Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.
Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:
| ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S.No. | Citation | Case No. | Case Year | Parties | Bench Type | Order/Judgment | Order_Date | A.F.R | Head Notes/ Tag Line | Bench | Apex Court | Apex Status |
1 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 200/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: 201/2018 | 2018 | MUHAMMAD NADEEM KHAN S/O FAHEEM KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
2 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 193/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD ALAMGHIR S/O MUHAMMAD QASIM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
3 | 2020 YLR 1752 | Cr.J.A 107/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | FARMAN ALI S/O ASIF-UR-REHMAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.A.14-K/2022 Farman Ali and another v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
4 | 2020 PCr.LJ 128 | Criminal Appeal 318/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | MUHAMMAD BILAL S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.5-K/2020 Jaan Muhammad v. The State thr. P.G.Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
5 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 363/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD USMAN S/O MUHAMMAD RAFIQ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
6 | 2020 MLD 1676 | Cr.Acctt.A 5/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | ALTAF AHMED S/O GUL HASSAIN SHAIKH (Appellant) VS NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
7 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 51/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | SHAHZAD @ DILAWAR KHAN @ KHALID S/O GULAB KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
8 | Const. P. 3706/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Muhammad Luqman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and rs (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | C.P.2520/2020 Muhammad Luqman v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | ||
9 | Const. P. 4203/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Kausar Jabeen (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | C.P.829-K/2020 Kausar Jabeen & another v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | ||
10 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 181/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | MUHAMMAD RASHID S/O ASHIQ ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
11 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 182/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | MUHAMMAD RASHID S/O ASHIQ ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
12 | 2021 PCr.LJ Note 13 | Cr.J.A 273/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | MUHAMMAD ALI S/O YAMEEN KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
13 | 2021 PCr.LJ 24 | Const. P. 6026/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Shoukat Hussain Jokhio (Petitioner) VS The Stae thr Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-AUG-20 | Yes | Lastly, we may observe that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but the only tentative assessment is required, and a cursory glance of the record show that all the petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail in connivance with each other have caused huge loss to the Government exchequer, therefore, the pre-arrest bail of petitioners Sabah-ul-Islam, Muhammad Waseem, Roshan Ali Shaikh, Fazal-ur-Rehman, Ahmed Ali, Farrukh Jamal Siddiqui, Nadeem Qadir Khokhar and Sohail Yar Khan is recalled with imidiate effect, their petitions are dismissed. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | C.P.486-K/2020 Sabah-ul-Islam Khan & another v. The Chairman NAB Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous |
14 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 53/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | MUHAMMAD HASSAN S/O ATTA MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
15 | Cr.J.A 46/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Crl. Confirmation Reference No. D- 05 of 2021 | 2015 | Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz Kalhoro & anothe (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-FEB-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court(A.T.C Death) | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | J.P.94/2021 Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz v. The State,Crl.A.178/2023 Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Pending | |
16 | Conf.Case 14/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Abdul Rahim Shaikh (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-JUN-21 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
17 | Criminal Appeal 36/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Zafar-uddin @ Zafar (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
18 | Criminal Appeal 126/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ISLAM SHAH S/O SYED KAMAL SHAH & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-NOV-22 | Yes | It is observed that the mere heinousness of the charge and recovery of a huge quantity of the alleged contraband is no ground to convict the accused. The prosecution is under a bounden responsibility to drive home the charge by proving each limb of its case that essentially included the production of the witness tasked with the responsibility of keeping the narcotic in safe custody and safely transmitting the samples to the office of the Chemical Examiner. Failure to do so is fatal to the prosecution case. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
19 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 29/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | KHAWAR S/O DILDAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-AUG-22 | Yes | Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
20 | Criminal Appeal 705/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SARDAR ALI S/O SAMEEN JAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-NOV-22 | Yes | No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellant against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross-examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination. Even otherwise, section 25 of the CNS Act has excluded Section 103 Cr.P.C. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.1644/2022 Sardar Ali v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor A.N.F. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
21 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 68/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | SAMIULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD BADSHAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-OCT-22 | Yes | An accused person is presumed to be innocent till the time he is proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt, and this presumption of his innocence continues until the prosecution succeeds in proving the charge against him beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of legally admissible, confidence inspiring, trustworthy and reliable evidence. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
