Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.
Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:
| ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.No. | Citation | Case No. | Case Year | Parties | Bench Type | Order/Judgment | Order_Date | A.F.R | Head Notes/ Tag Line | Bench | Apex Court | Apex Status |
| 1 | Const. P. 565/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Muhammad Latif (Petitioner) VS District Judge South Karachi & other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 2 | Suit 1014/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | MUHAMMAD ANWER (Plaintiff) VS SYED SALEEMUDDIN & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-SEP-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 3 | Adm. Suit 503/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 19-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 4 | Adm.A 5/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | F.T. SELNES, a fishing trawler / vessel (Appellant) VS Mega International Commercial Bank Company Limited, Taiwan, Republic of China (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-JUL-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 5 | I.T.R.A 46/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 6 | H.C.A 86/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Sarana Hitshri Ayervedic Ashodhalaya Association (Appellant) VS Pakistan Drug House & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 7 | Cr.Appeal 90/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Muhammad Qasim (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-APR-14 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 8 | Const. P. 440/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Fida Hussain Rind (Petitioner) VS Executive Engineer Irrigation Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 9 | Suit 306/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | SYED ALTAF HUSSAIN (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 14-DEC-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 10 | Const. P. 735/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Dillip Kumar (Petitioner) VS V/S Secretary Local Govt. and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 11 | Const. P. 227/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Liaquat Ali Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 12 | Const. P. 1974/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Faiz Mohammad Sarki (Petitioner) VS R.P.O Sukkur and other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 13 | Suit 833/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | Naila Moins (Plaintiff) VS Narmeen S,Hussain (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 31-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 14 | Const. P. 1104/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Samiullah (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Amin & Othrs (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-MAR-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 15 | Judicial Companies Misc. 47/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Muhammad Younus & another (Applicant) VS Venu Gurdas Advani & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-SEP-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 16 | Const. P. 3469/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Nasiruddin Shahab (Petitioner) VS Sub Registrar Clifton Town & Ors (Defendant) | D.B. | Order | 19-APR-12 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 17 | Const. P. 998/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Muhammmad Hashim Panhyar and others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 18 | Suit 1673/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Mrs. Shamshad Begum and another (Plaintiff) VS Syed Iftikhar Hussain Jaffary and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 19-DEC-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 19 | Suit 1134/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | SYED AFSAR HUSSAIN RIZVI (Plaintiff) VS SYED NAYAR HUSSAIN (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 02-NOV-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 20 | Const. P. 3133/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 23-AUG-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai | C.P.1927/2013 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad thr. Secretary Establishment v. Shahab Mazhar Bhalli & others,C.A.1533/2013 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad thr. Secretary Establishment v. Shahab Mazhar Bhalli & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed | ||
| 21 | Cr.Bail 60/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Sunny @ Ali Raza Malhani (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 22 | Cr.J.A 105/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2004 | Muhammad Amin (Appellant) VS The State (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-MAY-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 23 | Suit 822/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 24 | Civil Revision 53/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 11-MAR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 25 | Civil Revision 172/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 18-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 26 | Civil Revision 9/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Mushtaq Ahmed (Applicant) VS Malik Ghulam Abbas (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-MAR-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 27 | Judicial Companies Misc. 21/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | King?s Food (Pvt.) Ltd. and Hilal Confectionery (Pvt.) Ltd.a (Applicant) VS Nonw (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-MAR-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 28 | Cr.Bail 357/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Khuda Bukhsh and 4 others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-SEP-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 29 | Suit 1373/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Amir Karim (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Asif & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 26-JUN-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 30 | Suit 596/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2002 | Union National Bank (Plaintiff) VS M/S Silver Reed International (Pvt.) Limited (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-JAN-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 31 | Cr.Bail 952/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Waqas (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 32 | Suit 229/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Pakistan State Oil Company Limited (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Navy Benevolent Association (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 30-APR-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 33 | Const. P. 516/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Abdul Qadeem Pathan (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Shikarpur and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar | ||||
| 34 | Suit 122/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Shahid Zaib and another (Plaintiff) VS The City District Government and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 05-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 35 | Const. P. 4149/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Abdul Wahab (Petitioner) VS V/S Abdul Rasheed and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 23-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 36 | Const. P. 6085/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Syed Riaz Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.474-K/2016 Syed Riaz Hussain Shah v. Federation of Pakistan M/o Housing & Works thr. its Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 37 | Const. P. 5729/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Sajjad Haider (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 38 | Const. P. 2255/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 39 | Suit 1105/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Maxim Advertising Company (Pvt.) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Rufi Builders and Developers & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-SEP-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 40 | Const. P. 772/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation. (Petitioner) VS V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 41 | S.M.A 41/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Aslam Mohsin Ali (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 42 | Suit 999/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Asif Ali Zardari (Plaintiff) VS Sadruddin Hashwani & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 43 | Suit 848/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) VS M/S Ravi Traders (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 25-NOV-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 44 | Suit 1508/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Humayun Naseer (Plaintiff) VS Lt. General Zahid Ali Khan Akbar and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 17-NOV-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 45 | Suit 356/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Asim Farooq (Plaintiff) VS Maj. (R) Noor-ul-Amin & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-SEP-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 46 | Const. P. 1413/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Mst. Taj Bibi Tahira and others (Petitioner) VS V/S VIth ADJ (South) and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 47 | Const. P. 3180/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ch: Muhammad Yahya (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-JUN-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 48 | Const. P. 2243/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Zeenatabad Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 49 | Const. P. 953/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | A. Razzaq Dawood (Petitioner) VS V/S M/s Urban Builders and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.1943/2018,C.P.1368/2019,C.P.5452/2021,C.P.6388/2021,C.A.644/2022,C.A.645/2022 SCP | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed | ||
| 50 | S.M.A 56/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Syeda Rafat Eijaz (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 51 | Const. P. 7312/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Burj Builders & Developers and another (Petitioner) VS Sindh Building Control Authority and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-SEP-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 52 | H.C.A 151/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Karachi Pipe Mills Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-JUN-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 53 | Const. P. 2703/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Nadar Shah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-MAY-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 54 | Const. P. 2288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-DEC-20 | Yes | Under Article 199 of Constitution In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded above, we are not satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that substantial compliance of the Judgment dated 23.01.2018 passed by this Court affirmed by the Honble Supreme Court vide order dated 09.07.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.322-K / 2018 has not been complied with in its letter and spirit. Therefore, at this juncture, prima facie, Petitioner No.2 has made out a case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors. Therefore, the office is directed to issue show cause notice under section 17 (1) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003 read with Article 204 of the Constitution, as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for willful defiance of the Judgment. The listed application bearing (CMA No. 7200 of 2019), is adjourned to be taken up in the second week of January 2021. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.322-K/2018 Khursheed Mukaram v. Ms. Azra Muqeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 55 | Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-20 | No | We are of the considered view that the interest of justice would be best met if the respondents are granted last opportunity to comply with the direction of this Court in the instant matter without fail within two (02) weeks and to submit compliance report to this Court on the next date of hearing, failing which show cause notice shall be issued to alleged contemnors on the next date of hearing. To be listed on 04.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when alleged contemnors must be present in Court along with their compliance report. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 56 | Const. P. 2620/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Bashir Ahmed Khan advocate and others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Local Government Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 57 | Cr.Misc. 84/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | MST. RAHEMA (Applicant) VS S.S.P DISTT.MITHI & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 58 | Const. P. 826/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Malik Pahar Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 59 | M.A. 13/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Abdullah & others (Appellant) VS Ghulam Nabi & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 60 | I. A 100/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Farhat Fareed Sheikh (Appellant) VS NIB Bank Limited and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.A.26-K/2020 Muslim Commercial Bank (MCB) Limited v. Mst: Farhat Fareed Shaikh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 61 | Const. P. 565/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Asad Hassan S/o Syed Sibte Hasan (Petitioner) VS The Ist ADJ, Karachi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 62 | Const. P. 1770/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Fayyaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst Farheen Akther (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-MAY-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 63 | Const. P. 705/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ahmed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 64 | Const. P. 873/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Roopchand (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 65 | Cr.Bail 451/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Moosa (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 66 | Const. P. 797/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mazhar Iqbal & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 67 | Const. P. 1022/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 68 | Cr.Bail 641/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Raheem (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 69 | Const. P. 838/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Husna & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 70 | M.A. 6/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Mrs. Delphine & Ors (Appellant) VS Mrs. Antonia & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-AUG-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 71 | H.C.A 130/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Sohail Akhtar (Appellant) VS Muhammad Amin Chapel (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 72 | Cr.Bail 392/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Nazeer Ahmed & an other (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 73 | Const. P. 768/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Baghbari & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 74 | Const. P. 1020/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Ghulam Sakina (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 75 | Cr.Bail 455/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ghous Bux (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 76 | Adm. Suit 918/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Petitioner) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 77 | Const. P. 6183/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mazhar Ali Magsi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 78 | Const. P. 1015/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Shrimati Ram Piyari (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 79 | Civil Revision 5/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2001 | Abdul Rasheed and others (Applicant) VS Mst. Hayat Khatoon and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-AUG-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 80 | Const. P. 717/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Noor Alam (Petitioner) VS The Honourable VIIth ADJ Khi South & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 81 | M.A. 9/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Abdullah Aftab (Appellant) VS IIIrd Additional District Judge Central at Karachi (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 82 | I. A 28/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MCR (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Soneri Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.A.5-K/2019 Soneri Bank Limited v. MCR (Pvt) Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | ||
| 83 | II.A. 31/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Ideal Arcade Builders & Developers (Appellant) VS Saeed Ahmad Qureshi (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 84 | Suit.B 159/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Deutsche Bank AG (Plaintiff) VS Fateh Textile Mills Limited (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 26-JUL-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 85 | Const. P. 964/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 86 | Const. P. 87/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Fayyaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 87 | Const. P. 1605/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Habib ullah Khan Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 88 | Const. P. 1781/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Moazam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 89 | Const. P. 1142/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Naveed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 90 | Const. P. 2041/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Arsalan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 91 | Const. P. 1534/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Zakir HUssain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 92 | Const. P. 2295/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Yasir Arfat and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 93 | Const. P. 3199/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Anees Raja (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 94 | F.R.A 15/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Airport Hotel (Appellant) VS Khursheed Pervaiz & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 95 | 2023 PLC CS Note 99 | Const. P. 3218/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.739-K/2019 Zaheer Ahmed v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 96 | Const. P. 2965/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 97 | Const. P. 5649/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | Contempt--Prima-facie the question of downgrading some of the petitioners in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the aggrieved persons to avail their respective remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondent-company, if any. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.3977/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. Rao Muhammad Gulzar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 98 | Const. P. 1318/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Syed Naimuddin Advocate (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Contempt | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 99 | Const. P. 1140/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Muhammad Awais (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 100 | F.R.A 10/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Airport Hotel (Appellant) VS Mrs. Shahida Irfan & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 101 | Const. P. 158/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 102 | Const. P. 3089/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Jahangir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 103 | Const. P. 32/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 104 | Const. P. 495/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 105 | Const. P. 2978/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Khalid Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 106 | Const. P. 9015/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Qari Muhammad Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-20 | No | Contempt--In our view, the compliance report submitted on behalf of the alleged contemnor is not in line with the order dated 26.09.2019 passed by this Court in letter and spirit. Resultantly, the compliance report is rejected. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 107 | Const. P. 2250/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-MAY-20 | No | With the consent of learned counsel for the parties and learned AAG Sindh, the petition and listed applications stand disposed of in the above terms and with the above directions with no order as to costs. Office is directed to issue notice to respondents 1 and 2 for compliance of this order in letter and spirit. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 108 | Const. P. 2546/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Aftab Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) VS The Speaker Provincial Assembly and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-MAY-20 | Yes | Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today. Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1879/2020 Aftab Ahmed Mahar v. Speaker Provincial Assembly of Sindh, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 109 | Const. P. 4905/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/ Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fayyaz Muhammad and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-OCT-20 | Yes | The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 110 | Const. P. 7155/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mujtaba Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 111 | Const. P. 8536/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Riffat John (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-FEB-20 | Yes | Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 112 | Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-NOV-20 | No | We have heard the learned counsel on the subject issue and have gone through the order dated 16.11.2020 passed by this Court. In our view, accidental errors can be corrected if such error being apparent on the face of the record. Our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Tufail and 3 others v. Ghulam Farid and 4 others (2000 SCMR 1035)-- In view of the above factual position of the case, the listed application is allowed as prayed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 113 | Const. P. 3055/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Maqsood Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | Since respondent No 3 has crossed the age of 60 years and left his position from KPT, no further action is required. However, it is made clear that he is not entitled to a second pension from KPT due to his illegal deputation and subsequent absorption in KPT in the intervening period without the approval of the competent authority as discussed in the preceding paragraphs---Before parting with this order, it may be observed that even on moral ground, the illegalities committed by the management of KPT and respondent No.3, being a retired naval forces personnel and a patriot, was expected to act honestly in the best interest of the country. However, he chose not only to get himself illegally absorbed in KPT, but also claimed and received pension from their different services causing heavy loss to the national exchequer. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1325/2021 CDR (R) Khalid Munir v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 114 | Const. P. 3997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Dr. Liaquat Ali Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-DEC-20 | Yes | i) whether the respondent namely Mrs. Abida Parveen was appointed in accordance with the law and had requisite qualifications and experience for the position of Registrar (BPS-19) in Environmental, Climate Change, and Coastal Development Department, Sindh Government to claim the post under the recruitment rules; ii) whether this Court can overrule the SPSCs recommendation under Article 199 of the Constitution or otherwise? And iii) whether the private respondent was awarded punishment in her previous employment and in view of such punishment, whether she could seek government employment in any other department or office. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.150-K/2021 Dr.Liaquat Ali Abro v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 115 | Const. P. 6200/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Syed Mehdi Hassan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-DEC-20 | Yes | Prima-facie his matter on the subject issue is still subjudice before the learned FST, which is presently not available at Karachi to adjudicate the matter of petitioner. This being the position of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct learned FST to decide the application under Rule 23-A of the Service Tribunals (Procedure) Rules 1974 of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 116 | Const. P. 6100/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 117 | Const. P. 6236/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Raza Muhammad & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-DEC-20 | Yes | The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed in limine along with the pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 118 | Const. P. 6256/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Rizwan Farooq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-MAR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.259-K/2020 Fazal-e-Rabbi v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Housing & Works & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 119 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 66 | Const. P. 244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Zahid Hassan Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed. DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 120 | Const. P. 3315/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mst. Zarina Anwar (Petitioner) VS The Secretary M/o Education & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-20 | Yes | We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Secretary Education, Government of Sindh and Secretary Education Department Government of Punjab, jointly and severally, to pay all her perks and privileges to which she was entitled to by issuance of notification of her retirement, inclusive of her entire pensionary benefits within two (02) months and report compliance through MIT-II of this Court. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 121 | Const. P. 5909/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Sajid Jalil (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-OCT-20 | Yes | It is a well-settled proposition of law that the Competent Authority is entitled to make rules in the interest of exigency of service and to remove anomalies in Service Rules. It is the Service Rules Committee which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion and it is essentially an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and policy decision making of the Respondent-Bank and the interference with such matters by the Courts is not warranted as no vested right of a Bank employee is involved in the matter of promotion, or the rules determining their eligibility or fitness, and in Bank Cases, the High Court has no jurisdiction through Writ to strike it down, except in the cases in which policy framed is against the public interest. This proposition of law has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in a plethora of judgments. Moreover, petitioner has not been able to point out any case where other employee(s), having rating equivalent to or lower than him, was / were promoted by the respondent-bank. Thus, prima facie it appears that the policy of the respondent is uniform and without any discrimination at least to the extent of the instant case. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.269/2021 Sajid Jalil v. National Bank of Pakistan through President, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 122 | Const. P. 1639/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Sara Durrani (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Petitioners, accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means while acting as a Minister of Local Government ,Other petitioners, accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc., are identified as Benamidar/ostensible owners of the properties actually owned and possessed by him. We come to the case of family members of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani (his wife, a son and three daughters). It is noted, they have been identified as Benamidar owners of certain properties like plots, flats ,bungalows, vehicles .s. Allegation to provide finance to purchase the properties is against him, and not against his family members. there is no evidence or even allegation that his family members were either privy to his alleged acts of depravity, aiding and abetting him. Petition of, Sara Durrani (C.P.No.D-1639/2020), is allowed and bail is confirmed on the same granted ad interim pre arrest bail on. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.6305/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Sarar Durrani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 123 | Cr.Bail 1375/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD KASHIF S/O MUHAMMAD RAFIQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant / accused Muhammad Kashif son of Muhammad Rafiq is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The instant bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. This bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 124 | Const. P. 585/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Gulbahar Lohar Baloch (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc. Gulbahar Lohar Baloch servant cum gunman of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani, has been found to have purchased a plot of 1000 sq. yards in DHA Karachi in the year 2013, have built a house thereon and sold it finally. He earned Rs.212,500,000.00 from this transaction. While working with accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani he was able to clinch such a deal in itself is a pointer to his role in the offence, that is, he has been facilitating him in accumulating property from illegal means. In presence of such prima facie evidence, sufficient enough to believe his involvement in the case, he is not entitled to grant of pre arrest bail. Hence, dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | |||
| 125 | Const. P. 528/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst. Nusrat & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 126 | Const. P. 1640/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Shahana Durrani (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Petitioners, accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc., are identified as Benamidar/ostensible owners of the properties actually owned and possessed by him. We come to the case of family members of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani (his wife, a son and three daughters). It is noted, they have been identified as Benamidar owners of certain properties like plots, flats ,bungalows, vehicles .s. Allegation to provide finance to purchase the properties is against him, and not against his family members. there is no evidence or even allegation that his family members were either privy to his alleged acts of depravity, aiding and abetting him. Petition of Shahana Durrani (C.P.No.D-1640/2020),, is allowed and bail is confirmed on the same granted ad interim pre arrest bail on. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.6346/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Shahana Durrani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 127 | Const. P. 1497/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Nasir Kamal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-JUN-21 | Yes | PNSC is hereby directed to pay all the post-retirement benefits to the petitioner strictly in accordance with law without fail within fifteen (15) days and to submit compliance report to this Court through MIT-II within seven (07) days thereafter. For future as well as for cases pending for calculation and/or payment of post-retirement benefits, PNSC is further directed to ensure compliance of the directions given by the Honble Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Advocate (supra) and Province of Punjab, through Conservator of Forest, Faisalabad (supra) in letter and spirit The petition is allowed in the above terms with costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | C.P.1089-K/2021 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation through its Chairman v. Nasir Kamal & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 128 | Const. P. 607/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Dawood Khan S/o Sher Ali (Petitioner) VS Rana Muhammad Rafique and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | It would be seen that it has been consistently held by the Honble Supreme Court that if the tenant asserts that he is no more a tenant as he had purchased the property, even then he has to vacate the property and file a Suit for specific performance of the sale agreement, and he would be entitled to possession of the property in accordance with law only if he succeeds in his Suit. It is also well-settled that till such time the Civil Court passes a decree against the landlord in a Suit for specific performance, landlord would be entitled to recover rent. In the present case, it is an admitted position that compliance of the tentative rent order was not made by the petitioner, therefore, the Rent Controller had no option, but to strike off his defence as held by the Honble Supreme Court in Safeer Travels (Pvt.) Ltd. V/S Muhammad Khalid Shafi through legal heirs, PLD 2007 S.C. 504. The impugned orders are in accord with the law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court. Accordingly, the petition and listed application are dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 129 | Cr.Bail 54/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD FAIQ S/O MUHAMMAD LAIQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 130 | Const. P. 679/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Javed Qureshi S/o Abdul Sattar Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Aftab Ali and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 131 | Cr.Bail 464/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | FARHAN S/O ABDUL AZIZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-SEP-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant / accused has made out a case for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him vide order dated 18.03.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. It is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative in nature which shall not prejudice the case of either party nor shall they influence the learned trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits in accordance with law. This bail application is allowed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 132 | II.A. 6/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2008 | Muhammad Hussain (Appellant) VS Azhar Abbas (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 133 | Suit 112/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Arshad Ikram. (Plaintiff) VS Civil Aviation Authority & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 134 | Const. P. 3597/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Abdul Rauf Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners questioned their transfer and posting orders issued by the respondent-Cantonment Board by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court asserting that the post against which the petitioners were appointed was/is a non-transferable under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule 5 of the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 135 | Suit 206/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | MST.GULSHAN NASEEM (Plaintiff) VS IZHARUDDIN (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-NOV-11 | Yes | Foregoing are the reasons for the short Order announced by me on 01.11.2012 whereby this Suit was decreed with costs against the defendant as prayed by the plaintiff. All pending applications, including CMA Nos.1465/2010, are disposed of in view of this judgment. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 136 | II.A. 57/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Salahuddin Siddiqui (Appellant) VS Learned VIIth A.D.J., & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-JUN-17 | Yes | As a result of the above discussion, the impugned judgments and decrees are set aside, and the matter is remanded to the learned trial Court with direction to allow the appellant / plaintiff to produce additional evidence in accordance with law, and thereafter to decide the Suit afresh latest by 31.08.2017 strictly in accordance with law. The appeal and listed applications stand disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 137 | Suit 728/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Rimsha Shaikhani. (Plaintiff) VS Nixor College & another.(ISSUES) (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 21-SEP-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 138 | Cr.Bail 498/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Qasim Pitafi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 139 | R.A (Civil Revision) 231/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2006 | G.N Corporation & Ors (Applicant) VS Mst Jannat Khatoon (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-AUG-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 140 | R.A (Civil Revision) 12/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sain Bux and others (Applicant) VS Nadir Ali and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 141 | Const. P. 1105/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 142 | Const. P. 1840/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Amphy Salim Malik (Petitioner) VS the Nazir of the High Caourt of Sindh at Karachi (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-MAY-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 143 | Cr.Rev 38/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Imran Ali Jatoi. (Applicant) VS Learned Sessions Judge Jamshoro @ Kotri. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 144 | R.A (Civil Revision) 85/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Mumtaz Ali and others (Applicant) VS Arz Mohammad and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 145 | R.A (Civil Revision) 53/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Muhammad Siddique (Applicant) VS Abdul Rehman (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-MAR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 146 | R.A (Civil Revision) 50/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Rafiq Ahmed Khichi (Applicant) VS Ashok Kumar & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-MAY-15 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 147 | Const. P. 828/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Faisal Khalid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 148 | Const. P. 3029/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Muhammad Hassan (Petitioner) VS SHO P.S. Gambhat District Khairpur & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-SEP-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 149 | S.M.A 6/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Syed Nadeem Ahmed Jilani S/o Saeed Ahmed Jilani (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 150 | Const. P. 895/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Nisar Ahmed S/o Muhammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS Matloob Alam Hussain and Another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 151 | Cr.Bail 2046/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD HARIS KHAN S/O AIZAZULLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 152 | Cr.Bail 2209/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD KAMAL @ ANDA S/O MUHAMMAD AYAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 153 | Cr.Bail 1879/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD ISMAIL @ BHAIYA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 154 | Cr.Bail 1296/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD ABID IQBAL S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | No | Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant Muhammad Hashim Iqbal vide order dated 21.06.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions ; and, post-arrest bail is granted to the applicant Muhammad Abid Iqbal subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000.00 and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 155 | I. A 39/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Syed Ameer Ali & Ors. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-MAR-22 | Yes | The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside with direction to the learned Banking Court to decide the Suit expeditiously. Needless to say the Suit shall proceed ex-parte against appellants 2 and 3 as they did not file any application for leave to defend. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 156 | M.A. 4/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Mst. Sassi Hizbullah (Appellant) VS Junaid Ahmed Khan and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-JAN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 157 | Const. P. 104/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Anwar ul Haq S/o Aziz Ahmed (Late) (Petitioner) VS Shaikh Salahudin and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 158 | S.M.A 549/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Shahzad Noor s/o Abdul Sattar Noor (Petitioner) VS petitioner (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-APR-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 159 | II.A. 30/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Khalida Thr. Attorney Sikandar Iqbal (Appellant) VS Raj Kumari (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-OCT-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 160 | Judicial Companies Misc. 7/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | RB HYGIENE HOME PAKISTAN LTD AND ANOTHER (Applicant) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-OCT-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 161 | Const. P. 824/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Dr. Sunil Ahmed Hotwani (Petitioner) VS Abdul Wakeel & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 162 | Const. P. 1165/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Muhammad Akbar & Others (Petitioner) VS Riaz Hussain & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-DEC-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 163 | Const. P. 2064/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Dost Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-NOV-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 164 | Const. P. 999/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Habib Carpets (Pvt.) Limited (Petitioner) VS Karachi Properties Investment Company Pvt Ltd & or (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.920-K/2022 Karachi Properties Investment Company (Pvt) Ltd. v. Habib Carpets (Pvt) Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted | ||
| 165 | Const. P. 622/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C. Ps. Nos. D-623, 626, 628, 633 and 678 of 2022 | 2022 | Saeed Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Chief Election Commission Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-JUN-22 | Yes | Declaration of assets in Local Government Elections | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput | |||
| 166 | Const. P. 2967/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muhamma Ilyas & Ors (Petitioner) VS SHO P.S Boat Basin & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-NOV-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 167 | S.M.A 375/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Atif Farooqui s/o Khursheed Umer Farooqui (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-MAY-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 168 | S.M.A 521/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Salim s/o Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-MAY-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 169 | Const. P. 1671/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Shabbir (Petitioner) VS Mst. Tahira Begum & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 170 | Const. P. 3026/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Nadeem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 171 | Const. P. 118/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Kamal Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 172 | Const. P. 3025/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Naveed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 173 | Const. P. 2841/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Ali Hassan (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 174 | Const. P. 98/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mansoor-ul-Haque Solangi (Petitioner) VS PIDC & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-APR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 175 | R.A (Civil Revision) 57/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Tehreek Jadeed Anjuman Ahmedia (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ishaque thr: L.Rs & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 176 | Const. P. 5549/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Syed Mohsin Mahzar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-FEB-24 | Yes | Scope of Deemed Approval, Alteration and Regularisation under the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations , 2002 and the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 177 | Const. P. 1585/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Hamid Mehmood & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JAN-24 | Yes | Interpretation of Regulation No.18-4.1 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 in respect of the conversion of amenity plots. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 178 | H.C.A 336/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Farid Shalwani (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ali Taufiq & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 179 | I. A 78/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Syed Muhammad Naeem (Appellant) VS Ziauddin and Another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 180 | Const. P. 4847/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Muhammad Muneer (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 181 | Const. P. 4790/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Kashif bin Rauf (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 182 | Const. P. 4909/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Faisal Hashmani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-SEP-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 183 | Const. P. 2465/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Abdul Majeed Sohail (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Mahboob-uz-Zaman Khan & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 25-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 184 | Const. P. 1714/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Burgar D. Sethna & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 185 | Const. P. 565/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | City Environment Society (Petitioner) VS KBCA & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 186 | Const. P. 280/1997 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1997 | Tariq Ahmed Khan Lodhi (Appellant) VS K.D.A Karachi (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 08-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 187 | Adm. Suit 1740/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 10-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 188 | Const. P. 1634/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Mrs.Fateh Mobeen (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive Officer Faisal Cantonment Board (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 189 | Const. P. 596/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Dannish Ammad (Petitioner) VS The State (NAB) (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-APR-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 190 | Const. P. 1711/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd., (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAY-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 191 | H.C.A 76/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 192 | Const. P. 1707/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 193 | I. A 103/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Younus Kamal (Appellant) VS Standard Charterd Bank (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-JUL-12 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.260-K/2012 Younus Kamal v. Standered Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 194 | Const. P. 3302/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Zaidi Abid Foundations (Petitioner) VS CDGK & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 195 | Adm. Suit 1122/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 29-MAR-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 196 | Const. P. 1232/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Muhammad Hanif (Appellant) VS Fed: of Pakistan & ors (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 06-APR-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 197 | Cr.Rev 186/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Sabir Zaman and others (Applicant) VS The State and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-JAN-14 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 198 | Suit 3463/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Dr Raheela Magsi (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-MAY-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 199 | Const. P. 3048/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-MAR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 200 | Suit 950/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | HAJI NAIMATULLAH (Plaintiff) VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 201 | Cr.Bail 1010/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Shafique (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-JUL-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 202 | Cr.Bail 1206/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Zubair @ Chhota Munna (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 203 | Cr.Bail 1130/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Abdul Sattar @ Baba (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 204 | Suit 684/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | Engro Fertilizers Limited. (Plaintiff) VS The Federation of Pakistan (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-OCT-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 205 | Const. P. 436/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Muhammad Khan Shaikh (Petitioner) VS SSP Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 206 | Const. P. 724/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Masood Ahmed Khuhro (Petitioner) VS E.D.O Education Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 207 | Suit.B 6/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Transmission Engineering Industries Limited (Plaintiff) VS Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 03-DEC-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 208 | Suit 1469/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | MST.AFSHAN (Plaintiff) VS SYED KAMRAN ALI SHAH & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-NOV-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 209 | Suit 1743/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Tayyab Rafiq Bilgarami (Plaintiff) VS M/s Flying Cement (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-NOV-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 210 | Const. P. 1558/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Saifullah Lahori (Petitioner) VS District Officer Roads Kamber Shahdadkot and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 211 | Suit 104/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | A.J CORPORATION (Plaintiff) VS FAUJI FERTILIZERS BIN QASIM (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 212 | Suit 1266/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Chief Resident Representative WAPDA (Plaintiff) VS M/s Transglone Shippoing Services (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 30-NOV-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 213 | Const. P. 953/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Manzoor Ahmed Jakhrani (Petitioner) VS SSP Jacobabad and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 214 | Cr.Bail 342/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Imdad Ali Bhatti (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 215 | Const. P. 3319/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Muhammad Ayub (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-APR-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.1685/2012 N.A.D.R.A. thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Muhammad Ayub & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | ||
| 216 | Const. P. 1170/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Sarfaraz Khan (Appellant) VS NBP (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-FEB-13 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 217 | Suit.B 181/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Emirates Global Islamic Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Abdul Salam Khan (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-DEC-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 218 | Const. P. 3250/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Muhammad Shafiq (Appellant) VS Ministry of Finance (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-MAR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam | ||||
