and hence according to Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, it was otherwise proved through the evidence available on record. On the other hand the appellant examined himself only without corroboration of any other witnesses. Even defendants No.2 and 3 did not turn up to examine themselves and/or to support the appellant/defendant No.1. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.649-K/2021 Abdul Rahim Memon v. Mst. Amina Sheikh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
894 Const. P. 4272/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Artistic Millinners Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
895 Const. P. 4439/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s National Petrocarbon Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
896 Const. P. 4706/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Shamim Agencies Pvt Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
897 Const. P. 8562/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Farooq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
898 Const. P. 4100/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Habib Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
899 2021 YLR 1021 Cr.J.A 115/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Vijay Kumar & Other (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-NOV-20 Yes When the cause of death was found to be the incident on account of neurogenic shock of injuries No.1 and 2 i.e. wounds sloughing of flesh form right leg from thigh (mid) to ankle and abrasion on the left anterolateral side of Anus, it was inevitable for the prosecution to have obtained the sperm report of the sample found on the body and of the accused. It cannot be confidently said that the victim Vishal was subjected to humiliation of sodomy by the accused Vijay Kumar and Abbas Mallah since no such report of sperm test is available. --Even the alleged motive of ransom is not confidence inspiring as the Complainants family was a poor one. --There is no eye witness at all and even the story of the prosecution is not confidence inspiring as the boy who was allegedly abducted belongs to a poor class and it does not inspire confidence that somebody could abduct a child who belongs to a family from whom there are remote chances of any financial benefit. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
900 Const. P. 5958/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
901 Const. P. 8883/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Awab Alvi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
902 Const. P. 5623/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Radium Silk Factory (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
903 Const. P. 4124/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shabbir Tiles (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
904 Const. P. 4903/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Moon LIght Trader (SMC-PVT) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.5300/2021 M/s Moon Light Traders, Karachi v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary Excise and Taxation Department Sindh Karachi and others,C.A.1614/2021 M/s Moon Light Traders, Peshawar v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary Excise and Taxation Department Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relied,Pending
905 Const. P. 5853/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Steelman Engineeing & Construction Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
906 Const. P. 5355/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Mushtaq Sons (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
907 Const. P. 208/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Nafees ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
908 Const. P. 6205/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Imran Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed, of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
909 Const. P. 5444/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Loads Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
910 Const. P. 999/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s UBL Ltd (Petitioner) VS Asst: Commissioner Unit No.9 SRB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
911 Const. P. 6123/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Khairullah Paper & Board Works & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No In view of a decision in respect of Anti-dumping claim, the learned counsel does not wish to proceed with the matter. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as not pressed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
912 Const. P. 4306/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Orinet Communication Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
913 Const. P. 4293/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Autocare Experts (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
914 Const. P. 4590/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khalil Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
915 Const. P. 4624/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Citibank N.A (Petitioner) VS Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
916 Const. P. 5809/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hasan Mumtaz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
917 Const. P. 5577/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Creative Leather Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
918 2024 YLR 16 Const. P. 2068/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Gulistan Textiles Mills Limited (Petitioner) VS VIIIth ADJ Karachi South & Another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-MAY-21 Yes - Similarly, a presumptive view in respect of overall inflation and rate of taxes cannot be applied. The maintenance claimed to have been made/done by the landlord/respondent and in support thereof they have filed some accounts and debit vouchers but it pertains to a period w.e.f. March 2007onward. How these debit vouchers and maintenance bills are being applied to entire building and on what calculation and basis its ratio in terms of facilities provided to the premises is being applied, is inconceivable on the strength of the evidence available on record. Floor-wise true calculation is not provided. The presumptive analysis thus is beyond the domain and jurisdiction of the Rent Controller. The statistics in terms of inflation and maintenance charges should have been provided in statement recorded on oath and only then it could have been taken into consideration by the appellate Court. Filing plethora of documents disclosing them as debit vouchers in respect of maintaining the entire building is inconceivable. Statistics showing percentage of taxation over the building in question as well as maintenance as to be applied to entire building and has to be established statistically and not generally. Such data was not provided to Rent Controller. Taxation and maintenance are differently applied on ground floor and upper floors. - Similarly in presence of lease deeds of the same building between same landlord and tenant or between same landlord and other tenants, the reliance/applicability of rent or fair rent of other buildings in the adjoining locality should not have been applied as a priority, wherein respect of which direct evidence is available. When a building is operated by lifts there is not a serious degree of difference between second and third floor of the same building where premises are situated. - Though the Rent Controller while determining fair rent of the premises in question has taken a very conservative view by fixing fair rent at Rs.10/-per sq. foot, yet I am of the view that fair rent fixed by the appellate Court is on higher side. The Rent Controller and appellate Court were required to provide a cumulative effect of all those factors available under section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 subject to availability of evidence though the quantum of inflation and the enhancement of taxation has not been statistically provided in terms of applicability of such claim/charges per sq. foot yet the other factors may contribute for the determination of fair rent. - The rise in cost of construction has also not been demonstrated statistically. It is only presumptive analysis that cost of construction rises with the passage of time, however, the witness is required to provide data of such rise in cost of construction through his affidavit or any expert witness. It is a difficult assignment but the requirement of law. This burden could be relieved had appropriate lease deeds of same building or of adjoining building having similar facilities could be cited in evidence. - Section 8(2) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 enables the Rent Controller to revise such fair rent on account of changes/ additions brought or improving the premises in question which is not the case here. Similarly, there cannot be an automatic enhancement at the rate of 10% per annum on the fair rent in terms of Section 9 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. It provides a maximum cap of 10% per annum on the existing fair rent and not an automatic enhancement to its maximum. Such enhancement at any particular rate, which in any case should not be 10% per annum, is dependent on certain factors which were not decided in the application under section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. Besides, there was no prayer for such enhancement under section 9 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1490-K/2021 Gulistan Textile Mills Limited v. The Learned VIIIth Addl.District Judge, South at Karachi. & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
919 Const. P. 5550/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Leakhu Mal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
920 Const. P. 1530/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Jawed & Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
921 Const. P. 1038/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mehmood A. Ghaffar (Late) thr. legal heirs (Petitioner) VS Parvaiz Ahmed Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
922 Const. P. 4385/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Arshad Ayoub Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
923 Const. P. 6082/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahsanullah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
924 Const. P. 4239/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Memon Motors Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
925 Const. P. 1473/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s M. Usman and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
926 Const. P. 4783/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Haji Nazir Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
927 Const. P. 4786/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zeeshan Saleem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
928 Const. P. 4046/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s ZIF Agencies (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
929 Const. P. 5626/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s M.M Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
930 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 924/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Sports One International Trading Co. & anor (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1598-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Sports One International Trading Company Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
931 Const. P. 76/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nanik Ram Jethwani S/o Hari Ram (Petitioner) VS Lakhmichand Wadwani and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
932 Suit.B 55/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 IGI INVESTMENT BANK LTD (Plaintiff) VS M/S.DHA COGEN LTD. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 25-JAN-16 Yes It appears that the defendant has neither shown any amount that was availed of by it nor shown the amount which is to be returned/repaid. Hence, there is a non-compliance of the mandatory requirement of Section 10(4) of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001. The consequence provided in default thereof is dismissal of the leave application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
933 Const. P. 3449/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 M/s IFFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Hanif Ahmed Siddiqui and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.731-K/2019 Haneef Ahmed Siddiqui v. Chief Executive/Factory Manager M/s IFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.27-K/2020 Haneef Ahmed Siddiqui v. Chief Executive/Factory Manager M/s IFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted in all cases and appeals in the fixed for hearing with 3 wekks.,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
934 Const. P. 1478/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Izqar Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
935 Const. P. 1002/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mohsin Raffan Khan (Petitioner) VS XIVth Civil & Family Judge, & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-APR-21 No Although it was an independent burden on the respondent No.2, which ought to have been discharged independently butthe burden was diluted when petitioners/defendantscounsel herself suggested in the cross-examination that when they shifted at the rented house, they took all the dowry articles from her mother in laws house. By this question the dowry articles, list of which is independently attached, were conceded Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.875-K/2021 Mohsin Raffan Khan v. XIV Civil & Family Judge District Central Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
936 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 49/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Rahim (Applicant) VS The Customs Appellate Tribunal & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.713-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Waqes Danish Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
937 Const. P. 493/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Mujahid Oil Refinery (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
938 2017 CLD 546 Suit.B 51/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Pakistan Kuwait Investment Co. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Three Star Hosiery Mills Ltd (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 25-NOV-16 Yes The purpose of such authentication and certification in terms of subsection (8) of Section 2 of the Act is that it signifies the authenticity of document such as statement of account which in absence of such certificate cannot be presumed to be correct. Bankers Book Evidence Act provides the presumption of the correctness to such statement of account and is considered to be correct if it is certified by the officer as contemplated under section 2(8) of the Bankers Book Evidence Act,1891. Though it may have been attempted to be cured on the basis of additional statement of account which appears to have been certified yet the authority of the officer is only in relation to instituting a suit, verification of plaint, engaging a Counsel etc. in terms of Board resolution. This authority based on the board resolution cannot be stretched down to the frame of Section 2(8) of the Bankers Book Evidence Act. In the connected matter of Pak Kuwait Investment v. Active Apparel International where the shareholders claimed to be the same, the leave was granted on this score alone. The auditors report may have its strength but such material document ought to have been filed along with the plaint since the defendant have no chance to rebut the same as has been filed along with the replication. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
939 Suit.B 78/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Habib Metropolitan Bank Limited. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Shahi Textiles and others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 04-FEB-14 Yes the statement of account filed along with the plaint cannot be stated to be a statement of account under the provisions of Banker Books Evidence Act, 1891 and cannot support the claim of the plaintiff in terms of the provisions of Section 9 subsection (2) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
940 2015 SBLR Sindh 215 Suit 1920/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 MUHAMMAD ANWAR & ORS (Plaintiff) VS BADRUDDIN & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 14-DEC-14 Yes The permission to file a fresh suit need not be expressed but may be implied from the circumstances under which the order was passed. In absence of express order by the Court granting permission to file fresh proceedings while allowing withdrawal of suit it could be a natural outcome and necessarily follow that such permission has been granted by the Court as in case the Court does not wish to grant the conditional application for permission, it can dismiss the application and direct the plaintiff to proceed with the suit and if he fails to do so the Court can dismiss the suit for non-prosecution. Since an express application has been filed the Court could not allow the suit to be withdrawn and at the same time refuses liberty to agitate grievance in subsequent proceedings. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
941 Const. P. 1957/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Umer Corp. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
942 R.A (Civil Revision) 65/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imran Ishaq Thr. Attorney Muhammad Idrees (Applicant) VS Jama Masjid Al-Rehman Trust and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.657-K/2021 Imran Ishaq & another v. Jama Masjid Al-Rehman Trust & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
943 Const. P. 6556/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Iqbal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Chairman FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
944 Const. P. 2310/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Pakistan Beverages Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
945 Const. P. 7364/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Royal Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
946 Const. P. 8904/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nisar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
947 Const. P. 1747/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Revive Pharmakon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
948 2012 CLC 1293, 2012 SBLR Sindh 611 H.C.A 22/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Arshad Naseemuddin Ahmed (Appellant) VS Javed Baloch & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-MAY-12 Yes It is neither obligatory nor lawful to have always decide the application under section 47 and Order XXI rule 95, 100, 103 CPC by recording the evidence. It actually depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. The learned Single Judge has done nothing wrong while dismissing the application summarily since there was no material or facts which were required to be investigated. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
949 Const. P. 3310/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Indus Motor Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
950 Const. P. 7148/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s KKR Oil & Ghee Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.234/2022 M/s KKR OIL AND GHEE MILLS (PVT) LTD., Mirpur AJK v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and another,C.A.2072/2022 M/s KKR OIL AND GHEE MILLS (PVT) LTD., Mirpur AJK v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 1st week of October 22,Pending
951 Const. P. 5203/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 A F Steel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
952 Const. P. 6814/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Jawaid Nabi Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
953 Const. P. 8449/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Anas International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
954 Const. P. 6959/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehmood Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
955 Const. P. 6307/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Yamaha Motor Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Othes (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
956 Const. P. 256/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Sajid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
957 Const. P. 2494/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Be Energy Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.305-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Be Energy Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
958 Const. P. 6985/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ramzan Dahir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
959 Const. P. 2406/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.242-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Shell Pakistan Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
960 H.C.A 47/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Wahid Hussain (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
961 Const. P. 7275/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mansoor Ellahi Shamsi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
962 2013 CLD 854 I. A 152/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Crescent Leasing Corporation Ltd., (Appellant) VS Sarhad Goods Transport Co.& Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-12 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
963 Const. P. 7274/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Iftikhar Ahmed & Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
964 Const. P. 6701/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
965 Const. P. 4502/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst Azra Zulfiqar (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Faisal & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
966 Const. P. 788/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Fozia Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Learned Banking Court No.1 & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
967 Const. P. 481/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Noman Tabani & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-NOV-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
968 Const. P. 1750/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shamshad Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
969 Cr.Bail 411/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SABIR HUSSAIN S/O KHAN MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
970 Const. P. 4865/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Masoom International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
971 Civil Revision 36/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ahmed Saeed (Applicant) VS Abdul Aziz and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
972 Civil Revision 183/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst Joshna (Applicant) VS Learned District & Sessions Judge Mirpurkhas & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
973 Const. P. 4193/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sara Muhammad Ubaid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
974 Const. P. 2432/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Prof Dr.Syed Mahtab Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS University of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
975 Const. P. 2035/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s General Tyre & Rubber Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
976 Const. P. 3310/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhib Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-OCT-20 Yes (SON QUOTA) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
977 Const. P. 1442/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Sarfraz Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed; Of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
978 II.A. 31/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Bhoja Airlines (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) VS P>I.A. Corporation (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-OCT-17 Yes The case of respondent is based on a contract, breach of which is claimed by the respondent and hence they preferred a claim for recovery. Article 120 will only be made applicable when no Article prescribes the limitation to file a suit for recovery as claimed by the respondent. Perusal of Article 115 shows that it is for the recovery/compensation for breach of any contract either express or implied. Respondent has claimed nothing but a breach of contract in respect of service which was allegedly rendered by it as it is claimed that they have failed, refused and neglected to make payment which is breach of a contract. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
979 Const. P. 674/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Ayesha Amir & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
980 Const. P. 711/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Asif Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
981 Const. P. 175/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Sindh Boys and Scout Association. (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
982 Const. P. 909/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.Ps No.D-1308, 1312, 1419, 1420, 1421, 1422, 1431, 1468, 1470, 1502, 1503, 1504, 1505 & 1506 of 2022 2022 Abdul Waheed And others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-22 No The point of laches has not been decided conclusively, those orders would not bind other Bench to follow similar view in view of the point under consideration. There is no such order of equal Bench , which has addressed on the issue of laches and then ordered for appearance before Redressal Committee. Since the question of laches was never discussed in detail in any of the cited orders of other bench, hence these petitions suffer from laches and same are accordingly dismissed alongwith listed application(s). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
983 Const. P. 94/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Director General NADRA Thr. Ali Adnan Arif Tabba (Petitioner) VS Mehrun Nisa and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.L.A.650-K/2023 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal) v. Diamond International Corporation Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 15-Apr- 24
984 Suit 91/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Umer Khalid & others (Plaintiff) VS Moshsin Mushtaq & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
985 Const. P. 2979/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Al-Asar mTraders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
986 Const. P. 2655/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Korangi Landhi Istaal Holder Welfare Association (Petitioner) VS Chairman DMC East and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
987 Const. P. 6661/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Saleem and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
988 Const. P. 1515/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M/s Winner Safety Glass (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
989 Civil Tran 25/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Irfan. (Applicant) VS Aghis u Salam & Another. (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
990 I. A 54/1993 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1993 Abdul Jalil Khan (Appellant) VS Sohail Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
991 Const. P. 1309/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rizwan Zahid (Petitioner) VS Mst Naila & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
992 Const. P. 1874/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Parvar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
993 Const. P. 1391/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Zubair Ahmed Pathan & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
994 Spl.Cr.Bail 86/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 XIA YUNXIAN S/O XIA CHUN DI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
995 Civil Tran 26/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Umair. (Applicant) VS The Lrd 4th Civil and Family Judge, Hyd & Another. (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
996 R.A (Civil Revision) 70/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Muhammad Amjad (Applicant) VS Shaikh Inamullah & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-APR-22 Yes Since the applicant has failed to prove that the respondents No.1 & 2 had the knowledge of any sale transaction, the act of purchasing the property without public notice cannot be pressed into service to prove the mala fide of the respondents No.1 & 2. It could be a careless approach being less serious but not at par with mala fide / dishonesty. Hence specific performance cannot be enforced against subsequent buyer in view of facts of case. Similarly with respect to other issue which concerns with the willingness of applicant, which also on facts ended against applicants, no claim of any alternate relief of damages could be granted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
997 Const. P. 2329/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dr Allah Juriyo (Petitioner) VS Mehmood Ahmed & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
998 Const. P. 110/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Azeem & another (Petitioner) VS Imran Shah & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
999 Const. P. 539/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asif Khan & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1000 Suit.B 34/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Faysal Bank Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Cresox (Pvt) Limited & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1001 Const. P. 598/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Nisar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1002 Const. P. 1931/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Pir Bux & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1003 Const. P. 795/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Haider Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1004 Const. P. 1571/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS SILK Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah C.P.844-K/2022 Muhammad Siddique v. Silk Bank Limited through its Principal Officer/Manager Road Branch Hyderabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1005 Const. P. 4/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Sleh (Petitioner) VS CM P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1006 Const. P. 1718/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1007 Const. P. 827/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Mst. Tahira Parveen & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1008 Const. P. 726/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Shabir (Petitioner) VS P.o Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1009 Suit -1491/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 ISRA ISLAMIC FOUNDATION (GUARANTEE) LIMITED & ORS (Plaintiff) VS DR. NAZIR ASHRAF LAGHARI & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 23-AUG-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1010 Suit 1568/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM SHAFI (SINCE DEACSED) THR. L/H (Plaintiff) VS M/S. PATEL HOSPITAL KARACHI & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1011 Suit 1724/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Aejaz Lutfi & others. (Plaintiff) VS M/s Delhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd & anotr (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 12-OCT-22 Yes Whether defendant No.1 has done enough to develop land is also a triable issue, therefore, I am not inclined, at this point of time to reject the plaint of the suit out rightly on account of involvement of triable issues and existence of the cause of action Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1012 2024 MLD 66 Suit 672/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S. MULTIX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (Plaintiff) VS KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-OCT-22 Yes Word "Irrevocability" is not connected or articulated anywhere except Clause 1 i.e. for first 15 years only. There is no clause of investment after 15 years which may give continuity to irrevocability for any other period than described in the first clause and defendant has to hand over every structure, whether built by plaintiff or plaintiff occupied an already constructed area and that is it. Now at the end of this period the plea of investment cannot come into play since 15 years were consumed by plaintiff which is a huge period for recovery of such investment, if made, which in any case not the responsibility of defendant, as understood from plain reading of agreement. This has to be kept in mind while reading clause 38 that it is not a grant in perpetuity; only if parties to contract agree, it may be extended. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1013 Const. P. 682/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Aatma Ram & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1014 Const. P. 697/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Muhammad Imran Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1015 2024 MLD 387 Suit 2020/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/S FORTUNE FOUR LLP (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 22-MAR-23 Yes Buying property on "as is where is basis" does not conclude that it was purchased with this understanding that there is no right of way from the northern side (Jinnah Avenue). The right of way was only objected by Civil Aviation Authority much later, but that has not been justified by the Civil Aviation Authority at this interlocutory stage and mere objection alone is not enough when the title of 1994 and 1996, prior to it being mortgaged with the Bank of Khyber identified the metes and bounds. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1016 Suit 585/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 KHALID INAM (Plaintiff) VS MRS. SUMMAYA REHMAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 06-APR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1017 Const. P. 1396/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Aisha Hareem Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1018 Const. P. 1849/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ms. Samreen Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1019 Suit 501/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 OZEFA (Plaintiff) VS SAHAB SHAH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 06-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1020 Const. P. 3779/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s ZT Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Chief Collector of Custom and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1021 Const. P. 2214/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Irfan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1022 Const. P. 3628/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mansha Masih (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1023 J.M -1911/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 PAKISTAN MEDICO INTERNATIONAL (PMI) (Applicant) VS SAFIR WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1024 H.C.A 344/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Amjad Ali and Others (Appellant) VS Bahria Town Private Limited and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.4477/2023 Dr. Amjad Ali and others v. Bahria Town Private Limited Karachi through the Chief Executive Officer and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1025 Const. P. 100/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Nangar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1026 H.C.A 339/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Amir Ali (Appellant) VS Mst. Farah Akhter & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1027 Const. P. 6820/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Unique Building Materials (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1028 H.C.A 60/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Chapal Builders (Appellant) VS Humair Associates Builders (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1029 Const. P. 4198/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 The Aga Khan Hospital & Medical College & another (Petitioner) VS IXth ADJ (East) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1030 H.C.A 312/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Bahauddin & another (Appellant) VS Syed Zainuddin & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1031 Const. P. 260/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Gotam Kumar (Petitioner) VS Sht. Mala (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1032 Const. P. 6656/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Galaxy Pharma Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1033 I. A 57/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sheikh Humayun Saghir (Appellant) VS Bankers Equity Limited (BEL) (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1034 H.C.A 41/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s. Bank Islami Pakistan Limited (Appellant) VS Mst. Surraiya Bibi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1035 Const. P. 7458/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Moosa and Another (Petitioner) VS Mst. Zubaida Lohar Warda and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1036 Const. P. 4316/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1037 H.C.A 4/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Cresent Bahria Cadet college & another (Appellant) VS Ahmed Raza Khan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1038 Const. P. 312/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Pervaiz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1039 H.C.A 43/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Yasmeen Saleem & Others (Appellant) VS Sindh Building Control Authority & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1040 I. A 6/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mazhar Ali (Appellant) VS Ahsan Ali and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1041 H.C.A 197/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Sudheer Ahmed & others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1042 I. A 42/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: I.A 60 of 2020 2021 Abdul Basit Khan (Appellant) VS Bank Islamic Pakistan Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1043 Const. P. 5673/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Muhammad Afsar Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1044 Const. P. 6804/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Alpino Food (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1045 II.A. 11/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Pervaiz Jabeen & others (Appellant) VS Fida Ali & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1100-K/2023 Pervaiz Jabeen & others v. Fida Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1046 Const. P. 2804/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP D 2803 of 2022 2022 Mazhar Ali Chandio (Petitioner) VS M/S Archroma Pakistan Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1047 Const. P. 1157/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Asif and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1048 H.C.A 440/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Muhammad Talha Thanvi through attorney (Appellant) VS Sahibzada Fazal Ali Baig and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1049 Const. P. 672/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1050 H.C.A 320/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Noor Ahmed Shaikh (Appellant) VS Syed Imtiaz Ali Zaidi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1051 Const. P. 6660/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mehrab Mercantile Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1052 Const. P. 3532/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Gul Naz (Petitioner) VS Faisal Canotnment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1053 Const. P. 285/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Rukhsana (Petitioner) VS M. Wahiduddin & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1054 H.C.A 19/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s. Punjab Beverages Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Others (Appellant) VS Danish Ellahi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1055 Const. P. 4321/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1056 Const. P. 4324/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1057 Civil Revision 14/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2006 Revo (Expired),thr:his L.Rs. (Applicant) VS Chandu and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1171-K/2018 Revo thr. his L.Rs and others v. Chahdoo and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1058 Civil Revision 15/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2006 Revo (deceased),thr:his L.Rs.&Ors. (Applicant) VS Chandoo Marecho and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1172-K/2018 Revo thr. his L.Rs and others v. Chahdoo and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1059 Suit 1466/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 AHMED GUL (Plaintiff) VS THE PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-JUN-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1060 Suit 741/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 MEHBOOB BHAI & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS G.M.PAK LTD. & OTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 11-JUN-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1061 Const. P. 808/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Rajib Magsi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Hyderi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1062 Const. P. 956/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Muhammad Bakhsh Muhammadani (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Yaro Lund and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1063 Const. P. 135/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Seema Parveen Abro and another (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Ratodero and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1064 Civil Revision 63/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Civil Revn. Appln. No.S-64 of 2011 2011 Sayed Nooral Shah (Applicant) VS Paryal Shah and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1065 Const. P. 126/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Iqra Javed Abro (Petitioner) VS Senior Superintendent of Police Kamber and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1066 Cr.Bail 340/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Abdul Sattar Jaffery (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 Yes It is matter of fact that a number of such mobile phones of china origin, namely, are Nasaki available in the market and alleged recovery of such mobile phone is not sufficient to decline the bail to the applicant, when the recovery itself is doubtful, as to whether it is the same set or it has been replaced. In addition to above there is delay of seven hours in lodging the F.I.R. The injuries allegedly caused are not on the vital part of the body and on the touchstone of the judgments referred above, the applicant is entitled for bail, which was accordingly granted by a short order and these are the reasons for the same. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1067 Cr.Misc. 185/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Dr.Ashok Kumar (Petitioner) VS SHO.P.S.Civil Line Larkana & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1068 2014 SBLR Sindh 495 Const. P. 518/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Amir Aslam Shaikh & ohters (Petitioner) VS COurt of IV th Rent Controller & ohters (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-JUL-13 Yes the jurisdiction vested in it was not exercised fairly justly and in fact the findings of the learned Rent Controller has completely shut down the plea raised by the petitioners/tenants wherein it is alleged by tenants that in terms of section 18 the default claimed is to be regulated by section 15 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 and despite the fact that 30 days period was provided under section 18 to tender the rent, the tenants/petitioners can still avail the rights guaranteed to them in terms of proviso to section 15 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, provided that they have fulfilled the conditions laid down therein. The judgments relied upon by learned counsel for respondent No.3 are not relevant to the present case. They relate to the issue of interlocutory orders regarding which no appeal lies, however, in the instant case issue is totally different wherein the learned Rent Controller has not performed and exercised the jurisdiction, as required. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui C.A.200-K/2013 Muhammad Nadeem v. Aamir Aslam Shaikh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1069 Const. P. 987/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mehboob Ali Dashti (Petitioner) VS WHC Anwar Ali Bangulani and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1070 Cr.Bail 612/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Muhammad Aslam (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-JUL-13 Yes The contents under Section 489-F for the perusal as reproduced as also the contents of the FIR clearly manifest the dishonesty. For reaching the conclusion as to whether offence under Section 489-F is bail out or not the applicants attitude towards the cheques need not to be further established as he has failed to inform the concerned Manager of the Bank regarding the alleged misappropriation of cheque which was allegedly stolen. The applicant has not been able to this fact satisfactorily as to why this information was not given to the Manager. It also creates an impression that before issuing cheque to the complainant he might have managed to lodge this non-cognizance report to save his skin from future dispute. With these reasons I am clear in my mind that the applicant is not entitled for concession of bail and this bail application is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1071 Suit 815/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 MUHAMMAD SHAHNAWAZ & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS K.E.S.C & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 22-FEB-22 No Prima facie the scope of this suit cannot be enlarged to the extent of post retirement benefits i.e. pensionary benefits unless amended. Learned counsel, however, submits that the subject dispute as raised by the plaintiffs in this suit came up for consideration before Hon`ble Supreme Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1072 2017 CLC Note 141 Suit 67/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Fashion Knit Industries (Plaintiff) VS Sui Southern as Co. Ltd. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 11-NOV-16 Yes Impugned Sunday Closure Notices are illegal, unlawful and ultra vires the Constitution Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1073 Suit 512/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 plaintiff (Plaintiff) VS defendant (Defendant) S.B. Order 23-FEB-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1074 Const. P. 3188/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Abdul Shakoor Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Habib Bank Ltd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-DEC-12 Yes Obviously the respondent which is a public limited company has to streamline performance appraisal and development and to provide mechanism for evaluating employees to facilitate ranking of individuals according to their respective performance. Such appraisal of the employee could ultimately become the basis of distinction between performers and nonperformers, hence the arguments of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that such amendment is discriminatory, malafide and does not provide a right to defend is not sustainable. Impugned amendment clearly stipulates action only in the event that a member of regular staff of the Bank receive two (02) consecutive appraisals which are below average/below par. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1075 H.C.A 236/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Member(LU) Board Revenue & Ors. (Appellant) VS K.P.T. Officer Coop.Housing Socy & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-SEP-13 Yes The compromise entered into between the parties is one which is beyond mechanism and mandate which enabled the Government of Sindh to have transferred the land in question and the learned single Judge ought to have considered aforesaid aspects before allowing the compromise application as prayed. I Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.2191/2013 The Trustees of Port of Karachi v. The Member (Land Utilization) BOR, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1076 E.P 13/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mir Ghalib Hussain Khan Domki (Petitioner) VS Abdul Raoof Khoso & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-APR-19 Yes It is thus a case which is not seriously contested by petitioner and even the officials around/against whom the story revolve were not summoned or examined by the petitioner to prove his assertion vis-??-vis corrupt and illegal practices. Thus in the absence of any material in support of petitioners case or contrary to the order of Sukkur Tribunal whereby nomination papers of returned candidate were accepted, the nomination papers of the returned candidate cannot be invalidated as this Commission is not an appellate authority of an earlier Sukkur Tribunal constituted to scrutinize the nomination papers of the candidates under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1077 Const. P. 140/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Naimatullah Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Mansoor Ali Jaffar & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 21-OCT-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.706-K/2017 Mansoor Ali Jaffar v. Naimatullah Shaikh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1078 Const. P. 862/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mst Sonia Bano Memon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1079 Const. P. 1890/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mrs. Israr Amna Begum & Others (Petitioner) VS S.M. Muhammad Iqbal & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-OCT-17 Yes As regards the claim of investment/Pugree of Rs.4,40,000/- is concerned, the same cannot withstand the default that has been committed by the petitioners. The Rent Controller cannot adjudicate upon the issue of Rs.440,000/- either as investment or to be considered as Pagree amount hence this petition filed against the concurrent findings of two Courts below which findings being based on reasoning and supported by documents i.e. conveyance deed in respect of the demised premises, does not merit consideration. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.12-K/2018 Mrs.Israr (Amna Begum) and others v. S.M.Muhammad Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1080 Const. P. 2336/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Shahan Mashori (Petitioner) VS Mst. Asima Mashori & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1081 Const. P. 1521/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mazhar Hussain Shah & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1082 Civil Revision 27/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2009 Muhammad Mohsin and others. (Applicant) VS Taluka Council Khairpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1083 E.P 15/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Tahir Hussain Khoso (Petitioner) VS Sohrab Khan Sarki & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-FEB-19 Yes If a history is traced of the judicial pronouncement relating to the question in hand that concerns with the deficiencies in the election petition and deciding its fate, the first judgment that I came across is of S. M. Ayub v. Syed Yusaf Shah and others reported in PLD 1967 Supreme Court 486. It deals with the National and Provincial Assemblies (Elections) Act (VII of 1964). Section 59 of the aforesaid law is somehow peri materia to Sections 142, 143 and 144 of the present enactment of 2017. The Hon'ble Supreme Court maintained that Section 67 does not, in terms, say that the petition shall be dismissed even if there be a partial failure to comply with the provisions of Section 59, ex facie Section 67 of the Act would seem to be designed to cover a case where the petition as a whole made allegations of a vague and indefinite character, without being supported by full particulars of the corrupt or illegal practice alleged. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that unless, therefore, the language of the law is intractable and clearly provides for dismissal of a petition for a technical defect, the Courts should not be astute to ascribe to the legislature a desire to be hypertechnical, so as to smother genuine litigation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1084 Const. P. 125/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Muhammad Naqi S/o Muhammad Shafi (Petitioner) VS Shamsuddin & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.60-K/2018 Shamsuddin v. Dr.Muhammad Naqi and others,C.P.620-K/2018 Shamsuddin v. Dr.Muhammad Naqi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1085 Const. P. 4354/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Deedar Ali Bhayo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1086 Const. P. 2207/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1087 Const. P. 987/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mohammad Ali Maitlo (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary Govt; Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio C.P.1098-K/2022 Miss Rabeela Abro v. Mrs. Irum Waheed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1088 Const. P. 1343/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Shahid Hussain Mallah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1089 Const. P. 1042/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Dilbar Yar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1090 Const. P. 4484/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Ghulam Rasool Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1091 Const. P. 4825/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Tarique Aziz Tunio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1092 Const. P. 1635/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Taj Muhammad Gabol (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1093 Const. P. 1408/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul Hakeem Chandio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1094 Const. P. 1515/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Naseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1095 Const. P. 1983/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Sakha Hussain Palh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1096 Const. P. 3207/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Ali Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
1097 Const. P. 940/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) VS Dr. Nizamuddin Ghori and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1098 2018 PLD Sindh 377 Const. P. 4/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Scherazade Jamali (Petitioner) VS Hasim Gillani & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 27-MAR-18 Yes The primary object of the Guardian & Ward Court or for that matter appellate Court was to discover as to where the welfare of the ward lies and how such welfare can be effectively achieved and maintained and should not have concerned with the visitation rights of father. --Jurisdiction Issue- The child may be an American national by birth and he may have been permanently residing in Kuwait with parents but he is a dual national. When the respondent/ father surrendered to the jurisdiction of the trial Court by moving an application under section 25 of the Guardian & Wards Act, it was promptly responded and replied by filing written statement and jurisdiction conceded by petitioner. --Once petitioner acquiesced to the jurisdiction, she cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time. The question of jurisdiction even if made dependent on ordinary residence of ward, it may not be a pure question of law that can be assailed at any forum or at any time. For that it has to be specifically pleaded so that the facts in this regard be brought to the notice of the Court. It is, thus, not a simple question of law rather a mixed question of law and facts which requires determination through evidence. --Movement or Restriction in Movement of ward-The ward belongs to a family which can afford a better upbringing, education and environment either in Pakistan or anywhere in the world which was restricted and curtailed by restriction in his movement. The Courts below should not have seen welfare only from the angle that the father/respondent must not miss his opportunity to see his child but it must also be seen from the angle as to whether a ward who is capable of studying abroad, in case the opportunities are available to him, should he be deprived of on account of the fact that father must not miss a visiting opportunity? --In any other case it would have been the welfare considering the situation of the ward while being at Karachi and only Pakistani national but the situation here is different as the child is privileged to have access to any educational institution around the world including Pakistan. An educational institute or an environment for which most of the children could only dream for. Every child has its own peculiar circumstances and the welfare demands may vary. The restriction in the movement in the present case appeared to be a tool to settle score with mother/petitioner but it will not serve as the welfare of the child. The father/respondent who had raised serious allegations against the mother/petitioner as he claimed that she is not fit to take care of ward yet is not serious in having the custody of the ward, although none of them stands proved in evidence. There are ways and mechanism to regulate the movement which is not achieved by of restricting the movement. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1034/2018 Hashim Gillani v. Scherazade Jamali & others,C.A.1355/2018 Hashim Gillani v. Scherazade Jamali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed
1099 II.A. 63/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui (Appellant) VS Mst. Afsari Begum & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1100 2020 PLC (CS) 1359 H.C.A 15/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Karachi International container Terminal Ltd. (Appellant) VS Brig (Retd.) Arif Mahmud Malik (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1101 Conf.Case 10/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zubair Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1102 Cr.J.A 192/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Noor Muhammad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1103 Const. P. 31/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Khushnood Banoo (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Tarque & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1104 I. A 92/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2002 Sirajuddin Sikandar (Appellant) VS L.A.O.and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.35-K/2020 Commandant Indus Rangers Headquarters v. Sirajuddin Sikandar & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1105 Const. P. 89/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Usman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1106 Const. P. 1324/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Faheem Ahmed Farooqi (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1107 Const. P. 4307/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Amity International (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1108 Const. P. 8509/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ismail Ind Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1109 Const. P. 8404/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s TF Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1110 Const. P. 4618/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Nadeem Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1111 Cr.Bail 404/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMAMD ASLAM S/O MUHAMMAD BACHAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1112 Const. P. 4092/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/S Awan Trading Company (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1113 Const. P. 1664/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s GlaxoSmithKline Healthcare Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1114 Const. P. 5161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Battery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1115 Const. P. 6092/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1116 Const. P. 2363/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Goldway Hygiene Products (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1117 Const. P. 4837/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Irfan Ghazi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1118 Const. P. 5238/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Heinz Pakistan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1119 Const. P. 4199/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Y.B Holdings Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1120 Const. P. 5364/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Procter & Gamble Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1121 Const. P. 5073/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M. Hameed Textile (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1122 Const. P. 5644/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehran Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1123 Cr.Bail 712/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 YASEEN S/O MUHARRAM (Applicant) VS THE STAE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JUN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1124 Const. P. 3927/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1125 Const. P. 4101/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Habib Sugar Mills LTd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1126 Const. P. 5158/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ENI Pakistan (M) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1127 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 233/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Collector,Collectorate of Customss (Preventive) (Applicant) VS Muhammad Akhbar (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1128 Const. P. 5932/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1129 Const. P. 5942/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s OM & S Solution (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1130 Const. P. 6003/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Khairpur Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1131 II.A. 166/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Arif Thr. Attorney Muhammad Tariq (Appellant) VS IIIrd ADJ Karachi South and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1132 Const. P. 5149/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s SEPCO (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1133 M.A. 5/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: - 2021 Jaag Broadcasting Systems (Private) Limited (Appellant) VS Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-APR-21 Yes -Once a decision was taken for the withdrawal of the complaint and to refer it to Council of Complaints, Karachi (Sindh) there should be some logical reasons for not referring it to the Council of Complaints, Karachi (Sindh). Logic and reason existed when it was withdrawn from Council of Complaints, KPK to Council of Complaints, Sindh. It was exclusive prerogative of PEMRA and not Council of Complaints, KPK. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1134 Const. P. 4713/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Mughal Iron and Steel (Petitioner) VS F.B.R & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1135 Const. P. 3542/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Surge Laboratories (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1136 Const. P. 5578/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Bilal Traders and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.5489/2021 M/s Bilal Traders, Karachi and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary (Tariff-I) Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others,C.A.438/2022 M/s Bilal Traders, Karachi and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary (Tariff-I) Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
1137 Const. P. 4589/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sabih Mohsin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1138 Const. P. 3395/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Bellco Trading Co (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1139 Const. P. 4673/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noor ul Hakeem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1140 Const. P. 2385/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP No.D-4861/2013 and others 2017 Nadeem Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1141 Const. P. 4634/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Al Karam Textile Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1142 Const. P. 4228/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Harris Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1143 Const. P. 1388/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Younus S/o Shamsuddin (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Farooq and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1144 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 388/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Union Auto Corporation & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1678-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Union Auto Corporation & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1145 Const. P. 3983/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Rabia Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1146 Const. P. 5551/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Leakhu Mal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1147 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 544/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Dream Garments (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1148 Const. P. 5321/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Battery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1149 Const. P. 4435/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Rabia (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1150 Const. P. 290/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mohammad Owais Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain C.P.1439-K/2021 Syed Shafqat Ali v. Mr. Muhammad Owais Yousuf & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1151 Const. P. 3452/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1152 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 303/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 The Director PCA (Applicant) VS M/s. Naushad Enterprises (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1153 Const. P. 1661/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sheikh Muhammad Manzoor (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1154 Const. P. 4693/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Farm Plant (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1155 Suit.B 84/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M/s. Summit Bank Limited. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Al-Abid Silk Mills Limited. (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-NOV-14 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1156 II.A. 63/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Hameed S/o (Late) Abdul Majeed (Appellant) VS Malik Haq Nawaz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1157 Const. P. 4462/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Noor Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1158 Const. P. 1901/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ikram Ali (Petitioner) VS M/s PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1159 Const. P. 1920/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Tairq Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1160 Suit.B 93/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 BURJ BANK LTD. (Plaintiff) VS M/S. PAK HY-OILS LTD. & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 19-FEB-16 Yes The Facility Advising Letter was subsequent to the Murahaba Facility Agreement dated 01.6.2010 these Murahaba Facilities are to be established independently as being separate and independent transactions. Certainly the agreement in relation thereto does provide a mechanism, method and a way in case of dispute however as to the disbursement of amount and availment of fund, it could independently be established through Murahaba transactions which in the present case have not been denied except it is claimed that all previous debt prior to June, 2010 stood paid and that these Murahaba transactions have not been based on any Finance Agreement. The set of documents provided by the plaintiff is sufficient to ascertain (i) the principal amount, (ii) the profit payable, (iii) transaction debt and (iv) the maturity date. Thus in my view this could hardly constitute a ground to grant leave in this suit since the finance otherwise is established and nothing would turn on the contention that the stamp endorsed on some of the documents were subsequent to the agreement which documents were earlier used with some different dates as the contents of the guarantee itself is sufficient. The plaintiff would have gained nothing by endorsing such stamps on those documents as text of guarantees speaks itself. The contents of the guarantee relates to a Finance Agreement or any supplemental thereto thus these transaction of Murahaba Facility though are supplement to the earlier agreement and Facility Advising Letter so also these guarantees cannot be said to be limited only to the extent of date prior to the 2010. These contentions of the learned Counsel for the defendant do not constitute a substantial question of law and facts. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1161 Const. P. 520/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Masood Ahmad Bhatti. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-MAY-13 Yes Perusal of the contract shows that it is one time concluded contract and the parties were neither coerced nor compelled to enter such adjustments. The VSS scheme was signed by the petitioner challenging certain statistics in terms of the length of service which he could have agitated before VSS Support Centre to initiate the appeal process which was to be decided within 180 days of the VSS announcing date. The petitioner did not opt for such process and has voluntarily signed the separation scheme. It is a binding and concluded contract and the petitioner cannot resile from the terms and conditions thereof. It is required to be accepted as it is or not at all as it is the spirit of the contract itself which says take it or leave it. The petitioners claim appears to have been further adjusted only as a gesture of good-will when the package was enhanced to Rs.4,039,307/- and an additional amount of Rs.791,291/- was offered along with enhanced payable pension to the petitioner. In the circumstances, we are of the view that the petitioner has failed to substantiate his claim vis-??-vis final VSS settlement and release of his actual pension and other service benefits, however, since the petitioner is agitating his grievances since 2009 and the amount is also lying with the respondents, therefore, the petitioner is entitled to the interest over such amount. Accordingly, while disposing of the petition vide short order dated 14.05.2013 the respondents were directed to pay interest at the rate of 8% per annum from 10.3.2008 till the entire amount is paid to the petitioner. . Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1162 Const. P. 1810/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Kamar Ali S/o Tahir Ali (Petitioner) VS VIth Sr.Civil Judge/Rent Controller Khi East & ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-OCT-17 Yes It appears that these petitions are against an interlocutory order passed on 21.07.2017 whereby the application of the petitioner in relation to framing of preliminary issues was dismissed. The law does not provide any room to file appeal/petition against an interlocutory order. By this tentative/interim order no right appears to have been taken away from the petitioners by rejecting an interlocutory application which could be subjected to petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1163 2018 SBLR Sindh 245 Suit 2257/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Al-Hamd Associates. (Plaintiff) VS Sohail Nawab. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 15-MAY-17 Yes The plaintiff in this matter has fairly invoked the jurisdiction of this Court in pursuance of the arbitration clause and not for any other remedy which may include reinstatement or declaration that it was unlawfully cancelled. --In the instant case the plaintiff is not seeking any injunctive relief and instead chose to file this application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act for referring this dispute of alleged termination. Whether or not it is lawful on the part of the licensor to terminate is not for this Court to comment. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1164 Const. P. 1345/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Tando Allayar Sugar Mills (Petitioner) VS Chief Commissioner I.R and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1165 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 273/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Muhammad Sami & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1166 M.A. 24/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rameez Dar S/o Liaquat Dar (Late) (Appellant) VS Learned IXth ADJ, Karachi (South) (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-APR-21 Yes There is nothing on record to ascertain as to how learned Additional District Judge came up with the valuation of immovable property at Rs.1,50,00,000/-as schedule of property discloses it at Rs.10 Million. Unless otherwise evidence and material is available,such statement/schedule which is filed along with memo of petition should not have been discarded or ignored. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1167 2021 CLC 98 Const. P. 1111/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nafeesa Begum (Petitioner) VS State Life Insurance Corporation & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 27-JAN-20 Yes The expression subject to agreement is occasionally used in the correspondence exchanged between the parties during contract negotiations. These words denote that the document is not an offer or acceptance and negotiations are still going on. The expression, which may be found similar and closer to the term subject to agreement, is without prejudice, which may not be a synonym but much closer to the essence of expression subject to agreement/contract. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1168 Const. P. 6965/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Deharki Sugar Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1169 Const. P. 7167/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 J.B Saeed Studio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1170 Const. P. 1811/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Tahir Ali thr. Attorney Zulfiqar Ameer Ali (Petitioner) VS VIth Sr.Civil Judge/Rent Controller Khi East & ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1171 Const. P. 7335/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shah Murad Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1172 Const. P. 6579/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Arbab Ali Khan (M/s Best Homes) (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1173 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 74/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS M/s. Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Brothers (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1174 Const. P. 6356/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s M.M Associates (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1175 Const. P. 6913/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Aisha Steel Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1176 Const. P. 6910/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tariq Chobdar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1177 Const. P. 2492/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Be Energy Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.407-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Be Energy Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1178 Const. P. 6931/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 JS Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1179 Const. P. 7150/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Comfort Oil Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.236/2022 M/s COMFORT OIL MILLS (PVT) LTD., Islamabad v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and others,C.A.2074/2022 M/s COMFORT OIL MILLS (PVT) LTD., Islamabad v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 1st week of October 22,Pending
1180 Const. P. 6304/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s ORB Exim Corporation (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1181 Const. P. 7125/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Rubicon Builders & Developers (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1182 2021 SBLR Sindh 2413 Const. P. 1033/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ahsanullah S/o Amanullah (Petitioner) VS Sultan Shah and another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 16-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.800-K/2021 Sultan Shah v. Ahsanullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1183 Const. P. 7207/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Jetpur Wala (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1184 Const. P. 6963/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Meezan Islamic Fund (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1185 Const. P. 6601/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Amin Impex (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1186 Const. P. 6392/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Talib Amin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1187 Const. P. 171/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Yousuf Channa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1188 Const. P. 1020/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Rasheed & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1189 Const. P. 654/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Drayhi & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1190 Const. P. 6823/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Multi Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1191 R.A (Civil Revision) 87/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Almas Begum & another (Applicant) VS Abdul Aziz Memon & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 24-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1192 Const. P. 1503/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Jan Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Pak Through its Sec Local Govt Islamabad & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1193 R.A (Civil Revision) 155/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Kazi Muhammad Ilyas and Ors (Applicant) VS Kazi Muhammad Raees and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1194 Suit 2955/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD FAHEEM KHAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1195 Const. P. 3980/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Morgen & Tag (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.165-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Morgen & Tag & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1196 Const. P. 1261/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Fahmida (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1197 Const. P. 865/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Chhutto Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1198 Const. P. 1291/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Habib ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-OCT-19 Yes we have straightaway enquired from the Counsel as to what reason was provided in support of the application for condonation of delay, he relied upon the affidavit in support of the application available at page-99. In para-2, para-12 of the memo of petition was adopted in support of the application for codonation of delay. He claimed to have fallen sick due to sudden shock of his removal from service and claimed to have remained in constant supervision of a doctor with effect from 02.2.2012 to 30.4.2012. In support of such contention he attached two certificates of doctors available on record. First certificate is of 29.4.2012 and the other is of 01.5.2012. Both these certificates only demonstrate that the petitioner remained under treatment of a doctor and not that he was bedridden or unable to engage in daily activities Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1199 Suit 1058/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Shoaib Soomro & others (Plaintiff) VS Export Processing Zone Authority & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 Yes Since the inception of their appointments no codal formalities were exhausted; their appointments were on the basis of walk-in interview. I have not been able to find any advertisement or test amongst the deserving persons who could have applied for such appointments having genuine belief that later on they could be confirmed. Plaintiffs without any contest were given appointment letters and now after so many years of their unlawful appointments they want these appointments to be given premium by confirmation of their appointments, without undergoing process of even NTS tests, which was ordered to be undertaken. I would not even consider NTS tests to be a justified attempt to regularize or regulate their services. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1200 I. A 2/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Rashid Shaikh (Appellant) VS Mst. Afshan Naz (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1201 Const. P. 3108/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sharique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1202 I. A 14/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mrs. Mahrukh Haider & another (Appellant) VS Mst. Farhat Imrana & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1203 Const. P. 483/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naik Muhammad S/o Nasrullah (Petitioner) VS Iqbal Muhammad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JUN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1204 2022 PLD Sindh 278 S.M.A 394/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Saleem Islam s/o late SYed Zafar ul Islam (Petitioner) VS Wing Cdr Syed Feroze Ali Rizvi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-FEB-22 Yes Section 15 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that every suit shall be instituted in a Court of lowest grade competent to try it. The primary reason, amongst many, is that a right of appeal may be available before appellate jurisdiction which jurisdiction is asked to exercise concurrent jurisdiction. Concurrent jurisdiction could only be exercised in exceptional cases and circumstances which do not exist here. It could also be exercised when appeal is being heard and orders are required to be passed as being from original court/forum, for exercise of concurrent jurisdiction as in the case of Idara-e-Noore-Haq. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1205 Civil Revision 182/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Bashir Ahmed Thr LRs (Applicant) VS Learned Distt: Judge Mirpurkhas and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1206 Const. P. 619/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Solar Packages (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1207 Const. P. 8982/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Wahid Akhter Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1208 Const. P. 4123/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Pak Arab Engineering Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1209 I. A 6/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 M/S Kohisar Industries Kotri (Appellant) VS JS Bank Ltd. & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1210 Const. P. 2663/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mrs. Bilqees Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1211 Const. P. 1722/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C P No D 1834 of 2021 2021 Saindad & Other (Petitioner) VS Asif Mehmood & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1212 Const. P. 256/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Iqbal Jawaid (Petitioner) VS Dr. Syed Abid imam Zaidi & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1213 H.C.A 158/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zahid Ali Khan (Appellant) VS Mrs. Fauzia Aqeel Lari (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1214 Suit 57/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MST FAHMIDA & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS AMIR ZAIB & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 16-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1215 Const. P. 249/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hameer (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1216 2023 PLC (CS) 889 Suit -3416/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 Yes laintiff was appointed by defendant No.3 when it acquired the corporate status and hence the relationship is governed the rule of `master` and `servant`. The Human Resource Manual which is relied upon by the plaintiff itself suggests that the termination of the service could be effected without assigning any reason or as a measure of retrenchment, after giving him a notice of three months or payment in lieu thereof Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1217 Const. P. 271/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Gul Bahadur S/o Bahram Khan (Petitioner) VS Jama Masjid Muhammadi & Madrasah Tehfeesz-ul-Quran (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1218 Suit 779/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Parwaiz Hussain. (Plaintiff) VS Clifton Cantonment Board & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1219 Const. P. 274/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zulfiqar Ahmed S/o Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Jama Masjid Muhammadi & Madrasah Tehfeesz-ul-Quran (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1220 Const. P. 6701/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Younus Vohra (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1221 Const. P. 1538/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Bushra Abrar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1222 Const. P. 493/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Saeed Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Karam Ali Khan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1223 Const. P. 849/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Mst. Sanam Khushk & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1224 2023 CLD 454 Judicial Companies Misc. 44/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Shafi Tanneries (Pvt) Ltd & (2) Others (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 17-FEB-23 Yes This petition under section 279 read with Section 280 to 283 and 285(8) of Companies Act, 2017 pertains to demerger of specific undertakings of petitioners No.1 and 2 in petitioner No.3. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1225 2023 YLR 414 II.A. 44/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: IInd Appeal No. 45 of 2021 2021 Abdul Malik (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-JUN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.901-K/2022 Abdul Malik v. Province of Sindh through Secretary, Revenue Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1226 S.M.A 595/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abir Samad Viqar s/o Viqar Samad (Petitioner) VS Viqar Samad (Deceased) (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1227 2023 CLD 426 Judicial Companies Misc. 45/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ASSOCIATED CONSULTING ENGINEERS ACE LtD & 4 OTHERS (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-FEB-23 Yes The Scheme of Arrangement/Demerger Undertaking in view of understanding of the members/directors is to redesign and restructure the companies to promote the business avenues and apparently not against the public interest or violation of law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1228 Adm. Suit 13/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. Agro Trade (Pvt) Ltd (Plaintiff) VS M.V POAVOSA WISDOM III & 3 Others (Defendant) S.B. Order 25-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1229 Const. P. 728/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Kiran Chandra (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1230 Const. P. 1587/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Dadli & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1231 Suit 1860/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 ZAHOOR SHAH (Plaintiff) VS MST. RUKHSANA TABASUM & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 07-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1232 Const. P. 1713/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Zaheer ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1233 Const. P. 513/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CPs No D-521, 543, 549, 558, 607, 628, 629, 630, 633, 648, 650, 651, 655, 660, 674, 682, 697, 702, 705, 706, 710, 711, 720, 721, 722, 723, 725, 865, 866, 876, 878, 345, 407, 424, 476, 498, 537, 563, 564, 572, 728,730, 743, 745, 746, 775, 786, 809, 814, 824, 827, 828, 849, 851, 854, 589, 591, 595, 596, 597, 598, 616, 617, 619, 621, 624, 632, 637, 640, 641, 643, 644, 645, 646, 656, 657, 669, 670, 671, 683, 684, 685, 687, 689, 691, 692, 694, 695, 699, 701, 703, 712, 714, 716, 717, 719, 731, 735, 737, 738, 741, 742,744, 753, 754, 755, 758, 761, 762, 764, 768, 770,772, 773, 783, 788, 791, 792, 800, 805, 806, 818, 825, 830, 842, 845, 859, 861, 867, 869, 871, 875, 882, 886, 888, 900, 906, 911 &920 of 2022 2022 Prem Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No NTS Matters Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1234 Suit 2008/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MST SAMIA QAZI (Plaintiff) VS THE PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-FEB-23 Yes There cannot be parallel trial of same questions before two forums under doctrine of election. Once the questions raised by directorate and passed through appellate forum which decides the issues after hearing the appeal of plaintiffs, who opt to prefer an appeal, this original jurisdiction cannot be exhausted, not even as an Appellate authority against the decision of two forums including Appellate Authority created under the Sindh Coal Act, 2012 and the relevant Rules. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1235 2023 CLC 237 Suit 1068/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Liaquat Dawood Kukda. (Plaintiff) VS Syed Hashim Raza. (Defendant) S.B. Order 12-OCT-22 Yes Performance of the later agreement executed between plaintiff and defendant No.1, cannot be undertaken to be adjudicated by the Banking Court and/or could be denied. Even at the execution stage in a banking case, if in this suit prima facie case is made out while hearing injunction application the defendant No.1 can be restrained from executing any conveyance deed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1236 Const. P. 1460/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shahzad Maqbool (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1237 Const. P. 7234/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s Falcon Oil Filling Station (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1238 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 121/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Director General I & I Customs Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s A.N.I enterprises and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1239 Const. P. 1634/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Samina Asif and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1240 Const. P. 199/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Corp Tech Agri Services (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1241 Const. P. 3299/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Democratic Workers Federation (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1242 Const. P. 7966/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Rubina Wali Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.947-K/2023 Mst.Safia & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others,C.P.946-K/2023 Mst.Rukia Wali Muhammad & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
