Export
Report-002 AFR

Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.

Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:

Show Only Authored Judgements/Orders

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi

High Court of Sindh, Principal Seat Karachi, Bench at Sukkur, Circuit Courts at Hyderabad and Larkana
S.No. Citation Case No. Case Year Parties Bench Type Order/Judgment Order_Date A.F.R Head Notes/ Tag Line Bench Apex Court Apex Status
1 Cr.J.A 56/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Arz Muhammad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
2 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 368/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ATIF MEHMOOD S/O ALI ASGHAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
3 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 269/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 SHEERAZ @ SHAHZAD S/O MIR DOST (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-OCT-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
4 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 169/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD ABID HUSSAIN @ TAO S/O GHULAM MUJTABA (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
5 2020 YLR Note 1557 Criminal Appeal 419/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 BABAR MASIH S/O SABIR MASIH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
6 2020 PCr.LJ 928 Cr.Acq.A. 44/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sajjan S/o Muhammad Ramzan (Appellant) VS Mehboob Ali and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
7 2020 PCr.LJ 780 Cr.Bail 872/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mirza Ali Adil Baig (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
8 2020 PCr.LJ Note 90 Cr.Bail 191/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ibrahim (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
9 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 170/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD ABID HUSSAIN @ TAO S/O GHULAM MUJTABA (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
10 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 355/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 SHAHZAD KAMRAN S/O QADIR BUX (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
11 Const. P. 4203/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Kausar Jabeen (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.829-K/2020 Kausar Jabeen & another v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
12 Cr.Acctt.A 31/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD ASAD ABBASI S/O MUHAMMAD KHURSHID ABBASI (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.1338/2020 Chairman National Acountability Bureau through Prosector General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Muhammad Asad Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
13 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 52/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 JILANI @ JAVED S/O DUWA KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
14 Cr.Bail 424/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Wajid Pahore (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-FEB-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
15 Cr.Bail 491/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Janib Jagirani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-FEB-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
16 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 304/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 SAINDAD S/O MEER MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
17 Cr.Acctt.A 39/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 KARAMUDDIN PANHYAR S/O KORAL KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH NAB (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-SEP-20 Yes Since the appellant is the sole breadwinner of a large family, old age of above 60 years and no loss has occurred to the Government therefore in our view is capable of reformation under such circumstances, we hereby dismiss the instant appeal of the appellant on merits but since we find the sentence rather harsh keeping in view the submissions of the appellant , we hereby reduce/alter the sentences of the appellant and convict him under section 9(a) (vi) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 and sentence him to suffer R.I. for five (05) years and to pay fine of Rs.500,000/- (five lac). The appellant shall forthwith cease to hold public office, if any, held by him and he stands disqualified for a period of ten (10) years to be reckoned from the date of elected, chosen, appointed or nominated as a member or representative of any public body or any statutory or local authority or in service of Pakistan or of any province so also he shall not be allowed to apply for or be granted or allowed any financial facilities in the form of any loan or advances from any bank or Financial Institution in the public sector, for a period of ten (10) years from the date of conviction. However, the benefit of section 382(B) Cr.P.C. is extended to the appellant as the same was already extended to him by the trial court--Disposed of. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
18 Cr.J.A 72/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2018 Nazeer Ahmed & an other (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-MAR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
19 Criminal Appeal 88/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Criminal Jail Appeal No. S- 46 of 2020. 2018 Hafeez Machi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-JUN-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
20 Const. P. 151/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Munawar Ali Narejo (Petitioner) VS Judge Anti-Terrorism Shikarpur and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
21 Criminal Appeal 52/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mansoor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JUN-21 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
22 Cr.Bail 637/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Shoukat Ali Memon (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-21 Yes BAIL BEFORE ARREST Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
23 Criminal Appeal 32/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Muhammad Nawaz and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
24 Criminal Appeal 126/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ISLAM SHAH S/O SYED KAMAL SHAH & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-22 Yes It is observed that the mere heinousness of the charge and recovery of a huge quantity of the alleged contraband is no ground to convict the accused. The prosecution is under a bounden responsibility to drive home the charge by proving each limb of its case that essentially included the production of the witness tasked with the responsibility of keeping the narcotic in safe custody and safely transmitting the samples to the office of the Chemical Examiner. Failure to do so is fatal to the prosecution case. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
25 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 29/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 KHAWAR S/O DILDAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-AUG-22 Yes Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
26 Const. P. 328/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C. Ps. No. D-329, 337, 338, 339, 354, 359, 365, 368, 371, 374, 391, 392, 417, 421, 431, 432, 437, 438, 439, 440, 446, 447, 452, 456, 461, 484, 485, 506 & 512 of 2022 2022 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS The ECP & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAY-22 Yes The Delimitation is to be carried out in terms of the mandatory provisions of Section 8 to 10 of the Local Government Act, 2013, Read with Section 20(3) & (4) read with section 221 to 223 of the Election Act, 2017 keeping uniformity in population of Union Councils. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
27 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 23/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 AMIR RAHMEEM S/O MUHAMMAD RAHEEM BONERI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
28 Criminal Appeal 384/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAHNAWAZ S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-NOV-22 Yes No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellant against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during the cross-examination. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) J.P.583/2022 Shahnawaz v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
29 Criminal Appeal 29/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Conf:Cases 05/2021 & Cr A S 51/2021 2021 VEERO (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-OCT-23 Yes The medical evidence is in the nature ofsupporting, confirmatory or explanatory of the direct or circumstantial evidencein the sense the term is used in legal parlance for a piece of evidence that itself also has force to connect the accused person(s) with the commission of the offence Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
30 Cr.J.A 122/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khemchand (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
31 2020 MLD Note 763 Const. P. 2019/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Ashkaran @ Aashankar (Petitioner) VS The State (NAB) and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.882/2020 Aashakaran @ Aashankar v. The State (NAB) thr. its Director General, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
32 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 SADDAM KAKAR S/O SAADULLAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
33 2020 MLD Note 714 Const. P. 2802/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr. Salman Gul Silawat (Petitioner) VS The Chancellor of University of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.730-K/2019 Dr.Salam Gul Silawat v. The Chancellor of University of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
34 2020 MLD Note 1202 Criminal Appeal 110/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Abdul Ghafoor (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
35 Const. P. 3706/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Luqman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and rs (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.2520/2020 Muhammad Luqman v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
36 Const. P. 2189/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M. Liaquat Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
37 2020 YLR 2226 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 23/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Suleman Shah@ Sunny & Another. (Appellant) VS The State. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
38 Suit.B 4/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Nisar Mustafa Shaikh & Others (Plaintiff) VS Sajid Ahmed Kalhoro (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 18-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
