Export
Report-002 AFR

Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.

Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:

Show Only Authored Judgements/Orders

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana

High Court of Sindh, Principal Seat Karachi, Bench at Sukkur, Circuit Courts at Hyderabad and Larkana
S.No. Citation Case No. Case Year Parties Bench Type Order/Judgment Order_Date A.F.R Head Notes/ Tag Line Bench Apex Court Apex Status
1 Const. P. 1661/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sheikh Muhammad Manzoor (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
2 Const. P. 955/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sikandar Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
3 Cr.Rev 14/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Hakim Rajjar & another (Applicant) VS The State & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana Crl.P.122-K/2023 Shah Bux v. Hakim & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4 Const. P. 4317/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonement Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
5 Const. P. 5861/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Fouzia Owais Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
6 Const. P. 5704/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amjadullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Syed Muhammad Iqbal and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
7 Spl.H.C.A 239/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Najma Sugar Mills Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
8 Const. P. 4309/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
9 Const. P. 6662/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Najam Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
10 I. A 15/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Iqbal Qamar Siddiqui (Appellant) VS Muhammad Jameel Siddiqui & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
11 Const. P. 6810/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 NKR Clothing Tower Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
12 H.C.A 290/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Nadra Jawed & others (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shehzad & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
13 Suit 1104/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 MUHAMMAD ZAKARIA.. (Plaintiff) VS DJM SECURITIES PVT.LTD. (Defendant) S.B. Order 13-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
14 Const. P. 4197/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Sher Bacha (Petitioner) VS VIIth A.D.J East and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
15 I. A 5/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Dr. Bhagwandas and another (Appellant) VS Mashooq Ali Jatoi and Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-MAR-24 No The period of limitation prescribed under Section 12 of the Defamation Ordinance, 2002, cannot be read as a continuing reoccurring cause of action based on each time the Plaintiff acquired notice/knowledge of publication of the same defamation matter of the same date, such event extended the period of limitation. Interpretation would lead to absurdity. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
16 I. A 32/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s. Khursheed Engineering (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Agha Steel Industries Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
17 H.C.A 146/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zafar Iqbal (Appellant) VS Mst. Mumtaz Bibi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
18 H.C.A 36/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Wasim Awan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Riaz Awan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-DEC-23 Yes Cumulative effect of entire evidence would weigh in favour of respondent and against the appellant. The appellant has miserably failed to discharge the burden of proof even for all original, issues, in his favour on all the counts Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.8-K/2024 Muhammad Wasim Awan v. Muhammad Riaz Awan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
19 2024 SBLR Sindh 178 H.C.A 34/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Nafees Zubair through her attorney (Appellant) VS Saeeda Bano & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-23 Yes *-Performance is equity based, court is obliged to perform equity as performance is not vested right. **An oral (unregistered) gift alone, or any private communication between donor and donee, would not be an obstacle in seeking performance against the title holder being a last registered instrument. ***Deed of Redemption is no doubt claimed to be a registered instrument however this Redemption Deed is just a privileged document between the mortgagor and the mortgagee but the Redemption Deed itself does not confer title. ****the performance cannot be declined on the execution of oral gift and that due diligence was not made. Performance could only be sought against title holder. If these "oral gifts" are allowed to come in the way of performance, then no suit for performance could succeed. *****It would not be an equity if appellant is allowed the performance realizing the no efforts were made to deposit the balance amount at the time when injunction was sought and/or when suit was filed, since doctrine of lis pendence is also an obstacle for seller. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
20 H.C.A 432/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Sharjeel Hayat (Appellant) VS Mazhar Kamal & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
21 Const. P. 3210/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shan (Petitioner) VS Roshan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
22 Const. P. 4184/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s Al-Baraka Apparel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
23 Const. P. 6805/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Active Apparel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
24 Const. P. 6812/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Golden Sindh Cotton Ginning & Pressing Factory (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
25 Cr.Bail 37/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Usama Ulro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
26 I. A 8/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Gulshan Spinnign Mills Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Meezan Bank Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
27 H.C.A 176/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Hashim Raza (Appellant) VS Syed Muhammad Ali & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
28 H.C.A 60/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Chapal Builders (Appellant) VS Humair Associates Builders (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
29 Suit 1569/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 M/S.QURESHI INTERNATIONAL (Plaintiff) VS M/S.GOLBELINK PAKISTAN PVT LTD (Defendant) S.B. Order 15-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
30 Suit 763/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 ARFEEN INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD (Plaintiff) VS CARACRETE PVT LTD (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
31 H.C.A 129/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nooruddin & others (Appellant) VS M/s. S.I.T.E. Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-JAN-24 Yes So Section 21 CPC has its own comprehensive jurisprudence which could overview the original court`s proceedings. The ibid section is primarily for appellate/revisional court where an appeal is preferred apparently by the appellant defending the suit but one must not be misled by such language. The language is couched in such a way that for appellant, who defended the suit, some restrictions were imposed, before enabling the appellate court to take cognizance. It has, however, provided a legal frame for the trial court considering the nature of jurisdiction being objected. **Lack of territorial or pecuniary jurisdiction becomes a mere irregularity at a later stage, if not taken at the earliest which does not make a decree nullity and in fact if taken belatedly and successfully may lead to a failure of justice. ***The two jurisdictions of the appellate court have been established to have acted lawfully i.e. (i). In the first instance where on account of procedural illegality or irregularity, identified above for [a] & [b] kinds of jurisdiction not by way of inherent lack of jurisdiction, a litigant plaintiff is ousted and (ii). In a case of lack of inherent jurisdiction, the court continue to proceed with the matter which may have resulted in the failure of justice. For both these limbs, the appellate jurisdiction is available Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
32 I. A 15/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Arslan Buriro (Appellant) VS Rustam Ali Tunio (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-FEB-24 No Civil Court, exercising summary jurisdiction, discarded Roznamcha as it was not produced in evidence. However, said Roznamcha was produced by the SHO before two different Courts as well as cited in two separate Judgments one of which judgment attained finality. Roznamcha was part of judicial recitals and could not be ignored. Roznamcha established bonafide of the Appellant-Defendant claim that the cheque was reported lost in 2018 and could not be issued in 2019. Appeal allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
33 Const. P. 775/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sher Khan Kubar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
34 Const. P. 2521/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sarah Sohail Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
35 Const. P. 6505/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Shaheen Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
36 Cr.J.A 29/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Cr. Conf. Case No.D-11 of 2019 2019 Ashiq Ali @ Chano Soomro & Another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
37 Criminal Appeal 34/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Majid Bhutto (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
38 Suit 248/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 GULZAR AHMED & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD ZAMAN & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 15-MAR-24 Yes The plaintiffs paid the full price of the Suit Land under the Sale Agreement and then paid off the Defendant Seller's 75% of the outstanding loan amount to Zarai Tarkiati Bank Ltd. The Bank acknowledged the funds deposited by the Plaintiffs and Defendant. Defendant Seller still denied the Agreement of Sale on the ground that he never signed the said Agreement and Plaintiffs were his tenant. Defendant produced no evidence in support of his defence. Suit for Specific Performance granted. Suit decreed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
39 Criminal Appeal 76/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Irshad Bhayo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
40 I. A 7/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Roshan Ali Mahar (Appellant) VS Ghulam Ali Dahar & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-APR-24 Yes Filing of an FIR, false or otherwise, neither constitutes ???publication??? nor in itself meets any of the ingredients of defamation. The Appellant has, at best, framed a suit for alleged malicious prosecution in his plaint, but such an action cannot be maintained under the special law, i.e., the Defamation Ordinance, 2002. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
41 Criminal Appeal 37/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Rahzan Sabzoi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-APR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
42 I. A 42/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: I.A 60 of 2020 2021 Abdul Basit Khan (Appellant) VS Bank Islamic Pakistan Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
43 H.C.A 380/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Muzaffar Hasan Khan (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
44 I. A 61/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shad Jan (Appellant) VS Iqbal Usmani (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
45 H.C.A 328/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Qasim Pathan & Another (Appellant) VS Karachi Gymkhana & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-NOV-23 No This process or any other rule cannot be bypassed and that is the spirit of the order impugned in these proceedings and there is no reason to interfere in the impugned order which is correct way of exercising a discretion for disposing off interim injunction application involving adjudicating forum such as clubs governed by rules Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
46 H.C.A 383/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ishrat Niaz Ahmed Lari (Appellant) VS Akhtar Yar Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
47 I. A 47/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muzzamil Ashraf (Appellant) VS Muhammad Naeem & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
48 H.C.A 233/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Appellant) VS SPEC Energy DMCC & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
49 Suit 385/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/S ABDUL SATTAR ARBANI BUILDERS SMC PVT. LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 18-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
50 Const. P. 92/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Dr. Mahjabeen Mughal (Petitioner) VS R.O PS-11 Larkana and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-JAN-24 No Electric bill relied upon by R.O. for rejecting nomination was a questionable document. Petition allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
51 Const. P. 7462/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
52 Const. P. 7465/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
53 H.C.A 400/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Popular Spinning Mills Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
54 Const. P. 8498/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Danial Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Learned IIIrd ADJ Sujawal & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
55 Suit 466/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 CYNERGYICO PK LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS TRAFIGURA PTE LIMITED (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 18-DEC-23 Yes Plaintiff (Award-Debtor) filed suit against Defendant (Award-Creditor) for declaration and mandatory injunction. pleading grounds of public policy under Article V(2) of the New York Convention read with Sections 6 and 7 of the REA, 2011. The pro-enforcement bias of the NY Convention discussed in the CNAN Group SpA case reported in PLD 2014 Sindh 349 in respect of Article V(1) is equally applicable to the Foreign Arbitral Award under challenge in this lis by Plaintiff. There has to be an action initiated by the Award-Creditor, first, in whose favor the Award has been made before the Award-Debtor raises a challenge in the domestic court. The suit is dismissed as not maintainable under Article V (2) of the New York Convention. Office is directed to draw up a decree in terms of the Judgment. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
56 H.C.A 180/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Bhalan & others (Appellant) VS Muhammad Asif Sakaria & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-NOV-23 Yes The ???embezzlement??? alleged by the Appellants/Plaintiffs in 2003 would have been in relation to the registered conveyance deeds of 1992, and still, Mohammad did not take any positive action to safeguard his rights up to the time of his death (he passed away on 13.01.2005). The second point is that the next conveyance of the Suit Properties took place through sale deeds duly registered in the years 2005 and 2007. The sale was registered after the death of Muhammad. This time, it was the onus of the legal heirs of Muhammad to remain vigilant, especially when apparently they had knowledge of the ???embezzlement??? in the year 2003. There is nothing on record to show that Muhammad and the legal heirs of Muhammad were not indolent. Nothing on record demonstrates their vigilance. The admission made by the legal heirs of Muhammad in clear terms in the Plaint disentitles the Appellants/Plaintiffs from raising any challenge to the Impugned Order of the trial court. The Appellants/Plaintiffs were well aware of the presumption of truth associated with a sale/conveyance deed that is duly registered under the Registration Act, 1908. The Appellants/Plaintiffs neither produced nor relied upon any document which prima facie could be deemed or interpreted to rebut such a presumption. This aspect of the matter did not and does not help the cause of the Appellants/Plaintiffs. In the circumstances, Appeal is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.17-K/2024 Mst. Bhalan and others v. Muhammad Asif Sakaria and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
57 Const. P. 4159/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mairaj Begum (Petitioner) VS Director M.E.O and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
58 Const. P. 6817/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mulla Ebrahimji Kairmbhoy (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
59 H.C.A 408/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: HCA 407 of 2006 2006 Noor Muhammad & Ors (Appellant) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
60 Const. P. 650/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Farooq Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
61 Const. P. 4322/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
62 H.C.A 54/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s. Data Steel Pipe Industries (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s.Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd. & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
63 H.C.A 71/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Mehar Sultan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Saddiq Butt & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
64 H.C.A 278/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ms. Bilquis Qureshi & Others (Appellant) VS Dr. Nasim Kalar (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
65 H.C.A 75/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Zia ul Haq (Appellant) VS Alexis Hague Malik & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
66 Const. P. 107/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C.P.No.D- 110 of 2020 2020 Bibi Talat (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