| 219 | H.C.A 180/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Zulfiqar Ahmed and others (Appellant) VS Suit No. 965 of 2003 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-OCT-13 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 220 | H.C.A 5/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | M/s Rock Well Enterprise (Appellant) VS Employees? Old Age Benefits Institution and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-APR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam | C.P.1174/2013 M/s Rock Well Enterprises v. M/s EOBI, M/o Labour , Government of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 221 | Adm. Suit 160/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2002 | Syed Mohsin Ali (Petitioner) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-AUG-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam | ||||
| 222 | Civil Revision 109/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2008 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 21-MAR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 223 | H.C.A 131/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-SEP-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 224 | J.M 1/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | United Banik Limited (Applicant) VS Gulistan Textile Mills Limited (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-DEC-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 225 | H.C.A 140/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | M/s Rice Export Corporation of Pakistan (Appellant) VS M/s European Asian Agencies & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-SEP-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.416-K/2014 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. M/s European Asian Agencies and others,C.A.141-K/2015 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. M/s European Asian Agencies and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed | ||
| 226 | Const. P. 1374/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2014 | Mst Nooran Khatoon and another (Petitioner) VS SIP Mohammad Khan Abro SHO PS Bakrani and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar | ||||
| 227 | H.C.A 15/1979 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1979 | M/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan Limited (Appellant) VS M/S General Industrial Machines (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-DEC-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 228 | Suit.B 28/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Sheraz Riaz (Plaintiff) VS M/S Sil Bank (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 11-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 229 | II.A. 25/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Mrs. Gulshan Akhtar (Appellant) VS State Life Insurance and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 230 | Suit 296/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Muzaffar Ahmed Bughio (Plaintiff) VS M/S Al-Rauf Builders & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 05-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 231 | Const. P. 2257/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Amjad & Others (Petitioner) VS V/S P.O.S & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 232 | Const. P. 3145/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Farmanullah (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 233 | Const. P. 753/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | M/s.Karam Ceramic Ltd., (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh & ORS (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-JUN-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 234 | Const. P. 3194/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Makhtar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS V/S The Director NFC Dept (NADRA) and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-JUN-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 235 | Const. P. 4295/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Samandas Vidani (Petitioner) VS V/S K.M.C & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.132-K/2014 Mrs. Khatija and another v. Samandas Vidani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 236 | Const. P. 2628/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Fareedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS V/S Govt. of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 237 | Const. P. 255/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mst. Kishwar Jehan Sultana (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 238 | Suit 1125/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Rehman-ul-Haq (Plaintiff) VS City District Government and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 11-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 239 | Const. P. 2524/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ali Muhammad & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-AUG-16 | No | Registered sub-leases in respect of two apartment / units which were non-existent at the time of registration and even till the decision of the instant petition, have been directed to be cancelled by Nazir of Sindh High Court. It is an admitted position that these apartments are to be located at the third floor / story of the building which is not even constructed by the Builder. Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, cannot be construed so as to include an immoveable property, which is not even existing at the time of registration. Property sought to be registered should be of ascertainable description. Similarly, Section 2, subsection (6) of the Registration Act, 1908, wherein an immoveable property is defined, inter alia, means that an immoveable property should be a tangible one and physically exists. Different orders passed by this Court in various constitutional petitions, crux of which is that no registration of a residential or a commercial unit of a multistoried building should be done without a completion plan / occupancy certificate, are the decisions in rem, and thus applicable to the present case as well. One of the main objectives, that can be achieved by looking at the completion plan / occupancy certificate is that it can help in identifying the property sought to be registered and also verify the fact that a multistoried building is Regulations compliant, particularly having structural stability. Rule 135 of the West Pakistan Registration Rules, 1929, is not applicable to the facts of subject constitutional petition as the illegality of sub-leases in question were floating on surface and no further inquiry was required for ascertaining the validity of these sub-leases in question. Even otherwise a rule cannot be interpreted in such a manner that results in perpetuating illegality rather preventing it. Registered sub-leases in respect of two apartment / units which were non-existent at the time of registration and even till the decision of the instant petition, have been directed to be cancelled by Nazir of Sindh High Court. It is an admitted position that these apartments are to be located at the third floor / story of the building which is not even constructed by the Builder. Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, cannot be construed so as to include an immovable property, which is not even existing at the time of registration. Property sought to be registered should be of ascertainable description. Similarly, Section 2, subsection (6) of the Registration Act, 1908, wherein an immovable property is defined, inter alia, means that an immovable property should be a tangible one and physically exists. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 240 | Const. P. 810/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Zarina & another (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Badin & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 241 | Const. P. 803/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Beenish (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.644-K/2017 Gul Muhammad v. Mubashir Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 242 | Const. P. 744/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ayaz Ali Halepoto (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 243 | Const. P. 957/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Shahida (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 244 | Const. P. 1731/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Munawar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.320-K/2017 Muhammad Imran Anwar and another v. Dr. Munawar Hussain and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 245 | Const. P. 1011/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | REHAN AHMED BIAG (Petitioner) VS MST. SABEEN NAZ & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 246 | Const. P. 2625/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Faizan Shabbir S/o Shabbir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Shaikh Abdul Wahab thorugh Afsarullah Khan & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 247 | Const. P. 934/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Khudadino (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 248 | Const. P. 856/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Taj Muhammad Shah & Other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 249 | Cr.Tran 119/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Niaz Hussain (Applicant) VS ADJ Shahdadpur and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 250 | Cr.Bail 1/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Muhammad Ishaque (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 251 | Const. P. 706/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Neem Raj Kohli (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 252 | Cr.Bail 479/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Javeed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 253 | Const. P. 940/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Hashim (Petitioner) VS SSP Hyd & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 254 | Const. P. 988/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Surahiya & Other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 255 | Suit 866/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Mst. Parveen Azad (Plaintiff) VS The Administrator/Chairman, National Medical Centre Hospital (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 22-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 256 | I. A 10/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Al-Shaymaa (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Pakistan Telecommunicatiion Authority (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 257 | M.A. 8/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Athar Askari S/o Syed Hafiz Ali (Late) (Appellant) VS The District & Session Judge, Karachi Central (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 258 | 2018 MLD 440 | Const. P. 1412/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Muhammad Aqil Asim and 02 others (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Clifton (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | |||
| 259 | Cr.Bail 459/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Hawa Talpur (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 260 | Const. P. 55/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Chuadary Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Vth Additional District Judge, Karachi South & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-JAN-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 261 | Cr.Bail 486/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Majeed Rajput (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 262 | Const. P. 6378/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mst. Fatima Begum (Petitioner) VS Bashir Ahmed and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-DEC-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 263 | Const. P. 438/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Iftikhar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS The Addl. District Judge No. VI, Khi South & other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 264 | Const. P. 527/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-DEC-20 | Yes | Contempt--Primarily substantial compliance of the judgment passed by this Court has been made. Prima-facie, the question of not considering some of the petitioners in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the aggrieved petitioners to avail their remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondents, if any, for the reasons that the respondent-department was directed to take a fresh decision for regularization of their service, without any discrimination, in accordance with law subject to the budgetary sanction, qualifications, and eligibility of the petitioners, which compliance report has now been submitted. Prima-facie the reasons assigned in the aforesaid report cannot be dilated upon for and against in contempt proceedings. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1421-K/2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and others v. The Province of Sindh and others,C.P.140-K/2021 Agha Shohaib Abbas & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 265 | Const. P. 808/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Umer Daraz (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hina Mariam (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-JAN-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 266 | 2018 CLD 1167 | I. A 29/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Ghulam Rasool Abbasi (Appellant) VS United Bank Ltd. & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.217-K/2019 Ghulam Rasool Abbasi v. United Bank Ltd and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 267 | I. A 28/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | M/s. Hassan Dyeing Process & another (Appellant) VS Bank Alfalah Ltd. & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 268 | I. A 27/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Citi Bank N.A. (Appellant) VS Muhammad Abdul Ghaffar (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 269 | Const. P. 441/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Sohail (Petitioner) VS Kamran Siddiqui (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 270 | Const. P. 1592/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Ishtiaq (Petitioner) VS IInd ADJ Karachi Central & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.531-K/2019 Muhammad Ishtiaq v. Syed Nazir Hussain Rizvi (decd) thr. his L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 271 | Const. P. 654/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Sultanul Uloom (Petitioner) VS Anis-ur-Rehman & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-JUL-19 | Yes | Point of reconstruction coupled with personal need. The petition is allowed, the impugned judgment of the learned appellate Court is set aside and the eviction order passed by the learned Rent Controller is restored. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 272 | Const. P. 799/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | M/s. Quality Service Station (Petitioner) VS Rana Azhar Ali Khan & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 273 | Const. P. 1260/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Attique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 274 | F.R.A 9/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Airport Hotel (Appellant) VS Khawaja Ahsan Mehmood & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 275 | Const. P. 131/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 276 | Const. P. 1177/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Perviaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 277 | 2021 MLD 304 | Const. P. 2385/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Qamar Zaman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 278 | Const. P. 310/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Abdul Hai (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 279 | Const. P. 2671/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 280 | Const. P. 2628/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Abdul Wahid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 281 | Const. P. 898/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Shahbaz Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Mola Bux and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 282 | Const. P. 102/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mst. Zulekhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 283 | Const. P. 131/1993 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1993 | Muhammad Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Hyderabad and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 284 | Const. P. 300/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Hyder Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 285 | Const. P. 538/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Arif and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 286 | Const. P. 655/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Hidayatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 287 | Const. P. 1085/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Nizakat Ali (Petitioner) VS C.E.O, HESCO, and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-DEC-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 288 | Const. P. 1080/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 289 | Const. P. 609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Sajid Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 290 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 81 | Const. P. 417/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Zameer Hussain (Petitioner) VS Registrar & Campus Administrator & Security Advisor (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 291 | Const. P. 2261/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Wagho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 292 | Const. P. 1724/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Idrees Adil and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 293 | Const. P. 83/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 294 | Const. P. 3437/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Syed Hussain Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 295 | Const. P. 3274/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Asif Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 296 | Const. P. 1794/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 297 | Const. P. 1761/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Anwar Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 298 | Const. P. 2221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Rasool Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 299 | Const. P. 1224/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 300 | F.R.A 13/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Airport Hotel (Appellant) VS Mrs. Farhat Irshad Nakhuda & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 301 | Const. P. 19/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Sikandar Ali Malah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-OCT-20 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue a retirement order of the petitioner in BPS-17/18 under the law and to pay his full pensionary benefits, from the date of attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 31.12.2011 as admissible to him under the law within one month from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioners and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from 31.12.2011 to date. Petition and pending applications are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 302 | Const. P. 1652/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Abdul Qudos Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-MAR-20 | Yes | quo warranto--Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of quo warranto against respondents 9 to 11 to vacate the office presently they are holding, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not qualified to hold the office and their appointments are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973--The above discussions lead us to an irresistible conclusion that the instant petition being incompetent is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no orders as to cost. quo warranto--Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of quo warranto against respondents 9 to 11 to vacate the office presently they are holding, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not qualified to hold the office and their appointments are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973--The above discussions lead us to an irresistible conclusion that the instant petition being incompetent is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no orders as to cost. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 303 | Const. P. 2428/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-MAY-20 | No | Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Respondent No.2 / Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh is directed to appear before this Court in person on the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the impugned notification to the extent of the present petitioner shall remain suspended. To come up on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 am along with C.P. No.D-2387/2020. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 304 | Const. P. 2428/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-MAY-20 | No | By consent all these petitions and listed applications are disposed of with no order as to costs in terms of the above undertaking given by the Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh ; and, as agreed by the parties, the impugned Notification shall remain suspended to the extent of the present petitioners till the final decision / order of the competent authority of the Board of Revenue Sindh on the representations filed by the petitioners. Needless to say any person aggrieved by the order / decision of the competent authority will seek his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 305 | Const. P. 4932/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Zakia Naz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | petitioner has impugned the Notice dated 04.09.2020 issued by the respondents for vacating the official accommodation i.e. Flat No. B-18, situated in Government Official Residence (GOR-II) Sindhi Muslim Co-operative Housing Society ---Since the issue involved in this petition is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-4129 of 2020 and other connected petitions vide common Judgment dated 12.10.2020, therefore, the instant petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution is dismissed accordingly, leaving the petitioner to avail and exhaust her remedy, if any, as provided under the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1442-K/2020 Zakia Naz v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 306 | I. A 31/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Government of Sindh & others (Appellant) VS M/S United Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Appeal was allowed with costs and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 307 | 2022 PLC CS Note 24 | Const. P. 8251/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Jamal Nasir (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-JAN-20 | Yes | STEVTA--promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA under Rule 7-A of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--a civil/government servant is entitled for proforma promotion, once during his service his promotion is approved by the Competent Authority and in the meanwhile if he superannuates, he is entitled for all benefits as admissible under the law--we deem it appropriate to send the matter of the petitioner for the promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA to the Competent Authority of Sindh Government for consideration in accordance with law. STEVTA | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 308 | Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 309 | Const. P. 2184/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Humayoon (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 310 | II.A. 24/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Bibi Amirunnisa (Appellant) VS Syed Ghulam Hyder Shah (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 11-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 311 | Const. P. 3376/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 312 | Const. P. 869/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS M.D STEVTA and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-OCT-20 | Yes | Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service. Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 313 | Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the period of adhoc appointment cannot be counted towards service, the seniority in grade is to be taken effect from the date of regular appointment to a post and it cannot be conferred retrospectively. Since the service of the petitioner was confirmed admittedly with effect from 22.11.2019 as such promotion cannot be claimed by him without the requisite length of service except from the date of regular appointment. This reduces to the dictum that an ad-hoc appointee would only be entitled to seniority from the date of his regularization and not from the date of initial appointment. The petitioner accordingly is neither entitled for retrospective seniority nor promotion. This view is cemented by the judgment delivered in the case of Province of Sindh and others vs. Ghulam Farid and others, 2014 SCMR 1189, and Secretary to Government of Punjab and others vs. Muhammad Khalid Usmani and others, 2016 SCMR 2125. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 314 | Const. P. 6021/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Syed Ahmed Maaz and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-NOV-20 | No | Petition was dismissed in the following terms and with the following direction to PMC : Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent No.3 as well as learned DAG have concluded their submissions. For the reasons to follow, the instant petition and listed application are dismissed, however, with the direction to respondent No.3 / PMC to ensure that all SOPs in relation to the Covid-19 pandemic prescribed by the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), Ministry of Health Government of Pakistan, and the Ministry of Health of the Province concerned, are strictly followed in letter and spirit by the students, invigilators and all persons / staff present at the examination centres during the subject MDCAT examination. There will be no order as to costs. PMC is further directed to ensure that results of the subject tests held on 29.11.2020 and 13.12.2020 must be announced together and a single merit list is issued in respect of the tests held on both the above dates. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 315 | Const. P. 4210/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mumtaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-DEC-20 | Yes | Essentially in service jurisprudence, appointment, promotion is of utmost importance. If these are made on merit in accordance with definite rules, instructions, etc., and the same will rightly be considered and treated as part of the terms and conditions of service of a civil/government servant, which cannot be interfered with under the constitutional jurisdiction, under the service law, besides that the petitioner has no vested right to claim promotion against the post which was meant for initial appointment, therefore, the petitioner is precluded to ask for the actualization of his alleged promotion made by DPC-II which was rightly cancelled. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 316 | Const. P. 4340/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Whaeed ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-NOV-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 317 | Const. P. 2298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-JAN-20 | Yes | EOBI--pension of the petitioner was stopped by the respondent/institution without disclosing any reasonable cause--We are of the firm view that the petitioner did not qualify the minimum years of service as laid down under Section 22(b) of the Act, whereby the qualifying service for being entitled to pensionary benefits is 15 years, whereas, it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was an employee of the private company and had served it only for a period of 13 years. Petitioner does not meet the requisite criteria stipulated in the said Section to claim old age pension--Adverting to the next contention that the Labor Policy-2010 was fully applicable in the case of parties, in our view, Circular No.3 of 2010 (Policy) cannot override the Act, 1976, therefore, no benefit can be obtained arising out of it--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition, being devoid of any legal standing, is hereby dismissed along with pending application with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.206-K/2020 Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 318 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 949 | Const. P. 2647/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Dr. Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-DEC-20 | Yes | relieving him from the post of Director Anti-Quackery Sindh Health Care Commission (`SHCC`)--In view of the above discussion, the petition is not maintainable either on facts or in law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated in the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government. A person coming to Court must be fully aware of his right i.e. whether he is entitled to such right or not. We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of the plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent- SHCC. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.104-K/2021 Dr.Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 319 | Const. P. 4508/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Dr. Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.269-K/2021 Dr.Dilshad Ahmed v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 320 | Const. P. 3405/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Nazim Inayat (Petitioner) VS National Command & Authority (NCA) and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 321 | Const. P. 8033/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Ayoub Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-NOV-20 | No | By consent, this petition and the applications pending therein are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. Office is directed to communicate this order immediately to learned Official Assignee, and Additional Registrars of this Court at the Sukkur Bench and Circuit Courts at Hyderabad and Larkana. Issue notice to Chief Secretary Sindh and Chairman Sindh Service Public Commission for compliance. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.1439-K/2020 Muhammad Ayub Panhwar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 322 | Const. P. 2195/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Syed Ali Irteza Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Re-Insurance Co. Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-AUG-20 | No | The impugned enquiry reports dated 01.07.2014, being not sustainable either in law or on facts, are hereby set aside, and the instant petitions are allowed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 323 | Const. P. 4310/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Rizwan Khan (Petitioner) VS KMC and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-SEP-20 | No | We direct respondents 3 and 4 to assign posting to the petitioner within a reasonable time strictly in accordance with law in his own pay scale. Let notice be issued to respondents 3 and 4 for compliance. The petition and listed applications stand disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 324 | Const. P. 2477/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Amolakh Das (Petitioner) VS Speaker Provincial Assembly of SIndh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-MAY-20 | No | Service matter regarding repateriation Notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for 29.05.2020 at 10:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 325 | Const. P. 591/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Okash Khalid Memon & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (???DRTA???) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (DRTA) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.433-K/2020 Okash Khalid Memon v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 326 | Const. P. 6999/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Shabbir Aslam (Petitioner) VS The Adjutant General & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAR-20 | Yes | He assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon???ble Supreme Court in C.P No.428-K of 2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.08.2019 with the observation that the petitioner, if he has any other subsisting grievance against the respondents, may avail his remedy in accordance with law.--Petitioner, who is present in person, states that his cause of action against the respondents still subsists, therefore, he has approached this Court. We are not satisfied with the aforesaid assertion of the petitioner for the simple reason that Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan restricts this Court for making an order on application made by or in relation to a person who is a member of armed forces of Pakistan or who is for the time being subject to any law relating to any of those Forces in respect of his terms and conditions of service or in respect of any matter arising out of his service, or in respect of any action taken in relation to him as a member of the Armed Forces or as a person subject to such law.--dismissed He assailed the aforesaid order before the Honble Supreme Court in C.P No.428-K of 2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.08.2019 with the observation that the petitioner, if he has any other subsisting grievance against the respondents, may avail his remedy in accordance with law.--Petitioner, who is present in person, states that his cause of action against the respondents still subsists, therefore, he has approached this Court. We are not satisfied with the aforesaid assertion of the petitioner for the simple reason that Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan restricts this Court for making an order on application made by or in relation to a person who is a member of armed forces of Pakistan or who is for the time being subject to any law relating to any of those Forces in respect of his terms and conditions of service or in respect of any matter arising out of his service, or in respect of any action taken in relation to him as a member of the Armed Forces or as a person subject to such law.--dismissed | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.195-K/2020 Shabbir Aslam v. The Adjutant General and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 327 | Const. P. 7520/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Irfan Ali (Petitioner) VS Sect: Local Board and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAR-20 | Yes | The instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been filed by the petitioner, seeking declaration to the effect that two additional assignments / charges of the post of Secretary, Union Council, Naseer Khan Chang and Union Council, Nango Shah, given to the private respondent No.3 in addition to his own duty as Secretary, Union Council, Saeed Khan Lund, Tando Muhammad Khan, vide impugned orders issued by the Director, local Government, Hyderabad, is illegal on the premise that the private respondent No.3 does not qualify to hold two offices in addition to his own duties--Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid statement of the Director, Local Government Board, Government of Sindh, and seeks disposal of this petition accordingly. Be that as it may, official respondents 1 and 2 are warned to be careful in future and are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh for information. --Disposed of. The instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been filed by the petitioner, seeking declaration to the effect that two additional assignments / charges of the post of Secretary, Union Council, Naseer Khan Chang and Union Council, Nango Shah, given to the private respondent No.3 in addition to his own duty as Secretary, Union Council, Saeed Khan Lund, Tando Muhammad Khan, vide impugned orders issued by the Director, local Government, Hyderabad, is illegal on the premise that the private respondent No.3 does not qualify to hold two offices in addition to his own duties--Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid statement of the Director, Local Government Board, Government of Sindh, and seeks disposal of this petition accordingly. Be that as it may, official respondents 1 and 2 are warned to be careful in future and are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh for information. --Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 328 | Const. P. 2308/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Zubair Javed (Petitioner) VS Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-APR-20 | Yes | Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of impugned Notification dated 21.04.2020 (page 37) shall remain suspended. To be listed on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. along with C.P No.D-6431/2019. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 329 | Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-NOV-20 | Yes | Contempt proceedings--The explanation offered by the respondents, prima-facie, is tenable under the law as the petitioner was considered for the promotion in DPC in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 12.05.2020. It is noted that the representative of SGA&CD opined for deferment of the promotion of the petitioner and consideration of his case after finalization of the proceedings against him, in our view, this is the correct approach. Prima-facie such decision of the DPC to clear him for promotion during the pendency of criminal proceedings is erroneous. However, his deferment shall be subject to the outcome of the criminal proceedings presently pending against him. This view is fortified by the decision rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mst. Ifat Nazir vs. Government of Punjab and others, 2009 SCMR 703. It is well-settled law that in case of promotion vested / fundamental rights cannot be claimed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 330 | Const. P. 4932/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Abdul Haleem Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the statement dated 20.10.2020 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, and submission of learned AAG, this Court is left with no option but to direct the Respondents to place Petitioners' promotion case before the Provincial Selection Board-II in its next Meeting within one month positively from the receipt of a copy of this order. The Provincial Selection Board-II shall consider the Petitioner's case fairly and justly under law, rules and regulations and the result thereof be conveyed to the MIT-II of this Court. Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 331 | Const. P. 4579/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Qasim Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-20 | No | The petitioner ought to have approached the proper forum instead of invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. It is an admitted position that the petitioner is a civil servant and since the above order was passed on his representation on 10.04.2019 in compliance of the learned Tribunals order, he ought to have approached the proper forum instead of invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. In view of the above, the petition and listed application are dismissed in limine with no order as to costs, leaving the petitioner at liberty to avail his remedy, if any, before the competent forum in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 332 | Const. P. 7530/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Dr. Mir Nusrat Ali Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 333 | Civil Revision 165/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muhammad Khan Mari (Applicant) VS Waseem Ahmed & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 334 | Cr.Bail 713/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | JAHANZAIB QAZI S/O JAWED AKHTAR QAZI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-SEP-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the interim bail granted to the applicant / accused vide order dated 26.04.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. However, if the concession of bail is misused by the applicant in any manner whatsoever or he violates his undertaking to attend the case before the trial Court on every date of hearing, the learned trial Court will be at liberty to take action against him in accordance with law, including cancellation of bail. This bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 335 | Const. P. 675/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Sharib Badar S/o Badar Abbas (Petitioner) VS Mst. Ofaira Sharib and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 336 | Const. P. 233/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-FEB-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan | ||||
| 337 | Const. P. 586/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Munawar Ali (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen. Two were the plots purchased in the name of Munwar Ali and Ghulam Murtaz ,who are co-accused and have been drivers of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani. Third property, a commercial plaza in DHA, he purchased, is in the name of Agha Shahbaz Ali s/o Agha Siraj Khan Durani No case for pre arrest bail, Hence , dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | |||
| 338 | Const. P. 592/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Tufail Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 339 | Const. P. 5659/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muhammad Sajjad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners questioned their transfer and posting orders issued by the respondent-Cantonment Board by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court asserting that the post against which the petitioners were appointed was/is a non-transferable under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule 5 of the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1324-K/2022 Muhammad Javed & others v. The Federation of Pakistan through & Secretary, Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 340 | Suit 192/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s. Focus Entertainment (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Television Media Network (Pvt.) Ltd & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 26-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 341 | M.A. 1/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Nishat Raffiq & Ors. (Appellant) VS Securities & Exchange Commission (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | ||||
| 342 | Const. P. 1726/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Agha Nazimuddin and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | C.P.3563/2021 Association of Builders and Developers of Pakistan (ABAD), Hyderabad and others v. Government of Sindh, Secretary Home Department and Secretry Revienue, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 343 | II.A. 27/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Mst. Tabasum Muneer & another (Appellant) VS Asghar Hameed & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-JUL-17 | Yes | The impugned judgments and decrees are set aside and the present appeal is allowed with costs throughout. Accordingly, the Suit filed by the appellants is decreed as prayed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 344 | I. A 73/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Mustafa Ahmed & another (Appellant) VS M/s Allied Bank and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-OCT-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 345 | R.A (Civil Revision) 53/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Wali Muhammad (Applicant) VS Habib-ur-Rehman Through LRs & Another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-MAY-17 | Yes | Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 30.05.2017, whereby this civil revision application was allowed and the impugned order and judgment were set aside. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 346 | S.M.A 195/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Ashar Siddiqi S/o (Late) Nusrat Rashid Siddiqi (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-MAY-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 347 | Const. P. 440/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Fida Hussain Rind (Petitioner) VS Executive Engineer Irrigation Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 348 | I. A 15/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Habib Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Ajiaz Ali Khaskheli & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-FEB-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 349 | II.A. 7/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Raja Zafar Mehmood & others (Appellant) VS Meer Gul & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-FEB-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.A.51-K/2021 Mr. Meer Gul v. Mr. Raja Zafar Mehmood & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Notice | ||
| 350 | Const. P. 31/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Raza Mohammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 351 | Civil Revision 21/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Razia and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Sabir Rasheed and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.268-K/2021 Mst.Razia & others v. Muhammad Sabir Rasheed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed | ||
| 352 | Const. P. 374/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Samina Ambreen & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan | ||||
| 353 | Election Appeal 10/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Muhammad Zaman (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan, through Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 354 | Const. P. 284/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 355 | Suit 641/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | MUHAMMAD SHOAIB (Plaintiff) VS JAMILA KHATOON & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-MAR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 356 | Const. P. 3869/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Imam Bux (Petitioner) VS Khuram Khalil Nanitalwala & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-APR-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 357 | Suit 1077/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Akhlaq Hashmi (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Bakht Bibi & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-APR-21 | Yes | Suit and listed applications were dismissed with costs of Rs.50,000.00 (Rupees fifty thousand only) to be paid by the plaintiff to defendants 1 to 31 within thirty (30) days. The amount of Rs.7,000,000.00 (Rupees seven million only) received by the said defendants from the plaintiff shall be returned by them to him within thirty (30) days. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 358 | Const. P. 4882/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Khalid Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Court of Minister of Cooperation & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-DEC-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 359 | Civil Tran 32/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Sardar Muhammad Bukhsh Khan Mahar Thr. Ammar Ahmed (Applicant) VS The Learned Family Court, Khi (South) & Another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 360 | Cr.Bail 1882/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SHAHJAHAN LASHARI S/O MUHAMMAD ESSA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed with direction to the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the subject case within three (03) months strictly in accordance with law. Let this order be communicated to the learned trial Court for compliance. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 361 | Const. P. 1417/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Siraj Moosa (Petitioner) VS Jawed Ahmed Khan & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 362 | F.R.A 45/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Altaf Ali S/o Aftab Ali (Appellant) VS Mst. Shamima Begum (Since deceased through L.Rs) (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 363 | Const. P. 184/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Shakila Appa (Late) since died Thr. Ameen (Petitioner) VS Nadeem Ghani and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 364 | S.M.A 248/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Jawwad Ahmad Shabbir s/o Shabbir Ahmad (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-MAR-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 365 | Cr.Bail 1310/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SHABBIR AHMED S/O MOLA BUX (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 366 | Cr.Bail 1344/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | AZIZ UR REHMAN @ BABUL S/O ALI AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-FEB-22 | Yes | Consequently, the pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant on 14.07.2021 is hereby recalled and this bail application is dismissed with direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously within two (02) months strictly in accordance with law. Let this order be communicated to the trial Court for compliance. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 367 | Cr.Bail 1309/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SHABBIR AHMED S/O MOLA BUX (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 368 | Const. P. 1962/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muhammad Younis (Petitioner) VS Mansoor Ali & Other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUN-22 | Yes | After thoroughly examining the record and all the aspects of the case as discussed above, I am of the firm view that the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below are balanced, well-reasoned and in accord with the evidence on record. Therefore, the impugned concurrent findings of fact do not require any interference by this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with costs throughout. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 369 | M.A. 29/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Siraj Cochinwala Thr. Anwar Shah (Appellant) VS The Court of Xth ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 370 | Civil Tran 24/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Dr, Muhammad Bashir Qasim (Applicant) VS Mrs. Farida Bano & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 371 | Const. P. 612/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Kanaya Lal Hindu (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput | ||||
| 372 | S.M.A 2/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Mrs. Zia Ul Qamar Wd/o Anwar Khan (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAY-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 373 | Const. P. 649/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Majid Ali Danwar & another (Petitioner) VS The ECP & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | ||||
| 374 | M.A. 20/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Aneel Kumar Seedani (Appellant) VS M/s Chughtai Lab & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 375 | Const. P. 2828/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ameer Bux and an other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-NOV-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 376 | M.A. 32/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Abdul Rasheed Thr. Anwar Shah (Appellant) VS The Court of Xth ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 377 | Const. P. 230/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | The Province of Sindh thr. Secretary (Colleges) (Petitioner) VS The Islamic Education Trust and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-OCT-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 378 | R.A (Civil Revision) 60/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Haji Umar Lakhany & others. (Applicant) VS Mst. Khatoobai Haji Noor Muhammad & others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 379 | R.A (Civil Revision) 159/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Rahila Allai (Applicant) VS Miss. Tasleem Akhter & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 380 | Const. P. 3208/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Ghulam Ruquia @ Tooba Baloch Adv & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 381 | Const. P. 423/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Irshad Ahmed Qazi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | ||||