39 Const. P. 7380/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Karamuddin Panhyar (Petitioner) VS The NAB (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-SEP-20 Yes We have decided the main appeal of the appellant therefore the Constitution Petition No: 7380 of 2018 filed by the appellant for suspension of his sentence during the pendency of the appeal has become infructuous and is also dismissed. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
40 2020 YLR 143 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 176/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 JUNAID-UR-REHMAN S/O ANEES-UR-REHMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
41 Cr.Acq.A. 213/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 GUL WALI KHAN (Appellant) VS ALI BAT KHAN & 05 ORS (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
42 Const. P. 2145/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pervez Ahmed (Petitioner) VS NAB (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.2488/2020 Pervez Ahmed v. National Accountability Bureau, thr. Its Chairman, Islamabad and its Director General, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
43 Const. P. 457/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 M/S Rafique Ahmed & Co (Petitioner) VS The Registrar of Trade Union Govt Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 Yes Sind Industrial Relations Act, 2013. Maintainability of petition by Employer against order of Registrar Trade Union passed under section 9(10). Held Yes. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi C.P.5602/2021 Fauji Fertilzer Company Mazdoor Union through its President / General Secretary, Ghotki and others v. M/s Rafique Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
44 2020 PCr.LJ 1221 Cr.Bail 694/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Atta Muhammad Janwari (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JAN-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
45 Cr.J.A 33/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Cr. Conf. Case No. D-04 of 2018 Cr. Acq. Appeal No. D-09 of 2018 Cr. Rev. Appln. No. D-05 of 2018 Cr. Jail Appeal No. S-44 of 2018 2018 Gulzar Sanghro (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-MAR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence) Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
46 Criminal Appeal 101/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2012 Jumo Brohi (Appellant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
47 II.A. 2/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2018 Muhammad Umar & another (Appellant) VS Sikandar Ali & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-MAY-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
48 Cr.Rev 38/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Pir Bux Brohi & another (Applicant) VS The State & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-APR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
49 Criminal Appeal 3/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Dost Muhammad Thebo & Another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-JUN-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
50 Const. P. 183/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Ali Bux Chohan & Another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 Yes Petitions seek execution and/or implementation of orders passed by the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal, Sukkur. we have noticed with concern that the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal is passing orders and is disposing of the complaints apparently in a slipshod manner inasmuch as on the one hand, certain directions are given to carry out demarcation and survey of the property, only then an order for removal of the encroachment has to be passed. Both directions at the same time and final disposal of a complaint are unwarranted as it creates further complications. The above provision clearly provides that the Tribunal is the final authority to determine all disputes, whereas, it has to conclusively determine the rights of the parties to a dispute. In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of this case, both these Petitions are dismissed as not maintainable. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
51 I. A 27/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 M/S Z.T.B.L and others (Appellant) VS Yaseen Dahri (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-OCT-21 Yes Law of limitation will also apply to Sale of property by a Financial Institution under Section 15 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance 2001. If limitation to file a Suit for recovery under section 9 of the Ordinance has expired, then no sale could be conducted under section 15 as well. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi C.P.1706-K/2021 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited & another v. Yaseen Dahri & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
52 Const. P. 89/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Sikandar Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-22 Yes Service matters. No vested right concept in promotion policy. Government can amend the same, if deemed appropriate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi C.P.1700/2022 Sikandar Ali and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and Literacy Department Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
53 Criminal Appeal 705/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SARDAR ALI S/O SAMEEN JAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-NOV-22 Yes No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellant against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross-examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination. Even otherwise, section 25 of the CNS Act has excluded Section 103 Cr.P.C. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.1644/2022 Sardar Ali v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor A.N.F. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
54 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 156/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NAZEER AHMED S/O SARDAR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-AUG-22 Yes PW Muhammad Akeel at the time of recording his evidence has not identified the present appellant to be a same person who was identified by him at the time of identification parade as such in our view such identification of the accused has no such legal value to maintain conviction of accused in a case of capital punishment without any other corroboration. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
55 Const. P. 2647/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Election Matter 2022 Zakir Hussain Khokhar (Petitioner) VS Assistant Commissioner T.A.Yar & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JUL-22 Yes Election Matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.3625/2022 Zakir Hussain Khokhar v. Assistant Commissioner Tando Allahyar, Returning Officer, Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
56 Cr.Acq.A. 36/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Abdul Sattar Lashari (Appellant) VS Ishaque Brohi & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
57 Cr.Misc. 352/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Iqbal (Applicant) VS S.S.P Dadu and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 21-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
58 Cr.Acq.A. 122/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Imdad Ali (Appellant) VS The State & another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
59 Cr.Bail 1035/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
60 Const. P. 3387/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P. No. D ??? 3388/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3389/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3390/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3397/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3399/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3417/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3430/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3431/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3432/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3433/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3434/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3435/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3459/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3477/2023 2023 Mst. Sumera Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-AUG-23 Yes Preventive detention under the MPO Ordinance, 1960. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
61 Cr.Bail 682/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Hassan & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
62 Conf.Case 11/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Reference made by the IIIrd Addl.S.Judge Khi Cenra (Appellant) VS BABAR MASIH S/O SABIR MASIH (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
63 Const. P. 241/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Farooq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.3961/2019 Farooq Ahmed Jamali v. Government of Pakistan thr. Chairman National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
64 2020 YLR 1160 Cr.J.A 103/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Momin & others (Appellant) VS State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-JAN-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
65 2020 YLR Note 979 Const. P. 217/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS Amanullah and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.657-K/2019 Muhammad Usman v. Amanullah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
66 2020 MLD 1676 Cr.Acctt.A 5/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ALTAF AHMED S/O GUL HASSAIN SHAIKH (Appellant) VS NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
67 2021 YLR 188 Const. P. 5009/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Const. P No.D-1158 of 2019 2019 Sheikh Muhammad Ashgar (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
68 Cr.Acctt.A 29/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ALEEMUDDIN S/O ZIAUDDIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (NAB) (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.1336/2020 Chairman National Acountability Bureau through Prosector General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Aleemuddin Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
69 2021 MLD 292 Cr.Bail 197/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHEERAZ S/O IMAM BUX (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