22 | Cr.J.A 266/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Syed Shiraz Hussain (Appellant) VS The State (Complainant) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author) | ||||
23 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 160/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | KIFAYATULLAH S/O KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-SEP-22 | Yes | The motive is always a double-edged weapon. No doubt, the previous enmity can be a reason for the appellant to commit the alleged crime, but it can equally be a reason for the complainant side to falsely implicate the appellant in the case of a previous grudge. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
24 | Cr.Rev 80/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | AYESHA MIRZA D/O SALIM MIRZA (Applicant) VS FIA THROUGH IST DIRECTOR & ANOTHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | Crl.P.719/2023 Ayesha Mirza v. Federal Investigation Agency through its Director General Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
25 | Conf.Case 13/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | REFERENCE MADE BY THE IST ADJ/MCTC KHI EAST (Appellant) VS SOHAIL ABDUL SALAM MUGHAL (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
26 | Const. P. 655/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | Dildar Khan & Ors (Appellant) VS V/S Mst. Fatima Bibi & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-APR-24 | Yes | Appellant has failed to prove the Sale Agreement, hence, Receipt issued in pursuance thereof, has no legal value. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | |||
27 | Const. P. 218/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Muhammad Idrees Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Kashif Khan & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-JUN-09 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | C.P.728-K/2009 Muhammad Idrees Qureshi v. Muhammad Kashif Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | ||
28 | Const. P. 3363/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Sarfaraz Ghani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-15 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
29 | Criminal Appeal 292/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Conf. Case No.06/2016 | 2016 | BILAL HUSSAIN S/O MUHAMMAD HANAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
30 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 239/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl.Anti. Ter.A. No.240/2017 and Spl. Ant. Ter. J.A.258 of 2017 | 2017 | KASHIF SOHAIL S/O GRIFFIN ALMAS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
31 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 213/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl.Cr.Anti.Ter.A 214, 215 & 216 of 2016 and Conf. Case No.5/2016 | 2016 | MUHAMMAD UMER S/O MUHAMMAD SULEMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | J.P.30/2020 Muhammad Umar & Muhammad Fazil @ Rana v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
32 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 354/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SHAHZAD KAMRAN S/O QADIR BUX (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
33 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 289/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | SADDAM KAKAR S/O SAADULLAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
34 | 2020 PCr.LJ 134 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 222/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SHAHNAWAZ S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
35 | Cr.Acctt.A 11/2001 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2001 | Mian Waqar Akhtar Paganwala (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Thus based on the discussion made hereinabove we are of the considered view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt against the appellant by producing reliable, trustworthy, and confidence-inspiring oral evidence as well as documentary evidence in support of the same. We, therefore, uphold all the sentences, fines, and penalties for each offence in the judgment whilst dismissing the appeal. Thus based on the discussion made hereinabove we are of the considered view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt against the appellant by producing reliable, trustworthy, and confidence-inspiring oral evidence as well as documentary evidence in support of the same. We, therefore, uphold all the sentences, fines, and penalties for each offence in the judgment whilst dismissing the appeal. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
36 | Cr.Acctt.A 75/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUMTAZ ALI NIZAMANI S/O LAL DINO NIZAMANI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | As discussed above, we are of the firm view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt by producing trustworthy and confidence inspiring evidence against all three appellants and uphold their convictions. The appeals of the appellants Muhammad Asif Arshad and Muhammad Adil Arshad have not been pressed on merits and they only prayed for reduction of their sentence based on the mitigating circumstances mentioned above. We find such mitigating circumstances to justify a reduction in their sentences. We also consider that the sentences awarded to them were too harsh, therefore, the conviction awarded to them by the trial court is maintained, however, both their sentences are reduced to the time which they have already undergone which includes the additional sentence of imprisonment in default of fine but the fine imposed on them is still outstanding against them which shall be recovered by NAB in accordance with the law. The appellants Muhammad Asif Arshad and Muhammad Adil Arshad are in custody, they are ordered to be released forthwith if not required in any other custody case. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.1224/2020 Mumtaz Ali Nizamani v. National Accountability Bureau thr. the D.G. Sindh, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
37 | 2021 YLR 188 | Const. P. 5009/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Const. P No.D-1158 of 2019 | 2019 | Sheikh Muhammad Ashgar (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
38 | 2021 YLR Note 12 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 50/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | JILANI @ JAVED S/O DUWA KHAN & ORS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
39 | Criminal Appeal 239/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | SYED IMRAN AHMED S/O SYED RIAZ AHMED SABIR (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
40 | Criminal Appeal 58/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Abdul Ghani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | ||||