67 I. A 122/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 MCB Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS Tariq Aziz (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
68 Const. P. 1220/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP. D 132 of 2019 2023 Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others\ (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
69 H.C.A 274/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khurram Ahmed Mumtaz (Appellant) VS Mst. Unza Naz Khurram & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
70 Const. P. 5826/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Ghani Builders & Developers (Petitioner) VS D.J Malir and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
71 H.C.A 37/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Wasim Awan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Riaz Awan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.9-K/2024 Muhammad Wasim Awan v. Muhammad Riaz Awan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
72 Const. P. 6813/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S Maskatiya Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
73 H.C.A 366/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Laila Sarfaraz & another (Appellant) VS Hussain A. Haroon & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
74 H.C.A 373/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Shazia Sohail [Shazia Waqas] (Appellant) VS Mst. Wajib Sultana and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
75 I. A 64/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Abdul Hameed and Others (Appellant) VS Bank Islami Pakistan Limited & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
76 Const. P. 2790/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Wajahat Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Abdul Kabeer and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
77 I. A 60/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Basit Khan (Appellant) VS Bank Islami Ltd & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-23 Yes *the appellant is none but a stranger to these proceedings and the observation of the executing Court does not call for any interference as it is a dispute between financial institution and the customer and appellant is thus not in any way a proper and necessary party and that too after the disposal of suit, when it was decreed and execution proceeded. ** In terms of Order XXI Rule 60 CPC release of a property from attachment can be allowed only in case the objector/claimant had a title or right over it, whereas in the instant case on one hand appellant has no valid title in his favour and on the other there is a registered document whereby the judgment debtor is the sole owner of the subject property Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
78 Const. P. 946/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Aslam Bajwa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
79 Const. P. 5549/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Pervaiz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Shakir & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
80 Const. P. 6814/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 NKR Engineering (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.L.A.669-K/2023 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal) v. M/s. Blessed Textiles Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 15-Apr- 24
81 Cr.J.A 9/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Abdul Rehman Kamboh (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
82 H.C.A 388/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Adnan Ahmed Shaikh thru attorney Abdul Hakeem (Appellant) VS Muhammad Raees (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
83 Cr.J.A 22/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mehmood Khan Pathan & Others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
84 H.C.A 401/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Siddique (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
85 Const. P. 5166/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Amin Chapal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
86 H.C.A 381/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. S.S.S. Corporation (Appellant) VS Abdul Qadir & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
87 I. A 1/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. Favourite Garments Industries & Others (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-23 Yes It is only an extension of similar finances granted earlier, hence the claim of the respondent in respect of the suit includes the entire amount recoverable extended in the said account and that cannot be limited to the extent of Rs.5.00 million and Rs.6.00 million respectively. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
88 Suit 65/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 IQBAL AHMED CHANDNA. (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 06-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
89 Suit 767/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 HASCOL LUBRICANTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAK (SECP) & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 06-JUL-23 Yes Once costs are paid to SECP for obtaining certified copies of statutory forms, SECP cannot deny such requests made by the company. Under Regulation 20 of the Companies (Registration Offices) Regulations, 2018, SECP may insert certain qualifications/remark on such statutory forms. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
90 Const. P. 6821/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Securpring (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
91 I. A 16/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Exquisite Textile Industries (Appellant) VS Bank Al-Falah Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
92 H.C.A 138/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Imran Moosa & Others (Appellant) VS Sub Registrar I Saddar Town Clifton & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
93 R.A (Civil Revision) 51/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2018 Mst. Almas Khatoon and an Other (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-MAR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
94 Suit 2105/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 State Life Properties (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) VS M/s. A.A. Corporation & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
95 H.C.A 319/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Ibrahim (Appellant) VS Syed Imtiaz Ali Zaidi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
96 H.C.A 198/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. Rose Beauty Parlour Private Limited & Others (Appellant) VS Syed Kazim Raza (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
97 Const. P. 7412/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Majid Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Abbas Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
98 Const. P. 5391/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Abdul Razzaq (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
99 Const. P. 626/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Mst: Haseena Teewno & Another (Petitioner) VS SSP Dadu & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
100 Const. P. 605/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Abdul Ghani Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
101 Const. P. 39/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Zohaib Hussain Kamaro (Petitioner) VS The Govt. of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-FEB-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
102 Adm. Suit 17/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 M/S. Jawad Hussain & Sons (Plaintiff) VS M.V. Tolmi & another (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 07-AUG-23 Yes An Admiralty claim was filed in Pakistan Rupees for Invoices raised in United States Dollars duly acknowledged by the master of the vessel. Neither evidence was brought on record to corroborate the rate of exchange applied, nor did the defendant raise any objections. The rate of exchange applied for the conversion of USD Invoices in PKR accepted. Court auction order passed by the Court of the Republic of Togo duly certified evidence of change in title of ownership. Court auction order evidenced that at the time of the cause of action accrued in Pakistan against the vessel, the vessel was not owned by the new owner. Plaintiff's claim is neither maritime lien nor sustainable under Sections 4(3) and 4(4) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction of the High Court Ordinance, 1980 nor is fraud alleged by Plaintiff proven. During the hearing, Defendant No.2, the Agent of Vessel, furnished an Affidavit of No Objection accepting the claim amount in personam. In the circumstances, the suit was decreed against the Defendants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
103 H.C.A 197/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Sudheer Ahmed & others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
104 Const. P. 6815/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Pinnacle Biotech Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.L.A.657-K/2023 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal) v. M/s. Faisal Spinning Mills Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 15-Apr- 24
105 H.C.A 241/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. Lakhani Enterprises Private Limited (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakisan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
106 I. A 91/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Rashid Noorani (Appellant) VS M/s. J.S Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
107 Const. P. 5293/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Riffat Saeed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Islamic Republic of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
108 I. A 53/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mukesh Kumar (Appellant) VS Nevat Mal & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
109 H.C.A 382/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. S.S.S. Corporation (Appellant) VS Umair Baloch Ent. (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
110 Const. P. 848/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: 132 of 2019 2023 National Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
111 Const. P. 6004/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Marco Tex (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Right of personal hearing. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
112 Suit 226/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2004 HARRODS LTD. (Plaintiff) VS HARRODS SCHOOL OF APPLIED & APPLIED SCIE. (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
113 H.C.A 30/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghulam Muhammad Khan through Attorney (Appellant) VS Asrar Rauof & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
114 Suit 1171/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 ABDUL KHALIL (Plaintiff) VS AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
115 Suit 2447/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Hina Shaikh (Plaintiff) VS I.B.M., & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Application for adjournment which may cause delay dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
116 I. A 85/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Chakar Khan (Appellant) VS Mst. Saira Abdul Rauf (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
117 I. A 80/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Shahzad (Appellant) VS Faisal Bank Limited and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-OCT-23 No Appellant-Customer pleaded lack of knowledge of banking suit and filed application u/s 12(2) CPC belatedly against Judgment, challenged banking court decree under Section 22 of FIO, 2001 after six years from the date of banking decree. Challenges by Appellant-Customer dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
118 Const. P. 3246/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahnila Altaf & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
119 Const. P. 4027/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mrs. Farzana Javed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
120 Const. P. 6808/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Noor Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
121 Const. P. 904/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Afshan alias Absha & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
122 Const. P. 4306/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.232/2024 Karachi Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Karachi v. State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan, through its Attorney, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
123 H.C.A 410/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Continental Energy Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
124 Const. P. 3171/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Karim Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
125 Const. P. 285/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Rukhsana (Petitioner) VS M. Wahiduddin & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
126 Const. P. 7464/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
127 Const. P. 3532/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Saeedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Clifton Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
128 Const. P. 5051/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Fayaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghaffar and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
129 Const. P. 8341/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shahida Salam (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
130 I. A 49/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Fareed (Appellant) VS Al-Zamin Leasing Modaraba & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
131 Const. P. 1333/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Rukhsana Zaffar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
132 Const. P. 1014/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst. Salman Ujjan & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
133 H.C.A 159/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shafaat Hydri & Others (Appellant) VS Naila Hydri & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
134 I. A 4/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 anaging Director, SSGCL & others (Appellant) VS The Learned Presiding Officer,K@Kandhkot & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-24 Yes There is no provision under the Sindh Consumer Protection Act which enables class action complaints or complaints on behalf of unrepresented parties to be entertained by a Consumer Court. Appeal allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
135 H.C.A 305/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Parveen Razzak Kamani & Another (Appellant) VS Huma Kamani & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
136 I. A 83/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Rashid Ali Khan (Appellant) VS Rohail Khan and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
137 H.C.A 344/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Amjad Ali and Others (Appellant) VS Bahria Town Private Limited and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.4477/2023 Dr. Amjad Ali and others v. Bahria Town Private Limited Karachi through the Chief Executive Officer and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
138 Const. P. 39/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Shah Muhammad Zaman Junejo (Petitioner) VS Bilawal Bhutto Zardari & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
139 I. A 88/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 House Building Finance Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS Major Muhammad Abdul Aziz & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-NOV-23 Yes The learned Judge has correctly granted HBFC cost of funds from 2010 onwards in the Judgment, which, according to Respondent No.1-Customer???s admission, was the date of default, yet there is no explanation why the learned Judge proceeded to apply a varying rate of cost of funds as already discussed. Therefore, HBFC???s claim that the learned Judge of the Banking Court has not granted the cost of funds from the date of default is incorrect. In fact, the Banking Court granted costs of funds but did not grant HBFC the cost of funds as certified by the State Bank of Pakistan from time to time from 2010 till the date of Judgment in May 2016. The case is remanded to the Banking Court to determine the cost of funds amount payable to HBFC in terms of section 3(2) of the FIO, 2001. There shall be no change in the already decreed principal outstanding amount of Rs.1,771,340 and the costs of the suit of Rs.31,425, which will remain the same. The Respondent No.1-Customer has already paid HBFC through the Banking Court a total sum of Rs.3,057,486, which comprised of the old decretal (i) principal outstanding amount, (ii) the disputed cost of funds amount, and (iii) the costs of the suit. The Banking Court shall adjust the payment already made by Respondent No.1-Customer to HBFC of Rs.3,057,486 against the fresh cost of funds to be determined by it and pass an amended Decree, accordingly. All the other terms and conditions of the Decree dated 05.05.2016 shall remain intact. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
140 Const. P. 8061/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Azeem Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Syed A. Mohiuddin and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-OCT-23 Yes Respondent/Plaintiff's First Application was dismissed under Order 39, Rule 1 and 2 CPC by the trial court, Without pleading any change of circumstances, Respondent/Plaintiff's Second Application seeking exact same relief under Section 151 CPC allowed by same trial court. the trial court should not have hesitated to dismiss the subsequent (second) application in its Second Order based on the principles of res judicata and of equity enunciated by Order II Rule 2 CPC, that if any of the grounds that existed and could have been taken and not taken cannot form part of subsequent application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
141 Const. P. 7184/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sohail Nomani (Petitioner) VS Amjad Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
142 Suit 981/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 QAMAR IFTIKHAR (Plaintiff) VS SYED EHSAN ALI RIZVI (Defendant) S.B. Order 13-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
143 H.C.A 339/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Amir Ali (Appellant) VS Mst. Farah Akhter & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