1243 Const. P. 3142/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s SAM Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1244 H.C.A 366/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Laila Sarfaraz & another (Appellant) VS Hussain A. Haroon & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1245 I. A 82/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Ifrahim & Another (Appellant) VS M/S. JS Bank Limited and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-DEC-23 Yes The value and/or forced sale value is provided in the sale proclamation only as equity and to have an idea about the possible price. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1246 I. A 64/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Abdul Hameed and Others (Appellant) VS Bank Islami Pakistan Limited & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1247 Const. P. 6662/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Najam Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1248 I. A 60/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Basit Khan (Appellant) VS Bank Islami Ltd & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-23 Yes *the appellant is none but a stranger to these proceedings and the observation of the executing Court does not call for any interference as it is a dispute between financial institution and the customer and appellant is thus not in any way a proper and necessary party and that too after the disposal of suit, when it was decreed and execution proceeded. ** In terms of Order XXI Rule 60 CPC release of a property from attachment can be allowed only in case the objector/claimant had a title or right over it, whereas in the instant case on one hand appellant has no valid title in his favour and on the other there is a registered document whereby the judgment debtor is the sole owner of the subject property Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1249 Const. P. 946/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Aslam Bajwa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1250 I. A 32/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s. Khursheed Engineering (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Agha Steel Industries Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1251 H.C.A 116/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Majeed Qureshi (Appellant) VS Yasmeen Bibi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1252 Const. P. 4311/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1253 I. A 112/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shah Alam (Appellant) VS Hafiz Muhammad Jahangir & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1254 Const. P. 3763/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Inayatullah Abbas (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1255 H.C.A 80/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Muhammad Akhtar Khan & Ors (Appellant) VS Hanif Merchant (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1256 H.C.A 130/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Customs Today & another (Appellant) VS Qasim International Container Terminal (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1257 H.C.A 322/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Qadir (Appellant) VS Mst. Shabeena Farooq & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1258 I. A 1/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Mehar-un-Nissa & ors (Appellant) VS Faysal Bank Limited & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1259 H.C.A 69/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shabbir Ahmed Arif & Another (Appellant) VS Rizwan Riaz & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1260 I. A 62/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sultana Saleem & Another (Appellant) VS M/s. BRR Guardian Modaraba & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1261 R.A (Civil Revision) 113/1995 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1995 Muhammad Haroon through LRs (Applicant) VS Ali Asghar and other. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1262 H.C.A 55/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Basit Godil & Another (Appellant) VS Paramount Associates & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1263 Const. P. 2521/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sarah Sohail Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1264 Const. P. 192/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Miss. Shehla (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1265 I. A 84/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Qasim Jamali (Appellant) VS Learned Court of 4th ADJ Karachi East and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1266 I. A 34/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Hanif (Appellant) VS M/s. B.R.R. Guardian Modarba & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1267 I. A 70/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sohail Ilyas (Appellant) VS Silk Bank Ltd & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1268 Const. P. 1274/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Ghulam Rasool Kazi & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-23 No Isra University matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1269 Const. P. 5177/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1270 Const. P. 3137/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP. D 132 of 2019 2023 Yasmeen Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1271 H.C.A 403/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Afzal Hussain & Another (Appellant) VS Mst. Jannat-un-Nissa & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1272 H.C.A 237/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aviserv Limited (Appellant) VS Civil Aviation Authority (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1273 Const. P. 538/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Haseeb-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1274 Const. P. 1056/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Choith Ram & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1275 Const. P. 7462/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1276 Const. P. 6444/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mrs. Najma Asif Sajan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1277 H.C.A 406/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. A.S.K Traders Pvt. Ltd (Appellant) VS Bashiruddin Qureshi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1278 Const. P. 732/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Qamaruddin (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1279 Const. P. 8341/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shahida Salam (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1280 2013 CLC 164 Suit 1440/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Mst.Shabana Yasmeen (Applicant) VS Prov.of Sindh (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 27-AUG-12 Yes For the purpose of existence or absence of a prima facie case in relation to exercise under Order XXXIX rules 1 & 2, facts canvassed by both sides have to be examined and it is on preponderance of facts as based on documentary material and averments in the way of affidavits that concept of arguable case has to be determined. In addition, while deciding application under Order XXXIX rules 1&2 CPC, Court is required to travel beyond four corners of plaint to determine, though tentatively, as to on what facts, finding is to be based. Thus spectrum of Order XXXIX rules 1 & 2 CPC is broader and more comprehensive Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1281 Cr.Bail 555/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Hazoor Bux Brohi and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-FEB-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1282 Cr.Bail 34/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Khair Jan Jakhrani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1283 Const. P. 776/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Syed Mohammad Hashim Shah (Petitioner) VS SSP Dadu and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1284 Const. P. 845/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Allah Dito Domki (Petitioner) VS SIO PS Bakshapur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1285 Cr.Bail 552/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Abdul Rasool Khoso & ors (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 Yes In the entire application it has not been convincingly stated as to what malafide was involved in nominating the applicants after 04 months and 12 days. Statement of the applicants that since they have been involved after 04 months and 12 days is sufficient to establish the malafides, I am afraid, is not convincing statement. The complainant and the eyewitnesses have categorically nominated the applicants in their statements and as observed by the Honourable Supreme Court that no court would have any power to grant pre-arrest bail unless all the conditions specified for allowing bail before arrest specially the condition regarding malafides were proved. Perusal of the record shows that no such ground was available or were made out as far as bail application is concerned. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances and in view of medical post-mortem report and the statements of the eyewitnesses I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail in favour of the applicants and being so the instant application stands dismissed and the interim pre-arrest bail already allowed to them is hereby recalled. Accordingly, bail application is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1286 Cr.Misc. 206/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Badshazadi Narejo (Applicant) VS SHO Naudero and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1287 Const. P. 392/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Juma Khan Golo (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Murtaza Mirani and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1288 Const. P. 71/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst. Sughran Solangi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Shahdadkot and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1289 Const. P. 2148/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Nazir Ahmed Chandio (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Waggan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1290 Const. P. 925/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Abdul Karim Khokhar (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1291 Civil Revision 58/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2006 Mehrullah and ors (Applicant) VS Barkat Ali and Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1292 Const. P. 201/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Muhammad Aslam Kourejo (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Civil Line and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1293 Const. P. 1/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Sarwar Khatoon Tunio (Applicant) VS The state and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1294 Const. P. 990/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Asiya Channa (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Gaheja and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1295 Const. P. 994/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Nabi Bakhsh Bughio (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Baqapur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1296 Cr.Bail 258/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Theseen (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-AUG-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1297 J.M 4/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Anant Kumar Parshtam Kanabar (Applicant) VS Swami Narain Temple Estate Trust & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-NOV-13 Yes Upshot of the above discussion is that the applicant has failed to demonstrate that he is a necessary and property to be joined in the suit proceedings, which could be contemplated as fraud and misrepresentation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1298 I. A 45/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Ali Rashid (Appellant) VS M/S Unuted Bank Ltd & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-OCT-19 Yes The appellant cannot be made to suffer on these facts and circumstances when he had deposited the bid amount at the relevant time. The bid amount was in fact more than forced sale value evaluated by the consultant and declared in the sale proclamation to which no objections were raised. Thus there are enough material and reasons available to interfere with order passed by the Banking Court, which has no reason or logic. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1299 M.A. 6/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2005 Muhammad Basheer Juma (Appellant) VS Institute Charted Accountants Pak (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-MAY-18 Yes I do not see any charge within the frame of clause 5 Part 4 of Schedule 1 of Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961 in the absence of any audit report duly signed by him (appellant). All that I could see is that the report was tentatively drafted, having certain queries which the Board of Bankers Equity Limited was supposed to furnish. At the most the auditor should have asked for such queries before even attempting to prepare a draft for the period ending on 30.06.1998 and this is perhaps not covered by the clause 5 of Part 4 of Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961 referred above. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1300 R.A (Civil Revision) 180/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Province of Sindh & Ors (Applicant) VS Syed Murad Ali Shah (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-JAN-18 Yes Appellant may have lost the remedy of appeal but not their rights as to the entitlement over the subject land, as they claimed, and they may pursue actions and/or approach revenue forum to get the title clear, in case it is so desired, which may be considered and decided in accordance with law and the exparte finding may not come in the way of such judicial proceedings which shall be in accordance with law. This is a case where the provincial government shall also initiate proceedings against the officials who were responsible for not contesting the case on merit or who may be in collusion with the respondents and shall submit report to this Court within three months. States interest and/or the revenue interest is to be jealously guarded and more importantly when some officials appeared to have acted negligently and carelessly. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.585-K/2018 Syed Murad Ali Shah v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.137-K/2019 Syed Murad Ali Shah v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1301 Civil Revision 17/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2003 Mst.Aisha Kazi and others (Applicant) VS Anwar Ahmed (died),through his L.Rs. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 12-FEB-19 Yes The registration of a document does not help in proving the contents of the document. This burden is to be discharged separately under the Evidence Act, 1872 and/or the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Mere alleged registration does not prove the contents of the instrument. The quantum of evidence to establish a testamentary paper must always depend upon the circumstances of each case. Burden to prove execution lies on those propounding a Will to affirm positively execution of the Will. Opposite side should not be burdened with onus to prove that Will had not been executed or that it was a forged one. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1302 II.A. 83/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Waheed Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Sadiq (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-MAR-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.511-K/2018 Abdul Waheed Khan (decd) thr. his L.Rs v. Muhammad Sadiq Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1303 Const. P. 939/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 President Poors Welfares (Petitioner) VS Regional Police Officer and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro C.P.797/2019 Mansoor Ashraf v. President Poors Welfare Association Sukkur thr. its President Hazoor Bux & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1304 Const. P. 1418/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ali Hyder & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1305 Const. P. 221/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Saeedullah Manganhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1306 Const. P. 3178/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Atique Ahmed Allahabdi (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1307 Suit 1529/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Saad Ullah Khan. (Plaintiff) VS Al-Baraka Bank (Pakistan ) Ltd. (Defendant) S.B. Order 31-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1308 Const. P. 2618/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Muharram and othrs (Petitioner) VS Ahmed Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1309 Const. P. 2280/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Wajid Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1310 Civil Revision 72/1988 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 1988 Ghulam Qadir (deceased),thr:his L.Rs.&Ors. (Applicant) VS Ghulam Muhammad (deceased),thr:his L.Rs.&Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 17-SEP-18 Yes The issues were framed by the trial Court also relate to a decree which was allegedly obtained by false and misrepresentation / fraud. Issues framed under Section 12(2) CPC do not pertain to the declaration in respect of the orders passed by Member Board of Revenue and Additional Commissioner Sukkur Division Sukkur. Hence in all fairness, the evidence that was recorded before the trial Court by the parties was in respect of issues framed and not beyond that. The issues and the evidence thereon, in relation to the entitlement of the parties and the validity of the orders of the Member Board of Revenue and Additional Commissioner Sukkur Division was yet to be recorded and that could have been possible only once the appropriate issues could have been framed on the basis of pleadings. No doubt, in appropriate cases where the result would be no different than what can be achieved without setting aside a decree, appropriate orders could have been passed but in the instant case there could have been a possibility that the applicant may have been able to achieve his goal after recording appropriate evidence on providing opportunity to record evidence, insofar as the orders of the Member Board of Revenue and Additional Commissioner Sukkur Division is concerned. However, in the instant proceedings such liberty was not given to the applicant nor such issues were framed and on the basis of evidence recorded under Section 12(2) CPC the decree was reviewed and amended which was not warranted in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.48-K/2020 Mst: Irshad Begum @ Naseeban & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Board of Revenue Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1311 Civil Revision 171/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Abdul Haleem and an other (Applicant) VS Land Acquisition Officer and an other (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1312 Const. P. 1143/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1313 Const. P. 2625/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Abdul Rahman Lohar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1314 Const. P. 1007/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mohsin Raza (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1315 Const. P. 4504/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1316 Const. P. 1951/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ali Raza Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1317 Const. P. 1954/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Muhammad Iqbal Arain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1318 Const. P. 1452/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mirza Muhammad Umar Baig (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 07-NOV-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1319 Const. P. 1075/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Fayyaz Husain (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio C.P.5194/2017 Abdul Farooq Rathoor v. Rights Now Pakistan thr. its Social Mobilizer Mr. Muhammad Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1320 2022 CLC 489 Const. P. 145/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Muhammad Hashim Thr:L.Rs Dr.Aftab Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Haji Abdul Ghafoor and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1321 Civil Revision 11/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Aqeel (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1322 II.A. 6/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Haroon and others (Appellant) VS Qaimkhani Welfare Society and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-FEB-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.247-K/2020 Muhammad Haroon and others v. Qaimkhani Welfare Society Registered and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
1323 Const. P. 2952/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Ayan Energy Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1324 Const. P. 5313/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Samad International Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1325 2022 PTD 634, 2021 SBLR Sindh 2408 Const. P. 8642/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Govind Ram (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakitan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 Yes The powers primarily were exercised under Section 176(1)(b) of Income Tax Ordinance, whereas investigation undertaken in terms of Section 9(1) of Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 by the investigating officer could commence, provided that the investigating officer acted, not later than seven days from the date of order of attachment made under sub-section (1) of section 8 or, seizure of property under section 14 or section 15, on service of a notice of thirty days on the person concerned which may also be an assessee, however, no such pre-qualification exists. We are therefore, of the view that unexplained amount which came in and went out of the account, could be inquired about and an explanation could be sought but until and unless an explanation is forwarded by the assesse to the dissatisfaction of the officer concerned, it is inconceivable at the said premature stage that it was laundered money which is defined under Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010. Any amount which is not accounted or not considered as taxable amount not necessarily be the laundered money having meaning under AMLA-2010. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1326 Const. P. 4819/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Haji Nazir Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1327 Const. P. 3379/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Hammad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1328 Const. P. 5668/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Gul Ahmed Holding (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.5555/2021 Gul Ahmed Holdings (Pvt) Ltd Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Ex-Officio Chairman, FBR, Islamabad and others,C.A.321/2022 Gul Ahmed Holdings (Pvt) Ltd Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Ex-Officio Chairman, FBR, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
1329 Const. P. 1023/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Liberty Power Tech Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1330 Const. P. 6071/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Majeed & Sons (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1331 Const. P. 1794/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Aziz Impex (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1332 Const. P. 4093/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Irfan Ghazi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1333 Const. P. 4664/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 OOCL Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1334 Const. P. 6145/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Lefres (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1335 Const. P. 5461/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Habib Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1336 Const. P. 5489/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s FIrebolt 63 (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1337 Const. P. 6191/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Tando Allayar Sugar Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1338 I.T.R.A 85/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) VS M/S EMPACT ACTIVATION SERVICE (PVT) LTD (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1339 Const. P. 3243/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Ittefaq General Store (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1340 Const. P. 5339/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Raja Steel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1341 Const. P. 3701/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Huffaz Seamless Pipe Ind Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1342 Const. P. 4031/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Alam Cotton Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1343 I.T.R.A 367/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) VS M/S DIGITECH SYSTEM KHI (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1344 Const. P. 4535/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Medicare Paksitan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1345 Const. P. 4349/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mahesh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1346 2021 CLC 1931 M.A. 3/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s. Jiangsu Dajin Heavy Industry Co. Limited (Appellant) VS Port Qasim Authority (PQA) and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-JUN-21 Yes - Indeed, it appears that it was more than a month after opening of the bid that the appellant made an attempt to rectify its material inability by furnishing a separate/counter bank guarantee from Bank AlHabib for both the tenders. This deficiency could not have been resurrected as by then the ship sailed. These belated attempts would have amounted to a modification of the tender documents, which is not permissible under Rule 31 of Rules 2004. Eventually only those whose technical bids were found to be in consonance with the terms of the invitation, were liable to be considered for further steps and were considered accordingly. -Petitioner being aware of the said tender conditions participated and having participated in the tender cannot challenge or dislike prerequisites meant for technical qualification. He could only expect judicious treatment within the playing rules however, it was too late for appellant when it realized that playing conditions were not palatable to it. The situation faced by appellant based on the aforesaid facts is not res integra as a number of judgments are in the filed covering the issue as settled law. - Even if I have to measure bidding terms on the touchstone of malice and mala fide, I would come out with understanding that these terms are for every one and not to exclude anyone. These are commercial transactions and decisions in this regard should base on strict compliance of terms of tenders whereas equity and fair play based on financial offer is not primary concern. Even if someone intends to impress by showing better financial offer, he has to qualify first on technical grounds. It is the overall impact till completion of job that needs serious consideration by procuring agency. Whether a bidder has the ability to deliver as per terms of tenders and having capacity to ensure projects completion should be the primary concern of procuring agency. There is thus nothing which could lead to conclude that the process ended up in a decision of rejecting technical bid of appellant was flawed. - Any term within frame of law is also not open for a judicial review even under the hierarchy of procurement laws as Rule 25 enables the procuring agency to require bid security not exceeding five per cent of the bid price to be furnished by every bidder and procuring agency may save its effectiveness for a period as they required in terms of Rule 26. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1347 Const. P. 3762/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Foundation Securities (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1348 2022 MLD 73 Const. P. 948/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Ameer Jahan / Bisma Noreen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-OCT-21 Yes COVID VACCINATION AND 5G TECHNOLOGY ---Fifth Generation technology is making its roots across the world and all countries have framed policies to get benefit out of it. Fifth Generation technology caters for faster browsing, streaming, uploading and downloading speed with better connectivity. Its adoption perhaps is the only way out to be at par with rest of the world. Its application is nowadays common in robotic devices, self-driven cars, medical devices etc. Insofar as Covid-19 is concerned, perhaps the petitioner is not even remotely aware of the consequences of Corona Virus disease that triggered in 2019 and is yet to be controlled; there are international and national policies which are being towed by different departments of the provincial as well as federal government including health departments. The world is facing this novel experience which is never seen before is pandemic in nature and since last two years efforts are being made to have a complete control over it. Research progress is continued however the precautionary measures to control its maximum effect is being taken and monitored in the entire world by way of enhancing the immunity of body i.e. resistance against the virus (Covid-19). One should not be an obstacle by saying that he/she is not interested in such scheduled vaccination as this might result in rapid growth/increase/ontogenesis of Corona Virus. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.51/2022 Bisma Naureen/Ameer Jehan v. The Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Defence, Islamabad Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1349 Const. P. 6193/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Tando Allayar Sugar Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1350 Const. P. 6106/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Fine Star Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1351 Const. P. 4685/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Battery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1352 Const. P. 6891/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Stamco Steel Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1353 Cr.Tran 56/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MST. MAH BIBI W/O ESSA (Appellant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1354 R.A (Civil Revision) 74/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ziauddin Gabol S/o Amin Gabol (Applicant) VS Nabi Bukhsh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-APR-21 No n application for leave to defend was filed by applicant in a summary suit filed for recovery of Rs.14,915,000/-.While considering the leave to defend application,the Court granted the leave to the effect that only 1/3 of the total claim was required to be submitted in terms of surety, which order is impugned in this revision application. Prima facie it appears that a fair discretion was exercised by the trial Court. This is no defence that he (applicant) has no financial means for submitting surety in terms of Order XXXVII CPC. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1355 Const. P. 4560/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Agility & Co. and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1356 Cr.Tran 46/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SAEED AHMED KHAN S/O AMANULLAH KHAN (Appellant) VS RAKHSHI KHAN D/O MUHAMMAD MOHIBULLAH KHAN & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1357 Const. P. 618/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rana Muhammad Abid Hussain S/o Rana Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst. Samina Qadri and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.3062/2022 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Ghulam Mustafa and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1358 Const. P. 4987/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Siccotel Trading (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1359 Const. P. 5050/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sharifullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1360 Const. P. 4812/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Malik Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1361 Const. P. 1798/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Nadir Khan (Petitioner) VS Membre S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1362 Const. P. 1628/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Zulfiqar Hussain (Petitioner) VS District Judge, Khi-C & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-DEC-17 Yes annual value of the premises or imposition of taxes may have contributed but the landlord has not taken shelter on those grounds. Therefore, in the absence of any evidence as regards other points/ingredients of Section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, the consideration of existing point can be given effect. On account of enforcing only one of the ingredients the landlord is not disentitled for the enhancement of rent. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1363 Const. P. 4299/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Samina Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS I.G Police Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1364 Const. P. 316/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Noman Butt S/o Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Court of IIIrd ADJ, Karachi South and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-20 Yes The petitioner cannot challenge the source wherefrom such golden ornaments were purchased, either by respondent No.3 or her father. All that is important for such controversy is that ornaments, which were given to respondent No.3, were retained by petitioner. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.273-K/2020 Noman Butt v. The Court of the Learned IIIrd Additional District Judge Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1365 Const. P. 3968/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Asian Kings Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1366 Const. P. 5207/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Naimatullah Steel Works (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1367 Const. P. 2415/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Puma Energy Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.218-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Puma Engery Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1368 Const. P. 6393/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s NTL (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh Revenue Board and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1369 Const. P. 6490/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Knitwear Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1370 Const. P. 7255/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tanweer Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1371 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 851/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS M/s. Fahad Bashir Bangash & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-21 No The reliance on the forensic report is not impressive as this was not the case of the department in show-cause notice; they (the department) never raised any allegation as to tampering either in chassis number or engine number. The only question raised was that it was a smuggled one and to overcome such allegation sufficient documents are available on record for the Tribunal to reach to a lawful conclusion, which it has done Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.3-K/2022 Collector of Customs v. M/s. Fahad Bashir Bangash Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1372 Const. P. 2468/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s PSO Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.318-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Pakistan State Oil Company Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1373 Const. P. 5546/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Meelano Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1374 Const. P. 7336/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shah Murad Sugar Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1375 Const. P. 2236/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.322-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Byco Petroleum Pakistan Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1376 Const. P. 5202/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 A F Steel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1377 Const. P. 6815/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shamsuddin Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1378 Const. P. 6391/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Chandar Lal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1379 Const. P. 3596/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Maqsood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Malir (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1380 Const. P. 5205/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Naimatullah Steel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1381 Const. P. 5206/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Amir Asim Steel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1382 Const. P. 6745/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Power Cement Ltd (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1383 Const. P. 7326/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Iqbal Latif Bawaney & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1384 Const. P. 7309/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naseem Aksar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1385 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 2795/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Yousaf (Applicant) VS The Member Technical & Judicial & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1386 Const. P. 3070/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Rehman Contractors Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.428-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Rehman Construction Co. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1387 Const. P. 7327/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Iqbal Latif Bawaney & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1388 Const. P. 3462/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 United Brands Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1389 Const. P. 6550/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Khyber Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1390 F.R.A 3/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mushtaq Hussain (Appellant) VS Muhammad Irfan & another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1391 Suit 1884/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/S. FLYING PAPER INDUSTRIES LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1392 Const. P. 270/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Pervaiz S/o Behram Khan (Petitioner) VS Jama Masjid Muhammadi & Madrasah Tehfeesz-ul-Quran (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1393 Const. P. 1021/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Zahid Ahmed Arain & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1394 R.A (Civil Revision) 174/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Abdul Majeed Abid and Other (Applicant) VS Sindh Small Industries Corporation (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-APR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1395 Const. P. 7241/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Celerity Supply Chains (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1396 Const. P. 6515/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s S.M Traders and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1397 Const. P. 380/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Rashid S/o Muhammad Aslam Shujja (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1398 Const. P. 6745/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1399 2017 YLR 2442 Suit 1691/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shaheen Air International Ltd., (SAIL) & another. (Plaintiff) VS Civil Aviation Authority & anaother. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 25-NOV-16 Yes "Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2---General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 24-A---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 18 & 25---Suit for declaration and injunction---Interim injunction, grant of---License, renewal of---Right to trade and business---Discrimination---Plaintiffs were licensed by Civil Aviation Authority to operate commercial airline for passengers and cargo---Grievance of plaintiffs was that authorities declined to renew the license on the plea that some of the Directors and Shareholders of plaintiff company required security clearance---Validity---Denial of security clearance was not as required under the law---Such was not only devoid of serious reasoning of security/ intelligence agencies but also hit by S.24-A of General Clauses Act, 1897---In absence of detailed reasoning as to the adverse observation, it would not be possible for plaintiffs to comply with such anonymous terms---Change of directorship or Chief Executive Officer, was not the solution as it would amount to denying a right as guaranteed to each citizen of Pakistan in terms of Arts. 18 & 25 of the Constitution---Letter of government advising plaintiff company through Civil Aviation Authority that they could either get security clearance from the Directorate of Inter Service Intelligence or concerned Director/Chief Executive Officer should be considered to be changed was of no consequence at all---Denial to renew a license to plaintiff company on account of dual nationality of Directors amounted to curtailing a right guaranteed under Arts. 18 & 25 of the Constitution unless valid reasons were provided---High Court directed plaintiffs to respond to queries and provide all information and documents as and when required by the concerned authority/security agencies---High Court suspended the orders passed by the authorities---Interim injunction was granted in circumstances." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1400 Judicial Companies Misc. 29/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 State Bank of Pakistan (Applicant) VS Industrial Development Bank Limited & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1401 Const. P. 2681/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Pakistan Mobile Communcation (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1402 Const. P. 2065/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Haji Haroon (Petitioner) VS Manzor Ahmed & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1403 Const. P. 295/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Kamran Abdul Shakoor (Petitioner) VS Mst Zahida Haroon and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-MAY-22 Yes Section 14 never demands for a bona fide entitlement; all that is required under Section 14 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, is that certain events have occurred within frame of Section 14 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, as stated above. A statement on oath by the applicant within parameter of said provision for personal use and possession is enough. It is this provision of law which does not contain the word ""personal bona fide need" as contained in Section 15 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance; therefore, both the provisions are different and distinguishable. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1404 Const. P. 336/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 M/S Sui Suthern Gas Company Ltd (Petitioner) VS Gul Hassan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1405 2012 CLC 1878 Suit 105/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 SYED IMDAD HUSSAIN SHAH (Plaintiff) VS REHMAT KHAN VARDAG & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 04-JUN-12 Yes --S. 13---Application for return of court-fee---Compromise between the parties after about two months of filing the suit---Contention of the plaintiff was that since the matter had been compromised between the parties and no issues had been framed as such, they were entitled for return of the court-fee, and that the suit was filed in the month of January, 2010 and was disposed of as compromised in March, 2010, therefore, the court had only consumed two months, on basis of which the plaintiff was entitled for the return of the court-fee---Validity---Suit in question was filed on 25-10-2010, whereafter notices and summonses were issued---On 27-10-2010 the bailiff's report was returned with the endorsement that one of the defendant's had refused to receive notice and as such bailable warrants were issued on 27-10-2010---On 29-10-2010 the plaintiff was able to obtain an order by which the court directed the Judicial Magistrate to take over possession of the containers belonging to the plaintiff, which had been allegedly unauthorizedly retained by the defendants and prepare an inventory and park the said containers in the court premises---On 8-2-2010 it was ordered that the defendants might file written statements and counter affidavits within four days with advance copy to the plaintiffs who in turn might file a copy of the rejoinder, whereafter the matter was adjourned---Plaintiff moved an urgent application on 29-2-2010, and as such the matter was heard on three subsequent dates, ending in a compromise as appearing in the order dated 4-3-2010---Court had spent its valuable time in examining the case, in hearing the arguments and in deliberation, therefore, it could not be said that the court had not consumed its valuable time---Plaintiff had achieved what he could through his prayer in the plaint---Decree in terms of the order dated 4-3-2010 was passed by the High Court whereby the rights of the parties were determined---Relevant factors which went against the contentions of the plaintiff were the initiation of the proceedings by the court, hearing of the matter and the benefit derived by the party-- Application for return of court-fee was dismissed, in circumstances Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1406 Const. P. 130/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Bherji (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1407 Suit 1832/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Rehana Aslam (Plaintiff) VS Mst.Shamim Begum (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1408 Const. P. 1019/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst:Samreen (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1409 Const. P. 149/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMAD ASIM (Petitioner) VS XXIIIRD CIVIL & FAMILY JUDGE, KARACHI EAST & ANOTH (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1410 Suit 531/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 SYED FAZIL HUSSAIN SHAH &ORS. (Plaintiff) VS NOOR ALAM KHAN & OTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1411 Const. P. 1995/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Khalid Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Dir: Investigation & Intelligence & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1412 Const. P. 2332/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Haji Jaffer and Ors (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1413 R.A (Civil Revision) 317/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Jethanand (Applicant) VS Mumtaz Ali and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1414 Const. P. 255/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Chanesar Shah & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1415 Const. P. 831/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Nisar Ahmed Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1416 Const. P. 7276/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Cherat Cement Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1417 Const. P. 303/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Manzoor Ali & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1418 Suit 1736/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/S TCS LOGISTICS (PVT.) LTD (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 07-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1419 Suit 1224/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 ZAINAB GARMENTS PVT. LTD. (Plaintiff) VS M/S. KING EMBROIDING & KNITWEAR (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1420 Const. P. 355/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D-1343 of 2017(Zainulabdin v/s D.C Hyderabad and others) ) 2017 Aayatullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1421 J.M 43/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 DEWAN MUHAMMAD YOUSUF FAROOQUI (Applicant) VS ABDUL MANNAN MUTAQI & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1422 Const. P. 630/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Riaz Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1423 Const. P. 641/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Noor Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1424 Const. P. 42/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS National Transmission Company & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1425 2023 PLD Sindh 66, 2023 CLD 265 Suit 2272/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Suits No. 2273, 2455 and 2474 of 2021 2021 PAKISTAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 13-JUN-22 Yes Chairman's right to cast second vote Challenged by plaintiffs. **There should not have been a situation of even number of member of commission in a quasi-judicial proceeding, however, in the current situation the event of an equality of votes reached and hence the Chairman/Chairperson and/or any other member already rendered opinion, cannot be saddled with additional responsibility to cast a vote to untie knot as it would destroy the balance of each independent judicial mind being applied to a triable question under adjudication. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1426 Const. P. 543/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Delimitation Connected Matters 2022 Muhammad Nadeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1427 Const. P. 520/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS MD SSGC and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1428 Const. P. 660/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Ghulam Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1429 Const. P. 705/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Shahid Rajput (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1430 Const. P. 633/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Aftab Ali & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1431 Const. P. 637/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Sarfaraz & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1432 2023 CLD 162 Judicial Companies Misc. 1/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 JOHNSON CONTROL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED (Applicant) VS SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 21-SEP-22 Yes Company wound up Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1433 Const. P. 483/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Model Civil Court A.D.J Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1434 Suit 82/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Najibuddin (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 25-JAN-23 No Plaints contents would sum up the case of plaintiff and would not be diluted by mere affidavit filed belatedly and consequently, an application for withdrawal was filed by a counsel who was appearing against his interest. Either first or second version is incorrect and misleading. Both the statements are on oath and will be taken to its logical not by withdrawing the suit. If the statement of plaintiff in suit was incorrect, he would face serious consequences. He should be in attendance on the next date. In case the contents of plaint found incorrect and misleading, prosecution will follow. There were/are direct allegations including one that he never appeared before the Board of Revenue for land in question. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1435 Const. P. 589/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 J.S.Akhtar and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1436 Const. P. 1306/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hameed Zaman Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1437 Const. P. 1947/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Khuda Dino (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1438 Const. P. 1606/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Rai Singh (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Delimitation Matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1439 Const. P. 1553/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Regional Election Commissioner MPK and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1440 2023 CLD 241 Judicial Companies Misc. 29/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Total Parco Pakistan limited & another (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-SEP-22 Yes This is not a conveyance or sale deed under Transfer of Property Act which requires registration and stamping under Registration Act and Stamp Act ibid, before Sub-Registrar; rather it is a Scheme of Arrangement not required to be registered under the two ibid enactments before the Sub-Registrar. It is approved by a Court of law as an instrument confirming scheme and forwarded to any authority concern in the format as defined in Form A ibid. Since the aforesaid transfer under Scheme of Arrangement is not in pursuance of Land Grant Policy, therefore, the charges as being claimed for the transfer of plot are not applicable on this count also. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1441 Suit 1961/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Amir Hussain (Plaintiff) VS Sir Syed University of Engineering & Tecnology (Defendant) S.B. Order 22-MAR-23 Yes It is thus a private University which was formed and is governed by the statute. I would conclude that there is a relationship of master and servant between the plaintiff and defendant Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1442 Const. P. 968/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 K-Electric (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1443 Const. P. 1468/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Ayesha + Maryam (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1444 Const. P. 1756/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Pioneer Amusement (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1445 Const. P. 1264/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Shahid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1446 Const. P. 1903/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Farzana Kausar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1447 Const. P. 2120/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Zia Uddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1448 Const. P. 1998/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Usama Bin Mushtaq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1449 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 767/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 The Collector of Customs, (East) Karachi (Applicant) VS The Custom Appellate Tribunal, Karachi & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1450 Const. P. 6390/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Nafees Ahmed (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Railways and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1451 Const. P. 6968/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shoukat Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1452 Const. P. 2162/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Ashraf and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1453 Judicial Companies Misc. 15/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 GULISTAN SPINNING MILLS LIMITED & OTHERS (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1454 Spl.H.C.A 239/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Najma Sugar Mills Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1455 Const. P. 8166/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abeer Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1456 Const. P. 6810/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 NKR Clothing Tower Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1457 I. A 94/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Jamil Ahmed Junejo & another (Appellant) VS M/s. Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1458 Const. P. 5549/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Pervaiz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Shakir & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1459 Const. P. 4315/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1460 I. A 35/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sultana Saleem & another (Appellant) VS M/s B.R.R. Modarbaa & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1461 H.C.A 423/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Hanif & Others (Appellant) VS The Board of Revenue Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1462 H.C.A 401/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Siddique (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1463 H.C.A 315/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Iktikhar Cutchi (Appellant) VS Ibrahim Nawroz Ali Bhamani & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1464 I. A 1/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. Favourite Garments Industries & Others (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-23 Yes It is only an extension of similar finances granted earlier, hence the claim of the respondent in respect of the suit includes the entire amount recoverable extended in the said account and that cannot be limited to the extent of Rs.5.00 million and Rs.6.00 million respectively. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1465 I. A 106/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Tehsin Ahmed & others (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1466 Const. P. 1554/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Abdul Hussain (Petitioner) VS XII ADJ South and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1467 Const. P. 894/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Najaf Ali Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1468 H.C.A 129/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nooruddin & others (Appellant) VS M/s. S.I.T.E. Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-JAN-24 Yes So Section 21 CPC has its own comprehensive jurisprudence which could overview the original court`s proceedings. The ibid section is primarily for appellate/revisional court where an appeal is preferred apparently by the appellant defending the suit but one must not be misled by such language. The language is couched in such a way that for appellant, who defended the suit, some restrictions were imposed, before enabling the appellate court to take cognizance. It has, however, provided a legal frame for the trial court considering the nature of jurisdiction being objected. **Lack of territorial or pecuniary jurisdiction becomes a mere irregularity at a later stage, if not taken at the earliest which does not make a decree nullity and in fact if taken belatedly and successfully may lead to a failure of justice. ***The two jurisdictions of the appellate court have been established to have acted lawfully i.e. (i). In the first instance where on account of procedural illegality or irregularity, identified above for [a] & [b] kinds of jurisdiction not by way of inherent lack of jurisdiction, a litigant plaintiff is ousted and (ii). In a case of lack of inherent jurisdiction, the court continue to proceed with the matter which may have resulted in the failure of justice. For both these limbs, the appellate jurisdiction is available Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1469 Const. P. 3591/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 ARK.Society for Protection of fundamental Right (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1470 Spl.H.C.A 4/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Zulfiqar Ali Rizvi (Appellant) VS Bank Al-Falah Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1471 H.C.A 94/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Capt.S.M.Aslam (Appellant) VS Asad Mehmood Hashmi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1472 H.C.A 16/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Maryam Sultana & Another (Appellant) VS Ch. Raheel Rauf & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1473 H.C.A 256/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Kamran Rasheed (Appellant) VS Mrs. Lala Rukh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1474 Const. P. 6505/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Shaheen Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1475 I. A 74/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Majeed Ghazaini & another (Appellant) VS Arshad Iqbal & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1476 Const. P. 1531/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Platinum Petroleum Service (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan C.P.3421/2023 Platinum Petroleum Service, Hyderabad v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Irrigation department Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1477 Spl.H.C.A 260/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Bank Alfalah Ltd. (Appellant) VS Syed Zulfiqar Ali Rizvi & other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1478 Const. P. 2192/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1479 H.C.A 463/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Karachi Development Authority (Appellant) VS Lal Muhammad Brohi & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-NOV-23 No Although the appeal is otherwise time barred, had court fee be affixed with the appeal, it???s belated attempt has further made the case more miserable as the time that was consumed in filing the court fee will also be added as the time consumed in filing the appeal, thus the appeal is barred by time. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1325-K/2023 Karachi Development Authority v. Lal Muhammad Brohi deceased through his L.Rs. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1480 Suit 1037/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 KARACHI PARSI C.H.S.LTD (Plaintiff) VS SHAIKH NAIMAT ALI QURESHI & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1481 Const. P. 3246/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahnila Altaf & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1482 Const. P. 4027/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mrs. Farzana Javed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1483 Const. P. 6808/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Noor Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1484 H.C.A 410/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Continental Energy Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1485 Const. P. 3170/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Karim Abdul Hameed and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1486 Const. P. 1933/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Lt. Col Syed Jawaid Ahmed (Rtd) (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Defence Officer Housing Authority & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-14 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.39/2010 Pakistan Defence Officer Housing Authority and others v. Lt. Col. Syed Jawaid Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1487 Const. P. 164/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Javed Ahmed Brohi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Rehmatpur Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1488 Cr.Misc. 41/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mohammad Naseer Jagirani (Applicant) VS SHO Rehmatpur PS Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1489 Suit 252/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Dr. Muhammad Iqbal & others (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Medical Association (Centre) (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-JAN-14 Yes Bye-law 48(d) provides that all delegates will be elected by the respective branches and the Branch Secretaries have to get their names registered with PMAC one month before the conference in order to prepare an electoral list. It appears that such exercise has been carried out by PMA Hyderabad and Dr. Muhammad Waseem Shaikh, the Honorary General Secretary, has provided the list. The only controversy that needs to be resolved is that of Annexure P/8, which is the letter of PMA Hyderabad concerning their general body meeting wherein they have decided the names of the delegates. In order to resolve such controversy I have gone through the relevant articles and bye-laws of the Association. Sending names of delegates of a branch in pursuance of relevant bye-laws are only the prerogative of concerned branch and as far as any decision taken in the general body meeting of PMA Sindh is concerned, it carries no role in the branch decision concerning delegates. PMA Sindh could only forward list of the delegates provided by the concerned branch. It is important to note that as far as General Body Meeting of PMA Hyderabad is concerned, it has not been objected by any member of PMA Hyderabad that the delegates of PMA Hyderabad were not elected. It was only PMAC which claims that the list of Hyderabad delegates was not sent. Now if anybody who could have a valid objection as far as election of delegates are concerned that could be a member or members of PMA Hyderabad, certainly not PMAC or PMA Sindh. None of the members of PMA Hyderabad has objected to the process of sending names of delegates of PMA Hyderabad so it does not lie in the mouth of defendants to object to such list of delegates (as far as election is concerned) when they themselves have no role in the process of sending list of delegates. Importantly in electoral list the names of delegates from Hyderabad Branch have not been included and it was only central councillors who have been inducted. Byelaw 48 speaks for election of delegates and for sending its name by General Secretary of that particular branch. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1490 Const. P. 848/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Samina Solangi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Hyderi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1491 Const. P. 999/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Shaharbano and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Market and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1492 Const. P. 438/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Raza Mohammad Totani (Petitioner) VS S.H.O PS Kamber & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1493 Const. P. 1951/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Munwar Hussain Surhio (Petitioner) VS S.H.O PS Gareelo and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1494 Cr.Misc. 37/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Banty Lal Bashani (Applicant) VS The SHO PS Badeh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
1495 2015 PCr.LJ 813 Cr.Misc. 264/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Hussain Bux Dal and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Khan Ghumro and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 Yes the sufficient material was not available before the Judicial Magistrate as well as before the revisional Court to handover the custody of the buffaloes to the respondents only on the basis of the enquiry report by disregarding the fact that these respondents did not bother to make hue and cry for about one and a half year and all of a sudden when these buffaloes were recovered or discovered, they lodged F.I.R to take advantage. It is yet to be determined as to how they got such information and who gave them such information of these buffaloes being seized. This needs further expert enquiry and investigation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1496 Cr.Bail 438/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Abdul Majeed @ Manzoor Khoso (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1497 Const. P. 150/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Meer Jan Shar (Petitioner) VS SHO PS/I.O of PS Naudero and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1498 Const. P. 158/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Ali Dost Golo (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1499 Const. P. 1041/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Ghazi Abbas Solangi (Petitioner) VS Senior Civil Judge Mehar and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1500 Const. P. 137/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Naheed Akhtar Mirali (Petitioner) VS SHO Hyderi PS Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1501 Suit 323/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mst. Aziz Bano (Plaintiff) VS Khalifa Aziz Mian (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 20-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1502 Suit 1489/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Adnan Aziz Ahmed (Plaintiff) VS Rakil Ahmed Zaman& Others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 06-MAY-22 Yes As far as strength and defence of sale certificate, as relied upon by the defendants, who are the other set of legal heirs are concerned, the subject property never vested with the Nazir of this Court, which could enable him to sell the same and issue sale certificate. Nazir was never given any authority to sell the property on behalf of legal heirs. It was a private sale and some of the legal heirs arranged a buyer and presented him before the Court. Thus, the act of issuing sale certificate by the Nazir was without jurisdiction and/or mandate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1503 Const. P. 679/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Nihal Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1504 Const. P. 1183/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Din Muhammad Jatoi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1505 R.A (Civil Revision) 201/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Province of Sindh & Ors (Applicant) VS Naseem Khan & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 27-MAR-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.8-K/2018 Naseem Khan v. Province of Sindh thr. its Secy: Land Utilization Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed and Remanded
1506 I. A 22/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Krishandas and others (Appellant) VS H.B.L and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1507 Const. P. 434/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Umar Channa (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1508 Const. P. 1659/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Allah Dito Napar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1509 Const. P. 667/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Khalid Hussain Jatt (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.151-K/2019 Khalid Hussain v. Province of Sindh. thr. Home Secretary, Home Department, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1510 Civil Revision 117/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Gul Muhammad & another (Applicant) VS Bhagwan Dass & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1511 Const. P. 4663/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Najeebullah Memon (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1512 Const. P. 1725/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Naveed Ahmed Unnar (Petitioner) VS The Secratary Education & Literacy Dept; & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1513 Const. P. 202/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Waqar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1514 Const. P. 2364/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Waseem Hassan Khuwaja (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1515 Const. P. 1171/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ahmed Ali and an other (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1516 Const. P. 1675/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Rashid Hussain Almani (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1517 Const. P. 642/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Fida Odh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1518 Const. P. 2760/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Abdul Wahab Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1519 Const. P. 1067/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Nisar Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1520 Civil Revision 122/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Muhammad Naeem & Others (Applicant) VS Ghulam Muhammad & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 17-SEP-18 Yes it is a case of material irregularities and illegalities, as the evidence is totally contrary and against the claim of respondent whose suit was decreed. Hence the suit of the plaintiff/respondent No.1 stands dismissed. However, this would not give a license to the applicants as far as their claim is concerned and the revenue authorities are at liberty to act in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1179-K/2018 Ghulam Muhammad v. Muhammad Naeem and others,C.A.15-K/2020 Ghulam Muhammad v. Muhammad Naeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed and Remanded
1521 Const. P. 240/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Mujeeb-ur-Rehman and others (Petitioner) VS Provincial Police Officer and othes (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-AUG-18 Yes hus the matter was referred to the Police Recruitment Board to be placed in a meeting before them for a decision within the period prescribed therein and to submit report to this Court. In pursuance of the order dated 27.05.2017 the report was submitted and out of 19, 4 were declared as successful at serial No.1 to 4 in the compliance report available at page 477, relevant page 479. Candidates from serial No.5 to 9 were failed whereas candidates at serial No.10, 11, 12 and 16 were appointed in other department. Some of the candidates refused to receive notices. Three separate statements to the above extent were filed which are taken on record. We do not see any error or impediment in the implementation and compliance of the report of Mr. Bashir Ahmed Memon by the Police Recruitment Board. After passing of so many years, the interview by the Police Recruitment Board was inevitable and it is borne out from the order dated 27.05.2017 for placing the report before the Police Recruitment Board for decision, otherwise the order of their appointment could have been passed then and there by this Bench. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio C.P.1182-K/2018 Muneer Ahmed and othes v. Provincial Police Officer Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1522 Const. P. 1182/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Habib Bank Limited (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Yameen and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.721-K/2018 Habib Bank Limited v. Muhammad Yameen and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1523 2019 YLR 966 F.R.A 22/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Pharmacie Plus (Appellant) VS Abdul Latif & Another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 07-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui C.P.711-K/2018 Abdul Latif and another v. M/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd.,C.M.A.881-K/2018 Abdul Latif and another v. M/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.25-K/2018 Abdul Latif and another v. M/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted, Notice in CMA.,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed
1524 Const. P. 2088/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Mst Haseena & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-18 Yes Two things are admitted in the cross-examination of the petitioner / defendant No.1; first is that certain dowry articles were retained by him and that in the other set of evidence he stated that only golden ornaments were taken away by the plaintiff / respondent No.1 from the house. The first part insofar as above dowry articles are concerned, the same are admitted whereas for the other dowry articles i.e. golden ornaments, the burden was on defendant / petitioner to establish that she (respondent No.1) took away all of them. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1525 Const. P. 2422/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Syed Ali Gul Shah (Petitioner) VS Muneer Ahmed & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1526 Const. P. 1079/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Muhammad Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1527 Const. P. 4012/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1528 Const. P. 2543/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Ahsan ul Haq and others (Petitioner) VS General Manager Legal & C&C PTCL (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1529 Const. P. 451/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Noor Nabi (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1530 Const. P. 2712/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Deputy Administratar Evacuee Trust Propetry (Petitioner) VS Sikandar Ali & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1531 Const. P. 2059/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Zahoor and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1532 Civil Revision 145/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Babar Kamal (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1533 Const. P. 1725/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 M/S shadman Cotton Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Abdul Jabbar and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1534 2020 YLR 2597 Const. P. 2180/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Masood Ahmed Wassan & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-APR-20 Yes For roads, bridges, gas/oil line etc. most precious lands were/are being acquired or intercepted in between to have a shortest distance to minimize the cost of that project, but we do not realize that while doing so we are not only destroying fertile/ agriculture land but so also risking our future. This acquisition is normally based on feasibility report of that particular project but there is no realization that for providing some convenience or low cost project, precious land is being destroyed, which is far more important for our future than the convenience and low cost project. The project may cost less but consequences would be detrimental. We are living in a world where natural resources such as fertile land is being vacuumed up by development of concrete structure and this would count a lot in future and no one would come for our rescue when we have to yield our own food for our own consumption. In this case land was attached with the research based agriculture department of Sindh which caters for not only fruit crop but other agri products as well. The authorities responsible for identifying this land have not applied their mind at all and in an attempt to please, the most fertile land of the province had been provided for an object which could conveniently be achieved on non-agriculture land, subject to law. Blanket recommendation was forwarded by the Committee constituted for the aforesaid purpose and without identifying the reasons of disassociating the land with the agriculture based research department, they have made this land available for a scheme called Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Town. The recommendation of the Committee and the action of the authority is neither transparent nor lawful but in fact a mala fide attempt to usurp the most precious and fertile land of district Mirpurkhas where research is being conducted. The provincial government should have emphasized to uplift the research system of the agriculture department and steered the progress by maintaining it rather than to ignore the research based system. They could always find the land anywhere else and provide resources and amenities for dwellers where the land could be developed by land developers. The performance of Ministry of Agriculture to save the land was half-hearted and they only presented themselves as marionette since they have not taken action against usurpation of their land. If we really want to protect the agricultural lands and to promote sustainable agrarian growth for the future, large scale basic reforms and legislation are needed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
1535 Conf.Case 20/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ayub (Appellant) VS The state (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1536 Civil Revision 223/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2005 Ibrahim (Applicant) VS LAL and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1537 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 334/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Collector of Customs Model (Applicant) VS Minhaj Zafar (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1538 Const. P. 4207/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s A.R Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1539 Const. P. 5607/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Al Kafeel Processing Ind. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1540 Const. P. 2860/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Javed Arshad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1541 Const. P. 2366/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Goldway Hygiene Products (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1542 Const. P. 2313/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Shafi Lifestyle Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.5367/2021 M/s Shafi Lifestyle Pvt Limited Karachi v. The Province of Sindh through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and another,C.A.1584/2021 M/s Shafi Lifestyle Pvt Limited Karachi v. The Province of Sindh through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relief,Pending
1543 Const. P. 1022/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Liberty Power Tech Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1544 Const. P. 1836/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Iqbal Hussain Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.5692/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accounability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liaquat Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