| 382 | Const. P. 1467/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Perma nand (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 383 | H.C.A 162/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Sheikh Nadeem Rehmat (Appellant) VS Mrs. Zarqa Jahanzeb & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 384 | Const. P. 6190/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Abdullah Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-JAN-24 | Yes | Obligation on the SBCA to demolish a building under Section 14 of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 385 | Const. P. 6793/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Pakistan Post Office C.H.S (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-23 | No | Application of Sindh Gothabad Act , 1987 to Urban Areas and allotments made of Goths in Karachi. Illegal | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 386 | Const. P. 5404/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Haroon Mahmood Tai & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-FEB-24 | No | Whether a Society can through its bye laws restrain an owner of land that Society registered under the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2022 from becoming a member of the Society | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 387 | Const. P. 4940/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Ahmed Anjum and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 388 | H.C.A 286/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | TPL Properties Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS Siraj Ahmed and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 389 | Const. P. 4881/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Zakaullah (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 390 | Const. P. 6627/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Mrs. Afreen Begum (Petitioner) VS Malir Cantonment Board (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-23 | Yes | Regularisation under the Cantonment Malir Cantonment Building Byelaws 2023. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 391 | Const. P. 424/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Tehrik-Jadid Anjuman-Ahmdiya (Petitioner) VS Abddul Aziz & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 392 | Const. P. 3725/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Ahmed Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Khurram and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-OCT-23 | No | Whether a person who has a unit in a building constructed without an approved plan has a right to be impleaded as a party to a lis. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 393 | I. A 24/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Jamil Ahmed Ghaznavi (Appellant) VS M/s. Bank Alfalah Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 394 | H.C.A 95/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Jaffar Haroon & Others (Appellant) VS Ibrahim Suteria & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 395 | Const. P. 565/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Muhammad Latif (Petitioner) VS District Judge South Karachi & other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 396 | Const. P. 565/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | City Environment Society (Petitioner) VS KBCA & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 397 | Cr.Bail 515/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Dr Mazhar Ali Hisbani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 398 | Const. P. 1709/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Muhammad Farogh Naseem (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAY-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 399 | H.C.A 40/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | . Shabanam and ors (Appellant) VS Cantonemnt Board Malir Cantt and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-APR-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 400 | Const. P. 1926/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 29-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 401 | Const. P. 1710/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd., (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAY-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 402 | Cr.Bail 1198/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | IRFAN AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 403 | Suit 1173/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | CHOUDHRY ABDUL WAHEED (Plaintiff) VS MUKHTAR AHMED (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-NOV-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 404 | Const. P. 647/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2009 | Abdullah Solangi (Petitioner) VS Secretary Education Karachi & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 405 | Const. P. 781/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Asif Hussain Chandio (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 406 | Cr.Misc. 27/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Saleemullah Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUL-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 407 | Suit 791/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN (Plaintiff) VS ABDUL NAFEH KHAN & OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 408 | Const. P. 971/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Agha Nadeem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 409 | Suit.B 125/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Habib Metropolitan Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS Century 21 Textile & Sportswear (Pvt.) Limited and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-JAN-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 410 | Const. P. 2228/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Abdul Aziz Dahani (Petitioner) VS E.D.O Education Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 411 | Cr.Bail 94/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Farooque Shar & an ors (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 412 | Const. P. 727/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Mohammad Khan Barchond (Petitioner) VS E.D.O Education Shikarpur and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 413 | Const. P. 722/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Assadullah Solangi (Petitioner) VS Principal CMC Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 414 | Const. P. 2685/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Ahmed Ali Gadhi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 415 | Const. P. 3608/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Wasatullah Jaffery (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Interior and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-MAY-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam | ||||
| 416 | Const. P. 1684/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Dr. Nasir Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Prof. Manzoor Hussain and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-APR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam | ||||
| 417 | Suit 1585/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-AUG-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 418 | I. A 121/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Asif Kudia (Appellant) VS M/s. KASB Bank Limited & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-JUN-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 419 | Suit 734/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 420 | Const. P. 1642/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 12-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 421 | Suit 812/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2001 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 422 | Suit 127/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Muhammad Akbar (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Tariq & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 15-APR-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 423 | Suit 988/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | ... (Plaintiff) VS ... (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 424 | Suit 1276/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Syed Muhammad Waqaruddin (Plaintiff) VS Owais Ahmed Idress (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-JUL-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 425 | Suit 1102/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | Abdul Majeed Abdani (Plaintiff) VS Rabia Construction Company & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 04-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 426 | Cr.Misc. 635/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Muhammad Ibrahim Leghari (Appellant) VS D.P.O. Sanghar and others (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 427 | Const. P. 6/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Tariq Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Rubina Bano (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-DEC-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 428 | Cr.Misc. 186/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Mst. Haseena & another (Applicant) VS Mst. Basran & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUL-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 429 | Suit 560/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | Nasreen Yousuf (Plaintiff) VS Aijaz Safdar Kiyani and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 430 | I. A 15/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Muhammad Akhtar Hookmani & another (Appellant) VS Faysal Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 431 | Const. P. 2858/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Tanveer Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar | ||||
| 432 | Const. P. 2386/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Karachi Property Investment (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ros (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.578-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Culture Deptt: v. Karachi Property Investment Company (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 433 | Const. P. 185/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Syed Tanveer-ul-Haq (Petitioner) VS V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 434 | Suit 894/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Ghayas-uz-Zman Siddiqui (Plaintiff) VS Marine Resort (Pvt.) Limited (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 14-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 435 | Const. P. 237/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | United Bank Limited (Petitioner) VS IV Court of Addl. District East & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.429-K/2016 Siddiqui Saley Muhammad through L.Rs. v. United Bank Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | ||
| 436 | Adm. Suit 111/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | Muhammad Sabir Awan through his legal heirs. (Appellant) VS Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-OCT-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 437 | Suit 419/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Syed Tariq Mustafa (Plaintiff) VS Tauqir Jahan Mustafa & Others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-OCT-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 438 | Const. P. 2155/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Jummon Baloch (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 439 | Const. P. 2463/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Awwal (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 440 | S.M.A 168/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Mrs. Amina Jaffer (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 441 | Const. P. 2221/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 442 | Const. P. 3202/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s Admore Gas (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-JUN-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 443 | Adm. Suit 728/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Rimsha Shaikhani (Plaintiff) VS Nixor College and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 21-SEP-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 444 | Const. P. 3150/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s Jubilee Life Insurance (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.37-K/2018 M/s Jubilee Life Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | ||
| 445 | Suit 1375/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Muhammad Anwar (Plaintiff) VS Habib Bank Limited and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 08-OCT-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 446 | Suit 1081/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Amjad Ali (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Ruqiya Begum and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 05-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 447 | Suit.B 19/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | The Bank of Punjab (Plaintiff) VS Dewan Salman Fibre Limited (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 25-AUG-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 448 | Const. P. 484/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ikramullah (Petitioner) VS Imran Jamshed & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 449 | Const. P. 879/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Shahar Bano (Petitioner) VS S.S.P S.B. A Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 450 | Const. P. 1306/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Jumma Khan (Petitioner) VS Arif Habib and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 451 | Const. P. 786/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 452 | Const. P. 858/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Khuda Dino (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 453 | Const. P. 566/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Asad Hasan S/o Syed Sibte Hasan (Petitioner) VS The Ist ADJ, Karachi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 454 | Const. P. 1007/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Muhammad Mehboob (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAY-18 | Yes | The prohibitions contained in Sections 3 and 4 and the punishments provided therein for their contravention clearly show that the persons who do not fall within the exemptions provided in Section 5 or who knowingly and willfully show disrespect for the persons fasting and/or for the holy month of Ramazan, are to be dealt with strictly and punished under Sections 3 and 4, as the case may be. Another important aspect is that no person should be allowed to take advantage of the exemptions provided in Section 5 or to exploit the same if he is not entitled to the same.Since the hotels and restaurants of the petitioners are admittedly not situated within the premises of any of the places enumerated in Section 5 of the Ordinance, they are not certainly entitled to seek exemption under the said Section, and as such all these petitions are liable to be dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 455 | Const. P. 1436/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Shah Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-JAN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 456 | Cr.Tran 120/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Umar (Applicant) VS Addl Session Judge Shahdadpur and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 457 | Const. P. 758/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Urs (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 458 | Cr.Bail 447/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Meer Hazar Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 459 | Const. P. 802/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ghul Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 460 | Const. P. 821/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Gangdev (Petitioner) VS S.H.O P.S City Umerkoi & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 461 | Cr.Tran 83/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Bashir Ahmed & another (Applicant) VS IIIrd Addl Session Judge & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 462 | Const. P. 625/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Anwar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 463 | Cr.Tran 19/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Amanullah (Applicant) VS Civil Judge and J.M No.@ Dadu and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 464 | M.A. 7/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Mrs. Delphine and another (Appellant) VS Mrs. Antonia and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-AUG-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 465 | H.C.A 440/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | M/s. Zamzama Builders & Developers (Appellant) VS Cantonment Board Fasial & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | ||||
| 466 | Const. P. 1906/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Manzoor Ahmed Rajpot (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 467 | Const. P. 947/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Sakina & another (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Umerkot & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 468 | Const. P. 937/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Jagdesh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 469 | Const. P. 1116/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | Prima-facie, the question of downgrading the petitioner in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the petitioner to avail his remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondent-company, if any. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.882-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Muhammad Yaseen and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 470 | II.A. 6/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | MRS. SAMINA QASIM (Appellant) VS MST. JAMILA NAHEED & ANOTHER (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 471 | Const. P. 837/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Karim (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 472 | Const. P. 800/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Hajran Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 473 | Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-MAY-20 | No | Federal Government and PSM are directed to allocate requisite funds to settle the post-retirement claims of all such retired employees of PSM who have not approached the Court, and to deposit the same with the Nazir of this Court latest by 31.08.2020. At the request of learned DAG, PSM is directed to submit a complete list of claims of all such retired employees who have not approached the Court, within fifteen (15) days with advance copy to learned DAG. By consent, adjourned to 03.09.2020 at 11:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 474 | H.C.A 386/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muhammad Salman Iqbal & another (Appellant) VS M/s. T-Ten Sports Manaement FZE & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 475 | Const. P. 1593/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Khalid Hussain (Petitioner) VS IInd ADJ Karachi Central & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.532-K/2019 Khalid Hussain v. Syed Nazir Hussain Rizvi (decd) thr. his L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 476 | Const. P. 429/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Naushad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 477 | Const. P. 1339/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 478 | Const. P. 2995/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Muhammad Akram Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 479 | Const. P. 3629/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst.Mumtaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 480 | Const. P. 2676/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Javed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 481 | Const. P. 3360/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 482 | 2020 SBLR Sindh 365 | Const. P. 1589/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 1589 of 2013,CP No. D- 1803 of 2015,CP No D- 2423 of 2015,CP No. D- 2834 of 2015,CP No. D- 847 of 2016, CP No. D- 958 of 2016, CP No. D- 1071 of 2016, CP No. D- 1173 of 2016, CP No. D- 1826 of 2016, CP No. D- 2179 of 2016, CP No. D- 2539 of 2016, CP No. D- 2656 of 2016, CP No. D- 2776 of 2016, CP No. D- 2941 of 2016, CP No. D- 3078 of 2016, CP No. D- 3148 of 2016, CP No. D- 3212 of 2016, CP No. D- 3391 of 2016, CP No. D- 3445 of 2016, CP No. D- 02 of 2017, CP No. D- 43 of 2017, CP No. D- 201 of 2017, CP No. D- 291 of 2017, CP No. D- 301 of 2017, CP No. D- 314 of 2017, CP No. D- 322 of 2017, CP No. D- 379 of 2017, CP No. D- 478 of 2017, CP No. D- 547 of 2017, CP No. D- 639 of 2017, CP No. D- 733 of 2017, CP No. D- 729 of 2017, CP No. D- 917 of 2017, CP No. D- 1000 of 2017, CP No. D- 1054 of 2017, CP No. D- 1067 of 2017, CP No. D- 1084 of 2017, CP No. D- 1085 of 2017, CP No. D- 1086 of 2017, CP No. D- 1168 of 2017, CP No. D- 1174 of 2017, CP No. D- 1237 of 2017, CP No. D- 1359 of 2017, CP No. D- 1446 of 2017, CP No. D- 1086 of 2017, CP No. D- 1168 of 2017, CP No. D- 1174 of 2017, CP No. D- 1237 of 2017, CP No. D- 1359 of 2017, CP No. D- 1446 of 2017, CP No. D- 1344 of 2017, CP No. D- 1533 of 2017, CP No. D- 1576 of 2017, CP No. D- 1727 of 2017, CP No. D- 2071 of 2017, CP No. D- 2137 of 2017, CP No. D- 2403 of 2017, CP No. D- 2452 of 2017, CP No. D- 2608 of 2017, CP No. D- 2634 of 2017, CP No. D- 2835 of 2017, CP No. D- 2879 of 2017, CP No. D- 3018 of 2017, CP No. D- 3130 of 2017, CP No. D- 3273 of 2017, CP No. D- 3341 of 2017, CP No. D- 3345 of 2017, CP No. D- 3369 of 2017, CP No. D- 3696 of 2017, CP No. D- 3742 of 2017, CP No. D- 3808 of 2017, CP No. D- 129 of 2018, CP No. D- 163 of 2018, CP No. D- 332 of 2018, CP No. D- 413 of 2018, CP No. D- 505 of 2018, CP No. D- 736 of 2018, CP No. D- 1066 of 2018, CP No. D- 1526 of 2018, CP No. D- 2094 of 2018, CP No. D- 2194 of 2018, CP No. D- 2195 of 2018, CP No. D- 2334 of 2018, CP No. D- 2366 of 2018, CP No. D- 2451 of 2018, CP No. D- 2469 of 2018, CP No. D- 2683 of 2018, CP No. D- 3069 of 2018, CP No. D- 3215 of 2018, CP No. D- 3218 of 2018, CP No. D- 3221 of 2018, CP No. D- 3302 of 2018, CP No. D- 84 of 2019, CP No. D- 108 of 2019, CP No. D- 369 of 2019, CP No. D- 436 of 2019, CP No. D- 544 of 2019, CP No. D- 696 of 2019, CP No. D- 1137 of 2019, CP No. D- 1609 of 2019, CP No. D- 1683 of 2019, CP No. D- 1827 of 2019, CP No. D- 1836 of 2019, CP No. D- 1904 of 2019, CP No. D- 1929 of 2019 | 2013 | Kaleemullah (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 483 | Const. P. 664/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Allah Bachayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 484 | Const. P. 2342/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Naseeban (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 485 | Const. P. 637/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Manzoor Alam and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 486 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 266 | Const. P. 2054/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Natho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 487 | Const. P. 2065/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mashooq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 488 | Const. P. 1195/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Asmatullah (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 489 | Const. P. 3504/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 490 | Const. P. 3146/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Lala Aijaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 491 | Const. P. 494/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ali Mardan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 492 | Const. P. 2761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Sadiq Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-JAN-20 | Yes | University of Karachi--candidature for the post of professor was not considered--if the remedy of appeal is available to a party under the statute, availing such statutory remedy, and without calling in question the appellate order, only seeking setting aside the original order in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is not proper under the law. if the remedy of appeal is available to a party under the statute, availing such statutory remedy, and without calling in question the appellate order, only seeking setting aside the original order in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is not proper under the law | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 493 | Const. P. 702/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst, Tasleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 494 | Const. P. 3300/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Jamshed Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 495 | Const. P. 2063/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Achar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 496 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 68 | Const. P. 3065/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Rehan Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 497 | Const. P. 1343/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Nek Muhammad (Petitioner) VS WAPDA and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.60-K/2020 Nek Muhammad v. The Water & Power Development Authority (WAPDA) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | ||
| 498 | Const. P. 44/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Syed Muhammad Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.1027/2021 Hilal Care Private Ltd Karachi and others v. Sindh through Secretary Excise & Taxation Department Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 499 | Const. P. 3800/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Ayoob and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 500 | Const. P. 112/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Tariq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 501 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 89 | Const. P. 985/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Hammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 502 | Const. P. 3495/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.817/2017 Abdullah v. National Accountability Bureau (NAB) thr. Its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 503 | Const. P. 990/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ghulam Mohiuddin (Petitioner) VS C.E.O. (NTDC) WAPDA and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 504 | Const. P. 899/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Hameedullah and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 505 | Const. P. 2928/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Misri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 506 | Const. P. 2744/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Ghayas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 507 | Const. P. 2114/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 508 | F.R.A 12/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Airport Hotel (Appellant) VS Mrs. Ishrat Rasheed & Another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 509 | Const. P. 2039/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Masood Ahmed Sangi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-AUG-20 | No | Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to comply with the order dated 26.11.2018 by regularizing the services of petitioners 1 and 3 viz. Masood Ahmed Sangi and Ghulam Qadir within fifteen (15) days, however, subject to fulfillment of remaining legal and codal formalities, if any, and to submit compliance report to this Court within seven (07) days thereafter through MIT-II. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 510 | Const. P. 7506/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Abdul Razzaque & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Directorate of Human Rights, Government of Sindh. They have alleged that their cases were put up before the Selection Committee on 20.03.2018 wherein minutes in this regard were prepared and the Committee, without assigning valid and cogent reasons and in a scanty and vague manner, did not consider their cases for regularization which action is impugned through the captioned petitions before this Court--Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Directorate of Human Rights, Government of Sindh. They have alleged that their cases were put up before the Selection Committee on 20.03.2018 wherein minutes in this regard were prepared and the Committee, without assigning valid and cogent reasons and in a scanty and vague manner, did not consider their cases for regularization which action is impugned through the captioned petitions before this Court--Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 511 | Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 512 | Const. P. 2520/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-MAY-20 | No | By consent all these petitions and listed applications are disposed of with no order as to costs in terms of the above undertaking given by the Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh ; and, as agreed by the parties, the impugned Notification shall remain suspended to the extent of the present petitioners till the final decision / order of the competent authority of the Board of Revenue Sindh on the representations filed by the petitioners. Needless to say any person aggrieved by the order / decision of the competent authority will seek his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 513 | Const. P. 4105/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Jam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-JAN-20 | Yes | this petition is allowed in the terms whereby the competent authority of CAA is directed to consider the case of petitioner for his proforma promotion in PG-10, Works and Development Directorate, CAA for the purpose of pensionery benefits within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 514 | Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-MAY-20 | No | For further hearing and compliance of our above directions, adjourned to 06.07.2020. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 515 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 10 | Const. P. 2341/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) VS The federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 516 | 2023 PLC Lab. 41 | Const. P. 3026/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Waris (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 517 | Const. P. 4789/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Khizar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-NOV-20 | Yes | whether the petitioner can challenge the show cause notice issued against him and his suspension order in a Constitution Petition?--We are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, a final decision against the petitioner has yet to be taken by the respondent- Police Department and he has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the said proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 518 | Const. P. 2666/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Saeed Habib (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-DEC-20 | Yes | NBP--We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-bank. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.305/2021 Saeed Habib v. National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 519 | Const. P. 1336/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Farhan Ali Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-AUG-20 | No | Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to comply with the order dated 26.11.2018 by regularizing the services of petitioners 4, 5 and 10 viz. Ali Raza, Muhammad Iqbal and Ali Asghar, respectively, within fifteen (15) days, however, subject to fulfillment of remaining legal and codal formalities, if any, and to submit compliance report to this Court within seven (07) days thereafter through MIT-II. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 520 | Const. P. 4890/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Garibdas (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-NOV-20 | Yes | It is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, competent authority and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court. With the above observations and direction, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Let notice be issued for compliance to the Chief Secretary Sindh and the Secretaries of all the departments of the Government of Sindh. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 521 | Const. P. 5931/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Imtiaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-JAN-20 | Yes | Actualization of promotion in BPS-19 and posting--The transfer and posting of a civil/government servant is prerogative of the Government, which cannot be interfered with under the constitutional jurisdiction, under the service law, petitioner is under obligation to serve anywhere in the province, he has no vested right to remain at particular post for indefinite period, therefore the petitioner cannot ask for posting at particular place. Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 522 | Const. P. 7122/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Zamir Hussain Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-MAR-20 | Yes | Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 523 | Const. P. 6622/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Javed Iqbal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Home Dept Sindh: & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-MAR-20 | Yes | The grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been rejected and they have been declared medically unfit on the basis of medical reports submitted by respondent No.5, wherein it was stated that they were suffering from Hepatitis B & C.--In view of the aforesaid position, the basic grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioners namely Abdul Sattar, Javed Iqbal and Sanullah, within a period of 02 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As far as petitioner No.3 Hafiz Muhammad Saleem is concerned, who was absent at the time of medical test, his medical test may be conducted in terms of order dated 26.02.2020, and if he clears the said test, he may be issued appointment order within two (02) weeks from the date of the result of his medical test. The grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been rejected and they have been declared medically unfit on the basis of medical reports submitted by respondent No.5, wherein it was stated that they were suffering from Hepatitis B & C.--In view of the aforesaid position, the basic grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioners namely Abdul Sattar, Javed Iqbal and Sanullah, within a period of 02 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As far as petitioner No.3 Hafiz Muhammad Saleem is concerned, who was absent at the time of medical test, his medical test may be conducted in terms of order dated 26.02.2020, and if he clears the said test, he may be issued appointment order within two (02) weeks from the date of the result of his medical test. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.380-K/2020 The Province of Sindh & others v. Javed Iqbal Shah & others,C.A.1192/2020 The Province of Sindh thr. Secretary, Home Department & others v. Javed Iqbal Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 524 | Const. P. 2590/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Bakhtiar Ahmed Sheikh & Another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-MAY-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 525 | Const. P. 400/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mir Qadir Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 526 | Const. P. 3568/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Fareed Ahmed Sabir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-SEP-20 | No | They undertake to consider and finalize his case within a period of one (01) month from today and to submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court within seven (07) days thereafter. It is clarified that the conviction of the petitioner, which has been set-aside by this Court, shall not be treated or considered as an impediment or disqualification in considering or deciding his case for regularization, which shall be decided strictly in accordance with law and the prevailing rules, regulations and policy of KMC ; and, same treatment shall be given to him as was given to other contractual employees of KMC. By consent, the petition and pending application are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 527 | Const. P. 2797/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mohammad Rashid (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1332-K/2020 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 528 | Const. P. 6845/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Juanid Ahmed Sarki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JAN-20 | Yes | Deceased quota-- Petitioner???s case if not approved by the competent authority may seek his remedy, if any, before the competent forum in accordance with law. Deceased quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 529 | Const. P. 5481/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 530 | Cr.Bail 1225/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MANZOOR ALI S/O MAQBOOL AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-SEP-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed with direction to the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the subject case within three (03) months strictly in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 531 | Const. P. 507/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst. Shakeela & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 532 | Const. P. 853/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Adil Raheem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 533 | Cr.Bail 1160/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | KHURRAM SHAHZAD S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF BHATTI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-OCT-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant / accused Khurram Shahzad son of Muhammad Yousuf Bhatti is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The instant bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 534 | Cr.Bail 1153/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD ASLAM S/O SARDAR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-SEP-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the interim bail granted to the applicant / accused vide order dated 18.06.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. However, if the concession of bail is misused by the applicant in any manner whatsoever, the learned trial Court will be at liberty to take action against him in accordance with law, including cancellation of bail. This bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 535 | Suit 17/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD JAMIL BABAR (Plaintiff) VS SARA JALIL & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 04-JUN-21 | No | In view of the above discussion, it is hereby held that the instant Suit is maintainable and the same should be decided on merits. Resultantly, CMA No.6832/2021, filed by defendant No.1 for dismissal of the Suit, is dismissed with no order as to costs ; and, CMA No.7798/2021, filed by the plaintiff seeking permission to deposit the original documents of his vehicle in lieu of the amount ordered by this Court, having become infructuous in view of the deposit already made by him, is dismissed as such. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 536 | Const. P. 2976/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc. Gulzar Ahmeds case is almost on identical footings. He is said to have aided and abated accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani in acquiring illegal assets; and utilizing accounts of PW Sadaf Chohan and Syed Mobin Saeed by parking money therein for such Page 15 of 19purpose. There is however statement of only PW Sadad Chohan In this regard on record. But her statement tends to incriminate herself rather than accused Gulzar Ahmed. She says that the money was deposited in her account in Meezan Bank (by Gulzar Ahmed) and that she had issued cheques for withdrawing the same. She claims that the money was parked into her account by Gulzar Ahmed but admits at the same time that it was done by him on her own request as she wanted to improve statement of her bank account for applying for UK visa. c she claims, without any proof, deposited the money in her account has been arrayed as accused. Regarding transactions of 600 million found in his account, relevant evidence that this amount either belongs to or was parked by accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani and was utilized for purchasing assets on his behalf by this petitioner is yet to be produced by the prosecution in the trial. Bail granted. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.1129/2020 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Gulzar Ahmed and another,C.A.297/2021 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Gulzar Ahmed and another,C.P.6306/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Gulzar Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 537 | Const. P. 77/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 538 | Cr.Bail 810/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ARSHAD SIRAJ KHAN S/O SIRAJ AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 539 | H.C.A 93/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Rashid Naeem (Appellant) VS Abdul Azizi Hasim Chhutani & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-JUL-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 540 | Spl.H.C.A 279/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | M/s.Moghul & Sons (Appellant) VS NIB Bank Ltd., & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-APR-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 541 | Const. P. 2951/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Fareed Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-OCT-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 542 | Cr.Rev 59/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Dr. Syed Ali Akbar Shah (Applicant) VS Baboo@ Syed Ghulam Muhammad Shah and Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-JAN-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 543 | Const. P. 1307/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Sindh Agriculture University Tando Jam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-JUL-21 | Yes | We have examined the layout plan, drawings and Google map of the project available on record, wherein the actual path of the project and the bigger curve proposed by the University have been distinctly shown. It is clear from the above that if the impugned alignment is altered by including the bigger curve proposed by the University, the overall length of the project will be increased by several kilometers, and a portion of the said proposed bigger curve will pass through the oil and gas fields of OGDC. In such an event, the cost of the project and the time required for its completion will be increased substantially, and the said oil and gas fields will be exposed to the public / commuters and heavy construction machinery which may result into a disaster. Therefore, in addition to the legal position discussed above, prima facie, the proposal made by the University does not appear to be practical and safe for the commuters, public at large and the people working at the said oil and gas fields. In view of the object, purpose and urgent need of the project, it shall be in the public interest that the same is completed expeditiously. As a result of the above discussion, C.P. No.1307/2020 and all the applications pending therein are dismissed ; and C.P. No.05/2021 is disposed of by directing the Government and the acquiring agency to complete the project and the land acquisition proceedings in respect thereof expeditiously and strictly in terms of the Act. There will be no order as to costs in any of the subject petitions. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan | |||
| 544 | R.A (Civil Revision) 145/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Hamid Saleem (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 545 | Cr.Misc. 465/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Mst. Sadori (Applicant) VS SSP Ghotki & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-SEP-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 546 | Cr.Misc. 587/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Abdul Majeed (Applicant) VS S.H.O P.S Puban and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JAN-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 547 | J.M 10/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | M/S.ARK GARMENTS INDUSTRIES & OTHERS (Applicant) VS NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-12 | Yes | As a result of the above discussion, this application under Section 12(2) CPC is allowed, and the ex-parte decree passed on 06.04.2007 in Suit No. B52 of 2006 against the applicants is hereby set aside. The applicants shall file the application for leave to defend in the Suit within thirty (30) days hereof, which shall be decided in accordance with law. It is hereby clarified that the observations made and the findings contained in this Order shall not prejudice the merits of the case of either of the parties. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 548 | Suit.B 17/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL & AGRICULTURAL INV & Co (Plaintiff) VS INDUS STEEL PIPES LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-DEC-15 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 549 | J.M 50/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | MUHAMMAD YOUNUS (Applicant) VS VENUE GURDAS ADVANI & ORS. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-SEP-14 | Yes | After minutely examining the applications in hand and the material on record as well as the law cited at the bar with the able assistance of the learned counsel for the parties and giving due consideration to the arguments advanced by them, the conclusion of the above discussion is that the applicants have no locus standi to file the instant applications ; the impugned orders could not be challenged under Section 12(2) CPC ; the fraud alleged by the applicants was not in connection with the proceedings before the Court nor was any fraud played upon the Court when the impugned orders were passed ; the applicants have failed to fulfill the mandatory requirement of Section 12(2) CPC by not specifically disclosing and pleading the relevant and material details of the alleged fraud ; and, J. Misc. No.47/2012 is hopelessly barred by time. Consequently, J. Misc. No.50/2005 and J. Misc. No.47/2012 are dismissed along with the listed applications with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 550 | Suit 701/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Shakir Ahmed Khan (Plaintiff) VS Nishat Akhtar Khan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-APR-21 | No | Latest report be called from learned XXIInd Judicial Magistrate Karachi East in Criminal Case No.1344/2019. Also issue notice to the SSP and SHO concerned to produce defendants 1, 2 and 3 before this Court on the next date of hearing. To be listed on 24.05.2021 at 11:00 am. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 551 | Suit 1068/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | ASLAM PERVAIZ. (Plaintiff) VS MST. NASEEM FATIMA (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 09-MAR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 552 | Cr.Misc. 172/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Mst. Nazeeran (Applicant) VS SHO P.S. Daharki District Ghotki & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 553 | Const. P. 229/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Punhoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan | ||||
| 554 | Cr.Bail 1214/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | AARIFA @ MADOO W/O ABDUL GHAFAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 555 | Cr.Bail 1169/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD HASHIM IQBAL S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Applicant) VS THE STAT (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | No | Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant Muhammad Hashim Iqbal vide order dated 21.06.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions ; and, post-arrest bail is granted to the applicant Muhammad Abid Iqbal subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000.00 and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 556 | Const. P. 922/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Francis Rasheed S/o Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Court of Family Judge, Karachi South and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 557 | Cr.Bail 1924/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | AZIZ KHAN S/O HAJI AKBAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 558 | Cr.Bail 1942/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ZAFAR KHAN S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 559 | Const. P. 1807/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Mirza Fayyaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 560 | Const. P. 350/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Syed Muhammad Ahsan Thr. Mushabbir Hussain Mufti (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Aslam Shah Khan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 561 | Const. P. 2255/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Mst. Naseem (Petitioner) VS Home Sect: and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-APR-14 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 562 | Const. P. 35/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Syed Nazir Ahmed Thr. Attorney Muheeb Ullah (Petitioner) VS Ayaz Ahmed Shaikh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-JAN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 563 | S.M.A 357/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Syed Zohaib ul Yaqin S/o Muhammad Ajaz ul Yaqin (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 564 | Const. P. 411/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Najaf Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 565 | Const. P. 833/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Muhammad Faisal Thr. Attorney Muhammad Faizan (Petitioner) VS Iqbal e Bandooqwala and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 566 | Const. P. 1497/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Irfan Ali S/o Syed Intezar Ali (Petitioner) VS Syed Wajid Hussain and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 567 | F.R.A 12/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Mehmood Ahmed Bukhari S/o Nisar Ahmed Bukhari (Appellant) VS Mrs. Shafqat Pervaiz and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 568 | Const. P. 515/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-NOV-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 569 | S.M.A 390/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Amad uddin Siddiqui s/o Mohi uddin Shamim Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-MAY-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 570 | M.A. 34/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Rafiq Essa Thr. Anwar Shah (Appellant) VS The Court of Xth ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 571 | Const. P. 613/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Ali Jan Rajper & Others (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | ||||
| 572 | II.A. 29/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Khalida Thr. Attorney Sikandar Iqbal (Appellant) VS Shakira Khatoon and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-OCT-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 573 | Const. P. 834/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Sheesh Ahmed Thr. Attorney Muhammad Faizan (Petitioner) VS Iqbal e Bandooqwala and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 574 | Const. P. 410/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Muhammad Saleem Uddin Khan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Waseem and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 575 | Const. P. 929/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Samina Begum Wd/o Mirza Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Haq Nawaz Khan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 576 | Const. P. 644/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Shujauddin Khan Durrani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | C.P.846-K/2022 Saeed Ahmed v. Shujauddin Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 577 | Const. P. 3759/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Mst. Suraiya (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | ||||
| 578 | Const. P. 1790/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Jahangir Mastoi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | ||||
| 579 | Const. P. 3547/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Sadaqat Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 580 | Const. P. 703/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Abdul Qadeer Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 581 | Const. P. 6475/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Katy Meheryad Dubash & another (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-FEB-24 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 582 | Const. P. 7892/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Nilofer Haider Ali Rashid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-OCT-23 | Yes | Application of Article 4 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 583 | Const. P. 4435/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-23 | Yes | Approval of Layout Plans in Cantonment Areas under Section 178 AA and 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 584 | I. A 67/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Ali Asghar Hashim Ali (Appellant) VS Shabbir Hussain & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 585 | Const. P. 4857/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Faraz Ali (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 586 | Suit 1230/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | MUHAMMAD TALIB (Appellant) VS MUHAMMAD SARWAR NAZ & ANOTHER (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 587 | M.A. 1/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Nishat Rafiq & others (Appellant) VS Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-FEB-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 588 | Suit 742/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | MRS. AMEENA RTARIQ. (Plaintiff) VS LIAQUAT HUSSAIN & AN OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 05-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 589 | Spl.H.C.A 191/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | M/s.Taha Spinning Mills Ltd., & Ors. (Petitioner) VS V/S M/s.NIB Bank Ltd (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 590 | Const. P. 155/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Yasmeen & Ors. (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 591 | Suit 755/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | DR.SOFIYA SAEED (Plaintiff) VS ANDEREW WIIILAIMS & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-JUL-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 592 | I. A 97/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | M/s.United Bank Ltd (Appellant) VS M.Mubeen Khan (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-APR-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 593 | Const. P. 537/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Mst Munawar Khatoon Patujo (Petitioner) VS SHO PS B-Section Shahdadkot and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 594 | Const. P. 2004/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Aamir Nazir Mirani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 595 | Const. P. 889/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Mst Bushra and another (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Rehmatpur and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 596 | Const. P. 1059/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS District and Session Judge West Islamabad and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 597 | Suit 928/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2001 | SHOUKAT ALI (Plaintiff) VS K.M.C & OTHES (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 14-NOV-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 598 | Const. P. 903/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Abdul Shakoor Chutto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 599 | Suit 1699/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | ABBAS ALI (Plaintiff) VS ASIF ABBAS & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 01-AUG-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 600 | Suit 570/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Mirza Imtiaz Baig (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Pakistan Hockey Federation & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 28-AUG-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 601 | Cr.Bail 1227/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | SAIF MALOOK SHAH & 6 ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Appellant) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 602 | I. A 8/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | S.M.E. Leasing Limited (Appellant) VS M/S Hilton Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar | C.P.647-K/2013 Mr. Sabir Ali Qureshi v. SME Leasing Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 603 | Const. P. 995/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Shaman Ali Totani (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Darri and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 604 | Cr.Bail 61/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Allah Rakhio Jatoi and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 605 | Const. P. 267/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | All Pakistan Security Agencies (Petitioner) VS Fedration of pakistan (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-MAY-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 606 | Suit 458/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-SEP-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 607 | Cr.Rev 148/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Muhammad Ibrahim (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-JUL-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 608 | Suit.B 101/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | SILKBANK Limited (Plaintiff) VS M/s. AZM Chemical Company & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 02-MAY-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 609 | Const. P. 464/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | Amir Ali (Petitioner) VS City District Government Karachi & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-OCT-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 610 | Cr.Bail 1192/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Dawood Jan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 611 | H.C.A 131/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | Civil Aviation Authority & others (Appellant) VS Providence Aviation Services (Pvt.) Ltd. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-AUG-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 612 | Const. P. 1721/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Mashooque Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar | ||||