144 I. A 5/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Munawar Ali Soomro. (Appellant) VS N.B.P.and an Other. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAR-24 Yes The Banking Court, in the facts and circumstances of the case, did not commit any irregularity. Discretion of Banking Court while examining the Application for Leave to Defend under Section 10 of FIO, 2001 and at the time of the announcement of Judgment, to set-off and adjust the liability of the Respondent-Bank to adjust / setoff the Order passed by the Division Bench under Writ Jurisdiction directing the Respondent-Bank to pay the Appellant-Customer his salary and dues. Appellate Court has power under FIO, 2001 to adjust/set-off liabilities payable between parties, inter se. Appeal partly allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
145 I. A 105/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Shoaib (Appellant) VS Aqil Abbas and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
146 Suit 108/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Mujeeb Ullah Siddiqui (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 18-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
147 Const. P. 6653/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Scilife Pharma Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
148 Const. P. 6803/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Akkar Internatoinal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
149 Const. P. 6820/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Unique Building Materials (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
150 H.C.A 34/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Siddiqsons Ltd & others (Appellant) VS Creck Marina Singapore Pte Ltd & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
151 R.A (Civil Revision) 108/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Syed Muzafar Ahmed Ashraf through his L.Rs.& ors. (Applicant) VS Anwar Ali Janwri and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 12-FEB-24 Yes The onus was on the Plaintiff to prove his claim to succeed in his suit. A prayer clause has no place in the Written Statement, and the trial court should have ignored it. Instead, the trial court copied and pasted the prayer clause from Defendant/Respondent No.1???s Written Statement as an issue on which parties were at variance when this was clearly not the case. Issue No.5, framed by the trial court, was wholly alien and did not arise from the pleadings. As such, it was rightly ignored by the trial court in its judgment. The trial court correctly decided the suit on the sole issue of maintainability, and for the reasons discussed hereinabove, there was no need to examine the other issues framed by the trial court. Revision dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
152 Const. P. 49/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Makhdoom Fazal Hussain Qureshi (Petitioner) VS FOP & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
153 Const. P. 7463/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
154 Const. P. 131/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Saleem Butt (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
155 Suit 997/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 HASHAM ALIIBHAI (Plaintiff) VS NEW JUBILLEE INSURANCE CO. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 13-OCT-23 Yes As a rule, Articles of Association normally exclude any interest claim on unpaid dividends. The Defendant Company had withheld payment of unpaid dividends to Plaintiff even though Articles 6, 5 and 14 of the Articles of Association of 1953, 1986 and 2007 provided an exception to the rule. The relationship between Plaintiff and Defendant Company from 1970 to 2005 was not governed by the Articles of Association but was crystallised by the Order of the Court. Defendant Company liable to compensate Plaintiff in the sum of Rs.154,110,753 (net of taxes) being the equalizer profit on the dividend income retained and utilized by the Defendant Company based on principles of equity and in the alternative, unjust enrichment, read in the light of Articles 6, 5 and 14 of the series of Defendant Company's Articles of Association. Bar of Order 2 Rule 2 CPC not applicable to the two rounds of litigation of 1978 and 1993 culminating in Judgment of 07.08.2003 (2007 CLC 1448) amended by a Compromise Application allowing Plaintiff to claim interest on dividends recorded by Division Bench Order dated 20.12.2005 involving, Counsel for Defendant/Respondent Company who fully participated in the final order even though the Defendant/Respondent Company had not signed the Compromise Application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
156 Execution First Appeal 15/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Hashim Ali Rizvi (Decree Holder) VS Owner of Vessel M.V. ECO EKRAM [thr M/s Terra Mar] (Judgment Debtor) S.B. Judgement 28-SEP-23 No Admiralty Decree in United States Dollars. Vessel furnished Bank Guarantee in Pakistan Rupees. USD Decree could only be part-satisfied against Vessel's PKRs Bank Guarantee. The vessel sailed away after furnishing the Bank Guarantee. No other assets/property were available. Execution adjourned sine die as enforceable under Section 4 (4) of Admiralty Ordinance, 1980, if and when the sister vessels of Defendant enter the jurisdiction of High Courts. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
157 Const. P. 5061/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS Furqan uddin Usmani and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-OCT-23 Yes Scope of Writ Jurisdiction in hearing revisions arising from interlocutory orders passed during trial about civil procedure matters. Petition challenging trial court's order relating to Petitioner/Defendant application to examine witnesses under Order 16 Rule 1 CPC., Exercise of writ jurisdiction against revisional order has to be exercised in rare and exceptional circumstances only when it could be said that the order passed by the revisional Court has been passed without lawful authority, beyond jurisdiction and vested rights were curtailed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
158 H.C.A 196/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Shafiq & Others (Appellant) VS Abdul Salam Mandhro & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1308-K/2023 Muhammad Shafiq & others v. Abdul Salem Mandhro & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
159 I. A 1/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2015 Hafiz Khair Mohammad Choliani (Appellant) VS Z.T.B Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-FEB-24 Yes Appellant-Customer, after having availed finance from Respondent-Bank, had no legs to stand, pleading that the Bank did not ask him for his CNIC and disbursed the loan on NIC. Documents available on record confimed Appellant-Customer's ID and obligation to the Respondent-Bank. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
160 H.C.A 34/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Province of Sindh (Appellant) VS Muhammad Aslam Siddiqui & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
161 Suit 1650/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Nadeem Ahmed Qureshi (Plaintiff) VS Mrs. Nasreen Fatima (Defendant) S.B. Order 03-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
162 Const. P. 8387/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Global Educational Constulting Society (Petitioner) VS Cantonmnet Board Korangi Creek and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
163 I. A 38/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Aslam (Appellant) VS Muhammad Hasan Khan & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-OCT-23 No Summary Suit. Order 37 CPC. Leave Granting Order not averred in the Appeal filed by Appellant/Defendant. Appellant/Defendant aggrieved in High Court appeal only with the Trial Court's Conditional Order seeking a reduction in the quantum of the surety to be deposited with the Court within 15 days as ordered in the leave granting order and passing Judgment and Decree. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.1193-K/2023 Muhammad Aslam v. Muhammad Hasan Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
164 Const. P. 5669/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Iqbal Siraj (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
165 Const. P. 52/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Mst Nihal Khatoon (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Mahota & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
166 Const. P. 4111/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amir Mahmood (Petitioner) VS Izharuddin and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-NOV-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
167 Const. P. 106/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Shahzad Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
168 Const. P. 7657/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Inam Willayat Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
169 Const. P. 192/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 K.M.C (Petitioner) VS IXth ADJ (East) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-NOV-23 Yes KMC is a part of the third tier of Government. Several Judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan have already made affirmative observations in support of the proposition in the case of local government and municipal authorities. In such cases, as per CPC and Sindh Civil Court Rules, KMC, as a 'third-tier of Government", may appoint counsels by way of filing a Memo of Appearance instead of Vakalatnama subject to conditions specified under the Sindh Local Government Act, 2013. KMC???s Counsel???s submission, based on a judgment of the Indian Court that the government, at its discretion, may appoint as many government pleaders as it likes, is contrary to Pakistan law based on Judgment of Supreme Court of Pakistan in Rasheed Ahmad v. Federal of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage, Government of Pakistan Islamabad, and Other, PLD 2017 SC 121. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
170 Const. P. 7261/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Azhar Iqbal Faruqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
171 Const. P. 3023/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Subak Majeed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.231/2024 Cantonment Board Clifton through Executive Officer, Karachi v. Subak Majeed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
172 I. A 86/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 National Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) VS Zafar Iqbal (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
173 H.C.A 145/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Cantonment Board Clifton (Appellant) VS Nadim Ahmed Ansari (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-23 Yes Section 273 of the Cantonments Act requiring a notice to be given to CBC before filing a suit against CBC is not unfettered and unqualified. A suit for either declaration or injunctions, etc., are well-regulated under the said provision so long as the civil action is in pursuance of the Act. NAA Consulting Engineers had filed a suit against CBC for compensation for services rendered to CBC which was not in pursuance to the Act. Those civil actions beyond the Act's parameters could not be eclipsed by the bar on suits under Section 273. In the circumstances, Section 273 was not applicable. The In-house Counsel of CBC stepped into the witness box. kept responding to questions put to him in the cross-examination, claiming a lack of awareness of NAA's documents exhibited, including his own documents. In the circumstances, he accepted NAA Consulting Engineers claim against CBC. Appeal allowed and Judgment and Decree confirmed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.6-K/2024 Cantonment Board Clifton through CEO v. Nadeem Ahmad Ansari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
174 H.C.A 433/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Saadul Haq and Another (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No An initial stage of the suit and the requirement of Section-10 CPC is not at all attracted to the case in hand, prima facie. At the most the court shall stay the trial of the suit on meeting the conditions of Section-10 CPC and not otherwise. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
175 H.C.A 420/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Amir Khan (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-JAN-24 No Appeal filed against an ad-interim Order, parties will have a right of appeal when the applications are finally decided. At the moment, Pink Residency obtained an injunction when no final decree could be passed which issue is yet to be finally decided. Parties (Appellant, Intervener/Pink Residency/Official Government) chain of title in Suit Property yet to be decided? Intervener/Pink Residency is yet to explain how it obtained possession after Nazir presumably handed it over to the Appellant. Several issues are yet to be decided, Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
176 Suit 319/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MAXCO (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 23-AUG-23 Yes Justice demands that rights in the physical world and the digital/virtual world should be the same and at par with each other. Yet currently, SECP appears to be maintaining two different sets of standards for qualifications/remarks. It is clear that the Registrar of Companies, SECP is not empowered to publish qualifications/remarks on its dashboard and/or its digital platform for banks relating to the Plaintiff Company that ???Currently Company is under DISPUTE CASES??? as the same is contrary to law and SECP???s regulations framed under the Companies Act, 2017. Consequently, SECP is directed to immediately remove the said remarks from its dashboard/digital portal accessed by banks or other entities and replace such qualifications/remarks with any of the qualifications/remarks that may be assigned to the Plaintiff Company under Regulation 20 of the Companies (Registration Offices) Regulations, 2018. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
177 Const. P. 4172/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Laique Ali (Petitioner) VS UBL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No petitioner is a habitual litigant as for one reason or the other for some interconnected claims having a common cause he has been filing suits against the respondent Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
178 Const. P. 3764/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asadullah Khatri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
179 Const. P. 6663/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Universal Brushware Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
180 I. A 41/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 MCB (Appellant) VS Bilal Oil Depot (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
181 Const. P. 5416/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Khadeeja & Ors (Petitioner) VS Abdul Rehman Wariya & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
182 Const. P. 925/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Jameeela lakho & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
183 Const. P. 6816/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Eternal Group of Industries (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
184 Const. P. 1491/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Waseem Ahmed Bhayo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
185 H.C.A 88/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ayub Sorathia & Another (Appellant) VS Aslam Sadaruddin & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
186 H.C.A 138/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ahsan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Suleman & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
187 Const. P. 132/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Millennium Mall Management Co (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.102/2024 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defense, Govt of Pakistan Rawalpindi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company through its Managing Partner, Karachi and others,C.P.230/2024 Faisal Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Karachi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company, through its authorized managing partner and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
188 I. A 14/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mrs. Mahrukh Haider & another (Appellant) VS Mst. Farhat Imrana & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
189 H.C.A 316/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Nadeem Ali (Appellant) VS Mst. Sanober Asif & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
190 H.C.A 251/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: H.C.A. No.227 & 250 of 2018 [Ghulam Mustafa v. Muhammad Younis, Mst. Nasreen & others] 2018 Ghulam Mustafa (Appellant) VS Mst. Nasreen & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
191 Const. P. 5921/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Saeeda Begum (Petitioner) VS M/s AGE & Sons Pvt Ltd and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
192 I. A 108/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 White Pearl Rice Mills Limited (Appellant) VS Saif Bari (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
193 H.C.A 471/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Najma Sajjad-ul-Hassan & another (Appellant) VS Aftab Ahmed Sethi & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
194 I. A 69/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asim Hameed Lodhi (Appellant) VS Syed Nafeezur Rehman & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
195 Const. P. 24/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Fareed Raza & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-JAN-24 No Criminal proceedings can continue in parallel with civil proceedings. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
196 H.C.A 44/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Miss Uzma Amjad Ali & Another (Appellant) VS Dr. Nafees Zubair and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
197 Const. P. 4834/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 National Distributors (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Learned V A.D.J West Karachi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
198 M.A. 5/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Shaheen Insurance Co. Ltd. (Appellant) VS Ghulam Qadir & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
199 H.C.A 40/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Sarim Burney Welfare Trust International & Another (Appellant) VS Syed Sarwar Muiz and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
200 H.C.A 315/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Iktikhar Cutchi (Appellant) VS Ibrahim Nawroz Ali Bhamani & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