70 2021 PCr.LJ 24 Const. P. 6026/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shoukat Hussain Jokhio (Petitioner) VS The Stae thr Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-20 Yes Lastly, we may observe that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but the only tentative assessment is required, and a cursory glance of the record show that all the petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail in connivance with each other have caused huge loss to the Government exchequer, therefore, the pre-arrest bail of petitioners Sabah-ul-Islam, Muhammad Waseem, Roshan Ali Shaikh, Fazal-ur-Rehman, Ahmed Ali, Farrukh Jamal Siddiqui, Nadeem Qadir Khokhar and Sohail Yar Khan is recalled with imidiate effect, their petitions are dismissed. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.486-K/2020 Sabah-ul-Islam Khan & another v. The Chairman NAB Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
71 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 126/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 ABID KALOO S/O DUR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
72 Cr.J.A 2/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2014 Abdul Waheed Larik (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
73 Cr.J.A 83/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Muhammad Mithal Narejo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
74 2020 MLD 1455 Cr.Bail 737/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Jatoi Dahar & others VS (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-JAN-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
75 Cr.Misc. 9/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 SIP Munwar Ali & others (Applicant) VS Fazal Muhammad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-21 Yes 22 A-B Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
76 Cr.J.A 91/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Jan Mohammad Chachar & another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
77 Const. P. 992/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2014 Majid Ali Memon, (Petitioner) VS Senior Superintendent of Police Shikarpur and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.1009-K/2021 The Senior Superintendent of Police Shikarpur & others v. Majid Ali Memon Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
78 Criminal Appeal 52/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2014 Altaf Hussain Kharos and an other (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-JUN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
79 Criminal Appeal 51/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Mujahid Ali Dawachi and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-APR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
80 Cr.J.A 1/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2013 Abdullah Junejo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
81 2020 MLD 1417 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 107/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 GHULAM SHABBIR @ PAPPI S/O PERVEZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
82 I. A 33/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: Ist Appeal No. D-34 of 2004 2004 Fed.of Pak.thr:Secretary Communication & another (Appellant) VS Haji Abdul Latif Bughio and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-22 Yes 1. Maintainability of appeal under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 against an order passed on an application under section 12(2) CPC; Held No 2. Election of Forum for seeking remedy. Once a party has selected a legal forum for seeking any relief, then it cannot abate such proceedings in between and seek any other remedy for the same relief. Once that remedy was elected, then, by implication of the doctrine of election, the other remedy by was barred. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi C.P.1817/2022 Chairman National Highway Authority, Islamabad through Project Director, Moro v. Haji Abdul Latif through its L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
83 Conf.Case 10/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 REF. MADE BY 1ST ADJ/MCTC MALIR KARACHI (Appellant) VS NADIR ALI @ BABAR & OTHERS (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-SEP-22 Yes Turning to the quantum of sentence awarded to the appellants by the trial court we have considered the evidence produced by the prosecution and found that there were general allegations against the appellants of causing hatchet and knife injuries to the deceased resulting in his death and all the witnesses have deposed that the appellants actively participated in the commission of offence. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
84 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 167/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD ADNAN S/O MUHAMMAD HANIF (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-OCT-22 Yes No ransom demand has been proved by the prosecution through any tangible evidence. For instance, there is no CDR to link the appellants to the offence. No one saw the appellants throw the body of the deceased in the canal and the last seen evidence without proper identification of the appellants cannot be relied upon which in any event is only circumstantial evidence and is to be viewed with extreme caution. No toxicology report was produced to show that the child had even been drugged. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
85 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 25/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 AMIR RAHEEM S/O MUHAMMAD RAHEEM BONERI (Appellant) VS TH STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
86 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 90/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD BUX @ BABU S/O KHADIM HUSSAIN LAGARI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
87 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 24/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 AMIR RAHEEM S/O MUHAMMAD RAHEEM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
88 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 89/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD BUX @ BABU S/O KHADIM HUSSAIN LAGARI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
89 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 68/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SAMIULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD BADSHAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-OCT-22 Yes An accused person is presumed to be innocent till the time he is proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt, and this presumption of his innocence continues until the prosecution succeeds in proving the charge against him beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of legally admissible, confidence inspiring, trustworthy and reliable evidence. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
90 Criminal Appeal 500/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAKEEL AHMED S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ORS (Appellant) VS THE STATE/ ANF (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-NOV-22 Yes No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
91 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 155/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NAZEER AHMED S/O SARDAR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-AUG-22 Yes PW Muhammad Akeel at the time of recording his evidence has not identified the present appellant to be a same person who was identified by him at the time of identification parade as such in our view such identification of the accused has no such legal value to maintain conviction of accused in a case of capital punishment without any other corroboration. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
92 Criminal Appeal 79/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.Appeal.No- D. 80/2022 2022 Abdul Rasheed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-OCT-23 Yes The sole evidence of a material witness i.e. an eyewitness is always sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused if the same is confidenceinspiring and trustworthy and supported by another independent source of evidence because the law considers the quality of evidence and not its quantity to prove the charge. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
93 Conf.Case 21/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khemchand (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
94 Const. P. 998/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst. Shaheen Gul (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
95 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 128/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Ghulam Shabir Lashari (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
96 Cr.Acq.A. 109/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mst. Shahida Mehtab (Appellant) VS Ansar Ahmed Khan & Another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
97 Cr.J.A 315/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 ROSHAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
98 Criminal Miscelleneous 352/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr Misc A.S 353/2022 2022 Muhammad Iqbal (Applicant) VS S.S.P Dadu and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 21-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
99 Cr.Bail 1017/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Zulfiqar Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
100 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 193/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD ALAMGHIR S/O MUHAMMAD QASIM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
101 Conf.Case 8/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 REFERENCE MADY BY THE IST ADJ KARACHI SOUTH (Appellant) VS MUHAMMAD BILAL S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
102 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 367/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ATIF MEHMOOD S/O ALI ASGHAR & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
103 2020 PCr.LJ 128 Criminal Appeal 318/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 MUHAMMAD BILAL S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.5-K/2020 Jaan Muhammad v. The State thr. P.G.Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
104 2020 PCr.LJ 134 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 222/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 SHAHNAWAZ S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-OCT-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
105 Const. P. 2713/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
106 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 182/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 MUHAMMAD RASHID S/O ASHIQ ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
107 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 320/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 RAJAB ALI @ NADEEM S/O MOHBAT ALI RAJPER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
108 Const. P. 3594/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Jamaluddin (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.2521/2020 Jamaluddin v. National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and its D.G, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
