Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.
Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:| S.No. | Citation | Case No. | Case Type | Case Year | Parties | Order_Date | A.F.R | Head Notes/ Tag Line | Bench | Apex Court | Apex Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 PCr.LJ 962 | Suit 1808/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2016 | Mst. Bilqis Bano & another. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Defence Housing Authority & others (Defendant) | 17-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2 | Nil | Suit.B 58/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2015 | National Bank of Pakistan. (Plaintiff) VS Tuwairqi Steel Mills Ltd., & another. (Defendant) | 31-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3 | 2019 CLD 853 | Const. P. 2102/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Textilers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Meezan Bank Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 4 | 2019 CLC 1371 | H.C.A 404/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | MCB Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS Sajida Naqi Riaz & others (Respondent) | 12-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 5 | 2019 YLR 911, 2018 SBLR Sindh 2127 | Suit 1808/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2017 | CPLC-Neighborhood Care & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) | 24-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 6 | 2019 CLD 549 | I. A 74/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2014 | Abu Bakar (Appellant) VS First Women Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.1120-K/2018 Abu Bakar v. First Women Bank Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 7 | Nil | Cr.Bail 519/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ali Sher (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 8 | 2021 CLD 362 | Suit 94/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2020 | Jazaa Foods (Pvt.) Limited & another. (Plaintiff) VS Junaid Jamshed (Pvt.) Limited & others. (Defendant) | 07-APR-20 | Yes | 1. Effect of disclaimer made under section 21 of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 from exclusive use of a name. 2. The principle that registration of a trade mark gives rise to a prima facie case, balance of convenience and likelihood of irreparable loss, that principle would be applicable where the trade mark was registered without a disclaimer. 3. In view of section 42(3) of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001, the use of the disclaimed feature of the mark in question would not constitute trade mark infringement. 4. An action for passing-off is essentially to protect property in goods based on the reputation of those goods, as distinct from an action to protect a trade mark which is a property in itself. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 9 | 2020 SHC KHI 318, 2021 YLR 2318 | Criminal Appeal 486/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2018 | MUHAMMAD KASHIF S/O SHER MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 12-FEB-20 | Yes | The test for weighing the evidence of identification proceedings is to first assess the system variables, i.e. the precautions taken at the test identification parade, and then to assess the estimator variables i.e. the capacity and ability of the eye-witness to identify the accused in the circumstance of the case. Rel. Mian Sohail Ahmed v. The State (2019 SCMR 956) and The matter of Kanwar Anwaar Ali (PLD 2019 SC 488). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | J.P.496/2020 Muhammad Kashif and Muhammad Hanif @ Kalia @ Mamoo v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous |
| 10 | 2021 SHC SUK 473 | R.A (Civil Revision) 120/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2014 | Shabbir Ahmed Memon and others (Applicant) VS Shahnawaz and others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.548-K/2021 Shabbir Ahmed & others v. Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 11 | 2020 SHC KHI 160, 2020 CLC 1857 | J.M 49/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2018 | Iftikhar Ahmed Qureshi (Applicant) VS Mr. Muhammad Abrar Ahmed Qureshi & others (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. Substituted service by way of publication is only presumed to be personal service by virtue of Rule 20(2) of Order V CPC. Such presumption is rebuttable. Therefore, where service by publication is challenged, the first test is to see whether the conditions of Order V Rule 20 CPC had been met, viz., that the publication was resorted to after the Court was satisfied that the defendant was avoiding service, or there was some other reason to believe that summons could not be served in the ordinary manner; in other words, whether the ordinary modes of service available had been exhausted. Rel: Muhammad Anwar v. Abdul Haq (1985 SCMR 1228); Haji Akbar v. Gul Baran (1996 SCMR 1703); and Nargis Latif v. Feroz Afaq Ahmed Khan (2001 SCMR 99). 2. While a couriers receipt was filed to show that summons had been dispatched, there was no report of delivery by the courier to show that summons so dispatched were delivered or tendered within the meaning of Order V Rule 10 CPC. So far there is no statute that attaches a presumption of service to summons sent by a private courier service (as opposed to a public courier service). Rel: Inayatullah v. Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah (2014 SCMR 1477). Thus, it can be safely said that prior to publication neither the available modes of service were exhausted nor was there a verification that the modes of service so used had failed. In any case, the publication made was at best publication of the notice of the pending CMAs and there was no publication made of the summons of the suit. 3. Had it not been a case attracting section 12(2) CPC, the exparte judgment and decree could nonetheless be set-aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 12 | 2022 PLC CS 197, 2022 PLC (CS) 197 | H.C.A 163/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | National Refinery Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Syed Niaz Ahmed (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | The terms of the service were ensured at the time of his (respondent's) transfer, which cannot be lifted unilaterally depriving an employee of his post-retirement benefits or any of the terms of transfer, to which he was entitled at the time when he was inducted/transferred. The transfer confirmation letter dated 08.03.1992 does suggest variance in Scheme for employees but the boards decision has prospective application as far as lifting of any beneficial arrangements are concerned. Wisdom should have prevailed at the time when employees were being transferred and not at the twilight of their career when they (employees) only hoped to get their retirement benefits.. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.711-K/2019 National Refinery Ltd another v. Syed Niaz Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 13 | 2020 SHC KHI 2042 | Const. P. 5124/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s Farkhunda Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS Secretary, M/o Interior & Ors (Respondent) | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the service of temporary employees can be terminated on 14 days??? notice or pay in lieu thereof, whereas in the present case petitioner claims revival of the contract through reinstatement in service, which factum cannot be thrashed out in writ jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 14 | 2021 SHC KHI 121, 2021 SBLR Sindh 1254, 2021 PTD 1118, 2021 PLD Sindh 306 | Suit 618/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2012 | ABDULLAH RAFI (Plaintiff) VS DIRECTOR PROPERTY AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX & OTHER (Defendant) | 12-FEB-21 | Yes | Sindh Entertainment Duty Act, 1958 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 15 | 2021 SHC KHI 487 | Const. P. 4896/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muzaffar Hussain Katpar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-21 | Yes | suspension order | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 16 | 2021 SHC KHI 1290, 2022 PLD Sindh 521 | Suit 1608/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2020 | Seamax Marine Services (Plaintiff) VS The Ministry of Maritime Affairs & others. (Defendant) | 14-JUL-21 | Yes | Rule 48 of Public Procurement Rules, 2004. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 17 | 2021 PTD 2063 | Const. P. 5430/2020 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Imad Samad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 10-SEP-21 | Yes | - Import of vintage cars on the strength of SRO No.833(I)/2018 dated 03.07.2018 followed by a decision in the case of Moin Jamal Abbasi in CP No.D-4124 of 2019 reported as 2020 PTD 660. --Full Bench was constituted to consider the question arising out of litigation:- Whether the subject SRO No.833(I)/2018 issued in terms of Section 19 of Customs Act, 1969 can also be treated as SRO issued by the Ministry of Commerce in terms of Section 3 of the Import & Export Control Act, 1950, permitting import of vintage cars which are otherwise not importable as being old and used in terms of the Import Policy Order of both 2016 and 2020. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge | ||
| 18 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1117 | Const. P. 6192/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 22-APR-21 | Yes | quo warranto | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.562-K/2021 Roshan Ali Kanasro v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 19 | 2021 SHC KHI 861 | Const. P. 4172/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sami Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) | 21-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 20 | 2021 SHC KHI 676, 2021 SBLR Sindh 1715, 2022 PTD 812, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1316 | Suit 1872/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2016 | Saleem Butt.. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & others (Defendant) | 31-MAY-21 | Yes | Challenge to the vires of section 230(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on the ground of delegation of excessive legislative power not successful. While making such challenge, the Plaintiff had also to demonstrate infringement of a Fundamental Right. SRO 115(I)/2015 re the conferring of powers and functions on the DG I&I, was within the jurisdiction of the FBR. Effect of striking-down of same SRO by another High Court discussed. The invoking of section 176 does not militate against the concept of deemed assessment under section 122 of the Ordinance. Malafides had to be pleaded with particulars. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 21 | 2021 SHC HYD 848 | Const. P. 1644/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Nawaz Murad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 22 | 2021 SHC HYD 237 | Const. P. 907/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2009 | Roshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Nazim Taluka Municipal Administration Samaro & Others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 23 | 2021 SHC HYD 254 | Const. P. 262/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 24 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 505 | Const. P. 974/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Isra village Housing Scheme (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 25 | 2021 SHC HYD 88 | Const. P. 51/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst Shahnaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.1713-K/2021 Mst. Shahnaz Bibi v. Ali Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 26 | 2021 SHC HYD 377 | Const. P. 427/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Arsalan Khan (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 27 | 2021 SHC HYD 1370 | Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Out of turn promotion, deputation and OPS | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 28 | 2021 SHC HYD 299 | Const. P. 517/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abid Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.103/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Abid Hussain Yousafzai and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 29 | 2021 SHC HYD 68 | Const. P. 1763/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 30 | 2021 SHC HYD 655 | Const. P. 1328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mehboob Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 31 | 2021 SHC HYD 324 | I. A 1/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Intra Court Appeal No.01 of 2019 [Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited versus Saleem Ahmed Memon] | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Saleem Ahmed Memon (Respondent) | 30-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 32 | 2021 SHC HYD 209 | Const. P. 1197/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr. Ali Murad Lajwani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 33 | 2021 SHC HYD 1408 | Const. P. 1261/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shamshad Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 14-DEC-21 | Yes | It is well-settled that conversion of an amenity plot into any other purpose is illegal and encroachment thereon cannot be allowed under any circumstances. This view is fortified by the following authorities of Honble Supreme Court and cases decided by learned Division Benches of this Court, laying down the principles regarding illegal conversion and use of amenity plots/public properties for other purposes, rights of public in respect of amenity plots/public properties and duties of authorities concerned for maintaining the status of amenity plots/public properties | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 34 | 2021 SHC HYD 1390 | Const. P. 63/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Amin & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.2268/2025 Sindh Revenue Board thr. its Chairman and another v. Lucky Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
| 35 | 2021 SHC HYD 90 | Const. P. 356/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Sharafat Ali (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 36 | Nil | Const. P. 1291/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Habib ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | 29-OCT-19 | Yes | we have straightaway enquired from the Counsel as to what reason was provided in support of the application for condonation of delay, he relied upon the affidavit in support of the application available at page-99. In para-2, para-12 of the memo of petition was adopted in support of the application for codonation of delay. He claimed to have fallen sick due to sudden shock of his removal from service and claimed to have remained in constant supervision of a doctor with effect from 02.2.2012 to 30.4.2012. In support of such contention he attached two certificates of doctors available on record. First certificate is of 29.4.2012 and the other is of 01.5.2012. Both these certificates only demonstrate that the petitioner remained under treatment of a doctor and not that he was bedridden or unable to engage in daily activities | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 37 | 2023 SHC LAR 120, 2014 YLR 2152, 2023 PLD Sindh 231 | II.A. 7/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mohammad Rafique Aghani (Appellant) VS Mohammad Ali Aghani and Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-23 | Yes | The requirement of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 is that if a document is required by law to be attested, it shall not be used as evidence until two attesting witnesses at least have been called for the purpose of proving its execution, if there be two attesting witnesses alive, and subject to the process of the Court and capable of giving evidence. There is a proviso for a registered document, but that is not relevant for the present purposes. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 38 | 2022 SHC KHI 875 | Const. P. 550/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst. Kiran Yazdani D/o Syed Ather Yazdani (Petitioner) VS The XXth Civil Judge/JM, Khi South and another (Respondent) | 22-JUN-22 | Yes | When an appeal lies against an order on temporary custody passed under section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 39 | 2023 SHC KHI 424 | Execution First Appeal 68/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | JAWAID SARWAR (Decree Holder) VS RANA MUNIR & ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor) | 07-APR-23 | Yes | Decree for specific performance entails possession. Privity of contract. Compromise decree when executable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 40 | 2023 SHC KHI 537, 2024 PLD Sindh 374, 1170 CLD 1170 | Suit 1192/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2022 | ZIAUDDIN AHMED & CO. (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS KARACHI SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING WORKS LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) | 31-AUG-23 | Yes | Bank guarantee. Rule of non-interference and the rule of strict compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 41 | 2023 SHC KHI 976 | Const. P. 3387/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P. No. D ??? 3388/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3389/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3390/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3397/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3399/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3417/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3430/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3431/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3432/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3433/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3434/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3435/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3459/2023, C.P. No. D ??? 3477/2023 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst. Sumera Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-23 | Yes | Preventive detention under the MPO Ordinance, 1960. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 42 | 2024 SHC KHI 914 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 213/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Hyd. (Applicant) VS Muhammad Sabir S/o Muhammad Yousaf & another (Respondent) | 05-NOV-24 | Yes | Burden of proof under section 187 Customs Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 43 | 2025 SHC KHI 155 | Cr.Bail 2690/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | NOOR AGHA S/O GUL MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 16-JAN-25 | Yes | Statutory ground of delay. Assessment of hardened, desperate or dangerous criminal. Bail denied. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.27-K/2025 Noor Agha v. The State & another,Crl.A.333/2025 Noor Agha v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed |
| 44 | 2024 SHC KHI 557 | E.P 52/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | ZAIN PERVEZ (Petitioner) VS ECP AND OTHERS (Respondent) | 03-OCT-24 | Yes | Interpretation of section 144(2)(a) of the Election Act, 2017. Consequence of defective affidavits by witnesses. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 45 | 2025 SHC KHI 149 | Judicial Companies Misc. 16/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2011 | M/s. New Jubilee Insurance Comp. (Applicant) VS M/s. Active Apparels Int (Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent) | 24-APR-25 | Yes | Statutory notice of demand under section 306(1)(a) Companies Ordinance, 1984. Effect of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 46 | 2025 SHC KHI 2166 | Const. P. 245/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s GBM Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 02-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 47 | 2025 SHC KHI 2101 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 77/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUHAMMAD ASIF @ KATTO S/O MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 18-AUG-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author) | |||