41 | Conf.Case 10/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | REF. MADE BY 1ST ADJ/MCTC MALIR KARACHI (Appellant) VS NADIR ALI @ BABAR & OTHERS (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-SEP-22 | Yes | Turning to the quantum of sentence awarded to the appellants by the trial court we have considered the evidence produced by the prosecution and found that there were general allegations against the appellants of causing hatchet and knife injuries to the deceased resulting in his death and all the witnesses have deposed that the appellants actively participated in the commission of offence. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
42 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 2/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SAJID S/O NOOR AHMED (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-AUG-22 | Yes | Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
43 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 148/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | FAIZ UR REHMAN S/O ABDUL REHMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 23-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
44 | Criminal Appeal 470/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O BASHIR AHMED & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-NOV-22 | Yes | There is no evidence to ascertain as to whether the property was kept in safe custody from its recovery till its arrival at the office of the chemical examiner. Therefore, by failing to prove the safe custody of the recovered contraband, the same could not be used against the appellants in this regard and the chemical report is of no legal value. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
45 | Criminal Appeal 68/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-JUN-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author) | Crl.P.156-K/2023 The State/DG Regional Directorate, ANF Sindh v. Muhammad Iqbal Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
46 | Cr.Appeal 68/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-JUN-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author) | ||||
47 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | ALI AHMED @ KHATIYA S/O MUMTAZUL HAQ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
48 | 2020 YLR Note 1719 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 167/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SHAHZAD @ KALAY KHAN S/O ALI AKBAR SAWATI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.A.601/2022 Shahzad @ Kalay Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
49 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 169/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD ABID HUSSAIN @ TAO S/O GHULAM MUJTABA (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
50 | 2020 YLR 63 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 318/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | ALI AHMED @ KHATIYA S/O MUMTAZUL HAQ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
51 | 2020 YLR 2053 | Cr.Acq.A. 543/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | The State / ANF (Appellant) VS Basar Khan (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | On a careful scrutiny of above provision in our view it is clear that the prescribed period of Limitation of thirty days and sixty days respectively is available only for those criminal acquittal appeals which are filed by the complainant or person aggrieved respectively. We have found no specific period of Limitation under the amended provision as regards the acquittal appeals under sub-section (1) to section 417, Cr.P.C. is prescribed. We have also examined the Article 157 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which reads as under:- Description of Appeals Period of limitation Time from which period begins to run 157. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, from an order of acquittal. Six months The date of the order appealed from. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
52 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 353/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD AZEEM S/O ABDUL AZIZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
53 | Conf.Case 2/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | REFERENCE MADE BY THE VTH ADDL.S.JUDGE KHI EAST (Appellant) VS FARMAN ALI S/O SAIF-U-REHMAN & ANOTHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
54 | Const. P. 3496/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Shafqat Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | C.P.2533/2020 Shafaqat Ali Shah v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary to the Govt. of Pakistan, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | ||
55 | Cr.J.A 48/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Criminal confirmation No. D- 06 of 2018. | 2018 | Jhangal Dahani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-JAN-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence) | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | J.P.20/2021 Jhangal v. The State,Crl.A.164/2023 Jhangal v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Pending | |
56 | Criminal Appeal 276/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Faheem Arshadullah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.111-K/2020 Faheem Arshadullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned Next Session | ||
57 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 126/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | ABID KALOO S/O DUR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
58 | Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. 1/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | THE STATE / NAB (Appellant) VS MOHAMMAD SARDAR KHAN (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
59 | Const. P. 2836/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Hameedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | C.P.4283/2021 Zulfiqar Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary to Government of Pakistan, M/o Interior, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | ||
60 | Cr.Acq.A. 123/1995 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1995 | Mst.Azra Begum (Appellant) VS The State and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-MAY-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
61 | Criminal Appeal 501/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SHAKEEL AHMED S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE/ ANF (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-NOV-22 | Yes | No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
62 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 25/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | AMIR RAHEEM S/O MUHAMMAD RAHEEM BONERI (Appellant) VS TH STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-SEP-22 | Yes | The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