201 Spl.Cr.J.A 19/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Karam Bux Brohi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
202 Const. P. 7461/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
203 Const. P. 4310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
204 Const. P. 4318/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
205 Execution First Appeal 35/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MR ABDUL SATTAR QURESHI (Decree Holder) VS M/S NASIR ILYAS & OTHERS (Judgment Debtor) S.B. Order 24-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
206 Const. P. 6655/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Adamjee Automotive Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
207 Const. P. 6818/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 c32 Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
208 Suit 563/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 MCB Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS EMAD UL HASAN (Defendant) S.B. Order 01-FEB-24 Yes Plaintiff-Bank elected to proceed against Customer for recovery of loan in the ordinary civil jurisdiction. The trial court never framed any issue of jurisdiction, and parties had concluded evidence. Appellate Court framed issue of jurisdiction to be decided by the trial court. Defendant urged that returning the Plaint to the Banking Court after 16 years would be tantamount to failure of justice. Principles discussed in unreported Judgement dated 11.01.2024 in High Court Appeal No.129 of 2017, Nooruddin & others Versus M/s Sindh Industrial Trading Estate & others applied. The factor of delay may be one of the considerations when examining the question of territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction but not subject-matter jurisdiction. Delay in identifying subject-matter jurisdiction may not be considered as a failure of justice as set out in Section 21 of CPC. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
209 H.C.A 455/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Waseem Ahmed (Appellant) VS Mst. Ayesha Fatima Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
210 Const. P. 1075/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Babli alias Dur Naz & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
211 Suit 645/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 VOLGA INTERNATIONAL LTD. (Plaintiff) VS SHAHEEN AIR CAROG (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 28-AUG-23 Yes Plaintiff filed suit for recovery five years from the date when the amount became due. Acknowledgement of liability by Defendant addressed to an unrelated third party, accepting part-liability on the part of Defendant covered by Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Extended the period of limitation. Defendant accepted part-claim. Suit partly decreed to the extent of acknowledgement of liability coupled with 1% simple markup. Court's discretion to award lower markup as banks in Pakistan currently offering much lower markup on US$ deposits compared to what banks are currently offering on PKR deposits. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
212 Suit 200/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Sadiq & Suharwardy (Plaintiff) VS Ismail Industries Limited (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-AUG-23 No Transfer of Intellectual Property Law cases to IP Tribunal of Sindh at Karachi Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
213 Suit 8/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2005 M/S.SOUVENIR TOBACCO COMPANY (Plaintiff) VS M/S.SADIQ CIGARATTE (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
214 Const. P. 69/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Yasiruddin (Petitioner) VS R.O PS-109 & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
215 Criminal Appeal 74/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Deedar Ali Bhayo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
216 I. A 7/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 S.S.G.C. L (Appellant) VS Irshad Ali Bhutto and antoher (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-FEB-24 Yes The suit filed by SSGC was hopelessly time-barred. Gas Utility Court is not obliged to decide the question of maintainability after its decision on the leave to defend application. Gas Company's allegation that the Defendant-Customer was involved in the theft of gas, no ground to condone limitation.. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
217 Cr.Bail 10/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Zain @ Aitbar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
218 Const. P. 249/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mrs. Shehla Balal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
219 H.C.A 250/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: H.C.A. No.227 and 251 of 2018 [Ghulam Mustafa v. Muhammad Younis, Mst. Nasreen & others] 2018 Ghulam Mustafa (Appellant) VS Mst. Nasreen & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
220 Suit 1764/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. A.A. Corporation (Plaintiff) VS M/s. State Life Insurance Corporation (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
221 Suit 273/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ISMAIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 31-OCT-23 Yes Plaintiff is seeking the release of a consignment of imported raw peanuts after court-tested Lab Reports observed levels of aflatoxin exceeded the permissible limit of 20 ppb enforced by the Department of Plant Protection. Pleadings sought relief based on errors in gathering samples for testing of aflatoxin levels sent to different Labs across Pakistan. Plaint did not impugn the testing standards of PPD, challenged sampling only (applying plant standards to food items), USDA procedure for aflatoxin thought adopted by DPP, not properly applied and pest (fungi) causing aflatoxin not codified. Plaintiff could not plead a different case. Challenge not set up in Plaint, argued orally, cannot help Plaintiff's cause when seeking discretionary relief. Single Judge Order not binding, distinguishable on facts, prima facie case not made out as Court-ordered Report confirming higher than allowable levels of aflatoxin in consignment not appealed or challenged. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
222 I. A 37/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 United Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ismail (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
223 H.C.A 228/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Chairman Pakistan Railway (Appellant) VS Syed Imitaz Ali Zaidi and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
224 R.A (Civil Revision) 33/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Chakar Bijarani & others (Applicant) VS Abdul Rasool Bijarani & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 06-FEB-24 No As per Written Statement filed by Applicant-Defendants, they purchased suit land from co-sharer knowing fully well the risks associated with such purchase. They never had consent to the sale of the remaining co-sharers (2/3rd share). Suit partially decreed, Applicant-Defendants claim over property declined by trial court. Appellate Court upheld Judgment and Decree. No case for Revision made out. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
225 I. A 85/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Standard Chartered Bank (Pak) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Salman Anis (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
226 Suit 508/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR (Plaintiff) VS THE AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 19-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
227 Const. P. 88/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P. No. 89/2024 2024 Masroor Ali (Petitioner) VS Dist: Returning Officer NA-231 (Malir-II) & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-JAN-24 No Material relied upon by R.O. for rejecting nomination was questionable. Petitions allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
228 Const. P. 3341/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saeed uz Zaman Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
229 R.A (Civil Revision) 6/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mir Khan Jakhrani (Applicant) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-FEB-24 Yes In view of the observations of the Division Bench in the unreported case of Nooruddin-SITE (supra) following the judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the Counsel for SK Jakhrani???s arguments to dislodge the applicability of the principles of res judicata on the ground that the pecuniary jurisdiction of the civil court which passed the judgment in the first suit is different from the pecuniary jurisdiction of the civil court in the subsequent suit, is reduced to a cipher Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
230 Const. P. 4323/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
231 Cr.Bail 23/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Khuda Bux Kanrani and Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
232 R.A (Civil Revision) 49/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Abdul Latif Siyal & others (Applicant) VS Imtiaz Buriro & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-MAR-24 Yes The courts below acted with material irregularity when they rejected the Applicant-Plaintiff's Plaint seeking a declaration of Suit Land in its entirety after acknowledging prima facie Plaintiff had title in part of the Suit Land. Revision allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
233 Const. P. 6506/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
234 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 46/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Shafiq-ur-Rehman Malkani & another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-JUN-23 Yes Re-appraisal of evidence in light of the delay in lodging the Crime Report, uncertainties in recording Statements, last seen together witnesses, retracted confessions, recoveries made and weak investigation leading to acquittal. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
235 Spl.Cr.J.A 7/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Lal Bux Brohi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-JUN-23 Yes Establishing the chain of safe custody under the Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
236 Suit 1058/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 PHARMATON S.A (Plaintiff) VS RITE AID DRUGS PVT.LTD. (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
237 Const. P. 446/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Zakria and Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
238 I. A 74/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Badiya Tariq and another (Appellant) VS United Bank Limited and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
239 H.C.A 403/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Afzal Hussain & Another (Appellant) VS Mst. Jannat-un-Nissa & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
240 Const. P. 75/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Manzoor Ahmed Khushik (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Petitioner not vigilant in approaching Election Tribunal. Petition dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
241 H.C.A 408/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Engineer Anwer Aleem (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
242 H.C.A 237/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aviserv Limited (Appellant) VS Civil Aviation Authority (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
243 Suit 584/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 GUJRANWALA FOOD INDUSTRIES (Plaintiff) VS MUGHAL ENTERPRISES & ANOTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
244 Const. P. 2603/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP. D 132 of 2019 2023 Faiza Saeed and Others (Petitioner) VS DHA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
245 Const. P. 6660/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mehrab Mercantile Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
246 H.C.A 333/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 S.S.S. Corporation (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
247 H.C.A 218/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shahzad Amir Ali (Appellant) VS Gavin Venantius & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
248 Const. P. 3987/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s BBQ Delight (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
249 I. A 12/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Atif Ikram (Appellant) VS Hafiz Wali ur Rehman & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
250 Const. P. 6854/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Samba Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
251 R.A (Civil Revision) 78/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Dur Muhammad Malik (Applicant) VS Zafarullah Malik & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-JAN-24 Yes Respondent/Zafarullah, born in the year 2000, claimed paternity from Applicant/Dur Muhammad, except that his father, Dur Muhammad, took the position that he divorced Zafarullah's mother, Zulekhan, in 1998. Zafarullah's mother, his phuppi and step-father, all gave oral testimony that Zafarullah's mother was divorced in 2002. Dur Muhammad produced no evidence under DMMA in support dissolution of marriage that he divorced his first wife (Zafarullah's mother) in 1998. DNA testing would not come to his aid in the facts and circumstances of the case. Presumption of Article 128 of Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984, presumption of marriage and his evidence did not support Dur Muhammad's cause. Revision Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
252 H.C.A 278/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Welfare Association Ali (Appellant) VS Shakeel Ahmed and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-NOV-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
253 Const. P. 860/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Aneela & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
254 H.C.A 321/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Prof. Mufti Mrs. Urooj Qadri (Appellant) VS S.M Asem Qadri and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
255 H.C.A 56/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Masoor Ahmed Zai (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
256 H.C.A 347/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MCB Bank Ltd (Appellant) VS Zahid Ali & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.4509/2023 MCB Bank Limited Karachi v. Zahid Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
257 H.C.A 412/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shah-e-Karbala Trust and Others (Appellant) VS Syed Masood Hasan Jafri & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
258 Const. P. 2797/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mir AKbar Askani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
259 Const. P. 249/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Ghazan Shafique Khoso (Petitioner) VS Tarique Khoso & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-24 No Impugned Order Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
260 I. A 2/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Safdar Ali Jalbani (Appellant) VS ZTBL Mirokhan Branch & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAR-24 No Appellant-Customer's plea that he was condemned without hearing when the Banking Court No.1 at Larkano simultaneously dismissed his Application for Leave to Defend and passed judgment and Decree on the same day has no legs to stand. The credit entries in the disbursement account corroborates the precise date of disbursement of finance and there was no carried forward balance on the opening day of the account. The Appellant-Customer's defence that the finance was advanced in 2016 is not supported by any Statement of Account in terms of Section 10(4), FIO, 2001. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
261 Suit.B 48/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Summit Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS Mr. Farooq Nasir & another (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 21-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
262 H.C.A 457/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 National Highway Authority (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
263 Const. P. 5298/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Learned Dist. & Session Judge Malir & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
264 2024 CLD 338 I. A 92/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Khalid (Appellant) VS M/s. Habib Bank Limted & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-DEC-23 Yes All the legal heirs of Judgment-Debtor were not taken on record by the Banking Court. Further none of those (LRs) who were taken on record were issued notice leading to the sale proclamation. Auction proceedings set aside with directions to add all the legal heirs in the execution proceedings and issue a fresh proclamation after issuing fresh notice to all the legal heirs. The Auction Purchaser is at liberty to either match the proposed bid, enhance it, or claim re-payment of his deposited amount along with profit accrued thereon. Appeal disposed of in the above terms. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.L.A.19-K/2024 Aziz Alam Siddiqui v. Abdul Khalid and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
265 Spl.H.C.A 288/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 PSRM Steel Pvt Ltd. (Appellant) VS ASkari Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-DEC-23 Yes The appellant could hardly be considered to have a case for interference as on the counts as being highest bidder; no vested right could be assumed at such stage;; even the acceptance of an offer is not a vested right which has to pass through the rigorous of Order-XXI Rule-89/90 CPC etc. The appellant, merely on the strength of a highest bidder, cannot insist for acceptance of its offer and/or confirmation when the material available before the court, as shown above, was sufficient to justify the order of reauction of the properties both moveable and immoveable which have been ordered to be highlighted in the sale proclamation to fetch the maximum amount. In terms of sale proclamation, the discretion vest with the Court either to accept or refuse bid(s) subject to valid reasons. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
266 H.C.A 439/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Aamir Baqi (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
267 H.C.A 94/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: HCA 93 of 2022 2022 Jameel Ahmed & Others (Appellant) VS Hayat Muhammad Sher Pao & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.1298-K/2023 Hayat Muhammad Sher Pao & others v. Jameel Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