| 613 | J.M 8/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Jaffer Brothers (Private) Limited and another (Applicant) VS SECP (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-DEC-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 614 | Const. P. 5360/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Niaz Khan (Petitioner) VS V/S Mukhtiarkar & Assistant Collector & ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 615 | I. A 2/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Umer Shariq (Appellant) VS M/S SME Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 616 | Suit 218/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Amjad Ali (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Ali Abbas and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 05-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 617 | Adm. Suit 1045/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abdul Rahim Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 618 | Suit 1555/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Naseem Bano (Plaintiff) VS Karachi Electric Supply Corporation and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 11-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 619 | Const. P. 3172/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Cyrus Cowasjee and Ors (Plaintiff) VS V/S KMC and Ors (Defendant) | D.B. | Order | 31-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.444-K/2022 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation through its Administrator v. Mr. Cyrus Cowasjee & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 620 | Suit 509/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mrs. Nasreen Siddiqui (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 08-OCT-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 621 | H.C.A 139/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | Karachi Properties Investment Company (Pvt.) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Karachi Properties Investment Company (1974) (Pvt.) Ltd. & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-DEC-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 622 | Suit 1498/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Haji Muhammad Iqbal & others (Plaintiff) VS Deputy District Officer (Revenue) & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 02-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 623 | S.M.A 164/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mrs. Sayeeda Vellani (Plaintiff) VS . (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 624 | Suit 1698/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Qamran Construction (Pvt.) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Army Welfar Trust & 5 others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 625 | Cr.Misc. 108/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Hassan (Applicant) VS Haij Sethar & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 626 | Const. P. 725/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Hayat (Petitioner) VS Mst. Ambreen (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 627 | Const. P. 892/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Haseena (Petitioner) VS S.S.P S.B.A & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 628 | II.A. 84/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Pervaiz Iqbal (Appellant) VS Faisal Akram (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-AUG-17 | Yes | Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 30.08.2017 whereby this appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, the impugned judgments and decrees were set aside and Suit No.563/2010 for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction filed by the respondent against the appellant was dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.61-K/2018 Faisal Akram v. Pervaiz Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 629 | H.C.A 48/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Muhammad Shafat Khan & Ors (Appellant) VS Mst. Inayat Bibi & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-MAY-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.248-K/2014 Muhammad Shafat Khan and another v. Mst. Inayat Bibi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 630 | Const. P. 3937/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Dr.Ali Muhammad Ansari & Other (Petitioner) VS Sindhi Muslim Co-Operative Housing & Society & Oth (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-MAY-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.236-K/2014 Sindhi Muslim Cooperative Housing Society v. Dr. Ali Muhammad Ansari and others,C.A.73/2021 Sindhi Muslim Cooperative Housing Society v. Dr. Ali Muhammad Ansari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | ||
| 631 | Const. P. 224/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Nsreen Kausar (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hoor Afzal & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 632 | Const. P. 6090/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Dr. Farrukh Mirza (Petitioner) VS The Sect: and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-FEB-20 | Yes | The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs. The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.386-K/2020 Dr. Farrukh Mirza v. The Secretary Finance Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 633 | Const. P. 563/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Asad Hasan S/o Syed Sibte Hasan (Petitioner) VS The Ist ADJ, Karachi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 634 | Const. P. 230/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Syed Qasim Hassan (Petitioner) VS Syed Muhammad Hassan & ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-JAN-15 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro | C.P.341-K/2015 Syed Qasim Hassan v. Syed Mehdi Hassan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 635 | Const. P. 782/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Samreen Naz & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 636 | Cr.Bail 426/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Zulfiqar Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 637 | Const. P. 950/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Zakaria & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 638 | Cr.Misc. 169/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Musharraf Ali Memon (Applicant) VS Learned District Judge Jamshoro & Ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 639 | Const. P. 1017/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sht. Kosheela (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 640 | Civil Revision 70/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Mst. Farzana Bhatti (Applicant) VS Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-AUG-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 641 | I. A 99/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Ayub Raza (Appellant) VS M/S. Bank Al-Falah Limited & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 642 | Const. P. 1333/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | Mohammad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 643 | H.C.A 118/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Water and Power Development Authority WAPDA (Appellant) VS Shaikh Gulzar Ali and Company Limitged and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 644 | H.C.A 461/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Sheikh Muhammad Shahid (Appellant) VS The Stillman Company (Pvt.) Ltd. and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 645 | Const. P. 2568/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Sarem Mukhtar S/o Arif Mukhtar (Petitioner) VS Sadia Aquil Ahmed & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-FEB-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.4479/2018 Sadia Aquil Ahmed v. Sarem Mukhtar & others,C.P.4480/2018 Sadia Aquil Ahmed v. Sarem Mukhtar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 646 | Const. P. 1435/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-JAN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | C.P.213-K/2017 Sher Muhammad v. Karachi Water & Sewerage Board Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 647 | Const. P. 484/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mir Muhammad Hingorjo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 648 | Const. P. 893/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Karachi Citizens Basic Rights Effectees Welfare Association (Petitioner) VS SBCA and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 649 | Const. P. 4000/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Muhammad Javed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-SEP-20 | No | Order on contempt applications. No case for initiating contempt proceedings has been made out by the petitioners. In any event, the grievance of the petitioners in relation to the findings of the Scrutiny Committee is beyond the scope of the listed contempt applications. If any of the petitioners is aggrieved with the findings of the Scrutiny Committee, he may avail his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. The listed contempt applications stand disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 650 | Cr.Misc. 157/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Zulfiqar Ali (Applicant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 651 | Civil Revision 4/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Mst: Sahiban & Another (Applicant) VS Attaullah (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 652 | Const. P. 685/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Nawaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and orthers (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-FEB-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain M. Sheikh | ||||
| 653 | Const. P. 1265/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Zeenat Nawaz (Petitioner) VS VIth A.D.J South & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 654 | Const. P. 7073/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ali Abdul Razzaq and other (Petitioner) VS Goverment of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JAN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 655 | Const. P. 4490/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | M/s. I.S.M. Hospital (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-FEB-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 656 | Cr.Misc. 121/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Shirimati Shani (Applicant) VS S S P Tando Allahyar & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 657 | H.C.A 133/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | National Logistic Cell (NLC) (Appellant) VS Abdul-e-Rasool Adat & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 658 | Const. P. 2681/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mazhar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 659 | Const. P. 2084/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Khair Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 660 | Const. P. 2378/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Nazia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 661 | Const. P. 761/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ihsan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 662 | Const. P. 1860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 663 | Const. P. 511/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Farooque (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 664 | Const. P. 721/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Irrigation matter | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 665 | Const. P. 2408/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Jalal Khan (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 666 | Const. P. 908/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Zahid Khan S/o Muhammad Matloob Khan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Razia Khatoon and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 667 | II.A. 44/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Mrs. Musarrat Islam (Appellant) VS Mrs. Farzana Anwar & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.A.110-K/2022 Mst. Farzana Anwar v. Mst. Musarrat Islam & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 668 | Const. P. 2872/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 669 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 261 | Const. P. 144/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Leemon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 670 | Const. P. 136/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 671 | Const. P. 492/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Dildar Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 672 | Const. P. 671/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 673 | Const. P. 2768/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 674 | Const. P. 2832/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 675 | Const. P. 93/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Ghulam Rabani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 676 | Const. P. 2087/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Shazia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 677 | Const. P. 3020/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Manoj (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 678 | Const. P. 2143/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Inamullah Halepoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 679 | Const. P. 1544/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Dilshad Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 680 | Const. P. 1763/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Noor Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 681 | Const. P. 507/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mohsin Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 682 | Const. P. 2021/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Tahir Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.437-K/2020 Tahir Muhammad v. Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | ||
| 683 | Const. P. 635/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Akram & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 684 | Const. P. 3400/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Abdul Subhan (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JAN-20 | Yes | NBP--demotion of the petitioner from the post of Vice President/Ex-Manager to next lower grade--Adverting to the claim of the petitioner with regard to his promotion in the next rank under NBP Staff Service Rules, 1973. It is well settled proposition of law that it is the Service Rules Committee of the respondent-bank which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion of the petitioner for which they have to take decision in accordance with law--In view of the foregoing facts concluded in para 07 supra, the action taken by the respondent Bank is/was too harsh, therefore we set aside the impugned orders dated 26.11.2014 regarding demotion of the petitioner and order dated 03.03.2017 regarding demotion in pay. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.197-K/2020 National Bank of Pakistan NBP and others v. Abdul Subhan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 685 | Const. P. 7221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Talal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-FEB-20 | Yes | Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine. Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 686 | Const. P. 5336/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s Alsons Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Alsons Ind Peoples Empl: Union and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 687 | Const. P. 6066/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Shahzad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 688 | Const. P. 2195/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-APR-20 | No | The petition has become infructuous, the same stands disposed of along with listed applications with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 689 | Const. P. 5851/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mst. Saima Ather (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-APR-20 | Yes | The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.937/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Mst. Saima Athar and others,C.P.1755/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Mst. Saima Athar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained. | |
| 690 | Const. P. 2869/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-SEP-20 | No | Petition is hit by the doctrine of laches, for which no explanation whatsoever has been offered by the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition and pending CMA No.12487/2020 are dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author) | |||
| 691 | Const. P. 4976/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Naseer Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-NOV-20 | Yes | Petitioner has called in question the rejection of his candidature for the post of District Public Prosecutor (BS-19) in Law Department, Government of Sindh vide letter dated 18.10.2019 issued by Sindh Public Service Commission Hyderabad (SPSC) on the analogy that he did not possess ten (10) years' experience as an Advocate of High Court ---In our view, the submission of respondents will be counterproductive and would prevent good Advocates from accepting appointments in civil service if this analogy persists. The second limb of the argument of the respondents is that once an Advocate is appointed as a Law Officer in any department of the Government of Sindh, he cannot be appointed to the post of District Public Prosecutor has to be ruled out for the understanding that it does not appeal to logic--We, therefore, hold that ten (10) years' service experience includes a period of serving as a law officer, which counts active practice at the bar which petitioner possesses and therefore is qualified to appear for the subject test for the position of District Public Prosecutor--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of SPSC is directed to allow the petitioner to appear in the subject interview and after conducting his interview announce the result accordingly within two (02) weeks from today. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 692 | Const. P. 3454/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Attaullah Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-DEC-20 | Yes | We are not impressed with the analogy as put forward by him for the reasons that departmental action against the petitioner having been initiated during his service independently of a criminal case registered against him. Merely obtaining an acquittal order in a criminal case would not nullify the departmental proceedings at this stage after his retirement. Since PSB-I did not consider his case for promotion and in the meanwhile, he stood retired from service, no benefit of Rule 7-A of The Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974, could be given to him after he retired from service in the year 2017--Dismissed | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.307-K/2021 Attaullah Bhutto v. Province of Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 693 | Const. P. 7994/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Abdul Majeed Shar (Petitioner) VS NED Univeristy and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-20 | No | We are of the view that final order is yet to be passed by the respondents pursuant to the inquiry, and as far as the present petition is concerned, the same has become infructuous as the impugned show cause notice has merged into the inquiry report. We are of the view that final order is yet to be passed by the respondents pursuant to the inquiry, and as far as the present petition is concerned, the same has become infructuous as the impugned show cause notice has merged into the inquiry report. Regarding the petitioners contention that allegation contained in the impugned show cause notice was false and/or malafide, suffice it to say if any adverse order is passed against him by the respondents, he will be at liberty to challenge the same before the competent forum in accordance with law and to urge such ground, or as many grounds as he wants, in his said appeal. With this observation, the petition is disposed of along with listed application with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 694 | Const. P. 2427/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mst. Ghulam Fatima (Petitioner) VS Controller Naval Accounts and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-MAY-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 695 | Const. P. 2497/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Syed Kifayat Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-MAY-20 | No | Service matter. Notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for 29.05.2020 at 10:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 696 | Const. P. 5344/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Shafique Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS The Administrator KMC and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-20 | No | The Chief Secretary Sindh is directed to ensure that in future postings should not be denied or delayed by the department concerned, and in any such event if an application / representation / complaint seeking posting is filed by the appointee before the Secretary / Head of the department concerned, the same must be decided by the said Secretary / Head within fifteen (15) days strictly in accordance with law. The above direction shall also be followed in case of applications / representations / complaints by an employee against his transfer. Let notice be issued to the Chief Secretary Sindh, the Secretaries of all the departments in the Government of Sindh, and the Heads of KMC, KDA, MDA and SBCA for compliance. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 697 | Const. P. 7120/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Zamir Ahmed Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Lt Cdr (R) Kashif Ahmed Abbasi and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | The Additional Secretary is directed to ensure that vacant possession of the subject flat is taken over from respondent No.1 and/or from any person(s) in possession on his behalf, and is handed over to the present petitioner without fail within seven (07) days from today. Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh, is directed to pay a sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) to the petitioner on or before the next date of hearing as compensation. The Additional Secretary, Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, is directed to submit a complete list before this Court on the next date of hearing of all such quarters, flats, bungalows and Government accommodation that are in unauthorized occupation or possession of such persons who are not entitled to enjoy possession thereof. Adjourned to 26.02.2020 at 11:00 am when above named Additional Secretary shall be in attendance. Let notice be issued to Chief Secretary Sindh to ensure compliance of this order in letter and spirit. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 698 | Const. P. 5850/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Zeeshan Usman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-APR-20 | Yes | The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1754/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others,C.A.936/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained.,Disposed Allowed | |
| 699 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 309 | Const. P. 7077/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Amanullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 700 | Const. P. 2414/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | TYMS Education Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-MAY-20 | No | Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for 14.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Till the next date of hearing, operation of clauses (ii) and (iv) of the impugned special order dated 28.04.2020 shall remain suspended. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 701 | Const. P. 4326/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Abdul Waheed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | ||||
| 702 | Const. P. 5644/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mst. Zain un Nisa (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 703 | Const. P. 444/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Mehbob Ali (Petitioner) VS D.C. Sanghar & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Prima-facie the subject land is reserved for Musafir khana which is for the people of area, legal title may vest in the Government, but such title, and the exercise of powers based thereon, is to be exercised in public interest, in accordance with the Constitution and the laws framed thereunder. Similarly, in the case reported as Ardeshir Cowasjee and 10 others v. Karachi Building Control Authority (KMC), Karachi and 4 others (1999 SCMR 2883) in somewhat similar facts in respect of a plot which was carved out within a park area, the Honble Supreme Court has held that an amenity plot cannot be used for any commercial purpose. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 704 | Const. P. 1708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Haji Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Re-Insurance Co. Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-AUG-20 | No | The impugned enquiry reports dated 01.07.2014, being not sustainable either in law or on facts, are hereby set aside, and the instant petitions are allowed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan(Author) | |||
| 705 | Const. P. 630/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-NOV-20 | Yes | We have noticed that the respondents have complied with the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court passed in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 in C.A. 30-K of 2014 and Crl. M.A 37-K of 2017 in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 and petitioner has been given a proforma promotion in BPS-20 with effect from 12.3.2017 one day before his retirement from service on 13.3.2017; thus no further indulgence of this court is required in the matter. It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others, PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 706 | 2023 PLC CS Note 97 | Const. P. 2293/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Noureen Naz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.230-K/2020 Noureen Naz v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 707 | Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-APR-20 | Yes | Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. As an interim measure, respondents are directed to consider the case of the present petitioner for promotion strictly on merits and in accordance with law. In case, his case is deferred and/or rejected, the competent authority shall pass a speaking order after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. To be listed on 07.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 708 | 2022 PLC (CS) 1289 | Const. P. 4077/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-20 | Yes | Repatriation, from the appointment as Assistant Commissioner (BPS-17) in Ex-PCS Cadre by way of nomination, to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue, Sindh---we are not impressed with the grounds urged by the petitioner in his petition for the simple reason that the appointment of the petitioner in Ex-PCS cadre (BS-17) had already been declared as illegal by the Honorable Supreme Court and ordered his repatriation to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue--In our view, since the directions of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters are still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 709 | Const. P. 6328/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Rashid and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Case of the petitioners is that they were appointed purely on temporary contract basis in the ADP schemes / projects viz. Youth Health Awareness Program (YHAP), Establishment of Mobile Skill Development Unit for Underprivileged Youth (EMSDUUY) and Benazir Bhutto Shaheeed Youth Development Porgramme (BBSYDP), in the years 2009, 2012 and 2013 till completion of the projects. After completion of the projects, their services stood discontinued as per terms of their appointment orders--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Case of the petitioners is that they were appointed purely on temporary contract basis in the ADP schemes / projects viz. Youth Health Awareness Program (YHAP), Establishment of Mobile Skill Development Unit for Underprivileged Youth (EMSDUUY) and Benazir Bhutto Shaheeed Youth Development Porgramme (BBSYDP), in the years 2009, 2012 and 2013 till completion of the projects. After completion of the projects, their services stood discontinued as per terms of their appointment orders--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 710 | Cr.Bail 1563/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ZAMEER AHMED S/O ZAHEER AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE THROUGH DIR. FIA ANTI COURRUPTION (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 711 | Const. P. 8474/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Sayed Muhammad Shah (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen. Syed Muhammad Shah is identified to have purchased at least three properties in DHA Karachi through pay orders using his name on behalf of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani. Two were the plots purchased in the name of Munwar Ali and Ghulam Murtaza, who are co-accused and have been drivers of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani. No case for pre arrest bail, Hence , dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.1920/2020 Chairman NAB thr. PG NAB, Islamabad v. Syed Muhammad Shah,C.A.304/2021 Chairman NAB thr. PG NAB, Islamabad v. Syed Muhammad Shah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | |
| 712 | Const. P. 7096/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Nadeem Aqeel Rajput (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-OCT-20 | No | In view of the above Rules and the well-settled law discussed above, the petitioner does not have any vested right to seek regularization of his contractual service ; and, he has also not acquired any legal right from the appointment made by TCP and accepted by him admittedly on contract. Therefore, no corresponding legal duty was/is cast on TCP to appoint him on regular basis, and thus writ of mandamus, as prayed for by the petitioner, cannot be granted. Petition dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | C.P.922-K/2021 Muhammad Nadeem Aqeel Rajput v. The Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 713 | Const. P. 1850/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mitha Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc. Mitha Kan ,a driver in Local Government Department, aided accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani like Tufail Ahmed Shah in acquiring a property againstRs.46,000,000.00 in phase-VI DHA Karachi by getting pay orders issued in his name. He denied his role in the investigation. But bank record goes against him and implicates him in the alleged offence. No case for pre arrest bail, Hence , dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.1131/2020 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Mitha Khan and others,C.A.299/2021 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Mitha Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | |
| 714 | Const. P. 1776/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Tufail Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS NAB (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc. Tufail Ahmed Shah in acquiring a property againstRs.46,000,000.00 in phase VI DHA Karachi by getting pay orders issued in his name. He denied his role in the investigation. But bank record goes against him and implicates him in the alleged offence .h huge amount despite being a low-paid employee, nor could he refute his nexus with accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani in such circumstances. No case for pre arrest bail, Hence , dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.1133/2020 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Tufail Ahmed Shah,C.A.301/2021 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Tufail Ahmed Shah,C.P.1680-K/2021 Taufail Ahmed Shah v. National Accountabilty Bureau Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 715 | Const. P. 1943/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | M/S Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Murtaza & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 716 | Const. P. 268/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Saeed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 717 | Const. P. 775/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Rizwan Munir Khan S/o Munir Khan (Petitioner) VS Shehryar Hasan Burney and Another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 718 | Civil Revision 36/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Ghulam Ali (Applicant) VS Muhammad Bux (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-FEB-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 719 | Civil Revision 109/1996 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1996 | Evacuee Trust Property Board & ors (Applicant) VS Abdullah and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 720 | Const. P. 274/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst. Yasmeen & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 721 | Cr.Misc. 301/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2013 | Abdul Wajid Kalo (Applicant) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-AUG-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 722 | Const. P. 1726/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Agha Nazimuddin and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | C.P.3563/2021 Association of Builders and Developers of Pakistan (ABAD), Hyderabad and others v. Government of Sindh, Secretary Home Department and Secretry Revienue, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 723 | Const. P. 3102/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Fahad Jawed (Petitioner) VS Syed Asif Hussain & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-APR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 724 | II.A. 85/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Naz Bibi (since died) through her LRs (Appellant) VS Wahid Bux (since died) through his LRs and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | The impugned judgment and decree of the learned appellate Court are maintained to the extent of entitlement of respondent No.1 in respect of the amount of the National Savings Certificates left by the deceased along with profit thereon, however, according to his share as per Shariah ; and, the impugned judgment and decree are set aside to the extent of grant of 50% share to respondent No.1 in the severance grant, gratuity and benevolent fund of the deceased, which shall be paid expeditiously to the legal heirs of the appellant / widow as per the service rules and regulations of the respondent No.2-bank. Needless to say the above payments shall be in addition to the donation by the respondent No.2-bank and the death compensation of the deceased granted to the appellant / widow by the learned appellate Court which, having not been challenged by respondent No.1, has attained finality. This appeal is partly allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.1520-K/2021 Wahid Bux & others v. Mst.Naz Bibi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 725 | Const. P. 1500/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst. Gulshan & anothers (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 726 | Cr.J.A 177/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Umar Wahid (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-OCT-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 727 | Const. P. 53/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst Gulshad Khatton (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 728 | Civil Revision 165/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Naseer Muhammad (Applicant) VS Muhammad Hakim (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-OCT-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 729 | R.A (Civil Revision) 67/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2006 | Khuda Bux Buriro (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 730 | R.A (Civil Revision) 185/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | District Coordination Officer Sukkur & others (Applicant) VS Khan Muhammad & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 731 | II.A. 29/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Ahmed Raza Thaheem & others (Appellant) VS Ghulam Mohiuddin & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-APR-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 732 | Const. P. 112/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Aslam Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 733 | First Appeal Against Order 6/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Yameen Ali (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 734 | Const. P. 551/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Khalil Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 735 | Const. P. 1470/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 736 | S.M.A 37/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Cdr (R) Mirza Hasnain Baig s/o Late Agha M. Baig (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 737 | Suit 1399/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Nasir Mirza. (Plaintiff) VS Syed Muzaffar Ejaz & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-APR-21 | Yes | Suit was dismissed with costs of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) to be paid by the plaintiff to defendant No.1 within thirty (30) days. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 738 | R.A (Civil Revision) 9/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | MUSHTAQ AHMED (Applicant) VS MALIK GHULAM ABBAS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-MAR-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 739 | Const. P. 478/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst. Sameena (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Khalid & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-MAR-21 | No | Prima facie, it appears that the learned appellate Court has not only failed to appreciate the above important aspect of the case, but also failed to follow the law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in relation thereto. In the above circumstances, let notice be issued to respondent No.1. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the impugned judgment of the learned appellate Court shall remain suspended. To be listed in the first week immediately after summer vacations. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 740 | R.A (Civil Revision) 174/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Muhammad Ibrahim (Applicant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-MAR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 741 | S.M.A 148/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Syed Zia Islam (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 742 | Judicial Companies Misc. 60/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1991 | I.D.B.P (Applicant) VS M/s.Farmaish Industries Ltd & anor (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 743 | S.M.A 81/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Fatima Iqbal wd/o Iqbal Mehmood Ghani (Petitioner) VS ABC (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 744 | Const. P. 902/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mehmood Rabbani S/o Abdul Shakoor (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Haider Baloch and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 745 | Cr.Bail 853/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SYED ABDUL RAFFAY S/O SYED ABBAS HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 746 | Const. P. 1075/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mst. Rani Wd/o Manzoor Khan @ Raju (Petitioner) VS Saeeda Begum and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 747 | II.A. 208/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Dr. Natasha Mustafa and Another (Appellant) VS Mst. Shah Sultana W/o Ismail Muslim (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-JAN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 748 | M.A. 43/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Sikandar Raza Zaidi S/o Late Syed Asad Ali Zaidi (Appellant) VS Mst. Shahida Parveen and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 749 | Const. P. 73/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Mst. Rashida Begum Thr. Attorney M. Aijaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS District & Sessions Judge, Khi-Central & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 750 | Const. P. 912/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Zahid Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 751 | Const. P. 1721/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Ghulam Qadir Otho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.327/2022 Ghulam Qadir Otho v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 752 | Const. P. 406/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Nadeem (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Mahir and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.5387/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Muhammad Bachal Mirbahar,C.A.2846/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Muhammad Bachal Mirbahar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | ||
| 753 | Const. P. 37/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Touseef Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Najam-us-Saqib and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 754 | Const. P. 496/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Saad Salman Khan S/o Muhammad Suleman Khan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shireen Jamal Thr. Mst. Seema Faisal & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.965-K/2022 Saad Salman Khan v. Mst. Shireen Jamal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 755 | Const. P. 2013/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Haji Umer S/o Haji Siddiq (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Farooq Motan & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 756 | S.M.A 545/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Naila Shamim wd/o late Mohammed Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-MAY-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 757 | Const. P. 209/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Shakiruddin S/o Fakharuddin (Petitioner) VS Abdul Hameed Thr. Attorney Muhammad Umer & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 758 | Const. P. 617/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Khalique Zaman Maitlo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | ||||
| 759 | Const. P. 5129/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Anjuman E Tajiran & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-DEC-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 760 | Const. P. 6715/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P. No.D-6810 of 2015 | 2016 | Mst Husna (Petitioner) VS DG (MDA) & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-DEC-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 761 | Const. P. 685/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Shafqat Ali Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | ||||
| 762 | Const. P. 583/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Muhammad Yameen and Others (Petitioner) VS Begum Sarwari Irfanullah and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 763 | Const. P. 3544/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Akash Ahmed Mubashar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 764 | Const. P. 579/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Bangul Khan Mahar (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | ||||
| 765 | F.R.A 38/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Naseer Uddin Jatoi S/o Late Zia Uddin Jatoi (Appellant) VS Miss. Reham Asad & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 17-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 766 | II.A. 55/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Gul Muhammad (Appellant) VS Nusrat Jamal (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 767 | Const. P. 2071/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Zain-ul-Abideen & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | ||||
| 768 | Const. P. 3609/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Abdul Waheed Dangar (Petitioner) VS Dr. Sajid Rafee Memon & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 769 | Const. P. 3565/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Abdul Malik (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 770 | Const. P. 30/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | ADAM KHAN (Petitioner) VS GHULAM RASOOL & ANOTHER (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 771 | Judicial Companies Misc. 10/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | BHANERO ENERGY LIMITED AND ANOTHER (Applicant) VS SECP (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-MAY-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 772 | H.C.A 358/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Abdul Ghani & Others (Appellant) VS Waheeduddin Siddique throuh legal heirs & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 773 | Const. P. 5822/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | The State (ANF) (Petitioner) VS Agha Mehmood ul Hassan Haravi & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-23 | No | Whether the Anti Narcotics Force (ANF) is an aggrieved party having a right to file an appeal under Section 32 of the Prevention of Smuggling Act, 1977 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 774 | Const. P. 5543/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Aftab Mughal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-DEC-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 775 | Const. P. 6052/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-NOV-23 | No | Right of a person allotted land in Glisten e Jauhar by the Province of Sindh to be made a party to proceedings on account of Judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan passed in Talat Ejaz Case | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 776 | Const. P. 3375/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Saeed Rabi Arain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-23 | Yes | Right of a person having acquired title to a unit in a building without an approved plan to be made a party in a proceeding. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 777 | Judicial Companies Misc. 41/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | BEST WAY EXCHANGE COMPANY-B PVT. LTD (Applicant) VS Compnay Matter (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-AUG-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 778 | I. A 52/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Chakar Khan (Appellant) VS Mst. Saira Abdul Rauf & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 779 | Suit 742/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | MRS. AMEENA RTARIQ. (Plaintiff) VS LIAQUAT HUSSAIN & AN OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 05-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 780 | Const. P. 1879/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Amber Alibhai & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Yunus Ali Gillani & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-DEC-23 | Yes | Interaction and application of Regulation 5-1.22 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 and Regulation 3-2.18 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 781 | Const. P. 1236/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Kashif-ur-Rehman Khan (Appellant) VS Fed: of Pakistan & ors (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 06-APR-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 782 | Adm. Suit 1009/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 06-APR-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 783 | I. A 14/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Mst. Pathani (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Ltd and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-APR-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 784 | Const. P. 179/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS DDO CDGK Sheme No2 & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | C.A.7-K/2015 Municipal Committee Ghotki v. Fateh Chand and others,C.P.126-K/2014 Municipal Committee Ghotki v. Fateh Chand and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned,Disposed Leave Granted | ||