63 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | KIFAYATULLAH S/O KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-SEP-22 | Yes | The motive is always a double-edged weapon. No doubt, the previous enmity can be a reason for the appellant to commit the alleged crime, but it can equally be a reason for the complainant side to falsely implicate the appellant in the case of a previous grudge. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
64 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 24/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | AMIR RAHEEM S/O MUHAMMAD RAHEEM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-SEP-22 | Yes | The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
65 | Cr.J.A 506/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD SHAFI S/O FAIZULLAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-SEP-22 | Yes | It is observed that mere heinousness of the charge and recovery of huge quantity of the alleged contraband is no ground to convict accused. The prosecution is under a bounden responsibility to drive home the charge by proving each limb of its case that essentially included production of the witness, tasked with the responsibility of transmitting the samples to the office of Chemical Examiner. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
66 | Conf.Case 14/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | REF. MADE BY SPL. COURT II CNS KARACHI (Appellant) VS NAEEM AKHTAR @ ALI HAIDER & 2 ORS (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-SEP-22 | Yes | No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained unshattered during the cross-examination. Even otherwise, the provision of Section 25 of the CNS Act has provided the exclusion of Section 103 Cr.P.C. during recovery proceedings. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
67 | Cr.J.A 115/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | SOHAIL ABDUL SALAM MUGHAL S/O ABDUL SALAM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
68 | Conf.Case 1/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | REFERENCE MADE BY ADJ IX KHI SOUTH (Appellant) VS MUHAMMAD SADIQ S/O MUHAMMAD UMAR (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
69 | Cr.Acq.A. 209/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2007 | The State/A.N.F. (Appellant) VS Anwar Ali Shaikh (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | ||||
70 | Conf.Case 11/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Reference made by the IIIrd Addl.S.Judge Khi Cenra (Appellant) VS BABAR MASIH S/O SABIR MASIH (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
71 | Conf.Case 8/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | REFERENCE MADY BY THE IST ADJ KARACHI SOUTH (Appellant) VS MUHAMMAD BILAL S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
72 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 170/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD ABID HUSSAIN @ TAO S/O GHULAM MUJTABA (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
73 | 2021 SBLR Sindh 100 | Cr.Acctt.A 73/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD ASIF ARSHAD S/O MUHAMMAD ARSHAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | As discussed above, we are of the firm view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt by producing trustworthy and confidence inspiring evidence against all three appellants and uphold their convictions. The appeals of the appellants Muhammad Asif Arshad and Muhammad Adil Arshad have not been pressed on merits and they only prayed for reduction of their sentence based on the mitigating circumstances mentioned above. We find such mitigating circumstances to justify a reduction in their sentences. We also consider that the sentences awarded to them were too harsh, therefore, the conviction awarded to them by the trial court is maintained, however, both their sentences are reduced to the time which they have already undergone which includes the additional sentence of imprisonment in default of fine but the fine imposed on them is still outstanding against them which shall be recovered by NAB in accordance with the law. The appellants Muhammad Asif Arshad and Muhammad Adil Arshad are in custody, they are ordered to be released forthwith if not required in any other custody case. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
74 | 2020 YLR 2226 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 23/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Suleman Shah@ Sunny & Another. (Appellant) VS The State. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
75 | Const. P. 7380/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Karamuddin Panhyar (Petitioner) VS The NAB (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-SEP-20 | Yes | We have decided the main appeal of the appellant therefore the Constitution Petition No: 7380 of 2018 filed by the appellant for suspension of his sentence during the pendency of the appeal has become infructuous and is also dismissed. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
76 | 2021 PCr.LJ Note 13 | Cr.Rev 118/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | ABDUL REHMAN S/O MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD ALI & ANOTHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
77 | Cr.Acctt.A 39/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | KARAMUDDIN PANHYAR S/O KORAL KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH NAB (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-SEP-20 | Yes | Since the appellant is the sole breadwinner of a large family, old age of above 60 years and no loss has occurred to the Government therefore in our view is capable of reformation under such circumstances, we hereby dismiss the instant appeal of the appellant on merits but since we find the sentence rather harsh keeping in view the submissions of the appellant , we hereby reduce/alter the sentences of the appellant and convict him under section 9(a) (vi) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 and sentence him to suffer R.I. for five (05) years and to pay fine of Rs.500,000/- (five lac). The appellant shall forthwith cease to hold public office, if any, held by him and he stands disqualified for a period of ten (10) years to be reckoned from the date of elected, chosen, appointed or nominated as a member or representative of any public body or any statutory or local authority or in service of Pakistan or of any province so also he shall not be allowed to apply for or be granted or allowed any financial facilities in the form of any loan or advances from any bank or Financial Institution in the public sector, for a period of ten (10) years from the date of conviction. However, the benefit of section 382(B) Cr.P.C. is extended to the appellant as the same was already extended to him by the trial court--Disposed of. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