| 48 | 2025 SHC KHI 3221 | Const. P. 5148/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s. Imperial Panel Industries Pvt Limited (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 49 | 2025 SHC KHI 3177 | Const. P. 4793/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Rawat Oil & Ghee (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 04-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 50 | 2019 MLD 212 | Suit 1593/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2012 | NAZAR GUL (Plaintiff) VS MAYMAR HOUSING SERVICE (PVT) LTD. & OTHERS (Defendant) | 17-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 51 | Nil | Civil Revision 49/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | Mumtaz Ali Hulio (Applicant) VS Azhar Ali and others (Respondent) | 25-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 52 | 2020 CLD 829 | Const. P. 905/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s MCB (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 05-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.2612/2019 MCB Bank Ltd, Lahore v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Zulfiqar Hussain Awan, Director (Legal-II), Office of Consultant Legal Affairs to the President of Pakistan, Islamabad & others,C.A.533/2020 MCB Bank Ltd, Lahore v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Zulfiqar Hussain Awan, Director (Legal-II), Office of Consultant Legal Affairs to the President of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 4 weeks a/w C.As.1386/2018 etc,Pending Adjourned | |
| 53 | Nil | Suit -9/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2018 | Muhammad Afzal (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | 02-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 54 | 2019 PLD Sindh 155 | Suit 1264/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2007 | MUHAMMAD AYUB GABOL (Plaintiff) VS THE PROV OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant) | 09-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 55 | 2019 MLD 1554 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 66/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | SHAKEEL S/O DODO KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 10-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 56 | 2020 PLC (CS) 764 | Const. P. 3508/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Riasat Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-DEC-19 | Yes | 1. Pursuant to Article 129 of the Constitution, the executive authority of the Provincial Government is to be exercised by the Provincial Cabinet as a collective entity albeit in the name of the Governor. When a Provincial statute, such as the Sindh Agriculture University Act, 1977, provides for the exercise of executive authority by the Provincial Government, that is to be done and the decision for that has to be taken by the Provincial Cabinet and not by the Chief Minister alone. Rel: Mustafa Impex v. Government of Pakistan (PLD 2016 SC 808); Karamat Ali v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2018 Sindh 8); Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Province of Sindh, C.P. No.D-8591/2018. 2. Having seen that the word Government in section 27(1) of the Sindh Agriculture University Act, 1977, as it stood amended at the relevant time by the Sindh Universities and Institutes Laws (Amendment) Act, 2014, could only mean the Provincial Cabinet, the decision to extend the tenure of the Respondent No.5 as Vice Chancellor for another term, and the terms and conditions of such extension, had to be taken by the Provincial Cabinet and not by the Chief Minister in isolation of the Provincial Cabinet. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 57 | 2020 MLD 1755 | Cr.Bail 1083/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | ARIF BALOCH S/O YAR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 14-NOV-19 | Yes | Plea of alibi can be considered at the stage of bail. Rel: Zaigham Ashraf v. The State (2016 SCMR 18). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 58 | Nil | Suit 1646/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2008 | Arshad Mahmood & Others (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh (Defendant) | 23-DEC-19 | Yes | Since the Hindu Gymkhana is a Government-owned protected heritage and the Subject Agreement is not with any private-owner of protected heritage under sections 7(3) to 7(5) or section 8 of the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Preservation) Act, 1994 [the Heritage Act], the role of the Advisory Committee envisaged under the said provisions is also not attracted. For the same reason the power of the Advisory Committee to pass a prohibitory order under section 10 of the Heritage Act, which is dependent on an agreement with the private owner under section 8 of the Act, is also not attracted. The record does not show that the Government sanctioned custodianship of the Hindu Gymkhana to the Advisory Committee under section 7(1) of the Heritage Act; nor does the criteria of section 13 of the Heritage Act seems to be met by the Hindu Gymkhana. Thus, having seen that the provisions of sections 7, 8, 10 and 13 of the Heritage Act are not attracted to the circumstances of the case, prima facie it cannot be said that construction of a theatre by NAPA on the land granted to it was prohibited by the Heritage Act, or that the said Act required NAPA to obtain the approval of the Advisory Committee before raising such construction. Impugned notice to remain suspended pending suit. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 59 | Nil | Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) | 23-OCT-19 | Yes | Though he was appointed in the year 1996 on ad-hoc and the appointment apparently was not regular one yet the petitioner has spent more than two decades with a hope that no later, the post would fallen vacant, he will be considered. The record reflects that he is still being considered as ad-hoc. This status throughout his career has not earned him anything except that he has faced certain charges which he defended and that he being deprived of further promotion on account of such status. The period of ad-hoc appointment should not have prevailed for such a long period. In case the authority had no complaints as far as the conduct and working of the petitioner is concerned, steps should have been taken by the authority to regularize the services of the petitioner. The authority remained indolent and petitioner continued as ad-hoc. The record shows that the only ground whereby he was deprived of any such promotion is that he was an ad-hoc employee. Thus, while we consider that his very appointment was not made on regular basis in BPS-18, we are also conscious of the fact that the petitioner has served more than two decades without any prospects of promotion | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 60 | 2020 SHC SUK 10 | Civil Revision 88/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2002 | Syed Shahan Shah @ Syed Nasrullah Shah (Applicant) VS Syed Amanullah Shah and others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 61 | 2021 PLD Sindh Note 57, 2021 PLD Sindh 57 | Suit 1740/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2014 | Sadan General Trading LLC. (Plaintiff) VS Trading Corporation of Pakistan & another. (Defendant) | 25-JUN-20 | Yes | Measure of damages under section 73 of the Contract Act. Assessment of reasonable compensation under section 74 of the Contract Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 62 | 2020 SHC KHI 1909 | Suit 1479/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2008 | M/S.ADAMJEE INSURANCE CO.LTD (Plaintiff) VS THE ASSISTANT COLLECTOR & ORS. (Defendant) | 30-NOV-20 | Yes | Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005. Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 63 | 2020 SHC SUK 815 | Civil Revision 170/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2010 | Raja Abdul Hameed,thr:L.Rs. (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ahsan Nawaz & anor (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 64 | 2024 SHC KHI 782, 2025 SBLR Sindh 5 | Suit 2316/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | MUHAMMAD FARHAN WAZIR & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | 23-APR-24 | Yes | Plaint can be rejected if it is bad for multifariousness. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 65 | 2021 SHC KHI 394, 2021 PTD 1082 | Suit 989/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2018 | Reliance Petrochemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS F.B.R., & others. (Defendant) | 01-MAR-21 | Yes | After repeal of proviso to section 40B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the posting order passed thereunder by the Commissioner is not saved under section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 66 | 2021 SHC KHI 276, 2022 PTD 716 | Suit 2415/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2016 | Saleem Butt (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan and Others (Defendant) | 31-MAY-21 | Yes | Given the mechanism in-built in section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, which includes the providing of reasons in writing to the taxpayer, the power conferred on the Commissioner to call for record under section 177(1) of the Ordinance, does not by itself offend Article 25 of the Constitution. The question then, whether such power has been used unlawfully, is different, and one that may vary with the circumstances of each case. While making such challenge, the Plaintiff had also to demonstrate infringement of a Fundamental Right. The invoking of section 177(1) does not militate against the concept of deemed assessment under section 122 of the Ordinance. Malafides had to be pleaded with particulars. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 67 | Nil | Const. P. 5232/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Danish Khan (Petitioner) VS NBP and Ors (Respondent) | 02-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 68 | 2021 SHC KHI 1374 | Const. P. 4112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-APR-21 | Yes | Petitioner seeks appointment in the Karachi University as Adhoc Teacher, based on differently-abled quota on the premise that he was/is a qualified and fit person to be considered for the subject post. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 69 | 2021 SHC KHI 332, 2022 SBLR Sindh 322 | Suit 2019/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Along with other connected Suits. | Original Side | 2015 | A&Z Agro Industries (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others.. (Defendant) | 13-SEP-21 | Yes | Search of premises under section 38 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and section 175 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 70 | 2021 SHC HYD 577 | Const. P. 1491/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Akhlaue Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 71 | 2021 SHC HYD 166 | Const. P. 2648/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Neno (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 72 | 2021 SHC HYD 1095 | Const. P. 894/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Rafique and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 73 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1604 | Const. P. 2358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 2358 & 2622 of 2019 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Faisal Shah Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 30-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 74 | 2021 SHC HYD 866 | Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 75 | 2021 SHC HYD 506 | Const. P. 583/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Lakhmir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 76 | 2021 SHC HYD 1108 | Const. P. 256/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Sajid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 77 | 2021 SHC HYD 1381 | Const. P. 6/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Asif & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | "Shifting of SABZI MANDI - MARKET COMMITTEE" | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 78 | 2021 SHC HYD 352 | Const. P. 203/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2003 | Saifal Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 79 | 2021 SHC HYD 1264 | Const. P. 1442/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muzaffar Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 80 | 2021 SHC HYD 930 | Const. P. 202/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2003 | Ghulam Mustafa Shah and anothers (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) & others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 81 | 2021 SHC HYD 241 | Civil Revision 116/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2002 | Govt Of Pakistan & Others (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 82 | Nil | I. A 46/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Ali Rashid (Appellant) VS M/s. United Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent) | 22-OCT-19 | Yes | Article 166 of the Limitation Act requires such application under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC as well as deposit thereunder to be made within 30 days from the date of sale. Such deposit is a condition precedent to entertain the application and the Court cannot extend the time for depositing the amount under section 148 CPC too. The date of sale in the ibid rules relates to situation on which the sale was knocked out to the highest bidder and not the date of confirmation. The date of confirmation of sale under Rule 92 CPC relates to the issuance of sale certificate. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 83 | 2022 SHC KHI 181, 2023 PLD Sindh 123 | Suit 1256/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2019 | Eaton Phonenixtec MMPL Co., LTD (Plaintiff) VS Messrs. New Rabia Enterprises (Defendant) | 22-NOV-22 | Yes | Plea of equitable set-off in defense to Order XII Rule 6 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 84 | 2022 SHC HYD 767, 2024 PLC (CS) 11 | Const. P. 646/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Engro Foods Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Union and another (Respondent) | 18-AUG-22 | Yes | "Industrial Relations. Challenge to registration of trade union re trans-provincial establishment". | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 85 | 2023 SHC LAR 713 | R.A (Civil Revision) 137/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Alam and Others. (Applicant) VS District officer community and others. (Respondent) | 03-MAR-23 | Yes | Order XXI Rule 103 CPC | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 86 | 2023 SHC KHI 1033 | Suit 1344/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2016 | Aviserv Limited (Plaintiff) VS Civil Aviation Authority (Defendant) | 24-NOV-23 | Yes | Specific performance of un-registered agreement to lease. The Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that it was ready and willing to perform the same. Stay application dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 87 | 2023 SHC KHI 1037 | Suit 1237/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2022 | Alhaushabi Stevedores (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | 17-JUL-23 | Yes | Suit for abuse of dominant position. Exclusive jurisdiction with Competition Commission. Suit barred. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 88 | 2024 SHC KHI 815 | H.C.A 184/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Behzad Amir Memon (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ishrat & others (Respondent) | 22-NOV-24 | Yes | Section 5(3) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 also states that ???In the case of a contempt having been committed, or alleged to have been committed, by a company, the responsibility thereof shall extend to the persons in the company, directly or indirectly, responsible for the same, who shall also be liable to be punished accordingly.??? Therefore, in our view, before the matter could be fixed for framing charge, there had to be some discussion as to which of the alleged contemnors was prima facie responsible. It is the case of some of the Appellants that they were posted to SITE for brief periods and could not be held responsible for acts committed before or after their posting, which aspect has not been considered in the impugned order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author) | ||
| 89 | 2024 SHC KHI 397 | E.P 2/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | Khurram Sher Zaman (Petitioner) VS Mirza Ikhtiar Baig & Others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-24 | Yes | Where the Petitioner deposited costs in the old treasury account instead of the prevailing account, consequence of rejection in Section 145(1) of the Election Act is not attracted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 90 | 2025 SHC KHI 235 | E.P 59/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | SIRBULAND KHAN (Petitioner) VS THE RETURNING OFFICER PS-112 AND OTHERS (Respondent) | 10-FEB-25 | Yes | Scope of service under section 143(3) of the Election 2017. Tribunal has jurisdiction to examine order of recount passed by ECP. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 91 | 2025 SHC KHI 752 | Spl.Cr.Misc 4/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | MUHAMMAD SALEEM CHANNA S/O NAJAMUDDIN CHANNA & ANR (Applicant) VS THE STATE TH DIR GEN I&I FBR, HYDERABAD (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Application under section 561-A CrPC for quashing investigation of FIR, not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 92 | 2025 SHC KHI 1851 | Judicial Companies Misc. 24/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | UNILEVER PAKISTAN LIMITED AND ANOTHER (Petitioner) VS On Court notice - Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent) | 23-JUN-25 | Yes | Demerger of undertaking sanctioned. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 93 | 2025 SHC KHI 2045 | Spl.Cr.Bail 210/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2025 | USMAN ALI S/O MUHAMMAD YAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 13-AUG-25 | Yes | Effect of Taj International on bail. Applicant booked for abating tax fraud. Doubtful whether he had knowledge of tax fraud. Bail granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 94 | 2025 SHC KHI 2117 | Cr.Rev 40/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | SHER MUHAMMAD S/O DAD MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 26-AUG-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author) | |||
| 95 | Nil | I. A 45/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Ali Rashid (Appellant) VS M/S Unuted Bank Ltd & others (Respondent) | 22-OCT-19 | Yes | The appellant cannot be made to suffer on these facts and circumstances when he had deposited the bid amount at the relevant time. The bid amount was in fact more than forced sale value evaluated by the consultant and declared in the sale proclamation to which no objections were raised. Thus there are enough material and reasons available to interfere with order passed by the Banking Court, which has no reason or logic. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 96 | 2020 PLD Sindh 99 | Const. P. 8125/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Pakistan Minerals Developement Corporation (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-19 | Yes | Petitioner, Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources. In respect of an area of 3818.81 acres at Lakhra, District Jamshoro, for which a mining-lease was granted to the Petitioner for mining coal for a period of thirty[30] years. These renewal applications remained pending with the Respondent No.2, and though in the meantime both the mining-leases of the Petitioner expired in April 2015, the date of such expiry stood extended .Respondent No.2 had granted mining-permits to SLCMC without waiting for a decision on the Petitioners appeals pending under Rule 71 of the SMC Rules. Mr. Jawad Dero, the learned AAG Sindh, and Mr. Jaffar Raza, learned counsel for SLCMC had objected to the maintainability of these fresh petitions on the ground that the Hyderabad Petitions for the same relief were still pending. we agree with Barrister Zameer Ghumro that these petitions cannot be held to be not-maintainable merely on the ground that the Hyderabad Petitions are also pending. Appellate Authority manifests that the refusal to renew the Petitioner mining-leases was only for the reason that the Petitioner was Federal Government entity and the Government of Sindh had already made up its mind to award a mining concession in the same area to the SLCMC, a company wholly owned by the Government of Sindh. Having found no reason to interfere in the discretion exercised by the Respondent No.2 The petitions succeed for prayer clause 3 in terms that the impugned Notifications dated 09-07-2018 granting mining permits to SLCMC (Respondent No.3) having been granted in contravention of Rule 68 of the SMC Rules, the same are without lawful authority and are therefore set-aside judgment shall be dispatched by the office to o be placed in C.P. No. D-7643/2018 pending before this Court at Karachi The petitions stand disposed off. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.2795/2019 M/s Sindh Lakhra Coal Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation thr. its Project Director & others,C.P.L.A.443-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Energy Department, Govt. of Sindh and another v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation and another,C.A.1539/2019 M/s Sindh Lakhra Coal Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation thr. its Project Director & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of |