| 785 | Const. P. 2866/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Wariyam and others (Petitioner) VS Prov.of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-20 | No | Contempt--Admittedly, the aforesaid petitioners are literate i.e. Primary Pass, which is requisite qualification to claim regularization, therefore, the compliance report submitted on behalf of the alleged contemnor is not in line with the order dated 01.11.2018 passed by this Court in letter and spirit. Resultantly, the compliance report is rejected--To be listed on 02.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m., when alleged contemnor must be present in Court along with his compliance report. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 786 | Suit 949/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | HAJI NAIMATULLAH (Plaintiff) VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 787 | Cr.Bail 59/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Javed Ali Mirani (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 788 | Suit.B 59/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | KASB Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Ahmed Ansari (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-MAY-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 789 | Suit 1108/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | M/S. CRESENT STEEEL & ALLIED PRODUCTS LTD (Plaintiff) VS SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LTD & ANOTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-DEC-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 790 | Suit 1380/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (Appellant) VS M/S. AER RIANTA INTERNATIONAL CPT. & OTHERS. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-DEC-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 791 | Suit 1107/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | M/S. CRESENT STEEL & ALLIED PRODUCTS LTD (Plaintiff) VS SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LTD & ANOTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-DEC-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 792 | Const. P. 1706/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Const. Petition No.D-1707 of 2011 | 2011 | Sultan Ahmed Katto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 793 | Const. P. 2063/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Ali Asghar Khokhar (Petitioner) VS Manager NBP Dokri and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 794 | Cr.Bail 74/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Muhammad Ilyas Aboo (Appellant) VS The State (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 20-FEB-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 795 | I. A 48/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | M/s. Sadia Industries & 3 others (Appellant) VS Soneri Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-OCT-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 796 | I. A 13/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Syed Zahid Hussain (Appellant) VS M/s KASB Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-SEP-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 797 | Const. P. 859/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Muhammad Yousuf & others (Petitioner) VS Commodore Mohammad Afzal & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-MAY-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 798 | Cr.Bail 1226/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | FAZAL WADOOD & 8 ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 799 | Suit.B 52/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | National Bank of Pakistan (Plaintiff) VS M/S ARK Garments Industry (Pvt.) Ltd. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-JAN-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 800 | I. A 57/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | M/S S. F. International & others (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 801 | Cr.Appeal 333/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 802 | H.C.A 235/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Chief Engineer, Building and Road Department, Government of Balochistan Quetta (Appellant) VS M/s Umar Khan through Mr. Mumar Khan Managing Partner I-E-4/1-A Nazimabad Karachi (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-JUN-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.1552/2014 Chief Engineer, Bulding & Road Department, Govt. of Balochistan, Quetta v. M/s Umar Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 803 | Suit 1577/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Artistic Denim Mills LImited (Plaintiff) VS Fatani Impex (Pvt.) Ltd. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 804 | Suit 830/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | S. Abdul Mannan Muttaqi (Plaintiff) VS Defense House Authority & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 28-APR-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 805 | Const. P. 2386/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Karachi Property Investment (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ros (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.578-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Culture Deptt: v. Karachi Property Investment Company (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 806 | S.M.A 67/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mst. Adila Ishrat (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 807 | Adm. Suit 419/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Syed Tariq Mustafa (Plaintiff) VS Tauqir Jahan Mustafa and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-OCT-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 808 | Adm. Suit 35/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2002 | Kamran Kayani (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan National Shipping Corporation & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 809 | Const. P. 1290/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Khalid and ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Jamiluddin and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 810 | Suit 1508/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Kalimuddin (Plaintiff) VS Sajad Sher another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 811 | Suit 1397/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Mr. Fawad Fazal (Plaintiff) VS Habib Bank Limited & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 11-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 812 | Suit 315/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 14-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 813 | Const. P. 2875/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Wali (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 814 | Suit 438/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Ch. Muhammad Ashraf (Plaintiff) VS Hafeez-ur-Rehman & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 30-NOV-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 815 | Const. P. 1459/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 816 | Const. P. 4407/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Afzal And ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 817 | Const. P. 1117/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Mohammad Sohail Khan (Petitioner) VS V/S Abdul Sajid Shamsi and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 818 | Const. P. 54/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 819 | S.M.A 44/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Asghar Jalil (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 820 | Const. P. 441/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Khurram Usmani l (Petitioner) VS V/S Chief Controller of Building and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 821 | II.A. 91/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Zaheer Ahmed Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Eteshamuddolah Khan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-AUG-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 822 | Suit 135/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Independent Media Corporation Private Limited (Plaintiff) VS Mr. Ali Azmat & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 15-AUG-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 823 | Civil Revision 133/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Shaikh Muhammad Sajid and another (Appellant) VS Roohullah Jan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-AUG-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 824 | Suit.B 40/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | M/S Meezan Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS A. H. International (Private) Limited & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-AUG-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 825 | 2017 PLD 88 | H.C.A 147/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | M/S Tee Jays Exclusive (Pvt.) Limited & another (Appellant) VS Muhammad Naveed (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.A.138-K/2016 M/s Tee Jays Exclusive (Pvt) Ltd and another v. Muhammad Naveed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned [ Next Session ] | |
| 826 | Cr.Misc. 129/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Rasool Bux (Applicant) VS S S P Jamshoro & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 827 | Const. P. 980/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Javed Ansar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 828 | Const. P. 775/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mashooque Ali Magsi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 829 | Const. P. 3178/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Nayab Haider (Petitioner) VS Project Director, Lines Area Re-Development Project, And 06 others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 830 | Const. P. 7084/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Ateeq and others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Shafiq and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 831 | Const. P. 962/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Musawar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 832 | Const. P. 3216/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Muhammad Younus Ahmed Zai (Petitioner) VS The Executive Officer, Malir Cantonment, and 03 others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JAN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | C.P.392-K/2017 Cantonment Board Malir v. Muhammad Younus Ahmed Zai Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | ||
| 833 | Const. P. 1642/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Ashraf and another (Petitioner) VS Faisal Cantonment Board and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 834 | Const. P. 196/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Rafi Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS CDGK and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | C.P.314-K/2017 M/s Lucknow Cooperative Housing Society thr. its Housing Secy: v. Rafi Ahmed Qureshi and others,C.P.448-K/2019 Muhammad Jameel v. Rafi Ahmed Qureshi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | ||
| 835 | Const. P. 902/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Mst Zahida Parveen & an Ors (Petitioner) VS Iftikhar Hussain & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.923-K/2018 Iftikhar Hussain v. Mst: Zahida Parveen and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 836 | R.A (Civil Revision) 121/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Shahid Khan & Another (Applicant) VS Mst. Zubaida Begum thr LRs. Mst. Humaira & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 837 | Const. P. 222/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Noor Ellahi Irfani (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hoor Afzal & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 838 | Const. P. 564/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Asad Hasan S/o Syed Sibte Hasan (Petitioner) VS The Ist ADJ, Karachi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 839 | II.A. 33/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Saleem S/o Islamuddin (Appellant) VS Mrs. Kishwar Kanwal and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 840 | Const. P. 3050/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Waqar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and orthers (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-FEB-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain M. Sheikh | ||||
| 841 | Const. P. 627/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Shabbir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 842 | Const. P. 897/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Uroosa & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 843 | Const. P. 954/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Fatima (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 844 | Const. P. 944/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Nailla & another (Petitioner) VS Akbar & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 845 | Cr.Bail 120/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Altaf (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 846 | Civil Revision 1042/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Umed Ali & Another (Applicant) VS Haji Abdullah Shaikh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 847 | II.A. 30/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Ideal Arcade Builders & Development (Appellant) VS Mst. Farida Shehnaz (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 848 | H.C.A 47/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Shafi Muhammad (Appellant) VS Cant View Scheme and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 849 | I. A 56/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | M/S. Victor Corporatoin (Pvt) Ltd. and others (Appellant) VS Faysal Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 850 | Cr.Tran 58/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Naseer Ahmed (Applicant) VS C.J & J.M-I Shahdadpur & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 851 | Const. P. 3383/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mst. Qaima and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-JUN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author) | ||||
| 852 | Civil Revision 80/1989 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 1989 | Rehmat Ali and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Din (deceased) though his L.Rs (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 853 | Const. P. 439/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Tariq Manzoor (Petitioner) VS The Court of 1st ADJ, Malir, Khi and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 854 | H.C.A 210/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Fawad Rehman (Appellant) VS FT. LT. Syed Shamsuddin & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 855 | Const. P. 4224/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Shahid Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 856 | Const. P. 4622/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-FEB-20 | No | Contempt--- This petition was disposed of vide order dated 29.10.2018 with direction to the respondents to award benefit of Office Memorandum dated 11.02.1985 to the petitioner, without discrimination, within a period of two months. Respondents assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition No.1456-K of 2018, which was dismissed vide order dated 18.7.2019. Their review application was also dismissed vide order dated 24.12.2019. Now the respondents have complied with the order by depositing an amount of Rs.1, 208,000.00 with the Nazir of this Court and the same has been disbursed in favour of the petitioner, which factum is disclosed in the order dated 10.01.2020 passed by this Court-- In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that compliance of the order dated 29.10.2018 passed by this Court has been made in its letter and spirit. Contempt--- This petition was disposed of vide order dated 29.10.2018 with direction to the respondents to award benefit of Office Memorandum dated 11.02.1985 to the petitioner, without discrimination, within a period of two months. Respondents assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition No.1456-K of 2018, which was dismissed vide order dated 18.7.2019. Their review application was also dismissed vide order dated 24.12.2019. Now the respondents have complied with the order by depositing an amount of Rs.1, 208,000.00 with the Nazir of this Court and the same has been disbursed in favour of the petitioner, which factum is disclosed in the order dated 10.01.2020 passed by this Court-- In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that compliance of the order dated 29.10.2018 passed by this Court has been made in its letter and spirit. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1456-K/2018 The Secy: M/o Port & Shipping Now M/o Maritime Affairs and another v. Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 857 | H.C.A 251/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Ajaz Khan (Appellant) VS Amjad Khan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 858 | Const. P. 376/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 859 | Const. P. 1406/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Nehal Chang (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 860 | Const. P. 1247/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Allah Bux (Petitioner) VS M.D (CEO) H.B.F.C Ltd & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.38-K/2020 Allah Bux v. Managing Director (CEO) House Building Finance Company Ltd and others,C.A.2-K/2021 Allah Bux v. Managing Director (CEO) House Building Finance Company Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed | ||
| 861 | Const. P. 3365/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Zubair Ahmed. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 862 | Const. P. 1151/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ali Gul (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 863 | Const. P. 2852/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mohammad Nawaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | No | Contempt | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 864 | Const. P. 2633/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 865 | Const. P. 125/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition stands disposed of directing Chief Secretary to Government of Sindh to consider the case of the Petitioner for his appointment on any post against deceased quota as per his qualification on the basis of Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and in accordance with the dicta laid down by Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in C. P. No. 482-K & 503-K of 2016, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 866 | Const. P. 738/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 867 | Const. P. 1449/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst, Nadia (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 868 | Const. P. 3193/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Muneer Ahmed Shoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 869 | Const. P. 43/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Samuel Parvaiz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 870 | 2022 PLC (CS) 454 | Const. P. 5649/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-OCT-20 | No | Contempt--SSGC--We are of the considered view that the interest of justice would be best met if the respondent-company is granted last opportunity to comply with the direction of this Court as well as the Honorable Supreme Court in the instant matter without fail within two (02) weeks and to submit compliance report to this Court on the next date of hearing, failing which show cause notice shall be issued to alleged contemnors on the next date of hearing--To be listed on 09.11.2020 at 11:00 a.m., when alleged contemnors must be present in Court along with their compliance report. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.3977/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. Rao Muhammad Gulzar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 871 | Const. P. 3216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mir Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 872 | Const. P. 2784/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Huzoor Bux and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 873 | Const. P. 502/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mst .Rani Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-JAN-20 | Yes | whether Constable Mushtaque Khaskheli embraced Shahadat on 04.3.2015 or his case does not fall under the criteria for Shaheed as per The Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act-2014. Shahadat | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 874 | Const. P. 231/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Associate Professor Saeeda Parveen & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 875 | Const. P. 139/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Abdul Sattar and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 876 | Const. P. 2939/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Nasir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 877 | Const. P. 358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Noorunisa @ Fatima and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 878 | Const. P. 1708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 879 | Const. P. 556/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Syed Sadiq Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 880 | Const. P. 1997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Imdad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 881 | Const. P. 3031/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Sajidullah (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.M.A.178-K/2020 Imdad Hussain v. Sajidullah Memon and others,C.P.1451-K/2020 Imdad Hussain v. Sajidullah Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed | ||
| 882 | Const. P. 2893/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 883 | Const. P. 3143/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Shafi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 884 | Const. P. 1690/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 885 | Const. P. 3082/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Fida Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | No | Contempt | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 886 | Const. P. 1256/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Abdul Razzaq and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 887 | Const. P. 2574/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Ghulam Nabi & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 888 | I. A 16/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Syed Muhammad Nadeem Shah Bukhari (Appellant) VS Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 14-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 889 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 537 | H.C.A 253/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | K-Electric Ltd. (Appellant) VS Syed Anwar Ali & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-DEC-20 | Yes | KESC--Whether suit is maintainable by the retired employee of the KESC in the present form? 2. Whether through the KESC Officers Policy 2010, certain benefits to the Plaintiff under the previous policy, can be withdrawn by the Defendant ? | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.507/2021 K-Electric Ltd, Karachi v. Syed Anwar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned [ Next Session ] |
| 890 | Const. P. 8063/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Hafiz Muhammad Tabish (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-DEC-20 | Yes | we are of the considered view that merely obtaining acquittal from a criminal case is no ground to take benefit to bypass the disciplinary proceedings. Since the show cause was issued against the petitioner and he replied and it is for the respondent-KPT to decide in accordance with law for which this Court is not required to show indulgence in the matter under Article 199 of the Constitution to set-aside the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him--we do not see any infringement of the right of the Petitioner which could be called in question by way of Writ Petition. It is a well-settled principle of law that a public Servant has no vested right to call in question the disciplinary proceedings in Writ Petition. During the course of arguments, we have been informed that petitioners service has been dispensed with under the disciplinary proceedings. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 891 | Const. P. 2429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-MAY-20 | No | Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Respondent No.2 / Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh is directed to appear before this Court in person on the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the impugned notification to the extent of the present petitioner shall remain suspended. To come up on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 am along with C.P. No.D-2387/2020. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 892 | Const. P. 5585/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mst. Fakhar un Nisa (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 893 | Const. P. 7450/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Imran Ahmed Khanzada & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-DEC-20 | Yes | I. Whether respondent No.4 can hold the charge for the post of Director I.T. in BPS-18 under the law? II. Whether respondent No.4s case falls within the ambit of Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013? | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.594-K/2021 Mst.Tabassum Abbasi v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 894 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 1070 | Const. P. 1480/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Dr. Maryam Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Chancellor Fed. Urdu University & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court while calling in question the termination letter dated 26.02.2019 issued by the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as ???University???), relieving her from the services of University with retrospective effect i.e. 20.10.2018, which according to the petitioner is without lawful authority and of no legal effect.---We are not satisfied with the assertion of the respondent-university on the aforesaid analogy, for the reason that Fundamental Rule 54, is clear in its terms, dealing with the reinstatement of the employee consequent to setting aside of his dismissal/removal from service, the entitlement of the employee, to have the period of his absence from his service treated as "on duty" is a statutory consequence of his being reinstated on the merits--This being the legal position of the case, the instant petition is allowed with no order as to costs by holding that the impugned termination order dated 26.02.2019 issued by respondent-university is without legal consequence. Thus, the service of the petitioner is reinstated with effect from termination of her service i.e. 14.02.2019. The respondents are directed to grant her service benefits for the intervening period in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court while calling in question the termination letter dated 26.02.2019 issued by the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as University), relieving her from the services of University with retrospective effect i.e. 20.10.2018, which according to the petitioner is without lawful authority and of no legal effect.---We are not satisfied with the assertion of the respondent-university on the aforesaid analogy, for the reason that Fundamental Rule 54, is clear in its terms, dealing with the reinstatement of the employee consequent to setting aside of his dismissal/removal from service, the entitlement of the employee, to have the period of his absence from his service treated as "on duty" is a statutory consequence of his being reinstated on the merits--This being the legal position of the case, the instant petition is allowed with no order as to costs by holding that the impugned termination order dated 26.02.2019 issued by respondent-university is without legal consequence. Thus, the service of the petitioner is reinstated with effect from termination of her service i.e. 14.02.2019. The respondents are directed to grant her service benefits for the intervening period in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 895 | Const. P. 7731/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Javed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-20 | Yes | promotion in PSO | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 896 | Const. P. 5907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Overseas Pakistanis Foundation (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.228/2021 Overseas Pakistanis Foundation thr. its authorized Office, Karachi v. National Industrial Relations Commission(Full Bench) , Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 897 | F.R.A 2/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Ahmed Khan (Appellant) VS Javed Ali (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 898 | Const. P. 6027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Kanwar Naveed Jameel (MPA) (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 899 | Const. P. 6027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Kanwar Naveed Jameel (MPA) (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-20 | No | To appreciate the aforesaid contentions of the petitioner, let notice be issued to respondents 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 as well as to the learned Attorney General of Pakistan and learned Advocate General of Sindh under Order XXVII(A) of CPC. The Chief Secretary Sindh, to submit complete details of such cases of the Civil / Government Servants who entered into plea bargaining and Voluntary Return (VR) under the NAB law. To be listed on 21.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 900 | Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-OCT-20 | Yes | Employees of KDA whose pension and other post-retirement benefits have been stopped or delayed by KDA--According to the report, public notice in terms of order dated 19.03.2020 was published in newspapers on 27.08.2020 ; a total amount of Rs.234,749,894.00 is payable by KDA to its retired employees ; and, an amount of Rs.23,741,450.00, being 10% amount of the pension and post-retirement benefits, has been paid by KDA to its 988 retired employees. Learned counsel for the petitioners have expressed some reservations with regard to the contents of the above compliance report and state that the orders of this Court have not been complied with by KDA in letter and spirit. The above named Director Finance & Accounts KDA is directed to produce before this Court on the next date of hearing the complete bank statement of the bank account opened by KDA for the above purpose in pursuance of the order dated 19.03.2020. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 901 | Const. P. 7252/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Naveed Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1436-K/2020 Naveed Ahmed Abro v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 902 | I. A 17/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Shaneela Raza & another (Appellant) VS Allied Bank Limited & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 903 | Const. P. 6161/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Khaliq Dad Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-SEP-20 | No | The petitioner undertakes to vacate the premises within three (03) months from today. As the legitimate post-retirement dues have been admittedly withheld by the respondents, they shall not take any coercive action against the petitioner during the next three (03) months, including any action for recovery of rent. It is, however, clarified that if the premises are not vacated by the petitioner within three (03) months, the respondents would be at liberty to seek his eviction strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, the petition and listed applications stand disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 904 | Const. P. 5844/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Naeemullah Samoo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-FEB-20 | Yes | Deceased quota latest Deceased quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 905 | Const. P. 5853/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | National Engineering Servies Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-NOV-20 | Yes | reinstatement in service--we may observe that the learned Single Bench of NIRC vide order dated 08.10.2020 allowed the Grievance Application of respondent No.2 and passed ex-parte order, which issue is still subjudice before the learned Full Bench of NIRC, which is presently not available at Karachi to adjudicate the matter of petitioners. This being the position of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.5 to decide the case of the petitioners within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with the law. Meanwhile, operation of the impugned order dated 08.10.2020 shall remain suspended. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 906 | Const. P. 5391/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 907 | Const. P. 5391/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | In view of the statement of learned AAG, let notice be issued to the Chief Secretary, Sindh, to submit complete details of such cases of the Civil / Government Servants who are facing disciplinary proceedings or criminal cases, and enjoying the posting even those who entered into plea bargaining and Voluntary Return (VR) under the NAB law. To be listed on 21.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 908 | Const. P. 483/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-DEC-20 | Yes | In view of the above, this petition is allowed with the direction to the competent authority of the respondent-police department to take the decision afresh as to whether Constable Amjad Ali embraced Shahadat on 26.12.2012 or his case does not fall under the criteria for Shaheed as per The Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act-2014.The aforesaid exercise shall be completed by a speaking order within two (2) months from the date of receipt of this order after hearing the petitioner. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 909 | Const. P. 607/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Abdul Hameed Asghar Thr. Mehmood Asghar (Petitioner) VS Learned Vth ADJ, Khi East and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 910 | Const. P. 6070/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Sana Jabeen Khan (Petitioner) VS Chairman SPSC (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-20 | No | Before parting with this case, it may be observed that in order to avoid unnecessary complications and litigation as well as hardship and embracement to the applicants, such applicants should not be allowed by SPSC to participate in any competitive process who do not fulfill the eligibility criteria specified in the advertisement. The application forms of such candidates should be rejected in the first instance so that the question of their written test etc. does not arise at all. Such vigilance on the part of SPSC shall ensure participation of only eligible candidates in the competitive process. Let notice be issued to the Chairman SPSC for compliance. The petition stands disposed of in terms of the above observations and direction with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 911 | Const. P. 5682/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-FEB-20 | Yes | Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed. Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 912 | 2022 PLC (CS) 307 | Const. P. 6948/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Anis Haroon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | i) Whether the post of Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations is to be filled amongst the career foreign service officers or eminent personalities from business, media, law, and other areas on a contract basis ; ii) Whether the Prime Minister of Pakistan is the competent authority under Rule 15(1)(g)(h) of the Rules of Business, 1973 or the Federal Cabinet under Article 90 of the Constitution of Pakistan to make such appointment ; and, iii) Whether appointments on a contract basis are prohibited under or contrary to Section 14 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, and the Policy unless the conditions specified therein are satisfied? | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 913 | Const. P. 3652/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Ali Murad Sipio (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 914 | R.A (Civil Revision) 18/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Mehboob (Applicant) VS Nadir Hassan (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 14-MAR-20 | Yes | Relevant facts of the case are that the above Suit was filed by the respondent claiming to be the sole and exclusive owner of property bearing C.S. No.4407, Ward ???G???, out of R.S. No.27 and others in Deh Ghangra, situated at Phulelipar, Paretabad, Hyderabad Sindh (???suit property???)--The main concern raised on behalf of the applicant was that as the property in his possession is separate and distinct from the one claimed by the respondent, the impugned decree cannot be executed in respect of his property. In this context, it may be noted that there are already concurrent findings against the applicant and this Court has also affirmed the same. Be that as it may, needless to say that the executing Court cannot go behind the decree and the decree shall be executed only in respect of the property described therein after carefully identifying and ascertaining the same. Relevant facts of the case are that the above Suit was filed by the respondent claiming to be the sole and exclusive owner of property bearing C.S. No.4407, Ward G, out of R.S. No.27 and others in Deh Ghangra, situated at Phulelipar, Paretabad, Hyderabad Sindh (suit property)--The main concern raised on behalf of the applicant was that as the property in his possession is separate and distinct from the one claimed by the respondent, the impugned decree cannot be executed in respect of his property. In this context, it may be noted that there are already concurrent findings against the applicant and this Court has also affirmed the same. Be that as it may, needless to say that the executing Court cannot go behind the decree and the decree shall be executed only in respect of the property described therein after carefully identifying and ascertaining the same. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 915 | Const. P. 4316/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Rizwan ul Haque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-SEP-20 | No | As the matter has not yet been concluded by the respondents, the petitioner will be at liberty to raise objection(s) with regard to the jurisdiction / authority of the respondents to hold the impugned inquiry and/or to pass any order in pursuance thereof. In such an event, respondents shall first decide his objection(s) before proceeding further. Needless to say proper opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the petitioner and the matter shall be conducted strictly in accordance with law. Let notice be issued to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. The petition and listed applications stand disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 916 | 2021 PLD Sindh Note 103 | Const. P. 139/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Nadeem Zuberi (Petitioner) VS C.A.A (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-OCT-20 | No | It is the case of the petitioner that it was specifically stated by him in his above application for withdrawal of the petition that the same was being filed by him as the respondent had assured him that his post-retirement benefits will be disbursed in his favour immediately upon withdrawal of the petition---In view of the above admitted position, we are of the view that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner stood abated, and resultantly his status, for the time being, is that of a retired employee of the respondent for all legal intent and purposes--Such an absurd situation cannot be allowed to happen as ; firstly, it is a well-settled and consistent view of the Superior Courts that matters should be decided on merits rather than depriving a party on technical grounds ; secondly, it is the duty of the Court to ensure dispensation of justice by setting the controversy before it at rest ; and lastly, this Court, under its inherent powers, can allow restoration of the petition so that the petitioner may get a fair opportunity of decision of his case on merits. It may be observed that the question of restoration of a case or application, as the case may be, would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case--Our above view is fortified by the following cases. In H. M. Saya & Co. Karachi V/S Wazir Ali Industries Ltd., Karachi and another, PLD 1969 SC 65--In view of the above discussion, the listed application is allowed with no order as to costs, and resultantly the petition is restored to its original position. Needless to say the observations made herein shall not affect the merits or demerits of the case of either of the parties to the petition, which shall be decided on merits in accordance with law. It is the case of the petitioner that it was specifically stated by him in his above application for withdrawal of the petition that the same was being filed by him as the respondent had assured him that his post-retirement benefits will be disbursed in his favour immediately upon withdrawal of the petition---In view of the above admitted position, we are of the view that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner stood abated, and resultantly his status, for the time being, is that of a retired employee of the respondent for all legal intent and purposes--Such an absurd situation cannot be allowed to happen as ; firstly, it is a well-settled and consistent view of the Superior Courts that matters should be decided on merits rather than depriving a party on technical grounds ; secondly, it is the duty of the Court to ensure dispensation of justice by setting the controversy before it at rest ; and lastly, this Court, under its inherent powers, can allow restoration of the petition so that the petitioner may get a fair opportunity of decision of his case on merits. It may be observed that the question of restoration of a case or application, as the case may be, would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case--Our above view is fortified by the following cases. In H. M. Saya & Co. Karachi V/S Wazir Ali Industries Ltd., Karachi and another, PLD 1969 SC 65--In view of the above discussion, the listed application is allowed with no order as to costs, and resultantly the petition is restored to its original position. Needless to say the observations made herein shall not affect the merits or demerits of the case of either of the parties to the petition, which shall be decided on merits in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.1156/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi,C.A.445/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Dismissed |
| 917 | Const. P. 5646/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Sahiba (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 918 | Const. P. 7576/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Badaruddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively. the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 919 | 2023 PLC CS Note 103 | Const. P. 340/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | M.Saleem Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-FEB-20 | Yes | We are of the view that the post cannot be upgraded / re-designated merely by passing the Resolution by defunct CDGK, the law has to take its own course and to be followed for the aforesaid purpose for which the petitioner has failed to justify his entitlement for proforma promotion with retrospective effect---It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others , PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed. proforma promotion | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 920 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 78 | Const. P. 6863/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-MAR-20 | Yes | the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases. the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 921 | Const. P. 4461/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Imtiaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-FEB-20 | Yes | Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceased???s first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Hon???ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance. Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceaseds first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Honble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 922 | Const. P. 3494/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Sarwar and Others (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 923 | Const. P. 2235/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Aslam Pervaiz Langah (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc., Petitioner Aslam Pervaiz Langah (C.P.No.D-2235/2019)is stated to a broker/estate agent. He is stated to have facilitated Agha Siraj Khan Durani in sale/purchase of certain assets, .But there is nothing palpably incriminating in this, this is what a realtor does to earn his livelihood. Prima facie his role is of doing business with accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani or with the ones acting on his behalf. There is no material to show that he was in collusion with him .Unless the evidence to establish his complicity with accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani for creating layers to conceal his property or income is produced in the trial, his case would fall within the scope of further enquiry and he would be entitled to relief of pre arrest bail. bail is confirmed | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.1135/2020 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Aslam Pervaiz Langha and others,C.A.303/2021 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Aslam Pervaiz Langha and others,C.P.6308/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Aslam Pervaiz Langah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 924 | Const. P. 1471/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Nadeem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & OtherS (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 925 | Const. P. 1637/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mrs. Naheed Durrani (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Petitioners, accused in reference were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court . NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court and remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250 . The case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, for committing corruption and corrupt practices illegal means while Other petitioners, accused in the reference, said to be his family members ,associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, are identified as Benamidar/ ostensible owners of the properties actually owned and possessed by him. foreign currency and estimation of value of properties held by his Benamidars and his family members, Copies of pay orders got issued from banks, by his servants or the officials working with him, is yet another prima facie piece of evidence against him in this respect. when he buys a property in the name of his wife or children, or makes payments at their behest for this purpose, there would normally be no reason for them to get alarmed or suspect that he has done corruption and is providing money from the wealth earned by him .petitions of Mrs. Naheed Durrani (C.P.No.D-1637/2020),allowed and their bail is confirmed on the same terms and conditions they were granted ad interim pre arrest bail on. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.6304/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Mrs. Naheed Durrani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 926 | Cr.Bail 1464/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | BILAL S/O SHAH JAHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-OCT-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed with direction to the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the subject case within three (03) months strictly in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 927 | Cr.Bail 1401/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | USMAN S/O AHRAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-SEP-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant Usman son of Ahrar is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000.00 (Rupees fifty thousand only) and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The instant bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 928 | Const. P. 1853/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS F.E.D. Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan | ||||
| 929 | Const. P. 584/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc Two were the plots purchased in the name of Munwar Ali and Ghulam Murtaza ,who are co-accused and have been drivers of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani , No case for pre arrest bail, Hence , dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | |||
| 930 | Const. P. 691/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Shoaib Basharat Thr. Attorney Basharat Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Kanwal Noureen and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 931 | Const. P. 1641/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Sonya Durrani (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc., are identified as Benamidar/ostensible owners of the properties actually owned and possessed by him. We come to the case of family members of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani (his wife, a son and three daughters). It is noted, they have been identified as Benamidar owners of certain properties like plots, flats ,bungalows, vehicles .s. Allegation to provide finance to purchase the properties is against him, and not against his family members. there is no evidence or even allegation that his family members were either privy to his alleged acts of depravity, aiding and abetting him. Petition of SoniaDurrani (C.P.No.D-1641/2020) is allowed and bail is confirmed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.6307/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Sonya Durrani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 932 | Cr.Misc. 518/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Mst. Sikander (Applicant) VS Mehboob Ali & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 933 | Const. P. 1726/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Agha Nazimuddin and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | C.P.3563/2021 Association of Builders and Developers of Pakistan (ABAD), Hyderabad and others v. Government of Sindh, Secretary Home Department and Secretry Revienue, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 934 | I. A 72/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Mustafa & another (Appellant) VS M/s Allied Bank & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-OCT-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 935 | I. A 7/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Chaudhry Abdul Jabbar (Appellant) VS Presiding Officer, Banking Court-II, Sukkur & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 936 | S.M.A 312/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Junaid ur Rehman S/o Hafeez ur Rehman Malik (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-APR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 937 | Cr.Tran 64/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Jumo Oad (Appellant) VS Ahmed Sahito & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JAN-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 938 | R.A (Civil Revision) 140/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Asghar Ali (Applicant) VS Muhammad ismail (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-DEC-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 939 | Cr.Bail 727/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SYED MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN ZAKIR & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 940 | I. A 5/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2013 | Javed-ur-Rehman and others (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 941 | I. A 1/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Habib Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ismail (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan | ||||
| 942 | R.A (Civil Revision) 111/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Khadim Hussain & Others (Applicant) VS Additional Distt: Judge-I, Khairpur & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-APR-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 943 | Suit -819/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SYED GHULAM SARWAR SHAH (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-21 | Yes | As a result of the above discussion, it is hereby held that the instant Suit is barred by limitation, and also under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, and Order VI Rule 4 CPC, and is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. Accordingly, the Suit is liable to be dismissed with costs. Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 08.04.2021 whereby this Suit and the listed applications were dismissed with costs of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only). The amount of costs shall be deposited by the plaintiff with the Nazir of this Court within thirty (30) days, which amount shall be transferred / deposited forthwith by the Nazir in the bank account of Edhi Foundation. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 944 | Suit 1262/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | SUZUKI MOTOR CYCLES (Plaintiff) VS MALIK QAISER ZAMAN & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-MAR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 945 | Suit 467/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Noushad Anwer & others. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Nadeem Anwer (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 29-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 946 | I. A 2/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Khadim Hussain & others (Appellant) VS Gul Hassan Tiwano & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 947 | R.A (Civil Revision) 184/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Muhammad Anwar Khan (Applicant) VS Mst bushra Siddiqui & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-MAR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 948 | Const. P. 2561/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Faraz Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-FEB-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | C.P.1544/2021 Faraz Ali and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary to Governor @ Governor House Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 949 | Const. P. 624/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst. Shamina & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 950 | Const. P. 438/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Saddam Hussain (Petitioner) VS V.C University Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan | ||||