78 | Criminal Appeal 41/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Ashique Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 23-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | Crl.A.105/2020 Sartaj Khan v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh,Crl.P.76-K/2021 The State through Prosecutor General Sindh v. Faisal Mehmood @ Mota,Crl.P.75-K/2021 The State through Prosecutor General Sindh v. Faisal Mehmood @ Mota Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Pending ,Pending | ||
79 | Criminal Appeal 18/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Irshad Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | ||||
80 | Criminal Appeal 498/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD UMAIR @ KABO S/O MUHAMMAD USMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-NOV-22 | Yes | No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellant against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
81 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 3/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | GHULAM RASOOL RABBANI S/O MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-AUG-22 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
82 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 155/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | NAZEER AHMED S/O SARDAR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-AUG-22 | Yes | PW Muhammad Akeel at the time of recording his evidence has not identified the present appellant to be a same person who was identified by him at the time of identification parade as such in our view such identification of the accused has no such legal value to maintain conviction of accused in a case of capital punishment without any other corroboration. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
83 | Criminal Appeal 43/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MUHAMMAD IQBAL S/O ABDUL QADIR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
84 | 2020 SBLR Sindh 814, 2020 MLD Note 871 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 352/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD AZEEM S/O ABDUL AZIZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
85 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 168/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SHAHZAD @ KALAY KHAN S/O ALI AKBAR SAWATI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.A.602/2022 Shahzad @ Kalay Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | ||
86 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 355/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SHAHZAD KAMRAN S/O QADIR BUX (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
87 | 2021 YLR Note 17 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 108/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | MOHSIN BALOCH S/O HAJI HASSAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
88 | Cr.Rev 159/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | SYED ALI ZAIDI & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author) | ||||
89 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 320/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | RAJAB ALI @ NADEEM S/O MOHBAT ALI RAJPER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
90 | Const. P. 2139/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Rafique Tawakal (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-JUN-20 | Yes | The petitioner named above seeks his post-arrest bail in the reference No.7 of 2004--In view, thereof the petitioner has made out his case for grant of his post-arrest bail on the ground of rule of consistency and therefore admitted to bail subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs 1000000/= (one million) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Registrar of this court--We observed that the reference was filed in the year 2004 and the same has not been decided by the National Accountability Court till yet, therefore, in these circumstances, we direct the National Accountability Court No-1 Karachi to decide the case expeditiously--disposed of. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
91 | Const. P. 7761/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Roshan Ali Kanasiro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | We may observe here that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but only a tentative assessment is permissible and a cursory glance of the record shows that all the petitioners in connivance with each other have misappropriated a huge amount of money from the Government from which some amount was recovered through plea bargains. Under these circumstances the interim pre-arrest bail granted to all the petitioners earlier by this court is recalled with immediate effect. We also find that with regard to petitioner Shahenshah Hussain who is seeking his post-arrest bail there is sufficient evidence against him in the shape of documentary evidence which connects him to the commission of offence to which he has been charged and therefore his petition for post-arrest bail is also dismissed. We may observe here that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but only a tentative assessment is permissible and a cursory glance of the record shows that all the petitioners in connivance with each other have misappropriated a huge amount of money from the Government from which some amount was recovered through plea bargains. Under these circumstances the interim pre-arrest bail granted to all the petitioners earlier by this court is recalled with immediate effect. We also find that with regard to petitioner Shahenshah Hussain who is seeking his post-arrest bail there is sufficient evidence against him in the shape of documentary evidence which connects him to the commission of offence to which he has been charged and therefore his petition for post-arrest bail is also dismissed. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | C.P.2603/2020 Roshan Ali Kanasro v. Federation of Pakistan through Federal Secretary, Interior Department, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
92 | Cr.Acq.A. 213/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | GUL WALI KHAN (Appellant) VS ALI BAT KHAN & 05 ORS (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
93 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 180/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | JUNAID-UR-REHMAN S/O ANEES-UR-REHMAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
94 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 304/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | SAINDAD S/O MEER MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
95 | Cr.J.A 33/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Cr. Conf. Case No. D-04 of 2018 Cr. Acq. Appeal No. D-09 of 2018 Cr. Rev. Appln. No. D-05 of 2018 Cr. Jail Appeal No. S-44 of 2018 | 2018 | Gulzar Sanghro (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-MAR-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence) | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