| 97 | Nil | Suit 553/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2009 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | 09-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 98 | Nil | Const. P. 601/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Kashif Hussain Gaad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 13-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 99 | Nil | Const. P. 190/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | A-One Laboratories and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 15-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 100 | Nil | Const. P. 536/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Jangi Mahar & another (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh (Appellant) | 22-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 101 | Nil | Cr.Bail 293/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ali Murad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 102 | 2019 SBLR Sindh 544, 2019 YLR 979 | Suit 1518/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2007 | ANSAR ALI (Plaintiff) VS ALTAF AHMED MEMON & ANOTHER. (Defendant) | 09-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 103 | 2018 PLD Sindh 564 | S.M.A 46/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Mohammad Abdul Bashir - DECEASED | Original Side | 1998 | Mst. Jamila Naheed...........(Petitioner (Petitioner) VS Mrs. SaminaQasim (Respondent) | 19-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 104 | Nil | Const. P. 5570/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muneem Khan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Registrar Pakistan Nursing Council & Ors (Respondent) | 15-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 105 | 2020 YLR 2024 | Suit 2215/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2014 | Muhammad Kashif Vohra. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Ismail & Others. (Defendant) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | 1. A suit for specific performance of contract of immovable property brought by the vendee can be dismissed without going through a trial where the plaintiff, when put on terms to deposit the sale consideration in Court, fails to do so. That has been the consistent approach on the Original side of this Court. The wisdom behind that of course is that when called upon by the Court, if the plaintiff/vendee cannot demonstrate that he is ready and willing to make payment to perform his part of the contract, which is the primary test for grant of equitable discretionary relief in a suit for specific performance, then that is sufficient reason for the Court to decline the exercise of discretionary jurisdiction. Rel: Allah Ditta v. Bashir Ahmed (1997 SCMR 181); Abdul Hameed Khan v. Ghulam Rabbani (2003 SCMR 953); and Hamood Mehmood v. Shabana Ishaque (2017 SCMR 2022); 2. It is not in every case that the Court may require the plaintiff of a suit for specific performance of contract to deposit the sale consideration in Court. Rel: Bin Bak Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Friends Associates (2003 SCMR 238). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 106 | Nil | Civil Revision 4/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2005 | United Bank Limited (Applicant) VS Shoaib Ahmed and others (Respondent) | 09-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 107 | Nil | Const. P. 6439/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Javeria (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-NOV-19 | Yes | (a) The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was by virtue of Article 89(2)(a)(ii) of the Constitution, i.e., by a resolution of the Senate disapproving the same and not by way of any repealing enactment. Therefore, the effect of repeal contained in sections 6, 6-A and section 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which otherwise apply only when a repeal is by way of a repealing enactment, were neither triggered nor would those serve as an aid in construing the effect of repeal under a Constitutional provision such as Article 89. In other words, on the repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, nothing contained in the General Clauses Act, 1897 would come to save the Amending Admission Regulations that had been made under the repealed Ordinance. In view of Pakistan Medical and Dental Council v. Muhammad Fahad Malik (supra), Article 264 of the Constitution also did not have the effect of saving or giving permanency to the Amended Admission Regulations when the effect of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was only temporary as it was never accorded approval by the Parliament. Therefore, on 29-08-2019, when the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was repealed by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, the Amended Admission Regulations also stood repealed and the Original Admission Regulations were revived. (b) It will be seen that while the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 repeals all previous Regulations, but that is subject to sub-section (7) which provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process. The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 1962 by the PMC Ordinance, 2019, the former being a permanent statute under the 1973 Constitution, is not a repeal by virtue of Article 89 of the Constitution, but a repeal by a repealing statute, albeit a temporary one, and one which has been expressly made subject to section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which in turn provides that the repeal shall not revive anything not in force or existing at the time at which the repeal takes effect. We have already discussed above that on 29-08-2019 the Amended Admission Regulations had ceased and the Original Admission Regulations had revived. Therefore, when sub-section (7) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process, those can only be the Original Admission Regulations. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.4396/2019 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Javeria & others,C.A.611/2020 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council now Pakistan Medical Commission thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Javeria & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution |
| 108 | 2020 SHC KHI 681, 2021 PLD Sindh 130 | Suit 42/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2020 | Syed Zain Ul Abideen (Plaintiff) VS Federal Board of Revenue & others. (Defendant) | 16-APR-20 | Yes | Ouster of jurisdiction to try a civil suit in respect of matters arising under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 2017 and exceptions to such ouster. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 109 | 2020 SHC KHI 1935, 2022 YLR Note 180 | Cr.Bail 829/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | ALLAH MUHAMMAD S/O KHUDA NOOR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 22-JUL-20 | Yes | (1) Direction by a superior Court to the trial court to conclude a trial within a specified period is an administrative direction, and non-compliance thereof does not ipso facto entitle an accused person to be admitted to bail. (2) Return of the stolen amount by the accused cannot be taken as a ground in itself to grant bail independent of the merits of the case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 110 | 2020 SHC KHI 652, 2021 CLC 1222, 2021 CLD 951 | Const. P. 6339/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Habeen Fatani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 24-DEC-20 | Yes | ECL Matter. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 111 | 2020 SHC KHI 2324, 2021 YLR Note 73 | Cr.Bail 508/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | ABDUL RASHEED S/O GHULAM RASOOL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 28-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 112 | 2020 SHC SUK 896 | Civil Revision 6/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2000 | Executive Engineer Highways and others (Applicant) VS Nazir Ahmed and others (Respondent) | 27-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 113 | 2020 SHC SUK 775 | Civil Revision 198/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Abdul Majeed Kalhoro (Applicant) VS Amjad Ali Arain (Respondent) | 14-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 114 | 2020 SHC KHI 1484, 2023 PCr.LJ Note 37 | Cr.Bail 558/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O JAN MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 19-MAY-20 | Yes | Effect of the prohibition in section 51(1) of the CNS Act, 1997. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 115 | 2021 SHC KHI 421 | Const. P. 2328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Tanveer (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corp Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | 14-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 116 | 2021 SHC KHI 948 | Const. P. 5025/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Imdad Ali Abro & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 28-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioners are seeking the up-gradation of the post of Computer Operator/Assistant Computer Programmer BS-16 to 17--we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts in BPS-17 with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 117 | 2021 SHC KHI 258 | Const. P. 4035/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Bashir Ahmed Kalwar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 31-MAY-21 | Yes | Declare the supersession of the petitioner made by the Respondent No.02 / CSB and the competent authority through impugned order dated 06.06.2018 as illegal--Direct the respondents to consider the case of promotion of petitioner in BPS-20, in terms of original reference of December, 2016--when a civil/public servant is recommended for supersession by the Central Selection Board (CSB) and the recommendation of the CSB is approved by the competent authority, what is its effect, and whether supersession is punishment? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.3921/2021 The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Govt of Pakistan, Islamabad and another v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar and another,C.P.L.A.757-K/2021 The Chairman (FBR) v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous |
| 118 | 2021 SHC KHI 715 | Const. P. 3585/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Misri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-21 | Yes | termination--Sindh Madressatul Islam University | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 119 | 2021 SHC HYD 1243 | Const. P. 639/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Ismail & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 120 | 2021 SHC HYD 251 | Const. P. 1174/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sikandar Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 121 | 2021 SHC HYD 1151 | Const. P. 614/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Mst:Akbaro (Petitioner) VS Appellate Authority Board Of Trustee E.O.B.I, & Or (Respondent) | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 122 | 2021 SHC HYD 451 | Conf.Case 23/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Hassan @ Ali Hassan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | The murder of two persons at the hands of appellant has although been proved beyond a shadow of doubt but the motive alleged has not been established. All these factors point out to circumstances overwhelmingly mitigating in nature and justify conversion of death sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and conviction of the appellant is maintained but his death sentence is converted into life imprisonment each against each murder. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 123 | 2021 SHC HYD 771 | Const. P. 10/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr. Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 124 | 2021 SHC HYD 910 | Const. P. 2608/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Deepak (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 125 | 2021 SHC HYD 766 | Const. P. 96/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C. P. No. D- 06 of 2020 [Muhammad Asif & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C. P. No. D- 96 of 2020 [Abdul Rasheed & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-111 of 2020 [Muhammad Anwar vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-126 of 2020 [Nizamuddin & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-244 of 2020 [Wali Muhammad & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Rasheed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.4725/2021 Shahi Khan Jagirani v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Health Department, Larkana and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 126 | 2021 SHC HYD 1142 | Const. P. 745/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Asma Hameed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 127 | 2025 SHC KHI 2 | H.C.A 97/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mian Ahmed Akbar & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Al-Dahra Agriculture Co. Pak (Pvt) Ltd. & ors (Respondent) | 23-JAN-25 | Yes | Test of section 34 Arbitration Act, 1940. Appeal against stay dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | C.P.L.A.459-K/2025 Mian Ahmed Akbar & others v. M/s Al-Dahra Agriculture Co. Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd & others,C.P.4584/2021 Al-Dahra International Investment SP LLC, Karachi v. Mian Ahmad Akbar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Next Session),Disposed Disposed of |
| 128 | Nil | Const. P. 3787/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | M/s Rajby Industries (Petitioner) VS Rahim Dad And ors (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.684-K/2019 M/s Rajby Industries v. Rahim Dad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 129 | 2021 SHC HYD 499 | Const. P. 2382/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Attaullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federal Secretary Ministry of Water and Power dev.... (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 130 | 2021 SHC HYD 1327 | Const. P. 1523/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 131 | 2021 SHC HYD 139 | Const. P. 1163/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Altaf Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 23-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 132 | 2022 SHC KHI 185 | Suit 85/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2022 | M/S TAHIR FOODS PRODUCTS (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | 14-FEB-22 | Yes | Power of DG I&I Customs re phytosanitory action under the Pakistan Plant Protection Rules, 2019. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 133 | 2022 SHC KHI 907, 2016 YLR 300 | Suit 1634/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2009 | Mst. Humera Jabeen & Ors (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Arshad & Ors (Defendant) | 30-MAR-22 | Yes | Principles of recusals of a Judge. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 134 | 2023 SHC LAR 1083, 2024 PLC (CS) 460 | Const. P. 764/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Inayatullah Lashari (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent) | 08-FEB-23 | Yes | Employee engaged on adhoc or under a time-bound contract has no vested right to regularization | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | C.P.L.A.688-K/2023 Inayatullah v. The Commissioner Larkana & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 135 | 2022 SHC KHI 761, 2024 PCr.LJ 713 | Spl. Cr. A. 47/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | THE STATE / ANF (Applicant) VS AGHA MEHMOOD UL HASSAN HARAVI & OTHERS (Respondent) | 19-OCT-22 | Yes | Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, overrides Prevention of Smuggling Act, 1977. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.198-K/2022 The State / Director General Anti-Narcotics Force Sindh v. Agha Mehmood Ul Hassan Haravi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 136 | 2023 SHC KHI 185 | Suit 645/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2010 | MST.SHABANA HANIF (Plaintiff) VS M/S.NEW CHALI TRADE CENTRE (Defendant) | 01-NOV-23 | Yes | Section 13(3) SBCO, 1979. Interpretation of. Regulation 5-1.22 KBTPR, 2002. Section 22(1) of Limitation Act, 1908. Time runs from date of joinder application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 137 | 2024 SHC KHI 785 | Judicial Companies Misc. 28/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | N.P Spinning Mills Limited (Applicant) VS Muhammad Siddique (Respondent) | 06-SEP-24 | Yes | Company Bench is not the Court designated to try offences under Companies Act, 2017. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 138 | 2024 SHC KHI 670 | H.C.A 182/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zeeshan Alvi (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ishrat (Respondent) | 22-NOV-24 | Yes | Section 5(3) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 also states that ???In the case of a contempt having been committed, or alleged to have been committed, by a company, the responsibility thereof shall extend to the persons in the company, directly or indirectly, responsible for the same, who shall also be liable to be punished accordingly.??? Therefore, in our view, before the matter could be fixed for framing charge, there had to be some discussion as to which of the alleged contemnors was prima facie responsible. It is the case of some of the Appellants that they were posted to SITE for brief periods and could not be held responsible for acts committed before or after their posting, which aspect has not been considered in the impugned order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author) | ||
| 139 | 2025 SHC KHI 753 | Spl.Cr.Misc 5/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | IMRAN BAHIR S/O BASHIR AHMED BHUTTO (Applicant) VS THE STATE TH DIR GEN I&I FBR, HYDERABAD (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Application under section 561-A CrPC for quashing investigation of FIR, not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 140 | 2025 SHC KHI 607 | Judicial Companies Misc. 17/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2011 | M/s. New Jubilee Insurance Corp. (Applicant) VS M/s. Three Stars Housing Mills (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent) | 24-APR-25 | Yes | Statutory notice of demand under section 306(1)(a) Companies Ordinance, 1984. Effect of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 141 | 2025 SHC KHI 1913 | Const. P. 3050/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The State & another (Respondent) | 21-JUL-25 | Yes | Production of Under Trial Prisoners via Video Link; Held YES; Circular of this Court and the decision of National Judicial Policy Making Committee dated 11.07.2025 upheld No writ lies against order of a single judge of the High Court | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 142 | 2025 SHC KHI 1182 | E.P 15/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | Adeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-25 | Yes | Affidavit of service filed after period of 45 days did not cure non-compliance of section 144(2)(c) of Election Act. Petition rejected under section 145(1) of the Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.A.315-K/2025 Adeel Ahmed v. Election Commission, Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 143 | 2025 SHC KHI 2104 | Const. P. 1958/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Faisal Ansari @ Soni & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 24-JUL-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author) | |||