268 Const. P. 4325/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
269 Const. P. 3847/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mrs. Gulzar Parveen (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
270 Const. P. 5830/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Sarfraz Hussain (thru Legal Heirs) (Petitioner) VS Nazir Ahmed (thru Legal Heirs) & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-DEC-23 No In case the respondents pleads that even otherwise, after giving effect of Section 15 of the Limitation Act, the execution is barred by time, the Court may consider it, and they (respondents) have all the rights to plead their case before the two forums below afresh. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
271 Suit 1265/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 KESTREL EDUCATION (Plaintiff) VS AYESHA WASEEM (Defendant) S.B. Order 20-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
272 Suit 1203/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S GERRY (Plaintiff) VS M/S PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIAITON AUTHORITY (CAA) (Defendant) S.B. Order 07-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
273 Const. P. 6802/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Entree Food Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
274 Const. P. 6807/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shan Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
275 H.C.A 447/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. Abdullah Engineering Works (Appellant) VS K-Electric Limited & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-23 Yes The Plaintiff filed suit in relation to Tender A and subsequently withdrew the suit; earnest money deposited with Nazir was in connection with Tender A. Earnest money deposited by the bidder in Tender B could not be setoff with Tender A. Plaintiff could not plead return of earnest money under Tender B in Appeal when suit filed was in relation to Tender A. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
276 Const. P. 4198/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 The Aga Khan Hospital & Medical College & another (Petitioner) VS IXth ADJ (East) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
277 I. A 18/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s. Mazhar Ghulam Lotia and Co. & Others (Appellant) VS SME Bank Limited and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
278 Const. P. 696/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ashfaque Ali panhwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
279 J.M 34/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 ISMAIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED (Applicant) VS M/S SADIQ & SUHARWARDY & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
280 Const. P. 7460/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
281 Const. P. 1494/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
282 Const. P. 6656/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Galaxy Pharma Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
283 Const. P. 71/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 National Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
284 Suit 348/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Shafaat Ali & another. (Plaintiff) VS Syed Farhat Ali & Others. (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 19-AUG-23 Yes Plaintiff filed suit for recovery of damages for Malicious Civil Proceedings and Malicious Prosecution against Defendants. Whereas the Supreme Court of Pakistan had recognised malicious civil proceedings by the 1990s, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has only recently held that a claim in malicious prosecution could also be brought in relation to civil proceedings in Willers v. Joyce, [2016] UK SC44 (reported in 2016 SCMR 1841). Plaintiff was unable to establish through evidence the five (5) elements that form the basis for accepting or rejecting a suit for recovery of damages for malicious prosecution/malicious civil proceedings as laid down in the case of Niaz and Others v. Abdul Sattar and Others, PLD 2006 SC 432. In the circumstances, proving the six (6) principles for granting and/or refusing damages with regards to malicious prosecution/malicious civil proceedings as laid down in Muhammad Akram v. Mst Farman Bi, 1990 SC 28 is irrelevant. Suit dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
285 Const. P. 909/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Sikandar Ali Bangwar & Others (Petitioner) VS Learned District & Session Judge Kashmore & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
286 I. A 1/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Ali Raza Mugheri (Appellant) VS Ghulam Rasool Abro and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-24 Yes Banking Court assessed whether the Customer had any cause of action based on facts alleged and documents filed by the Financial Institution with its application for leave to defend. The Banking Court did not decide the leave to defend application and dismissed the suit based on finding no cause of action. The Banking Court had to assess the issue of cause of action based on the Plaint filed by the Customer. The customer's Appeal was allowed. The Banking Court to decide the leave to defend application first which may well include the issue of cause of action. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
287 Const. P. 119/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Khalid Ahmed Tanwri (Petitioner) VS District & Sessions Judge Shikarpur & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-FEB-24 Yes Three Brothers. Chachaa-Uncle-Petitioner allegedly co-owner of Suit Property impleaded only one brother's nephew in Suit but not the eldest brother. Nephew impleaded in Suit submitted in Written Statement interests of the eldest brother in the Suit Property. Eldest brother's children necessary party, impleaded by the trial court, and order upheld by Appellate Court. Petition challenging the two Orders of the lower Courts dismissed as Petition not maintainable in Writ Jurisdiction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
288 R.A (Civil Revision) 10/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Arslan Habib Buriro (Applicant) VS Rustam Ali Tunio (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-FEB-24 Yes After the recording of evidence, the trial court was operating in the second stage of the summary suit and had to dig deeper into the evidence to decide the suit. The evidence brought on record required greater scrutiny, and the threshold of the burden of proof was on a higher pedestal based on the general principles of the law of evidence. Yet the trial court decided against the applicant/defendant on the assumption that the production of the cheque was sufficient and/or no further proof was required as the cheque was a negotiable instrument. This may be one of the considerations in deciding an application for leave to defend, but it was not proper for the trial court to overlook the circumstantial evidence produced by the applicant-defendant-Arslan Buriro and available in the suit file surrounding the alleged loan and the cheque issuance. Revision against the Execution allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
289 I. A 34/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Irfan Sharuddin (Appellant) VS Yousuf Sadiq (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-OCT-23 No Title of Plaint listed three different addresses of Defendant. In the circumstances, whether the Appellant/Defendant was affected service on all three addresses mentioned in the title of the Plaint by Registered Post Acknowledgement Due was irrelevant. Validly served by bailiff, process server by pasting, and publication in the newspaper under Order 37 Rule 1(2). Yet the Appellant/Defendant did not file leave to defend application within time. Trial Court has not fallen under any error. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
290 Const. P. 342/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Nafees Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
291 Const. P. 4312/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
292 Const. P. 79/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Mashooque Ali Meerani (Petitioner) VS RO UC Amrote Sharif & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
293 Const. P. 4307/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
294 Const. P. 29/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Sher Muhammad Suhriyani (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak Election Commission Pak & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
295 Const. P. 7697/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mrs. Aliya Jafery (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
296 Const. P. 6396/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khawaja Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
297 Suit 276/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Kashan. (Plaintiff) VS Sindh Buildiing Control Authority. (Defendant) S.B. Order 20-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
298 R.A (Civil Revision) 11/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Muhammad Usman and Others (Applicant) VS Abdul Waheed Buriro and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
299 Cr.Bail 8/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Abdul Haleem Mahar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
300 Cr.Bail 161/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: Cr.Bail 191/2023 2023 Sher Ali Bullo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-JUN-23 Yes Post-arrest (custody) bail application of police officials arising from the escape of a lifer jail convict from Sukkur Central Jail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
301 Const. P. 5053/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mazhar Ali B. Chohan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Anwer and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
302 Suit 1795/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 THE LENDING TREE COMMERCIAL BROKERS LLC DUBAI (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-JUL-23 No On 15.11.2022 Court passed ex-parte ad-interim order on Plaintiff's Interlocutory Application restraining Defendants from taking coercive action detrimental to the rights of Plaintiff. Nazir's Reference dated 05.07.2023 disclosed fresh information previously not available. Defendants had yet to file their Counter-Affidavit. Court has the power to review such ex-parte ad-interim order. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
303 R.A (Civil Revision) 53/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Ghulam Abbas Kalhoro (Applicant) VS Asad Ali Channa and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 16-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
304 H.C.A 67/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: High Court Appeal No. 56 of 2020 High Court Appeal No. 57 of 2020 High Court Appeal No. 58 of 2020 2020 Abdul Sami Soomro (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
305 H.C.A 220/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Reckitt Benckiser Pakistan Limited (Appellant) VS Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
306 2024 CLD 264 Spl.H.C.A 137/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 National Tiles and Ceramics Ltd & Another (Appellant) VS Sindh Bank Limited & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Judgment-Debtor did not take any action under Order 21 Rules 89 or 90 CPC during the hearing of the appeal against the impugned Order passed by the learned Single Judge on Order 21 Rule 86 CPC, Division Bench passed. ad-interim Order beyond the scope of Order 21 Rule 89. Such an interim Order was a provisional measure subject to hearing the Auction-Purchaser; it was not final, did not meet the procedural requirements of CPC, and was barred by limitation. No grounds were agitated by the Judgment-Dector under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC. The period of 30 days under the Limitation Act of 1908 commenced from the date of sale (i.e. when the Court approved the sale pursuant to Order 21 Rule 86 CPC. Valuable rights had accrued to the Auction-Purchaser which could not be taken lightly. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
307 H.C.A 93/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Jameel Ahmed & Others (Appellant) VS Hayat Muhammad Sher Pao & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1297-K/2023 Hayat Muhammad Sher Pao & others v. Jameel Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
308 Suit 425/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2005 MRS.KHALIDA KHANUM. (Plaintiff) VS C.D.G.K. & OTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 13-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
309 I. A 42/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Niaz Yousuf (Appellant) VS Jehantab s/o Jahangir Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
310 Suit 1040/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 NASIR ALI (Plaintiff) VS SYED QAMAR HUSSAIN (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 26-AUG-23 Yes Plaintiff Buyer, within the time prescribed in the contract, made part payment of the Sale Price, whereafter Defendant Seller handed over the first floor of the bungalow on the suit property to Plaintiff. Plaintiff Buyer did not pay the outstanding balance sale price when he found out the suit property was mortgaged. Blamed Defendant Buyer for not executing the sale deed, expressed willingness and readiness to pay and filed suit for specific performance under the Specific Relief Act as well as claimed part performance under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act. Interpretation of where time is of the essence, proving readiness and willingness, criterion for curating discretionary relief where the cause of action accrued in 2005 and the case decided in 2023. Suit dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
311 H.C.A 220/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Anees Haider (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
312 Const. P. 7318/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Tahira Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
313 H.C.A 320/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Noor Ahmed Shaikh (Appellant) VS Syed Imtiaz Ali Zaidi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
314 Const. P. 41/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Jamsher Ogahi (Petitioner) VS The Election Commission Pak & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
315 H.C.A 407/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Asif Agencies through its Sole Proprietor Altaf (Appellant) VS Muhammad Anwar Mianoor and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
316 Const. P. 3170/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Karim Abdul Hameed and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
317 Cr.Bail 134/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mumtaz Hussain Malik (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-JUN-23 Yes The criminal bail application of police officials concerning the escape of a lifer jail convict from Sukkur Central Jail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
318 H.C.A 162/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Masuma Hasan (Appellant) VS Imtiaz Ali Khan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-NOV-23 Yes Factors regarding whether a dispute or objection of an objector, other than the legal heir of the deceased, as to ownership of property could be adjudicated within the framework of a suit for administration. Muhammad Zahid v. Mst. Ghazala Zakir and Others, PLD 2011 Karachi 83 followed along with updating and cross-referencing the several Judgments/Orders of the Division and Single Bench of this Court from 2015 onwards applying the principles laid down in the Ghazala Zakir case. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
319 Const. P. 7832/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Hashim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
320 Const. P. 5459/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 IBA (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
321 Const. P. 4321/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
322 Const. P. 4324/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
323 H.C.A 134/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Federation of Pakistan & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Al-Hassan Tech Engg. SVC (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1343-K/2023 Federation of Pakistan & others v. M/s. Al-Hassan Tech Eng. SVC. (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
324 Const. P. 132/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Millennium Mall Management Co (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JAN-24 Yes the power to levy, charge, impose and recover any or all tax(es) separately on immovable property is concerned it is an alien object under cantonment laws in the present frame of the Constitution. The tax on the annual rental value of immovable property is a tax and not a fee or any other genre of levy. The Cantonment Boards have no power to levy tax on immovable property including tax on annual rental value of immovable property. The Presidential Order 13 of 1979 has no effect on the subject after the revival of the Constitution and the 18th Amendment, and the subject law to the extent of provision of section 3 as applied, is no longer protected. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.102/2024 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defense, Govt of Pakistan Rawalpindi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company through its Managing Partner, Karachi and others,C.P.230/2024 Faisal Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Karachi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company, through its authorized managing partner and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
325 H.C.A 92/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Abdul Rehman & Others (Appellant) VS Asrar Ahmed Burney & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
326 Const. P. 7225/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Yousuf Master (Petitioner) VS A.D.J IV (Central) & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.L.A.4396/2022 UMAR TEXTILES thr. its Authorized Representative Mr. Muhammad Iqbal v. The Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
327 Const. P. 1013/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst. Farzana & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
328 Const. P. 4028/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aslam Assi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
329 H.C.A 42/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Amar Khan & Another (Appellant) VS Sahibzada Khan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