96 | 2020 MLD 1417 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 107/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | GHULAM SHABBIR @ PAPPI S/O PERVEZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
97 | Cr.J.A 51/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mansoor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JUN-21 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | J.P.229/2021 Mansoor Ahmed & others v. The State,Crl.A.219/2023 Mansoor Ahmed & others v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Pending | ||
98 | Cr.Acq.A. 95/1996 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1996 | The State (Appellant) VS Ahmed and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-MAY-14 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | ||||
99 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 90/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MUHAMMAD BUX @ BABU S/O KHADIM HUSSAIN LAGARI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-SEP-22 | Yes | The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
100 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 89/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MUHAMMAD BUX @ BABU S/O KHADIM HUSSAIN LAGARI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-SEP-22 | Yes | The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
101 | Criminal Appeal 500/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SHAKEEL AHMED S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ORS (Appellant) VS THE STATE/ ANF (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-NOV-22 | Yes | No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
102 | Criminal Appeal 742/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Muhammad Sadiq S/o Muhammad Umar (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
103 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 144/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | SHAHID WILAYAT S/O WILAYAT MASIH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-SEP-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author) | ||||
104 | Cr.Bail 571/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Muhammad Hanif S. Kalia and two others (Applicant) VS State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 06-JUL-09 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
105 | Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A 22/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | The State (Appellant) VS Kamran @ Kami & Another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
106 | 2020 PCr.LJ 1693, 2020 PLJ 463 | Criminal Appeal 113/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | TAJ MUHAMMAD S/O BAKHT ZAMIR KHAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.259-K/2019 Deendar Ali Advocate v. Abdul Basir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
107 | 2020 PCr.LJ 120 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 192/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD ALAMGHIR S/O MUHAMMAD QASIM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
108 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 52/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | JILANI @ JAVED S/O DUWA KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
109 | Const. P. 2440/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Waseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The State and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-AUG-20 | Yes | In view thereof, the petitioner has made out his case for grant of bail, under these circumstances, C.P.No.D-2440 of 2020 is allowed. Petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs.500000/- (Rupees Five Lacs) and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. However, the Ministry of Interior is directed to put the name of petitioner on the ECL. A copy of this order be sent to the Secretary, Ministry of Interior Government of Pakistan for compliance. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
110 | 2020 YLR 143 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 176/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | JUNAID-UR-REHMAN S/O ANEES-UR-REHMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
111 | Criminal Appeal 231/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | MUHAMMAD ALI S/O YAMEEN KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
112 | Conf.Case 8/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Muhammad Ashraf (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
113 | Criminal Appeal 57/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Mst Hajani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | ||||
114 | Cr.Acq.A. 147/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 148 of 2003 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 149 of 2003 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 150 of 2003 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 151 of 2003 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 152 of 2003 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 33 of 2004 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 34 of 2004 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 35 of 2004 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 36 of 2004 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 37 of 2004 Cr.Acquittal.Appeal.No.D- 38 of 2004 | 2003 | The State (Appellant) VS Dr.Qadir Magsi and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | ||||
115 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 4/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SARDAR S/O MIR HASSAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-AUG-22 | Yes | Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
116 | Cr.J.A 538/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | NAEEM AKHTAR @ ALI HAIDER & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
117 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 156/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | NAZEER AHMED S/O SARDAR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-AUG-22 | Yes | PW Muhammad Akeel at the time of recording his evidence has not identified the present appellant to be a same person who was identified by him at the time of identification parade as such in our view such identification of the accused has no such legal value to maintain conviction of accused in a case of capital punishment without any other corroboration. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
118 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 39/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | NASEER AHMED @ MULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-OCT-22 | Yes | For an identification parade to be properly held, it is essential that it must be conducted soon after the arrest of the accused and that accused is not shown to the witnesses before the identification parade. However, the said guidelines were not followed. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