109 Const. P. 7761/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Roshan Ali Kanasiro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes We may observe here that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but only a tentative assessment is permissible and a cursory glance of the record shows that all the petitioners in connivance with each other have misappropriated a huge amount of money from the Government from which some amount was recovered through plea bargains. Under these circumstances the interim pre-arrest bail granted to all the petitioners earlier by this court is recalled with immediate effect. We also find that with regard to petitioner Shahenshah Hussain who is seeking his post-arrest bail there is sufficient evidence against him in the shape of documentary evidence which connects him to the commission of offence to which he has been charged and therefore his petition for post-arrest bail is also dismissed. We may observe here that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but only a tentative assessment is permissible and a cursory glance of the record shows that all the petitioners in connivance with each other have misappropriated a huge amount of money from the Government from which some amount was recovered through plea bargains. Under these circumstances the interim pre-arrest bail granted to all the petitioners earlier by this court is recalled with immediate effect. We also find that with regard to petitioner Shahenshah Hussain who is seeking his post-arrest bail there is sufficient evidence against him in the shape of documentary evidence which connects him to the commission of offence to which he has been charged and therefore his petition for post-arrest bail is also dismissed. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.2603/2020 Roshan Ali Kanasro v. Federation of Pakistan through Federal Secretary, Interior Department, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
110 2020 MLD 1841 Cr.Bail 697/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Mumtaz Ali Mirani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
111 Const. P. 2836/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Hameedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.4283/2021 Zulfiqar Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary to Government of Pakistan, M/o Interior, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
112 Cr.J.A 30/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2014 Ghulam Abbas Magsi (Appellant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
113 Cr.J.A 31/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Abdul Majeed Gaincho (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
114 Cr.J.A 43/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Cr. Confirmation Case No. D-08 of 2016 2016 Sadique Ali Sabzoi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence) Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
115 2020 YLR 1843 Cr.J.A 107/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Ali Nawaz and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
116 Cr.J.A 78/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Tarique Ali (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-JUN-21 Yes Appellant filed appeal against Conviction and Sentenced for the offence U/S 302,338-B, 337-H(2), 386, 114, 34 P.P.C r/w S-7(a) & (h) of Anti-Terrorism Act. Samina wife of Complainant she was signer/artist. At the time of incident she was pregnant of eight months. Samina as usual was singing a song at stage. Tarique Ali, with two unknown culprits, whose faces were open armed with Pistols they by pointing their Pistols asked his wife Mst. Samina that she may sing a song in standing position. On that his wife Mst. Samina told to them that she was running pregnancy On hearing so, they asked my wife Mst. Samina that if she would not sing a song in standing position, then she may be ready for death Tarique Ali Jatoi fired at his wife Mst. Samina, when she was giving instructions to her co artist . She died It was told by the lady doctor that baby in womb of Mst. Samina had also died. The complainant who is the husband of the deceased had changed his entire version given by him in the FIR at the time of recoding his evidence. He completely exonerated the appellant. In the FIR he shows himself as an eye witness while during his examination-in-chief he deposed that he was informed through phone that his wife sustained firearm injury on such he rushed at hospital where he came to know that his wife has already died. Two more eyewitnesses not supported the case of prosecution. Both the witnesses exonerated the appellant and not supported. Criminal jail appeal was allowed Appellant Tarique Ali Jatoi was acquitted of the charge . Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
117 Cr.J.A 32/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Crl. Confirmation Case No. D- 03 of 2018 2018 Lal Muhammad Brohi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) J.P.78/2021 Lal Muhammad v. The State,Crl.A.235/2023 Lal Muhammad v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
118 Cr.J.A 85/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Ahsan Marfani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-APR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
119 2020 YLR 2001 Const. P. 1653/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: CP No. D- 1653 of 2019 Irshad Ahmed Gopang Vs. NAB through its Chairman and others CP No. D- 1670 of 2019 HabibullahShaikh Vs. The State through NAB. CP No. D- 1671 of 2019 Jagdesh Kumar Waleecha Vs.The State through Chairman NAB. CP No. D- 1672 of 2019 GhulamSiddiqueSoomro Vs.The State through Chairman NAB. CP No. D- 1673 of 2019 Nazeer Ahmed Abro Vs.The State through Chairman NAB. CP No. D- 1675 of 2019 Azad Ali Bahrani (Custody)Vs. The NAB and others. CP No. D- 1699 of 2018 Abdul KarimMemon Vs. Chairman NAB & another. CP No. D- 1705 of 2019 Aijaz Ali Memon Vs. The State through NAB & others. CP No. D- 1706 of 2019 Abdul MajidMemon Vs. The State through NAB & others. CP No. D- 1714 of 2019 AnjumNaveedLarikVs.The State through Chairman NAB. CP No. D- 1721 of 2019 Shahid Ali Shaikh Vs. NAB through its Chairman &others. CP No. D- 1772 of 2019 Mujeeb-ur-RehmanVs. The Federation of Pakistan throughChairman NAB &others CP No. D- 1755 of 2019 Sikander Ali Veesar Vs. The NAB through its Chairman. CP No. D- 200 of 2020 Zulfiqar Ali Jakhrani Vs. Federation of Pakistan & others. 2019 Irshad Ahmed Gopang (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
120 Cr.Bail 617/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Kohyaro Teghani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
121 Cr.J.A 59/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Waheed Shah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
122 Conf.Case 5/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mansoor Ahmed (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JUN-21 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
123 Const. P. 667/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Prof. Dr. Jan Muhammad Memon & another (Petitioner) VS P. O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-FEB-22 Yes Service Matter; Quo Warranto 1. Appointment of an ad hoc appointee / Professor as Principal of a Medical College challenged; Held No 2. Exercise of Discretion in such matter; guidelines Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
124 Const. P. 2272/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Liquat Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
125 Criminal Appeal 470/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O BASHIR AHMED & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-22 Yes There is no evidence to ascertain as to whether the property was kept in safe custody from its recovery till its arrival at the office of the chemical examiner. Therefore, by failing to prove the safe custody of the recovered contraband, the same could not be used against the appellants in this regard and the chemical report is of no legal value. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
126 Const. P. 764/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2015 Inayatullah Lashari (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-FEB-23 Yes Employee engaged on adhoc or under a time-bound contract has no vested right to regularization Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
127 Criminal Miscelleneous 12/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Sajid Hussain and Another (Applicant) VS The State and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-23 Yes Transfer application under section 23 ATA, 1997. Jurisdiction of ATC under third schedule of the ATA, 1997 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
128 Const. P. 2489/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P. No. D. 2202 of 2023 2023 Tanveer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-AUG-23 Yes KBTPR prohibits regularization of additional floors. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
129 Cr.J.A 180/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Roshan Ali and Others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
130 Cr.J.A 67/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr. Jail Appeal D 66/2021 2021 Allah Warayo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-OCT-23 Yes The sole evidence of a material witness i.e. an eyewitness is always sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused if the same is confidenceinspiring and trustworthy and supported by another independent source of evidence because the law considers the quality of evidence and not its quantity to prove the charge. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
131 Criminal Appeal 37/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Khurram Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
132 Cr.Bail 817/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Danish Naseer & others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
133 Cr.Rev 71/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Shabir Khoso and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 06-APR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
134 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ALI AHMED @ KHATIYA S/O MUMTAZUL HAQ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
135 Conf.Case 2/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Reference made by the D.&.S.J KHI WEST (Appellant) VS TAJ MUHAMMAD S/O BAKHT ZAMEEN & ANOTHER (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
136 2020 PCr.LJ 1693, 2020 PLJ 463 Criminal Appeal 113/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 TAJ MUHAMMAD S/O BAKHT ZAMIR KHAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.259-K/2019 Deendar Ali Advocate v. Abdul Basir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
137 Const. P. 2088/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Ibrahim and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.3973/2019 Muhammad Ibrahim v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Interior Minister, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
138 2020 PCr.LJ 1609 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 163/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 SYED MEHROZ MEHDI ZAIDI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