| 951 | Const. P. 360/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Sabir S/o Shahabuddin (Petitioner) VS Syed Amanat Ali and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 952 | F.R.A 2/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Farasat Ali Khan S/o Shujaat Ali Khan (Appellant) VS Cdr (R) Ather Rafi Siddiqui (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 953 | Const. P. 698/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Syed Imran Mustafa Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Learned XVIIIth Family Judge(Kch-Central) & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 954 | Const. P. 862/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Shoaib and Another (Petitioner) VS Kashif Agha and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 955 | Cr.Bail 1603/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SHAKEEL AHMED S/O ZAHEER MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 956 | Cr.Bail 1965/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD UMER S/O SAINDAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant / accused Muhammad Umar son of Saindan is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The instant bail application is allowed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 957 | Const. P. 873/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Siddiqui S/o Haroon (Petitioner) VS Dawood and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 958 | Const. P. 827/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Sajida W/o Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 959 | Const. P. 157/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Mst. Shireen Bano (Petitioner) VS Islamuddin @ Mallow & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 960 | Const. P. 403/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Malik Haq Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Mahir and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 961 | Cr.Bail 1198/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ABRAR AHMED SIDDIQUI S/O MUKHTAR AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-APR-22 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant / accused Abrar Ahmed Siddiqi has made out a case for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him vide order dated 23.06.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. It is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative in nature which shall not prejudice the case of either party nor shall they influence the learned trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits in accordance with law. This bail application is allowed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 962 | Cr.Bail 173/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MUHAMMAD ADNAN S/O MUHAMMAD AASHIQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 963 | Const. P. 405/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Aurangzaib Khan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Mahir and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 964 | Judicial Companies Misc. 4/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Eleven star Securities (Pvt.) Limited. (Applicant) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-OCT-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 965 | Const. P. 866/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Jahanzaib S/o Dawood Bhai (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Tahir (Late) Thr. L.Rs Nazeer Ahmed & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 966 | Const. P. 756/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Zainullah S/o Abdul Wajid Khan (Petitioner) VS Abdul Kalam Khan and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 967 | M.A. 35/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Asif Balwani Thr. Anwar Shah (Appellant) VS The Court of Xth ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 968 | Const. P. 1484/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Azeem-ur-Rehman S/o Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Amanullah and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 969 | S.M.A 130/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Rehan Julian Ali s/o Saiyed Mohsin Azhar Ali (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAY-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 970 | Const. P. 605/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Junaid Ahmed Indher (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput | ||||
| 971 | Const. P. 1242/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Mashooque Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 972 | R.A (Civil Revision) 158/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Rahila Allai (Applicant) VS Mst. Shamim Begum & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 973 | Judicial Companies Misc. 19/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s. Mistsui O.S. K Lines Pakistan Pvt Limited (Applicant) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-APR-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 974 | Const. P. 810/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Syed Nusratullah Thr. Attorney Matiullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Amin and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 975 | Const. P. 3103/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Khalid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 976 | H.C.A 330/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Umar Baloch Enterprises Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 977 | Const. P. 6476/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Jehangir Perozshaw Dubash (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-FEB-24 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 978 | Const. P. 3380/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Anound Tasveer Jumani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-FEB-24 | No | Jurisdiction of a Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 in the presence of an arbitration clause, Application of principles of Malice in law and the Public Procurement Regulatory Ordinance 2002 and the Public Procurement Rules 2004 to a government controlled Company. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 979 | Const. P. 478/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Rana Muhammad Khalil (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-JAN-24 | No | Right of a Person to claim Post Facto Regularisation under the Doctrine of Necessity where there was no Approval ever applied for by. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 980 | Const. P. 5876/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Rameez Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-FEB-24 | Yes | Overlap between Regulation 25-2 and 25.9 of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations 2002 explained | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 981 | H.C.A 19/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Muhammad Khalid Ali Khan (Appellant) VS Najam Ahmed & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 982 | Suit 1230/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | MUHAMMAD TALIB (Appellant) VS MUHAMMAD SARWAR NAZ & ANOTHER (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 983 | H.C.A 74/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Union Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Mohammad Naeem and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.411-K/2019 Union Bank Limited v. Muhammad Naeem & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 984 | Const. P. 565/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Muhammad Latif (Petitioner) VS District Judge South Karachi & other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 985 | Const. P. 565/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | City Environment Society (Petitioner) VS KBCA & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 986 | Const. P. 1231/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Muhammad Ilyas (Appellant) VS Fed: of Pakistan & ors (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 06-APR-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 987 | Const. P. 2783/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Ramoon Malah (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 988 | Const. P. 1720/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Abdul Jabbar (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commission and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-MAY-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam | ||||
| 989 | Const. P. 2429/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | M/s. Satcom (Pvt) Limited (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 24-APR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 990 | H.C.A 162/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | The Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Appellant) VS M/s.Razaque Steel Pvt.,Ltd. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-APR-12 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 991 | Const. P. 968/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Mukhtiar Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Sukkur Electric Power Larkana SEPCO and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 992 | Const. P. 766/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Mst Sardaran Mugheri (Petitioner) VS SHO PS B Section Shahdadkot and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 993 | Const. P. 1256/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Ahsan Ali Soomro (Petitioner) VS D.E.O Male Jacobabad and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 994 | Const. P. 1182/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Mrs.Zarina (Plaintiff) VS Sirajul Hassan (Defendant) | D.B. | Order | 16-APR-12 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 995 | Suit 1171/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | ZULFIQAR SHAKOOR (Plaintiff) VS M/S. QUETTA TOWN CO-OPY (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-OCT-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 996 | Const. P. 3853/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Muhammad Usman & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Shafaat-Ullah Khan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-AUG-16 | No | It is well-settled that no party should suffer because of mistake of the Court. In the instant case, respondent No.1 has suffered because of the above lapse on the part of the office and incorrect observation by the Court regarding service upon him. The question whether his allotment was liable to be cancelled or not, ought to have been decided after giving opportunity of hearing to him, or at least after proper service upon him. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 997 | Suit 95/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | ABDUL KHALIQ SHAIKH (Plaintiff) VS SEEMA MASOOD (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUL-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 998 | Suit 727/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | BAYER AG and Bayer Health Care AG (Plaintiff) VS Bayhealth Care (Private) Limited & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-MAY-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 999 | Adm. Suit 684/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | Engro Fertilizers Limited. (Plaintiff) VS The Federation of Pakistan. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-OCT-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1000 | Const. P. 2120/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 23-AUG-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai | ||||
| 1001 | Suit 1447/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Syed Amjad Mahboob (Plaintiff) VS Raja Mumtaz Hussain Arif & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 15-APR-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1002 | Suit 1722/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | M/S Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS President, Sukkur Gymkhana (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1003 | Cr.Bail 1235/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Sohail Adnan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1004 | II.A. 9/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2008 | Malik Muhammad Yaseen (Appellant) VS Syed Raza Hyder and ors (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 17-APR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.A.432/2014 Syed Raza Haider v. Malik Muhammad Yaseen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | ||
| 1005 | Suit 323/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Mst. Aziz Bano (Plaintiff) VS Khalifa Aziz Mian (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 10-APR-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1006 | Const. P. 24/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Munawar Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Secretary Land Utilization Dept and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-FEB-14 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1007 | J.M 14/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Apollo Pharma Limited and others (Applicant) VS SECP (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-NOV-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1008 | Const. P. 2666/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1009 | Const. P. 2344/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ghulam Yasir (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1010 | Const. P. 4779/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Kausar Shamim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1011 | Const. P. 1274/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Rab Nawaz Anjum and ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and osr (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1012 | Const. P. 1841/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Sami Ahsan (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-JUN-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.164-K/2016 Sami Ahsan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | ||
| 1013 | Const. P. 6660/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Mst. Zamrad Begum and Ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Muhammad Rafiq Choudhry and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.2890/2016 Muhammad Rafiq Chaudhry v. Mst. Zamrad Begum & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 1014 | Const. P. 2345/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | The Anjuman Masjid New Town and Ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Muhammad Shahid Zaki and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1015 | Const. P. 1088/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | KESC (Petitioner) VS V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Organization / Department Name (if any): (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1016 | Const. P. 3210/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abdul Fateh Jamali (Petitioner) VS V/S NAB and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-JUN-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1017 | Const. P. 3722/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | M/s Lucknow C.H.S (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1018 | Const. P. 2876/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Shahid Ansari (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1019 | Const. P. 2256/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1020 | II.A. 91/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Zaheer Ahmed Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Eteshamuddolah Khan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-AUG-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1021 | Cr.Tran 52/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sahib Khan (Applicant) VS 1st Addl Session Judge Dadu & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1022 | Cr.Bail 345/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | qadir bux @ qadan (Applicant) VS the state (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1023 | Const. P. 886/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ameer Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1024 | Const. P. 854/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Shamsher Khan (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 1025 | Const. P. 3607/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | abc (Petitioner) VS xyz (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1026 | Const. P. 223/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Nasreen Kausar (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hoor Afzal & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1027 | Const. P. 3522/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mrs. Nighat Saimi and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and 10 others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-FEB-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 1028 | Const. P. 815/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Razzaque (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1029 | Const. P. 761/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Maqsood Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sind & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1030 | Const. P. 15/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Jago S/O Ropo (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1031 | Const. P. 754/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sanbho (Appellant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1032 | Const. P. 1028/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Pathani (Petitioner) VS Arbab (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1033 | Const. P. 1044/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Lal Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1034 | Cr.Bail 676/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ali Murad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1035 | Const. P. 939/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1036 | Const. P. 311/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Zenat & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1037 | Const. P. 757/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Debho (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1038 | Cr.Misc. 140/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | sanwal ahmed (Applicant) VS abdul haq rajput (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1039 | Const. P. 934/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Collachi Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Government of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-SEP-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1040 | Const. P. 1083/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Dr. Muhammad Sharif (Petitioner) VS Military Estate Officer and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 14-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | C.P.299-K/2017 Dr.Muhammad Sharif v. Military Estate Officer, ML&C Department, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1041 | Const. P. 482/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Swami Narayan Temple Trust (Petitioner) VS Syed Muhammad Naeem and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-SEP-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1042 | Cr.Misc. 151/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Ambreen (Applicant) VS S.S.P, Distt Hyd and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1043 | Const. P. 1018/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Rukhsana & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1044 | Const. P. 971/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Thara (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Tando Muhammad Khan & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1045 | Const. P. 983/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1046 | Const. P. 982/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Prof Hussain Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1047 | Const. P. 1577/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Allah Jiwayo (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Ubauro & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-AUG-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1048 | H.C.A 393/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | M/s. M.C.B. Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Emad-ul-Hasan (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1049 | Const. P. 2185/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Saeed (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.1432-K/2018 Muhammad Saeed v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Home Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1050 | H.C.A 414/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Donvand Limited (Appellant) VS Oasis Travels (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1051 | H.C.A 219/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Redtone Telecommunication Pakistan (Pvt) Limited (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1052 | Const. P. 968/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Talib Hussain (Petitioner) VS S.H.O P.S Tando Allahyar & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1053 | Const. P. 793/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Aqlan & another (Petitioner) VS Abdul Mutlab & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1054 | Const. P. 2438/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Syed Ali Abbas Rizvi Thr. Nisar Muhammad (Petitioner) VS The Addl. Controller of Rents Clifton & Another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-19 | Yes | The petition is dismissed with costs as the impugned order is an interlocutory order and it does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect or error, this petition, being misconceived and malafide, is not maintainable. The learned Rent Controller is directed to decide the subject rent case within forty five (45) days from receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law and in view of consent order dated 24.08.2010 passed by this Court in C.P. No.S-597/2010 and the judgment delivered by this Court on 10.04.2009 in FRA No.38/2008, and to report compliance within seven (07) days thereafter to this Court through MIT-II. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 1055 | Const. P. 1591/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS IInd ADJ Karachi Central & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.530-K/2019 Muhammad Hanif v. Syed Nazir Hussain Rizvi (decd) thr. his L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1056 | II.A. 25/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mst. Shahida Parveen & Another (Appellant) VS Sardar Atif Ali Sanjrani & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1057 | Const. P. 3102/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Haseeb Malik & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1058 | Const. P. 280/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2004 | Pervaiz (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1059 | Const. P. 836/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Inayat (Petitioner) VS PO sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1060 | Const. P. 1352/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Niaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | No | Contempt | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1061 | Const. P. 2715/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Muhammad Yameen (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.740-K/2019 Muhammad Yameen v. Chairman Sindh Irrigation & Drainage Authority (SDA) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1062 | Const. P. 348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Asif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1063 | Const. P. 1639/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Shafique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.M.A.2348/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others,C.P.3787/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered and also notice be issued,Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 1064 | F.R.A 14/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Airport Hotel (Appellant) VS S. Imtiazuddin & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1065 | I. A 27/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | M/S Quaraquram Cotton Ginners Factory &Oil Mills (Appellant) VS NBP Br,At Sanghar (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 1066 | Const. P. 1840/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Zahida Usman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1067 | Const. P. 523/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1068 | Const. P. 3618/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Yousif (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1069 | Const. P. 1885/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1070 | Const. P. 3066/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1071 | Const. P. 370/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1072 | Const. P. 3306/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1073 | Const. P. 2510/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst.Razia Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1074 | I. A 26/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | M/S Quaraquram Cotton Ginners Factory & Oil Mills& (Appellant) VS NBP and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1075 | Const. P. 1406/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Ilamzadi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1076 | Const. P. 2680/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Sachal Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1077 | Const. P. 3275/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1078 | Const. P. 400/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 1079 | Const. P. 317/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1080 | Const. P. 2926/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1081 | Const. P. 221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1082 | Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-OCT-20 | Yes | Differently abled persons' plea for appointment in the quota reserved for such persons--We are of the view that the Chief Secretary Sindh, being the senior most officer in the Province, would be the most suitable person to oversee the entire process under his personal supervision in order to ensure not only the compliance of this Court's orders, but also to conclude the exercise in relation to those petitioners whose cases have not yet been considered and/or finalized--To ensure that appointment orders are received by all the 102 (81 + 21) petitioners, before the next date of hearing, who have been already recommended for appointment --To ensure that cases of all such petitioners in these petitions, that have not yet been considered and/or finalized, are considered on merits, strictly in accordance with law, and after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to them a speaking order is passed by the competent authority before the next date of hearing in relation to every such petitioner who is rejected for appointment --To ensure that all those petitioners who have been or will be recommended and have been / will be issued appointment orders are allowed to join their duties before the next date of hearing after completion of all codal formalities--To communicate this order to all the relevant departments and their Secretaries with direction to ensure implementation and compliance thereof in letter and spirit within the stipulated period. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1083 | Const. P. 876/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Shakir Ali (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-DEC-20 | Yes | Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.736/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. P.G. NAB, Islamabad v. Shakir Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1084 | Const. P. 408/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mohammad Mithal Lohach (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-FEB-20 | Yes | No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to assist this Court. This petition was filed in the month of January 2016, praying for initiation of an inquiry against the then Secretary, Education Department, Government of Sindh--In the above circumstances, this petition, being not maintainable and having become infructuous, is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to assist this Court. This petition was filed in the month of January 2016, praying for initiation of an inquiry against the then Secretary, Education Department, Government of Sindh--In the above circumstances, this petition, being not maintainable and having become infructuous, is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1085 | Const. P. 6387/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mst. Beenish Mobin & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1432-K/2020 Amjad Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1086 | Const. P. 3478/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment. the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1661/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Bashir Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 1087 | Const. P. 2692/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Shahnawaz and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-NOV-20 | Yes | Seniority matter--SRP--Police Constables--Adverting to the point raised by learned counsel for the petitioners that they were appointed in SRP Karachi and posted in RRF Karachi since 2009, thus their seniority is liable to be maintained in Karachi range, suffice it to say that prima-facie, the RRF was / is not part of the Karachi range, but is a combination of different regions/units of the Sindh police, merely their appointment in SRP Karachi and posting in RRF Karachi does not support their case to the effect that they belonged to Karachi Range Police, for the reason that they never remained posted in the Karachi range police, therefore, their seniority cannot be ordered to be mixed with Karachi range police. The record further reflects that their recommendations for initial appointments by their regional head were made based on their respective place of domicile. Petitioners have failed to point out that their appointment was / is based on Karachi domicile, therefore they are precluded to claim vested right for seniority and promotion at Karachi Range on the aforesaid analogy--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1438-K/2020 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others,C.A.57-K/2021 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned | |
| 1088 | Const. P. 2593/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mst. Afsheen Sajid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 1089 | Const. P. 7214/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Abdul Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | regularization of their contingent service as computer Operator, Naib Qasid and Chowkidar in the Sindh Coal Authority (SCA) Government of Sindh---The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor fall within the ambit of Policy of the Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with the pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1090 | Const. P. 2429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-MAY-20 | No | By consent all these petitions and listed applications are disposed of with no order as to costs in terms of the above undertaking given by the Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh ; and, as agreed by the parties, the impugned Notification shall remain suspended to the extent of the present petitioners till the final decision / order of the competent authority of the Board of Revenue Sindh on the representations filed by the petitioners. Needless to say any person aggrieved by the order / decision of the competent authority will seek his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1091 | Const. P. 2509/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Rasheed Rizvi Centre & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-MAY-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 1092 | Const. P. 7103/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-20 | Yes | release his monthly salary--whether the salary of the petitioner can be withheld without providing an opportunity of hearing? --In our view, he, who seeks equity, must do equity and approach the Court with clean hands, ill-gotten gains cannot be protected. It is argued by the learned AAG that the petitioner had got his appointment through the backdoor, thus cannot agitate any grievance on the pretext of denial of due opportunity of hearing to him--we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and since the Competent Authority has already determined the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims on the issue of appointment of non-teaching staff in the Directorate of School Education (Elementary/ Secondary / Higher Secondary Karachi), vide order dated 11.01.2019 on the subject as discussed supra, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained. On the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, we are guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1093 | Const. P. 5203/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Khalid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1094 | Const. P. 1194/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-APR-20 | Yes | The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.442-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary & another v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi & others,C.P.1840/2020 Aijaz Ali Sahto thr. University & Board Department of the Province fo Sindh and others v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1095 | Const. P. 6632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Fareed Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-OCT-20 | Yes | regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.3640/2020 Abdul Haque Shaikh and others v. Province of Sindh thr. its Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Sindh Sectt. Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 1096 | Const. P. 5814/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Tariq Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-20 | No | In the above circumstances, respondents 1 and 2 are jointly and severally directed to ensure that proper rules are framed and are placed before this Court without fail on or before the next date of hearing. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 for compliance. Till the next date of hearing, parties are directed to maintain status quo with regard to the present status of the petitioners. To be listed on 10.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1097 | Const. P. 558/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-DEC-20 | Yes | Basically, the petitioner was appointed as a Clerk in BPS-05 on 02.12.1980 and his grade was enhanced and placed in BPS-06 vide office order dated 27.10.1985. Prima-facie, his juniors have been promoted in various grades whereas the petitioner has been ignored without disclosing his ineligibility or otherwise. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1098 | Const. P. 6908/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS The Registrar High Court of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-OCT-20 | No | . We have scanned the file and nothing is available on record to suggest that the petitioner was gainfully employed during the period that he was kept away from his job. The decision of respondent No.2 to the extent of treating the period with effect from 01.12.2014 to 06.11.2018 as extraordinary leave without pay is erroneous for the simple reason that the petitioner was reinstated in service by the order of Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal and no appeal was preferred against the said order. We have noted that respondent No.2 has not assigned valid reasons to decline the back benefits to the petitioner for the aforesaid period. Therefore, the Petitioner is entitled to the back benefits after his reinstatement in service under the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1099 | II.A. 32/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Bundoo Khan & another (Appellant) VS Muhammad Younus (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 09-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1100 | Const. P. 3913/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-20 | Yes | i) Whether the petitioner possesses the required qualifications for the post of police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police as per recruitment Rules-2016 ? And ii) Whether police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police can be recruited on a contract basis and subsequently be regularized in service under the law? | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1725-K/2021 PC.77 Jan Muahmmad & others v. Province of Sindh thorugh Secretary, Home Department Govt, of Sindh & others,C.P.5160/2021 Abdul Ghafar and others v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 1101 | Const. P. 5337/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s Alsons Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Alsons Ind Peoples Empl: Union and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1102 | Const. P. 3479/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muhammad Irfanullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years??? service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs. the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1662/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Irfan Ullah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 1103 | Const. P. 5571/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Majeedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS KW & SB and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-DEC-20 | Yes | correctio in date of birth | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1104 | I. A 31/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Government of Sindh, through Secretary Education Department and others (Appellant) VS United Bank Limited (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1105 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 726 | Civil Revision 219/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Ayoob, (Applicant) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1106 | Const. P. 1229/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Atta Muhammad alias Attan (Petitioner) VS Senior Superintendent of Police, Hyd & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1107 | Cr.Misc. 752/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst. Mukhtiaran (Applicant) VS D.I.G Police Nawabshah and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1108 | Cr.Bail 1249/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MALIK AAMIR S/O NOOR KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-OCT-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant / accused Malik Amir son of Noor Khan is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The instant bail application stands disposed of in the above terms | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1109 | Const. P. 1424/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Dr Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 1110 | S.M.A 66/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Syeda Shakira Raza w/o Ghulam Raza (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1111 | Cr.Bail 1237/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ADNAN S/O MUHAMMAD AYOUB (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-SEP-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed with direction to the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the subject case within three (03) months strictly in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1112 | Cr.Bail 1400/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | USMAN S/O AHRAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-SEP-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant Usman son of Ahrar is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000.00 (Rupees fifty thousand only) and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The instant bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1113 | Civil Revision 58/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2007 | Abdullah and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Siddique and other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1114 | Const. P. 1559/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Irfan (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc. Muhammad Irfan is found an ostensible owner of a bungalow in phase-V DHA Karachi estimated to be Page 10 of 19worth Rs.240 million. That he purchased in the year 2011 and since then accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani has been living there with his family, and he not for a single day has resided therein. No plausible explanation for such status quo has been forwarded by him in his petition. He has only pleaded that being owner of a bungalow is not an offence. But has utterly disregarded, in the wake of allegations against him, to tell the resource utilized by him to purchase such property and in what capacity he has let accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani live in his bungalow. there is prima facie sufficient evidence against him plus there is no material to show his implication by NAB in this case on account of any disingenuous motive. No case for pre arrest bail, Hence , dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | |||
| 1115 | II.A. 191/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Suman Khalid and another (Appellant) VS Nadeem Qureshi and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1116 | Const. P. 17/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muhammad Sadique (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Tahir & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1117 | Const. P. 310/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D-311 of 2020 C.P. No.D-312 of 2020 C.P. No.D-313 of 2020 C.P. No.D-314 of 2020 C.P. No.D-315 of 2020 C.P. No.D-316 of 2020 C.P. No.D-317 of 2020 C.P. No.D-318 of 2020 C.P. No.D-319 of 2020 C.P. No.D-364 of 2020 C.P. No.D-401 of 2020 C.P. No.D-422 of 2020 | 2020 | Abdul Aleem & Others (Petitioner) VS P. O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 1118 | Const. P. 121/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Raja Sikandar Hayat (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 1119 | Cr.Bail 1350/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | GUL HASSAN S/O MUHAMMAD HASSAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-OCT-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant / accused Gul Hassan son of Muhammad Hassan has made out a case for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him vide order dated 14.07.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. This bail application is allowed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1120 | Suit 1647/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | RIFFAT SAEED & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS ZAHID SAEED & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 17-JAN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1121 | R.A (Civil Revision) 133/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Shaikh Muhammad Sajid & Another (Applicant) VS Roohullah & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-AUG-16 | Yes | Civil Revision Application was dismissed with costs of Rs.10,000.00 ; the applicants were directed to deposit the said amount with the Nazir of this Court within thirty (30) days ; and, the Nazir was directed to utilize the same towards the benevolent fund of the employees of this Court. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1122 | I. A 77/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Pakistan Export Finance Guarantee Agency Ltd (Appellant) VS MuhamadDawood Khan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1123 | Const. P. 336/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Irshad Ali Jesar (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-MAR-21 | No | NAB-426 Cr.P.C | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | |||
| 1124 | Suit 1769/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | MRS.MAHEEN KATCHI (Plaintiff) VS MRS. TAHIRA KADER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1125 | Const. P. 2566/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Muhammad Fazul (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-OCT-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1126 | I. A 16/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Province of Sindh & others (Appellant) VS Deputy District Officer (Rev) & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-AUG-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1127 | Civil Revision 80/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Abdul Qadir Memon (Applicant) VS Shahid Umar Rajput (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1128 | Civil Revision 107/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Nabi Bux Chijjan (Applicant) VS Province Of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1129 | F.R.A 31/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mumtaz Ali S/o Lal Muhammad (Appellant) VS Fayyaz Ahmed and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1130 | I. A 5/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Abdul Samad Mahar & others (Appellant) VS The Habib Bank Limited & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 1131 | S.M.A 91/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | SAAD MIRZA S/O. MIRZA ASLAM (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1132 | Const. P. 562/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst. Shahida and another (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1133 | Const. P. 1883/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | M/s Sultan Mehmood & Co. (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Clifton & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAR-17 | Yes | It is now well-settled that use of an amenity / public property by the public for enjoyment of life is covered by the word life employed in Article 9 of the Constitution ; such right to enter into and use the amenity / public property without any obstacle is a fundamental right as enshrined in Article 26 read with Article 9 of the Constitution ; liberty and right of a person to have access to amenity / public property or to utilize and enjoy the same cannot be taken away by converting such amenity into a commercial one for the purpose of extending benefit to a third person ; any violation in respect of rights relating to the access, use or enjoyment of amenity / public property or change in the use thereof, whether temporary or permanent, by any individual, government, functionary or agency is illegal ; amenity / public property cannot be used for any other purpose than for which it was carved out, earmarked or reserved. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1134 | I. A 9/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Nand Lal and another (Appellant) VS M/S Askari Bank Ltd.and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 1135 | Const. P. 374/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Miskeen Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Senior Member Board Of Revenue Hyderabad & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-FEB-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1136 | R.A (Civil Revision) 39/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2007 | Nasim Hayat (Applicant) VS Mrs.Naseem Akhtar and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-MAY-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1137 | R.A (Civil Revision) 180/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Muhammad Soomar (Applicant) VS Javed Ali & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-FEB-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1138 | Cr.Tran 67/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Altaf Hussain VS The State and others (Appellant) VS The State and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-FEB-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1139 | Const. P. 1528/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Aijaz Hussain Jakhrani (Petitioner) VS National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-AUG-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.3022/2022 Aijaz Hussain Jakhrani v. National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman NAB, HQ, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed | ||
| 1140 | R.A (Civil Revision) 58/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2008 | Gul Zaman (Applicant) VS Mst Rukhsana & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-MAR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1141 | Const. P. 1563/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Arshad Khan (Petitioner) VS IIIrd Family Judge & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1142 | S.M.A 193/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Haseeb Ahmed Shaikh S/o (Late) Shamim Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1143 | Const. P. 255/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | M/s Al Raheem & Co (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan | ||||
| 1144 | Cr.Bail 1161/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD WALEED S/O ABDUL WAHEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-NOV-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant / accused has made out a case for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him vide order dated 08.07.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1145 | Const. P. 1050/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Gul Muhammad alias Guloo & another (Petitioner) VS VIIth Addl:District Judge Karchi South & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1146 | 2012 CLC 1293, 2012 SBLR Sindh 611 | H.C.A 22/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Arshad Naseemuddin Ahmed (Appellant) VS Javed Baloch & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-MAY-12 | Yes | It is neither obligatory nor lawful to have always decide the application under section 47 and Order XXI rule 95, 100, 103 CPC by recording the evidence. It actually depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. The learned Single Judge has done nothing wrong while dismissing the application summarily since there was no material or facts which were required to be investigated. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) | ||
| 1147 | Suit 950/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | CHINA MOBILE PAKISTAN LIMITED (ZONG) & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 27-AUG-21 | Yes | Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 27.08.2021 whereby C.M.A. No. 8722 of 2021 filed by defendants 3 and 4, seeking return of the plaint, was dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1148 | Const. P. 1419/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mst. Salma and others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Saleem and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1149 | Cr.Bail 2275/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | KHALID HUSSAIN S/O SHARAFAT HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1150 | Const. P. 681/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1151 | I. A 40/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Syed Zafar Ali & Another. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-MAR-22 | No | The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside with direction to the learned Banking Court to decide the Suit expeditiously. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1152 | S.M.A 619/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Nasreen Tariq D/o late Abdul Rashid Soorty (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-APR-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1153 | H.C.A 249/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | D.G. Malir Development Authority & Another (Appellant) VS Fareedullah & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | ||||
| 1154 | Const. P. 402/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Malik Haq Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Mahir and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1155 | Const. P. 680/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | ||||
| 1156 | Const. P. 1005/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mehmood Ashraf Khan S/o Ashraf Khan (Late) (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sabeen (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1157 | Const. P. 58/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Maqbool Ahmed S/o Khair Muhammad Khaskeli (Petitioner) VS Qadir Bux Khaskeli and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1158 | Const. P. 1739/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Ahsan Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1159 | Judicial Companies Misc. 36/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | M/s. AKD Securities Limited & Another (Applicant) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1160 | Const. P. 558/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Syed Najaf Ali Shah (since decsd) thr. Syed Azhar (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Iqbal and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1161 | M.A. 31/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Waqar Ahmed Thr. Anwar Shah (Appellant) VS The Court of Xth ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1162 | Const. P. 521/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Muhammad Munir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1163 | Const. P. 423/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Irshad Ahmed Qazi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | ||||
| 1164 | Const. P. 269/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Allah Dino (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Umer and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1165 | Const. P. 2701/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1166 | Const. P. 1394/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Qurat-ul-Ain & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | C.P.712-K/2023 The Province of Sindh through Advocate General Sindh v. Qurat-ul-Ain & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 1167 | Judicial Companies Misc. 6/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | BRR INVESTMENT PVT LTD AND TWO OTHERS (Applicant) VS BRR GUARDIAN LIMITED (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1168 | R.A (Civil Revision) 190/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Dilmurad (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1169 | Const. P. 5139/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Al-Saeed Service & CNG (Petitioner) VS M/s K-Electric Ltd and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1170 | Const. P. 5556/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Imran Razi Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1171 | Const. P. 3083/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Nadeem Ellahi (Petitioner) VS P.D.O.H.A (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-23 | No | Application of the doctrine of Privity of Estate as between a Head Lessor and a Sub- Lessee | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 1172 | Const. P. 1917/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Mst. Asma Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-FEB-24 | No | Whether a Lease can be allotted in the presence of a registered lease over the same property. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 1173 | Const. P. 6026/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-FEB-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 1174 | Const. P. 4789/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Saqib bin Rauf (Petitioner) VS SBCA & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-OCT-23 | Yes | Jurisdiction of SBCA to institute criminal proceedings under Section 19 of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 1175 | Const. P. 4038/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Muhammad Sheraz Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Sindh HIgher Education Commission & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-JAN-24 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | ||||