1545 Const. P. 3935/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Fazaia Housing Scheme Karachi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1546 Const. P. 3727/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Fuso Master Motors (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1547 Const. P. 5951/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Al-Tabooq Al-Tijari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1548 Const. P. 5464/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Habib Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1549 Const. P. 5766/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ravi Kumar Lohana (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1550 Const. P. 5643/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Bhojraj Manglani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1551 Const. P. 5396/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1552 Const. P. 5520/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Eastern Textile (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1553 Const. P. 1392/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Khurram Agencies (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1554 Const. P. 3375/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Allied Modaraba (Petitioner) VS Chief Commissioner I.R & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1555 Const. P. 4242/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Faisal Jamal (Petitioner) VS Commissioner I.R and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1556 Const. P. 5455/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s The Karachi Garden (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1557 Const. P. 1414/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Fareeda Aslam thr Attorney M Aslam Mian (Petitioner) VS The DJ Karachi South and another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1558 Const. P. 4591/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 IBL Corporation Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1559 Const. P. 4686/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Battery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1560 Const. P. 4806/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Unicon Paint Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1561 Const. P. 5871/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Dewan Sugar Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1562 Const. P. 325/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pak Kuwait Takaful Company Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1563 Const. P. 1597/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Dadan Steel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1564 Const. P. 4232/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Horizon Alloys Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1565 Const. P. 6141/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sakrand Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1566 Const. P. 4244/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mirpurkhas Sugar Mill Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1567 Const. P. 6181/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Islam Engieering (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1568 Const. P. 242/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Uzma Bibi W/o Shabar Khan (Petitioner) VS Bakht Roman and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1569 Const. P. 3766/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Rice International Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1570 Const. P. 5961/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1571 Const. P. 4182/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Pharma Net (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1572 Const. P. 4785/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Haji Nazir Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1573 Const. P. 1576/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Umer Khoso & Ors (Petitioner) VS Secretary Education Colleges & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1574 Suit.B 37/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 BANK ISLAMI PAKISTAN LTD (Plaintiff) VS FATANI IMPEX (PVT) LTD (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 25-MAR-16 Yes Insofar as circular of the State Bank of Pakistan, as relied upon by defendant No.5, is concerned, it only caters for a situation where such personal guarantee for minor shareholder was not obtained. It is not the situation here where a minor shareholder of the company is insisted upon to submit a personal guarantee. As a partner/director he stood guarantor and such personal guarantee is available on record which is continued to be enforced. Hence, I do not consider the arguments of learned counsel for the defendant No.5 sufficient for the grant of leave as by raising such arguments, no substantial question of law and fact has been raised. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1575 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 611/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Director (Enforcement) DGI&I-FBR (Applicant) VS Sheikh Ali Habib & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1576 Const. P. 4572/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Kanal @ Mamoo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1577 Const. P. 4700/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Azam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1578 2021 MLD 2085 Const. P. 4604/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sohail Hameed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-21 Yes It is not only the petitioner for whom the respondents, including federal and provincial governments, have taken this decision but in fact the respondents in pursuit of their responsibilities to take care of the health of entire nation, have issued numerous notifications, circulars to curb the virus spread. Petitioner, instead of being supportive, is being troublesome in the smooth operation of effective measures undertaken by government. The government is primarily responsible to take care of health of 220 million citizens of Pakistan and hence the desire of one person being petitioner cannot supersede the demand of ever-growing spread of pandemic Covid-19. The Sindh Government has already taken steps and are monitoring it periodically under the umbrella of Sindh Epidemic Diseases Act, 2014. Section 3 of ibid Act enables the government to take strict measures as they deem fit and proper in case the provincial government feels the necessity of enforcing prescribed measures to curb the threatened situation. ---This Covid-19 is exceeding and spreading for a number of reasons that it is new virus meaning that no one has immunity for this virus. It is highly contagious, meaning it spreads fast. Its novelty meaning scientists are still not completely sure as to how it behaves since it is changing its form and producing different variants and since they have a very limited history to go on. It is being reported worldwide that Covid-19 will have its short medium and long term effects for general population, health care workers, patients and other citizens. As our general responsibility we need to think ahead of ourselves and think beyond and stop being selfish, not only for our survival but for the survival of our population. The only way is to support the health care system. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1106-K/2021 Sohail Hameed v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1579 2019 SBLR Sindh 1630 Suit 263/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Maqbool Co-Operative Housing Cociety Ltd.. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Jawed & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 20-MAY-16 Yes The crucial letter in relation to the withdrawal of the approved plan dated 03.12.2015 has not been agitated. It is nowhere claimed in the petition that vide letter dated 03.12.2015 the subject plan has already been withdrawn.Thus the subject letter of withdrawal was never available for consideration of the Honble Division Bench while passing the order dated 15.12.20215 hence the order passed on 08.2.2016 in this suit is independent of the order passed by the Honble Division Bench. On the strength of the withdrawal of the approved plan the defendant was restrained from raising any further construction which construction could not be deemed to have been allowed vide order dated 15.12.2015 and since the defendant continued with the construction contempt application was filed.After inspection it revealed that the defendants were continuing with the construction. The defendants have not denied raising construction at the time of inspection. Counsel submitted that the Honble Division Bench in HCA as well as in Constitutional Petition has continued the order passed in C.P. No.D-7743/2015 therefore, it does not constitute violation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1580 Const. P. 5205/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sahara Public Rights (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1581 2014 CLD 1367 Suit.B 89/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 HABIB METROPOLITAN (Plaintiff) VS ABID NISAR (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-MAR-14 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1582 Const. P. 1152/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 M/s. Agfa Colour Services (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Additional District Judge-IV Karachi & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-DEC-17 Yes The winter holidays would not be excluded from computing the period of limitation as the application to obtain certified copy of the order, in order to exclude the winter holidays, ought to have been filed on the day when the judgment was announced which may be a day before commencement of winter holidays Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1583 Const. P. 4696/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1584 Cr.Bail 540/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MANSOOR IQBAL S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1585 Suit 1928/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mr. Mehtab Tahir Niazi (Plaintiff) VS M/s Al-Qasmia Properties & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-NOV-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.445/2023 Khawaja Muhammad Awan v. Government of Sindh through its Secretary Home, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1586 Const. P. 357/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Akram Bugti S/o Muhammad Hanif Bugti (Petitioner) VS Mst. Farwa and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1587 Suit.B 130/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 NIB BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS TANVEER COTTON MILLS (PVT) LTD (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-NOV-16 Yes No doubt the documents attached with the replication cures the defect as originally existing in the statement of account available at pages 277 onwards however such document attached with the replication cannot be replied or rebutted. At the most it could be considered as a document curing the defect existing in the earlier document but on this defect and deficiency a leave application cannot be out rightly dismissed since the claim of the plaintiff is based on statement of account which is not in accordance with subsection 8 of Section 2 of Bankers Books Evidence Act, 1891. In such a situation an opportunity ought to have been provided to the defendant to defend the suit which is not based on proper statement of account. The presumption of truth cannot be said to be attached to this Statement of Account. Even if it is a computer generated statement it is being fed by human being therefore in my view even such Statement of Account for the purposes of deciding the claim ought to have been certified in the same manner. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1588 Const. P. 5223/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Universal Logistics Services Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh Revenue Board and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1589 Const. P. 4563/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Freislandcampina Nederland B.V (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakisan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1590 Const. P. 418/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M Parvaiz Hayat (Petitioner) VS VII ADJ (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 21-FEB-18 Yes In case the two tenements of same nature are allowed to be evicted under section 14 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 it would be in defiance of a restriction in terms of subsection 2 of Section 14 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 that he (landlord) is not in occupation of a building (or independent portion) owned by him in any locality. Once he (landlord) got possession of an independent portion of the building or a premises then he automatically ceased to be entitled under the said provision for a second shop. He may avail benefit under other provisions of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 for eviction of tenant but at least for the purposes of Section 14 Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 his remedy ceases when one portion of the building or an independent premises got vacated. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1591 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 466/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Abdullah Paracha & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-21 No There is absolutely no justification for the department to file this Reference since goods declaration that reflects and identify the goods was filed with the department. The only justification provided by the department was that the respondents have not justified/put forwarded any other explanation and it was asserted by the department that the sales tax invoices do not mention the name of the tea garden to identify the seized tea. We may observe that this is a novel proposition rendered by the departments counsel as once the importability of the goods was justified by providing goods declaration for its lawful import then it does not lie in their mouth to raise this absurd and novel proposition that the sales tax invoices do not mention the name of the tea garden where the subject tea was grown/harvested. There can hardly be a question of law arising out of the impugned judgment. The proposed questions are thus answered accordingly i.e. in favour of the respondent and against the applicant, in result whereof instant Special Customs Reference Application stands dismissed along with listed application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1592 Const. P. 6642/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s SAMBA Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1593 Const. P. 6921/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Avanza Solutions (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1594 Const. P. 6394/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zahir uddin Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1595 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 73/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS M/s. Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Brothers (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1596 Const. P. 1812/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mrs. Rehana Mansoor W/o Mansoor Saleh (Petitioner) VS VIth Sr.Civil Judge/Rent Controller Khi East & ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1597 Const. P. 3455/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Zahid World Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1598 Const. P. 2699/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Ibrahim & Sons (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1599 Const. P. 7044/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ms. Rashida Yousfa Pasha (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1600 Const. P. 7149/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s MSK Industries (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.235/2022 M/s MSK INDUSTIES at Mohmand Economic Zone, Michni District Mohmand v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and others,C.A.2073/2022 M/s MSK INDUSTIES v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 1st week of October 22,Pending
1601 2022 PTD 779 Const. P. 5596/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Zarif Khan Zai and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-21 Yes Appendix "H" of Import Policy Order 2016 provides list of Pre-shipment Inspection Companies which includes M/s SGS whose certificate was provided by the respondent at the time of import. The Committee, allegedly constituted for compliance of Import Policy Order 2016, however considered the manufacturing year of the vehicle as 2006 on the basis of seatbelt, which perhaps is extraneous consideration; there is no serious challenge to the pre-shipment report of M/s SGS which is one of the preshipment inspection companies, as structured in Appendix "H" of Import Policy Order 2016. There has to be material of evidentiary value to form a different view than the one disclosed in M/s SGS certificate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1602 Const. P. 6760/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 China Power Hub Generation Co. Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1603 Const. P. 6369/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Galaxy Impex (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1604 2018 CLC Note 82 M.A. 31/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Independent Media Corp. Pvt (Appellant) VS PEMRA & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1605 Const. P. 6819/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Geo Entertainment Television (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS S.R.B and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1606 Const. P. 1608/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 TPL Insurance Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.103-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. TPL Insurance Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1607 Const. P. 5681/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ziauddin Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1608 Suit 2095/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 KHALIL AHMED (Plaintiff) VS ABDUL LATIF & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1609 Const. P. 638/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Manzoor Ahmed @ Manzoor Hussain (Petitioner) VS Darul Allom Husania & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-OCT-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1610 Cr.Bail 921/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 AZEEM AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1611 M.A. 5/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Mst Bachan (Appellant) VS Allah Dino & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1612 Const. P. 321/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Grandiphar Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Drug Appellate Board & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
1613 Suit 2285/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s. Gulshan-e-Rasool & others (Plaintiff) VS Director of Estate Project & others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 19-FEB-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1614 2023 SBLR Sindh 1041 Suit 102/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 M/s. Sassi International. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Oman Air Lines & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 28-SEP-16 Yes The airway bill in terms of Rule 11 prima facie is evidence of the conclusion of contract, of the receipt of the goods and of the conditions of carriage. Rule 13 to me is relevant and crucial as far as the facts of the case in hand are concerned. It provides that consignee is entitled on the arrival of goods at the place of destination, to require the carrier to hand over to him the airway bill and to deliver the goods to him, on payment of the charges due and on complying with the conditions of carriage set out in the airway bill. Chapter-3 of the Rules relates to the liability of the carrier. Rule 18 is also very relevant as far as the facts of the instant case are concerned. It provides that the carrier is liable for damage sustained in the event of the destruction or loss or damage to any registered luggage or any goods if the occurrence which caused the damage so sustained took place during the carriage by air. Rule 24 provides that the cases covered by Rules 18 and 19 the action for damages may be brought, however subject to the conditions and limits set out in this schedule hence reliance is placed on Rule 29 which provides a period of two years from the occurrence of causes. The causes set out in the plaint are beyond the scope of Rule 29 as relied upon by the defendant. The last airway bill provides date of flight as 31.8.2011 and perhaps the expected date of delivery could be within the following 2/3 days Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1615 Const. P. 7417/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Catwalk Event Management & Production Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1616 Const. P. 23/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Dr. Muhammad Hassan Memon. (Petitioner) VS LUMHS Jamshoro. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-OCT-20 Yes University Matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1617 Spl.Cr.Bail 49/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD KASHIF ISHAQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1618 H.C.A 278/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ms. Bilquis Qureshi & Others (Appellant) VS Dr. Nasim Kalar (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1619 Cr.Bail 632/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHER KHAN S/O RAFIULLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1620 Civil Revision 32/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Mir Fateh Ali (Applicant) VS Mst. Bano & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1621 Suit 1745/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mohammad Shahid (Plaintiff) VS Mohammad Abid & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 26-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1622 Const. P. 7270/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Qureshi Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1623 Suit 2695/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 FAIR INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1624 R.A (Civil Revision) 226/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 mst shamim (Applicant) VS muhammad aslam & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1625 I. A 46/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Ali Rashid (Appellant) VS M/s. United Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-OCT-19 Yes Article 166 of the Limitation Act requires such application under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC as well as deposit thereunder to be made within 30 days from the date of sale. Such deposit is a condition precedent to entertain the application and the Court cannot extend the time for depositing the amount under section 148 CPC too. The date of sale in the ibid rules relates to situation on which the sale was knocked out to the highest bidder and not the date of confirmation. The date of confirmation of sale under Rule 92 CPC relates to the issuance of sale certificate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1626 Const. P. 765/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ali Murad (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1627 Const. P. 940/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Union Administration SonWalhar-1(Bolhari) (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1628 R.A (Civil Revision) 103/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Hubdar Ali (Applicant) VS Mst. Fareeda & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1629 Cr.Bail 1005/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SAFDAR KHAN S/O QADIR KHAN & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1630 Const. P. 7812/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1631 Const. P. 3070/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Raheem Burney (Petitioner) VS KMC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1632 Const. P. 8515/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M. Kashif Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1633 Const. P. 130/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2005 Haji Muhammad Ishaq . (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1634 Const. P. 1198/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Sajjid Ali Hakro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1635 Const. P. 7445/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Paksat International (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1636 Const. P. 807/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Ayaz Latif and Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1637 Suit 262/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Waheed (Plaintiff) VS Sindh Building Control Authority & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1638 R.A (Civil Revision) 237/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Hemant Kumar (Applicant) VS Assaram & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.771-K/2022 Hemant Kumar v. Assaram & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1639 I. A 23/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Khalid Hussain Bhurgari. (Appellant) VS House Building Finance Company & Another. (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1640 Suit -3416/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1641 Const. P. 2359/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Insaf Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1642 Suit 55/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mrs. Rubina Aslam. (Plaintiff) VS P.I.A. Corporation & another. (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-NOV-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1643 Const. P. 3830/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Kamla Brothers (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1644 Const. P. 2054/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Haji Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1645 Suit 477/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 ZOBIA AAMIR & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS P.T.A. (S.Z) (Defendant) S.B. Order 22-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1646 I. A 13/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Habib Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Ali Hassan & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1647 Const. P. 360/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Engr Muhammad Parvaiz (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1648 Const. P. 828/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Ghazi Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1649 Const. P. 1559/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Qamaruddin & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1650 Const. P. 786/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Vinod Kumar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1651 Cr.Tran 51/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Criminal Transfer Application 52 of 2022 2022 ALI HASSAN BROHI & ORS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUN-22 No Transfer application was disposed of with directions to the Administrative Judge of Anti-Terrorism Court, Karachi to pass appropriate order for transfer of the cases to any other competent court of Anti-Terrorism for the adjudication of the cases as required under law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1652 2023 CLD 652 Judicial Companies Misc. 1/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Nadeem Power Generation & Nadeem Textile Mills Ltd (Applicant) VS Nadeem Textile Mills Ltd. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 12-DEC-22 Yes A wise group of businessmen has taken a decision considering all its pros and corns. While taking such decision there are chances of success and failure but then while questioning such decision the bona fide is the real litmus test. A businessman takes decision foreseeing the future aspect. The Court could only see that all legal formalities have been fulfilled and that the scheme is neither unjust nor unfair or against the national interest but cannot challenge the wisdom of a decision of businessman as by doing that the Court would be overriding the wisdom of a businessman and their prerogative. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1653 Const. P. 595/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Mst. Nusrat and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1654 Const. P. 2510/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mashooque Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1655 Suit 141/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Scene Enterprise (Plaintiff) VS Karachi Metropolitan Corporation & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-FEB-23 No The damages should be claimed in a justified proportion to the principle relief. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1656 Const. P. 725/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Sajjad Ali Khumbhar (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1657 Suit 1062/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Siddiqsons Private Limited & another (Plaintiff) VS Creek Marina Singapore PTE Limited & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 Yes Out of a common cause, parties may have different reliefs and remedies available to them within same jurisdiction of the Court but with different procedural way outs for reliefs and remedies claimed such as original civil jurisdiction and jurisdiction under Summary Chapter, though later is also categorized as original jurisdiction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1658 Const. P. 1775/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1659 2023 CLD 170 Judicial Companies Misc. 8/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Amer Tex (Pvt) Ltd and 6 others (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-SEP-22 Yes Since the Demerging Undertaking is subject to any liability immediately prior to the effective date hence for the purposes of this Demerging Undertaking the effective date is the date of this order and the Demerging Undertaking is deemed to have been transferred from this date subject to any liability prior to this date, over petitioner No.1. From the effective date of the approval of the Scheme by virtue of this order without any further act or deed, all charges or liabilities in relation to Demerging Undertaking shall be deemed to have been created by and vested with the petitioners No.2 to 7. The Demerging Undertaking (inclusive of liabilities) shall be deemed to be assumed by the petitioners No.2 to 7 as their own and consequently by assumption of such liabilities, the petitioner No.1 has been relieved from all obligations in respect of such liabilities as being assumed under the scheme. Consequently rights and securities of the creditors of petitioner No.1, if any, though not disclosed, will not be affected on account of subject scheme. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1660 2023 SBLR Sindh 1373 Const. P. 1351/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 1352 of 2022; CP No. D- 1353 of 2022; CP No. D- 1354 of 2022; CP No. D- 1355 of 2022; 2022 Novex Dry Cleaners Hyd (Petitioner) VS learned Sindh Labour Court Hyderbad & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 Yes Since the discretion was exercised by the Tribunal in condoning the delay within frame of SIRA Act 2013, we cannot replace our discretion with that of the Tribunal as this petition is neither statutory nor efficacious remedy. We are not sitting in appeal against order of appellate labour tribunal. The petitioners have already exhausted the remedy of appeal before Appellate Tribunal. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1661 Const. P. 629/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Aashique Ali & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1662 Const. P. 657/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Mst. Rasheeda Mirjat & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1663 Suit 1677/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Zulfiqar Ali (Plaintiff) VS Iftikhar Ahmed & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-OCT-22 No The cause of action discloses that the amount was remitted for purchase of the property which has not been conveyed. It is a triable issue and at this point of time the conclusivity cannot be given to such statements Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1664 Const. P. 7395/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Deltacom Technologies & Services (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1665 Const. P. 1474/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Salim (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1666 Const. P. 1286/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Tahir Ayub (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1667 Const. P. 1695/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Labbaik (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1668 Const. P. 1477/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1669 Const. P. 3940/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Allah Dita Khan Sajid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1670 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 323/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Collector of Customs Model ,Hyderabad (Applicant) VS Fateh Textile Mills Ltd & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1671 Const. P. 1706/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M. Naveed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1672 Const. P. 2197/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 All Pakistan Post DMO Empl: & Worker Union (Petitioner) VS DG Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1673 Const. P. 5039/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Radium Silk Factory (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1674 Const. P. 2511/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Hidaya Trust (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1675 H.C.A 316/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Nadeem Ali (Appellant) VS Mst. Sanober Asif & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1676 Const. P. 5826/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Ghani Builders & Developers (Petitioner) VS D.J Malir and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1677 Const. P. 2790/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Wajahat Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Abdul Kabeer and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
1678 Const. P. 4309/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1679 H.C.A 471/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Najma Sajjad-ul-Hassan & another (Appellant) VS Aftab Ahmed Sethi & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1680 H.C.A 9/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & ors (Appellant) VS Muhammad Tarique Khan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1681 H.C.A 57/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: High Court Appeal No. 56 of 2020 , High Court Appeal No. 58 of 2020 High Court Appeal No. 67 of 202 2020 Muhammad Anis Uddin (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
1682 H.C.A 35/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Nafees Zubair through her attorney (Appellant) VS Saeeda Bano & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1683 Const. P. 7461/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1684 I. A 15/1995 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1995 Govt. of Sindh & Others (Appellant) VS Haji Muhammad (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan C.A.92-K/2023 Govt. of Sindh through Secretary Land Utilization Department and others v. Haji Muhammad Deceased through L.Rs. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1685 I. A 105/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Naveed & other (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 Yes The judgment may not bind us in terms of Article 189 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, but we are in agreement with the observations made therein that in the first instance it is to be seen whether a plaint has complied all the requirement of Section 9 of the FIO, failing whereof, the consequences would follow, which in the instant case should have been a grant of leave in the absence of a true Statement of Accounts, as it is not the correct reflection of account. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1686 Const. P. 6818/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 c32 Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1687 Const. P. 1320/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mst: Shakra Inayat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1688 H.C.A 338/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Aslam thru Attorney Abdul Hameed (Appellant) VS Ahsan Ali and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1689 H.C.A 336/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Fateh Ali (Appellant) VS Mst. Shahida & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1690 Const. P. 5110/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Al-Waqar Corp (Petitioner) VS M/s Rice Export Corp & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1691 H.C.A 319/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Ibrahim (Appellant) VS Syed Imtiaz Ali Zaidi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1692 H.C.A 228/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Chairman Pakistan Railway (Appellant) VS Syed Imitaz Ali Zaidi and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1693 Const. P. 1758/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Shakir Ali Barni & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1694 I. A 100/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Subhanuddin (Appellant) VS Muhammad Rashid (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1695 I. A 35/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Farrukh Shahzad Choudhry (Appellant) VS MCB Bank Limited & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1696 H.C.A 31/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saeed Ahmed (Appellant) VS Muhammad Saleem & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1697 Const. P. 7657/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Inam Willayat Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1698 H.C.A 12/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Khalil ur Rehman & Others (Appellant) VS Zoomlion Pakistan Pvt Ltd and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1699 H.C.A 241/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. Lakhani Enterprises Private Limited (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakisan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1700 H.C.A 17/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Basit Gazdar (Appellant) VS Mst. Samia Faisal Gazdar & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1701 H.C.A 67/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: High Court Appeal No. 56 of 2020 High Court Appeal No. 57 of 2020 High Court Appeal No. 58 of 2020 2020 Abdul Sami Soomro (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
1702 H.C.A 433/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Saadul Haq and Another (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No An initial stage of the suit and the requirement of Section-10 CPC is not at all attracted to the case in hand, prima facie. At the most the court shall stay the trial of the suit on meeting the conditions of Section-10 CPC and not otherwise. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
1703 H.C.A 112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Attiqur Rehman Khan & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Lakhnow Cooperative Housing Society & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1704 Const. P. 1309/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Ilyass (Petitioner) VS Learned 9th Additional District Judge, Hyd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1705 Const. P. 6659/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Prince Art Packages Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1706 Const. P. 2473/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cp D 2472/2019 2019 Muhammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS Sindh Text Book Board Jamshoro (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1707 Const. P. 7318/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1708 Const. P. 6707/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Younus and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1709 I. A 88/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Bin Yamin & Another (Appellant) VS Muhammad Arshad & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1710 H.C.A 214/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ziauddin University & Another (Appellant) VS Basit Nazir (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1711 Const. P. 7464/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1712 I. A 51/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Ifrahim and Another (Appellant) VS M/s. J.S Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1713 Const. P. 600/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mst: Mir Shamim Talpur (Petitioner) VS 6th Additional District Judge Hyd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1714 Suit 1063/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Pakistan Refinery Limited (Plaintiff) VS Barrett Hodgson Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. & another (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 01-DEC-14 Yes in terms of Rule 10 of the Civil Defence (Special Powers) Rules, 1951 hereinafter referred to as the Rules, 1951, no construction can take place within 200 yards of defendants installation therefore, they were asked to stop installation/ construction immediately hence the instant leading suit is filed. Similarly defendant No.1 has also filed the connected suit against the plaintiff on the ground that it being classified as Key Point Installation, no construction of the nature as has been raised can be allowed. I Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1715 Suit 1307/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 M/S. HABIB OIL MILLS (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) VS MR. IRFAN A. IFTIKHAR (Defendant) S.B. Order 27-AUG-12 Yes the suit of the plaintiff is decreed only in terms of prayer clause (a) however with interest as prescribed under sub rule 2 of Order 37 CPC with cost Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1716 Const. P. 77/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Pir Bux Abro (Petitioner) VS SIP Haq Nawaz Lolai and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1717 Const. P. 98/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Basran Mirani (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Civil Line and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1718 Const. P. 1015/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Hussain Baloch and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Civil Line and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1719 Cr.Bail 63/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mumtaz Shaikh and another (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1720 Cr.Bail 363/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Gulab Dahani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1721 Const. P. 112/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Khalid Hussain Bugti (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Civil Line and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1722 Const. P. 142/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Miss Naheed Munwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1723 Const. P. 747/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Shahzadi Khatoon Gaincho (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Warah and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1724 Const. P. 980/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Muhammad Ali Khero (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1725 Cr.Bail 500/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Sajjad Ali Chandio (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1726 Civil Revision 36/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Abdul Wahab Brohi (Applicant) VS Nasir Ali and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
1727 Const. P. 3525/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-OCT-17 Yes Board of Trustees were required to convene a meeting and the petitioners agreed. The petition was disposed off accordingly. It perhaps on an interpretation of order dated 18.12.2017 that the Board of Trustees resolved to approve the upgradation of the petitioner as Executive Director as if it was an order of this Court, which Board of Trustees decision was subsequently withdrawn. The alleged contemnor may have stated that the upgradation was allowed but it was only the statement of the Counsel that was recorded. Neither the withdrawal nor review of earlier decision taken in 118th Meeting could constitute contempt as there was no straightaway direction for up-gradation of the post from Assistant Director to Executive Director. The issue was to be resolved by the Board of Trustees of EOBI Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.431/2018 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1728 Const. P. 1357/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shrimati Aashi (Petitioner) VS Bhesham Lal & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-17 Yes This Proviso is primarily is in consideration of the fact that Muslim women who file their respective suits for dissolution of marriages and dower amount shall also be in a position to avail the jurisdiction of local limits where the (wife) ordinarily resides but that doesnt exclude the jurisdiction of the above two situations i.e. (a) and (b). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1729 2018 YLR 2337 Const. P. 1862/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/S Dewan Sugar Mills Limited (Petitioner) VS M/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) ltd & (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-DEC-17 Yes Ousting the petitioner from availing their remedy which they could have before the executing Court amounts to a denial of fair trial. I am in agreement that such a compromise ought to have been recognized by executing Court, however whether tenant can still make an attempt to have it recognized or otherwise, the jurisdiction vest with the executing Court to be exercised first and I refrain from passing on my observation as it may prejudice the case of parties Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.69-K/2018 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Dewan Sugar Mills Ltd. and others,C.P.60-K/2018 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Dewan Sugar Mills Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1730 Judicial Companies Misc. 31/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2000 Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan (Applicant) VS M/s Baig Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1731 R.A (Civil Revision) 41/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Muhammad Soomar Danwar (Applicant) VS Allah Rakhio and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1732 Const. P. 1359/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Yousuf Thr Attorney Muhammad Shahid (Petitioner) VS Kashif Muhammad Baig & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.81-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Muhammad Yousuf and others,C.P.1098-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Muhammad Yousuf and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
1733 Const. P. 3036/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Mir Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1734 Const. P. 3825/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Ali Nawaz Kalwar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1735 2017 CLD 1256 Suit 4-B/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Habib Metropolitan Bank (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Dagra Textile (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 11-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
1736 Const. P. 1343/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Muhammad Hamzo Buriro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1737 Const. P. 1670/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ayaz Hussain Mangi (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1738 Const. P. 561/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Pandi Khan Pathan (Petitioner) VS Fed; Of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1739 Const. P. 2918/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Mehmood (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1740 Const. P. 670/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1741 Const. P. 1896/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Majid Ali Ghanghro (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1742 Const. P. 2174/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shamsheer Security Guards (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Manik Chowdhary & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-AUG-18 Yes It was a burden upon the petitioner/tenant to establish that rent for the month of November 2007 onwards was paid in any form which burden was not discharged. In fact the suggestion that respondents refused to receive the rent w.e.f. November 2007, as borne out from the cross-examination of the petitioner, it becomes toothless defence that rent of the subject period was paid. Though this evidence was not discussed by the appellate Court yet in the ultimate paragraph it was observed that the evidence was not perused by the Rent Controller and rightly so. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1743 Const. P. 2253/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Nawaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1744 Const. P. 3452/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Naveed Haryah (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1745 Const. P. 3338/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Siraj Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1746 Const. P. 1168/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Niaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1747 Const. P. 677/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1748 Const. P. 77/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Haji Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Head Master Govt Primary School Bhutta Road Suk (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-OCT-18 Yes ence, it could be safely observed that the pleadings of the plaint do support the proposed amendment sought by the petitioner. In the same way, will not change the nature and complexion of the suit. Had the proposed amendment be not supported by the pleadings in terms of Para 6 as well as in terms of prayer clause A, it could be a possibility that nature and complexion of the suit may have been altered by introduction of these impugned, proposed amendments, but that is not the case here. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1749 Const. P. 197/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Miss Hina and an other (Petitioner) VS District Accounts Officer Sukkur and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-18 Yes Since possibility of competence of appointed candidates, as claimed by them, cannot be brushed aside straight-away as they have been serving since seven years nor it would be in the interest of justice to deprive petitioners of their undeniable rights to have fair-competition. Therefore, to ensure a balance, we do not find it proper to order for fresh process of recruitment by re-advertisement. We find it in all fairness to provide a fair-opportunity of proving their eligibility only to those, who, having eligibility, to test the competence. Worth to add that fresh advertisement would make it open for all, eligible today, which may result in prejudicing the eligibility of those, who otherwise were eligible at such time (about seven years ago). Thus, in short, fresh competition amongst those who appeared earlier could be the best solution that we have for them. Needless to add that if they (private respondents) are and were competent they would sail and, if not, will sink and in such eventuality they would not press application of Locus poenitentiae with reference to their length of service because legally seven years of service cannot overshadow the non-transparent and deceitful recruitment process as same was / is nothing but a premium, being given to them, on account of a cheating undertaken by the officials who conducted the recruitment process. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio C.P.17-K/2019,C.P.1469-K/2018,C.P.4857/2018,C.P.4654/2018,C.A.1190/2019,C.A.1194/2019,C.A.1189/2019,C.A.1191/2019 SCP Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after Summer vacation,Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after Summer vacation,Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after Summer vacation,Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after Summer vacation,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
1750 Const. P. 351/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2008 Hindu Welfare Association Gambat (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1751 Const. P. 2108/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Muhammad Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Mst Kausar Parveen & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1752 2019 YLR 2500, 2019 SBLR Sindh 1096 Const. P. 922/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Capri Autos (Petitioner) VS Dr. Masuma Hasan & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-JUN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.907-K/2018 Dr. Masuma Hasan v. Capri Autos Motor Cycle Dealer and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1753 Const. P. 1055/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mst Tahira Farooque Awan (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1754 II.A. 7/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Haroon and others (Appellant) VS V/S Qaimkhani Welfare Society and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-FEB-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1755 Civil Revision 203/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Gul Sher (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1756 2021 PCr.LJ 1270 Const. P. 2147/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Ghafar S/o Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-MAR-20 Yes Every disease, if not attended properly, would cause negative and hazardous effect to life but it doesn???t mean that its medical remedy is bail from the recovery of such diseases. His treatment in a best available hospital under a care of best team of doctors could serve the best option. These stresses and pressures discussed could only be ruled out if a patient remains away from all these stresses and strains and the best possible place for the prescribed health issues is a Hospital where a patient could be treated free from all such stress possibilities. Post Arrest Bail Application on medical ground dismissed in view of the recommendations of the Medical Board Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam C.P.363-K/2020 Abdul Ghaffar v. Federation of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1757 Const. P. 2655/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1758 H.C.A 29/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Muhammad Imran Mustaqeem & Ors (Appellant) VS Muhammad Mustaqeem & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-24 Yes The object of petition for Letters of Administration is only to the extent of its grant or otherwise and the question of sale and purchase of the properties does not arise whereas in the instant matter despite objections taken by one of the legal heirs for its conversion into a suit, the property was attempted to be auctioned. Once the property devolved amongst the legal heirs that was and is the end of the lis filed in shape of petition for Letters of Administration. Hence, in all fairness not only the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed but now since the property is to be devolved amongst the legal heirs, the Letters of Administration be issued accordingly, if it has not been issued as yet, leaving it up to them i.e. legal heirs to see/decide the fate of their property as they deem fit and proper and not in a petition, which is/was only to the extent of grant of Letters of Administration. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1759 Const. P. 6105/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Fine Star Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1760 Const. P. 1704/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 G.S Fashion (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1761 Const. P. 4804/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/S Jabbar Steel Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1762 Const. P. 3934/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Fazaia Housing Scheme Karachi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1763 Const. P. 4099/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Habib Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1764 Const. P. 1020/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Liberty Power Tech Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1765 Const. P. 845/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Asian Impex (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1766 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 124/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS M/s. Java enterprises and other (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1767 Const. P. 3925/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Raja Steel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1768 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 16/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Getz Pharma (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) VS Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-I & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1769 Const. P. 3135/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Millennium Mall Management Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1770 Const. P. 4916/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Safdar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1771 Const. P. 5760/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 HRSG Recruiting (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1772 Const. P. 785/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Shakir S/o Muhammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS M/s. United Bank Limited and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1773 Const. P. 5810/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Yasir Mumtaz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1774 Const. P. 4440/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Murshid Builders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1775 Const. P. 5038/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zameer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1776 F.R.A 10/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aamir Rafat Siddiqui Thr. Attorney Mrs. Sadia Aami (Appellant) VS The VIIIth Senior Civil Judge, Khi South & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1777 2022 PTD 8 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 424/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS Syed Javed Ahmed & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 Yes The Tribunal has also laid reliance on Rule 17 of the Baggage Rules, 2006 which provides that the goods brought in commercial quantity shall be allowed release only on payment of duty and taxes at the statutory rates and redemption fine equal to thirty per cent of the value of the goods in terms of the Notification No.SRO 547(1)/2005 dated 06th June, 2005 wherein fine was subsequently reduced by a following SRO in 2009. Thus in view of the definition of Section 2(s) of the Customs Act, 1969 the commercial quantity of silver jewelry does not fall in any prohibition or restriction clause unless proved otherwise. The SRO 499(1)/2009 also allow commercial quantity baggage to be released on taxes or redemption fine. In view of Section 139 of the Customs Act, 1969 we are of the view that the passenger was at liberty to declare such contents of his baggage orally which he did as disclosed in the impugned order and such facts cannot be re-appreciated while hearing reference Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1778 2019 PTD 347 Suit 1763/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Umer Spinniing Mills (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 05-SEP-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1779 Const. P. 4784/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Haji Nazir Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1780 Const. P. 4792/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s HSJ Metal (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1781 Const. P. 5286/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s S.M Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1782 Const. P. 1578/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Majeed & Sons Steel (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1783 2014 CLD 1039 Judicial Companies Misc. 2/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Zafar Iqbal and Others (Applicant) VS Naseem Ahmed and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-MAY-15 Yes It is not a question of embarking upon the jurisdiction, but a question which involves adjudication of issues before this Court. The question of overlapping is also not tenable as the title of these shares is not subjudice before Senior Civil Judge at Multan. I may however observe that the District Judge may pass its own independent order and any observation here shall not influence proceedings before any other forum including trial of Suit No.54 of 2013. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1784 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 5/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Al-Hamra Trading Company (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1785 Const. P. 8126/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Riaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1786 Const. P. 132/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Millennium Mall Management Co (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JAN-24 Yes the power to levy, charge, impose and recover any or all tax(es) separately on immovable property is concerned it is an alien object under cantonment laws in the present frame of the Constitution. The tax on the annual rental value of immovable property is a tax and not a fee or any other genre of levy. The Cantonment Boards have no power to levy tax on immovable property including tax on annual rental value of immovable property. The Presidential Order 13 of 1979 has no effect on the subject after the revival of the Constitution and the 18th Amendment, and the subject law to the extent of provision of section 3 as applied, is no longer protected. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.102/2024 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defense, Govt of Pakistan Rawalpindi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company through its Managing Partner, Karachi and others,C.P.230/2024 Faisal Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Karachi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company, through its authorized managing partner and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
1787 Const. P. 550/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Muhammad Sabir (Petitioner) VS Faiz Ahmed Qureshi & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1788 Const. P. 846/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Zafar Malik (Petitioner) VS Azhar Abbas Butt & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-FEB-18 Yes The legislature has limited the definition of personal use of the landlord to the extent of spouse and son and daughter. It thus cannot be extended to use of brother as a personal use. The personal use of the respondent himself was satisfied/proved in CP No.S-846 of 2009 in relation to Rent Case No.103 of 2002, as observed above, however the bona fide of the landlord insofar as other two applications are concerned required a strict test. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1789 Suit.B 66/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 ASKARI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) VS MAGNA STEEL (PVT) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 28-MAR-14 Yes The provision of section 9 & 10 of the of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 are mandatory. Upshot of the above discussion is that both leave to defend applications are allowed as prayed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1790 II.A. 131/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Kaleemuddin (Appellant) VS Naushaba Mobeen & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1791 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 455/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Commissioner Inland Revenue (Applicant) VS M/s. New Allied Electronics Industries (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 Yes Under Customs Act, 1969, Section 79 onwards is a procedure which regulates the import through filing of Goods Declaration along with necessary documents including examination of imported goods and clearance thereof. Such mechanism was adopted and exhausted by the customs when goods declaration was dealt with. The purported allegation of misdeclaration was in fact within the domain and jurisdiction of Collectorate of Customs, which, in case of any controversy, could have retained the consignment/goods for further inquiry or chemical test and determine the duty provisionally till disposal of the inquiry or reassessment. This has not happened in the instant case as had it been a misdeclaration of the goods, the officers concerned may have taken cognizance and could have objected to the assessment in terms of Section 193 and 195 of Customs Act, 1969 read with Section 32 of the said Act. Sales Tax Act, 1990 does not deal with issue of misdeclaration as being dealt with by the customs officials under Customs Act, 1969. Therefore, unless a misdeclaration is established by the customs officials such recourse of recovery of short levy of sales tax could not have been triggered. The dispute of classification was never raised at customs level. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1792 2021 PTD 1858, 2021 PTCL 835 Const. P. 4776/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Al-Hamd Steel Furnace (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-SEP-21 Yes The amendment, as sought by the petitioner, could not have been carried out in terms of Section 45(2) of Customs Act, 1969 as this section relates to an obvious error in the import manifest or an omission which in the opinion of such officer was result of an accident or inadvertence. Petitioners case has not fallen in any of such exceptions inviting and/or calling for an amendment or issuance of supplementary import manifest as it is apparently a deliberate attempt to provide an umbrella to the original consignee as against recovery of Rs.71.179 Million. --Previously there was absolutely no permission whatsoever for carrying out any amendment in the import manifest except as provided in subsection (2). This subsection (3) was replaced by a proviso introduced through Finance Act 2021 which now provides that before berthing of vessel or the crossover of the vessel, as the case may be, the person incharge of a conveyance or his duly authorized agent may amend the import manifest subject to rules notified by the Board. ---The replaced subsection (3) of Section 45 would be applicable in the sense that except as provided in subsection (2) no import manifest shall be amended. Event disclosed is prior to amendment carried out via Finance Bill 2021. This would leave a very little margin, in fact no margin, for the amendment sought to be carried out in the import manifest in terms of subsection (2) as it is specifically for an obvious error or in fact an omission, which in the opinion of the concerned officer is a result of accident or inadvertence. In fact petitioners case has not fallen in either of the two i.e. its case is neither covered by subsection (2) of Section 45 nor the proviso recently inserted by Finance Act, 2021. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1793 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 536/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Multan Chemical Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1794 Const. P. 638/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mohan S/o Doonger (Petitioner) VS Mst. Suneeta and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1795 Const. P. 1465/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 MUHAMMAD ISHAQ KALOTA (Petitioner) VS NAFEES AHMED & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-NOV-17 Yes Admission of alleged default by tenant in any previous litigation or even in this case cannot be relied upon. Admission could only be of facts and cannot be of law. The law takes effect when applied on facts. Admission of law, if any, has to pass through the test prescribed and required by law itself. If a person conceded to have defaulted being ignorant of law such is no admission unless approved by law as the law takes its course when applied on facts which may suggest otherwise than what allegedly conceded or admitted in facts Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1796 Const. P. 1731/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Kausar Tasneem (Petitioner) VS Habib Muhammad Naseeb & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-DEC-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1797 Const. P. 5189/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1798 Const. P. 1425/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Momin Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Chief Collector & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.604-K/2021 The Model Collectorate of Custom v. Syed Momin Hussain Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1799 Const. P. 631/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Nusrat Hussain @ Shahid Warsi (Petitioner) VS Aal-e- Aba Trust & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 12-APR-18 Yes The rent was deposited in the name of two persons i.e. Aale-eAba Trust and as well as previous owner Fayyaz Hussain Qazalbash. This was done after receipt of notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 from new owner i.e. Aale-e-Aba Trust. Despite having knowledge and despite having seen the documents, as the correspondence shows, the tenant/ petitioner without first offering the rent to the respondent No.1 started depositing rent in Misc. Rent Case. This deposit is not a lawful deposit in terms of Section 10(3) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1800 H.C.A 96/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nazir Ahmed Chandio`` (Appellant) VS Abdul Rehman & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1093-K/2021 Nazir Ahmed Chandio v. Abdul Rehman & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1801 Const. P. 6865/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Agha Steel Ind. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1802 2022 PTD 245 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 335/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Forte Impex Lahore (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-21 Yes Simply mentioning that there is danger of removal of goods is not sufficient. The officer must state grounds which justify apprehension of danger of such removal and so also information that he received from an individual having name and that the concerned party has taken steps or about to take steps for the removal of the goods. Nothing of such sort is mentioned in the under considered warrant allegedly issued under section 163 of Customs Act, 1969. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1803 Const. P. 8448/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms Mirza Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1804 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 170/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Brothers Pen Company (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1805 Const. P. 2303/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Mysons Engineering System Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1806 Const. P. 6614/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Basiruddin Omar Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1807 Const. P. 7281/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tariq Chobdar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1808 Const. P. 6452/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sidat Hyder Morshed Associates Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1809 Const. P. 6641/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s SAMBA Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1810 Const. P. 6944/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s ISRA University (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1811 Const. P. 7062/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shah Transport Network (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1812 Const. P. 3488/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Greeno Corp Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS The Chief Commissioner IR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1813 Const. P. 5836/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khawaja Anver Majid (Petitioner) VS F.B.R & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1814 Const. P. 4418/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rehmatullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Faisal (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1815 Const. P. 6644/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s SAMBA Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1816 Const. P. 6690/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1817 Const. P. 7303/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Erum Tahir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1818 Const. P. 1917/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Adeel (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Faisal & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1819 Const. P. 163/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Raheem Shaikh (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1820 2014 YLR 1273 Suit 1015/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Abdul Aziz. (Plaintiff) VS Shahid Ahmed and others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 24-JAN-14 Yes "Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. VII, R. 11, O. II, R. 2 & O. XXIII, R. 1---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts.91 & 113---Withdrawal of earlier suit---Filing of fresh suit---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Contention of defendants was that earlier suit was withdrawn unconditionally and plaintiff was precluded from filing fresh suit---Validity---Plaintiff had fresh cause of action to file the present suit---Earlier suit had been withdrawn under O.XXIII, Rule 1, C.P.C. but same would preclude the plaintiff to file fresh suit on the same cause of action---Cause of action to file the present suit commenced from the day when the alleged settlement between the parties was arrived at and compliance of same was denied---Plaintiff sought compliance of settlement arrived at between the parties at the time of withdrawal of earlier suit for which limitation period was three years---Article 91 of Limitation Act, 1908 would not apply in the present case as the facts entitling the plaintiff to file present suit commenced when public notice was issued---Present suit had been filed for enforcement of settlement arrived at in the earlier suit between the parties---Earlier suit was filed for declaration and cancellation of sale deed, however on account of settlement a fresh cause accrued to the plaintiff on denial of such settlement---Plaintiff had not relinquished any rights with regard to suit property---Application filed under O. VII, Rule 11, C.P.C. was dismissed accordingly. " Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1821 Civil Revision 107/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Ahmed Saeed Qureshi (Applicant) VS Abdul Aziz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1822 Const. P. 202/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Imran and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1823 Suit 1046/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Ali Hasan (Plaintiff) VS Defence Officers Housing Authority (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1824 Const. P. 1019/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Ahsan Ali Arain & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1825 Adm. Suit 5/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 M/s. Fauji Ferttilizer Co. Ltd (Plaintiff) VS M.V. B-India & Ors (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 08-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1826 Suit 2372/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SYED MUHAMMAD AYUB (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 11-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1827 Const. P. 188/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Falcon - I (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1828 Const. P. 4296/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 S.S Fashion Resources (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1829 Const. P. 4559/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asim Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Malik Muhammad Afzal and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1830 2023 SBLR 22 Suit 630/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mohammad Tarique Khan (Plaintiff) VS Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 11-MAR-22 Yes 1- A promotion cannot be deferred till such time the enquiry and/or disciplinary proceedings are finalized as a person is presumed to be innocent until found guilty1 . Pendency of inquiry and minor penalties could not come in way of promotion; enquiry proceedings pending against plaintiff for an indefinite period smacked of arbitrariness and mala fide and is a hanging sword on head of employees; such treatment could not sustain in eye of law to deprive the plaintiff of promotion2 . Pendency of inquiry was no ground for denying promotion to the employee and no one could be punished by denying promotion before establishing charge3 . Any such rule formed in deviation of settled principle of law would not come in the way of equality rights guaranteed by Constitution. 2--As regards rejection of plaint under order VII rule 11 CPC on the ground of res judicata is concerned, the defendants plead that the subject matter of instant suit has been decided in the earlier suit and/or the subject matter of earlier suit. In this regard firstly the subject matter of instant suit is a subsequent show-cause notice which was not even in existence at the time of filing earlier suit. Therefore neither principle of order 2 rule 2 nor doctrine of order 23 rule 1 CPC would apply. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1831 II.A. 54/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 The Secretary thr:secretary PCCC Karachi (Appellant) VS Abdul Samad Shaikh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 24-JAN-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1832 F.R.A 24/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Nasir Hussain & Ors (Appellant) VS Mumtaz Ali (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-OCT-17 Yes The evidence i.e. available on record and three contrary versions and the pleadings of the rent case wherein no amount of rent was stated to be in existence or fixed and the cause of action alone was enough to establish that the cause was not on account of non-payment of any rent and it is only on account of interference caused by the appellant in renting out shops to different individuals that respondents furious to file the ejectment application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1833 Const. P. 1491/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Noshad Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1834 Const. P. 757/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Iqbal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1835 Const. P. 706/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Mst. Anum (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1836 Suit 1540/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Faiz Bukhari (Plaintiff) VS Siraj Muhammad Iqbal & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 16-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1837 Suit 1434/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SUPER STAR METAL FINISHING (PRIVATE) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS SYED SHAHZAD ALI & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1838 2022 PLD Sindh 378 Adm. Suit 2/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tenedos Denizcilik ve Tie Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS M.T MAKHAMBET & Others (Defendant) S.B. Order 04-MAR-22 Yes --Section 11 CPC is universal doctrine so it does not matter if the judgment is of a foreign Court or of a Court beyond the territorial limits of this Court. The subject claim is a tried and adjudicated issue (within competent jurisdiction) and hence it is being applied for enforcing res- judicata. There is no legislation enacted contrary to the acceptance of such rule except as provided in Section 11 CPC. --The explanation provides that a former suit is one which has been decided prior, irrespective of its filing date. Explanation II provides that for the purpose of Section 11 competence of Court shall be determined irrespective of any provision as to right of appeal from the decision of such Court5 . Explanation III provides that matter referred to must in the former suit have been alleged by one party and either denied or admitted expressly or impliedly by the other. Explanation IV provides that any matter which might or ought to have been made ground of defence or attack in such former suit shall be deemed to have been a matter directly or substantially in issue in such suit and under Explanation V any relief claimed in the plaint, which is not expressly granted by the decree, shall for the purposes of this section be deemed to have been refused. The remaining explanation VI is not relevant for the purposes of issue in hand. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1839 2020 SBLR Sindh 744 Const. P. 213/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Burhan (Petitioner) VS Election Commisson Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
1840 Suit 540/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khadim Hussain & another. (Plaintiff) VS Huzoor Bux Gabol & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1841 Const. P. 1678/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Rehan Warris and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1842 Suit 1066/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 MST. LUBNA NAYYER (Plaintiff) VS M/S. EMAAR GIGA KARACHI LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1843 Const. P. 1584/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Since the Tribunals for the purposes, as disclosed in the petition, are functioning within the respective jurisdiction, the petitioner may approach the concerned Tribunal, having jurisdiction to exhaust the remedy as available to him under the law, as these intricate questions cannot be decided under Article 199 of the Constitution Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1844 Const. P. 1270/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Yamin (Petitioner) VS C.B.C & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
1845 M.A. 20/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ehsan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Zakir & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1846 Const. P. 7279/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Arbab Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1847 Judicial Companies Misc. 12/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Patek (Private) Limited and another (Applicant) VS . (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAY-16 Yes It is contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the scheme of arrangement is such that the petitioner No.1 is being demerged and one part of it is being amalgamated and merged with petitioner No.2. Scheme is available as annexure-E. In terms of the order dated 23.9.2015 such petitioners were allowed to hold separate meetings with their shareholders including the directors and the Chairman was directed to submit report accordingly. The report has been filed subsequently and in pursuance of this merger petition SECP has filed its parawsie comments/objections which are substantially dealt with one by one. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
1848 Execution 3/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 ABDUL HALEEM (Decree Holder) VS M/S. GULSHAN-e-FAISAL CO-OP SOCIETY & AN OTHER (Judgment Debtor) S.B. Order 21-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1849 Const. P. 115/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ali Akbar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1850 Const. P. 1308/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Ayesha and others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Saeed and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1851 Suit 283/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s. Al-Awwal International. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 09-MAY-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1852 Suit.B 116/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 BANKERS EQUITY LTD (Plaintiff) VS SARDAR ABDUL HAMID & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 16-DEC-14 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1853 Suit 1433/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SUPER TECH AUTO PARTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS SYED SHAHZAD ALI & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1854 Const. P. 5537/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Hadi International (Pvt) Ltd and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1855 Const. P. 800/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Kamaluddin Jamro ( Khi To Hyd ) (Petitioner) VS V.C University Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1856 Const. P. 616/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Muhammad Salman Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1857 Const. P. 545/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Sarwae Qureshi (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1858 Const. P. 43/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Saeed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1859 Const. P. 651/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Nafees Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1860 Const. P. 607/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Delimitation Connected Matters 2022 Muhammad Umar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1861 Const. P. 722/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Samina Khokhar & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1862 Const. P. 723/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Zahid Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1863 Const. P. 1569/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS SILK Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah C.P.842-K/2022 Muhammad Siddique v. Silk Bank Limited through its Principal Officer/Manager Road Branch Hyderabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1864 Suit 941/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 DRUGPHARMA CHEMICALS (PVT) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 16-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1865 2023 CLC 1098 Suit 1357/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 ABDUL REHMAN (Plaintiff) VS NOMAN ABID (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-SEP-22 Yes The circular in this regard is for the litigants who have crossed age of 65, widow who have not re-married and orphan whose both parents have expired. The litigant, for the purpose of defining above circular, does not include the attorney who is contesting on behalf of person litigating under such status, on a private arrangement. The attorney may have crossed the age of 65 but the litigant has not. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1866 Suit -380/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Nasreen (Plaintiff) VS Ali Hasan Brohi & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 26-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1867 Const. P. 650/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Saniya Adnan (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