| 144 | 2025 SHC KHI 1335 | Judicial Companies Misc. 33/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | U & I GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED (Applicant) VS Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent) | 13-MAY-25 | Yes | Scheme of amalgamation sanctioned. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 145 | 2025 SHC KHI 2573 | Const. P. 1916/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Shaikh Hiisham Mehmood & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 146 | 2025 SHC KHI 3491 | Const. P. 6095/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Brussel Trading (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 147 | 2024 SHC KHI 1315 | Suit 1552/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2009 | ABDUL QADIR MOSANI (Plaintiff) VS MIAN AFTAB IQBAL & ORS. (Defendant) | 02-JUL-24 | Yes | Decision under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC is res judicata. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 148 | 2022 SHC KHI 944 | Const. P. 946/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: aa | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Astro Plastic (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 26-DEC-22 | Yes | ADR under Customs Act, 1969. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 149 | 2018 SBLR Sindh 1974, 2018 PLD Sindh 671 | Suit 983/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2017 | Mrs. Hina Mumtaz Somroo (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Sami Soomro (Defendant) | 03-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 150 | Nil | Suit 1572/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2010 | Zahid Hussain (Plaintiff) VS United Bank Limited & another (Defendant) | 16-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 151 | 2019 SBLR Sindh 376, 2019 CLC 781 | Suit 203/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2002 | ADVOCATE GENERAL SINDH (Plaintiff) VS ISLAMIC EDUCATION TRUST & ORS. (Defendant) | 07-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 152 | 2019 YLR 1700 | Suit 1254/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2015 | Mrs Naveen Irfan (Plaintiff) VS Mst Shama Parveen (Defendant) | 03-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 153 | 2020 CLC 721 | H.C.A 104/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Port Qasim Authority (Appellant) VS Industrial Management & Investment Co. Ltd. & ors (Respondent) | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.A.577/2019 Aromatic Foods Limited v. Port Qasim Authority & others,C.A.578/2019 Industrial Management & investment Company Ltd. v. Port Qasim Authority & others,C.A.579/2019 Project Development Corporation LTD v. Port Qasim Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending ,Pending ,Pending | |
| 154 | Nil | H.C.A 6/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Faiz Muhammad (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.286-K/2019 Shahid Hussain Malik v. Faiz Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 155 | 2020 YLR 859 | Const. P. 6554/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ms. Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) VS PM & DC and Ors (Respondent) | 14-NOV-19 | Yes | (a) The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was by virtue of Article 89(2)(a)(ii) of the Constitution, i.e., by a resolution of the Senate disapproving the same and not by way of any repealing enactment. Therefore, the effect of repeal contained in sections 6, 6-A and section 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which otherwise apply only when a repeal is by way of a repealing enactment, were neither triggered nor would those serve as an aid in construing the effect of repeal under a Constitutional provision such as Article 89. In other words, on the repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, nothing contained in the General Clauses Act, 1897 would come to save the Amending Admission Regulations that had been made under the repealed Ordinance. In view of Pakistan Medical and Dental Council v. Muhammad Fahad Malik (supra), Article 264 of the Constitution also did not have the effect of saving or giving permanency to the Amended Admission Regulations when the effect of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was only temporary as it was never accorded approval by the Parliament. Therefore, on 29-08-2019, when the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was repealed by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, the Amended Admission Regulations also stood repealed and the Original Admission Regulations were revived. (b) It will be seen that while the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 repeals all previous Regulations, but that is subject to sub-section (7) which provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process. The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 1962 by the PMC Ordinance, 2019, the former being a permanent statute under the 1973 Constitution, is not a repeal by virtue of Article 89 of the Constitution, but a repeal by a repealing statute, albeit a temporary one, and one which has been expressly made subject to section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which in turn provides that the repeal shall not revive anything not in force or existing at the time at which the repeal takes effect. We have already discussed above that on 29-08-2019 the Amended Admission Regulations had ceased and the Original Admission Regulations had revived. Therefore, when sub-section (7) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process, those can only be the Original Admission Regulations. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.4221/2019 Pakistan Medical & Dental Council thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Ms. Urooj Fatima & others,C.A.610/2020 Pakistan Medical & Dental Council now Pakistan Medical Commission thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Ms. Urooj Fatima & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution |
| 156 | 2020 PLD Sindh 400 | Suit 1461/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2016 | Mohsin Abbas. (Plaintiff) VS Air Waves Media (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Defendant) | 16-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 157 | 2021 CLC 54 | Suit 362/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2015 | Wakeel Akhtar (Plaintiff) VS Shahzad Alam (Defendant) | 29-NOV-19 | Yes | While Article 84 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order provides a mode for proving execution of a document by comparison of signature or hand-writing, that is an additional mode and not a substitute of or an alternate to the mandatory provision of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order. The mode of proof by way of Article 84 is not the most desirable of modes in that, the signature and hand-writing of a person may vary with time and age; or a person called upon under sub-Article (2) of Article 84 to give a specimen of his signature or hand-writing may feign the same to defeat the comparison. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 158 | 2021 YLR Note 37, 2021 YLR 440 | Criminal Appeal 245/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2018 | KARMAT HUSSAIN S/O MUBARAK HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 31-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. Even in a case involving capital punishment, conviction can follow on circumstantial evidence, but that such circumstantial evidence should provide all links in an unbroken chain where one end of the chain touches the dead body and the other the neck of the accused. 2. Though evidence implicating an accused cannot be used to convict him if he was not confronted with it under section 342 Cr.P.C., but that does not mean to say that every inadequate examination under section 342 Cr.P.C. results in vitiating the trial, nor does it mean to say that the other independent evidence standing against the accused stands diminished. Rel. S.A.K. Rehmani v. The State (2005 SCMR 364). Even discarding the evidence not confronted to the accused under section 342 Cr.P.C., the chain of circumstantial evidence against him is complete and uninterrupted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | J.P.196/2020 Karamat Hussain v. The State,Crl.A.398/2025 Karamat Hussain v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed |
| 159 | 2021 CLD 194 | Suit.B 15/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2017 | National Bank of Pakistan (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Textile City Limited & others (Defendant) | 22-APR-20 | Yes | 1. Notwithstanding the failure of the defendant to comply with conditions of a leave application, the Court is still required to apply its mind to the case of the plaintiff before passing any order/judgment. Leave granted where statement of account incomplete. 2. Notwithstanding the creation of a mortgage, the mortgagor remains liable to the lessor for any breach or non-performance of the conditions of lease; and that if the lessor forfeits the lease, the remedy of the mortgagee is against the mortgagor for indemnification, and not against the lessor. The security of the mortgagee in the mortgaged property can be no better than the interest given to the mortgagor by the lease. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 160 | 2020 SHC KHI 2075 | Const. P. 1158/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Rehan Khalid (Petitioner) VS Chairman FBR and Others (Respondent) | 12-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 161 | 2021 SHC HYD 795 | Const. P. 585/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Inayatullah & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.1717-K/2021 Inayatullah & ohters v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 162 | 2021 SHC KHI 1249 | Const. P. 427/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-APR-21 | Yes | In our view, no candidate shall be appointed to a post unless after such medical examination as Government may prescribe such candidate is found medically fit to discharge the duties of the post. In the present case, the petitioner was relieved from the duties on medical grounds and his appeal was rejected on the same analogy. Besides above, the assertion of the petitioner is misconceived on the premise that he obtained a medical examination fitness test certificate on 02.12.2019 after the rejection of his appeal, on 14.5.2019, thus this document could not be taken into consideration, besides the respondents have relied upon the documents which prima facie show adverse inference against him. Thus, at this stage, we cannot declare him medically fit or otherwise for the subject post, which was a contractual position and by efflux of time expired. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 163 | 2021 SHC KHI 628, 2022 PCr.LJ 1388 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 103/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | MUHAMMAD ASAD QURESHI S/O MASOOD AHMED (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 25-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 164 | 2021 SHC KHI 681, 2022 PLD Sindh 160, 2022 PLD Sindh 165, 2022 CLD 315 | Suit 308/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | M/S. FOREL INTERNATIONAL TRADING & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS WAQAS AHMED JAT & OTHERS (Defendant) | 25-MAY-21 | Yes | Suit barred for staying freezing order passed under section 5(5) of the FIA Act, 1974. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 165 | 2021 SHC KHI 625, 2021 MLD 1877 | Suit 2581/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2014 | Mohsin Ahmad. (Plaintiff) VS Nasreen Irfan & Others. (Defendant) | 01-JUL-21 | Yes | Stipulation in mortgage deed that mortgagee would become owner or vendee of the property if mortgage money is not paid, is a clog on the right/equity of redemption, repugnant to law and void. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 166 | Nil | Const. P. 8126/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Riaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.4186/2019 Riaz Ahmad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Finance, Finance Division, Islamabad & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 167 | Nil | Const. P. 3449/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | M/s IFFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Hanif Ahmed Siddiqui and Ors (Respondent) | 28-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.731-K/2019 Haneef Ahmed Siddiqui v. Chief Executive/Factory Manager M/s IFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.27-K/2020 Haneef Ahmed Siddiqui v. Chief Executive/Factory Manager M/s IFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted in all cases and appeals in the fixed for hearing with 3 wekks.,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 168 | 2021 SHC KHI 786 | Const. P. 6604/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Nasim Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 13-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioner is an educationist and has been serving in the Public Education Sector in Sindh since 1987. Per learned counsel the Universities and Boards Department, the Government of Sindh, Karachi invited application for the position of Chairman-Board and petitioner was one of the candidates for the aforesaid post-- | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 169 | 2021 SHC HYD 666 | Const. P. 1102/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | MS Beenish Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 170 | 2021 SHC HYD 420 | Const. P. 1478/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mst Hanifa Karim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.158-K/2022 Mst. Hanifa Karim & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 171 | 2021 SHC HYD 1430 | Const. P. 1931/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Vishandas (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 172 | 2021 SHC HYD 1149 | Const. P. 770/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Salman Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.1712-K/2021 Salman Qureshi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 173 | 2021 SHC HYD 810 | Const. P. 944/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 174 | 2021 SHC HYD 895 | Const. P. 38/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Administrator Evacuee Trust property & Others (Petitioner) VS Pardeep Kumar & Others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 175 | 2021 SHC HYD 54 | Const. P. 526/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 176 | 2021 SHC HYD 1072 | Const. P. 3157/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sh. Nenoo Bheel (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | we may observe that pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges; prima-facie there was/is no conviction in his credit, and pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on that score. In our view pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of any charges; and, is violative to the law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon (PLD 2007 SC 35) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 177 | 2021 SHC HYD 22 | Const. P. 182/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P.No.D-198 of 2021 [Qurban & another Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-435 of 2021 [Khalil Ahmed & anothervs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-479 of 2021 [Mushtaque Ali & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-509 of 2021 [Noorullah Dehraj vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-534 of 2021 [Nazar Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-668 of 2021 [Gul Mir vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-769 of 2021 [Mst. Razia & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-845 of 2021 [Abdul Majeed vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-914 of 2021 [Pir Bux & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1027 of 2021 [Ali Ahmed & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1070 of 2021 [Ayaz Ali & others vs. SHO PS Punhan Khan Chandio & another] C.P No.D-1198 of 2021 [Ali Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1277 of 2021 [Mukhtiar Ali & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1543 of 2021 [Behram Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1556 of 2021 [Khurram Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] -:2:- C.P No.D-182/2021 a/w connected petitions C.P No.D-1689 of 2021 [Muhammad Waris @ Suneel vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mevo Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 178 | 2022 SHC KHI 264, 2022 SBLR Sindh 2119, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1585 | Suit 2970/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | SHUJABAD AGRO INDUSTRIES (PT.) LTD. (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | 04-MAR-22 | Yes | Policy-making by the CCI under Article 154(1) is in a different sphere than policy-making by the Federal Government in the exercise of its executive authority under Article 97. The Natural Gas Allocation & Management Policy, 2005 was within the legal competence of the Federal Government and not the CCI. Under the GSAs between the Plaintiffs and the SSGC, the Plaintiffs cannot assert a right to receive gas for industrial use during the months of December, January and February. Article 158 of the Constitution exists as a prerogative of a Provincial Government, and therefore it does not give actionable cause to a person other than the concerned Provincial Government to invoke the same. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 179 | 2021 SHC HYD 559 | Const. P. 688/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Imran (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 180 | 2021 SHC HYD 370 | Const. P. 837/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mir Munawar Ali Talpur (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 181 | 2021 SHC HYD 600 | Const. P. 1523/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 182 | 2021 SHC HYD 888 | Const. P. 2134/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Abdul Wahid and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.101-K/2022 Abdul Wahid & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Livestock, Fisheries Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 183 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 94 | Const. P. 1430/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst Touqeer Fatima Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 184 | 2022 SHC KHI 183, 2022 SBLR Sindh 883 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 5/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Shahzad & another (Respondent) | 23-FEB-22 | Yes | Confiscation of vehicle under Section 157(2) of the Customs Act, 1969. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.690-K/2022 Shahzad v. The Collector of Customs & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 185 | 2022 SHC KHI 684 | Suit 891/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | MST. FEHMIDA BEGUM (Plaintiff) VS MATI-UR-RAHMAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | 09-SEP-22 | Yes | Stranger to an arbitration award cannot file objections. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 186 | 2023 SHC LAR 1113, 2023 MLD 1321 | Const. P. 240/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mazhar Ali Langah (Petitioner) VS Asad Ali Khoso & ors (Respondent) | 12-JAN-23 | Yes | Territorial jurisdiction of Family Court is governed by Rule 6 of the Family Court Rules 1965, not by provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act 1890. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 187 | 2023 SHC LAR 346, 2014 YLR 2152, 2023 PLD Sindh 231 | II.A. 7/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mohammad Rafique Aghani (Appellant) VS Mohammad Ali Aghani and Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-23 | Yes | The requirement of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 is that if a document is required by law to be attested, it shall not be used as evidence until two attesting witnesses at least have been called for the purpose of proving its execution, if there be two attesting witnesses alive, and subject to the process of the Court and capable of giving evidence. There is a proviso for a registered document, but that is not relevant for the present purposes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 188 | 2023 SHC KHI 220 | Suit 2580/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Suit No.2719 of 2021, Suit No.2720 of 2021, Suit No.2721 of 2021 & Suit No.2897 of 2021 | Original Side | 2021 | AL-KARAM TOWEL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | 14-MAR-23 | Yes | Re: Concessionary Tariff of RLNG. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 189 | 2023 SHC LAR 581 | Cr.Acq.A. 32/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | Nisar Ahmed Shaikh (Appellant) VS PC Umed Ali Jakhrani & others (Respondent) | 19-MAY-23 | Yes | Scope of Referee Judge in Cr. Appeals. Death in police custody. Appraisal of evidence should not be unrealistic. Applicability of section 302(c) PPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.131-K/2023 PC Umeed Ali & others v. Nisar Ahmed & another,Crl.M.Appeal.1-K/2023 Umed Ali & others v. The Deputy Registrar Supreme Court Pakistan Karachi. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Disposed of |