119 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 18/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ASGHAR ALI MUGHERI S/O MUHAMMAD AACHAR & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-AUG-22 | Yes | Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
120 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 91/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MUHAMMAD BUX @ BABU S/O KHADIM HUSSAIN LAGARI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-SEP-22 | Yes | The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
121 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 127/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | REHMATULLAH S/O AJAB KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 14-SEP-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author) | ||||
122 | Cr.Rev 11/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | AYESHA MIRZA D/O SALIM MIRZA (Applicant) VS FIA THROUGH DIR GEN. & ANOTHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | Crl.P.718/2023 Ayesha Mirza v. Federal Investigation Agency through its Director General Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
123 | Cr.Rev 18/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | FATIMA LYBA D/O MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN (Applicant) VS FIA & ANOTHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
124 | Conf.Case 7/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | REFERENCE MADE BY MCTC/ 1ST ADJ. KHI WEST (Appellant) VS ANJUM AIJAZ S/O CHANAN KHAN & ANOTHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
125 | Cr.Rev 81/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | AYESHA MIRZA D/O SALIM MIRZA (Applicant) VS FIA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR & ANOHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | Crl.P.720/2023 Ayesha Mirza v. Federal Investigation Agency through its Director General Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
126 | Criminal Appeal 59/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Ahmed and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-DEC-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | ||||
127 | Cr.J.A 378/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | MUHAMMAD BABAR S/O MUHAMMAD SALEEM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
128 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 368/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | ATIF MEHMOOD S/O ALI ASGHAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
129 | Conf.Case 2/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Reference made by the D.&.S.J KHI WEST (Appellant) VS TAJ MUHAMMAD S/O BAKHT ZAMEEN & ANOTHER (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
130 | 2020 YLR Note 1557 | Criminal Appeal 419/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | BABAR MASIH S/O SABIR MASIH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
131 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | SADDAM KAKAR S/O SAADULLAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
132 | 2020 MLD Note 1329 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 276/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | AZHAR HUSSAIN S/O ALLAH BUX (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
133 | Spl.Cr.A.T.A. 96/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SYED RIFFAT HUSSAIN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
134 | 2020 MLD Note 1319 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 362/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD USMAN S/O MUHAMMAD RAFIQ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
135 | Const. P. 2713/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
136 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 163/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN S/O GHULAM SARWAR & ORS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-OCT-22 | Yes | No ransom demand has been proved by the prosecution through any tangible evidence. For instance, there is no CDR to link the appellants to the offence. No one saw the appellants throw the body of the deceased in the canal and the last seen evidence without proper identification of the appellants cannot be relied upon which in any event is only circumstantial evidence and is to be viewed with extreme caution. No toxicology report was produced to show that the child had even been drugged. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
137 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 167/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD ADNAN S/O MUHAMMAD HANIF (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-OCT-22 | Yes | No ransom demand has been proved by the prosecution through any tangible evidence. For instance, there is no CDR to link the appellants to the offence. No one saw the appellants throw the body of the deceased in the canal and the last seen evidence without proper identification of the appellants cannot be relied upon which in any event is only circumstantial evidence and is to be viewed with extreme caution. No toxicology report was produced to show that the child had even been drugged. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
138 | Criminal Appeal 630/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | KAMRAN MIRZA S/O MIRZA RIAZ BAIG (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-NOV-22 | Yes | It is well settled that if a set of witnesses is disbelieved to the extent of some accused the same cannot be believed in respect of the remaining accused facing the same trial without any independent and strong corroboration. Upon scrutiny of the material available on record, we find no corroboration to maintain the conviction and sentence of the appellant. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.33-K/2023 MCB Bank Limited v. Kamran Mirza Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
139 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 5/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | DANISH S/O ABDUL MAJEED (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-AUG-22 | Yes | Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
140 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 23/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | AMIR RAHMEEM S/O MUHAMMAD RAHEEM BONERI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
141 | Criminal Appeal 520/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SHAHZAIB @ KAKA S/O ALI BUKSH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-NOV-22 | Yes | while awarding the conviction in cases of capital punishment also has no force as the reluctance of the general public to become a witness in such cases has become a judicially recognized fact and there was no way out but to consider the statement of the official witnesses as no legal bar or restriction has been imposed and even then there was no time to collect independent witnesses. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