1868 Suit 2814/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 REHAN HAMID (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 26-OCT-22 Yes Plaint Returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC. ---The only defence taken by the learned counsel for the plaintiff is that when he landed at Karachi Airport he came to know about impugned notification dated 26.11.2021, therefore, the cause accrued within the territorial limit of this Court. I am afraid this kind of logic is not tenable in law. The cause of action was accrued when and from where the impugned notification was issued and also at place where in pursuance of such agreement he works or worked for gain, and not where he on his arrival or departure informed or where it was brought to his knowledge. Furthermore, the plaintiff was appointed with defendant at Hyderabad and throughout he was employed there, therefore, if this plea is taken to be lawful it will make entire scheme of jurisdiction as redundant and such was not the intention of legislation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1869 Const. P. 1027/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Mehmooda Khanam (Petitioner) VS CEO Cantonment Board Clifton and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1870 Const. P. 1659/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Kamran Ali (Petitioner) VS Ordinance Centre and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.734-K/2023 Kamran Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Defense Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1871 Const. P. 1878/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP D 1717 of 2023 2023 Dr. Kulsoom Kausar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1872 Const. P. 1496/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 PIA (Petitioner) VS Tazeen Shah and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1873 Const. P. 2151/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Supernet Ltd (Petitioner) VS Chief Inspector (Collector) of Stamps and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1874 I.T.R.A 148/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MR. UMAIR BIN DILSHAD (Applicant) VS Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1875 I. A 122/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 MCB Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS Tariq Aziz (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1876 H.C.A 372/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s National Refinery Limited (Appellant) VS Syed Mansoor Ali and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-NOV-23 Yes Sub-section-2 of Section-3 provides an appeal to a Bench of two or more Judges of High Court from an order made by a single Judge of that Court under clause-1 of Article-199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, not being an order made under subparagraph (i) of paragraph (b) of that clause. To our understanding, it excludes an appeal in relation to a subject summarized in Article199(1)(b)(i), whereas, rest of the "subjects" of Article-199(1) have been subjected to appeal. Subject of dismissal of a claim made under Section-15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is already subjected to appeal under Section-17, but this is not the ???subject??? which could be impugned in any of the lower fora and hence neither appeal nor petition is a remedy. For the purpose of appeal under Law Reforms Ordinance or this appeal in particular wherefrom the impugned order has arisen, out of proceeding under Article-199 from a single Bench, we may sum-up by referring to Appellate side of Sindh Chief Court Rules. Rule-8 confers jurisdiction ordinarily exercised by two Judges of this Court, except otherwise provided by law in particular. Similarly Rule-9 discussed matter to be decided by single Judge of appellate side, not necessarily under Article-199 as there may be some miscellaneous lis etc. Such work (subject) assigned under Rule9 ibid is not the one impugned by the appellant before learned single Judge, hence jurisdiction was not vested and incorrectly exercised. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.4312/2023 National Refinery Limited, Karachi v. Syed Mansoor Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1877 H.C.A 305/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Parveen Razzak Kamani & Another (Appellant) VS Huma Kamani & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1878 I. A 83/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Rashid Ali Khan (Appellant) VS Rohail Khan and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1879 I. A 34/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shabbir Hussain (Appellant) VS Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1880 I. A 79/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: I.A D 78/2021 2021 M/S Qalandri Filling & CNG Station & others (Appellant) VS SME Leasing Limited (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan C.P.1291-K/2023 M/s. Qalandri Filling & CNG Station & others v. The Manager S.M.E. Leasing Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1881 H.C.A 290/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Nadra Jawed & others (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shehzad & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1882 H.C.A 146/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zafar Iqbal (Appellant) VS Mst. Mumtaz Bibi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1883 H.C.A 184/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2004 M/s. Continental Cargo Services (Appellant) VS Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1884 I. A 106/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mohsin Lakho through attorney Mst. Zehra Fatima (Appellant) VS Asad Ejaz and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1885 H.C.A 457/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 National Highway Authority (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1886 Const. P. 4834/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 National Distributors (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Learned V A.D.J West Karachi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1887 H.C.A 40/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Sarim Burney Welfare Trust International & Another (Appellant) VS Syed Sarwar Muiz and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1888 Const. P. 3847/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mrs. Gulzar Parveen (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1889 Const. P. 3210/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shan (Petitioner) VS Roshan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1890 Const. P. 6809/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s Khan Brothers (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1891 Const. P. 6812/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Golden Sindh Cotton Ginning & Pressing Factory (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1892 Const. P. 6208/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s The Benitoz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1893 Const. P. 553/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Memon Pir Mohammad (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1894 Civil Tran 28/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mst. Sana (Applicant) VS Muhammad Nasrullah Hussain (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1895 H.C.A 34/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Siddiqsons Ltd & others (Appellant) VS Creck Marina Singapore Pte Ltd & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1896 Const. P. 131/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Saleem Butt (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1897 Const. P. 865/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Imran and Others (Petitioner) VS Shafiq ur Rehman and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1898 I. A 10/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Syed Haris Hassan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Irfan (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1899 Const. P. 6169/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sarfaraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Abdul Khaliq And ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1900 Const. P. 7874/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Haji Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS Addl: Session Judge No. IX & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1901 H.C.A 74/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Khalid (Appellant) VS Ume Aiman & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1902 I. A 32/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Imtiaz & another (Appellant) VS Abdul Ghaffar (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1903 Const. P. 3001/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Saeed Badshah and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1904 Const. P. 5923/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Aqeel Bukhari (Petitioner) VS M/s AGE & Sons Pvt Ltd and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1905 Const. P. 6663/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Universal Brushware Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1906 II.A. 15/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Saphire Textile Mills Ltd (Appellant) VS Indus Steel Pipe Factory Pvt Ltd & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1907 H.C.A 20/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Azizur Rehman Chaudhary (Appellant) VS Captain Muhammad Aijaz Haroon & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1908 Const. P. 7465/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1909 H.C.A 242/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dadabhoy Foundation & another (Appellant) VS K. B. C. A. & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-23 Yes The order passed in JM has not given a license to carry on construction in violation of status quo order. In fact it restrained the parties from raising construction. Even the permission claimed from Sindh Building Control Authority is of no avail in presence of status quo order and the matter being subjudice. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1910 Const. P. 584/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Rashid Ahmed (Petitioner) VS M/S OGDC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
1911 Const. P. 4159/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mairaj Begum (Petitioner) VS Director M.E.O and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1912 Spl.H.C.A 25/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Soneri Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS Elite Publishers Limited & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1913 Const. P. 3230/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Symmetry Group Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
1914 H.C.A 71/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Mehar Sultan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Saddiq Butt & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
1915 Const. P. 90/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Malik Maqsoodul Hassan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Faisal Azam & 5 Ors (Appellant) S.B. Judgement 15-MAY-18 Yes The point of merger insofar as invoking the jurisdiction in terms of Section 12(2) CPC is concerned has already attained the finality in terms of judgment reported in PLD 2015 SC 358 and there are no issues on its maintainability. However the case as presented does not come within the frame of Section 12(2) CPC. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1916 Const. P. 442/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mangan Dahani (Petitioner) VS S.H.O PS Madeji and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1917 Cr.Misc. 209/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Khadim Ali Gopang (Applicant) VS Additional District Judge Kamber & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1918 Const. P. 901/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Qazi Abdul Wahab Junejo (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Dokri and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1919 Civil Tran 2/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Liaquat Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS Anwar Khso & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1920 Const. P. 482/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Shahmore Shaikh (Petitioner) VS SHO PS New Foujdari and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.130-K/2012 Arbab Zulfiqar and another v. Speaker Provincial Assembly through its Secretary Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1921 Cr.Bail 241/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Manthar Channa (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1922 Civil Tran 6/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Khan Mohammad Borhi (Applicant) VS Mohamad Hashim Brohi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1923 Const. P. 709/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Bakhshal Khakhrani (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Rehmatpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1924 Const. P. 11/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Shazia Mangi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Dari and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1925 Const. P. 2113/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Amjad Hussain Shaikh (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Shahdadkot and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1926 Const. P. 109/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Hakeema and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Sobhodero and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1927 Const. P. 2729/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Noor Illahi Khan Sundrani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1928 Cr.Bail 33/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mohammad Achar Bozdar & Ors (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1929 Cr.Misc. 227/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Inayat Khatoon Korkani (Applicant) VS The state and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1930 Cr.Bail 714/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Ramzan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 17-OCT-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1931 2012 CLD 1623 Suit.B 65/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 NIB BANK LTD (Plaintiff) VS TERRY TOWELLERS (PVT) lTED (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 13-AUG-12 Yes Suit for recovery was decreed and machinery of judgment-debtor was to be auctioned---Objection Application to enforcement of decree---Contention of the objector inter alia was that he was the landlord of the premises where the machinery was kept; that arrears of rent had been due to him and that he on his own expense moved the machinery to a godown and had incurred rent for the same---Contention of the objector was that he be compensated for the costs incurred by him from the sale proceeds of the machinery---Validity---Claims of the objector were flimsy and he had not kept record of the accounts or payments by cash for the godown and it was inconceivable that he was incurring expenditures on a person who in arrears of rent and with whom he was litigating---Machinery was hypothecated/pledged with the decree holder Bank and even otherwise it was the preferential right of the decree holder Bank to auction the machinery against their claim---Claim of objector was without merit---Application was dismissed, in circumstances. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1932 2016 SBLR Sindh 1268 Suit 1978/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pakistan Beverage (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 18-MAY-16 Yes here is a need of carving out a distinction between a determined/prescribed price for the consumer and sale price for the consumer. OGRA only determines the prescribed price on the basis of estimated revenue requirements and that is the only determination that they forwarded to the federal government i.e. Rs.469.04 per MMBTU. It cannot be considered as a sale price for each category of consumer since this could only be culminated and matured into a sale price once the federal government sends it back to the authority/OGRA for issuing a notification considering it to be a sale price in the notification. Determined prescribed price of OGRA cannot prematurely be considered to be sale price under the given circumstances. The impugned notification further lacks its sanctity as the same was much higher i.e. Rs.600 MMBTU than the prescribed/recommended price of Rs.469.04 per MMBTU by OGRA itself. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1933 Suit 211/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 AerSale 27469 Aviation Ltd., & another (Plaintiff) VS Air Indus (Pvt) Ltd. (Defendant) S.B. Order 26-APR-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1934 Suit.B 78/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Haji Abdul Razzak (Plaintiff) VS Faisal Bank Limited (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-FEB-17 Yes Prima facie it seems that the MCB has filed Suit No.1674 of 1997 only for recovery of US $.51,066,208/-. Both counsel have also relied upon pleadings of Suit No.1674 of 1997 As far as this particular amount i.e. US $.26 Million is concerned, for which all rights claimed to have been transferred to M/s Al-Faisal Investment Bank Limited, MCB from its pleadings has shown no interest and it is only in pursuit of its claim of recovery that this amount was sought to be attached and it is on consideration of above facts and circumstances that this amount of US dollars was ordered to be released subject to execution of guarantee in terms as stated in the order of the Honble Supreme Court. After execution of the guarantee Al-Faisal Investment Bank got payments of US $.21 Million on 09.03.1998 and of US $.5 Million on 11.03.1998. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1935 Const. P. 1715/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Sadaf Younus thr Her Father Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Saqib Nadeem & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-DEC-17 Yes Insofar as Rules 5 and 6 of the West Pakistan Rules under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961 is concerned, the petitioner was divorced in Pakistan while the custody of the ward was with her. Both the counsels have not objected that the ward is a dual national and since ward being with mother is living within the territorial limits of the Court where Guardian & Ward application was filed and the cause of action in terms of Rule 6 ibid arisen, it has the jurisdiction. Such point was never raised before the trial Court or before the appellate Court and hence it does not lie in the mouth of the respondent who himself filed an application for the custody of the ward surrendering himself to the jurisdiction of the trial Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.641-K/2018 Mst: Sadaf Younus v. Saqib Nadeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1936 Const. P. 1038/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 P.O Sindh Thrgh: Divi: Forest Affors: Divi: Khp. (Petitioner) VS Photo Rajar & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1937 Const. P. 2889/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Syed Mukhtiar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
1938 Const. P. 742/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Muhammad Kashif (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1939 Const. P. 1413/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Nooruddin Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1940 Const. P. 719/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Pir Bux Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1941 Civil Revision 108/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Taki Muhammad (decd), thr:L.Rs: (Applicant) VS Mst. Saeed Akhtar & ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1942 Const. P. 3674/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Ali Bux Shar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1943 Const. P. 2273/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ghulam Hyder Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1944 Const. P. 3569/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Walidad & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1945 Const. P. 2709/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1946 Const. P. 2156/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Rafique Ali Ansari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1947 Const. P. 65/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ghulam Shabir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-18 Yes The comments filed by respondents No.3 and 4 accompanied with the recommendation of the Government of Sindh, Finance Department with reference to Rule 171 of the Sindh Civil Services Rules that there shall be no change in the date of birth which shall lead to the advantage to the Government servant concerned and unless an application in that behalf is made by the Government servant concerned within two (02) years of the date on which his service book was opened under Rule 167 of the Sindh Civil Services Rules. His service book apparently was opened in the year 1988 by Superintendent District Jail, Dadu, and an attempt has been made to alter it in the year 2017 and that too on the basis of irrelevant factor on account of medical certificate which otherwise, never permit such correction. It may well be added that things, if are done, in deviation to specific law and procedure, shall always be considered as nullity hence no benefit could be claimed in consequence thereof. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1948 Const. P. 245/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Javed Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1949 Const. P. 829/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Rasheed Ahmed @ Abdul Rasheed & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-18 Yes In pursuance of the report submitted by Mukhtiarkar (Revenue) Ghotki, one Muhammad Umar was found to have occupied the subject piece of 00-09 ghuntas to which these petitioners do not claim. They only claim that this piece of land, which is claimed by respondent No.4, is part and parcel of the village and as such the villagers have right over the land. This is not a public interest litigation as the petitioners were defendants in the suit and contested on their own right as being in occupation. The petitioners have not been able to show any right or title over the land in question. The orders, which they have impugned, may have been passed beyond jurisdiction but the approach of the petitioners is mala fide and the hands are tainted. They have not approached the Court with clean hands. Muhammad Umar, who was found to be in possession, was claimed to be the brother of the petitioners and this fact was not denied, and he has not been made party in these proceedings purposely. This is not difficult to ascertain as to why he has not been arrayed as one of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro C.P.714-K/2018 M/s Sessi United Staff Union Sindh (CBA) and another v. The Registrar Trade Unions and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1950 Const. P. 1178/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Ghulam Mustafa and others (Petitioner) VS Jashan Mal and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-OCT-18 Yes The question of the pendency of the suit and necessary registration under Section 18 of the Registration Act is misconceived since the decree had already been passed and as such the defence, as claimed in terms of the registration of an agreement of sale under Section 18 of the Registration Act was not available. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1951 Const. P. 1929/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Kaleemullah Khoso (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1952 Const. P. 2340/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mashooque Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1953 Const. P. 5214/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Abdul Sattar Memon (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1954 Const. P. 1948/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Imdad Hussain Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary Govt of sindh & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1955 Const. P. 965/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Sanaullah Soomro (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1956 Const. P. 1180/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Abdul Jabbar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1957 Const. P. 1723/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Sher Ali Lashari & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1958 Const. P. 572/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mansoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1959 Const. P. 4505/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Zainal Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
1960 Const. P. 2551/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Saeed Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Local Govt Department and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
1961 Civil Revision 14/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Khadim Hussain (Applicant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-MAR-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1962 Const. P. 2921/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Mian Khalid (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1963 Const. P. 8908/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Pakistan Television Crop Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Habib Ahmed and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-FEB-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2836/2021 M/s Pakistan Television Corporation Limited thr. Muhammad Atif, Senior Personnel Officer, Karachi v. Muhammad Habib Ahmed Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1964 Const. P. 1331/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ali Murtaza and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1965 2020 YLR 2188 Const. P. 620/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 The Fauji Foundation Charitable Trust (Petitioner) VS Federal Land Commission & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-APR-20 Yes Subject: Resumption of land under MRL 115 Fauji Foundation a "Charitable Trust" operating under endowment Act 1980 was functioning through a committee formed vide notification of 08.03.1972 of federal Government. Committee after deliberation resolved that secretary to act as authorized person. Unless otherwise explained, it does not deemed to have empowered /authorized secretary to further delegate the powers by a simple authority letter signed by Secretary alone, when it's not borne out of resolution. In the earlier petition when resumption of land was questioned, the parties withdrew their lis in view of negotiation which ended as 30 years leases of subject land and the cause of resumption deemed to have exhausted by way of doctrine of election, Petitioner opted for a long term lease instead to continue litigation against resumption of land .Such right (if any) was bartered with long term lease. Such right to challenge the resumption of land thus was not available when present petition was filed. Process of execution for long term lease should have followed requirement of MLR 115 and section 17 of Act II of 1977 and since it was not transparent, the two leases were executed in an unlawful manner and which period (30 years) has already been exhausted. Scheme of recovery of land revenue includes a process of attachment of holding against arrears which are due. Unless a remedy is exhausted, immediate jump to arrest and detention would not be justified. The question of declaring MLR 115 being repugnant to injunctions of Islamic law has already been decided but with its prospective effect as highlighted in the judgment of Qazalbash Waqf v. Chief Land Commissioner and the effective date was set as 23rd March, 1990 before which the process of resumption had already been completed yet long term leases were executed surrendering rights over the land. (if any) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam C.P.1751/2020 The Fauji Foundation, Charitable Organization under the Committee of Administration thr. Brig. (R) Sabir Ali, Fauji Foundation, Fauji Towers, Rawalpindi v. The Federal Land Commission thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1966 Const. P. 4855/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Khyber Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1967 Const. P. 4701/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s KTD (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1968 Const. P. 1793/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Farooq Ind and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1969 I. A 44/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Waseem (Appellant) VS M/s. Bank Al-Falah Ltd (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1970 Const. P. 4064/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 QICTL (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1971 Const. P. 6076/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehran Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1972 Const. P. 5476/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Jamshed Farhad Irani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1973 Const. P. 2139/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Hussain Formaids (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1974 Const. P. 4721/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abbott Laboratories (Pakistan) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1975 Const. P. 1228/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Khurram Agencies (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1976 Const. P. 4881/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Prepac Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1977 Const. P. 1960/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Daanish Ghazi (Petitioner) VS F.B.R & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1978 Const. P. 2616/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Sea King Shipping (Petitioner) VS Asstt: Collector of Custom and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-21 Yes Section 202 of Customs Act, 1969 does not extend its arms against a clearing agent acting in good faith without any collusion or negligence to cause financial loss to national exchequer. As observed, neither a show-cause was issued nor the assessment order declared such terms of recovery to be made against clearing agent. In fact the importer failed to substantiate his declared value in terms of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969 read with Rule 109 of the Customs Rules, 2001. The declared value may have varied with the advice of Director General Customs Valuation however, the connivance of clearing agent to cause losses to national exchequer is missing. Not all such Goods declarations be categorized as false or untrue statement and hence require a burden to be discharged by customs officials, if such is attributed separately against importer and clearing agent. Not necessarily a declared value, which is objected by the customs officials be always considered to be a willful act of causing losses to national exchequer in terms of duties and taxes, however, a mechanism is provided to levy duties and taxes in terms of transactional value i.e. price actually paid or payable for the goods under section 25 of Customs Act, 1969 when sold for export from Pakistan, subject to provisos therein Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1979 Const. P. 5701/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Arshad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1980 Const. P. 4011/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s GESCO Engineering Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS SRB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1981 Const. P. 4045/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 D to D Logistics Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1982 Const. P. 5960/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1983 Const. P. 3981/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Falcon - I Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1984 Const. P. 5854/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Muneer (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1985 Const. P. 4769/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zenith Chemicals Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1986 Const. P. 5404/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Packages Convertors Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.5676/2021 Packages Converters Limited, Karachi v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary, Excise & Taxation Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and another,C.A.1647/2021 Packages Converters Limited, Karachi v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary, Excise & Taxation Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relied,Pending
1987 Const. P. 5841/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sheikh Muhammad Naeem and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1988 Const. P. 5578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Creative Leather Ind. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1989 Const. P. 4788/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Z.M International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1990 Const. P. 4723/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mazharuddin (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author) C.P.299-K/2021 Mazharuddin v. Government of Sindh through Secretary Co-operation Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1991 Const. P. 4063/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 PICTL (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1992 Const. P. 4065/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s English Biscuits Manufacturers Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1993 Const. P. 5522/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Kohinoor Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1994 Const. P. 5319/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ENI Paksitan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
1995 2014 CLC 1714 Suit 169/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 ABDUL REHMAN KHAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINE CORP. (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-FEB-14 Yes In my view under the present facts and circumstances where a circular has been challenged which involves a common question of fact and since involves common grounds, it certainly involve common question of law as such is covered by Order 1 Rule 1 CPC. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1996 Const. P. 6160/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Bakhtiar Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
1997 Suit.B 2/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 UNITED BANK LTD (Plaintiff) VS FASHIONWEAR (PVT) LTD & OTHER (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 18-SEP-15 Yes Contents of the plaint as well and it appears that the defendant has evasively denied his liabilities in the leave to defend application which is not requirement of Order VIII Rule 4 CPC. Under the law every allegation of fact in the plaint should be denied specifically and if not it would amount to an evasive denial. ---Insofar as the claim of the mark up is concerned as it should be strictly subject to agreement as in chart given as the plaintiff has not cited any agreement to entitle them to claim mark up as sought, however no dispute with cost of funds from the date of default Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1998 Cr.Tran 47/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD ALI S/O MUHAMMAD ASHFAQUE (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
1999 Const. P. 329/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Clariant Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS The Court of Commissioner Workmen of anaother (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2000 2021 PTD 1955 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 239/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Lake View Forest (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-AUG-21 Yes -The scheme of the Customs Act reveals that the subject is governed in terms of Section 25 of the Customs Act and in case it could not be determined under Section 25, then the recourse is available by applying valuation ruling if available in terms of Section 25-A whereafter it is finalized under the Customs Act, 1969. After the assessment and the release of the consignment, the goods are made out of any charge of the Customs. In case the aforesaid process is required to be revisited, (in appropriate cases), the mechanism is available under the law such as Section 32, 193 and 195 of the Customs Act, 1969. --The event of post scrutiny of the goods declaration after assessment and release of goods, is not covered by Section 80(3), as undertaken. It is applicable at the time of original checking of the goods declaration in his hands and goods are yet to be assessed and released and not at belated stage when even the goods have been released. This situation (for appropriate cases) is catered by Section 32, 193 and 195 of the Customs Act, 1969 where under a show cause and/or an appeal within 30 days could have been preferred, or the Board or the Collector of Customs or the Collector of Custom (Adjudication) may, within his jurisdiction, call for the examination of the records of any proceedings under the act for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any decision or order passed by a subordinate officer respectively, could have been followed, however, none of them were invoked. Surprisingly the applicant opt to invoke Section 80(3) of the Customs Act which is then shown to have been followed by consequences. It is thus under above referred provisions when the competent authority is of the view that the assessment was not made in accordance with law, the past and closed transaction could be reopened but not in the manner as done in the instant case. Prima-facie it is neither a case of mis-declaration as correct PCT was claimed by the consignee nor this is a case of mis-declaration in terms of its value declared, to make out a case under Section 32 of the Act. --- Without prejudice applicants case is that Section 80(3) of Act was rightly invoked under the given facts and circumstances. In the instant case, if at all, there was any illegality in the assessment of the goods, it could be attributed to the sub-ordinate officers of the Customs and hence the implication of Section 32 of the Customs Act, 1969 would not be attracted to penalize the respondent or their directors. The purported action by Customs was triggered under Section 80(3) of the Customs Act, 1969 does not have a legal cover in view of the goods being out of charge and the recourses which could have been made were under Section 32, 193 and 195 of the Customs Act, 1969 which were not directly invoked. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2001 2019 SBLR Sindh 1466 Suit 874/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Nadeem Ahmed Chowdry. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-NOV-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2002 Const. P. 4985/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Noorullah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2003 Const. P. 5328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 International Pleasure Motor (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2004 Const. P. 4830/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s K.P Services (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2005 Const. P. 914/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Sardar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Masood Hussain Antria (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-NOV-17 Yes it is also a well settled that Constitution Petition cannot be considered as a regular appeal and hence question of facts cannot be appreciated the way they could be appreciated in appeal. The scope of the petition is limited to the extent as if any piece of evidence was misread or that the jurisdiction was not exercised in accordance with law Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2006 I.T.R.A 30/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) VS M.R RANJEET KUMAR S/O SRI CHAND CO, (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2007 H.C.A 198/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Gulzar Muhammad (Appellant) VS Malik Abdul Haque. (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2008 2016 YLR 748 Suit 164/1996 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1996 LT.CDR.MIRZA MANSOOR HUSSAIN (Plaintiff) VS S.MUHAMMAD FAHEEM (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 18-SEP-15 Yes I am of the view that though the defendants No.3 & 4 have not opted to issue public notice before purchase of property however it would be difficult to assume that it was done in bad faith, particularly when the record of the DHA shows the alleged entitlement of defendant No.2 to sale. Off course the defendants No.3 & 4 could not have traced the forgery as now come on surface. More importantly the defendants No.3 and 4 still are in occupation of the premises in question and raised construction at the relevant time. Had there been an iota of fraud they would have got away in these six years i.e. from 1990 to 1996. Since public notice is not considered as a legal requirement it cannot be stretched down to the wire that it was in fact in bad faith. Therefore, it cannot contribute towards mala fide which could cast any shadow on his bona fide. Hence, I am of the view that the issue No.4A is decided in affirmative that the defendant is a bona fide purchaser without notice. The plaintiff is however entitled to claim damages, which are to be calculated according to the market value of the subject plot. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2009 Const. P. 6452/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Rasool Bhagat (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
2010 Const. P. 5169/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Metro International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2011 Const. P. 5170/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Surriya Textile (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2012 Cr.Bail 463/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAFQAT ALI S/O NOOR AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-APR-21 Yes Though the FIR is absolutely silent as far accusation against the applicant is concerned but the investigation reveals that it is a dispute of a plot in question primarily between Faizan who disclosed his name as Kamran, one of the co-accused and the two property dealers i.e. Shafqat Ali, the applicant and Iftikhar, the complainant. The facts of the case are such that it cannot be ruled out that the applicant Shafqat Ali was made hostage and that is the reason that the Call Data Record shows his presence within the crime scene. Be that as it may, it appears to be a case of further inquiry as there is no direct accusation against the applicant in the FIR. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Crl.P.79-K/2021 The State v. Shafqat Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2013 Const. P. 7329/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Habib Metropolitan Bank (Petitioner) VS SRB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2014 Const. P. 6523/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahmed Fine Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2015 Const. P. 6580/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Quality Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2016 Const. P. 6956/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s International Brands Distributions (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2017 Const. P. 4902/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Hameed Haroon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2018 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 314/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Commissioner I-R Zone-II (Applicant) VS M/s. Dewan Cement Limited dewan Centre Khi (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2019 Const. P. 6142/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 International Packaging Films Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.5605/2021 International Packaging Films Limited Karachi v. Sindh through the Secretary, Excise & Taxation Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and another,C.A.1608/2021 International Packaging Films Limited Karachi v. Sindh through the Secretary, Excise & Taxation Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relief,Pending
2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 704/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) VS Abdul Hameed Sheikh & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-21 Yes Had it been registered then perhaps the lawful presumption would have attached to such registered document but no such document constitute evidentiary value for the purposes of the impugned order passed by the Tribunal as such data of all the aforesaid documents are different and distinguishable and are not reconcilable. The impugned orders, at least of the Tribunal, is not clear at all, particularly as to on what basis the vehicle is being released as the Motor Vehicle Tax Slip, Annexure-D to the memo of Reference, discloses the identity of the subject vehicle as Toyota Crown as against claimed vehicle Toyota Surf Jeep. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2021 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 432/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs MCC of Preventive (Applicant) VS Kamran Khan (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2022 Const. P. 6526/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahmed Fine Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2023 Const. P. 6934/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Avaises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2024 Const. P. 4628/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khuwaja Anwar Majid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2025 Const. P. 6521/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahmed Fine Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2026 Const. P. 6946/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Khamiso Khan & Co. (Petitioner) VS SRB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2027 Const. P. 6463/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Khyber Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2028 Const. P. 758/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP.NO D: 874 of 2017 2017 Mst. Ambreen (Petitioner) VS Honourable Court of VIth ADJ Khi Central & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2029 Const. P. 2471/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s PSO Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.220-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Pakistan State Oil Company Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2030 Const. P. 7353/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s ISRA Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2031 Const. P. 6896/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Fuzail Ahmed Qadir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2032 Const. P. 1685/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Dewan Salman Fibre Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.4729/2021 Dewan Salman Fibre Ltd Karachi v. The Province of Sindh through Provincial Secretary Excise Taxation Department Sindh Karachi and others,C.A.1028/2021 Dewan Salman Fibre Ltd Karachi v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary Excise & Taxation Department Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed, Leave Granted and Impugned Judgment suspended.,Pending
2033 Const. P. 4752/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Tipu Sultan (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2034 Suit 1991/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 REHANA FIRDAUS & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 22-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2035 Const. P. 4747/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Haleem Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2036 Suit 359/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LTD. (Plaintiff) VS DAWOOD HERCULESS LTD. & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-14 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2037 Const. P. 737/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 University Of Sindh and an Others (Petitioner) VS Senior Member Board Of Revenue Hyd and Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2038 Const. P. 195/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.S-196 of 2010 C.P. No.S-205 of 2010 C.P. No.S-725 of 2011 C.P. No.S-726 of 2011 C.P. No.S-757 of 2011 C.P. No.S-758 of 2011 C.P. No.S-759 of 2011 C.P. No.S-764 of 2011 C.P. No.S-862 of 2011 2010 Aziz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Anjuman-e-Imania & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2039 Civil Revision 199/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Farshad Hussain Qureshi (Applicant) VS Mst Zubeda Shah & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2040 R.A (Civil Revision) 84/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Allah Warayo (Applicant) VS Muhammad Anwar & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2041 J.M 48/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Jahanzeb. (Applicant) VS Muhammad Jamil Qasim & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2042 Const. P. 7222/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s AAD Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2043 Const. P. 469/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP D.256/2010 2012 Mehboob Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2044 Const. P. 275/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saleem Ahmed S/o Shujauddin (Petitioner) VS Jama Masjid Muhammadi & Madrasah Tehfeesz-ul-Quran (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2045 Const. P. 3227/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Rasool and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2046 II.A. 94/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Rabia & others (Appellant) VS District Judge Dadu & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2047 Cr.Bail 696/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ALI SHER S/O SYED KAREEM DAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2048 Const. P. 1904/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Province Of Sindh & Others (Petitioner) VS Shabbir Ahmed & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-DEC-20 Yes The amount allegedly deducted as government policy as 25% was held to be unlawful. The petitioner intend to travel beyond the judgment and decree wherein neither such defence was taken nor the deduction of the amount of Rs.1,78,415/- being 25% of the entire amount of respondent was held as lawful deduction in terms of the government policy. The petitioner cannot travel beyond decree which was neither challenged by the petitioner nor it is otherwise unlawful. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2049 Const. P. 255/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nazeer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2050 II.A. 49/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Younus Dawood S/o Ali Muhammad Dawood (Appellant) VS Arif Abid and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.108-K/2022 M/s Huffaz Seamless Pipe Industries v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2051 Const. P. 1711/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Premier Mercantile Services Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.1667-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through Chairman Sindh Revenue Board & others v. M/s. Premier Mercantile Services (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2052 Const. P. 794/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS Secretary/Chairmain Ministary of Railway & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2053 Const. P. 845/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst Henna Hassan & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2054 Const. P. 458/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.Ps No.D-530, 573, 575, 576, 577, 578, 586, 587 , 652, 653, 654, 667, 675, 678, 681, 713, 732, 736, 751, 760, 763, 767, 769, 771, 774, 776, 778, 779,781, 782, 789, 790, 798, 801, 802, 803, 807, 808, 811, 812, 813, 817, 819, 820, 823, 829, 831, 833, 834, 836, 843, 844, 846, 848, 852, 853, 855, 856, 858, 860, 862, 863, 872, 883, 884, 885, 887, 891, 892, 893, 894, 895, 897, 918, 959, 1013, 1053 &1059 of 2022 2022 Jia Ram Bagari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh another (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2055 Suit 50/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 BRIGADIER (RETIRED) AHMED RASHID KHAN (Plaintiff) VS BILAL SOLEJA (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2056 Const. P. 571/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Mst.Zubeda Begum Thr: her LRS.Shahzad Badar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Sye Saeed Ahmed and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2057 Const. P. 1382/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 MST. SULTANA AHMED (Petitioner) VS IIIRD A.D.J KARACHI (WEST) & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-MAY-18 Yes There is no privity of contract between the petitioner and applicant who is claiming to be licensee. The status of the applicant is nothing more than a licensee who does not enjoy any right on its own. He has to sail and sink with the lessee and cannot maintain an independent status as being in alleged occupation or possession. Such occupation was only permissive under the Easement Act and the implied possession was always with the lessee who has already lost the cases up to the Honble Supreme Court and hence has to since with the landlord in pursuance of the eviction order maintained by this Court as well as by Honble Supreme Court. The question of being as licensee and its rights was never taken into consideration in the referred CP No.S-277/2005 (Naimatullah Shaikh vs. Noor Banoi & others) and hence it is per-inquirium. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2058 Suit 254/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 PROF. DR. ANEELA ATTA UR RAHMAN (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2059 Suit -1937/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 GHULAM RASOOL (Plaintiff) VS NAUMAN SHAIKH & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
2060 Const. P. 2755/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Faheem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Irfan Masood & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2061 2015 CLC 916 Execution 49/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 M/S.SAUDI ARABIAN AIR LINES (Decree Holder) VS M/S.INT.MARKETING (Judgment Debtor) S.B. Judgement 02-SEP-14 Yes "Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. XXI, Rr. 22 & 66---Execution petition---Sale of attached property---Objections---Notice to Judgment-debtor to settle terms of sale---Necessity---Deposit of decretal amount, application for---Constructive res judicata, principle of---Applicability---Contention of judgment-debtor was that neither notice for sale proclamation nor for settling terms of sale were issued---Validity---No notice under O.XXI, R.66, C.P.C. was issued to the judgment-debtor nor such application had been preferred---Decree-holder was bound to apply for a notice under O.XXI, R.66, C.P.C. so that judgment debtor had an opportunity of raising objection to the sale, if any, or assist in settling terms to sale--- Judgment-debtor was entitled for notice to settle terms of sale proclamation---Judgment-debtor would lose right to object the execution petition after his service through public notice---Service of earlier notice would not take away the right of judgment-debtor to claim notice when property was put to auction---Sale could not be considered to be a valid sale in absence of notice under O.XXI, R.66, C.P.C.---When the judgment-debtor, in response to the notice, failed to appear, he was precluded by the rule of constructive res judicata from raising such objection at a later time and not by virtue of notice under O.XXI, R.66, C.P.C.---Non-compliance to the provisions of O.XXI, R.66, C.P.C. might vitiate the sale on account of material irregularity---Application for deposit of decretal amount was accepted in circumstances." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2062 Suit 2489/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Murshad Ali. (Plaintiff) VS Bank Islami & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-FEB-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2063 Const. P. 1757/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Nagina ( Khi To Hyd ) (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2064 Const. P. 6107/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khalid Mahmood (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2065 Const. P. 1152/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Ashrafia & Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2066 Const. P. 1298/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ghulam Noor S/o Juma Khan (Petitioner) VS IInd Rent Controller, Karachi East and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2067 Const. P. 1904/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Qamar Arslan Aziz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2068 Suit 1748/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Khadim Hussain. (Plaintiff) VS Sindh Bank Limited & another. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 13-MAY-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2069 Suit 2445/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ali Abbas Jaffri (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Employees Cooperative Housing Soc. & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Order 16-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2070 Const. P. 1335/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst Shah Jehan (Petitioner) VS IVth ADJ (MCAC) Khi Central & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2071 Suit 1007/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Asif Shah. (Plaintiff) VS Mrs. Feroza & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2072 2022 CLC 1322 Suit 648/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Idrees Abbasi (Plaintiff) VS Syed Akbar Khan & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 18-FEB-22 Yes Section 12(2) CPC provides a bar where plaintiff is precluded by rule from instituting a further suit in respect of any particular cause of action and shall not be entitled to institute a suit in respect of such cause of action in any court to which this code applies. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2073 R.A (Civil Revision) 98/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 The Hyderabad Municipal Corporation & Ors. (Applicant) VS M/S Trends Limited & Another. (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2074 Const. P. 1155/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2075 R.A (Civil Revision) 46/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Province of Sindh & others (Applicant) VS Mubarak Khan (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2076 Const. P. 2968/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Cavish Security Service (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.579/2022 Sindh Revenue Board Through Chairman, Karachi v. Cavish Security Service (PVT) Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted and dismissed
2077 Suit 142/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MALIK ITTEHAD COOPERATIVE HOUSING LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 15-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2078 R.A (Civil Revision) 6/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 M/s. Samta Siluer Trading Ptd. Ltd (Applicant) VS M/s. Adamjee Insurance Co Ltd & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2079 Const. P. 1947/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2080 Const. P. 1770/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rahim Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-22 Yes A formal inquiry was ordered to be conducted. That order of de novo inquiry could have been passed only when authority was convinced that decision of dismissal was neither lawful and nor based on legitimate findings and unless such finding of facts are unearthed through de novo inquiry, the order of dismissal would be meaningless. De novo inquiry in fact impliedly means that the order was set-aside otherwise there was no wisdom or logic behind such formal inquiry. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2081 2023 PLD Sindh 421, 2023 CLD 1220 Suit 1797/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 THE HUB POWER COMPANY LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS CHINA POWER HUB GENERATION COMPANY (PVT) LTD & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Order 30-NOV-22 Yes I- Despite different designations there are in fact `legal similarities` attached to both the documents i.e. standard letter of credit and standby letter of credit, if compared. There may be some differences in the banking practice but are functionally similar and makes no material difference when it comes to execution and implementation. The SBLC thus has evolved as one of the kind of letter of credit and forms on independent guarantee such as performance bond/surety ship guarantee. II- While in every instance where there is a fraud there would have been a lack of bonafides as well, however, to its contrast it does not mean that in every instance where beneficiary of credit lacks bonafides there is necessarily a fraud behind it. One may be compelled to or had no choice, despite having knowledge. III- The concept of unconscionability runs the same way i.e. the concept of unconscionability involves unfairness as distinct from dishonesty or fraud or conduct of a kind so reprehensible or lacking in good faith that the court of conscience either restrain the party or refuse to assist the party. Mere breaches of contract by a party would not by themselves be unconscionable. Thus unfairness is also excluded for the concept of unconscionability to prevail. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2082 Const. P. 489/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2083 Const. P. 1631/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Nawab Bazaid Hyder Bakht (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Delimitation Matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2084 Const. P. 1602/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2085 Const. P. 1810/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst: Anam & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2086 II.A. 20/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Al Haj Gulshan Ellahi (Appellant) VS Imdad Ali and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2087 H.C.A 196/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Yousuf Naz (Appellant) VS Aslam Gatta & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JUN-22 No The impugned order being exparte ad-interim. Unless the rights are conclusively decided by the interim order or there is imminent danger arises out of exparte interim order and the property is likely to be wasted, interference at this stage, when application itself is yet to be heard and decided finally, should be avoided. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2088 Const. P. 517/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Qadir Bux (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shazia & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2089 Const. P. 669/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Gulzar Ali Laghari & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2090 Const. P. 110/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Abdul Lateef. (Petitioner) VS Shaukat Ali and Others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2091 Const. P. 424/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Gulnaz Ghouri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2092 Const. P. 1004/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sabir Ali Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2093 2016 YLR 104 II.A. 11/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Aziz (Appellant) VS Abdul Kareem & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-MAY-22 Yes Sale deed of appellant as being enjoyed by appellant cannot be set-aside automatically as the defence of the appellant is protected being buyer without notice of any dispute. As stated above it has to be proved independently through impartial evidence failing whereof the aforesaid provisions of law would protect the title of appellant. Section 27(b) is for enforcing performance against those who acquired title with knowledge of previous agreement/contracts, whereas section 41 of Transfer of Property Act protect title for those who acquired title without knowledge of previous litigation. Since it is a case of cancellation of sale deed I am of the view that section 41 of Transfer of Property Act is more appropriate for its application Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2094 Suit 622/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 FAUZIA SAID KHAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS SHAIZA SAID KHAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 26-AUG-22 Yes in the absence of any challenge to the declaration of gift executed by deceased himself during his life time along with signed transfer deeds, it is a futile attempt to grant any such injunction of the nature as argued, and not even prayed. No doubt the application itself has prayed for an order that the defendants be restrained from selling, transferring, disposing off or gifting in any manner, way or form the property, undertakings and assets of the company other than in accordance with law, which do not call for orders as prayed for on the strength of the shareholding of the company, which has not been disputed in the application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2095 Const. P. 1961/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Fahmeed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Ist. Addl:D.J Sanghar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-22 Yes The Appellate Court is burdened with more responsibility if a judgment is being set-aside then in case where the judgment is being upheld by him, as he could agree with the reasons assigned by the trial court. But when the judgment and decree is being set-aside then the strong reasons are required to be provided by the Appellate Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2096 R.A (Civil Revision) 146/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Hassan & other (Applicant) VS Liaquat Ali & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2097 2023 CLD 33 Judicial Companies Misc. 18/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 N.P waterproof Industries Pvt ltd & others (Applicant) VS N.P spinning Mills limited & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-OCT-22 Yes Though this is not in dispute but the arguments put forward by learned counsel for petitioners is that by virtue of being a Muslim, shares automatically devolve upon the legal heirs of deceased shareholder. This perhaps may be a case under Muhammaden Law where rights are being acquired in respect of movable and immovable assets under general law, but in case where an entity is created by a special law, it is to be dealt with within that frame of special law. No provision of this special Act would take away any of their right under the general law but it laid down a procedure of its own because the entity is the creation of company law. The successor who intends to take advantage of any of its shareholding left by deceased has to go through a process prescribed by company law and that is Section 78 of the Companies Act, 2017 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2098 Suit 570/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Alay Zahra. (Plaintiff) VS Karachi Development Authority & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Subsequent enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction of the Civil Courts of district Karachi including District East will not attract the jurisdiction in this case since at the relevant time the pecuniary jurisdiction was lawfully and rightly invoked. Consequential amendment under the ibid Act will not have a retrospective effect unless otherwise legislated accordingly Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2099 Suit 1770/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SAIMA AKBAR & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS SADIA RAFIQ & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 26-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2100 I.T.R.A 973/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Commissioner (Legal Division) (Applicant) VS State Life Insurance Corp. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-MAR-23 Yes Section 65 of 1979 Ordinance, which is in relation to additional assessment, provides that no proceedings thereunder i.e. subsection (1) of Section 65 shall be initiated unless definite information has come into the possession of (Deputy Commissioner) and he has obtained a previous approval of the Inspecting (Additional Commissioner) of the Income Tax in writing to do so. Subsection (3) of Section 65 further reiterated that notice under subsection (1) in respect of any income year may be issued within ten years of assessment year in which total income of the said year was first assessable. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2101 Const. P. 1821/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Amir (Petitioner) VS M/s K-Electric Ltd and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2102 Const. P. 1168/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JS Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2103 Const. P. 2436/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Huala Engineering & Technology (Petitioner) VS SRB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2104 Const. P. 5861/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Fouzia Owais Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2105 Const. P. 951/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Akhtari Bano (Petitioner) VS Abdul Fareed and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2106 I. A 108/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 White Pearl Rice Mills Limited (Appellant) VS Saif Bari (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2107 2024 SBLR Sindh 405 Suit 1932/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 DINSHAW BEJAN AGA (Plaintiff) VS FIZOOZEH AGA (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 11-NOV-23 Yes In such a situation there is no factual controversy left to be decided by the delegates. The delegates present in Court have conceded to such position and thus opined that a decree of dissolution of marriage may be passed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2108 I. A 69/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asim Hameed Lodhi (Appellant) VS Syed Nafeezur Rehman & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2109 Const. P. 6814/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 NKR Engineering (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.L.A.669-K/2023 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal) v. M/s. Blessed Textiles Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 15-Apr- 24
2110 Const. P. 5929/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed MIthal Shah (Petitioner) VS Zareen Rubab and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2111 Const. P. 519/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Nizamuddin (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Irfan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2112 Const. P. 5298/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Learned Dist. & Session Judge Malir & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2113 R.A (Civil Revision) 130/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Mukhtiar Ahmed (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ashraf and an Other (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2114 H.C.A 309/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Ali Sultan & Others (Appellant) VS Muhammad Hanif & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2115 I. A 123/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 MCB Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS Syed Asghar Abbas (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2116 Const. P. 4184/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s Al-Baraka Apparel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2117 Const. P. 6807/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shan Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2118 I. A 70/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Farhan Siddiqui (Appellant) VS Fahad Nasir Khan (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2119 Spl.H.C.A 45/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Dewan Salman Fibre ltd (Appellant) VS M/S Soneri Bank Ltd (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2120 I. A 16/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Exquisite Textile Industries (Appellant) VS Bank Al-Falah Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2121 H.C.A 21/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mohsin Abbas Dharsi & Another (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2122 Const. P. 71/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 National Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2123 H.C.A 337/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Fateh Ali (Appellant) VS Mst. Shahida & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2124 Const. P. 663/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Ahsan Shakeel (Petitioner) VS LUMHS thr: Registrar & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan C.A.1938/2023 Liaqat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro through its Registrar and another v. Muhammad Ahsan Shakeel and others,C.P.3933/2023 Liaqat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro through its Registrar and another v. Muhammad Ahsan Shakeel and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed.also a short CO
2125 I. A 27/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s. MCB Bank Limited (Appellant) VS M/s. Spectrum Autos & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2126 Const. P. 4644/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sardar Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Memon Group of Ind. & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2127 H.C.A 303/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 American Electronics (SMC-Pvt) Ltd & another (Appellant) VS Fujitsu General Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2128 Const. P. 652/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Imran Ali Sikandar (Petitioner) VS IInd ADJ East and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2129 Const. P. 5391/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Abdul Razzaq (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2130 H.C.A 452/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Fayyaz Ahmed (Appellant) VS Noor Ahmed & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2131 H.C.A 351/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Greeno Corporation (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2132 H.C.A 399/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mustansir Ali Sheikha & Others (Appellant) VS Ali Adnan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2133 I. A 11/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s. Sami Jewelers and Another (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2134 I. A 79/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Afzaal Ahmed (Appellant) VS Haji Muhammad Aslam (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.5-K/2024 Muhammad Afzal Ahmed v. Hajji Muhammad Aslam Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2135 Const. P. 848/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: 132 of 2019 2023 National Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2136 Const. P. 446/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Zakria and Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2137 Const. P. 1796/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Naseem Javed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2138 H.C.A 233/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Appellant) VS SPEC Energy DMCC & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2139 Const. P. 656/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Moto (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2140 Const. P. 1228/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Meomoona Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2141 Const. P. 8498/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Danial Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Learned IIIrd ADJ Sujawal & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2142 Const. P. 6661/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mediplas Innovations Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2143 Cr.Misc. 84/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Muhammad Aslam Khuhawar (Applicant) VS The State and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2144 Cr.Bail 82/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Zulifqar Ali Khoso and others (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2145 Const. P. 25/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Niaz Ali Khan Pathan (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2146 Const. P. 99/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Abdul Wahab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2147 Const. P. 110/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Tabbasum Jakhrani and another (Petitioner) VS SHO Garhi Khairo PS District Jacobabad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2148 Const. P. 120/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Asia Khatoon Brohi and another (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Rehmatpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2149 Const. P. 118/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2150 Const. P. 2604/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mst; Amina and another (Petitioner) VS S.H.O PS Waleed and ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2151 Const. P. 968/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Ali Nawaz Tagar (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Rehmatpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2152 Cr.Bail 459/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Saddam Hussain Qambrani (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 Yes It appears that the enmity that has been shown in the F.I.R is on account of playing cricket, as stated in the F.I.R. It is alleged that accused Saddam Hussain on the issue of altercation over playing cricket gave and in furtherance of common intention accused Muhammad Parial caused pistol, accused Saeed Ahmed caused iron bar and accused Ali Asghar alias Zahid caused Danda blows to brother of the complainant Riaz and accused Saddam Hussain fired from gun straight upon brother of the complainant Riaz with intention to commit his murder, such injury as reported in the F.I.R has been explained in the final medico legal certificate in terms whereof the investigation result shows that metallic gun shot opautics on both sides of chests, and on the left shoulder joint arms, such injury has been declared as Ghayr Jaifah Munaqilah and is of firearm weapon. Apparently this offence falls under section 337-F (vi) P.P.C, punishable upto seven years. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2153 Const. P. 985/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Samreen and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Shahdadpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2154 Const. P. 551/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Koonj Jagirani (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Taluka and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2155 Suit 352/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2000 plaintiff (Plaintiff) VS Defendant (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-NOV-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2156 Const. P. 290/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Main Fakir Muhammad Mahar (Petitioner) VS SP Shikarpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2157 Const. P. 32/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Akhtiar Hussain (Petitioner) VS SIP Imamuddin Chandio PS Waleed & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2158 Cr.Misc. 249/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Abdul Ghafoor Bangulani (Applicant) VS The state and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2159 Const. P. 1064/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Abdul Sattar Sabzoi (Petitioner) VS S.H.O P.S Kandhkot and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2160 Cr.Bail 21/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mir Hassan @ Meeral Korai (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2161 2016 PLD Sindh 532 Suit 821/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ayesha Solvent Plant (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 04-MAY-16 Yes Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 1976--- ----R. 8(1)(5)---Phytosanitary certificate---Place of origin, determination of---Principle---Goods in transit/re-export---Consignment in question consisted of soyabean of Brazil and US origin imported by an importer in Egypt and was off loaded at an Egyptian port---Relevant authorities of Brazil and USA had issued Phytosanitary certificates and on basis of same certificates, consignment was exported to Pakistan---Authorities declined to issue necessary plant protection release order in relation to consignment in question on the ground that origin of consignment was Egypt, not Brazil/USA therefore, Phytosanitary certificate had to be issued by Egypt, not Brazil/USA---Validity---Shipment from port of Egypt was being made after a delay of about six months and it might or might not be in transit---Provisions of R.8(1) of Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 1967 required that such plant or plant material should carry official certificate from a plant quarantine authority of that country and did not only relate to a country where such plants or plant products were grown--- Place of origin varied according to situation and requirement of a Phytosanitary status---Place of origin under the Convention and Act referred to a place from where a consignment gained its Phytosanitary status where possibility of exposure to infestation or contamination of pests was evident and could not be ruled out---Place where commodity was grown was not always considered as place of origin---If a commodity was stored, its Phytosanitary status could change over a period of time as a result of its new location---In such cases, new location could change Phytosanitary status and might be considered as place of origin---Place of origin was dependent upon Phytosanitary status not place of growth---Commodity could gain its Phytosanitary status from more than one places and NPPO of all such countries providing certificates should decide about place or places of origin depending upon the situation that they had undergone which might have changed Phytosanitary status---Egypt was to be considered as place of origin for such shipment, and the definition of 'place of origin' in policy would not turn the situation unless such certificates were made available, authorities in Pakistan under Quarantine Act were justified in not issuing release order---In terms of R.8(5) Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 1967, shipment arrived without certificate or declaration meant in R. 8(2) of Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 1967 and with permit were liable to be confiscated or destroyed or to be returned to the port of origin at the expense of importer---Application was disposed of with order and observations by the High Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2162 Const. P. 1096/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr. Farooque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nasreen Begum & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2163 Const. P. 1680/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mrs. Tahmina Amir Khumbati & Another (Petitioner) VS Akbar Ali & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.876-K/2018 Mrs: Tehmina Amir Khambati and another v. Akbar Ali (decd) thr. his L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2164 Suit 302/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 FatimaFert Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-MAR-17 Yes Thus, it is unanimous view that an order of suspension of the operation of the judgment and decree or leave granting order would not operate to have a binding effect on other parties; it could operate inter parties since the operation of the judgment and decree was suspended in a particular suit/appeal with reference to particular party. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2165 2021 PLD Sindh 13 Const. P. 598/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY EDUCATION (Petitioner) VS ISLAMIC EDUCATION TRUST & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.709-K/2017 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: (Colleges) Education & Literacy Department v. The Islamic Education Trust and others,C.M.A.3636/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: (Colleges) Education & Literacy Department v. The Islamic Education Trust and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2166 Const. P. 668/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Assadullah (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2167 Const. P. 2092/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Zafar ALi Siyal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2168 Const. P. 654/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2004 Chaudhary Iqbal Hussain (Petitioner) VS Dr. Ehtesham Naseerul Haque & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.5180/2017 Chaudhry Iqbal Hussain (decd) thr. LRS v. Dr. Ehtaesham Naseerul Haque & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2169 2018 PLD Sindh 251 M.A. 39/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Liaquat Ali (Appellant) VS Mst. Huma Faiz and another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-JAN-18 Yes Succession Certificate could have been granted only in respect of assets left by the deceased either in favour of widow or any of the brothers of deceased as deem fit and proper and the purpose of granting succession certificate was the distribution of assets amongst the legal heirs, which is not the case here at least for these financial heads which does not form assets of deceased. --Widow being nominee is entitled for such funds i.e. provident fund, gratuity, group insurance, welfare funds and benevolent fund without having any recourse of obtaining any succession certificate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.28-K/2018 Liaquat Ali v. Mst: Huma Faiz and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2170 I. A 139/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Muhammad Ayoub (Appellant) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.88-K/2017 Haji Baig Ali thr. his L.Rs and others v. WAPDA and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2171 Const. P. 838/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Nevand Ram (Petitioner) VS S.H.O Police & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2172 Const. P. 1114/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Haji Ali Bux Shambani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2173 Const. P. 56/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Ali Hyder & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2174 Civil Revision 46/1997 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 1997 Allah Wadhayo Naich and others (Applicant) VS Mian Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-18 Yes insofar as these ancillary reliefs followed by declaration are concerned that relate to the documents, the Civil Court and the appellate Court have rightly exercised their jurisdiction, but insofar as the possession is concerned, on the basis of pleadings and in terms of para 17 of the plaint, it is regulated by the Rent Controller in terms of Section 13 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2175 Const. P. 1391/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Abdul Sami Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2176 Const. P. 2153/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Wajid Khan Mahar (Petitioner) VS Mst Salma & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2177 Const. P. 4042/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Kamran Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2178 Const. P. 1787/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Ghulam Ali & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2179 Const. P. 1054/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mst Sidra Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P O Sinbdh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2180 Const. P. 351/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ahmed Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2181 Const. P. 754/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ali Muhammad & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2182 Const. P. 594/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Shahzaib Khokhar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2183 Const. P. 1705/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Siraj Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2184 Const. P. 1358/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ismail Ibrahim S/o Ibrahim Jamal (Petitioner) VS Kashif Muhammad Baig & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.80-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Ismail Ibrahim and others,C.P.1097-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Ismail Ibrahim and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