330 Const. P. 4319/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
331 Const. P. 3179/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Haji Moosa Khan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nazia and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-23 Yes Suggestions alone that they have given false evidence could not be materialized in favour of the petitioners as primary burden was discharged by plaintiffs/respondents. It is a cumulative effect of all evidence available on record that is to be seen and applied. In addition to it, this Court in terms of Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan cannot assume the jurisdiction which is otherwise not vested, that is reappraisal of evidence, which has been done by the revisional court and that is the last fact finding court. This Court could only intervene had the jurisdiction been exercised which was not vested and/or vested but not exercised. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1273-K/2023 Haji Moosa Khan (Late) through L.Rs. and others v. Mst. nazia Bibi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice)
332 Const. P. 4315/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
333 Const. P. 4756/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Asad Ali Awan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Naseem Begum & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
334 H.C.A 123/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ahsan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Suleman & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
335 Suit.B 109/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 BURJ BANK LTD. (Plaintiff) VS GULISTAN WEAVING MILLS LTD. & OTHERS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 11-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
336 I. A 4/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Saleem Ali Chandio (Appellant) VS Syed Abid Hussain Shah & another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-MAR-24 No The Appellant-Defendant had no ground to rely on an October 2018 payment mentioned in the Iqrarnama executed in November 2019, when the said payment was found not mentioned in the compromise Order recorded by the trial court in December 2018. Iqrarnama was reduced to a cipher in the face of the Decree passed on the basis of the Compromise Order. The unrecorded payment was not challenged in either appeal or review. The order attained finality. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
337 I. A 39/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Jamil Ahmed Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ahmed Siddiqui & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
338 H.C.A 407/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Qadir Bux & Ors (Appellant) VS Goernment of Sindh & Orsw (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
339 Suit 1161/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2004 MASTER TEXTILE MILLS LTD (Plaintiff) VS MASTER FABRIC & OTHER (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
340 Const. P. 4311/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
341 Const. P. 4326/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
342 Const. P. 6819/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Hoora Pharma (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
343 Suit 200/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Sadiq & Suharwardy (Plaintiff) VS Ismail Industries Limited (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 Yes These ten trademark suits currently pending in the High Court are disposed of in three different manner following the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Muhammad Multazam Raza v. Muhammad Ayub Khan, 2022 SCMR 979 in paragraph 12 and the enactment of the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2023, on 11.08.2023. The three actions on the part of the High Court depend on the category of trademark dispute: Category A - Suits for infringement currently pending in the High Court and filed prior to 29.12.2015 may be transferred to the IP Tribunal forthwith (Category ???A???). Category B - trademarks suits filed after 29.12.2015, currently pending in the High Court, the Plaint in such suits must be returned (Category ???B???) as High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the same. Finally, in cases involving a Suit connected with a J. Misc. Application involving either Section 73(4) [an application for revocation], Section 80(4) [an application for declaration of invalidity], Section 96(2) [an application for rectification], etc, the High Court may retain jurisdiction and proceed with deciding both Suit and J. Misc. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
344 Suit 579/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 RAIS JAFRY (Plaintiff) VS TALAT AFROZE & OTHER (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 15-AUG-23 No Suit for Declaration involving Pre-lease Suit Property. Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 had competing Allotment Orders issued by Defendant No.2. Issues were framed as to who was the real owner: Plaintiff or Defendant. Ordinarily, the onus of proof was on Plaintiff; . In the present case the burden of proof was on Plaintiff to prove his title in the suit property. However, when the Court framed issues, it acknowledged Defendant No. 1's assertion of her title in the said property and framed the issue accordingly. Defendant No.2 produced documents establishing chain of title. Plaintiff did not confront the genuineness of the title document in favour of Plaintiff issued by Defendant No.2. He did not adduce evidence to corroborate the payment vouchers/challans through witness of the bank. Plaintiff failed to prove his case. Suit dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
345 Const. P. 5167/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Amin Chapal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
346 Cr.Bail 40/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Tufail Ahmed Bangulani and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
347 Const. P. 85/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Fayyaz Ai Butt (Petitioner) VS RO PS-81 Mehar, District Dadu & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-FEB-24 No Change in Polling Station - Petitioner had filed objections - no case made out for any interference. Petition dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
348 H.C.A 172/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 New Thatta Sugar Mills Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS Sindh Sugar Corporation Limited & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-NOV-23 No While the learned Single Judge disposed of the OA Ref. No.2015, yet he says that, ???Till the next date of hearing, no further sale and transfer be made of Dadu Sugar Mills and Thatta Sugar Mills and no payment be made to creditors, contributors, or any third party.??? It appears that the learned Single Judge may have been silent as it was an ???ad-interim??? Order, as opposed to a final order. Additionally, the learned Single Judge was apparently going to hear other pending matters on the next date of hearing, which included the unsuccessful bidder, Sooraj Enterprises Ltd. two (2) applications, namely, Application under Order 39 Rules 1&2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC seeking suspension of the Orders dated 14.02.2013 and 11.04.2013 (CMA No.147/2014) and another Application under Section 12(2) CPC (CMA No.148/2014). As such, as the learned Single Judge expected to hear the Appellant/Auction-Purchaser in future, he made no concrete remarks to prejudice the Appellant???s case and chose to remain silent and passed an ad-interim Order only. No interference is to be made as the matter is likely to be heard by the learned Single Judge to examine the conclusions/issues in the Impugned ad-interim Order of the learned Single Judge dated 07.09.2021 after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the parties, including the Appellant (auction purchaser), to file written reply, counter-affidavit and rejoinder, as the case may be. It is best that the Appellant/Auction-Purchaser defend the proceedings in JCM No.15/2006 and once and for all put to rest the challenges raised against the auction-purchasers. The remarks made by the learned Single Judge shall be treated as tentative subject to re-hearing of all the parties and stakeholders. Appeal allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
349 Const. P. 4644/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sardar Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Memon Group of Ind. & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
350 Const. P. 2970/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sana Hussain Merchant and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
351 Const. P. 7458/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Moosa and Another (Petitioner) VS Mst. Zubaida Lohar Warda and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
352 H.C.A 453/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ghulam Hussain Jaffar (Appellant) VS Dr. Nazeer Hussain Kalhoro & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
353 Const. P. 6397/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khawaja Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
354 H.C.A 463/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Karachi Development Authority (Appellant) VS Lal Muhammad Brohi & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-NOV-23 No Although the appeal is otherwise time barred, had court fee be affixed with the appeal, it???s belated attempt has further made the case more miserable as the time that was consumed in filing the court fee will also be added as the time consumed in filing the appeal, thus the appeal is barred by time. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.1325-K/2023 Karachi Development Authority v. Lal Muhammad Brohi deceased through his L.Rs. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
355 Const. P. 5177/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
356 I. A 76/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Karim Momnani & Another (Appellant) VS M/S. Habib Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-DEC-23 Yes Appellant-Customer challenged the Banking Court judgment and decree not in appeal but by filing an Application under Section 12(2) CPC alleging that the branch manager had misappropriated funds from the Appellant-Customer's running finance account. Appellant-Customer grounds for alleged fraud and misrepresentation focussed on entries in the Statement of Accounts. No case was made out under Section 12(2) CPC. Appeal dismissed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
357 Const. P. 3137/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP. D 132 of 2019 2023 Yasmeen Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
358 Const. P. 1038/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Aneelan and an Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
359 2024 CLD 525 H.C.A 171/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 New Dadu Sugar Mills Pvt Ltd. (Appellant) VS Sindh Sugar Corporation Limited & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-NOV-23 Yes Article 10A serves as a safeguard for individuals condemned without a fair hearing, ensuring that actions taken against such individuals adhere to the principles of due process of law. In the instant case, Article 10A of the Constitution guaranteed the right to a free trial, and as auction purchasers, this right was unmistakably infringed upon when the Court failed to provide them with notice. A thorough examination of the appeal file reveals a glaring absence of notice to the auction purchaser, a procedural step that the Court should have diligently observed. The Appellants filed their appeals without delay as soon as they received notice from the Official Assignee as Provisional Manager about passing the Order dated 07.09.2021. A breach of Article 10-A of the Constitution of Pakistan is evident. The Appellants were not present before the learned Single Judge to assist the Court in the proceedings. Appeal allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
360 H.C.A 397/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Amir Khan through Attorney M. Feroze (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-JAN-24 Yes Appeal filed against an ad-interim Order, parties will have a right of appeal when the applications are finally decided. At the moment, Pink Residency obtained an injunction when no final decree could be passed which issue is yet to be finally decided. Parties (Appellant, Intervener/Pink Residency/Official Government) chain of title in Suit Property yet to be decided? Intervener/Pink Residency is yet to explain how it obtained possession after Nazir presumably handed it over to the Appellant. Several issues are yet to be decided, Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
361 Suit 2232/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ontex Pakistan (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Mr. Abdul Sattar (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
362 Cr.Rev 15/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Syed Saqlain Shah Lakyari (Applicant) VS The State & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
363 R.A (Civil Revision) 60/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Himath Ali and others (Applicant) VS Riaz Hussain and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
364 Const. P. 6755/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Jehanzaib Hassan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Raeesa Bano and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
365 Suit 33/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 MRS GHAZAL RIAZ. (Plaintiff) VS LIAQUAT HUSSAIN & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 16-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
366 Const. P. 840/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Fouzia Owais Kalia and another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
367 I. A 5/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Faheem Hussain Zaidi (Appellant) VS Saeed & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
368 Const. P. 1228/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Meomoona Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
369 Const. P. 2278/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ayub and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-23 Yes The syntax concerning the slash (/) sign repeatedly used in the General Power of Attorney has, context and deeper meaning, is a tool of interpretation and provides a signpost to the person relying on it to plead his rights. Therefore, there is merit in spending some time with the slash (/) sign to decide this Petition. The Orders of the trial court and the District Court, both forums have not given importance to the slash ( / ) sign appearing in the General Power of Attorney.???. The use of slash (/) meant that the word ???case??? and ???property??? should be read interchangeably. As discussed hereinabove as ???case and/or property???. This meant that all the powers set out in the General Power of Attorney related to both the Suit and the Subject Property. A restrictive meaning could not be read into the General Power of Attorney. A power of attorney, which is related to the accretion of the right to the properties and assets of the principal, has to be interpreted liberally and not in a restrictive and stringent manner. Petition allowed. Application under Section 12(2) remanded to the trial court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
370 I. A 88/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Bin Yamin & Another (Appellant) VS Muhammad Arshad & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
371 H.C.A 242/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dadabhoy Foundation & another (Appellant) VS K. B. C. A. & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-23 Yes The order passed in JM has not given a license to carry on construction in violation of status quo order. In fact it restrained the parties from raising construction. Even the permission claimed from Sindh Building Control Authority is of no avail in presence of status quo order and the matter being subjudice. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
372 Const. P. 4314/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
373 Spl.H.C.A 25/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Soneri Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS Elite Publishers Limited & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
374 Const. P. 4327/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
375 Const. P. 3135/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Millennium Mall Management Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
376 Suit 2100/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SAYED MUHAMMAD TANVEER AHMED (Plaintiff) VS SYED MUHAMMAD SOHAIL AHMED QUTTABI & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
377 Adm. Suit 16/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 Amsa Marine Aid (Plaintiff) VS M.V. Tolmi & Another (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 07-AUG-23 Yes Admiralty suit filed for necessaries sustainable in rem against the same vessel but to operate against any other vessel action must meet statutory requirements of Section 4 of the Admiralty Jurisdiction of High Courts Ordinance, 1980 unless Plaintiff succeeds in establishing fraud. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
378 Const. P. 852/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Kiran & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
379 H.C.A 372/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s National Refinery Limited (Appellant) VS Syed Mansoor Ali and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-NOV-23 Yes Sub-section-2 of Section-3 provides an appeal to a Bench of two or more Judges of High Court from an order made by a single Judge of that Court under clause-1 of Article-199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, not being an order made under subparagraph (i) of paragraph (b) of that clause. To our understanding, it excludes an appeal in relation to a subject summarized in Article199(1)(b)(i), whereas, rest of the "subjects" of Article-199(1) have been subjected to appeal. Subject of dismissal of a claim made under Section-15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is already subjected to appeal under Section-17, but this is not the ???subject??? which could be impugned in any of the lower fora and hence neither appeal nor petition is a remedy. For the purpose of appeal under Law Reforms Ordinance or this appeal in particular wherefrom the impugned order has arisen, out of proceeding under Article-199 from a single Bench, we may sum-up by referring to Appellate side of Sindh Chief Court Rules. Rule-8 confers jurisdiction ordinarily exercised by two Judges of this Court, except otherwise provided by law in particular. Similarly Rule-9 discussed matter to be decided by single Judge of appellate side, not necessarily under Article-199 as there may be some miscellaneous lis etc. Such work (subject) assigned under Rule9 ibid is not the one impugned by the appellant before learned single Judge, hence jurisdiction was not vested and incorrectly exercised. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.4312/2023 National Refinery Limited, Karachi v. Syed Mansoor Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