139 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 353/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD AZEEM S/O ABDUL AZIZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
140 Const. P. 173/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Imran Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.4088/2019 Imran Ali Talpur & another v. Government of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
141 2021 SBLR Sindh 100 Cr.Acctt.A 73/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD ASIF ARSHAD S/O MUHAMMAD ARSHAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes As discussed above, we are of the firm view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt by producing trustworthy and confidence inspiring evidence against all three appellants and uphold their convictions. The appeals of the appellants Muhammad Asif Arshad and Muhammad Adil Arshad have not been pressed on merits and they only prayed for reduction of their sentence based on the mitigating circumstances mentioned above. We find such mitigating circumstances to justify a reduction in their sentences. We also consider that the sentences awarded to them were too harsh, therefore, the conviction awarded to them by the trial court is maintained, however, both their sentences are reduced to the time which they have already undergone which includes the additional sentence of imprisonment in default of fine but the fine imposed on them is still outstanding against them which shall be recovered by NAB in accordance with the law. The appellants Muhammad Asif Arshad and Muhammad Adil Arshad are in custody, they are ordered to be released forthwith if not required in any other custody case. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
142 Const. P. 1666/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Hussain (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
143 Const. P. 2440/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Waseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The State and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes In view thereof, the petitioner has made out his case for grant of bail, under these circumstances, C.P.No.D-2440 of 2020 is allowed. Petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs.500000/- (Rupees Five Lacs) and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. However, the Ministry of Interior is directed to put the name of petitioner on the ECL. A copy of this order be sent to the Secretary, Ministry of Interior Government of Pakistan for compliance. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
144 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 53/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 MUHAMMAD HASSAN S/O ATTA MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
145 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 180/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 JUNAID-UR-REHMAN S/O ANEES-UR-REHMAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
146 Cr.Bail 510/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Cr. Bail Appln. No. S-546 of 2020 2020 Syed Zaman Ali Shah (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-FEB-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
147 Criminal Appeal 37/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2014 Ashique Ali Panhwar and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
148 Criminal Appeal 26/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Criminal Appeal No. S-28 of 2016 2016 Gulzar Ahmed Soomro (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 16-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
149 Criminal Appeal 7/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ali Nawaz Lolai (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-JUN-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
150 Criminal Appeal 83/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Rafique Ahmed Peerzado (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 22-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
151 Criminal Appeal 21/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Sanaullah & Another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-JUN-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
152 Conf.Case 8/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Ashraf (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUL-21 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
153 Cr.Acq.A. 39/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Nazir Ahmed Lakhair (Appellant) VS Abdul Qadir And Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-APR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
154 Criminal Appeal 250/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Rahim Shaikh (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-JUN-21 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.101-K/2021 Mushtaque Hussain v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
155 Cr.J.A 51/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mansoor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JUN-21 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) J.P.229/2021 Mansoor Ahmed & others v. The State,Crl.A.219/2023 Mansoor Ahmed & others v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
156 Cr.Bail 1080/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.Bail. A S.1081/2021(ABDUL AZIZ & OTHERS VS THE STATE) 2021 ZAHID (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JAN-22 Yes Bail After Arrest. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
157 Cr.Bail 1094/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Asif (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
158 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 85/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD AMEER S/O MOMIN KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-OCT-22 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
159 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 163/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN S/O GHULAM SARWAR & ORS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-OCT-22 Yes No ransom demand has been proved by the prosecution through any tangible evidence. For instance, there is no CDR to link the appellants to the offence. No one saw the appellants throw the body of the deceased in the canal and the last seen evidence without proper identification of the appellants cannot be relied upon which in any event is only circumstantial evidence and is to be viewed with extreme caution. No toxicology report was produced to show that the child had even been drugged. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
160 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 4/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SARDAR S/O MIR HASSAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-AUG-22 Yes Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
161 Cr.J.A 538/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NAEEM AKHTAR @ ALI HAIDER & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-OCT-22 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
162 Const. P. 941/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Faheem (Petitioner) VS DCO, DC Jamshoro and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
163 Cr.J.A 14/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr A D 13 of 2019 2019 Abdullah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-AUG-22 Yes (Life Imprisonment) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
164 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 18/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ASGHAR ALI MUGHERI S/O MUHAMMAD AACHAR & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-AUG-22 Yes Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
165 Const. P. 2308/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-JUL-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.2394/2022 Jawaid Juman Lund Baloch v. The Election Commission of Pakistan through Chief Election Commissioner, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned. Relist before 3 members bench
166 Cr.J.A 100/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Ghulam Rasool Ogahi & Another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 13-APR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
167 Cr.J.A 5/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Rahib Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
168 Criminal Appeal 8/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Ramzan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) J.P.366/2023 Muhammad Ramzan & 2 others v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
169 Cr.Acq.A. 46/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Bagan Khan Buriro (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ibrahim Buriro & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
170 Cr.Bail 982/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Zahid Hussain and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
171 Cr.Bail 1023/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Ashraf & others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
172 Cr.Bail 1059/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Ayoob @ Ayoob (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
173 Const. P. 2274/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Govind and another (Petitioner) VS State (NAB) and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.3960/2019 Muhammad Hassan v. State (NAB) thr. its Director General NAB, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
174 2020 YLR 63 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 318/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ALI AHMED @ KHATIYA S/O MUMTAZUL HAQ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
175 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 354/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 SHAHZAD KAMRAN S/O QADIR BUX (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
176 Criminal Appeal 55/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Sulleman (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
177 2020 MLD 1176 Cr.Acq.A. 151/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Tarachand S/O Daryano Mal (Appellant) VS Imtiaz Ali and another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
178 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 289/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 SADDAM KAKAR S/O SAADULLAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
179 Cr.Bail 192/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ibrahim (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
180 Cr.Acctt.A 30/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 HAROON PUNJWANI S/O SULEMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.1337/2020 Chairman National Acountability Bureau through Prosector General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Haroon Punjwani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