2185 Const. P. 1764/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Suhbat Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2186 Civil Revision 170/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Taj Muhammad (Applicant) VS Allah Din & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-MAR-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2187 Const. P. 2012/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Faheem (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2188 Const. P. 3636/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdullah Shah Ghazi sugar Mills (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2189 Const. P. 5691/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 OOCLPakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2190 Const. P. 1019/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Liberty Power Tech Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2191 Const. P. 1648/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Rehman & Others (Petitioner) VS IIIrd A.D.J Karachi - South & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2192 Const. P. 5611/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 The House Keeper (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2193 Const. P. 5430/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Equity Textile Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2194 Const. P. 4634/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Najam Mirza (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2195 Const. P. 5462/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Habib Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2196 Const. P. 4367/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 National Insurance Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2197 Const. P. 6166/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Pakistan Currency Exchange Co. Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2198 Const. P. 5930/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Popular Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2199 Const. P. 5978/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imran Crown Corks (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2200 Const. P. 4209/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Ahmed International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2201 Const. P. 4679/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Habib Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and OThers (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2202 Const. P. 5453/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2203 Const. P. 154/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 TARIQ MASOOD (Petitioner) VS SHER MUHAMMAD DIN & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-APR-21 Yes The respondent may have proved the ownership of the property but then the relationship of landlord and tenant has to be established independently. It has to be proved through reliable evidence and documents that applicant/respondent apart from being owner of property was also the landlord of the occupant. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2204 Const. P. 1363/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s New United Chemical & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2205 Const. P. 5943/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khurram Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2206 Const. P. 5052/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Allah Rakha Choudhry (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2207 Const. P. 5237/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Heinz Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2208 Const. P. 3848/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Zahid Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2209 II.A. 70/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Farooq (Appellant) VS Ranomal and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-APR-21 Yes I have reached to the conclusion that perhaps these power of attorney and sub-power of attorney are to be read with the sale agreement and sale consideration and the contents of the power of attorney which may be looked into in terms of Section 200 and 202 of the Contract Act and some view had to be formed whether it coupled with interest. In that case if the property was not enjoyed by Safari Construction (Pvt.) Limited it was surely enjoyed by one of the Directors i.e. Allah Dino Behan and at one point of time the widow of Allah Dino Behan i.e. Mominat Behan, may be as chief executive of Safari Construction (Pvt.) Limited, entered into agreement of sale, having share in it. The sale consideration for plot was paid by Allah Dino Behan. If at all for any technical reason the performance could not be sought against Safari Construction (Pvt.) Limited, it could well be asked against an individual Allah Dino Behan and/or widow Mominat who acquired share in it when she entered into agreement. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2210 Const. P. 4175/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s K.S Enterprise and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2211 Const. P. 132/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Millennium Mall Management Co (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.102/2024 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defense, Govt of Pakistan Rawalpindi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company through its Managing Partner, Karachi and others,C.P.230/2024 Faisal Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Karachi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company, through its authorized managing partner and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
2212 2022 PLD Sindh 6 M.A. 7/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Southern Networks Limited (Appellant) VS PEMRA Thr. Its Chairman & Another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-SEP-21 Yes -Definition of a person is provided under Ordinance, 2002, which includes an individual, partnership, association, company, trust or corporation. Invariably in the show-cause/decision impugned, PEMRA presumed to have issued licenses to individual directors hence referred that licenses to them should not have been transferred by them. It is misconceived impression. --The issuance of licence is subject to Section 19 of Ordinance 2002. The authority enjoys exclusive right to issue licence for the establishment and operation of broadcasting media and distribution services and that these licences shall be in conformity with the principles of fairness and equity and the eligibility of such applicant to whom the licence is likely to be granted is based on prescribed criteria notified in advance. ---With this understanding of law perhaps the intensity of violation and penalty imposed on appellant should be viewed in term of their proportionality. Wednesburys principle while defining proportionality has discussed role of public officers entrusted with the discretionary powers. However, it is often seen that officers entrusted with such powers exercising their discretion goes unattended. Discretion at times goes unmeasured. Subjective analysis of a discretion exercised by public officers is a difficult proposition but proportionality is a tool which can play its role to serve the subject. The principle requires that measures adopted by the authority should not exceed the limits of what is proper and necessary in order to attain the objectives, legitimately. It is generally expected that where there is choice between several appropriate remedies and measures, the recourse that must be the least onerous and least cumbersome be adopted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.5469/2021 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) through its Chiarman, Islamabad and another v. Southern Networks Limited, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2213 2022 PTD 732, 2021 SBLR Sindh 2391 Const. P. 5674/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Spectrum Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 Yes Sub-section 2 of Section 81 caters for a situation when the goods are allowed to be cleared or delivered on the basis of provisional determination, the amount of duty, taxes and charges correctly payable to those goods shall be determined within six months from the date of provisional determination. The time is further extendable provided the officer concerned may in the circumstances of exceptional nature and after recording such situation extends period of final determination, which shall in no case exceeds ninety days.2 Proviso to sub-section 2 provides the calculating mechanism of the period prescribed in subsection 2 of Section 81. Sub-section 3 of Section 81 provides the mechanism on completion of final determination. The amount already paid or guaranteed shall be adjusted against the amount payable on the basis of final determination and difference between the two amounts shall be paid forthwith to or by the importer as the case may be. --Indeed the Explanation in a statute/enactment does form an integral part to the extent of explaining and elaborating meaning of the word in the section3 and the purpose is to explain, clarify, add or subtract something by clarification 4, however, the word provisional assessment is neither used in sub-section 1 nor in sub-section 2. It is sub-section 1 which secured differential amount on provisional determination and not provisional assessment 5. If the interpretation of respondent is accepted then customs would never bother to determine it finally and would enjoy benefit of not doing anything after provisional release. We may observe that the respondent conceded that the cause of delay in final determination is not attributable to the importer. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1606-K/2021 Federal of Pakistan & others v. M/s Spectrum Enterprises Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2214 M.A. 16/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sultan Ali (Appellant) VS Metro (Pvt.) Ltd. & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2215 Const. P. 3101/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst Noor Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author) C.P.891-K/2020 Mst.Noor Bibi v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
2216 Const. P. 1169/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nusratullah Khan S/o Farhatullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Shahid Aslam & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-OCT-17 Yes sale agreement does not reflect that he/petitioner was given possession in part performance of the agreement. The possession was to be handed over on payment of full sale consideration when he undertook to pay in installment. How then plea of handing over possession in part performance be accepted. The alleged payment towards initial sale consideration was also all in cash. He could have defended the application after complying the tentative rent order. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2217 Const. P. 4832/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s K.P Services (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2218 Cr.Bail 706/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NASIR S/O ABDUL MANAN & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2219 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 194/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s. Sabri Store, Lahore (Applicant) VS Director General Intelligence & Investigation-FBR (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2220 Const. P. 2995/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s H & H Agro Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2221 Const. P. 4996/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Allah Rakha Choudhary (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan adn Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2222 2017 PLD Sindh 520 Suit 1145/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 M/S. BHANERO ENERGY LTD. (Plaintiff) VS SUI SOUTHERN GAS CO. LTD. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 30-JUN-15 Yes The other aspect i.e. to be applied is the Principle is Estopple. The person or entity shall not be permitted to blow hot and cold with reference to transaction or insist for different treatment at different time. Since 1995 and more importantly since the Policy of 1994 and 2002 was introduced they have never considered themselves to be an IPP. It would be highly inequitable if an entity is allowed to repudiate a former instance or act to deny a constant approach of another entity or person who has been all along insisting on it constantly. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2223 Const. P. 1345/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Muhammad Azhar Imam Thr. M. Afsar Imam (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nida Jamil and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2224 Const. P. 1059/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.635-K/2019 Zaheer Ahmed v. Province of Sindh thr. Education & Literacy Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2225 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 133/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl.Cus: Ref: Appln 132 of 2015 2015 The Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Al-Naseeb Traders, Karachi. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-SEP-21 No Once the assessment order is passed and clearance of the goods under Section 80 is made, the consignment then is out of charge and then such assessment is not liable to be intervened unless the recourse as available under law is invoked before a Collector Appeals for reopening of the assessment etc. In addition to this the amended section 38 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and insertion of Section 230 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the customs officials including respondent No.1 cannot be deemed to have been appointed as officer of Inland Revenue. Thus the contravention so prepared is without jurisdiction and the authority. The Collectorate of Customs does not enjoy the authority of collecting sales tax and income tax of the regime under discussion, once the goods are out of charge Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.1642-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Al-Naseeb Traders,C.A.120/2023 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Al-Naseeb Traders Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
2226 Const. P. 4829/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s K.P Services (Petitioner) VS Fed/ of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2227 2022 PTD 539 Const. P. 4292/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Outdoorsman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-21 Yes We do not find any necessity of an independent license from the federal government in presence of Import Policy Order, 2016 w.e.f. 14.6.2018 followed by Import Policy Order, 2020. The Import Policy Order, 2016 in terms of the subject in hand was amended by virtue of SRO No.772(1)/2018 on 14.6.2018 which provides that the individual license holders or arms dealership license holders [as issued by Home Department, Province of Sindh] are allowed to import arms and ammunition. It was clarified by Federal Government, Ministry of Commerce & Textile vide letter dated 06.09.2019 that the import of arms and ammunition does not require any import authorization from the Commerce Division Islamabad after issuance of SRO No.772(I)/2018 dated 14-06-2018. For convenience and ready reference, text of [i]. Letter dated 06.09.2019, [ii]. Section 6(1) and [iii]. Entry No.62 Part I of Appendix B of IPO, 2020 ---Section 4 of ibid Act 2013 is related to the license for the manufacture/sale of arms and ammunition which is not the case here. Section 5 deals with the import, export and transportation which for all intent and purposes means import and export within the province of Sindh and we, while read it down, do not find it to be ultra vires to the Constitution. It primarily concerns with the person who is brining into and taking out of Sindh or any of its districts, arms, ammunition or military stores of a firearm or convert an imitation firearm into a firearm unless a license has been issued in accordance with the provisions and rules thereunder. Similarly, in section 9&10 the words import and export are in relation to brining into and taking out of the province of Sindh and any of its districts and it does not mean import of any arms and ammunition from outside the country which is an independent subject of the federal government hence, we read down these provisions to be within frame of Sindh Arms Act, 2013 and are not ultra vires the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.245-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Home Department Government of Sindh & others v. M/s. Outdoorsman & others,C.P.246-K/2022 Federal Board of Revenue & others v. M/s. Outdoorsman & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
2228 Const. P. 7041/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rizwan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2229 Const. P. 6974/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SEPCO Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2230 Const. P. 6789/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Gul Ahmed Holdings (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2231 Const. P. 3300/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s EPlanet Communications (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS The Commissioner I.R (Appeals-III) and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2232 Const. P. 5835/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khawaja Anver Majid (Petitioner) VS F.B.R & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2233 Const. P. 2539/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s RAZ Textile (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2234 Const. P. 6525/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahmed Fine Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2235 Const. P. 2469/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s PSO Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.323-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Pakistan State Oil Company Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2236 2022 PTD 205, 2022 PTCL 400 Const. P. 8297/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Louis Dreyfus Co. Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS F.B.R & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes the goods which have already been subjected to sales tax under the previous regime and were in stock by 30.6.2019 and to be supplied after the effected date of the standard regime would be subjected to input tax adjustment under standard regime to save the goods from double / increased incidence of tax. Several sectors have been accommodated by the FBR such as steel sector, oil and ghee sector etc., but specifically the bulk importers of edible oil were not given this fair opportunity to maintain equality. Thus STGO No.105/2019 in its true spirit be applied in the case of the petitioner in relation to a stock for which stock report has been filed in terms of FBRs letter dated 09.7.2019. The manual returns thus filed in terms of the orders of this Court shall be taken into consideration in view of the above, wherein adjustment of the stock, as mentioned above is claimed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author)
2237 Const. P. 2414/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Puma Energy Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.217-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Puma Engery Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2238 Const. P. 4755/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Hamza Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2239 Const. P. 6241/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s South Creek Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2240 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1233/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Ms. Shazia Aman (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 Yes the Valuation Ruling such as one dated 10.07.2008 is not applicable as the valuation is to be issued on the basis of data of 90 days, either before or after, import in terms of Rule 107(A) of Customs Rules 2001. It has not been disclosed as to what the exact dates of the clearance of the goods are however subsequent valuation rulings, as reviewed, are of 15.07.2009 and 27.04.2010 respectively. In the absence of a clear date of clearance of the goods, the applicability of Valuation Ruling of 15.07.2009 and 27.04.2010 would be farfetched. Subsection 4 to Section 25A of Customs Act, 1969 was amended by Finance Act 2010 and assented on 30.06.2010 which was subsequent to the last ruling relied upon, hence by the time goods were cleared the regime of availability of 90% data, pre or post, was applicable as the applicability of last issued Valuation Ruling was introduced after 30.06.2010. Even the show-cause notice is silent as to the date of clearance of the goods. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2241 Const. P. 2405/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shakir Ali Bhaijee (Petitioner) VS The Commissioner I.R & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2242 Const. P. 2099/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M.A.K Azmati (Petitioner) VS IIIrd ADJ Karachi South & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2243 Suit 706/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Hassan Haroon (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Basit & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2244 Const. P. 5130/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Asif and Ors (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2245 Suit 108/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 MRS.AISHA JAZBI FARHAT (Plaintiff) VS IMRAN AHMED & OTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2246 Suit 1585/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SKYHAWKS AVIATION SERVICES WORLDWIDE (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (Defendant) S.B. Order 01-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2247 Const. P. 321/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Khalid Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Najam Ahmed & Orhers (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
2248 Const. P. 2691/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Greaves Air-Conditioning Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2249 Const. P. 3628/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mrs. Rabia Tariq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
2250 2015 YLR 2436 Suit 50/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Waterlink Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Farrell Lines & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 02-JUN-15 Yes "Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908).-- ---O. XXXVIII, R. 5---Attachment before judgment---Transportation of goods from one country to another---Breach of obligation---Attachment of container-- Word ""intent""---Scope---Plaintiff had sought attachment of containers which were belonged to Shipping None of the containers sought to be attached could be deemed to be in Pakistan as ultimate destination of such goods was Afghanistan---Said goods were only available at Port in Pakistan for the purpose of clearance and transshipment i.e. for transit period only---Plaintiff had no claim with regard to the containers-,-- Detention charges must have been accrued for shipping line---Goods did not belong to the consigner rather same belonged to the consignee in Afghanistan-Goods were neither deemed to have arrived or existed in Pakistan nor it would belong to consignor for the purpose of attachment-- Plaintiff had no privity of contract with the consignee---Present suit had not been filed against the consignee of the attached goods but against contractor of the consignee against whom plaintiff had a claim of recovery---Neither containers nor the goods therein were liable to be attached for the purpose of claim of plaintiff---Goods were meant to be transshipped to Afghanistan which were in Pakistan only in transit---Goods were not removed with ""intention"" to frustrate the decree which might be passed-- Application for attachment of goods was dismissed in circumstances." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2251 Const. P. 3743/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shahid Mehmood (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2252 Const. P. 1899/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Chevron Lubricants Holding Pte Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.724-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Legal v. M/s. Chevron Lubricants Holding (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2253 Cr.Bail 773/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SADAQAT ALI KHAN S/O MAQSOD ALI (Applicant) VS THES STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2254 Const. P. 6340/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sultan Mehmood (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2255 Const. P. 941/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Ashraf and others (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2256 R.A (Civil Revision) 131/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Liaquat Hussain & Others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Rahim & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2257 Suit 1476/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Latif Farooqi (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan International Airline Corporation Limited (Defendant) S.B. Order 25-FEB-22 Yes In terms of the written understanding, the plaintiff`s insurance claim should have been forwarded to the Insurance Department with available record, immediately after 12.6.2017 however, they took about six months when the Manager Insurance and Terminal Benefit for payment of loss of license insurance was appraised of such fact of the plaintiff`s medical inability. The reference to insurance company was made through AGM claims on 27.6.2018 i.e. after more than a year of expiry of policy and plaintiff being declared unfit. The plaintiff was then informed that the insurance company rejected claim of the plaintiff as insurance policy was expired and his case was forwarded to relevant insurance company belatedly Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2258 Const. P. 983/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sajjad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2259 Const. P. 1173/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P No.D-1174, 1175, 1176, 1177, 1179, 1180, 1181, 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1186, 1187, 1188, 1190, 1191, 1192, 1193, 1194, 1195, 1197, 1200, 1203, 1204, 1205, 1224, 1225 & 1322 of 2022 2022 Syed Muhammad Ovais (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-22 No The point of laches has not been decided conclusively, those orders would not bind other Bench to follow similar view in view of the point under consideration. There is no such order of equal Bench , which has addressed on the issue of laches and then ordered for appearance before Redressal Committee. Since the question of laches was never discussed in detail in any of the cited orders of other bench, hence these petitions suffer from laches and same are accordingly dismissed alongwith listed application(s). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2260 Const. P. 866/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Mst. Nazia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2261 Judicial Companies Misc. 2/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Industrias Cannon de Colombia S.A (Applicant) VS Olympia Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-AUG-16 Yes The claim of the petitioner itself is yet to be ascertained on the touchstone of Article 51 and Section 19 of the Limitation Act which summarily cannot be decided here. Even in the case of Halla Spinning Mills the observation of the Honble Supreme Court was that efforts should be made by the judicial forums to adopt such device so that the project may continue running commercially and its financial liabilities starts reducing gradually. --The statutory notice of demand under clause (a) of subsection (1) of Section 306 of the Companies ordinance is in relation to a debt claimed by the petitioner which as observed is to be ascertained and is also subjected to a limitation clause and hence such statutory notice would also loses its strength when not only the claim is bonafidely disputed but is also subjected to the Limitation Act, which in this particular case appears to be a mixed question of law and facts. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2262 Suit 329/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMM. PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2263 Suit 2027/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 TARIQ HUSSAIN MAHESAR (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 25-NOV-16 Yes Perusal of these clauses show that the plaintiff was restrained from having direct or indirect interest or connections with an external organization that has business dealing with the PSO and that any act of such member or any such involvement which could potentially be considered in clear conflict. The clause 3.4.1 further emphasises that a member of PSO family shall not give or receive bribe in order to retain or bestow business or financial advantages and that any account of personal financial benefits for having giving business to outsider will constitute bribery and that any such relationship with external agencies should be such that the PSOs integrity shall not be damaged Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2264 Suit 2025/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Rana Tahir Mahmood. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. English Biscuit. (Defendant) S.B. Order 01-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2265 Suit 442/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 SALEEM (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD SHUJAAT ALI SHAH (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2266 Suit 206/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Fiza Bai & others (Plaintiff) VS Ghulam Ali & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2267 Const. P. 8011/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s S.M Chawla & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2268 Const. P. 4808/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Indus Motor Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2269 Const. P. 7129/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Choudhary Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2270 I. A 10/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Gul Muhammad Shar (Appellant) VS M/S Orix Leasing Pakistan Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2271 Const. P. 5120/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills (Petitioner) VS M/s Fakhra Jabeen and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2272 M.A. 95/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Sohail. (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shakeel & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2273 Suit 2596/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MST. SAMAN HASSAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS MST. SHAMIM FATIMA & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 16-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2274 R.A (Civil Revision) 84/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Noman Bashir Ansari S/o M Zahid Faheem (Applicant) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2275 M.A. 4/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Reshman (Appellant) VS Mst. Naazi & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2276 Const. P. 101/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Sharif (Petitioner) VS M.D K-Electric & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
2277 2022 SBLR Sindh 1125, 2023 PLC (CS) 202 Suit 2679/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 TUFAIL AHMED SHAIKH (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 Yes There is no cavil to the fact that the plaintiff is an engineer and Member Technical as disclosed in the transfer letter of 08.11.2021. The gazetted rules that concerns with the posting and transfer in terms of Chapter V of the National Highway Authoritys Employees Service Rules, 1995 framed under National Highway Authority Act, 1991 duly framed by the federal government, recognizes that the competent authority may post or transfer an employee of the authority to the head office or to any of the subordinate offices in Pakistan under its administrative control or management, which has only gained strength on the basis of NHA Code 2005 which excludes Chairman and Member from the applicability of normal tenure for an officer on the same post for three years and not extendable for a period of more than five years in all. Thus, even the Code excludes Chairman and Member Technical from application of such normal tenure of an officer/employee. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2278 Const. P. 370/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mst Bibi Naz Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-JAN-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
2279 Const. P. 1585/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Shahnawaz Channar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2280 2023 YLR 1431 Suit 2299/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Maqbool Ahmed Solangi. (Plaintiff) VS The Chairman Board of Revenue & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-NOV-22 Yes Plaintiff thus has no prima facie case in his favour and since defendants have registered instruments in their favour and have acquired the title after a long drawn litigation, the other two ingredients for grant of injunction i.e. balance of inconvenience and irreparable loss also does not exist in plaintiffs favour. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2281 Judicial Companies Misc. 29/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amir Bux Channa & Another through Attorney (Applicant) VS Isra Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) Limited. (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Perhaps the Act would define role of Chancellor and Vice Chancellor and before reaching to such conclusion I am of the view that all such affairs, as ordered as interim measure, referred above, shall continue and Nazir shall continue to disburse salaries of employees of Isra University accordingly in terms of list already available with him (Nazir) including payment towards utilities and/or any other lawful routine expenses likely to be incurred. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2282 2023 MLD 1131 Suit 2642/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ABDUL RAUF KHAN (Plaintiff) VS MEEZAN BANK LIMITED & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 13-FEB-23 Yes The cheque was returned by the Meezan Bank Limited having branch at Civic Centre, District Khairpur Mirus and the Criminal Miscellaneous Application was also 2 filed before Additional Sessions Judge-II, District Khairpur Mirus. Legal notice was served upon Meezan Bank, Civic Centre Branch District Khairpur Mirus, hence for all intent and purposes the cause if at all triggered, it was within the local limits of District Khairpur Mirus and this Court has no territorial jurisdiction Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2283 Suit 1354/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MST. AFTAB FIZZA & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS RAHEEL QAISER (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2284 2023 CLD 1088 Judicial Companies Misc. 49/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SPI INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANOTHER (Applicant) VS . (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2285 Const. P. 549/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Delimitation Connected Matters 2022 Aneel Kumar and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2286 Const. P. 1616/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Sharif (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-22 Yes Since water quality plays significant role for aquatic life, we have enquired about tentative water quality assessment from officials who have not satisfactorily assisted. pH and TDS plays a significant role in determining the quality of water and its conduciveness for fish growth. It is very alarming if these tenders could be awarded without water assessment and thus would be a futile attempt for such purpose and may have a financial catch for some individual[s]. pH is a measurement of concentration of hydrogen ions in water. Lower pH means more hydrogen ions and higher PH means fewer hydrogen ions. pH has a scale from 1-14 which measures acidity and Alkalinity of water, anything above 7 in an alkaline based water whereas less than 7 is acidic. Similarly TDS is actually total dissolved solids in water which include both organic and inorganic substance. Research shows the effect of varying pH value differently on different commodity. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2287 Suit 1210/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S. S.S.S. CORPORATION (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2288 2023 PLD Sindh 11 H.C.A 210/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Haji Ibrahim & Others (Appellant) VS Abdul Qadir Lakhani & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JUL-22 Yes 1). Before granting a mandatory interlocutory injunction the Court had to feel a high degree of assurance that at the trial it would appear that the injunction had been rightly granted. 2).Similarly, a mandatory injunction ought not to be granted on an interlocutory application in the absence of special circumstances and then only in clear cases either where the court thought that the matter ought to be decided at once or where the injunction was directed at a simple and summary act which could be easily remedied or where the defendant had attempted to steal a march on the plaintiff. Moreover, before granting a mandatory interlocutory injunction the Court had to feel a high degree of assurance that at the trial it would appear that the injunction had been rightly granted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
2289 Const. P. 720/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Saima Younis & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2290 2023 YLR 2101, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1037 Suit 1027/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Qadir Dad Shah (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan International Airline Company (PIACL) (Defendant) S.B. Order 15-DEC-22 Yes Undoubtedly the aircrew needs to be looked after by specially trained staff and for this reason such job training is inevitable. The normal take care of an employee (patient) of defendant No.1 are different from those who operate flights and there could be no two opinions about it. The officials of defendant No.1 may have awaken late in realizing their duties and it is they who could be blamed for earlier flight operations through untrained staff but the passengers cannot be left at the mercy of those who lacks such qualification/training, be it an "on job training" Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2291 2023 CLD 920 Suit.B 39/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 THE BANK OF PUNJAB (Plaintiff) VS M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 06-FEB-23 Yes ----With regard to candid admission on the part of the defendant, the execution of documents referred above including a request letter for grant of loan, sanction letters, finance agreements and creation of charge documents are of much significance. ----Defendants have neither denied execution of agreement nor challenged the authority of Mr. Jawed Khan to execute the agreement with it on behalf of the bank. It is thus not a question of law that could form substantial question out of the pleadings in consideration of law of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 and execution of documents in particular Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2292 2023 CLD 464 Judicial Companies Misc. 18/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Habib Metropolitan Modaraba Manag. & Others (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 07-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2293 Const. P. 746/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Nazia (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2294 Const. P. 1637/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Munwar Ali (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistand and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2295 Const. P. 1681/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Umer Daraz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah C.P.3669/2022 Messrs Raja Motor Car Company Limited thr. its Managing Director, Karachi v. Assistant Collector of Customs, Processing - II, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC
2296 Const. P. 1935/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Aslam Khawar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2297 Judicial Companies Misc. 43/1988 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1988 M/s.National Lines (Pvt) Ltd. (Petititon (Applicant) VS .na (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-MAR-23 No Poor investors who invested their savings/hard earned money with the company in 1980s should get the amount proportionate to their investments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2298 Const. P. 1779/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M. Mushtaq Khan Niazi & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2299 Const. P. 1809/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Malik Sheriyar Asad (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2300 Const. P. 6188/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s National Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of NIRC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2301 Const. P. 6975/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Al-Ghurair Giga Pak (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2302 Const. P. 909/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Demras International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2303 Const. P. 2538/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Fazal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Zaheer A. Malik and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2304 Suit 1274/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Babar Ahmed (Plaintiff) VS Institute of Business Administration & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2305 Suit 446/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 SAJJAD ASHRAF (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD DARBAR (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2306 R.A (Civil Revision) 169/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rais Ahmed Shaikh & Ors. (Applicant) VS Muhammad Abid. (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2307 2024 SBLR Sindh 178 H.C.A 34/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Nafees Zubair through her attorney (Appellant) VS Saeeda Bano & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-23 Yes *-Performance is equity based, court is obliged to perform equity as performance is not vested right. **An oral (unregistered) gift alone, or any private communication between donor and donee, would not be an obstacle in seeking performance against the title holder being a last registered instrument. ***Deed of Redemption is no doubt claimed to be a registered instrument however this Redemption Deed is just a privileged document between the mortgagor and the mortgagee but the Redemption Deed itself does not confer title. ****the performance cannot be declined on the execution of oral gift and that due diligence was not made. Performance could only be sought against title holder. If these "oral gifts" are allowed to come in the way of performance, then no suit for performance could succeed. *****It would not be an equity if appellant is allowed the performance realizing the no efforts were made to deposit the balance amount at the time when injunction was sought and/or when suit was filed, since doctrine of lis pendence is also an obstacle for seller. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2308 H.C.A 94/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: HCA 93 of 2022 2022 Jameel Ahmed & Others (Appellant) VS Hayat Muhammad Sher Pao & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.1298-K/2023 Hayat Muhammad Sher Pao & others v. Jameel Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2309 Const. P. 4318/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2310 Const. P. 6655/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Adamjee Automotive Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2311 I. A 98/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Manzoor Hussain Choudhry (Appellant) VS Standard Chartered Bank Pakistan Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2312 H.C.A 417/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Adnan Aziz Ahmed through Attorney (Appellant) VS Rakil Ahmed Zaman and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2313 R.A (Civil Revision) 222/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Murad & Ors. (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2314 Const. P. 4985/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ahsanullah Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2315 Const. P. 8375/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Fine Cotton (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2316 Const. P. 988/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shahid Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Mumtaz Ahmed and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2317 I. A 81/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Fida Hussain (Appellant) VS Muhammad Imran & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2318 Const. P. 5851/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Hashim Khosa (Petitioner) VS Mst. Anila Kalim and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2319 Const. P. 40/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Munawar Ali Sagar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-OCT-23 Yes A) The site "Karoonjhar Hills" is not available for excavation of any nature whatsoever except excavation for discovering historical monuments and that too after following international guidelines and archeological department B) Mines & Mineral Department do not enjoy the jurisdiction over it since it is protected heritage and not available as a site for mining/excavation; C) Entire range Karoonjhar Hills in ???one monument??? under the law and cannot be divided into pieces and portions and to make some part of it (range) available for any prohibited excavation. Its importance lies in preserving the entire range and not permitting mineral excavation in between as it would not only destroy the beauty but at the conclusion of mining process would destroy the existing topography Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan C.P.3964/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh Secretariat, Karachi v. Munawar Ali Sagar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Notice
2320 I. A 6/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Ali Imran (Appellant) VS J.S Bank Limited & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2321 Const. P. 7697/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mrs. Aliya Jafery (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2322 Const. P. 6396/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khawaja Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2323 R.A (Civil Revision) 109/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Arshad (Applicant) VS Abdul Ghaffar & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2324 I. A 76/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Javed Kamal (Appellant) VS Muhammad Farid Qureshi (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2325 Const. P. 1072/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Naveed (Petitioner) VS P.o Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2326 H.C.A 382/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. S.S.S. Corporation (Appellant) VS Umair Baloch Ent. (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2327 H.C.A 93/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Jameel Ahmed & Others (Appellant) VS Hayat Muhammad Sher Pao & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1297-K/2023 Hayat Muhammad Sher Pao & others v. Jameel Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2328 H.C.A 234/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Cedar Pvt. Ltd (Appellant) VS Soneri Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-JAN-24 Yes *The subject matter of the suit is not just simply a negotiable instrument but it is the rent of the subject period which was not paid, therefore, there is no logic in saying that since the Rent Controller could not pass any order on ???negotiable instrument???. **Section-12 of the SRPO, 1979 does not empower the civil court to adjudge necessary repairs to be carried out by the landlord; neither an application was filed by the tenant in this regard. ***once the rent is deposited pursuant to the orders of the Court, which the appellant had not deposited till date, the tenant/appellant will ???not??? be under the obligation to deposit the arrears of rent in compliance of Section-16(1) of the SRPO, 1979, as the tenant cannot be waxed twice. Security would not come in the way unless the tenant vacates the premises. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2329 H.C.A 407/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Asif Agencies through its Sole Proprietor Altaf (Appellant) VS Muhammad Anwar Mianoor and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2330 H.C.A 25/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Pak. Hoisery Manufacturers & Exporters Ass & Other (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2331 Const. P. 4322/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2332 H.C.A 138/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ahsan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Suleman & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2333 Suit.B 94/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Royal Bank of Scotland (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Nadeem (Defendant) S.B. Order 31-AUG-12 Yes It is neither shown nor indicated in any document as to how the damages and liquidation charges had been claimed and calculated and how they are reasonable which amount is otherwise contrary to the provisions of Contract Act, 1872. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2334 Civil Revision 69/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Muhammad Sharif, thr:L.Rs: (Applicant) VS Abdul Razak, thr:L.Rs.and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-JAN-19 Yes The applicant claimed to be in possession of the subject property, however, he was unable to demonstrate as to how he came in possession. The agreement is absolutely silent as far as delivery of possession is concerned. His brother was a lessee of the land in question, however, the lease expired in the year 1997 and the possession of his brother is neither in pursuance of the sale agreement nor could he be deemed to be in possession as a lessee after the sad demise of his brother. His only defence was that he was given possession of the suit land in part performance of the agreement which has not come out of the evidence and the agreement. His own witnesses denied his version as there was no decision being taken as far as possession is concerned at the time of alleged agreement. In fact, the record and proceedings were called and original agreement was perused. It reflects a contrary view about possession which is to be delivered at the time of the registration of sale deed, hence, the evidence of the applicants is not confidence inspiring. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.175-K/2019 Muhammafd Sharif thr. his L.Rs & others v. Abdul Razak thr. his L.Rs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2335 Const. P. 963/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Sher Muhammad Mangi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Dakhan namely Samander Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2336 Const. P. 22/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Safia Brohi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Bakrani and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2337 Const. P. 905/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Fateh Muhammad Solangi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Kashmore and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2338 Cr.Bail 295/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Imran Bhatti (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 Yes here is a considerable delay in lodging the F.I.R i.e., 3 days despite the fact that victim's brother went to police station to obtain the letter. In addition, perusal of the F.I.R shows that there is hardly any role prescribed to the applicant and entire accusation was made for Bashir Bhatti who caused straight fire from his Kalashnikov which hit the deceased on his back and went through. However, nothing was attributed to the applicant and no role was assigned to him. As far as the case of vicarious liability is concerned, no doubt Section 460, P.P.C is quite different and distinct from Section 302, P.P.C, however, it is yet to be determined that the applicant was involved as it has become a case of further enquiry on account of delay in lodging the F.I.R. These views are also fortified by one of the judgments referred above i.e., case of Faraz Akram, in terms whereof it was observed that the vicarious liability could be determined at the trial and not at this stage, where there is inordinate delay in lodging the F.I.R. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2339 Cr.Misc. 105/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Qadir Bux Brohi (Applicant) VS The State and an other (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2340 Cr.Appeal 55/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2006 Muhammad Rafique Malanhas (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
2341 Cr.Bail 46/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Ali Murad Khaskheli (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
2342 Cr.Bail 433/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Sajjad @ Sijoo Shaikh (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 Yes Prima facie, it appears that the injury allegedly caused by the applicant is at the elbow of the right arm which went through and through and the medical report that has been read over by the learned State counsel is in fact to the extent that the fatal injury was one which is caused by Wahab which is the stomach injury in view of the above it has become a case of further enquiry despite the fact that the applicants bullet was allegedly hit at the elbow he, at this stage could not be presumed to have come with the intention to kill unless such contention is proved in evidence. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2343 Const. P. 47/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Arbab Khatoon another (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Rehmatpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2344 Cr.Acq.A. 128/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Manzoor Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2345 Civil Revision 73/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2005 Agha Abdul Ghafoor and others (Appellant) VS Lal Chand and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2346 Const. P. 144/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Nooral Luhar (Petitioner) VS Ali Anwar Brohi SHO PS Store Ganj & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2347 Const. P. 323/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Ahmed Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Darri Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2348 Cr.Bail 83/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Sarfraz Bughio (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2349 Const. P. 2841/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mst. Shama Lashari (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Thariri Muhabbat and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2350 Const. P. 2249/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Bilawal Pahore (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2351 2016 MLD 1527 Const. P. 2547/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Khalid Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Deen Muhammad & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-DEC-15 Yes Sindh Local Government Act (XLII of 2013)--- ----Ss. 23 & 36---Sindh Local Councils (Election) Rules, 2013, R.18---Election for the seat of local council---Non-disclosure of complete assets at the time of submitting nomination papers---Effect---Rejection of nomination papers---Scope---Proper and Seconder were required to be from the constituency of candidate Nomination papers of the candidate were rejected on the ground that he had not disclosed his complete assets at the time of submitting the same---Appeal filed by the candidate was accepted and it was held that a person could not be disqualified for not disclosing the assets---Contention of rival candidate was that false statement had been given disclosing incomplete assets---Validity---Provisions of Sindh Local Government Act, 2013 and Sindh Local Councils (Election) Rules, 2013 did not provide any necessity or mandatory requirement to submit the details of assets at the time of submitting nomination papers---Successful candidate had to submit the details of assets within a period of 30 days when he took oath of an office---Candidate could not be disqualified on summary assumption for such details of assets---No one should be penalized for not disclosing the assets when law did not require him to disclose the same---No reason was available with the Returning Officer to reject the nomination form on account of not disclosing the assets---Statement made by the candidate did not fulfill the requirements for considering it to be an affidavit on oath---Even such information could not be considered to be a false affidavit---Nothing had been gained by the candidate by not showing assets at the time of filing nomination papers---Such information could not be considered to be a mala fide---Candidate's proposer and seconder were required to be from the same ward or constituency from where a candidate was contesting the election---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.603-K/2015 Khalid Ahmed Memon v. Deen Muhammad Talpur and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2352 Suit 815/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 MUHAMMAD SHAHNAWAZ & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS K.E.S.C & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 25-APR-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2353 Suit 1980/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Engro Fertilizers Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Pak. Standards & Quality Control Authority & Ors. (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-MAY-16 Yes Before parting I may observe that at an interlocutory stage this being not a petition or an appeal but an interlocutory application a detail discussion of the factual aspects of the matter and the Pakistan Standard & Quality Control Authority Act (Act VI of 1996) itself may prejudice case of the either parties. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2354 Const. P. 527/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2004 Joseph Masih through L.Rs. (Petitioner) VS 2nd A.D.J. Karachi South and ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-AUG-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.623-K/2013 Josef (decd) through his L.R's v. 2nd Additional District Judge Karachi South and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2355 2016 CLD 1938 Suit 516/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Jubilee Life Insurance Co (Plaintiff) VS The United Insurance Co (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 06-MAY-15 Yes Section 39 of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001 relates to the rights conferred by registration whereas Section 40 of the Ordinance deals with the infringement of the registered trademark. In terms of Section 40 subsection 3(c) of the Ordinance a person shall infringe a registered trademark if the person uses in the course of a trade a mark which is identical with, or deceptively similar to, the trademark in relation to services of the same description as that of service in respect of which a trademark is registered. The proposition thus appears to be simple that service which is being dealt with by both the plaintiff and the defendant whether is of same description or otherwise to attract the provisions as referred above. I may refer to the international classification of goods and services and it seems that it is being dealt with by class-36 and there is no dispute in this regard as the defendant himself chooses to apply under the same class. The defence that they have been dealing with takaful business would not turn much as it is being dealt with by the same classification Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2356 Suit 223/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Arif Habib Equity (Pvt.) Limited & others (Plaintiff) VS Army Welfare Trust (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2357 Civil Revision 47/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Khan Muhammad (Appellant) VS Area Manager Sui Southern Gas Co and other (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-NOV-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2358 Suit 114-B/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Al-Baraka Bank (Pakistan) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Enshaa Holdings Ltd. (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-JAN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
2359 2017 CLC Note 157 J.M 12/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Karachi Development Company (Applicant) VS IM Technologies Pakistan & another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2360 Adm. Suit 2/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 M/s Megafeeder (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) VS M.V. H & H Tide & another (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-DEC-16 Yes For exercising admiralty jurisdiction the case is to be made out in terms of Section 3 of Ordinance 1980 and prima facie no claim appears to have been made out as against defendant No.1 under admiralty jurisdiction. The question now arises is whether defendant No.2 who was prepared to deposit US $.300,000/- with the Nazir of this Court was in lieu of the claim against defendant No1 or defendant No.2 stood surety for itself as well. The order referred above is clear in this regard. The defendant No.2 deposited the subject amount against arrested vessel and it is not a surety against defendant No.2 otherwise this amount could have been withhold. The amount that was deposited thus could only be considered as a surety for defendant No.1 vessel for which prima facie the case has not been made out. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2361 II.A. 30/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Mrs. Naseem Akhtar (Appellant) VS Mst. Rehana Nihal & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui C.A.1-K/2018 Mrs. Naseem Akhtar v. Mst: Rehana Nihal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2362 Civil Revision 35/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Jam Muneer Ahmed Khan (decd),thr:L.Rs: & Ors (Applicant) VS Ahmed Din Rajri and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2363 Const. P. 2377/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Muhammmad Ayub Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2364 Const. P. 1949/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Khadim Hussain bhand (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Sukkur & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2365 Const. P. 964/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Amjad Hussain Gajani (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2366 Const. P. 2614/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Gulzar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2367 Const. P. 1302/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Nand Lal Hindu (Petitioner) VS Askari Bank Ltd. Sarafa Bazar Sukkur & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2368 Const. P. 1019/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Muhammad Saleem Leghari (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2369 Const. P. 508/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mumtaz Ali Lashari (Petitioner) VS Aditional District Judge Hudood & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2370 Const. P. 1659/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Dishad Ali Mughal (Petitioner) VS Mst. Rozina & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2371 Const. P. 738/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2372 Const. P. 2154/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Wajid Khan Mahar (Petitioner) VS Mst Salma & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2373 2019 SBLR Sindh 896 II.A. 54/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Zafar Aziz Osmani (Appellant) VS Lt. Col.(R) M. Yousuf Satti & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.4212/2018 Muhammad Gulistan Khan v. Zafar Aziz Osmani & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2374 Const. P. 2879/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Naveed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2375 Const. P. 5394/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Riaz Hussain Chahchar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2376 Civil Revision 22/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Masjid Madina (Applicant) VS Muhammad Rafique (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2377 Const. P. 5199/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Waheed Ali Lakho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2378 Const. P. 708/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Inayatullah (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2379 Const. P. 1112/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Swami Narayan Temple Trust Karachi (Petitioner) VS Mst. Paroo & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.884-K/2018 Mst: Paro v. Swami Narayan Temple Trust Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2380 2020 PLC (CS) 895 Const. P. 141/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-DEC-19 Yes Subsection 2 of Section 36 of Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organization) Act, 1996 enabled an employer, with the consent of the transferred employee, to award appropriate compensation in lieu of whatever benefits they could have gained at the end of their tenure. These employees were given service benefits, which were not even matured at the time the employees opted VSS, hence it cannot be said that any guarantee or secured right was arbitrarily snatched by the employer. These employees could have continued to serve without opting VSS. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract (for any prompt gain) in bargain with their post retirement or pensionary benefits. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
2381 Const. P. 1208/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dr. Zafar Ul Haq & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2382 2021 YLR 867 Const. P. 6168/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sardar Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2383 Const. P. 1404/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Mst. Rasheda Parveen and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2384 Const. P. 3798/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ms. Sumaya Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Governor of Sindh/Chancellor U.O.S, Jamshoro & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2385 Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-OCT-19 Yes Though he was appointed in the year 1996 on ad-hoc and the appointment apparently was not regular one yet the petitioner has spent more than two decades with a hope that no later, the post would fallen vacant, he will be considered. The record reflects that he is still being considered as ad-hoc. This status throughout his career has not earned him anything except that he has faced certain charges which he defended and that he being deprived of further promotion on account of such status. The period of ad-hoc appointment should not have prevailed for such a long period. In case the authority had no complaints as far as the conduct and working of the petitioner is concerned, steps should have been taken by the authority to regularize the services of the petitioner. The authority remained indolent and petitioner continued as ad-hoc. The record shows that the only ground whereby he was deprived of any such promotion is that he was an ad-hoc employee. Thus, while we consider that his very appointment was not made on regular basis in BPS-18, we are also conscious of the fact that the petitioner has served more than two decades without any prospects of promotion Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2386 Const. P. 2514/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2387 Const. P. 7112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nasir Ahmed Butt (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shaheen Afroz and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 Yes Family Pension Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2388 Const. P. 4060/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s M3 Technologies Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Commissioner IR (Appeals-II) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2389 2022 CLC 254 M.A. 1/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Show Time Cable & Datacom Pvt Limited (Appellant) VS PEMRA & Another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-APR-21 Yes Two propositions/counts are as under: (i) That for the impugned decision an opinion was sought from the Regional Council of Complaints which had no jurisdiction under the ibid Ordinance to comment and/or recommend any opinion ,as far as dispute is concerned; (ii) That even if such recommendations are ignored to have been forwarded by the Council of Complaints and the impugned order be seen as an independent decision of PEMRA then again, the details of the outstanding dues does not seems to generate from PEMRA Ordinance 2002, Regulations 2011-12 and PEMRA Rules 2009, and hence are/were illegal and unlawful, and could be struck down by this Court on merit. -So far as the first question as raised by the appellant is concerned, is answered in affirmative that the Council of Complaints had no jurisdiction for rendering opinion/recommendation to PEMRA under the Ordinance and its role in this regard and the advice sought is of no avail and merits no consideration; it should have been an independent order of PEMRA in view of provisions of PEMRA Ordinance. - Schedule-B attached to these rules enables PEMRA to recover in-house channel fee for cable TV. Table VI provides licence fee of Rs.175,000/-upto10,000 subscribers as B-5 category which category appellant is enjoying followed by annual renewal of Rs.87,500/-. This amount is being paid by the appellant in terms of said rules as reflected in the outstanding dues chart hereinabove. It also enable the licensor PEMRA to recover Rs.24/-per subscriber per year which is a subscriber fee(Table VI), disclosed in horizontal column 2 in the subject chart incorporated in the impugned order. Table IX deals with in-house channel licence fee and is chargeable to all categories from B-1 to B-10. -Thus, in view of aforesaid rules and regulations, the claim is legitimate and I do not see any transgression of the PEMRA authority in claiming the amount mentioned in the impugned decision. -.It is pertinent to point out that rationale and vires of such levy and charge were argued by appellants counsel as the fee and other claims are claimed to be disproportionate. Perhaps these arguments could have served better had it been a case of challenging the vires of regulations and rules. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.3385/2021 Show Time Cable & Datacom (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad through Chairman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2390 Const. P. 7392/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Khawaja Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2391 Const. P. 6091/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sakrand Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2392 Const. P. 361/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Sania and another (Petitioner) VS Babar Riaz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2393 Const. P. 5079/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s BST Services (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2394 Const. P. 4838/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Jaguar Shipping Line (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2395 Const. P. 5573/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Qureshi Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2396 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 665/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Tri Angles Company (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2397 Const. P. 5612/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 The Souse Keeper (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2398 Const. P. 1507/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Zam Zam Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2399 Const. P. 5463/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Habib Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2400 Const. P. 4588/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Raza Mehmood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2401 Const. P. 4698/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dolmen (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2402 2022 PTD 345, 2022 PTCL 415 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 94/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Commissioner inland revenue legal (Applicant) VS M/s filters pakistan pvt. ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 Yes Section 6 is pari materia to provisions for recovery of sale tax in respect of goods imported into Pakistan and time and manner shall be similar to that of recovery made under Customs Act, 1969. For the instant matter, for determining tax liability for the period 2011-12 limitation would perish by 30 June, 2017. Show cause notice was issued on 21.08.2017, after requisite period. Hence, any notice that was issued belatedly i.e. beyond the statutory requirement would have no bearing. --The consequential point that arises is whether a timeframe prescribed under Section 11(5) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 for issuance of show-cause notice and after the expiry of timeframe prescribed, could be extended and/or resurrected a time barred cause under SRO 394(I)/2001 dated 21.05.2009 read with Section 74 of the Act, 1990. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2403 Const. P. 5007/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s J & S Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2404 Const. P. 5650/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Century Engineering Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2405 Const. P. 4625/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Citibank N.A (Petitioner) VS Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2406 Const. P. 1028/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Allah Rakha (Petitioner) VS Abdul Rehman (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-APR-21 No The petitioner was tenant of the subject premises of the respondent. Statutory notice under Section 18 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was served on the petitioner on 15.12.2017. It is claimed that the rent upto February 2018 was deposited in Suit No.1153/2008 in terms of order of court, however, notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, was issued to the petitioner who, despite receipt of the notice, has not tendered the rent of March, 2018 till 17th October, 2018, when for the first time it is contended that the money order was sent. By that time the default of March to July, 2018 has already been committed, even if the rent was required to be deposited in 60 days of its becoming due. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2407 Cr.Bail 539/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MANSOOR IQBAL S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2408 Const. P. 4109/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s ZIF Agencies (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2409 Const. P. 3979/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Falcon-I (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2410 Const. P. 1417/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s W.S Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2411 Const. P. 4303/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Grid Solution Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2412 Const. P. 4516/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Topine Securities Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2413 Const. P. 3994/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Khairpur Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2414 Const. P. 2225/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 AGP Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.5378/2021 AGP Limited, Karachi v. Pakistan through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2415 Const. P. 5575/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Creative Leather Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2416 2021 PLC (CS) Note 11 Const. P. 756/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 S.M Kaleem Makki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-OCT-19 Yes It is the general principle of jurisprudence that the law takes its effect from the date of promulgation and interpretation of the said law cannot be subjected to the doctrine of retrospective effects unless expressed specifically in the judgment, therefore, Mustafa Impexs case is to be applied prospectively, in general. It is the existence of law at the relevant time that counts, which may have been interpreted at a later date. Since the deficiency in the appointment notification as far as Provincial Cabinet is concerned, is not questioned no challenge could be thrown. The principle we derive from the conclusion of the aforesaid three judgments is that Mustafa Impex only invalidates those actions retrospectively which were impugned in that lis and not all others, so by virtue of aforesaid principle the notification for the appointment of the petitioner is saved whereas it set a mechanism for future course i.e. issuance of impugned notification. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.724-K/2019 Province of Sindh and others v. S.M Kaleem Makki,C.P.41-K/2020 S.M Kaleem Makki v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2417 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 279/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Commissioner I-R Zone-IV (Applicant) VS M/s. Byco Petroleum Pakistan Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2418 Const. P. 4482/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s United King (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2419 Const. P. 874/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghazala Wd/o Noor Hassan (Petitioner) VS Samina Naz & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2420 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 246/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 D. G. Customs Valuation (Applicant) VS M/s. Forte Marketing Services (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2421 Suit 510/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Muhammad Rafique (Plaintiff) VS Raja Mohammad Usman & Others (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-SEP-15 Yes First Partnership Deed is between plaintiff and defendants No.1 and 7 to 10 and the second Partnership Deed is between plaintiff and defendants No.1 to 6. Hence, the two causes of action cannot be merged into one in order to avail the jurisdiction of this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2422 Const. P. 8807/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imran Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2423 Const. P. 8948/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 Yes Member of the Armed Forces--review petition pending before respondent No.1 may be ordered to be decided under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2424 Const. P. 4617/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Irfan Gul Dars and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
2425 Const. P. 651/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2004 Shahid Sajjad (Petitioner) VS Dr. Ehesham Naseerul Haque & 3 Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2426 2022 PTD 796, 2022 SBLR Sindh 22 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 826/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Samad Enterprises (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-21 Yes the show-cause notice is without jurisdiction on the count that the customs authorities have not been conferred with the powers of adjudication as far as Sales Tax Act, 1990 and the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 are concerned. Customs Authorities have powers to collect sales tax/income tax etc. at the import stage in the capacity of collecting agents on the basis of registration certificate and the status is being adjudged by the registration authority itself. In the absence of any evidence which could contravene the requirements of the subject SRO, no other view is deducible as these are questions of facts alone, which are thus answered accordingly in favour of respondent and against the applicant. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1602-K/2021 The Colelctor of Customs, Karachi v. M/s. Samad Enterprises Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2427 Const. P. 440/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Mustafa Qadri (Petitioner) VS Abbas Hashim & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2428 Suit.B 124/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 NATIONAL BANK OF PAKSITAN (Plaintiff) VS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 07-FEB-17 Yes The presumption of truth cannot be said to be attached to a statement of account, which is not certified as required under Act 1891. Computer generated accounts may not have required attestation under Act 1891 for any other issue but not for considering the claim of the plaintiff as true and correct. Indeed such statement could be believed to be true in case it is ratified as above and on the assumption/confirmation that it is certified by the relevant officers concerned. Even in a computer generated statement, the statistics/figures are being fed by the accountants. These accountants were previously used to prepare ledger/accounts books through their own hands/manually hence the presumption of truth in relation to both the statements could only be said to be attached in case they are certified, as required under the law. --It is a settled principle of law that in case of conflict between special laws and general laws, special laws prevail. ----It is quite surprising that despite the judgment of Honble Supreme Court, whereby the appointment of the President of the plaintiff bank was held to be unconstitutional, the Power of Attorney executed by such alleged president was continued to be implemented/ acted upon. This act of the plaintiff bank is not only contemptuous but also unlawful and illegal in view of the fact that the principal ceased to exist the moment the judgment was rendered by the Honble Supreme Court insofar as the appointment of the president of the plaintiff bank is concerned Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2429 Const. P. 2468/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 M/S Tri-Star Power Ltd. (Petitioner) VS SECP and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-DEC-12 Yes Since a substantial right of petitioner was subjudiced in the Appeal No.15/2005 before the Appellate Bench therefore, the Division Bench of this Court was pleased to suspend the operation of the order and the trading of shares were restored. Presently there are findings of the Appellant Bench against the petitioner which are subject matter of Misc. Appeal No.04/2009 now renumbered as 74/2010. The miscellaneous appeal was kept pending under objection and the petitioner did not obtain any orders for suspension of the orders of Appellate Bench of SECP Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2430 Suit 64/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 GHULAM RASOOL (Plaintiff) VS ASGHAR ALI (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 19-JAN-15 Yes No doubt it is a valid cause of action which has been utilized by the plaintiff but then cause of action and the proof of damages being sustained by the plaintiff are two independent issues. If the defendant has provided a cause to the plaintiff by filing this suit for malicious prosecution it does not absolve the plaintiff from established that he has in actual suffered such damages. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2431 Const. P. 5142/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Universal Auto Engineering (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2432 Const. P. 4942/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehtab Alam (Petitioner) VS Commissioner IR & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2433 Const. P. 4977/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Isra Islamic Foundation (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2434 Const. P. 249/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Bank Al-Habib Limited Thr. Sayyed Qalb e Abbas (Petitioner) VS Fayz e Husayni Trust and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2435 Const. P. 246/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nadir Khan S/o Muhammad Qasim Khan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Fareeda Nadir and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2436 Const. P. 6765/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s State Bank of Pakistan Class - IV (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2437 Const. P. 7023/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Miracle Products (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2438 Const. P. 1671/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Meskay & Fentee Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2439 Const. P. 7239/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammd Rahim (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2440 Const. P. 1932/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Rousch Pakistan Power Ltd (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.1114/2021 M/s Rousch (Pakistan) Power Ltd. Karachi v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh Karachi and another,C.P.4820/2021 M/s Rousch Pakistan Ltd Karachi v. The Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Disposed Allowed, Leave Granted and Impugned Judgment suspended.