| 1176 | Suit 1842/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | SHEIKH NADEEM REHMAT & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS SINDH BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY & ANOTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 27-SEP-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1177 | H.C.A 289/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Institution of Business Administration & others (Appellant) VS Hammad Sarfraz (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 1178 | R.A (Civil Revision) 28/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Jamil Ahmed Shaikh (Appellant) VS Muhammad Taqi Siddiqui (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-JAN-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1179 | Const. P. 275/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2008 | Abdul Khaliq @ Khalique (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khatija & others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-MAR-14 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1180 | Spl.H.C.A 279/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-JUN-11 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1181 | Const. P. 223/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Niaz Ali Areejo and others (Petitioner) VS D.C.O Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1182 | Const. P. 2329/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | M/s.Union Insurance Co. (Petitioner) VS Federal Insurance Ombudsman (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 1183 | Suit 485/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | SOORTY ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) VS K.E.S.C. LTD & ANOTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 29-AUG-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1184 | Adm. Suit 448/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 05-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1185 | Cr.Appeal 151/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Hajjan another (Appellant) VS The State and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 14-MAR-14 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1186 | Const. P. 674/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Muhammad Nasir Kaleem (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Khizar Khan & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-NOV-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1187 | Const. P. 2102/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Hakim Ali Mamrani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1188 | Const. P. 1707/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Sikandar Ali Katto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1189 | Suit 1380/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (Appellant) VS M/S. AER RIANTA INTERNATIONAL CPT. & OTHERS. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-DEC-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1190 | Const. P. 369/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: C.P. No. 404, 482, 763 & 774 of 2012 | 2010 | Mst; Shaista Gaad (Petitioner) VS The Secretary Education and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-SEP-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1191 | Suit 1699/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | ABBAS ALI (Plaintiff) VS ASIF ABBAS & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-OCT-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1192 | Civil Revision 174/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-MAR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1193 | Civil Revision 184/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Syed Murshad Ali (Applicant) VS Syed Amjad Ali and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-MAR-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.174-K/2014 Syed Amjad Ali and another v. Syed Murshad Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | ||
| 1194 | Const. P. 3463/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Dr Raheela Magsi (Plaintiff) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Defendant) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-MAY-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1195 | Const. P. 174/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Mst. Nazia Parveen Qadri (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiarkar City Survey Officer Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1196 | Const. P. 1984/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Nisar Ahmed Khokhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1197 | Cr.Misc. 168/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Anwar Ali (Applicant) VS Mazhar Hussain Hisbani and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-FEB-14 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1198 | Suit 385/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | Ali Nawaz (Plaintiff) VS National Bank of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 08-APR-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1199 | Const. P. 288/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Syed Sajid Abbas Rizivi (Petitioner) VS Mst. Naureen and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-APR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1200 | Suit.B 26/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Yawar Farooqui (Plaintiff) VS Standard Chartered Bank Limited & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-SEP-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1201 | Cr.Bail 1205/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Dawar Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1202 | Suit.B 117/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | I.G.I. Investment Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS M/S Admore Gas (Pvt) Ltd & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 30-OCT-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1203 | Suit.B 117/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | I.G.I. Investment Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS M/S Admore Gas (Pvt) Ltd & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-FEB-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1204 | H.C.A 152/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Mst. Khursheed Begum & another (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-MAR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam | ||||
| 1205 | Civil Revision 180/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-FEB-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1206 | Const. P. 1061/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Haji Faiz Muhammad and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-MAR-14 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1207 | S.M.A 31/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Arif Shaffi (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1208 | Const. P. 1159/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s National Absorbent Cotton (Petitioner) VS V/S Presiding Officer and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1209 | Const. P. 2891/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Sikandar Khan Kalmati Baloch (Petitioner) VS V/S Sect: Irrigation and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1210 | S.M.A 50/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Yaqoob Mirza (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1211 | Const. P. 3193/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Talib Hussain (Petitioner) VS V/S The Director NFC Dept (NADRA) and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-JUN-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1212 | Suit 177/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Maxim Advertising Company (Plaintiff) VS Rufi Builders and Developers & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-OCT-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1213 | Const. P. 844/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Shehri-Citzens & Ors. (Petitioner) VS V/S Karachi Muncipal Corporation & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1214 | Const. P. 5005/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Shafi Muhammad Kalwar (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1215 | S.M.A 174/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Mst. Badarunnisa Begum (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1216 | Const. P. 420/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mst. Bilquees Begum (Petitioner) VS Malir Development Authority (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1217 | Suit 1544/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Kamran Ali Khan and another (Plaintiff) VS Vaneeza Umeran and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 19-SEP-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1218 | Const. P. 3235/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mr. Hafeez-ur-Rehman Khattak Advocate (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-SEP-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1219 | Const. P. 7743/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Javed and others (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cooperative Housing Society and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-MAY-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | C.P.360-K/2017 Maqbool Co-operative Housing Society v. Muhammad Jawad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1220 | Cr.Tran 75/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Shahid Mahmood and Others (Applicant) VS The State and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1221 | M.A. 2/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Ghulam Hyder Lashari (Appellant) VS Romana Chandio & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1222 | Const. P. 221/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Noor Ellahi Irfani (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hoor Afzal & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1223 | Const. P. 494/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Custom Public School Thr. Akbar Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Aftab Ahmed and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-MAY-19 | Yes | Section 21 of SRPO 1979 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 1224 | Const. P. 899/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Zakia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1225 | Cr.Bail 295/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Safdar Ali & an other (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1226 | Const. P. 697/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Naila Siyal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1227 | Const. P. 780/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Ameeran Begum & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1228 | Const. P. 741/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Fatima & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1229 | Const. P. 225/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Begum (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.3621/2016 Hassan Bux v. Board of Intermediate & Secondary Education, Hyderabad thr. its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 1230 | Const. P. 1077/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Wali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1231 | Cr.Bail 329/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ali Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1232 | Const. P. 806/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Sakina & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1233 | Cr.Bail 485/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Saima and an Other (Petitioner) VS Liaquat Ali and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1234 | Cr.Misc. 156/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mulazim Hussain (Applicant) VS S S P Badin & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1235 | Const. P. 1574/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Mst Indra Bai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-AUG-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1236 | Const. P. 1592/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Bakhtawar Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh 7 ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-AUG-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1237 | 2019 CLD 272 | Spl.H.C.A 158/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Imran Husssain (Appellant) VS Banker Equity Ltd. & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 1238 | I. A 7/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s. Industrial Development Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/S. Ideal (Pvt.) Ltd. and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1239 | Const. P. 678/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | Mst. Zulekha Khanum (Petitioner) VS Pervaiz Akhter & 2 Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 17-JAN-19 | No | The petition is allowed with no order as to costs by directing respondent No.1 to hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the demised premises to the petitioner within thirty (30) days. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.222-K/2019 Pervaiz Akhtar v. Mst: Zulekha Khannum and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of [Four months time is granted] | |
| 1240 | Const. P. 4747/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Rukhsana Yahya (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-OCT-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1241 | Const. P. 1438/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | S. Shamraiz and another (Petitioner) VS Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-JAN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 1242 | 2018 MLD 82 | Suit 906/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Pakistan Water & Power Development Authority (WAPDA) (Plaintiff) VS M/S CCI - AG, AN IMI Company and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 1243 | Const. P. 1573/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Ayaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS SSP Larkana & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-AUG-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1244 | H.C.A 209/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Fawad Rehman (Appellant) VS FT. LT. Syed Shamsuddin & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1245 | H.C.A 280/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Zaheen Cooperative Housing Society Limited (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.1503-K/2018 Dr. Fiaz-ul-Hasan Shah v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Cooperation Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 1246 | Const. P. 2149/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: Const. P D 4729/2015 | 2015 | Abdul Hameed and another (Petitioner) VS Provicne of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-MAY-18 | Yes | In our humble opinion, one of the reasons for introducing the doctrine of alternate remedy was to avoid and reduce the number of cases that used to be filed directly before this Court, and at the same time to allow the prescribed lower forum to exercise its jurisdiction freely under the law. Moreover, if a person moves this Court without exhausting the remedy available to him under the law at lower forum, not only would the purpose of establishing that forum be completely defeated, but such person will also lose the remedy and the right of appeal available to him under the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 1247 | Const. P. 2176/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mst. Arifana & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1248 | Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 1249 | Const. P. 2580/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ms. Samina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1250 | Const. P. 2071/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Sarfraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1251 | Const. P. 920/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Shaikh Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiarkar Revenue Nagarparkar and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1252 | Const. P. 1937/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Arbab Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1253 | Const. P. 2833/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1254 | Const. P. 2320/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Shah Muhammad and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1255 | Const. P. 2549/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Dayal Chand (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1256 | Const. P. 78/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Zahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-NOV-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1257 | Const. P. 50/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Junaid Muzahir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1258 | Const. P. 3739/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS NAB & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1259 | Const. P. 848/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1260 | Const. P. 1952/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Samani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1261 | Const. P. 2933/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Dolat Khan (Petitioner) VS D.C. Tando Allahyar and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1262 | Const. P. 5784/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Abdul Salam Khatri (Petitioner) VS D.G MC & C and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-JAN-20 | Yes | Non prosecution--Since the issue of transfer and posting from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Iqbal and others supra, this petition is not maintainable. The issue of transfer and posting from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board has already been settled by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Iqbal and others. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1263 | Const. P. 3196/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Raza Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1264 | Const. P. 1587/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Faraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1265 | Const. P. 1659/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Miss Sanam & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.99-K/2020 Director (Legal) WAPDA v. Miss Sanam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | ||
| 1266 | Const. P. 78/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Sharoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1267 | Const. P. 721/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Irrigation matter | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1268 | Const. P. 1347/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1269 | Const. P. 224/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Gul Bahar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1270 | Const. P. 1578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1271 | Const. P. 2588/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 1272 | Const. P. 10/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Zafar Ali Khushk (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1273 | Const. P. 2011/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Anwar and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1274 | Const. P. 2622/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | P.I.A Senior Staff Association (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-MAY-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 1275 | Const. P. 6868/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Arsalan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-APR-20 | Yes | the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed. the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.369-K/2020 Muhammad Saleem v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1276 | Const. P. 7563/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Irshad Ahmed Siyal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-FEB-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1277 | Const. P. 877/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-DEC-20 | Yes | Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.737/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. P.G. NAB, Islamabad v. Sarvech Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1278 | Const. P. 4309/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Asif Hashim Mughal (Petitioner) VS Dawood Uni of Engineering & Technology & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-SEP-20 | No | We direct respondent No.1 to decide the petitioners representation / appeal within fifteen (15) days from receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law, prevailing rules, regulations and policy of DUET, and after providing opportunity of hearing to him. Let notice be issued to respondent No.1 for compliance. This petition and listed applications stand disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 1279 | Const. P. 6046/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Ghulam Mustafa Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-OCT-20 | Yes | The disciplinary matters fall within the expression ???terms and conditions of service??? which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984. The disciplinary matters fall within the expression terms and conditions of service which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.3452/2020 Ghulam Murtaza Daudpoto v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1280 | Const. P. 5723/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-NOV-20 | Yes | water tankers / business--it is the basic duty of the Karachi Water & Sewerage Board to supply water to the citizens of Karachi. When Karachi Water & Sewerage Board was / is unable to meet the water needs of the city of Karachi, a water tanker mafia had sprung up in Karachi. During the argument, we have been informed that there is certain direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court for the closing of illegal hydrants from Karachi city. Prima-facie, the Management of KW&SB has failed to remove illegal hydrants operating in the city despite Honorable Supreme Court directions. Moreover, the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan had directed the Management of KW&SB to focus upon their core operations to provide portable water via a regular distribution network. Even, if hydrants are needed, there should be a rational and scientific study to evaluate the need for hydrant services in water-scarce areas. The hydrant services preferably should supply water to improvised population. On the aforesaid proposition, this Court has already settled the issue in the case of Muhammad Rafique Sia vs Province of Sindh and others, 2016 CLC 170. Besides that, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in HRC No.28963/2014 directed the respondents to take action against illegal and unauthorized hydrants--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1281 | Const. P. 6766/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Shoukat Qadri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JAN-20 | Yes | pensionery benefits--Prim facie, the petitioner has qualifying length of service to his credit as per VSS calculation work sheet available at page-11 of the memo of petition. It is well settled law that no pension granted or continued to the pensioner is liable to seizure by the department under Pension Act, 1871, and the rules framed thereunder--In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed and Anis Hyder in C.P No.D-5734/2018 and C.P No.D-6225/2018, respectively. pensionery benefits | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1282 | Const. P. 5695/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-DEC-20 | No | In the above circumstances, respondents are directed to pay the entire outstanding commutation amount to the petitioner as well as the amount deducted from his pension on account of rent. The above exercise shall be completed without fail within sixty (60) days and compliance report in terms of this order shall be filed by the respondents within ten (10) days thereafter through MIT-II of this Court. The petition is allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Listed application stands disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1283 | Const. P. 8984/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Farzana Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner??? late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner??? late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.1756/2020 Managing Director, Pakistan Television Corp. Ltd(PTVC), Islamabad and another v. Farzana Shafique and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed | |
| 1284 | Const. P. 6241/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Anjum Badar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-APR-21 | Yes | petitioners have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments / services be regularized in BPS-17 under Section 3 of The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013---Whether temporary employees appointed on contract in BS 16 and above can be deemed to have been validly appointed on regular basis, without going through the competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, merely in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the mandatory requirement of competitive process of selection only through the Sindh Public Service Commission for appointments in BS 16 and above, which is the command of the Constitution and specific direction to the Government of Sindh by the Honble Supreme Court, can be waived, relaxed, done away with, exempted and or bypassed in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the petitioners have any vested right for regular appointment, or to claim regularization, or to approach this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction to seek redressal of their grievance relating to regularization ; and, is there any corresponding legal duty cast on the Government of Sindh to appoint them on regular basis ? If no, then can a writ of mandamus to this effect be issued against the Government of Sindh ? --Whether Section 3 of the Act of 2013, to the extent of regularization / appointment in BS 16, 17 and 18 without the mandatory competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, is ultra vires the Constitution and against the law laid down and the direction given by the Honble Supreme Court to the Government of Sindh in Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and others V/S Province of Sindh and others, 2015 SCMR 456. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.735-K/2021,C.A.28-K/2021,C.A.27-K/2021,C.M.A.589-K/2021 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed [ C.P. be numbered & leave granted & C.A. be fixed after three months ] | |
| 1285 | Const. P. 4646/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Z.A Quraishi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-MAR-20 | Yes | Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same. Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1286 | Const. P. 4542/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the statement dated 20.10.2020 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, and submission of learned AAG, this Court is left with no option but to direct the Respondents to place Petitioners??? promotion case before the Provincial Selection Board-II in its next Meeting within one month positively from the receipt of a copy of this order. The Provincial Selection Board-II shall consider the Petitioner's case fairly and justly under law, rules and regulations and the result thereof be conveyed to the MIT-II of this Court. Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1287 | Const. P. 4802/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mansoor Ahmed Rajput and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | Promotion to the post of Director Information BS-19, which has been deferred vide notification dated 29.9.2020 on account of pendency of NAB reference / proceedings--whether a Civil Servant can be promoted against whom prima facie involvement in the serious charges of misconduct was available in the shape of NAB reference / proceedings ? --we are of the view that the case of the petitioners for promotion was rightly deferred by the competent authority / Board, and such decision does not call for any interference by this Court. However, their deferment shall be subject to the final outcome of the NAB reference / proceedings presently pending against them. disposed of | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.786-K/2020 Mansoor Ahmed Rajput & another v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1288 | Const. P. 6275/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS D.J South Khi (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-DEC-20 | Yes | ACR--Admittedly, the Petitioner is a Civil Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal which has the exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of Civil Servants working in Sindh Subordinate Judiciary under the law and the petitioner has a right to file an appeal against the impugned order adversely affecting the terms and condition of his service before the Tribunal subject to the qualification provided therein. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1289 | Const. P. 2387/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Allah Dino and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-MAY-20 | No | Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Respondent No.2 / Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh is directed to appear before this Court in person on the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the impugned notification to the extent of the present eight (08) petitioners shall remain suspended. To come up on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 am. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1290 | Const. P. 730/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Muhammad Asim Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAR-20 | Yes | The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1291 | Const. P. 403/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Ali Raza and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-SEP-20 | No | Finance Department of Government of Sindh is directed to pay / disburse the Special Judicial Allowance to all the employees and officers of this Court and the district and subordinate Courts in Sindh (BPS-1 to BPS-22) for the months of July, August and September 2020 latest by 30.09.2020, and to ensure the provision / payment / disbursement of the said allowance to them for the remaining twenty one (21) months / installments with effect from October 2020 strictly on monthly basis. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 1292 | Const. P. 2414/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | TYMS Education Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-MAY-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 1293 | Const. P. 1055/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Molvi Muhammad Hassan Pathan (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1294 | Const. P. 5334/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Zubair Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Local Govt. Board and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-DEC-20 | Yes | It is well-settled that in absence of codal formalities i.e. advertisement, the constitution of Selection Committee, test and interview, before filling up the subject post, this Court cannot come to rescue and entertain the grievance of the petitioner as made by him in the prayer clauses under the constitutional jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1295 | Const. P. 9013/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Raja Naved Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-FEB-20 | Yes | fake appointment--Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Hon???ble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable. Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Honble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1296 | II.A. 49/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | MUHAMMAD ASHRAF (Appellant) VS ASLAM PARVAIZ & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-JAN-19 | Yes | Appeal allowed with costs throughout. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.A.26-K/2019 Aslam Pervaiz and others v. Muhammad Ashraf Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1297 | Const. P. 3247/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Prof: Syed Farhat Ali Jaffery (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | By means of this petition, the petitioner has impugned office order dated 30.05.2016 whereby his extra assignment of the post of Principal, Karachi Medical & Dental College, KMC, in addition to his own duties, was cancelled / withdrawn--Admittedly, the petitioner is Government Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the terms and conditions of his service. In our view, a Government Servant has no vested right to claim a particular assignment in addition to his own duties forever or for a stipulated period as a matter of right. The respondents have already cancelled / withdrawn the aforesaid assignment vide Office Order dated 30.05.2016, which does not call for any interference-Dismissed. By means of this petition, the petitioner has impugned office order dated 30.05.2016 whereby his extra assignment of the post of Principal, Karachi Medical & Dental College, KMC, in addition to his own duties, was cancelled / withdrawn--Admittedly, the petitioner is Government Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the terms and conditions of his service. In our view, a Government Servant has no vested right to claim a particular assignment in addition to his own duties forever or for a stipulated period as a matter of right. The respondents have already cancelled / withdrawn the aforesaid assignment vide Office Order dated 30.05.2016, which does not call for any interference-Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1298 | Const. P. 2884/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Sikandar Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.381-K/2020 Sikandar Ali & others v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1299 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1992 | Const. P. 1318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Wasim Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-DEC-20 | Yes | the petitioner is seeking regularization of his service under section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 in Malir Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as MDA)--Since the issue involved in this petition is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-6632 of 2019 and another connected petition vide common order dated 16.10.2020, therefore, this petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution is disposed of in terms of the common order dated 16.10.2020, leaving the petitioner to avail and exhaust his remedy if any, as provided under the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1300 | Const. P. 2271/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Ms. Shama Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1793/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Shama Hassan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1301 | Const. P. 53/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS Post Master General Khi and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JAN-20 | Yes | Record reflects that petitioner has attained the age of superannuation in the year 2019, therefore, no further recovery can be initiated from his pensionery benefits. The respondents are directed to adjust the deducted amount in the pensionery benefits of the petitioner accordingly. Record reflects that petitioner has attained the age of superannuation in the year 2019, therefore, no further recovery can be initiated from his pensionery benefits. The respondents are directed to adjust the deducted amount in the pensionery benefits of the petitioner accordingly. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1222/2020 Director General, Pakistan Post, Islamabad & others v. Muhammad Ibrahim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1302 | II.A. 162/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Anwar S/o Muhammad Saeed (Appellant) VS Mst. Fouzia Qasim and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | I am afraid this contention cannot be accepted in view of Imtiaz Ali V/S Atta Muhammad and another, PLD 2008 S.C. 462, wherein it was held by the Honble Supreme Court that the appeal, having been filed after one day of the period of limitation, had created valuable right in favour of the respondents, and no sufficient cause was found for filing the appeal beyond the period of limitation. The delay of only one day was not condoned by the Honble Supreme Court in the cited case. In the above circumstances, the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity. Accordingly, the appeal and listed application are dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1303 | Const. P. 529/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Sht. Seema & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1304 | Cr.Bail 1327/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | FAHAD NAWAZ S/O GUL NAWAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1305 | Const. P. 2356/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Agha Siraj Khan Durrani (Petitioner) VS The State (NAB) (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Petitioners, accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means while acting as a Minister of Local Government ,Other petitioners, accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc., are identified as Benamidar/ostensible owners of the properties actually owned and possessed by him. It is commonly known in our society, recognized almost as a convention, that parents purchase property in the name of their children, not for any base reason but only to ensure their safety, security and welfare in future. It is not disputed that accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani is a politician and has held different positions. Therefore, when he buys a property in the name of his wife or children, or makes payments at their behest for this purpose, there would normally be no reason for them to get alarmed or suspect that he has done corruption and is providing money from the wealth earned by him as such. Normal presumption, his children or for that matter any prudent mind would get, would be of his acting bona fide and providing the amounts from his legitimate sources of income. Gulzar Ahmeds is said to have aided and abated accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani in acquiring illegal assets; and utilizing accounts of PW Sadaf Chohan and Syed Mobin Saeed by parking money therein for such Page 15 of 19purpose. Bail of Agha Siraj Khan Durrani (C.P.No.D-2356/2019) is dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.1128/2020 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Agha Siraj Khan Durrani,C.A.296/2021 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Agha Siraj Khan Durrani,C.P.5747/2021 Agha Siraj Khan Durrani v. The State through Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1306 | Const. P. 52/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Muhammad Ibrahim & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 1307 | Const. P. 1111/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Shafiq S/o Imran Ali (Petitioner) VS Learned Court of IXth ADJ, Khi East and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1308 | Const. P. 595/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1309 | Const. P. 625/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst. Kainat & Another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1310 | Const. P. 2804/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Muhammad Nawaz Bugti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1311 | Civil Revision 218/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Abdul Jabbar (Applicant) VS Muhammad Khan & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1312 | Const. P. 1782/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Farhan Saeed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-SEP-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1313 | Cr.Misc. 423/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Ghulam Fareed (Applicant) VS SHO P.S Sangi & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1314 | Const. P. 2575/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Mst. Sulima Tart (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1315 | II.A. 80/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ramzan Ali Lakhani (Appellant) VS Amir Ali Jamal Nanji and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-MAY-19 | Yes | I am of the considered view that the concurrent findings of both the learned Courts below are well-reasoned and based on proper appreciation of evidence and law. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to point out any illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgments which do not require any interference by this Court. Accordingly, both these appeals and the applications pending therein are liable to be dismissed. Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 02.05.2019 whereby both these appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1316 | Const. P. 56/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Syed Munawar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-JAN-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1317 | Const. P. 542/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Parvez Masih (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 1318 | S.M.A 91/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Maryam Salman Farooqui D/o. Late Muhammad Salman F (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1319 | R.A (Civil Revision) 184/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | SYED MURSHAD ALI (Applicant) VS SYED AMJAD ALI & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-MAR-14 | Yes | Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 06.03.2014, whereby the impugned judgment was set aside, and this Civil Revision Application was allowed with costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) payable by respondents 1 and 2 each to the applicant. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.520-K/2018 Syed Sarfaraz Ali v. Syed Murshid Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1320 | Suit 1110/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | JEHANGIR ANWAR (Plaintiff) VS KHALID HUSSAIN (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-JAN-13 | Yes | The above are the reasons for the short order announced by me on 10.01.2013, whereby prayers A, B, C and E made by the defendant in his counter claim, were allowed, and this Suit was decreed with costs in his favour in terms of the said prayers | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 1321 | Judicial Companies Misc. 5/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Kolson Industries Private Limited & others (Applicant) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-MAY-16 | Yes | The object of the Scheme of Arrangement, as stated therein, appears to be lawful, and the proposed amalgamation of petitioners No.1 with petitioner No.2 does not appear to be against the public interest / policy, or in violation of any law. In view of the above and also as the members of the petitioners have unanimously approved the said proposed amalgamation, the Scheme of Arrangement is hereby sanctioned and the petition is granted as prayed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1322 | Suit 779/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | MST.TASNEEM KHALIL (Plaintiff) VS ZAFAR MEHMOOD SHAIKH & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 25-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1323 | Election Appeal 8/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Faraz Khan Dahraj & another (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commissioner Sindh Karachi & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1324 | F.R.A 52/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | ANwar Ahamed (Appellant) VS jamil Ahmed (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | The impugned orders, being not sustainable in law or on facts, are liable to be set aside. Accordingly, all these appeals are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1325 | R.A (Civil Revision) 61/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | K SHUAIB AHMED (Applicant) VS IQBAL AHMED & ANOTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-MAY-15 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1326 | Cr.Rev 41/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Imdad Hussain Tunio (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1327 | Civil Tran 20/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Amir and others (Applicant) VS Learned Family Judge-XVIII, Khi Central & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1328 | Const. P. 689/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Syed Wajid Ali Rizvi S/o Syed Mubarak Ali Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Xth Rent Controller, Karachi East and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-NOV-21 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below do not require any interference by this Court. Accordingly, the petition and listed applications are dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1329 | M.A. 70/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Zahid Khitab S/o Zahir Khitab (Late) (Appellant) VS IInd ADJ, Karachi-Central (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1330 | Const. P. 858/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ZAHID HUSSAIN (Petitioner) VS District & Session Judge Karachi (East) & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1331 | Cr.Bail 1357/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | AZEEM SADIQ S/O MUHAMMAD SADIQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1332 | II.A. 120/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Abdul Ghafoor Kandhro S/o Hakeem Muhammad Suleman (Appellant) VS Mst. Sakina Thr. Attorney Ahmed uddin Hanjrah (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.554-K/2022 Mr. Abdul Ghafoor Kandhro v. Mst. Sakina Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 1333 | Cr.Bail 2186/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ABDUL BARI S/O ABDUL ALI & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1334 | R.A (Civil Revision) 23/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Pakistan Broadcasting Corp & another (Applicant) VS Mst. Sehar Saeed & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1335 | Const. P. 219/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Moeen Ali S/o Muhammad Jamil (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shumaila Naseem and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-MAR-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1336 | Const. P. 438/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Shahnaz Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1337 | Cr.Bail 2105/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD IKRAM S/O ABDUL MANAF (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-JAN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1338 | Const. P. 993/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Miss. Nuzhat Mehdi D/o Ammar Mehdi (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Farooq and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1339 | S.M.A 324/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Sohaib s/o Muhammad Munir (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1340 | S.M.A 54/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Syed Osama Ali s/o Syed Arif Ali (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-MAY-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1341 | M.A. 36/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Tehmina Munaf Thr. Anwar Shah (Appellant) VS The Court of Xth ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1342 | Const. P. 650/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Ali Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | C.P.809-K/2022 Ali Ahmed & others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Election Commissin of Pakistan Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 1343 | Const. P. 472/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Muhammad Razzaque Mughal (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Illayas Mughal thr LRS & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1344 | Const. P. 988/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1345 | Const. P. 642/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Muhammad Waseem Sethi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | ||||
| 1346 | M.A. 30/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Bilqees Bai Thr. Anwar Shah (Appellant) VS The Court of Xth ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1347 | Const. P. 645/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Agha Mir Mustafa Khan Durrani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | C.P.847-K/2022 Niaz Ali Khan v. Agha Mir Mustafa Khan Durrani & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 1348 | Const. P. 2358/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Abdul Sattar & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1349 | Const. P. 1664/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Mst: Parveen Bano & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1350 | I. A 29/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Ameer Ul Hussain Kazi. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1351 | H.C.A 135/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-OCT-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 1352 | Const. P. 2241/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Syed Kamran Yonus and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JAN-24 | No | Rights of allottees in illegally constructed buildings and the right to regularise under the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 1353 | Const. P. 6115/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Saad Aqil (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-FEB-24 | Yes | The rights of tenants in Buildings declared as Dangerous by the SBCA under Section 14 of the SBCO, 1979 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 1354 | H.C.A 178/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Khalil Ahmed (Appellant) VS District Registrar for Registration & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1355 | Const. P. 4846/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Muhammad Rafiq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1356 | M.A. 6/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s. Asia Insurance Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Xibercom (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-DEC-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 1357 | H.C.A 327/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Market Committee Karachi through its Secretary (Appellant) VS Haji Amir Muhammad Khan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1358 | Const. P. 565/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Muhammad Latif (Petitioner) VS District Judge South Karachi & other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 1359 | Const. P. 565/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | City Environment Society (Petitioner) VS KBCA & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 1360 | Cr.Bail 231/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Capt Retd Zubair Aslam Jerry (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1361 | Const. P. 2811/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Mrs.Zeba Israr (Petitioner) VS K.B.C.A. & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 1362 | H.C.A 77/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 29-MAY-12 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1363 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 126/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Additional Collector of Customs Model (Applicant) VS M/s.Fortune Commercial &Co.Ltd (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 1364 | Const. P. 3415/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Gul Muhammad Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar | ||||
| 1365 | Const. P. 1708/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd., (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAY-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1366 | Suit 640/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | JAVED FLOUR & GENERAL MILLS (Plaintiff) VS FOOD DEPARTMENT & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 15-AUG-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1367 | Const. P. 175/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Muhammad Ali Chawla & Company (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Metropolitan Corporation & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-APR-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1368 | Const. P. 1778/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Zulfiqar Ali Areejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1369 | Suit 861/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | ABBAS (Plaintiff) VS MST.ROBINA & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 18-DEC-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1370 | Const. P. 606/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Liaquat Ali Bangwar (Petitioner) VS Zonal Chief Z.T.B.L Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1371 | Const. P. 1945/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Jagan Khan Mazari (Petitioner) VS Plant Manager-I GENCO-II Guddu and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1372 | Const. P. 2424/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: CP-2424,1960,2174 of2010 & CP-525,590,2600,2575,1696,53,2572,446 of 2011 & 857 of 2012 | 2010 | Azhar Ali Lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1373 | Const. P. 1093/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Muhammad Yaqoob Brohi (Petitioner) VS I.G.P Sindh, and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1374 | Const. P. 1185/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2009 | Gullan Wadho (Petitioner) VS E.D.O Education Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-OCT-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1375 | Cr.Rev 139/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Ghulam Rasool (Appellant) VS The State (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1376 | Cr.Bail 83/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Mujahid (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-JAN-14 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1377 | Suit 849/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | ABDUL REHMAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS ABDULLAH SAULEH AL-BASSAM (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-DEC-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1378 | Suit.B 4/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Askari Bank Ltd (Plaintiff) VS M/S.SHAHI TEXTILES & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-OCT-12 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1379 | Const. P. 730/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Veshal Bano and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Market and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1380 | Suit 1480/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | IRSHAD AHMED SHAD (Plaintiff) VS PERVEZ AKHTAR & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 19-NOV-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1381 | Cr.Misc. 619/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Murad @ Suny (Appellant) VS The State (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 29-JAN-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1382 | Civil Revision 39/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2007 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-MAY-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1383 | Const. P. 277/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ahmed Ramzani (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-AUG-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam | ||||