181 Const. P. 3496/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shafqat Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) C.P.2533/2020 Shafaqat Ali Shah v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary to the Govt. of Pakistan, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
182 Criminal Appeal 49/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Muhammad Ali Abro (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-JAN-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court( Upto 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
183 Criminal Appeal 276/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Faheem Arshadullah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.111-K/2020 Faheem Arshadullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned Next Session
184 Cr.Bail 651/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Bhagio Khan Bangulani & Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-FEB-21 Yes BAIL BEFORE ARREST Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
185 Criminal Appeal 102/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Abdul Rehman @ Suleman @ Siloo Magsi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 07-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
186 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. 1/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 THE STATE / NAB (Appellant) VS MOHAMMAD SARDAR KHAN (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
187 Const. P. 2146/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS NAB (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
188 Criminal Appeal 16/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2014 Hyder Ali Siyal (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
189 Const. P. 747/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Syed Sibt-e-Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-APR-22 Yes Promotion matters; fitness of employee; petition is maintainable; Once major penalty has been set-aside, then promotion cannot be denied on the same charges. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
190 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 2/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SAJID S/O NOOR AHMED (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-AUG-22 Yes Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
191 Criminal Appeal 630/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 KAMRAN MIRZA S/O MIRZA RIAZ BAIG (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-NOV-22 Yes It is well settled that if a set of witnesses is disbelieved to the extent of some accused the same cannot be believed in respect of the remaining accused facing the same trial without any independent and strong corroboration. Upon scrutiny of the material available on record, we find no corroboration to maintain the conviction and sentence of the appellant. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.33-K/2023 MCB Bank Limited v. Kamran Mirza Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
192 Cr.Bail 21/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 ABDUL MAJID (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
193 Const. P. 1058/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C.P.No.D- 632 of 2021 2020 Mukhtiar Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 Yes No writ of quo warranto against promotions on project posts, if otherwise they are qualified for promotion Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi C.P.2653/2022 Mukhtar Ahmed v. Province of Sindh through Secretary to Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
194 Cr.J.A 506/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD SHAFI S/O FAIZULLAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-SEP-22 Yes It is observed that mere heinousness of the charge and recovery of huge quantity of the alleged contraband is no ground to convict accused. The prosecution is under a bounden responsibility to drive home the charge by proving each limb of its case that essentially included production of the witness, tasked with the responsibility of transmitting the samples to the office of Chemical Examiner. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
195 Const. P. 3549/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Rao Abdul Khalique (Petitioner) VS Fed:of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
196 Criminal Appeal 15/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Zubair Ahmed (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-AUG-22 Yes On scanning the entire evidence produced by the prosecution in respect of the recovery, safe custody and its safe transmission for chemical analysis of the charas we are of the view that the prosecution failed to prove the safe custody and its transmission for chemical examination Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
197 Conf.Case 14/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 REF. MADE BY SPL. COURT II CNS KARACHI (Appellant) VS NAEEM AKHTAR @ ALI HAIDER & 2 ORS (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-22 Yes No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained unshattered during the cross-examination. Even otherwise, the provision of Section 25 of the CNS Act has provided the exclusion of Section 103 Cr.P.C. during recovery proceedings. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
198 Spl.Cr.A.A 20/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 The State through P.G Sindh (Applicant) VS Zameer @ Zamoo (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
199 Cr.J.A 34/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Asad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 07-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
200 Cr.J.A 66/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr. Jail Appeal D 67/2021 2021 Badurddin (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-OCT-23 Yes The sole evidence of a material witness i.e. an eyewitness is always sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused if the same is confidenceinspiring and trustworthy and supported by another independent source of evidence because the law considers the quality of evidence and not its quantity to prove the charge. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
201 Spl.Cr.J.A 15/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Arshad Ali Mughal & another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
202 Criminal Appeal 247/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Ali Hassan and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
203 Cr.Appeal 29/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 VEERO (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
204 Cr.Bail 658/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Shoukat @ Mishan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
205 Criminal Miscelleneous 843/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 MUHAMMAD NAWAZ (Applicant) VS SADAM HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 21-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
206 Cr.Rev 34/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) VS Sageer Ahmed and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
207 2020 PCr.LJ 1147 Cr.J.A 222/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Peeral (Appellant) VS The State, (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
208 2020 YLR Note 1719 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 167/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 SHAHZAD @ KALAY KHAN S/O ALI AKBAR SAWATI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.A.601/2022 Shahzad @ Kalay Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
209 2020 YLR 2053 Cr.Acq.A. 543/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 The State / ANF (Appellant) VS Basar Khan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-19 Yes On a careful scrutiny of above provision in our view it is clear that the prescribed period of Limitation of thirty days and sixty days respectively is available only for those criminal acquittal appeals which are filed by the complainant or person aggrieved respectively. We have found no specific period of Limitation under the amended provision as regards the acquittal appeals under sub-section (1) to section 417, Cr.P.C. is prescribed. We have also examined the Article 157 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which reads as under:- Description of Appeals Period of limitation Time from which period begins to run 157. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, from an order of acquittal. Six months The date of the order appealed from. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
210 2020 YLR 1752 Cr.J.A 107/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 FARMAN ALI S/O ASIF-UR-REHMAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.A.14-K/2022 Farman Ali and another v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
211 2020 MLD 886 Cr.Acctt.A 3/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 SYED SALAHUDDIN S/O NIZAMUDDIN (Appellant) VS THE NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.51-K/2020 Syed Salahuddin v. National Accountability Bureau/The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
212 2020 MLD Note 1329 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 276/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 AZHAR HUSSAIN S/O ALLAH BUX (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
213 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 168/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 SHAHZAD @ KALAY KHAN S/O ALI AKBAR SAWATI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.A.602/2022 Shahzad @ Kalay Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
214 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 363/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD USMAN S/O MUHAMMAD RAFIQ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
215 Conf.Case 2/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 REFERENCE MADE BY THE VTH ADDL.S.JUDGE KHI EAST (Appellant) VS FARMAN ALI S/O SAIF-U-REHMAN & ANOTHER (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
216 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 181/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 MUHAMMAD RASHID S/O ASHIQ ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
217 Cr.J.A 48/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Criminal confirmation No. D- 06 of 2018. 2018 Jhangal Dahani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-JAN-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence) Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) J.P.20/2021 Jhangal v. The State,Crl.A.164/2023 Jhangal v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
218 Const. P. 1785/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Jan Abdul Razzaq (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