380 H.C.A 246/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Raheel Shehzad (Appellant) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
381 I. A 35/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Irfan Sharuddin (Appellant) VS Yousuf Sadiq (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-OCT-23 No CPC - Summary Suit - Order V Rule 20 - Appellant/Defendant spouse, not Pardahnasheen, acknowledged and signed off summon. No leave to defend filed. Appeal dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
382 I. A 224/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Sajid Brothers & Co. & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Allied Bank Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
383 I. A 55/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Fida Muhammad (Appellant) VS Shahnawaz Khan & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-OCT-23 No The trial court Judge rightly observed that the presumption regarding the cheques in question under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is to be admitted. Fida has not raised any material grounds in this First Appeal to negate such inference. The trial court even took the more conservative and cautious approach in a summary suit, by not immediately announcing judgment and decree. Instead, the trial court ordered Shahnawaz Khan to file an affidavit in evidence of ex-parte proof before passing judgment and decree. This enabled the trial court to satisfy itself further as to the veracity of Shahnawaz Khan???s claim against Fida. Handing over KIA Sportage , no proof of payment for the Court to assume the negotiable instrument ought to be returned to Appellant/Defendant. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
384 Const. P. 5769/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ashraf Khan (Petitioner) VS Islamic Republic of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
385 Const. P. 82/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Syed Amjad Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-JAN-24 No Grounds taken for rejecting nomination papers were not material. Petition allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
386 H.C.A 58/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: High Court Appeal No. 56 of 2020 High Court Appeal No. 57 of 2020 and High Court Appeal No. 67 of 202 2020 Engineer Anwer Aleem (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
387 H.C.A 379/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Town Municipal Corporation, Gadap Town (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
388 Suit.B 40/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND (Plaintiff) VS ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INT. (PVT) LTD. & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-DEC-23 Yes Discretion of Banking Court to appoint Commission for Accounts / Amicus Curiae. Parties have no role in selection. Amicus Curiae must meet statutory requirements under FIO, 2001 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
389 I. A 75/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Jabbar Ghazaini (Appellant) VS Tahir Ahmed Khan & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
390 Suit 1051/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zeeshan Ahmed Durrani & another (Plaintiff) VS Habib Education Trust & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 17-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
391 Const. P. 4643/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Pervez Arshad Choudhary (Petitioner) VS Farzana Saleem and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
392 H.C.A 57/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: High Court Appeal No. 56 of 2020 , High Court Appeal No. 58 of 2020 High Court Appeal No. 67 of 202 2020 Muhammad Anis Uddin (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
393 H.C.A 35/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Nafees Zubair through her attorney (Appellant) VS Saeeda Bano & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
394 Const. P. 3426/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s National Medical Centre (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
395 I. A 123/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 MCB Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS Syed Asghar Abbas (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
396 Const. P. 48/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s Aisha Steel Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
397 Suit 2679/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Paramount International Export, Ltd (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Saleem & Others (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
398 Const. P. 8375/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Fine Cotton (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
399 Const. P. 3763/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Inayatullah Abbas (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
400 Const. P. 6658/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Serajsons Printers Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
401 R.A (Civil Revision) 94/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Wazeer Hussain Brohi (Applicant) VS Syed Sabir Shah & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-MAR-24 No Non-filing of material documents need not be fatal to the Revision. Depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Dismissing one Revision on the ground of non-filing of relevant documents, especially when the opposing parties have each preferred Civil Revisions arising from the same disputed subject-matter may be too harsh an approach. Civil Revisions should be decided on merits. Even otherwise, the records and documents the parties rely on in the two cases are similar, and the lis appears to have been listed together for the last several dates of hearing, although it has not been tagged. Consistency demands that both Revisions be decided together. The interlocutory challenge to the filing of Revision dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
402 Const. P. 5062/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS Furqan uddin Usmani and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-OCT-23 Yes Petitioner did not file a List of Witnesses under Order 16 Rule 1 CPC at the appropriate stage of the trial. Application to introduce material witnesses to Sale Agreement as Defendant Witnesses dismissed (by trial court???s Order dated 11.01.2022). Subsequently, an Application to summon Government Officers as Court witnesses was also dismissed (by trial court???s order dated 28.05.2022). In Civil Revision and, again in Petition, the Court cannot consider the trial court???s Order dated 11.01.2022 in a Petition/Revision, which challenges the trial court???s order dated 28.05.2022 and vice versa as pleaded in a separate Petition. Court ability to mould relief in writ jurisdiction constrained under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
403 Spl.H.C.A 183/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Batool Begum & Others (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-MAR-24 No Appellant-Customer, in his Leave to Defend Application in terms of Section 10-4 of FIO, 2001, admitted a certain amount as outstanding and payable by him and in the same breathe also alleged another (notional) sum should be set off. The Banking Court passed a decree in the suit in terms of the admission and granted conditional leave for the balance amount, was well within the powers of the Banking Court. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
404 Spl. Cr. A. 31/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Bacha Khan Khilji (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-JUN-23 Yes The Complainant and Investigation Officer were the same person, the threshold of the constitution of conscious possession of the accused under the Control of Narcotics Substance Act, safe custody and safe transmission established where the sample remains sealed and contradictions in witness statements and the memos prepared to be understood in the background of surrounding facts. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) Crl.P.134-K/2023 Bacha Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
405 Const. P. 4308/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
406 Const. P. 4313/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
407 H.C.A 39/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Qasim & another (Appellant) VS M/s. Gulshan-e-Faisal & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-FEB-24 Yes Notarized Oral Gift Deed could not be proved. Representative of Society filed a vague Written Statement and did not step into the witness box. The subsequent chain of registered sale deeds, including the Appellant-Defendant proving the registration of the sale deed, could not rescue them once the entire superstructure of sale deeds collapsed. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
408 Const. P. 4316/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
409 Const. P. 5811/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Rehan Mansoor (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
410 Const. P. 6806/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Synergy Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
411 Const. P. 6811/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Palpex Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
412 R.A (Civil Revision) 5/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Sher Khan Jakhrani (Applicant) VS Deputy Assistant Manager NADRA, Kashmore & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-FEB-24 Yes If the date mentioned on the Primary School Certificate was to be believed by the Applicant/Plaintiff when he applied for CNIC and furnished his information on Form A submitted to NADRA, he would be underage at the time of issuance of his CNIC (less than 18 years). Further, the Applicant/Plaintiff filed the same claim twice, first in 2015 and then again in 2020. Each application to NADRA does not constitute a fresh cause of action. Revision dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
413 Const. P. 50/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Rustam Khan Baghdar (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pak & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
414 Const. P. 715/1996 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1996 MST ANILA ABRAR (Petitioner) VS GOVT. OF SINDH AND OTHERS (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-MAR-24 Yes i-Section 10(2) of the Citizen Act gives a preferential treatment to the spouse of Pakistani man vis-??-vis a Pakistani woman and thus infringes constitutional guarantees ii-The object is foreign spouses and not just foreign wives and thus making of 10(2) and reading it now may vary with constitutional demands. The intent of the said provision is not to encourage or facilitate women to marry Pakistani men. The concept which now emerged through international jurisprudence is to enable Pakistanis married to foreigners to be able to live together and acquire nationality for their spouses and live a family life in Pakistan and the Act of 1951 should now be read and tamed accordingly. Restricting the benefit of Section 10(2) to Pakistani men only is a clear discrimination to Pakistani women. 45. The doctrine of reading in is used by Courts to extend the scope to avoid and limit the discriminatory language having head-on conflict with a constitutional provision. The doctrine of ???reading in??? involves adding words to a statutory provision to bring it in conformity with constitutional provisions. iii- The application of "reading in" is required to cater section 10(2) of the Citizenship Act to save it from offending Article 25 of the Constitution that is wherever reference is made to ???woman??? and ???she??? therein; the words "or man" and "or he" be read. This adjustment shall not have any effect on the operability of the statute. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
415 I. A 74/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Majeed Ghazaini & another (Appellant) VS Arshad Iqbal & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
416 H.C.A 234/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: HCA 233 of 2019 2019 Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Appellant) VS SPEC Energy DMCC & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
417 Cr.Ref 1/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 The State (Ref. by ATC Judge Shikarpur) (Applicant) VS Abdul Nabi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
418 Const. P. 476/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Mst. Mumtaz Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
419 Suit 368/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZEDCO (Plaintiff) VS TERUMO BCT ASIA PTE LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 07-JUL-23 Yes No interim relief can be granted, which is not prayed for in the main suit. The prayer clause in the main suit seeks orders to restrain Defendants from transferring the Plaintiff???s licence to another person. But the impugned decision of Defendant No.2 does not relate to the transfer of the import license. The impugned decision is for the cancellation of the import license of Plaintiff and not transfer. Thus, the interim relief sought by Plaintiff in CMA No.9885/2023 is not pleaded in the main suit. Further, Court proceedings will take their own time, whereas the medical devices of Defendant No.1 in circulation have a limited shelf life. A court should be mindful that when granting discretionary relief, its decision may not create a potential risk to the public. Therefore, this Court should avoid creating a new situation from a public health perspective too and is not inclined to withdraw the impugned decision on this score too. CMA No.9885/2023 is dismissed with directions to the Appellate Board of the Authority that if the Plaintiff prefers an appeal to the impugned decision before the Board, then the Board will give the Plaintiff an opportunity to be heard, including a personal hearing before passing any final order in the appeal. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
420 H.C.A 334/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Madni Ahmed Ali Arafat Siddiqui (Appellant) VS Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
421 Const. P. 4421/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mehboob Sher (Petitioner) VS Talha Naseem and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
422 H.C.A 316/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Zahid Rasheed (Appellant) VS Anita Nalini Das & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
423 I. A 10/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Farhan Dahri and Another (Appellant) VS M/S Sindh Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
424 Suit 624/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 ISMAIL SATTAR & ORS (Plaintiff) VS LIAQUAT NATIONAL HOSPITAL & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Order 13-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
425 Const. P. 5673/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Muhammad Afsar Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
426 Const. P. 1494/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: CPD 1742 of 2021 2021 Amjad Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
427 Criminal Miscelleneous 22/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Azizullah Shah & other (Petitioner) VS The State & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
428 I. A 66/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Taqi Abbas (Appellant) VS Syed Naqi Abbas (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
429 Const. P. 8194/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Imran Razi Ahmed Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Arshad Awan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-DEC-23 Yes Petitioner-Intervener relying on an unregistered sale deed objecting to auction proceedings has no legs to stand. Petition dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
430 Suit 796/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2004 AHMED KHAN (Plaintiff) VS CITY DIST. GOVT. & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 02-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
431 Const. P. 5647/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ambreen Mansoor (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
432 Suit 1396/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 DR.ZULFIQAR ALI MIRZA (Plaintiff) VS ARBAB GHULAM RAHIM (Defendant) S.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
433 H.C.A 20/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Azizur Rehman Chaudhary (Appellant) VS Captain Muhammad Aijaz Haroon & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
434 I. A 11/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mrs. Nazima Aqeel & others (Appellant) VS Atif Ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
435 H.C.A 321/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Zubair (Appellant) VS Syed Imtiaz Ali Zaidi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
436 Const. P. 6707/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Younus and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
437 Const. P. 48/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Muhammad Mohsin Khan Sarki (Petitioner) VS The DC DRO Jacobabad & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
438 Const. P. 3538/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Trump Management (Petitioner) VS Faisal Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
439 Const. P. 6661/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mediplas Innovations Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
440 Suit 161/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 22-DEC-23 No The Plaintiff's claim for relief was partly in tort. On the plaintiff's demise, this claim for damages under tort died with the Plaintiff, and the right to agitate this claim (Issue No.2) did not survive to his legal heirs. Additionally, the head of this claim does not fall within the said exception in Order XXII Rule 6 CPC. Reliance placed on Zahid Hussain Awan v. United Bank Limited, 2018 MLD 1369. Even otherwise the Plaintiffs have failed to prove their claim. It was incumbent upon the Plaintiffs to show as to and under which head of account and how such damages have been sustained against Government Officers. In the absence of such proof, special damages cannot be allowed. General damages are loss or injury sustained or caused as the direct or proximate consequence of the wrongful act. No loss or injury was proved. Claim for damages may fail, but Plaintiff proved by evidence suit for declaration of title, cancellation of registered power of attorney and permanent injunction not to disturb in the exercise of his rights. Suit decreed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