142 | Criminal Appeal 384/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SHAHNAWAZ S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-NOV-22 | Yes | No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellant against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during the cross-examination. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | J.P.583/2022 Shahnawaz v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
143 | Cr.Rev 34/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) VS Sageer Ahmed and Another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
144 | 2016 PTD 1723 | Const. P. 5188/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | D J Builders & Developers (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-MAR-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | |||
145 | Cr.Appeal 32/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Cr. J.A. 79/2017 and Conf. Case No.01/2017 | 2017 | MAIRAJ S/O TAJ MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
146 | Cr.J.A 459/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Cr. A. No.46/2017 & Conf. Case No.14/2016 | 2016 | YOUSUF BARMI S/O NABI HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha | ||||
147 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 269/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SHEERAZ @ SHAHZAD S/O MIR DOST (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
148 | 2020 MLD 886 | Cr.Acctt.A 3/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SYED SALAHUDDIN S/O NIZAMUDDIN (Appellant) VS THE NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.51-K/2020 Syed Salahuddin v. National Accountability Bureau/The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
149 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 367/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | ATIF MEHMOOD S/O ALI ASGHAR & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
150 | 2020 PCr.LJ 1609 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 163/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SYED MEHROZ MEHDI ZAIDI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
151 | Const. P. 7714/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Shah Rehman Dostay (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-SEP-20 | Yes | We find the case of petitioner Jam Abdul Razaq Dahar is one of further inquiry as has been discussed above therefore the petitioner Jam Abdul Razaq Dahar has made out his case for confirmation of his pre-arrest bail which is confirmed on the same terms and conditions.--In view of the above, (a) we dismiss the petition for post-arrest bail of the petitioner Shah Rehman and allow the petition for post-arrest bail of petitioner Muhammad Hussain and grant him bail subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 1000000/= (Ten Lacs) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Nazir of this court. (b) As regards the petitions for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners namely Jamal ud din Mahar, Pervaiz Ahmed Malik, Manzoor Ali Dars and Muhammad Liaquat Ali Khan all such petitions are dismissed, and interim pre-arrest bail granted to them earlier is recalled with immediate effect. (c) The petition for pre-arrest bail filed by the petitioner Jam Abdul Razaq Dahar (Sub-registrar) is allowed, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him is hereby confirm on the same terms and conditions. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
152 | Cr.J.A 43/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Cr. Confirmation Case No. D-08 of 2016 | 2016 | Sadique Ali Sabzoi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-FEB-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence) | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
153 | Criminal Appeal 68/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Muhammad Ashraf (Appellant) VS V/S The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-JUL-21 | Yes | It is established that the prosecution has successfully proved its case against the appellant through ocular account furnished by eye-witnesses, which is corroborated by the medical evidence coupled with the recoveries and other circumstantial/supportive evidence. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | J.P.311/2021 Muhammad Ashraf v. The State,Crl.A.188/2023 Muhammad Ashraf v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Pending | |
154 | Criminal Appeal 52/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mansoor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JUN-21 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
155 | Criminal Appeal 250/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Abdul Rahim Shaikh (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-JUN-21 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.101-K/2021 Mushtaque Hussain v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
156 | Conf.Case 5/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mansoor Ahmed (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JUN-21 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
157 | Criminal Appeal 48/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Ashique Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author) | ||||
158 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 85/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD AMEER S/O MOMIN KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
159 | Criminal Appeal 50/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | NADIR ALI @ BABAR S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB & OTHERS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-SEP-22 | Yes | Turning to the quantum of sentence awarded to the appellants by the trial court we have considered the evidence produced by the prosecution and found that there were general allegations against the appellants of causing hatchet and knife injuries to the deceased resulting in his death and all the witnesses have deposed that the appellants actively participated in the commission of offence. | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
160 | Criminal Appeal 155/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr. Appeal No.S-264 of 2019 | 2019 | Dilbar (Appellant) VS The State (Complainant) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author) | ||||
161 | Criminal Appeal 491/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | ANJUM AIJAZ CHANAN KHAN & ANOTHE (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
162 | Const. P. 4376/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P. No. D-4377 of 2020, C.P. No. D-4378 of 2020, C.P. No. D-4379 of 2020,C.P. No. D-4380 of 2020 , C.P. No. D-4381 of 2020, C.P. No. D-4382 of 2020, C.P. No. D-4383 of 2020, C.P. No. D-4384 of 2020, C.P. No. D-4385 of 2020, C.P. No. D-4386 of 2020, | 2020 | M/s Qadri Noori Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Trustees of Port of Karachi and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-APR-23 | Yes | Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) |