219 Const. P. 2139/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Rafique Tawakal (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JUN-20 Yes The petitioner named above seeks his post-arrest bail in the reference No.7 of 2004--In view, thereof the petitioner has made out his case for grant of his post-arrest bail on the ground of rule of consistency and therefore admitted to bail subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs 1000000/= (one million) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Registrar of this court--We observed that the reference was filed in the year 2004 and the same has not been decided by the National Accountability Court till yet, therefore, in these circumstances, we direct the National Accountability Court No-1 Karachi to decide the case expeditiously--disposed of. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
220 Criminal Appeal 231/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 MUHAMMAD ALI S/O YAMEEN KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
221 Criminal Appeal 239/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 SYED IMRAN AHMED S/O SYED RIAZ AHMED SABIR (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
222 Const. P. 7714/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shah Rehman Dostay (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes We find the case of petitioner Jam Abdul Razaq Dahar is one of further inquiry as has been discussed above therefore the petitioner Jam Abdul Razaq Dahar has made out his case for confirmation of his pre-arrest bail which is confirmed on the same terms and conditions.--In view of the above, (a) we dismiss the petition for post-arrest bail of the petitioner Shah Rehman and allow the petition for post-arrest bail of petitioner Muhammad Hussain and grant him bail subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 1000000/= (Ten Lacs) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Nazir of this court. (b) As regards the petitions for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners namely Jamal ud din Mahar, Pervaiz Ahmed Malik, Manzoor Ali Dars and Muhammad Liaquat Ali Khan all such petitions are dismissed, and interim pre-arrest bail granted to them earlier is recalled with immediate effect. (c) The petition for pre-arrest bail filed by the petitioner Jam Abdul Razaq Dahar (Sub-registrar) is allowed, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to him is hereby confirm on the same terms and conditions. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
223 Civil Revision 136/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Zia-Ul-Haque Mugheri. (Applicant) VS Muhammad Murad Mugheri and others. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
224 Cr.Bail 616/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Sabz Ali Badani Jatoi V/S (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-21 Yes Applicant seeks post arrest bail for offences punishable under section 302, 324, 148, 149, 114, 429, PPC. Complainant Mst. Khanzadi, stating therein that there is dispute between them and accused Ahmed Ali Jatoi. She took meals to them. At 1200 hours there came accused Ahmed Ali, Noor Hassan, Ali Hyder, Wahid Ali, Jumo having K.K rifles, Sabz Ali, Rasheed and 03 unknown persons having guns. On the instigation of Ahmed Ali, accused Ali Hyder fired at Qalandar Bux, accused Noor Hassan fired at Karim Dino and Sabz Ali fired at Akhtiar. Admittedly the name of the present applicant transpires in the FIR with specific role of causing gunshot injury upon P.W Akhtiar and in this unfortunate incident one person, namely, Qalandar Bux has lost his life and two persons received firearm injuries. All the eye witnesses including the injured witnesses supported the case in their statements under section 161 Cr.P.C. Bail and the same is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
225 Criminal Appeal 3/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Nakeef Nindwani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 22-APR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
226 Cr.Bail 71/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Shunaid Akbar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
227 Criminal Appeal 68/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Ashraf (Appellant) VS V/S The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUL-21 Yes It is established that the prosecution has successfully proved its case against the appellant through ocular account furnished by eye-witnesses, which is corroborated by the medical evidence coupled with the recoveries and other circumstantial/supportive evidence. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) J.P.311/2021 Muhammad Ashraf v. The State,Crl.A.188/2023 Muhammad Ashraf v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
228 Criminal Appeal 6/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Zahid Ali Mastoi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
229 Criminal Appeal 41/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Zaheer s/o Haji Qasim Lakho (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.1082/2020 Zaffarullah v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor A.N.F. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
230 2020 PLJ 1518 Cr.Bail 525/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Asif Ali @ Ghazi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
231 Conf.Case 14/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Rahim Shaikh (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-JUN-21 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
232 Criminal Appeal 79/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Mansoor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-JUN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
233 Const. P. 121/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C. P. No. D-256, 308 & 1501 of 2021 2021 Tanveer Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-FEB-22 Yes Service Matter; mere fact that petitioners were selected for appointment to vacancies, pursuant to an advertisement did not confer any right to be appointed to the post in question or to entitle the selectees to a writ of mandamus or any other writ compelling the authority to make the appointment Even if an appointment order has been issued, and subsequently, it transpires that there is some irregularity or the same has been issued in contravention of the rules or the advertisement, the same also does not create any vested right and can always be revoked. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi C.P.1828/2022 Tanveer Ahmed and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Chairman/Secretary, Pakistan Railways Boards Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
234 I. A 6/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: I.A No.D- 7 and 11 of 2005 2005 Asad Ali Khan (Appellant) VS The Conservator Forest and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAY-22 Yes 1. In a Reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act it is the obligation of the person claiming compensation to prove his ownership beyond any doubt. 2. A Reference under section 18 of the Act is different from a Reference under Section 30 ibid and cannot be converted from one to the other by the Referee Court; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
235 Criminal Appeal 498/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD UMAIR @ KABO S/O MUHAMMAD USMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-NOV-22 Yes No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellant against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
236 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 KIFAYATULLAH S/O KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-22 Yes The motive is always a double-edged weapon. No doubt, the previous enmity can be a reason for the appellant to commit the alleged crime, but it can equally be a reason for the complainant side to falsely implicate the appellant in the case of a previous grudge. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
237 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 39/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NASEER AHMED @ MULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-OCT-22 Yes For an identification parade to be properly held, it is essential that it must be conducted soon after the arrest of the accused and that accused is not shown to the witnesses before the identification parade. However, the said guidelines were not followed. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
238 Const. P. 240/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2005 M/S Fahad Construction Co (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
239 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 91/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD BUX @ BABU S/O KHADIM HUSSAIN LAGARI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes The Police officials are as good as private witnesses and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were police officials unless the defence would succeed in giving dent to the statements of prosecution witnesses and prove their mala fide or ill-will against accused which the defence counsel have neither been able to do or show during crossexamination. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
240 Criminal Appeal 520/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAHZAIB @ KAKA S/O ALI BUKSH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-NOV-22 Yes while awarding the conviction in cases of capital punishment also has no force as the reluctance of the general public to become a witness in such cases has become a judicially recognized fact and there was no way out but to consider the statement of the official witnesses as no legal bar or restriction has been imposed and even then there was no time to collect independent witnesses. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
241 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 160/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 KIFAYATULLAH S/O KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-22 Yes The motive is always a double-edged weapon. No doubt, the previous enmity can be a reason for the appellant to commit the alleged crime, but it can equally be a reason for the complainant side to falsely implicate the appellant in the case of a previous grudge. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
242 Criminal Appeal 50/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NADIR ALI @ BABAR S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB & OTHERS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-SEP-22 Yes Turning to the quantum of sentence awarded to the appellants by the trial court we have considered the evidence produced by the prosecution and found that there were general allegations against the appellants of causing hatchet and knife injuries to the deceased resulting in his death and all the witnesses have deposed that the appellants actively participated in the commission of offence. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
243 Cr.Bail 742/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Asadullah & Ors (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
244 Const. P. 247/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Dua Tauseef Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
245 Cr.J.A 6/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Mavia (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