2441 Const. P. 7848/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Tajran-e-Umar Farooqui Market (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2442 Const. P. 8570/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-DEC-21 Yes There is not an iota of evidence available to disagree with the observation of the Tribunal which ordered its (vehicles) release unconditionally however subject to verification of ownership. This being situation no question has arisen to deviate from the findings of the Tribunal and proposed question No.1 is answered in affirmative as the seizing agency has failed to comply with the provisions as required under section 26 of Customs Act, 1969 whereas the proposed questions No.2 is irrelevant for the purpose of declaring the subject vehicle as an smuggled vehicle. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2443 Const. P. 4749/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Memon Motors (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2444 Const. P. 7024/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Miracle Products (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2445 Const. P. 2309/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 National Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.307-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. National Refinery Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2446 Const. P. 4891/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Jawad Naseer (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2447 Const. P. 6996/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Danish Naseem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2448 Const. P. 6875/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Distribution of Fast Moving Goods Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2449 Const. P. 2407/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shell Pakistaqn Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.211-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Shell Pakistan Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2450 Const. P. 2493/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Be Energy Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.233-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Be Energy Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2451 Const. P. 6446/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Lucky Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2452 Const. P. 7304/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Erum Tahir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2453 Const. P. 6756/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Imran Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2454 Const. P. 6397/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Murtaza Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2455 Suit -2904/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Masroor Ahmed Faiz (Plaintiff) VS Masood Ahmed Faiz & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 27-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2456 Const. P. 2336/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Safa Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2457 Suit 744/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s.Reliance Consultancy & Eng. Wprls (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Civial Aiation Authority & another. (ISSUES) (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 04-MAY-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2458 Suit 170/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SYED MUSTAFA NAWAB ZAIDI (Plaintiff) VS MS KHADIJA ZAIDI & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2459 Const. P. 751/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Ishaque & others (Petitioner) VS Shamsuddin & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-OCT-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2460 Suit 987/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s. Project Managers. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Descon Engineering Ltd., & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2461 Const. P. 1841/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Faizan Usman (Petitioner) VS D.G MDA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2462 Const. P. 3513/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s First Paramount Modaraba (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2463 R.A (Civil Revision) 146/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Wali Muhammad S/o Late Syed Ali Muhammad (Applicant) VS Syed Ameer Muhammad and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2464 Suit.B 23/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 PAIR INVESTMENT CO LTD (Plaintiff) VS POLYGON DEVELOPERS & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 30-OCT-14 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2465 Const. P. 840/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Gas & Oil Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.6040/2021 Gas & Oil Pakistan Limited Lahore v. The Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Karachi and others,C.A.1638/2021 Gas & Oil Pakistan Limited Lahore v. The Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Pending
2466 Const. P. 346/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2008 Muhammad Haneef Memon (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Asif and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2467 Const. P. 1125/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hakim Ali & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author) C.P.764-K/2022 Hakim Ali & another v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary, Local Government Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2468 Const. P. 721/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Mst. Hakim Zadi & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2469 Const. P. 2014/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Wahid & Ord (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2470 Const. P. 83/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Suleman (Petitioner) VS Abdul Rasheed and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-MAR-18 Yes In the present case it was a heavy burden upon the appellant to disprove the execution of such lease or to prove a collusive execution of lease but failed in such attempt. In terms of Articles 70 and 72 of the Qanoon-e-Shahdat Order, 1984 the registered instrument must yield in favour of oral evidence. The registered instrument would always carry a presumption of truth and a very strong and exceptional evidence is needed to dislodge the inference of truthfulness and genuineness of such document. It may have been said by the Deputy Director Land, Lyari that the issue can be resolved by summoning the officer from Excise & Taxation Department who may verify the number but it was not satisfactorily established by the appellant by summoning the witness. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2471 Const. P. 643/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Soomrio & another (Petitioner) VS Provinceof Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah C.P.813-K/2022 Soomrio Bheel & another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2472 R.A (Civil Revision) 192/1995 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1995 Allah Bux and other (Applicant) VS Ahmed Ali and other (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2473 I. A 25/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Lal Chand (Appellant) VS Abdul Razzaq Sanai & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2474 Const. P. 437/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Province of Sindh and others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Afzal and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2475 Const. P. 763/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Fida Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2476 Const. P. 6027/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Fatima Fertilizers Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2477 Const. P. 813/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Allah Rakha & andothers (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Rafique Lawalni (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2478 Suit 367/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD SALMAN (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2479 Const. P. 2098/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Shahzad Ali S/o Syed Shabbir ALi (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghaffar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-MAY-18 Yes There cannot be any evidence structure of which not pleaded in written statement. It appears to be an attempt to support the allegations in respect of the property in question, as undertaken by some of the brothers of respondent who are in dispute as to its title. However the definition of landlord and owner are defined which would restrict tenant to probe once they consider respondent as their landlord. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2480 Const. P. 5549/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Usman Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2481 Const. P. 1027/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Faraz Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2482 Const. P. 989/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Habibullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2483 Const. P. 504/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Rehman Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-22 No NTS 2013 matters Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2484 2017 PTD 1852 Suit 991/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 China Harbour Engineering Co., Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 24-JUL-15 Yes "Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- ----Ss. 121, 124(4), 129, 132 & 137(2)---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 39, 42 & 54---Suit for cancellation, declaration and permanent injunction---Best judgment assessment---Assessment giving effect to an order---Disposal of appeal by the Appellate Tribunal---Due date for payment of tax---Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) had been directed to decide the plaintiff's appeal within certain period and till final disposal of the plaintiff's appeal, the defendants had been restrained from taking any coercive action against the plaintiff---Tabulation made by the plaintiff, wherein certain heads of account had been either deleted or sent for rectification under S. 221 of Income Tax Ordnance, 2001, was not disputed---In terms of S. 124 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, where direct relief was provided in order under Ss. 129 & 132 of the Ordinance, the Commissioner would issue Appeal Effect Order within two months of the date the Commissioner was served with the order---In pursuance of S. 137 (2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, where any tax was payable under assessment order or amended assessment order or any other order issued by the Commissioner under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, a notice would be served upon the taxpayer in the prescribed form specifying the amount payable and thereupon the sum so specified would be paid within 15 days from the date of the service of the notice---Original demand notice had been issued prior to amended assessment; hence, the same was not sufficient compliance of issuing notice of demand in pursuance of amended assessment to provide opportunity of 15 days specifying the total amount in pursuance of amended assessment---Compliance to Ss. 124 (4) & 137(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was necessary---Appeal Effect Order was an amended assessment tabulation and the same had to be given effect like any other amended decree---High Court directed the defendants to deposit the amount, which had been recovered by them from the Bank account of the plaintiff, in the Court till further orders." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2485 Suit 525/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NASIR AHMED & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS M/S. CREEK MARINA (PVT) LIMITED & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 15-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2486 Suit 944/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ATTOCK PETROLEUM LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS ANIS ALI & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2487 Const. P. 2772/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Rauf Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2488 Const. P. 1659/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 1661 of 2019 2019 Mumtaz & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2489 Suit -355/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Anwar Hafeez (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Rehana Islam & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2490 Const. P. 552/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Baboo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2491 Const. P. 1846/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Bekho Mal & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2492 Const. P. 617/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Sikandar Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2493 2023 CLC 1422 Suit 116/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 GUNVOR SINGAPORE PTE LTD (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN LNG LIMITED & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 13-FEB-23 Yes Procurement of LNG is a complexed but well settled process in international market. It has a limited and defined market and limited suppliers with a constant pressure of fluctuating market prices. The suppliers are never seen at losses and at times poll in windfall gains because of fluctuating market and this is how the system works. Realistically they (LNG supplier) do not end up in losses, unless a senseless decision is made. Pakistan like many other countries has a limited capacity to dock/store and transport LNG. ----The bid bond is an entirely independent contract to the bidding document and is enforced on the basis of the terms indicated in the bid bond. Bid term's validity and enforcement were not discharged on the Gunvor not being declared the most advantageous bidder on the opening of bid but endured itself for the entire period during which the bid remained valid i.e. up to 11.01.2021. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2494 Const. P. 656/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Aisha & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2495 Const. P. 878/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Saleem Khan and others (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2496 H.C.A 206/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Anees Abrahani (Appellant) VS Muhammad Feroz Khan & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
2497 Const. P. 1805/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Jalaluddin. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2498 Const. P. 448/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Ahsan Ali Shah and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2499 R.A (Civil Revision) 26/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Naroo (Applicant) VS Poonio and other (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2500 Const. P. 416/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Madad Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2501 2023 CLD 219, 2024 SBLR Sindh 166 Judicial Companies Misc. 2/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 DIN FARM PRODUCTS (PVT) LTD (Applicant) VS Security & Exchange Commissioner of Pakistan (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-SEP-22 Yes Share Reduction Allowed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2502 Const. P. 392/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Master Allahdino (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Siddique and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author) C.P.875-K/2022 Imran v. Muhammad Siddique & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2503 Const. P. 1735/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Ayoub Brohi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2504 Const. P. 1272/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Nasir Jamal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2505 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 210/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Additional Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Khalid Mehmood (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2506 Const. P. 1528/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Aisha Steel Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2507 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 65/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Yasir Nawaz thr. Attorney (Applicant) VS Addl. Collector of Customs (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2508 Const. P. 1818/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Krestacorp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2509 I.T.C 233/2001 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TEX (Applicant) VS KARACHI STOCK EXCHANGE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.985-K/2023 Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited v. Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone -VI, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2510 Const. P. 2667/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Suzuki Motorways (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Yousuf and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2511 Const. P. 7703/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Philips Morris (Pak) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Iqbal Ahmed Memon and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2512 Const. P. 2384/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s United Contractors Welfare Association (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.911-K/2023 M/s. United Contractors Welfare Association v. Province of Sindh Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2513 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 556/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. Pak International Good Transport Co.& another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2514 Const. P. 646/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Abdul Rauf (Petitioner) VS Prov of sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2515 Const. P. 1434/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Govt of Sindh & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Laiqdino and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2516 H.C.A 246/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Raheel Shehzad (Appellant) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2517 H.C.A 373/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Shazia Sohail [Shazia Waqas] (Appellant) VS Mst. Wajib Sultana and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2518 H.C.A 56/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Masoor Ahmed Zai (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2519 H.C.A 36/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Wasim Awan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Riaz Awan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-DEC-23 Yes Cumulative effect of entire evidence would weigh in favour of respondent and against the appellant. The appellant has miserably failed to discharge the burden of proof even for all original, issues, in his favour on all the counts Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.8-K/2024 Muhammad Wasim Awan v. Muhammad Riaz Awan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2520 I. A 86/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Muhammad Younus Qadri & Another (Appellant) VS Muhammad Fayyaz & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2521 Const. P. 4310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2522 Const. P. 6803/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Akkar Internatoinal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2523 Const. P. 6805/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Active Apparel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2524 H.C.A 12/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. R.B Avari Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Director General Department of Plant Protection (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2525 H.C.A 371/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Pakistan International Airlines Co. Ltd (Appellant) VS Fayyaz Ali Shah Masoomi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2526 H.C.A 465/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Murtaza Baig & others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-FEB-24 Yes The impugned order is only an interlocutory order and the main application under section 12(2) CPC is pending. The elections of the society pending since last more than six years i.e. ever since this appeal is filed and pending. It is therefore in the interest of the Society itself that the elections be held at the earliest with the inclusion of these applicants of application under section 12(2) CPC, identified as respondents in the instant appeal. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2527 H.C.A 138/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Imran Moosa & Others (Appellant) VS Sub Registrar I Saddar Town Clifton & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2528 I. A 127/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Mst Khursheed Begum & Ors (Appellant) VS NIB Bank Ltd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2529 Const. P. 5167/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Amin Chapal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2530 Const. P. 6654/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Jalil Packaging (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.233/2024 Cantonment Board Korangi Creek through Executive Officer, Karachi v. Jalil Packaging through its Managing Partner, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2531 I. A 37/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 United Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ismail (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2532 Const. P. 4320/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2533 H.C.A 72/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Majida Akram and Others (Appellant) VS Kausar Khursheed Allahwala and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2534 H.C.A 453/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ghulam Hussain Jaffar (Appellant) VS Dr. Nazeer Hussain Kalhoro & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2535 I. A 80/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zafar Iqbal (Appellant) VS A.D.J-VIII, Karachi South & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2536 Const. P. 775/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Ms. Faria Dilshad (Petitioner) VS Ms. Aziz Fatima and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2537 Const. P. 1251/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sadiq Rajani (Petitioner) VS C.B.C and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2538 I. A 25/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Zafar Hasan Khan & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Habib Bank Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2539 R.A (Civil Revision) 278/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Zahir Ali (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2540 H.C.A 380/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Muzaffar Hasan Khan (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2541 H.C.A 328/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Qasim Pathan & Another (Appellant) VS Karachi Gymkhana & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-NOV-23 No This process or any other rule cannot be bypassed and that is the spirit of the order impugned in these proceedings and there is no reason to interfere in the impugned order which is correct way of exercising a discretion for disposing off interim injunction application involving adjudicating forum such as clubs governed by rules Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2542 Const. P. 2113/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ahmed Notiyar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2543 H.C.A 408/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Engineer Anwer Aleem (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2544 H.C.A 30/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghulam Muhammad Khan through Attorney (Appellant) VS Asrar Rauof & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2545 Const. P. 7408/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS IInd A.D.J & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-JAN-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2546 I. A 118/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Hussain (Appellant) VS Learned 2nd ADJ Karachi South & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2547 Suit 814/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZAHEER UDDIN MEMON (Plaintiff) VS SECURITY PAPERS LIMITED & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2548 H.C.A 54/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s. Data Steel Pipe Industries (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s.Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd. & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2549 Const. P. 4707/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Bilal Saulat (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Tariq and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2550 2015 CLD 1162 Suit 1203/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 NOUARTIS AG. & OTHR (Plaintiff) VS NABIQASIM IND. PVT LTD (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 03-APR-15 Yes "Trade Marks Ordinance (XIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 8(1) & 40---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 54---Infringement of trade mark---Permanent Injunction---Application for grant of interim injunction under O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2, C.P.C.---Similarity and deceptivity in trade marks, determination as to--- Plaintiffs, pharmaceutical company owned trade mark ""LESCOL"" and got the same registered in year 1991---Trade mark ""DESCOL"" belonged to defendant, also a pharmaceutical company, which was registered in 2003---Plaintiff sought permanent injunction against use of defendant's trade mark and running of business thereunder contending that defendant's trade mark was phonetically, visually and structurally deceptive and confusingly similar and/or resembled plaintiff's trade mark and defendant's product was likely to pass off as that of plaintiff's product---Both trade marks involved sale of almost same medicinal product---Validity---Prescription of doctor and his expert opinion would be important factor in recommending medicine---Persons prescribing, dealing and offering medicines were specialist meant to protect passing of such medicine available at shop and sale of such medicine were carried out by authorized or licensed persons---Partially phonetically both trade marks were similar, but, for pharmaceutical products, the assigned names were given on basis of generics---No one could claim any proprietary right regarding such generic words as to its exclusive use---Trade mark was to be seen with complete getup, colour scheme, design and printing---Plaintiff's claim related to phonetic similarity between the two trade marks and not to the whole word or design or getup---No deceptive similarity existed between the two trade marks when seen as a whole---Pharmaceutical products were not ordinary goods which a person could point out at shop and buy at his choice---No case was made out for injunction---Application was dismissed, in circumstances." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2551 R.A (Civil Revision) 13/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2006 Shankar Marecho and others (Applicant) VS Ranjho (died),thr:his L.Rs.and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-SEP-18 Yes Mr. Mukesh Kumar G. Karara, Advocate, at this juncture complains that the respondents have been harassed by the applicants due to their close relationship with the Administration and particularly police. This has been disputed by Mr. David Lawrence Advocate who represents the applicants and further assures that no harassment either has been caused or will be caused in future, even otherwise since matters are sub judice, therefore, parties are directed to conduct themselves within parameters of law and not otherwise. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2552 Const. P. 795/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Gul Hassan Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Secretary Education & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2553 Suit.B 94/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Royal Bank of Scotland (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Nadeem (Defendant) S.B. Order 31-AUG-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2554 Const. P. 272/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Muhammad Ali Sodhar (Petitioner) VS 1st A.D.J Mehar & ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2555 Cr.Bail 513/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Hazaro @ Kamando Mazari (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2556 Civil Revision 1/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2008 Ameer Ali Junejo (Applicant) VS Sikandar Ali and ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2557 Cr.Bail 16/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Abdul Sattar and Others (Applicant) VS Deputy Director ACE and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-FEB-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2558 Const. P. 2397/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mukhtiar Ali Korkani and another (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Civil Line and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2559 Cr.Bail 235/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Bahar Khan Talani and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2560 Const. P. 2862/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mst. Kalsoom Khoso and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS A Section Kandhkot and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2561 Conf.Case 985/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Samreen and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Shahdadpur and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2562 Cr.Bail 231/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Haji Waris Chandio (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2563 Cr.Misc. 18/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Tarique Hussain Abro (Applicant) VS The state and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2564 Cr.Bail 3/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Cr. Bail Appln. No. S- 5 of 2013 2013 Ghulam Shabeer Khand and another (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2565 Const. P. 2342/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Irshad Ali Joyo (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Nasirabad and oth (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2566 Const. P. 2073/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Riaz Hussain Phuploto (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Naudero and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2567 Const. P. 761/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Mst Kamalan Khakhrani (Petitioner) VS S.I.O PS K.T Mumtaz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2568 Const. P. 210/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Muhammad Swaleh (Petitioner) VS Mst. Asma Yasin & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 12-APR-18 Yes The burden of proving payment of rent in advance was in fact apparently discharged when on a suggestion the petitioner/tenant himself admitted in the cross-examination that the rent was payable on or before 10th of each calendar month. Thus, the tenant had only a grace period of 15 days for its payment on its becoming due. Rent was due on 10th of each calendar month and grace period of 15 days makes it 25th of each month. The money order for the month of December 2001 and January 2002 was in fact tendered on 19.02.2002, by the time the default for these two months at least had already been committed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.606-K/2018 Muhammad Swaleh v. Mst: Asma Yasin and others,C.P.701-K/2018 Mst: Asma Yasin v. Muhammad Swaleh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
2569 Cr.Acq.A. 335/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Bheemoon Malhi (Appellant) VS Taro and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 17-OCT-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2570 2017 YLR 1752 Suit 1007/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Falcon-I (Private) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 20-MAR-17 Yes The scope of the suit apart from the requirement of Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is very necessary to be considered. Order 1 Rule 10 (2) CPC requires that the Court may at any stage of the proceedings, either upon or without the application of either party, and on such terms as may appear to the Court to be just, order that the name of any party improperly joined, whether as plaintiff or defendant, be struck out, and that the name of any person who ought to have been joined, whether as plaintiff or defendant, or whose presence before the Court may be necessary in order to enable the Court effectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit, be added. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2571 Suit 2282/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ghazi Anwar Kerio & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-FEB-16 Yes The plaintiff has approached this Court when he was already terminated and while granting the relief of the nature as claimed would amount to granting a decree as this is the main relief sought by the plaintiff. As admitted, the plaintiff is at the verge of retirement and hence the relief of the nature as to the reinstatement at this interlocutory stage as such would create a different situation. The listed application thus is dismissed with the above observation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2572 Const. P. 100/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Tanzeem Fikr o Nazar Sindh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro C.P.351/2019 Tanzeem Fikr-o-Nazar Sindh thr. its President Asghar, Sukkur v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Local Government, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2573 M.A. 1/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Nadeem Kiani Thr. Irfan Aziz (Appellant) VS Intellectrual Property Org. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.3519/2018 Dr. Nadeem Kiani v. Intellectural Property Organization of Pakistan thr. its Director General, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2574 Const. P. 976/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Zareen Ali Wd/O Salman Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Ajaz Ali Sehto & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-FEB-18 Yes It does not lie in the mouth of petitioner either to challenge the title of the previous landlord i.e. Bilal A. Malik to whom he (petitioner) was tendering the rent or to whom the previous landlord has delegated such powers by way of letter of attornment and the relationship was thus rightly held by the Courts below. There is no cavil that on the basis of a sale agreement only such relationship cannot be decided but if such sale agreement is coupled with notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 along with letter of attornment then it cannot be said to be just an agreement of sale. Such letter of attornment delegates all such authorities and powers required by a subsequent buyer to initiate proceedings, as initiated by respondent No.1 in the matter. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.99-K/2018 Mst: Zareen Ali v. Ajaz Ali Sehto and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2575 Const. P. 2279/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Crete Sol (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.831/2018 National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Amanullah,C.A.1269/2019 National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Amanullah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
2576 Const. P. 1808/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Muhammad Usman & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2577 Const. P. 23/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ali Gul Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Govt: Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2578 Const. P. 531/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Khursheed Afghan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2579 Const. P. 2947/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Ghulam Mustafa and others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2580 Const. P. 1443/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Islamuddin & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes We do not appreciate the manner on the basis of which this piece of land was allegedly allotted by the Local Government to the petitioners and that too from a park commonly known as Jinnah Chowk Children Park. District Judge has submitted compliance report which confirms this premise to be part of Jinnah Chowk Children Park. The petitioners as such are nothing but the trespassers of the land which is meant for park. They do not stand on any merit as far as the occupation of this land is concerned. The provisions of the Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 2001 were misused by the Local Government and the concerned officials of the Local Government are equally responsible for the issuance of the allotment order, which is available at page 25 of this petition. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2581 Const. P. 4791/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Ashique Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2582 Const. P. 808/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Faizan Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2583 Const. P. 148/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Waseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2584 Const. P. 200/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Zubair Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2585 Const. P. 1507/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Imran Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2586 Const. P. 3130/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Muhammad Adnan (Petitioner) VS Secretary Finance (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio C.P.12-K/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Finance Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and another v. Muhammad Adnan Qureshi,C.A.1192/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Finance Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and another v. Muhammad Adnan Qureshi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after Summer vacation,Disposed
2587 Const. P. 1731/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2588 Const. P. 5050/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Nawaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2589 Const. P. 1360/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Tajuddin Pathan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-AUG-18 No The subject matter of this petition is a detection bill, which was apparently issued by Sukkur Electric Power Company. When inquired from the counsel for SEPCO as to under which authority such detection bill was issued, the counsel showed his ignorance. In pursuance of SubSection 6 of Section 26 of the Electricity Act, 1910, it is a discretion and mandate of the Electric Inspector to look into the matter on an application by an aggrieved party. Sukkur Electric Power Company was aggrieved of the consumption of electricity by illegal means and an application ought to have been preferred by them to the Electric Inspector, who then adjudge such complaint Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2590 Const. P. 3682/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Hubdar Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2591 Const. P. 1037/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Mst.Husna and others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2592 Const. P. 4529/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Mst. Zameeran Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2593 Const. P. 1073/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Piral Buriro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pak through secretry wapda isb & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-AUG-18 No In terms of Section 26 Sub-Section 6 of the Electricity Act, 1910, it is only the prerogative of the Electric Inspector to look into such issues that relates to electric equipments and its faultiness; and, the power generating or supplying companies cannot issue a detection or supplementary bill as it encroaches upon the Electric Inspectors jurisdiction under Section 26 Sub-Section 6 of the Electricity Act, 1910 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2594 Const. P. 599/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Zahid Khan S/o Muhammad Mutloob Khan (Petitioner) VS Mrs. Zainab and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-MAY-19 Yes . If these are the pleadings then this is not a personal requirement. At the most it is a case that a fair rent is not being tendered by the tenant and resort could be made under section 8 of the SRPO, 1979. Under Qanoon-e-Shahadat, the evidence at best could support pleadings but additional case can not be made. The witnesses have taken U-turn in evidence when they deposed that premises are required for personal use. Pleadings of the parties cannot be ignored and evidence cannot be read in isolation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.483-K/2019 Zahid Khan v. Mrs. Zainab and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2595 Const. P. 2375/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Muhammad Essa Bhutto and ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.722-K/2019 Ali Akbar Ujjan and others v. The Chairman Port Qasim Authority and others,C.P.723-K/2019 Akbar Adeeb Zubairi and another v. The Chairman Sindh Lobour Appellate and others,C.P.741-K/2019 Rasheed Ahmed Memon v. The Chairman Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2596 Cr.J.A 119/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Suhbat (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2597 Const. P. 2758/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2598 Const. P. 45/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Dr: Ahmed Bux (Petitioner) VS Sikanadar Ali and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2599 Const. P. 2650/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mrs Rubina & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2600 Const. P. 548/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shahzad Khan & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2601 Const. P. 438/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Faruukh Arfeen (Petitioner) VS GM HR USC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2602 Const. P. 935/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Chaudhry Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS HESCO (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2603 2021 CLD 48 M.A. 24/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 MUHAMMAD SHAH KAKAR THR ATTORNEY AHMED SHAH (Appellant) VS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TRIBUNAL AT SINDH & BALOCHIS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-JUN-20 Yes SRO 170(I)/2017 dated 17.03.2017 is for "imported goods only" and was not applied to parallel or grey market imports and de-minimis imports. Powers to take action, detention, seizure, confiscation of goods imported into or taken out of Pakistan were/are always available with the customs officials and it is not that SRO 170(i)/2017 that has empowered them, it only set the process to be initiated by custom officials in relation to goods being imported. What was amended by virtue of SRO 768(I)/2014 is also very material. In Section 3CC and 3E of Customs Act, 1969 formation of the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement was redesigned along with its functions, jurisdiction and powers. In the present case Tribunal could only pass order to the extent of trade mark being an infringed one or otherwise and to restrain it from being violated. The Procedural action of custom officials was not questioned independently by respondent. Once the effect of infringement was determined by tribunal the customs officials would definitely have followed it. Color and color scheme also at time claimed to be an inventive one but that is not the case here as no one has claimed livery or color scheme or get up to be a mark of distinction under any intellectual property rights. Both parties are contesting over one mark i.e Tabiat and no one has claimed any exclusive right over livery or dress up of mark. So everything is a disclaimer except "Tabiat". If there are deceptive liveries of common product like rice, with one trade mark "Tabiat" in the absence of a right claimed under the liveries, the buyer would definitely get confuse and jump to some other brand as a natural course. In terms of Section 5(2) of Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 goods even if not meant for a local consumption but only to enter the port for onwards journey, would mean the use of mark within jurisdiction. Unless goods in transit are defined otherwise, only aforesaid meaning is deducible. Construction of our Trade Mark Ordinance, 2001 is also based on same scheme and there is no inconsistency as far as framing of relevant provision trade mark is concerned. The word import or export (exclusively or inclusively) not defined under the law in hand differently that is dealing with goods in transit. The case of the appellant is on better footing since the attempt is made to export the goods from the territory where the mark is registered The word "use" as explained above is also applicable to goods "for export only" and hence Section 5(2) read with section 40 of Trade Mark ordinance 2001 would be interpreted accordingly as use within territory of Pakistan. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2604 Const. P. 4318/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Jaun Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2605 Const. P. 4684/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Battery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2606 Const. P. 5954/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ayaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed, of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2607 Const. P. 5929/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Popular Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2608 2023 MLD 522 Const. P. 2129/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS M/s. Jamia Imamia Trust & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-APR-21 Yes It is immaterial for the tenant as towho are the trustees and how those trustees were/are being replaced. It is indoor/internal management of the trustees and trust which has nothing to do with the relationship of landlord and tenant between Jamia ImamiaTrust and thepetitioner. None of thealleged trustees who were deprived of any benefit of being a trustee was cited as a witness or summoned by the petitioner. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2609 Const. P. 1064/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2610 Const. P. 2949/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nishat Linen Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2611 Const. P. 2479/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Wasima Bano (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2612 Cr.Bail 1695/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD FAIZAN S/O MUHAMMAD AHSAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2613 Const. P. 5460/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Amna Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2614 Const. P. 3349/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Pakistan Dental Association & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2615 Const. P. 798/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Lucky Commodities Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2616 Const. P. 4196/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nusrat Hydri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2617 Const. P. 5446/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Iqbal Khalid Tabba (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2618 Const. P. 4656/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s N.A Textile (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2619 Const. P. 326/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Hira Imam Thr. Nawabzada Kamran Hussain (Petitioner) VS Hasan Khurshid Hashmi and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.3057/2021 Mst. Hira Imam and another v. Hasan Khrushid Hashmi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2620 Const. P. 1555/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Adnan Impex & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2621 Const. P. 5821/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Saif ur Rehman & Brothers (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2622 Const. P. 4181/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Pharma Net (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2623 Const. P. 1137/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Pyramid Gas (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2624 R.A (Civil Revision) 36/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SYED IMRAN (Applicant) VS SYED SOHAIL HASAN & OTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2625 Const. P. 5305/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Bin Bakar Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2626 Cr.J.A 65/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Badar @ Badro (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2627 Const. P. 162/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rashid Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS IBA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.654-K/2019 Rashid Ali Khan v. Institute of Business Administration (IBA) and anotehr,C.A.45-K/2020 Rashid Ali Khan v. Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Karachi thr. its Registrar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,Pending Adjourned
2628 Const. P. 1214/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M/S JAMIA MASJID GHARIB NAWAZ (Petitioner) VS MUHAMMAD ARIF & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2629 Const. P. 1555/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rashid Bohio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5467/2021 Muhammad Rashid Bohio v. Federation o Pakistan the Secretary, Establishment Division Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2630 2017 YLR 582, 2016 SBLR Sindh 1476 J.M 10/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 SARA AHMED SOOMRO (Applicant) VS SARWAT UN NISA & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 16-MAR-16 Yes in such a situation where the powers have been delegated to a counsel and who acted upon it, is allowed to be challenged in such a manner, as is in this case, then perhaps there will no end to the litigation and the authority of the counsel, to whom the powers have been delegated, would always remain under shadow of doubt. Insofar additional property which was not initially available in the plaint filed by applicant herself, the special Power of Attorney is available to validate the authority of respondent No.1 to compromise on behalf of applicant Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2631 Const. P. 4958/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 OOCL Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2632 Const. P. 315/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waqas Ahmed S/o Waqar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst. Maryam Hafeez and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-21 No Though under section 14 of the Family Court Act, 1964a decision is appealable however considering the facts and circumstances when interim meeting was ordered to be arranged in terms of the order ofthe trial Court theorder was not interfered by the appellate Court. Trial Court has exercised their right and maintained by appellate Court and such discretion being rightly exercised cannot be interfered. There is nothing to interfere in the interim arrangement,which seems to be lawful and justified. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2633 Const. P. 1271/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Khawaja Muhammad Ali S/o Khawaja M Ismail Late (Petitioner) VS Syed Razi Ahmed & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-NOV-17 Yes In the absence of any proof as to the original tenant as being M/s Muhammad Ismail, a registered or unregistered partnership firm, least that could be a point of understanding or admission that Muhammad Ismail was tenant as the ejectment application was filed against him and Khawaja Muhammad Ali and availability of a rent receipt Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2634 Const. P. 2728/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Fahad Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Emirates Supply Chain and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2635 Cr.Bail 711/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 YASEEN S/O MUHARRAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JUN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2636 Const. P. 1387/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Bulls Eye Advertising (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2637 Const. P. 4833/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s K.P Services (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2638 Const. P. 5399/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Saleem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2639 Const. P. 5517/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s W.R Edible Oil Refinery (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No while exercising jurisdiction under ibid section 46(2) primary notice had already been sent to the petitioner vide letter dated 01.09.2021, however, the same is not impugned here, perhaps for the reason that cognizance against the petitioner, being involved in alleged fraud or evasion of duty, may have been taken and disclosed therein. Hence, unless there is a challenged to the initial/primary notice issued on 01.09.2021, it cannot be conceived that the instant impugned notice under section 46 of Federal Excise Act, 2005, which is dated 06.09.2021, is devoid of any such prerequisite of Section 46 of ibid Act of 2005. It is not even disclosed and/or pleaded in the petition that the petitioner has not received any such notice dated 01.09.2021.. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2640 Const. P. 3463/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Khalid & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2641 Const. P. 4260/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Jehanzeb Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2642 Const. P. 4930/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Adnan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2643 R.A (Civil Revision) 68/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Naseem Kausar and others Thr. Junaid Safdar (Applicant) VS Sardar Abdul Rehman (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-APR-21 Yes Reader and even for that matter court had no jurisdiction to extend time for filing leave application against statutory period and that too without any justified reason. By that time the service has already been effected at least by publication on 06.12.2020. In terms of Order XXXVII Rule 3, CPC, the leave to defend application is supposed to have been filed within the period prescribed therein. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.812-K/2021 Mst.Naseem Kausar & others v. Sardar Abdul Rehman & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2644 Const. P. 2522/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Irshad Traders and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2645 I. A 44/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Bilal (Appellant) VS Dubai Islamic Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2646 Const. P. 1252/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shakeel Khilji S/o Rehman Khilji (Petitioner) VS Samreen Tayyaba & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2647 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1236/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Singer Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1637-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Singer Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2648 Const. P. 7025/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Miracle Products (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2649 2022 PTD 1302 Const. P. 3068/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Quick Contractor & Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-21 Yes With this observation since Import Policy Order 2013 in its present form is exactly the same (for present purpose) as it stood in 2009, the clarification will be carried forward and the objections of the department insofar as the two dissimilar brands/makes i.e. crane and truck are concerned, would not be tenable. It was never the requirement of Import Policy Order 2013 that a truck-mounted crane should be factory-fitted or that the crane and truck should not be dissimilar as far as their makes are concerned. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2650 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 72/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS M/s. Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Brothers (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2651 H.C.A 474/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sindh Revenue Board (Appellant) VS Mst. Shamim Taher Sachak & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2652 2022 PTD 576 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 2/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 IMS Health Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) VS Commissioner-II SRB (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-NOV-21 Yes It is the consideration in money including federal and provincial duties and taxes which constitute value of taxable services which the person provides against the consideration but it excludes the amount of sales tax under the ibid Act. The Tribunal was of the view that the invoices generated on the amount includes the expenses/expenditures plus 10-% service charges and is to be taken as one revenue component for services rendered. The Tribunal is also of the view that in certain cases there is specific rule in Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 providing for valuation of a particular service and providing a certain minimum threshold and also any exemption and exception. However, Tribunal considered that since no rule is available for the category of Business Support Services full value of generated invoices shall be taken as the value of services rendered or provided in terms of provisions of Section 5 ibid. --Primarily value of service charges for the purposes of Act 2011 is governed by the value of service agreed upon between the provider and the recipient as the market itself is so competitive that nothing could defeat the actual amount being declared to be taxed. However, in case such understanding of value of service is doubtful as it does not disclose correct value of service, it was open for the department to have considered the open market price of such service as required to be determined under section 6 of Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 which is not the case here. Two provisos to Section 5 deals the situation of value of service. In a situation where the consideration of value of service is in kind or is partly in kind and partly in money, value of service shall mean open market price2 excluding the amount of sales tax under Act 2011. Similarly in case where service is provided by provider to a recipient who is an associated person and the value is not the actual value of service, then the value of service which is being provided by a provider to a non-associated person shall be counted and in case no consideration is claimed or value is lower than it is being provided by other persons, the value of service shall be of open market. In principle the department has not disputed the value of services rather the department is of the view that reimbursed amount or the amount of maintenance/expenses incurred should be made part of the value of the service. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2653 I.T.R.A 264/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) VS M/S CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2654 Const. P. 3879/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Princely Jets (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2655 Const. P. 8796/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Babar Jameel and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.659-K/2019 Muhammad Naeem v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2656 Const. P. 2135/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Adeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2657 Const. P. 6957/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Shabbir Teli (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2658 Const. P. 7108/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tayyab Usman Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2659 Const. P. 6798/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imtiaz Provisions Store (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2660 Const. P. 6947/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Khamiso Khan & Co. (Petitioner) VS SRB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2661 Const. P. 6305/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s ORB Exim Corporation (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2662 2022 PLD Sindh 47 Civil Ref. 2/2018 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Assistant Chief Inspector of Stamps (Appellant) VS .. (Respondent) F.B. Judgement 16-NOV-21 Yes The Court had itself observed that the valuation done by the family Court was for a particular purpose and since it was not a decree of a Court the valuation so carried out was not binding. And then the Court went on to observe that even if there is a decree of the Court, the stamp duty would be payable as per Valuation Table. Though on facts the said judgment is not relevant; nonetheless, since it has been cited before this Full Bench, therefore, we are compelled to hold that we do not approve such observations made by the Division Bench in the aforesaid paragraph. Had it been in performance of decree, an instrument is being registered, it ought to be on the basis of value determined in the decree and/or agreement entered into for which performance is to be made in terms of Court decree. In such situation there was no occasion for altering/undervaluing the property to avoid stamp duty as the value is already determined by Court of law or decree. It is only in case when the property has changed its status lawfully i.e. from a built-up property to an open plot or from a semi-constructed property to a fully constructed property, the value of the property may be altered in instrument sought to be registered. Thus, when the property sold out on the basis of a decree, which decree has valued the property in question, then the right of valuing the property does not rest with the vendor and vendee and/or the concerned authority. H Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
2663 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 36/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Quick Contractors & Traders (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author) C.P.519-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Quick Contractors & Traders Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2664 Const. P. 6412/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/S Pakistan Currency Exchange Co (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fedratoin of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2665 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 927/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Rehman Construction Company (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.432-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Rehman Construcation Co. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2666 Const. P. 7176/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahid Aziz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2667 Const. P. 7308/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Lucky Oil Co. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2668 Const. P. 6348/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Naurus (Pvt) lTD (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2669 II.A. 176/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Latif S/o (Late) Bhola Din (Appellant) VS Ghulam Sarwar and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2670 Const. P. 4928/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Iftikhar Auto Store (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2671 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 827/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Uzair Enterprises (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2672 Const. P. 4623/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Tataran International (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2673 Civil Revision 26/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Naroo (Applicant) VS Poonio and other (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2674 Suit 989/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zainuddin (Plaintiff) VS Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2675 R.A (Civil Revision) 46/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 1998 Ali Ahmed Balouch (Applicant) VS Arbab Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-APR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2676 Const. P. 1838/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Ramzan Halepoto (Petitioner) VS Po Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2677 Const. P. 151/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 City Observer (Petitioner) VS Shahzada Sweet Towers & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
2678 Const. P. 4363/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Spirit Industries Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2679 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 107/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Commissioner I-R Zone-III (Applicant) VS M/s. Sapphire Finishing Mills Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2680 Suit 237/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Hafiz Abdul Quddus (Plaintiff) VS M. Noor Alam & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2681 Const. P. 949/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sakina Riaz Thr. Attorney Abrar Ali (Petitioner) VS The District Judge, Khi East and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2682 Suit 1849/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Siddiqsons Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2683 2016 CLC 1396 Suit 2471/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 M/s Hascol Petroleum Limited (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Shell Pakistan Limited & others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 26-MAR-16 Yes Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XXXIX R.1 & 2---Suit for declaration, damages, permanent and mandatory injunction--- Application for grant of temporary injunction---Statutory tenant---Suit property was leased to defendant vide lease agreement that had expired and despite correspondence from landladies same was not renewed---Landladies entered into a new lease agreement with plaintiff but defendant had installed its machinery on leased land---Effect---Ignorance or no-reply on part of defendant should not be considered in a way that he had conceded their rights as to possession or statutory rights of tenancy---Defendant was for all intent and purposes in occupation of suit property and were running business of supply of petrol and other allied products---Defendant had also applied for storage license after spending huge fee contrary to allegation that they were not interested in operation from suit property---Plaintiff's case was not considered to be one of prima facie, nor it would suffer an irreparable loss---Plaintiff had also not come with clean hands, hence was denied discretionary relief---High Court, in circumstances, dismissed application for grant of temporary injunction under its original jurisdiction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2684 Suit 1607/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Fahad Iqbal (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Azam Khan & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 25-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2685 Suit 1680/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Haji Noorul Haq (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Basit Memon & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 18-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2686 Const. P. 1817/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Ihsanullah and Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2687 Const. P. 547/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chancellor QUEST & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2688 II.A. 128/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Hum Network Limited (Appellant) VS Naveed Khan & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-DEC-17 Yes The requirement of passing a resolution is set at par with the powers of directors under section 183(1) of the Companies Act, 2017 which is parametria to Section 196 (1) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984. Since the Board is vested with the powers of management which has delegated all such rights through a Power of Attorney to the Chief Executive with further powers to delegate such powers therefore, such strict action in terms of under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint is uncalled for. This delegation of power further gets support in terms of Articles of Association which reiterate the aforesaid authority as statutory delegation of powers which was vested with the Board of Directors. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2689 Suit 1545/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/S S.S.S CORPORATION (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 04-MAR-22 No Before filing this suit the plaintiff have since surrendered themselves to the jurisdiction under the Sindh Public Procurement Rules, 2010, therefore, it may be in all fairness that the plaintiff may appear before the addressee where they claimed their review appeal is pending and seek its disposal in accordance with law after notice to respondents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2690 Suit 2463/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Amina.. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Tariq Mianoor & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2691 Const. P. 1603/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Questions regarding non-schedule load shedding cannot be resolved in petition under Article 199 of the Constitution against Hyderabad Electricity Supply Company, being entity under Company law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2692 Const. P. 357/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Masooda Maqsood (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2693 I. A 10/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Rajib Ali Warar (Appellant) VS Ashique Ali Kamboh (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-MAY-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2694 Suit 2999/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OFFICERS ASSOC. & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 21-MAR-22 Yes it is inconceivable that under the ibid repealed Ordinances, which were never in fact acted upon, plaintiffs could exert for the transfer of the employees/officers of the two divisions to their respective authorities. The law that stood prior to the repeal of the ordinances under consideration revived and the two authorities are now deemed to be working under the common umbrella of Ordinance 1982 as were earlier. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2695 Cr.Bail 823/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 FAHIM ANSARI S/O MUHAMMAD KHALIL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2696 Const. P. 3366/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
2697 2015 PLD Sindh 261 Suit 1003/1979 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1979 AL-AHRAM BUILDERS LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS P.D.O.H.A. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 02-OCT-14 Yes "(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S.12---Specific performance of agreement---Indoor management, doctrine of---Applicability---In terms of doctrine of indoor management, plaintiff cannot be made to suffer for any deficiency on the part of defendant to follow informal procedure internally adopted by it. (b) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ----Art. 129---Two presumptions---Applicability---Where there are two presumptions and both are equally claimed to be balanced, court must yield for one which best accords with facts. (c) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ----Art. 129 (g)---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Os.XI & XVI---Withholding of evidence---Presumption, raising of---Principle---In order to raise presumption under Art.129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, it is not necessary to follow procedure of giving notice for production of documents under O.XI, C.P.C. or to summon documents under O. XVI, C.P.C. (d) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S.12---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art.114---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Agreement---Proof---Estoppel, principle of---Applicability---Claim of plaintiff was that earlier suit was withdrawn subject to conditions mentioned under letter dated 17-6-1974---Plea raised by defendant society was that the letter in question was result of fraud---Validity---Plaintiff, as per its plaint had unequivocally accepted offer contained in letter in question and further withdrew proceedings initiated by it---Although details of earlier suit filed by plaintiff did not come on record during evidence but such averment had been reaffirmed by plaintiff's witness in his deposition---Nothing was on record from the side of defendant to controvert such assertion of plaintiff and defendant was estopped in law from turning its back and resiling from commitment made through letter dated 17-6-1974---Defendant invited offers for transfer of plot in question in response thereto plaintiff submitted offers and the same were accepted by Managing Committee of defendant society and unconditional offer was communicated to plaintiff without any reservation---Such was an unqualified acceptance and constituted valid contract for transfer of subject property by defendant to plaintiff---Defendant failed to point out any illegality or irregularity in allotment made in favour of plaintiff, therefore, it could not cancel the same---Suit was decreed in circumstances." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2698 Const. P. 3932/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
2699 Const. P. 1574/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Wali Muhammad Shoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2700 Const. P. 5968/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Prof. Dr. Moin-ud-din (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2701 Const. P. 545/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Aijaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ayaz Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
2702 Suit 1822/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 ZEESHAN JAVED ARAIN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS M/S. LUCKY CEMENT LTD. & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 11-NOV-14 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2703 Const. P. 1427/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Gul Rehmat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2704 Const. P. 57/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Abdul Razzak Arain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2705 F.R.A 21/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Kamran Hussain and another (Appellant) VS Mst. Dilshad and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2706 Civil Tran 7/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Naveed Ali & Another. (Applicant) VS Mohammad Juman & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2707 2023 PLC (CS) 527 Suit 51/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Sultan Ahmed Hashmani (Plaintiff) VS M/s Thatta Cement Company & another (Defendant) S.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Not even remotely, after two complete rounds of litigation upto Hon'ble Supreme Court it can be imagined that the termination of the plaintiff could be held as unlawful and consequently damages could be granted in this suit. In the first round itself, the Tribunal and the subsequent Hon'ble Courts held that the termination was lawful. Granting damages on the preposition that it was an unlawful termination, would amounts to ignoring and bypassing the judgments of the Senior Civil Judge, Tribunal, this Court as well as Hon'ble Supreme Court. There is no cavil that the dismissal of the plaintiff from the service was held to be lawful and hence the plaintiff cannot count on the imaginary unlawful dismissal, as he claimed, to claim damages. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2708 Const. P. 65/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Mushtaque Ali Shoro and Others (Petitioner) VS Government of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author) C.P.651-K/2018 Liaquat Ali (decd) thr. his L.Rs v. Fayazuddin (decd) thr. his L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2709 I. A 68/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zafar Hassan Khan (Appellant) VS M/s. Habib Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2710 F.R.A 1/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asif Ali Shaikh (Appellant) VS Irshad Begum Khero (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2711 Const. P. 2865/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Qasim Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2712 Suit 2300/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Talat Mahmood Malik (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Najma Malik & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2713 Const. P. 7216/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
2714 Const. P. 591/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Muhammad Farhan Shaikh and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2715 Const. P. 851/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Noreen Memon & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2716 Const. P. 498/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Muhammad Iqbal and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2717 F.R.A 1/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: F.R.A. 2 of 2014 2014 Faqir Muhammad (Appellant) VS Mst Sakina and an Other (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2718 Const. P. 1849/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2719 Const. P. 814/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Mst Uzma Yousif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2720 Const. P. 572/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Amanullah Memon and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2721 Judicial Companies Misc. 1/1989 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1989 Abu Bakar & Ors (Applicant) VS M/s.T.J Ibrahim & Co & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2722 Suit 855/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sajid Hussain. (Plaintiff) VS P.I.A., Corporation & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 27-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2723 2023 CLD 644 Judicial Companies Misc. 9/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 AWWAL MOHDARABA MANAGEMENT LTD AND OTHERS (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2724 2023 CLD 639 Judicial Companies Misc. 13/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 LUCKY LANDMARK (PVT) LTD AND ANOTHER (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2725 Suit 1789/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 ARIF HASSAN ALI HASHWANI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS SADRUDDIN HASHWANI & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 16-MAR-23 Yes If a litigant is entitled to more than one relief in respect of same cause of action, as indeed, in the instant case, he has to sue for all or he may sue for any of the relief he may opt but the leftover would count as an omission to sue. Since provisions of Order II rule 2 CPC are penal in nature it would preclude a litigant to sue for a portion of claim or remedy so ignored or omitted. The plaintiffs have ignored and omitted to sue for all the claims and reliefs to which they were entitled with regard to a cause of action that is "breach of trust" and hence are precluded to have a next round of litigation on the original cause of action. Plaintiff can only ignore any of the matured relief at the risk of treating them as relinquished or ignored one Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2726 Const. P. 1243/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Expert Cargo (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2727 Const. P. 1304/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Sarwat Shakeel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2728 Const. P. 1853/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Hanif Jewani (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2729 Const. P. 2141/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Devisers Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Hussain Bazdar and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2730 Const. P. 1908/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Asma Aftab @ Asma Mirani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2731 I. A 87/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Zia Rasool (Appellant) VS Syed Tanveer Alam and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2732 Const. P. 962/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Noor Muhammad Malik & another (Petitioner) VS Faisal Aijaz & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2733 Const. P. 1167/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Shahabuddin Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Ali Nawaz & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2734 I. A 15/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Iqbal Qamar Siddiqui (Appellant) VS Muhammad Jameel Siddiqui & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2735 H.C.A 58/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: High Court Appeal No. 56 of 2020 High Court Appeal No. 57 of 2020 and High Court Appeal No. 67 of 202 2020 Engineer Anwer Aleem (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2736 H.C.A 388/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Adnan Ahmed Shaikh thru attorney Abdul Hakeem (Appellant) VS Muhammad Raees (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2737 H.C.A 407/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Qadir Bux & Ors (Appellant) VS Goernment of Sindh & Orsw (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2738 Const. P. 3426/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s National Medical Centre (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2739 H.C.A 381/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. S.S.S. Corporation (Appellant) VS Abdul Qadir & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2740 I. A 8/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Gulshan Spinnign Mills Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Meezan Bank Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2741 Const. P. 907/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Azam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2742 Const. P. 1494/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2743 H.C.A 181/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Customs Today & another (Appellant) VS Qasim International Container Terminal & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2744 II.A. 29/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Moula Bux Panhwar (Appellant) VS Prov of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2745 H.C.A 167/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Qamran Construction Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS Saleemullah & 3 Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2746 I. A 18/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Amir Ali (Appellant) VS Muhammad Mustaqeem & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2747 H.C.A 24/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Samiuddin Qureshi (Appellant) VS Mrs. Rahat Saleem & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2748 Const. P. 7289/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ablagh-e-Ama Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Nasim Shakir Jaffery and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2749 H.C.A 352/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan and Others (Appellant) VS AGP Limited and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2750 I. A 74/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ilahi Bakhsh (Appellant) VS Ahmed Nawaz (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2751 Const. P. 715/1996 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1996 MST ANILA ABRAR (Petitioner) VS GOVT. OF SINDH AND OTHERS (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-MAR-24 Yes i-Section 10(2) of the Citizen Act gives a preferential treatment to the spouse of Pakistani man vis-??-vis a Pakistani woman and thus infringes constitutional guarantees ii-The object is foreign spouses and not just foreign wives and thus making of 10(2) and reading it now may vary with constitutional demands. The intent of the said provision is not to encourage or facilitate women to marry Pakistani men. The concept which now emerged through international jurisprudence is to enable Pakistanis married to foreigners to be able to live together and acquire nationality for their spouses and live a family life in Pakistan and the Act of 1951 should now be read and tamed accordingly. Restricting the benefit of Section 10(2) to Pakistani men only is a clear discrimination to Pakistani women. 45. The doctrine of reading in is used by Courts to extend the scope to avoid and limit the discriminatory language having head-on conflict with a constitutional provision. The doctrine of ???reading in??? involves adding words to a statutory provision to bring it in conformity with constitutional provisions. iii- The application of "reading in" is required to cater section 10(2) of the Citizenship Act to save it from offending Article 25 of the Constitution that is wherever reference is made to ???woman??? and ???she??? therein; the words "or man" and "or he" be read. This adjustment shall not have any effect on the operability of the statute. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2752 H.C.A 41/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Kamran & Others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2753 H.C.A 348/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 P.E.M.R.A & Another (Appellant) VS M/s. Labbaik Pvt. Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2754 H.C.A 334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 National Medical Centre (Pvt) Limited & others (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ali Razi Khan (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2755 I. A 40/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehboob Ali (Appellant) VS Munawwar Hussain Suhag (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2756 Const. P. 3514/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Anwar Ali Talpur and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2757 Const. P. 6506/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2758 H.C.A 196/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Islamic Educational Society (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2759 H.C.A 51/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Fahimul Huda (Appellant) VS Anwarul Huda & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-23 No Since consolidation order of suits in which this court has pecuniary jurisdiction has already been passed, even if the value of the Suit bearing No.1452/99 is lesser than pecuniary jurisdiction of the court the proceedings under such suit can be retained as greater/enhanced pecuniary jurisdiction includes lesser pecuniary jurisdiction in it and learned judge rightly passed the order dismissing the application for transfer of the suit from this court to civil court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2760 H.C.A 383/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ishrat Niaz Ahmed Lari (Appellant) VS Akhtar Yar Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2761 I. A 85/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Chakar Khan (Appellant) VS Mst. Saira Abdul Rauf (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2762 I. A 47/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muzzamil Ashraf (Appellant) VS Muhammad Naeem & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2763 Const. P. 4306/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.232/2024 Karachi Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Karachi v. State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan, through its Attorney, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2764 Const. P. 6817/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mulla Ebrahimji Kairmbhoy (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2765 H.C.A 408/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: HCA 407 of 2006 2006 Noor Muhammad & Ors (Appellant) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2766 Const. P. 4314/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2767 Const. P. 5459/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 IBA (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2768 R.A (Civil Revision) 137/1993 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1993 Kabeer Khan and other (Applicant) VS Qadir Khan and other (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 10-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1236-K/2023 Qadeer Khan deceased through his L.Rs. and others v. Kabeer Ahmed Khan deceased through his L.Rs. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2769 Const. P. 5051/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Fayaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghaffar and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2770 Const. P. 109/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Abdul Sattar through L.Rs Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS Secretary, Ministry of Religious Affaris and othrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2771 Suit 694/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Barrett Hodgson Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. & another (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Refinery Limited & others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 01-DEC-14 Yes Rule 10 of Rule 1951 is an enabling provision for the concerned government. Such rule provides that either federal government or the provincial government, as the case may be, may by an order in respect of an area specified therein provide for securing that no building or building of such class, as may be specified in the order, shall be erected, extended or structurally altered except with the permission of that government as to lay out, material and construction. Thus, the words area specified does not and cannot be extended to restrain any adjacent land owner from raising construction in accordance with law. The word area specified in Rule 10 means the key-point such as 1-A etc. It is this area which is to be specified in the order to secure such area; either it may be point installation 1-A or 1-B, the concerned government may it be federal or provincial provide for securing such area that no building of such class as may be specified in the order referred above be erected without permission of that government unless that government gives permission with regard to its layout material and construction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2772 2012 CLD 1588 Suit 222/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 NADIR AKMAL KHAN LEGHARI (Plaintiff) VS ASIM ARSHID & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 13-AUG-12 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2773 Cr.Misc. 45/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Dr. Ihsanullah & Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2774 Cr.Misc. 244/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst.Irshad Soomro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2775 Civil Revision 47/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2010 Iftikhar Ahmed (Applicant) VS Abdul Ghafoor and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2776 Const. P. 2042/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Zakir Hussain Gopang (Petitioner) VS S.H.O PS Miro Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2777 Const. P. 359/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: V/S SHO PS Radhan and others 2012 Shamsuddin Solangi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Radhan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2778 Const. P. 55/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Karam Khan Siyal (Petitioner) VS SHO PS B Section Shahdadkot and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2779 Const. P. 818/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Syed Javed and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Kandhkot and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2780 Const. P. 67/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Muhammad Mithal Mirbahar (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Market and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2781 2012 CLC 1902 Suit 1761/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Mst. Shagufta Noor (Plaintiff) VS Defendant (Defendant) S.B. Order 06-AUG-12 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