| 1384 | Suit 812/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2001 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-JAN-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1385 | Const. P. 822/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Assistant Administrator, Evacuee Trust Property Board (Petitioner) VS The Secretary to the Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Minorities (Minorities Affairs Division) & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-MAY-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1386 | Suit 744/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Nayyar Alam Siddique (Plaintiff) VS M/S. Zytex Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 04-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1387 | Const. P. 533/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 16-APR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam | ||||
| 1388 | Const. P. 2862/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | D.B. | Order | 23-AUG-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai | ||||
| 1389 | Suit.B 97/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | M/S. Habib Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS Mahmood Alam Sherani & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-APR-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1390 | Cr.Bail 1163/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Usman Khan (Applicant) VS Mst. Nasreen & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-AUG-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1391 | Const. P. 184/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Mst. Nagma and anothers (Petitioner) VS Suptd of Police Naushahro Feroze (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-APR-14 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1392 | Const. P. 452/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Rajib Ali Gadehi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS KN Shah and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar | ||||
| 1393 | I. A 2/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2010 | Abdul Rauf Soomro (Applicant) VS Regional Manager House Building Finance and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar | ||||
| 1394 | Cr.Misc. 43/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2014 | Nizamuddin alias Nizam Brohi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-MAR-15 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto | ||||
| 1395 | Const. P. 2702/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Makoo Bhatti (Petitioner) VS V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1396 | Const. P. 4779/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Kausar Shamim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1397 | Const. P. 1045/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abdul Rahim Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1398 | S.M.A 57/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Zeeshan Saleem (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1399 | Suit 584/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | Mrs. Najma Mushir (Plaintiff) VS Miss Erum Mushir and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-SEP-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1400 | Const. P. 6237/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mohammad Sajjad Haider (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1401 | Const. P. 1105/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Shakeel (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1402 | Suit 1635/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Ejaz Ahmed (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Qadir Raja and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-OCT-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1403 | Const. P. 965/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Universal Welfare Organization. (Petitioner) VS V/S KBCA and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1404 | Adm. Suit 2250/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1405 | Const. P. 2115/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Zahid Hussain Pipran (Petitioner) VS i V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1406 | Const. P. 255/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Imtiaz Jaffery (Petitioner) VS Fouzia Bano & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1407 | Const. P. 1785/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mohammad Khawar Usmani (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1408 | Const. P. 3127/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s Check & Watch (Petitioner) VS V/S SBCA and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.6390/2021 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. M/s Check and Watch Environment (NGO) and others,C.A.647/2022 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. M/s Check and Watch Environment (NGO) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | ||
| 1409 | S.M.A 49/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Rustom Hoshang Kakalia (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-MAY-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1410 | Const. P. 1258/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1411 | J.M 27/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Joint Registrar of Companies (SECP) (Applicant) VS Whitebay Limited (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-DEC-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1412 | S.M.A 45/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Air Vice Martial (Retd.) Sohail Ahmed Malik (Petitioner) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1413 | Const. P. 1697/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Mubarak Maseh (Petitioner) VS V/S Muhammad Yaqoob & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.889-K/2018 Mubarak Masih v. Muhammad Yaqoob and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1414 | Const. P. 3149/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s Jubilee Life Inusrance Co. (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | C.P.36-K/2018 M/s Jubilee Life Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | ||
| 1415 | Const. P. 2061/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman | ||||
| 1416 | S.M.A 73/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mst. Ratna Devi (Appellant) VS .. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JUN-15 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1417 | Suit.B 40/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | M/S Meezan Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS A. H. International (Private) Limited & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-AUG-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1418 | Cr.Bail 668/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Walji (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1419 | I. A 17/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | M/S ZTBL & Others (Appellant) VS Mst. Nawazi & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan | C.P.708-K/2017 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Ltd. and others v. Mst: Nawazi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1420 | Const. P. 870/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Pehlaj Rai (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1421 | Const. P. 214/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Sazzuddin & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.364-K/2019 Muhammad Ishaque v. Sazzuddin and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 1422 | Const. P. 903/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Muhammad Nasir Siddiqui & others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Qasim Ansari & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.945-K/2018 Muhammad Qasim Ansari v. Muhammad Nasir Siddiqui and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1423 | Const. P. 2825/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Engr. Dr. Bhawani & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-MAR-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.916/2013,C.P.917/2013,C.P.918/2013,C.A.232/2014,C.A.233/2014,C.A.234/2014 SCP | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed | ||
| 1424 | Const. P. 3029/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Yaseen and others (Petitioner) VS Chairman PIDC Harnai Woolen Mill Ltd. and 06 others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 1425 | Const. P. 905/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Rabia (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1426 | Const. P. 964/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Sadiq & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1427 | Const. P. 771/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sht. Jeeta & another (Petitioner) VS Wagho & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1428 | Const. P. 839/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1429 | Cr.Tran 50/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Manzoor Ali (Applicant) VS Ghulam Sarwar & ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1430 | Const. P. 3270/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Nazim (Petitioner) VS M/S Sound Builders (Pvt.) Limited and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.833-K/2016 M/s Sound Builders (Pvt) Ltd. v. Muhammad Nazim and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1431 | Const. P. 932/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | President Gharib Nawaz Colony (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and 03 others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-FEB-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 1432 | Const. P. 1774/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | M/S Housing Enterprises (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) VS KDA and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-NOV-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1433 | Cr.Misc. 134/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Tharo (Applicant) VS Aijaz Ali & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1434 | Const. P. 955/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Jaman (Petitioner) VS Provice Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1435 | Cr.Misc. 137/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Doho Katchi (Applicant) VS P O Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1436 | Const. P. 903/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Ismail Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1437 | Cr.Misc. 161/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Hakim Zadi (Applicant) VS S.S.P, Distt Dadu and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1438 | Civil Revision 62/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Abdul Jabbar & Others (Applicant) VS Amanullh Maqsood & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1439 | 2018 SBLR Sindh 119 | Const. P. 361/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Muhammad Umar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-FEB-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | |||
| 1440 | Const. P. 31/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Saify Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-JAN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 1441 | Const. P. 182/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mst. Naheed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-FEB-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | ||||
| 1442 | Const. P. 829/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Ameerzadi & Other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1443 | Const. P. 795/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Zubi Attari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1444 | Const. P. 949/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Sania & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1445 | Const. P. 6286/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abdul Majeed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-DEC-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1446 | Const. P. 719/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mohammad Izhar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1447 | I. A 49/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | M/S. Al-Rehman Traders and another (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1448 | II.A. 64/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | MISS. KHALIDA JILANI (Appellant) VS MAJOR (R) TARIQ LODHI & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.M.A.5347/2019 Maj. (R) Tariq Lodhi v. Mst. Khilda Jilani & others,C.A.1934/2019 Maj. (R) Tariq Lodhi v. Mst. Khalida Jilani (decd.|) thr. LRs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Adjourned,Pending | ||
| 1449 | H.C.A 226/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | State Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) VS Mohammad Naeem and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.146-K/2019 State Bank of Pakistan v. Muhammad Naeem & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 1450 | H.C.A 234/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Port Qasim Authority (Appellant) VS Khyber Agro Pvt.,Ltd., (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1451 | 2018 CLC 743 | Const. P. 867/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mrs. Aneesa Farooqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-MAR-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui | |||
| 1452 | I. A 9/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Niaz Ahmed (Appellant) VS M/S. Bank Al-Falah Limited. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1453 | Const. P. 90/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Nizar Noor Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Ameer Ali & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-JUL-19 | Yes | Order of eviction passed by the learned Rent Controller is restored. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 1454 | Const. P. 897/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | M/s. Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Rana Azhar Ali Khan & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1455 | Const. P. 1897/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Munawar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1456 | 2022 PLC (CS) Note 1 | Const. P. 3123/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Rubina Bano and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1457 | Const. P. 635/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Bibi Sakeena and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1458 | Const. P. 1524/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1459 | Const. P. 3596/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sayeda Kiran Batool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1460 | Const. P. 472/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Zohaib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 1461 | Const. P. 758/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mst. Nighat Sultana (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1462 | Const. P. 1910/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1463 | Const. P. 590/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Director School ducation Mirpurkhas & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1464 | Const. P. 2550/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mohsin Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1465 | Const. P. 2557/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Samad Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1466 | Const. P. 2946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Fahad Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1467 | Const. P. 676/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Abdul Salam and others (Petitioner) VS Jan Ali and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1468 | Const. P. 1882/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1469 | Const. P. 1709/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Atta Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1470 | Const. P. 3791/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1471 | I. A 49/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2000 | Mashooq Ali Bhutto (Appellant) VS ADBP Hyd & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1472 | Const. P. 377/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1473 | Const. P. 412/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Bahadur Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1474 | Const. P. 654/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Malik Hasnain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1475 | Const. P. 3816/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.4105/2019,C.P.4144/2019,C.P.622-K/2019,C.P.4410/2019 SCP | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 1476 | Const. P. 1185/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Imtiaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1477 | Const. P. 339/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ashfaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1478 | Const. P. 2467/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Boota Masih (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1479 | Const. P. 3319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Suresh Kumar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1480 | Const. P. 1268/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Allah Warrayo (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1481 | Const. P. 1826/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Haji Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1482 | Const. P. 521/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Rights Now Pakistan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1483 | Const. P. 1857/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1484 | Const. P. 3718/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-NOV-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1485 | Const. P. 2576/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, the petitions are not maintainable either on facts or in law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated in the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government. A person coming to Court must be fully aware of his right i.e. whether he is entitled to such right or not. We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of the plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-CAA. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petitions are liable to be dismissed with costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.449-K/2021 Javed Iqbal v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
| 1486 | Const. P. 4906/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS M. Shair Afzal Khan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-OCT-20 | Yes | The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1487 | 2022 PLC CS Note 26 | Const. P. 2695/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Tarruf Ali (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JAN-20 | Yes | Police Department--Petitioner has been reverted / demoted from the rank of Police Inspector to his substantive rank of Police Head Constable on account of earning out of turn promotion during his tenure of service---In view of the foregoing discussion, this petition is allowed whereby the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue retirement order of the petitioner to the rank of Police Inspector and is entitled to be paid his full pensionary benefits as admissible to Police Inspector under the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this judgment. Pending application stands disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.193-K/2020 Province of Sindh thr. I.G.Police and others v. Taaruf Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1488 | Const. P. 6499/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Dr. Mashhood-uz-Zafar Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1489 | Const. P. 4327/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mehtab Tahir Niazi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-SEP-20 | No | We direct the appellate authority of respondent No.2 to decide the petitioners appeal within three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of this order strictly in accordance with the prevailing rules and regulations of respondent No.2. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be provided adequate opportunity of hearing and his appeal shall be decided strictly on merits. Till the final decision of his said appeal, further coercive action shall not be taken against him. Issue notice to respondent No.2 for compliance. The petition and the listed application stand disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan | |||
| 1490 | Const. P. 6431/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Irshad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-APR-20 | Yes | Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to submit before this Court on the next date hearing a list of all such employees of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh who were absorbed / appointed at any post and are still holding such post, and also the notification of repatriation of respondent No.7 to his parent department. Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1491 | Const. P. 3840/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTET and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-20 | Yes | The grievance of the petitioner, who is a retired employee of respondent No.2 / PTCL, is that pension has not been / is not being paid to him in accordance with law as substantial amounts have been / are being deducted therefrom illegally by the respondents on account of rent---It is well-settled that no amount on account of rent can be deducted from pension. On behalf of respondent No.2, their above named officer undertakes that the amount of Rs.476,373.00 illegally deducted from the petitioner's pension on account of rent shall be refunded to him within thirty (30) days from today. Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the above undertaking and seeks disposal of the present petition in terms thereof. Regarding the amount illegally deducted by respondent No.2 from the pension of other retired employees on account of rent, further undertaking has been given by the above named officer on behalf of respondent No.2 that the entire said amount shall be refunded to all the said retired employees within three (03) months from today, and for this purpose they shall publish a public notice in leading English and Urdu newspapers having large circulation throughout Pakistan, inviting all the said retired employees to collect their refund. Respondent No.2 is directed to submit a compliance report to this Court in terms of this order through MIT-II latest by 31.01.2021---By consent, the petition is allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs and listed application stands disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1492 | Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-MAR-20 | No | The Director General and Member Finance are directed to publish a public notice on behalf of KDA in Urdu daily Jang and English daily Dawn within ten (10) days from today notifying the retired employees of KDA that their pension and other post-retirement benefits shall be settled by KDA by paying 10% thereof latest by 30.04.2020 and the remaining 90% latest by 31.10.2020. Director General and Member Finance are directed not to use / utilize / appropriate any of the amounts mentioned in the proposal submitted today, or any part thereof, for any other purpose. In order to ensure compliance of this direction, they shall open a new bank account and shall transfer / deposit therein all the amounts, received and/or to be received, as mentioned in the said proposal. They are further directed to submit compliance report to this Court along with proof of opening the said new bank account, the transfer / deposit of amounts therein, fate of the auction of unsold units in PHS to be held on 24 to 27 March 2020, fate of the auction of plots in different schemes / townships to be held on 07 to 09 April 2020, and proof of payment of 10% amount to all retired employees as at 30.04.2020. To come up on 05.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when the Director General KDA and Member Finance KDA shall be in attendance along with the compliance report in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1493 | Const. P. 7189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-FEB-20 | Yes | Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression ???terms and conditions of service??? and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed. Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression terms and conditions of service and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1494 | Const. P. 4201/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-DEC-20 | Yes | The pivotal question involved in the present proceedings is whether a Civil / Government Servant who is found guilty of misconduct under The Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, and a minor penalty was imposed upon him could be considered for promotion? ---In our view, the promotion to a post depends upon several circumstances. To qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. An employee found guilty of misconduct cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion committee takes the penalties imposed upon the employee into consideration and denies him the promotion, such denial cannot be termed as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal or unjustified. In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee should not be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the DPC, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess every proposal for promotion, on case to case basis. In cases where disciplinary case / criminal prosecution against the Civil / Government servant is not concluded even after the expiry of two years from the date of the meeting of the first DPC which kept its findings in respect of the Government servant the appointing authority may consider the desirability of giving him an ad-hoc promotion--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.405-K/2021 Shamsuddin Dal v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1495 | Const. P. 2157/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Kashmir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1496 | Civil Revision 18/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Mehboob (Applicant) VS Nadir Hussain (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-DEC-19 | Yes | Revision Application and pending stay application were dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | |||
| 1497 | Const. P. 2445/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mubin Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Sinior Director, HR Management KMC & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-MAY-20 | No | Service matter. Notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for 20.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the impugned order shall remain suspended. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1498 | Const. P. 6241/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Anjum Badar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-MAR-20 | Yes | Advocate General Sindh is also put on notice to satisfy the Court on the next date regarding vires of Section 3 of the Act of 2013, which, prima facie, appears to be in clear conflict with the above mentioned authority of the Honble Supreme Court to the extent of regularization of service in BS-16 and above. Let notice under Rule 1 of Order XXVII-A CPC be issued to learned Advocate General Sindh. To come up on 18.03.2020 at 12:00 noon. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.P.735-K/2021,C.A.28-K/2021,C.A.27-K/2021,C.M.A.589-K/2021 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed [ C.P. be numbered & leave granted & C.A. be fixed after three months ] | |
| 1499 | Const. P. 2889/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ahmed Kehar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-OCT-20 | Yes | We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1500 | Const. P. 160/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Tahir (Petitioner) VS Gulab & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1501 | Const. P. 1040/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Muhammad Danish (Petitioner) VS Deputy General Hyderabad Development Authority & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||||
| 1502 | Const. P. 2735/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mst. Ravi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-OCT-20 | Yes | In view of the above, the competent authority of respondents is directed to consider the case of the petitioner-widow for her family pension if her deceased husband had a requisite length of service to claim pensionary benefits on account of family pension. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed by a speaking order within one month from the date of receipt of this order after hearing the petitioner. By consent, this petition is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1503 | Const. P. 285/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mst. Noor Afshan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ghalib & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-FEB-19 | No | This petition is allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs and the listed application stands disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1504 | Const. P. 6032/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Waqarullah Korejo Advocate (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1505 | 2022 PLC (CS) 481 | Const. P. 4941/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-20 | Yes | PTCL-Voluntarily Separation Scheme (VSS)--we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in October 2020 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in June 2008, i.e. approximately 12 years before filing of the instant petition--Dismissed in limine. we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in November 2011 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to her in June 2008 when her late husband availed the benefits of VSS, i.e. approximately 04 years before the filing of the instant petition. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1506 | Const. P. 2387/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Allah Dino and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-MAY-20 | No | Matters pertaining to Board of Revenue Sindh. By consent all these petitions and listed applications are disposed of with no order as to costs in terms of the above undertaking given by the Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh ; and, as agreed by the parties, the impugned Notification shall remain suspended to the extent of the present petitioners till the final decision / order of the competent authority of the Board of Revenue Sindh on the representations filed by the petitioners. Needless to say any person aggrieved by the order / decision of the competent authority will seek his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1507 | Const. P. 2860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-20 | Yes | chowkidar in the office of District & Sessions Judge, Karachi East based on son quota--Therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings as it would fall within mischief of constructive res-judicata. Reliance is placed on the case of State Bank of Pakistan through Governor and others vs. Imtiaz Ali Khan and others (2012 SCMR 280). 5. In our view, once the stance of the petitioner on the aforesaid analogy has been set at rest by the Administrative Committee, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution as writ does not lie against such decision of the Administrative Committee. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1508 | Civil Revision 140/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Asghar Ali (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ismail (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | C.P.425-K/2020 Asghar Ali v. Muhammad Ismail & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1509 | H.C.A 108/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Pvt.,Ltd., (Appellant) VS Jan Muhammad & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Appeal allowed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author) | |||
| 1510 | Civil Revision 12/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sain Bux & others (Applicant) VS Nadir Ali & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-APR-20 | Yes | The Civil Revision Application is allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Impugned judgment of the learned appellate Court is hereby set aside and resultantly the order of learned trial Court is restored. However, respondents 1 to 11 will be at liberty to seek damages, if they are so advised and if permissible under the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | C.A.25-K/2020 Nadir Ali & others v. Mst.Bilquees Begum Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 1511 | Const. P. 7604/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Syed Shoaib Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-FEB-20 | Yes | petitioner has assailed order dated 12.9.2018, passed by respondent-Karachi Electric (K.E) whereby he was dismissed from service on the charge of misconduct--assailed the same before NIRC--There is no cavil to what the respondent-K.E says to the extent that case of the petitioner should be decided by the appellate forum i.e. Full Bench of NIRC, if petitioner approaches them with an application for condoning the delay in filing of the case before the NIRC. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision dated 11.06.2019 rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2019--We, in the circumstances, dispose of this petition with no order as to costs with the observation that if petitioner approaches the competent / appellate forum against the impugned orders passed by the respondents, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the question of limitation, if any, shall also be dealt with in accordance with law and keeping in view the grounds to be urged by the petitioner for condoning the delay. petitioner has assailed order dated 12.9.2018, passed by respondent-Karachi Electric (K.E) whereby he was dismissed from service on the charge of misconduct--assailed the same before NIRC--There is no cavil to what the respondent-K.E says to the extent that case of the petitioner should be decided by the appellate forum i.e. Full Bench of NIRC, if petitioner approaches them with an application for condoning the delay in filing of the case before the NIRC. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision dated 11.06.2019 rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2019--We, in the circumstances, dispose of this petition with no order as to costs with the observation that if petitioner approaches the competent / appellate forum against the impugned orders passed by the respondents, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the question of limitation, if any, shall also be dealt with in accordance with law and keeping in view the grounds to be urged by the petitioner for condoning the delay. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1512 | Const. P. 6563/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mazahar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Senior Director Culture & Sports and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-JAN-20 | Yes | Contempt--This petition was disposed of vide order dated 11.12.2018 with direction to the respondent No.4 to process the case of petitioner in accordance with law and if he qualifies to be appointed / promoted subject to availability of the post, his case may be recommended to Metropolitan Commissioner Karachi for promotion strictly in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations--Therefore, at this juncture, no case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors is made out. Resultantly, CMA No. 7446/2019 is dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1513 | Const. P. 4907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fareed and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-OCT-20 | Yes | The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1514 | Const. P. 8261/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-OCT-20 | Yes | Repatriation from the post of Additional Deputy Commissioner-I, Hyderabad to his parent department i.e. Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. vide Notification dated 12.2.2016 issued by Chief Secretary--whether the petitioner was qualified to be inducted from Sui Southern Gas Company in Sindh Government on deputation for three years' And, whether the Chief Minister, Sindh was competent to nominate the petitioner as Assistant Commissioner in Ex-PCS cadre under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964? and, whether his repatriation to his parent department is in accord with the direction given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court?--It is well-settled law that a deputationist does not have any vested right to remain on the post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period. He can be repatriated to his parent department at any time. The Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafiur Rehman Afridi v. CDA, 2010 SCMR 378, has settled the issue on the aforesaid proposition. Therefore, no further deliberation is required by us--In our view, since the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters is still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1515 | Const. P. 3263/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-NOV-20 | No | EOBI--Since the issue involved in these petitions is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-3026 of 2015 and other connected petitions vide common order dated 16.11.2020, therefore, these petitions being not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution are dismissed accordingly, leaving the petitioners to avail and exhaust their remedy, if any, as provided under the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1516 | Const. P. 1851/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Shamshad Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc .This accused has been found to have a commercial plaza built on a plot No.8-C DHA phase II. Karachi, ostensibly entered in the name of his wife Shamshad Khatoon who is also an accused. She is not only shown as the declared owner of that property but has been found related to sale and purchase of at least one more expensive property in DHA Karachi involving an amountofRs.26,500,000.00.Then she herself is a government employee, a teacher, and it is incumbent upon her to declare in her tax returns not only her properties but also the source used to buy them .Bail dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.1132/2020 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Shamshad Khatoon and others,C.A.300/2021 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Shamshad Khatoon and others,C.P.5840/2021 Shamshad Khatoon v. The Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1517 | Const. P. 6623/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc., Shakeel Ahmed Soomro is town officer of Garhi Yasin, district Shikarpur, home town of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani. He was found engaged in buying and selling two very expensive properties in DHA Karachi. The money found to have exchanged his hands in this respect runs in myriad millions. Further he is found to have established a liaison for this purpose i.e. sale and purchase with petitioner Gulzar Ahmed whose counsel in his arguments did not deny this fact. But explained that Gulzar Ahmed was a broker and had dealt with him professionally only; had received money from him and then passed on to the party concerned as per business mores. Which is prima facie a glaring indictment of the role ascribed to the petitioner in the reference. When it is considered together with evidence of holding of assets by him, ostensibly beyond his means, in his name in Karachi furnishes sufficient material to believe his involvement in the alleged offence .Therefore, pre arrest bail is dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.1130/2020 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Shakeel Ahmed Soomro and others,C.A.298/2021 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Shakeel Ahmed Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | |
| 1518 | Cr.Bail 1443/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | HAZRAT BILAL S/O NAIMAT BAIG (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-OCT-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the applicant / accused Hazrat Bilal son of Naimat Baz has made out a case for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him vide order dated 02.08.2021 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. This bail application is allowed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1519 | F.R.A 15/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Aijaz Maqbool and another (Appellant) VS Javed Ahmed and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1520 | Const. P. 2236/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Zulfiqar Ali Dahar (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NAB (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc. Some of the properties being physically enjoyed by accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani are found still standing in their name in the record. One of them is accused Zulifiqar AliDehar who has remained his private secretary when he was the Minister, Local Government Department. He got a pay order ofRs.49,728,343.00, used for buying a property by accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani, issued from a bank. He did not join investigation, despite being called upon, to put up his defense in this regard. Hence, bail dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author) | C.P.1134/2020 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Zulfiqar Ali Dahar and others,C.A.302/2021 NAB thr. its Chairman v. Zulfiqar Ali Dahar and others,C.P.5839/2021 Zulfiqar Ali Dahar v. The Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1521 | Const. P. 67/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Farhan (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1522 | Const. P. 837/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Qurat-ul-Ain Laghari & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 1523 | Const. P. 2973/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Anil Alam & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-OCT-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1524 | I. A 13/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Mst. Shahmir (Appellant) VS Ghulam Hyder (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-SEP-12 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1525 | Const. P. 189/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Fazal Karim & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-FEB-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1526 | Election Appeal 28/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Abdullah Bahleem (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1527 | Const. P. 11/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Shamsuddin & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-APR-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1528 | I. A 36/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Anwar Ali Shah (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pak & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-FEB-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1529 | R.A (Civil Revision) 128/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Yaseen & Others (Applicant) VS Mohammad Luqman @ Luqman & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar | ||||
| 1530 | R.A (Civil Revision) 21/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Market Committee Thr:its Administrator/Secretary (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Karim and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-JAN-13 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1531 | I. A 14/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Habib Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Aijaz Ali Khaskheli & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-FEB-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1532 | Const. P. 142/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mst. Surriya Bibi Wd/o Late Idrees (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ali Qureshi & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-SEP-19 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1533 | Const. P. 100/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muhammad Moosa (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) | ||||
| 1534 | H.C.A 111/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | Muhammad Sabir Awan (Appellant) VS Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Author (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-OCT-15 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1535 | H.C.A 93/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Anant Kumar Parshotam Kanabar (Appellant) VS Swami Narain Temple Estate Trust & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-MAY-14 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1536 | II.A. 44/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Choudhry Muhammad Zaka Ashraf (Appellant) VS Mst Sumera & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-FEB-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1537 | Suit 1346/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Yameen (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Shakeel & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 25-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1538 | Suit 1784/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | SHARAFAT ALI (Plaintiff) VS MST. SHAHJAHAN BEGUM & ANOTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 01-JUN-21 | Yes | The Suit was liable to be dismissed in any event in view of the above-cited law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court due to the plaintiffs admitted failure in depositing the balance sale consideration in Court despite this Courts order. Thus, the order dated 21.05.2018 of the dismissal of the Suit on both the grounds was fully justified, and the same is not liable to be recalled. Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 01.06.2021 whereby the listed application was dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1539 | Cr.Bail 1655/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | NIZAM @ NIZAMI S/O MUHAMMAD HASSAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-NOV-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed with direction to the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the subject case within three (03) months strictly in accordance with law. Let this order be communicated to the learned trial Court for compliance. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 1540 | Const. P. 996/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Faheem Ahmed Thr. Attorney Kaleem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Samina Jamil and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1541 | F.R.A 46/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Murtaza Khan S/o Abdar Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Irshad Khan and Another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1542 | R.A (Civil Revision) 119/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | SYED HSSAN RAZA SAFVI (Applicant) VS ATIQUR REHMAN GHAZALI & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1543 | M.A. 85/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Ashraf (Deceased) Thr LRs Huma Ikram & Or (Appellant) VS District & Sessions Judge, Karachi-East and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1544 | Cr.Bail 967/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Kanwar Singh S/O Nighjee Singh (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | Crl.P.1644/2021 The State / Director General, Regional Directorate, Anti Narcotics Force, Sindh, Govt. of Pakistan M/o Narcotics Control, through Assistant Director (Law), Karachi v. Kunwar Singh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 1545 | Const. P. 978/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Amanullah Khan S/o Abdullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Najeeb Ullah Malik and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1546 | Const. P. 1536/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | shafi Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 1547 | Cr.Bail 2158/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | AFSAR KHAN S/IO FAZAL KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JAN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1548 | Const. P. 439/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Iqbal Thr. Attorney Muhammad Zubair (Petitioner) VS S. M. Jameel Javed and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1549 | Cr.Bail 157/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MASOOD HUSSAIN S/O QAZI MANZOOR HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1550 | Const. P. 404/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Sarfaraz Butt (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Mahir and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-FEB-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1551 | Const. P. 692/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Ghulam Asghar Tanwari (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ismail Mahar & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-JUN-22 | No | Election Petitions | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | |||
| 1552 | Const. P. 618/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Khalique Zaman Maitlo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | ||||
| 1553 | S.M.A 523/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Omair Saleh s/o Saleh Mohammad (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-MAY-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1554 | H.C.A 173/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Hussain Dawood (Appellant) VS Haji Maqbool Ahmed & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1555 | Const. P. 615/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Arz Muhammad mahar & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author) | ||||
| 1556 | Const. P. 988/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | ||||
| 1557 | M.A. 27/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Abdul Kader Thr. Anwar Shah (Appellant) VS The Court of Xth ADJ, Khi (South) and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1558 | Const. P. 613/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Taj Bibi D/o Badshah Gul (Petitioner) VS IIIrd ADJ Karachi South and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1559 | M.A. 33/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Yousuf Thr. Anwar Shah (Appellant) VS The Court of Xth ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1560 | Const. P. 3022/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Niaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1561 | Const. P. 3184/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Dr. Shamsa Arain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 1562 | Const. P. 387/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR (Petitioner) VS MST. LUBNA IMRAN (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1563 | H.C.A 68/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mian Parvez Akhtar (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 1564 | Const. P. 8219/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Hamdani Brother (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-NOV-23 | No | Interpretation of the Scheme for the Management and Disposal of Urban Evacuee Trust Properties, 1977 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 1565 | Const. P. 3128/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | NAUSHIRWAN PEROZSHOW DUBASH. (Petitioner) VS FED OF PAKISTAN AND ORS. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-FEB-24 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 1566 | Const. P. 7142/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Shahnaz Hanif Merchant (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-FEB-24 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||||
| 1567 | Const. P. 4363/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Shahab Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-JAN-24 | Yes | Validity of Regulation No. 3-2.14.3 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 in the context Section 6 and 7D of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 1568 | Const. P. 5490/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Ayesha Zafar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-23 | No | Jurisdiction of ANF to place information under Section 31 of the Prevention of Smuggling Act, 1977, Right of KDA to restrain dealing with property without a "Freezing" Order having been passed in terms of Article 4 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 1569 | Judicial Companies Misc. 35/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | H.P Byramji & Co. Private Limited (Applicant) VS SECP (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-AUG-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) | ||||
| 1570 | H.C.A 395/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Impact Builders Pvt Limited & Another (Appellant) VS Iffat Iqbal & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-OCT-23 | No | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||