246 Cr.J.A 294/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Allah Dino (Appellant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
247 Cr.Acctt.A 50/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Himat Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Defendant) D.B. Judgement 28-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.247-K/2019 Himat Ali v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
248 2020 SBLR Sindh 814, 2020 MLD Note 871 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 352/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD AZEEM S/O ABDUL AZIZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-DEC-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
249 2020 PCr.LJ 120 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 192/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD ALAMGHIR S/O MUHAMMAD QASIM (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
250 2020 MLD Note 1319 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 362/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUHAMMAD USMAN S/O MUHAMMAD RAFIQ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
251 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 51/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 SHAHZAD @ DILAWAR KHAN @ KHALID S/O GULAB KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
252 Cr.Acctt.A 11/2001 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2001 Mian Waqar Akhtar Paganwala (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Thus based on the discussion made hereinabove we are of the considered view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt against the appellant by producing reliable, trustworthy, and confidence-inspiring oral evidence as well as documentary evidence in support of the same. We, therefore, uphold all the sentences, fines, and penalties for each offence in the judgment whilst dismissing the appeal. Thus based on the discussion made hereinabove we are of the considered view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt against the appellant by producing reliable, trustworthy, and confidence-inspiring oral evidence as well as documentary evidence in support of the same. We, therefore, uphold all the sentences, fines, and penalties for each offence in the judgment whilst dismissing the appeal. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
253 Cr.Acctt.A 75/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MUMTAZ ALI NIZAMANI S/O LAL DINO NIZAMANI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes As discussed above, we are of the firm view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt by producing trustworthy and confidence inspiring evidence against all three appellants and uphold their convictions. The appeals of the appellants Muhammad Asif Arshad and Muhammad Adil Arshad have not been pressed on merits and they only prayed for reduction of their sentence based on the mitigating circumstances mentioned above. We find such mitigating circumstances to justify a reduction in their sentences. We also consider that the sentences awarded to them were too harsh, therefore, the conviction awarded to them by the trial court is maintained, however, both their sentences are reduced to the time which they have already undergone which includes the additional sentence of imprisonment in default of fine but the fine imposed on them is still outstanding against them which shall be recovered by NAB in accordance with the law. The appellants Muhammad Asif Arshad and Muhammad Adil Arshad are in custody, they are ordered to be released forthwith if not required in any other custody case. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.1224/2020 Mumtaz Ali Nizamani v. National Accountability Bureau thr. the D.G. Sindh, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
254 2021 YLR Note 17 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 108/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 MOHSIN BALOCH S/O HAJI HASSAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
255 2021 PCr.LJ Note 13 Cr.J.A 273/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 MUHAMMAD ALI S/O YAMEEN KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
256 2021 YLR Note 12 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 50/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 JILANI @ JAVED S/O DUWA KHAN & ORS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAY-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
257 2021 PCr.LJ Note 13 Cr.Rev 118/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 ABDUL REHMAN S/O MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD ALI & ANOTHER (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-APR-20 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
258 Cr.J.A 98/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2018 Allah Dino Phulpoto (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
259 2020 YLR 115 Criminal Appeal 207/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: Conf. Case No. D ??? 14 of 2019 Cr. Jail Appeal No. D ??? 209 of 2019 Cr. Acq. Appeal No. D ??? 185 of 2019 2019 Riazullah and another (Appellant) VS VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAR-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.613/2020 Riazullah S/o Rafiullah Khan and another v. The State through Deputy Prosecutor General, Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
260 Cr.J.A 46/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Crl. Confirmation Reference No. D- 05 of 2021 2015 Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz Kalhoro & anothe (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(A.T.C Death) Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) J.P.94/2021 Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz v. The State,Crl.A.178/2023 Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
261 Cr.Rev 5/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Chatto Khan Suhandro (Applicant) VS Ghulam Nabi Suhandro and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-APR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Crl.P.653/2021 Chatto Khan v. Ghulam Nabi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
262 Criminal Appeal 4/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Nakeef Nindwani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 22-APR-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
263 Const. P. 755/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Karim Bux Tanwri & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 Yes Group Insurance Policy matures only on death; petitioners who are alive; retired and have crossed the age of 65 years are not entitled for refund or return of contribution made by them during service. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
264 Criminal Appeal 107/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2011 Lal Bux @ Laloo Bangulani (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-FEB-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
265 Criminal Appeal 35/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Akhtiar Ali Langah & Others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
266 Cr.J.A 61/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Saeedo @ Saindad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-JUN-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Life) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
267 Criminal Appeal 4/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mansoor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-JUN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
268 Const. P. 821/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Noor Muhammad Chandio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 Yes Petition of Employees of SEPCO (Sukkur Electric Power Company) in respect of service matters is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
269 Criminal Appeal 501/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAKEEL AHMED S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE/ ANF (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-NOV-22 Yes No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
270 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 148/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 FAIZ UR REHMAN S/O ABDUL REHMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-NOV-22 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
271 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 5/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 DANISH S/O ABDUL MAJEED (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-AUG-22 Yes Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case. Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
272 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 3/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 GHULAM RASOOL RABBANI S/O MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH (Appellant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-AUG-22 Yes Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
273 Criminal Appeal 13/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.A D 14 of 2019 2019 Dilbar (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-AUG-22 Yes No direct enmity or ill will can be suggested among appellants with the complainant who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during the cross-examination. However, the provision of Section 25 of the CNS Act has provided the exclusion of Section 103 Cr.P.C Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) J.P.455/2022 Dilbar Chandio v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
274 Const. P. 3548/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
275 Cr.J.A 51/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr A D 29/2021 2021 Mst. Rado @ Ladoni (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 10-OCT-23 Yes Life Imprisonment Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
276 Cr.Bail 458/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Shafi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
277 Criminal Miscelleneous 353/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr Misc A.S 352/2022 2022 Muhammad Iqbal (Applicant) VS S.S.P District Dadu and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 21-SEP-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
278 Criminal Appeal 80/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr Appeal NO-D-79/2022 2022 FAIZ MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-OCT-23 Yes The sole evidence of a material witness i.e. an eyewitness is always sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused if the same is confidenceinspiring and trustworthy and supported by another independent source of evidence because the law considers the quality of evidence and not its quantity to prove the charge. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
279 Cr.Bail 55/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Ghulam Nabi Laghari (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
280 Conf.Case 5/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 VERO (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-OCT-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)