| 190 | 2023 SHC KHI 99 | Spl.Cr.Rev. 297/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl.Cr.Rev. (S) 298/2021, 299/2021, 300/2021 and 301/2021 | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | HANIF MOOSA S/O MOOSA & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 18-DEC-23 | Yes | Intent of section 540 CrPC is to ensure a just decision. If that leads to filling of lacuna in evidence, such consequence does not come in the way of exercising the power. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 191 | 2024 SHC KHI 856 | Spl.Cr.Bail 34/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUZAMIL AKBAR MOTEN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-APR-24 | Yes | Sales tax fraud in refund claims. Section 33 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. Bail granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 192 | 2024 SHC KHI 363 | Suit 1397/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Suit No. 800 of 2009 | Original Side | 2008 | IQBAL & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS MST. AZIZA BAI (Defendant) | 19-SEP-24 | Yes | Scope of Order XVI Rule 1 CPC for summoning a Defendant. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 193 | 2024 SHC KHI 1063 | Cr.Bail 782/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUHAMMAD RAFIQ S/O GUL RAUF (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Statutory ground of delay. Bail granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 194 | 2024 SHC KHI 755 | Spl. Cr. A. 1/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | THE STATE / ANF (Applicant) VS B.R.R GUARDIAN MODARABE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 11-JUL-24 | Yes | Appeal of ANF under section 43 of the Prevention of Smuggling Act, 1977 not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 195 | 2025 SHC KHI 542 | Suit 1406/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | WSKB & Company (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh & others (Defendant) | 30-JAN-25 | Yes | Public Procurement - In absence of material violation of law on public procurement, Court will not interfere in public projects. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 196 | 2025 SHC KHI 3380 | Const. P. 4144/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Faran Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 197 | Nil | Suit 533/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2016 | Zain Khan. (Plaintiff) VS Taj Roshan & Others. (Defendant) | 16-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 198 | 2020 CLC 275, 2019 SBLR 2301 | H.C.A 85/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | SAGA Shipping & Trading Corporation Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS WALIA Steel Industries PLC & others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.2407/2019 SAGA Shipping & Trading Corporation Ltd & others v. WALIA Steel Industries & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 199 | 2018 CLC 1720 | Suit 1710/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2015 | Syed Shafaat Ali.(ISSUES) (Plaintiff) VS Syed Feroz Ali. (Defendant) | 26-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 200 | 2018 YLR 1936 | Suit 344/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2007 | MUHAMMAD SHAHID AKRAM. (Plaintiff) VS GHULAM QADIR JUMANI & ORS (Defendant) | 02-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 201 | Nil | Const. P. 2304/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Meezan Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Textilers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 202 | Nil | S.M.A 312/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2017 | Sobia Jasim (Petitioner) VS Jasim Rasool - Deceased (Respondent) | 22-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 203 | 2020 CLC Note 20 | Suit 1762/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2018 | Mrs. Zarina Iqbal (Plaintiff) VS Haji Jaffar & others (Defendant) | 09-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 204 | Nil | Civil Revision 30/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mst. Hijab Akhtar (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 205 | Nil | Const. P. 2375/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Essa Bhutto and ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and ors (Respondent) | 09-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.722-K/2019 Ali Akbar Ujjan and others v. The Chairman Port Qasim Authority and others,C.P.L.A.723-K/2019 Akbar Adeeb Zubairi and another v. The Chairman Sindh Lobour Appellate and others,C.P.L.A.741-K/2019 Rasheed Ahmed Memon v. The Chairman Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 206 | Nil | Const. P. 451/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ghulam Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 01-OCT-19 | Yes | Sindh Tenancy Act, 1950 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.652-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Senior Member Board of Revenue and others v. Ghulam Ali Leghari,C.A.7-K/2022 Province of Sindh thr. Senior Member Board of Revenue and others v. Ghulam Ali Leghari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Pending |
| 207 | 2020 SHC KHI 1190 | J.M 74/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2015 | Maula Bakhsh. (Applicant) VS Muhammad Abrar Ahmed & Others. (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. Substituted service by way of publication is only presumed to be personal service by virtue of Rule 20(2) of Order V CPC. Such presumption is rebuttable. Therefore, where service by publication is challenged, the first test is to see whether the conditions of Order V Rule 20 CPC had been met, viz., that the publication was resorted to after the Court was satisfied that the defendant was avoiding service, or there was some other reason to believe that summons could not be served in the ordinary manner; in other words, whether the ordinary modes of service available had been exhausted. Rel: Muhammad Anwar v. Abdul Haq (1985 SCMR 1228); Haji Akbar v. Gul Baran (1996 SCMR 1703); and Nargis Latif v. Feroz Afaq Ahmed Khan (2001 SCMR 99). 2. While a couriers receipt was filed to show that summons had been dispatched, there was no report of delivery by the courier to show that summons so dispatched were delivered or tendered within the meaning of Order V Rule 10 CPC. So far there is no statute that attaches a presumption of service to summons sent by a private courier service (as opposed to a public courier service). Rel: Inayatullah v. Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah (2014 SCMR 1477). Thus, it can be safely said that prior to publication neither the available modes of service were exhausted nor was there a verification that the modes of service so used had failed. In any case, the publication made was at best publication of the notice of the pending CMAs and there was no publication made of the summons of the suit. 3. Had it not been a case attracting section 12(2) CPC, the exparte judgment and decree could nonetheless be set-aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 208 | 2021 SHC SUK 311 | R.A (Civil Revision) 16/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2010 | Shahnawaz and another (Applicant) VS Shabbir Ahmed Memon and others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 209 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 522, 2021 SBLR Sindh 522, 2021 PLD Sindh 256 | Const. P. 4953/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Peoples University of Medical & Health Sci (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-DEC-20 | Yes | Reasons assigned to the short order dated 11.11.2020 passed in the MDCAT petitions viz. C.P. Nos.D-4953, 5036, 5158, 5237 of 2020 (challenging the vires of Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020) by Division Bench of Sindh High Court comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.1301-K/2020 Peoples University of Medical & Health Seiences for Womon & others v. Pakistan Ministry of Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed |
| 210 | 2021 SHC KHI 1414 | Const. P. 2805/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr. Shamim Qureshi (Petitioner) VS J.S.M.U and Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 211 | 2021 SHC KHI 1212, 2022 PLD Sindh 388 | Execution First Appeal 51/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | MENA ENERGY DMCC (Decree Holder) VS HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Judgment Debtor) | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | Execution of Foreign Decree. Judgment when conclusive under section 13 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 212 | Nil | Const. P. 162/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Rashid Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS IBA and Ors (Respondent) | 24-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.654-K/2019 Rashid Ali Khan v. Institute of Business Administration (IBA) and anotehr,C.A.45-K/2020 Rashid Ali Khan v. Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Karachi thr. its Registrar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,Pending | |
| 213 | 2021 SHC KHI 388, 2022 PTD 212 | Suit 3/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2019 | Amsons Textile Mills (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) | 05-MAY-21 | Yes | res judicata in suit after decision in constitution petition. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 214 | 2021 SHC KHI 829 | Suit 717/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2010 | AGAH ASAD ABBAS (Plaintiff) VS MST.NASEEM IRFAN (Defendant) | 01-JUL-21 | Yes | Limitation for an application for restoration of a suit dismissed for non-prosecution, is governed by Article 163 of the Limitation Act, not by Article 181. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 215 | 2021 SHC KHI 135 | Const. P. 7700/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Husnain Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-APR-21 | Yes | Health Department, Government of Sindh, whereby the petitioners may be allowed to pursue their academic medical career subject to extraordinary leave (without pay) for the required period--At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners in substance has pleaded discrimination as they were not sent for training within time, however, he has seriously submitted that their other batch mates on the same consideration were considered and were sent for training and the petitioners were left out except petitioners No.6, 9, 10, and 14. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 216 | 2021 SHC HYD 187 | Const. P. 532/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Arif & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.104/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Nadeem Arif and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 217 | 2021 SHC HYD 1369 | Const. P. 673/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 218 | 2021 SHC HYD 1398 | Const. P. 2623/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Gul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 219 | 2021 SHC HYD 516 | Const. P. 1518/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 220 | 2021 SHC HYD 1254 | Const. P. 2155/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Imdad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 221 | 2021 SHC HYD 1403 | Const. P. 1913/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sindh High Court Employees C.Operative (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 222 | 2021 SHC HYD 1157 | Const. P. 1720/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Razzaque (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 223 | 2021 SHC HYD 826 | Const. P. 2380/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Abdul Khaliq (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 224 | 2021 SHC HYD 1337 | Const. P. 1160/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Ghous Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 225 | 2021 SHC HYD 1278 | Const. P. 594/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Urs (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 226 | 2021 SHC HYD 1349 | Const. P. 656/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rao Abdur Razik & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 227 | 2021 SHC HYD 1021 | Const. P. 1167/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Jalaluddin Khawaja (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 228 | 2021 SHC KHI 554 | Const. P. 3310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Imamdin and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 229 | 2021 SHC HYD 900 | Const. P. 2296/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mohammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 230 | 2021 SHC HYD 1190 | Const. P. 1416/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Zulfiqar Ali Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 23-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.153-K/2022 Zulfiqar Ali Solangi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 231 | 2023 SHC LAR 1077, 2006 CLD 163 | Const. P. 816/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Imran Ali Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Larkana and Others (Respondent) | 08-FEB-23 | Yes | Employee engaged on adhoc or under a time-bound contract has no vested right to regularization | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.689-K/2023 Imran Ali Kalhoro v. The Commissioner Larkana & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 232 | 2023 SHC KHI 860, 2024 CLC 1549 | H.C.A 28/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: High Court Appeal No. 29 of 2021 | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | SPEC Energy DMCC (Appellant) VS Pakistan Petroleum Ltd & another (Respondent) | 20-SEP-23 | Yes | Works contract running into minute details, not specifically enforceable, hence temporary injunction cannot be granted. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 233 | 2024 SHC KHI 1304 | Spl.Cr.Bail 17/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl. Cr. Bail No.18/2024 and Spl. Cr. Bail No.19/2024 | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | ATTAULLAH S/O ALLAH DIWAYO KHUSHIK & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 14-MAR-24 | Yes | Bail. Smuggling by way of en-route pilferage of transit goods. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | Crl.A.2-K/2024 Attaullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed |
| 234 | 2025 SHC KHI 293 | J.M -1494/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | M/s. Dr. Mubin Akhtar Hospital & another (Applicant) VS Syed Muhammad Salahuddin & another (Respondent) | 14-JAN-25 | Yes | Applications under sections 73 and 80 of Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 returned when no proceedings concerning trademark were pending in High Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 235 | 2024 SHC KHI 110 | H.C.A 183/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Lubna Ejaz (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ishrat (Respondent) | 22-NOV-24 | Yes | Section 5(3) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 also states that ???In the case of a contempt having been committed, or alleged to have been committed, by a company, the responsibility thereof shall extend to the persons in the company, directly or indirectly, responsible for the same, who shall also be liable to be punished accordingly.??? Therefore, in our view, before the matter could be fixed for framing charge, there had to be some discussion as to which of the alleged contemnors was prima facie responsible. It is the case of some of the Appellants that they were posted to SITE for brief periods and could not be held responsible for acts committed before or after their posting, which aspect has not been considered in the impugned order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author) | ||
| 236 | 2024 SHC KHI 900 | H.C.A 181/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Rasheed Malano (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ishrat (Respondent) | 22-NOV-24 | Yes | Nil.Section 5(3) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 also states that ???In the case of a contempt having been committed, or alleged to have been committed, by a company, the responsibility thereof shall extend to the persons in the company, directly or indirectly, responsible for the same, who shall also be liable to be punished accordingly.??? Therefore, in our view, before the matter could be fixed for framing charge, there had to be some discussion as to which of the alleged contemnors was prima facie responsible. It is the case of some of the Appellants that they were posted to SITE for brief periods and could not be held responsible for acts committed before or after their posting, which aspect has not been considered in the impugned order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author) | ||
| 237 | 2025 SHC KHI 754 | Spl.Cr.Misc 6/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | MUHAMMAD SALEEM CHANNA & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE TH DIR GEN I&I FBR, HYDERABAD (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Application under section 561-A CrPC for quashing investigation of FIR, not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 238 | 2025 SHC KHI 756 | Spl.Cr.Misc 387/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2014 | MUHAMMAD TAUFEEQ KHANANI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE THROUGH D.A.G (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Application under section 561-A CrPC for quashing investigation of FIR, not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 239 | 2025 SHC KHI 2090 | Const. P. 4011/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s Sidra International (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) | 18-AUG-25 | Yes | Release of goods under section 83B Customs Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza | ||
| 240 | 2025 SHC KHI 2118 | Criminal Appeal 850/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | Ilyas Ibrahim S/o Muhammad Ibrahim & another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 28-AUG-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author) | |||
| 241 | 2025 SHC KHI 2418 | Const. P. 4353/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s Hoora Pharma (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | Reduced rate of sales tax under Entry No.81 of 8th Schedule applicable to drugs under Drugs Act, 1976, not to medical devices under DRAP Act, 2012 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza | ||