2782 Cr.Bail 121/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Manzoor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2783 Cr.Misc. 162/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst.Hayatan Khatoon Lolai (Applicant) VS The State and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2784 Const. P. 16/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Abdul Sattar and Others (Petitioner) VS Deputy Director ACE and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2785 Const. P. 2091/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Syed Manzoor Shah (Petitioner) VS Afzal Shah and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2786 Cr.Misc. 178/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Mst Hooran Jatoi (Applicant) VS The state and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2787 2017 SBLR Sindh 1537 Suit 2110/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Glaxosmithkline Services Unlimited (Plaintiff) VS Anfords Pakistan (Pvt) Limited (Defendant) S.B. Order 05-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2788 2020 YLR 132 E.P 19/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Jam Saifullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-APR-19 Yes Section 144(4) of the Election Act provides that an Election Petition and its annexure shall be signed by the petitioner and the petition shall be verified in the manner laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 for the verification of the pleadings. This clearly overcomes the earlier provision of Section 55(3) of ROPA which provides that every election petition and schedule or annexure to the petition shall be signed by the petitioner and verified in the manner laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Thus, it is no longer required under present enactment that the annexures are to be verified as was the requirement earlier under ROPA. As far as the signatures on the annexures/schedule are concerned, the record shows that perhaps on an objection raised by the office it was complied with. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2789 Const. P. 304/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Aijaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
2790 E.P 1/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Nida Khuhro (Petitioner) VS Moazam Ali Khan Abbasi & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.188/2019 Nida Khuhro v. Moazzam Ali Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed
2791 Const. P. 598/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Shamshad Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2792 Const. P. 1982/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Waqar Hussain Palh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2793 Const. P. 2001/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Imdad Ali Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2794 Const. P. 490/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Iqbal Ahmed Mastoi (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2795 Civil Revision 82/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Mst. Arbab Khatoon and others (Applicant) VS Sher Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2796 Const. P. 3252/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Mst: Naziran Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2797 II.A. 1/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Mst.Hanifa (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-NOV-18 Yes The appellant has attempted to challenge, by filing Civil Appeal No.44/2007, both the preliminary decree dated 10.10.2000 and final decree dated 28.03.2007. The appellate Court, on consideration of the accounts and the reports of the Mukhtiarkar, did not find any illegality or irregularity committed by the Senior Civil Judge while passing final decree. It is also a matter of fact that in her own examination-in-chief, she has stated that at the time of marriage, the age of his father-in-law was about 80 years and that two of her sons Abdul Majeed and Abdul Rahman were jobless. In the pleadings, respondents No.3 and 4 i.e. Mst. Hanifa and her husband Nazeerullah s/o Haji Sultan Muhammad, whose property is under dispute, admitted that his father-in-law / father was an old man and needed care and help in feeding and lodging, which was done by defendant No.3 (appellant), hence when enquired from the counsel Mr. Lawrence that he was on death bed, Mr. Lawrence honestly and categorically conceded. He, however, was of the view that he was in full senses. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.28-K/2019 Mst: Hanifa v. Province of Sindh thr. Revenue Department Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2798 Const. P. 825/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mushtaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2799 Const. P. 1805/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Waseem Hassan Phull (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2800 Const. P. 2733/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 kamran Ali Gajani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2801 Civil Revision 96/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2009 Syed Himat Ali Shah (Applicant) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-SEP-18 Yes Prima facie, such declaration could only be sought in case the respondent Ghulam Hussain was in the process of seeking any declaration as to his own entitlement over the subject land but that is not the case, hence, I agree with the contention of the State Counsel that the suit is hit by the provisions of Sections 42 and 56 of the Specific Relief Act. In addition to the above, the government of Sindh was not sued through concerned Secretary of the Revenue Department, and even if any opportunity is given, in terms of the reported judgment of Government of Balochistan, CWPP&H Department and others v. Nawabzada Mir Tariq Hussain Khan Magsi and others reported in 2010 SCMR 115, the suit would have been time barred against the officials whose order was challenge. Hence, I do not agree with the reasoning assigned by the appellate Court without considering the consequences of the above legal issues. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2802 Const. P. 1643/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Imran Ali Rind (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2803 E.P 3/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Saifullah Abro (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-NOV-18 Yes ection 55(3) of the RoPA, 1976 to the extent of verification and signing of the schedule or annexure is peri materia to Section 144(4) of the Elections Act, 2017, however, this relevant provision is to be adjudged and tested along with the rules framed under the Elections Act, 2017. Previously, there were no such rules except (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1977 which catered the process of election (pre-election process). Rule 140 offers that every petition shall be processed by the Tribunal and in case the petition is found deficient of laid down procedure, the petitioner shall be informed accordingly, indicating the deficiency/ies in the petition, directing him to fulfill the same within seven (07) days of the receipt of communication from the Tribunal, failing which the petition is liable to be dismissed by the Tribunal. The moot question thus is whether Rule 140 has any application to Sections 142, 143 and 144 of the Elections Act, 2017. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2804 Const. P. 1097/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Muzaffar Hussain (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2805 Const. P. 797/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Maqsood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2806 Const. P. 296/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Al-Murtaza Bulo (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2807 Const. P. 409/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Niazakat Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2808 Const. P. 1346/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Syed Abdul Sattar Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
2809 Civil Revision 210/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Hameed (Applicant) VS P.O. Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2810 Const. P. 2759/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Qadir and others (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2811 Const. P. 411/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 High Court Bar Hyd (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-20 Yes Petition pertains to the current issue of Corona Virus (COVID-19) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
2812 Const. P. 1264/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Yar Mohammad (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2813 Const. P. 91/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS 5th ADJ Hyd & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2814 Const. P. 3815/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Maqsood Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2815 II.A. 5/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Haroon and others (Appellant) VS V/S Qaimkhani Welfare Society and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-FEB-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.261-K/2020 Muhammad Haroon & others v. Qaimkhani Welfare Society Registered through its President & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
2816 Const. P. 5718/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Darya Khan Sugar Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2817 Const. P. 4180/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Pharma Net (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2818 Const. P. 679/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sufiyan Steel and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2819 Const. P. 5389/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Soulco Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2820 Const. P. 7912/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Java Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2821 Const. P. 1966/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Reliance Petrochemical Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2822 Const. P. 5754/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Home Products International Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2823 Const. P. 2036/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Pak Telecom Mobile Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2824 Const. P. 4687/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hamdam Paper Products (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2825 Const. P. 2729/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s M.F Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2826 2017 PLD Sindh 567 J.M OGRA 1/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sui Southern Gas Company (Applicant) VS Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority & another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-NOV-16 Yes The jurisdiction under section 12(2) of Ordinance 2002 is limited to the extent that this Court could only apply judicial view as to whether the procedural requirement as required under Ordinance 2002, Rules and the Licenses have been followed. This Court cannot sit as a Court of appeal and consider those details which the OGRA has undertaken. This Court is neither concerned with the policy nor with the rates. The price fixation mechanism is not a function which is to be undertaken by this Court, off course to the extent where the procedural requirements have been flouted, the Court may provide indulgence. In the given frame this Court has minutely seen all such procedural requirements which were undertaken and considered by the regulatory authority. These specialized performances which are assigned to regulatory authority could hardly be undertaken by this Court in exercise of their judicial discretion. Judicial intervention in the instant matter is required only where the person aggrieved i.e. SSGCL could show that the tariff fixation is a procedure bypassed, arbitrary and ultra vires. It could only then if the statutorily prescribed procedure is not followed, a tariff could be held ultra vires to be remanded back. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1066/2016 The Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd (SSGC), Karchi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2827 Const. P. 6164/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hapag-Lloyd Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2828 Const. P. 1457/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Muhammad Siddiue Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2829 Const. P. 3338/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Masroor Ahmed Alvi (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2830 Const. P. 2247/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Allied Rental Modaraba (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2831 2022 PTD 372, 2022 PTCL 420 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 948/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Abdullah Traders (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes The goods declaration for the release of the consignments were filed prior to the insertion of sub section 4 of Section 25-A. Learned counsel for the applicant does not controvert these facts. Thus at the relevant time when the goods were cleared and/or goods declarations were filed, benefit of sub section 4 of Section 25-A was not available with the applicant for enforcing earlier Valuation Ruling dated 10.12.2007 which was reviewed on 1.9.2008 issued by the competent authority under Section 25-A and 25-D of the Act. Undoubtedly before insertion of sub section 4 the continuity of an earlier time lapsed Valuation Ruling could not have been enforced. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2832 Const. P. 6467/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shahid Raza (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2833 2020 SBLR Sindh 279 Suit 860/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 M/S. WALLSTREET EXCHANGE (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) VS WAQAS SABIR CHIPA & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 24-APR-14 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2834 Const. P. 2822/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Prime Trading Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2835 Const. P. 2160/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Amna Apparels (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2836 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 639/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Fort Tiles, Karachi (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2837 Const. P. 8078/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Irfan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2838 Const. P. 5329/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s M. Usman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2839 Const. P. 1872/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mondelez Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2840 Const. P. 1871/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MCR (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS F.B.R and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2841 Const. P. 4619/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahzad Rahim Saya (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2842 2022 PTD 402 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 418/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Abdul Ghafoor (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2843 Const. P. 1994/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abbas Ali Nayani (Petitioner) VS Dir: Investigation & Intelligence & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2844 Const. P. 5085/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 National Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2845 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 449/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Director I & I-FBR (Applicant) VS M/s. Tabani Traders & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2846 2018 MLD 1408 II.A. 49/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Zaka Uddin (Appellant) VS M/s. S. Ashrafi Abbasi & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2847 2017 SBLR Sindh 2173 Judicial Companies Misc. 9/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 South Asia Geophysical Services (SAGeo) (Applicant) VS New Horizon Exploration & Production Ltd. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-JAN-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2848 Const. P. 1321/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Muhammad Irshad (Petitioner) VS Mst.Khalida Afsar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 24-OCT-17 Yes The initial burden was discharged by the respondent No.1 by filing affidavit-in-evidence. She also stated in the examination-in-chief that the affidavit-in-evidence that was produced as Ex. A/1 is the same and correct and bears her signature whereas in the cross-examination she has stated that she does not know about the contents of the affidavit-inevidence. It is perhaps cumulative effect of the evidence that is to be looked into. A solitary statement regarding contents of the affidavit-inevidence cannot wash the entire proceedings such as filing of affidavit on oath and the statement that the affidavit-in-evidence bears her signature and that the contents are correct. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2849 2021 SBLR Sindh 1669 R.A (Civil Revision) 39/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Ayub (Applicant) VS Muhammad Shafee & another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-JAN-20 Yes Registered instruments would stand against oral and unregistered instruments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.239-K/2020 Muhammad Ayoob v. Muhammad Shafi (decd) thr. his L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2850 Const. P. 5232/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Danish Khan (Petitioner) VS NBP and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2851 Const. P. 4929/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Adnan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2852 Suit.B 151/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 DAWOOD ISLAMIC BANK LTD (Plaintiff) VS M/S.AFTAB TECHNOLOGIES (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 21-JAN-15 Yes It is also very pertinent to mention that even the defendants along with their leave to defend application have filed their own statement of account such as one available as Annexure D/38 onwards and it is in consonance with the statement of account shown by the plaintiff. Hence, I do not see any reason to disagree with the statement of account given by the plaintiff. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2853 Const. P. 4448/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hammad Muslim Surmawala (Petitioner) VS Hum Network Ltd and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2854 Cr.Bail 72/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 KASHIF SHABBIR S/O SHABBIR AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2855 Const. P. 2377/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Bank Alfalah Limited (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-12 Yes petitioner is precluded from raising such contention in the generalized form, more importantly as we have already observed it is not the kind of investigation that would be governed by any of the above enactment since it involves a question of granting auto loan on the basis of bogus document such as Auto loan agreement, ID Card of individuals who never applied for such loan. It is mainly related to their officers concerned and it is to be seen whether any public exchequer, cess was involved and/or misappropriated including but not limited to the offence that has already been registered. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2856 Suit.B 190/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 ASKARI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) VS MAGNA STEEL PVT LTD & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 29-FEB-16 Yes The defendants since admitted the repayment of the same finance facility were stopped from denying or questioning such finances. This is even supported by a letter whereby they agreed to avail Rs.345 Million and requested to terminate remaining amount of Rs.155 Million. The subject Syndicate Terms Finance Agreement is available as Annexure B/1 page 87. Although the purchase price was mentioned as Rs.696,875,000/- but the statement of account provides charging of markup in accordance with agreed formula. Such admission in terms of the agreed rate of markup is also admitted by defendant No.1 in their annual account and the outstanding amount is also reflected in the statement of annual account Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2857 Const. P. 4669/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2858 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 451/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Allied Engineering & Services Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2859 Const. P. 1474/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Asif International (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2860 Const. P. 3408/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Jannat Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2861 2016 SBLR Sindh 753 Suit.B 8/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Dubai Islamic Bank Pakistan Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Gulistan Textile Mills Ltd., & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 14-JAN-16 Yes s the denial of disbursement of the amount is concerned, I am in agreement with the contention of the plaintiffs counsel that the documents available as Annexure C/1 to D/1 and onwards shows that after the approval of this financial facility the defendants themselves have offered to purchase the commodity to be disposed of at a price agreed. The statement of account needs not to be in a particular format. The statement of account needs to include all those required heads to establish that such an amount was disbursed and availed and paid and such amount was overdue, which include principal amount as well as interest/profit, as the case may be. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2862 Const. P. 6465/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Imran Farooqui (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2863 Const. P. 5608/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Gulf Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2864 2022 PTD 363 Const. P. 6544/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Drive Line Motor Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Othes (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 Yes Since section 138 deals with the frustrated cargo and Rule 86 has defined what frustrated cargo would be. It is thus one which will brought into customs station by reason of inadvertence or misdirection or where consignee is untraceable or has dishonoured his commitments and the consignor wishes to have it re-shipped to him. Since the consignee has refused or dishonored his commitments, the consignor immediately acted upon by moving an application for re-export on 17.04.2018 and that is exercised under Rule 88 of the ibid Rules. There was no occasion for the Collector of Customs to have avoided or discarded the application of the consigner for the re-export of the vehicle as it was and is within the definition of frustrated cargo and permission ought to have been followed in terms of Rule 89 on Collector being satisfied which he should under the relevant circumstances of the case as in our view the vehicle came out as a frustrated cargo. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2865 Const. P. 4374/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Madiha International Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2866 Const. P. 1677/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Tapal Tea Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2867 Const. P. 6984/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ms. Soofia Saeed Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2868 Const. P. 6422/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/S Madina Private Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.5904/2021 M/s Madina (Private) Limited, Karachi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Excise and Taxation Department Sindh Sectt, Karachi and others,C.A.2062/2022 M/s Madina (Private) Limited, Karachi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Excise and Taxation Department, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 1st week of October 22,Pending
2869 I.T.R.A 92/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Merck (Private) Limited (Applicant) VS Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2870 Const. P. 2408/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.212-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Shell Pakistan Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2871 Const. P. 5204/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Nizami Steel Products (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2872 Const. P. 847/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Sohailur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Azgar Abbas Butt & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2873 Const. P. 6629/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Shahid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2874 Const. P. 6671/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sakrand Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2875 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 822/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 The Collector MCC, Hyderabad (Applicant) VS M/s. Rizwan Khan & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2876 Const. P. 3206/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zahid Umer (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2877 Const. P. 7055/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Mumtaz and Minerals (Petitioner) VS The Chief Commissioner I.R and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2878 Const. P. 6698/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2879 Const. P. 6398/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sino Sindh Resources (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2880 Const. P. 5192/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Ber\ (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2881 Const. P. 6594/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sky Overseas (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2882 Const. P. 6360/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Greeno Corp (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Chief Commissioner I.R and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2883 Suit 1044/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 M/S.IBRAHIM FIBRES LTD (Plaintiff) VS FED.OF PAK & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 07-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2884 2018 YLR 2337 Const. P. 160/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS VIIth A.D.J Karachi (South) & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-DEC-17 Yes Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)--- ----S. 15--- Ejectment application---Commercial premises---Bona fide personal need of landlord---Scope---Prerogative of landlord to supplement portion(s) of rented premises--- Scope--- Petitioners/ tenants contended that landlords were continually evicting the tenants of subject property at their will and whim and ground floor alone of multi-storeyed subject premises was sufficient to run their small scale industry---Landlords/ company contended that as ground floor had no frontage so whole subject building was needed for viable functioning of their company---Validity---Admittedly, subject property was commercial premises so bona fide need of the landlords for such property was to be seen on the touchstone of test different from that of residential rented premises---Record revealed that landlords in the evidence of one ejectment proceedings stated that their initially occupied ground floor had no frontage but in the cross-examination of proceedings of other ejectment petition, main gate as entrance on the rear side of ground floor was admitted---When the prerogative of landlords was left to their desire when the ground floor was acquired, in order to acquire more space some confidence inspiring evidence was required---Prerogative, choice and whims could not be the only tool left to judge the bona fides of the landlords at later attempts when they failed to explain insufficiency of earlier portion---Landlords made no attempt to show any progress of their company which was hampered due to mere insufficiency of space---Memorandum and Articles of Association of the company/landlords was silent as to running of factory as its object---High Court observed that there were no aims and objects of the company enabling the landlords to evict tenants for the purpose of establishing industrial unit " for its own"---Bona fides, in circumstances, became missing ingredient to evict tenants on the ground of personal requirement---High Court set aside impugned judgments passed by the two Courts below, resultantly the ejectment applications were dismissed---Constitutional petitions were allowed accordingly. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2885 Suit 2494/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD SHOAIB UL HAI (Plaintiff) VS RIZWAN AHMED & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 01-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2886 Const. P. 272/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Adnan Hussain S/o Muhammad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Jama Masjid Muhammadi & Madrasah Tehfeesz-ul-Quran (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2887 Cr.Bail 692/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 AQIB ALI SHAH S/O GUL ZAHIR SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2888 Const. P. 5431/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Kohinoor Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2889 Const. P. 3534/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
2890 Const. P. 4019/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Global Textile (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2891 Const. P. 1948/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Hasnain Karim Jivajee & Ors (Petitioner) VS The Chairman Planning Development & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2892 Const. P. 4863/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zargul Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2893 Const. P. 1092/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rashid Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2894 Suit 2782/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SEEMA FARHAD (Plaintiff) VS DKT PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2895 Const. P. 661/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Aslam & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2896 Judicial Companies Misc. 13/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Inbox Business Technologies & another (Applicant) VS .. (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-MAR-16 No None of the shareholders or creditors has any grievance since purported interest and respective shareholding is being safeguarded. The only objection taken by the SECP is that NOC has not been provided by the creditors of petitioner No.1. Although these NOCs are claimed to have been obtained from the creditors which are available on record, yet insofar as the restructuring of petitioner No.1 is concerned, the decision vests with the Board of Directors which they have taken and accordingly filed this petition for restructuring of petitioner No.1 in the shape of petitioners No.2 & 3 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2897 Suit 1634/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 MUHAMMAD NOMAN SHAIKH (Plaintiff) VS GHULAM RASOOL BHABRA (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2898 Const. P. 110/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2899 Const. P. 650/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Zahoor Khan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Inshallah Begum (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-DEC-12 Yes Since final order on the ejectment applications has already been assailed in other parallel litigation, it would be in the fitness of things that such an order denying to implead the City District Government Karachi as necessary and proper party could well be agitated before the forum hearing the appeal in respect of an order disposing of the main ejectment applications and the Court hearing the appeal or petition in respect of final order passed on ejectment application could decide the controversy as to whether the City District Government Karachi was or was not a necessary and proper party before the trial Court in rent proceedings. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2900 Const. P. 885/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Malik Imran (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2901 Const. P. 2723/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahabuddin Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2902 Suit 488/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Luqman & another (Plaintiff) VS Mairajuddin Shaikh & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2903 Const. P. 616/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mushtaq Ali & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2904 Const. P. 939/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Ejaz Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro C.P.1-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary Board of Revenue & another v. Eijaz Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2905 Const. P. 273/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Fazil S/o Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS Jama Masjid Muhammadi & Madrasah Tehfeesz-ul-Quran (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2906 Const. P. 741/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Jarar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Syeda Anis Fatima & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2907 Const. P. 356/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Asif Thr. Attorney Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shahina Kanwal and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2908 Const. P. 1745/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sohail Shelan Hashmi (Petitioner) VS VIth Senior Civil Judge Karachi East & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2909 Const. P. 5017/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Abdullah Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2910 R.A (Civil Revision) 244/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Amjad (Applicant) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2911 Const. P. 86/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sohail Akhtar (Petitioner) VS S.B.C.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
2912 Const. P. 1295/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Farhana Rohi (Petitioner) VS Faiz Ur Rehman & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2913 R.A (Civil Revision) 115/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Ramzan (Applicant) VS Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2914 Suit 168/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Imran Muhammad Shafi & another. (Plaintiff) VS Afzal Ahmed & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2915 Const. P. 2065/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Saley Ebrahim Mayet (Petitioner) VS M.A.K Azmati & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2916 Const. P. 945/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Din Muhammad Parhiyar and others (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2917 Const. P. 2098/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Diamond Paint Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2918 II.A. 125/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Afreen & Another (Appellant) VS IIIrd ADJ Karachi South & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 06-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2919 M.A. 37/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Owais Khan S/o Jahingir Imtiaz (Appellant) VS The Learned IXth ADJ, Karachi South (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2920 Const. P. 203/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2921 2023 YLR 1385 Suit 923/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Irshad Bibi (Plaintiff) VS Samiullah Niazi & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 04-NOV-22 Yes In terms of Article 91 of Limitation Act since subject sale deed is a registered instrument it is deemed to be in the knowledge of plaintiff and the facts entitling the plaintiff to have the instrument cancelled known to her at the relevant time but she did not take any action Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2922 2023 CLD 691 Judicial Companies Misc. 29/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amir Bux Channa & Another through Attorney (Applicant) VS Isra Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) Limited. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-DEC-22 Yes 1. A post to which a person is nominated is not a tenured post. His nomination can be withdrawn at any time by the nominating authority, although it has to be seen whether nominating authority is constituted legally. 2. This principle of reading down is applied when a provision is capable of more than one interpretation and one or more of those interpretations would render the other provisions either redundant or illusory or in conflict with main frame of the Statute. In such cases, Courts will read down the provision in a manner that saves the provision . 3.since the induction of the council members has been successfully disputed by petitioners; hence I am of the view that the audit of the foundation is also inevitable. 4. Claim of rent by foundation is neither illegal nor illogical, however one may argue on the quantum and an arbitrary way of fixing the rent. This should have been done without any influence and coercion from either side. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2923 Const. P. 816/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Muhammad Qasim Panhwar & Others (Petitioner) VS Govt: Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2924 Const. P. 1570/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS SILK Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah C.P.843-K/2022 Muhammad Siddique v. Silk Bank Limited through its Principal Officer/Manager Road Branch Hyderabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2925 R.A (Civil Revision) 197/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nadir Ali & others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Idrees & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2926 Const. P. 2464/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mir Ahmed Yar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2927 R.A (Civil Revision) 226/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: R.A. No.227 of 2016 (Kamran versus Bashir Ahmed & others) 2016 Karam Ali & ors. (Applicant) VS Bashir Ahmed & ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2928 Const. P. 745/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Khalique Zaman (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2929 Const. P. 1717/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Nawaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2930 Const. P. 702/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Muhammad Laique (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2931 Const. P. 743/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Anika Tanveer (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2932 Const. P. 424/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Gulnaz Ghouri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
2933 Suit 2343/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 AZEER SECURITIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 30-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
2934 Judicial Companies Misc. 1/1989 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1989 Abu Bakar & Ors (Applicant) VS M/s.T.J Ibrahim & Co & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2935 Const. P. 1814/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst: Reshima & Others (Petitioner) VS S.S.P. Hyderabad & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2936 Const. P. 619/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Saleem Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
2937 Suit 809/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asma Shuja & others (Plaintiff) VS Mehmood Shuja Baig (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-MAR-23 No where keys are lost, Vaults do have a mechanism to continue lockers operation, after its opening by any means Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2938 Const. P. 1998/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shahzad Ali Anwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.493-K/2023 Shahzad Ali Anwar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Govt. of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2939 Suit 145/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JDW Sugar Mills Limited & others (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 07-MAR-23 Yes Now this debate is not concluding here to benefit any party to whom quota was allocated or would be allocated following above understanding of policy, but the end beneficiary is the federal government as the policy ensured prompt foreign exchange in about 45 days of opening of Letter of Credit. We need to understand that the subject matter is of such a magnitude that it requires immediate and conclusive attention of Court. Cane commissioner misunderstood when he applied his wisdom without following the limitations that they are under. Federal government is also equally responsible in not assisting this Court and clarifying the intent of policy to the cane commissioner as adjudged above. Politics should not invade policy matter meant for public interest in a way that fundamental and secured legal rights of citizen would get prejudiced. This case seems to be one of those, unfortunately. Thus, not being an ordinary situation I not only inclined to grant injunction restraining cane commissioner to act in such manner and distribute quota arbitrarily, but would expect prompt makeup for the losses by adhering to the above conclusion drawn by this Court, as far as sugar mills quota is concerned i.e. distribution on performance based i.e. sugar crushed and/or sugar produced which is the only justified formula provided by federal government when policy was made and applied. Since it is time bound issue and since sugar has its best use if consumed in two years' time, it is expected that cane commissioner would respond and submit reallocation within two weeks from date of this order Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2940 2023 PLD Sindh 278 Const. P. 1781/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-APR-23 Yes ----Section 35 of the ibid Act could empower Director General to make rules in terms of mandate within the statute. The rules thus could never be framed to pierce the contour of the statute itself. -----Without prejudice to above, unless a parent statue provides such levy, the rules by way of subordinate legislation cannot be legitimized. The concept of subordinate legislation by way of rules is to toe the object of the main statute and not to collide with scheme of law. The subordinate rules, even if conceived to be available, could only function in conformity with the main statute in order to give effect to the statutory provisions, which is not the case in hand. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2941 Const. P. 1980/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Rehmatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2942 Const. P. 2002/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Izqar Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2943 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 562/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 The Director, Through the Deputy Director., Kar. (Applicant) VS M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt) Ltd., Karachi (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2944 Const. P. 1820/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Saeed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.572-K/2023 Saeed Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Revenue Division Islamabad & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2945 Const. P. 1220/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP. D 132 of 2019 2023 Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others\ (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2946 H.C.A 321/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Prof. Mufti Mrs. Urooj Qadri (Appellant) VS S.M Asem Qadri and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2947 H.C.A 37/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Wasim Awan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Riaz Awan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.9-K/2024 Muhammad Wasim Awan v. Muhammad Riaz Awan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2948 I. A 97/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mrs. Kaveeta w/o Dileep Kumar (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Limited & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2949 H.C.A 44/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Miss Uzma Amjad Ali & Another (Appellant) VS Dr. Nafees Zubair and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2950 Const. P. 1255/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Aftab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2951 Const. P. 5521/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Bilqis Khalid and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2952 H.C.A 326/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mrs. Tanvir Qazi (Appellant) VS Moin us Samad Khan & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-DEC-23 Yes The burden of proving fraud is always on the party alleging it, which in the instant case is appellant, which should be based on clear, strong and convincing and/or independent evidence, particularly when long period has expired and valuable rights have accrued to the other side, which in the instant case is respondent No.1 who since 2008 is pursuing his case for recovery. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.43-K/2024 Mrs, Tanvir Kazi v. Moin Us Samad Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2953 Const. P. 398/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Shamshad Ali (Petitioner) VS Secretary Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2954 H.C.A 109/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 B.E. Energy Limited (Appellant) VS Pakistan thru Sec.Ministry of Finance Isb. & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2955 Const. P. 1312/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Tariq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2956 Const. P. 1308/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Ilyass (Petitioner) VS Learned 9th Additional District Judge, Hyd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
2957 H.C.A 34/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Khair Muhammad & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Godhra Gulistan Cooperatvie H. Society & anor (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2958 Spl.H.C.A 13/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Aurangzeb & another (Appellant) VS Bank Al-Falah Private Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2959 I. A 98/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s. Silver Reed International (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS IGI Investment Bank Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2960 Const. P. 4308/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2961 Const. P. 342/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Nafees Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2962 H.C.A 250/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: H.C.A. No.227 and 251 of 2018 [Ghulam Mustafa v. Muhammad Younis, Mst. Nasreen & others] 2018 Ghulam Mustafa (Appellant) VS Mst. Nasreen & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2963 H.C.A 198/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. Rose Beauty Parlour Private Limited & Others (Appellant) VS Syed Kazim Raza (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
2964 I. A 85/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Standard Chartered Bank (Pak) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Salman Anis (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2965 Const. P. 6806/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Synergy Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2966 Const. P. 7412/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Majid Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Abbas Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2967 Const. P. 4323/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2968 H.C.A 129/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Raeesa Begum (Appellant) VS Mst. Zubaida Idress (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-MAR-24 No The evidence produced by the appellants were hearsay and the witnesses were unable to support the case of the appellants, particularly when it is weighed and compared with the evidence as produced by plaintiff/respondent No.1, orally as well as documentary Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2969 Const. P. 4111/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amir Mahmood (Petitioner) VS Izharuddin and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-NOV-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2970 Const. P. 3307/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shahid Nabi Malik (Petitioner) VS Mst. Mussrat Intekhab (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2971 H.C.A 378/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Professor Doctor Ahmed Ali Brohi & Others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2972 Const. P. 5415/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Rasheed Khan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Iqbal (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2973 H.C.A 334/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Madni Ahmed Ali Arafat Siddiqui (Appellant) VS Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2974 I. A 53/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mukesh Kumar (Appellant) VS Nevat Mal & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2975 Const. P. 5647/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ambreen Mansoor (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2976 I. A 31/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Nasir Aybani (Appellant) VS Saleem Butt (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
2977 I. A 2/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Mehar-un-Nissa & ors (Appellant) VS Faysal Bank Limited & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
2978 2024 PLD Sindh 38 Suit 174/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S BISMILLAH METAL IMPEX (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) VS PORT QASIM AUTHORITY & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 04-OCT-23 Yes The tug/craft is to be weighed on "as is where is basis" and there is no way that the drafts/tugs could be weighed in a way that steel and other part/ components of the ship should be segregated first. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2979 H.C.A 400/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Popular Spinning Mills Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2980 H.C.A 321/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Zubair (Appellant) VS Syed Imtiaz Ali Zaidi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2981 H.C.A 218/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shahzad Amir Ali (Appellant) VS Gavin Venantius & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2982 H.C.A 278/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Welfare Association Ali (Appellant) VS Shakeel Ahmed and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-NOV-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2983 H.C.A 88/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ayub Sorathia & Another (Appellant) VS Aslam Sadaruddin & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2984 Const. P. 4327/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2985 Const. P. 611/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Muhammad Islam &Ors. (Petitioner) VS The General Manager Petroman &Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2986 Suit 804/1996 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1996 ABDUL KARIM K. KHAN. (Plaintiff) VS ABDUL MALIK K. LOKHA (Defendant) S.B. Order 04-NOV-13 Yes The plaintiff cannot succeed for the restoration of his suit on the weaknesses of defendant Counsel. He had to show why he was prevented from appearing which was to be measured on the touch stone of the sufficient cause independently and not viz-a-viz defendants Counsel appearance or non-appearance. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2987 Cr.Bail 601/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2006 Abdul Latif Brohi and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2988 2013 CLD 550 Const. P. 734/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 M/s Sardar Mohammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & ORS (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-12 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2989 Const. P. 44/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Sonhan Chandio and another (Petitioner) VS The SHO PS Waleed and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2990 Cr.Bail 145/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Muhammad Usman (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-13 Yes It appears that the applicant Muhammad Usman, who is alleged to be Auditor in the District Accounts Office, Jacobabad, in collusion with the other co-accused misappropriated the government amount, however, it has not been clarified to the satisfaction of the Court that how the co-accused were let-off. I also prima facie observe that the role of the applicant is limited to the extent to see the genuineness of bills and to see that the claim is within budget available. I am not inclined to go into the deeper appreciation of the evidence regarding the strictness of the role, as it might prejudice the case of either side. Since it involves further enquiry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2991 Cr.Bail 501/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Khadim Hussain Sakhani Chandio (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2992 Const. P. 7/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mst Kianat Khatoon and another (Petitioner) VS SSP Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2993 Cr.Bail 10/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Ali Akbar Brohi and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2994 Cr.Bail 391/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Sadar Shar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-MAR-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2995 Cr.Misc. 35/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Abdul Majeed Balharo & Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2996 2013 CLD 1922 Spl.H.C.A 98/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Irfan Nawab (Appellant) VS Soneri Bank (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-MAY-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2997 Suit 1344/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Amin Jan Mohammad (Plaintiff) VS Innovative Investment Bank Ltd. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 20-NOV-13 Yes the changes so made are not proved to be structural as the averments of the plaintiffs witnesses are neither corroborated nor supported by any cogent material except that of verbal assertion. So also the plaintiff has failed to bring on record and/or exhibited any receipts to show payment as maintenance charges to the Association. It is a settled practice that whenever maintenance is paid receipts are being issued towards the same and in the absence of such receipts it cannot be established that the plaintiff has paid the maintenance charges and that too at the rate claimed. Since I have observed that the plaintiff has failed to prove any structural changes in the premises, the question of damages or cost towards restoring the premises back to its original position does not arise and the plaintiff is not entitled to claim such relief. As regards the claim of notice amount i.e. 12 months rent is concerned, the defendant in his letter dated 09.05.2008 (Ex.PS-1/9) asserted that since the premises was vacated by the defendant on special circumstances, therefore it was not binding on them to give notice of 12 months. This is an admission on the part of the defendant that they have not given 12 months notice. As regards the claim of the defendant as to the special circumstances, such thing is nowhere in the agreement which may absolve the defendant to perform his part of the agreement. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2998 Const. P. 1046/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Parvez Ali Mirani (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Darri and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAR-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
2999 Suit 40/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Technova Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Sohail Tayyab Ali & another (Defendant) S.B. Order 29-JUN-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3000 R.A (Civil Revision) 39/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Allahdino (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-APR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3001 Const. P. 3842/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Ranjho (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes The petitioner has every right to pursue his remedy against it, which he failed. The amount paid to the father could never be considered as the dower amount paid to the bride and that she was liable to return at the time of dissolution of marriage by way of khulla. Even the ring as mentioned in the nikahnama was refused / declined to have been received by her and no confidence inspiring evidence was recorded by the defendant to believe that version. In this constitution petition such deeper re-appraisal of evidence is not within the domain of this Court when two efficacious remedies i.e. trial Court and appellate Court were exhausted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3002 2019 SBLR Sindh 1212 R.A (Civil Revision) 108/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Shoukat Ali Solangi & others (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-19 Yes The jurisdiction of a Civil Court cannot be completely ousted against the officials on account of any colourful exercise of powers. The mandatory test is to be seen by consequential provisions. The jurisdiction to be exercised by these officials should strictly be within the four corners of the statue and not otherwise. In case it is so pleaded, it needs probe and unless such questions are dealt with accordingly after an enquiry and probe, plaint cannot be summarily rejected as has been done in this case. I am not commenting about the merit of the case which may go either way, but it is the manner in which a plaint was dealt with. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3003 Const. P. 126/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Yousuf Thr. Dr. Muhammad Naqi (Petitioner) VS Shamsuddin & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.61-K/2018 Shamsuddin v. Muhammad Yousuf and others,C.P.621-K/2018 Shamsuddin v. Muhammad Yousuf and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
3004 Const. P. 3678/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Umer (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3005 2019 CLC 1159 Civil Tran 39/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Sht Ashee (Applicant) VS Beshamal (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-17 Yes Family Court Act, 1964 and the Rules framed there under i.e. West Pakistan Family Court Rules 1965 are applicable to all Family Courts including but not limited to those who professes different religions. The question before me is as to whether the trial court where a suit for judicial separation under Hindu Family Law was filed could exercise jurisdiction in view of the facts, pleadings and the relevant rules as referred above. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3006 Civil Revision 116/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Gul Muhammad and an other (Applicant) VS Ramesh (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3007 Civil Revision 15/1995 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 1995 Muhammad Amin and others (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 03-DEC-18 Yes Although the marriage/Nikah itself is a contract but the parents cannot enter into contract for their sons and daughters (without their consent) which could bind them. If the sons and daughters of parents are minor, this would be an invalid contract and void ab initio, and if this is done by parents when they (son and daughter) are major and have consensual age then also they are not the ones to enter into such contract on their behalf. The concerned parties themselves are responsible for an agreement or a disagreement to enter into such contract, hence consequences of such consensus between the parents cannot end up in a penalty. On this count alone the alleged gift is invalid. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.190-K/2019 Muhammad Amin & others v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3008 Const. P. 4558/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Muhammad Rafique Pathan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3009 Const. P. 332/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Saifuddin Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3010 Const. P. 100/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Khalil-ur-Rehman & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3011 Const. P. 1585/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Moulana Shahzado Dreho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3012 Const. P. 1078/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Gul Bahar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3013 I. A 44/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2004 Hafiz Prof. Abdul Ghaffar (Appellant) VS The Assistant Commissioner & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-SEP-18 Yes The land acquisition proceedings commenced well before 1997 and 1998 and the appellants originally were not made party to the proceedings. The dispute in the shape of Suit No.108/1996 was pending adjudication between private parties which was resolved somewhere in December 2002 as informed. This question of such references being barred by time was considered by different benches having their independent views, however, this question was ultimately set at rest by Honble Supreme Court in the case of Government of West Pakistan (Now Government of N.W.F.P.) through Collector, Peshawar v. Arbab Haji Aimed Ali Jan and others reported in PLD 1981 Supreme Court 516. The Honble Supreme Court, in the aforesaid judgment, examined the judgment of the Full Bench of Peshawar High Court in appeal. The Full Bench of Peshawar High Court was of the view that it is the reference of the Collector which invests the Court with necessary jurisdiction to enquire into objections mentioned in Section 19 of the Act and not the objection application filed by an interested person before the Collector. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3014 Const. P. 979/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ubedullah Asif (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3015 Const. P. 1123/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Abdul Jabbar Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3016 Const. P. 2432/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Asadullah Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3017 Const. P. 748/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Aqib Abro (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3018 Const. P. 701/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mumtaz Ali Lashari (Petitioner) VS Civil/Family Judge Sukkur & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3019 Const. P. 228/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Punhoon & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3020 E.P 11/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Hafiz Rabnawaz Chachar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-NOV-18 Yes Section 156(2) disclosed that if the contravention of the corrupt or illegal practice is proved at the polling station, the Election Tribunal may, while declaring election of the returned candidate void, direct re-poll at the polling station. The Tribunal was further coached with the negative covenant that the election of the returned candidate shall not be declared void on the ground if the Tribunal is satisfied that it was not committed by or with the consent or connivance of the candidate or his election agent and that the election agent took all reasonable precautions to prevent its commission and that any other contesting candidate was, on the nomination day, not qualified for or was disqualified from being elected as a Member. The law as framed couched very heavy burden on the petitioner not only to make out a case within the parameters of the recent Election Act that corrupt practice was exercised but also that it was done in connivance with the returned candidate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3021 I. A 22/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Asmatullah Khan Masood (Appellant) VS The President (HBL) & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-18 Yes Section 128 of the Contract Act provides that the liability of the surety is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor unless otherwise provided by the contract. This liability is enforceable under the law and the principal borrower was also liable for the repayment of the outstanding loan. The surety has guaranteed the performance of an agreement which principal borrower failed and, hence, deduction of the amount from suretys account is within the frame of the guarantee that he executed. Though in the cross-examination, he has admitted to have received the loan amount from Habib Bank Limited, Ghotki and that he had not paid the loan amount to the concerned bank within time, however, he also stated that he stood guarantor of the haris who obtained loan. The loan application was in his name and the pass book, khasra girdwari also stood in his name duly mortgaged with the bank. The finance agreement was also executed in his name and so also in the names of haris. This evidence is neither here nor there to benefit the appellant. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3022 Const. P. 1966/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Abdul Rehman Jiskani and others (Petitioner) VS Misri Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-OCT-18 Yes In terms of Order XXII Rule 4 sub-rule (4) CPC it is not necessary to substitute the legal representatives of any such defendant who has failed to file a written statement or has failed to appear and to contest the suit at the hearing; and the judgment in such cases may be pronounced against the said respondents notwithstanding his death, and such judgment shall have the same force and effect as if it had been pronounced before his death took place. Surprisingly, the same counsel is appearing for both the alleged co-plaintiffs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3023 Const. P. 39/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Altaf Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3024 Const. P. 101/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ahmed Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio C.P.194-K/2019 Ahmed Ali v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Irrigation Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3025 Const. P. 1636/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3026 Const. P. 4588/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Ahsan Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3027 Const. P. 158/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Shokat Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3028 2020 PLC (CS) 417 Const. P. 673/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ahmed Ali Saharan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.591-K/2019 Ahmed Ali Saharan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3029 Const. P. 716/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Abdul Khalique Memon and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3030 Const. P. 2325/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Abdul Azeem & others (Petitioner) VS Rehmatullah & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
3031 Const. P. 240/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Punhal and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3032 Conf.Case 15/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Irfan Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3033 Const. P. 975/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Mst Mubina Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3034 Const. P. 3966/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sajid Plastic Factory (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3035 Const. P. 3922/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Pakistan Flour Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3036 Cr.Bail 989/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SYED MEHSAM RAZA ZAIDI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JUN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3037 Const. P. 4768/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tayyaba Matin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3038 Const. P. 5959/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3039 II.A. 35/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Fasih Iqbal Thr. his Legal Heirs & Others (Appellant) VS Hassan Sardar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-APR-21 Yes Perhaps deciding issue No.1 afresh in this third tier of litigation would be harsh as any party aggrieved of it would be deprived of right of appeal. A fair judicial proceedings includes a right of appeal and only then the spirit of fair trial could be materialized. In my humble view this issue ought to have been decided on merit by the Courts below so that it could be decided conclusively whether any rights in the property were delegated by defendant No.1/applicant to defendant No.2/respondent No.2as only then attorney could delegate such rights further to the plaintiff i.e. respondent No.1 herein as his sub-attorney and a decree of lawful purchaser could be passed in favour of respondent No.1 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3040 Const. P. 5123/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Maryam Bearing Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3041 Const. P. 165/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Haji Ali Muhammad Foundation (Petitioner) VS Adminstrator KMC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3042 Const. P. 5852/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s J.J Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3043 Const. P. 4080/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Pakistan Kuwait Investment Co. Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Commissioner I.R (Appeals-II) LTO and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3044 2021 SBLR Sindh 2413 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 913/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Parkash Lal (Applicant) VS Deputy Collector of Customs & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 Yes Critical examination of ibid provision reveals that there are no consequential effects provided under Section 194-B of Customs Act, 1969 to a decision beyond 60 days time or within such extended period, as the Tribunal may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, fix. The word shall alone cannot demonstrate the mandatory test of the provision. What is more essential is the consequences and further test such as penal action, if prescribed. In the absence of such consequences or penal action the word shall alone cannot be construed as the time frame being mandatory when the Tribunal itself has been given authority to extend the period as deemed fit by it. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3045 Const. P. 6103/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Fine Star Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3046 Const. P. 5397/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3047 Const. P. 4201/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sinotrans Logistcs (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3048 Const. P. 7060/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Nasif (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3049 Const. P. 5160/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Battery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3050 Const. P. 5105/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Attock Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3051 II.A. 61/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Kamran Zafar S/o Shams ul Zafar (Appellant) VS Muhammad Idrees and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3052 Const. P. 1507/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ramzan Ali Hoti S/o Late Zafar Ali Hoti (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nadira and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3053 2016 CLD 1938 Suit.B 63/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN (Plaintiff) VS RAJA TRADERS & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 16-APR-15 Yes Under the parameters of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 the defendant is entitled for a relief if question of law and fact is being established. Article 10-A of the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan no doubt provides an opportunity of fair trial but it does not amount to a trial of a suit where neither any question of law nor a fact was established. Article 10-A of the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan also provides for the determination of a civil right and the obligation. Once the due process as required in terms of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 is adopted and the defendant is before the Court for redressal of his grievance, all he has to do is to establish the question of fact and law for determination of civil right and obligation, which is to be determined by the Court. In terms of Section 10(3) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 the application for leave to defend is supposed to be in the form of written statement which shall be containing summary of substantial question of law as well as fact in respect of which in the opinion of defendant, evidence needs to be recorded.. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3054 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 71/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Shafiq Awan (Applicant) VS Customs Appellate Tribunal & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3055 Const. P. 5251/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Shahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3056 Const. P. 1415/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Diamond Steel Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3057 Const. P. 802/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Attock Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.5805/2021 Attock Petroleum Limited, Rawalpindi v. Sindh thr. the Secretary M/o Finance Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & others,C.A.2057/2022 Attock Petroleum Limited, Rawalpindi v. Sindh thr. the Secretary M/o Finance Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 1st week of October 22,Pending
3058 2022 PTD 59 Const. P. 4188/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Panjgour Goods Transport and Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-OCT-21 Yes The proposition whether the events, as disclosed in the respective seizure reports of all three references followed by show cause notices and passing of Order-in-Originals, could be distinguished from the frame of SRO 499(I)/2009 as far as owners plea is concerned. Preamble (b) of the aforesaid SRO provides that the option shall not be given to pay fine in lieu of confiscation in respect of a vehicle which is defined as good/goods in terms of sub-clause (b) of the said preamble. Thus, a lawfully registered vehicle/conveyance, having packages and containers inside, found carrying smuggled goods, in false cavities or were being used exclusively or wholly for transportation of offended goods under clause (s) of Section 2 of Customs Act, 1969 becomes a subject matter of such offence. This clause (b) has emphasized that a vehicle or conveyance used exclusively or wholly for transportation of offended goods cannot be distinguished from the one having packages and containers inside as such conveyance having packages and containers are inclusive of such definition of vehicle/conveyance. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3059 R.A (Civil Revision) 71/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shakeel Abu Bakar S/o Abu Bakar (Applicant) VS Muhammad Bilal Lakhani and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-APR-21 No In a summary suit pending in the Court of XI-AdditionalDistrict Judge Karachi East,conditional leave was grantedto the applicant who admitted the signatures on the dishonored cheques. Irrespective of the amount involvedand irrespective of the fact whether applicant could furnish surety of the amount, as directedby the trial Court, thereis no justificationin interfering in the order of the trial Courtwhich has exercised its jurisdiction/discretion by extending the leave subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.7.5 Million,which amount is equivalent to the amount of dishonored cheques involved in the summary suit. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3060 Const. P. 5086/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Najam Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3061 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 311/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Director I&I-FBR (Applicant) VS M/s. Al-Wahab Traders & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1694-K/2021 Directorate General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) v. M/s. Al-Wahab Traders & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3062 Const. P. 5498/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Ghandhara Nissan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3063 M.A. 44/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Ltd (Appellant) VS The Court of District Judge, Khi (East) & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JUN-21 Yes Precisely the gist of law and the succession application provides that the litigation commenced for issuance of a certificate in terms of Rule 1, 2 and 6 of Sixth Schedule of the ibid Act 2012. It enabled one of the legal heirs of the deceased to pursue the proceedings on behalf of all legal heirs who sustained damages to claim compensation from the airline. -Respondent No.2 approached District Judge/ respondent No.1 for issuance of requisite succession certificate. The District Judge/ Respondent No.1 however in terms of order impugned in these proceedings treated such compensation as an asset left by the deceased/victim and by considering it as part of succession application and has taken action in terms of the impugned order, which action is being challenged by the appellant/PIA in these proceedings. I disapprove the observation of the District Judge to the extent whereby recovery process was initiated. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.813-K/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Limited v. The Court of District & Sessions Judge East at Karachi. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
3064 Const. P. 5320/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Battery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3065 Const. P. 3917/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Tex Chem Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3066 Const. P. 4348/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mahesh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3067 I.T.R.A 13/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) VS M/S. BROTHERS BUILDING & dEVELOPERS LTD (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3068 Const. P. 2059/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Awan Trading Co. Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3069 Const. P. 1528/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Tayyaba Agencies (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3070 Const. P. 5576/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Creative Leather Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3071 Const. P. 1369/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Pakistan International Container Terminal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3072 Const. P. 1395/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Ollympia Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3073 Const. P. 4350/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Naeem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3074 Const. P. 4646/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hidayatullah Khokhar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3075 2022 SBLR Sindh 1052 II.A. 20/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Khayyam Ahmed Khattani (Appellant) VS M/s. Orix Leasing Pakistan Limited (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.A.100-K/2022 Mr. Darya Khan v. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3076 Const. P. 576/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Muhammad Nadeem & Ors (Petitioner) VS Vth Addl: District Judge Karachi & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-OCT-17 Yes The bona fide of the applicants/petitioners in view of above evidence cannot be challenged on the ground that Shop No.2 was vacated at some point of time and the premises is in possession of the attorney of the applicants. The father of the applicants, in fact is doing his business under the name and style of Akhtar & Sons. The judgments, as relied upon by the respondents counsel are not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the instant case as the respondent has failed to establish that it was lying vacant before filing of the ejectment application. -----As far as dishonesty or non-existence of good-faith is concerned, the burden was upon respondent to show that good faith is missing or that the tenant vacated Shop No.2 prior to filing of the ejectment application and hence it was required to be disclosed as to nonsuitability of Shop No.2. It is clearly stated in the cross-examination that the attorney of applicants, who is also their father, is conducting business in the name and style of Akhtar & Sons. The respondent has not cross examined about the genuine need of attorneys son Muhammad Nadeem/petitioner No.1 as he has also denied that Shop No.2 is vacant in the building. It is the cumulative effect of evidence of the parties, which is to be looked into. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3077 Const. P. 1333/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Rukhsana Zaffar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3078 Const. P. 2695/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Muhammad S/o Muhammad Anwar (Petitioner) VS Noorullah & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 Yes -The petitioner while making such statement of alleged purchase has not realized the burden he took over. There is a marked difference in the probative value of entering into possession for the first time as tenant, and continuing in possession with claim of change in its nomenclature. Where occupant claiming his continuous possession as other than original character, it is expected that some trustworthy evidence in furtherance of his subsequently claimed character would be shown, failing whereof his admitted character would concur (Reliance2). -This PT-1 was then followed by another PT-1, which is claimed by the respondent No.1. This PT-1 then followed by notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. While recovering taxes in terms of the gross annual rental value, as assessed by authority under ibid Act, constructive possession of the respondent No.1 had been identified and regulated. It may not constitute the ownership but it does authorize the one who was found in constructive possession, to regulate his possession as required under the law. This was thus a jura possession recognized by Sindh Urban Immovable Property Tax Act and rules framed thereunder of 1958. Thus having constructive jura possession with reference to property in question, an authoritative recognition in the shape of PT-1 was issued. -This PT-1 would enable the respondent No.1 to deal with his possession as deem fit and proper under the law. It is not in dispute that respondent No.1 was and is responsible for payment of annual gross rental value and it is not in dispute that in terms of Section 14 of Sindh Urban Immovable Property Tax Act, 1958, the tax recoverable from any person on account of any building or land, if found in arrears, it shall be lawful for the proscribed authority to serve upon any person paying rent in respect of that building or land or any part thereof to the person from whom the arrears are due, a notice for the recovery of such taxes may be issued to the tenants or one from whom such taxes are required in terms of PT-1. It also enables the authority that if a person willfully fails or neglects to comply with the notice, the authority may after giving him an opportunity of being heard proceed against him as it could have proceeded under the provisions of this act against the defaulter of the tax. -Thus, in my view this PT-1 authorizes respondent No.1 to deal with this property as deem fit and proper and a lawful notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was issued to the petitioner to apprise him about the current situation as to the change of PT-1 and authority of new landlord. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.573-K/2021 Syed Muhammad v. Noorullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of [ Four months time granted ]