441 Suit 2150/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s. Allied Plastic Industries (Pvt.) Ltd (Plaintiff) VS M/s. ICC Chemical Corporation & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 10-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
442 Const. P. 3359/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saad Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
443 I. A 87/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Zia Rasool (Appellant) VS Syed Tanveer Alam and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
444 H.C.A 227/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Mustafa (Appellant) VS Muhammad Younis & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
445 I. A 82/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Ifrahim & Another (Appellant) VS M/S. JS Bank Limited and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-DEC-23 Yes The value and/or forced sale value is provided in the sale proclamation only as equity and to have an idea about the possible price. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
446 Const. P. 8166/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abeer Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
447 I. A 13/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Tariq Tufail (Appellant) VS Aamir Ali & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
448 H.C.A 74/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Standard Chartered Bank (Pak) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Mst. Fatima Ehsan Al Ghori & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-23 Yes The appellant perhaps on their own obtained expert opinion on the basis of the photocopies which could not be considered at all on several counts. Firstly, it was done at their own and whatever material provided to the alleged expert is not known either to the respondent or to the Court. Secondly, undisputedly the report was based on the photocopy of a material document which is seriously disputed and was never produced throughout the proceedings and any forensic report of an expert based on photocopy, that too obtained unilaterally, cannot be relied upon and would be gross miscarriage of justice, if that is considered. Who acknowledged those bearer certificates is also a mystery and where and how such certificates were encashed (although were bearer) is also an untraced history and the appellant negligently avoided to lead evidence. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
449 I. A 94/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Jamil Ahmed Junejo & another (Appellant) VS M/s. Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd. (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
450 I. A 4/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Dr. Bhagwandas and another (Appellant) VS Mashooq Ali Jatoi and Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-MAR-24 Yes Defamation suits are regulated by special law. The non-compliance of the statutory requirement under Section 8 meant that the defamation claim could not be maintained. The first Appeal was dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
451 Const. P. 5929/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed MIthal Shah (Petitioner) VS Zareen Rubab and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
452 H.C.A 5/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Delhi Mercantile Muslim Co-Op Housing Society Ltd. (Appellant) VS Searle Company Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
453 H.C.A 409/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammed AnisUddin (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
454 Const. P. 5521/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Bilqis Khalid and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
455 Const. P. 6657/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Universal Packaging Co. Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
456 Const. P. 6809/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s Khan Brothers (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
457 Const. P. 1055/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ali Muhammad Khoso & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
458 Const. P. 74/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Iqrar Ali Jakhrani (Petitioner) VS The Election Commission Pak & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
459 H.C.A 326/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mrs. Tanvir Qazi (Appellant) VS Moin us Samad Khan & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-DEC-23 Yes The burden of proving fraud is always on the party alleging it, which in the instant case is appellant, which should be based on clear, strong and convincing and/or independent evidence, particularly when long period has expired and valuable rights have accrued to the other side, which in the instant case is respondent No.1 who since 2008 is pursuing his case for recovery. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.43-K/2024 Mrs, Tanvir Kazi v. Moin Us Samad Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
460 Const. P. 19/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Air Indus (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS The Collector of Customs and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
461 Const. P. 105/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Muzafar Ali Brohi & Another (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
462 J.M 34/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 ISMAIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED (Applicant) VS M/S SADIQ & SUHARWARDY & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-AUG-23 No Transfer of Intellectual Property Matter to IP Tribunal of Sindh at Karachi Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
463 Const. P. 71/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Hassan Sabir (Petitioner) VS R.O NA-236 & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-JAN-24 No Re-election symbol. Valid reasons given by Election Tribunal for allowing appeal against rejection. Petition dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
464 Const. P. 498/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Khalique Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
465 Const. P. 4985/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ahsanullah Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
466 Const. P. 6654/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Jalil Packaging (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana C.P.233/2024 Cantonment Board Korangi Creek through Executive Officer, Karachi v. Jalil Packaging through its Managing Partner, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
467 Const. P. 1226/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Sardar Bux Mirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
468 I. A 47/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Sajid Nawaz Khan (Appellant) VS Muzammil Rao & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
469 H.C.A 128/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Rifat Saeed & another (Appellant) VS Zahid Saeed & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-FEB-24 Yes Plaintiffs prayed for a restraining order, which is a form of equitable and discretionary relief that is to be invoked in the aid of justice and not to aid injustice and favor one party over another. If we do not grant relief, then the subject matter of the suit, which is essentially a family dispute, may well become complicated and potentially frustrate the decree, if any. While a case for stay is made out, which is allowed however the trial court correctly dismissed the Receiver's appointment because receivership is the harshest remedy in civil law Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
470 I. A 84/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Qasim Jamali (Appellant) VS Learned Court of 4th ADJ Karachi East and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
471 Const. P. 4320/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 State Life Insurance Corp. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
472 I. A 6/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Ali Imran (Appellant) VS J.S Bank Limited & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
473 Suit.B 49/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 M/S.TRADESMAN INT. (Plaintiff) VS M/S.STANDARD CHARTERED (Defendant) S.B. Order 28-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
474 H.C.A 377/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Raza Ali Zaidi and Another (Appellant) VS Syed Ziauddin and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-23 No Respondent No.1/Syed Ziauddin???s civil suit for compensation and damages has alleged negligence and breach of law by the Appellant brothers and Respondent Nos.2 to 5. Respondent No.1/Syed Ziauddin has identified and set out valid causes of action in support of his claim. The onus is on Syed Ziauddin (the Plaintiff) to show that he is entitled to the relief as prayed. The issues raised by him are mixed questions of law and fact. The claim is not based on purely legal grounds, which can be decided at the initial stage without recording evidence. No case is made out for rejection of the Plaint and/or dismissal of the suit. Appeal dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
475 I. A 3/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Late Ghulam Muhammad & Others (Appellant) VS Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-FEB-24 Yes The Bank did not implead all the legal heirs in the banking suit. Only those legal heirs of the deceased Customer known to the bank were impleaded. The suit was decreed against the Bank. It was held that the decree is enforceable against the mortgaged property of the deceased Customer. The Bank has priority over the legal heirs shares in the said mortgaged property. The fact that the Bank discovered in appellate proceedings that it had not impleaded all the legal heirs is of no consequence. The Judgment-Debtors/Legal Heirs of the deceased customer's challenge to the Banking Court???s decree was dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
476 H.C.A 31/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saeed Ahmed (Appellant) VS Muhammad Saleem & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
477 I. A 76/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Javed Kamal (Appellant) VS Muhammad Farid Qureshi (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
478 Const. P. 1251/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sadiq Rajani (Petitioner) VS C.B.C and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
479 Criminal Appeal 27/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2023 Nek Mohammad Soomro (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
480 Const. P. 398/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Afaque Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
481 I. A 3/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Abdul Rasheed Arain. (Appellant) VS ZTBL Warah Branch and Others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
482 Spl.Cr.J.A 18/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Muhammad Younis Noorani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-JUN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana J.P.314/2023 Muhammad Younis v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
483 Suit.B 45/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 THE BANK OF PUNJAB (Plaintiff) VS M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Defendant) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 Yes Condonation Application to allow Defendant Customer to file leave to defend application in Banking Suit allowed. Summons were defective, as Plaintiff Bank did not include the registered address of the Defendant Company in the title of the Plaint. Plaintiff relied on Musharaka Agreement which mentioned the previously registered address. Subsequently, Defendant Company notified the change of registered address to PSX, SECP and updated its website page. Defendant Customer did not notify Plaintiff Bank. Order 29 CPC mandatory. Registered Post Acknowledgment and Delivery Report of summons were not available. Bailiff, on his own volition, reached the registered address of Defendant Company. Publication of Summons alleged by Defendant was not in its knowledge. In the circumstances and based on case law, Defendant Condonation Application allowed and Leave to Defend taken on record with the same to be decided in accordance with law, including Plaintiff's right to file replication, if so desired. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
484 Suit 1276/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2001 VIRGIN ENTERPRIES LTD. (Plaintiff) VS VIRGIN EXPRESS INT. PVT. LTD. & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 29-AUG-23 Yes Following the establishment of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of Sindh at Karachi, even if the Companies Act, 2017, provides a framework to change/rectify a company's name, where, in the opinion of the Registrar, the name of the Company is identical to or resembles or is similar to the name of a company, the High Court cannot transfer the suit partly relating to Trade Marks and Passing off while retaining the suit regarding injunctive relief under the Companies Act, 2017. The entire suit has to be transferred to the Intellectual Property Tribunal and left to the Plaintiff to take appropriate steps to seek such relief in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
485 Suit 1744/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/S SHAMI GENERAL TRADING LLC (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 14-JUL-23 No On 17.11.2022 Court passed ex-parte ad-interim order on Plaintiff's Interlocutory Application. Defendants in spite of entering appearance did not bother to file Counter-Affidavit. Nazir's Report dated 05.07.2023 introduced fresh information. Court has the power to modify its Order for ends of justice even prior to the hearing of the interlocutory application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
486 H.C.A 196/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Islamic Educational Society (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
487 H.C.A 51/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Fahimul Huda (Appellant) VS Anwarul Huda & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-23 No Since consolidation order of suits in which this court has pecuniary jurisdiction has already been passed, even if the value of the Suit bearing No.1452/99 is lesser than pecuniary jurisdiction of the court the proceedings under such suit can be retained as greater/enhanced pecuniary jurisdiction includes lesser pecuniary jurisdiction in it and learned judge rightly passed the order dismissing the application for transfer of the suit from this court to civil court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
488 Const. P. 6804/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Alpino Food (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
489 Const. P. 6659/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Prince Art Packages Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
490 H.C.A 150/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tariq Mehmood (Appellant) VS PALPA Pilots Occupational Disability Funds (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
491 Const. P. 7408/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS IInd A.D.J & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-JAN-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
492 Const. P. 7783/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mrs. Shama Aslam (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
493 Const. P. 6444/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mrs. Najma Asif Sajan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
494 Const. P. 49/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 Zulfiqar Ali Seelro (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pak & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
495 I. A 61/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Muzammil through attorney (Appellant) VS Khurram Saeed (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-NOV-23 No The Appellant-Defendant in a Summary Suit took the plea of Article 10-A. He had also filed suit for cancellation. Article 10-A is applicable where a person is condemned unheard or action against a person is taken without resorting to due process of law. This is clearly not the case. If anything, the trial court's record highlighted evidenced repeated indulgence granted by the trial court to Muzammil???s Counsel to defend the summary suit. He was not condemned unheard by the trial court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) C.P.18-K/2024 Muhammad Muzzammil v. Khurram Saeed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
496 Const. P. 3532/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Gul Naz (Petitioner) VS Faisal Canotnment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
497 H.C.A 214/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ziauddin University & Another (Appellant) VS Basit Nazir (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
498 Const. P. 4707/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Bilal Saulat (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Tariq and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
499 H.C.A 271/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Farzana Arshad & Another (Appellant) VS Mst. Shazia Kamran & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
500 Const. P. 4795/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Muhammad Ghous (Petitioner) VS Mst. Najma & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-OCT-23 No Petitioner can now neither take benefit of proviso to Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, nor has he been able to establish to be a bona fide purchaser for valuable consideration without notice under section 27(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1877. Lastly, the Petitioner/Applicant did not act prudently. He had remedies available to him for the redressal of his grievance, including filing a suit for specific performance, yet he took the path less travelled by attempting to prove his title by filing a 12(2) CPC application. Petition dismissed. Trial court and district court impugned orders dismissing the Petitioner's Application under Section 12(2) are upheld. No disturbance is required. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)