| 242 | 2018 PLC CS Note 171 | Const. P. 3525/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) | 30-OCT-17 | Yes | Board of Trustees were required to convene a meeting and the petitioners agreed. The petition was disposed off accordingly. It perhaps on an interpretation of order dated 18.12.2017 that the Board of Trustees resolved to approve the upgradation of the petitioner as Executive Director as if it was an order of this Court, which Board of Trustees decision was subsequently withdrawn. The alleged contemnor may have stated that the upgradation was allowed but it was only the statement of the Counsel that was recorded. Neither the withdrawal nor review of earlier decision taken in 118th Meeting could constitute contempt as there was no straightaway direction for up-gradation of the post from Assistant Director to Executive Director. The issue was to be resolved by the Board of Trustees of EOBI | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.431/2018 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 243 | Nil | Const. P. 2847/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sajjad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 24-JUL-19 | Yes | Declare that naming, renaming any street, road, government institute, town, or city after the name of any individual having no positive social, role, courage or exceptional dedication to service in ways that bring special credit to an area, city town is illegal, unlawful against the basic rights of citizens of particular areas, towns, cities and public at large. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 244 | Nil | Cr.Bail 486/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Wahid Bux @ wahidoo Shaikh (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 11-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 245 | 2019 PLD Sindh 456 | Const. P. 4506/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Shabana Noor (Petitioner) VS D.G Immigration & Passport & Ors (Respondent) | 12-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 246 | 2019 PLD Sindh 330 | S.M.A 241/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2017 | Barbara Helena Philomina through attorney Debbie (Petitioner) VS Marina Caroline Bond - Deceased (Respondent) | 18-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 247 | Nil | Cr.J.A 39/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Mithal (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 29-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 248 | Nil | H.C.A 448/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ahsanuddin (Appellant) VS Shahid Hussain Malik & others (Respondent) | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 249 | Nil | Suit -52/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2016 | Allahdino & Others.. (Plaintiff) VS H.H Shaikh Zaid Bin ultan Al-Nahyan & Others. (Defendant) | 09-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 250 | 2021 SHC HYD 747 | Const. P. 178/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 251 | 2020 SHC KHI 1402 | Const. P. 4483/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Pakistan International Airline Corp Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 252 | 2020 SHC KHI 1285, 2020 PLD Sindh 551 | Suit 304/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2020 | Husein Industries Ltd (Plaintiff) VS Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & others. (Defendant) | 09-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. A bank guarantee is an independent contract between the surety (bank) and the creditor (beneficiary of the guarantee), and as such the bank guarantee is to be construed on its own terms independent of the underlying contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, and irrespective of claims pending interse the creditor and principal debtor. Rel: National Construction Ltd. v. Aiwan-e-Iqbal Authority (PLD 1994 SC 311); and Shipyard K. Damen International v. Karachi Shipyard & Engineering Works Ltd. (PLD 2003 SC 191). 2. Mobilization Guarantees are generally not subject to a restraining order even if there is a dispute between the parties to the underlying contract. However, in cases of guarantees other than Mobilization Guarantees, the Court have granted or refused injunction to restrain encashment depending upon the literal words used in the guarantee. Rel: National Grid Company v. Government of Pakistan (1999 SCMR 2367); and Shipyard K. Damen International ibid. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 253 | 2021 YLR 141 | J.M 45/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2019 | Al-Habib Coop: Housing Society Ltd (Applicant) VS Mrs. Shamim Barlas & another (Respondent) | 05-MAY-20 | Yes | Where the plaintiff/applicant establishes fraud, the defendant benefitting from the fraud and opposing the application of section 18, Limitation Act, must show that the plaintiff had clear and definite prior knowledge of the facts constituting the particular fraud and not merely clues or hints of the fraud, failing which limitation will run only from the date of actual knowledge of the fraud. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 254 | 2020 SHC KHI 197 | Suit 1494/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2008 | M/S.CENTURY INSURANCE CO.LTD (Plaintiff) VS THE ASSITANT COLELCTOR (Defendant) | 30-NOV-20 | Yes | Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005. Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 255 | 2020 SHC SUK 1742 | Civil Revision 22/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | Ghulam Mustafa Malak (Applicant) VS Divisional Forest Officer & ors (Respondent) | 22-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 256 | 2021 SHC KHI 16, 2022 PLD Sindh 440 | Const. P. 1914/2020 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Along with other connected Petitions | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Amir Akbar Khan (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent) | 26-APR-21 | Yes | Applicability of the regime of sections 204 and 91 Cr.P.C. to a Reference under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi | C.P.L.A.5188/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Amir Akbar Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded |
| 257 | 2021 SHC KHI 753 | Const. P. 2410/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 21-APR-21 | Yes | promotion issue | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 258 | Nil | Const. P. 8331/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mehboob Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-OCT-19 | Yes | Regularization Act 2013 does not suggest that all those contractual employees for whom the basic requirements of transparency is not fulfilled, are also entitled to be regularized. Regularization of Ad-hoc or contract employees under Act of 2013 is not open for all those contractual and ad-hoc employees for whom the codel formalities have not been fulfilled thus a competition should have been made available amongst all those who were interested in the appointments on subject posts. We would not approve the process involved in the appointment of petitioners, which could ultimately deprive the eligible and entitled persons of a fair competition and a precedent could be made to cater the system where the appointment of selected persons, can be legitimized. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.614-K/2019 Mehboob Ali and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 259 | 2021 SHC KHI 1184 | Const. P. 2395/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS The Secretary SWWB & Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-21 | Yes | The aforesaid petition is virtually against the transfer and posting order of the private respondent on Own Pay Scale basis. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 260 | 2021 SHC KHI 1377 | Criminal Appeal 565/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2020 | WAKEEL S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 261 | 2021 SHC HYD 289 | Const. P. 201/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2003 | Nabi Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 262 | 2021 SHC HYD 489 | Const. P. 640/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Gulji & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 263 | 2021 SHC HYD 192 | Const. P. 503/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Vishandas (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 08-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 264 | 2021 SHC HYD 844 | Const. P. 1393/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 265 | 2021 SHC HYD 1359 | Const. P. 1757/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Herlal and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 266 | 2021 SHC HYD 814 | Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 267 | 2021 SHC HYD 580 | Const. P. 441/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Saleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 268 | 2021 SHC HYD 611 | Const. P. 2724/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Sattar Khanzada (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 269 | 2021 SHC HYD 1054 | Const. P. 335/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 270 | 2021 SHC HYD 905 | Const. P. 437/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Hawa & Ors (Petitioner) VS National Highway Authority & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 271 | 2021 SHC HYD 149 | Const. P. 477/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Fareed Ahmed & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.105/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Fareed Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 272 | 2022 SHC KHI 680 | Suit 474/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2022 | All Pakistan Solvent Extractors Association & ors (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | 11-MAY-22 | Yes | Quarantine pests. Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 2019. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 273 | 2022 SHC KHI 65 | Suit 1074/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2019 | Ever Shine Constructors (Plaintiff) VS Khairpur Special Economic Zone (Defendant) | 23-MAY-22 | Yes | Court having jurisdiction under section 20 Arbitration Act, 1940. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 274 | 2023 SHC KHI 167 | Suit 360/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2013 | GHULAM ALI ALLANA (Plaintiff) VS LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES SUISSEE SA & OTHERS (Defendant) | 06-MAR-23 | Yes | Test for attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 275 | 2024 SHC KHI 169 | Suit 1161/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2009 | MUHAMMAD FEROZE AKHTAR (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD NASIM AKHTAR (Defendant) | 09-FEB-24 | Yes | Effect of Article 79 Qanun-e-Shahadat Order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 276 | 2024 SHC KHI 467, 2024 PLD Sindh 446 | Suit 141/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2012 | M/S.HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD (Plaintiff) VS PROV.OF SINDH & OTHER (Defendant) | 07-MAR-24 | Yes | Under section 20(c) CPC, notification of statute is not place of cause of action. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 277 | 2024 SHC KHI 690 | Suit 1290/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2010 | SYED HABIB HAIDER ZAIDI (Plaintiff) VS SYED HUSSAIN KHURSHEED BILGRAMI & OTHERS (Defendant) | 19-MAR-24 | Yes | Proof of possession of gifted property. Elements of Benami. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 278 | 2024 SHC KHI 401 | Spl.Cr.Tran 100/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MILLAT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 03-OCT-24 | Yes | Test of transfer under section 526 (1)(a) Cr.P.C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 279 | 2024 SHC KHI 1314 | E.P 13/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | FAHEEM KHAN (Petitioner) VS ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAK & OTHERS (Respondent) | 10-OCT-24 | Yes | Sections 143(3) & 144(2)(c) Election Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 280 | 2024 SHC KHI 115 | Suit 971/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2022 | M/S INSAF & BROTHERS (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) | 13-MAY-24 | Yes | Rules 31, 32 SPPRA, 2010. Section 10 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 281 | 2024 SHC KHI 444 | E.P 30/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | MUHAMMAD ALAMGIR KHAN (Petitioner) VS ECP AND OTHERS (Respondent) | 03-DEC-24 | Yes | Failure to join a contesting candidate ??? effect. Non-compliance of section 68 Election ??? effect. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 282 | 2024 SHC KHI 536 | Judicial Companies Misc. 8/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | EFG HERMES PAKISTAN LTD AND ANOTHER (Applicant) VS Court Notice - PSX & SECP (Respondent) | 09-OCT-24 | Yes | Sanction of scheme of merger. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 283 | 2024 SHC KHI 778 | Spl.Cr.Misc 612/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | USMAN BAJWA S/O JAWED A. BAJWA (Applicant) VS THE STATE &ORS (Respondent) | 31-OCT-24 | Yes | Separate trials of special offences by Special Courts does not attract bar of double jeopardy. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.1364/2024 Usman Bajwa v. The State through D.A.G. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned |
| 284 | 2025 SHC KHI 151 | Judicial Companies Misc. 45/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2022 | Reliance Cotton Spinning Mills ltd & 8 Others (Applicant) VS SECP - On Court Notice (Respondent) | 10-MAR-25 | Yes | Sanction of Arrangement under section 279 Companies Act, 2017. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 285 | 2025 SHC KHI 1734 | Judicial Companies Misc. 12/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2025 | Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti (Applicant) VS TRG Pakistan Limited and others (Respondent) | 20-JUN-25 | Yes | Scope of section 286 of Companies Act, powers of Court, applicability of Limitation Act and implication of Securities Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.871-K/2025 The Resource Group International Limited v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti and others,C.P.L.A.872-K/2025 TRG Pakistan Limited v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti & others,C.P.L.A.2543/2025 Greentree Holdings Limited, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti thr. attorney and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 01-Dec-25). Part Heard Matter,Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 01-Dec-25). Part Heard Matter,Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 01-Dec-25). Part Heard Matter |
| 286 | 2025 SHC KHI 2085 | Suit.B 32/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | PAK BRUNIE INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS ATLAS CABLES (PRIVATE) LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant) | 20-AUG-25 | Yes | Statement of account not filed with plaint but with replication. Effect. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 287 | 2025 SHC KHI 2400 | Cr.Rev 143/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2025 | MUHAMMAD HAROON S/O MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM (Applicant) VS THE ANTI-TER COURT XV KHI & ORS (Respondent) | 16-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author) | |||
| 288 | 2020 YLR 1783 | H.C.A 185/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Dr. Obaid ur Rehman & Others (Appellant) VS Mrs. Neelofer Khalid & Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.A.31-K/2019 Mrs. Neelofer Khalid and others v. Dr.Obaid-ur-Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned. Relist it before a 3 members bench | |
| 289 | Nil | Suit 2418/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2014 | Muhammad Raza & others (Plaintiff) VS Nasir Khan (Defendant) | 27-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 290 | 2019 CLD 920 | H.C.A 217/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dawlance Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS G-Force Communicaton & others (Respondent) | 05-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.385-K/2019 G.Force Communications and others v. Dawlance Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. and another,C.A.12-K/2020 G.Force Communications and others v. Dawlance Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Pending | |
| 291 | Nil | Const. P. 858/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Irshad Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 15-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 292 | 2019 CLD 659 | I. A 15/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Pak Leather Crafts Limited & others (Appellant) VS Al-Barak Bank Limited (Respondent) | 19-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.1422-K/2018 Pak Leather Crafts Limited and others v. Al-Baraka Bank Limited,C.A.24-K/2019 Pak Leather Crafts Limited and others v. Al-Baraka Bank Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 293 | Nil | H.C.A 219/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Karachi Metropolitan Corporationi & another (Appellant) VS M/s. Zafar Memorial Education Society (Respondent) | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 294 | 2019 CLC 1739 | H.C.A 285/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2007 | Mst. Nafeesa Siddiqui & others (Appellant) VS Danish Rafiq & others (Respondent) | 16-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.1178-K/2018 Mst: Nafeesa Siddiqui and others v. Danish Rafique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 295 | Nil | Const. P. 64/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Syed Akbar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Mst Mehar-U-Nisa and others (Respondent) | 29-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 296 | 2020 PLC (CS) 630 | Const. P. 4047/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Ali Javed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-OCT-19 | Yes | The general principles of up-gradation that to our mind emerge from the enunciations of the Supreme Court can be elucidated as follows: (i) Up-gradation is not the same as promotion, the latter being a term specifically defined in civil service statutes; (ii) Up-gradation is essentially an upgrade of the post to a higher pay-scale and not a promotion to a higher grade. Thus, the incumbent of the upgraded post retains his substantive grade; (iii) Up-gradation is meant for isolated posts, where the service structure does not provide avenues for promotion to a higher pay-scale thus putting the incumbent at a disadvantage as compared to other employees, its purpose being to address the stagnation and frustration of the employee of such post so that he/she remains productive; (iv) To justify up-gradation, the Government will have to demonstrate that it is required for restructuring or reforming the department or to meet exigencies of service in the public interest. In other words, up-gradation should be pursuant to a scheme or a policy; (v) Up-gradation should not be to the prejudice of other employees and should not be used to by-pass prescribed rules of promotion. Rel. Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456); Regional Commissioner Income Tax v. Munawar Ali (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030); and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 297 | Nil | Civil Revision 27/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Haji Ghano Khan Jatoi and others (Applicant) VS District Forest Officer a Forestation Division Larkana and others (Respondent) | 29-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 298 | 2020 PLD Sindh 717 | Cr.Rev 201/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | MST. NAGHMA IMJRAN WD/O IMRAN KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | 06-DEC-19 | Yes | The Explanation clause of section 435 Cr.P.C. entails that while the High Court can call for and examine the record of proceeding before a Magistrate, either suo moto or in Revision arising from an order of a Sessions Judge, a Revision application against the order of a Magistrate is to filed by the litigant to the Sessions Judge to whom the Magistrate is a Court inferior within the meaning of the Explanation clause of section 435 Cr.P.C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 299 | Nil | Cr.Bail 1507/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | FAHEEMUDDIN S/O ALEEMUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | In section 395 PPC, while the alternative to life imprisonment is rigorous punishment which shall not be less than four years nor more than ten years, that alternative punishment still provides for a maximum of 10 years, keeping the offence within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C. Thus, at the stage of bail when the Court looks at the alternate punishment provided under section 395 PPC, that is for the purposes of considering whether the case is one of further inquiry within the ambit of sub-section (2) of section 497 Cr.P.C., and it is not to say that the case does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 300 | 2020 SHC KHI 508 | Suit.B 4/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2014 | National Bank of Pakistan. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Amna Export (Pvt) Ltd. & Others. (Defendant) | 09-JUN-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 301 | 2020 SHC KHI 962, 2023 PLC CS Note 64 | Const. P. 838/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Imran Ahmed Ansari (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 22-JAN-20 | Yes | 1. Since the Petitioners service was terminated under Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules, which rule has since been declared un-constitutional by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Itrat Sajjad (2017 SCMR 2010), the only point left for our consideration is whether the effect of the declaration in Itrat Sajjad on the case of the Petitioner can be addressed by us in writ jurisdiction. 2. It had been settled by a 5 member Bench of the Supreme Court in DHA v. Jawaid Ahmed (2013 SCMR 1707) that applying the function test, the DHA is a person to whom a writ can issue under Article 199(1)(a)(ii) of the Constitution of Pakistan. But then, moving to a question distinct, viz. whether the employee of a statutory authority can invoke the writ jurisdiction of the High Court to enforce service rules of the statutory authority, it was held that where service rules were non-statutory, those cannot normally be enforced in writ jurisdiction for such rules attract the principle of master and servant; but at the same time it was also held that where action of a statutory authority in a service matter is in violation of principles of natural justice, such action can be interfered with in writ jurisdiction. Itrat Sajjad reiterates the same principles, and while it was concluded that the DHA Service Rules are non-statutory and thus not enforceable ordinarily by way of a writ petition, the judgment went on to hold that since Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules violated the principle of natural justice, the case fell within the recognized exception that a writ can issue where the action of a statutory authority in a service matter is violative of the principle of natural justice. For the same reason, this petition, to the extent it assails termination issued under the same Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules, is also maintainable. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 302 | 2020 SHC SUK 1374 | Civil Revision 109/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shafi Muhammad Khan (Applicant) VS Abdul Rehman & others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 303 | 2020 SHC KHI 1566 | Suit 172/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2019 | Furqan & others. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Roshan Ara & others. (Defendant) | 09-JUN-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 304 | 2020 SHC KHI 749 | Suit.B 15/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2011 | NIB BANK LTD (Plaintiff) VS M/S.VENUS CHEMICALS PVT LTD. (Defendant) | 01-JUN-20 | Yes | Statement of account filed by the bank did not bear the name and official title of the persons certifying the same as required by section 9(2) of the FIO, 2001 read with section 2(8) of the Bankers Books Evidence Act, 1891. Such was not a certified copy and did not attract a presumption of correctness. The bank will have to prove the same as any other document. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 305 | 2021 SHC KHI 852 | Const. P. 4287/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 20-APR-21 | Yes | Petitioner, who is serving at present as Assistant Commissioner in BPS-17, is aggrieved by the purported decision of the Provincial Selection Board-II (`PSB-II`) dated 09.3.2020 and 11.3.2020, whereby his promotion to the post of Deputy Secretary (Equivalent BPS-18) was deferred on the ground that his Annual Confidential Reports (`ACRs`) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 306 | 2024 SHC KHI 463, 2025 PLC (CS) 93, 2023 SBLR Sindh 51, 2023 PLC (CS) 961 | Const. P. 875/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Arif and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 22-APR-24 | Yes | Three thousand three hundred and fifty nine petitioners collectively filed these forty eight petitions, requiring this court, in its writ jurisdiction, to judge their individual claims for regularization in Suit Southern Gas Company Limited; premised upon their averment of having rendered contingent / contractual services thereto, though third party companies or otherwise. Petitions dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.352/2025,C.A.1376/2021,C.P.L.A.5119/2021,C.P.L.A.1092-K/2022,C.P.L.A.3914/2022,C.A.3991/2022,C.A.4009/2022,C.P.L.A.3556/2024,C.P.L.A.3890/2024 SCP | Pending Adjourned. Be fixed before a Larger Bench,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed ,Pending Adjourned/Referred to Larger Bench to be fixed within a month.,Pending Adjourned/Referred to Larger Bench to be fixed within a month. |
| 307 | 2021 SHC KHI 399 | Const. P. 3100/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ms. Surriya Kanwal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 29-APR-21 | Yes | whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.3922/2021 Managing Director Pakistan Bait ul Mal, Islamabad v. Surriya Kanwal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 308 | 2021 PLC (CS) Note 11 | Const. P. 756/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | S.M Kaleem Makki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 28-OCT-19 | Yes | It is the general principle of jurisprudence that the law takes its effect from the date of promulgation and interpretation of the said law cannot be subjected to the doctrine of retrospective effects unless expressed specifically in the judgment, therefore, Mustafa Impexs case is to be applied prospectively, in general. It is the existence of law at the relevant time that counts, which may have been interpreted at a later date. Since the deficiency in the appointment notification as far as Provincial Cabinet is concerned, is not questioned no challenge could be thrown. The principle we derive from the conclusion of the aforesaid three judgments is that Mustafa Impex only invalidates those actions retrospectively which were impugned in that lis and not all others, so by virtue of aforesaid principle the notification for the appointment of the petitioner is saved whereas it set a mechanism for future course i.e. issuance of impugned notification. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.724-K/2019 Province of Sindh and others v. S.M Kaleem Makki,C.P.L.A.41-K/2020 S.M Kaleem Makki v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 309 | 2021 SHC KHI 408 | Const. P. 6462/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Najam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-APR-21 | Yes | deceased quota | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 310 | 2021 SHC KHI 213, 2024 PTD 681 | Suit 850/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Along with other connected Suits. | Original Side | 2020 | Dewan Sugar Mills Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | 09-AUG-21 | Yes | Selection for audit under section 25 of the Sales Tax Act and section 46 of the Federal Excise Act requires the giving of reasons. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 311 | Nil | Const. P. 1901/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ikram Ali (Petitioner) VS M/s PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 312 | 2021 SHC KHI 207, 2022 PTD 1742 | Suit 1682/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2014 | Pakistan Petroleum Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & another. (Defendant) | 23-FEB-21 | Yes | Ouster clause in Section 227(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Suit against show cause notice Plaint rejected. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 313 | Nil | Const. P. 1059/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 02-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.635-K/2019 Zaheer Ahmed v. Province of Sindh thr. Education & Literacy Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 314 | 2021 SHC KHI 1441, 2022 PCr.LJ 1779 | Cr.J.A 631/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | JAWAD ALI S/O DEEDAR ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 13-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 315 | 2021 SHC KHI 155 | Const. P. 2191/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Saeed Akhter (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-APR-21 | Yes | Primarily, this petition has served its purpose, which is disposed of in the terms, whereby the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to issue posting and transfer orders of the petitioner and the private respondent, if no disciplinary proceedings are pending against them, strictly under the schedule of the establishment of law department KMC, with correct description/designation of their respective posts as per their entitlement under the law. The said exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks from the date of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 316 | 2021 SHC HYD 1056 | Const. P. 1550/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Jalauddin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 25-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 317 | 2021 SHC HYD 364 | Const. P. 1655/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Junaid Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.6282/2021 Junaid Ahmed v. Province of Sindh, through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 318 | 2021 SHC HYD 440 | Const. P. 974/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 319 | 2021 SHC HYD 285 | Const. P. 1619/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst Shumaila & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 320 | 2021 SHC HYD 864 | Const. P. 943/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | S & Sons Contractor (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & & Others (Respondent) | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 321 | 2021 SHC HYD 250 | Const. P. 442/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 322 | 2021 SHC HYD 62 | Const. P. 1028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Kashif Hussain (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 323 | 2021 SHC HYD 1269 | Const. P. 3207/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sardar Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.65-K/2022 Syed Sardar Ali Shah & others v. Government of Sindh through chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 324 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 1061 | Const. P. 1170/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Haroon Sohail (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 325 | 2022 SHC KHI 464 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 22/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Along with Constitution Petition No. D ??? 7423 of 2021 | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Collector of Customs (Enforcement) (Applicant) VS M/s. Ara Detergents & Chemicals FZE & others (Respondent) | 26-APR-22 | Yes | Scope of Tribunals power under section 194A Customs Act, 1969. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.2051/2022 The Collector of Customs (Enforcement), Karachi v. M/s Ara Detergents & Chemicals FZE, Sharjah, UAE Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 326 | 2023 SHC LAR 9 | Const. P. 1202/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Hameer Ali (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent) | 08-FEB-23 | Yes | Employee on engaged adhoc or under a time-bound contract has no vested right to regularization | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.690-K/2023 Hameer Ali Abbasi v. The Commissioner Larkana & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 327 | 2023 SHC KHI 989 | Suit 1803/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Alongwith 181 connected suits. | Original Side | 2020 | KARAM CERAMICS LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | 21-FEB-23 | Yes | Challenge to the gas tariff issued under the OGRA Ordinance, the definition of Captive Power Plants and the Moratorium on the supply of gas to Captive Power Plants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 328 | 2023 SHC LAR 852, 2023 CLC 1383 | R.A (Civil Revision) 46/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | EDO Roads Kashmore @ Kandhkot & others (Applicant) VS Abdul Hafeez Chachar & others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-23 | Yes | The courts can mould the relief within the scope of the provisions of Order VII, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 ("C.P.C."), and are empowered to grant such relief as the justice may demand in the facts and circumstances of the case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 329 | 2022 SHC KHI 834, 2023 CLD 570 | Suit 1529/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2018 | Mohammad Ahmed Ansari (Plaintiff) VS Interglobe Commerce Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd & another (Defendant) | 13-JUN-22 | Yes | Lifting the veil of incorporation | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 330 | 2023 SHC LAR 1140 | Criminal Miscelleneous 12/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Original Side | 2022 | Sajid Hussain and Another (Applicant) VS The State and Another (Respondent) | 15-MAR-23 | Yes | Transfer application under section 23 ATA, 1997. Jurisdiction of ATC under third schedule of the ATA, 1997 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 331 | 2023 SHC LAR 1192 | R.A (Civil Revision) 73/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Safdar Brohi (Applicant) VS Mukhtiar Ali Chandio & others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-23 | Yes | Suit for malicious prosecution where acquittal on benefit of doubt. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 332 | 2023 SHC KHI 41 | Suit.B 30/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Suit No. B ??? 24 of 2003 | Original Side | 2003 | MIRZA SUGAR MILLS LTD. (Plaintiff) VS P.I.C.I.C (Defendant) | 17-OCT-23 | Yes | Banking suit. Effect of Restructuring Agreement. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 333 | 2024 SHC KHI 177, 2024 SBLR Sindh 834 | Suit 224/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2013 | ABDUL QAYUM KHAN (Plaintiff) VS ABDUL AZIZ KHAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | 01-MAR-24 | Yes | Mistake of Court. Court-Sale set-aside under inherit powers. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 334 | 2023 SHC KHI 631, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1904 | Const. P. 2489/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P. No. D. 2202 of 2023 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Tanveer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-23 | Yes | KBTPR prohibits regularization of additional floors. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | C.P.L.A.1089-K/2023 Muhammad Mohsin Waheed v. Tanveer Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 335 | 2024 SHC KHI 865 | Spl.Cr.A.A 7/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | THE STATE THOROUGH COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS KHI (Appellant) VS TALIB HUSSAIN & ANOHTER (Respondent) | 31-JAN-24 | Yes | Sufficient cause to condone limitation in Criminal Acquittal Appeal under Customs Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 336 | 2023 SHC HYD 277 | Const. P. 1233/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Major (Rtd) Raja Mohammad Basharat Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 04-DEC-23 | Yes | Re-grant of land under Colonization Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 337 | 2023 SHC KHI 965 | Const. P. 4247/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abid Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Mst. Mareena Soomro & another (Respondent) | 05-SEP-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 338 | 2023 SHC KHI 918, 2023 SBLR Sindh 2106 | Const. P. 6912/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | UBL (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-AUG-23 | Yes | Bank account of customer debited with the forged cheque. Bank held liable to reimburse customer. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.1333-K/2023 United Bank Limited v. Federation Of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned |
| 339 | 2024 SHC KHI 751, 2024 MLD 1267, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1971 | Suit 1660/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2015 | Askari Bank Limited (Plaintiff) VS Hafiz Ghulam Murtaza (Defendant) | 11-MAR-24 | Yes | ???Factory??? let without machinery, eviction lies before Rent Controller. Suit entertained for recovery of arrears of rent. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 340 | 2024 SHC KHI 517 | E.P 36/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | SAEED AHMED S/O SAID GHAFOOR (Petitioner) VS ECP AND OTHERS (Respondent) | 17-OCT-24 | Yes | Affidavit of service not filed within time. Election Petition rejected. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 341 | 2024 SHC KHI 545 | Const. P. 4657/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ubaidullah Qazi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 04-SEP-24 | Yes | Absorption contrary to section 11A Civil Servants Act. Writ issued. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro | ||
| 342 | 2024 SHC KHI 693 | H.C.A 177/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nazar Mohammad Bozdar (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ishrat & others (Respondent) | 22-NOV-24 | Yes | Section 5(3) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 also states that ???In the case of a contempt having been committed, or alleged to have been committed, by a company, the responsibility thereof shall extend to the persons in the company, directly or indirectly, responsible for the same, who shall also be liable to be punished accordingly.??? Therefore, in our view, before the matter could be fixed for framing charge, there had to be some discussion as to which of the alleged contemnors was prima facie responsible. It is the case of some of the Appellants that they were posted to SITE for brief periods and could not be held responsible for acts committed before or after their posting, which aspect has not been considered in the impugned order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author) | ||
| 343 | 2024 SHC KHI 204 | E.P 7/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | Khalid Mehmood Ali (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 30-MAY-24 | Yes | Power of Election Tribunal to order recount. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 344 | 2024 SHC KHI 543 | Spl. Cr. A. 6/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl. Cr. Appeals No. 8 & 9 of 2004 | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2004 | Tariq Irshad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 30-JUL-24 | Yes | Forfeiture of assets for smuggling narcotics. Jurisdiction lies with Court under CNS Act, not under Sections 30 & 31 of PSA. Appeal by ANF under Section 43 PSA, not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 345 | 2025 SHC KHI 116 | Suit 963/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2018 | M/s. Ruknuddin (Pvt.) Ltd (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh & others (Defendant) | 14-FEB-25 | Yes | Suit not maintainable against acquisition proceedings under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 346 | 2025 SHC KHI 751 | Spl.Cr.Misc 2/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | SOHAIL ANSARI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE TH DIR GEN I&I FBR, HYDERABAD (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Application under section 561-A CrPC for quashing investigation of FIR, not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 347 | 2025 SHC KHI 114 | Spl. Cr. A. 5/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | THE DIR. GEN I& IR KHI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | 13-MAR-25 | Yes | Money laundering and predicate offences. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.64-K/2025 The Director DG I&I- Sales Tax House Karachi & another v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned/ repeat notice |
| 348 | 2025 SHC KHI 755 | Spl.Cr.Misc 7/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | MUHAMMAD GHAZANFFAR KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE TH DIR GEN I&I FBR, HYDERABAD (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Application under section 561-A CrPC for quashing investigation of FIR, not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 349 | 2025 SHC KHI 758 | Spl.Cr.Misc 388/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2014 | LAJPAT S/O PAROMAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE THROUGH D.A.G (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Application under section 561-A CrPC for quashing investigation of FIR, not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 350 | 2025 SHC KHI 1230 | Judicial Companies Misc. 38/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2011 | Banker Equity Ltd. (Applicant) VS Hamid Textile Mills Ltd. (Respondent) | 12-MAY-25 | Yes | Territorial jurisdiction for entertain petition under section 290 of Companies Ordinance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 351 | 2025 SHC KHI 2119 | Criminal Appeal 142/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2025 | THE STATE/ANF THR ITS ASSTT DIRECOTR (LAW) (Appellant) VS ILYAS IBRAHIM DAHI S/O MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM DAHI (Respondent) | 28-AUG-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author) | |||
| 352 | 2025 SHC KHI 2164 | Const. P. 6565/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s Food Axis Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 353 | 2025 SHC KHI 2409 | Const. P. 4243/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s ASA International (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 19-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 354 | 2025 SHC KHI 2211 | Const. P. 4201/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/S Belting Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-25 | Yes | Summons u/s 37 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 for inquiry into tax fraud. Petition dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 355 | 2025 SHC KHI 2410 | Const. P. 4244/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s Munir Brothers & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 19-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 356 | 2025 SHC KHI 2792 | Const. P. 4649/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Brothers (Petitioner) VS Collector of Customs and Others (Respondent) | 22-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 357 | 2025 SHC KHI 3195 | Judicial Companies Misc. 24/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2019 | Syed Saeed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS M/s Mehran Oils (Pvt) Ltd. & Others (Respondent) | 05-NOV-25 | Yes | Rectification of members register under section 126 Companies Act, 2017. Applicability of Limitation Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 358 | 2019 CLD 999 | Const. P. 4190/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Askari Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS President of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 05-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 359 | Nil | S.M.A 68/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2018 | Dr.Mohammad Sharif (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | 23-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 360 | 2020 PLD Sindh 116, 2019 CLD 1359 | Const. P. 1702/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2007 | Federation of Pakistan & another. (Petitioner) VS Official Assignee & Ors (Respondent) | 17-JUN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.3535/2019 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secratary Ministry of Finance , Islamabad and another v. Office Assignee/ Official Liquidator in matter of Pakistan Fertilizer Company Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 361 | 2019 SBLR Sindh 1734, 2019 YLR 2364 | H.C.A 171/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 15-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.4612/2018 Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islamabad & others,C.P.518-K/2019 Mst: Sajida Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.883/2020 Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islambad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 362 | 2019 PLD Sindh 490 | S.M.A 141/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2016 | Muhammad Iqbal S/o Abdul Wahab (Petitioner) VS Noor Muhammad Chutani - Deceased (Respondent) | 24-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 363 | 2019 MLD 1244 | Suit 370/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2005 | MANZOOR AHMED SHAHZAD (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD SHAKIR SHAN (Defendant) | 15-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 364 | 2021 SBLR Sindh 1664 | Criminal Miscelleneous 154/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2019 | MRS. FARHEEN W/O AURANGZEB MUHAMMAD KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 18-DEC-19 | Yes | 1. The ratio of the said judgments of the Supreme Court is that where the remedy under section 249-A Cr.P.C. is available before the trial Court, the High Court should not exercise inherent jurisdiction under section 561-A Cr.P.C except in extraordinary circumstances which warrant such an action. In other words, the question is not to the jurisdiction of the High Court, but the manner in which such jurisdiction is to be regulated by the High Court. Ref. Muhammad Farooq v. Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani (PLD 2016 SC 55); Maqbool Rehman v. State (2002 SCMR 1076); Bashir Ahmed v. Zafar-ul-Islam (PLD 2004 SC 298); Mian Munir Ahmad v. State (1985 SCMR 257). 2. It is a misconception to state that in all cases where it is being contended that a civil dispute has been converted into a criminal case, an applicant need not approach the trial Court under section 249-A Cr.P.C. or 265-K Cr.P.C. 3. The argument that section 249-A Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked until a formal charge is framed under section 242 Cr.P.C., is misconceived. Section 249-A Cr.P.C. categorically states that the power thereunder can be exercised at any stage of the case. Rel. State v. Ashiq Ali Bhutto, 1993 SCMR 523. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 365 | 2021 PCr.LJ Note 38 | Criminal Appeal 219/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2019 | ANANTKUMAR PARSHOTAM (Appellant) VS MEM. OF MANAGING COMT. NARAYAN TEMPLE TRUST & ORS (Respondent) | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. Under section 8-A of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, an order that is appealable to the High Court does not include an order dismissing the complaint. However, the appeal can be converted to a criminal revision. 2. In order to constitute an offence under the Illegal Dispossession Act, the complaint must disclose actus reas and mens rea, and if the facts that constitute an offence under section 3 of the Illegal Dispossession Act are not disclosed through the complaint or documents with it, then the Court can dismiss the complaint straight away. Rel: Waqar Ali v. The State (PLD 2011 SC 181). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 366 | 2021 SHC KHI 1240, 2021 PLD Sindh 373 | Suit 2206/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2017 | M/s. Chhipa Corporation (Plaintiff) VS Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & another (Defendant) | 17-MAR-21 | Yes | Explanation clause to Order II Rule 2 CPC | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 367 | 2021 SHC KHI 361 | Const. P. 6300/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Bashir Ahmed Abbasi Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-APR-21 | Yes | Prima facie under the Sindh Rules of Business, 1986, the Chief Minister is the Chief Executive of the Province; and, has no direct role whatsoever in the matter of a Junior School Teacher, about his appointment, posting, transfer, promotion, and disciplinary issues. On the aforesaid proposition, the Honble Supreme Court in the case of The STATE v. ANWAR SAIF ULLAH KHAN (PLD 2016 Supreme Court 276) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.572-K/2021 Bashir Ahmed v. Government of Sindh Chief Secretary of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution as well as on Merits |
| 368 | Nil | Const. P. 3786/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | M/s Rajby Industries (Petitioner) VS Sajjad Ali And ors (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | The private respondents in these cases were gatekeepers and labours respectively and were terminated in terms of Section 12(3) of the Standing Order, 1968, thus it is not an industrial dispute which could empower the Commission to assume and exercise its jurisdiction in terms of Sections 54 and 57 of the IRA, 2012. Such provisions empowering the Commission in terms of Sections 54 and 57 of the IRA, 2012 were also in existence well before its promulgation and also while the provisions of IRO(xxiii) of1969 were in existence. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.683-K/2019 M/s Rajby Industries v. Sajjad Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 369 | 2021 SHC KHI 496 | Const. P. 4003/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Munaza Yasmeen and Ors (Petitioner) VS Learned / Hon (Respondent) | 22-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioners have assailed the findings of the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi whereby their Grievance Petitions were dismissed with direction to the respondent-Pakistan International Airline Company to allow joining period to them till 13.06.2019. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 370 | 2021 SHC HYD 834 | Const. P. 2593/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Rao Talib Hussain & anothers (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.6489/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited through its M.D. Karachi and others v. Rao Muhammad Asif and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 371 | 2021 SHC HYD 535 | Const. P. 1761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Syed Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | CP No. D- 1761 of 2011 CP No. D- 1763 of 2011 CP No. D- 614 of 2012 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 372 | 2021 SHC HYD 662 | Const. P. 68/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2009 | Gulshan and others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 15-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 373 | 2021 SHC HYD 350 | Const. P. 1769/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr Arshad Ali Lodhi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.282-K/2022 Dr.Khalid Iqbal Talpur v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 374 | 2021 SHC HYD 632 | Const. P. 217/2001 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2001 | Agha Nisar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Zeal Pak Cement Factory and others (Respondent) | 30-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 375 | 2021 SHC HYD 317 | Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 376 | 2021 SHC HYD 563 | Civil Revision 107/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: RA. sec 92 CPC not applicable to waqf | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2000 | Misri @ Shamsuddin (Applicant) VS Tharparkar Dist Devolopment (Respondent) | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Civil Revision section 92 CPC not applicable to waqf | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 377 | 2021 SHC HYD 1209 | Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 378 | 2021 SHC HYD 902 | Const. P. 1471/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Shahid Ahmed Khan Qaboolio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 379 | 2021 SHC HYD 1428 | Const. P. 114/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: attached case ...... CP No. D- 1236 of 2014 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Mohammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 380 | 2021 SHC HYD 1422 | Const. P. 632/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.918-K/2022 Faheem Ahmed v. Province of Sindh Chief Minister, through Principal Secretary to Chief Minister Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 381 | 2021 SHC HYD 1382 | Const. P. 1216/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Martha Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 14-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 382 | 2021 SHC HYD 70 | Criminal Miscelleneous 19/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2021 | Ghulam Nabi (Applicant) VS Senior Superintendent of Police (Respondent) | 14-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 383 | 2021 SHC HYD 204 | Const. P. 1564/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 15-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 384 | 2021 SHC HYD 936 | Const. P. 1348/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 385 | 2022 SHC KHI 117 | Suit 1497/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2020 | TOTAL PARCO PAKISTAN LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY & OTHERS (Defendant) | 16-NOV-22 | Yes | Doctrine of indoor management. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 386 | 2024 SHC KHI 445 | Spl. Cr. A. 13/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2002 | Mohammad Siddique Pechuho (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 30-JAN-24 | Yes | Officer of Customs can be charged for offence u/s 32(1) of the Customs Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 387 | 2023 SHC KHI 862 | Const. P. 3727/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Asif Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS Mst. Razia Begum and Others (Respondent) | 06-SEP-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 388 | 2024 SHC KHI 931 | E.P 25/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | Usman Ghani s/o Yaqoob Hingoro (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 22-NOV-24 | Yes | Restoration of Election Petition, allowed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 389 | 2024 SHC KHI 745 | H.C.A 185/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khair Mohammad (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ishrat & others (Respondent) | 22-NOV-24 | Yes | Section 5(3) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 also states that ???In the case of a contempt having been committed, or alleged to have been committed, by a company, the responsibility thereof shall extend to the persons in the company, directly or indirectly, responsible for the same, who shall also be liable to be punished accordingly.??? Therefore, in our view, before the matter could be fixed for framing charge, there had to be some discussion as to which of the alleged contemnors was prima facie responsible. It is the case of some of the Appellants that they were posted to SITE for brief periods and could not be held responsible for acts committed before or after their posting, which aspect has not been considered in the impugned order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author) | ||
| 390 | 2025 SHC KHI 389 | Suit -1495/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | M/S. DR. MUBIN AKHTAR HOSPITAL & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS SYED MUHAMMAD SALAHUDDIN & ANOTHER (Defendant) | 14-JAN-25 | Yes | Jurisdiction of IP Tribunal not confined merely to suits for infringement of trademark. Plaint returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 391 | 2024 SHC KHI 701 | Cr.Rev 68/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Cr. Rev. 69/2015 | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | SULEMAN LALANI & 02 OTHERS (Applicant) VS AQEEL KARIM DEDHI S/O HAJI KARIM DEDHI & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 30-MAY-24 | Yes | Test for issuing process under section 204 CrPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.77-K/2024 Jahangir Siddiqui v. The State and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned |
| 392 | 2024 SHC KHI 784 | Suit 717/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | M/S CENTURY ROLLER & STONE FLOUR MILLS PVT LTD&ORS (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD ASIF & OTHERS (Defendant) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | Suit barred by section 69(2) of the Partnership Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 393 | 2024 SHC KHI 1286 | E.P 4/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | IRFANULLAH KHAN MARWAT (Petitioner) VS ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAK & OTHERS (Respondent) | 13-JUN-24 | Yes | Verification and oath on election petition. Section 144(4) Election Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 394 | 2024 SHC KHI 299 | H.C.A 180/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rahim Buksh Baloch (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ishrat (Respondent) | 22-NOV-24 | Yes | Section 5(3) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 also states that ???In the case of a contempt having been committed, or alleged to have been committed, by a company, the responsibility thereof shall extend to the persons in the company, directly or indirectly, responsible for the same, who shall also be liable to be punished accordingly.??? Therefore, in our view, before the matter could be fixed for framing charge, there had to be some discussion as to which of the alleged contemnors was prima facie responsible. It is the case of some of the Appellants that they were posted to SITE for brief periods and could not be held responsible for acts committed before or after their posting, which aspect has not been considered in the impugned order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author) | ||
| 395 | 2024 SHC KHI 677, 2024 SBLR Sindh 2021 | Cr.Bail 1002/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUNSIF KHAN S/O NARAS ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 02-SEP-24 | Yes | Bail on ground of statutory delay, not available under CNS Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 396 | 2025 SHC KHI 484 | Judicial Companies Misc. 35/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | BEACH LUXURY HOLDINGS (PRIVATE) LIMITED & OTHERS (Applicant) VS . (Respondent) | 24-APR-25 | Yes | Scheme of demerger and merger sanctioned. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 397 | 2025 SHC KHI 1280 | E.P 24/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | Tariq Hussain s/o Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-25 | Yes | Affidavit of service beyond limitation. Petition rejected. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.A.134-K/2025 Tariq Hussain v. Election Commission of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 398 | 2025 SHC KHI 2114 | Const. P. 4131/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P. No. D - 4132 of 2025 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s Amal Steel (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 25-AUG-25 | Yes | Fine in lieu of confiscation for warehoused goods payable on ex-bond. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza | ||
| 399 | 2025 SHC KHI 2165 | Const. P. 6566/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ms Plasticflex Films Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | |||
| 400 | 2025 SHC KHI 3055 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 92/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | DANISH MAQBOOL S/O MAQBOOL HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 28-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author) | |||
| 401 | 2025 SHC KHI 2705, 2025 SHC KHI 2706 | Const. P. 4353/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 13-OCT-25 | Yes | A plea of ???equitable set-off??? therefore cannot be sustained in unrelated and ???unascertained??? disputes. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) | ||
| 402 | 2025 SHC KHI 2572 | Const. P. 1915/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Shiakh Hisham Mehmood & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author) |