3079 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 132/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl.Cus: Ref: Appln 133 of 2015 2015 The Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. General Food Corporation, Karachi. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-SEP-21 No Once the assessment order is passed and clearance of the goods under Section 80 is made, the consignment then is out of charge and then such assessment is not liable to be intervened unless the recourse as available under law is invoked before a Collector Appeals for reopening of the assessment etc. In addition to this the amended section 38 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and insertion of Section 230 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the customs officials including respondent No.1 cannot be deemed to have been appointed as officer of Inland Revenue. Thus the contravention so prepared is without jurisdiction and the authority. The Collectorate of Customs does not enjoy the authority of collecting sales tax and income tax of the regime under discussion, once the goods are out of charge. They do the act as an agent at import stage in the capacity of collecting agent and can recover the avoided or short paid customs duty and other taxes levied but not once the goods are out of charge. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.1641-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. General Food Corporation,C.A.119/2023 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. General Food Corporation Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
3080 II.A. 56/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghulam Rasool S/o Nek Muhammad (Appellant) VS Adam Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3081 2021 PTD 2042 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 275/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s A.U Technologies & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-21 Yes the questions, as proposed by the applicant department, do not appear to be the questions of law. It could have been the questions in appeal but not in Special Customs Reference Application where only questions of law arising out of the Tribunal Order could be taken into consideration. The facts of the case are that the consignments were imported on 15.09.2007 and the Goods Declaration was filed on 18.09.2007 whereas the Valuation Ruling No.22/2008, is of 11.03.2008, and hence became a convincing tool for the officers. However, there is no concrete evidence as to the value of the goods arrived at Port on 15.09.2007 for which Goods Declaration was filed on 18.09.2007. The ibid valuation ruling was later in time that it came after about six months of the arrival of the goods. So the question before the Tribunal was whether there was sufficient evidence before Valuation Department for adjudging the value of the goods in terms of the subject Valuation Ruling which was later in time (above six months). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3082 2021 PTD 1867, 2021 PTCL 804 I.T.R.A 49/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (Applicant) VS THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND ANOTHER (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 Yes Section 236A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 requires a person, making sale by public auction or auction by a tender of any property or goods (including property or goods confiscated or attached, either belonging to or not belonging to the Government, local Government, any authority, a company, a foreign association declared to be a company under sub-clause (vi) of clause (b) of subsection (2) of section 80, or a foreign contractor or a consultant or a consortium or Collector of Customs or Commissioner Inland Revenue or any other authority, shall collect advance tax, computed on the basis of sale price of such property and at the rate specified in First Schedule, from the person to whom such property or goods are being sold. This provision is as clear as crystal however it is followed by an explanation inserted by Finance Act 2020 for the removal of doubt that the expression of sale of public auction or auction by tender include renewal of license previously sold by public auction or auction by a tender and where payment is received in installments, advance tax is to be collected with each installment. As we observe that there is no necessity of any explanation or any clarification as section 236A is clear in its entirety. Notwithstanding the above, even the explanation of clarificatory nature operates retrospectively as it only provides an assistance in interpreting the provisions correctly in terms of intention of the legislature, subject to however if a contradictory situation is reached by the Court interpreting the basic provisions as against explanation. We are, therefore, of the view that the applicant described as an agent collecting advance tax from the bidders/occupants/lessees/ licensees etc. to whom the premises/property was given either by way of public auction or tender or by any other mode and includes renewal of such document. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3083 Const. P. 3717/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s M. Siddique (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3084 Const. P. 6973/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SEPCO Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3085 Const. P. 6596/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s MATCO Food Ltd (Petitioner) VS Commissioner IR (Appeals-II) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3086 2022 PTD 512 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 850/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Collector of Customs MCC (Preventive) (Applicant) VS Falak Jan & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-21 Yes Exemption is a privilege being enjoyed by diplomats and other dignitaries. If we trace history of last 50 years (though there were earlier SROs also), we come across initial SRO 53(I)/70 issued in exercise of powers available under Section 19 of Customs Act for all articles of household and personal effects including motor vehicles for the personal use by the ruler of any of the Gulf Sheikhdoms including vehicles imported by the UAE dignitaries which includes use and donations to welfare projects in Pakistan with conditions, such as articles will not be sold without prior consent of Central Board of Revenue, as it then was. It was persons specified SRO as it contained list of all such dignitaries with a table attached. Vehicle was imported in 2002 when SRO 506(I)/88 was active. It restricted the sale without prior permission of Federal Government, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to be routed through a formal application. In other event, no such vehicle could have been sold within two years of its importation to anyone other than Department of Investment Promotion or diplomatic representatives or mission of foreign government, except when the diplomatic representative by whom it was imported is transferred within two years of its importation and it has been used by him for not less than one year. So nothing beneficial could be achieved by respondent through said SRO Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.273/2022 Falak Jan v. The Collector of Customs Model Collectorate of Customs (Preventive) Custom House Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3087 Const. P. 5756/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Hameed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3088 Const. P. 204/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Hansika Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3089 Const. P. 4327/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Meezan Islamic Fund (Trust) (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3090 Const. P. 737/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Black Gold Ind (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3091 Const. P. 7046/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s CEEC TIAJIN (PAK) ELECTRIC POWER CONST: (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3092 Const. P. 6400/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Grace Passion (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3093 Const. P. 6524/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahmed Fine Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3094 Const. P. 6945/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ocean Network Express Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3095 Const. P. 6699/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3096 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 880/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Power Solution, Lahore (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3097 Const. P. 6700/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3098 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 879/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Real Impacts, Lahore (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.164-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Real Impacts Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3099 Const. P. 1153/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 M/s. AMA Colour Laboratories (Petitioner) VS VIth Additional District Judge Karachi & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3100 Const. P. 7026/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Miracle Products (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed/ of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3101 Const. P. 6743/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Raheel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3102 Const. P. 7197/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 H. Nizam Din & Sons (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3103 Const. P. 328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imdad Ali (Petitioner) VS Sect: Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3104 Const. P. 3514/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Rashida Farnaz (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-DEC-19 Yes Rule-1 of the probation provides that a regular employee appointed to any post in the strategic organization shall be for a period of year. Rule-2 of the probation provides that in the event of initial appointment, the employee who failed to show satisfactory performance and conduct during the probationary period, the Competent Authority may extend the period of probation for a maximum period of another year or dispense with his/her service without assigning any reason. Rule-3 provides that if no order is issued under clause c(2), on the expiry of the first year of probation, the same shall be taken to have been extended for another one year. Thus, she could have claimed her extension of probation and not regularization, in the absence of an order, however order was passed after about three months but these facts will not materially affect the merit of the case. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
3105 Const. P. 3574/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s MCB Arif Habib (Petitioner) VS S.R.B and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3106 Const. P. 750/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Basheeran Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3107 Suit 873/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Aftab Hussain (Plaintiff) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 24-FEB-14 Yes "a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. VII, R. 11---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42 & 56---Lease agreement---Scope---Suit for permanent injunction , recovery of amount incurred on the maintenance and renovation of suit property and security deposited for the same---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Contention of plaintiff was that defendant had assured that he would not be evicted from the suit property and licence would be extended for another three years and he had incurred amount on the maintenance and renovation of premises and security for the same was also paid to the defendant---Validity---Neither declaration to the effect that plaintiff was a lessee was made nor he could maintain the present suit as a licensee---Expenses incurred on the renovation of premises would not give any cause of action to the plaintiff as agreement was silent with regard to construction or renovation work---Claim of damages was maintainable only in case the defendant had withheld the permission to use the premises without notice which was not the matter in the present case---Alleged claim of compensation/damages was not maintainable as plaintiff was given notice not to enter into the suit property---Plaintiff had no cause of action and no injunction could be granted of any nature---Present suit was hit by Ss. 42 & 56 (f) of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Application for rejection of plaint was accepted and plaint was rejected in circumstances. (b) Words and phrases--- ----""Lease"" and ""licence""---Distinction---Lease was transfer of interest in property whereas in a licence such element was excluded; exclusive right of possession was granted to the lessee and the lessor was totally excluded from such right; right granted to the lessee was assignable and transferable while in a licence it was not so; licence was a personal right which was purely permissible right; notwithstanding the permission, the grantor would retain control over the property." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3108 2015 SBLR Sindh 327, 2015 SBLR Sindh 469, 2016 MLD 266 Suit 1108/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Shabir-ul-Hassan Khusroo. (Plaintiff) VS Asad Mustafa & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 16-OCT-14 Yes a) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)--- ----S.4---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, R.11---Succession---Son of predeceased sister of deceased---Inheritance, right of---Scope---Categories of legal heirs---Plaint, rejection of---Provisions of S. 4 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 were applicable to a specific category of class of legal heirs i. e. sons and daughters of deceased which could not be applied to the son of predeceased sister of deceased---Sons and daughters of predeceased sister would come in the third category of legal heirs i.e. distant kindred---Shares out of assets at first were to be consumed by the sharers and left over to be consumed by the residuaries and if there were no residuaries then same had to revert back to the sharers---If sharers and residuaries were available then distant kindred were not entitled to share under Islamic Law---Both the sharers and residuaries were available in the present case and there was no question of inheritance by distant kindred---Plaintiff being in the third category of legal heirs was not entitled to inherit share from the assets left by the deceased in presence of sharers and residuaries---Plaint could not be rejected in piecemeal---Application for rejection of plaint was dismissed in circumstances. (b) Islamic law--- ----Inheritance---Categories of legal heirs---Categories of legal heirs were sharer, residuaries and distant kindred. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3109 Const. P. 2985/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Gatro Power (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.1699-K/2021 M/s. Gatro Power (Pvt) Ltd. v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary Finance Department & others,C.A.2038/2022 M/s. Gatro Power (Pvt) Ltd. v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary Finance Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 1st week of October 22,Pending
3110 Suit 1529/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 VENU G.ADVANI (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-NOV-14 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3111 Const. P. 41/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Janta devi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-DEC-20 Yes Son Quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3112 Const. P. 1608/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Hareef Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chancellor Quaid Awam Uni SBA and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-OCT-20 Yes University Matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3113 II.A. 30/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Sania (Appellant) VS Board of Secondary Education Karachi & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 21-NOV-17 No In order to have record correct with reference to fathers name, the appellant filed a suit which was dismissed, followed by an appeal and now this second appeal. Although there are concurrent findings of two Courts below but it seems that the appellant is facing hardship in respect of his credential/educational transcript Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3114 Suit 1572/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Asif & another. (Plaintiff) VS Ahmeed Faraz. (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3115 Const. P. 868/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Connected cases ..... C. P. No. D- 879 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 890 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 908 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 985 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 994 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 998 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 1012 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 1019 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 1024 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 1046 of 2022, C. P. No. D- 1054 of 2022 2022 Sajida Parveen & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3116 Const. P. 138/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Shahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3117 Const. P. 363/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.Ps No.D- 850, 889, 1025, 1166, 1167, 1168, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1178, 1196, 1198, 1201, 1202, 1221, 1222, 1223 & 1226 of 2022 2022 Ghous Bux Dahyo & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3118 Const. P. 252/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2008 Abdul Hayee Khan Pathan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3119 Suit 2139/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SPIRIT INDUSTRIES PVT LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 18-APR-22 Yes It seems that strategically parties resorted to litigation to have an order of the Court in presence of media campaign and were not willing to do it themselves. Cause for filing this suit is only to the extent that defendants gave a deaf ear to the requests of plaintiffs as far as supply and its acknowledgment is concerned. Defendants are within their rights to accept and inspect the goods as per specifications before goods could be acknowledged. Therefore, if a Committee is created or formed for inspection of goods, the plaintiffs should not shy away and the only purpose left for the Committee is to carry out above mandate as per terms of the contracts- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3120 Suit 288/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pakistan House International Limited (PHIL) (Plaintiff) VS Engro Vopak Terminal Limited (EVTL) & another. (Defendant) S.B. Order 27-JAN-22 Yes The exclusive items disclosed in Article 3.2 is inclusive but not exhaustive. It includes Styrene Monomer [SM] Linear Alkaline Benzene [LAB] which is being claimed by the plaintiff. The license of the plaintiff issued by FBR is in fact for public bonded warehouse which too was later in time after implementation agreement of defendant No.1 and defendant No.2 which grants exclusive handling of various chemicals and to establish its terminal. This exclusivity was never challenged ever since these bonded warehouse licenses were extended. For the sake of convenience of the plaintiff, Mr. Almani submitted that the customers of the plaintiff may approach defendant No.1 for effective handling of the cargo and after it being handled at defendant No.1`s Jetty and transported to the plaintiff`s facility through the pipeline at the fee to be paid to defendant No.1, the grievance could be redressed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3121 Const. P. 780/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Shoaib Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3122 Judicial Companies Misc. 38/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MFG Insurance Company Limited (Applicant) VS Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-FEB-22 Yes In case for confirmation of resolution of reduced share capital the question for consideration are, should the Court refuse its sanction to the reduction out of regard to the interest of those members of the public who may be induced to take shares in the company; is the reduction fair and equitable between different classes of shareholders; whether the reduction is shared by all; and is it designed to work justly and equitably and whether it does not involve diminution of the liability in respect of unpaid capital or payment of any shareholder of any paid up capital; and there is evidence regarding loss of capital and nonrepresentation of available assets. None of these impediments exist in the case of the petitioners company and consequently in view of above proposed reduction in the share capital, as resolved by the company itself, apparently seems to be just, fair and reasonable and not likely to adversely affect the interests of shareholders who have themselves resolved to the approval of this scheme of reduction. The proposal for reduction of share capital is therefore confirmed in terms of the requirements of Companies Act, 2017. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3123 Const. P. 1644/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Zahid Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3124 Civil Revision 200/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Muhammad Ali & Others (Applicant) VS Haji Rahim Bux & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.537-K/2017 Muhammad Ali and another v. Haji Rahim Bux and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted with Notice to A.G. Sindh
3125 Suit 1182/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MST. SHAISTA NOREEN (Plaintiff) VS MST. ALMAS AFTAB ALI & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 16-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3126 Const. P. 7280/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shahmir Impex and Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3127 R.A (Civil Revision) 7/1995 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1995 Progressive Construction Co (Applicant) VS Govt of Sindh and other (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3128 Const. P. 2038/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ashraf Suleman (Petitioner) VS IXth ADJ (South), Karachi & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-MAY-18 Yes in order to avail a remedy under section 14 of the SRPO, 1979 the applicant/landlord is required to establish his personal need. In that case there would be no distinction left between section 14 and 15(2)(vii) of the SRPO, 1979 and the object of scheme and the purpose for which it was provided would be frustrated. The provisions of Section 14 is meant for a particular class of a landlord and hence the burden of establishing bona fide requirement or even a requirement was lifted. Section 14 has its own barrier and it is not an un-probed provision. Subsection (2) of Section 14 of the SRPO provides that nothing in this subsection shall apply where the landlord has rented out a building after he has retired or attained the age of 60 years or, as the case may be, i.e. landlord has become widow or orphan. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.882/2023 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd (SSGCL) through its M.D. Karachi and another v. Abdul Aziz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3129 Const. P. 1575/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Dr. Sheikh Naeem-ul-Haq (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3130 Const. P. 1599/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Asif S/o Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nasreen Bano & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 24-MAY-18 Yes as the case of personal requirement is concerned, there is nothing to challenge the personal bona fide need of the landlord. The defence that has now taken, at this stage, is that the premises are never owned by the respondent as it is the land of KMC and the respondent has no title. Even this defence as of now, is not available to the petitioner since the definition of landlord included the respondent who was receiving rent on the basis of rent agreement at the relevant time, which is named as Goodwill Agreement. The only relationship that could said to be in existence in pursuance of such agreement is of a landlady and tenant. In case the petitioner intends to challenge the title of the respondent, he could have handed-over the possession of the premises to the landlady first and then may challenge the title of the landlady if permissible under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3131 Suit 224/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Parveen Kauser. (Plaintiff) VS M. Fazil Arif (since deceased) thr. his LRs. & Ors (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3132 Const. P. 1485/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Shahid Zaman (Petitioner) VS Said Muhammad & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3133 Suit 1918/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 MUHAMMAD ARIF BAWANI (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 12-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3134 I. A 10/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 JS Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Ghulam Shabir & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAY-22 Yes The public notice "alone" in the newspaper, as issued by the Bank in the generalized form for the auction of pledged goods of different customers including gold ornaments of respondent, without any specific name of alleged defaulter(s), could hardly meet the requirement of law for effecting service of notice before auction, either under the Contract Act or the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001. Such notices should be specific and in personam. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3135 Suit 1617/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dell Global B.V. (Plaintiff) VS Moin Ahmed & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3136 Suit 7/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 RANA MUHAMMAD KHALIL AHMED. (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD ISMAIL QADRI & AN OTHER. (Defendant) S.B. Order 28-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3137 Const. P. 540/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Nawab Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3138 Suit -1930/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Qazi Moin Uddin (Plaintiff) VS Ashraf Moin & others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 15-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3139 R.A (Civil Revision) 129/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ghulam Mujtaba (Applicant) VS TMA Nawabshah & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3140 Const. P. 6751/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Shahzeb Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3141 Const. P. 1617/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Ammar Yasir Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3142 I. A 22/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Jumman (Appellant) VS Ibrahim (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3143 Const. P. 596/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Sajid and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3144 Const. P. 345/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Ghulam Abbas Baricho & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3145 Const. P. 1863/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Akbar &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3146 2023 CLD 530 M.A. 2/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mckinsey & Company Pakistan (Private) Limited (Appellant) VS Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-FEB-23 Yes It is nobody's case that holding company has discharged such obligations, if at all it is under such duty. It is not stated that the holding company has disclosed such data in the consolidated financial statements of the group and presented as those of single enterprise and that such would be within domain of SECP, so that the purpose of non-disclosure of the remuneration of CEO or director of the relevant company whose shares are being held, would be inconsequential. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.577-K/2023 McKinsey & Company Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3147 Suit 2841/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ALI ADNAN ARIF TABBA (Plaintiff) VS NADRA & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-SEP-22 Yes In the absence of any substantial relief being matured, no consequential relief could be claimed, be that damages. Neither any jurisdictional error was highlighted nor the plaintiffs case is within the frame of such jurisdictional error hence plaintiffs case could not be isolated on such count alone. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3148 Suit 2065/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 MRS. FAKHAR-UN-NISA & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS ZULFIQAR ALI SHAIKH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 25-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3149 Const. P. 1806/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Dr. Nisar Ahmed Sohoo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 No Transfer posting is the prerogative of Government and petitioner cannot insist or enforce Government for his posting. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3150 2023 CLD 366, 2023 YLR 1177, 2023 SBLR Sindh 366 Suit 2707/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/S AGP LIMITED & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS M/S GALAXY PHARMA (PVT) LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 15-SEP-22 Yes Undoubtedly and undisputedly the circumstances governed by an agreement no longer exists to enable defendant No.1 to continue using the registration. This drug was registered on the application of foreign principal in favor of defendant No.1 enabling it to manufacture, market and sell the products of the foreign principal. In view of severance of relationship between plaintiff No.2 and defendant No.1, as disclosed above the agreement came to an end. ---In the absence of any contract between foreign principal and defendant No.1 it would be a matter of serious concern if defendant No.1 would continue to manufacture, market and sell product of foreign principal without its permission and authorization. Plaintiffs thus have disclosed a prima facie case with balance of inconvenience and irreparable loss in their favour. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3151 Suit 1424/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hina Nauman Shaikh (Plaintiff) VS Ghani Builders & Developers (Pvt) Ltd & Others ` (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-OCT-22 No when the evidence is yet to be recorded and issues yet to be framed, the parties cannot be compelled to produce documents Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3152 Const. P. 2695/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sanaullah Lund (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3153 Const. P. 4875/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Noor Uddin Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chairman FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3154 Suit 346/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION (SCBAP) & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 09-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3155 H.C.A 421/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shahnaz Hyder (Appellant) VS Sadia Siddiqui & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3156 Const. P. 2358/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Aijaz Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3157 Const. P. 2505/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Arsalan Ramza (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3158 Const. P. 2298/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Abdul Hafeez Mahar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3159 I. A 13/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Tariq Tufail (Appellant) VS Aamir Ali & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3160 Const. P. 4319/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3161 H.C.A 439/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Aamir Baqi (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3162 M.A. 5/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Shaheen Insurance Co. Ltd. (Appellant) VS Ghulam Qadir & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3163 H.C.A 358/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Rehman Badshah thru L/Rs (Appellant) VS M/s Holy Quran Society of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3164 H.C.A 197/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 The Collector of Customs & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Engro Elengy Terminal (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3165 Const. P. 202/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
3166 Const. P. 6658/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Serajsons Printers Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3167 Suit 1630/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZUHAIR SIDDIQUI (Plaintiff) VS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAK & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 06-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3168 Const. P. 517/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Syed Rehan Qasim (Petitioner) VS Syed Zulfiqar Ali and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3169 Const. P. 4312/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3170 Const. P. 2070/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Hashim (Petitioner) VS Mst. Anita Kalim and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-24 Yes This is not the court which can reappraise the facts as concurrently maintained by the two courts below as this is not the court of appeal. The jurisdiction of this court under Article-199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan in relation to findings of facts is limited. The petitioner has already exhausted their remedies by moving the application under Section-12(2) CPC followed by dismissal of revision application and this court under Article-199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan cannot sit on the concurrent findings of facts of two courts below. No interference is required as far as the dismissal of the main revision application is concerned. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3171 Const. P. 4340/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Mehrun Nisa (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Saleem and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3172 H.C.A 111/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s. Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Ahmed Brothers & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-FEB-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3173 H.C.A 60/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s. Abbot Labotories Pvt. Ltd (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3174 H.C.A 316/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Zahid Rasheed (Appellant) VS Anita Nalini Das & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3175 Const. P. 7261/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Azhar Iqbal Faruqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3176 H.C.A 220/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Reckitt Benckiser Pakistan Limited (Appellant) VS Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3177 Const. P. 873/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Ibrahim & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
3178 I. A 11/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mrs. Nazima Aqeel & others (Appellant) VS Atif Ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3179 Const. P. 216/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Amanullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
3180 H.C.A 333/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 S.S.S. Corporation (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3181 Suit 1341/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 SHUJAAT ALI KHAN (Plaintiff) VS M/S. DUNE GROUP, BUILDERS & DEVE. (Defendant) S.B. Order 04-JUN-12 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3182 2012 CLC 1508 Suit 485/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 SOORTY ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) VS K.E.S.C. LTD & ANOTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 18-JUN-12 Yes when the parties are not at issue the question of its determination does not arise. The plaintiffs was already put on notice by notices dated 17.2.2012 and the controversy came to an end on account of such admission with regard to keeping the load as standby. The distinguishing features as far as this suit and the Suit No. 329/2012 are concerned is of course the admitted position with regard to the status of the sanctioned load when the initial notices dated 17.02.2012 were replied. Since there was no question of determination and even after the issuance of notices it was consistent stand of the plaintiff that it was keeping the sanctioned load as standby, the defendant No.1 was well within their right to disconnect the electricity as the determination is not required. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3183 Const. P. 2248/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Malho Pahore (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3184 Const. P. 2/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Jan Muhammad Nindwani (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JAN-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3185 Cr.Bail 516/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Akhlaque Ahmed Jagirani and an others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-FEB-13 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3186 Const. P. 2148/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Shahana W/o Muhammad Ali Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ovais & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.318-K/2018 Mst: Shahana v. Muhammad Ovais and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
3187 M.A. 47/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Labbaik Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS PEMRA & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-JUN-18 Yes hese folds, as unfolded, could only reveal contravention on the part of the Ministry of Interior and not on the part of appellant. Security clearance no doubt is inevitable but under the present set of facts Council of Complaints would not come in picture. Rule 7(d) of Rules 2009 without any ambiguity provides a right to PEMRA to ascertain the credibility and track record of the management and the majority shareholding and management control and so also in terms of Rule 7(e) read with Rule 9(5) of 2009 Rules at inception, whereas 30(d) caters for subsequent change. It however does not include the scope of Council of Complaints in terms of Section 30(d) of the Ordinance 2002 as prima facie it relates to issues between Ministry of Interior and PEMRA. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1506/2017 PEMRA thr. Secretary to Authority, Islamabad v. M/s Labbaik (Pvt.) Ltd. and others,C.A.1568/2017 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) thr. Secretary to Authority v. M/s Labbaik (Pvt.) Ltd and others,C.P.1689/2017 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) thr. Secretary to Authority v. M/s Labbaik (Pvt.) Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of as having been Fructified,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
3188 Const. P. 2631/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Mst Parveen (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3189 E.P 12/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul Razzak Khan Khoso (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Pleading is general structure of facts and allegations. Blacks Law Dictionary provides it to be A formal document in which a party to a legal proceeding (esp. a civil lawsuit) sets forth or responds to allegations, claims, denials, or defenses. In civil procedure, the main pleadings are the plaintiffs complaint and the defendants answer. The pleadings get support and strength through the evidence to be recorded in support thereof. Thus, it needs not to be an encyclopedia, it should contain material facts, allegations and grounds with particular references, which in the present case, are available. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3190 Const. P. 165/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Dr.Fariduddin Qureshi & Ors (Petitioner) VS Syed Zammrrud Hussain & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 06-FEB-18 Yes It is not disputed that the rent was being collected by rent collector Zamarrud Hussain who is also one of the legal heirs and respondent in these petitions. It is also a matter of record that rent up to August 2006 was paid to the rent collector whereafter the rent was tendered to the rent collector through money order in the month of October 2006. It was endorsed at the back of the money order that the tenant is remitting rent for the month of September 2006 as the rent collector has not come to collect the rent despite telephonic conversation. The said money order was refused by the rent collector on the ground that the endorsement on the money order disclosed the shop to be on Pugree basis. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.659-K/2018 Dr.Fariduddin Qureshi and another v. The 1st Additional District Judge, Karachi (Central) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
3191 Suit 2603/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Novartis Pharma Pakistan Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 19-DEC-16 Yes The drugs are being considered as essential commodities. These are always subject to regulations and unbridled ways of dealing with the prices and allowing market forces to set the prices cannot be granted. This could not be taken as violative of Article 18 or 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan. These are reasonable restrictions and are being protected under the Constitution as often it happens the cartels are formed to manipulate the situation of these essential commodities and hence are always subjected to reasonable restrictions. However, in Suit No.1217 of 2016 in which Mr. Anwar Mansoor Khan learned advocate is appearing wherein Policy itself has been challenged I would dispose of the injunction application in the following terms and keep the lis pending as an issue in relation to the vires of subject policy had not been framed. Any finding here would not influence the trial of this suit. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3192 2020 SBLR Sindh 1269 Suit 1009/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s. Century Paper & Board Mills Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 26-OCT-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3193 Const. P. 2267/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Ahmed-ul-Din (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3194 Civil Revision 62/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2010 Muhammad Yakoob & Others (Applicant) VS Abdul Karim and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3195 Const. P. 1271/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mst. Parveen Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3196 Const. P. 42/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Pir Bux Chandio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3197 Const. P. 444/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ameer Muhammad Pathan (Petitioner) VS Fed; Of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3198 Const. P. 2047/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Idrees Chachar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3199 Const. P. 2143/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Muhammad Masood Raza (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3200 I. A 23/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Munawar Ali & others (Appellant) VS H B L & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3201 Const. P. 1030/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Mehmood (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3202 Const. P. 192/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mr Nisar Ahmed Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3203 Const. P. 787/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Rajo Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary Govt; Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3204 Const. P. 3400/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Mukhtiar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3205 Const. P. 1387/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Aslam Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Mst. Ambreen Sadiq and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3206 Cr.Tran 54/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Parvez Ahmed Chandio (Appellant) VS The State & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3207 Const. P. 1695/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Alamgeer Solangi (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3208 Const. P. 153/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ali Mardan Shahani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3209 Const. P. 4671/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Mansoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3210 Const. P. 5070/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Imran (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3211 Const. P. 997/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abubakar Mirani (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3212 Const. P. 272/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Riaz Ali Mirani (Petitioner) VS P. O sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3213 Const. P. 6546/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Bheru Lal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3214 Const. P. 1665/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Tanveer Ahmed Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3215 Const. P. 5200/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Abdul Majid Siyal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3216 Const. P. 1938/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS Mst: Shahnaz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3217 Const. P. 224/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Raja Shafqat Hussain Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
3218 Const. P. 3687/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Manzoor Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3219 Const. P. 470/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Hanif Khan (Petitioner) VS M/S Atlas Battery & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput C.P.3568/2019 Moulana Shahzado Dreho v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Sindh Cultural Heritage, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
3220 Const. P. 3175/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2015 Mst Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author) C.P.1461-K/2018 Mst. Sahib Khatoon Panhwar v. The Province of Sindh & others,C.A.139-K/2019 Mst. Sahib Khatoon Panhwar v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
3221 Const. P. 6812/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3222 Const. P. 1905/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cp.D 1932/2011 &1269/2016 2011 Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-20 Yes Law Discussed: Land Acquisition Act, 1894----- Standing Order of the revenue department No.12, subsection 31 regarding land acquisition provides that if the land was not required for the purpose it was acquired, it should be relinquished and should be offered to the original occupant/owner on payment of compensation received by them and in case of their refusal to have it back on the said terms, it should be considered as a government property in the record. The proceedings of acquiring land could only be ended once the compensation is deposited and the possession was taken over by the acquiring agency. Thus, this would be in severe violation of Articles 23 and 24 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, depriving the land owner not only from enjoying the property but also from its compensation. Thus, there is no justification that he (the owner/private respondent) may be granted interest now after almost three decades of litigation when the value of the property multiplied several hundred folds, as against the compensation, the value of which was determined three decades before and grant of interests under Land Acquisition Act, under the circumstances has no justification. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam C.P.420-K/2020 Hyderabad Municipal Corporation v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3223 Const. P. 118/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghulam Rasool and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3224 Const. P. 2332/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Aftab Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1321-K/2022 Khalid Hussain v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
3225 2023 PLC (CS) 1133 Const. P. 139/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nadeem Zuberi (Petitioner) VS C.A.A (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-FEB-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1156/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi,C.A.445/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Dismissed
3226 I. A 16/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sultan through LRs. (Appellant) VS Abdul Mateen (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3227 Const. P. 4210/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Maryam Bearing Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3228 R.A (Civil Revision) 132/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Yousuf S/o Abdul Sattar (Applicant) VS Afzalullah Siddiqui and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3229 Const. P. 5825/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s New Jaddah Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3230 Const. P. 4666/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 TPL Properties Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3231 Const. P. 3648/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s S.R Global (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3232 Const. P. 1021/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Liberty Power Tech Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3233 Const. P. 6047/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Quality 1 Petroleum Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.5550/2021,C.A.1378/2021,C.P.5121/2021,C.A.1592/2021 SCP Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relief,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Pending
3234 Const. P. 4324/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Kirthar Pakistan BV (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3235 Const. P. 3105/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Bismillah Ind and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3236 Const. P. 5743/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3237 Const. P. 2241/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Farooq Sattar Ind. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3238 Const. P. 2764/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s. Siza Foods (Pvt) Ltd & Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3239 Const. P. 5634/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Data Steel Pipe Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3240 Const. P. 2178/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Baluchistan Engineering Works (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Paksitan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3241 Const. P. 1439/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Animal Health & Care (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3242 Const. P. 3959/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Rech International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3243 Const. P. 5159/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Battery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3244 Const. P. 411/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN (Petitioner) VS MUHAMMAD ARIF & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3245 Const. P. 4529/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Searl Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3246 Const. P. 1809/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Alpha Insurance Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3247 Const. P. 1860/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Rehan Can Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3248 2022 MLD 308 II.A. 205/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ms. Qaiser Jehan Begum Thr. Salman Hussain Memon (Appellant) VS Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 30-APR-21 Yes the provisions of Section 42 were misconstrued by Courts below. A plaint could only be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC if it is barred by law. None of the provisions of law was cited by respondents counsel and/or find mention in the orders/judgment of two Courts below whereby a plaint of the suit of the appellant could be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC. The appellant had a cause of action on account of a threat to her property in view of alleged unlawful and illegal construction beingraised on the adjacent plot. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.815-K/2021 Amir Nisar v. Qaiser Jehan Begum & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3249 Const. P. 2362/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Goldway Hygiene Products (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3250 Const. P. 703/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Nimra Saleem D/o Muhammad Tahir Khan (Petitioner) VS Saleem Khalid and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3251 Const. P. 4342/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s ARA Detergents Chemcials (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3252 Const. P. 3700/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Huffaz Seamless Pipe Ind Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3253 Const. P. 4606/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rizwan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3254 Const. P. 4327/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Farooq Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3255 Const. P. 4459/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Attractive International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3256 Const. P. 1350/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Pak Telecom Mobile Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3257 Const. P. 4415/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Z.N Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3258 Const. P. 6158/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Jamshoro Power Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3259 2022 PLC (CS) 69 Const. P. 3893/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shabana Haider (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-NOV-19 Yes The right of withdrawal of the resignation was available as long as the resignation was not accepted. This gained strength when sub-clause (v) is read along with this proposition. It provides that in case an employee withdraws the resignation before its acceptance, the resignation shall be deemed to have been withdrawn. This is not the case here. The resignation was accepted on 08.02.2016 whereas the request for withdrawal of the resignation was made on 26.02.2016, on the imaginary ground that 30 days' notice period was yet to expire. In this context we may observe that notice period has nothing to do with the acceptance of resignation. On acceptance of resignation all that is essential for an employee is to complete the notice period i.e. to serve the Commission in case the employee had opted to give one month notice. The employee could have opted to pay salary in lieu thereof but that is not the case here. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
3260 Const. P. 4570/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s M.A Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3261 2018 SBLR Sindh 520 Const. P. 609/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 MUHAMMAD MOIN (Petitioner) VS MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE & TWO OTHERSS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-JAN-18 Yes The appellate Court is required to peruse the record minutely and give valid reasons while passing the judgment/decision. The impugned order of Appellate Court is absolutely without any reasoning or justification. --There appears to be no attempt on the part of the respondent to tender the rent once the notices of the application for ejectment were served upon him Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3262 Const. P. 673/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Rehman S/o Khursheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Saim Mehmood and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 24-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3263 2022 SBLR Sindh 687 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 450/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Allied Engineering & Services Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-21 Yes As far as finalization of the provisional assessment in time is concerned, the provisional assessments were made on 07.09.2012 and it was required to be finalized within the time frame given under section 81(2) of the Customs Act i.e. six months. This finalization ought to have been completed by 06.03.2013 (incorrectly stated 07.03.2013) as the law requires finalization within six months. The final assessment was made on 15.05.2013. Reliance of the learned counsel for the applicant was placed on the note of Additional Director of Customs which forwarded a summary for the approval of the extension. Allegedly the time was extended on 20.03.2013 by 60 days. By the time the purported summary was granted, on 20.03.2013, six months time had already lapsed. The fact of the matter is that the time for finalization had already lapsed. Even if 60 days time is counted from the date when time lapsed i.e. 06.03.2013, it should not have gone beyond 06.05.2013 whereas final assessment was made on 15.05.2013. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3264 Suit.B 33/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN (Plaintiff) VS REFEH ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 30-SEP-16 Yes The only thing to be seen is as to whether in the statement of account any additional amount towards markup or any other charges are being claimed. Learned counsel for the plaintiff in that regard has taken me to the entries in the statement of accounts to show that it is only the debit and credit entries in relation to the two finance agreements that are being considered. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3265 Spl Central Excise A. 71/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2002 Mehran Metal Containers (Pvt) (Appellant) VS Collector of Sales Tax and Central Exci (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3266 Const. P. 3945/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Karachi Golf Club (Petitioner) VS SRB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3267 Const. P. 1246/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Mst. Hajra Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Javed Akhtar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-NOV-17 Yes There appears to be a solitary defence for non-payment of rent, which is a sale agreement claimed to have been entered between petitioner and the father of respondent No.1. Such could hardly be taken into consideration on account of the fact that the petitioner admitted to have been inducted in the premises as tenant and he cannot resile from such relationship on the pretext of an agreement of sale. The petitioner in order to prove such claim had to surrender the possession as being tenant and only in case he succeeds in establishing his case for specific performance, the possession could be restored and/or he be absolved from payment of the rent after decree. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3268 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 23/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Cargo Aviation System & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3269 F.R.A 5/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sohail Mustafa S/o Ghulam Mustafa (Appellant) VS Mrs. Mahjabeen Mirza (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3270 Cr.Bail 405/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD ASLAM S/O MUHAMAMD BACHAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3271 Const. P. 6399/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Chas A. Mendoza (Petitioner) VS Commissioner I.R (Appeals-IV) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3272 Const. P. 2538/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Raz Textile (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3273 Const. P. 6597/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Orient Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Commissioner IR (Appeals-II) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3274 Const. P. 6813/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Jawaid Nabi Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3275 Const. P. 5201/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Faizan Steel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3276 Const. P. 6583/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sadruddin Gilani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3277 Const. P. 6749/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s G (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3278 Const. P. 6633/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Heeran Bai (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3279 Const. P. 6888/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 CNG System (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3280 Const. P. 7189/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Sohail Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs Appraisal West & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3281 Const. P. 6623/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aligarh Institute of Technology (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3282 F.R.A 41/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ali Gohar S/o Mohammad Umar (Appellant) VS Syed Raziuddin and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.547-K/2021 Ali Gohar v. Syed Raziuddin & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
3283 Const. P. 6183/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s A.A.D Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3284 Const. P. 7425/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mansoor Ellahi Shamsi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3285 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 46/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Abdullah Computers. (Applicant) VS Collector of Customs. (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3286 Const. P. 4770/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Aslam & Sons Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3287 Const. P. 143/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Shafique & Others (Petitioner) VS Rahimuddin & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-OCT-15 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
3288 Const. P. 968/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Ghulam Qasim (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
3289 Suit 2956/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MST ABIDA JEHANGIR (Plaintiff) VS KHURRAM SHAHZAD & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3290 Const. P. 2155/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Allah Warrayo and others (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
3291 Const. P. 4998/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kashif Zaki (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3292 Const. P. 5044/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Hashim Lakhani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3293 S.M.A 67/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Saifuddin s/o Ghulam Abbas (Petitioner) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3294 Const. P. 8137/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Al-Hamra Trading Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3295 Const. P. 7970/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Zubaida (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3296 Civil Revision 59/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mst. Zubeda and Others (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3297 Const. P. 2804/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khuda Dost (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
3298 2023 CLC 2119 Suit 2933/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMIANL LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-MAR-23 Yes Plaintiff is in no position to succeed on the strength of investment made by him as it was on Build Operate and Transfer (BOT) basis. Plaintiff build and operated it for 21 years and now it stands transferred at the conclusion of Agreement. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3299 Const. P. 282/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Arbab Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3300 Const. P. 352/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khan Muhammad & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3301 Suit.B 6/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Allied Bank Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Enshaa NLC Development (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 04-OCT-16 Yes leave Granted- Prima facie it seems that by virtue of undertaking sum of money as equity amount was required to be injected by way of investment and it is thus no case of repayment of any amount disbursed to defendant No.2. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3302 Suit 2729/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MRS. NAJMA BEGUM (Plaintiff) VS WAKEEL AHMED & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 18-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3303 Const. P. 3307/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Sea Gold (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.1686-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through Secretary Finance Government of Sindh & others v. M/s. Sea Gold (Pvt) Ltd.,C.P.6179/2021 Sindh Revenue Board, A Statutory Body, through its Chairman, SRB Karachi v. M/s Sea Gold (Private) Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
3304 Const. P. 16/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst Razia & Other (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Sabir Rasheed & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah C.P.704-K/2022 Mst. Razia & others v. Muhammad Sabir Rasheed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3305 Suit.B 57/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Habib Metropolitan Bank Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Nisar Hanif & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3306 2022 PTD 866, 2024 SBLR Sindh 409, 2022 PTCL 253 Const. P. 5107/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Atlas Honda Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-22 Yes Sectoral benchmark ratios are therefore figures for various business metrics that must be used by the Commissioner to determine taxable income for a taxpayer where a taxpayer has been lawfully selected for audit but is unable to provide the relevant information, sufficient explanation for the record. Sectoral benchmark ratio does not concern with sectoral audit selection. It only empowers the Commissioner on an event when a taxpayer has failed to furnish record or documents including books of accounts or has furnished incomplete record or books of accounts or is unable to provide sufficient explanation regarding defect in relation to the documents or books of accounts on the basis of an independent procedure of Section 177 of Ordinance 2001. It is at this stage when the guidelines of sectoral benchmark ratios, as prescribed by the Board, could be adhered to. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.680-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Atlas Honda Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
3307 Suit 2766/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MIRPURKHAS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 21-MAR-22 Yes This would be an extraneous issue if sugarcane price in the province of the Punjab is compared with the minimum price in Sindh as the factors involved in fixation of minimum price in the Punjab are not available before this court. Although this is not the core issue arising out of the litigation as here I have to see whether provision of Section 16 of the Act, 1950 have been complied substantially, however, the factors that rendered difference of prices between the two provinces are that harvesting season of two provinces is different; Fertility of the Punjab soil that normally yields more per acre than in Sindh; irrigation water; subsidy on fertilizer and higher level sucrose. These are only tentative assessment since Mr. Pirzada has, in terms of the minimum price of the sugarcane historically, has questioned its fixation to have been always more than Punjab sugarcane price whereas it is always been less in the province of Sindh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3308 Suit 2200/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Sadiq Baloch. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Khurshid Begum. (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3309 Const. P. 4883/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Deharki Sugar Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3310 Const. P. 6361/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Aamir Brothers (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3311 Const. P. 162/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ameer Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3312 Const. P. 605/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Ali Hassan & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3313 Const. P. 252/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ahsan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
3314 Const. P. 498/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mirza Shamshad Baig (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3315 Const. P. 4670/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Basheer Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
3316 Const. P. 3601/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Pakistan Stock Exchange (Petitioner) VS Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-JAN-22 Yes Stock Exchange is a commercial organization and is engaged in a business of providing services for the trading of securities. As per definition of the term Stock Exchange it is a market place where facilities for trading of securities are provided. The surplus (receipts over expenses) is distributed regularly as dividend amongst the shareholders. Its shareholders taking part in trading activities as brokers derive profit. Even before demutualization the members of stock exchange were entitled to trading on stock exchange and were also provided services as brokers; they have established their offices and solicit business and use their membership for earning income therefore economic and commercial activities were the core activities of the erstwhile members and also the present TRE holders (trading right entitlement). Stock exchanges entertain applications from individuals and corporate entities to issue them such trading certificates for their economic/business activity. The stock exchange lacks the important attribute of lack of commerciality of a members club for application of the doctrine of mutuality Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan C.P.775/2022 Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited, Karachi v. Sindh through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3317 H.C.A 92/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Abdul Rehman & Others (Appellant) VS Asrar Ahmed Burney & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3318 Suit 1678/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 IBRAHIM (Plaintiff) VS M/S ADAM LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 15-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3319 Const. P. 3395/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amin ur Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3320 Const. P. 1835/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Hamdam Paper Products (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) C.P.5691/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accounability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Mohammad Farooque Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
3321 Const. P. 597/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Ghulam Farooque Moroojo and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3322 S.M.A 76/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Amina Sajid D/o Mohammad Ishaq Arshad (Petitioner) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3323 R.A (Civil Revision) 145/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad khan and an Others (Applicant) VS Ghulam Hussain and an Other (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3324 Const. P. 643/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Asif Zaman & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3325 Const. P. 644/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Babar Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3326 Const. P. 632/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Muhammad Azfar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3327 Execution First Appeal -10/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shahbaz Khan (Decree Holder) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Judgment Debtor) S.B. Order 08-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3328 Const. P. 564/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matter 2022 Sajjad Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3329 Const. P. 648/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: NTS Matters 2022 Mst: Shazia (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3330 Const. P. 521/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Delimitation Connected Matters 2022 Shafique Ahmed Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3331 Const. P. 2125/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Junaid Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Secretary, Local Govt, and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
3332 R.A (Civil Revision) 108/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Abdul Razzak (Applicant) VS Jamal Ahmed Khan and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3333 2023 CLD 883 Judicial Companies Misc. 14/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Foundation Securities (Pvt) Limited & Another (Applicant) VS NA (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-MAR-23 Yes In view of the above, it appears that the petitioners completed all necessary legal formalities, including holding separate meetings of shareholders and creditors, requisite publication and issuance of notices to the Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan. In terms of meetings of the shareholders reports of which meetings are available on record, not a single shareholder of any of the two petitioners objected to the scheme Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3334 2024 PLD Sindh 50 Suit 1292/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 ARY COMMUNICATIONS LTD (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-MAR-23 Yes Reasonable restriction imposed by law, by no stretch of imagination means to condemn a person/entity without any justification and without hearing3. According to (RSF) Reporters without borders Pakistan press, since beginning is oscillated between civil societys demand for greater press freedom and the political and executive/establishment elites constant reassertion of extensive control over the media. This has to be streamlined within frame of law not by dictations Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3335 Const. P. 5798/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Bashir Ahmed Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.711-K/2023 Dr. Basir Ahmed Bhutto v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Govt. of Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3336 Const. P. 7554/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP D 7807 of 2022 2022 Abu Bakar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
3337 Const. P. 1582/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ayaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
3338 2023 PTD 1415 Const. P. 4446/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Hascol Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-APR-23 Yes Like Letter of Credits, which essentially establishes the intent and commercial transaction the presence of vessel at high seas has to be seen within the same frame i.e. it is there for petitioners and such has not been established via vessels Bill of Lading or private contracts as they are easily getable Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.680-K/2023 HASCOL Petroleum Limited & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary (Revenue Division) Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Re-List
3339 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 869/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) VS Qasim Khan S/o Sher Muhammad & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
3340 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1015/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 The Collector of Customs Appraisement East Karachi (Applicant) VS Causis Mass Transit Pvt Limited Islamabad & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.1070-K/2023 Causis Mass Transit Pak (Private) Limited v. Collector of Customs (Appraisement - East) Karachi. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3341 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 216/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Collector of Customs MCC Appraisement (East) (Applicant) VS M/s. M.I. Traders (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
3342 Const. P. 2374/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Madeeha Danish and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
3343 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1059/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s,. Heal Pharmaceutical (Pvt) Ltd., Peshawar (Applicant) VS The Collector of Customs, Karachi & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) C.P.1024-K/2023 M/s. Heal Pharmaceutical (Pvt) Ltd. v. The Collector of Customs & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3344 Const. P. 2018/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Reckitt Beckiser Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
3345 H.C.A 274/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khurram Ahmed Mumtaz (Appellant) VS Mst. Unza Naz Khurram & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3346 H.C.A 159/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shafaat Hydri & Others (Appellant) VS Naila Hydri & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3347 Const. P. 3179/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Haji Moosa Khan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nazia and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-23 Yes Suggestions alone that they have given false evidence could not be materialized in favour of the petitioners as primary burden was discharged by plaintiffs/respondents. It is a cumulative effect of all evidence available on record that is to be seen and applied. In addition to it, this Court in terms of Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan cannot assume the jurisdiction which is otherwise not vested, that is reappraisal of evidence, which has been done by the revisional court and that is the last fact finding court. This Court could only intervene had the jurisdiction been exercised which was not vested and/or vested but not exercised. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1273-K/2023 Haji Moosa Khan (Late) through L.Rs. and others v. Mst. nazia Bibi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice)
3348 Const. P. 4756/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Asad Ali Awan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Naseem Begum & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3349 H.C.A 123/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ahsan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Suleman & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3350 I. A 39/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Jamil Ahmed Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ahmed Siddiqui & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3351 Spl.H.C.A 288/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 PSRM Steel Pvt Ltd. (Appellant) VS ASkari Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-DEC-23 Yes The appellant could hardly be considered to have a case for interference as on the counts as being highest bidder; no vested right could be assumed at such stage;; even the acceptance of an offer is not a vested right which has to pass through the rigorous of Order-XXI Rule-89/90 CPC etc. The appellant, merely on the strength of a highest bidder, cannot insist for acceptance of its offer and/or confirmation when the material available before the court, as shown above, was sufficient to justify the order of reauction of the properties both moveable and immoveable which have been ordered to be highlighted in the sale proclamation to fetch the maximum amount. In terms of sale proclamation, the discretion vest with the Court either to accept or refuse bid(s) subject to valid reasons. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3352 H.C.A 432/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Sharjeel Hayat (Appellant) VS Mazhar Kamal & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3353 Const. P. 6653/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Scilife Pharma Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3354 H.C.A 274/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s. China Mobile Pak Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Makran Communication & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-JAN-24 Yes Health status of one of the partners of firm could not be attributed to the termination of agreement/license agreement and more importantly, if it is not established to be an ???unlawful termination of license???, then the principal cannot be saddled with the responsibility of paying the damages of whatsoever nature. A lawful termination may have effected someone???s health, but the lawful actions taken cannot be subjected to claim of damages. Only unlawful termination may give rise to a claim of damages. Since it is not established to be an unlawful termination, therefore question of awarding damages does not arise Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3355 Const. P. 3529/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Rubina Anjum (Petitioner) VS Najmul Islam and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3356 Suit 318/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD AYUB TAREEN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS JS BANK LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 27-JUN-23 Yes -A subsidiary as defined in Section 2(68) of the Companies Act, 2017, which can only exist in relation to a holding company in which the holding company either (i) controls the composition of the Board of the subsidiary or (ii) exercises or controls more than one half of its voting securities. Viewed in this context and in particular read with Section 23 of BCO, it is clear that the word ???form??? used in this section clearly envisages the forming of a subsidiary by acquisition either by control of composition of its Board or control of more than half of its shareholding by way of acquisition under the Regulations, 2017. This is further strengthened by the fact that Section 23(1) uses the term ???formed??? in past tense in respect of the subsidiary being taken over by Banking Company. So it envisages a subsidiary which is being formed or was already formed. --The objective behind and mischief sought to be avoided by Section 23(1) is to bar more than one commercial banking license within a group save where a subsidiary is engaged in Islamic banking. Whether the subsidiary is a newly formed company or formed by way of acquisition of its majority shareholding, is immaterial to that objective. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3357 I. A 18/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. Mazhar Ghulam Lotia and Co. & Others (Appellant) VS SME Bank Limited and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3358 I. A 26/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s. MCB Bank Limited (Appellant) VS M/s. Khan Autos Engineers & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3359 I. A 49/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Farrukh Shahzad Chaudhry & others (Appellant) VS M.C.B. & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3360 I. A 58/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sheikh Rehan Ahmed (Appellant) VS M/s. Bank Islami (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3361 Const. P. 3975/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Altaf Hussain Hali and Others (Petitioner) VS DHA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3362 Const. P. 1158/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ramzan Bibi & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
3363 H.C.A 40/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s. Bank Islami Pakistan Limited (Appellant) VS Muhammad Usman & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3364 I. A 40/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Afsari Begum & others (Appellant) VS M/s. B.R.R. Guardian Modarba & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3365 Const. P. 2136/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shafi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
3366 Const. P. 5920/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Abrar Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS M. Kamran Khan & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3367 H.C.A 263/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s. Terry Towellers (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Hashmi Impex (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3368 H.C.A 34/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Province of Sindh (Appellant) VS Muhammad Aslam Siddiqui & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3369 H.C.A 297/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Byco Petroleum Pakistan Limited (Appellant) VS Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3370 H.C.A 234/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: HCA 233 of 2019 2019 Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Appellant) VS SPEC Energy DMCC & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
3371 I. A 10/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Farhan Dahri and Another (Appellant) VS M/S Sindh Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3372 I. A 66/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Taqi Abbas (Appellant) VS Syed Naqi Abbas (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3373 R.A (Civil Revision) 34/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Wikiyo (Applicant) VS Mst. Aami and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 16-AUG-23 Yes The succession to the estate of a Muslim under Muhammadan Law is open only at the time of his/her death and legal heirs alive at such time could be entitled to inherit his/her estate. It is only Section 4 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 which intervened with prospective effect. Thus the legal heirs of a predeceased son in the instant case were never devolved of any share or could not draw title by inheriting estate of his grandfather/ great grandfather under Muhammadan Law Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
3374 H.C.A 16/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd. (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3375 Const. P. 840/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Fouzia Owais Kalia and another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3376 Const. P. 6854/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Samba Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3377 Const. P. 3532/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Saeedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Clifton Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3378 Const. P. 2684/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 AbdulRazzaque & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
3379 H.C.A 89/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Mohammad Younus Bawany & Ors (Appellant) VS Mohammad Feroz Punjani (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
3380 Const. P. 36/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Yousuf Ismail (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan